A randomized controlled trial in a hospital population of ultrasound measurement screening for the small for dates baby. Fetal health surveillance: a community-wide approach versus a tailored intervention for the implementation of clinical practice guidelines. A pilot randomized controlled trial of two regimens of fetal surveillance for small-for-gestational-age fetuses with normal results of umbilical artery doppler velocimetry. Multicenter randomized clinical trial of home uterine activity monitoring: pregnancy outcomes for all women randomized. A randomised controlled trial of admission electronic fetal monitoring in normal labour. The effect of introduction of umbilical Doppler recordings to obstetric practice. Routine ultrasound fetal examination in pregnancy: the 'Alesund' randomized controlled trial. The Dublin randomized controlled trial of intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. Intrapartum management of nonreassuring fetal heart rate patterns: a randomized controlled trial of fetal pulse oximetry.
Poor fetal growth is an important cause of perinatal mortality and morbidity. Based on the hypothesis that early diagnosis of fetal growth problems leads to more appropriate management and therefore, improved outcome, a randomized controlled trial of ultrasound measurement was performed on 1,528 women booked through a hospital antenatal clinic. This compared a number of perinatal outcomes between the group who had a routine 2-stage examination (early dating and 34-week scan) and a group who had only a dating scan and then additional scans as generated by their clinical situations. No significant differences could be found between the groups when these perinatal outcomes were considered. These results mirror previously published randomized controlled trials. Selection of women for third trimester ultrasound examination for suspected fetal growth problems should be based on careful clinical assessment and should not be routine. The decreased use of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for healthy women in labour and the increased provision of professional support to all women in labour is recommended by experts. We evaluated the effectiveness of a community-wide approach to transferring research results to practice using a regional committee, newsletter articles and annual conference presentations compared with an additional tailored hospital intervention involving workshops to enhance self-efficacy for nurses, policy review, multidisciplinary meetings, rounds and unit discussions.
                We compared the proportion of women at low risk who received EFM and the proportion of nurses' time spent providing labour support before and after the intervention within each of 4 hospitals (2 tertiary and 2 secondary). One hospital of either type was randomly selected to receive the tailored intervention. Randomly selected charts (n = 200) were reviewed for the use of EFM at each hospital before (1995) and after (1996) the intervention. Trained observers at randomly selected times recorded the nurses' activities, including time spent providing labour support before and after the intervention.
                At the intervention secondary hospital, there was a large decrease in the use of EFM, from 90.1% before to 41.0% after the intervention (p < 0.001), but no change in nurses' time spent providing labour support. At the intervention tertiary hospital there was no change in EFM rates, but there was a small, statistically significant increase in time spent providing labour support (23.5% to 29.8%, p < 0.001). A negative effect on time spent providing labour support was found at the control secondary hospital (decrease from 19.6% to 12.8%, p < 0.001), with no change in the EFM rate. At the control tertiary hospital there was a small decrease in the use of EFM, from 99.5% to 91.4% (p < 0.001), but no change in time spent providing labour support.
                The results are mixed, and the tailored intervention thus appeared to have limited effects. No association was found between the reduction in the use of EFM and an increase in nurses' time spent providing labour support. This study was undertaken to determine whether the frequency of fetal surveillance could be safely reduced from twice weekly to fortnightly in the case of small-for-gestational-age fetuses with normal results of umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry studies.
                Pregnant women between 24 and 36 weeks' gestation (n = 167) with small-for-gestational-age fetuses and normal results of umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry studies were randomly allocated to undergo twice-weekly or fortnightly fetal surveillance. Statistical analysis was carried out according to intention to treat.
                Eighty-five women were randomly assigned to undergo twice-weekly fetal surveillance and 82 were randomly assigned to undergo fortnightly fetal surveillance. Those randomly assigned to twice-weekly surveillance were delivered 4 days earlier (264 vs 268 days; P =.04) and were more likely to have labor induced (n = 70, 82%, vs n = 54, 66%; P =.02) than those randomly assigned to fortnightly surveillance. Fifty-four babies (23%) were admitted to the neonatal nursery, but there were no differences in neonatal morbidity between the groups.
