Comparison of live attenuated and inactivated influenza vaccines in cystic fibrosis patients and their families: results of a 3-year study. Influenza immunization in children with cystic fibrosis. Repeated aerosolized AAV-CFTR for treatment of cystic fibrosis: a randomized placebo-controlled phase 2B trial. Prospective, controlled study of a polyvalent pseudomonas vaccine in cystic fibrosis--three year results. Randomized, placebo-controlled double blind study on the efficacy of influenza immunization on absenteeism of health care workers. Comparison of live and inactivated influenza vaccine in high risk children. Vaccination of patients with haematological malignancies with one or two doses of influenza vaccine: a randomised study. Comparison of immunogenicity and safety of a virosome influenza vaccine with those of a subunit influenza vaccine in pediatric patients with cystic fibrosis. Influenza vaccination in children with asthma: randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.
Forty-one cystic fibrosis (CF) patients and 89 family members were immunized in a double-blind randomized 3-year trial with either intranasal live cold-adapted (ca) influenza A vaccine or the recommended intramuscular trivalent inactivated (triv) influenza vaccine. Local, respiratory, and systemic symptoms after vaccine were infrequent and did not differ between vaccine groups. CF patients did not differ from family members in immune response to either vaccine. Although antibody responses tended to be higher after triv vaccine, > or = 85% of subjects had mean hemagglutination inhibition antibody titers > or = 1:32 to influenza H1N1 and H3N2 after the first dose of either vaccine. Infection with influenza H3N2 viruses circulating during this study occurred with comparable low frequency in CF patients after ca (14 infections/100 subject-years of observation) or triv vaccine (10 infections/100 subject-years of observation). Influenza A ca vaccines appear to be safe, immunogenic alternatives to influenza A inactivated vaccines for CF patients and their families. Nineteen children with cystic fibrosis and aged between 5 and 13 years were randomized to receive two doses at monthly intervals of either a split-virion influenza vaccine (MFV-Ject, Institut Merieux) or a sub-unit vaccine (Fluvirin, Evans). In those completing the study, there was a satisfactory serological response. There was no statistically significant difference between the immunogenicity of the two vaccines as evaluated by haemagglutination inhibition or single radial haemolysis tests. The incidence of local side-effects was similar in the two groups. Previous studies have demonstrated that delivery of a recombinant adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector encoding the complete human cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR) cDNA (tgAAVCF) to the nose, sinus, and lungs of subjects with cystic fibrosis (CF) was safe and well tolerated. In a small randomized, double-blind study of three doses of aerosolized tgAAVCF or placebo at 30-day intervals, encouraging but non-significant trends in pulmonary function and induced sputum interleukin 8 (IL-8) levels were seen at early time points. This larger study was conducted to verify these trends. One hundred and two subjects aged 12 years and older with mild-to-moderate cystic fibrosis (forced expiratory flow in 1 sec [FEV1]:60% predicted) were randomized to two aerosolized doses of 1x10(13)DNase-resistant particles of tgAAVCF (n=51) or matching placebo (n=51) administered 30 days apart. Although tgAAVCF was well tolerated, the study did not meet its primary efficacy end point of statistically significant improvement in FEV1 30 days after initial administration of tgAAVCF compared with placebo. There were no significant differences in spirometric lung function over time, induced sputum biologic markers, or days of antibiotic use in either treatment group. Thus repeated doses of aerosolized tgAAVCF were safe and well tolerated, but did not result in significant improvement in lung function over time. Because gene transfer is the simplest, most basic way to correct the underlying genetic defect that leads to disease in CF, further research is warranted to develop an effective gene transfer agent for the treatment of CF. Thirty four children with cystic fibrosis allocated to pseudomonas vaccine and control groups were studied for three years. No significant differences were observed in the numbers colonised by Pseudomonas aeruginosa or in the overall disease progress of the two groups. In healthy adults influenza immunization reduces absenteeism caused by respiratory infections, but data on its efficacy among health care workers are scarce.
                To determine the effect of the conventional inactivated influenza A vaccine on reducing absenteeism related to respiratory infections among pediatric health care providers.
                A randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind study on vaccine efficacy was conducted in two pediatric hospitals during the winter season 1996 to 1997. The primary endpoint was days of work lost from the hospital because of respiratory infections. The documentation of absenteeism was based on personal sickness logs.
                Of the 547 randomized vaccinees 427 (78%) persons completed the 4-month follow-up and returned the sickness logs. Immunization failed to reduce episodes of respiratory infections (1.8 episodes/study period among vaccinees vs. 2.0 among controls). Similarly the vaccine failed to affect the total number of days the vaccinees suffered from respiratory infections (13.5 days vs. 14.6 days, respectively). However, days of work lost because of respiratory infections (1.0 days vs. 1.4 days, respectively, P = 0.02) and especially total numbers of days the study persons felt themselves unable to work when either on or off duty (2.5 days vs. 3.5 days, P 0.02) were significantly decreased.
