Should hyperbaric oxygen be added to treatment in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss? Antiviral treatment of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss: a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Treatment of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss with antiviral therapy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Idiopathic Subjective Tinnitus Treated by Amitriptyline Hydrochloride/Biofeedback. Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of refractory chronic tinnitus: a randomized, placebo controlled study. An experimental evaluation of the effects of transcutaneous nerve stimulation (TNS) and applied relaxation (AR) on hearing ability, tinnitus and dizziness in patients with Menière's disease. Neuromonics Tinnitus Treatment: third clinical trial. Treatment of sudden sensorineural hearing loss with systemic steroids and valacyclovir. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation improve tinnitus in normal hearing patients: a double-blind controlled, clinical and neuroimaging outcome study.
At present, there is still no agreement about the therapy of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSHL). Hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) is used in the therapy of ISSHL to increase the partial oxygen pressure and the oxygen concentration in the inner ear and also to improve the blood profile and the microcirculation. In our prospective randomized study, we aimed to investigate the therapeutic effects of HBO therapy in the 1st 2 weeks of the onset of ISSHL. Fifty-one hospitalized patients with confirmed ISSHL who had received therapy were grouped randomly into two groups. Twenty-one patients (group I) received steroids, plasma expander dextrans (rheomacrodex), diazepam, pentoxiphylline and salt restriction, and 30 patients (group II) received the same basic treatment with the addition of HBO therapy. Audiological assessments of the patients were performed before and after the treatment. The hearing gains at frequencies of 250, 500, 1,000, 2,000 and 4,000 Hz were calculated separately. The level of hearing loss at the five frequencies was assessed in three groups at the first visit: equal or below 60 dB, between 61-80 dB and equal or above 81 dB. The average of the mean hearing gains at the five frequencies of the patients according to the age groups in group II was compared. The mean hearing gains at the five frequencies were compared between the two groups, and statistically significant improvement was detected in all the frequencies except at 2,000 Hz in group II. The mean hearing gains in group II were found to be significantly high in patients with initial hearing levels up to 60 dB in comparison to patients with initial hearing levels below 60 dB. When age groups and mean hearing gains were compared, there was no statistically significant difference in group I. In group II, the mean hearing gains were 39.1+/-18.3 dB in patients younger than 50 years and 22.7+/-11.3 dB in patients older than 50 years ( P=0.044). In conclusion, the addition of HBO therapy to conventional treatment modalities significantly improves the outcome of ISSHL, especially at the frequencies of 250, 500, 1,000 and 4,000 Hz and in hearing loss of above 61 dB. Furthermore, HBO therapy was found to be more effective in patients younger than 50 years. A subclinical viral labyrinthitis has been postulated in the literature to elicit Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss. An etiological role for the herpes virus family is assumed. Corticosteroids possess a limited beneficial effect on hearing recovery in ISSHL. In this study, the therapeutic value of the antiherpetic drug aciclovir (Zovirax) on hearing recovery in 44 ISSHL patients receiving prednisolone is evaluated in a multicentre clinical trial. The study is designed prospectively, randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled. Subjective parameters include hearing recovery, a pressure sensation on the affected ear, disequilibrium or vertigo and tinnitus. Audiometric parameters include pure tone and speech audiometry. A one-year follow up is obtained. Both the pressure sensation and disequilibrium or vertigo have a good prognosis, but tinnitus, occurring in most patients, has a poor prognosis. Hearing recovery prognosis depends on the severity of initial hearing loss, and not on vestibular involvement. No beneficial effect from combining aciclovir with prednisolone can be established in ISSHL. A subclinical viral labyrinthitis has been postulated in the literature to elicit idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSHL). An etiologic role for the herpes family is assumed. Corticosteroids possess a limited beneficial effect on hearing recovery in ISSHL. In this study, we evaluated the therapeutic value of the antiherpetic drug acyclovir (Zovirax) on hearing recovery in 91 patients with ISSHL who received prednisolone in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. The audiometric parameters included pure tone and speech audiometry. Subjective parameters studied included hearing recovery, a pressure sensation in the affected ear, vertigo, and tinnitus. A 1-year follow-up was obtained. Hearing recovery for the whole group averaged about 35 dB and was independent of the severity of the initial hearing loss or vestibular involvement. Speech audiometry improved from 49% to 75%. After 12 months, pressure sensation and vertigo decreased to 15.6% (acyclovir) and 10.3% (placebo) and 12.5% (acyclovir) and 10.7% (placebo), respectively. Tinnitus decreased slightly, to 46.9% (acyclovir) and 55.2% (placebo), in the same period (p > .05 for all parameters). We conclude that no beneficial effect from combining acyclovir with prednisolone can be established in patients with ISSHL. The efficiency of two treatment modalities for subjective/idiopathic tinnitus (SIT): biofeedback (BF) and amitriptyline hydrochloride (AT) was investigated in 225 randomly selected subjects. Findings show that after 10 weeks of treatment in the BF group, 43.5% of the patients reported an improvement of tinnitus during activity. In the AT group, 27.5% of patients reported subjective improvement of tinnitus at rest although only 15.8% of the AT patients reported improvement during activity. Biofeedback during rest had a significantly better effect on tinnitus disturbance than AT. No objective diminishment of tinnitus loudness was found as a result of any of the treatment modalities. We believe that BF can help tinnitus patients especially during periods of rest and we also suggest trying tricyclic antidepressant drugs such as AT for treatment of tinnitus patients, in small doses, however, to minimize the side effects of this drug. Subjective tinnitus (ST) is one of the most common and yet most unclear of otologic symptoms.