The effect of ciprofloxacin in the prevention of bacterial infection in patients with cirrhosis after upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Antibiotic prophylaxis after endoscopic therapy prevents rebleeding in acute variceal hemorrhage: a randomized trial. Parenteral antibiotic prophylaxis of bacterial infections does not improve cost-efficacy of oral norfloxacin in cirrhotic patients with gastrointestinal bleeding. Systemic antibiotic prophylaxis after gastrointestinal hemorrhage in cirrhotic patients with a high risk of infection. Variceal bleeding in portal hypertension: bacterial infection and comparison of efficacy of intravenous and per-oral application of antibiotics--a randomized trial. [Prospective randomized trial of intravenous ciprofloxacin for prevention of bacterial infection in cirrhotic patients with esophageal variceal bleeding]. Prophylactic antibiotics in cirrhotics with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: a prospective, controlled trial. Prevention of infectious complications after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in cirrhotic patients with a single dose of ceftriaxone. Antibiotic prophylaxis using third generation cephalosporins can reduce the risk of early rebleeding in the first acute gastroesophageal variceal hemorrhage: a prospective randomized study.
Cirrhotic patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding are prone to bacterial infection. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of prophylactic intestinal decontamination with oral ciprofloxacin for the prevention of bacterial infections in cirrhotic patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
                A total of 120 cirrhotic patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding were enrolled. Sixty patients received ciprofloxacin 500 mg twice daily given orally or through nasogastric tube immediately after upper gastrointestinal endoscopic examination; drug administration continued for 7 days. The remaining 60 patients, who received placebo, served as controls.
                The incidence of proven bacterial infection in the ciprofloxacin-treated group was significantly lower than that of placebo group (10% vs 45%, p < 0.001). The incidences of bacteremia, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and urinary tract infection in the ciprofloxacin-treated group were significantly lower than those in the placebo group (0% vs 23%, 3.3% vs 13%, and 5% vs 18%, respectively; p < 0.05, respectively). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that a lack of prophylactic treatment with ciprofloxacin and severity of cirrhosis were the independent significant predictors for cirrhotic patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding with infection.
                Prophylactic intestinal decontamination with oral ciprofloxacin is effective in the prevention of bacterial infections in patients with cirrhosis who were suffering from acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Bacterial infection may adversely affect the hemostasis of patients with gastroesophageal variceal bleeding (GEVB). Antibiotic prophylaxis can prevent bacterial infection in such patients, but its role in preventing rebleeding is unclear. Over a 25-month period, patients with acute GEVB but without evidence of bacterial infection were randomized to receive prophylactic antibiotics (ofloxacin 200 mg i.v. q12h for 2 days followed by oral ofloxacin 200 mg q12h for 5 days) or receive antibiotics only when infection became evident (on-demand group). Endoscopic therapy for the GEVB was performed immediately after infection work-up and randomization. Fifty-nine patients in the prophylactic group and 61 patients in the on-demand group were analyzed. Clinical and endoscopic characteristics of the gastroesophageal varices, time to endoscopic treatment, and period of follow-up were not different between the two groups. Antibiotic prophylaxis decreased infections (2/59 vs. 16/61; P <.002). The actuarial probability of rebleeding was higher in patients without prophylactic antibiotics (P =.0029). The difference of rebleeding was mostly due to early rebleeding within 7 days (4/12 vs. 21/27, P =.0221). The relative hazard of rebleeding within 7 days was 5.078 (95% CI: 1.854-13.908, P <.0001). The multivariate Cox regression indicated bacterial infection (relative hazard: 3.85, 95% CI: 1.85-13.90) and association with hepatocellular carcinoma (relative hazard: 2.46, 95% CI: 1.30-4.63) as independent factors predictive of rebleeding. Blood transfusion for rebleeding was also reduced in the prophylactic group (1.40 +/- 0.89 vs. 2.81 +/- 2.29 units, P <.05). There was no difference in survival between the two groups. In conclusion, antibiotic prophylaxis can prevent infection and rebleeding as well as decrease the amount of blood transfused for patients with acute GEVB following endoscopic treatment. Selective intestinal decontamination with norfloxacin is useful in the prevention of bacterial infections in cirrhotic patients with gastrointestinal bleeding. However, bleeding cirrhotic patients with ascites, encephalopathy, or shock are at high risk to develop bacterial infections in spite of prophylactic norfloxacin. The aim of this study was to assess whether the addition of intravenous ceftriaxone could improve the efficacy of prophylaxis with norfloxacin in these patients.
