Mandatory second opinion to reduce rates of unnecessary caesarean sections in Latin America: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Effect of peer review and trial of labor on lowering cesarean section rates. The impact of legislatively imposed practice guidelines on cesarean section rates: the Florida experience. Opinion leaders vs audit and feedback to implement practice guidelines. Delivery after previous cesarean section. A randomised controlled trial and meta-analysis of active management of labour. Financial incentives do not always work: an example of cesarean sections in Taiwan. Management of prelabour rupture of the membranes in term primigravidae: report of a randomized prospective trial. [The benefit of external version in full-term breech presentation]. Active management of labour in a district hospital setting.
Latin America has a high rate of caesarean sections. We tested the hypothesis that a hospital policy of mandatory second opinion, based on the best existing scientific evidence, reduces the hospital caesarean section rate by 25%, without increasing maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality.
                36 hospitals in Argentina (18), Brazil (eight), Cuba (four), Guatemala (two), and Mexico (four), were randomly assigned to intervention or control in a matched pair design. All physicians in the intervention hospitals deciding a non-emergency caesarean section had to follow a policy of mandatory second opinion. The primary outcome was the overall caesarean section rate in the hospitals after a 6-month implementation period. We also assessed women's satisfaction with labour and delivery care and physicians'acceptance of the second opinion policy.
                A total of 34 hospitals attending 149?276 deliveries were randomised and completed the protocol. The mandatory second opinion policy was associated with a small but significant reduction in rates of caesarean section (relative rate reduction 7.3%; 95% CI 0.2-14.5), mostly in intrapartum sections (12.6%; 0.6-24.7). Other maternal and neonatal outcomes and women's perceptions and satisfaction with the process of care were similarly distributed between the groups.
                In hospitals applying this policy of second opinion, 22 intrapartum caesarean sections could be prevented per 1000 deliveries, without affecting maternal or perinatal morbidity, and without affecting mothers' satisfaction with the care process. In an attempt to lower cesarean section rates, a cesarean surveillance system and a selective trial of labor were introduced in a tertiary hospital in Taiwan.
                From 1997 to 2000, 2 physicians were appointed as consultants for the pre-cesarean surveillance, and a trial of labor after a cesarean section was employed concurrently. We organized a weekly departmental Cesarean Indication Conference on Mondays. Comparisons of the cesarean rates between 1993-96 and 1997-2000 were made using the chi-square test. Comparisons of the proportion of overall cesarean sections contributed by each indication for both 1993 and 2000 were also made by chi-square test.
                A comparison of the 4-year periods before and after 1997 showed that the total cesarean rate had decreased from 37.0 to 30.7% (p < 0.001), primary cesarean rate from 21.3 to 17.8% (p < 0.001), and repeat cesarean rate from 15.7 to 12.9% (p < 0.001). No uterine rupture occurred. Among the 54 indications for primary cesareans, compared between 1993 and 2000, the proportion rates for dystocia, fetal distress, preeclampsia, induction failure, gestational diabetes, and elderly primigravidahad decreased substantially.
