A randomised controlled trial of an oral solution of prostaglandin E2 and oral oxytocin used immediately after low amniotomy for induction of labour in the presence of a favourable cervix. Intramesosalpingeal injection of oxytocin in conservative laparoscopic treatment for tubal pregnancy: preliminary results. A randomized comparison of prostaglandin E2, oxytocin, and the double-balloon device in inducing labor. Intraumbilical oxytocin for management of retained placenta. Cervical ripening and labor outcome with preinduction intracervical prostaglandin E2 (Prepidil) gel. Removing a retained placenta by oxytocin--a controlled study. Intravaginal prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening and initiation of labor. Comparison of a multidose gel and single, controlled-release pessary. Does prostaglandin confer significant advantage over oxytocin infusion for nulliparas with pre-labor rupture of membranes at term? The effect of oxytocin injection into the umbilical vein for the management of the retained placenta.
A randomised controlled trial was carried out in 50 primigravidae and 50 multigravidae to compare the effectiveness in induction of labour after low amniotomy of prostaglandin E2, given as an oral solution, and oxytocin, given as buccal tablets. The results showed that in dosages recommended by the manufacturers, both oxytocic preparations were almost equally effective. With oral oxytocin, once labour had been established and dosage was left to the discretion of the staff, there appeared to be a potentially dangerous tendency to continue giving large doses despite adequate uterine contractions. The authors comment that this was probably the reason why oxytocin-treated multigravidae having normal deliveries within 24 hours had labours significantly shorter on average than those of other successfully induced patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the local use of oxytocin as adjuvant treatment in conservative surgery for tubal pregnancy. The patients were 25 women with laparoscopic diagnosis of tubal pregnancy who were candidates for salpingotomy. Before salpingotomy, each patient was randomly allocated to intramesosalpingeal injection of 20 IU oxytocin diluted to 20 ml with saline solution or 20 ml saline solution. The surgeon then proceeded with salpingotomy and removal of the pregnancy according to the usual technique. The main outcome measures were bleeding during salpingotomy, ease of removal of the pregnancy, bleeding at the site of the pregnancy, and need for recourse to salpingectomy. Twelve women were randomized to the oxytocin group and 13 to the control group. Examination of the surgeons' assessments of the difficulties encountered at the different stages of surgery revealed statistically significant differences between the oxytocin group and controls in each variable. In particular, the amount of endosalpingeal bleeding after removal of the pregnancy was less in the oxytocin group. In one control patient, persistent bleeding due to incomplete trophoblast removal forced the surgeon to perform salpingectomy. Our results indicate that intramesosalpingeal injection of oxytocin facilitates the performance of conservative laparoscopic treatment for tubal pregnancy. To compare the efficacy of three methods for ripening and dilating the unfavorable cervix for induction of labor.
                Pregnant women having an indication for induction of labor with a singleton vertex fetus, intact membranes, and Bishop score of no more than 4 were randomized to one of three induction methods: intravaginal prostaglandin (PG) E2 tablets (3 mg) followed by a second dose if labor did not start; continuous intravenous oxytocin drip; or the Atad Ripener Device, with inflation of both balloons and removal after 12 hours. For all patients, the cervix was assessed by the same investigator before induction and 12 hours later.
                Thirty subjects were included in the PGE2 group, 30 in the oxytocin group, and 35 in the Atad Ripener Device group. The postpartum course was comparable in all. The change in Bishop score in the PGE2 and Atad Ripener Device groups was significantly better than in the oxytocin group (median and range of 5[0-9] and 5[0-7], respectively, versus 2.5 [0-9]; P < .01). Cervical dilation more than 3 cm was more frequent in the Atad Ripener Device group compared with both the PGE2 and oxytocin groups (85.7 versus 50 and 23.3%, respectively; P < .01). The trial of induction failed in only two patients (5.7%) in the Atad Ripener Device group, compared with six (20%) in the PGE2 and 16 (53.3%) in the oxytocin groups (P < .001). Mean (+/- standard deviation) induction-to-delivery interval was 21.3 +/- 7.0 hours in the Atad Ripener Device group, 23.2 +/- 12.5 hours in the PGE2 group, and 28.2 +/- 14.7 hours in the oxytocin group. The success rate for vaginal delivery was significantly better in the Atad Ripener Device and PGE2 groups compared with the oxytocin group (77.1 and 70%, respectively, versus 26.7%; P < .01).
                The Atad Ripener Device had a significantly better success rate for cervical dilation and a lower failure rate than those for PGE2 and oxytocin. The PGE2 and Atad Ripener Device groups had better results than the oxytocin group in regard to Bishop score change and induction-to-delivery interval. The Atad Ripener Device may be a superior method for cervical ripening and labor induction in patients with unfavorable cervices. The purpose of the study was to investigate the removal of a retained placenta.