                Fifty-six cirrhotic patients with gastrointestinal hemorrhage and ascites, encephalopathy, or shock were randomized into two groups: Group 1 (n = 28) received oral norfloxacin 400 mg/12 h for 7 days, and group 2 (n = 28) received norfloxacin plus intravenous ceftriaxone 2 g daily during the first 3 days of admission.
                Ten patients were excluded because of community-acquired infection, surgery, or death within the first 24 h. The incidence of bacterial infections during hospitalization was 18.1% in group 1 and 12.5% in group 2 (p = NS). The incidence of severe infections (spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, bacteremia, or pneumonia) was also similar in both groups: 9% in group 1 versus 8.3% in group 2 (p = NS). There were no statistical differences between the two groups with respect to duration of hospitalization or mortality. The cost of antibiotic therapy (including prophylaxis and treatment of infections) was significantly higher in group 2.
                These results suggest that the addition of intravenous ceftriaxone during the first 3 days of hospitalization does not improve the cost-efficacy of oral norfloxacin in the prevention of bacterial infections in cirrhotic patients with gastrointestinal bleeding and high risk of infection. In cirrhotic patients with gastrointestinal hemorrhage, bacterial infections are frequent and play a significant role in mortality. We have previously found that patients with a Child-Pugh's class C or a rebleeding are a subgroup of cirrhotic patients with a high risk of infection. The aims of the study were (1) to validate these indicators and (2) to assess the effectiveness of a systemic antibiotic treatment in preventing bacterial infections in bleeding cirrhotics with a high risk of infection. One hundred and nineteen bleeding cirrhotic patients were divided into 3 groups. Patients with a Child-Pugh's class A-B and no rebleeding (i.e., with a low risk of infection) constituted group 1 (n = 55). Patients with a high risk of infection were randomly allocated to serve as controls (group 2, n = 34) or to receive the ciprofloxacin and a combination of amoxicillin and clavulanic acid for 3 days after hemorrhage (group 3, n = 30). This antibiotic prophylaxis was administered first intravenously and then orally when the bleeding was controlled. The study period was defined as 10 days after hemorrhage. Incidence of bacterial infections was significantly higher in patients from group 2 than in patients from group 1 (52.9% vs. 18.2%; P < .001). Moreover, infections were more severe in group 2: a sepsis syndrome or a septic shock developed in 66.7% of infected patients from this group, but in only 20% of infected patients from group 1. Incidence of bacterial infections was much lower in patients from group 3 than in those from group 2 (13.3% vs. 52.9%; P < .001). Eight patients from group 2 (23.5%) and 4 patients from group 3 (13.3%) died during the first four weeks (P-not significant). Septic shock was the cause of death in 3 patients from group 2 and in only 1 patient from group 3. The cost of antibiotic therapy, including antibiotic prophylaxis in group 3, was $208 +/- $63 per patient in group 2 and $167 +/- $42 per patient in group 3 (P < .05). We conclude that (1) patients with a Child-Pugh's class C and/or a rebleeding are a subgroup of cirrhotic patients with a high risk of infection after gastrointestinal hemorrhage and that (2) in these patients, a prophylactic treatment with systemic antibiotics is very effective in preventing bacterial infections. To determine the prevalence of bacterial infection in patients admitted to hospital with variceal bleeding in comparison with patients with liver cirrhosis admitted because of another reason. To compare the effect of orally administered antibiotics vs. intravenous antibiotics.
