Blood pressure outcome of angioplasty in atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: a randomized trial. Essai Multicentrique Medicaments vs Angioplastie (EMMA) Study Group. The effect of balloon angioplasty on hypertension in atherosclerotic renal-artery stenosis. Dutch Renal Artery Stenosis Intervention Cooperative Study Group. Randomised comparison of percutaneous angioplasty vs continued medical therapy for hypertensive patients with atheromatous renal artery stenosis. Scottish and Newcastle Renal Artery Stenosis Collaborative Group. Surgery or balloon angioplasty for peripheral vascular disease: a randomized clinical trial. Principal investigators and their Associates of Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Number 199. Randomized comparison of coronary stenting with balloon angioplasty in selected patients with acute myocardial infarction. Balloon angioplasty combined with primary stenting versus balloon angioplasty alone in femoropopliteal obstructions: A comparative randomized study. A comparison of systematic stenting and conventional balloon angioplasty during primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. STENTIM-2 Investigators. Effect of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition on blood pressure and renal function during open heart surgery. In-hospital and late results of coronary stents versus conventional balloon angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction (GRAMI trial). Gianturco-Roubin in Acute Myocardial Infarction.
Data for the effects on blood pressure of renal artery balloon angioplasty are mostly from uncontrolled studies. The aim of this study was to document the efficacy and safety of angioplasty for lowering blood pressure in patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis. Patients were randomly assigned antihypertensive drug treatment (control group, n = 26) or angioplasty (n = 23). Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure, the primary end point, was measured at baseline and at termination. Termination took place 6 months after randomization or earlier in patients who developed refractory hypertension. In those allocated angioplasty, antihypertensive treatment was discontinued after the procedure but was subsequently resumed if hypertension persisted. Secondary end points were the treatment score and the incidence of complications. Two patients in the control group and 6 in the angioplasty group suffered procedural complications (relative risk, 3.4; 95% confidence interval, 0.8 to 15.1). Early termination was required for refractory hypertension in 7 patients in the control group. Antihypertensive treatment was resumed in 17 patients in the angioplasty group. Mean ambulatory blood pressure at termination did not differ between control (141+/-15/84+/-11 mm Hg) and angioplasty (140+/-15/81+/-9 mm Hg) groups. Angioplasty reduced by 60% the probability of having a treatment score of 2 or more at termination (relative risk, 0.4; 95% confidence interval, 0.2 to 0.7). There was 1 case of dissection with segmental renal infarction and 3 of restenosis in the angioplasty group. No patient suffered renal artery thrombosis. In unilateral atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis, angioplasty is a drug-sparing procedure that involves some morbidity. Previous uncontrolled and unblinded assessments of angioplasty overestimated its potential for lowering blood pressure. Patients with hypertension and renal-artery stenosis are often treated with percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty. However, the long-term effects of this procedure on blood pressure are not well understood.
                We randomly assigned 106 patients with hypertension who had atherosclerotic renal-artery stenosis (defined as a decrease in luminal diameter of 50 percent or more) and a serum creatinine concentration of 2.3 mg per deciliter (200 micromol per liter) or less to undergo percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty or to receive drug therapy. To be included, patients also had to have a diastolic blood pressure of 95 mm Hg or higher despite treatment with two antihypertensive drugs or an increase of at least 0.2 mg per deciliter (20 micromol per liter) in the serum creatinine concentration during treatment with an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor. Blood pressure, doses of antihypertensive drugs, and renal function were assessed at 3 and 12 months, and patency of the renal artery was assessed at 12 months.
                At base line, the mean (+/-SD) systolic and diastolic blood pressures were 179+/-25 and 104+/-10 mm Hg, respectively, in the angioplasty group and 180+/-23 and 103+/-8 mm Hg, respectively, in the drug-therapy group. At three months, the blood pressures were similar in the two groups (169+/-28 and 99+/-12 mm Hg, respectively, in the 56 patients in the angioplasty group and 176+/-31 and 101+/-14 mm Hg, respectively, in the 50 patients in the drug-therapy group; P=0.25 for the comparison of systolic pressure and P=0.36 for the comparison of diastolic pressure between the two groups); at the time, patients in the angioplasty group were taking 2.1+/-1.3 defined daily doses of medication and those in the drug-therapy group were taking 3.2+/-1.5 daily doses (P<0.001). In the drug-therapy group, 22 patients underwent balloon angioplasty after three months because of persistent hypertension despite treatment with three or more drugs or because of a deterioration in renal function. According to intention-to-treat analysis, at 12 months, there were no significant differences between the angioplasty and drug-therapy groups in systolic and diastolic blood pressures, daily drug doses, or renal function.
