Use of antibiotic prophylaxis in ear surgery. Prophylactic antibiotics in surgery for chronic ear disease. The role of prophylactic antibiotics in middle ear surgery. A study on phenoxymethylpenicillin prophylaxis. Antimicrobial prophylaxis in ear surgery. Single-dose v. short-term antibiotic therapy for prevention of wound infection in general surgery. A prospective, randomized double-blind trial. Effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotic treatment in mastoid surgery. Preoperative topical ofloxacin solution for tympanoplasty: a randomized, controlled study. Prophylactic ciprofloxacin drops after tympanostomy tube insertion. Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention of postoperative neurosurgical infections. A randomized clinical trial.
A prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study was performed to evaluate the effect of antibiotic prophylaxis in ear surgery. The present study reports on the results of 750 patients, half of whom received cefuroxime for 1 day, the other half, placebo. All postoperative infections occurring within 2 weeks after the intervention were recorded, together with several preoperative and perioperative parameters. It is concluded that exploratory tympanoplasties (including stapedotomy) and "dry perforation" tympanoplasties should be considered "clean" operations according to the American National Research Council and do not benefit from antibiotic prophylaxis. On the other hand, tympanoplasties performed on draining ears and on ears with cholesteatoma should be considered "dirty" operations for which antibiotic prophylaxis may decrease the postoperative infection rate by factor 3. All postoperative infections healed without sequels under proper treatment, except for three that resulted in graft necrosis--one in the placebo group and two in the cefuroxime group. In consequence, prophylaxis may not be mandatory in the dirty group, although the authors advocate its use for the sake of patient and surgeon comfort. The role of prophylactic antibiotics in otologic surgery continues to be debated and perhaps misused. Prior studies have provided conflicting evidence with regard to the benefit obtained from the use of prophylactic antibiotics in surgery for chronic otitis media. The current study was designed to evaluate the role of prophylactic antibiotics in the outcomes of surgery for chronic ear disease. It was the authors' impression that there was no indication for prophylactic antibiotics in such surgery.
                Randomized prospective study performed in a tertiary care facility.
                Patients who met inclusion criteria (n = 146) were randomly assigned to an antibiotic treatment group or a control group receiving no prophylactic antibiotics. Patients in the antibiotic treatment group were given preoperative intravenous antibiotics followed by oral antibiotics for 5 days after surgery. Patients were followed postoperatively and observed for clinical evidence of infection and graft failure.
                There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups with regard to the incidence of postoperative infection or graft survival.
                The use of prophylactic antibiotics in surgery for chronic ear disease cannot be recommended based on the findings of this study. A randomized prospective double-blind study was performed testing the value of phenoxymethylpenicillin in conjunction with middle ear surgery. The patients were evaluated for clinical signs of infection and with bacteriologic cultures both pre- and postoperatively. No difference in clinical signs of infection was noted between the pre- and postoperative evaluations. A significantly larger number of patients, however, presented with postoperative positive bacteriologic cultures as compared with the preoperative cultures. This increase was particularly evident in the placebo group. The two microorganisms that were found in increased numbers postoperatively were Staphylococcus epidermidis and Pseudomonas strains. The value of prophylactic antibiotic treatment and phenoxymethylpenicillin treatment in particular is discussed. The purpose of this research was to assess the efficacy of prophylactic antibiotic administration in ear surgery over a wide range of cases. Additional objectives include the assessment of the relative effect of patient age, duration of operation, preoperative condition, and the success of tympanoplasty. Prospectively, in a controlled study, 4,000 patients were studied employing cephalosporin and oxacillin as prophylactic antimicrobials. No statistically significant difference in postoperative otologic infection rates was observed. This conclusion was unaltered by the operative duration, patient age, or preoperative condition. Grafting success was not improved. To investigate the effectiveness of a single-dose antibiotic regimen for preventing postoperative wound infection, a prospective, randomized double-blind trial was carried out in patients undergoing "clean-contaminated", "contaminated" or "clean" (vascular) surgery. Both elective and emergency operations were included. Single-dose (preoperative) prophylaxis was compared with short-term prophylaxis (1 dose preoperatively and 2 doses postoperatively). The antibiotics were penicillin, tobramycin and metronidazole in various combinations, and comparisons between single-dose and short-term prophylaxis were made with all the regimens. The incidence of wound infection was 5/277 (1.8%) in the short-term group and 9/287 (3.1%) in the single-dose group. The difference was not statistically significant. Nor was statistically significant difference found when the type of operation and the degree of contamination were considered. Single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis thus gave a low incidence of postoperative wound infection, even in "clean-contaminated" or "contaminated" cases. This article describes a prospective study of the effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotic treatment in preventing infection following mastoid surgery. Seventy-two patients who underwent surgery for chronic middle ear disease served as the basis for this study. Bacteriologic findings from middle ear discharge, showing aerobic and anaerobic bacteria, are reported. The patients were randomly classified into two groups, one undergoing surgery with preventive antibiotic treatment with clindamycin and gentamycin and the other undergoing surgery without antibiotic therapy. The early postoperative inflammatory complications are presented. No significant differences were found in the incidence of these complications between the two groups. In view of the results, the effectiveness of preventive antibiotic treatment in mastoid surgery is questioned. To establish the efficacy of immediate preoperative ototopical ofloxacin eardrops in eradicating middle ear pathogens and improving operative outcome.
