The immunomodulatory effect of topical cyclosporin A in atopic keratoconjunctivitis. A randomized trial of topical cyclosporin 0.05% in topical steroid-resistant atopic keratoconjunctivitis. A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of cyclosporine in steroid-resistant idiopathic focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in children. Randomised controlled trial of topical ciclosporin A in steroid dependent allergic conjunctivitis. Evaluation of conventional therapy versus cyclosporine A in Behçet's syndrome. Sirolimus reduces the incidence of acute rejection episodes despite lower cyclosporine doses in caucasian recipients of mismatched primary renal allografts: a phase II trial. Rapamune Study Group. A multicenter study of topical azelaic acid 15% gel in combination with oral doxycycline as initial therapy and azelaic acid 15% gel as maintenance monotherapy. Results of a randomized, placebo-controlled safety and efficacy study of topical diclofenac 3% gel in organ transplant patients with multiple actinic keratoses. Topical treatment of distal active ulcerative colitis with beclomethasone dipropionate or mesalamine: a single-blind randomized controlled trial.
To perform a detailed examination of the immunomodulatory effects of topical cyclosporin A (CsA) in conjunctival tissue from patients with atopic keratoconjunctivitis (AKC).
                Patients with active AKC were randomly allocated into two groups of four patients. For 3 months one group received 2% CsA drops, and the other group received placebo drops. Superior tarsal conjunctival biopsy specimens were harvested before and after treatment and examined by one- and two-color immunohistochemistry to compare leukocyte counts, HLA-DR+ and IL-2R+ cell counts, HLA-DR positivity of conjunctival epithelial cells, and counts of T cells expressing the cytokines interleukin (IL)-2, IL-3, IL-4, IL-5, and interferon (IFN)-gamma.
                Posttreatment values were significantly less than pretreatment values for the total number of leukocytes and in the numbers of CD3+ T cells, CD4+ cells, CD8+ cells, CD20+ B cells, neutrophils, and macrophages, and there was a decrease in the CD4-CD8 ratio (P = 0.03) in the CsA group. There was a reduction from before CsA treatment to after CsA-treatment in the numbers of HLA-DR+ and IL-2R+ cells (P = 0.03), but the reduction in the epithelial cell HLA-DR expression did not reach significance. The number of T cells staining for IL-3 and IL-5 was reduced, although not to statistical significance, but there was a significant reduction in the number of T cells expressing IL-2 and IFN-gamma (P = 0.03) after CsA treatment compared with initial values. There were no statistically significant differences between pretreatment and posttreatment values in the placebo group. There was a clinical improvement in the CsA group and a clinical worsening in the placebo group.
                The in vitro effects of CsA translate into a reduction in T cells, a normalization of the CD4-CD8 ratio, a decrease in T-cell activation, and a reduction in T-cell cytokine expression, especially IL-2 and IFN-gamma. The decrease in HLA-DR expression may be mediated by the change in IFN-gamma. There were fewer B cells but not fewer plasma cells after CsA and no change in IL-4 expression, suggesting minimal effects on type I hypersensitivity responses. There was no significant reduction in mast cell or eosinophil numbers, but direct effects of topical CsA on their function may play a role in the therapy of ocular allergic disease. These results show that the beneficial effects of topical CsA in AKC are accompanied by important changes in conjunctival immune cell profiles. To evaluate the short-term efficacy and safety of topical cyclosporin A 0.05% in the treatment of patients with severe, steroid-resistant atopic keratoconjunctivitis (AKC).
                Multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-masked, randomized trial.
                Twenty-two patients with AKC refractory to topical steroid treatment.
                Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to treatment with topical 0.05% cyclosporin A eyedrops or a placebo (artificial tears) for a period of 28 days, 6 times daily during the first 2 weeks and 4 times daily during the last 2 weeks.
                Symptoms (itching, tearing, discomfort, mucous discharge, and photophobia) and signs (bulbar conjunctival hyperemia, upper tarsal conjunctival papillae, punctate keratitis, corneal neovascularization, cicatrizing conjunctivitis, and blepharitis) of AKC recorded on the day of enrollment and at the end of the treatment period.
                A composite score computed by summing the severity grade over all 5 symptoms and 6 signs of AKC for each patient indicated a greater improvement in the cyclosporin A group relative to the placebo at the end of the 4-week treatment period (P = 0.048 and P = 0.002, for symptoms and signs, respectively). No adverse effects of the treatment with cyclosporin A 0.05% eyedrops were observed.
