Feasibility and safety of inducing modest hypothermia in awake patients with acute stroke through surface cooling: A case-control study: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Mild hypothermia as a protective therapy during intracranial aneurysm surgery: a randomized prospective pilot trial. A multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial of the efficacy of mild hypothermia for severely head injured patients with low intracranial pressure. Mild Hypothermia Study Group in Japan. Cardiopulmonary bypass, temperature, and central nervous system dysfunction. Normothermia versus hypothermia during cardiopulmonary bypass: a randomized, controlled trial. A phase II study of moderate hypothermia in severe brain injury. Cooling for acute ischemic brain damage (cool aid): an open pilot study of induced hypothermia in acute ischemic stroke. Lack of effect of induction of hypothermia after acute brain injury. Mild hypothermia induced by a helmet device: a clinical feasibility study.
Hypothermia reduces neuronal damage in animal stroke models. Whether hypothermia is neuroprotective in patients with acute stroke remains to be clarified. In this case-control study, we evaluated the feasibility and safety of inducing modest hypothermia by a surface cooling method in awake patients with acute stroke.
                We prospectively included 17 patients (cases) with stroke admitted within 12 hours from stoke onset (mean 3.25 hours). They were given hypothermic treatment for 6 hours by the "forced air" method, a surface cooling method that uses a cooling blanket with a flow of cool air (10 degrees C). Pethidine was given to treat compensatory shivering. Cases were compared with 56 patients (controls) from the Copenhagen Stroke Study matched for age, gender, initial stroke severity, body temperature on admission, and time from stroke onset to admission. Blood cytology, biochemistry, ECGs, and body temperature were monitored during hypothermic treatment. Multiple regression analyses on outcome were performed to examine the safety of hypothermic therapy.
                Body temperature decreased from t(0)=36.8 degrees C to t(6)=35.5 degrees C (P:<0.001), and hypothermia was present until 4 hours after therapy (t(0)=36.8 degrees C versus t(10)=36.5 degrees C; P:=0.01). Mortality at 6 months after stroke was 12% in cases versus 23% in controls (P:=0. 50). Final neurological impairment (Scandinavian Stroke Scale score at 6 months) was mean 42.4 points in cases versus 47.9 in controls (P:=0.21). Hypothermic therapy was not a predictor of poor outcome in the multivariate analyses.
                Modest hypothermia can be achieved in awake patients with acute stroke by surface cooling with the "forced air" method, in combination with pethidine to treat shivering. It was not associated with a poor outcome. We suggest a large, randomized clinical trial to test the possible beneficial effect of induced modest hypothermia in unselected patients with stroke. To conduct a pilot trial of mild intraoperative hypothermia during cerebral aneurysm surgery.
                One hundred fourteen patients undergoing cerebral aneurysm clipping with (n = 52) (World Federation of Neurological Surgeons score < or =III) and without (n = 62) acute aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) were randomized to normothermic (target esophageal temperature at clip application of 36.5 degrees C) and hypothermic (target temperature of 33.5 degrees C) groups. Neurological status was prospectively evaluated before surgery, 24 and 72 hours postoperatively (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale), and 3 to 6 months after surgery (Glasgow Outcome Scale). Secondary outcomes included postoperative critical care requirements, respiratory and cardiovascular complications, duration of hospitalization, and discharge disposition.
                Seven hypothermic patients (12%) could not be cooled to within 1 degrees C of target temperature; three of the seven were obese. Patients randomized to the hypothermic group more frequently required intubation and rewarming for the first 2 hours after surgery. Although not achieving statistical significance, patients with SAH randomized to the hypothermic group, when compared with patients in the normothermic group, had the following: 1) a lower frequency of neurological deterioration at 24 and 72 hours after surgery (21 versus 37-41%), 2) a greater frequency of discharge to home (75 versus 57%), and 3) a greater incidence of good long-term outcomes (71 versus 57%). For patients without acute SAH, there were no outcome differences between the temperature groups. There was no suggestion that hypothermia was associated with excess morbidity or mortality.
