Efficacy of aminophylline in the treatment of acute asthma exacerbation in children. Aminophylline therapy does not improve outcome and increases adverse effects in children hospitalized with acute asthmatic exacerbations. Intravenous aminophylline confers no benefit in acute asthma treated with intravenous steroids and inhaled bronchodilators. Randomised controlled trial of aminophylline for severe acute asthma. Intravenous salbutamol bolus compared with an aminophylline infusion in children with severe asthma: a randomised controlled trial. Corticosteroids in status asthmaticus. Does aminophylline benefit adults admitted to the hospital for an acute exacerbation of asthma? Inhaled albuterol and oral prednisone therapy in hospitalized adult asthmatics. Does aminophylline add any benefit? Aminophylline, salbutamol and combined intravenous infusions in acute severe asthma.
The role of aminophylline (ethylene diamine salt of theophylline) in the treatment of acute exacerbation of asthma has not been well established in children.
                The aim of the study was to determine the additional therapeutic benefit of intravenous aminophylline in the treatment of children hospitalized for acute asthmatic exacerbation and treated with inhaled bronchodilators and glucocorticoid therapy.
                Thirty-eight children aged from 2 to 16 years (mean age 5.64 +/- 3.31), admitted for acute exacerbation of asthma, participated in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. All the subjects received methylprednisolone, administered intravenously, and nebulized salbutamol. The treatment group received intravenous aminophylline therapy and the placebo group received 0.9% saline solution for 24 hours.
                The number of salbutamol nebulizations needed and the clinical asthma scoring were recorded both at onset and at the end of 24 hours. There was no significant difference in either the mean number of nebulizations or the clinical asthma scores between the two groups (P = .7843, P = .8452).
                Intravenous aminophylline (ethylene diamine salt of theophylline) demonstrated no additional beneficial effect to the combination of beta adrenergic agonists and glucocorticoid treatment in acute asthma attack in children. To evaluate the effects of aminophylline (Am) in children hospitalized with asthma.
                Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Subjects were children between the ages of 5 and 18 years admitted for asthma exacerbation to either a tertiary care children's hospital or an inner-city general hospital in New York. Exclusion criteria were admission to the intensive care unit, initial theophylline level > 5 micrograms/dL, or the presence of other systemic disorders. All patients received nebulized albuterol therapy and intravenous glucocorticosteroids in standardized doses. Thirty-one patients were randomized to receive either an Am bolus followed by continuous Am infusion or placebo (P) bolus and infusion. The outcome variables were: duration of hospitalization, percent of predicted peak expiratory flow rates recorded at 12-hour intervals, number of albuterol treatments required, and adverse effects.
                There were no significant differences at study entry in age, sex, race, number of previous hospital admissions, prior medications used, clinical symptom scores, or initial peak flow rates for the two groups. For 26 patients who completed this study, 15 patients in the P group were hospitalized for a mean duration of 2.33 +/- 1.3 days, whereas 11 patients in the Am group required 2.58 +/- 1.5 days. There were no significant differences between the two groups for hospital days, peak flow rates at any time interval, or amount of albuterol therapy required (P > .2). In the Am group, 6 of the 14 patients who entered the study experienced significant adverse effects consisting of nausea, emesis, headache, abdominal pain, and palpitations. Only 1 of 17 patients in the P group had an adverse effect (P < .05).
                There is no benefit and considerable risk of adverse effects associated with the use of Am in hospitalized asthmatic children. The role of intravenous aminophylline in acute asthma is unclear despite meta-analysis of many studies comparing aminophylline with other bronchodilator therapies.
                The aim of this study is to determine whether continuous aminophylline infusion confers any benefit in acute severe asthmatics treated with intravenous steroids and inhaled bronchodilators.
                The study was randomised, double-blind and placebo-controlled. All patients received nebulised salbutamol (1 mL of 0.5%) and ipratropium bromide (1 mL of 0.025%) with glycol diluent (1 mL) at 0, two, four, six, eight and 12 hours, and six-hourly thereafter. In addition all patients were given intravenous hydrocortisone 250 mg six-hourly and oxygen to maintain normoxia. Aminophylline infusions were adjusted to maintain therapeutic levels. Peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) was measured before and after nebulised bronchodilator on a two-hourly basis in the Emergency Department (ED) and six-hourly on the inpatient wards.
