Preoperative vaginal preparation with povidone-iodine on post-caesarean infectious morbidity. Vaginal cleansing before cesarean delivery to reduce postoperative infectious morbidity: a randomized, controlled trial. Preoperative vaginal preparation with povidone-iodine and the risk of postcesarean endometritis. Vaginal preparation with povidone iodine and postcesarean infectious morbidity: a randomized controlled trial. Preoperative skin preparation and intraoperative pelvic irrigation: impact on post-cesarean endometritis and wound infection. Does the addition of pre-operative skin preparation with povidone-iodine reduce groin sepsis following arterial surgery? Paint-only is equivalent to scrub-and-paint in preoperative preparation of abdominal surgery sites. The efficacy of exit site povidone-iodine ointment in the prevention of early peritoneal dialysis-related infections. Skin preparation methods before cesarean section. A comparative study.
The commonest complication associated with caesarean section is infection. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of vaginal preparation with povidone-iodine on post-caesarean infection. In this clinical trial, 568 patients were selected for two groups: a treatment group and a control group, each with 284 patients. A vaginal scrub was performed before the routine abdominal scrub, with two 4 × 4 cm sponge sticks saturated with povidone-iodine solution, rotated in the vagina for about 30 s. In the control group, only the abdominal scrub was performed. Patients received a single dose of prophylactic antibiotics, and were reviewed for 6 weeks to look for predefined variables. Post-caesarean endometritis occurred less frequently in the treatment group than in the control group (2.5% vs 1.4%). There was no significant difference for febrile morbidity and wound infection in the two groups. The adjusted odds ratio for endometritis after vaginal preparation was 0.03 (95% CI: 0.008-0.7). Vaginal preparation with povidone-iodine may decrease the risk of post-caesarean endometritis. The objective of the study was to determine whether vaginal preparation with povidone iodine before cesarean delivery decreased the risk of postoperative maternal morbidities.
                The design of the study was a randomized, controlled trial in women undergoing cesarean delivery with subjects assigned to have a preoperative vaginal cleansing with povidone iodine or to a standard care group (no vaginal wash). The primary outcome was a composite of postoperative fever, endometritis, sepsis, readmission, wound infection, or complication.
                There were 155 vaginal cleansing subjects and 145 control subjects. Overall, 9.0% developed the composite outcome, with fewer women in the cleansing group (6.5%) compared with the control group (11.7%), although the difference was not statistically significant (relative risk, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.26-1.11; P = .11). Length of surgery, being in labor, and having a dilated cervix were all associated with the composite morbidity outcome.
                Vaginal cleansing with povidone iodine before cesarean delivery may decrease postoperative morbidities, although the reduction is not statistically significant.
                Copyright 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved. Postcesarean endometritis and wound infection remain significant morbidities, despite use of strategies to prevent these complications. We investigated the effect of preoperative vaginal preparation with povidone-iodine as a preventive intervention against postcesarean endometritis and wound infection.
                A randomized controlled study was performed in 308 women undergoing nonemergent cesarean delivery. Subjects received either standard abdominal scrub alone or abdominal scrub with an additional vaginal preparation with povidone-iodine solution. All subjects received prophylactic antibiotic at the time of umbilical cord clamping. Each subject's postoperative course was reviewed for development of febrile morbidity (temperature > 38.0 degrees C), endometritis (temperature > 38.4 degrees C accompanied by fundal tenderness occurring beyond the first postoperative day, in the absence of evidence of other infection), and wound infection.
                Postcesarean endometritis occurred in 7.0% of subjects who received a preoperative vaginal preparation and 14.5% of controls (P < .05). There was no measurable effect of a vaginal scrub on the development of postoperative fever or wound infection. The adjusted odds ratio for developing endometritis after a vaginal preparation was 0.44 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.193-0.997). Multivariate analysis showed an increased risk of developing endometritis in association with severe anemia (adjusted OR 4.26, 95% CI 1.568-11.582), use of intrapartum internal monitors (adjusted OR 2.84, 95% CI 1.311-6.136), or history of antenatal genitourinary infection (adjusted OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.265-6.596).
                Preoperative vaginal scrub with povidone-iodine decreases the incidence of postcesarean endometritis. This intervention does not seem to decrease the overall risk of postoperative fever or wound infection. To determine whether vaginal preparation with povidone iodine before cesarean decreased the incidence of postpartum infectious morbidity.
                Participants were randomly assigned to vaginal preparation with povidone iodine (n = 247) or no preparation (n = 251). Postpartum infectious morbidity included fever, defined as temperature of 38C or greater after the day of surgery; endometritis, defined as fever with abdominal or uterine tenderness and initiation of intravenous antibiotics; and wound separation, defined as disruption of the abdominal incision that required wound care. We calculated overall rates of postpartum infectious morbidity, relative risks (RR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the effect of vaginal preparation. As designed and reported, the trial had at least 80% power to detect a 10% or greater absolute difference in rates of overall infectious morbidity, fever, and endometritis (two-tailed, alpha = 0.05).
                There was no difference between groups in maternal age, parity, race, education, prior cesarean, type of anesthesia, labor before current cesarean, number of vaginal examinations during labor, internal monitoring, prophylactic antibiotic use, gestational age at delivery, or payment status. Excluding 68 women with chorioamnionitis, incidence of postoperative fever was 19.3%, endometritis 7.2%, and wound separation 7.0%. Vaginal preparation with povidone iodine before cesarean had no effect on risk for fever (RR 1.1, 95% CI 0.8, 1.6), endometritis (RR 1.6, 95% CI 0.8, 3.1), or wound separation (RR 0.6, 95% CI 0.3, 1.3).
