Posterior capsule opacification after phacoemulsification: silicone CeeOn Edge versus acrylate AcrySof intraocular lens. Posterior capsule opacification after extra capsular cataract extraction in Indian rural population: foldable acrylic vs poly (methyl-methacrylate) intraocular lenses a randomized clinical trial. Optic edge design as long-term factor for posterior capsular opacification rates. Posterior continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis with and without optic capture of the posterior chamber intraocular lens in the absence of vitrectomy. Long-term results of sealed capsule irrigation using distilled water to prevent posterior capsule opacification: a prospective clinical randomised trial. Randomized study of the blood-aqueous barrier reaction after phacoemulsification and extracapsular cataract extraction. Clinical evaluation of posterior capsule opacification in eyes with different small-incision intraocular lenses. The Madurai Intraocular Lens Study. II: Clinical outcomes. Effect of optic material on posterior capsule opacification in intraocular lenses with sharp-edge optics: randomized clinical trial.
To compare the rates and morphologic features of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) after small-incision phacoemulsification and in-the-bag implantation of 2 foldable intraocular lenses (IOLs) over an 18-month follow-up.
                Departments of Ophthalmology, Hospital of Conegliano, Conegliano, and Maggiore Hospital of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
                In an open clinical study, 78 cataract patients were randomly selected to have implantation of a silicone CeeOn Edge (Pharmacia) or acrylate AcrySof (Alcon) IOL after phacoemulsification cataract surgery. All the patients were operated on using a standard technique and in-the-bag IOL implantation. One eye in each patient was studied. Morphologic evaluation of PCO was performed using Evaluation of Posterior Capsule Opacification software.
                At 18 months in the CeeOn Edge group, 36 eyes (90%) had a clear posterior capsule and 4 (10%) had PCO that did not affect visual acuity. In the AcrySof group, 26 eyes (68%) had a clear posterior capsule, 11 (29%) had PCO that did not affect visual acuity, and 1 (3%) had PCO with a decrease of 2 or more lines of visual acuity that required a neodymium:YAG laser capsulotomy. No eye developed Elschnig pearls or stretched folds in the bag. The postoperative best corrected visual acuity ranged from 0.8 to 1.0 in 96% in the CeeOn Edge group and in 92% in the AcrySof group. No IOL haze or discoloration was observed in the CeeOn Edge group. Mild IOL decentration and tilting occurred in 4 AcrySof eyes; however, no glistenings were found any AcrySof IOL.
                Both the CeeOn Edge and AcrySof groups had a low incidence of PCO after an 18-month follow-up. The CeeOn Edge group had significantly less PCO than the AcrySof group. These results confirm that IOLs with square truncated edges create a barrier effect at the optic edge, reducing the overall incidence of PCO. To compare the performance of single-piece acrylic vspoly (methylmethacrylate) intraocular lenses (IOL) on the development of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) after conventional extra capsular cataract extraction (ECCE).
                One hundred and eighty-two eyes of 91 patients with bilateral senile cataract undergoing ECCE were prospectively randomized to receive a single-piece Alcon AcrySof SA60AT IOL or a single-piece EPOCH polymethylmethacrylate IOL in the first eye to have surgery. At 1, 6 and 12 months post-operative follow-up, digital retro illumination images of the posterior capsule were taken for PCO assessment semi-objectively using PCO (POCO automated analysis software) system. Relationship of anterior capsule contact (total off and partial cover) on optic for PCO was analyzed.
                The AcrySof IOL was associated with less PCO than EPOCH lens at 6 months (10.01+/-8.75% vs 32.26+/-27.44%; P<0.001) and 1-year (11.65+/-10.55% vs 38.38+/-29.62%; P<0.001) follow-up. The EPOCH IOL showed a remarkably significant difference on development of PCO with anterior capsule overlap on IOL optic (total off and part on) 1 year (P<0.039), whereas no such difference was observed with the AcrySof IOL (P=0.197).
