A randomized controlled study investigating the necessity of routine cervical dilatation during elective cesarean section. Preinduction cervical ripening: prostaglandin E2 gel vs hygroscopic mechanical dilator. Is routine cervical dilatation necessary during elective caesarean section? A randomised controlled trial. Routine cervical dilatation during elective cesarean section and its influence on maternal morbidity: a randomized controlled study. Preoperative cervical dilatation: a trial of laminaria tents and prostaglandin F2 alpha gel. A prospective randomized evaluation of a hygroscopic cervical dilator, Dilapan, in the preinduction ripening of patients undergoing induction of labor. A randomised prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus vacuum extraction using defined criteria. The role and comparison of two techniques of paracervical block for pain relief during suction evacuation for first-trimester pregnancy termination. Preinduction cervical ripening techniques compared.
To investigate if it was necessary to dilate the cervix routinely during elective cesarean section and to determine the effects of this traditional maneuver on maternal morbidity.
                A total of 150 patients meeting eligibility criteria were enrolled in this prospective, randomized controlled study. Patients were allocated randomly into cervical dilatation group or non-dilated group. In the cervical dilatation group, the surgeon performed cervical dilatation by inserting a double-gloved index finger into the cervical canal of the patients after extraction of placenta and membranes. Endometrial cavity thickness of the patients at postoperative 24 h, development of postoperative febrile-infectious morbidity and postoperative hemoglobin levels were evaluated and compared between the groups.
                The two groups were comparable with regard to demographic and clinical properties. Mean postoperative endometrial cavity thickness of the dilated group was significantly less than the non-dilated group (6.87 ± 2.50, 9.51 ± 3.35 respectively, p < 0.0001). The level of hemoglobin reduction was comparable between the groups (p = 0.37). Febrile morbidity was seen in one patient in the dilated group. Endometritis or wound infection was not encountered in either group during the puerperium.
                Cervical dilatation seems to be an unnecessary intervention during the cesarean section. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of hygroscopic mechanical dilators (Dilapan) for ripening the pregnant cervix prior to induction of labour at or near term and to compare it with an intracervical PGE2 gel (Prepidil).
                One hundred and eighty-five women (69 nulliparae, 116 multiparae) at term with singleton pregnancies in cephalic presentation, who were scheduled for induction of labour in the labour ward at the National University Hospital, but had an unfavourable cervical score were randomized into 2 groups by random number table. In group 1 (Prepidil), 0.5 mg of PGE2 in 2.5 ml of triacetin gel was inserted into the endocervical canal. In women in group 2 (Dilapan) upto a maximum of 4 hygroscopic dilators were placed in the endocervical canal. If labour did not ensue at the end of 12 hours of ripening, the cervical score was assessed, amniotomy was performed and oxytocin commenced. Neonatal and obstetric outcome was compared, statistical analysis performed using Chi-square, and t-tests.
                Significantly more women in the group who received Dilapan for cervical ripening required amniotomy and oxytocin for induction of labour > 12 hours after priming compared with the group who received Prepidil (p < 0.001). Operative delivery for no progress and fetal distress respectively was similar in the 2 groups. The number of cases of hyperstimulation were higher in the Prepidil group but did not result in an increased incidence of operative deliveries for fetal distress. There was one neonatal death and one case of neonatal sepsis in the Dilapan group. Uterine rupture occurred in 1 woman who received Prepidil.
                Dilapan, a mechanical method of cervical ripening is as effective as the more widely accepted mode of ripening with an endocervical PGE2 gel in achieving vaginal delivery. Dilapan would be useful for cervical priming prior to induction of labour in places where prostaglandins are not available because of cost and the need for a cold chain. The purpose of this prospective randomised study was to determine the effect of routine cervical dilatation during elective caesarean section on maternal morbidity.
                Participants with indication for elective caesarean section were randomly allocated to two groups. Group A (n = 200) women with intraoperative cervical dilatation; group B (n = 200) women with no intraoperative cervical dilatation.
                No demographic differences were observed between groups. There was no significant difference between groups in infectious morbidity (P = 0.87) (relative risk (RR) 1.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58-2.11), endometritis (P = 0.72) (RR 1.68, 95% CI 0.39-7.14), febrile morbidity (P = 0.66) (RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.51-2.87), wound infection (P = 0.82) (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.44-2.81), endometritis (P = 0.72) (RR 1.68, 95% CI 0.39-7.14) or urinary tract infection (P = 1.00) (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.28-3.50), and estimated blood loss (P = 0.2). However, group A had longer operative times compared with the group B (P = 0.01).
                Intraoperative digital cervical dilatation during elective caesarean section did not reduce blood loss and postoperative infectious morbidity. The routine digital cervical dilatation during elective caesarean section is not recommended. To determine the effect of routine intraoperative cervical dilatation during elective cesarean section on maternal morbidity.
                Patients with even numbers in the operative elective cesarean section list were included in the study. Of these, every second patient underwent intraoperative cervical dilatation. All participants in the two groups had otherwise similar preoperative care, operative procedures and subsequent clinical care. Blood loss was estimated and maternal infection status was assessed postoperatively by any rise of temperature or wound infection.
                Of the 131 patients included in the study, 67 underwent cervical dilation and 64 served as controls. There was no significant difference in postoperative hemoglobin, incidence of fever, or wound infection between the two groups. Only two of the cervical dilation group and one control patient developed postoperative fever. A hemoglobin drop of more than 0.5 g/dL was noted in 27 and 26 patients in the cervical dilation and the no dilation groups, respectively (NS). None of the study patients had signs of wound infection.
