Methotrexate in chronic active ulcerative colitis: a double-blind, randomized, Israeli multicenter trial. Effect of once- or twice-daily MMX mesalamine (SPD476) for the induction of remission of mild to moderately active ulcerative colitis. Methotrexate in chronic active Crohn's disease: a double-blind, randomized, Israeli multicenter trial. Once-daily, high-concentration MMX mesalamine in active ulcerative colitis. Safety and efficacy of a new 3.3 g b.i.d. tablet formulation in patients with mild-to-moderately-active ulcerative colitis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. A randomised dose finding study of oral tacrolimus (FK506) therapy in refractory ulcerative colitis. Treatment of ulcerative colitis with a humanized antibody to the alpha4beta7 integrin. Delayed-release oral mesalamine at 4.8 g/day (800 mg tablet) for the treatment of moderately active ulcerative colitis: the ASCEND II trial. Randomised controlled trial of methotrexate for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (RMC trial): a pilot, multicentre study.
Uncontrolled studies have suggested that methotrexate may be effective in patients with active ulcerative colitis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of oral methotrexate in chronic steroid-dependent ulcerative colitis in a randomized, double-blind multicenter trial.
                Patients with active ulcerative colitis who have received steroids and/or immunosuppressives for at least 4 months during the preceding 12 months with a current Mayo Clinic score of > or = 7 were included in the study. Methotrexate (12.5 mg) or placebo was added to their treatment once weekly for 9 months.
                Sixty-seven patients were included (methotrexate, 30 patients, placebo, 37 patients). The proportion of patients entering first remission (methotrexate, 46.7%; placebo, 48.6%), the time to reach first remission (methotrexate, 4.1 +/- 1.9 months; placebo, 3.4 +/- 1.7 months), as well as the proportions of patients having a relapse after first remission (methotrexate, 64.3%; placebo, 44.4%) were not significantly different between the two groups. The mean Mayo Clinic score, the mean monthly steroid dose, and the proportion of abnormal laboratory results during the study were also similar.
                Methotrexate at a weekly oral dose of 12.5 mg was not found to be better than placebo in the induction or maintenance of remission in patients with chronic active ulcerative colitis. SPD476 (MMX mesalamine), a novel, once-daily mesalamine formulation, uses MMX Multi Matrix System (MMX) technology to delay and extend delivery of active drug throughout the colon. We performed a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase III study in patients with mild to moderately active ulcerative colitis.
                Two hundred eighty patients with mild to moderately active ulcerative colitis received MMX mesalamine 2.4 g/day given twice daily (n = 93), 4.8 g/day given once daily (n = 94), or placebo (n = 93) for 8 weeks. The primary end point was the percentage of patients in clinical and endoscopic remission (modified ulcerative colitis disease activity index score of < or =1, with a score of 0 for rectal bleeding and stool frequency, and at least a 1-point reduction in sigmoidoscopy score) at week 8. Patients with mucosal friability were not considered to have achieved this end point.
                Clinical and endoscopic remission at week 8 was achieved by 34.1% and 29.2% of patients receiving MMX mesalamine 2.4 g/day given twice daily and MMX mesalamine 4.8 g/day given once daily, respectively, versus 12.9% receiving placebo (P < .01). MMX mesalamine was generally well-tolerated.
                MMX mesalamine given once or twice daily is well-tolerated and, compared with placebo, demonstrated efficacy for the induction of clinical and endoscopic remission in mild to moderately active ulcerative colitis. At present only one large controlled study has indicated that parenteral methotrexate may be effective in chronic active Crohn's disease (CD).
                To evaluate the effectiveness of oral methotrexate in chronic steroid-dependent CD.
                Patients with active CD, who have received steroids and/or immunosuppressives for at least 4 months during the preceding 12 months and with a current Harvey-Bradshaw index of > or = 7 were studied.
                Methotrexate (12.5 mg weekly) or 6-mercaptopurine (50 mg daily), or placebo were given during the 9 months of the trial in addition to steroids and 5-aminosalicylic acid as clinically indicated.
                Eighty-four patients were included (methotrexate, 26 patients; 6-mercaptopurine, 32 patients; placebo, 26 patients). The proportion of patients entering first remission as well as the proportions of patients relapsing after first remission were not significantly different between the groups. The mean Harvey-Bradshaw index and the mean monthly steroid dose were also similar. However, when each patient was evaluated as his or her own control, the reduction in steroid dose, the general well being, and the reduction in abdominal pain were significantly better in the methotrexate treated patients.
