The use of nebulized albuterol in wheezing infants. Treatment of acute wheezing and dyspnea attacks in children under 2 years old: inhalation of fenoterol plus ipratropium bromide versus fenoterol. Nebulised sodium cromoglycate in the treatment of wheezy bronchitis. A multicentre double-blind placebo controlled study. Is an antihistamine-decongestant combination effective in temporarily relieving symptoms of the common cold in preschool children? Inhaled steroids compared with disodium cromoglycate in preschool children with episodic viral wheeze. Dexamethasone and salbutamol in the treatment of acute wheezing in infants. Treatment of recurrent acute wheezing episodes in infancy with oral salbutamol and prednisolone. Slow release theophylline in preschool asthmatics. Reduction of nocturnal asthma by an inhaled anticholinergic drug.
Using a double-blind, placebo-controlled protocol, we evaluated the efficacy of nebulized albuterol in the treatment of infants aged 0 to 24 months who presented to the emergency department with wheezing. Twenty-five infants were randomly assigned to receive two identical treatments of either nebulized albuterol (0.15 mg/kg) or placebo (saline). Assessment after each treatment included a wheeze and retraction score, respiratory and heart rates, and pulse oximetry. After two treatments, there was a significant improvement in the wheeze scores (P less than 0.05) and total scores (P less than 0.05) of the albuterol group compared with the placebo group. After one treatment, there was an initial decrease in oxygen saturation in the albuterol group, which improved after the second treatment. There were no significant differences between the two groups in heart rate or respiratory rate. This study supports the use of nebulized albuterol in the treatment of wheezing infants in the emergency department. Two treatment regimens for the initial treatment of acute wheezing were evaluated in 61 wheezing infants. Thirty-one patients received fenoterol (F) (0.1 mg/kg) and placebo (P) and 30 patients received fenoterol (F) (0.1 mg/kg) plus a fixed dose of ipratropium bromide (IB) (50 micrograms). Both groups received the drugs by inhalation using an ultrasonic nebulizer and face mask. A clinical score system based on wheezing and rib cage retraction was established and evaluations were performed before and at 15, 30, and 45 minutes after treatment. After the last evaluation based on the clinical score, it was decided whether to repeat or not to repeat the treatment. Our results showed that a combination of a beta agonist and ipratropium bromide (FB) was more effective than a beta agonist alone (F) in reducing wheezing and dyspnea during an acute attack (63.4 versus 25.8%; p less than 0.05). The efficacy of nebulised sodium cromoglycate (SCG) used as a prophylactic treatment of wheezy bronchitis in children aged 1 to 4 years was evaluated in a multicentre double-blind placebo controlled, group comparative study. Fifty-four patients completed the 10-week trial (29 treated with SCG and 25 treated with placebo), preceded by 4-8 weeks baseline. Nebulised SCG did not prove significantly superior to placebo in reducing day wheezing, day coughing, or sleep disturbance due to wheezing or coughing at night. Neither was there significant difference in the use of supportive medicine (beta 2-agonist and theophylline) between the groups. Extra doctor visits, hospital admissions, and parental preference did not show significant difference either. To determine whether an antihistamine-decongestant combination (ADC) is superior to placebo in temporarily relieving symptoms of upper respiratory tract infection (URI) in preschool children.
                Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
                Four pediatric offices in the Seattle, Wash, area.
                Children 6 months through 5 years of age with a URI of less than 7 days' duration.
                Children were randomly assigned to receive an ADC (brompheniramine maleate-phenylpropanolamine hydrochloride) or placebo as needed for URI symptoms. Two hours after each dose of study medication, changes in the child's runny nose, nasal congestion, cough, and sleep status were assessed by means of a standardized questionnaire.
                A total of 175 responses were recorded for 59 patients. There were no statistically significant differences in symptom improvement between the ADC and the placebo group (runny nose, p = 0.48; nasal congestion, p = 0.94; cough, p = 0.66). However, the proportion of children asleep 2 hours after receiving the ADC was significantly higher than the proportion receiving placebo (46.6% vs 26.5%; p = 0.01). Results were unchanged after control for the correlated nature of repeated responses, age, symptom duration, use of acetaminophen, time that the medication was given, and parental desire for medication.
