Improved outcomes in patients with acute allergic syndromes who are treated with combined H1 and H2 antagonists. Famotidine in the treatment of acute urticaria. Oral agents in the management of urticaria: patient perception of effectiveness and level of satisfaction with treatment. Differential effects of fluticasone propionate on allergen-evoked bronchoconstriction and increased urinary leukotriene E4 excretion. Influence of intranasal steroids during the grass pollen season on bronchial responsiveness in children and young adults with asthma and hay fever. Fluticasone propionate in children with moderate asthma. Cost effectiveness of leukotriene receptor antagonists versus long-acting beta-2 agonists as add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids for asthma: a pragmatic trial. Clinical efficacy and safety of preseasonal sublingual immunotherapy with grass pollen carbamylated allergoid in rhinitic patients. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Controlled trial of inhaled budesonide in patients with cystic fibrosis and chronic bronchopulmonary Psuedomonas aeruginosa infection.
Although the addition of H(2) blockers to H(1) antagonists has been promoted for use in anaphylaxis, there have been no large studies establishing the advantage of this approach in treating acute allergic syndromes. In this study we tested the hypothesis that combined H(1) and H(2) blockage results in improved outcomes in patients treated for acute allergic syndromes compared with treatment with H(1) blockade alone.
                In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 91 adult patients with acute allergic syndromes were treated with either 50 mg of diphenhydramine and saline solution (control group) or with 50 mg of diphenhydramine and 50 mg of ranitidine (active group). These patients were treated with parenteral administration. Patients were recruited from an emergency department at an urban academic medical center. The primary endpoints were resolution of urticaria, angioedema, or erythema at 2 hours after protocol treatment. Areas of cutaneous involvement, heart rates, blood pressures, respiratory findings, and symptom scores were also assessed at baseline, 1 hour, and 2 hours.
                There were significantly more patients without urticaria at 2 hours among the patients in the active group compared with those in the control group. Both groups had similar proportions of urticaria at baseline. Logistic regression models to predict resolution of urticaria, which accounted for baseline urticarial involvement, showed odds ratios in favor of the active group treatment. Similar findings were observed when the absence of both urticaria and angioedema was considered as the dependent variable. There was not a significant difference between the 2 groups with regard to the absence of erythema or angioedema (irrespective of the presence of urticaria) at 2 hours. Blood pressure and symptoms did not show differences between the 2 groups over time. Lower heart rates were observed 1 hour after treatment in the active treatment group (mean reduction 10 beats/min) compared with those found in the placebo group (mean reduction 6 beats/min).
                These data show that adding H(2) blockers to H(1) antagonists results in additional improvement of certain cutaneous outcomes for patients presenting with acute allergic syndromes. These findings favor the recommendation for using combined H(1) and H(2) antihistamines in acute allergic syndromes. Recent studies suggest that histamine H2-receptor antagonists may be useful in the treatment of urticaria. This study was conducted to determine whether famotidine, a H2 antagonist, is effective in the treatment of acute urticaria and compare its effect with that of the H1 antagonist diphenhydramine. In this prospective, double-blind, controlled trial, 25 patients with urticaria of less than 72 h duration were randomized to receive a single dose of either famotidine 20 mg i.m. or diphenhydramine 50 mg i.m. Prior to treatment and 30 min after treatment, patients rated pruritus and sedation using visual analogue scales, while physicians evaluated intensity of urticaria and percentage of body surface area involved by urticaria. Famotidine was found to reduce pruritus associated with acute urticaria, intensity of urticaria, and body surface area affected by urticaria without causing sedation. Famotidine was comparable to diphenhydramine in efficacy; however, there was a (nonsignificant) trend for diphenhydramine to be more effective than famotidine in the treatment of pruritus, and for famotidine to be more effective in the reduction of surface area of involvement. It is concluded that famotidine merits further investigation as a potential medication for treatment of urticaria. Orally administered diphenhydramine, famotidine, and cromolyn sodium were compared for their abilities to alleviate symptoms of acute urticaria.
                This was a prospective, randomized, blind study, implemented in the emergency departments (EDs) of two teaching hospitals, each with an annual average of 40,000 ED patient visits. Patient perception of the effectiveness of treatment was assessed using a visual analog scale.
                33 adult patients presenting to the EDs were entered into the study over a one-year period. Of these, 8 were lost to follow-up and 5 were noncompliant with medications and not included in data analysis. Twenty adult patients, aged 19-78 years, completed the five-day study: 7 received diphenhydramine, 6 received famotidine, and 7 received cromolyn sodium.
                Patients receiving diphenhydramine reported the greatest satisfaction with treatment: 86 percent (6/7) indicated they would use the medication again. Fifty percent (3/6) in the famotidine group and 43 percent (3/7) in the cromolyn sodium group rated the treatment as worth using again. Patients receiving famotidine reported the greatest occurrence of adverse effects (50 percent, 3/6); the lowest incidence of such effects was seen in the cromolyn sodium group (14 percent, 1/7). Patients receiving diphenhydramine reported adverse effects at a rate of 43 percent (3/7).
