Crystalloid versus colloid fluid therapy after cardiac surgery. Short-term effectiveness of different volume replacement therapies in postoperative hypovolaemic patients. Colloid solutions in the critically ill. A randomised comparison of albumin and polygeline. 1. Outcome and duration of stay in the intensive care unit. Cardiac response is greater for colloid than saline fluid loading after cardiac or vascular surgery. Does the type of volume therapy influence endothelial-related coagulation in the critically ill? [Comparison of postoperative volume therapy in heart surgery patients]. Crystalloid vs. colloid resuscitation: is one better? A randomized clinical study. Use of modified fluid gelatin and hydroxyethyl starch for colloidal volume replacement in major orthopaedic surgery. A prospective randomized trial evaluating colloid versus crystalloid resuscitation in the treatment of the vascular leak syndrome associated with interleukin-2 therapy.
Differences in hemodynamic stability and fluid requirements were examined in patients randomly assigned to receive either normal saline crystalloid solution (N = 10) or hetastarch colloid solution (N = 11) after coronary artery bypass or valve operation. Both solutions were administered in the same manner for 8 hours after surgery, with hourly assessment of hemodynamic parameters and intake/output data. Infusion rates and 8-hour intake were higher for the group receiving normal saline solution (p less than 0.001), as was postoperative weight gain (p less than 0.01), although urine and chest tube outputs did not differ. Despite lower filling pressures, subjects receiving hetastarch exhibited higher systolic blood pressures and cardiac outputs (p less than 0.05). Hematocrits on postoperative day 1 were lower in the group given hetastarch (p less than 0.001), suggesting prolonged intravascular expansion. The subjects given hetastarch also required significantly less time in the intensive care unit (p less than 0.001). Thus, cardiac surgical patients receiving colloids exhibited reduced fluid requirements, superior hemodynamic performance, and shortened intensive care stay when compared with those given crystalloid resuscitation. To examine the kinetics of volume loading with crystalloid and colloid infusions in critically ill patients after major surgery, using the pulse contour cardiac output (PiCCO) monitoring technique.
                This prospective, randomized, multicentre study of 11 ICUs involved 200 mixed postoperative hypovolaemic patients (50 patients per group) in Hungary. Patients received 10 ml kg of lactated Ringer's solution, succinylated gelatin 4% w/v, 130/0.4 hydroxyethyl starch 6% w/v (HES) or human albumin 5% w/v over 30 min. A complete haemodynamic profile was obtained at 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 min after baseline. The peak haemodynamic effects, the 120 min changes compared with baseline, the area under the curve (AUC) for the haemodynamic parameters over 120 min and the haemodilution effect of the solutions were analysed. The primary outcome was to compare the AUCs and the secondary outcome was to evaluate the haemodynamic changes at 120 min.
                There were significant differences in the AUCs of the haemodynamic parameters between colloids and lactated Ringer's solution in the cardiac index and global end-diastolic volume index (GEDVI); human albumin vs. lactated Ringer's solution in stroke volume variation (SVV); and succinylated gelatin, HES vs. lactated Ringer's solution in the oxygen delivery index (DO2I). Colloid infusions (mainly HES and human albumin) at 120 min caused significant changes in central venous pressure, cardiac index, GEDVI, SVV, DO2I and central venous oxygen saturation compared with baseline. The haemodilution effect was significantly greater in colloids vs. lactated Ringer's solution.
                In postoperative hypovolaemic patients, lactated Ringer's solution can significantly improve haemodynamics at the end of volume loading, but this effect completely disappears at 120 min. Ten millilitres per kilogram of colloid bolus (especially HES) improved the haemodynamics at 120 min; however, this was by only 5-25% compared with baseline. The colloids caused significantly larger AUCs than lactated Ringer's solution, but only in the cardiac index, GEDVI and DO2I, plus human albumin in the SVV. All patients admitted to an Intensive Care Unit were randomised to receive all volume replacement fluid as either human albumin solution or a synthetic colloid. A total of 475 patients were admitted during the study period. Patients' age, sex, APACHE score and calculated risk of death were assessed on admission. Outcome was assessed as length of Intensive Care stay and mortality. There was no difference between the groups. Subgroups of patients with APACHE score greater than 10, calculated risk of death greater than 50% and length of stay greater than 5 days were also evaluated but not significant differences were found between treatment groups. The use of albumin rather than 3.5% polygeline for volume replacement in the Intensive Care Unit has no influence on outcome. To study the effects on volume expansion and myocardial function of colloids or crystalloids in the treatment of hypovolaemic hypotension after cardiac and major vascular surgery.
                A single-centre, single-blinded, randomized clinical trial at the intensive care unit of a university hospital.
                Patients (n=67) were subjected to a 90-min filling pressure-guided fluid challenge with saline 0.9% or the colloids gelatin 4%, hydroxyethyl starch 6% or albumin 5%. Biochemical variables and haemodynamics (transpulmonary thermodilution) were measured.