                Methotrexate at a weekly oral dose of 12.5 mg was found to be moderately better than 6-mercaptopurine and placebo in patients with chronic active CD. SPD476 (LIALDA in the US; MEZAVANT in the EU; otherwise known as MMX mesalamine; Shire Pharmaceuticals Inc., Wayne, PA, under license from Giuliani SpA, Milan, Italy) is a novel, once-daily, high-strength (1.2 g/tablet) formulation of mesalamine, utilizing MMX Multi Matrix System (MMX) technology designed to deliver the active drug throughout the colon. We performed a double-blind, multicenter study, comparing MMX mesalamine vs placebo for the treatment of active ulcerative colitis. A delayed-release oral mesalamine (ASACOL; Procter & Gamble, Cincinnati, OH) reference arm was included.
                Three hundred forty-three patients with active, mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis received MMX mesalamine 2.4 g/day or 4.8 g/day given once daily, ASACOL 2.4 g/day given in 3 divided doses, or placebo for 8 weeks. The primary end point was the proportion of patients in clinical and endoscopic remission (modified ulcerative colitis disease activity index of < or =1 with rectal bleeding and stool frequency scores of 0, no mucosal friability, and a > or =1-point reduction in sigmoidoscopy score from baseline).
                A significantly greater proportion of patients receiving MMX mesalamine 2.4 g/day given once daily (40.5%; P = .01) and 4.8 g/day given once daily (41.2%; P = .007) achieved clinical and endoscopic remission at week 8, vs placebo (22.1%). The clinical and endoscopic remission rate for ASACOL (32.6%; P = .124) was not significantly superior to placebo. All active treatments were well-tolerated.
                Once-daily MMX mesalamine was efficacious and well-tolerated for the induction of clinical and endoscopic remission. MMX mesalamine offers effective and convenient mesalamine therapy, potentially improving treatment compliance. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a new twice-daily balsalazide disodium 1.1 g tablet dosing regimen (6.6 g/day, three tablets twice daily) for the treatment of mild-to-moderately-active ulcerative colitis (UC).
                In a double-blind, multicenter study patients with symptoms of acute UC and a baseline Modified Mayo Disease Activity Index (MMDAI) score between 6 and 10, inclusive, with a subscale rating of > or =2 for both rectal bleeding and mucosal appearance were randomized to receive 3.3 g of balsalazide or placebo tablets twice daily for 8 weeks. The primary end point was the proportion of patients achieving clinical improvement (> or =3 point improvement in MMDAI) and improvement in rectal bleeding (> or =1 point improvement) at 8 weeks. Safety assessments were conducted from baseline through 2-weeks post-treatment.
                A total of 249 patients (166 balsalazide, 83 placebo) received at least 1 dose of study medication. The mean MMDAI score at baseline was 7.9; 62% of patients had a score > or =8.0 (moderate disease). A significantly larger proportion of patients achieved clinical improvement and improvement in rectal bleeding in the balsalazide group vs. the placebo group (55 vs. 40%, P=0.02). The most common adverse events reported were worsening of UC and headache; both were reported more often in the placebo group.
                Balsalazide disodium 1.1 g tablets administered as 3.3 g twice daily are effective, well tolerated and significantly better than placebo for improving signs and symptoms of mild-to-moderately-active UC. This new formulation with a reduced pill and dosing burden offers the potential to improve convenience and compliance in patients with active UC. Immunosuppressive therapy with intravenous ciclosporin is an alternative treatment option to total colectomy for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), while the benefits of oral administration of tacrolimus are not well defined and are based on reports of several uncontrolled studies.
                Patients with refractory active UC were randomly assigned to a high trough concentration (10-15 ng/ml) group (HT group) (n = 21), low trough concentration (5-10 ng/ml) group (LT group) (n = 22), or placebo group (n = 20). Patients received an initial oral dose of 0.025 [DOSAGE ERROR CORRECTED] mg/kg tacrolimus or placebo twice daily. Efficacy was evaluated in 60 patients based on a disease activity index (DAI) score. Fifty eight patients had additional treatment with tacrolimus and were evaluated for efficacy in a 10 week open label extension.
                An improvement in DAI score (>or=4 points, all categories improved) was observed for 68.4% of cases in the HT group compared with 10.0% in the placebo group (p<0.001). In the HT group, 20.0% of patients had clinical remission and 78.9% had mucosal healing. In the open label extension, 55.2% of all patients had an improved DAI score at week 10. Mean dose of prednisolone was reduced from 19.7 mg/day at study entry to 7.8 mg/day at week 10. The incidence of side effects in the HT group was significantly higher than that of the placebo group (p = 0.043). The most common event was mild finger tremor.
                Our findings demonstrate dose dependent efficacy and safety of oral tacrolimus for remission-induction therapy of refractory UC. The optimal target range appears to be 10-15 ng/ml in terms of efficacy with two week therapy. Selective blockade of interactions between leukocytes and vascular endothelium in the gut is a promising strategy for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases.
