Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of pramipexole in untreated and levodopa-treated patients with Parkinson's disease. Efficacy of pramipexole, a novel dopamine agonist, as monotherapy in mild to moderate Parkinson's disease. The Pramipexole Study Group. Pramipexole in patients with early Parkinson's disease. The long-acting dopamine receptor agonist cabergoline in early Parkinson's disease: final results of a 5-year, double-blind, levodopa-controlled study. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, multi-center study of pramipexole in advanced Parkinson's disease. Efficacy, safety, and tolerance of the non-ergoline dopamine agonist pramipexole in the treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease: a double blind, placebo controlled, randomised, multicentre study. Double-blind comparison of pramipexole and bromocriptine treatment with placebo in advanced Parkinson's disease. International Pramipexole-Bromocriptine Study Group. Efficacy screening trials of paroxetine, pentoxifylline, riluzole, pramipexole and venlafaxine in cocaine dependence. Cabergoline compared to levodopa in the treatment of patients with severe restless legs syndrome: results from a multi-center, randomized, active controlled trial.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the non-ergot dopamine agonist pramipexole in untreated and levodopa-treated Chinese patients with early or advanced Parkinson's disease.
                This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, which was conducted in Hong Kong and Taiwan, comprised a screening period of at least 1 week, a dose-escalation period of 7 weeks, and a maintenance period of 8 weeks (total duration of treatment: 15 weeks). During the dose-escalation period, the dose of pramipexole (or number of placebo tablets) was escalated in a blinded fashion according to a predetermined schedule to the optimum tolerated dose of pramipexole, administered three times a day (minimum dose=0.375 mg/day; maximum dose=4.5 mg/day). This dose was then maintained for the duration of the maintenance period. Efficacy was primarily assessed by the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS). Safety and tolerability were evaluated by treatment-emergent adverse event reports, clinical laboratory test results (blood chemistry, hematology, and urinalysis), vital signs, and electrocardiograms.
                Pramipexole was significantly more effective than placebo in reducing the total scores of the UPDRS Part II, Part III, and Parts II and III combined. Approximately 70% of both the placebo- and pramipexole-treated patients evaluated in this analysis were on levodopa. Regardless of levodopa use, the mean UPDRS total scores showed a consistently greater improvement in pramipexole patients than in placebo patients. Mean scores for pramipexole patients not on levodopa showed a greater improvement than did pramipexole patients on levodopa. The mean improvement for the pramipexole/no levodopa group relative to the placebo/no levodopa group at week 15 was 10.93 points (i.e., -14.43 points minus -3.50 points). The mean improvement for the pramipexole/levodopa group relative to the placebo/levodopa group at week 15 was 9.04 points (i.e., -10.26 points minus -1.22 points). Pramipexole was also superior to placebo as measured by improvement in the modified Hoehn and Yahr Scale and a reduction in the number of "off" hours for patients on concomitant levodopa therapy.
                Pramipexole is an effective and well-tolerated therapy, with or without concomitant levodopa, for Chinese patients with Parkinson's disease. A total of 335 patients with early Parkinson's disease (PD) were enrolled in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial designed to assess the efficacy and safety of pramipexole. Entry was restricted to patients with idiopathic PD who were not receiving levodopa. Pramipexole was administered according to an ascending dose schedule up to 4.5 mg/d. During the 7-week dose-escalation phase, each subject was titrated to his or her maximally tolerated dose of study medication. This was followed by a 24-week period of maintenance therapy. The mean daily dose during the maintenance period was 3.8 mg. Pramipexole significantly reduced the severity of PD symptoms and signs compared with placebo, as measured by decreases in parts II (Activities of Daily Living) and III (Motor Examination) of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale at week 24 compared with baseline (p < or = 0.0001). Differences between the active drug and placebo groups emerged at week 3 (1.5 mg/d) in the ascending-dose interval and persisted throughout the maintenance phase (p < or = 0.0001). The majority of patients completed the study (pramipexole 83%, placebo 80%). In the assessment of adverse events, nausea, insomnia, constipation, somnolence, and visual hallucinations occurred more frequently in the pramipexole treatment group compared with placebo patients. No clinically significant changes were noted in blood pressure or pulse rate. Overall, these results indicate that pramipexole is safe and effective in the treatment of early PD. We evaluated the efficacy, safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of pramipexole, a novel dopamine D2 receptor agonist, in early Parkinson's disease (PD). The study design was a parallel, placebo-controlled