Early versus delayed surfactant administration in extremely premature neonates with respiratory distress syndrome ventilated by high-frequency oscillatory ventilation. Comparative efficacy of exosurf and survanta surfactants on early clinical course of respiratory distress syndrome and complications of prematurity. Use of surfactant for prophylaxis versus rescue treatment of respiratory distress syndrome: experience from an Italian-Bulgarian trial. Early surfactant for neonates with mild to moderate respiratory distress syndrome: a multicenter, randomized trial. Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of human surfactant given at birth versus rescue administration in very low birth weight infants with lung immaturity. Prophylactic administration of calf lung surfactant extract is more effective than early treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in neonates of 29 through 32 weeks' gestation. A multicenter randomized, masked comparison trial of natural versus synthetic surfactant for the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome. A multicenter randomized masked comparison trial of synthetic surfactant versus calf lung surfactant extract in the prevention of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Exogenous surfactant for treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in premature infants.
To determine whether early surfactant administration is superior to selective delayed treatment in terms of improving survival and/or reducing chronic lung disease in extremely premature neonates with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) treated by high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV).
                Prospective randomized clinical trial.
                Tertiary neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in the Perinatology Center of Prague.
                Forty-three extremely premature infants who needed artificial ventilation within 3 h after delivery.
                Patients were randomly assigned to either early ( n=21) or delayed (n=22) administration of surfactant. All were ventilated by HFOV as the primary mode of ventilation using the high volume strategy aimed at optimizing lung volume. Curosurf at a dose of 100 mg/kg was given as a single bolus via the endotracheal tube within 1 min immediately after intubation in the early group (EARL), or during HFOV only when defined criteria were reached in the delayed (DEL) group.
                No differences were noted in demographic data between the two groups. Fewer infants randomized to the EARL group required oxygen use or died at 36 weeks (combined outcome 29% vs 64%, p=0.021), and there was a lower incidence of any intraventricular hemorrhage in this group (43 vs 82%, p=0.008).
                When compared to delayed dosing, early administration of surfactant followed by HFOV facilitates and accelerates respiratory stabilization during the acute phase of severe RDS, may reduce the incidence of chronic lung disease or death and may positively influence the incidence of severe intracranial pathology in extremely premature infants with primary surfactant insufficiency. To determine the comparative efficacy of Exosurf Neonatal and Survanta surfactants on the early course of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), arterial blood gases, ventilatory support, outcome morbidity rate, and complications of prematurity and RDS.
                Medical records from 203 premature newborn infants undergoing mechanical ventilation for respiratory distress syndrome, and who received up to four rescue doses of either Exosurf or Survanta, were retrospectively reviewed.
                All groups were comparable for birth weight and gestational age. Although the two randomized groups were similar in severity of RDS based on fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) and ventilatory support, a significantly greater improvement in respiratory function as evidenced by FIO2, mean airway pressure, alveolar-arterial partial pressure of oxygen difference, and oxygen index, was observed in the Survanta group from 12 hours (p < 0.05) through 48 hours (p < 0.01). Comparison of outcome morbidity rate by gestational age showed a higher occurrence of retinopathy of prematurity (p < 0.02) among the older infants (28 to 32 weeks) who were treated with Exosurf.
                Survanta exerted a significantly faster response in the early clinical course of RDS compared with Exosurf. However, no difference in the impact on eventual respiratory outcome was observed. We therefore conclude that both surfactants are effective for the treatment of RDS. To show if surfactant applied in different social-sanitary realities as prophylaxis of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is equally useful and able to reduce mortality and incidence of 3-4 radiological grade RDS.
                Two neonatal intensive care units (NICU) in Italy, one NICU in Bulgaria and one NICU in Romania were involved in a randomized controlled clinical trial of prophylaxis vs rescue treatment of RDS. Babies with gestational age 26-30 wks were randomized before birth to prophylaxis in the delivery-room with 200 mg/kg of porcine surfactant (prophylaxis) or to routine assistance (control). Subsequently the babies developing RDS requiring mechanical ventilation and fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) > or = 0.4 to maintain PaO2 about 50 mmHg were allowed to be treated rescue with 200 mg/kg of the same surfactant. To reach end-points of reducing mortality by 40% and incidence of radiological grade 3-4 RDS a total number of 174 patients were required.
