A randomised dose finding study of oral tacrolimus (FK506) therapy in refractory ulcerative colitis. Topical treatment with 5-aminosalicylic in distal ulcerative colitis by using a new suppository preparation. A double-blind placebo controlled trial. Infliximab for acute, not steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis: a randomized pilot study. Clinical trial: ulcerative colitis maintenance treatment with 5-ASA: a 1-year, randomized multicentre study comparing MMX with Asacol. 5-Aminosalicylic acid enemas in refractory distal ulcerative colitis: a randomized, controlled trial. 5-Aminosalicylic acid enema in the treatment of distal ulcerative colitis, proctosigmoiditis, and proctitis. Clinical trial: randomized-controlled clinical study comparing the efficacy and safety of a low-volume vs. a high-volume mesalazine foam in active distal ulcerative colitis. Interferon-beta-1a for the treatment of steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. 5-Aminosalicylic acid suppositories in the maintenance of remission in idiopathic proctitis or proctosigmoiditis: a double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial.
Immunosuppressive therapy with intravenous ciclosporin is an alternative treatment option to total colectomy for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), while the benefits of oral administration of tacrolimus are not well defined and are based on reports of several uncontrolled studies.
                Patients with refractory active UC were randomly assigned to a high trough concentration (10-15 ng/ml) group (HT group) (n = 21), low trough concentration (5-10 ng/ml) group (LT group) (n = 22), or placebo group (n = 20). Patients received an initial oral dose of 0.025 [DOSAGE ERROR CORRECTED] mg/kg tacrolimus or placebo twice daily. Efficacy was evaluated in 60 patients based on a disease activity index (DAI) score. Fifty eight patients had additional treatment with tacrolimus and were evaluated for efficacy in a 10 week open label extension.
                An improvement in DAI score (>or=4 points, all categories improved) was observed for 68.4% of cases in the HT group compared with 10.0% in the placebo group (p<0.001). In the HT group, 20.0% of patients had clinical remission and 78.9% had mucosal healing. In the open label extension, 55.2% of all patients had an improved DAI score at week 10. Mean dose of prednisolone was reduced from 19.7 mg/day at study entry to 7.8 mg/day at week 10. The incidence of side effects in the HT group was significantly higher than that of the placebo group (p = 0.043). The most common event was mild finger tremor.
                Our findings demonstrate dose dependent efficacy and safety of oral tacrolimus for remission-induction therapy of refractory UC. The optimal target range appears to be 10-15 ng/ml in terms of efficacy with two week therapy. Sixty-two patients with ulcerative colitis localised to the distal sigmoid colon and rectum (less than 20 cm) entered the trial. Thirty-two were treated with 5-ASA 500 mg suppositories (Asacol) 3 times a day for 1 month while 30 received a placebo given in the same regime. Clinical, sigmoidoscopic and histological assessment was carried out before, after 15 days and after 1 month of treatment. At the end of the study 5-ASA suppositories showed significantly better results in all the parameters recorded than placebo (p less than 0.01). There were no unwanted effects related to the use of suppositories. This treatment should therefore be offered as a first choice for patients with distal rectosigmoiditis. Therapeutic alternatives for patients with acute ulcerative colitis in whom steroids would usually be contraindicated are rare. The antibody to tumor necrosis factor alpha, infliximab, has shown to be effective in the treatment of steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis in pilot studies. We therefore evaluated whether infliximab can achieve remission in patients with acute ulcerative pancolitis who were not steroid-refractory.
                Patients were eligible if they had acute disease with a modified Truelove and Witts activity score of more than 10 for at least 2 weeks and if they were currently not receiving immunomodulators or more than 10 mg/day prednisolone. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either three intravenous infusions of infliximab at 5 mg/kg (group A) or high-dose prednisolone (1.5 mg/kg body weight) daily for 2 weeks, followed by 1 mg/kg for 1 week, followed by a weekly reduction of 5 mg (group B). Therapy success was defined as clinical response in terms of a decrease of more than 5 points from the baseline score and to less than 10 points total after 3 weeks as well as after 13 weeks.