                Single-blind, randomized control study.
                Tertiary referral center, ambulatory clinic, and hospital setting.
                Consecutive patients with chronic suppurative otitis media for Type I tympanoplasty (myringoplasty).
                The patients were randomly assigned to 3 groups: Group A underwent 10-minute daily treatments with eardrops for 2 weeks before surgery, Group B underwent 3-minute daily treatments for 2 weeks before surgery, and Group C underwent no treatment.
                Preoperative and perioperative bacteriology and success of the surgery as defined by an intact tympanic membrane in the eighth week postsurgery.
                There were 101 patients entered in the study. The preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative observation of discharge and quantity of the discharge were compared, and no differences were found among the groups (Kruskal-Wallis test). The perioperative culture results were analyzed and 18/21 (86%) became culture negative in Group A, 23/27 (85%) became culture negative in Group B, and 3/21 (14%) became culture negative in the control group (Group C versus Group A or Group B, chi(2) tests p < 0.001). The success rates of surgery as defined by an intact tympanic membrane showed no difference: 28/33 (85%), 27/33 (82%), and 31/35 (89%) in Groups A, B, and C, respectively. The preoperative positive bacteriology rate in the surgical failures was 10/15 (67%), compared with 16/76 (21%) for the successful procedures (p < 0.001).
                Our study has shown that ofloxacin successfully eradicates most bacterial flora preoperatively. We cannot, however, confirm the benefits of its preoperative usage in improving the graft success rate. To evaluate the effectiveness of prophylactic ciprofloxacin drops in decreasing the incidence of post-tympanostomy otorrhea, and the relation between middle ear content and post-tympanostomy otorrhea.
                One hundred and fifty patients aged 3-14 years underwent tympanostomy and tube insertion at the Prince Rashid Ben Al-Hasan Hospital, Al-Husn, Jordan during the interval between February 2000 to January 2003. The patients were randomized into 3 groups: group 1 (control group) received no antibiotic drops, group 2 received a single dose of ciprofloxacin drops intraoperatively and group 3 received an intraoperative dose followed by 5-day postoperative course.
                Application of topical ciprofloxacin after tympanostomy tube insertion was associated with a significantly lower incidence of early post-tympanostomy otorrhea. The rate of otorrhea for the control group was 16.5% and the treatment groups were (group 1) 8.4%, (group 2) 8.2% and p=0.011. A single dose of antibiotics was effective when patient's middle ears were dry or had serous effusions. For those whose ears had mucoid or purulent content a 5-day course was indicated.
                Topical administration of a single dose of ototopical ciprofloxacin after surgery is an effective treatment for the prevention of early post-tympanostomy otorrhea, and a prolonged course (5 days) may be indicated for those whose ears had purulent or thick mucoid contents, and the content of middle ear are important in predicating postoperative otorrhea. The authors report the results of a randomized, prospective study to assess the effectiveness of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in preventing postoperative infections following clean neurosurgical operations. The study group comprised 846 patients treated between October, 1979, and June, 1984. Antibiotics, including cefazolin and gentamicin, were administered only in the immediate preoperative and intraoperative periods. Sixteen patients, none of whom developed infections, were excluded from final statistical analysis because they had inadvertently been entered into the study while failing to meet entry criteria. Fifteen wound infections (3.64%) developed in the group of 412 patients who did not receive antibiotics, whereas only four infections (0.96%) were identified among the 418 patients who received antibiotics. The difference is statistically significant (p = 0.008) and represents a 74% reduction in infection rate with antibiotics. An analysis of subgroups of surgical procedures revealed a dramatic decrease in craniotomy infections from 6.77% to 0% (p = 0.003). Of the four infections that occurred among the antibiotic-treated patients, three were in cases where foreign bodies had been implanted. No complications of antibiotic usage were identified. The rates of infection in areas of the body other than the surgical wound were no different in the antibiotic-treated and nontreated groups. All wound infections in both antibiotic-treated and nontreated patients involved similar types of Gram-positive organisms, suggesting that antibiotic prophylaxis did not produce infections with resistant or unusual organisms. This study, combined with other recently published analyses, suggests that routine perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis can significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative neurosurgical infections.
There is no strong evidence that the large-scale use of prophylactic antibiotics in clean and clean-contaminated ear surgery is helpful in reducing postoperative complications such as wound infection, discharge from the outer ear canal, labyrinthitis and graft failure.