Long-term effects of outpatient rehabilitation of COPD: A randomized trial. Quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease improves after rehabilitation at home. Effects of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A comparison between an outpatient hospital-based pulmonary rehabilitation program and a home-care pulmonary rehabilitation program in patients with COPD. A follow-up of 18 months. Rehabilitation of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Exercise twice a week is not sufficient! Effects of home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized trial. Does early pulmonary rehabilitation reduce acute health-care utilization in COPD patients admitted with an exacerbation? A randomized controlled study. The effect of comprehensive outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation on dyspnea.
To examine the short- and long-term effects of an outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program for COPD patients on dyspnea, exercise, health-related quality of life, and hospitalization rate.
                Secondary-care respiratory clinic in Barcelona.
                We conducted a randomized controlled trial with blinding of outcome assessment and follow-up at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months. Sixty patients with moderate to severe COPD (age 65 +/- 7 years; FEV(1) 35 +/- 14%) were recruited. Thirty patients randomized to rehabilitation received 3 months of outpatient breathing retraining and chest physiotherapy, 3 months of daily supervised exercise, and 6 months of weekly supervised breathing exercises. Thirty patients randomized to the control group received standard care.
                We found significant differences between groups in perception of dyspnea (p < 0.0001), in 6-min walking test distance (p < 0.0001), and in day-to-day dyspnea, fatigue, and emotional function measured by the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (p < 0. 01). The improvements were evident at the third month and continued with somewhat diminished magnitude in the second year of follow-up. The PR group experienced a significant (p < 0.0001) reduction in exacerbations, but not the number of hospitalizations. The number of patients needed to treat to achieve significant benefit in health-related quality of life for a 2-year period was approximately three.
                Outpatient rehabilitation programs can achieve worthwhile benefits that persist for a period of 2 years. We have developed a rehabilitation programme at home and have investigated its effects on quality of life (QOL), lung function, and exercise tolerance in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We studied 43 patients with severe airflow obstruction: forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 1.3 +/- 0.4 l (mean +/- SD), FEV1/inspiratory vital capacity (IVC) 37 +/- 7.9%. After stratification, 28 patients were randomly allocated in a home rehabilitation programme for 12 weeks. Fifteen patients in a control group received no rehabilitation. The rehabilitation group received physiotherapy by the local physiotherapist, and supervision by a nurse and a general practitioner. Quality of life was assessed by the four dimensions of the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ). We found a highly significant improvement in the rehabilitation group compared to the control group for the dimensions dyspnoea, emotion, and mastery. Lung function showed no changes in the rehabilitation group. The exercise tolerance improved significantly in the rehabilitation group compared to the control group. The improvement in quality of life was not correlated with the improvement in exercise tolerance. Rehabilitation of COPD patients at home may improve quality of life; this improvement is not correlated with an improvement in lung function and exercise tolerance. Although pulmonary rehabilitation is effective for patients with COPD, its efficacy in patients with IPF is unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of pulmonary rehabilitation in IPF.
                Thirty patients diagnosed with IPF, according to the consensus statement, were randomly assigned to the rehabilitation group or the control group. The pulmonary rehabilitation mainly consisted of a 10-week programme of exercise training. Pulmonary function, blood gas analysis, 6MWD, dyspnoea rating with the baseline dyspnoea index and health-related quality of life score on the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire were evaluated at baseline and after the programme.
                Assessment of efficacy was carried out on 13 patients who completed the programme and 15 patients in the control group. There were no significant effects of the programme on measures of pulmonary function, values of arterial blood gas analysis or dyspnoea rating. Although there were some differences in the baseline 6MWD and total health-related quality of life score which were not statistically significant, marked improvements were observed in the 6MWD (mean difference 46.3 m (95% CI: 8.3-84.4), P < 0.05) and the total health-related quality of life score (-6.1 (95% CI: -11.7 to -0.5), P < 0.05).
                Pulmonary rehabilitation improves both exercise capacity and health-related quality of life in patients with IPF. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in India. Drug treatment alone does not optimize therapy. Pulmonary rehabilitation has been found to improve the physical efficiency of COPD patients. Therefore, we evaluated the effect of domiciliary pulmonary rehabilitation programme in patients of COPD.
