Management of miscarriage: a randomized controlled trial of expectant management versus surgical evacuation. Randomized outpatient clinical trial of medical evacuation and surgical curettage in incomplete miscarriage. Medical vs. surgical evacuation of first-trimester spontaneous abortion. Randomised trial comparing expectant with medical management for first trimester miscarriages. Misoprostol versus curettage in women with early pregnancy failure after initial expectant management: a randomized trial. A randomised trial of surgical, medical and expectant management of first trimester spontaneous miscarriage. A randomized study comparing efficacy and patient satisfaction in medical or surgical treatment of miscarriage. A comparison of medical management with misoprostol and surgical management for early pregnancy failure. A randomized controlled trial comparing medical and expectant management of first trimester miscarriage.
In many countries, surgical uterine evacuation is the standard treatment for women with a miscarriage, but expectant management has been advocated as an alternative. The choice between the two options cannot be based on published evidence alone, because randomized clinical trials are scarce while generalizability of findings to patients with a strong preference for either management options is unclear.
                In a randomized controlled trial, the complications and efficacy of either expectant or surgical management for miscarriages were compared, and the results in patients who refused randomization and were managed according to their own preference were studied. In total, 122 patients were randomized and 305 were managed according to their choice.
                No differences were found in the number of emergency curettages and complications between expectant and surgical management. Efficacy at 6 weeks was 30/64 (47%) in women allocated to expectant management, and 55/58 (95%) in women allocated to surgical evacuation. After 7 days, 37% of expectantly managed women had a spontaneous complete miscarriage. After 6 weeks, intention-to-treat analysis including cross-overs showed similar effectiveness (92% versus 100%). Results in the preference groups were comparable with those in the randomized groups.
                In our experience a waiting period of 7 days after diagnosis may prevent 37% of surgical procedures. To compare the efficacy and safety of misoprostol in outpatient medical evacuation with surgical curettage in uncomplicated incomplete spontaneous miscarriage.
                Eighty women with a history of vaginal bleeding, and passage of some products of the conceptus were randomized into two groups. Forty patients in Group 1 received 200 microg misoprostol q.i.d. after the application of 200 microg intravaginal misoprostol for 5 days; 40 patients in Group 2 had a surgical curettage performed. All of the patients were re-evaluated after 10 days. The success rates, mean number of days of bleeding, mean decreases in hemoglobin levels, the complications and the rates of patient dissatisfaction in the two groups were compared.
                The success rate in the misoprostol-administered group was 95% [corrected]. Although the mean number of days of bleeding was significantly higher in the misoprostol-administered group, the mean decreases in hemoglobin values in the two groups were not significantly different. The patient dissatisfaction rate was 2.5% in the misoprostol group, compared to 35% in the control group. The difference between the two groups was significant.
                The use of misoprostol in the outpatient treatment of uncomplicated incomplete spontaneous miscarriage is safe and effective and can be an alternative to surgical evacuation and expectant management. To determine whether management of incomplete first-trimester abortion with vaginal misoprostol in an under-resourced setting is a viable treatment option.
                A total of 94 women were randomized to 600 microg of misoprostol intravaginally or to surgical curettage. The women receiving misoprostol were administered a second dose if the abortion was incomplete; and if still not complete after a week, evacuation of retained products of conception was performed. All women had a follow-up visit 2 weeks following complete abortion.
                The overall success rate of medical management was 91.5%, with 15 of 47 successful cases after 1 dose of misoprostol; 8.5% of the 47 women required evacuation of retained products of conception after 1 week because of treatment failure. The success rate in the surgical arm was 100%. Patients in the medical arm had a longer duration of bleeding and a greater need for analgesia. There were no differences in hemoglobin levels, white blood cell count, adverse effects, pain score, and satisfaction with treatment at the follow-up visit. However, more women who received the medical treatment would recommend it or choose it in the future.
