Hepatitis B vaccines in patients with chronic renal failure before dialysis. Hepatitis B vaccine in health care personnel: safety, immunogenicity, and indicators of efficacy. Hepatitis B vaccine in medical staff of hemodialysis units: efficacy and subtype cross-protection. Simultaneous vaccination against hepatitis A and B: results of a controlled study. Hepatitis B vaccine in patients receiving hemodialysis. Immunogenicity and efficacy. Influence of smoking on immunological responses to hepatitis B vaccine. Long-term efficacy of active postexposure immunization of infants for prevention of hepatitis B virus infection. United States-People's Republic of China Study Group on Hepatitis B. Immunogenicity of hepatitis B Vaccines. Implications for persons at occupational risk of hepatitis B virus infection. A randomized double-blind clinical trial of a mammalian cell-derived recombinant DNA hepatitis B vaccine compared with a plasma-derived vaccine.
Hepatitis B remains a significant risk to patients receiving chronic hemodialysis, but no certain method of prevention has been identified. We tested two vaccines, plasma-derived vaccine (40-micrograms dose) and recombinant-derived vaccine (40-micrograms and 20-micrograms doses), in 61 patients with chronic renal failure who were not yet dependent on dialysis. Patients were followed up clinically and with laboratory tests of kidney function and hepatitis B virus serology for one year. Significantly more recipients of plasma-derived vaccine responded to vaccination; they also achieved a higher titer of antibody to hepatitis B virus than did recipients of recombinant-derived vaccine when evaluated at 6, 7, 9, and 12 mo after vaccination. No serious side effects were observed with any vaccine preparation, nor were excessive adverse effects observed in any group. Compared with the dialysis patients previously studied, patients with renal failure who were not yet dependent on dialysis responded more favorably to the hepatitis B virus vaccine. In a double-blind trial, we randomly assigned 1330 high-risk health care personnel to receive three 20-micrograms doses of hepatitis B vaccine or placebo. Among vaccine recipients 58% responded within 1 month and 97% within 9 months; there was no difference in immune response to the vaccine between men and women. Efficacy was evaluated after a mean follow-up of only 13.2 months, just before the vaccine was released commercially. Five hepatitis B infections were identified in placebo recipients and one in a vaccine recipient. Although the number of infections was too small to allow confident conclusions about protective efficacy of the vaccine, we saw a 67% reduction in the need for hepatitis B immune globulin after accidental hepatitis B inoculation in the vaccine group (relative risk, 5.08; 95% confidence intervals, 1.3 to 19.9). Minor side effects occurred with equal frequency after vaccine (28.7%) and placebo (27.2%) injections; no participant had a severe adverse reaction. Vaccination with the 20-micrograms hepatitis B vaccine was highly immunogenic and safe in health care workers. We evaluated the efficacy of hepatitis B vaccine (Heptavax-B) containing only the ad subtype in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial among 865 staff members of 43 hemodialysis units in the United States. Surface antibody developed in 92.6 per cent of the subjects after two doses of vaccine and in 96 per cent after the six-month booster. The incidence of infections with hepatitis B virus (with or without hepatitis) was 9.9 per cent in placebo recipients and 2.2 per cent in vaccine recipients (P less than 0.01). The two cases of hepatitis B among vaccine recipients did not occur in subjects in whom antibody had developed. In 81 per cent of the hepatitis events, the virus was of the ay subtype. The indicence of ay virus was 8.2 per cent among placebo recipients and 1.2 per cent among vaccine recipients (P less than 0.005). We conclude that these data confirm the efficacy of the vaccine and demonstrate subtype cross-protection. Hepatitis A and hepatitis B are endemic in many countries and must be considered as serious health risks for large parts of the world population. Simultaneous or combined vaccination against these two diseases would therefore be most advantageous. In order to investigate possible interactions between these vaccines with respect to their tolerability and immunogenicity, we conducted a randomized prospective study comparing single and simultaneous administration of the two vaccines. Three groups of healthy volunteers, each with 55 persons, were included in the study. All were negative for hepatitis A and hepatitis B markers and had normal serum liver enzyme values. Group I received hepatitis A vaccine (720 ELISA units) into the left deltoid muscle, group II received hepatitis B vaccine (20 micrograms) into the right deltoid muscle and group III received hepatitis A vaccine into the left, and hepatitis B vaccine into the right deltoid muscle. Three doses of the vaccines were administered at 0, 1 and 6 months. Local and systemic reactions were monitored by means of questionnaires. Blood samples for determination of antibody to hepatitis A virus (anti-HAV) and antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) and of serum SGOT and SGPT levels were drawn at months 0, 1, 2, 6 and 7. There were no serious general and only mild local reactions. The mean serum SGOT and SGPT values remained in the normal range in all groups. The seroconversion rates and mean geometric titres of the anti-HAV and anti-HBs antibodies were similar when the vaccines were administered separately or simultaneously. There were no significant differences between the compared groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) We evaluated the immunogenicity and efficacy of hepatitis B vaccine (Heptavax-B) in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving 1311 patients receiving hemodialysis in the United States. After three doses of vaccine (40 micrograms each) had been administered, 63 per cent of the patients were antibody-positive. After correction for possible passive transfer of antibodies by blood transfusion, only 50 per cent of vaccine recipients were considered vaccine responders. The incidence of hepatitis B viral infection during the 25 months of the trial was much lower than