                We conducted a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of MLN02, a humanized antibody to the alpha4beta7 integrin, in patients with active ulcerative colitis. We randomly assigned 181 patients to receive 0.5 mg of MLN02 per kilogram of body weight, 2.0 mg per kilogram, or an identical-appearing placebo intravenously on day 1 and day 29. Eligible patients also received concomitant mesalamine or no other treatment for colitis. Ulcerative colitis clinical scores and sigmoidoscopic assessments were evaluated six weeks after randomization.
                Clinical remission rates at week 6 were 33 percent, 32 percent, and 14 percent for the group receiving 0.5 mg of MLN02 per kilogram, the group receiving 2.0 mg per kilogram, and the placebo group, respectively (P=0.03). The corresponding proportions of patients who improved by at least 3 points on the ulcerative colitis clinical score were 66 percent, 53 percent, and 33 percent (P=0.002). Twenty-eight percent of patients receiving 0.5 mg per kilogram and 12 percent of those receiving 2.0 mg per kilogram had endoscopically evident remission, as compared with 8 percent of those receiving placebo (P=0.007). For the minority of patients in whom an MLN02 antibody titer greater than 1:125 developed, incomplete saturation of the alpha4beta7 receptor on circulating lymphocytes was observed and no benefit of treatment was identifiable.
                In this short-term study, MLN02 was more effective than placebo for the induction of clinical and endoscopic remission in patients with active ulcerative colitis. Preliminary data have shown that delayed release oral mesalamine (Asacol) dosed at 4.8 g/day provided additional efficacy benefit compared to 1.6 g/day in patients with mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis. Additionally, Asacol dosed at 2.4 g/day has been proved to be more effective than 1.6 g/day. Whether 4.8 g/day of mesalamine (dosed with an investigational 800 mg tablet) is more effective than Asacol 2.4 g/day (dosed with a 400 mg tablet) in patients with moderately active ulcerative colitis is unknown.
                A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial (ASCEND II) was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of 4.8 g/day of mesalamine in adults with active ulcerative colitis. Three hundred eighty-six patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis were randomized for treatment with mesalamine 2.4 g/day (400 mg tablet) or 4.8 g/day (800 mg tablet) for 6 wk. The primary efficacy population was 268 patients with moderately active ulcerative colitis treated with 2.4 g/day (n = 139) or 4.8 g/day (n = 129). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients in each treatment group that achieved overall improvement ("treatment success," defined as either complete remission or a clinical response to therapy) from baseline at week 6.
                Seventy-two percent of patients receiving 4.8 g/day of mesalamine for moderate ulcerative colitis (89/124 patients) achieved treatment success at week 6, compared with 59% of those who received 2.4 g/day (77/130 patients) (p= 0.036). Both regimens were well tolerated. Adverse events and clinically significant changes in laboratory results were similar in both treatment groups.
                Patients with moderately active ulcerative colitis treated with 4.8 g/day of mesalamine (800 mg tablet) are significantly more likely to achieve overall improvement at 6 wk compared to patients treated with 2.4 g/day. Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) responds to treatment with corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, and plasma exchange. We aimed to test whether the standard immunosuppressive drug methotrexate was of use in treatment of CIDP.
                In a pilot, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, controlled trial we compared oral methotrexate 7.5 mg weekly for 4 weeks, then 10 mg weekly for 4 weeks, and finally 15 mg weekly for 32 weeks (40 weeks' total treatment) with placebo in patients with CIDP requiring intravenous immunoglobulin or corticosteroids. After about 16 weeks, the dose of corticosteroids or intravenous immunoglobulin was decreased by 20% every 4 weeks if participants did not deteriorate. Primary outcome was a greater than 20% reduction in mean weekly dose in the last 4 weeks of the trial compared with the first 4 weeks. Secondary outcomes analysed separately at the mid-trial and final visits measured activity limitations and strength. Analyses were done by intention to treat. This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN73774524.
                59 of the 60 enrolled participants completed the trial. 14 (52%) of 27 taking methotrexate and 14 (44%) of 32 taking placebo had a greater than 20% reduction in mean weekly dose of corticosteroids or intravenous immunoglobulin (adjusted odds ratio 1.21, 95% CI 0.40-3.70). There were no clinically and statistically significant differences in secondary outcomes. The one serious adverse event in the placebo group and the three in the methotrexate group were not thought to be related to treatment.
                Oral methotrexate 15 mg weekly showed no significant benefit, but limitations in the trial design and the high rate of response in the placebo group meant that a treatment effect could not be excluded. This study can inform design of future trials in CIDP.
                The GBS/CIDP Foundation International.
A single trial of methotrexate 12.5 mg orally weekly showed no benefit over placebo in remission induction in patients with active ulcerative colitis. There is no evidence on which to base recommendations for treating ulcerative colitis patients with methotrexate. However, the possibility of a type 2 error exists, and a higher dose of methotrexate may be effective. A new trial in which adequate numbers of patients are randomized to placebo or a higher dose of methotrexate should be considered.