An evaluation of patients with severe intermittent claudication and the effect of treatment with naftidrofuryl. [Naftidrofuryl in arterial occlusive disease. Controlled multicenter double-blind study with oral administration]. [Effect of naftidrofuryl on physiological walking distance in patients with intermittent claudication]. Effects of regular physical training in a supervised class and additional intravenous prostaglandin E1 and naftidrofuryl infusion therapy in patients with intermittent claudication--a controlled study. Treatment of stage II chronic arterial disease of the lower limbs with the serotonergic antagonist naftidrofuryl: results after 6 months of a controlled, multicenter study. Naftidrofuryl in chronic arterial disease. Results of a six month controlled multicenter study using Naftidrofuryl tablets 200 mg. A randomized double-blind controlled trial of naftidrofuryl in acute stroke. Efficacy of naftidrofuryl in patients with moderate senile dementia. New approach to treatment of recent stroke.
A randomized placebo-controlled study was undertaken in 188 patients with severe intermittent claudication attending two vascular clinics in Manchester and Liverpool. After a 4-week run-in period, patients received active or placebo treatment for 24 weeks. Patients were assessed on a treadmill prior to the 4-week run-in period, at randomization, and at 8, 16, and 24 weeks. Outcome was measured in terms of change in pain-free walking distance, maximum walking distance, and pressure indices. In this severe claudication population, in which the patients presented with a mean pain-free walking distance of 60 m, an intention-to-treat analysis demonstrated that the outcome in the naftidrofuryl-treated group was significantly better than in the group receiving placebo (p = 0.045). Additionally, 7% of patients in the naftidrofuryl group deteriorated compared with 22% in the placebo group (p = 0.005). Of the various risk factors that were recorded during the study--smoking habits, the presence of hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and duration of illness--only duration of illness had a significant influence on outcome. Maximum walking distances alone were not significantly influenced by treatment, but the use of a combined index of pain-free walking distance, maximum walking distance, and pressure indices to record success or failure confirmed a significant treatment effect (p = 0.047). A higher incidence of minor gastrointestinal symptoms was recorded in the naftidrofuryl-treated group. Treatment with naftidrofuryl was shown to prevent or slow the deterioration observed in a group of patients with severe claudication over a 24-week period. The efficacy of naftidrofuryl ( Dusodril ) for treatment of stage II arterial occlusive disease was evaluated in a controlled multi-centre study in a total of 104 out-patients with angiographically documented localization of occlusion. The therapeutic effect was assessed over three months by measurements of walking distance using standardized treadmill conditions. Further parameters were venoocclusive plethysmography and Doppler ultrasonography measurement of pressures. The complaint-free walking distance increased significantly during daily application of 600 mg naftidrofuryl orally (n = 54) during the 12-week assessment period when compared to the placebo group (n = 50). Taking the intraindividual variability of 17.2 m in assessment of walking distance into account, the increase of painless walking of 93 m after treatment for 12 weeks in the active-drug group is considered the result of treatment-induced increased performance. To evaluate the physiological walking distance measured with the Peripheral Arterial Disease Holter Control device (PADHOC) after 12 months of treatment with naftidrofuryl in a double blind placebo controlled, parallel group study, in patients presenting with intermittent claudication.
                The outpatients selected were of both sexes, aged 40 to 80, with a chronic, stable intermittent claudication and an ankle brachial index between 0.60 and 0.90. They received naftidrofuryl 200 mg tid or placebo for 12 months. Outcome measures included physiological painfree and maximal walking distances using the PADHOC device. The principle of this device is the measurement of the intermalleolar distances using ultrasound telemetry. The PADHOC measures the walking distance and the speed profile in an ambulatory subject.
                182 patients were randomised and 168 entered the intention to treat analysis. The two groups were well matched for demographic variables, risk factors and history of vascular disease. After 12-month treatment, patients who received naftidrofuryl had a 107% improvement of geometric physiological pain-free walking distance versus 12% in the placebo group (P < 0.001) and 74% improvement of geometric maximal physiological walking distance versus 1% in the placebo group (P < 0.001).
