Mesocaval shunt or repeated sclerotherapy: effects on rebleeding and encephalopathy--a randomized trial. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt versus sclerotherapy plus propranolol for variceal rebleeding. Randomised trial of transjugular-intrahepatic-portosystemic shunt versus endoscopy plus propranolol for prevention of variceal rebleeding. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt versus sclerotherapy in the elective treatment of variceal hemorrhage. Distal splenorenal shunt versus endoscopic sclerotherapy in the prevention of variceal rebleeding. First stage of a randomized, controlled trial. Sclerotherapy vs. distal splenorenal shunt in the elective treatment of variceal hemorrhage: a randomized controlled trial. Carotid endarterectomy: to shunt or not to shunt. A randomized clinical trial comparing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt with endoscopic sclerotherapy in the long-term management of patients with cirrhosis after recent variceal hemorrhage. Shunt surgery versus endoscopic sclerotherapy for long-term treatment of variceal bleeding. Early results of a randomized trial.
Sclerotherapy is usually effective in controlling acutely bleeding esophageal varices. It may not be as effective as shunt surgery for prevention of rebleeding; therefore we undertook a prospective study comparing interposition mesocaval shunt (MCS) and repeated sclerotherapy.
                Forty-five patients (mean age, 52.6 +/- 9.8 years) with variceal bleeding were randomized after emergency endoscopic sclerotherapy either to repeat variceal obliteration followed by regular check endoscopy (n = 21) or to elective interposition mesocaval shunting by use of 14 mm polytetrafluoroethylene graft (n = 24). There was an equal distribution of Child's classes in the two groups.
                In the sclerotherapy group 12 patients had recurrent hemorrhages causing five deaths compared with the shunt group, in which four patients had postoperative bleeding but without associated death. No difference was noted in the incidence of encephalopathy despite the development of total shunting 1 year after MCS. The median hospital stay was similar; 34.5 days (MCS) and 33 days (sclerotherapy). The number of intensive care unit days was also similar in the two groups. No difference was noted in survival in patients with Child's A and Child's B disease in the treatment groups. In patients with Child's C cirrhosis there was a statistically significant longer survival in patients undergoing MCS compared with patients undergoing sclerotherapy.
                The results of the study show that the rate of rebleeding is significantly higher after sclerotherapy than after mesocaval shunting. In patients with Child's C cirrhosis MCS may be an alternative to sclerotherapy for the prevention of rebleeding from esophageal varices in patients not suitable for transplantation. In patients with cirrhosis of the liver, after the first variceal bleeding episode, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunting (TIPS) and endoscopic sclerotherapy plus propranolol (ES) were compared regarding prevention of variceal rebleeding and mortality.
                Eighty-three patients with cirrhosis of the liver were randomized to undergo TIPS (n = 42) or ES (n = 41).
                Median observation time was in 1.6 years in the TIPS group and 1.45 years in the ES group. Cumulative rates of rebleeding were 23% in the TIPS group and 57% in the ES group (P = 0.0001). Hepatic encephalopathy was observed in 29% of the patients in the TIPS group and in 13% of those in the ES group (P = 0.041). Cumulative rates of survival were 69% in the TIPS group and 67% in the ES group (P = 0.62). Mortality rates in both groups were positively correlated with a higher Child's classification.
                Although TIPS significantly reduced the rate of rebleeding, survival rates were not improved. Because TIPS is associated with an increased risk of encephalopathy and high rates of shunt dysfunction, which requires reintervention, the procedure cannot be recommended for elective treatment after the first variceal bleeding episode, but it is an effective therapy in patients in whom endoscopic sclerotherapy fails to control bleeding. The transjugular-intrahepatic-portosystemic shunt is a new interventional treatment for portal hypertension. The aim of our study was to compare the transjugular shunt with endoscopic treatment for the prophylaxis of recurrent variceal bleeding.
                Between March, 1993, and March, 1996, 126 patients with variceal bleeding were randomly assigned either transjugular shunt (n = 61) or endoscopic treatment (n = 65). Patients were followed up for a median of 14 (IQR 8-25) months and 13 (8-25) months, respectively. In 31 (51%) of the shunted patients, simultaneous transjugular-variceal embolisation was done at the time of shunt placement. Endoscopic treatment consisted of sclerotherapy and/or banding ligation and was combined with propranolol medication.