                Thirty-one patients were clinically sufficiently improved within 12 hours to be discharged home from the ED. The remaining 28 patients were admitted to the inpatient ward for a total trial duration of 48 hours. No significant difference was found between the placebo and treatment groups for measurements of PEFR, or for the duration of stay of the patients in hospital. The power of the study was 80% for a 25% to 33% difference at a 5% level of significance. Presentation values of PEFR and arterial blood gases did not predict which patients would require inpatient admission and which could be safely discharged home from the ED. To determine whether children with severe acute asthma treated with large doses of inhaled salbutamol, inhaled ipratropium, and intravenous steroids are conferred any further benefits by the addition of aminophylline given intravenously.
                Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial of 163 children admitted to hospital with asthma who were unresponsive to nebulised salbutamol.
                The placebo and treatment groups of children were similar at baseline. The 48 children in the aminophylline group had a greater improvement in spirometry at six hours and a higher oxygen saturation in the first 30 hours. Five subjects in the placebo group were intubated and ventilated after enrollment compared with none in the aminophylline group.
                Aminophylline continues to have a place in the management of severe acute asthma in children unresponsive to initial treatment. The relative efficacies of aminophylline and salbutamol in severe acute childhood asthma are currently unclear. A single bolus of salbutamol was compared with a continuous aminophylline infusion in children with severe asthma in a randomised double blind study.
                Children aged 1-16 years with acute severe asthma were enrolled if they showed little improvement with three nebulisers (combined salbutamol and ipratropium) administered over an hour and systemic steroids. Subjects were randomised to receive either a short intravenous bolus of salbutamol (15 micro g/kg over 20 minutes) followed by a saline infusion or an aminophylline infusion (5 mg/kg over 20 minutes) followed by 0.9 mg/kg/h.
                Forty four subjects were enrolled, with 18 randomly allocated to receive salbutamol and 26 to receive aminophylline. The groups were well matched at baseline. An intention to treat analysis showed that there was no statistically significant difference in the asthma severity score (ASS) at 2 hours between the two groups (median (IQR) 6 (6, 8) and 6.5 (5, 8) for salbutamol and aminophylline respectively, p=0.93). A similar improvement in ASS to 2 hours was seen in the two groups (mean difference -0.08, 95% CI -0.97 to 0.80), there was a trend (p=0.07) towards a longer duration of oxygen therapy in the salbutamol group (17.8 hours (95% CI 8.5 to 37.5) v 7.0 hours (95% CI 3.4 to 14.2)), and a significantly (p=0.02) longer length of hospital stay in the salbutamol group (85.4 (95% CI 66.1 to 110.2) hours v 57.3 hours (95% CI 45.6 to 72.0)). There was no significant difference in adverse events between the two groups.
                This study suggests that, in severe childhood asthma, there is no significant difference in the effectiveness of a bolus of salbutamol and an aminophylline infusion in the first 2 hours of treatment. Overall, the aminophylline infusion was superior as it significantly reduced the length of stay in hospital. Nineteen children who were not steroid dependent and were hospitalized in status asthmaticus were studied to evaluate the effect of corticosteroids. They were randomized into two groups. Each group received salbutamol inhalations and intravenous aminophylline therapy. One group received 7 mg/kg hydrocortisone intravenously every six hours; the other group served as a control. Each group showed significant improvement in clinical score and peak expiratory flow rate after 36 hours; there was no statistical difference in the degree of improvement. Six of ten steroid-treated children and six of nine controls achieved a PEFR of 50% predicted by 36 hours. The response to inhaled salbutamol was similar in each group. The results show that in the first 36 hours of therapy, corticosteroids have no additive effect on the bronchodilator response of aminophylline and salbutamol and do not hasten the recovery of nonsteroid-dependent children in status asthmaticus. Although the results show that an inhaled sympathomimetic drug is beneficial in status asthmaticus, corticosteroid therapy does not increase the responsiveness of the airways to these agents. To determine the effect of adding intravenous theophylline (administered as aminophylline) to nebulizations of albuterol and intravenous methylprednisolone in adults hospitalized for acute asthma.
                Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study.
                Inpatient service of a tertiary-care, university teaching hospital.
                21 adults (22 to 48 years old)--10 in the aminophylline group and 11 in the placebo group.
                Nebulized albuterol, 2.5 or 5.0 mg every 0.5 to 4 hours; intravenous methylprednisolone, 60 mg every 6 hours; and either individualized doses of aminophylline or placebo for 48 hours.
                Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), the number of "as needed" albuterol nebulizations and total dose, asthma symptom scores, and adverse effects.