                An amount of 1800 (1300-1800) ml of saline or 1600 (750-1800) ml of colloid solution (P< 0.005) was infused. Colloid osmotic pressure (COP) decreased in the saline group and increased in the colloid groups (P< 0.001). Plasma volume increased by 3.0% (-18 to 24) in the saline versus 19% (-11 to 50) in the colloid groups (P< 0.001). Cardiac index increased by median 13% (ns) in the saline group and by 22% in the colloid groups (P<0.005). The rise in left ventricular stroke work index was greater in the colloid than in the saline groups. The different colloids were equally effective. The rise in cardiac index related to the rise in plasma volume and global end-diastolic volume, confirming plasma volume and preload augmentation by the fluid loading.
                After cardiac or major vascular surgery, the pressure- and time-guided fluid response is dependent on the type of fluid used. Colloid fluid loading leads to a greater increase in preload-recruitable cardiac and left ventricular stroke work indices than that with saline, because of greater plasma volume expansion following an increase in plasma COP. The endothelium plays an important role in the regulation of haemostasis by producing substances such as thrombomodulin (TM). The influence of long-term volume replacement with different types of fluid on the TM-protein C-protein S system was investigated in a prospective, randomized study. Thirty trauma patients and 30 patients suffering from sepsis after major surgery received either 10% low-molecular weight (LMW) hydroxyethylstarch solution (HES-trauma, n = 15; HES-sepsis, n = 15) or 20% human albumin (HA-trauma, n = 15; HA-sepsis, n = 15) for 5 days to maintain central venous pressure (CVP) between 12 and 16 mm Hg. Plasma concentrations of TM, protein C, (free) protein S and thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) were measured in arterial blood samples obtained on the day of admission to the intensive care unit or on the day of diagnosis of sepsis and over the next 5 days. There were no differences between HA- and HES-treated trauma patients. Protein C and protein S also did not differ between HA- and HES-treatments. At baseline, TM plasma concentrations were increased to > 40 micrograms litre-1 in both sepsis groups only. In the HA-sepsis group, TM increased significantly (from 48.1 (SD 13.9) to 68.4 (13.0) micrograms litre-1), whereas it remained almost unchanged in the HES-sepsis group. In HES-sepsis patients, protein C (from 51.0 (10.1) to 71.9 (8.9)%) and protein S (from 19.0 (6.0) to 40.8 (11.4)%) increased significantly during the study, whereas both remained reduced in HA-patients. TAT (indicating intravascular coagulation) did not differ between the two fluid groups. We conclude that in trauma patients, the type of volume therapy had no influence on the TM-protein C-protein S system. In sepsis patients, volume therapy with HES was beneficial, whereas infusion of HA had no substantial positive effect on endothelial-associated coagulation. Patients who have undergone cardiac surgery with use of extracorporeal circulation frequently reveal marked hypovolaemia in spite of a highly positive fluid balance. This is thought to be due to transient microvascular damage and extravascular fluid shift. Further volume replacement to achieve haemodynamic stability in the postoperative period may cause fluid overload and congestive heart failure. The present study was designed to investigate whether this fluid overload could be avoided by using a hypertonic-hyperoncotic solution (group I: HHL, 10% hydroxyethylstarch 200/0.5 in 7.2% saline) instead of two different standard colloid solutions (group II: HA, 5% albumin; group III: HES, 6% hydroxyethylstarch in 0.9% saline).
                Twenty-one patients meeting our criteria for hypovolaemia immediately after cardiac surgery were randomly assigned to three groups. Patients in group I received HHL in increments of 150 ml, while patients in group II and group III were given HA and HES respectively in increments of 500 ml until hypovolemia was corrected. Haemodynamic assessment was done using a pulmonary artery thermodilution catheter. Intra- and extravascular volumes, including extravascular lung water (EVLW), intrathoracic blood volume (ITBV), and total blood volume (TBV) were measured by the double indicator technique using lung water software (COLD-System, Pulsion, Munich, Germany).
                Correction of hypovolaemia-related haemodynamic parameters and restoration of normal TBV were achieved by 236 +/- 80 ml of HHL (group I), 857 +/- 244 ml of HA (group II) and 1000 +/- 0 ml of HES (group III) respectively. TBV increased significantly in each group, compared to baseline values. EVLW did not change significantly in any group. We found that the volume-augmenting effect of HHL per millilitre infused solution was more than four times that of HA and HES, primarily as a result of increasing plasma osmolality due to an increase of plasma sodium levels. This pronounced effect on intravascular volume of HHL lasted for only 2 h following infusion, however, and did not lead to any unwanted side effects. In the period between 2 and 20 h after primary volume replacement, further fluid therapy with colloids and crystalloids, guided by clinical signs of hypovolaemia, was necessary in each group of patients. The overall fluid requirements for the first 20 h after operation did not differ among the three resuscitation regimens.
