Double-blind, controlled trial of inositol treatment of depression. Inositol addition does not improve depression in SSRI treatment failures. Combination of inositol and serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the treatment of depression. Inositol as an add-on treatment for bipolar depression. Inositol versus placebo augmentation of serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder: a double-blind cross-over study. Inositol treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder. A controlled trial of maprotiline (Ludiomil) in depressed outpatients. Respiratory distress syndrome and inositol supplementation in preterm infants. A double-blind comparative trial of zimelidine, amitriptyline, and placebo in patients with mixed anxiety and depression.
CSF levels of inositol have been reported to be lower than normal in depressed subjects. The authors administered inositol to depressed patients in a double-blind, controlled trial.
                Under double-blind conditions, 12 g/day of inositol (N = 13) or placebo (N = 15) was administered to depressed patients for 4 weeks.
                The overall improvement in scores on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale was significantly greater for inositol than for placebo at week 4. No changes were noted in hematology or in kidney or liver function.
                This may be the first use of the precursor strategy for a second messenger rather than a neurotransmitter in treating depression. Although inositol had a significant antidepressant effect in this study, replication is crucial. Some antidepressants, such as Lithium, can augment the antidepressant effect of serotonin selective uptake inhibitors (SSRI) in patients who have failed to respond to SSRI. Inositol has demonstrated antidepressant effects but in a controlled double blind augmentation trial did not improve depression in SSRI treatment failures. Inositol has been reported to be an effective treatment in depression, and we hypothesized that inositol addition might enhance or speed up response to serotonin selective reuptake inhibitors (SSRI).
                Twenty-seven depressed patients completed a double-blind controlled 4-week trial of SSRI plus placebo or SSRI plus inositol. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale was used as an assessment tool at baseline, and 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks.
                No significant difference was found between the two treatment groups.
                Previous studies combining different effective antidepressant therapies similarly found no evidence for additive effects [e.g., monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOI) plus tricyclic antidepressants (TCA), TCA plus lithium]. By contrast, augmentation by lithium or MAOI after a failed course of antidepressant treatment is effective and should be studied with inositol. Inositol is a constituent of the intracellular phosphatidyl inositol (PI) second messenger system, which is linked to various neurotransmitter receptors. Inositol crosses the blood-brain barrier in pharmacological doses, and has shown efficacy in a small double-blind study of unipolar depression. This pilot study evaluated its potential efficacy and safety in bipolar depression.
                Twenty-four consenting adult men and women with DSM-IV bipolar depression (bipolar I = 21; bipolar II = 3) were randomly assigned to receive either 12 g of inositol or D-glucose as placebo for 6 weeks. Efficacy and safety ratings were done weekly. Thymoleptic medications (lithium, valproate, carbamazepine) in stable doses and at therapeutic levels at study entry were continued unchanged.
                Two subjects receiving placebo dropped out early due to worsening or non-adherence to the protocol. Among the 22 subjects who completed the trial, six (50%) of the inositol-treated subjects responded with a 50% or greater decrease in the baseline Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) score and a Clinical Global Improvement (CGI) scale score change of 'much' or 'very much' improved, as compared to three (30%) subjects assigned to placebo, a statistically nonsignificant difference. On the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), eight (67%) of twelve inositol-treated subjects had a 50% or greater decrease in the baseline MADRS scores compared to four (33%) of twelve subjects assigned to placebo (p = 0.10). Inositol was well tolerated with minimal side effects, and thymoleptic blood levels were unaltered.
                These pilot data suggest a controlled study with an adequate sample size, and the appropriate rating scale may demonstrate efficacy for inositol in bipolar depression. The tolerability and the 'natural substance' aspect of inositol may be particularly appealing to subjects with bipolar depression. Current serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SRI) treatments for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) provide only partial benefit. A previous study suggested that inositol alone is efficacious in OCD. Ten DSM-IV OCD patients completed a study of 18 g inositol or placebo for 6 wk each in addition to ongoing SRI treatment in a double-blind randomized cross-over design. Weekly assessments included the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (YBOCS) and Hamilton Depression and Anxiety scales. No significant difference was found between the two treatment phases. nan A double blind comparison is reported of a new tetracyclic antidepressant, maprotiline, with amitriptyline and placebo in psychiatric outpatients. Amitriptyline was significantly more effective than placebo in its global effect on depression. Maprotiline emerged as neither inferior to amitriptyline nor superior to placebo. Methodological difficulties prevented an adequate assessment of the anxiolytic activity of maprotiline. We report a randomised double blind trial of myo-inositol (inositol) supplementation for 10 days in 74 preterm infants with a birth weight less than 2000 g (mean gestational age 29.5 weeks and mean birth weight 1266 g). All infants required artificial ventilation for treatment of respiratory distress syndrome. Inositol (120-160 mg/kg/day) was administered by the ingastric or intravenous route. The 37 infants who received inositol supplementation required less mechanical ventilation during days 4-10, had less failures of indomethacin to close ductus arteriosus, and had less deaths or bronchopulmonary dysplasia, or both, than the infants treated with placebo. There were no detectable adverse effects. These preliminary results suggest that inositol is an important nutrient in immature preterm infants. We performed a randomized, double-blind clinical trial comparing the efficacy and safety of zimelidine with amitriptyline and placebo in outpatients with major depression, in particular patients with mixed anxiety/depressive symptomatology. Overall, amitriptyline was more effective than zimelidine and placebo after 4 weeks of treatment. However, when those patients with more severe depression were specifically examined, both antidepressants were equal in efficacy and superior to placebo. We also found no evidence for a greater likelihood of a zimelidine-induced peripheral neuropathy in this study. The present results suggest that zimelidine may be more effective in the treatment of severely depressed patients, rather than those with more mild mixed anxiety/depressive syndromes.
It is currently unclear whether or not inositol is of benefit in the treatment of depression. Ongoing studies should reduce this uncertainty.