Doxycycline therapy for leptospirosis. Weekly epirubicin versus doxorubicin as second line therapy in advanced breast cancer. A randomized clinical trial. Use of doxycycline for leptospirosis after high-risk exposure in São Paulo, Brazil. Oral dolasetron mesylate for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. The Oral Dolasetron PONV Prevention Study Group. [Antiemetic effect of the levo isomer of sulpiride (L-sulpiride) in humans]. Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of combination antiemetic prophylaxis for day-case gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. Randomized controlled trial of doxycycline prophylaxis against leptospirosis in an endemic area. Doxorubicin versus methotrexate both combined with cyclophosphamide, 5-fluorouracil and tamoxifen in postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer--a randomised study with more than 10 years follow-up from the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG). Dolasetron for the prevention of postoperative vomiting in children undergoing strabismus surgery.
To study antibiotic efficacy, 29 patients with leptospirosis were treated in a randomized, double-blinded fashion with doxycycline, 100 mg orally twice a day, or placebo. Therapy was given for 7 days in a hospital, and patients were followed for 3 weeks afterwards. Duration of illness before therapy and severity of illness were the same in both groups. Doxycycline reduced the duration of illness by 2 days and favorably affected fever, malaise, headache, and myalgias. Treatment prevented leptospiruria and had no adverse effects. Doxycycline is effective in therapy for patients with leptospirosis. Forty-nine patients with advanced breast cancer who had failed from first-line cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF regimen) chemotherapy, were randomized to treatment with either epirubicin (Epi) or doxorubicin (Dox) at a dose of 20 mg/m2 given intravenously (i.v.) weekly to compare the efficacy and toxicity of these two anthracyclines given in such a schedule. Of 43 evaluable patients 36% (eight of 22) treated with Epi and 38% (eight of 21) treated with Dox achieved a complete plus partial response rate (95% confidence limits 16-56% +/- 20% and 18-58% +/- 20%, respectively). Patients who obtained a major therapeutic response to previous CMF exhibited a significantly higher response rate with both the drugs: seven of eight (87.5%) compared with one of 13 (8%); p less than 0.05 for Epi and six of seven (86%) compared with two of 15 (13%); p less than 0.05 for Dox. The median duration of response was 4.5 months with Epi compared with 7 months with Dox, and the median survival of the two groups of patients were superimposable (12 months with Epi versus 11 months with Dox). The median cumulative dose was 220 mg/m2 (range 160-620) and 240 mg/m2 (range 160-860) for Epi and Dox, respectively. Gastrointestinal and hematological toxicities were moderate for both the drugs, with fewer episodes of nausea and vomiting, stomatitis, and leukopenia following Epi administration. A very low incidence of alopecia was recorded for both the drugs. Regarding cardiac evaluation, no significant differences were evident; however, the only case that developed symptomatic congestive heart failure was in the Dox arm, after a cumulative dose of 820 mg/m2 at 11.5 months. Epi given weekly at low doses preserves efficacy in the treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer, and given at equimolar doses, has a slightly better therapeutic index than the parent compound. A clinical trial pilot study, double-blinded, randomized, and controlled with a placebo to assess the effectiveness of oral doxycycline (200 mg, single dose) in preventing leptospirosis after high exposure to potentially contaminated water was performed in São Paulo, SP, Brazil. Confirmed cases were defined as those with leptospira IgM antibody and symptoms; asymptomatic cases were those presenting with IgM antibodies but no symptoms; and suspected cases were individuals with symptoms but no IgM antibody. Forty subjects were given doxycycline and 42 were given placebo. In the drug-treated group there were 2 confirmed cases, 11 asymptomatic cases, and 6 suspected cases. In the placebo group there were 5 confirmed, 6 symptomatic, and 5 suspected cases. Even though we found a protective association of doxycycline for confirmed leptospirosis cases (RR = 2.3) and seroconversion only (RR = 2.0), the association was not statistically significant because of the small number of individuals enrolled in this pilot study. We observed that the 22% of the volunteers already had IgM antibodies to leptospirosis at the first sampling. Finally, the attack rate to confirmed, asymptomatic, and suspected cases of Leptospirosis was 8.5%, 22%, and 13%, respectively, in this population. To examine the safety and effectiveness of a range of single oral doses of dolasetron mesylate for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting.
                Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
                32 hospitals.
                789 female ASA physical status I, II, and III patients, ages 18 to 60 years, weighing between 45 and 100 kg, scheduled for major gynecologic surgery (including abdominal hysterectomy, gynecologic laparotomy, or vaginal hysterectomy) with general anesthesia.
                25, 50, 100, or 200 mg oral doses of dolasetron mesylate or placebo were administered 1 to 2 hours before induction of anesthesia. Efficacy was assessed for 24 hours postrecovery by measuring complete response (no emetic episodes, no rescue medication), total response (complete response with no nausea), time to first emetic episode or rescue, and patient visual analog scale evaluations of nausea severity and satisfaction with antiemetic therapy.
                Complete response rates for the 50, 100, and 200 mg dose groups were statistically greater than placebo (p < or = 0.018). Likewise, total response rates were statistically greater in the 50, 100, and 200 mg dose groups than in the placebo group (p = 0.012). Percentage of patients with no nausea and patient satisfaction scores were significantly higher for each dolasetron dose group than placebo (p < or = 0.047 and p < or = 0.004, respectively). Efficacy peaked at the 50 mg dose. The incidence of adverse events was similar in the placebo (30.1%) and dolasetron groups (29.4%). Headache was the most frequent treatment-related adverse event, with 2% to 5% incidence across groups. Incidence of adverse events did not increase with increasing dolasetron doses. Dose-related decreases in blood pressure at acute time points were not clinically significant.
                Single oral doses of dolasetron, administered 1 to 2 hours before induction of anesthesia, are safe and effective for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in this patient sample. Maximal antiemetic response was seen with the 50 mg oral dolasetron dose. Vomiting represents one of the most dangerous complications of general anesthesia. L-sulpiride has been able to control this complication very effectively. We studied the effect on vomiting of two doses of L-sulpiride (50/100 mg). Both these doses have been effective in reducing the episodes of vomiting other than in preventing nausea and retching if considered versus controls and also versus droperidol at the doses of 5 mg (50 mg L-sul = 12%, 100 mg = 4%, droperidol = 20%, controls = 28%). L-sulpiride is an antagonist of dopamine on D2 receptors therefore inhibits the action of dopamine increasing the secretion of prolactin. During the surgical distress per se prolactin levels are increased. Together with the increment of catecholamines, high concentration of prolactin can evoke arrhythmias. In view of this possibility we studied the time course of the administration of the two doses of L-sulpiride and of droperidol on prolactin secretion. Both of the drugs increased the plasma levels of prolactin. Droperidol-induced increase in prolactin secretion was significant already at ten minutes after the administration reaching the peak after 20 minutes. L-sulpiride increased prolactin secretion reaching the maximum increase 20 minutes after the administration of 50 mg of the drug, and 30 minutes after the administration of 100 mg doses. The hyperprolactinemizing action of droperidol lasts for at least 8 hours, whereas L-sulpiride action lasts 4 hours. In a randomized, double-blind trial, we compared i.v. ondansetron 4 mg (control), i.v. ondansetron 4 mg and cyclizine 50 mg (combination) and i.v. saline 0.9% (placebo), given after induction of standardized anaesthesia, for the prevention of nausea and vomiting (PONV) after day-case gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. Compared with placebo, fewer patients in the control group vomited (9/20 versus 11/59, P = 0.02) or needed rescue antiemetic (7/20 versus 9/59, P = 0.06) before discharge. Compared with the control, fewer patients in the combination group (n = 60) vomited (11/59 versus 2/60, P = 0.01) or needed rescue antiemetic (29/59 versus 2/60, P = 0.03) before discharge. The incidence of vomiting in the combination group was less than 5% overall. Compared with the control, the combination group had a significantly lower incidence (P = 0.001) and severity (P < 0.001) of nausea after discharge and more patients with no PONV at any time during the study (15/59 versus 27/60, P = 0.03). Unlike the placebo and control groups, no patient receiving combination prophylaxis was admitted overnight for PONV