Aggressive or expectant management for patients with severe preeclampsia between 28-34 weeks' gestation: a randomized controlled trial. A small randomised trial of low-dose aspirin in women at high risk of pre-eclampsia. Methyldopa versus no drug treatment in the management of mild pre-eclampsia. Treatment of severe preeclampsia with antithrombin concentrate: results of a prospective feasibility study. A randomised controlled trial of intravenous magnesium sulphate versus placebo in the management of women with severe pre-eclampsia. Antithrombin therapy for severe preeclampsia: results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. BI51.017 Study Group. Usefulness of aspirin therapy in high-risk pregnant women with abnormal uterine artery Doppler ultrasound at 14-16 weeks pregnancy: randomized controlled clinical trial. WHO antenatal care randomised trial for the evaluation of a new model of routine antenatal care. Abbreviated postpartum magnesium sulfate therapy for women with mild preeclampsia: a randomized controlled trial.
Fifty-eight women with severe preeclampsia between 28-34 weeks' gestation qualified for a randomized controlled trial to establish whether elective delivery 48 hours after administration of betamethasone (aggressive-management group) or delivery later as indicated by maternal or fetal condition (expectant-management group) was more beneficial to maternal and fetal outcome. Twenty women who qualified were not randomized because they developed maternal or fetal indications necessitating delivery within 48 hours; these newborns developed most of the complications. Expectant management was not associated with an increase in maternal complications, but it significantly prolonged the gestational age (mean 7.1 days; P less than .05), reduced the number of neonates requiring ventilation (P less than .05), and reduced the number of neonatal complications (P less than .05). To determine if aspirin (ASA) therapy reduces the incidence of pre-eclampsia in women at high risk of this condition.
                Randomised clinical trial. We recruited pregnant women with gestational age at randomisation <14 weeks, who satisfied the following criteria: chronic hypertension, history of severe pre-eclampsia or eclampsia or intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) or intrauterine foetal death. Nineteen women in the no-treatment group and 16 in the ASA group were successfully followed up.
                The mean birthweight was higher in the ASA group than in the no-treatment group (2790 g (S.D. 340 g) versus 2616 g (S.D. 779 g)), but the difference was not statistically significant. We found no statistically significant differences between the groups in the proportion of infants with birthweight below 2500 g (13.3% versus 29.4%) and the number of cases with pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH)/pre-eclampsia (31.3% versus 36.8%).
                These limited data give some support to the potential favourable effect of early treatment with ASA in pregnant women at risk of PIH and IUGR. To evaluate the efficacy of methyldopa in the treatment of mild pre-eclampsia, to prevent its progress and to investigate its effect on the pregnancy outcomes.
                Randomised clinical trial.
                Wad Medani Hospital in the central Sudan.
                Seventy primigravidae with single, alive baby of 28-36 weeks gestational age suffering from true mild pre-eclampsia were enrolled. The patients were randomised in two groups, treatment group who received methyldopa 750-4000 mg/day (n=34) and a control group who received no treatment (n=36). All the (treatment and control) patients were drug followed as in-patients till the delivery, seen with their babies on the days 7, 42 after the delivery.
                The outcomes examined were, rise of the diastolic blood pressure to 110 mm Hg or more, occurrence of imminent eclampsia or the eclampsia, if the maturity could be achieved, occurrence of intrauterine growth retardation, abruptio placentae, mode of delivery, birth weight, placental weight, perinatal death, Apgar score and referral of the babies to the pediatrician.
                Three out of 34 (8.8%) of the treatment group had a rise in the diastolic blood pressure of 110 mm Hg, 18/36 (50%) of the control had a rise in the diastolic blood pressure of 110 mmHg (p < 0.05). Three out of thirty four (8.8%) of the treatment group developed imminent eclampsia, while 10/36 (27.8) of the control group developed imminent eclampsia (p < 0.05). The maturity was achieved in 82.3% and 88.8% of the treatment and the control, respectively (p > 0.05). There were ten (14.2%) perinatal deaths, four of them in the treatment group, while six in the control (p > 0.05). There was no difference regarding birth weight, occurrence of intrauterine growth retardation, placental weight, mode of delivery, Apgar score, referral of the babies to the paediatrician. No patient developed eclampsia or abruptio placenta; there was no maternal death in both groups.