                Due to logistic, practical and social-political problems the study was interrupted after enrollment of 93 babies (61 in Italy and 32 in Bulgaria). The Romanian centre did not start the study because it was impossible in the scheduled times to equip it for mechanical ventilation of the newborn infants. Analysis done on an intention to treat basis did not show significant reductions of mortality and 3-4 radiological grade RDS, even if there was a trend towards a reduction in the babies given prophylaxis. A significantly lower number of babies given prophylaxis required a subsequent rescue treatment compared to controls (p < 0.001). There was no difference in other complications such as intraventricular haemorrhage, air-leak syndromes and infections between prophylaxis and control infants. As regards pulmonary gas exchange, the PaO2/FiO2 ratio was significantly improved in the babies given prophylaxis for the first 12 hours of life vs the controls.
                Even if the study was terminated before term, the analysis of the data shows that prophylaxis with surfactant is equally effective in different social-clinical conditions to improve pulmonary gas-exchange, especially in the first critical hours of life of premature babies. We studied the efficacy and safety of electively providing surfactant to preterm infants with mild to moderate respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) not requiring mechanical ventilation.
                A 5-center, randomized clinical trial was performed on 132 infants with RDS, birth weight >or=1250 grams, gestational age <or=36 weeks, postnatal age 4 to 24 hours, Fio(2) >or=40% for >or=1 hour, and no immediate need for intubation. Infants were randomly assigned to intubation, surfactant (Survanta, Ross Laboratories, Columbus, Ohio) administration, and expedited extubation (n=65) or expectant management (n=67) with subsequent intubation and surfactant treatment as clinically indicated. The primary outcome was duration of mechanical ventilation.
                Infants in the surfactant group had a median duration of mechanical ventilation of 2.2 hours compared with 0.0 hours for control infants, since only 29 of 67 control infants required mechanical ventilation (P=.001). Surfactant-treated infants were less likely to require subsequent mechanical ventilation for worsening respiratory disease (26% vs 43%, relative risk=0.60; 95% CI, 0.37, 0.99). There were no differences in secondary outcomes (duration of nasal continuous positive airway pressure, oxygen therapy, hospital stay, or adverse outcomes).
                Routine elective intubation for administration of surfactant to preterm infants >or=1250 grams with mild to moderate RDS is not recommended. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of human surfactant given intratracheally at birth (prophylactic) versus rescue administration after the onset of severe respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) was conducted among preterm infants born at 24 to 29 weeks of gestation. Singleton fetuses were randomly assigned to receive (1) placebo (air), (2) prophylactic surfactant treatment, or (3) rescue surfactant treatment; infants of multiple births received either (1) prophylactic or (2) rescue treatment. Of 282 potentially eligible fetuses, 246 infants received treatments at birth and 200 infants had RDS. Outcomes are presented both as an intention-to-treat analysis (including infants who met exclusion criteria at or after birth) and as a full treatment protocol analysis for those infants with RDS and likely to benefit from surfactant. Preterm infants (mean 1.0 kg birth weight, 27 to 28 weeks of gestational age) randomly assigned to receive prophylactic treatment received surfactant soon after birth; those assigned to receive rescue surfactant had instillation at a mean age of 220 minutes if the lecithin-sphingomyelin ratio was less than or equal to 2.0 and no phosphatidylglycerol was detected in either amniotic fluid or initial airway aspirate, oxygen requirements were a fraction of inspired oxygen of greater than 0.5, and mean airway pressure was greater than or equal to 7 cm H2O from 2 to 12 hours after birth. Up to four treatment doses (or air) were permitted within 48 hours; approximately 60% of surfactant-treated infants required two or more doses. Surfactant-treated infants had significantly less pulmonary interstitial emphysema than placebo-treated infants (p = 0.02), but there were no other significant differences in mortality rates or morbidity. Indexes of oxygenation and ventilation were improved in surfactant recipients during the first 24 hours. An intention-to-treat analysis found no significant differences between infants given placebo and surfactant-treated infants or between prophylactic- and rescue-treated infants; an improved total mortality rate (p = 0.002) was found among surfactant-treated infants in Helsinki but not in San Diego. Among infants with RDS, the total mortality rate was significantly improved (p = 0.004) with surfactant treatment but not the proportion alive and without bronchopulmonary dysplasia at 28 days (p = 0.052), or the proportion alive and without bronchopulmonary dysplasia at 38 weeks of postconceptional age (p = 0.18) to adjust for differences in prematurity. Deaths caused by RDS or bronchopulmonary dysplasia were significantly reduced among surfactant recipients (p = 0.0001). Neither among singletons nor among multiple-birth infants was there a selective advantage to prophylactic versus rescue treatment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS) Although numerous trials have demonstrated the efficacy of exogenous surfactant for prophylaxis or treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), optimum timing of administration remains controversial. One previous study showed that administration of calf lung surfactant extract immediately following birth, to neonates born before 30 weeks postconceptional age, was preferable to delaying administration until after development of RDS. The current study was designed to test a similar hypothesis for babies born between 29 and 32 weeks gestational age.
