Vaginal clindamycin and oral metronidazole for bacterial vaginosis: a randomized trial. Bacterial vaginosis: treatment with clindamycin cream versus oral metronidazole. Efficacy of clindamycin vaginal cream versus oral metronidazole in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis. Clindamycin vaginal cream versus oral metronidazole in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis: a prospective double-blind clinical trial. Clindamycin versus metronidazole in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis. Antimicrobial resistance associated with the treatment of bacterial vaginosis. Multicenter comparison of clotrimazole vaginal tablets, oral metronidazole, and vaginal suppositories containing sulfanilamide, aminacrine hydrochloride, and allantoin in the treatment of symptomatic trichomoniasis. Treatment options for bacterial vaginosis in patients at high risk of preterm labor and premature rupture of membranes. A pilot study of metronidazole vaginal gel versus oral metronidazole for the treatment of Trichomonas vaginalis vaginitis.
To compare the efficacy and safety of clindamycin vaginal ovules with oral metronidazole for treatment of bacterial vaginosis.
                Women with bacterial vaginosis received either 100-mg ovules of clindamycin (intravaginally for 3 consecutive days) plus placebo capsules (orally twice daily for 7 days) or metronidazole 500 mg (two 250-mg capsules orally twice daily for 7 days) plus placebo ovules (intravaginally for 3 consecutive days). The sample was determined prospectively to provide a probability of.84 of correctly concluding that the rate of success for clindamycin is not more than 15% less than the expected 75% success rate for metronidazole. Clinical outcome was determined on the basis of vaginal fluid amine odor and clue cells.
                Of the 399 patients enrolled, 233 could be evaluated for efficacy. Of those, 77 (68.1%) of 113 patients were cured with clindamycin, compared with 80 (66. 7%) of 120 who were cured with metronidazole (95% confidence interval -10.6%, 13.4%; P =.810). Treatment-related adverse events were reported more frequently in the metronidazole treatment group. Systemic symptoms, such as nausea and taste perversion, accounted for most of the difference between groups.
                A 3-day regimen of clindamycin, given as intravaginal ovules, was as effective as and better tolerated than a 7-day regimen of oral metronidazole 500 mg, given twice daily, for treatment of bacterial vaginosis. In a randomized, double-blind study, 48 women with symptomatic bacterial vaginosis were assigned to receive either 5 g of 2% clindamycin vaginal cream daily or 500 mg metronidazole oral tablets twice a day for 7 days. After completion of therapy, there was no significant difference in cure rates (clindamycin 72% versus metronidazole 87%). One month later, 61% of the patients in each group were still cured. Adverse reactions were mild in both groups. We conclude that clindamycin cream is a safe, well tolerated, and effective alternative to oral metronidazole for treatment of bacterial vaginosis. To compare the efficacy and tolerance with 2% clindamycin vaginal cream versus oral metronidazole for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis.
                This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study in which patients were randomly assigned to one of the following two regimens in a 1:1 ratio: clindamycin phosphate vaginal cream 2% (5 g intravaginally at bedtime for 7 days) plus two placebo capsules (twice a day for 7 days) or metronidazole 500 mg (two 250-mg capsules orally twice a day for 7 days) plus placebo vaginal cream (5 g intravaginally at bedtime for 7 days). The patients were seen for follow-up at 5-10 days and 25-39 days after completion of therapy.
                Seven investigators, four in Germany, two in Austria, and one in Switzerland, enrolled 407 patients. Four patients never received either protocol drug, leaving 403 evaluable for safety. Two hundred thirty-four patients were evaluable for efficacy. The analysis for all evaluable patients showed no significant difference between treatment groups. The cure or improvement rate at 1 month after therapy was 83% in the clindamycin group versus 78% in the metronidazole group. The incidence of drug-related adverse medical events was approximately 12% in both groups.