                Methyldopa can prevent the progress of the mild pre-eclampsia to severe pre-eclampsia, without affecting the maturity, birthweight or the neonatal outcomes. The prospective feasibility study was designed to determine whether treatment with antithrombin (AT) concentrates could be used for patients with severe preeclampsia to provide clinical efficacy without the full systemic antihypertensive drug. Twenty-nine severe preeclamptic patients (24 to 36 weeks of gestation, gestosis index [GI] >/= 6 points) were randomized to receive AT (1500 U/day) or not. AT was given intravenously once daily for 7 consecutive days. Twenty-four hours of continuous infusion of 5000 U/day of unfractionated heparin was given simultaneously in both groups. There were no statistical differences in the clinical profiles of the two groups. Maternal symptoms were evaluated from the difference of GI before and after treatment, and fetal findings were evaluated from the changes of the biophysical profile score. Improvement was significantly greater in the AT group for both the GI ( P = 0.046) and the biophysical profile score ( P = 0.022). The improvement of coagulation parameters was also evaluated. The improvement of plasmin-plasmin inhibitor complex (PPIC), D-dimer levels, and platelet counts was observed in the AT group compared with the non-AT group. The coagulation index as a composite coagulation test parameter showed a significantly improvement in the AT group. No adverse events related to AT were observed. Given that AT plus heparin was significantly better than treatment with heparin alone for improvement of both GI and biophysical profile of infant, it is suggested that therapy with AT alone might be effective enough for severe preeclampsia. To determine whether the administration of prophylactic intravenous magnesium sulphate reduces the occurrence of eclampsia in women with severe pre-eclampsia.
                Randomised controlled trial.
                A tertiary referral obstetric unit.
                Eight hundred and twenty-two women with severe pre-eclampsia requiring termination of pregnancy by induction of labour or caesarean section.
                The women were randomised to receive either placebo (saline) or magnesium sulphate intravenously. The investigators were blinded to the contents of the pre-mixed solutions.
                The occurrence of eclampsia in the two groups.
                The data of 699 women were evaluated. Fourteen were withdrawn after randomisation. The overall incidence of eclampsia was 1.8%. Of 345 women who received magnesium sulphate, one developed eclampsia (0.3%); in the placebo group, 11/340 women (3.2%) developed eclampsia (relative risk 0.09; 95% confidence interval 0.01-0.69; P = 0.003).
                The use of intravenous magnesium sulphate in the management of women with severe pre-eclampsia significantly reduced the development of eclampsia. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted to evaluate whether treatment with Antithrombin (AT) concentrates improved the clinical and perinatal outcome in patients with severe preeclampsia. Severe preeclamptic patients (24 to 35 weeks of gestation. Gestosis Index (GI) > or = 6 points) were randomized into two groups: 66 received AT and 67 received placebo. There were no statistical differences in the clinical profiles of the two groups. Study drugs were given intravenously once daily for 7 consecutive days. Maternal symptoms were evaluated from the difference of GI between before and after treatment, and fetal findings were evaluated from the changes of the biophysical profile score and the estimated fetal weight gain. Improvement was significantly greater in the AT group for both the GI (p = 0.020) and the estimated fetal weight gain (p = 0.029). The improvement of coagulation parameters was also evaluated. The D-dimer levels increased significantly in the placebo group (p = 0.026), but did not change in the AT group. Gestation was significantly prolonged (p = 0.007), and the number of low-birth weight infants was significantly smaller (p = 0.011) in the AT group. No adverse events related to AT were observed. It is revealed that AT concentrate therapy for preeclampsia is effective and safe, leading to an improved perinatal outcome. To assess the effectiveness of low-dose aspirin in the prevention of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) in high-risk pregnant women with abnormal findings at uterine artery Doppler velocimetry performed at 14-16 weeks.
                Randomized controlled clinical trial.
                Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt.
                The trial enrolled 139 women at risk of preeclampsia or IUGR, with abnormal uterine artery Doppler findings that included the presence of unilateral or bilateral diastolic notch, high resistance index (RI), or high pulsatility index (PI) at 14-16 weeks of gestation. The women were randomly allocated into two groups, one receiving aspirin since admission to hospital (n=74) and the other serving as control (n=65). All women were followed up until delivery to assess maternal and perinatal outcomes. T-test was used for comparison of quantitative variables, and categorical variables were compared by chi2 test. OUTCOME CRITERIA: Development of mild or severe preeclampsia, time of onset of preeclampsia, preterm delivery, and the development of IUGR.