                Bacteriological investigation of blood culture, urine, throat smear, perianal smear and ascites (polymorphonuclear count as well in ascites) was made in 46 cirrhotic patients admitted to hospital with variceal bleeding and 48 cirrhotic patients admitted because of another reason. Bleeders were treated endoscopically (sclerotization) and pharmacologically (terlipressin 1 mg every 4 h for 5 days), and were randomly allocated to the treatment with oral norfloxacin (25 patients) or intravenous ampicillin/sulbactam (21 patients). Early and late mortalities were evaluated.
                The incidence of infection was high in both groups (63.0% bleeders vs. 54.2% controls), but bleeding patients more often had positive blood culture (17.3% vs. 8.6%) and statistically significantly more positive findings in the throat smears (36.9% vs. 17.3%, P=0.04), which gives the evidence of increased pathological colonization in these patients. No difference in survival was seen in patients with per-oral or intravenous administration of antibiotics.
                Bacterial infection was demonstrated in high percentage in patients with liver cirrhosis admitted to hospital. The administration of antibiotics is indicated in these patients. Intravenous application is probably of the same efficacy as per-oral one. In cirrhotic patients with esophageal variceal bleeding, bacterial infections are a frequent complication. Oral antibiotic prophylaxis decreases the incidence of bacterial infections. The administration of oral antibiotics, however, may be difficult in some cirrhotic patients with active bleeding. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of prophylactic intravenous antibiotics for the prevention of bacterial infections in cirrhotic patients with esophageal variceal bleeding.
                From December 1998 to September 2001, a total of 40 consecutive cirrhotic patients with Child-Pugh class B or C were enrolled after emergent endoscopic esophageal variceal ligation (EVL) was taken because of esophageal variceal bleeding. Enrolled patients were randomized into a treatment group and a control group. The treatment group (n=20) received the intravenous ciprofloxacin 200mg IV q 12 hours for 3 days while the control group(n=20) didn,t.
                Bacterial infection developed in nine patients (45%) of the control group and only two patients (10%) in the treatment group. The incidence of bacterial infections was significantly lower in the treatment group than the control group (p < 0.005). The hospital cost and length of hospital stay decreased in the treatment group compared with the control group (p < 0.001). There were no differences in the hospital course and mortality within 30 days between the two groups.
                In cirrhotic patients with variceal bleeding and with Child-Pugh class B or C, the use of intravenous ciprofloxacin for 3 days after EVL was not only effective in the prevention of bacterial infections but also cost-effective. Infections are a frequent complication in cirrhotics, and gastrointestinal bleeding may increase the infection rate. Nonabsorbable antibiotics or quinolone have been employed to decrease the incidence of infection. Since most of these studies were performed in western countries, it is still unclear whether this holds true in our Taiwan cirrhotic patients. Thus we conducted this study using a different formula of antibiotics to evaluate the efficacy of reducing infection rates in cirrhotics with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
                From July 1999 to August 2000, all cirrhotic in-patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding but without infection were enrolled. The patients should not have received antibiotics within 2 weeks before admission and should have expected life expectance more than 7 days. Eligible patients who had received endoscopy within 12 hours of hospitalization were randomly allocated into 2 groups. Group A received intravenous cefazolin 1 gm every 8 hours started before endoscopy. After 3 days of prophylactic parenteral antibiotics, antibiotics were shifted to oral cephalexin of 500 mg every 6 hours for 4 days. Group B served as control subjects. All patients received chest X-ray, blood and urine cultures, and ascites culture and sputum culture if ascites and sputum were found. Patients were excluded when initial blood, urine or ascites culture was positive for bacterial growth.
                Ninety-seven patients were included. Group A was comprised of 47 patients and Group B comprised of 50 patients. There was no significant difference in age, sex, Child-Pugh's score or initial hemoglobin between the 2 groups. Proved infection developed in 6 patients of Group B. By contrast, no proved infection was found in Group A. Three organisms belonged to gram-negative bacilli and 3 organisms were gram-positive cocci. The incidence of proved infection during hospitalization was 0% in Group A and 12.0% in Group B (p = 0.027). If possible infection cases (patient's body temperature more than 38 degrees C for more than 2 days) were included, the infection rate was 6.4% in Group A and 26% in Group B (p = 0.013). Infection-related mortality occurred in 2 patients in Group B, but none in Group A.