                The AcrySof IOL led to significantly less PCO than the EPOCH IOL post-operatively after extracapsular cataract extraction. To compare the difference in posterior capsular opacification (PCO) between highly refractive silicone and hydrophobic acrylic foldable intraocular lenses (IOLs) with sharp and round edge designs 3 years after in-the-bag IOL implantation in subjects undergoing bilateral cataract surgery.
                Open-label, prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial.
                Two hundred and eighty-eight patients with bilateral surgery for senile cataract operated in German university clinics, eye hospitals, and private ophthalmic surgical centers (Aachen, Ahaus, Bad Hersfeld, Frankfurt/Main, Jena, Rosenheim, and Sulzbach/Saar).
                At each center, a highly refractive index silicone IOL with a sharp optic edge (CeeOn) was intraindividually compared either with a high-refractive index silicone IOL with a round optic edge (PhacoFlex) in 108 patients or with an acrylic IOL with a sharp optic edge (AcrySof) in 139 patients. All patients received standard phacoemulsification with IOL implantation in the bag in both eyes from the same surgeon. A morphological evaluation of PCO was performed by the Evaluation of the Posterior Capsule Opacification (EPCO) system 1 to 2 weeks and 11 to 14 and 35 to 37 months after surgery. The blinded digital pictures were evaluated by an independent investigator. Posterior capsular opacification was statistically evaluated by paired comparisons of 3-year cumulative incidences of neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Nd:YAG) laser treatment and EPCO scores.
                Posterior capsular opacification.
                The 3-year cumulative incidences of Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy were 2.1% (CeeOn), compared with 2.1% (AcrySof) (risk difference, 0%; 90% confidence interval, -3.4% to 3.4%), and 5.7% (CeeOn), compared with 17.0% (PhacoFlex) (risk difference, -11.4%; 90% confidence interval, -18.1% to -4.7%). In patients without Nd:YAG laser treatment, medians of the total area EPCO score were 0.0005 (CeeOn) versus 0.0440 (AcrySof) and 0 (CeeOn) versus 0.0700 (PhacoFlex) at 3 years. Functional results, safety, and handling did not significantly differ for the 3 lenses.
                Our results suggest that modern foldable IOLs have a low incidence of PCO after 3 years. There is less PCO for sharp optic edge designs independent of IOL material. To evaluate the efficacy of posterior continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (PCCC) with optic capture of the posterior chamber intraocular lens (PC IOL) in the absence of vitrectomy in preventing secondary opacification of the visual axis following pediatric cataract surgery.
                Thirty-four eyes of 28 children with congenital or developmental cataract, aged 1.5 to 12 years (mean, 6.39 years), were included in this prospective, randomized study. Anterior continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (ACCC) with PCCC without optic capture of the PC IOL was performed in group A (18 eyes) and ACCC with PCCC with optic capture of the PC IOL was performed in group B (16 eyes). None of the eyes underwent anterior vitrectomy. Secondary opacification of the visual axis, visual acuity, and possible complications were observed and analyzed.
                The follow-up period ranged from 8 to 28 months (mean, 17.5 months). All 16 eyes (100%) in group B had a clear visual axis at the end of follow-up. Eight eyes (44.4%) in group A had significant opacification of the visual axis. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P = .0011). No eye in group B required secondary intervention, whereas all 8 eyes in group A with significant secondary opacification required secondary intervention. There was no statistically significant difference in other complications such as anterior chamber reaction, fibrin formation, lenticular precipitates, and posterior synechiae. The final best-corrected visual acuity at the end of follow-up was comparable in the two groups (P > .05).
                PCCC with optic capture of the PC IOL prevents secondary opacification of the visual axis even in the absence of vitrectomy. We investigated long-term safety and efficacy of sealed capsule irrigation (SCI) during cataract surgery to prevent posterior capsule opacification (PCO).