                At admission from the emergency department, the mean +/- SD baseline FEV1 was 49% +/- 19% of the predicted value in the aminophylline group and 43% +/- 13% of the predicted value in the placebo group. The improvement in FEV1 at 3 hours was greater in the aminophylline group (29% +/- 23% compared with 10% +/- 10% in the placebo group; mean difference, 19 percentage points; 95% CI, 3 to 35 percentage points; P = 0.023). At 48 hours, FEV1 was 75% +/- 19% of the predicted value in the aminophylline group and 58% +/- 15% of the predicted value in the placebo group (mean difference, 17 percentage points; CI, 0.2 to 34.8 percentage points; P = 0.048). Aminophylline-treated patients required fewer nebulizations of albuterol (10.3 +/- 3.8 compared with 16.4 +/- 5.3; mean difference, -6.1; CI, -10.3 to -1.8) and less total dosage (34 +/- 16 mg compared with 70 +/- 34 mg; mean difference, -36 mg; CI, -60.6 to -11.3 mg P = 0.02). No statistical differences were observed in asthma symptom scores or frequency of adverse effects.
                Individualized doses of intravenous theophylline added to frequent nebulizations of albuterol and intravenous methylprednisolone appear to benefit adults admitted to the hospital with acute asthma and are well tolerated when serum concentrations are maintained in the therapeutic range. To determine the efficacy of intravenous aminophylline in the treatment of adult patients hospitalized for exacerbation of asthma.
                Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial throughout the study.
                University Hospital Clinical Research Center.
                Forty-four patients admitted from the emergency room with a primary diagnosis asthma; 39 patients completed the study.
                Patients received either intravenous aminophylline or placebo in addition to frequent nebulized albuterol; prednisone 0.5 mg/kg body weight every 6 h orally; and supplemental oxygen. Aminophylline infusion rates were adjusted to achieve serum theophylline concentrations of 10 to 20 micrograms/ml. Changes were made in placebo infusion rates to maintain the double blind design.
                Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and other spirometric measurements every 8 h by a blinded investigator or trained respiratory therapist. Subjective patient response and duration of hospitalization were compared. No difference in spirometric measurements was observed between the two groups at any time point. On admission to the study, FEV1 in the placebo group was 41.5 (+/- 2.9) percent predicted and in the aminophylline group 34.7 (+/- 2.3) percent predicted (p = 0.08). At discharge, FEV1 was 70.4 (+/- 2.9) percent predicted in the placebo group and 63.7 (+/- 2.8) percent predicted in the theophylline group (p = 0.10). There was no difference in subjective patient rating or duration of hospitalization between the two groups (placebo 1.95 days and aminophylline 1.78 days, p = 0.51).
                Our results suggest that aminophylline therapy does not add significant benefit to other standard therapies in hospitalized adult asthmatic patients. Because of the risks and cost of aminophylline treatment in the hospital setting, further research is needed to determine if there are subgroups of adult asthmatics who may benefit from the addition of aminophylline to other standard optimal therapies. Twenty-one patients admitted to hospital with acute severe asthma were allocated in a random, single-blind manner to receive intravenous infusions for 24 hours or either aminophylline or salbutamol or a combination of the two drugs. Infusions were administered by a slow infusion pump with an initial loading dose given over 15 minutes, followed by a continuous lower dose of the drug 24 hours as follows: 1. Aminophylline 0.285 mg/kg/min for 15 min followed by 0.014 mg/kg/min (20 mg/min. followed by 1 mg/min for a 70 kg subject). 2. Salbutamol 0.285 microgram/kg/min for 15 min followed by 0.057 microgram/kg/min (20 microgram/min followed by 4 microgram/min for a 70 kg subject). 3. Combined regimen of the above infusions. In addition each patient received intravenous hydrocortisone (4 g) and potassium chloride (4 g) in 2 litres of 5% dextrose infused over 24 hours amd 35% oxygen given via a Ventimask. Peak expiratory flow rates showed a significant improvement after 15 minutes treatment with aminophylline and the combined infusion, but this was not seen until 60 minutes with the salbutamol infusion. No synergistic bronchodilator effect was seen with the combined infusion. The results show that intravenous aminophylline is superior to intravenous salbutamol in the doses given in the initial treatment of acute asthma and that the combination when given intravenously is not better than aminophylline alone.
In children with a severe asthma exacerbation, the addition of intravenous aminophylline to ß2-agonists and glucocorticoids (with or without anticholinergics) improves lung function within 6 hours of treatment. However there is no apparent reduction in symptoms, number of nebulised treatment and length of hospital stay. There is insufficient evidence to assess the impact on oxygenation, PICU admission and mechanical ventilation. Aminophylline is associated with a significant increased risk of vomiting.