                Mild hypothermia during cerebral aneurysm surgery is feasible in nonobese patients and is well tolerated. Our results indicate that a multicenter trial enrolling 300 to 900 patients with acute aneurysmal SAH will be required to demonstrate a statistically significant benefit with mild intraoperative hypothermia. The criteria for the use of mild hypothermia (34 degrees C) in severely head injured patients have not been standardized. A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted to determine whether mild hypothermia is essential in the treatment of severely head injured patients with low intracranial pressure (ICP).
                At 11 medical centers, 91 severely head injured patients with an admission Glasgow Coma Scale score of 8 or less in whom ICP could be maintained below 25 mm Hg by conventional therapies were divided randomly into two groups: the mild hypothermia group (HT group, 45 patients) and the normothermia group (NT group, 46 patients). Patients in the HT group were exposed to mild hypothermia (34 degrees C) for 48 hours, followed by rewarming at 1 degrees C per day for 3 days, whereas patients in the NT group were exposed to normothermia (37 degrees C) for 5 days. The two groups were similar with respect to prognostic factors, and there was no difference in clinical outcome at 3 months postinjury. During treatment, there was a significantly greater use of neuromuscular blocking agents in the HT group (p = 0.011). During the initial 2 weeks postinjury, the incidences of pneumonia, meningitis, leukocytopenia, thrombocytopenia, hypernatremia, hypokalemia, and hyperamylasemia were significantly higher in the HT than in the NT group (p < 0.05).
                Mild hypothermia should not be used for the treatment of severely head injured patients with low ICP because this therapy conveys no advantage over normothermia in such patients. Neurological injury is an important cause of morbidity and mortality after cardiac surgery. With the advent of warm heart surgery, the neuroprotective role of hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) has come under increasing scrutiny. Preliminary work by us in the area found no increased risk of neurological morbidity with normothermic CPB in a small group of patients and suggested a possible benefit. The purpose of the present study is to compare the incidence of neurological and neuropsychological dysfunction in a larger number of patients randomized to warm or cold aortocoronary bypass surgery.
                With the approval of the institutional research ethics committee, 201 aortocoronary bypass patients were randomized to normothermic or moderate hypothermic CPB and subjected to neurological and neuropsychological evaluation. These subjects were a subset of patients enrolled in a large multicenter trial comparing warm versus cold heart surgery. The examinations took place preoperatively, 5 days after operation, and a 3-month follow-up. The examination consisted of a clinical neurological examination and a brief neuropsychological test battery. The neuropsychological tests included the Buschke selective reminding procedure, the Wechsler memory scale-revised visual reproduction subtest, the trial making test (parts A and B), the Wechsler adult intelligence scale-revised digit symbol subtest, and the grooved pegboard test. The examiner and subjects were unaware of the CPB temperature allocation (warm, > 34 degrees C; cold, < or = 28 degrees C). Statistical analysis was performed using the SAS statistical software package. Two hundred one patients were enrolled in the study. Of these, 155 patients completed the entire protocol and were included in the final analysis (warm group, n = 78; cold group, n = 77). One patient in the warm group died perioperatively from a massive hemispheric stroke. Another warm group patient was unable to complete neuropsychological evaluation because of a perioperative stroke. Thus, 153 patients completed the entire series of neuropsychological tests. A total of 6 patients (warm group, n = 2; cold group, n = 4; P = NS) suffered from perioperative focal neurological deficits. There was a consistent deterioration in scores from tests of psychomotor speed/coordination (trial making, digit symbol, pegboard) in the early postoperative period, which resolved by the 3-month follow-up. Tests of memory (Buschke, Wechsler memory scale) showed no evidence of patient deterioration in the postoperative period. No difference was seen between the warm and cold groups.