                The efficient way to lower the repeat cesarean rate is trial of labor, and the way to reduce the number of primary cesareans is in practicing of the guidelines for various indications. The cesarean surveillance system can solidify these guidelines, leading to a lower cesarean rate and an avoidance of inappropriate indications. Florida legislation implemented in the fall of 1992, unique in the nation, mandated that practice guidelines regarding cesarean section deliveries be disseminated to obstetric physicians. The law also required that peer review boards at hospitals be established to review cesarean deliveries and that the exact dates of implementation of the guidelines be reported to a state agency. To determine the impact of the legislation, we conducted a retrospective analysis of 366,246 total live births occurring in Florida hospitals during 1992 and 1993, before and after formal hospital certification of the implementation of the guidelines. Changes in primary and repeat cesarean rates were analyzed for 108 independent groups of births, controlling for the mother's age, race, payment source, and the timing of the implementation of the guidelines at hospitals. The guideline certification program did not accelerate the consistent but gradual downward trend in cesarean births which had already been evident in the three prior years. The data do suggest that the guideline program may have affected repeat cesareans more than primary cesareans, especially in the first quarter of 1993, immediately after the hospital certification period. Reductions in repeat cesareans involved both Medicaid and commercially insured births, whereas reductions in primary cesareans were found almost exclusively within commercially insured mothers, where the existing rates are highest. Although births with a prior cesarean represent only 12.5% of all births, significant decreases in repeat cesareans were found in groups representing 72.6% of this population. By comparison, significant decreases in primary cesareans were found in groups representing only 36.5% of the births without a prior cesarean. The date of guideline implementation reported by hospitals was not related to any systematic change in observed cesarean section rates. We concluded that the mere dissemination of practice guidelines by a state agency may not achieve either the magnitude or the specificity of the results desired without an explicit and thorough guideline implementation program. Blunt legislative mandates may be ineffective when multiple initiatives are already achieving desired outcomes. A randomized controlled trial with 76 physicians in 16 community hospitals evaluated audit and feedback and local opinion leader education as methods of encouraging compliance with a guideline for the management of women with a previous cesarean section. The guideline recommended clinical actions to increase trial of labor and vaginal birth rates. Charts for all 3552 cases in the study groups were audited. After 24 months the trial of labor and vaginal birth rates in the audit and feedback group were no different from those in the control group, but rates were 46% and 85% higher, respectively, among physicians educated by an opinion leader. Duration of hospital stay was lower in the opinion leader education group than in the other two groups. The overall cesarean section rate was reduced only in the opinion leader education group. There were no adverse clinical outcomes attributable to the interventions. The use of opinion leaders improved the quality of care. To test whether a policy of active management of nulliparous labour would reduce the rate of caesarean section and prolonged labour without influencing maternal satisfaction.
                Randomised controlled trial.
                Tertiary referral obstetric unit, Auckland, New Zealand.
                Nulliparous women in spontaneous labour at term with singleton pregnancy and cephalic presentation and without fetal distress.
                After the onset of active labour, previously consented women were randomly assigned to active management (n = 320) or to routine care (n = 331). Active labour was defined as regular painful contractions, occurring at least once in five minutes, lasting at least 40 seconds, accompanied by either spontaneous rupture of the membranes, or full cervical effacement and dilatation of at least two centimetres. Active management included early amniotomy, two-hourly vaginal assessments, and early use of high dose oxytocin for slow progress in labour. Routine care was not prespecified. Prolonged labour was > 12 hours duration. Maternal satisfaction with labour care was assessed by postal questionnaire at six weeks postpartum.
                Mode of delivery, duration of labour, and maternal satisfaction.
                Active management of labour did not reduce the rate of caesarean section 30/320 (9.4%), compared with 32/331 (9.7%) for routine care, but did shorten the length of first stage of labour (median 240 min vs 290 min; P = 0.02), and reduce the relative risk of prolonged labour (RR 0.39; 95% CI 0.22, 0.71). There were no differences between groups in the rates of newborn nursery admission, neonatal acidosis, low Apgar scores, or postpartum haemorrhage. Satisfaction with labour care was high (77%) and did not differ between groups.
                Active management of labour reduced the duration of the first stage of labour without affecting the rate of caesarean section, maternal satisfaction, or other maternal or newborn morbidity. To test the hypothesis that cesarean sections are less likely to be performed after equalizing the fees for vaginal births and cesarean sections.
                Population-based National Health Insurance inpatient claims in Taiwan are used. Pre-periods and post-periods are identified to investigate the impact of the policy changes. Logistic regressions are employed.
                The cesarean section rates for the first, second and higher-order births are 29, 37.4 and 39.3%, while the primary cesarean section rates are 29, 11.8 and 12.1%, respectively. After taking into consideration the case-mix and birth order, the second and higher-order births were approximately 60% less likely to be cesarean deliveries compared to the first births and the increase in the VBAC fee had an additional negative effect on them. A fee equalization policy was not found to influence the cesarean delivery. The total cesarean section rate was primarily determined by the cesarean section rate for the first birth.