                Influenza vaccination reduced absenteeism related to respiratory infections by 28%. We therefore believe that routine annual influenza immunizations should be recommended to health care providers working in pediatric settings. Bivalent, live attenuated intranasally administered influenza A vaccines were compared to inactivated, parenterally administered influenza A vaccines in a double-blind clinical trial in 55 children and young adults with cystic fibrosis. No qualitative or quantitative difference in symptomatology between the group receiving intranasal live vaccine versus placebo was observed. Serum immune responses to live vaccines were somewhat less than those to inactivated vaccine, particularly in adults. IgA response in nasal secretions was minimal in each vaccine group. In contrast, an IgG response in nasal secretions was commonly seen with both topically applied live vaccine and parenterally administered inactivated vaccine. An open, randomised study was performed to determine whether two doses of influenza vaccine were more effective than one to elicit an immune response in 70 patients with haematological malignancies. The responses were not improved by two doses compared with one (influenza A virus serotypes H1/N1 18% vs. 22% and H3/N2 26% vs. 14%; influenza B 25% vs. 22%). The results were similar in patients with ongoing and discontinued therapy. Patients treated with monoclonal antibodies for lymphoma had very poor responses. We conclude that two doses of influenza vaccine do not improve the antibody response in patients with haematological malignancies. The objective of this study was to compare the immunogenicity and safety of a single-dose regimen and a two-dose regimen of a trivalent virosome influenza vaccine (Inflexal Berna V) with those of a trivalent subunit influenza vaccine (Influvac) in children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis (CF). In an open, randomized, multicenter study with parallel groups, 11 young children with CF (1 to 6 years old) and 53 older children and adolescents with CF (>6 years old) were randomly assigned to one of the following immunization regimens: virosome vaccine at 0.5 ml on study day 0 or 0.25 ml on days 0 and 28 or a standard regimen of subunit vaccine, i. e., 0.5 ml on day 0 for older children and 0.25 ml on days 0 and 28 for younger children. Safety assessments, i.e., recording of systemic and local adverse events (AEs) and vital signs, were made for a 5-day observation period after each immunization. Hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titers were determined at baseline and 4 weeks after the single-dose and the two-dose immunizations, respectively. Immunogenicity was assessed according to the criteria of the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products (EMEA). Both vaccines induced comparable HI antibody titers. Seroconversion (> or =4-fold rise in HI antibody titers, reaching a titer of > or =1:40) was achieved in 41 to 100% of the participants. Seroprotection (HI titer, > or =1:40) and a >2.5-fold increase in geometric mean titers were achieved in 100% of the participants. Thus, all three EMEA requirements for influenza vaccine efficacy were met by all treatment groups and for both vaccines. The virosome vaccine, when administered as a single dose, seemed to induce superior immunogenicity compared with the standard pediatric two-dose regimen. Totals of 42 and 57% of vaccinees receiving virosome and subunit vaccines, respectively, reported at least one local AE (predominantly pain). Totals of 84 and 71% of subjects receiving virosome and subunit vaccines, respectively, complained in response to questions of at least one systemic AE (mainly cough, fatigue, coryza, or headache). The majority of events were mild or moderate and lasted 1 or 2 days only. No obvious relationship was found between AE reporting rate and vaccine formulation, age group, or dose regimen. The relatively high AE reporting rate seemed to be partly related to the symptomatology of the underlying CF disease. In summary, the virosome and subunit vaccines induced in both age groups and against all three influenza strains an efficient immune response and were well tolerated by the children and adolescents with CF. There is little evidence that influenza vaccination reduces asthma exacerbations. We determined whether influenza vaccination is more effective than placebo in 6-18-year-old children with asthma. We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Parenteral vaccination with inactivated influenza vaccine or placebo took place approximately November 1, and children were followed until April 1 of the next year. Airway symptoms were reported in a diary. When symptom scores reached a predefined level, a pharyngeal swab was taken. Primary outcome was the number of asthma exacerbations associated with virologically proven influenza infection. Three hundred forty-nine children were assigned placebo, and 347 were assigned vaccine. Pharyngeal swabs positive for influenza were related to 42 asthma exacerbations, 24 in the vaccine group and 18 in the placebo group, a difference of 33% favoring placebo (31% after adjustment for confounders; 95% confidence interval, -34% to 161%). Influenza-related asthma exacerbations were of similar severity in both groups; they lasted 3.1 days shorter in the vaccine group (95% confidence interval, -6.2 to 0.002 days, p = 0.06). We conclude that influenza vaccination did not result in a significant reduction of the number, severity, or duration of asthma exacerbations caused by influenza. Additional studies are warranted to justify routine influenza vaccination of children with asthma.
There is currently no evidence from randomised studies that influenza vaccine given to people with cystic fibrosis is of benefit to them. There remains a need for a well-constructed clinical study, that assesses the effectiveness of influenza vaccination on important clinical outcome measures.