                Topical cyclosporin A 0.05% seems to be safe and have some effect in alleviating signs and symptoms of severe AKC refractory to topical steroid treatment. There is no generally accepted treatment for primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). Steroids alone and steroids plus cyclophosphamide can be expected to induce a remission of the proteinuria in only 27% of patients. Probably the majority of FSGS patients will reach ESRD over the extended course of their disease. In addition to the work presented in this study, there have been many reports of the potential effectiveness of cyclosporine (CSA) on reducing the proteinuria of FSGS. This study was undertaken to test the efficacy and safety of a 6-month course of CSA in a double-blinded, prospectively randomized, placebo-controlled trial in children with corticosteroid-resistant FSGS. The potential inhibitory effect of hypercholesterolemia on the proteinuria-reducing actions of CSA was also assessed. Twenty-five patients with FSGS were randomized to receive either placebo or CSA for 6 months. Twelve of the 12 patients that received CSA experienced a diminution of their proteinuria as opposed to only two of the 12 placebo-treated patients. Proteinuria was significantly reduced from 151.7 +/- 162.4 mg/kg per 24 h at Week 0 to 36.9 +/- 42.3 at the end of the study in the group that received CSA (P < 0.05). There was no significant change in the proteinuria of the patients in the placebo group. A significant correlation between the percentage change of proteinuria over the 6 months of the study and the prestudy serum cholesterol levels (r = 0.79, P < 0.05) was seen in the CSA group. A partial correlation analysis controlling for the effects of serum cholesterol uncovered a significant relationship between average CSA level and proteinuria change (r = -0.76, P < 0.05). The fractional decline in GFR over the course of the study was not significantly different between the CSA and placebo-treated groups. In conclusion, CSA reduces proteinuria, increases serum albumin levels, and can be expected, therefore, to reduce the symptoms of nephrotic syndrome. Hypercholesterolemia antagonizes this effect of CSA. To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and therapeutic effect of topical ciclosporin A 0.05% as a steroid sparing agent in steroid dependent allergic conjunctivitis.
                Prospective, randomised, double masked, placebo controlled trial comparing signs, symptoms, and the ability to reduce or stop concurrent steroid in steroid dependent atopic keratoconjunctivitis and vernal keratoconjunctivitis using 0.05% topical ciclosporin A compared to placebo. Steroid drop usage per week (drug score), symptoms, and clinical signs scores were the main outcome measures.
                The study included an enrolment of 40 patients, 18 with atopic keratoconjunctivitis and 22 with vernal keratoconjunctivitis. There was no statistical significant difference in drug score, symptoms, or clinical signs scores between the placebo and ciclosporin group at the end of the treatment period. No adverse reactions to any of the study formulations were encountered.
                Topical ciclosporin A 0.05% was not shown to be of any benefit over placebo as a steroid sparing agent in steroid dependent allergic eye disease. When ocular structures are affected in Behçet's syndrome, a rapid loss of vision has been the rule regardless of the type of treatment--corticosteroids, Leukeran, Imuran, colchicine. The objectives of the present study were to compare, in a masked manner, conventional treatment (corticosteroids/Leukeran) to treatment with CsA. Forty patients suffering from Behçet's syndrome with active ocular inflammatory reactions were included in the study. These were randomly assigned to conventional or CsA regimens and were regularly examined by a multidisciplinary group of physicians. The unmasked internist modulated the treatment and recorded systemic manifestations. The masked ophthalmologists recorded the ocular findings without knowledge of the assigned type of treatment. An analysis of the results 3 years after initiation of the study shows that CsA is more effective than conventional therapy in decreasing the active ocular inflammatory processes and arresting the deterioration of visual acuity. Regarding the extraocular symptoms, however, conventional therapy is superior to CsA, especially for the control of skin lesions and arthritis. Side effects were recorded in a much higher incidence among patients receiving CsA. However, tight and constant control of the CsA dosage as performed in this study has, so far, prevented clinical and biochemical nephrotoxic manifestations in patients assigned to this treatment. The novel agent sirolimus (SRL; Rapamune; rapamycin) inhibits the immune response by a mechanism distinct from those of calcineurin antagonists or antimetabolites. This randomized, controlled, multicenter, single blind, phase II trial examined the combination of SRL, steroids, and full versus reduced doses of cyclosporine (CsA) for prophylaxis of acute renal allograft rejection.
