Rapid onset of action of levodopa in restless legs syndrome: a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, crossover trial. Cabergoline compared to levodopa in the treatment of patients with severe restless legs syndrome: results from a multi-center, randomized, active controlled trial. Levodopa or dopamine agonists, or deprenyl as initial treatment for Parkinson's disease. A randomized multicenter study. Treatment of idiopathic restless legs syndrome (RLS) with slow-release valproic acid compared with slow-release levodopa/benserazid. Five-year follow-up of early lisuride and levodopa combination therapy versus levodopa monotherapy in de novo Parkinson's disease. The French Lisuride Study Group. Double-blind placebo-controlled trial of adjunctive levetiracetam in pediatric partial seizures. Pergolide versus levodopa monotherapy in early Parkinson's disease patients: The PELMOPET study. Rasagiline mesylate, a new MAO-B inhibitor for the treatment of Parkinson's disease: a double-blind study as adjunctive therapy to levodopa. Selegiline as the primary treatment of Parkinson's disease--a long-term double-blind study.
To investigate the efficacy and safety of levodopa plus benserazide in the treatment of restless legs syndrome (RLS), in terms of the frequency of periodic limb movements (PLMs), objective and subjective criteria of sleep, onset of action, and withdrawal effects.
                A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, crossover trial, with two 4-week treatment periods.
                Outpatient units of three specialist centers in Germany.
                Eligible patients had to fulfill the diagnostic criteria of the International RLS Study Group and have sleep disturbances and PLMs during sleep shown on polysomnography at screening. Thirty-five patients were recruited, of whom 32 (13 men, 19 women) completed the study.
                Patients received a single dose of standard-release levodopa/benserazide 100/25 mg or placebo at bedtime each night for 4 weeks, before crossing over to receive the alternative treatment for a further 4 weeks; the dose could be doubled if required. The average dosages were 159 +/- 31 mg of levodopa and 1.56 +/- 0.29 capsules of placebo.
                Levodopa/benserazide significantly reduced the number of PLMs per hour (p<0.0001), increased the time in bed without limb movements (p<0.0001), and improved subjective quality of sleep (p=0.0004). The onset of action was rapid after the first dose, and full efficacy was achieved within the first few days of therapy; these improvements disappeared immediately when treatment was discontinued. Levodopa/benserazide treatment was well tolerated and safe.
                Levodopa/benserazide is effective and safe in the treatment of RLS. Objective and subjective measures of sleep improved rapidly after the first dose. RLS symptoms recurred immediately after treatment was discontinued. We report the first large-scale double-blind, randomly assigned study to compare two active dopaminergic therapies for Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS), the dopamine agonist cabergoline (CAB) and levodopa/benserazide (levodopa). Patients with idiopathic RLS were treated with fixed daily doses of 2 or 3 mg CAB or 200 or 300 mg levodopa for 30 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by changes in the IRLS (International RLS Severity Scale) and by time to discontinuation of treatment due to loss of efficacy or augmentation. 361 of 418 screened patients (age 58 +/- 12 years, 71% females) were randomly assigned and treated (CAB: n = 178; levodopa: n = 183) in 51 centers of four European countries. Baseline IRLS total score was 25.7 +/- 6.8. The baseline-adjusted mean change from baseline to week 6 in IRLS sum score was d = -16.1 in the CAB group and d = -9.5 in the levodopa group (d = -6.6, P < 0.0001). More patients in the levodopa group (24.0%) than in the CAB group (11.9%, P = 0.0029, log-rank test) discontinued because of loss of efficacy (14.2% vs. 7.9%, P = 0.0290) or augmentation (9.8% vs. 4.0%, P = 0.0412). Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 83.1% of the CAB group and in 77.6% of the levodopa group. In both groups, most frequent AEs were gastrointestinal symptoms (CAB: 55.6%, levodopa: 30.6%, P < 0.0001). This first large-scale active controlled study in RLS showed superior efficacy of cabergoline versus levodopa after a 30-week long-term therapy. Tolerability was found more favorable with levodopa than with cabergoline. Objectives: levodopa improves the quality of life in parkinsonian patients, however long term response is compromised by the emergence of motor fluctuations and dyskinesias. The aim of this study was to compare the occurrence of motor fluctuations and dyskinesias in previously untreated patients assigned to receive levodopa, a dopamine agonist or