Prospective comparison of arthroscopy and arthrocentesis for temporomandibular joint disorders. Improvement of pain and function after arthroscopy and arthrocentesis of the temporomandibular joint: a comparative study. A comparison of discectomy and arthroscopic lysis and lavage for the treatment of chronic closed lock of the temporomandibular joint: a randomized outcome study. A randomized placebo-controlled trial of arthroscopic lavage versus lavage plus intra-articular corticosteroids in the management of symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee. Assessment of the efficacy of joint lavage versus joint lavage plus corticoids in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Efficacy of temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis with and without injection of sodium hyaluronate in treatment of internal derangements. Arthroscopic lavage reduced the recurrence rate following primary anterior shoulder dislocation. A randomised multicentre study with 1-year follow-up. Arthroscopic surgery of the temporomandibular joint: comparison of two successful techniques. High condylectomy and disc repositioning compared to arthroscopic lysis, lavage, and capsular stretch for the treatment of chronic closed lock of the temporomandibular joint.
A prospective, randomized study was undertaken to compare arthroscopy and arthrocentesis for treatment of temporomandibular joint disorders.
                Nineteen patients with clinical and radiographic documentation of internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint(s) unresponsive to nonsurgical therapy were randomized to one of two surgical groups: arthroscopic lysis and lavage under general anesthesia or arthrocentesis, hydraulic distention, and lavage under intravenous sedation. Objective data were collected; including interincisal opening, lateral excursions, occlusal evaluation, deviation on opening, and tenderness to palpation. A questionnaire in the form of visual analog scales relating to pain, joint noise, jaw mobility, and dietary alterations was completed by each patient at 1 week, and 1, 3, 4, 12, and 26 months postoperatively.
                There was no statistically significant difference in outcome between the two groups for any parameter evaluated. Categorization of a particular subject into a successful outcome was based on statistically significant improvement in maximum incisal opening and pain scores; the overall success rate was 82% for arthroscopy and 75% for arthrocentesis.
                Therapeutic success was not significantly different for arthroscopy and arthrocentesis; both surgical modalities are useful for decreasing patient reports of pain while increasing functional mobility of the mandible. In 1993 and 1994, 720 patients with pain in the temporo-mandibular joint area were examined and treated. The authors describe their therapeutic protocol. Sixty-two patients were not relieved by conservative nonsurgical therapy and were treated by arthroscopy or arthrocentesis. In both groups the differences in functional result and in pain control were analysed. Results show that both arthroscopy and lavage are useful in improving function and diminishing pain. Arthroscopy shows better results for functional treatment whereas arthrocentesis and arthroscopy show similar results in pain control. The study compared the efficacy of discectomy or arthroscopic lysis and lavage in patients with chronic closed lock of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) in a prospective, randomized clinical trial.
                Twenty-two patients with a clinical diagnosis of chronic closed lock were prospectively randomized to either discectomy or arthroscopic lysis and lavage. The individual outcome in each patient was evaluated with a visual analog scale for pain and a questionnaire concerning mandibular functional impairment. The clinical evaluation included measurement of maximum interincisal opening and protrusion, recording of clicking and crepitation, and palpation for tenderness of the TMJ and jaw muscles. Recordings were made before the operation (baseline) and at the 1-year follow-up.
                Twenty patients completed the study. Discectomy and arthroscopic lysis and lavage significantly reduced pain and improved mandibular function. Discectomy reduced pain somewhat more effectively than arthroscopic lysis and lavage. The clinical recordings at the 1-year follow-up indicated similarly good outcomes after both procedures.
                Both discectomy and arthroscopic lysis and lavage are effective surgical methods for treatment of chronic closed lock of the TMJ. Considering that arthroscopic lysis and lavage is a minimally invasive outpatient procedure, it should be used as the first choice in surgical treatment of this condition.
                Copyright 2001 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. To assess the efficacy of intra-articular steroid injections following arthroscopy and joint lavage in symptomatic OA of the knee.
