Patient-controlled analgesia vs. conventional intramuscular analgesia following colon surgery. Preoperative PCA teaching program to manage postoperative pain. Cost-effectiveness analysis of patient-controlled analgesia, intramuscular q.i.d. injection and p.r.n. injection for postoperative pain relief. A statistical model for pain in patient-controlled analgesia and conventional intramuscular opioid regimens. Patient-controlled analgesia: a controlled trial. Patient-controlled analgesia: a randomized, prospective comparison between two commercially available PCA pumps and conventional analgesic therapy for postoperative pain. Patient-controlled analgesia: a new concept of postoperative pain relief. A study of pain management: patient controlled analgesia versus intramuscular analgesia. A prospective study of patient-controlled analgesia. Impact on overall hospital course.
Though patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) has been in use for over a decade, it has been popularized only recently. Conventional techniques of intermittent intramuscular (IM) administration of analgesia have fallen short of meeting the needs of patients following major abdominal surgery. This has prompted a search for methods to improve postoperative pain management. Though PCA has been accepted in many hospitals, few studies comparing conventional IM administration of morphine with PCA have been performed. A prospective randomized study comparing IM- and PCA-administered morphine in 62 patients undergoing colon surgery was performed. A comparison of the efficacy of analgesia and extent of sedation using these approaches shows that PCA allows for analgesia with less sedation and less drug requirement than that of IM administration. No differences were noted in postoperative duration of ileus, duration of hospitalization, and total hospital costs. This study confirms the safety and efficacy of PCA, and should be considered the current optimal method of controlling pain following major colonic surgery. Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) therapy was designed to provide patients with greater control in managing their pain. However, many patients continue to suffer from moderate to severe pain due to lack of knowledge about how to use PCA therapy. The results of this quasi-experimental study demonstrated that patients who received structured preoperative teaching had statistically significant higher knowledge regarding the use of PCA therapy and more positive attitudes toward using pain medicine. Patients who received the video teaching reported better pain control and satisfaction with pain management 4 and 8 hours following their surgical procedures. We conclude that the intravenous PCA method is a cost-effective technique. Although the PCA device is expensive, the cost-effectiveness analysis should give explicit figures for physicians and the hospital administrators to decide whether they should use the PCA instead of the conventional method. A statistical model was developed: 1) to compare the efficacy of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and traditional intramuscular (IM) opioids for pain relief in 40 patients after total knee replacement and, 2) to evaluate pain cycles associated with each technique. Hourly visual analog pain scores were subjected to two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and time-series analysis. Hourly verbal analog pain scores were used to determine predominant pain levels. According to ANOVA, PCA was no more effective than were IM opioids. Time-series analyses documented a complete cycle of pain every 5.3 hours in patients receiving IM opioids but no pain cycle with use of PCA. Analysis of PCA verbal analog scores demonstrated self-administration of opioids to "moderate" levels of pain relief with use of PCA, not to complete analgesia. These results suggest that certain patients may not envision complete postoperative analgesia as being possible. Hence, they self-administer opioids for pain relief with PCA according to their expectations. Population characteristics may modify PCA efficacy. These characteristics should be delineated and the use of PCA targeted to appropriate patients. Thirty-six patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery were included in a prospective randomized controlled study to compare the effects of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and a standard intramuscular/intravenous treatment (conventional analgesia, CA) of postoperative pain. Morphine was used in both groups. There were no significant differences between the two analgesic regimens in respect of linear analogue pain scores, verbal pain-relief scores, amount of morphine used or side-effects. No treatment-induced alterations in vital values were experienced. Two pumps, 'PA' and 'PB,' with different drug delivery characteristics were available at the time of this study for patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). PB purportedly produces a 'placebo effect' by emitting an audible signal whenever the patient depresses the trigger button. PA emits an audible signal only when the drug is successfully administered into the patient's intravenous line. In a prospective, randomized Latin squares cross-over study, the 2 pumps and conventional therapy were compared for efficacy and cost. Patients in both pump groups used less drug and perceived less pain than those on conventional therapy. However, statistically less anxiety and greater pain relief and patient and nursing satisfaction were reported with PA only. Daily cost including drug, pharmacy and nursing time, pump rental was 33%, PA, versus 23%, PB, more than conventional therapy. Purchase and amortization of the pumps decreases the cost. We conclude that PCA provides superior pain management at minimal additional cost. This report concerns evaluation of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) in the form of two preliminary investigations. In the first study, the patient-controlled analgesia device, which consists of a pump linked to a timer so that patients can activate intravenous administration of morphine sulfate to themselves during the postoperative period, was used in seven morbidly obese patients. The amount of morphine used during the first 36 hours was found to vary between 32 and 185 mg, with a significant difference in drug usage when related to weight as well as to body surface area. In the second study, morbidly obese patients undergoing gastric bypass operations were prospectively randomized into 12 patients who used the PCA device in the postoperative period and 12 patients who were given standard intramuscular dosages of morphine sulfate. An analgesia and sedation scale was then used to compare the two groups. The patients in the PCA group were able to maintain a state of adequate analgesia without sleep with a significantly greater frequency than were those in the intramuscular injection group. On the basis of answers to a questionnaire given to the patient after 60 hours of morphine analgesia, it was apparent that the PCA group was much more satisfied with that form of postoperative analgesia. It would appear that PCA is an efficacious and safe method of providing for postoperative pain relief. A clinical study examining the efficacy of Patient Controlled Analgesia compared with Intramuscular Analgesia was conducted. Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA) Therapy was used in a select group of patients after major abdominal surgery. Specific parameters monitored were: total amount of analgesia required, incidence of pulmonary complications, assessment of pain level and sedation, patient activity, nursing time required for administration, safety, cost-effectiveness of both modes of analgesia and length of hospital stay. A questionnaire survey of both patients and nursing staff was done to evaluate responses. Conventional pain management often is inadequate with PRN administration of analgesic drugs due to the unpredictable and uneven patient absorption rate and the individual pain intensity and tolerance. The patient experiences a repetitive cycle of pain and sedation. The patient on PCA therapy is able to titrate his analgesic medication very effectively and maintain a state of analgesia without sedation. He is more responsive and able to participate in the early postoperative rehabilitation phase. The transition to oral medication usually was accomplished at 48 hours postoperative. Previous studies have shown that patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) provides effective pain control in the postoperative patient. To determine the impact of PCA technology on the overall hospital course, we designed a randomized controlled study comparing patients receiving analgesia using PCA infusion (Abbott Lifecare, Abbott Laboratories; Chicago, IL) with patients receiving analgesia by traditional intramuscular or intravenous methods. All patients had undergone elective cholecystectomy. Sixty-nine patients completed the study, 35 received traditional postoperative analgesia, and 34 received analgesia using the PCA infuser. Comparison of both groups demonstrated no significant difference in postoperative bowel activity with both groups receiving liquids on the first postoperative day. There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to postoperative length of stay (3.4 days for PCA vs 3.6 days for traditional). Patients demonstrated a wide range of analgesic requirement in the first 24 hours but the average of the total analgesic required was higher in the PCA group (average, 29.5 mg) than the traditional group (22.8 mg). Urinary complications occurred more commonly in the group of patients receiving traditional analgesia than in the group of patients receiving analgesia with the PCA device. When compared with patients receiving analgesia by traditional methods, patients receiving the PCA infusion required more analgesia with fewer urinary complications and similar postoperative length of stay.
This review provides evidence that PCA is an efficacious alternative to conventional systemic analgesia for postoperative pain control.