                In the treatment of patients with hypertension and renal-artery stenosis, angioplasty has little advantage over antihypertensive-drug therapy. Data from randomised studies are lacking on the value of interventional procedures in the management of atheromatous renal artery stenosis. This randomised prospective trial compared the effects on blood pressure (BP) and renal function of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty vs medical therapy in hypertensive patients with both unilateral and bilateral disease.
                A total of 135 eligible patients were identified, of whom 55 (44%) were randomised. Eligible patients had sustained hypertension, with a minimum diastolic BP of 95 mm Hg on at least two anti-hypertensive drugs. Renal artery stenosis was defined by renal angiography as at least 50% stenosis in the affected vessel. All patients were observed during an initial 4-week run-in period on a fixed drug regimen and subsequent changes measured from this 4-week baseline.
                Blood pressure fell during the run-in period in all groups. In patients with bilateral renal artery stenosis randomised to angioplasty, a statistically significant (P<0.05) fall in BP was observed at latest follow-up (range 3-54 months). The mean fall in BP at latest follow-up in the angioplasty group, corrected for the medical group response, was 26/10 mm Hg. In patients with unilateral renal artery stenosis, no statistically significant or clinically important differences in outcome were observed between the two groups. No significant differences or trends in serum creatinine were observed between or within any group during follow-up. Major outcome events (death, myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke, dialysis) were similar in the angioplasty and medical groups during follow-up. In the 40/135 patients undergoing angioplasty, serious or potentially serious complications attributable to the procedure were observed in 11 patients, bleeding at the arterial site (8 patients) being the most frequent.
                In hypertensive patients with atheromatous renal artery stenosis, percutaneous renal angioplasty results in a modest improvement in systolic BP compared with medical therapy alone. This benefit was confined to patients with bilateral disease. No patient was 'cured', renal function did not improve, and intervention was accompanied by a significant complication rate. Surgical revascularization and angioplasty (PTA) are effective therapies for patients with peripheral arterial disease, but there are no data on long-term survival, limb salvage, and hemodynamic status from a randomized study of such patients. A multicenter, prospective trial compared PTA with bypass surgery (BP) in 263 men who had iliac, femoral, or popliteal artery obstruction.
                Lesions in the iliac versus the femoropopliteal artery and rest pain versus claudication were separately randomized to the two treatment interventions. One hundred twenty-six patients underwent BP, 129 patients underwent PTA, and eight patients were not treated for lower extremity ischemia.
                Three operative deaths occurred in the BP group and none in the PTA group. For the entire study, average annual mortality was higher in the BP group, but survival was not significantly different on life-table analysis (P = .08). Primary success favored BP, while limb salvage favored PTA, but differences were not statistically significant (P = .08 and .35, respectively). Patients with iliac disease or claudication fared better, but there was no statistical difference in response to PTA or BP.
                Patients in both treatment groups had prompt and sustained increases in hemodynamics and quality of life. This study of patients randomly assigned to BP or PTA shows no significant difference in outcomes during a median follow-up of 4 years. Although the benefits of primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction have been demonstrated, several areas for improvement remain. Therefore, a prospective randomized trial comparing primary stenting with balloon angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction was conducted.
                Patients with acute myocardial infarction were randomly assigned to undergo either primary stenting (n=112) or balloon angioplasty (n=115). The clinical end points were death, recurrent infarction, subsequent bypass surgery, or repeat angioplasty of the infarct-related vessel. The overall mortality rate at 6 months was 2%. Recurrent infarction occurred in 8 patients (7%) after balloon angioplasty and in 1 (1%) after stenting (P=0.036). Subsequent target-vessel revascularization was necessary in 19 (17%) and 4 (4%) patients, respectively (P=0.0016). The cardiac event-free survival rate in the stent group was significantly higher than in the balloon angioplasty group (95% versus 80%; P=0.012).
                In selected patients with acute myocardial infarction, primary stenting can be applied safely and effectively, resulting in a lower incidence of recurrent infarction and a significant reduction in the need for subsequent target-vessel revascularization compared with balloon angioplasty. To evaluate whether balloon angioplasty combined with stenting (ST) of symptomatic femoropopliteal disease would provide better results compared with balloon angioplasty alone (BA).
                Fifty-one patients were randomized between ST (24 patients) and BA (27 patients). Follow-up comprised clinical and hemodynamic assessment and color-flow duplex ultrasound examinations.
                Residual stenosis (> or = 30% diameter reduction) occurred in three BA patients, but not in the ST patients. By life-table analysis the cumulative rate of clinical and hemodynamic success after 1 year with ST was 74% (SE 9%) and for those with BA 85% (SE 7%) (p = 0.25). The primary patency at 1 year assessed by color-flow duplex ultrasound was 62% (SE 9%) for ST-treated patients and 74% (SE 8%) for BA patients (p = 0.22). Occlusion occurred in five ST patients (21%) compared with two BA patients (7%).