                Medical management using 600 microg of misoprostol in 2 doses is effective to treat incomplete first-trimester abortions in an under-resourced setting when there is no evidence of uterine sepsis. To compare the efficacy of antiprogesterone (mifepristone) in combination with a synthetic prostaglandin E1 analogue (misoprostol) for outpatient treatment of miscarriages.
                One hundred and twenty-two women with first trimester miscarriages.
                The women were randomised to treatment with mifepristone 400 mg orally followed by a single oral dose of 400 microg misoprostol 48 hours later (n = 60) or expectant management (n = 62). Women were re-evaluated five days later. If retained intrauterine products of conception were found with an antero-posterior diameter above 15 mm on transvaginal ultrasound, surgical evacuation was performed.
                Eighty-two percent of the women randomised to pharmacological treatment and 76% of those randomised to expectant management had an empty uterine cavity after five days. Convalescence time was 1.8 days longer for women randomised to pharmacological treatment. Pain, bleeding, complications, and satisfaction with the treatment did not differ between the groups.
                Most cases of spontaneous incomplete miscarriage will become a complete miscarriage without intervention. This study shows that outpatient treatment with a combination of antiprogesterone and a prostaglandin E1 analogue did not increase the rate of complete miscarriage, compared with expectancy alone, by a clinical important degree. Little is known about the effectiveness of misoprostol treatment in women with early pregnancy failure who have been managed expectantly. We therefore performed a randomized trial on this subject.
                Women with early pregnancy failure, who had been managed expectantly for at least 1 week, were assigned randomly (using a computer-generated list) to receive either vaginal misoprostol 800 microg or curettage. If, after 24 h, there had not been complete evacuation, a further 800 microg of misoprostol was administered. In the absence of complete evacuation after > days, curettage was performed. The primary end-point was the complete evacuation of the products of conception, with secondary end-points being the occurrence of side effects, pain intensity, need for analgesics, and intensity and duration of bleeding.
                In the misoprostol group, 47% (37/79) required curettage due to incomplete evacuation. After 1 week, evacuation was complete in 85% (67 out of 79) of the misoprostol group and 93% (70 out of 75) of the curettage group. Severity of pain, bleeding and emergency evacuation was higher in the misoprostol group. The complication rate was 0% for misoprostol and 4% for curettage.
                Curettage is superior to misoprostol in the evacuation of early pregnancy failure after failed expectant management. However, misoprostol could be clinically useful since it reduces the need for curettage by half and has a lower complication rate, at the expense of increased pain, vaginal bleeding and emergency evacuation.
                Copyright 2004 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology Medical management and expectant care have been considered possible alternatives to surgical evacuation of the uterus for first trimester spontaneous miscarriage in recent years.
                To compare the effectiveness and safety of medical and expectant management with surgical management for first trimester incomplete or inevitable miscarriage.
                Forty women were recruited following diagnosis of incomplete or inevitable miscarriage, and randomised to surgical, medical or expectant care via an off-site, computerised enrollment system. The primary outcome was the effectiveness of medical (vaginal misoprostol) and expectant management relative to surgical evacuation, assessed at 10-14 days and 8 weeks post-recruitment. Infection, pain, bleeding, anxiety, depression, physical and emotional recovery were assessed also. Analysis was by intention-to-treat.
                Effectiveness at 8 weeks was lower for medical (80.0%) and expectant (78.6%) than for surgical management (100.0%). Two women in the medical group had confirmed infections. Bleeding lasted longer in the expectant group than in the surgical group. There were no significant differences in pain, physical recovery, anxiety or depression between the groups. 54.6%, 42.9% and 57.1% of the surgical, medical and expectant groups respectively would opt for the same treatment again.
                Expectant care appears to be sufficiently safe and effective to be offered as an option for women. Medical management might carry a higher risk of infection than surgical or expectant care. To compare the efficacy of the medical treatment to surgical uterine evacuation and patient satisfaction in each group.
                A randomized, controlled study.
                An outpatient clinic in the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics in Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
                Ninety-eight eligible women who had had miscarriages.