management. Leptospirosis occurs as seasonal outbreaks, lasting for about 3 weeks during October-November in North Andaman. A randomized controlled trial was undertaken to assess the efficacy of doxycycline prophylaxis in the prevention of infection and clinical disease due to leptospires during the outbreak period. A sample population of 782 persons, randomized into two groups was given doxycycline 200 mg/week and a placebo. The microscopic agglutination test was done on blood samples collected on day zero, after 6 weeks and after 12 weeks. Infection rates and attack rates of clinical illness were calculated in the two groups based on the serological results. Statistically there was no difference in the infection rates among the two groups. However, a statistically significant difference was observed in the clinical disease attack rates (3.11 vs. 6.82%) between study group and control group. The results of the study indicate that doxycycline prophylaxis does not prevent leptospiral infection in an endemic area, but has a significant protective effect in reducing the morbidity and mortality during outbreaks. To evaluate the substitution of methotrexate with doxorubicin (Dox) in CMF-(cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil) containing regimen for advanced breast cancer, 415 postmenopausal patients below the age of 66 years, naïve to chemotherapy, were accrued from 1980 to 1984 and followed-up until 1995. They received tamoxifen 30 mg daily orally and by randomisation either 400 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide, 25 mg/m2 doxorubicin and 500 mg/m2 5-fluorouracil (CAF) or 40 mg/m2 methotrexate instead of Dox (CMF) intravenously (i.v.) days 1 + 8 repeated every 4 weeks. Dox was substituted by methotrexate at a cumulative dose of 550 mg/m2. Among 341 eligible patients the response rate and median time to progression was significantly in favour of CAF: 53% CAF versus 36% CMF (P = 0.002) and 11.8 months CAF versus 6.5 months CMF (P = 0.001). Median duration of response was 19.5 CAF versus 18.0 CMF months, and survival 20.8 CAF versus 17.4 CMF months (non-significant). The two regimens were equimyelotoxic. There were no treatment-related fatalities but 1 patient with congestive heart failure on CAF was reported. Nausea/vomiting, stomatitis and infections were modest in both groups, whilst alopecia was more common with CAF. Regression analysis showed that long recurrence free interval, good performance status, and no visceral involvement was significantly related to long-term survival, whilst the treatment regimen was not. It is concluded that in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced breast cancer Dox-containing regimens are superior and remain the first choice of chemotherapy, especially in patients with visceral metastases, until newer drugs and combinations have been proven to be superior. Children undergoing strabismus surgery have a high incidence of postoperative vomiting (POV). The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of dolasetron for the prevention of emesis comparing a single 0.35 mg.kg-1 or 12.5 mg dose with placebo.
                Children aged 2-12 years with an ASA status of 1 or 2 undergoing strabismus surgery were randomized in a double-blind manner to one of three treatment groups. Patients were excluded with a history of previous postoperative vomiting or motion sickness, allergy to serotonin receptor antagonists or previous antiemetic administration within 24 h prior to enrollment. General anaesthesia was induced with sevoflurane and N2O/O2 and maintained with isoflurane and N2O/O2. The study medication was administered 15 min prior to the end of surgery. Patients experiencing two or more episodes of vomiting were rescued in the postanaesthesia care unit (PACU) with metoclopramide 0.15 mg.kg-1. A total of 118 patients were enrolled with documentation of the number and severity of vomiting episodes, time to awakening, PACU length of stay and postoperative agitation.
                Patients with an acute complete response (ACR), defined as no emetic episodes and no rescue medication within 24 h of study drug administration were 62% (weight dose), 64% (fixed dose) and 33% (placebo, P < 0.05).
                There was no statistical difference between the 0.35 mg.kg-1 dose and the fixed 12.5 mg dose of dolasetron with both reducing the incidence of POV.
Regular use of weekly oral doxycycline 200 mg increases the odds for nausea and vomiting with unclear benefit in reducing Leptospira seroconversion or clinical consequences of infection.