                Intraoperative cervical dilatation during elective cesarean section did not reduce the risk of postoperative maternal fever, wound infection or change in hemoglobin concentration. Surgical damage to the cervix in patients undergoing termination of pregnancy may be responsible for serious complications in subsequent pregnancies. Sixty nulliparous women undergoing first trimester termination of pregnancy were randomly allocated to 3 treatment groups, one using laminaria tents preoperatively, one using intracervical PGF2 alpha gel preoperatively and one using no pretreatment. Results showed clear benefits in the laminaria group, in terms of achieving preoperative cervical dilatation and ease of further operative dilatation. Laminaria tents were superior to PGF2 alpha gel which was, in turn, superior to no pretreatment. There were no differences in blood loss or postoperative complications among the 3 groups. Laminaria tents provide a cheap, effective and safe method of reducing the risk of cervical damage in women undergoing surgical termination of pregnancy. Our purpose was to investigate the safety and efficacy of a synthetic intracervical hygroscopic dilator, Dilapan (Gynotech, Inc., Middlesex, N.J.), on ripening the cervix before medically indicated induction of labor.
                Two hundred forty patients with a Bishop score of < or = 4 were prospectively randomized to receive either preinduction synthetic hygroscopic dilators (n = 112) or no pretreatment (n = 128) before oxytocin induction.
                Compared with controls, the dilator group exhibited a significant change in median Bishop score, but there was no significant difference in length of labor (dilator 18.8 +/- 12.8 hours vs control 21.7 +/- 14.8 hours) or in the cesarean section rate (dilator 41/112 [36.6%] vs control 49/128 [38.3%]). Relative proportions of nulliparous and multiparous patients, infant weights, and cervical dilation at the time of cesarean section were not significantly different between groups. No adverse maternal or fetal effects could be attributed to use of the device.
                Preinduction cervical ripening with hygroscopic dilators does not shorten the length of labor or lower the cesarean section rate in patients undergoing induction of labor. The objective of this study was to determine the safety of obstetrics forceps when used under strictly defined criteria compared to vacuum extraction for delivery in the second stage of labour. A randomised prospective trial was performed on 442 women undergoing instrumental delivery in the second stage. Two hundred and four women were in the forceps group and 238 in the vacuum group. When using forceps traction efforts to deliver the baby were kept to less than three and the head was always delivered in the occipito-anterior position. In the two groups there were no significant difference in the incidence of third-degree perineal tears, post-partum haemorrhage or ruptured uterus. Cervical tears were slightly higher in the forceps group. Babies delivered by vacuum extraction showed a higher incidence of cephalhaematomas. There was no significant difference in babies needing resuscitation at birth, admission to neonatal intensive care unit, stillbirth or neonatal death rates. The failure rate was significantly higher in the vacuum group. The time taken to complete the procedure was significantly less in the forceps group. Forceps deliveries when performed under defined criteria are as safe as vacuum deliveries to the mother with a lesser failure rate and a lower incidence of cephalhaematomas in the neonate compared with vacuum deliveries. This prospective study assessed the role and compared two techniques of paracervical block (PCB) for pain relief during suction evacuation for first-trimester termination of pregnancy following cervical priming with misoprostol. One-hundred and thirty-five women undergoing suction evacuation up to 12 weeks of gestation were randomized into three groups: (a) 5 mL of 1% lignocaine injected at the 4 and 8 o'clock positions of the vaginal vault; (b) 5 mL of 1% lignocaine injected at the 4 and 8 o'clock positions of the cervix and (c) no PCB. Pain scores during PCB, cervical dilatation and during and after suction evacuation were compared among the three groups. The sedation and satisfaction levels were also compared. There were no statistically significant differences in the pain levels during PCB, cervical dilatation and suction evacuation and in the satisfaction levels among the three groups. Patients with a lighter sedation level experienced more pain. In conclusion, PCB did not improve the pain levels during first-trimester suction termination of pregnancy after cervical priming with misoprostol and use of intravenous sedation, regardless of whether the local anaesthetic was injected into the cervix or the vaginal vault. To assess the clinical efficacy of pharmacologic, mechanical and combination techniques of cervical ripening.
                From March 1997 to August 1998, all cervical-ripening patients at Lehigh Valley Hospital were randomly assigned to three groups: intravaginal misoprostol, intracervical Foley catheter, or combination prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) gel and Foley catheter. Inclusion criteria included Bishop score < or = 5 and no contraindication to labor. The remaining delivery process was actively managed according to established guidelines. Multiple variables in perinatal outcome were analyzed, with the cesarean section rate and time from ripening to delivery as the main outcome variables.
                Of the 205 patients, 65 were randomized to the misoprostol group, 71 to the Foley group and 69 to the catheter-and-gel group. There were no differences between groups in delivery indications, maternal demographics, ultrasound findings, labor interventions, intrapartum times, mode of delivery, postpartum complications or neonatal outcomes. The misoprostol group demonstrated a higher rate of uterine tachysystole and required oxytocin less when compared to the two catheter groups.
                The higher rate of uterine tachysystole with misoprostol did not increase the cesarean section rate. The higher rate of oxytocin required by the two catheter groups did not increase the delivery time intervals. There appears to be no benefit to adding intracervical or intravaginal PGE2 gel to the intracervical Foley balloon. The misoprostol and catheter ripening techniques have similar safety and efficacy.
There was insufficient evidence of mechanical dilatation of the cervix at non-labour caesarean section for reducing postoperative morbidity. Further randomised controlled trials with adequate methodological quality comparing intraoperative cervical dilatation using a finger, sponge forceps or other instrument during non-labour caesarean section versus no mechanical dilatation for reducing postoperative morbidity are needed.