                Oral metronidazole and intravaginal clindamycin cream had a similar efficacy of 78 to 83%. Both drugs were tolerated, with vaginal candidiasis developing in 8.5 and 4.7% of the patients in the clindamycin and metronidazole groups, respectively. Bacterial vaginosis is common among patients seen by gynecologists. Several types of therapy have been proposed. The purpose of this prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial was to examine the efficacy of clindamycin vaginal cream for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis. Sixty patients with symptoms of bacterial vaginosis were randomized into the study, and 46 completed the protocol. Twenty-three patients received 2% clindamycin vaginal cream (5 g applied intravaginally at bedtime for 7 days), with placebo oral tablets twice daily for 7 days. The other 23 patients received oral metronidazole tablets (500 mg twice a day for 7 days) and placebo vaginal cream (5 g intravaginally for 7 days). The cure rates for the two regimens were comparable. Twenty-two (97%) of the patients treated with clindamycin vaginal cream had improvement or cure at the first follow-up visit versus 19 (83%) of those taking metronidazole. There was no statistically significant difference between the two results. Side effects for both regimens were comparable. We conclude that 2% clindamycin vaginal cream offers similar efficacy and safety to standard oral metronidazole therapy for bacterial vaginosis. One hundred forty-three women with complaints of vaginitis were assigned to receive either 500 mg of metronidazole twice daily for 7 days or clindamycin 300 mg twice daily for 7 days. There was no significant difference in the failure rate between patients treated with clindamycin (6.1%) and those treated with metronidazole (4%). Adverse reactions were infrequent and mild in both treatment groups. Three patients who received clindamycin developed non-bloody diarrhea, which was mild and did not necessitate discontinuing therapy. We conclude that clindamycin may be a safe and effective alternative to metronidazole for treating women with bacterial vaginosis. This study was undertaken to evaluate antimicrobial susceptibility of vaginal anaerobic bacteria before and after treatment of bacterial vaginosis.
                A randomized clinical trial of 119 nonpregnant women with bacterial vaginosis receiving either intravaginal metronidazole for 5 days or clindamycin for 3 days was performed. Women had 1 baseline and 3 follow-up visits at which quantitative vaginal cultures were performed. Anaerobic isolates underwent antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
                Complete susceptibility data was available on 95 women (47 metronidazole and 48 clindamycin). Of 1059 anaerobic bacterial isolates, less than 1% demonstrated resistance to metronidazole. In contrast, 17% demonstrated baseline clindamycin resistance, and 53% demonstrated resistance to clindamycin after therapy. Women exposed to clindamycin (but not metronidazole) had high frequencies (80%) of clindamycin-resistant anaerobic bacteria that persisted for 90 days after treatment.
                Treatment of bacterial vaginosis with clindamycin is associated with marked evidence of antimicrobial resistance among vaginal anaerobic bacteria. This may increase the vaginal reservoir of macrolide-resistant bacteria. Trichomonas vaginalis is a common vaginal pathogen. Oral metronidazole is the drug of choice for the treatment of trichomoniasis. Oral metronidazole, however, may cause unpleasant side effects and is contraindicated during the first trimester of pregnancy. In vitro studies and preliminary clinical data have suggested that intravaginal clotrimazole may be effective against this pathogen.
                To compare the efficacy of clotrimazole vaginal tablets, oral metronidazole, and vaginal suppositories containing sulfanilamide, aminacrine, and allantoin (AVC suppositories) in the treatment of women with symptomatic trichomoniasis.
                In a multicenter, open-label trial conducted in 1982 and 1983, 168 symptomatic women with microscopically evident vaginal trichomoniasis were randomized to receive any of 2 g of metronidazole as a single oral dose, two 100-mg clotrimazole vaginal tablets once a day for 7 days, or vaginal suppositories containing 1.05 g of sulfanilamide, 14 mg of aminacrine hydrochloride, and 140 mg of allantoin (AVC suppositories) twice a day for 7 days. Wet mounts and cultures were repated at 1 to 2 and 4 to 6 weeks after completion of treatment.