                Oxytocin was injected into the vein of the umbilical cord. A total of 109 patients with retention of the placenta were randomized into two groups. Active management of the third stage of labor was carried out by giving oxytocin 5 IU intravenously and ergometrine maleate 0.2 mg intramuscularly after delivery of the fetus. Group 1, which comprised 68 patients, was allocated to receive 50 IU oxytocin diluted in 10 ml 0.9% sodium chloride solution, and the 41 patients in group 2 were given 20 ml plasma expander (dextran 70) into the umbilical vein.
                Forty-nine cases (72%) in the oxytocin group and 22 cases (54%) in the dextran 70 group required manual removal of the retained placenta. No significant differences were found between group 1 (oxytocin) and group 2 (dextran 70).
                Our results indicate that intraumbilical vein injection of oxytocin is not effective for removal of a retained placenta. Delivery with an unfavorable cervix using oxytocin is frequently unsuccessful. Used widely in Europe and increasingly in this country, locally applied prostaglandin E2 appears to improve labor induction. The present study prospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of a prostaglandin gel (0.5 mg) placed intracervically. The use of the gel, when compared to a control group who received no pretreatment prior to labor induction, resulted in improved Bishop scores (7.5 +/- 1.0 vs. 1.8 +/- 0.3, P less than 0.0001), reduced induction to delivery intervals (10.1 +/- 2.1 vs. 20.6 +/- 2.0 hours), reduced oxytocin infusion duration (10.0 +/- 2.1 vs. 20.0 +/- 2.3 hours. P less than 0.0001) resulting in a lower cesarean delivery rate, 26 vs. 47 per cent (P greater than 0.05). Thirty-two per cent of patients receiving the prostaglandin gel labored and delivered within 12 hours and required no oxytocin. In addition, the use of prostaglandin E2 gel appeared safe in that no patient experienced an untoward reaction. Two cases of uterine hyperstimulation occurred that required uterine tocolysis but were not associated with fetal distress. The use of prostaglandin gel appears to be a safe and effective method to improve cervical inducibility in patients undergoing induction for a variety of maternal and fetal indications. No increase in maternal plasma oxytocin concentration was detected after administration of 100 IU oxytocin into the umbilical veins of seven women immediately after delivery. The delivery of the placenta was accelerated after umbilical vein injection of 100 IU oxytocin in a placebo-controlled study of 40 women: 12 minutes (4 to 40) in the oxytocin group versus 40 minutes (29 to 40) in the placebo group (median and interquartile ranges), p less than 0.05. A study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of two methods of delivering prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) as a low-dose gel delivered in up to two sequential, 2.5-mg doses and as a single-dose, controlled-release, 10-mg pessary. A cervical change was present in both groups, but a Bishop score > or = 8 occurred in more nulliparous patients in the pessary than in the gel group by 12 hours after dosing. Labor was initiated without oxytocin more frequently in the pessary than gel group for nulliparas and multiparas. Reversal of uterine hyperstimulation was possible by removal of the pessary without tocolytic therapy. The controlled-release PGE2 pessary was more effective in changing the cervix in nulliparas and in initiating labor and offered the advantage of removal when desired. Ninety-four nulliparous women with a poor cervical score (less than 6) who had premature rupture of membranes at term were randomized by sealed envelope into two groups. One group received immediate stimulation of labor with oxytocin infusion. The second group received two prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) 3-mg pessaries 4 hours apart, followed by oxytocin infusion, if necessary. The interval between initiation of therapy to onset of labor was significantly longer in the PG group, but the length of labor was similar in both groups. The maximum dose of oxytocin needed was significantly higher in the oxytocin group. The cesarean delivery rate in the oxytocin group was 14.9%, compared with 19.1% in the PG group (not significantly different). All seven cesareans in the oxytocin group and seven of nine in the PG group were for failed stimulation of labor. Neonatal Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit were similar in the two groups. The incidence of maternal and neonatal infection was small and was not different in the two groups. The use of PGE2 3-mg pessaries 4 hours apart, followed by oxytocin infusion if necessary, did not confer any benefit over the use of intravenous oxytocin in obstetric or neonatal outcome when both agents were started a few hours after admission. In a single-blind study 51 patients with retention of the placenta were randomized into one of three groups: Group 1 was given 10 IU of oxytocin in 10 ml of sodium chloride into the umbilical vein; group 2 was given 10 ml of sodium chloride; group 3 was treated with manual removal of the placenta. No significant differences were recorded in groups 1 and 2, and no advantages were found in comparison with the procedure normally used.
UVI of oxytocin solution is an inexpensive and simple intervention that could be performed while placental delivery is awaited. However, high-quality randomized trials show that the use of oxytocin has little or no effect. Further research into the optimal timing of manual removal and into UVI of prostaglandins or plasma expander is warranted.