A randomized controlled study of post-injection rest following intra-articular steroid therapy for knee synovitis. Safety and efficacy of long-term intraarticular steroid injections in osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Randomised controlled study of postinjection immobilisation after intra-articular glucocorticoid treatment for wrist synovitis. A randomized clinical trial of treatment for lumbar segmental rigidity. A randomized controlled trial of surgery vs steroid injection for carpal tunnel syndrome. The effects of joint washout and steroid injection compared with either joint washout or steroid injection alone in rheumatoid knee effusion. Efficacy of intraarticular hyaluronic acid in patients with osteoarthritis--a prospective clinical trial. Effects of a cross-training exercise program in persons with osteoarthritis of the knee a randomized controlled trial. Concentric versus combined concentric-eccentric isokinetic training: effects on functional capacity and symptoms in patients with osteoarthrosis of the knee.
In order to assess the effect of 24 h observed bed rest following intra-articular steroid injection of the knee joint in patients with an inflammatory arthritis such as RA, AS or colitic arthropathy, 91 patients with inflammatory arthritis of one knee joint were randomized to receive 24 h bed rest in hospital following intra-articular steroid injection or were injected in outpatients. The clinical and laboratory assessments such as pain and stiffness on a 10-cm visual analogue scale, knee circumference (cm), 50 ft walking time (s), CRP and ESR were measured before receiving the steroid injection and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 weeks. Both groups of patients improved clinically and serologically at 3 weeks. By 12 weeks the degree of improvement in the pain score, stiffness score, knee circumference, 50 ft walking time and CRP was better in the rest group and these differences persisted to 24 weeks. For each outcome variable the summary measure of response was significantly better in the rest group compared to the no rest group. Intra-articular steroid injection of the knee joint followed by strict i inpatient bed rest for 24 h results in a greater degree of clinical and serological improvement, compared to routine outpatient injections for up to 6 months. It is therefore possible that 24-h post-injection rest will result in a prolonged duration of clinical response and reduce the need for frequent steroid injections and the risk of complications. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of long-term intraarticular (IA) steroid injections for knee pain related to osteoarthritis (OA).
                In a randomized, double-blind trial, 68 patients with OA of the knee received IA injections of triamcinolone acetonide 40 mg (34 patients) or saline (34 patients) into the study knee every 3 months for up to 2 years. The primary outcome variable was radiologic progression of joint space narrowing of the injected knee after 2 years. Measurements of minimum joint space width were performed by an automated computerized method on standardized fluoroscopically guided radiographs taken with the patient standing and with the knee in a semiflexed position. The clinical efficacy measure of primary interest was the pain subscale from the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities OA Index (WOMAC). Efficacy measures of secondary interest were the total score on the WOMAC, physician's global assessment, patient's global assessment, patient's assessment of pain, range of motion (ROM) of the affected knee, and 50-foot walking time. Clinical symptoms were assessed just before each injection.
                At the 1-year and 2-year followup evaluations, no difference was noted between the two treatment groups with respect to loss of joint space over time. The steroid-injected knees showed a trend toward greater symptom improvement, especially at 1 year, for the WOMAC pain subscale, night pain, and ROM values (P = 0.05) compared with the saline-injected knees. Using area under the curve analyses, knee pain and stiffness were significantly improved throughout the 2-year study by repeated injections of triamcinolone acetonide, but not saline (P < 0.05).
                Our findings support the long-term safety of IA steroid injections for patients with symptomatic knee OA. No deleterious effects of the long-term administration of IA steroids on the anatomical structure of the knee were noted. Moreover, long-term treatment of knee OA with repeated steroid injections appears to be clinically effective for the relief of symptoms of the disease. Intra-articular glucocorticoid treatment is frequently used in arthritic disorders. Postinjection rest has been shown to improve the outcome of knee injections.
                To investigate whether better treatment results might also be achieved by a similar postinjection regimen for the wrist, which is non-weightbearing.