trial using an ascending dose of 4.5 mg/day pramipexole maximum. All subjects received selegiline (10 mg/day) but were not treated with levodopa. Of the 55 subjects who received at least one dose of the study medication, all but one, in the placebo group, completed the trial, which was 9 weeks in duration. The primary efficacy endpoints were changes in scores from baseline to final measurement on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Parts II and III. The pramipexole group had a significantly greater improvement (p = 0.002) than the placebo group on UPDRS Part II (Activities of Daily Living). The change in score from baseline to final measurement on UPDRS Part III (Motor Examination) was not significantly different (p = 0.10) between the pramipexole and placebo groups, although the trend favoured the pramipexole group. All subjects in both the pramipexole and the placebo groups experienced one or more episodes of asymptomatic orthostatic hypotension; there was no significant difference between the pramipexole and the placebo groups in the number of subjects experiencing symptomatic orthostatic hypotension. The adverse events profile of pramipexole was similar, in general, to that of other dopamine receptor agonists. Plasma pramipexole levels increased linearly with dose. Pramipexole appears to be promising agent in the treatment of early PD. Cabergoline is an ergoline derivative with a very long half-life that allows once-daily administration and the potential for more continuous stimulation of dopaminergic receptors than is possible with other dopamine receptor agonists (DAs). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the possible advantage resulting from a more sustained dopaminergic effect of cabergoline would translate into delayed onset of motor complications, compared with levodopa, in patients with newly diagnosed Parkinson's disease.
                This study was a double-blind, multicentre trial that compared cabergoline and levodopa as initial therapy for Parkinson's disease. A total of 419 levodopa-, DA- and selegiline-naive patients with newly diagnosed Parkinson's disease were randomised to receive either cabergoline (n = 211) or levodopa (n = 209). Treatment was titrated to an optimal dose over a period of up to 24 weeks and then continued at this dose until the study endpoint (confirmed motor complications) or up to a maximum of 5 years. At years 1-5, the cabergoline group was receiving cabergoline at average daily doses ranging from 2.8-2.9 mg, with added levodopa at mean daily doses ranging from 322 mg at year 1 to 431 mg at year 5; over the same period, the levodopa group was receiving daily levodopa doses of 784 mg. Thus, patients in the cabergoline group received <50% levodopa than patients in the levodopa group.
                Motor complications were significantly delayed (p = 0.0175) and occurred less frequently in cabergoline-treated patients than in levodopa-treated patients (22.3% vs 33.7%). Cox model proportional hazards regression analysis showed that the relative risk of developing such complications was >50% lower (0.46; p < 0.001) in the cabergoline group compared with the levodopa group. In particular, development of dyskinesias was markedly delayed in the cabergoline group and occurred in 9.5% of patients compared with 21.2% in the levodopa group (p < 0.001). Among patients not requiring supplemental levodopa, the frequency of motor complications was three times higher with levodopa (15.5% of 110 patients) than with cabergoline (5.3% of 76 patients). Among patients who did need supplemental levodopa, motor complications were more frequent in the levodopa arm (54.1% of 98 patients) than in the cabergoline arm (31.9% of 135 patients). Consistent improvements relative to baseline in average Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) daily living activities and motor function sections, and in Clinical Global Impression severity of illness and physician- and patient- rated global improvement scores, were seen in both treatment groups, with maximal effects occurring within 2 years. However, levodopa treatment was associated with a significantly (p < 0.001) greater improvement in motor disability (as measured by the UPDRS motor score) over time, with mean values of 13.8 versus 12.9 in the cabergoline versus levodopa arm recorded at 1 year, 18.6 versus 17.2 at 3 years and 19.2 versus 16.3 at 5 years, respectively. While the overall frequency of adverse events was similar in the two groups, the cabergoline-treated group experienced marginally, but not significantly, higher frequencies of nausea, vomiting, dyspepsia and gastritis (37.4% vs 32.2% in the levodopa group) and of dizziness and postural hypotension (31.3% vs 24% in the levodopa group). Cabergoline-treated patients also experienced a significantly higher frequency of peripheral oedema (16.1% vs 3.4%, respectively; p < 0.0001). The cabergoline and levodopa groups had similar rates of sleepiness (17.5% vs 18.3%, respectively) and hallucinations (4.8% vs 4.4%, respectively); in an elderly population subset, hallucinations were reported in 7.1% and 6.5% of patients taking cabergoline and levodopa, respectively. Adverse events generally occurred more frequently in female patients (with the exception of dyskinesias, hyperkinesias and hallucinations, which occurred more frequently in men) and in the elderly.
