Induction of labour: a comparison of a single prostaglandin E2 vaginal tablet with amniotomy and intravenous oxytocin. Comparison of intravenous oxytocin and prostaglandin E2 for induction of labour using automatic and non-automatic infusion techniques. Double-blind trial of prostaglandin F2alpha and oxytocin in the induction of labour. [Comparison between prostaglandin E2 gel and oxytocin in medically indicated labor induction]. Induction of labor by intracervical prostaglandin gel and oxytocin infusion in primigravid women with unfavorable cervix. Prostaglandin E2 for induction of labor in patients with premature rupture of membranes at term. Induction of labour: the effect of vaginal prostaglandin or i.v. oxytocin--a matter of time only? Cervical ripening and labor outcome with preinduction intracervical prostaglandin E2 (Prepidil) gel. A randomised controlled trial of an oral solution of prostaglandin E2 and oral oxytocin used immediately after low amniotomy for induction of labour in the presence of a favourable cervix.
In a randomized controlled study of 100 women of low parity and favourable induction features, induction of labour by means of a single vaginal tablet containing 3 mg of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) was compared with the conventional method of amniotomy and intravenous oxytocin. Four of the patients (8%) who received the prostaglandin tablet required additional intravenous oxytocin to achieve delivery. The prostaglandin group had a longer mean overall induction-delivery interval but a shorter amniotomy-delivery interval than the oxytocin group. One patient in the PGE2 group and two in the oxytocin group required caesarean section. The PGE2 treated patients expressed a higher level of satisfaction with their method of induction, they required less analgesia, had less blood loss at delivery and their babies had a lower incidence of neonatal jaundice. A double blind trial of prostaglandin E2 and oxytocin given by intravenous infusion after amniotomy for induction of labour in 100 primigravidae with unfavourable induction features is reported. No clear-cut advantage of either drug emerged although PGE2 was perhaps superior when the cervix was highly unfavourable. Prostaglandin E2 appeared to produce less deleterious effects on the fetus but was associated with a higher incidence of maternal side effects. The automatic Cardiff Infusion apparatus was found to be a safe means of PGE2 infusion and to have advantages over the use of non-automatic techniques both for PGE2 and for oxytocin infusion. In a random double-blind trial in 28 pregnant women at term, labour was induced with either prostaglandin F2alpha or oxytocin given by intravenous infusion. The results showed that prostaglandin F2alpha was as active as oxytocin and induction was successfully carried out in 24 patients; 3 patients had a caesarean section because of an obstructed labour and 1 patient on oxytocin did not have regular contractions after 10-hours' infusion although she delivered spontaneously 2 days later. No difference was found in the induction--delivery interval in the 8 patients in each group who had early amniotomy (first 90 minutes). No adverse effects were noted in either mother or the child. The authors recommend that to avoid side-effects the dosage of 20 mug prostaglandin F2alpha per minute should not be exceeded and that, although no cardiotocographic abnormalities were noted, this method of control should be used. The use of prostaglandins (PG) increasingly replaces the "classical" method of induction of labour by means of oxytocin and amniotomy, the last-named method being associated, especially in women with an unripe cervix, with side effects like prolonged labour and a higher rate of obstetric surgery. In this study the point of interest was whether prostaglandins offer any advantages over the classical method in respect of efficacy and maternal and foetal tolerance. 99 patients subdivided into primiparae and multiparae were randomly assigned to group A or B. In group A labour was induced with 1 mg resp. 2 mg PGE2 intravaginally at an interval of 6 hours. In group B the method of induction consisted of intravenous oxytocin and amniotomy. The success rate of induction was almost equal in both groups. However, in those patients where PGE2 induction did not succeed and who could not be delivered within 12 hours the cervical score was significantly improved in comparison to the oxytocin group. Based on the experience reported in the literature, one might speculate that an increased dosage could still improve the results of vaginally administered PGE2 gel. The rate of Cesarean Section for failed induction of labor and maternal and fetal compilations are high when labor is induced in a nulliparas women with an unripe cervix by amniotomy and oxytocin infusion. Prostaglandins (PG) in different forms have been used for ripening the cervix with an aim of reducing these problems. A prospective randomized trial was performed on one hundred primigravid women between 37 and 42 weeks of gestation with singleton pregnancy, cephalic presentation and unfavorable cervix (Modified Bishop Score < or = 5) in the department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology of Institute of Postgraduate Medicine & Research from 1st May 1996 to 30th April 1997. In this study the efficiency of prostaglandin E2 intracervical (PGE2 IC) gel in induction of labor in a group of primigravid women with unripe cervix was assessed and compared with another group with similar characteristics using oxytocin infusion and artificial rupture of membrane (ARM). The Modified Bishop Score (MBS), interval between IOL and onset of labor and the duration of labor after insertion of PGE2 gel was significantly different from those of oxytocin infusion group. But the Apgar Score at 1 & 5 min had shown no statistically significant difference. Any significant difference could also not be detected in the mode of delivery between the two induction group. The proportion of emergency Cesarean Section (CS) was high in the oxytocin infusion group than that of in the prostaglandin group. There was also no significant difference regarding the acceptability of both the induction methods. A prospective study comparing three management schemes for patients at term with premature rupture of membranes was performed.