had been anticipated and was virtually the same in the vaccine and placebo recipients (6.4 and 5.4 per cent, respectively). Four cases of hepatitis B occurred in patients who had an apparent antibody response to the vaccine, but in each case either antibody had reached low or undetectable levels before hepatitis B surface antigen was detected or the patient had been receiving immunosuppressive therapy. This study did not demonstrate the efficacy of the vaccine in a population of patients receiving dialysis in whom both the rate of antibody response to hepatitis B vaccine and the viral attack rate were low. Other measures to control transmission of hepatitis B virus in dialysis units, including surveillance for hepatitis B surface antigen and isolation of patients who are positive for the antigen, must be continued. When 115 health-care workers participated in a study that monitored their serological responses to hepatitis B vaccine at regular intervals, it was found that smoking significantly affected their antibody titre responses adversely. The study group was randomly allocated into two comparable groups that received hepatitis B vaccine either in a rapid schedule (vaccination at 0, 1, 2 and 12 months) or a standard schedule-most commonly used worldwide-(vaccination at 0, 1, and 6 months). A significantly higher proportion of smokers, in both schedules, failed to seroconvert and to achieve higher antibody levels at month 3 (p = 0.01) and at month 13 (p = 0.0003). At month 7 a similar pattern was noted in smokers following the standard vaccination schedule (p < or = 0.05), but not in those following the rapid schedule. Perinatal transmission of hepatitis B virus (HBV) contributes to the high prevalence of chronic infection in China and many other countries. In a placebo-controlled trial among 166 infants, the 12-month efficacy of active postexposure prophylaxis to prevent chronic perinatal HBV infection varied by vaccine (range, 45%-89%). In a 5-year follow-up study, 2 additional infants became chronically infected with HBV, and the efficacy of active prophylaxis was estimated to be 38% and 72% for the two vaccines at 5 years. In addition, 80% of immunized infants continued to have protective levels of antibody at the end of 5 years. However, among 27 infants who received passive-active immunoprophylaxis with high-dose hepatitis B immune globulin, only 60% (11/19) had protective antibody levels. These data indicate that active postexposure immunization initiated soon after birth continues to provide protection during early childhood when there is a high risk of chronic HBV infection. To assess risk factors for decreased immunogenicity among adults vaccinated with hepatitis B vaccine and to determine the importance of differences in immunogenicity between vaccines among health care workers (HCWs).
                Randomized clinical trial and decision analysis.
                HCSw.
                Development of seroprotective levels of antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) and the number of expected chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections associated with lack of protection.
                Overall, 88% of HCWs developed seroprotection. Risk factors associated with failure to develop seroprotection included increasing age, obesity, smoking and male gender (P < .05). Presence of a chronic disease was associated with lack of seroprotection only among persons > or = 40 years of age (P < .05). The two vaccines studied differed in their overall seroprotection rates (90% vs. 86%; P < .05), however, this difference was restricted to persons > or = 40 years of age (87% vs. 81%; P < .01). Among HCWs > or = 40 years of age, the decision analysis found 44 (0.34/100,000 person-years) excess chronic HBV infections over the working life of the cohort associated with use of the less immunogenic vaccine compared to the other.
                He patitis B vaccines are highly immunogenic, but have decreased immunogenicity associated with increasing age, obesity, smoking, and male gender; and among older adults, the presence of a chronic disease. One of the two available vaccines is more immunogenic among older adults; however, this finding has little clinical or public health importance. Hepatitis B vaccines should be administered to persons at occupational risk for HBV infection early in their career, preferably while they are still in their training. Eight hundred volunteers from heath care and emergency fields participated in a randomized double-blind clinical trial of a new experimental mammalian cell-derived recombinant DNA hepatitis B vaccine (Betagen) compared with a licensed plasma-derived vaccine (Heptavax-B). Vaccine injections (20 micrograms) were administered intramuscularly at 0, 1, and 6 months, and sera were tested at 0, 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, and 12 months for hepatitis B surface antigen, antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen, and antibody to hepatitis B core antigen. Data from 745 vaccinees (93.1%), analyzed at the 7th month of follow-up, showed no significant difference in the seroconversion rates for Betagen (94.4%) vs Heptavax-B (97.3%), but the geometric mean titer of antibody was significantly higher for Heptavax-B (11 833 mIU/L) than for Betagen (4628 mIU/mL). The antibody response of Betagen was significantly and independently related to age and sex, while that of Heptavax-B was related to age only. Reported side effects from both vaccines were minor and mild, with approximately one fourth of all vaccinees reporting at least one side effect. Vaccinees, who had a protective level of antibody at the 7th month, were tested for antibodies at the 12th month. Of those in the Betagen-vaccinated group and those in the Heptavax-B-vaccinated group, 99.0% and 100%, respectively, were still protected. There was a proportionately larger decline in the geometric mean titers of antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen for Heptavax-B than for Betagen.
In people not previously exposed to hepatitis B, vaccination has unclear effect on the risk of developing infection, as compared to no vaccination. The risk of lacking protective antibody levels as well as serious and non-serious adverse events appear comparable among recipients and non-recipients of hepatitis B vaccine.