                One eye of each of 17 patients (mean age: 70.1+/-9.7 years) who presented with bilateral cataracts was randomly chosen for SCI treatment. After phacoemulsification, the capsular bag was vacuum sealed with the PerfectCapsule device (Milvella) followed by SCI using distilled water for two minutes. No vacuum loss occurred during irrigation. Each patient's fellow eye served as a control. One hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens model was implanted in all eyes. Five patients had to be excluded due to deep anterior chamber, small pupil or unilateral surgery. Follow-up examinations took place one day and one, three, six, 12 and 24 months after surgery. We evaluated safety parameters, anterior capsule (AC) overlapping and PCO.
                Postoperatively, mean best corrected visual acuity, pachymetry, endothelial cell count, intraocular pressure, AC overlapping and PCO showed no statistically significant difference between SCI and the control group (p>0.05, Wilcoxon test).
                SCI is a safe procedure and enables the specific pharmacological targeting of lens epithelial cells inside the capsular bag. Using distilled water, however, it is not possible to reduce PCO development significantly. Thus, alternative substances should be evaluated. To compare the blood-aqueous barrier (BAB) breakdown after endocapsular phacoemulsification and extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE).
                Forty-two patients (64-82 years) enrolled for cataract surgery were randomly assigned to phacoemulsification (group I) or ECCE (group II). Patients with pseudoexfoliation syndrome, small pupils, glaucoma, uveitis, dark brown irides, diabetes, treatment with eye drops or anti-inflammatory drugs were excluded. In group I the patients were operated with continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (CCC), phacoemulsification and implantation of a poly-(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) intraocular lens (IOL) through a 5.2 mm self-sealing incision. In group II linear capsulotomy, nucleus expression and PMMA IOL implantation through a large incision (10-11 mm) were performed. The incision was sutured. Before surgery and three days and three months after surgery postoperative inflammation and BAB reaction were measured by laser flare photometry and anterior chamber fluorophotometry after intravenous administration of fluorescein. The BAB diffusion coefficient was calculated. Laser flare photometry was performed also after one and two years.
                According to fluorophotometry, ECCE induced significantly more postoperative BAB breakdown than did phacoemulsification at three days (p=0.00016) and three months (p=0.00829). Laser flare photometry showed more inflammation in the ECCE group than in the phacoemulsification group at three days postoperatively (p=0.00005).
                This study suggests that cataract surgery performed with a small, self-sealing incision, CCC and phacoemulsification induces a reduced surgical trauma with less BAB breakdown compared to ECCE using a large sutured incision, linear capsulotomy and nucleus expression. To present a new method to quantify posterior capsular opacity with an anterior eye segment image analyzer (EAS 1000, NIDEK).
                This study was comprised of patients who underwent phacoemulsification intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. Three types of IOLS, acrylic, silicone, and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) were allocated to 30 eyes and clinically evaluated. Patients were observed for 3 years postoperatively using an anterior eye segment image analyzer (EAS1000). Opacity was determined by calculating the area of opacity from a retroillumination image. In the retroillumination mode of analysis, the measurement was limited to a 4-mm-diameter region of the pupillary zone to eliminate the influence of anterior capsular opacity. For color map analysis, the threshold level was expressed as the color tone of 0-255 CCT (computer compatible tape). The glare disability was measured to evaluate the three types of IOLs.
                The color map analysis revealed a time-related increase in the opacity level of patients receiving the PMMA IOL implant. Three years after surgery, the levels were significantly higher in the PMMA group (P < 0.01) compared to the acryl and silicone groups: acryl (17.5 +/- 3.8), silicone (18.0 +/- 6.2%), and PMMA 36.5 +/- 32.9%.
                Quantitative evaluation using an anterior eye segment image analyzer is effective for observing the degree of posterior capsule opacification. The color map analysis using an anterior eye segment image correlated with the visual function revealed that the time-related increase in the opacity level was significant during the third year in patients receiving PMMA IOL implantation. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of extracapsular cataract extraction with posterior chamber intraocular lens (ECCE/PC-IOL) compared with intracapsular cataract extraction with aphakic glasses (ICCE-AG).