                117 patients with rheumatoid arthritis and wrist synovitis were treated with intra-articular glucocorticoid injections. The patients were randomly allocated to 48 hour postinjection immobilisation in elastic wrist orthoses (n=58) or to normal postinjection activity (n=59). The primary end point was relapse of synovitis. In addition, joint circumference, pain, function, range of movement, and grip strength were followed up during six months.
                24 relapses occurred in the orthoses group and 14 in the active group (p=0.056). The secondary measure showed no statistically significant differences between the groups.
                The use of elastic wrist orthoses as a postinjection regimen does not improve the outcome of intra-articular glucocorticoid treatment for wrist synovitis. Results achieved in studies on knees should not be generalised to other joints, and postinjection recommendations should differ depending on the joint treated. A randomized single-blind clinical trial of facet injections plus exercise, versus exercise alone, in chronic disabling work-related lumbar spinal disorders (CDWRLSD), accompanied by pilot interrater reliability and facet syndrome prevalence studies.
                To systematically investigate the use of facet injections as an adjunct to supervised lumbar stretching exercises in regaining lumbar range of motion (ROM) following prolonged deconditioning after work-related lumbar injuries. To assess interrater reliability of visual assessment of segmental rigidity (SR), and to evaluate the prevalence of facet syndrome in cases of lumbar SR.
                Corticosteroid joint injections have often been used to reduce musculoskeletal inflammation to facilitate joint mobilization in the presence of degenerative arthritis. Lumbar segmental rigidity is a recently described entity usually associated with painful chronic spinal disorders and postoperative spine surgery. Previous work has shown that SR and lumbar ROM improves with a brief intervention consisting of facet injections followed by specific stretching exercises. No systematic study has investigated the potential benefits of a combination of facet injections and exercise over supervised exercises alone to treat lumbar SR. Similarly, no study has assessed the association between SR and the facet syndrome.
                From a group of consecutive patients (n = 421) with CDWRLSD referred for tertiary rehabilitation between November 1999 and January 2001, 70 were noted to have SR on intake physical examination. The first part of this study assessed interrater reliability for detecting SR, and intrarater reliability for 3-segment true lumbar ROM measurements. Patients randomly assigned to participate in supervised stretching exercises with the addition of fluoroscopically guided bilateral facet injections at the involved levels (Group A, n = 36) also underwent facet syndrome prevalence assessment at the time of injection. They were compared to a randomly allocated comparison group (Group B, n = 34) undergoing exercises alone in a single-blind design. Physical therapists saw patients an average of twice per week, providing supervision of a progressive home stretching program. Inclinometric joint ROM was measured at the time of group allocation, and again 5 to 7 weeks later. Validated questionnaires of pain (intensity VAS) and disability (Million VAS) related to the CDWRLSD were provided before and after the interventions.
                Part 1 reliability and facet syndrome prevalence work revealed that interrater reliability for experienced examiners to detect rigid segments was excellent (Pearson's r = 0.97, P < 0.01). Intrarater 3-joint motion measurement reliability was also good for all sagittal/coronal ROM (Pearson's r = 0.95-0.99, P < 0.01). Only 5 of 29 subjects with SR met criteria for facet syndrome (17%), consistent with prior prevalence studies of unselected patients with low back pain. In Part 2, a large majority of patients in both groups improved from the initial to the post-treatment ROM measurements (the primary outcome criterion of the study). However, a higher proportion of Group A (injection) patients (87%-95%) showed ROM improvement, compared to Group B (exercise only) patients (64%-79%). Group A patients showed a significantly greater ROM improvement in all sagittal and coronal movements, both in absolute terms and percent of initial measurement. No significant differences in pain or disability self-report were found between groups, pre- or postintervention, but both groups showed significant improvement from pre- to postintervention in pain and disability assessments.
