Does an integrated care pathway improve processes of care in stroke rehabilitation? A randomized controlled trial. The development of a stroke clinical pathway: an experience in a medium-sized community hospital. The effect of systematic care planning after acute stroke in general hospital medical wards. The critical path method in stroke rehabilitation: lessons from an experiment in cost containment and outcome improvement. Integrated care pathways and quality of life on a stroke rehabilitation unit. A model for management of patients with stroke during the acute phase. Outcome and economic implications. A randomized controlled trial of rehabilitation at home after stroke in southwest Stockholm. Variance analysis applied to a stroke pathway: how this can improve efficiency of healthcare delivery. Evaluation of a stroke family care worker: results of a randomised controlled trial.
to evaluate whether integrated care pathways improve the processes of care in stroke rehabilitation.
                comparison of processes of care data collected in a randomized controlled trial.
                acute stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation randomized to receive integrated care pathways management (n=76) or conventional multidisciplinary care (n=76).
                proportion of patients meeting recommended standards for processes of care using a validated stroke audit tool.
                integrated care pathways methodology was associated with higher frequency of stroke specific assessments, notably testing for inattention (84% versus 60%; P=0.015) and nutritional assessment (74% versus 22%, P<0.001). Documentation of provision of certain information to patients/carers (89% versus 70%; P=0.024) and early discharge notification to general practitioners (80% versus 45%; P<0.001) were also more common in this group. There were no significant differences in the processes of interdisciplinary co-ordination and patient management between the integrated care pathways group and the control group.
                integrated care pathways may improve assessment and communication, even in specialist stroke settings. Patients with acute ischemic strokes were studied in a medium-sized community hospital in Mississippi. Studies were done before and after implementation of the stroke clinical care pathway with emphasis on the following clinical indicators: 1) performance of a brain CT scan, 2) the search for the etiology of the stroke, 3) whether the patient was treated emergently for hypertension, 4) the use of measures to prevent deep-vein thrombosis, and 5) prophylactic drug treatment against recurrent stroke after hospital discharge. Following application of the clinical pathway, there was a significant improvement in all the clinical indicators that were felt to require further attention and none had a setback. The length of hospital stay was decreased, and there was no significant increase in the hospital costs in the post-pathway study despite an increase in the number of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures performed. When applied properly, clinical pathways can effectively mobilize hospital resources, maximize quality of care, and at the same time minimize costs. In a multidisciplinary study comprising 280 patients with acute cerebrovascular disease, the functional capacity was followed from the acute stage onwards with a test battery mainly measuring activities of daily living and motor capacity. Systematized care procedures with written care plans in accordance with the nursing process model, together with a booklet of guidelines in stroke care, were introduced during an experimental period in the care of 173 of the stroke victims. The remaining 107 patients received conventional care. The functional improvements were equal from a statistical standpoint in these two groups. However, in the group, which received special activities, there was a significant decrease in bed days, and a slightly larger number were able to return to their own homes. Compared with another stroke population from the same hospital, measured with the same functional instrument 7 years ago, the patients in this study seemed better off from a functional standpoint. For the individual severely-disabled patient, the care planning procedures seemed to be valuable and an effective way of promoting communication between different units. The difficulties in introducing new routines for documentation are discussed. This study tested the effects of a project network technique called the Critical Path Method (CPM) on the costs and outcomes of inpatient team stroke rehabilitation. On admission to a large, academic, inpatient rehabilitation hospital adults who had a recent (< 120 days) stroke were randomly assigned to receive rehabilitation services from a team trained in CPM (N = 53) or from usual care teams (N = 68). Results showed no significant difference between groups in length of stay, hospital charges, or functional status at discharge. CPM may be effective in patient care services that are less influenced by specialization, professional issues, and external regulation and in settings where patient outcomes are relatively fixed and predictable, and medical care is integrated across institutions. Integrated care pathways (ICP) may not reduce disability, institutionalization, or duration of hospitalization compared with conventional multidisciplinary team (MDT) care in organized stroke rehabilitation. Their potential to improve patient heath status or satisfaction with care is not known.
                A comparison of quality of life, caregiver strain, and patient/caregiver satisfaction at 6 months after stroke was undertaken in 152 stroke patients randomized to receive ICP or MDT care. Differences in processes of care were recorded with the use of a predefined schedule. Multivariate analyses were undertaken to identify the effect of age, sex, stroke severity, functional status, mood, and use of care pathway on quality of life score.
                The 2 groups were comparable for baseline characteristics of age, sex, stroke severity, and initial disability. MDT care was characterized by greater emphasis on return of higher function and caregiver needs compared with ICP. EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) scores were higher in the MDT group (median, 72 versus 63; P<0.005), who also had higher scores for EuroQol dimension of social functioning (P=0.014). Higher EQ-VAS scores were independently related to MDT care (P=0.04), Rankin score (P=0.01), and psychological function (P<0.0001) but not to age, sex, or stroke severity. There were no significant differences in patient or caregiver satisfaction between the 2 settings.
                Better quality of life in patients receiving conventional MDT care may be attributable to improved social functioning and greater attention to higher function and caregiver needs during rehabilitation. The purpose of the study was to develop a clinical pathway for patients with nonhemorrhagic stroke during the acute hospital phase to improve the quality of care and reduce costs.
                The pathway included standard admission orders and a swallow screen on day 1 of hospitalization. Physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech therapy, and social worker assessments were done on day 2. A physiatry consult was performed on day 3 if indicated, and by day 4 a discharge target date and disposition were addressed.