                We found that HHL is a safe and effective solution for acute correction of hypovolaemia after cardiac surgery. The advantages of a smaller initial volume load by HHL cannot be maintained for longer than 2 h. The effects of hemodynamic resuscitation with protein-containing or balanced salt solution were studied prospectively in 29 patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery. Blood loss was replaced with packed red cells and extracellular volume with either Ringer's Lactate (RL) or 5% albumin in Ringer's lactate (ALB). Fluids were given to maintain the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) equal to or within 5 torr above preoperative (PO) levels, the cardiac output (CO) equal to or greater than preoperative values, and the urine output at least 50 ml/hr. Serum colloid osmotic pressure (COP), CO, PCWP, the gradient between COP and PCWP (COP-PCWP), and intrapulmonary shunt (Qs/Qt) were measured PO, intraoperatively (IO), and daily for 3 days. The measured variables were similar PO in both groups. Operation time, estimated blood loss, and transfusions were similar. Total fluids received for resuscitation (day of operation) was 11.3 +/- 0.8 liters (RL) and 6.2 +/- 0.4 liters (ALB). Fluid balance at the end of resuscitation was 8.4 +/- 0.8 liters (RL) and 3.4 +/- 0.5 liters (ALB). Maximum decrease in COP was 40% (P less than 0.001) in the RL group and was insignificant in the ALB group. The COP-PCWP decreased from 11 +/- 1 to 2 +/- 1 in RL (P less than 0.001) and insignificantly in ALB. Qs/Qt increased slightly in both groups following operation but was not different between groups. Fluid balance, total fluid infused, sodium balance, total sodium infused, COP, or COP-PCWP did not significantly correlate with Qs/Qt. Two patients in the ALB group experienced pulmonary edema associated with normal COPs and elevated PCWPs. There were no cases of pulmonary edema associated with low COPs and normal PCWPs in the crystalloid group. These data seriously question the necessity to maintain COP by using protein-containing solutions during acute hemodynamic resuscitation. When titrated to physiological end points, even large volumes of balanced salt solutions are tolerated well. We have compared 6% hydroxyethyl starch (HES 200/0.5) with 3% modified fluid gelatin (MFG) for volume replacement in major orthopaedic surgery and studied the effects on haemodynamic state, colloid osmotic pressure, blood clotting and plasma homeostasis. Using a controlled, randomized, single-blind clinical design, we studied 46 consecutive patients undergoing major elective orthopaedic hip surgery. The two groups were comparable in age, body weight and duration of surgery. Patients were maintained haemodynamically stable using both HES and MFG over the entire study. Fluid balance and colloidal replacement volumes were comparable in both groups (median perioperative infusion volume: HES 2500 ml, MFG 2400 ml). Laboratory variables were not clinically different. We conclude that both colloidal solutions were comparable in volume efficacy and effects on plasma oncotic pressure, clotting and plasma homeostasis. In the small number of patients studied, 6% HES 200/0.5 was found to be safe when administered in amounts corresponding to the currently accepted maximum daily dose in Germany and France of 33 ml/kg body weight and 2.0 g/kg body weight, respectively. Interleukin-2 (IL-2)-based therapy induces a vascular leak syndrome (VLS), manifested by hypotension, tachycardia, and oliguria, as is also seen with septic shock. The optimal method for treating such VLS is not known. A prospective randomized trial was undertaken to compare crystalloid and colloid fluid resuscitation for patients receiving bolus IL-2-based therapy for metastatic cancer. All patients received maintenance crystalloid fluid administration and were randomized to receive crystalloid (0.9% normal saline) or colloid (5% human serum albumin) fluid boluses to maintain acceptable vital signs and urine output. Patients refractory to fluid boluses were given dopamine for oliguria and/or phenylephrine for hypotension. Of 107 patients who completed one cycle of therapy on study, 76 completed a full treatment course (two cycles) on study. The total number of saline and albumin fluid boluses given were 9.5 +/- 0.9 versus 7.7 +/- 0.7 (p = 0.36, n = 107) for the first cycle and 19.2 +/- 1.8 versus 16.1 +/- 1.6 (p = 0.33, n = 76) for a complete course, respectively. Although patients receiving saline boluses had significantly more oliguria during a course of therapy, weight gain, number of IL-2 doses, tachycardia, hypotension, vasopressor use, hospital stay, and clinical response rates did not significantly differ between arms. Changes in hematocrit, hemoglobin, protein, albumin, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and creatinine were analyzed, and patients receiving crystalloid showed greater decreases in albumin (p < 0.0001) and total protein (p < 0.05) as expected. A 40-fold greater cost associated with albumin suggested that crystalloid resuscitation be used to treat the VLS associated with IL-2 therapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Despite the confirmed beneficial effects of colloids in this review, further studies are still required. There are no studies examining the effects of combination fluid therapy. The primary research outcome was death, for which results were limited; therefore, future studies should pay more attention to short-term outcomes such as minimising the need for allogenic blood transfusion, complications (organ failure), and length of stay in both the intensive care unit and hospital.