[Clinical effects of naloxone on hemorrhagic shock]. Naloxone fails to reverse blood pressure in shock: a double blind study in man. Naloxone and methylprednisolone sodium succinate enhance sympathomedullary discharge in patients with septic shock. Prospective, controlled, randomized trial of naloxone infusion in early hyperdynamic septic shock. Effects of prolonged naloxone infusion in septic shock. Norepinephrine or dopamine for the treatment of hyperdynamic septic shock? Terlipressin or norepinephrine in hyperdynamic septic shock: a prospective, randomized study. Effects of naloxone on pethidine-induced neonatal depression. Part II--Intramuscular naloxone. Use of nalotone to to reverse narcotic respiratory depression in the newborn infant.
In order to study the clinical effects of naloxone on hemorrhagic shock, 21 patients with moderate hemorrhagic shock were randomly divided into two groups. The naloxone group (NLX group) was infused normal saline (200ml) and naloxone (0.02mg/kg) via central vein while the control group was infused normal saline (200ml) only. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), central vein pressure (CVP), cardiac output (CO), cardiac index (CI), peripheral vascular resistance (PVR), levels of lactic acid in both artery and vein, and levels of catecholamine in artery were measured before and after the administration of naloxone or normal saline. The results showed that naloxone significantly increased blood level of catecholamine and MAP (P < 0.01), the effects sustained for more than 15 minutes with an increased PVR (P < 0.05). After infustion of normal saline, blood level of lactic acid in artery and vein decreased slightly (P > 0.05), yet comparatively lower in artery. On the contrary, after administration of naloxone, the blood level of lactic acid markedly decreased in both artery and vein (P < 0.01), but higher in artery. It is suggested that naloxone improve tissue oxygen supply temporarily with enhancement of tissue lactic acid metabolism. nan Naloxone and methylprednisolone sodium succinate (MPSS) may act in synergy to improve hemodynamics in patients with septic shock by enhancement of sympathomedullary discharge. This randomized double-blind study describes the effect of various dosing regimens of naloxone and MPSS upon hemodynamics and plasma catecholamines in patients with septic shock (n = 57). Consecutive bolus doses of naloxone were given 30 minutes apart (10 micrograms/kg;-100 micrograms/kg) and a single dose of MPSS (30 mg/kg); bolus doses of 5% dextrose in water solution plus single dose of MPSS as above; bolus dose of naloxone (30 micrograms/kg) followed by continuous infusion (30 micrograms/kg/hr for 1 hour) with single dose of MPSS as above; a bolus and continuous infusion of naloxone as above without MPSS; MPSS alone and standard therapy alone. In patients treated with bolus doses of naloxone in combination with MPSS, plasma levels of epinephrine and norepinephrine were increased approximately five-to tenfold. In patients treated with bolus plus continuous infusion of naloxone given with or without MPSS, only plasma epinephrine levels were increased. Systolic blood pressure and left ventricular stroke work index were improved within 15 minutes in groups which received naloxone and corticosteroids regardless of dose. In those groups, there were no changes in heart rate or filling pressure. Systemic vascular resistance improved significantly only in the group which received low dose bolus and continuous infusion of naloxone and MPSS. Naloxone and MPSS quickly improved cardiac function in patients with septic shock by enhanced sympathomedullary discharge and may be useful as an adjunct in the therapy of this disorder. To determine whether naloxone infusion is efficacious in severe hyperdynamic septic shock, we conducted a prospective study of 22 patients randomly assigned to a naloxone or placebo group. Patients were treated 12 +/- 2 h (SEM) after the onset of shock, with a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 63 +/- 3 mm Hg. All patients had clinical evidence of an infectious process and required dopamine 20 +/- 2 micrograms/kg.min. Five (46%) of 11 patients in the naloxone group and one (9%) of the other 11 patients in the placebo group responded clinically. The MAP among the five responders increased from 62 +/- 5 to 89 +/- 4 mm Hg within 20 min of naloxone treatment (p less than .01). This favorable hemodynamic response was sustained throughout the patients' clinical course. In contrast, the MAP did not change significantly in the nonresponders who received naloxone, nor did it change in the placebo group. More patients in the naloxone group than in the placebo group received steroids concurrently. Survival rate was 100% in those who responded to naloxone clinically. However, overall survival rate in each group was essentially the same. No adverse effects were observed, except for mild agitation in some of the patients receiving naloxone. We conclude that naloxone infusion is clinically efficacious in improving the hemodynamic profile of a subgroup of patients with severe early hyperdynamic septic shock, but does not appear to improve the overall survival rate. Fourteen patients suffering sixteen episodes of septic shock requiring inotrope and/or vasopressor support were randomised to receive a 30 micrograms/kg naloxone intravenous bolus followed by a 30 micrograms/kg/h infusion or an equivalent volume placebo bolus and infusion for 8-16 h in a double-blind study. pH and pulmonary wedge pressure were kept constant, and inotrope and/or vasopressor were titrated to maintain a preselected mean blood pressure. Inotrope/vasopressor requirements in the naloxone-treated group were significantly lower than those in the control group at 8 h (eight patients in each group, p less than 0.005) and at 16 h (five patients in each group, p less than 0.02). Late but significant improvements in stroke volume (p less than 0.02) and heart rate (p less than 0.05) were also noted in the eight naloxone-treated patients. To compare the ability of dopamine and norepinephrine to reverse hemodynamic and metabolic abnormalities of human hyperdynamic septic shock.