                Seventy-seven patients with OA of the knee were randomized to receive either 120 mg methylprednisolone acetate (MPA) or placebo following arthroscopy. Clinical assessments included severity of pain on movement and at rest, stiffness, the presence of joint effusions, range of movement, WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) score and Lequesne functional assessment. The outcome measures were evaluated at baseline and 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 weeks. Further arthroscopies and synovial biopsies were performed at the time of clinical response and at relapse.
                An intention-to-treat analysis was performed on 71 patients (38 MPA, 33 placebo). Using the OARSI (Osteoarthritis Research Society International) response criteria, 58% of the steroid group vs 33% of the placebo group (adjusted relative risk = 2.38) (P = 0.004) responded at 4 weeks. At other time points, there were no significant differences between the treatment groups. There were no significant differences between the two treatment groups for pain, stiffness or WOMAC or Lequesne assessments at any time point.
                The response to intra-articular corticosteroids following joint lavage is short-lived (2-4 weeks), achievement of an OARSI response criterion being the only difference between the two groups. Joint lavage (JL), involves the passage of cold sterile 0.9% saline through the knee joint in order to have the fluid reach the inside of the joint capsule. This technique was evaluated as a local treatment for osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee alone (JL) and in combination with intra-articular infiltration with glucocorticoids (JLC).
                An overall 299 knees belonging to 205 patients (22% males, 78% females) with a mean age of 67 +/- 8 years and osteoarthritis of the knee of radiological grade II or III on the Kellgren scale were randomised in the ratio of 1:4 into two therapeutic groups, namely: JL (n = 62) and JLC (n = 237). All patients received joint lavage on day 0; in those of the JLC group, joint lavage was followed by infiltration of 40 mg of triamcinolone acetonide. The efficacy of both treatments was assessed by recording the corresponding values for the following variables: pain strength as measured by a visual analogy scale (VAS), effusion, crepitation, restricted motion, of osteoarthritis of the knee. spontaneous pain, pain on pressure, pain on passive motion and pain on active motion; all of these were recorded at the onset of the study, and after 1 and 3 months.
                There were no significant differences in the values of the variables at the different followup times. Also, pain severity was similar in both treatment groups. Thus, VAS for pain was 7.3 +/- 0.3 for the JL group and 7.1 +/- 0.2 for the JLC group at the onset, and decreased to 3.0 +/- 0.3 in the former and 2.8 +/- 0.2 in the latter after 1 month; the decrease was statistically significant in both cases. After 3 months, the JL and JLC groups had a VAS of 3.5 +/- 0.3 and 3.8 +/- 0.2, respectively.
                The results of this work suggest the absence of significant differences between the two treatments, such that both joint lavage alone and with infiltration with corticoids can be concluded as similarly effective for the symptomatic management This study was designed to investigate the efficacy of arthrocentesis with and without injection of sodium hyaluronate (SH) into the upper joint space in the treatment of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) internal derangements.
                Forty-one TMJs in 5 males and 26 females aged 14 to 53 years comprised the study material. The patients' complaints were limited mouth opening, TMJ pain and tenderness, and joint noises during function. Patients were randomly divided into 2 groups in which only arthrocentesis was performed in 1 group and arthrocentesis plus intra-articular injection of sodium hyaluronate was performed in the other group. Both groups contained patients with disc displacement with reduction and with closed lock. Clinical evaluation of the patients was done before the procedure, immediately after the procedure, on postoperative day 1, and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively. Intensity of TMJ pain, jaw function, and clicking sounds in the TMJ were assessed using visual analog scales. Maximal mouth opening and lateral jaw movements also were recorded at each follow-up visit.
                Both techniques increased maximal mouth opening, lateral movements, and function, while reducing TMJ pain and noise.
                Although patients benefitted from both techniques, arthrocentesis with injection of SH seemed to be superior to arthrocentesis alone.