                Maternal intervention (induction) was more common in the twice-weekly group. No differences in neonatal outcomes were detected. A much larger trial is required to determine the safety and potential benefits of less frequent surveillance of small-for gestational-age fetuses with normal results of umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry studies. Our purpose was to evaluate the impact of home uterine activity monitoring on pregnancy outcomes among women at high risk for preterm labor and delivery.
                Women at high risk for preterm labor at three centers were randomly assigned to receive high-risk prenatal care alone (not monitored) or to receive the same care with twice-daily home uterine activity monitoring without increased nursing support (monitored). There were 339 women with singleton gestations randomized with caregivers blinded to group assignment. The two groups were medically and demographically similar at entry into the study.
                Women in the monitored group had prolonged pregnancy survival (p = 0.02) and were less likely to experience a preterm delivery (relative risk 0.59; p = 0.04). Infants born to monitored women with singleton gestations were less likely to be of low birth weight (< 2500 gm; relative risk 0.47, p = 0.003), and were less likely to be admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit (relative risk 0.5, p = 0.01).
                These data show, among women with singleton gestations at high risk for preterm delivery, that the use of home uterine activity monitoring alone, without additional intensive nursing care, results in improved pregnancy outcomes, including prolonged gestation, decreased risk for preterm delivery, larger-birth-weight infants, and a decreased need for neonatal intensive care. To test the hypothesis that the use of admission Electronic Fetal Monitoring (EFM) for healthy pregnant women in spontaneous labour would result in an increase in continuous EFM when compared to women who have had no admission EFM.
                A randomised controlled trial.
                The Midwives Birth Unit in Glasgow Royal Maternity Hospital, a major urban teaching hospital with approximately 5000 births per year.
                Healthy pregnant women admitted in normal labour, deemed low risk based on the midwives' birth unit admission criteria.
                Women were randomly allocated either to receive a routine 20-minute period of EFM at the time of admission (control group), or to receive no routine admission EFM (study group).
                Primary study outcomes, use of continuous EFM; and use of EFM additional to the admission test. Secondary outcomes: artificial rupture of membranes, use of fetal scalp electrode, fetal blood sample, syntocinon, epidural analgesia, number of vaginal examinations, rate of transfer to labour ward, and reason for transfer.
                There was no statistically significant difference between the groups for use of continuous monitoring, but significantly more women in the control group did receive additional EFM. There was no statistically significant difference between groups for any of the interventions studied.
                The use of admission EFM did not in itself lead to a cascade of intervention. Other factors including setting of care and philosophy of caregivers may have an effect on the rate of intervention in labour. To assess the effect on obstetric practice of clinician access to umbilical artery Doppler ultrasound results.
                Randomised controlled trial.
                A large teaching hospital.
                Two thousand two hundred and eighty-nine pregnancies defined as being at risk by referral for Doppler or fetal monitoring.
                Continuous wave Doppler studies of umbilical artery. Results immediately available to clinicians.
                Fetal outcome: perinatal mortality, Apgar score and admission to the neonatal unit. Obstetric intervention: admission to hospital, induction of labour and caesarean section. Use of of fetal well being: cardiotocography, biophysical profile and ultrasound biometry.
                The treatment and control groups were comparable in age, parity, gestation at point of entry and risk features. There were no overall differences in perinatal outcome, obstetric intervention or use of fetal monitoring. Examination of a subset recruited only because of hypertension or suspected intrauterine growth retardation (n = 754) similarly showed no difference attributable to group randomisation. Comparison of only those pregnancies retrospectively defined as low risk and high risk showed more use of cardiotocography in the high risk group with access to Doppler (P = 0.007) but no difference in the low risk group.
                Doppler umbilical artery recording has been shown to perform well in prediction power of antenatal fetal compromise. What has been examined in this study is the response of clinicians to the test. The results suggest that obstetricians do not use the test to modify their risk assessment, and, therefore, the need for fetal monitoring in particular pregnancies. There is a real need for accumulation of information from very large data sets, particularly in the prediction power of Doppler for antenatal fetal compromise from apparently chronic utero-placental cause to guide use of monitoring resources. If simply added to existing fetal monitoring techniques in a hospital where these are widely used, then umbilical artery Doppler recordings may at present simply involve extra resources of staff and expenses, without benefit. To evaluate the possible benefits of the routine use of ultrasound screening in pregnancy.