                Our prophylactic antibiotic treatment proved safe and effective in reducing the infection rate in cirrhotics with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Patients with cirrhosis of the liver are prone to bacterial infections. Therapeutic interventions such as endoscopic sclerotherapy increase the risk of bacterial infections in these patients. Following insertion of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), the incidence of severe bacterial infections was recently shown to be 20% after elective procedures. This finding suggests antibiotic prophylaxis with the TIPS procedure. Antibiotic prophylaxis using cefotiam or cefotaxime/ampicillin did not significantly reduce infectious complications. The aim of the present study was therefore to investigate the efficacy of two different doses of a long-acting cephalosporin in prevention of bacterial infection after TIPS.
                Eighty-two patients with cirrhosis (age: 52 +/- 2 years) who underwent elective TIPS were randomized to receive a single i.v. dose of either 1 g or 2 g Ceftriaxone 1 hour before the intervention. Patients with evidence of or suspected infections and patients on antibiotic therapy within 7 days prior to TIPS were excluded. Body temperature was monitored t.i.d. for 1 week and white blood count (WBC) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were determined before TIPS and 1 day and 1 week after TIPS.
                Only 2 of 82 patients (2.6%) showed signs of infection following TIPS insertion: One of 40 patients receiving 1 g Ceftriaxone and 1 of 42 patients receiving 2 g Ceftriaxone prior to TIPS developed temperature > 38.5 degrees C. In the latter patient this was due to pneumonia. This patient received antibiotic treatment with imipenem for 10 days. Temperature in the other patient normalized within 12 hours and he did not require antibiotic treatment. No significant differences in temperature, WBC and CRP between the different doses of Ceftriaxone were observed.
                Prophylactic treatment with Ceftriaxone reduces the reported incidence of bacterial infections after TIPS in patients with cirrhosis of the liver. Prophylaxis with 1 g Ceftriaxone seems as efficacious as 2 g. Bacterial infection may be a critical trigger for variceal bleeding. Antibiotic prophylaxis can prevent rebleeding in patients with acute gastroesophageal variceal bleeding (GEVB). The aim of the study was to compare prophylactic third generation cephalosporins with on-demand antibiotics for the prevention of gastroesophageal variceal rebleeding. In a prospective trial, patients with the first acute GEVB were randomly assigned to receive prophylactic antibiotics (intravenous cefotaxime 2 g q 8 hr for 7 days, prophylactic antibiotics group) or to receive the same antibiotics only when infection became evident (on-demand group). Sixty-two patients in the prophylactic group and 58 patients in the on-demand group were included for analysis. Antibiotic prophylaxis decreased infection (3.2% vs. 15.5%, p=0.026). The actuarial rebleeding rate in the prophylactic group was significantly lower than that in the on-demand group (33.9% vs. 62.1%, p=0.004). The difference of rebleeding rate was mostly due to early rebleeding within 6 weeks (4.8% vs. 20.7%, p=0.012). On multivariate analysis, antibiotic prophylaxis (relative hazard: 0.248, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.067-0.919, p=0.037) and bacterial infection (relative hazard: 3.901, 95% CI: 1.053-14.448, p=0.042) were two independent determinants of early rebleeding. In conclusion, antibiotic prophylaxis using third generation cephalosporins can prevent bacterial infection and early rebleeding in patients with the first acute GEVB.
Prophylactic antibiotic use in patients with cirrhosis and upper gastrointestinal bleeding significantly reduced bacterial infections, and seems to have reduced all-cause mortality, bacterial infection mortality, rebleeding events, and hospitalisation length. These benefits were observed independently of the type of antibiotic used; thus, no specific antibiotic can be preferred. Therefore, antibiotic selection should be made considering local conditions such as bacterial resistance profile and treatment cost.