                ST does not improve clinical and hemodynamic outcome compared with BA. Moreover, the occlusion rate in ST-treated patients is higher. In a multicenter, randomized trial, systematic stenting using the Wiktor stent was compared to conventional balloon angioplasty with provisional stenting for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
                Primary angioplasty in AMI is limited by in-hospital recurrent ischemia and a high restenosis rate.
                A total of 211 patients with AMI <12 h from symptom onset, with an occluded native coronary artery, were randomly assigned to systematic stenting (n = 101) or balloon angioplasty (n = 110). The primary end point was the binary six-month restenosis rate determined by core laboratory quantitative angiographic analysis.
                Angiographic success (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] flow grade 3 and residual diameter stenosis <50%) was achieved in 86% of the patients in the stent group and in 82.7% of those in the balloon angioplasty group (p = 0.5). Compared with the 3% cross-over in the stent group, cross-over to stenting was required in 36.4% of patients in the balloon angioplasty group (p = 0.0001). Six-month binary restenosis (> or = 50% residual stenosis) rates were 25.3% in the stent group and 39.6% in the balloon angioplasty group (p = 0.04). At six months, the event-free survival rates were 81.2% in the stent group and 72.7% in the balloon angioplasty group (p = 0.14), and the repeat revascularization rates were 16.8% and 26.4%, respectively (p = 0.1). At one year, the event-free survival rates were 80.2% in the stent group and 71.8% in the balloon angioplasty group (p = 0.16), and the repeat revascularization rates were 17.8% and 28.2%, respectively (p = 0.1).
                In the setting of primary angioplasty for AMI, as compared with a strategy of conventional balloon angioplasty, systematic stenting using the Wiktor stent results in lower rates of angiographic restenosis. Activation of the renin-angiotensin system during open heart surgery may have consequences both beneficial in sustaining blood pressure and deleterious in compromising renal hemodynamics. The influence of short-term pretreatment with captopril on blood pressure and renal function was assessed double-blind versus placebo in 18 patients without pre-existing cardiac or renal failure, and undergoing coronary artery bypass. No difference in blood pressure and fluid requirement during the surgical period was observed between groups receiving captopril or placebo. Effective renal plasma flow and glomerular filtration rate decreased in the placebo group whereas they remained unaltered in the captopril group; during cardiopulmonary bypass, urinary excretion of sodium was greater in patients receiving captopril than those receiving placebo. These results suggest that captopril pretreatment does not compromise the control of blood pressure and renal function during open heart surgery; additional studies on the protective value of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors are warranted in patients at higher risk for developing renal failure. One hundred four patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction < 24 hours after onset were randomized to 2 groups: group I (n = 52) was treated with balloon angioplasty followed electively with Gianturco Roubin II stents, and group II was treated with conventional balloon angioplasty alone (n = 52). All lesions were suitable for stenting. Baseline clinical, demographic, and angiographic characteristics were similar in the 2 groups. Procedural success was defined as no laboratory death or emergent coronary bypass, Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trial 2 or 3 flow after the procedure in a culprit vessel, and a residual stenosis < or = 30% for coronary angioplasty and < 20% for stent. Procedural success was 98% in group I versus 94.2% in group II, p = NS. Thirteen patients in group II (25%) had bailout stenting during the initial procedure. Adverse in-hospital events including either death, nonelective coronary bypass, recurrent ischemia, and reinfarction occurred in 3.8% in group I versus 19.2% in group II, p = 0.03. Repeat angiography performed routinely before hospital discharge revealed TIMI 3 flow in the infarct-related artery in 98% in group I versus 83% in group II, p < 0.03. At late follow-up, event-free survival was significantly better in the stent (83%) than in the coronary angioplasty (65%) group (p = 0.002). The procedural in-hospital and late outcomes of this randomized study demonstrate that balloon angioplasty followed electively by coronary stents can be used as the primary modality for patients undergoing coronary interventions for acute myocardial infarction, increasing TIMI 3 flow, reducing in-hospital adverse events, and improving late outcome compared with balloon angioplasty alone.
Available data are insufficient to conclude that balloon angioplasty is superior to medical therapy in lowering blood pressure of people with renal artery stenosis and pharmacologically controlled blood pressure. Where hypertension is refractory to medical therapy, there is weak evidence that balloon angioplasty lowers blood pressure more effectively than medical therapy. Balloon angioplasty appears to be safe and shows fewer cardiovascular and renovascular complications. Randomised controlled trials are needed to compare the effect of balloon angioplasty and medical therapy on the preservation of renal function in the long term.