                This study showed that, compared with levodopa, initial therapy with cabergoline in patients with Parkinson's disease is associated with a lower risk of response fluctuations at the cost of a marginally reduced symptomatic improvement and some tolerability disadvantages that are mostly limited to a significantly higher frequency of peripheral oedema. Pramipexole (SND 919), a potent non-ergot dopamine agonist, or placebo, was administered to 69 patients with advanced Parkinson's disease (33 received placebo, 36 received pramipexole) in a double-blind, randomized, multi-center study in which individually optimized doses of L-dopa plus a dopa decarboxylase inhibitor were associated with dyskinesia, "on-off" fluctuation, dystonia, akinesia, or end-of-dose deterioration. Study medication was titrated over 7 weeks to the maximal tolerated dose or to the maximal dose allowed by the study (5 mg/day in four divided doses). Dosing was maintained for 4 weeks and then tapered during the final week. Total score on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) for the intent-to-treat population was significantly improved in the pramipexole-treated group compared with the placebo-treated group (16.9 +/- 14.9 vs 9.0 +/- 16.1; p = 0.0184). By the end of maintenance, the mean reduction in L-dopa requirement was -150.7 mg for pramipexole-treated patients compared to -10.6 for placebo-treated patients. The most common adverse events (< 10%) were dizziness, insomnia, nausea, and postural hypotension. Aggravated parkinsonism occurred only after withdrawal of the study medication. Treatment with pramipexole in doses up to 5 mg/day was safe and well tolerated by patients with advanced Parkinson's disease.Copyright Lippincott-Raven Publishers Pramipexole, a non-ergot dopamine D2/D3 receptor agonist, was investigated as an add on drug in advanced parkinsonian patients with motor fluctuations to assess efficacy, safety, and tolerance.
                Seventy eight patients of either sex with advanced Parkinson's disease and treatment complications such as motor fluctuations were enrolled into a double blind, placebo controlled, randomised, multicentre study (phase II) and assigned to add on treatment with pramipexole (n=34) versus placebo (n=44) to a previously stabilised antiparkinsonian medication (7 week dose titration interval, 4 week maintenance period). The primary end point of efficacy was the change from baseline in the total score of the unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (UPDRS) in the on "period" (2 hours after intake of study medication). Safety and tolerability were assessed on the basis of adverse events, vital signs, laboratory measurements, and ECG recordings.
                There was a significant improvement of the pramipexole group in UPDRS total scores, subscores part II, III (activities of daily living and motor examination), and IV (complications of therapy). Mean UPDRS total score decreased by 37.3% under pramipexole compared with 12.2% under placebo (p<0.001). Patients under pramipexole reported an overall reduction in "off" periods of 12%--resulting in 1.7 more hours "on" time a day--compared with an increase in "off" periods of 2% under placebo. There were no unexpected safety results. The adverse event profile disclosed a high tolerability. The most important adverse events under pramipexole were fatigue, dyskinesia, and vivid dreams.
                Pramipexole administration is an efficacious and well tolerated add on therapy in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease with an improvement in activities of daily living, motor function, and treatment associated complications. Pramipexole is a new, selective, nonergoline dopamine agonist that acts on D2 and preferentially on D3 dopamine receptors. Phase II and III clinical trials have shown this drug to be useful in treating both early and advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. A double-blind, randomized, multicenter study was performed to compare the safety, tolerance, and efficacy of pramipexole versus placebo in patients with advanced PD with motor fluctuations. A bromocriptine treatment group was included to enable comparisons between bromocriptine and placebo groups, but the study was not powered to show statistical differences between the active treatment groups. The study included 247 patients with "wearing off." Patients were Hoehn and Yahr stages II to IV during "on" times. The trial included three phases: dose escalation, 6 months' maintenance, and dose reduction. The primary end points were the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) parts II and III. Up to 4.5 mg per day of pramipexole and 30 mg per day of bromocriptine were used. The results of the study showed that the UPDRS part II improved by 26.7% for pramipexole (p = 0.0002) and 14% for bromocriptine (p = 0.02) versus 4.8% for placebo. The UPDRS part III showed improvements of 34% for pramipexole (p = 0.0006) and 23.8% for bromocriptine (p = 0.01) versus 5.7% for placebo. There were no major differences in safety data. In the active treatment groups there were more reports of dyskinesia and nausea compared with placebo. In regard to comparison of the Global Clinical Assessment of Efficacy between active treatment groups, there was a trend to significance (p = 0.056) in favor of pramipexole. We conclude that pramipexole-treated patients with advanced PD improved significantly more than placebo for both primary end points. The two studies presented here were conducted to assess the efficacy of paroxetine, pentoxifylline, riluzole, venlafaxine and pramipexole as medications for the treatment of cocaine dependence.
