[The best anastomoses after colonic resection]. Ileocolonic anastomosis after right hemicolectomy for carcinoma: stapled or hand-sewn? A prospective, multicenter, randomized trial. Comparison of manually constructed and stapled anastomoses in colorectal surgery. West of Scotland and Highland Anastomosis Study Group. [Is the stapled suture in visceral surgery still justified? A prospective controlled, randomized study of cost effectiveness of manual and stapler suture]. Staples or sutures for low colorectal anastomoses: a prospective randomized trial. Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery with primary intraperitoneal anastomosis by a single surgeon: interim analysis of a prospective single-blinded randomized trial. A prospective randomized study of sutured versus stapled bowel anastomoses in patients with cancer. Randomized prospective evaluation of the EEA stapler for colorectal anastomoses. Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery: a multicentre randomised trial.
Among the numerous anastomotic techniques after colonic resection, the mechanical sutures using staplers have been credited with a lower incidence of anastomotic leakage than hand-sewn anastomoses. This hypothesis has been tested in two multicentre, prospective, randomized trials after right hemicolectomy for carcinoma and after left colectomy with colorectal anastomosis. After right hemicolectomy, the stapled anastomosis using the GIA and TA staplers appeared to be superior to all hand-sewn anastomoses. This superiority was not apparent after left colectomy followed by colorectal anastomosis. Although the leakage rate of stapled anastomoses was similar to hand-sewn anastomoses, they carry a high rate of intra-operative mishaps. Furthermore, the stapler does not permit a lower anastomosis in this study. Finally, the overall cost of a stapled anastomosis is superior to the cost of an hand-sewn anastomosis. 440 patients were prospectively enrolled in a randomized, multicenter trial to compare 4 types of manual (84 interrupted end-to-end, 77 continuous end-to-end, 82 interrupted end-to-side, and 91 continuous end-to-side) (polyglycolic derived suture) and 1 type of stapled (106 side-to-side with GIA+TA devices) ileocolonic anastomosis after right hemicolectomy for carcinoma. The trial was designed according to Schwartz' pragmatic formulation. All 5 groups were well-matched, except for a lower rate of intraoperative sepsis in the stapled group (P < 0.02). The main end point was anastomotic leakage detected clinically or by routine sodium diatrizoate enema on the 8-10th postoperative day. Results showed that stapled ileocolonic anastomosis was associated with less anastomotic leakages (2.8%) than all the other techniques combined (8.3%). In spite of the fact that staples are approximately ten times more expensive, our results suggest performing side-to-side (GIA+TA) mechanical anastomosis after right resection for carcinoma. The authors compared both the initial and the long-term outcomes of patients undergoing stapled and sutured colorectal anastomoses.
                Sutured and stapled large bowel anastomoses are perceived to be equally safe, but concern has been raised about increased rates of tumor recurrence with the use of stapling instruments.
                The outcome of patients with sutured and stapled colorectal anastomoses were compared in a prospective, multicenter, randomized study. Factors affecting long-term outcomes were assessed by both univariate and multivariate analysis.
                Seven hundred thirty-two patients were recruited. There was a significant increase in radiologic leakage in the sutured group (14.4% vs. 5.2%, p < 0.05), but there was no difference in clinical anastomotic leak rates, morbidity, or postoperative mortality. Tumor recurrence and cancer-specific mortality were higher in the sutured patients (7.5% and 6.7%, respectively) and in patients with anastomotic leaks.
                This study shows that suturing or stapling are equally safe in large bowel surgery. However, it also shows a long-term benefit of stapling in colorectal cancer patients. Hospitals are facing increasing economic pressure. It therefore seems necessary to evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of medical or surgical interventions. In this study 324 anastomoses (167 stapled and 157 hand-sewn) were performed after randomization during 200 elective operations [20.5% gastrectomies, 14% gastric resections (Billroth II), 15% Whipple's procedures, 4% segmental colonic resections, 18% right-sided hemicolectomies, 4% left-sided hemicolectomies, 22% sigmoid- or anterior rectal resections, 2.5% total colectomies with pouch-anal anastomoses] in 200 patients. Postoperative motility (time to full oral diet, time with naso-gastric tube) and hospitalization were comparable in both groups. Anastomotic insufficiency was observed in 2.1% of all patients, five after stapled and two after hand-sewn anastomoses. Hospital mortality was 1.5%. All stapled anastomoses were performed significantly (P < 0.001) faster. However, the cost of material for these anastomoses was significantly (P < 0.001) higher, resulting in significantly higher total costs for reconstruction. The time saving for the reconstruction did not influence the total operative time (except for stapled gastrectomy). Therefore, all operations with stapled reconstruction were more expensive than those with sutured reconstruction. The difference was significant for the gastrectomy (P < 0.01), colonic resection (P < 0.01) and sigmoid and rectal resection (P < 0.001) groups. Stapled and sutured anastomoses are equally effective. Stapled anastomoses are not efficient, however, and should be reserved for individual indications. One hundred and eighteen patients undergoing low colorectal anastomoses were randomly allocated to reconstitution by either single layer interrupted extramucosal sutures or circular staple gun. In the 60 patients undergoing sutured anastomosis there were 2 (3 per cent) clinical leaks and 4 (7 per cent) radiological leaks, and no failures. Of the 58 patients who underwent stapled anastomosis there were 4 failures, 7 (12 per cent) clinical leaks, 14 (24 per cent) radiological leaks and 