(1-4) ST can accompany any type of hearing loss including both sensorineural as well as conductive hearing loss, and may originate from any part of the auditory pathway.(1,5) Treatment of ST must be primarily directed to the basic illness diagnosed after a thorough general ear-nose-throat and neurologic evaluation.(6) Severity of ST is evaluated both objectively, by determining the pitch and intensity of the tinnitus,(7) and subjectively as described by the patient. Because of the relatively high incidence of ST and in some patients, the severe personal reaction to it, many different treatments have been suggested, but generally only small to moderate success has been achieved in reducing tinnitus and its consequences, if any at all.(8) In this study we examined the effect of two treatment modalities: amitriptyline hydro-chloride and biofeedback. The pathophysiologic mechanisms of idiopathic tinnitus remain unclear. Low frequency rTMS applied over the auditory cortex has been proposed as a new and causally oriented treatment approach for pathological conditions with abnormal, increased cortical activity including tinnitus with increased activity in the auditory cortex. However available studies are characterized by a positive reports on the therapeutic effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for treatment of tinnitus, there are few details about the duration of specific treatment effects.
                The design of the study was randomized, prospective, placebo-controlled. Right-handed patients were treated with either real or sham 1 Hz frequency rTMS over a period of two weeks. Fifty-two patients with chronic, treatment resistant tinnitus and stable medication were enrolled in the study after giving written informed consent and forty-two patients completed the study and were included in data analysis.
                The ability to reduce the symptoms of tinnitus appeared in both randomized groups immediately after the 1 Hz rTMS and sham stimulation phase. There was a significant reduction in both groups of the tinnitus total score on the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) (real rTMS p=0.005; sham rTMS p=0.049) and Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ) total score (real rTMS p=0.003; sham rTMS p=0.049). On the THI evaluation scale, in the real rTMS a mild worsening was noted during week 6 in comparison with the state attained in week 2. During the subsequent course of the study a significant reduction of the total score persisted in the case of THI (real rTMS week 14 p=0.033 and borderline week 26 p=0.058). The reduction of symptoms as evaluated using the TQ was significant compared to baseline in the real rTMS group at week 2, 6 and 14 (p=0.003; p=0.024; p=0.022). The group treated with sham stimulation reached significant reduction of symptoms only at week 2 (p=0.049). A comparison of the difference in the recorded values of the total score during follow-up in relation to baseline expressed as a percentage demonstrates the difference in the effect of rTMS and sham stimulation as evaluated by both the basic scales. Graphical analysis of mean patterns of treatment response according to stimulation type shows a similarity between treatment response patterns evaluated by reduction of the total scores using THI and TQ.
                The principal finding of this study is that real 1 Hz rTMS treatment was capable of significantly reducing the total baseline score of basic scales that measure tinnitus severity. This result is important as it proves that significant reduction of symptoms can be achieved even in a group of patients with long-term symptoms resistant to pharmacological treatment. In 20 patients diagnosed with Menière's disease, transcutaneous nerve stimulation (TNS) and applied relaxation (AR) were used as a treatment aimed at reducing tinnitus and dizziness and increasing hearing ability. The main aim of the study was to examine whether TNS could be regarded as a more beneficial treatment regimen than AR. An experimental between-group cross-over design was used. The results from the experimental phase (group comparisons) showed a significantly increased ability to hear for the TNS group when measured on visual analogue scales. During the same period, the AR-group showed a significant hearing improvement for the ear not primarily affected by Menière's disease as measured with pure tone audiometry. The vestibular tests did not reveal any significant changes either after TNS or AR intervention. Tinnitus matching showed changes of pitch and loudness before and after both TNS and AR intervention. However, no statistically significant changes between treatment regimes were found on these measures. The results from this study did not show TNS to be superior to AR in reducing tinnitus, dizziness or increasing hearing ability. The Neuromonics Tinnitus Treatment combines the use of a novel approach to acoustic stimulation with a structured program of counseling and support by a clinician specifically trained in tinnitus rehabilitation. The distinctive acoustic component has been designed to provide stimulation to auditory pathways deprived by hearing loss, engage positively with the limbic system, and allow intermittent, momentary tinnitus perception within a pleasant and relaxing stimulus, thereby facilitating desensitization to the tinnitus signal. The purposes of this study were (1) to demonstrate the efficacy of the treatment, when enhanced with various modifications since previously reported trials and (2) to test the relative clinical effectiveness of two variations of the approach. In the first, intermittent tinnitus perception was facilitated throughout treatment through the use of a stimulus in which intensity peaks allowed the patients' tinnitus perception to be completely covered up, whereas in the intensity troughs their tinnitus was briefly discernible. In the second, subjects experienced little tinnitus perception while listening to the treatment for the first 2 mo, then experienced intermittent perception.