deprenyl.Thirty-five neurological departments in Italian hospitals participated in this randomized open trial. Patients with Parkinson's disease, who required the initiation of an effective antiparkinsonian treatment, were randomly assigned to receive levodopa, dopamine agonists or deprenyl. The end-points were motor dyskinesias and motor fluctuations occurring in a median follow-up period of about 3years.After a median follow-up of 34months, motor fluctuations and dyskinesias were less frequent in patients assigned to a dopamine agonist or deprenyl than in patients assigned to levodopa (relative risk [RR] 0.5, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.3-0.8, and RR=0.6, 95% CI 0.3-0.9, respectively), but dopamine agonists were less effective and less well tolerated than levodopa. The lower frequency of motor fluctuations in patients assigned to deprenyl was no longer statistically significant when prognostic predictors were considered in a multivariable analysis. Long-term mortality did not differ in the three arms of the study. Dopamine agonists and deprenyl can be considered as an alternative to levodopa for starting treatment in Parkinson's disease patients. However, on clinical grounds, only small advantages are expected over the traditional therapy initiation with levodopa. We aimed to compare the efficacy of valproic acid (VPA) on paresthesias and sleep in RLS to that of levodopa (LD). Twenty patients with idiopathic restless legs syndrome (RLS) were treated with 600 mg slow-release VPA and 200 mg slow-release LD+50mg benserazid in a randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over, double-blind setting with polysomography (PSG) at the end of each 3-week treatment periods. There was no major difference between the efficacy of valproic acid or LD. Periodic leg movements in sleep (PLMS) and PLM arousal index (PLMAI) significantly decreased with LD (p < or= 0.005). However, LD, but not VPA, significantly increased arousals not associated with PLMS (p = 0.002). Decrease of intensity and duration of RLS symptoms were more pronounced with VPA (p < or= 0.022) than with LD (NS). We conclude that slow-release VPA provides a treatment alternative for RLS. The value of an early initial coadministration of levodopa (L-dopa) and lisuride in Parkinson's disease was the main goal of the present study. Eighty-two patients with recently diagnosed idiopathic Parkinson's disease were randomized into two groups for treatment with L-dopa alone or L-dopa + lisuride. The trial was double-blinded for the first year and open for the following 4 years. Selegiline (10 mg/day b.i.d.) was added in both groups at the end of the first year. Outcome measures were evolution of L-dopa dosage and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale scores and subscores, and incidence of motor complications. The dropout rate was higher in the L-dopa group (63.4%) than in the combination group. Motor improvement was better (p < 0.01) in the L-dopa + lisuride group. Expected motor complications were rare, moderate and equivalent in the two groups despite a difference in L-dopa dosage (446.7 vs. 387.5 mg/day). Long-term follow-up demonstrated the L-dopa-sparing effect of lisuride (average 1 mg/day), the beneficial effect of early combination therapy on motor status and the paucity of motor complications in both groups.
                Copyright 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam (LEV) as adjunctive therapy in children (4 to 16 years) with treatment-resistant partial-onset seizures.
                This multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial consisted of an 8-week baseline period followed by a 14-week double-blind treatment period. During the treatment period, patients received either placebo or LEV add-on therapy and were up-titrated to a target dose of 60 mg/kg/day.
                One hundred ninety-eight patients (intent-to-treat population) provided evaluable data. The reduction in partial-onset seizure frequency per week for LEV adjunctive therapy over placebo adjunctive therapy was significant (26.8%; p = 0.0002; 95% CI 14.0% to 37.6%). A 50% or greater reduction of partial seizure frequency per week was attained in 44.6% of the LEV group (45/101 patients), compared with 19.6% (19/97 patients) receiving placebo (p = 0.0002). Seven (6.9%) LEV-treated patients were seizure-free during the entire double-blind treatment period, compared with one (1.0%) placebo-treated patient. One or more adverse events were reported by 88.1% of LEV-treated patients and 91.8% of placebo patients. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were somnolence, accidental injury, vomiting, anorexia, hostility, nervousness, rhinitis, cough, and pharyngitis. A similar number of patients in each group required a dose reduction or withdrew from the study as a result of an adverse event.
