Prophylactic antibiotics in neonates with umbilical artery catheter placement: a prospective study of 137 patients. Low positioning of umbilical-artery catheters increases associated complications in newborn infants. Randomized, controlled trial of amoxicillin prophylaxis for prevention of catheter-related infections in newborn infants with central venous silicone elastomer catheters. Randomized trial of prophylactic antibiotic therapy after preterm amnion rupture. [Prophylactic use of antibiotics in umbilical catheterization in newborn infants]. A randomized trial comparing peripherally inserted central venous catheters and peripheral intravenous catheters in infants with very low birth weight. Randomized controlled trial of vascular access in newborns in the neonatal intensive care unit. A double-blind randomized controlled trial on the use of prophylactic antibiotics in patients undergoing elective caesarean section. Intravenous access in newborn infants: impact of extended umbilical venous catheter use on requirement for peripheral venous lines.
To analyze the risk of cannula sepsis from indwelling umbilical arterial catheters and the indication for prophylactic antibiotics, 137 catheterized neonates with respiratory distress were prospectively placed into either antibiotic-treated (penicillin 50,000U/kg/day and kanamycin 15 mg./kg./day) or non-treated groups. Although bacteria were frequently isolated from blood and catheter tip cultures obtained upon removal of the catheter, especially among non-antibiotic treated infants, these isolates were predominantly non-pathogens and probably skin flora. Corresponding peripheral blood cultures were usually sterile. No cases of cannula-associated sepsis occurred among treated and non-treated newborns. The risk of bacteriologically proven sepsis resulting from an indwelling umbilical artery catheter appears insufficient to justify prophylactic antibiotics. We performed a randomized prospective study of the effect of placement position of umbilical-artery catheters on complication rates in high-risk newborn infants. A higher complication rate (31 of 40 vs. 13 of 33) (P less than 0.005) occurred in the group with the catheter tip at the third to fourth lumbar segment, as compared to those with the tip at the seventh to eighth thoracic segment, owing to more episodes of blanching and cyanosis of the extremities. There was no difference between groups in the rate of complications requiring catheter removal. Aortography revealed thrombosis in 21 of 23 patients studied, but there was no clinical evidence of impaired circulation. In retrospect, we found that, independently of catheter position, administration of antibiotics through the catheter was associated with an increased rate of complications (63 vs. 20 per cent). Umbilical-artery catheterization entails potential risks regardless of the position of the catheter; placement of the catheter with its tip at the seventh to eighth thoracic segment may be associated with fewer complications than at lower positions. To clarify the effectiveness of amoxicillin prophylaxis in the prevention of catheter-related infections.
                We performed a randomized, controlled, sequential, prospective trial in newborn infants undergoing percutaneous central venous catheterization.
                Seventy-five infants (median birth weight, 1240 gm; median age at catheter insertion, 3 days) received prophylactic amoxicillin (100 mg/kg per day); 73 infants in the control group (median birth weight, 1170 gm; median age, 2 days) received no routine prophylactic antibiotic treatment. No infant receiving amoxicillin had septicemia, whereas two infants (2.7%) in the control group did; suspected septicemia (positive clinical and laboratory findings but negative blood culture results) was found in 3 infants in the amoxicillin group and in 6 of the control group (not significantly). Bacterial contamination of the catheter tip at removal was significantly reduced in the amoxicillin group (13.3% vs 28.8% in control subjects; p < 0.05). Negligible differences were found in duration of catheterization (median, 15 days in both groups), or the number of thrombotic (9.3% vs 2.7% in control subjects) and other catheter-related complications between the groups.
                A low incidence of catheter-related infections can be achieved in neonates with central venous catheters without using prophylaxis with an antibiotic. Our purpose was to determine whether maternal administration of prophylactic ampicillin or erythromycin after preterm amnion rupture is associated with maternal or neonatal benefits.
                Women with singleton pregnancies between 24 and 33 weeks 6 days of gestation were eligible if they had no immediate indication for delivery. After giving informed consent, patients were randomized either to receive ampicillin (erythromycin if penicillin allergic) until delivery or to enter a control group. Women whose cervical cultures were positive for either group B streptococci or Neisseria gonorrhoeae received treatment. Tocolytics and corticosteroids were not used.
