Pentoxifylline therapy after laparoscopic surgery for different stages of endometriosis: a prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Pentoxifylline versus placebo in the treatment of infertility associated with minimal or mild endometriosis: a pilot randomized clinical trial. Combined laparoscopic surgery and pentoxifylline therapy for treatment of endometriosis-associated infertility: a preliminary trial. Effects of pentoxifylline on sperm motility in normogonadotropic asthenozoospermic men. Comparison of the effectiveness of placebo, clomiphene citrate, mesterolone, pentoxifylline, and testosterone rebound therapy for the treatment of idiopathic oligospermia. Placebo controlled double blind study with pentoxifylline of walking performance in patients with intermittent claudication. Danazol and medroxyprogesterone acetate inefficacious in the treatment of infertility in endometriosis. Efficacy of medroxyprogesterone treatment in infertile women with endometriosis: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Use of a progestogen only preparation containing desogestrel in the treatment of recurrent pelvic pain after conservative surgery for endometriosis.
To evaluate the effects of pentoxifylline administration on patients with different stages of endometriosis on whom laparoscopy was performed.
                Prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical (Canadian Task Force classification I).
                University and private hospitals.
                Eighty-eight women, all with infertility, some with dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, or pelvic pain, on whom a laparoscopic diagnosis of endometriosis was made.
                The treatment group received 800 mg pentoxifylline daily for 6 months immediately after surgery. The control group received placebo capsules. All patients were followed-up for 1 year thereafter.
                A comparison of pregnancy rate and recurrence of signs and symptoms in the 2 groups was performed. Forty-three patients were studied in the pentoxifylline group and 45 in the placebo group. The cumulative pregnancy rate was 39.5% and 35.6% in the treatment and control groups, respectively. The overall recurrence of signs and symptoms was 14% in the former group and 15.6% in the latter. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in rates of pregnancy and recurrence (p = .700 and .832, respectively). Nor was there any significant statistical difference between the same stages in the 2 groups regarding immunomodulation.
                According to the results of this study, and while keeping in mind that appropriate surgery is the main aspect of endometriosis treatment, there is no evidence that immunomodulation with pentoxifylline aids fertility or lessens recurrence of signs and symptoms in women with different stages of endometriosis (i.e., minimal, mild, moderate, or severe). The present study is the first prospective randomized controlled trial of the effect of pentoxifylline on future fertility in infertile women with asymptomatic minimal or mild endometriosis. After completion of a basic infertility workup and laparoscopy, patients were entered into the study and randomly allocated to receive either a 12 month course of oral pentoxifylline (800 mg/day) (n = 30) or an oral placebo (n = 30). Those patients with other infertility factors were included in the study only if the factors were correctable and ultimately determined to be non-contributory. Life-table analysis was used to compare pregnancy rates between the two groups over a 12 month period that started immediately after laparoscopy. The 12 month actuarial overall pregnancy rates were 31 and 18.5% in the pentoxifylline and placebo groups respectively. However, this difference was not statistically significant by the chi(2)-test. Similarly, the Cox regression method showed no differences between the hazard of pregnancy in the two groups studied (odds ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.18-1.67). Therefore, there is no evidence from this study that immunomodulation with pentoxifylline aids fertility in those women with minimal or mild endometriosis. Further studies including more infertile patients with endometriosis are desirable in order to confirm our results. Surgical treatment has modest efficacy for the treatment of infertility associated with early-stage endometriosis. Immunomodulation with pentoxifylline is considered as a new strategy potentially useful in treating endometriosis. Thus, this study investigated the usefulness of combined laparoscopic surgery and pentoxifylline therapy in the treatment of infertility associated with minimal to mild endometriosis.
                A prospective, randomized, controlled blind trial was conducted. Patients entered the study immediately after laparoscopic surgery and were randomly assigned to the treatment with either oral pentoxifylline (800 mg/day) (pentoxifylline group, n = 51) or an oral placebo (placebo group, n = 53). Patients were then observed for pregnancy for 6 months.
                Among 98 patients finally considered in the evaluation of the results, the 6 month overall pregnancy rates were 28 and 14% in the pentoxifylline and placebo groups, respectively. Thus, an absolute difference of 14% (95% CI -2 to 30) (Chi-squared test, P = 0.1) in the cumulative probability of pregnancy in 6 months after laparoscopic surgery in patients receiving pentoxifylline versus placebo post-operatively was observed.