                In this randomized trial of normothermic versus hypothermic CPB, we found deterioration in scores of tests of psychomotor speed but not of memory in the early postoperative period. We were unable to demonstrate any neuroprotective effect from moderate hypothermia in this patient population. To evaluate the influence of perfusion temperature on systemic effects of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), 30 patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting were randomly assigned to either normothermic (warm, n = 14, 36 degrees C) or hypothermic (cold, n = 16, 28 degrees C) CPB. Serial hemodynamic measurements and blood samples were obtained before, during and after the CPB procedure. During CPB, there were no differences between both groups in the need for vasopressors (norepinephrine, phenylephrine), urinary output, or fluid balance. In the early postoperative period, normothermic CPB patients had significantly lower systemic vascular resistance and higher cardiac index measurements (mean +/- standard error: systemic vascular resistance, 880 +/- 27 versus 1,060 +/- 57 dyne.s.cm-5, p = 0.025; cardiac index, 3.6 +/- 0.1 versus 2.9 +/- 0.1 L.min-1.m-2, p = 0.01) without differences in the administration of vasoactive drugs. Blood loss was significantly higher in patients after hypothermic CPB (median [range] body surface area: 370 [180-560] versus 490 [280-2,120] mL/m2, p = 0.0006), with a greater need for transfusion of erythrocytes and fresh frozen plasma. Plasma levels of tumor necrosis factor and soluble tumor necrosis factor receptors increased during and after CPB, independent of perfusion temperature. This study suggests a significant influence of CPB temperature and respective perfusion management on postoperative hemodynamics and blood loss. Normothermic CPB is not associated with additional systemic adverse effects. Forty-six patients with severe nonpenetrating brain injury [Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) 4-7] were randomized to standard management at 37 degrees C (n = 22) and to standard management with systemic hypothermia to 32 to 33 degrees C (n = 24). The two groups were balanced in terms of age (Wilcoxon's rank sum test, p > 0.95), randomizing GCS (chi-square test, p = 0.54), and primary diagnosis. Cooling was begun within 6 h of injury by use of cooling blankets. Metocurine and morphine were given hourly during induction and maintenance of hypothermia. Rewarming was at a rate of 1 degree C per 4 h beginning 48 h after intravascular temperature had reached 33 degrees C. Muscle relaxants and sedation were continued until core temperature reached 35 degrees C. There were no cardiac or coagulopathy-related complications. Seizure incidence was lower in the hypothermia group (Fisher's exact text, p = 0.019). Sepsis was seen more commonly in the hypothermia group, but difference was not statistically significant (chi-square test). Mean Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score at 3 months after injury showed an absolute increase of 16% (i.e., 36.4-52.2%) in the number of patients in the Good Recovery/Moderate Disability (GR/MD) category as compared with Severe Disability/Vegetative/Dead (SD/V/D) (chi-square test, p > 0.287). Based on evidence of improved neurologic outcome with minimal toxicity, we believe that phase III testing of moderate systemic hypothermia in patients with severe head injury is warranted. Hypothermia is effective in improving outcome in experimental models of brain infarction. We studied the feasibility and safety of hypothermia in patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with thrombolysis.
                An open study design was used. All patients presented with major ischemic stroke (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score >15) within 6 hours of onset. After informed consent, patients with a persistent NIHSS score of >8 were treated with hypothermia to 32+/-1 degrees C for 12 to 72 hours depending on vessel patency. All patients were monitored in the neurocritical care unit for complications. A modified Rankin Scale was measured at 90 days and compared with concurrent controls.
                Ten patients with a mean age of 71.1+/-14.3 years and an NIHSS score of 19.8+/-3.3 were treated with hypothermia. Nine patients served as concurrent controls. The mean time from symptom onset to thrombolysis was 3.1+/-1.4 hours and from symptom onset to initiation of hypothermia was 6.2+/-1.3 hours. The mean duration of hypothermia was 47.4+/-20.4 hours. Target temperature was achieved in 3.5+/-1.5 hours. Noncritical complications in hypothermia patients included bradycardia (n=5), ventricular ectopy (n=3), hypotension (n=3), melena (n=2), fever after rewarming (n=3), and infections (n=4). Four patients with chronic atrial fibrillation developed rapid ventricular rate, which was noncritical in 2 and critical in 2 patients. Three patients had myocardial infarctions without sequelae. There were 3 deaths in patients undergoing hypothermia. The mean modified Rankin Scale score at 3 months in hypothermia patients was 3.1+/-2.3.