                A randomized controlled trial was designed to detect a 50% difference in the incidence of induction for apparent post-term pregnancies between women who were screened with ultrasound and unscreened women. A total of 1628 pregnant women from the general population were included. Eight hundred and twenty-five were allocated to an ultrasound examination at the 18th and 32nd week of pregnancy in addition to receiving routine antenatal care. The remaining 803 women received standard antenatal care, but could only be referred for ultrasound examination on clinical indication.
                The incidence of induced labor due to apparent post-term pregnancies was approximately 70% lower in the ultrasound-screened group. Inductions from all causes were also less frequent among ultrasound-screened women. There were six perinatal deaths among the screened and seven among the controls after excluding three lethal malformations among the controls. There was no difference in Apgar score after 1 min, but the proportion with Apgar score less than 8 after 5 min was lower among the screened group (P = 0.04). The need for positive pressure ventilation for more than 1 min was lower among the screened group (P = 0.02). Birth weight was slightly higher in the screened group (39 g), but the difference was not statistically significant. Among the controls three pairs of twins remained undiagnosed until the mothers were admitted to the hospital in labor at between 36 and 38 weeks gestation.
                These results suggest that for women who were screened with ultrasound, obstetricians were less likely to induce labor due to apparent post-term pregnancy, than for women who were not screened. All 10 pairs of twins in the screened group were diagnosed at the routine examination. These data also suggest that perinatal morbidity might be slightly lower in the screened group. In a randomized controlled trial involving 12,964 women, a policy of continuous electronic intrapartum fetal heart monitoring was compared with an alternative policy of intermittent auscultation, both policies including an option to measure fetal scalp blood pH. Women allocated to electronic fetal heart monitoring had shorter labors and received less analgesia. The caesarean delivery rates were 2.4% for electronic fetal heart monitoring and 2.2% for intermittent auscultation but this small difference arose from the identification of nearly twice as many fetuses with low scalp pH (less than 7.20) in the electronic fetal heart monitoring group. The forceps delivery rate was 8.2% in the electronic fetal heart monitoring group compared with 6.3% in the intermittent auscultation group, and this excess was explained by more instrumental deliveries prompted by fetal heart rate abnormalities. There were 14 stillbirths and neonatal deaths in each group, with a similar distribution of causes. There were no apparent differences in the rates of low Apgar scores, need for resuscitation, or transfer to the special care nursery. Cases of neonatal seizures and persistent abnormal neurological signs followed by survival were twice as frequent in the intermittent auscultation group, and this differential effect was related to duration of labor. Follow-up at 1 year of babies who survived neonatal seizures revealed three clearly abnormal infants in each group. The implications of these findings for both theory and practice are discussed. We tested if fetal pulse oximetry in addition to electronic fetal monitoring (CTG) and scalp blood sampling improves the accuracy of fetal assessment and allows safe reduction of operative deliveries (-50%) and scalp blood sampling (-50%) performed because of nonreassuring fetal status. Study design A randomized controlled trial was conducted in 146 patients with term pregnancies in active labor and abnormal fetal heart rate patterns: 73 had electronic fetal heart rate monitoring (CTG) and fetal scalp blood sampling (control group), 73 had CTG, fetal scalp blood sampling, and continuous fetal pulse oximetry (study group).
                There was a reduction of -50% in operative deliveries and fetal scalp blood sampling performed because of nonreassuring fetal status in the study group: operative deliveries, study versus control 25/49 (P </= .001); fetal scalp sampling, study versus control 32/64 (P </= .001). An increase in cesarean sections because of dystocia in the study group did not change the net number of operative deliveries. There was no difference between the 2 groups in adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes, as well as for the end points of metabolic acidosis and need for resuscitation.
                There was a safe reduction in operative deliveries (-50%) and scalp blood sampling (-50%) performed because of nonreassuring fetal status. The increase in cesarean sections because of dystocia in the study group was a well-documented arrest of labor, but it did not change the total number of operative deliveries in this group.
There is limited evidence from randomised controlled trials to inform best practice for fetal surveillance regimens when caring for women with pregnancies affected by impaired fetal growth. More studies are needed to evaluate the effects of currently used fetal surveillance regimens in impaired fetal growth.