1 death. Stapled anastomoses were more than ten times as expensive as sutured anastomoses and there were no savings in time or numbers of associated colostomies. An interrupted extramucosal suture technique remains the ultimate standard for low colorectal anastomosis. We report an interim analysis of a prospective single-blinded randomized trial designed to investigate whether preoperative mechanical bowel preparation influences the rate of surgical-site infection and anastomotic failure after elective colorectal surgery with primary intraperitoneal anastomosis performed by a single surgeon. Patients scheduled to undergo an elective colorectal procedure with a primary intraperitoneal anastomosis were randomized to receive either oral polyethylene glycol lavage solution and enemas (group A) or no preparation (group B). Surgical-site infection and anastomotic failure were investigated. Of 97 patients included, 48 were assigned to group A and 49 to group B. Twelve (12.4%) developed wound infections, six in each group (12.5 vs. 12.2%; NS). Intra-abdominal sepsis was only seen in group A (n = 3, 6.3%). Anastomotic failure occurred in four patients in group A (8.3%) vs. two patients in group B (4.1%) (NS). The overall complication rate in group A was 27.1%, vs. 16.3% in group B. The number needed to harm was 9.3. Our interim analysis of a prospective single-blinded randomized trial suggests that a surgeon may have the same or even worse outcomes when mechanical bowel preparation is routinely used for colorectal surgery with primary intraperitoneal anastomosis. Eighty-eight cancer patients with the presence of one or more adverse factors for healing (carcinomatosis, adhesions, prior chemotherapy and radiation therapy, bowel obstruction, anemia, and low leukocyte count or albumin value) were prospectively randomized to undergo conventional two-layer hand suturing (45 patients) or mechanical stapling with a GIA/TA instrument (U.S. Surgical Corp., Norwalk, CT) (43 patients) of the large or small bowel anastomosis. Age, sex, complete blood count findings, and all biochemical plasma values were comparable in both groups. The anastomosis took an average of 19 minutes for the sutured and 9 minutes for the stapled technique (P = 0.0001), but the average length of operation, postoperative return of bowel function, and hospital stay were comparable in both groups. Bowel fistula was seen in one case of stapled anastomosis (P = not significant). The pulmonary and wound complication rates were the same in both groups. Of the four deaths (4.5%) due to causes unrelated to bowel anastomosis, three occurred in the stapled and one in the sutured group. It was concluded that a stapled anastomosis is as safe as a sutured one in patients with advanced-stage cancer. It saves time in anastomosis, but does not save time in postoperative return of the bowel function and hospital stay. A randomized, prospective study should be done to evaluate any new procedure or instrument. Our experience with the end-to-end anastomosis (EEA) stapler suggests that an anastomosis can be created in a shorter time than is required for the traditional hand-sewn technique. This difference is even greater when the anastomosis is technically difficult and located deep within the pelvis. There appears to be little difference in the security of a hand-sewn anastomosis compared with that of stapled anastomosis. Postoperative complications appear similar. With the stapler, however, there is an increased risk of intraoperative complications that are not apparent with the traditional hand-sewn technique. These include rectal tears and anastomotic defects. It appears that the EEA stapler can save as many as 12 percent of rectums that otherwise might have to be removed because of technical inability to perform an anastomosis. Mechanical bowel preparation is a common practice before elective colorectal surgery. We aimed to compare the rate of anastomotic leakage after elective colorectal resections and primary anastomoses between patients who did or did not have mechanical bowel preparation.
                We did a multicentre randomised non-inferiority study at 13 hospitals. We randomly assigned 1431 patients who were going to have elective colorectal surgery to either receive mechanical bowel preparation or not. Patients who did not have mechanical bowel preparation had a normal meal on the day before the operation. Those who did were given a fluid diet, and mechanical bowel preparation with either polyethylene glycol or sodium phosphate. The primary endpoint was anastomotic leakage, and the study was designed to test the hypothesis that patients who are given mechanical bowel preparation before colorectal surgery do not have a lower risk of anastomotic leakage than those who are not. The median follow-up was 24 days (IQR 17-34). We analysed patients who were treated as per protocol. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00288496.
                77 patients were excluded: 46 who did not have a bowel resection; 21 because of missing outcome data; and 10 who withdrew, cancelled, or were excluded for other reasons. The rate of anastomotic leakage did not differ between both groups: 32/670 (4.8%) patients who had mechanical bowel preparation and 37/684 (5.4%) in those who did not (difference 0.6%, 95% CI -1.7% to 2.9%, p=0.69). Patients who had mechanical bowel preparation had fewer abscesses after anastomotic leakage than those who did not (2/670 [0.3%] vs 17/684 [2.5%], p=0.001). Other septic complications, fascia dehiscence, and mortality did not differ between groups.
                We advise that mechanical bowel preparation before elective colorectal surgery can safely be abandoned.
The evidence found was insufficient to demonstrate any superiority of stapled over handsewn techniques in colorectal anastomosis surgery, regardless of the level of anastomosis. There were no randomised clinical trials comparing these two types of anastomosis in elective conditions in the last decade. The relevance of this research question has possibly lost its strength where elective surgery is concerned. However, in risk situations, such as emergency surgery, trauma and inflammatory bowel disease, new clinical trials are needed.