                Our findings provide preliminary clinical evidence to suggest the new experimental treatment approaches, toward endometriosis, that are based on immunomodulation deserve further attention. Well-designed multicenter trials are warranted to confirm or refute our results. Forty-seven normogonadotropic men with idiopatic asthenozoospermic were divided at random: group I (N = 22) received placebo and group II (N = 25) received 1200 mg of pentoxifylline/day during 6 months. Semen analysis was performed basal and at 3 and 6 months of the study period. No statistical changes in serum hormone concentration were found, nor in volume, sperm counts, viability, and morphology before and after treatment. Sperm motility increased following pentoxifylline treatment after 3 and 6 months from 25.5 (21.0-30.0) to 35.5 (31.5-39.0) (p < .00001) and to 42.0 (38.0-46.0) (p < .00001), respectively. Although in the placebo control cases some changes were observed in the sperm motility, they were less significant. Furthermore, progressive motility only in grade A increased with pentoxifylline from 2.5 (0.0-6.0) to 12.0 (6.0-19.5) (p < .001) at 3 months and to 22.5 (17.0-26.0) at 6 months (p < .00001). In conclusion, pentoxifylline had an additional effect rather than placebo and was useful treatment in these cases of male factor infertility. Forty-six subfertile men with idiopathic oligospermia were randomly assigned to 6 months of treatment with a placebo, clomiphene citrate (25 or 50 mg/day), mesterolone (100 mg/day), or pentoxifylline (1200 mg/day) or 4 months of testosterone enanthate treatment (100 or 250 mg on alternate weeks). Treatment with the placebo, mesterolone, pentoxifylline, and testosterone rebound therapy did not result in a significant increase in the mean sperm concentration or pregnancy in the partners. Clomiphene citrate at both dosages significantly increased the mean sperm concentration without improving sperm motility or morphology during the 6-month treatment period. Pregnancy rates of 36.4% and 22.2% were observed in partners of men receiving clomiphene citrate 25 mg/day and 50 mg/day, respectively. This study also illustrates the difficulties in identifying suitable patients for and assessing the efficacy of different treatment regimens. A double blind placebo-controlled randomised crossover study was performed with Pentoxifylline (Trental 400 tablets with 400 mg active ingredient) in 24 patients (19 males, 5 females, aged between 40 and 71 years) suffering from peripheral occlusive arteriopathy of stage II severity (Fontaine's classification). In 12 patients (group I) the treatment was started with placebo, and in another 12 subjects with Pentoxifylline (group II). The dosage was 3 tablets of either formulation t.d.s., the treatment periods were 8 weeks each with a two week washout between. The standardised walking test (120 steps/min under metronome control) was used for the assessment of the walking capacity. There was a significant 60% increase in pain-free walking distance in either Pentoxifylline treatment periods, whereas there were no clinically relevant changes in the placebo periods. When comparing the two starting periods only, there was an increase in the Pentoxifylline group from 223 to 359 m on average and in the placebo group from 208 to 215 m, patients in both groups being comparable at basal level as to the distribution of sex, age, location of occlusion, duration of disease as well as in respect to the walking capacity. No adverse reactions were recorded during the trial. Danazol (200 mg three times a day) and medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA, 100 mg a day) were compared with placebo in the treatment of infertility of patients with endometriosis. Twenty-seven patients had medical therapy alone for 6 months, and 22 patients received it after conservative surgery. The clinical characteristics of the patients in the danazol group (n = 18), the MPA group (n = 17), and the placebo group (n = 14) were comparable to each other. The follow-up time was 30 months. The cumulative pregnancy rates, 33% in the danazol group (n = 6), 42% in the MPA group (n = 7), and 46% in the placebo group (n = 6), did not differ significantly from each other. The time to pregnancy after the start of therapy was 17.7 +/- 8.4 (standard deviation [SD]) months in the danazol group, 18.0 +/- 9.0 months in the MPA group and 10.0 +/- 5.8 months in the placebo group with no significant difference between the groups. The abortion rate was 26%, and there was no significant difference among the groups. Cox multivariant analysis did reveal ovarian endometriosis a prognostically significant negative indicator as regards fecundation in endometriosis (P less than 0.05). In summary, correction of infertility alone does not appear to be an indication for the use of danazol or MPA in the treatment of endometriosis, and ovarian endometriotic lesions but not peritoneal ones do make a worse prognosis as regards fecundation in endometriosis. To determine the efficacy of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), 50 mg/d for 3 months, in treating endometriosis, with a follow-up of 6 months.
                Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
                Academic infertility unit in a teaching hospital.
                One hundred infertile women found to have endometriosis at laparoscopy, with 50 recruited to each treatment arm.
                Laparoscopy within 3 months of finishing therapy.
                Initial and second-look laparoscopy for revised American Fertility Society stages and scores, pregnancies achieved, effects on well-being via symptomatic improvement, and side effects.
                Whether initially high or low, both MPA and placebo therapy achieved similar statistically significant reductions in stages and scores at second-look laparoscopy. MPA was rated more effective in improving overall well-being. Side effects were minimal in both groups (10% MPA; 2% placebo). Six pregnancies occurred without other endometriosis therapy being instituted in the placebo group (3 during therapy), and one with MPA (0 during therapy).
                Both MPA and placebo appear equally and significantly effective in treating endometriosis over a 3-month period, as judged by comparative laparoscopy. Therefore, not only must the use of MPA at 50 mg/d over 3 months be questioned, but the performance of placebo also suggests the need to review whether therapy should be instituted at all as well as the present concept that endometriosis is frequently a spontaneously progressive phenomenon. To assess the effect of a new progestin progestogen only pill (desogestrel) versus an oral contraceptive in the treatment of recurrent endometriosis.
                A randomized prospective clinical study. A group of women with endometriosis (n=40) who showed recurrent dysmenorrhea and/or pelvic pain after conservative surgery, and did not desire a pregnancy. Continuous treatment for 6 months with desogestrel (75 microg/d) (n=20) versus a combined oral contraceptive (ethinyl estradiol 20 microg plus desogestrel 150 microg) (n=20) was performed.
                A significant improvement of both pelvic pain and dysmenorrhea was observed following each type of treatment (P<0.001). The use of desogestrel progestogen only pill was associated with a breakthrough bleeding in 20% patients, while a significant body weight increase was observed in 15% after oral contraceptive.
                Both desogestrel and an oral estro-progestinic were effective, safe and low cost therapy of pain symptoms after endoscopic surgery for endometriosis, the former showing an impact on breakthrough bleeding, the later an incidence on body weight increase.
This review has been updated in 2011. The results of the original review published in 2009 remain unchanged. There is still not enough evidence to support the use of pentoxifylline in the management of premenopausal women with endometriosis in terms of subfertility and relief of pain outcomes.