                One thousand three hundred ninety-eight neonates with obstetric estimates of 29 through 32 weeks' gestation were randomized to receive CLSE at birth or to wait until development of mild RDS. After exclusions for malformations and other factors, data from 1248 were analyzed.
                Prophylaxis was associated with less development of moderate RDS (7% vs 12%), less need for retreatment (5% vs 9%), less need for mechanical ventilation or supplemental oxygen during the first 4 days, and fewer deaths or less requirement for supplemental oxygen at 28 days (5% vs 9%). Although 1-minute Apgar scores were significantly lower in the prophylaxis group, the difference disappeared by the 5-minute score and there was no difference in the incidence of asphyxia-related complications. Sixty percent of the neonates assigned to early treatment received endotracheal intubation and 43% received calf lung surfactant extract at a median age of 1.5 hours. When data were analyzed by gestational age and birth weight subgroups, most of the differences could be attributable to babies born at 30 weeks or less or weighing less than 1500 g, probably because of the higher incidence of surfactant deficiency in this more immature subgroup. To compare the efficacy and safety of two surfactant preparations in the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS).
                We conducted a randomized, masked comparison trial at 21 centers. Infants with RDS who were undergoing mechanical ventilation were eligible for treatment with two doses of either a synthetic (Exosurf) or natural (Infasurf) surfactant if the ratio of arterial to alveolar partial pressure of oxygen was less than or equal to 0.22. Crossover treatment was allowed within 96 hours of age if severe respiratory failure (defined as two consecutive arterial/alveolar oxygen tension ratios < or = 0.10) persisted after two doses of the randomly assigned surfactant. Four primary outcome measures of efficacy (the incidence of pulmonary air leak (< or = 7 days); the severity of RDS; the incidence of death from RDS; and the incidence of survival without bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at 28 days after birth) were compared by means of linear regression techniques.
                The primary analysis of efficacy was performed in 1033 eligible infants and an analysis of safety outcomes in the 1126 infants who received study surfactant. Preentry demographic characteristics and respiratory status were similar for the two treatment groups, except for a small but significant difference in mean gestational age (0.5 week) that favored the infasurf treatment group. Pulmonary air leak (< or = 7 days) occurred in 21% of Exosurf- and 11% of infasurf-treated infants (adjusted relative risk, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.40 to 0.71; p < or = 0.0001). During the 72 hours after the initial surfactant treatment, the average fraction of inspired oxygen (+/-SEM) was 0.47 +/- 0.01 for Exosurf- and 0.39 +/- 0.01 for infasurf-treated infants (difference, 0.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.06 to 0.10; p < 0.0001); the average mean airway pressure (+/-SEM) was 8.6 +/- 0.1 cm H2O; for Exosurf- and 7.2 +/- 0.1 cm H2O for Infasurf-treated infants (difference, 1.4 cm H2O; 95% confidence interval, 1.0 to 1.8 cm H2O; p < 0.0001). The incidences of RDS-related death, total respiratory death, death to discharge, and survival without bronchopulmonary dysplasia at 28 days after birth did not differ. The number of days of more than 30% inspired oxygen and of assisted ventilation, but not the duration of hospitalization, were significantly lower in Infasurf-treated infants.
                Compared with Exosurf, Infasurf provided more effective therapy for RDS as assessed by significant reductions in the severity of respiratory disease and in the incidence of air leak complications. To compare the efficacy and safety of a synthetic surfactant (Exosurf Neonatal, Burroughs Wellcome Co) and a surfactant extract of calf lung lavage (Infasurf, IND #27,169, ONY, Inc) in the prevention of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS).
                Ten-center randomized masked comparison trial.
                Premature infants (n = 871) <29 weeks gestational age by best obstetric estimate.