                Technical success was achieved in all patients assigned to the shunt group. During follow-up, the cumulative 1-year variceal rebleeding rates in the shunted and endoscopically treated patients were 15% and 41% and the 2-year rates were 21% and 52% (p = 0.001), respectively. In nine (12%) patients from the endoscopic group treatment failed and the patients received the transjugular-shunt treatment. A total of 19 bleeding episodes from any source occurred in 15 patients in the shunt group compared with 100 episodes in 33 patients in the endoscopic group. There was no difference in survival with estimated 1-year survival rates for shunted and endoscopically treated patients of 90% and 89%, and 2-year survival rates of 79% and 82%, respectively. The incidence of clinically significant hepatic encephalopathy after 1 year was higher in the shunt group (36% vs 18%, p = 0.011).
                These results suggest, that the transjugular shunt is more effective than endoscopic treatment in prevention of variceal rebleeding but has a considerable risk of hepatic encephalopathy. Survival is similar in the two groups. Uncontrolled studies suggest that placement of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) could be useful in the treatment of variceal bleeding. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TIPS in the elective treatment of hemorrhage from esophageal varices in a randomized controlled study that compared the effects of TIPS with those of endoscopic sclerotherapy (ES).
                Sixty-three consecutive cirrhotic patients with hemorrhage from esophageal varices were included. Thirty-two patients were randomly allocated to ES and 31 to TIPS groups.
                One patient in each group died before the therapeutic procedure could be performed. During a mean follow-up period of 15 months, variceal rebleeding occurred in 51.6% of the patients in the ES group and 23% of those in the TIPS group. Uncontrolled rebleeding occurred in 10 of 31 patients in the ES group, whereas rebleeding did not occur in any patient of the TIPS group. Hepatic encephalopathy was more frequent in TIPS patients (33.3%) than in those treated by ES (13%). However, mortality was similar in both treatment groups.
                These preliminary results suggest that TIPS is more effective than ES in the prevention of variceal rebleeding in cirrhotic patients, even though no difference in survival was observed. In 1984 we started a prospective controlled trial comparing endoscopic sclerotherapy (ES) with the distal splenorenal shunt (DSRS) in the elective treatment of variceal hemorrhage in cirrhotic patients. The study population included 40 patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension referred to our department from October 1984 to March 1988. These patients were drawn from a pool of 173 patients who underwent either elective surgery or endoscopic sclerotherapy during this time. Patients were assigned to one of the two groups according to a random-number table: 20 to DSRS and 20 to ES. During the postoperative period, no DSRS patient died, while one ES patient died of uncontrolled hemorrhage. One DSRS patient had mild recurrent variceal hemorrhage despite an angiographically patent DSRS. Four ES patients suffered at least one episode of gastrointestinal bleeding: two from varices and two from esophageal ulcerations. Five ES patients developed transitory dysphagia. Long-term follow-up was complete in all patients. Two-year survival rates for shunt (95%) and ES (90%) groups were similar. One DSRS patient rebled from duodenal ulcer, while three ES patients had recurrent bleeding from esophagogastric sources (two from varices and one from hypertensive gastropathy). One DSRS and two ES patients have evolved a mild chronic encephalopathy; four DSRS and two ES patients suffered at least one episode of acute encephalopathy. Two ES patients had esophageal stenoses, which were successfully dilated. Preliminary data from this trial seem to indicate that DSRS, in a subgroup of patients with good liver function and a correct portal-azygos disconnection, more effectively prevents variceal rebleeding than ES. However no significant difference in the survival of the two treatment groups was noted. One hundred and twelve consecutive Child Class A and B cirrhotic patients were included in a prospective controlled trial aimed at investigating the efficacy and safety of endoscopic sclerotherapy vs. distal splenorenal shunt in the elective treatment of hemorrhage from esophagogastric varices. Fifty-seven patients were randomly allocated to splenorenal shunt and 55 to endoscopic sclerotherapy. Since only 4 of the 55 patients assigned to endoscopic sclerotherapy had to be excluded after randomization and before treatment as compared to 14 of the 57 patients assigned to splenorenal shunt, it is suggested that the applicability of endoscopic sclerotherapy is greater than that of splenorenal shunt. One patient in each group died within 30 days of the procedure and two in the endoscopic sclerotherapy group were lost to follow-up just after