                Preeclampsia developed in 35% of women receiving aspirin and 62% of women in the control group (P=0.003), with severe preeclampsia developing in 8% and 23% of women (P=0.215), respectively. Preeclampsia before 37 weeks of gestation was recorded in only 4% of women receiving aspirin as opposed to 83% of controls (P<0.001). In the group of women receiving aspirin, 19% of newborns suffered from IUGR as opposed to 32%of newborns in the control group (P=0.106). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the rate of preterm delivery (P=0.080), mode of delivery (P=0.971), Apgar score <5 after one minute (P=0.273) and after 5 minutes (P=0.941), maternal or neonatal bleeding (P=0.948), and neonatal birth weight (P=0.399).
                Low-dose aspirin administered as early as 14-16 weeks of gestation to pregnant women at high risk of preeclampsia with abnormal uterine Doppler findings may reduce or modify the course of severe preeclampsia. Its effects on the prevention of IUGR need further evaluation. We undertook a multicentre randomised controlled trial that compared the standard model of antenatal care with a new model that emphasises actions known to be effective in improving maternal or neonatal outcomes and has fewer clinic visits.
                Clinics in Argentina, Cuba, Saudi Arabia, and Thailand were randomly allocated to provide either the new model (27 clinics) or the standard model currently in use (26 clinics). All women presenting for antenatal care at these clinics over an average of 18 months were enrolled. Women enrolled in clinics offering the new model were classified on the basis of history of obstetric and clinical conditions. Those who did not require further specific assessment or treatment were offered the basic component of the new model, and those deemed at higher risk received the usual care for their conditions; however, all were included in the new-model group for the analyses, which were by intention to treat. The primary outcomes were low birthweight (<2500 g), pre-eclampsia/eclampsia, severe postpartum anaemia (<90 g/L haemoglobin), and treated urinary-tract infection. There was an assessment of quality of care and an economic evaluation.
                Women attending clinics assigned the new model (n=12568) had a median of five visits compared with eight within the standard model (n=11958). More women in the new model than in the standard model were referred to higher levels of care (13.4% vs 7.3%), but rates of hospital admission, diagnosis, and length of stay were similar. The groups had similar rates of low birthweight (new model 7.68% vs standard model 7.14%; stratified rate difference 0.96 [95% CI -0.01 to 1.92]), postpartum anaemia (7.59% vs 8.67%; 0.32), and urinary-tract infection (5.95% vs 7.41%; -0.42 [-1.65 to 0.80]). For pre-eclampsia/eclampsia the rate was slightly higher in the new model (1.69% vs 1.38%; 0.21 [-0.25 to 0.67]). Adjustment by several confounding variables did not modify this pattern. There were negligible differences between groups for several secondary outcomes. Women and providers in both groups were, in general, satisfied with the care received, although some women assigned the new model expressed concern about the timing of visits. There was no cost increase, and in some settings the new model decreased cost.
                Provision of routine antenatal care by the new model seems not to affect maternal and perinatal outcomes. It could be implemented without major resistance from women and providers and may reduce cost. To determine whether women receiving 12-hour and 24-hour postpartum magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) therapy for mild preeclampsia have differing clinical courses.
                Consenting women with suspected mild preeclampsia were randomly assigned to 12 hours or 24 hours of MgSO4 postpartum therapy. Treatment was continued after the assigned time period if there was evidence of severe preeclampsia. The frequency of progression to severe disease and other outcomes were compared between study groups using the Fisher exact, chi2, and Student t tests where appropriate.
                Between January 2001 and August 2004, 200 women were enrolled. The 12-hour and 24-hour groups were similar in age, parity, delivered gestational age, anesthesia, and mode of delivery, as well as for proteinuria and blood pressure. In the 12-hour group, MgSO4 treatment was extended in seven women (6.9%) for progression to severe disease versus one (1.1%) in the 24-hour group (P = .07). Women who developed severe disease had higher blood pressures at the first prenatal visit (140/78 versus 122/69, P < or = .02 for systolic and diastolic pressures), at the time of randomization (152/88 versus 135/78, P < or = .03 for systolic and diastolic pressures), and were more likely to have insulin-requiring diabetes (27.3% versus 4.4%, P = .03). No 12-hour patients required treatment beyond 24 hours postpartum. There were no seizures, MgSO4 toxicity, or intolerance in either group.
                Twelve hours of postpartum MgSO4 therapy for mild preeclampsia is associated with infrequent disease progression and a clinical course similar to that with 24-hour therapy. Patients with chronic hypertension and insulin-requiring diabetes are at risk for progression to severe disease postpartum.
                ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00344058
                I.
There are insufficient data for any reliable recommendation about which policy of care should be used for women with severe early onset pre-eclampsia. Further large trials are needed.
[Note: The citation in the awaiting classification section of the review may alter the conclusions of the review once assessed.]