                Infants were randomly assigned to a course of treatment with Exosurf Neonatal (n = 438) or Infasurf (n = 433) at birth, and if still intubated, at 12 and 24 hours of age. Crossover treatment was allowed within 72 hours of age if severe respiratory failure (defined as two consecutive a/A PO2 ratios </=.10) persisted after three doses of the randomized surfactant. Primary
                Three primary outcome measures of efficacy [the incidence of RDS; the incidence of RDS death; and the incidence of survival without bronchopulmonary dysplasia at 28 days after birth] were compared using linear regression techniques.
                Of 871 randomized infants, 18 infants did not receive treatment with a study surfactant, and 25 infants did not meet all eligibility criteria. The primary analysis of efficacy was performed in the 846 eligible infants and analysis of safety outcomes in the 853 infants who received study surfactant. Demographic characteristics did not differ between the two treatment groups. Compared with Exosurf, Infasurf treatment resulted in a 62% decrease in the incidence of RDS (Infasurf, 16% vs Exosurf, 42%) and a 70% decrease in RDS death (Infasurf, 1.7% vs Exosurf, 5.4%) but did not increase the incidence of survival without bronchopulmonary dysplasia at 28 days. Treatment with Infasurf resulted in significant improvement in several secondary outcome measures. Infasurf-treated infants had lower average FIO2 (Infasurf, .33 [SEM] vs Exosurf, .42; difference .08; 95% confidence interval [CI], .06 to .11) and average mean airway pressure (Infasurf, 6.0 cm H2O vs Exosurf, 7.1 cm H2O; difference 1.1 cm H2O; 95% CI, .7 to 1.6 cm H2O) for the first 72 hours of life. Crossover surfactant treatment was significantly less frequent in the Infasurf compared with the Exosurf group (Infasurf, 1% vs Exosurf, 6%). Complications (bradycardia, clinical airway obstruction, and transcutaneous arterial desaturation) associated with second and third, but not initial, surfactant treatments were observed more frequently in the Infasurf treatment group. Infasurf-treated infants had significantly less air leak (</=7 days) (Infasurf, 8% vs Exosurf, 14%; adjusted relative risk [ARR] .55; 95% CI, .37 to .81). Severe intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) (grade 3 and 4) did not differ between the two groups (Infasurf, 11.8% vs Exosurf, 8.3%; ARR 1.41; 95% CI, .94 to 2.09) but total IVH occurred more frequently in Infasurf-treated infants (Infasurf, 39.0% vs Exosurf, 29.9%; ARR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.57).
                Significant reductions in the incidence of RDS, the severity of early respiratory disease, the incidence of pulmonary air leaks associated with RDS, and the mortality attributable to RDS suggest that Infasurf is a more effective surfactant preparation than Exosurf Neonatal in the prophylaxis of RDS. However, Infasurf prophylaxis as used in this study was also associated with a greater risk of total but not severe IVH. A prospective, randomized and controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of surfactant in the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in infants. Eighteen premature infants with RDS were studied. Group I consisted of 9 premature infants with a mean birth weight of 1,455 +/- 265.9 g and a mean gestational age of 31.4 +/- 1.3 weeks. Group II consisted of 9 premature infants with a mean birth weight of 1,411 +/- 379.0 g and a mean gestational age of 30.6 +/- 1.7 weeks. Reconstituted bovine surfactant (Surfactant TA, Tokyo Tanabe Co., Japan), 120 mg/kg body weight was suspended in 4 ml normal saline and delivered to the lungs of the patients in group I through an endotracheal tube via a catheter in five divided doses (mean age at this point was 5.7 +/- 4.5 hours). An air placebo (4 ml per kilogram) was given to the patients in group II. The results showed that significant improvement in oxygenation, characterized by (1) an increase in the ratio of arterial to alveolar oxygen tension; (2) a decrease in the fractional inspiratory oxygen concentration; and (3) changes in mean airway pressure and ventilatory index, were noted in the surfactant-treated group. Pneumothorax was found in one surfactant-treated infant and one control infant. Pulmonary interstitial emphysema was found in one control infant. One control infant later developed bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Four (44.4%) of the surfactant-treated infants and four (44.4%) of the control infants had evidence of patient ductus arteriosus. The mean duration from birth to extubation in the surfactant-treated infants was 121.9 +/- 1.9 hours.
Early selective surfactant administration given to infants with RDS requiring assisted ventilation leads to a decreased risk of acute pulmonary injury (decreased risk of pneumothorax and pulmonary interstitial emphysema) and a decreased risk of neonatal mortality and chronic lung disease compared to delaying treatment of such infants until they develop worsening RDS.