                Vaginal preparation with povidone iodine before cesarean had no effect on the incidence of fever, endometritis, or wound infection. To determine the impact of two skin preparation methods and two techniques of pelvic irrigation on the incidence of post-cesarean endometritis and wound infection in an indigent patient population.
                A randomized study was performed in 100 cesarean patients. Subjects were assigned to one of four groups, involving either standard skin preparation (povidone-iodine [7.5%] scrub followed by povidone-iodine [10%] solution) or special skin preparation (5-minute scrub with parachlorometaxylenol followed by povidone scrub and solution), and either normal saline or antibiotic (cefazolin sodium, 1 g in 500 mL normal saline) irrigation of the pelvis and subcutaneous tissue at uterine and fascial closure. Four groups of patients were formed: standard skin preparation plus normal saline irrigation, standard preparation plus antibiotic irrigation, special preparation plus normal saline irrigation, and special preparation plus antibiotic irrigation.
                Endometritis occurred significantly more often in the combined groups that did not include antibiotic irrigation than in the combined groups involving antibiotic irrigation (P < .001). In contrast, comparison of skin preparation methods between povidone-iodine alone versus preparation including parachlorometaxylenol indicated no significant difference (P = .22).
                Skin preparation with an antibacterial scrub in addition to standard povidone-iodine scrub and solution does not appear to play as significant a role in the reduction of post-cesarean endometritis or wound infection as does intraoperative pelvic irrigation with antibiotic solution. Sixty-four consecutive patients undergoing elective vascular surgery involving exposure of the femoral artery at the groin were randomized to one of two groups. Group A (N = 34) received twice-daily skin preparation with 10% aqueous povidone-iodine for 48 h preoperatively, while group B (N = 30) did not. Both groups were examined on a daily basis following surgery and any discharge from the wound was recorded and sent for bacteriological culture. The groups were well matched for age, sex and the type of vascular graft material used. In group A there were six (18.7%) groin wound infections and in group B there were five (17.2%). In this series of patients the addition of preoperative skin preparation with 10% povidone-iodine to standard peri-operative prophylaxis had no effect on the incidence of postoperative groin wound sepsis. Antiseptic preoperative skin site preparation is used to prepare the operative site before making a surgical incision. The goal of this preparation is a reduction in postoperative wound infection. The most straightforward technique necessary to achieve this goal remains controversial.
                A prospective randomized trial was designed to prove equivalency for two commonly used techniques of surgical skin site preparation. Two hundred thirty-four patients undergoing nonlaparoscopic abdominal operations were consented for the trial. Exclusion criteria included presence of active infection at the time of operation, neutropenia, history of skin reaction to iodine, or anticipated insertion of prosthetic material at the time of operation. Patients were randomized to receive either a vigorous 5-minute scrub with povidone-iodine soap, followed by absorption with a sterile towel, and a paint with aqueous povidone-iodine or surgical site preparation with a povidone-iodine paint only. The primary end point of the study was wound infection rate at 30 days, defined as presence of clinical signs of infection requiring therapeutic intervention.
                Patients randomized to the scrub-and-paint arm (n = 115) and the paint-only arm (n = 119) matched at baseline with respect to age, comorbidity, wound classification, mean operative time, placement of drains, prophylactic antibiotic use, and surgical procedure (all p > 0.09). Wound infection occurred in 12 (10%) scrub-and-paint patients, and 12 (10%) paint-only patients. Based on our predefined equivalency parameters, we conclude equivalence of infection rates between the two preparations.
                Preoperative preparation of the abdomen with a scrub with povidone-iodine soap followed by a paint with aqueous povidone-iodine can be abandoned in favor of a paint with aqueous povidone-iodine alone. This change will result in reductions in operative times and costs. Infections are the main complications of peritoneal dialysis, and currently there is no established method for prevention. A prospective, randomized, single-blind study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of regular application of povidone-iodine ointment at the catheter site (during the entire time on the study) in peritoneal dialysis. One hundred twenty patients were randomized; three were excluded for not completing the study. Sixty-one patients received application of povidone-iodine and 56 patients received standard care. Povidone-iodine ointment was effective in delaying infectious complications, with a lower proportion of treated patients having infections (exit site and peritonitis) within 140 days of starting dialysis compared with the controls (P = 0.04, Wilcoxon test). This protective benefit was lost after 140 days on dialysis. Staphylococcus aureus infections developed in only two (3.3%) of the treated patients compared with 10 (21.4%) of the controls (P = 0.009), despite the higher rate of S aureus nasal carriage in the treated group (22 of 61 patients [36%] v 14 of 56 patients [25%]). Preoperative skin preparation before cesarean section using a one-minute alcohol wash followed by application of an iodophor-impregnated adhesive film was evaluated in a prospective, randomized, controlled study of 79 patients. The iodophor film was as effective as the five-minute iodophor scrub followed by an iodophor wash, as determined by a reduction in skin bacterial counts. Clinical infectious morbidity was no different between the treatment and control groups, although the study was too small to draw statistically significant conclusions in this respect. This study demonstrated the antimicrobial effectiveness of a new, more rapid method of pre-operative skin preparation before cesarean section as compared to a longer, traditional method. This new, rapid method offers advantages for many patients undergoing abdominal delivery.
Vaginal preparation with povidone-iodine solution immediately before cesarean delivery reduces the risk of postoperative endometritis. This benefit is particularly realized for women undergoing cesarean delivery with ruptured membranes. As a simple, generally inexpensive intervention, providers should consider implementing preoperative vaginal cleansing with povidone-iodine before performing cesarean deliveries.