                One hundred forty patients were randomized to one of three study groups: prostaglandin E2, placebo, or oxytocin. Patients randomized to prostaglandin E2 and placebo received vaginal suppositories containing 3 mg prostaglandin E2 or glycerin only, respectively; suppositories were administered in a double-blind fashion, on one or two occasions, 6 hours apart. Oxytocin was given only if labor was not established after 12 hours or to augment inadequate labor. In patients randomized to oxytocin labor was induced with intravenous oxytocin. The time interval to delivery, delivery outcome, and complications were analyzed.
                Patients receiving prostaglandin E2 were more likely to be in labor after one suppository and to be delivered without the addition of oxytocin when compared with placebo. The time interval to delivery was shorter with prostaglandin E2 and oxytocin induction versus placebo ("expectant management"). The incidence of maternal infection was lowest in patients with labor induced by prostaglandin E2. Although the overall cesarean section rate was low, there was a trend toward a lower rate with prostaglandin E2 induction. No adverse effects were observed with prostaglandin E2.
                Prostaglandin E2 can be used successfully to induce labor after premature rupture of membranes at term with greater ease of administration when compared with oxytocin. Ninety-one pregnant women with unfavourable cervix (Bishop score no higher than 6) were randomly allocated to induction of labour with either prostaglandin E2 suppositories 2.5 mg 1-2 a day or i.v. oxytocin 4-32 mU/min. The induction procedure was carried on for 2 days. For statistical comparison of efficacy, life table analysis and the logrank test were used with vaginal delivery as the aimed 'event'. Prostaglandin suppositories were more efficient after 12 h (p less than 0.025) and 24 h (p less than 0.005), whereas no difference in efficacy was observed after 48 h. Vaginal delivery was obtained within 48 h in 74% of the women in the prostaglandin group and in 70% in the oxytocin group. No difference was observed in methods of delivery or neonatal Apgar scores, though, in neonates delivered vaginally within 2 days, lowered umbilical artery blood pH values were found after prostaglandin E2 suppositories (p less than 0.05). The patients attitude toward the method of induction was highly in favour of the prostaglandin suppositories. Prostaglandin E2 suppositories are considered excellent for induction of labour if delivery has to be within 24 h, whereas the two methods are equally effective after 48 h. Delivery with an unfavorable cervix using oxytocin is frequently unsuccessful. Used widely in Europe and increasingly in this country, locally applied prostaglandin E2 appears to improve labor induction. The present study prospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of a prostaglandin gel (0.5 mg) placed intracervically. The use of the gel, when compared to a control group who received no pretreatment prior to labor induction, resulted in improved Bishop scores (7.5 +/- 1.0 vs. 1.8 +/- 0.3, P less than 0.0001), reduced induction to delivery intervals (10.1 +/- 2.1 vs. 20.6 +/- 2.0 hours), reduced oxytocin infusion duration (10.0 +/- 2.1 vs. 20.0 +/- 2.3 hours. P less than 0.0001) resulting in a lower cesarean delivery rate, 26 vs. 47 per cent (P greater than 0.05). Thirty-two per cent of patients receiving the prostaglandin gel labored and delivered within 12 hours and required no oxytocin. In addition, the use of prostaglandin E2 gel appeared safe in that no patient experienced an untoward reaction. Two cases of uterine hyperstimulation occurred that required uterine tocolysis but were not associated with fetal distress. The use of prostaglandin gel appears to be a safe and effective method to improve cervical inducibility in patients undergoing induction for a variety of maternal and fetal indications. A randomised controlled trial was carried out in 50 primigravidae and 50 multigravidae to compare the effectiveness in induction of labour after low amniotomy of prostaglandin E2, given as an oral solution, and oxytocin, given as buccal tablets. The results showed that in dosages recommended by the manufacturers, both oxytocic preparations were almost equally effective. With oral oxytocin, once labour had been established and dosage was left to the discretion of the staff, there appeared to be a potentially dangerous tendency to continue giving large doses despite adequate uterine contractions. The authors comment that this was probably the reason why oxytocin-treated multigravidae having normal deliveries within 24 hours had labours significantly shorter on average than those of other successfully induced patients.
Intravenous prostaglandin is no more efficient than intravenous oxytocin for the induction of labour but its use is associated with higher rates of maternal side-effects and uterine hyperstimulation.
No conclusions can be drawn form the comparisons of combination of prostaglandin F2 alpha and oxytocin compared to oxytocin alone or extra-amniotic and intravenous prostaglandin E2.
[Note: The two citations in the awaiting classification section of the review may alter the conclusions of the review once assessed.]