Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: hospitalization, sick leave, analgesia and trauma responses. Laparoscopic vs. open cholecystectomy in patients aged 65 and older. Laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. A prospective, randomized study. Randomized trial of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and mini-cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study. Effects of surgical trauma of laparoscopic vs. open cholecystectomy. [A cost analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared with the open technic]. A prospective randomised study of laparoscopic v. open cholecystectomy in aged patients with cholecystolithiasis. [Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-lap-cholecystectomy. Results of a prospective, randomized study].
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has rapidly become established as the treatment of choice for cholecystolithiasis. There is very little evidence, however, to support the claimed benefit to patients. In the present study 30 consecutive patients below the age of 65 years without acute cholecystitis and with no signs of common bile duct stones were randomized to laparoscopic or conventional open cholecystectomy. Median (interquartile range) intravenous consumption of pethidine with a patient-controlled injection device between 13 and 24 h after surgery was 125 (62-175) mg in patients who underwent the laparoscopic procedure and 200 (150-250) mg in those who had open operation. Urinary adrenaline and cortisol levels as well as those of plasma glucose, C-reactive protein and interleukin 6 were increased after surgery in both groups of patients, but without any significant difference between them. The mean(s.d.) duration of postoperative hospital stay (2.8(0.8) versus 1.8(0.6) days) and sick leave (24.0(4.4) versus 11.7(4.1) days) was significantly longer with open than laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The findings demonstrate obvious advantages of laparoscopic surgery as regards postoperative pain and convalescence, although factors reflecting the magnitude of trauma did not differ. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has displaced open cholecystectomy (OC) in the management of cholelithiasis. However, there are few studies on the role of this technique in patients who run a high risk of surgical complications. We performed a prospective study in 264 patients aged >65 years undergoing surgery for symptomatic cholelithiasis. They were divided into two groups according to the surgical technique performed: OC (131 patients) and LC (133 patients). Conversion from LC to OC was necessary in 11 patients (8.3%). Mean surgery time was 70.9 min for the OC group and 75 min for the LC group. The LC group had a lower rate of postoperative complications (13.53%) than the OC group (23.6%). The incidence of mild complications was similar in both groups; however, the rate of moderate complications was significantly higher in the OC group. Hospital stay was significantly longer in the OC group (9.9 days) than in the LC group (3.71 days). These results suggest that LC should be indicated in elderly patients, as they are better than those obtained with with OC and involve a lower morbidity rate and shorter hospital stay. To compare laparoscopic with open cholecystectomy.
                Prospective random control trial.
                Central Hospital of Akershus, Nordbyhagen, Norway.
                74 consecutive patients due to undergo elective cholecystecomy between October 1990 and June 1991.
                Two patients were excluded from randomisation, and two were withdrawn after randomisation. The remaining 70 were randomly allocated to open or laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n = 35 in each group).
                Duration of operation and postoperative stay in hospital, amount of postoperative pain, incidence of complications, and duration of convalescence and sick leave.
                Laparoscopic cholecystectomy took twice as long as open (median [range] 100 [52-180] minutes compared with 50 [15-115], p < 0.01), but patients stayed in hospital half the time (2 [1-9] days compared with 4 [2-22], p < 0.01); required less opiate analgesia (4 [0-20] doses compared with 6 [0-13], p = 0.02; took less sick leave (11 [4-267] days (n = 18) compared with 34 [20-48] (n = 22), p < 0.01); and spent less time in convalescence (8 [3-40] days (n = 17) compared with 49 [10-247] (n = 12), p < 0.01). There were six complications in the laparoscopy group and seven in the open cholecystectomy group.
                Because of the significant differences between laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy we have now adopted the laparoscopic method as our standard, but we think that we can improve our results further by refining our operative techniques and giving our patients more information. Three hundred and ten patients having elective cholecystectomy were randomized to either laparoscopic cholecystectomy or mini-cholecystectomy. There were 155 patients in each group. Conversion to open cholecystectomy was significantly more common with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (13 versus 4 per cent) and complications were significantly more frequent with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (9 versus 3 per cent). If laparoscopic cholecystectomy was successful, hospital stay was significantly shorter than for mini-cholecystectomy (2 versus 3 days respectively), but overall the hospital stay was not significantly different. Postoperative analgesia requirements were reduced and return to normal activities and to work were faster after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. There was no significant cost difference between the two procedures. To analyze outcomes after open small-incision surgery (minilaparotomy) and laparoscopic surgery for gallstone disease in general surgical practice.