                The ADC was equivalent to placebo in providing temporary relief of URI symptoms in preschool children. However, the ADC did have significantly greater sedative effects than did placebo. In school children with atopic asthma the beneficial effects of disodium cromoglycate (DSCG) and beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) are well-established. In preschool children, wheezing is quite common, and in the majority of cases the symptoms are episodic and reported to be associated with viral infections rather than atopy. We compared the efficacy of regular treatment with DSCG and BDP for prevention of wheezing in preschool children. We were interested to establish whether regular treatment with inhaled anti-inflammatory drugs could lead to a decrease in bronchial responsiveness. In 15 patients (median age, 56 months; range, 43-66 months) bronchial responsiveness was assessed by measuring specific airway resistance (sRaw) during a histamine provocation test. The concentration of histamine eliciting a 100% increase in sRaw (PC100his) was determined. In a double-blind crossover study, patients inhaled either DSCG 10 mg three times a day or BDP 100 microg three times a day for 2 months. After a wash-out period, treatment was changed to BDP or DSCG, respectively. Daily peak flow measurements were carried out, and exacerbations were noted. PC100his was measured at the start and end of each treatment period. No significant decrease in bronchial responsiveness was seen (PC100his DSCG: before 1.3, after 1.66 mg/ml, Pvalue not significant; BDP: before 1.1 after 1.22 mg/ml, Pvalue not significant). Significantly higher morning peak flows were observed on BDP therapy (160 on BDP vs. 150 L/min on DSCG, P < 0.03). BDP treatment resulted in significantly fewer wheezing exacerbations (7 vs. 16, P < 0.005) compared with DSCG therapy. We conclude that in preschool children with episodic virally induced wheezing, BDP therapy was superior to DSCG aerosol treatments for the prevention of exacerbations of wheezing, although no significant effect on bronchial responsiveness was noted during either treatment protocol. Thirty-two infants, aged 1 to 12 months, hospitalized with acute wheezing, were studied. They were randomly divided into four treatment groups of eight patients each. The treatments were intramuscular dexamethasone or placebo (double-blind), and salbutamol (oral and inhaled), or none (open), in all four possible combinations. The study was carried out as a randomized block design with eight blocks of four infants each, matched by age and clinical score. Average daily improvements, as reflected by changes in the clinical score and length of hospital stay, was essentially the same for infants treated with placebo, salbutamol alone, and dexamethasone alone. However, combined salbutamol-dexamethasone treatment resulted in more than twice the rate of improvement of the other treatments. The difference was statistically highly significant (P less than .01). Furthermore, the response of this combined treatment was observed within 24 hours; none of the ten infants in whom there was no significant improvement within 48 hours and neither of the two patients who developed respiratory failure received the combined salbutamol-dexamethasone treatment. A potentiating effect of corticosteroids on the beta-adrenergic responsiveness is a possible explanation for the advantage of this combined treatment in the management of acute wheezing in infancy. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of oral salbutamol and prednisolone in the treatment of acute episodes of wheezing in infants under 15 months of age. Sixty-two acute episodes of wheezing were studied in 59 babies (age range 3-14 months; mean 7 months), who had all suffered at least one previous wheezy episode. Patients were randomised to receive either salbutamol and prednisolone, salbutamol and placebo or double placebo. Parents were requested to keep a diary card record of twice daily scoring of their baby's symptoms over the next 14 days. A significantly greater number of treatment failures occurred in the placebo group compared to babies treated with oral salbutamol (relative risk 2.51; 95% confidence intervals for relative risk 1.09-5.79). There was no difference in the number of treatment failures between babies treated with a combination of salbutamol and placebo and those treated with salbutamol and prednisolone (relative risk 0.71; 95% confidence intervals for relative risk 0.18-2.80).
                This study demonstrates that oral salbutamol is beneficial in the treatment of acute episodes of wheezing in infancy. A combination of oral salbutamol and oral prednisolone appeared to have no additional benefit over treatment with oral salbutamol alone. A double blind crossover trial with active or placebo slow release theophylline (Slo-phyllin) in children with asthma aged up to 4 years is described. Although no difference in symptom scores was shown, other differences in favour of active treatment were noted. We conclude that this preparation is of benefit in the management of the wheezing preschool child. The value of symptom scores as an index of clinical improvement is discussed. Although the mechanisms of nocturnal asthma are still uncertain, increased vagal cholinergic tone may be contributory factor. To examine this hypothesis, we have studied the effect of an anticholinergic drug, oxitropium bromide, on the early morning fall in peak expiratory flow (PEF) in patients with nocturnal asthma. Eighteen patients (aged 18 to 76 years; seven men) with documented nocturnal asthma were studied in a double-blind randomized cross-over study in which they received either oxitropium bromide (200 micrograms or 400 micrograms) or placebo in a single dose at night for two-week periods. With placebo the mean (+/- SE) fall in PEF (expressed as percentage of evening PEF) was 17.3 +/- 2.0 percent, which was significantly reduced to 10.3 +/- 3.3 percent after oxitropium (400 micrograms) (p less than 0.05; ANOVA). Closer analysis revealed that nine of the 18 patients had responded in a dose-dependent manner, with the mean percentage decreases with placebo, 200 micrograms, and 400 micrograms of oxitropium being 19.1 +/- 3.2, 11.5 +/- 4.4, and 5.0 +/- 4.5 percent, respectively (p less than 0.01 between each treatment). The remaining patients were unaffected by therapy. There were no differences between "responders" and "non-responders" in terms of age, atopic status, duration of asthma, severity of asthma, or bronchodilator response to albuterol (salbutamol). There were no differences in nocturnal symptoms between periods of treatment, and no side effects were recorded. We conclude that anticholinergic drugs may protect against nocturnal asthma in some patients, indicating the involvement of vagal cholinergic mechanisms.
There is not enough evidence to support the uncritical use of anti-cholinergic therapy for wheezing infants, although parents using it at home were able to identify benefits.