                Thirteen patients (seven women, six men) were randomized (six for group A and seven for group B). The median baseline activity scores were 13.5 (12-18) in group A and 14.0 (11-18) in group B. Five of six patients in group A and six of seven patients in group B showed therapy success after 3 weeks as well as after 13 weeks.
                Infliximab could be effective in the treatment of acute moderate or severe ulcerative colitis. The obtained data call for larger controlled trials. 5-ASA-MMX (1.2 g/tablet) is a 5-aminosalicylic acid formulation, designed for once-daily dosing in the treatment of ulcerative colitis.
                To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 5-ASA-MMX (2.4 g/day, once daily), compared with Asacol (2.4 g/day, twice daily) in the maintenance of left-sided UC, through a double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, randomized, comparator study.
                In all, 331 patients with UC were randomized to receive either 5-ASA-MMX 2.4 g/day, once daily, or Asacol 2.4 g/day, twice daily, for 12 months. All patients were in remission for >or=1 month prior to the trial, with >or=1 documented relapse in the previous year. The co-primary endpoints of this study were the proportion of patients in clinical, and clinical and endoscopic remission following 12 months' treatment.
                In the intent-to-treat population, excluding those with major protocol deviations, 68.0 and 65.9% patients in the 5-ASA-MMX and Asacol groups, respectively, were in clinical remission (P = 0.69), and 60.9 and 61.7% of patients, respectively, were in clinical and endoscopic remission (P = 0.89). Diary card data revealed statistically significant treatment differences favouring 5-ASA-MMX. Both treatments were similarly tolerated.
                Once-daily 5-ASA-MMX is similarly effective with a comparable safety profile to Asacol administered twice daily, for the maintenance treatment of ulcerative colitis. 5-Aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA), the presumed active moiety of sulfasalazine, has shown clinical efficacy when administered per rectum as initial therapy to patients with distal ulcerative colitis. We report the results of a randomized double-blind trial comparing nightly retention of a 4-g 5-ASA enema with continued administration of hydrocortisone enemas in 18 patients with persistent active distal ulcerative colitis after at least a 3-wk course of treatment with 100-mg hydrocortisone enemas with or without oral sulfasalazine. Continuation of hydrocortisone enemas rather than placebo was used in the control group to reflect the realistic alternative therapy likely to be employed in current practice. Response to therapy was assessed after 3 wk by comparing pretreatment and posttreatment point scores of clinical, sigmoidoscopic, and histological severity. Improvement in clinical score was achieved in seven of nine 5-ASA enema-treated patients versus one of nine hydrocortisone enema-treated patients (p less than 0.05). Sigmoidoscopic and histological improvement generally paralleled clinical improvement. We conclude that in patients with distal ulcerative colitis unresponsive to standard therapy, treatment with 5-ASA enemas results in significant short-term clinical and sigmoidoscopic improvement in a majority of cases. Moreover, a significantly greater number of refractory patients improve when switched to 5-ASA enemas than when continued on standard therapy. The efficacy and safety of 4-g 5-aminosalicylic acid enemas were assessed in 153 patients with ulcerative colitis involving up to 50 cm of distal colon. Seventy-six patients received active medication and 77 received a placebo. There were 20 dropouts (6 in the active group and 14 in the placebo group) during the study because of insufficient efficacy. After 6 wk of therapy, 48 of the 76 patients (63%) receiving 5-aminosalicylic acid were considered to be "much improved" by the study physician compared to 22 of the 77 patients (29%) on placebo (p = 0.001). A disease activity index based on patient symptoms and sigmoidoscopic appearance was used to assess efficacy. Mean disease activity index declined 55% for patients on 5-aminosalicylic acid and 24% for patients on placebo (p = 0.0001). Analysis of subgroups indicated that patients most likely to respond were those with disease confined to the 20-40 cm from the anus. Response was not affected by concurrent sulfasalazine, but patients requiring concurrent oral steroids had a diminished response. Rapid onset of efficacy was shown by a significant reduction in rectal bleeding within 3 days of treatment initiation. 5-Aminosalicylic acid enemas are well tolerated and are of benefit in the treatment of ulcerative colitis confined to the distal colon. Rectally administered mesalazine (mesalamine; 5-aminosalicylic acid) is the first-line therapy for treatment of distal ulcerative colitis. Recently, a high-volume 5-aminosalicylic acid foam has been shown to be as effective and safe as standard 5-aminosalicylic acid enema.