                The detection of SR and measurement of 3-segment true lumbar ROM by experienced examiners is highly reliable. Only 17% of CDWRLSD patients with lumbar SR met criteria for the facet syndrome, a rate approximately equal to that of unselected low back pain cohorts. This indicates that lumbar SR may be found whether or not pain of facet joint origin is present. In the randomized trial, facet injections significantly increased the percentage of patients with SR showing ROM improvement, as well as the degree of improvement in lumbar mobility after treatment. There is no evidence that facet injections increase the improvements in pain/disability report noted in both groups. Decompressive surgery and steroid injection are widely used forms of treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) but there is no consensus on their effectiveness in comparison to each other. The authors evaluated the efficacy of surgery vs steroid injection in relieving symptoms in patients with CTS.
                The authors conducted a randomized, single blind, controlled trial. Fifty patients with electrophysiologically confirmed idiopathic CTS were randomized and assigned to open carpal tunnel release (25 patients) or to a single injection of steroid (25 patients). Patients were followed up at 6 and 20 weeks. The primary outcome was symptom relief in terms of the Global Symptom Score (GSS), which rates symptoms on a scale of 0 (no symptoms) to 50 (most severe). Nerve conduction studies and grip strength measurements were used as secondary outcome assessments.
                At 20 weeks after randomization, patients who underwent surgery had greater symptomatic improvement than those who were injected. The mean improvement in GSS after 20 weeks was 24.2 (SD 11.0) in the surgery group vs 8.7 (SD 13.0) in the injection group (p < 0.001); surgical decompression also resulted in greater improvement in median nerve distal motor latencies and sensory nerve conduction velocity. Mean grip strength in the surgical group was reduced by 1.7 kg (SD 5.1) compared with a gain of 2.4 kg (SD 5.5) in the injection group.
                Compared with steroid injection, open carpal tunnel release resulted in better symptomatic and neurophysiologic outcome but not grip strength in patients with idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome over a 20-week period. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis attending rheumatology out-patients who had a symptomatic knee effusion were randomly allocated to receive one of three treatments: group I, a steroid injection without washout; group II, a joint washout with normal saline; group III, a joint washout with normal saline and steroid injection. Sixty knees in all were studied. Laboratory parameters for disease activity (erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein) were monitored in all patients prior to the study and at 3 months. Clinical assessment of disease activity (pain, morning stiffness involving the knee, circumference of the knee, walking distance and range of movement) were recorded prior to the study, at 1 month and at 3 months. All three treatments, resulted in a reduction of pain and increased movement. However, patients who had a joint washout alone showed significantly less improvement as compared with the other two groups. Symptomatic improvement was marginally greater in patients following joint washout and injection than in those who had had joint injection alone. The results of the study indicate that the simple procedure of joint aspiration and steroid injection, which can be carried out in the out-patient clinic, provides satisfactory relief of symptoms in rheumatoid patients with knee effusions. Joint washout alone was less beneficial. The goal of this study was to determine whether or not the intraarticular administration of hyaluronic acid can improve functional parameters, such as isokinetic muscle strength or total work and clinical test results in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee.
                As part of a prospective, controlled study 43 patients with osteoarthritic changes of both knees (radiographic Kellgren stage II-III) were followed in a right/left comparison. The influence of intraarticularly injected hyaluronic acid (20mg hyaluronic acid/2ml Hyalart) on functional and clinical parameters was analysed. We used the isokinetic system Cybex 600 for measuring maximal isokinetic muscle strength and total work. A total of 20 males and 23 females fulfilled the inclusion criteria with an age between 55-78 years and underwent five injections of hyaluronic acid (one injection per week). The injected knee represented the treatment group, while the contralateral knee served as the control.