                Copyright 2001 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Young individuals have a high recurrence rate following non-operative treatment of traumatic primary anterior shoulder dislocation. The present multicentre study was undertaken to find out whether the results could be improved by using arthroscopic lavage as treatment. Sixty patients aged 16-30 years, with traumatic primary anterior shoulder dislocation were randomised into two groups. One group was treated with arthroscopic lavage within 10 days, while the other group was treated non-operatively. Rehabilitation was otherwise identical. At 1-year follow-up, 4 of 30 patients (13%) in the lavage group had had redislocation compared with 13 of 30 (43%) in the group treated non-operatively (P = 0.01). The difference in recurrence rate was more pronounced in younger patients. The functional outcome according to the Rowe shoulder score was better in the lavage group (P = 0.003), as was the anterior stability according to the apprehension test (P = 0.008). We conclude that arthroscopic lavage reduced the recurrence rate and produced a better functional outcome at 1-year follow-up than the non-operative treatment in young individuals. We have compared two techniques of arthroscopic surgery for advanced internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). Patients with stage III or above TMJ internal derangement, who had not responded to three months of non-surgical treatment, were prospectively and randomly assigned to one of two types of treatment. One group had arthroscopic lysis and lavage (ALL) and the other had ALL plus arthroscopic anterolateral capsular release (AALCR). All patients were assessed preoperatively, and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Thirty-five patients (41 joints) had ALL and 66 patients (73 joints) had AALCR. The only significant difference was at 1 month, when the ALL group could not open their mouths as far as the AALCR group (P < 0.01). Both groups had significantly less pain in the joint and better jaw opening one year postoperatively. The stage of disease did not affect the outcome. Both ALL and AALCR gave good results in the management of advanced internal derangement of the TMJ. Unless early wide mouth-opening is required, the less invasive procedure of lysis and lavage should be chosen. The article shows the 1-yr results comparing the efficacy of open-surgery high condylectomy and disc repositioning and the arthroscopic procedure of lysis, lavage and capsular stretch in patients with chronic closed lock of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ).
                Twenty patients with a clinical and radiologic diagnosis of chronic closed lock were randomly chosen to be treated with either open surgery or arthroscopy. Each patient was evaluated with a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and a mandibular functional impairment questionnaire (MFIQ). The evaluation also included a clinical examination. Each patient was recorded at baseline before surgery and at 1-yr follow-up. Statistical analysis was made to evaluate whether differences in MFIQ, VAS, maximum opening and protrusion, lateral joint tenderness, muscle tenderness, crepitation, and clicking at 1-yr follow-up from baseline were significant. Results were considered statistically significant when P < .05.
                Both open surgery and arthroscopic surgery reduced pain and improved mandibular function. The severity of pain was significantly reduced in both groups (P = .005). In both the open and arthroscopy groups mandibular function improved significantly (P = .005). The clinical examination showed similar good results for the 2 surgical procedures. At 1-yr follow-up a majority of patients from both the open (80% of the patients) and the arthroscopy (70% of the patients) groups fulfilled the criterion of a cutoff point for maximum interincisal opening of equal or more than 35 mm (P = 0.005); all the patients in both groups fulfilled the criterion of the cutoff point for maximum protrusion of more than 5 mm (P = .007). At 1-yr follow-up, clicking was the same as before surgical procedures; no patient in the open group showed crepitation, but crepitation was found in patients in the arthroscopy group. Joint tenderness and pain on lateral palpation as well as muscle tenderness and pain were reduced in all the cases, disappearing in some of them, but the difference was significant only regarding joint tenderness (open surgery, P = .016; arthroscopy, P = .031).
                Open-surgery high condylectomy and disc repositioning and the arthroscopic procedure of lysis, lavage and capsular stretch are both effective surgical methods to treat symptomatic patients with a diagnosis of chronic closed lock of the TMJ. Because of the minimally invasive character of the arthroscopic procedure, it should be considered as the first choice in the surgical treatment of the TMJ.
There is insufficient, consistent evidence to either support or refute the use of arthrocentesis and lavage for treating patients with temporomandibular joint disorders. Further high quality RCTs of arthrocentesis need to be conducted before firm conclusions with regard to its effectiveness can be drawn.