                Outcomes for 121 patients during the first year of pathway implementation are reported. The average length of stay on the acute service decreased from 10.9 days to 7.3 days (P < .05), reducing the charges per patient by 14.6%. Complications in the form of urinary tract infections and aspiration pneumonia rates decreased by 63.2% (P < .05) and 38.7%, respectively.
                We conclude that the implementation of a clinical pathway for patients with acute, nonhemorrhagic stroke resulted in a significant reduction in length of stay, charges, and complications while improving the quality of care. This study describes the methodology, patient outcome, and use of hospital and rehabilitation services at 3 months of a population-based randomized controlled trial. The purpose was to evaluate rehabilitation at home after early supported discharge from the Department of Neurology, Huddinge Hospital, for moderately disabled stroke patients in southwest Stockholm.
                The patients were eligible if they were continent, independent in feeding, had mental function within normal limits, and had impaired motor function and/or aphasia 1 week after stroke. Patients were randomized either to early supported discharge with continuity of rehabilitation at home for 3 to 4 months or to routine rehabilitation service in a hospital, day care, and/or outpatient care. The home rehabilitation team consisted of two physical therapists, two occupational therapists, and one speech therapist; one of the therapists was assigned as case manager for the patient. The rehabilitation program at home emphasized a task- and context-oriented approach. The activities were chosen on the basis of the patient's personal interests. Spouses were offered education and individual counseling. A total of 81 patients were followed up for a minimum of 3 months. Patient outcome was assessed by the Frenchay Social Activity Index, Extended Katz Index, Barthel Index, Lindmark Motor Capacity Assessment, Nine-Hole Peg Test, walking speed over 10 m, reported falls, and subjective dysfunction according to the Sickness Impact Profile. Patient use of hospital and home rehabilitation service and patient satisfaction with care were studied.
                Overall there were no statistical significant differences in outcome. Multivariate logistic regression analysis suggested a systematic positive effect for the home rehabilitation group in social activity, activities of daily living, motor capacity, manual dexterity, and walking. A considerable difference in resource use during such a 3-month period was seen. A 52% reduction in hospitalization was observed: from 29 days in the routine rehabilitation group to 14 days in the home rehabilitation group. Patient satisfaction was in favor of the latter group.
                Early supported discharge with continuity of home rehabilitation services for the majority of moderately disabled stroke patients during the first 3-month period after acute stroke is not less beneficial than routine rehabilitation and can be a rehabilitation service of choice if follow-up at 6 and 12 months confirms the suggested effectiveness and considerable reduction in use of health care. Stroke is a complicated disease that requires a multidisciplinary approach for its management. We postulated that variance analysis applied to a stroke pathway, by identifying major problem areas and encouraging timely corrective actions, would lead to more efficient healthcare delivery to hospitalised stroke patients.
                Prospectively collected variance data from consecutive stroke patients discharged from a tertiary hospital in Singapore during a 3-month period in 2000 were used to identify the major variances causing increased length of stay. These were compared and contrasted to variance data collected during the same 3-month period in the subsequent year (2001), after the implementation of stroke pathway and the availability of monthly variance analysis reports. Patient characteristics and outcome measures were also compared between the two study periods.
                The four major variances that accounted for increased length of stay were, in descending order of the number of patients affected, awaiting bed availability in step-down facilities, delay in head computed tomographic scan performance, awaiting family's decision on discharge plan and incomplete application submitted to step-down facilities. After implementation of the stroke pathway with ongoing variance analysis, all four variances showed different extent of improvements. There were no significant differences in patient characteristics between the two study periods, whereas the average length of stay significantly diminished in the late study period with a trend for decreased in-hospital mortality, compared to the early study period.
                Variance analysis applied in the context of a stroke pathway was effective in identifying major variances causing increased length of stay. This allowed targeted intervention to improve efficiency of healthcare delivery to stroke patients. To examine the effect of contact with a stroke family care worker on the physical, social, and psychological status of stroke patients and their carers.
                Randomised controlled trial with broad entry criteria and blinded outcome assessment six months after randomisation.
                A well organised stroke service in an Edinburgh teaching hospital.
                417 patients with an acute stroke in the previous 30 days randomly allocated to be contacted by a stroke family care worker (210) or to receive standard care (207). The patients represented 67% of all stroke patients assessed at the hospital during the study period.
                Patient completed Barthel index, Frenchay activities index, general health questionnaire, hospital anxiety and depression scale, social adjustment scale, mental adjustment to stroke scale, and patient satisfaction questionnaire; carer completed Frenchay activities index, general health questionnaire, hospital anxiety and depression scale, social adjustment scale, caregiving bassles scale, and carer satisfaction questionnaire.
                The groups were balanced for all important baseline variables. There were no significant differences in physical outcomes in patients or carers, though patients in the treatment group were possibly more helpless less well adjusted socially, and more depressed, whereas carers in the treatment group were possibly less hassled and anxious. However, both patients and carers in the group contacted by the stroke family care worker expressed significantly greater satisfaction with certain aspects of their care, in particular those related to communication and support.
                The introduction of a stroke family care worker improved patients' and their carers' satisfaction with services and may have had some effect on psychological and social outcomes but did not improve measures of patients' physical wellbeing.
Use of stroke care pathways may be associated with positive and negative effects. Since most of the results have been derived from non-randomised studies, they are likely to be influenced by potential biases and confounding factors. There is currently insufficient supporting evidence to justify the routine implementation of care pathways for acute stroke management or stroke rehabilitation.