                From January 1990 to February 1992 117 patients (antibiotics 59, control 58) were recruited and analyzed. Prophylactic antibiotics were associated with a longer latent phase (mean 12 vs 7.0 days, p = 0.004) and fewer maternal infectious complications (29% vs 60%, p = 0.001). A higher incidence of neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis was observed in the treatment group (14% vs 3.5%, p = 0.05). Other neonatal complications, including death, were lower in the treatment group, but none attained statistical significance (p = 0.09 to 0.33).
                The use of prophylactic antibiotics in selected patients after preterm amnion rupture appears to have a demonstrable maternal benefit. Large, multicenter trials may demonstrate a significant neonatal benefit or confirm any adverse outcomes. nan To determine whether percutaneously inserted central venous catheters (PICC) and peripheral intravenous catheters (PIV) in infants with very low birth weight (VLBW) differ with respect to (1) incidence of sepsis, (2) number of insertion attempts and catheters required for total intravenous therapy, (3) courses of antibiotics, and (4) total duration of intravenous (IV) use.
                A randomized comparative trial was conducted involving 63 VLBW infants (<1,251 g) who required IV therapy. Infants were assigned randomly at 1 week of age to either a PIV or a PICC catheter and followed up prospectively until an IV was no longer required or the infant was transferred out of the neonatal intensive care unit.
                Data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. There was no difference in the incidence of sepsis (P = .64), number of courses of antibiotics (P = .16), or total duration of IV use (P= .34) between the 2 groups. The number of insertion attempts required for total IV therapy was significantly lower in the PICC group than in the PIV group (P = .008). There also was a significantly lower number of total catheters utilized in the PICC group (P = .002). When data were controlled for birth weight strata the results were similar.
                PICC lines reduced the number of painful IV procedures in VLBW infants without additional morbidity. To compare the effectiveness of two methods of vascular access in newborns.
                Randomized controlled trial.
                Neonatal intensive care unit in Regional Hospital of Valdivia, Chile.
                Seventy-four high-risk newborns.
                Peripherally inserted central catheter and peripheral intravenous catheter.
                Length of neonatal intensive care unit stay and incidence of sepsis and phlebitis. RESULTS/DATA ANALYSIS: There were no statistically significant differences in the length of the neonatal intensive care unit stay and in the incidence of sepsis between groups. There was a significant higher incidence of phlebitis in the peripheral intravenous catheter group.
                Although there was not a significant effect of the kind of catheter on length of neonatal intensive care unit stay, the peripherally inserted central catheter is recommended because of the decreased risk of phlebitis and the decreased number of venipuncture attempts and catheters needed to complete intravenous therapy. In a double-blind randomized controlled study 232 patients undergoing elective lower segment caesarean section were randomly allocated to receive a pre-operative prophylactic dose of a combination of crystalline penicillin and chloramphenicol or a placebo. The two groups were comparable in terms of patient characteristics and operation variables. The group receiving antibiotics had significantly fewer febrile and infectious morbid events and thus spent fewer days in hospital than the group receiving the placebo. Central venous lines are used to care for critically ill neonates in cases of limited peripheral venous access. This prospective, randomized study evaluated the risks and benefits of the use of single- and double-lumen umbilical venous catheters for up to 14 days. Patients were randomized to one of three treatment arms: (1) single-lumen umbilical catheter, (2) double-lumen umbilical catheter, or (3) no umbilical catheter; peripheral intravenous lines only. Infants in the groups treated with an umbilical venous catheter had significantly fewer venipunctures and peripheral intravenous lines placed during their first 2 weeks of life than those in the peripheral line only group. Less time and money were spent obtaining peripheral line placement in the umbilical venous catheter groups. The incidence rates of sepsis and complications were not higher in treated patients than in control patients. The double-lumen catheter further reduced peripheral venipunctures and lines. We conclude that an umbilical venous catheter used during the first 2 weeks of life is a relatively safe, less stressful, cost-effective means of providing intravenous therapy to neonates.
There is insufficient evidence from randomised trials to support or refute the use of prophylactic antibiotics when umbilical artery catheters are inserted in newborn infants, and no evidence to support or refute continuing antibiotics once initial cultures rule out infection in newborn infants with umbilical artery catheters.