                Forty patients of stable COPD having severe airflow obstruction were included in the study. They were divided into control and experimental groups randomly. Rehabilitation included walking, breathing exercises, postural drainage, controlled coughing and changes in life style activities. Exercises of 30 minutes duration were performed at home twice daily for four weeks supervision. Six-minute walking distance, forced expiratory volume in one seocond (FEV1) and various indices of chronic respiratory disease questionnaire (CRDQ) were measured in both experimental and control groups before and after completion of the study.
                In the experimental group, after four weeks, the mean (+/- SD) difference in six-minute walking distance, dyspnoea, mastery, fatigue and emotion scores were 54.2 (26.7) meters, 0.96 (0.26), 0.89 (0.44), 0.90 (0.40) and 0.91 (0.32) respectively. Changes in all these parameters were statistically significant (p < 0.001) as compared to the control group. There was no significant change in FEV1.
                It was concluded that domiciliary pulmonary rehabilitation for four weeks results in significant improvement in the quality of life and exercise tolerance, even without improvement in FEV1. In this study, the effects of a 12-week hospital-based outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program (HRP) are compared with those of a 12-week home-care rehabilitation program (HCRP) in COPD patients. A control group received no rehabilitation therapy.
                After randomization and stratification, effects on lung function, exercise performance (4-min walking test and cycle ergometer test), dyspnea, and leg effort during exercise, and well-being were assessed in 45 COPD patients with moderate to severe airflow limitation (mean [SD] FEV1 percent predicted, 42.8 [8.4]).
                After HRP and HCRP, at 3 to 6 months after the start of the study, equal improvements were detected in exercise capacity and in Borg dyspnea and leg effort scores at similar work levels during the cycle test. However, whereas after HRP at longer term values tended to return to baseline outcome, after HCRP a further ongoing significant improvement in exercise capacity was observed, while Borg dyspnea scores remained significantly improved over 18 months. Improvements in cycle workload and dyspnea score were significantly better maintained after HCRP as compared with HRP. Lung function, arterial oxygen saturation, and heart frequency during exercise did not change. A significant improvement in well-being was maintained over 18 months in both rehabilitation groups.
                Beneficial effects are achieved both after a HRP and a HCRP in COPD patients with moderate to severe airflow limitation. Yet we recommend to initiate HCRPs as improvements are maintained longer and are even further strengthened in this setting. Several studies of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have shown that pulmonary rehabilitation, consisting of at least three training sessions a week, improves exercise performance and health status. This study investigates feasibility, effect and economic aspects of a rehabilitation programme consisting of two sessions a week for 8 weeks. Twenty-four patients with moderate COPD were randomized to rehabilitation and 21 to placebo. Patients were assigned to an 8-week programme of exercise plus education (Exercise group) or conventional community care (Placebo group). The rehabilitation program was carried out in a hospital outpatient setting and consisted of 16 h exercise and 13.5 h of education. The exercise group received physiotherapy and education twice a week. Seven patients did not complete the programme. The characteristics of the 38 COPD-patients at baseline were the following: (mean +/- SD) forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) 1.1+/-0.4 1 (47% of predicted), 6-min walking distance (6MWD) 413+/-75 m, score of St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) 44+/-21. Health-status, assessed by SGRQ and The Psychological General Well-being (PGWB) Index, did not improve. Rehabilitation resulted in an insignificant improvement in the 6MWD [29 m (95% confidence interval: -8 -66 m)]. We conclude that a rehabilitation program consisting of exercise and education twice a week for 8 weeks had no effect on exercise performance and well being in patients with moderate COPD. Home-based rehabilitation is a promising approach to improve access to pulmonary rehabilitation.
                To assess whether self-monitored, home-based rehabilitation is as effective as outpatient, hospital-based rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
                Randomized, multicenter, noninferiority trial.
                10 academic and community medical centers in Canada.
                252 patients with moderate to severe COPD.
                After a 4-week education program, patients took part in home-based rehabilitation or outpatient, hospital-based rehabilitation for 8 weeks. They were followed for 40 weeks to complete the 1-year study.