                This study was a randomized, single-blind, multicenter trial comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) to minilaparotomy cholecystectomy (MC). Both elective and acute patients were eligible for inclusion. All surgeons normally performing cholecystectomy, both trainees under supervision and consultants, operated on randomized patients. LC was a routine procedure at participating hospitals, whereas MC was introduced after a short training period. All nonrandomized cholecystectomies at participating units during the study period were also recorded to analyze the external validity of trial results. The randomization period was from March 1, 1997, to April 30, 1999.
                Of 1,705 cholecystectomies performed at participating units during the randomization period, 724 entered the trial and 362 patients were randomized to each of the procedures. The groups were well matched for age and sex, but there were fewer acute operations in the LC group than the MC group. In the LC group 264 and in the MC group 150 operations were performed by surgeons who had done more than 25 operations of that type. Median operating times were 100 and 85 minutes for LC and MC, respectively. Median hospital stay was 2 days in each group, but in a nonparametric test it was significantly shorter after LC. Median sick leave and time for return to normal recreational activities were shorter after LC than MC. Intraoperative complications were less frequent in the MC group, but there was no difference in the postoperative complication rate between the groups. There was one serious bile duct injury in each group, but no deaths.
                Operating time was longer and convalescence was smoother for LC compared with MC. Further analyses of LC versus MC are necessary regarding surgical training, surgical outcome, and health economy. The effects of surgical trauma resulting from laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy, were compared by assessing the postoperative acute phase alterations of selected plasma proteins, hormones and lymphocyte subpopulations in fifty-seven patients prior to elective cholecystectomy. Patients were prospectively randomized to undergo either laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n = 30) or open cholecystectomy (n = 27). Duration of operation and general anesthesia was similar in the two patient groups. The laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients had a shorter postoperative stay in hospital (3.1 (0.5) days vs. 7.1 (1.6) days; p < 0.001). In open cholecystectomy patients a significantly greater postoperative acute phase increase in plasma C-reactive protein (p < 0.001), cortisol (p < 0.05), and prolactin blood level (p < 0.001) was recorded. The postoperative acute phase decrease in the blood total-T-lymphocyte count (CD3 cells) and in the activated-lymphocyte count (OKDR cells) was significantly greater after open cholecystectomy (p < 0.05). These results, showing that acute phase responses are less marked after laparoscopic cholecystectomy than after open cholecystectomy, support the concept that the laparoscopic procedure is less traumatic. The aim of this study was to compare the cost of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with that of open cholecystectomy.
                We analyzed the cost of both procedures regarding hospital stay, days of work lost and the cost derived from the morbidity of the complications of each technique in two groups of patients. With these data we were able to calculate direct and indirect costs of both procedures and compare them.
                Morbidity was similar in both groups and had no influence in the cost; cost of the material used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy was higher; hospital stay and days of lost work were significantly lower for the laparoscopic procedure than for the open one. The total cost of laparoscopic cholecystectomy was 23% cheaper than that of open cholecystectomy.
                Laparoscopic cholecystectomy appears to be cheaper than open cholecystectomy. As the laparoscopic technique becomes more widespread its cost might decrease even further. Between August 1992 and July 1993, 27 patients aged 70 years of older with cholelithiasis were prospectively randomised into 2 groups. Fifteen patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 12 patients underwent open cholecystectomy. Shorter operation time (93.3 +/- 25.3 minutes v. 176.3 +/- 26.1 minutes, P < 0.00001), fewer postoperative analgesic requirements (0.53 +/- 0.52 days v. 2.00 +/- 0.74 days, P < 0.00001), shorter postoperative hospital stay (3.93 +/- 1.71 days v. 7.92 +/- 0.79 days, P < 0.00001) and better cosmesis were found in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy group. The above data suggest that laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the treatment of choice for cholecystolithiasis in elderly patients. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LCCE) was gaining acceptance rapidly, when several institutions could demonstrate the safety of this minimal invasive treatment modality. Nevertheless prospective randomised studies still are missing to prove the advantages of this new treatment modality in contrast to open cholecystectomy. 77 patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis were treated by LCCE (n = 40) or mini-lap CCE (n = 37) in a prospective, randomised study. As preliminary results, there were no differences in duration of anesthesia and operation time, perioperative complications or postoperative need for analgetics. Patients with LCCE had significant less postoperative pain, less restriction of total vital capacity and a shorter postoperative hospital stay as parameters of a diminished operative trauma.
No significant differences were observed in mortality, complications and operative time between laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with a significantly shorter hospital stay and a quicker convalescence compared with the classical open cholecystectomy. These results confirm the existing preference for the laparoscopic cholecystectomy over open cholecystectomy.