                To study the efficacy and safety of a low-volume vs. a high-volume 5-aminosalicylic acid foam.
                In this investigator-blinded study, patients with active distal ulcerative colitis [Clinical Activity Index (CAI) > 4, Endoscopic Index > or = 4] were randomized to receive 2 x 1 g/30 mL low-volume (n = 163) or 2 x 1 g/60 mL high-volume 5-aminosalicylic acid foam (n = 167) for 42 days. Primary end point was clinical remission (CAI < or = 4) at the final/withdrawal visit (per-protocol).
                330 patients were evaluable for efficacy and safety by intention-to-treat, 290 for per-protocol analysis. Clinical remission rates at week 6 (per-protocol) were 77% on low-volume foam vs. 77% on high-volume foam (P = 0.00002 for non-inferiority). The low-volume foam was associated with a lower frequency of severe discomfort, pain and retention problems.
                Low-volume 5-aminosalicylic acid foam is as effective and safe as a high-volume 5-aminosalicylic acid foam in the treatment of active distal ulcerative colitis, but offers compliance advantages compared to the high-volume preparation. We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of recombinant interferon-beta-1a (rIFN-beta-1a) in outpatients with active steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis.
                Ninety-one randomized patients subcutaneously received 3 MIU rIFN-beta-1a (group A, n = 32), 1 MIU rIFN-beta-1a (group B, n = 30), or placebo (group C, n = 29) 3 times a week over a period of 8 weeks in addition to standard therapy. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of treatment. Results: In all 3 groups, the median prestudy clinical activity index (CAI) was 10. In 18 of 32 patients (56%) in group A, in 11 of 30 patients (36%) in group B, and in 10 of 29 patients (34%) in group C, a reduction of the CAI of 6 points or greater (response) was achieved (differences were not statistically significant). Complete response (reduction of CAI to < or =4) was achieved in 56%, 30%, and 38% of patients in groups A, B, and C, respectively. Compared with baseline, the median endoscopic index had been reduced by 5, 3, and 4 points in groups A, B, and C, respectively. Steroid reduction was 12 mg in group A, 6 mg in group B, and 10 mg in group C. Identical side effects occurred in all 3 groups. Seven serious adverse events were reported (1 in group A and 6 in group C). All were unrelated to therapy as judged by the investigating physicians.
                rIFN-beta-1a was safe but not significant, at the dosage and/or duration of treatment used, in steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis. Further studies are indicated. Thirty patients with distal ulcerative colitis in remission (17 proctitis, 13 proctosigmoiditis) were randomly given either 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) or placebo suppositories, 400 mg bid. During the 1-yr follow-up, patients were assessed clinically every month, and flexible sigmoidoscopy with a rectal pinch biopsy specimen and laboratory data were carried out every 3 months. Two patients in the 5-ASA group chose to withdraw from the study, one relapsed, and 12 remained in remission. In the placebo group, one patient chose to withdraw, 11 relapsed, and three remained in remission. The cumulative remission rate at the 12th month was 92% in the 5-ASA group and 21% in the placebo group. Log rank test showed a significant difference in the relapse rate between the two groups (chi 2 = 14.26, p less than 0.001). No side effects were observed. We conclude that 5-ASA in suppository form (800 mg/day), administered for 1 yr, is safe and effective in maintaining remission of distal ulcerative colitis.
Tacrolimus may be effective for short-term clinical improvement in patients with refractory ulcerative colitis. However, these results should be interpreted with caution due to the small number of patients enrolled in the trial and other study limitations. Insufficient treatment and follow-up intervals prevent any conclusions with regard to long term safety and efficacy. The use of tacrolimus in the clinical setting requires careful consideration of risks versus benefits as well as close monitoring for adverse events. More data from well designed and controlled studies are needed to determine the long-term efficacy and safety of tacrolimus.