                The primary outcome was the change in Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire dyspnea subscale score at 1 year. The primary analysis took a modified intention-to-treat approach by using all patients who provided data at the specified follow-up time, regardless of their level of adherence. The analysis used regression modeling that adjusted for the effects of center, sex, and baseline level. All differences were computed as home intervention minus outpatient intervention.
                Both interventions produced similar improvements in the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire dyspnea subscale at 1 year: improvement in dyspnea of 0.62 (95% CI, 0.43 to 0.80) units in the home intervention (n = 107) and 0.46 (CI, 0.28 to 0.64) units in the outpatient intervention (n = 109). The difference between the 2 treatments at 1 year was small and clinically unimportant. The 95% CI of the difference did not exceed the prespecified noninferiority margin of 0.5: difference in dyspnea score of 0.16 (CI, -0.08 to 0.40). Most adverse events were related to COPD exacerbations. No serious adverse event was considered to be related to the study intervention.
                The contribution of the educational program to the improvement in health status and exercise tolerance cannot be ascertained.
                Home rehabilitation is a useful, equivalent alternative to outpatient rehabilitation in patients with COPD. In COPD, hospital admissions and readmissions account for the majority of health-care costs. The aim of this prospective randomized controlled study was to determine if early pulmonary rehabilitation, commenced as an inpatient and continued after discharge, reduced acute health-care utilization.
                Consecutive COPD patients (n = 397), admitted with an exacerbation, were screened: 228 satisfied the eligibility criteria, of whom 97 consented to randomization to rehabilitation or usual care. Both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses are reported with adherence being defined a priori as participation in at least 75% of rehabilitation sessions.
                The participants were elderly with severe impairment of pulmonary function, poor health-related quality of life and high COPD-related morbidity. The rehabilitation group demonstrated a 23% (95% CI: 11-36%) risk of readmission at 3 months, with attendees having a 16% (95% CI: 0-32%) risk compared with 32% (95% CI: 19-45%) for usual care. These differences were not significant. There were a total of 79 COPD-related readmission days (1.7 per patient, 95% CI: 0.6-2.7, P = 0.19) in the rehabilitation group, compared with 25 (1.3 per patient, 95% CI: 0-3.1, P = 0.17) for the attendees and 209 (4.2 per patient, 95% CI: 1.7-6.7) for usual care. The BMI, airflow obstruction, dyspnoea and exercise capacity index showed a non-significant trend to greater improvement among attendees compared with those receiving usual care (5.5 (2.3) and 5.6 (2.7) at baseline, improving to 3.7 (1.9) and 4.5 (2.5), respectively, at 3 months). No adverse effects were identified.
                Early inpatient-outpatient rehabilitation for COPD patients admitted with an exacerbation was feasible and safe, and was associated with a non-significant trend towards reduced acute health-care utilization. To evaluate the effect of outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation (OPR) on dyspnea, we measured this symptom using a visual analogue scale during graded treadmill exercise testing and with baseline and transitional dyspnea indices (TDI). The latter measure overall dyspnea in three spheres: functional impairment, magnitude of task, and magnitude of effort. Twenty patients with COPD referred for OPR were randomly assigned to either a treatment group (T, n = 10), with dyspnea evaluated at baseline then shortly following a 6-week OPR program, or a control group (C, n = 10), with dyspnea evaluated at baseline then following a 6-week waiting period. No significant change in maximal exercise performance from baseline to repeated testing was observed in either group. Dyspnea at maximum treadmill workload (Dmax), which did not significantly change in C, decreased from 74.4 +/- 18.9 percent at baseline to 50.5 +/- 23.2 percent post-OPR in T (p = 0.006). The Dmax related to minute ventilation (Dmax/VEmax) and oxygen consumption (Dmax/VO2max) also significantly decreased following OPR. The reduction in exertional dyspnea was apparent by the second minute of exercise. Additionally, TDI focal scores were significantly higher in T than C (2.3 +/- 1.06 vs 0.2 +/- 1.75 units, p = 0.006), indicating decreased overall dyspnea following OPR. These results point to significant improvements in both exertional and clinically assessed dyspnea following OPR.
Rehabilitation relieves dyspnea and fatigue, improves emotional function and enhances patients' sense of control over their condition. These improvements are moderately large and clinically significant. Rehabilitation forms an important component of the management of COPD.