                Prospective, double-blind, randomized trial.
                An ICU in a university hospital.
                Adult patients with hyperdynamic septic shock after fluid resuscitation.
                Patients were assigned to receive either dopamine (2.5 to 25 micrograms/kg/min) or norepinephrine (0.5 to 5.0 micrograms/kg/min). If hemodynamic and metabolic abnormalities were not corrected with the maximum dose of one drug, the other was added.
                The aim of therapy was to achieve and maintain for at least 6 h all of the following: (1) systemic vascular resistance index > 1,100 dynes.s/cm5.m2 and/or mean systemic blood pressure > or = 80 mm Hg; (2) cardiac index > or = 4.0 L/min/m2; (3) oxygen delivery > 550 ml/min/m2; and (4) oxygen uptake > 150 ml/min/m2. With the use of dopamine 10 to 25 micrograms/kg/min, 5 of 16 patients (31 percent) were successfully treated, as compared with 15 of 16 patients (93 percent) by norepinephrine at a dose of 1.5 +/- 1.2 micrograms/kg/min (p < 0.001). Ten of 11 patients who did not respond to dopamine and remained hypotensive and oliguric were successfully treated with the addition of norepinephrine.
                At the doses tested, norepinephrine was found, in the present study, to be more effective and reliable than dopamine to reverse the abnormalities of hyperdynamic septic shock. In the great majority of the study patients, norepinephrine was able to increase mean perfusing pressure without apparent adverse effect on peripheral blood flow or on renal blood flow (since urine flow was reestablished). At the same time, oxygen uptake was increased. To compare, in patients with hyperdynamic septic shock, the effects of norepinephrine or terlipressin on hemodynamic variables and renal function.
                Prospective, randomized, open-label study.
                Intensive care unit of a university, tertiary, and referral center.
                Twenty adult patients with hyperdynamic septic shock, after fluid resuscitation.
                Patients were randomized to receive norepinephrine or terlipressin. Global hemodynamic variables, oxygen consumption, urine flow, creatinine clearance, and arterial blood lactate levels were measured.
                Mean arterial pressure, systemic vascular resistance, pulmonary vascular resistance, and left and right ventricular stroke work were significantly increased with both drugs. With terlipressin, but not with norepinephrine, a significant decrease in heart rate (from 113 +/- 17 to 104 +/- 11 beats.min(-1), p < .01) and cardiac index (from 5.1 +/- 1.7 to 4.2 +/- 1.6 L.min(-1).m(-2)) was observed, with no change in stroke volume. Oxygen delivery index (from 784 +/- 131 to 701 +/- 92 mL.min(-1).m(-2)) and consumption index (from 244 +/- 69 to 210 +/- 54 mL.min(-1).m(-2)) were significantly decreased with terlipressin, but not with norepinephrine. Blood lactate concentrations were significantly decreased with both drugs. Urine flow and creatinine clearance were increased with both drugs.
                In patients with hyperdynamic septic shock, both norepinephrine and terlipressin were effective to raise mean arterial blood pressure. With terlipressin, but not norepinephrine, the improvement in blood pressure was achieved at the expense of cardiac index and oxygen consumption, which were significantly decreased. Renal function was improved with both drugs. In further studies, alternative strategies to maintain cardiac index should be explored, such as a synergy between low-dose terlipressin and dobutamine. Thirty full-term infants whose mothers had had pethidine during labour were given either naloxone 200 microgram or normal saline intramuscularly. The drugs were chosen blindly and administered within one minute of birth. Naloxone produced a significant reduction in mean alveolar carbon dioxide tension and an increase in carbon dioxide excretion and mean alveolar ventilation at all times up to 48 hours after birth. The mean rate of habituation to a repeated auditory stimulus, the mean sucking frequency, the sucking pressure, and the mean consumption of milk were all significantly higher in the naloxone-treated group than in the placebo-treated group up to 48 hours after birth. Intramuscular naxolone therefore seemed to reverse the undesirable effects of pethidine. Twenty neonates whose mothers had received meperidine (1.0 to 1.5 mg/kg) intravenously within three hours of delivery were studied to determine the effectiveness of naloxone in reversing neonatal respiratory depression. The following measurements were carried out within 20 to 30 minutes after delivery: minute ventilation, end tidal CO2, and ventilatory response to CO2. These determinations were repeated after administration of either placebo or naloxone, 0.01 mg/kg intramuscularly. Minute ventilation and PAco were within a normal range before medication in both groups, but the slope of the CO2 response curve was decreased, indicating mild-to-moderate respiratory depression. After administration of placebo the test results did not change significantly. After administration of naloxone, VE increased significantly (P less than 0.05) and the slope of the CO2 response curve doubled (P less than 0.001). Naloxone effectively reverses narcotic depression of the respiratory center in the newborn infant.
Naloxone improves blood pressure, especially mean arterial blood pressure. However, the clinical usefulness of naloxone to treat shock remains to be determined and additional randomized controlled trials are needed to assess its usefulness.