                Medical treatment of miscarriage (n = 49) with 200 mg of mifepristone and 0.8 mg of misoprostol 1-3 days after the event or surgical uterine evacuation (n = 49). Questionnaires to collect data of experienced pain and patient satisfaction.
                The complete abortion rate with the primary treatment (primary outcome) and the patient satisfaction (secondary outcome).
                The success rate was equal (100% in surgical and 90% in medical group). More infections were diagnosed in the surgical group. Surgically treated patients were more satisfied with the treatment (100% vs. 88%). Medical treatment was considered more painful and fewer patients (70% vs. 91%) would choose the medical method in the future.
                Medical treatment is an effective alternative to surgical treatment and increases the choice available to women. Surgical treatment is associated with more infections. More medically treated patients experienced pain and dissatisfaction. Misoprostol is increasingly used to treat women who have a failed pregnancy in the first trimester. We assessed the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of this treatment in a large, randomized trial.
                A total of 652 women with a first-trimester pregnancy failure (anembryonic gestation, embryonic or fetal death, or incomplete or inevitable spontaneous abortion) were randomly assigned to receive 800 microg of misoprostol vaginally or to undergo vacuum aspiration (standard of care) in a 3:1 ratio. The misoprostol group received treatment on day 1, a second dose on day 3 if expulsion was incomplete, and vacuum aspiration on day 8 if expulsion was still incomplete. Surgical treatment (for the misoprostol group) or repeated aspiration (for the vacuum-aspiration group) within 30 days after the initial treatment constituted treatment failure.
                Of the 491 women assigned to receive misoprostol, 71 percent had complete expulsion by day 3 and 84 percent by day 8 (95 percent confidence interval, 81 to 87 percent). Treatment failed in 16 percent of the misoprostol group and 3 percent of the surgical group (absolute difference, 12 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 9 to 16 percent) by day 30. Hemorrhage or endometritis requiring hospitalization was rare (1 percent or less in each group), with no significant differences between the groups. In the misoprostol group, 78 percent of the women stated that they would use misoprostol again if the need arose and 83 percent stated that they would recommend it to others.
                Treatment of early pregnancy failure with 800 microg of misoprostol vaginally is a safe and acceptable approach, with a success rate of approximately 84 percent.
                Copyright 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society. We aimed to determine whether outpatient treatment of miscarriage with vaginal misoprostol is more effective than expectant management in reducing the need for surgical evacuation of retained products of conception (ERPC).
                Of 131 eligible women with first trimester miscarriage, 104 agreed to randomization to either 600 microg misoprostol or placebo intravaginally. They were assessed the following day and administered a second dose of their allocated treatment if miscarriage was not complete. Those not successful after two doses were seen on day 7, and, if miscarriage was not complete, an ERPC was performed.
                The success rate of medical management was 88.5% (46/52) compared with 44.2% (23/52) for expectant management. There was no significant difference in success rate (100 versus 85.7%) in women treated with an incomplete miscarriage. Women with early pregnancy failure had a success rate of 87% with misoprostol compared with 29% with expectant management [odds ratio (OR) 15.96; 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.26, 48.37]. The complete miscarriage rate was achieved quicker in the medical group than the expectant group by day 1 (32.7 versus 5.8%) and by day 2 (73.1 versus 13.5%) of treatment. There were no differences in side-effects, bleeding duration, analgesia use, pain score and satisfaction with treatment. Women in the expectant group made more outpatient visits (5.06 versus 4.44%; OR = -0.62, 95% CI -1.04, -0.19). More women in the medical group (90.4 versus 73.1%; OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.05, 1.50) would elect the same treatment in the future.
                Medical management using 600 microg misoprostol vaginally is more effective than expectant management of early pregnancy failure. Misoprostol did not increase the side-effect profile and patient acceptability was superior to expectant management.
The available evidence suggests that medical treatment, with misoprostol, and expectant care are both acceptable alternatives to routine surgical evacuation given the availability of health service resources to support all three approaches. Women experiencing miscarriage at less than 13 weeks should be offered an informed choice. Future studies should include long-term follow-up.