                In a nonmasked randomized controlled clinical trial, 3,400 bilaterally vision-impaired patients aged 40 to 75 years with operable cataract were randomly assigned to receive either ICCE-AG or ECCE/PC-IOL at the Aravind Eye Hospital in India. The surgery was performed by one of four study surgeons. Patients were hospitalized for 5 postoperative days, with follow-up visits at 2, 6, and 12 months after discharge. Postsurgery evaluations were conducted by two independent study ophthalmologists.
                At any single postoperative follow-up time point, there were no statistically significant differences of clinical relevance between treatment groups for any complication of a serious nature except cystoid macular edema, which was more common with ICCE (4.2% vs 1.6%). In general, whether of a trivial, intermediate, or serious nature, complication rates were low at each evaluation time point. Cumulatively, the incidence of serious complications of all types throughout the 1-year study period was 14.5% for patients in the ICCE-AG group and 7.7% in the ECCE group (P < .001). Best-corrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better at 12 months was attained by 90.7% of ICCE-AG patients and 96.3% of ECCE/PC-IOL patients (P < .001).
                Although both operative procedures are safe and effective for cataract patients with bilateral impairment, ECCE/PC-IOL is superior to ICCE-AG in terms of both visual acuity restoration and safety. Comparison of the intensity of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) between a silicone intraocular lens (IOL) and a hydrophobic acrylic IOL, both of them 3-piece and open-loop and having truncated optics with sharp edges.
                Randomized, controlled, patient- and examiner-masked trial with intrapatient comparison.
                One hundred six eyes of 53 patients with age-related bilateral cataract.
                Each patient had cataract surgery in both eyes and received a silicone IOL in one eye and a hydrophobic acrylic IOL in the fellow eye. Follow-up examinations were at 1 and 3 years after surgery. The patients were examined at the slit lamp, visual acuity (VA) was assessed, and standardized high-resolution digital retroillumination images of the posterior capsule were taken. The amount of PCO was assessed subjectively at the slit lamp and objectively using automated image analysis software. Data of 56 eyes of 28 patients, who were examined at each follow-up, were analyzed.
                Posterior capsule opacification intensity at 3 years as measured with automated image analysis.
                At 1 and 3 years after surgery, PCO did not differ between the silicone (1.6 and 1.9 [image analysis scores, 0-10 scale], respectively) and acrylic IOLs (1.7 and 2.2) (P > 0.24). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in best-corrected VA, rhexis/IOL overlap, capsular folds, and amount of anterior capsule opacification during the follow-up period. In each group, one neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (YAG) laser capsulotomy was performed during the entire study duration.
                Silicone and hydrophobic acrylic are similarly effective in inducing the PCO-inhibiting effect of a rectangular, sharp optic edge. Three years after surgery, the PCO intensity and the YAG rate were low with both IOL models.
This review provides evidence from seven RCTs that phacoemulsification gives a better outcome than ECCE with sutures. We also found evidence that ECCE with a posterior chamber lens implant provides better visual outcome than ICCE with aphakic glasses. The long term effect of posterior capsular opacification (PCO) needs to be assessed in larger populations. The data also suggests that ICCE with an anterior chamber lens implant is an effective alternative to ICCE with aphakic glasses, with similar safety. Phacoemulsification provides the best visual outcomes but will only be accessible to the poorer countries if the cost of phacoemulsification and foldable IOLs decrease. Manual small incision cataract surgery provides early visual rehabilitation and comparable visual outcome to PHACO. It has better visual outcomes than ECCE and can be used in any clinic that is currently carrying out ECCE with IOL. Further research from developing regions are needed to compare the cost and longer term outcomes of these procedures e.g. PCO and corneal endothelial cell damage.