                Thirty-five subjects with a predominantly moderate to severe level of tinnitus-related distress before treatment were randomly allocated into one of two treatment groups, corresponding to the two stage-based variations of the Neuromonics Tinnitus Treatment. Participants were provided with a high-fidelity personal sound player with earphones and an acoustic stimulus that had been spectrally modified according to their individual audiometric profile. They were instructed to use the acoustic stimulus for at least 2 hr per day, particularly at those times when their tinnitus was usually disturbing. Each group had equal amounts of clinician time for education, monitoring, and support.
                At 2, 4, 6, and 12 mo after commencing treatment, both groups displayed clinically and statistically significant improvements in tinnitus distress, awareness, and minimum masking levels as well as loudness discomfort levels. Improvements increased with time over the first 6 mo of therapy, at which time 91% of all subjects across the two groups reported an improvement in tinnitus disturbance (as measured by the Tinnitus Reaction Questionnaire) of at least 40%, with a mean improvement of 65%. Also, 80% of subjects at 6 mo reported a level of tinnitus disturbance that was no longer clinically significant. There was some indication of a more consistent benefit over 12 mo for the group that was provided initially with a high level of tinnitus interaction; however, inter-group differences were not statistically significant. A relation between reported treatment usage (hours per day) and clinical outcomes was observed, suggesting that a "dosage effect" may apply with the stimulus provided.
                This study found that the Neuromonics Tinnitus Treatment provides rapid and profound improvements to the severity of tinnitus symptoms and their effect on the subject's quality of life. This was a consistent effect, provided by a treatment that subjects reported as being pleasant to use. Both of the stage-based variations of the treatment that were tested in this study were shown to be successful in achieving these outcomes. To determine if the addition of an antiviral medication to systemic steroids improves recovery in the treatment of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss.
                Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled prospective multicenter clinical trial.
                The study was administrated from a tertiary care center and clinical research institute; patients were enrolled by otolaryngologists in academic and private practice outpatient settings.
                Inclusion criteria included 1) loss of at least 30 dB in 3 contiguous frequencies over <3 days in patients with previous audiometry, 2) marked loss of hearing in patients with prior subjectively normal hearing and no previous audiometry, with contralateral hearing taken as baseline, and 3) patients seen within 10 days of onset of hearing loss. Pretreatment evaluation included audiometry and complete blood cell count, complete blood chemistry, and fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption test. Auditory brainstem-evoked response or magnetic resonance imaging was recommended.
                Patients received prednisone (80 mg/d for 4 d, then tapered over 8 d) with placebo or prednisone with valacyclovir (1 g, 3 times a day for 10 days).
                1) Audiometric assessment at presentation, Week 2, and Week 6; 2) Hearing Screening Inventory questionnaire twice weekly for 6 weeks; and 3) acute Short Form-12 questionnaire at presentation and Week 2.
                Of 105 subjects enrolled in the study, 84 subjects were evaluable. There were no significant differences between placebo and valacyclovir treatment groups in terms of hearing recovery or symptom recovery on the basis of the Hearing Screening Inventory or Short Form-12 questionnaires. No adverse events were related to the use of valacyclovir.
                Within the paradigm used in the current study, an antiviral medication did not provide more benefit than steroid alone in the treatment of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Tinnitus is a frequent disorder which is very difficult to treat and there is compelling evidence that tinnitus is associated with functional alterations in the central nervous system. Targeted modulation of tinnitus-related cortical activity has been proposed as a promising new treatment approach. We aimed to investigate both immediate and long-term effects of low frequency (1 Hz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in patients with tinnitus and normal hearing.
                Using a parallel design, 20 patients were randomized to receive either active or placebo stimulation over the left temporoparietal cortex for five consecutive days. Treatment results were assessed by using the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory. Ethyl cysteinate dimmer-single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging was performed before and 14 days after rTMS.
                After active rTMS there was significant improvement of the tinnitus score as compared to sham rTMS for up to 6 months after stimulation. SPECT measurements demonstrated a reduction of metabolic activity in the inferior left temporal lobe after active rTMS.
                These results support the potential of rTMS as a new therapeutic tool for the treatment of chronic tinnitus, by demonstrating a significant reduction of tinnitus complaints over a period of at least 6 months and significant reduction of neural activity in the inferior temporal cortex, despite the stimulation applied on the superior temporal cortex.
For people with acute ISSHL, the application of HBOT significantly improved hearing, but the clinical significance remains unclear. We could not assess the effect of HBOT on tinnitus by pooled analysis. In view of the modest number of patients, methodological shortcomings and poor reporting, this result should be interpreted cautiously. An appropriately powered trial is justified to define those patients (if any) who can be expected to derive most benefit from HBOT.
There is no evidence of a beneficial effect of HBOT on chronic ISSHL or tinnitus and we do not recommend the use of HBOT for this purpose.