discharge. Variceal rebleeding during follow-up occurred in 37.5% (18/48) of patients in the endoscopic sclerotherapy group and in 14.3% of those in the splenorenal shunt group (6/42) (p less than 0.02), whereas hepatic encephalopathy was more frequent in patients submitted to splenorenal shunt (10/42, 24%) than in those treated by endoscopic sclerotherapy (4/48, 8%) (p less than 0.05). The therapeutic modality was the only variable with independent predictive value for rebleeding during follow-up, whereas for hepatic encephalopathy, the therapeutic modality, and the presence of encephalopathy related to the bleeding episode each showed independent predictive value. Early and long-term mortality, did not differ between the two therapeutic groups, being the 2-year survival was 71% for splenorenal shunt and 68% for endoscopic sclerotherapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) Because of controversies in the cerebrovascular literature regarding the use of an intraluminal shunt in carotid endarterectomy, we report a randomized prospective study of 118 consecutive symptomatic patients receiving surgery within a single neurosurgical practice. Over 4 years, 138 carotid endarterectomies were performed in the 118 patients, 63 operations with intraluminal shunting and 75 without. Standard rationale for surgery included ipsilateral cerebral infarction in 38% of the operations and ipsilateral transient ischemic attacks in 36%. Unilateral angiographic stenosis of greater than 90% was seen in 58% of the operations; there were no ipsilateral occlusions. Surgery was performed under general anesthesia with barbiturate induction and mild blood pressure elevation. The 30-day complication rate included a mortality rate of 0.7% with a 5.1% incidence of postoperative neurologic deficit and a 1.4% rate of myocardial infarction. In the 24 hours after surgery there were no cerebral infarctions in the shunted group and six in the unshunted group. This 8% rate in the unshunted group compared with 0% in the shunted group was significant at p = 0.023 with a power of 0.95 by Fisher's exact test and chi 2 analysis. This suggests that in our neurosurgical practice (resident training program) the use of an intraluminal shunt during carotid endarterectomy significantly reduces the risk of intraoperative neurologic deficit without increasing the incidence of other complications. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) with that of endoscopic sclerotherapy (ES) in the long-term management of patients with cirrhosis after variceal bleeding. Seventy-eight consecutive cirrhotic patients with recent variceal bleeding were randomly allocated to either TIPS (n=38) or ES (n=40). All patients were in good condition at randomization. The mean follow-up was 1116+/-92 days in the TIPS group and 1047+/-102 days in the ES group. Differences in rebleeding from any source (18.4% vs. 32.5%) and esophageal variceal rebleeding (15.7% vs. 27.5%) were not significantly different between the two groups (P>0.05). The mortality rates were similar in both treatment groups. Shunt dysfunction was noted in 27 patients (71%) in the TIPS group. There were more numbers of rehospitalization during follow-up in the TIPS group than in the ES group (2.6+/-0.4 vs. 1.1+/-0.2) (P<0.01). TIPS and ES are equally effective in the prevention of variceal rebleeding. However, TIPS is associated with high incidence of shunt dysfunction, which lead to more rehospitalization. Therefore, TIPS may not be a first-line treatment for the prevention of variceal rebleeding in cirrhotic patients who are in stable condition. In September 1982, a prospective randomized trial comparing shunt surgery and endoscopic sclerotherapy for the elective management of variceal hemorrhage in patients with cirrhosis was initiated. Twenty-seven patients have received shunts (distal splenorenal = 23, nonselective = 4) and 30 patients have had chronic sclerotherapy. Eighty-six per cent of patients had alcoholic cirrhosis and 33% were Child's class C. After a mean follow-up of 25 months, 19% of shunt and 57% of sclerotherapy patients have had rebleeding (p = 0.003). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis reveals similar 2-year survival rates for shunt (65%) and sclerotherapy (61%) groups. Only two of 10 sclerotherapy failures have been salvaged by surgery. Posttherapy quantitative hepatic function, frequency of encephalopathy, and cumulative medical costs were similar for both groups. Hepatic portal perfusion and portal pressure at 1 year were better maintained by sclerotherapy than by distal splenorenal shunt. In conclusion, endoscopic sclerotherapy and shunt surgery provide similar results with respect to survival, hepatic function, frequency of encephalopathy, and costs. Sclerotherapy is an acceptable, but not superior, alternative to shunt surgery for treatment of variceal hemorrhage.
All shunts resulted in a significantly lower rebleeding rate at the expense of a higher incidence of encephalopathy. TIPS was complicated by a high incidence of shunt dysfunction. No survival advantage was demonstrated with any shunt.