                Our results suggest that patients receiving diphenhydramine are more satisfied with their treatment than are patients receiving famotidine or cromolyn sodium. Allergen challenge is associated with an increased excretion of urinary leukotriene E4. The source of this increase is unknown, although the lack of effect of inhaled beta-agonists and sodium cromoglycate suggests that airway mast cells may not be involved. We investigated this further using a new and topically potent inhaled glucocorticoid, fluticasone propionate (FP). A group of 10 mild atopic asthmatic subjects (6 males; FEV1 > 60% of predicted; PC20 histamine < or = 8 mg/ml; and on inhaled beta 2-agonists only) were studied before and after a 2-wk period of FP (1,000 micrograms/day) or placebo administered by metered-dose inhalers as two puffs twice per day through a large-volume spacer. Treatments were assigned in a double-blind crossover fashion separated by a 3-wk washout period. The PC20 histamine was measured at the start and end of each treatment when subjects also received a bronchial allergen challenge. Urine was collected for 4 h after allergen challenge for determination of LTE4 using HPLC-RIA, and 2 h later the PC20 histamine measurement was repeated. The 2-wk treatment with FP significantly inhibited both early and late responses to allergen: the maximum % fall in FEV1 during the early (0 to 2 h) and late response (2 to 6 h) was 32.6 +/- 3.4 and 19.6 +/- 5.2, respectively, following placebo versus 19.5 +/- 4.5 and 3.6 +/- 2.6 following FP (both p < 0.02).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) It has been reported that intranasal corticosteroids can influence bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) in asthmatic subjects with seasonal rhinitis. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of intranasal fluticasone propionate and beclomethasone dipropionate on BHR and bronchial calibre (forced expiratory volume in one second, FEV(1)) in children and young adults with seasonal rhinitis and mild asthma during two consecutive grass pollen seasons.
                In the first pollen season 25 patients aged 8-28 years were included in a double blind, placebo controlled study. The active treatment group used fluticasone aqueous spray 200 microgram once daily. In the second pollen season 72 patients aged 8-28 years participated in a double blind, placebo controlled study of a similar design to that of the previous year except that an additional treatment group of patients using beclomethasone 200 microg twice daily was included. FEV(1) was measured before and after three and six weeks of treatment; BHR to methacholine (PD(20)) was measured before and after six weeks of treatment.
                In the first season the mean (SD) logPD(20) of the patients decreased significantly both in the fluticasone group (from 2.43 (0.8) microgram to 1.86 (0.85) microgram) and in the placebo group (from 2.41 (0.42) microgram to 1.87 (0.78) microgram) without any intergroup difference in the change in logPD(20). In the second pollen season the mean logPD(20) in the fluticasone, beclomethasone, and placebo groups did not change significantly.
                Intranasal steroids did not influence BHR during two grass pollen seasons in children and young adults with seasonal rhinitis and mild asthma. Inhaled corticosteroids are considered to be effective and safe to treat children with asthma. These drugs, often used as maintenance treatment, can, however, influence the HPA-axis, which might be reflected by the serum and urine cortisol concentration. The aim of the present study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate (FP) 100 microg administered twice a day via a Diskhaler for 3 mo. FP was tested in a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled parallel trial in a group of 34 children with moderate asthma who did not use inhaled steroids for at least 4 wk prior to the study. At home, symptoms and peak flow recordings (PEFR) were noted in a diary. At each visit lung function was measured, and serum and urinary cortisol were determined. During treatment, wheezing decreased and PEFR values increased in the FP group. FEV1 and PC20-histamine increased and the reversibility decreased in the FP group. All changes were significant, with the exception of the change in nocturnal PEFR. Four weeks after cessation of FP all parameters returned to pretreatment values. Serum cortisol did not change significantly in either treatment group. The decrease in urinary cortisol in the FP group was significant only if it was compared with the increase in urinary cortisol in the placebo group. We conclude that FP 100 microg given twice a day is effective in children with moderate stable asthma. Suppression of the HPA-axis by FP 100 microg given twice daily, although not likely, cannot be ruled out by this study since the absence of a significant decrease in urinary cortisol in the FP group could be due to an insufficient number of patients. Additional studies are required to solve this problem. Information is lacking on the relative effectiveness and cost effectiveness--in a real-life primary-care setting--of leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) and long-acting beta2 adrenergic receptor agonists (beta2 agonists) as add-on therapy for patients whose asthma symptoms are not controlled on low-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS).
                To estimate the cost effectiveness of LTRAs compared with long-acting beta2 agonists as add-on therapy for patients whose asthma symptoms are not controlled on low-dose ICS.
                An economic evaluation was conducted alongside a 2-year, pragmatic, randomized controlled trial set in 53 primary-care practices in the UK. Patients aged 12-80 years with asthma insufficiently controlled with ICS (n = 361) were randomly assigned to add-on LTRAs (n = 176) or long-acting beta2 agonists (n = 185). The main outcome measures were the incremental cost per point improvement in the Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (MiniAQLQ), per point improvement in the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) and per QALY gained from perspectives of the UK NHS and society.