                A total of 149 recipients of mismatched cadaveric- or living-donor primary renal allografts were randomized into six groups. Three groups received placebo or 1 or 3 mg/m2/day SRL, as well as steroids and full-dose CsA (Sandimmune). Three groups received steroids, reduced-dose CsA (target trough level 50% of full-dose range), and 1, 3, or 5 mg/m2/day SRL.
                The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes within the first 6 months after transplant was reduced from 32.0% in the control group to 8.5% in patients receiving SRL (1 or 3 mg/m2/day) and full-dose Sandimmune CsA (P=0.018). Similar low rates of acute rejection episodes were observed among non-African-Americans, but not African-Americans, treated with SRL and reduced-dose Sandimmune CsA. Despite the augmented immunosuppression, 1-year patient and graft survival rates did not differ significantly across groups. Adverse effects attributable to CsA, including hypertension and new-onset diabetes mellitus, were not exacerbated by SRL. Except for an increased incidence of pneumonia among patients receiving full-dose CsA and 3 mg/m2/day SRL, the incidences of opportunistic infections were similar in all treatment groups. Although SRL produced more frequent, but reversible, hematological and lipid abnormalities, it had no apparent nephrotoxic effects to exacerbate CsA-induced renal dysfunction.
                SRL in combination with CsA and steroids not only lowers the incidence of biopsy-proven acute renal allograft rejection episodes, but also may permit CsA sparing, at least among Caucasian patients, without an increased risk of rejection. This two-phase, multicenter study was undertaken to examine the safety and efficacy of combination therapy with oral doxycycline and topical azelaic acid (AzA) 15% gel in moderate-to-severe papulopustular rosacea and to determine the effect of subsequent maintenance monotherapy with AzA 15% gel alone. In the initial open-label, non-randomized phase of the study, subjects (n=172) received topical AzA 15% gel and oral doxycycline (100 mg), both twice daily, for < or = 12 weeks. In the second, double-blind study phase, subjects who had initially undergone at least four weeks of combination treatment in phase 1 and who achieved > or = 75% inflammatory lesion count reduction (n=136) were randomized to receive either AzA 15% gel or its vehicle twice daily for an additional 24 weeks. Assessments of efficacy were obtained at four-week intervals throughout both phases of the study and included change in inflammatory lesion count, investigator global assessment (IGA) of rosacea severity, and separate assessments of erythema and telangiectasia severity. At the last visit for each phase of the study, the investigator and participant each rated overall improvement, with the participant rating cosmetic acceptability and the investigator rating treatment as "success" or "failure" based on IGA score. During the second phase of the trial, the rate of relapse -- defined as either a 50% deterioration in the lesion count improvement from phase 1, an increase in erythema intolerable to the subject or maintenance therapy failure as judged by the investigator and/or the subject -- was obtained. Safety assessments were conducted for both phases of the study and included analysis of adverse events (AEs) and a rating of cutaneous tolerability by the subject. By week 12 of the open-label phase of the study, 81.4% of subjects had reached a 75% or greater reduction in inflammatory lesion count, and 64% of patients achieved treatment success. During the second study phase (maintenance phase), AzA 15% gel consistently provided a better maintenance response than vehicle, with maintenance of remission in 75% of patients over the six-month duration of the maintenance phase. Additionally AzA 15% gel showed a statistically significantly lower deterioration in absolute inflammatory lesion counts than did vehicle after 8, 16, 20 and 24 weeks of maintenance therapy. No serious treatment-related AEs were encountered in the study, and 98.5% of subjects were satisfied with the local tolerability of both AzA gel and vehicle. Increasing incidence rates of cutaneous malignancies, paralleling rising survival times of grafts and patients in organ transplant recipients, represents an escalating challenge for dermatologists worldwide. Especially, invasive squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) in immuno-compromised patients are characterized by significantly increased morbidity and mortality and characteristically outnumber basal cell carcinoma in this population. Effective management of actinic keratoses (AK) could help to prevent the further development of invasive SCC. Diclofenac in hyaluronic acid has previously shown to be an effective and well tolerated option for the treatment of AK in immuno-competent patients. However, its safety and efficacy in organ-transplant patients has not been evaluated in a controlled study so far. 32 organ transplant patients (kidney (+/- pancreas), liver, heart) screened at our specialized transplant dermatology outpatient clinic were found eligible and were randomized to either active treatment (24) or vehicle (8). Patients who had stable status of the transplanted graft in the 12 months prior to entering the study and >/= 3 AK lesions in a contiguous 50 cm2 area on the face, forehead, hands or balding scalp were eligible for inclusion in the study. Treatment of AK with 3% diclofenac in 2.5% hyaluronic acid or placebo twice daily was conducted over a total of 16 weeks, followed by a final evaluation 4 weeks after last application of the study drug. Biopsies were taken from the treated areas at the final visit to verify clinical clearance. Patients were assessed for safety variables that included adverse events, local skin reactions, laboratory results, dosage of immunosuppressive medication and indication of graft rejection. A 24 months follow up was conducted after the end of treatment. 87% (n = 28/32) of the patients completed the 16 week treatment phase and presented for final evaluation 4 weeks after end of treatment. In the diclofenac 3% gel treatment group, a complete clearance of AK lesions was achieved in 41% (9/22) compared to 0% (0/6) in the vehicle group. Side effects in most of the patients included a mild erythema and a mild to moderate swelling of the areas treated. No graft rejections or trends for a deterioration of graft function were detected. No meaningful trends were observed in laboratory results. In 55% of the previously cleared patients, new AK developed in the study area after an average of 9.3 months. None of these patients developed invasive SCC in the study area within 24 months of follow-up. This study demonstrated a greater lesion clearance rate of AKs in OTRs treated with diclofenac 3% gel than with vehicle. Despite recurrent AK in 55% of the previously cleared patients, the 24 month results showed no invasive SCC in this group. This study suggests that diclofenac 3% gel is not only an efficient and well tolerated treatment for multiple AKs in OTRs but also may prevent invasive SCC in these high-risk patients. Therapy for active ulcerative colitis (UC) usually involves rectal formulations of corticosteroids (CS), which are characterized by the risk of systemic steroid-related adverse effects.
                To compare the efficacy and safety of the topically acting CS beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) versus mesalamine (5-ASA) in the treatment of active UC.
                Patients with mild to moderate distal active UC were randomized to a 6-week treatment with BDP 3 mg enema o.d. or 5-ASA 1 g enema daily in a single-blind, multicenter, parallel-group, controlled study. The primary efficacy variable was the decrease in Disease Activity Index (DAI) score. Safety variables were adrenal function, monitoring of adverse events, vital signs, and laboratory parameters.
                A total of 217 patients were enrolled and treated with BDP (n = 111) or 5-ASA (n = 106). A significant decrease in the DAI score (P < 0.05) was observed in both treatment groups, with a clinical remission rate of 36.7% in the BDP group and of 29.2% in the 5-ASA group. Both treatments were well tolerated. No changes from baseline in morning cortisol levels were observed in the BDP group.
                BDP administered as a rectal enema over a 6-week treatment period was efficacious and safe in patients with active UC, without interference with pituitary adrenal axis.
This systematic review highlights the relative scarcity of controlled clinical trials assessing the efficacy of topical CsA therapy in AKC and suggests that evidence on the efficacy and safety of topical CsA treatment in patients with CsA remains limited. However, the data suggest that topical CsA may provide clinical and symptomatic relief in AKC and may help to reduce topical steroid use in patients with steroid-dependent or steroid-resistant AKC. No serious adverse events were reported. Reported adverse events in patients treated with topical CsA include intense stinging and eyelid skin maceration. One patient in the placebo group developed a severe allergic response to maize antigens. However, the total number of patients in the trials was too small to assess the safety of this treatment.
Additional well-designed and powered RCTs of topical CsA in AKC are needed. Ideal study designs should include adequate randomisation and concealment of allocation; masking of participants, personnel and outcome assessors; adequate follow-up periods and minimisation of attrition bias; and comparison groups with similar clinical and epidemiologic characteristics. Samples should be large enough to provide sufficient statistical power to assess the safety of CsA and to detect clinically relevant treatment effect sizes of the primary outcomes. Analyses should be appropriate to the study’s design and outcome measures. Moreover, standardisation of outcome measures and follow-up periods across studies would be beneficial to maximise study comparability.