                The number of patients who had positive cultures after treatment were 40/45 (88.9%) in the clotrimazole group, 35/43 (81.4%) in the AVC suppository group, and 9/45 (20%) in the metronidazole group (P < 0.001). All treatments were associated with a reduction in reported symptoms. Oral metrohidazole was more effective in reducing symptoms than either of the topical preparations. Adverse events, mostly mild or moderate in severity, were reported by 7 (14.6%) of 48 patients who had received oral metronidazole and 4 (7.8%) of 51 women who used AVC suppositories. There were no adverse events reported by the 50 women who used clotrimazole vaginal tablets.
                Oral metronidazole was more effective in eradicating T. vaginalis than clotrimazole vaginal tablets or AVC vaginal suppositories. All three regimens reduced symptoms; oral metronidazole was more effective in reducing symptoms than either topical preparation. To estimate the efficacy of different therapeutic modalities on proven cases of bacterial vaginosis (BV) in patients at high risk of preterm labor and premature rupture of membranes.
                This was a longitudinal prospective comparative study set in the antenatal outpatient clinic of the department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt. Four hundred and sixty-eight patients with a clinical picture of threatened preterm labor or at high risk of premature rupture of membranes in the third trimester were screened for BV. Positive BV was diagnosed in 156 patients. They were randomly classified into four equal groups according to the line of medical treatment. The treatments were: (i) oral metronidazole, (ii) clindamycin vaginal cream, (iii) oral clindamycin, or (iv) metronidazole vaginal suppositories. The effects of medical treatment on Amsel's criteria as well as maternal and fetal outcomes were measured.
                Based on Amsel's criteria, 156 patients (33.3%) were diagnosed with BV. There was a significant disappearance of vaginal discharge, with decreased percentages of pH > 4.5, positive amine test, and clue cells after treatment of BV in the four groups without any statistically significant difference between them. There were variable effects of the different treatments on increasing birthweight values, admission to neonatal intensive care units, and prolongation of the gestational age. Some maternal adverse effects have been recorded. There were significant improvements of the outcomes for oral metronidazole and clindamycin compared with outcomes for intravaginal metronidazole and clindamycin.
                Metronidazole and clindamycin achieve nearly equivalent cure rates when administered orally or vaginally in patients at high risk of preterm labor and premature rupture of membranes. Oral metronidazole is considered the drug of choice in treating BV due its high cure rate, better outcomes, and low cost. Trichomonas vaginalis is a common sexually transmitted pathogen. In the United States, oral metronidazole is the only officially sanctioned treatment option.
                This study was undertaken to compare the efficacy and safety of 0.75% metronidazole vaginal gel with that of oral metronidazole for the treatment of trichomonal vaginitis.
                Women with trichomoniasis were enrolled in this randomized, open-label pilot study of 0.75% metronidazole vaginal gel twice daily for 7 days compared with 7 days of generic oral metronidazole, 250 mg, three times daily. Patients were seen for follow-up visits 5 to 7 days and 21 to 28 days after the last dose of medication.
                Using culture for test of cure, trichomonal infection was eliminated in all 15 women treated with oral metronidazole and 7 (44%) of 16 women treated with intravaginal metronidazole. Adverse events were similar, except that there were more taste-related adverse events in the oral metronidazole group. Significant reductions in genitourinary symptoms were seen in both the oral and intravaginal groups.
                This study has shown that 0.75% metronidazole vaginal gel is not effective as a single agent for the treatment of trichomoniasis. Future studies may define a role for metronidazole gel for symptomatic relief in patients intolerant of oral medication or as adjunctive treatment with oral metronidazole for the management of patients infected with metronidazole-resistant strains of T. vaginalis.
Clindamycin preparations, oral metronidazole, and oral and intravaginal tablets of lactobacillus were effective for bacterial vaginosis. Hydrogen peroxide douche and triple sulphonamide cream were ineffective. Metronidazole caused metallic taste, nausea and vomiting. We need better-designed trials with larger sample sizes to test the effectiveness of promising drugs.