                Cesarean section rates are greater for the higher-order births because of the practice "once a cesarean section, always a cesarean section". Against the background of a rapidly declining fertility rate, females play a more important role in the mode of delivery than ever before. As such, financial incentives designed specifically for obstetricians do not have the desired impact. Policies that are aimed at altering behavior should be designed within the social context. To compare a conservative and an active policy (immediate oxytocin infusion) of management of prelabour rupture of the membranes in term primigravidae.
                Randomized trial involving 444 women.
                District maternity hospital.
                Caesarean section rate in each group; also the rate of forceps deliveries, spontaneous deliveries, length of labour, number of vaginal examinations, type of analgesia, pyrexia in labour or the puerperium and antibiotic use in the mother and the infant in each group. The caesarean section rate for the whole trial where the latent period was greater than 12 h was compared to that where the latent period was less than or equal to 12 h.
                There were fewer caesarean sections in the conservative group (odds ratio (OR) 0.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.35 to 1.02; P = 0.06). There was a similar number of forceps deliveries (OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.52 to 1.19; P = 0.26) but more spontaneous deliveries (OR 1.57; 95% CI 1.08 to 2.29; P = 0.02) in the conservative group. More women managed conservatively required inhalational analgesia only for pain relief in labour (OR 2.88; 95% CI 1.46 to 5.68; P = 0.003), a similar number required pethidine (OR 1.29; 95% CI 0.85 to 1.94; P = 0.23), and fewer required epidural analgesia (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.39 to 0.84; P = 0.005). The number of vaginal examinations was less in the conservative group (difference between mean 0.53; 95% CI 0.25 to 0.80; P less than 0.001). Fewer women managed conservatively experienced four or more vaginal examinations in labour (OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.39 to 0.86; P = 0.007). There were no differences in the lengths of labour, the proportions of women who developed pyrexia in labour or the puerperium or who required antibiotics or in the proportions of infants who required antibiotics.
                These results argue in favour of a conservative policy in managing primigravidae at term with prelabour rupture of the membranes. We report a randomised controlled trial of external version in 52 women with breech presentation after 36 weeks' gestation; 83% gave informed consent to undergo the management to which they had been randomized. Only 5% of initial attempts without tocolysis succeeded, but 31% of the failures subsequently had a successful version under tocolysis. External version resulted in a small decrease in the frequency of breech presentation at birth (64% vs. 74%), and in an unexpected increase in the caesarean section rate (28% vs. 11%). The increase in caesarean section rate could be attributed to failed versions, which apparently greatly influenced the choice between abdominal and vaginal delivery. Our findings and data from similar research suggest that benefits of external version at term may not apply to populations with a low caesarean rate, unless versions are carried out with maximal efficiency (which, on the basis of available data, would imply tocolysis) or so indifferently that failed attempts do not influence the choice between abdominal and vaginal delivery. The aim of this randomised trial was to determine the effect of the policy of active management of labour in all its components on the rate of caesarean section in a Nigerian district hospital setting. Two hundred and twenty-one nulliparous women fulfilling selected inclusion criteria were randomised to receive active management of labour, and 227 control women received routine labour management. Labour was significantly shortened by over 2 hours with active management of labour, and caesarean section reduced (9% vs. 16%, RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.34-0.95). There were no significant differences in maternal infectious morbidity, uterine hyperstimulation syndromes, ruptured uterus or neonatal Apgar scores between the two groups. We conclude that active management of labour shortens primigravid labour and reduces caesarean risk.
Implementation of guidelines with mandatory second opinion can lead to a small reduction in caesarean section rates, predominately in intrapartum sections. Peer review, including pre-caesarean consultation, mandatory secondary opinion and postcaesarean surveillance can lead to a reduction in repeat caesarean section rates. Guidelines disseminated with endorsement and support from local opinion leaders may increase the proportion of women with previous caesarean sections being offered a trial of labour in certain settings. Nurse-led relaxation classes and birth preparation classes may reduce caesarean section rates in low-risk pregnancies.