                Over 2 years, the societal cost per patient receiving LTRAs was pounds sterling 1157 versus pounds sterling 952 for long-acting beta2 agonists, a (significant, adjusted) increase of pounds sterling 214 (95% CI 2, 411) [year 2005 values]. Patients receiving LTRAs experienced a non-significant incremental gain of 0.009 QALYs (95% CI -0.077, 0.103). The incremental cost per QALY gained from the societal (NHS) perspective was pounds sterling 22,589 (pounds sterling 11,919). Uncertainty around this point estimate suggested that, given a maximum willingness to pay of pounds sterling 30,000 per QALY gained, the probability that LTRAs are a cost-effective alternative to long-acting beta2 agonists as add-on therapy was approximately 52% from both societal and NHS perspectives.
                On balance, these results marginally favour the repositioning of LTRAs as a cost-effective alternative to long-acting beta2 agonists as add-on therapy to ICS for asthma. However, there is much uncertainty surrounding the incremental cost effectiveness because of similarity of clinical benefit and broad confidence intervals for differences in healthcare costs.
                UK National Research Register N0547145240; Controlled Clinical Trials ISRCTN99132811. The aim of this study was to confirm the clinical efficacy and safety of a preseasonal sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in a group of allergic patients with seasonal rhinoconjunctivitis with or without mild intermittent or mild persistent asthma. The immunotherapy was administered through the oral mucosa with a monomeric carbamylated allergoid (allergoid SLIT) for grass pollens. A secondary endpoint was to evaluate the effect of the allergoid SLIT on nasal reactivity.
                A single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was performed. Patients were selected and randomly allocated to two groups: one group received active treatment (allergoid SLIT) for 2 years and the other received placebo. Both groups received the necessary drug treatment throughout the trial. Thirty-three outpatients (20 men and 13 women, mean age: 30 years; range: 19-43) attending our center were enrolled in the study. Symptoms and medications were scored on diary cards during the pollen season. An allergen nasal challenge was performed at baseline and after 2 years of SLIT to evaluate nasal reactivity. Because the clinical scores were non-normally distributed, the Mann-Whitney and the Chi-square tests for intergroup comparisons and the Wilcoxon test for intragroup comparisons were used. The results were evaluated after 1 and 2 years of treatment. Between the first and second years of treatment, no changes in the scores for the placebo group were found, while for the active vaccine group significant decreases were found in rhinorrhea (p < 0.03), sneezing (p < 0.03), and conjunctivitis (p < 0.02). Symptom scores after nasal challenge decreased (p < 0.03) after 2 years' treatment. Nasal steroid use significantly decreased in the active treatment group during May and June in both the years of treatment (p < 0.02). Only two mild local adverse events were reported in the active group and none was reported in the placebo group.
                The results of this study show that the allergoid SLIT is safe and effective in decreasing symptom scores and drug use in rhinitic patients allergic to grass pollen. The efficacy and safety of anti-inflammatory treatment with inhaled glucocorticosteroids in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and complicating chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P.a.) lung infection was studied in a placebo-controlled, parallel, double-blind single center trial. Active treatment consisted of budesonide dry powder, 800 microg twice daily, delivered from a Turbuhaler. The study period covered two successive 3-mo intervals between elective courses of intravenous anti-Pseudomonas antibiotics. Fifty-five patients entered the study, with a mean age of 20 yr and a mean FEV1 of 63% of predicted. Analysis of all patients entered, irrespective of trial adherence ("intention to treat"), showed a decrease in FEV1 in the first period of -0.032 L in patients on budesonide versus -0.187 L in patients on placebo (p = 0.08). The corresponding figures for the patients adhering to the protocol during the first period were -0.017 L versus -0.198 L (p < 0.05, confidence interval of the difference: -0.035 to +0.327 L). For all patients entered, as well as for patients adhering to the trial, there was always a trend in favor of budesonide, as judged by changes in FEV1 and FVC in both 3-mo periods. None of the patients had asthma, but the patients on budesonide had a mean improvement in histamine reactivity of +1.15 dose steps over the entire 6-mo period, as opposed to +0.017 dose steps in patients on placebo (p < 0.05). There was also a significant (p = 0.01) correlation between pre-trial histamine reactivity and the change in FEV1 in the first period in patients on budesonide. We conclude that inhaled glucocorticosteroids can be of short-term benefit in patients with CF and chronic P.a. infection and that those patients most likely to benefit from this treatment are patients with hyperreactive airways. Prolonged studies in larger number of patients are necessary to determine the long-term efficacy of this treatment.
The very limited evidence provided by this review was based on a few old studies of a relatively small size, which we categorised as having high to unclear risk of bias. Thus, at present, the review does not allow confident decision-making about the use of H2-receptor antagonists for urticaria. Although some of these studies have reported a measure of relief of symptoms of urticaria and rather minimal clinical improvement in some of the participants, the evidence was weak and unreliable. We have emphasised the lack of precision and limitations in the reported data where appropriate in this review.