                A multi-arm, modified blinded, placebo-controlled design was used.
                The studies were conducted at the Boston VA Healthcare System and the Boston University School of Medicine Medication Development Research Unit (MDRU).
                Participants met criteria for cocaine dependence during a 2-week screening period.
                Following random assignment to one of the treatment groups, subjects received active medication or placebo for 8 weeks in combination with cognitive behavioral counseling. In the first study the efficacy of the antidepressant paroxetine (20 mg daily), the phosphodiesterase inhibitor pentoxifylline (1200 mg daily) and the glutamate release inhibitor riluzole (100 mg daily) was assessed. The antidepressant venlafaxine (150 mg daily) and the dopamine agonist pramipexole (1.5 mg daily) were evaluated in the second study.
                Urine benzoylecgonine (BE) concentrations, self-report of cocaine use and global impression scores served as primary outcome measures. Secondary measures included assessments of cocaine craving and psychiatric functioning. Adverse events were monitored during the treatment period.
                None of the active medications produced greater reductions in urine BE concentrations over the treatment period than did placebo. There were trends for BE levels to become reduced in the pentoxifylline group during the first 4 weeks of treatment and for Addiction Severity Index (ASI) drug composite scores to be lower in the pentoxyfylline group at end-point compared to the placebo group. Significant within-group reductions in reported cocaine use and craving were found for all treatment groups, but none of the active medications were superior to placebo on these measures. The accuracy of self-reported cocaine use declined over the study period. Overall, the active medications were well tolerated.
                This study does not support the use of paroxetine, pentoxifylline, riluzole, venlafaxine or pramipexole for the treatment of cocaine dependence. However, these results need to be interpreted with caution because of the small size and lack of homogeneity of the experimental groups. We report the first large-scale double-blind, randomly assigned study to compare two active dopaminergic therapies for Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS), the dopamine agonist cabergoline (CAB) and levodopa/benserazide (levodopa). Patients with idiopathic RLS were treated with fixed daily doses of 2 or 3 mg CAB or 200 or 300 mg levodopa for 30 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by changes in the IRLS (International RLS Severity Scale) and by time to discontinuation of treatment due to loss of efficacy or augmentation. 361 of 418 screened patients (age 58 +/- 12 years, 71% females) were randomly assigned and treated (CAB: n = 178; levodopa: n = 183) in 51 centers of four European countries. Baseline IRLS total score was 25.7 +/- 6.8. The baseline-adjusted mean change from baseline to week 6 in IRLS sum score was d = -16.1 in the CAB group and d = -9.5 in the levodopa group (d = -6.6, P < 0.0001). More patients in the levodopa group (24.0%) than in the CAB group (11.9%, P = 0.0029, log-rank test) discontinued because of loss of efficacy (14.2% vs. 7.9%, P = 0.0290) or augmentation (9.8% vs. 4.0%, P = 0.0412). Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 83.1% of the CAB group and in 77.6% of the levodopa group. In both groups, most frequent AEs were gastrointestinal symptoms (CAB: 55.6%, levodopa: 30.6%, P < 0.0001). This first large-scale active controlled study in RLS showed superior efficacy of cabergoline versus levodopa after a 30-week long-term therapy. Tolerability was found more favorable with levodopa than with cabergoline.
The meta-analyses show the superiority of dopamine agonists over placebo in RCTs up to seven months. Cabergoline and pramipexole showed larger efficacy compared to levodopa in some but not all outcomes.