                The maximum peak torque of the knee extensors in the treatment group was measured between 57+/-26.15/32.33+/-19.63Nm prior to the injections and 77.17+/-32.54/47.83+/-21.43Nm following the hyaluronic acid therapy (P< 0.01). The analysis of the knee flexors at angular velocities of 60 degrees /s and 180 degrees /s revealed values of 40.44+/-21.58/22.89+/-16.64Nm and 53.55+/-24.26/34.05+/-17.37Nm (P< 0.01) respectively. The evaluation of the total work of the knee flexors and extensors revealed a significant difference (P< 0.01) between the treatment and control group. The Lequesne score was reduced from 13.57+/-1.88 prior to the injections to 7.94+/-2.53 after the treatment (P< 0.01). The pain score was documented with the help of a visual analog scale. The VAS values were reduced at rest from 3.83+/-1.72cm to 1.36+/-1.42cm and during weight bearing from 7.57+/-1.34cm to 3.75+/-1.32cm in the treatment group (P< 0.01).
                This controlled prospective clinical trial confirmed that 5 weekly intraarticular injections of HA (Hyalart) in patients with OA of the knee provide pain relief and functional improvements.
                Copyright 2002 OsteoArthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. This study was designed to evaluate, by means of a randomized controlled trial, the effects of a physical activity program incorporating aerobic, strength, and stretching exercises in individuals with osteoarthritis of the knee. We randomly assigned 137 volunteers ages >/=50 to an experimental group or a control group. The experimental group participated in three 1-hour sessions of supervised exercises per week over a 3-month period. The control participants were instructed to continue their usual daily activities, and they attended 1-hour education sessions twice a month. The effectiveness of the program was evaluated using repeated measurements of parameters related to self-reported health status, physical capacity, and joint tenderness.After 3 months, significantly greater improvements were observed in the experimental group than the control group in terms of: arthritis pain (p = 0.02), ability to walk and bend (p = 0.03), aerobic capacity (p < 0.0001), hamstring and low back flexibility (p = 0.003), quadriceps and hamstring strength (p <0.01), and the perception of changes relating to osteoarthritis of the knee and general condition (p < 0.0001). However, no significant differences were observed between the groups in isokinetic strength of the quadriceps (all p's >== 0.05), joint tenderness (p = 0.18), and health perception (p = 0.7). The overall results suggest that this program is effective for older persons with osteoarthritis of the knee and that it could contribute to maintaining their independence and improving their quality of life. To compare the effects of concentric and coupled concentric-eccentric isokinetic resistance training on functional capacity and symptoms of patients with osteoarthrosis (OA) of both knees.
                Repeated measures.
                A university exercise physiology laboratory.
                Twenty-three volunteers, ages 41 to 75 years. Patients were randomly assigned to 3 groups: concentric (CON, n = 9), concentric-eccentric (CON-ECC, n = 8), and nontreatment (NONTX, n = 6).
                The CON group performed 12 concentric contractions of each knee extensor and flexor muscles; the CON-ECC group performed 6 concentric and 6 eccentric contractions of each knee muscle group by using a spectrum of angular velocities ranging from 30 degrees/s to 180 degrees/s with 30 degrees/s intervals, for both sides, 3 days a week for 8 weeks.
                Functional capacity (rising from a chair, walking, stair climbing and descending) and pain during rest and activities, peak torque, and cross-sectional area (CSA) of knee muscle groups of subjects were tested before and after training.
                Both training groups showed marked decreases (P <.001) in pain scores and increases (P <.001) in functional capacity together with increases (P <.05--.01) in peak torque and CSA of knee muscles. However, the NONTX group did not display these marked changes after the 8-week period. The results also indicated that concentric-eccentric training has a greater influence on functional capacity, especially stair climbing and descending, than that of concentric training when compared with NONTX group; however, the improvements in pain measurements were better in the CON group compared with the CON-ECC group after the training.
                The results suggest that with the isokinetic resistance training used in this study, it is possible to improve functional capacity and decrease pain in patients with OA of the knee. The results also showed that extensive training involving a high number of repetitions and eccentric contractions was safe, effective, and well tolerated for the patients with knee OA.
                Copyright 2002 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
There is some evidence to support the use of IA steroid injections and resting a knee following injections but that wrists should not be rested following injections. The included studies involved adult participants so any conclusions can only cautiously applied to children. Further research is required to examine the use and type of rest and the differential responses of different joints following injections.