                Induced hypothermia appears feasible and safe in patients with acute ischemic stroke even after thrombolysis. Refinements of the cooling process, optimal target temperature, duration of therapy, and, most important, clinical efficacy, require further study. Induction of hypothermia in patients with brain injury was shown to improve outcomes in small clinical studies, but the results were not definitive. To study this issue, we conducted a multicenter trial comparing the effects of hypothermia with those of normothermia in patients with acute brain injury.
                The study subjects were 392 patients 16 to 65 years of age with coma after sustaining closed head injuries who were randomly assigned to be treated with hypothermia (body temperature, 33 degrees C), which was initiated within 6 hours after injury and maintained for 48 hours by means of surface cooling, or normothermia. All patients otherwise received standard treatment. The primary outcome measure was functional status six months after the injury.
                The mean age of the patients and the type and severity of injury in the two treatment groups were similar. The mean (+/-SD) time from injury to randomization was 4.3+/-1.1 hours in the hypothermia group and 4.1+/-1.2 hours in the normothermia group, and the mean time from injury to the achievement of the target temperature of 33 degrees C in the hypothermia group was 8.4+/-3.0 hours. The outcome was poor (defined as severe disability, a vegetative state, or death) in 57 percent of the patients in both groups. Mortality was 28 percent in the hypothermia group and 27 percent in the normothermia group (P=0.79). The patients in the hypothermia group had more hospital days with complications than the patients in the normothermia group. Fewer patients in the hypothermia group had high intracranial pressure than in the normothermia group.
                Treatment with hypothermia, with the body temperature reaching 33 degrees C within eight hours after injury, is not effective in improving outcomes in patients with severe brain injury. To test the feasibility and the speed of a helmet device to achieve the target temperature of 34 degrees C in unconscious after out of hospital cardiac arrest (CA).
                Patients with cardiac arrest due to asystole or pulseless electrical activity (PEA) who remained unconscious after restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) were enrolled in the study and randomised into two groups: a normothermic group (NG) and a hypothermic group (HG). Bladder and tympanic temperature were monitored every 15 min. A helmet device was used to induce mild hypothermia in the HG. Later on, the effect of mild hypothermia on the haemodynamics, electrolytes, lactate, arterial pH, CaO2, CvO2 and O2 extraction ratio were analysed and compared to the values obtained from the NG.
                Thirty patients were eligible for the study, 16 were randomised into the HG and 14 were randomised into the NG. The median tympanic temperature at admission in both groups was 35.5 degrees C (range: 33.3-38.5 degrees C) and the median tympanic temperature after haemodynamic stabilisation was 35.7 degrees C (range: 33.6-38.2 degrees C). In the HG, the core and the central target temperature of 34 degrees C were achieved after a median time of 180 and 60 min, respectively after ROSC. At the start of the study, no significant differences between the NG and HG were seen. At the end of the study, lactate concentration and O2 extraction ratio were significantly lower in the HG; however the CvO2 was significantly lower in the NG.
                Mild hypothermia induced by a helmet device was feasible, easy to perform, inexpensive and effective, with no increase in complications.
This review could find no definite advantage of hypothermia over normothermia in the incidence of clinical events. Hypothermia was associated with a reduced stroke rate, but this is off set by a trend towards an increase in non stroke related perioperative mortality and myocardial damage. There is insufficient data to date to draw any conclusions about the use of mild hypothermia. Similarly, there is insufficient data to date to comment on the effect of temperature during CPB on subtle neurological deficits, and further trials are needed in these areas.