                This study demonstrates the efficacy of naftidrofuryl versus placebo in patients with intermittent claudication using a new device measuring the walking distances of the patients in a more physiological way than the treadmill test. The aim of this study was to investigate if PGE1 i.v.-therapy after active physical training further increases the walking distance in PAOD stage IIb according to Fontaine. 48 outpatients with intermittent claudication underwent a standardized active walking training of about 6 months twice weekly. Afterwards patients were randomly given once daily an i.v. infusion of 60 micrograms PGE1 (3 ampoules prostavasin) or 600 mg naftidrofuryl. The therapy lasted for 3 weeks with the exception of Saturdays and Sundays. Besides laboratory and doppler parameters, painfree and maximum walking distance (treadmill, 10% incline, 3.5 km/h) were determined. Results: Under active physical training the patients' walking distance increased significantly to more than double the baseline levels. Further significant increase of the painfree walking distance was seen after a 3 week treatment with PGE1 from 136 to 270 m (99%) as well as with naftidrofuryl from 117 to 230 m (97%). While this difference was not significant there was a significant difference in favour to PGE1 after the follow-up period (p less than 0.01). In the PGE1-group the painfree walking distance showed a further increase (from 270m to 306m) whereas it decreased in the naftidrofuryl-group (from 230m to 210m). At the same time under PGE1 the ankle/arm index increased significantly in comparison to naftidrofuryl (p less than 0.01). Side effects differed significantly in respect of the frequency and severity. In the PGE1-group in 20.8% of the patients side effects occurred, whereas in 91.6% of the patients in the naftidrofuryl-group side effects were observed. In no case therapy had to be discontinued because of side effects. A study was carried out in patients with intermittent claudication (Fontaine's stage II). The atheromatous origin of the disease was confirmed and localized by angiography or Doppler. One hundred eight-three patients were selected initially (day -30) with a pain-free walking distance on a treadmill (at a speed of 3 km/h and a slope of 10%) ranging from 150 to 300 m. During the first month (washout period) all patients received two placebo tablets daily. At the end of this run-in period (day -30; day 0) and after checking walking distance stability (allowed variation: 20% between the two measurements), patients were included in the study. According to this criterion, 112 patients were selected and 94 remained during the whole study. The study was designed in double-blind, using two parallel, randomly selected groups. Fifty-two patients received naftidrofuryl (2 x 316.5 mg tablets daily with meals) for 6 months; 42 patients received placebo under the same conditions. During this period, clinical and paraclinical examinations were carried out every quarter (day 90 and day 180). After checking the initial homogeneity of the naftidrofuryl and placebo groups, the comparison between the two groups indicates a significant improvement in the naftidrofuryl group after 3 months and 6 months of treatment, for the pain-free walking distance. For the maximal walking distance, a significant improvement was found at day 180. Nonparametric analysis (chi 2 test) also indicated a significant improvement for the naftidrofuryl group. These results confirm that naftidrofuryl is beneficial in the treatment of patients with chronic arterial disease. The study was carried out on patients with intermittent claudication (Fontaine's stage II). The arterial and atheromatous origin of the disease was confirmed and localized by angiography or Doppler velocimetry examination. One hundred eighty-six patients were selected initially. Their pain-free walking distance on a treadmill (at a speed of 3 km/hour and an inclination of 10%) had to be 150-300 m. During the first month all patients received 3 placebo tablets daily. At the end of this run-in period (D-30; D 0) and after checking walking distance stability (allowed variation: +/- 20% between the two measurements) the patients were included in the study. One hundred fifty-four patients were selected and 118 remained during the whole study. The study was designed as a double-blind, using two parallel randomly selected groups. Sixty-four patients received for six months Naftidrofuryl (3 X 200 mg tablets daily with meals); 54 patients received placebo under the same conditions. During this period, clinical and paraclinical examinations were carried out every quarter (D 90 and D 180). After checking the initial homogeneity of the Naftidrofuryl and placebo-groups, the comparison between groups indicates a significant improvement in Naftidrofuryl group after 3 and 6 months of treatment. At the end of the study the observed differences in walking distance with Naftidrofuryl are approximately twice the difference in the reference group (D 90: p less than 0.05; D 180: p less than 0.02). The results of this study indicate that Naftidrofuryl is an efficient pharmacological tool for treatment of patients with chronic arterial disease (Fontaine's stage II). There is evidence to support the use of naftidrofuryl in acute stroke with claims of increased recovery, reduced fatality and reduced bed occupancy in patients treated with either oral or intravenous preparations. One hundred patients presenting with acute hemisphere stroke (less than 72 hours) were randomized to receive either a new oral formulation of naftidrofuryl or placebo on a double-blind basis. Treatment was given for a total of 12 weeks and patients followed for 26 weeks with serial neurological and functional assessments by a single observer. Cumulative fatality and hospital-bed occupancy were determined at each assessment interval. No significant difference was demonstrated in cumulative fatality, hospital-bed occupancy or recovery of motor function in patients treated with either naftidrofuryl or placebo. There is no evidence from this study to support the use of oral naftidrofuryl in acute stroke. In a controlled double-blind study, 78 patients with moderate senile dementia were randomly assigned to 3-months' treatment with 200 mg naftidrofuryl twice daily in slow-release form or with placebo. The patients were selected on the basis of the EACG (Echelle d'Appréciation Clinique en Gériatrie), which was also used as main criterion for confirmatory analysis of the efficacy of naftidrofuryl. A further main criterion was the SGRS (Stockton Geriatric Rating Scale). Secondary criteria examined were visual memory as tested in the Benton test, verbal memory as tested in the Rey test and numerical memory as tested in the digit-span test. The patients' concentration was tested in the Zazzo test. The tests were performed before the patients were admitted to the study and after 1 and 3-months' treatment. Confirmatory analysis of the primary criteria showed a significant treatment difference in favour of naftidrofuryl in the form of improvement in the global symptoms of senile dementia both in the EACG and in the SGRS, the scores in the naftidrofuryl group improving by 15% compared with only 5% in the placebo group. This was paralleled by a significant improvement in visual and verbal memory in the naftidrofuryl group in comparison with placebo. The naftidrofuryl patients also showed a greater improvement in concentration than the placebo group. One patient in the naftidrofuryl group suffered briefly from gastro-intestinal symptoms. There were no changes in routine laboratory parameters studied. Ninety-one patients with acute stroke participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of naftidrofuryl. Treatment was allocated at random and given over 12 weeks, neurological and neurophysical scores being obtained before treatment and at weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12. Both treatment groups greatly improved over the 12 weeks, but the naftidrofuryl-treated patients made greater neurological progress. Of the patients eventually discharged, those given naftidrofuryl spent only half as long in hospital as the controls. Deaths attributable to stroke were significantly fewer in the active-treatment group.
Oral naftidrofuryl has a statistically significant and clinically meaningful, although moderate, effect of improving walking distance in the six months after initiation of therapy for people with intermittent claudication. Access by researchers to data from RCTs that are suitable for IPD analysis should be possible through repositories of data from pharmacological trials. Regular formal appraisal of the balance of risk and benefit is needed for older pharmaceutical products.