                Levetiracetam adjunctive therapy administered at 60 mg/kg/day is efficacious and well tolerated in children with treatment-resistant partial seizures. Dopamine agonists are used as initial treatment in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) to reduce incidence and severity of motor complications. This paradigm is based on long-term studies, allowing "rescue" therapy with levodopa. The present strict monotherapy study (PELMOPET, the acronym for the pergolide-versus-L-dopa-monotherapy-and-positron-emission-tomography trial) evaluated the efficacy and safety of pergolide versus levodopa without levodopa "rescue" medication. This multicenter, double-blind, randomized, 3-year trial compared pergolide monotherapy (n=148) with levodopa monotherapy (n=146) in dopamine-naive patients with early PD (Hoehn and Yahr stage 1-2.5). Primary efficacy measures were clinical efficacy, severity and time to onset of motor complications, and disease progression. During the 3 years, severity of motor complications was significantly lower and time to onset of dyskinesia was significantly delayed in the group receiving pergolide (3.23 mg/day) compared with those receiving levodopa (504 mg/day). However, time to onset of motor complications was not longer in patients receiving pergolide after 3 years. Symptomatic relief (assessed by Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale [UPDRS], UPDRS II, and III, Clinical Global Impressions [CGI] severity, and CGI and Patient Global Impressions [PGI] improvement) was significantly greater in patients receiving levodopa. Adverse events led to discontinuation of therapy in 17.6% of pergolide patients and 9.6% of levodopa patients. This is the first study comparing strict monotherapy with a dopamine agonist versus levodopa in previously untreated early PD. In principle, both levodopa and a dopamine agonist such as pergolide seem to be suitable options as initial PD therapy. The choice remains with the treating physician based on the different efficacy and adverse event profiles.
                (c) 2005 Movement Disorder Society. Rasagiline mesylate (TVP-1012) is a potent, selective, non-reversible MAO-B inhibitor, without the tyramine-potentiating effect and with neuroprotective activities. The benefit of rasagiline as monotherapy in patients with early Parkinson's disease (PD) has already been reported. To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and clinical effect of rasagiline as adjunctive therapy to levodopa, a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study (0.5, 1, and 2 mg/d) was conducted for 12 weeks in 70 patients with PD (mean age, 57.4 y; mean disease duration, 5.7 y; 32 patients had motor fluctuations). A beneficial clinical effect was observed in fluctuating patients treated with rasagiline (all doses), expressed as a decrease in total Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) score (23.0% vs 8.5% in the placebo group). The treatment effect was still evident 6 weeks after drug discontinuation (in all doses). The safety and tolerability of rasagiline were good. Adverse events were no different than those of patients taking placebo. Almost complete platelet MAO-B inhibition was obtained at all rasagiline doses. This study has demonstrated that rasagiline (up to 2 mg/day) has a good safety profile and a beneficial clinical effect in fluctuating patients with PD when given as an add-on to chronic levodopa therapy. To assess the therapeutic efficacy of selegiline combined with levodopa in the long-term treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD).
                A randomized, prospective, double-blind study on 44 patients with PD needing levodopa therapy after the initial double-blind treatment with placebo or selegiline was carried out. The patients were followed-up for 5 years under combination therapy.
                Selegiline induced a significant (P < 0.001) slowing in the need to increase the daily levodopa dose in order to compensate for the progression of the disease. After 5 years of combination therapy the mean dose of levodopa was on average 320 mg lower in the selegiline group (405 +/- 59 mg vs 725 +/- 78 mg). The difference in the levodopa doses between the two groups increased along with follow-up time, as also the ratio of the levodopa doses (placebo/selegiline group). The number of daily levodopa doses needed to compensate for the occurrence of motor fluctuations was significantly lower in the selegiline group. The parkinsonian disability did not differ between the two groups because the clinical condition was kept as optimal as possible by adjusting the levodopa dosage. Nine patients in the placebo group needed initiation of additional dopaminergic therapy in comparison to one in the selegiline group (P = 0.004). During the 5-year follow-up period 11 patients were withdrawn from the selegiline group, 7 due to adverse events. There was no difference in mortality between the two groups.
                Selegiline therapy offers beneficial long-term effets in the treatment of PD.
Levodopa is efficacious for the short-term treatment of RLS. Augmentation, the clinically most relevant adverse event, was not investigated sufficiently.