Comparative efficacy and safety of a once-daily dosage of hypericum extract STW3-VI and citalopram in patients with moderate depression: a double-blind, randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled study. Efficacy and tolerability of hypericum extract WS 5572 versus placebo in mildly to moderately depressed patients. A randomized double-blind multicenter clinical trial. [Treatment of depressive symptoms with a high concentration hypericum preparation. A multicenter placebo-controlled double-blind study]. Hypericum extract versus imipramine or placebo in patients with moderate depression: randomised multicentre study of treatment for eight weeks. Efficacy and tolerability of Hypericum extract STW 3-VI in patients with moderate depression: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Hypericum extract LI 160 and fluoxetine in mild to moderate depression: a randomized, placebo-controlled multi-center study in outpatients. Clinical significance of hyperforin for the efficacy of Hypericum extracts on depressive disorders of different severities. Equivalence of St John's wort extract (Ze 117) and fluoxetine: a randomized, controlled study in mild-moderate depression. Comparison of an extract of hypericum (LI 160) and sertraline in the treatment of depression: a double-blind, randomized pilot study.
The objective of this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, multicentre clinical study was to demonstrate the non-inferiority and safety of the hypericum extract STW3-VI in a once-daily dosage regime in the treatment of moderate depression. During the 6-week treatment phase, the course of depression was documented by use of HAMD (items 1-17), the von Zerssen's Adjective Mood Scale (BfS) and the CGI scales. The primary objective of this 3-arm design study was to demonstrate the non-inferiority of hypericum extract STW3-VI (900 mg) to the SSRI citalopram (20 mg) and superiority of hypericum over placebo.
                Outpatients (N = 388) suffering from moderate depression were enrolled. The safety and tolerability of hypericum extract in comparison to citalopram and placebo was investigated on the basis of CGI, the occurrence of adverse events and the investigation of laboratory parameters and vital signs.
                From almost identical baseline values of 21.9 +/- 1.2 points (hypericum extract), 21.8 +/- 1.2 points (citalopram) and 22.0 +/- 1.2 points (placebo), the HAMD score was reduced to 10.3 +/- 6.4 (hypericum extract), 10.3 +/- 6.4 (citalopram) and 13.0 +/- 6.9 (placebo), respectively. Based on this data, the statistical significant therapeutic equivalence of hypericum extract STW3-VI to citalopram (p < 0.0001) and the superiority of this hypericum extract over placebo (p < 0.0001) was demonstrated. At the end of treatment 54.2 % (hypericum extract), 55.9 % (citalopram) and 39.2 % (placebo) of the patients were assessed as therapy responders. The secondary efficacy parameters, change in BfS, CGI and amount of therapy responders showed that the hypericum group was not statistically different from the citalopram group, and significantly superior to the placebo group. Significantly more adverse events with "certain", "probable" or "possible" relation to study medication were documented in the citalopram group (hypericum: 17.2 %, citalopram: 53.2 %, placebo: 30 %). In most cases, the investigators assessed the tolerability of hypericum extract, citalopram and placebo as "good" or "very good".
                The non-inferiority of hypericum extract as compared to citalopram and the superiority of both active compounds to placebo were demonstrated, as well as a better safety and tolerability of hypericum extract in comparison to citalopram. These results revealed that hypericum extract STW3-VI is a good alternative to chemically defined antidepressants in the treatment of outpatients with moderate depression. We have investigated the antidepressant efficacy and safety of Hypericum perforatum (St. John's wort) extract WS5572 in a double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter clinical trial. 72 patients (WS 5572: 37, placebo: 35) with a diagnosis of mild to moderate major depressive disorder (according to DSM-IV criteria) were randomized in 42 days of treatment with either 300 mg WS5572 t.i.d. or placebo. The primary efficacy variable was the change of the 17-item Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) total score between baseline and double-blind treatment. The study was conducted with an adaptive interim analysis, which led to early stopping because convincing treatment efficacy could already be demonstrated. Group differences in favor of WS 5572 were descriptively apparent as early as day 7 of randomized treatment and were statistically significant at days 28 (p = 0.011) and day 42 (p < 0.001). Between baseline and treatment end, the HAMD total score decreased from 19.7 +/- 3.4 to 8.9 +/- 4.3 points in the Hypericum group and from 20.1 +/- 2.6 to 14.4 +/- 6.8 points in the placebo group (mean +/- SD). Responder rates were consistently higher in the Hypericum group. Comparable group differences in favor of WS 5572 were also found for von Zerssen's Depression Scale (D-S; self-rating), Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) and a global patient's self-assessment (GPA). Tolerability was very good in both groups, with no adverse drug reactions and no clinically relevant changes in safety parameters. The results indicate that Hypericum extract WS 5572 is an effective and well-tolerated drug for the treatment of mild to moderate major depressive disorder. In a multicenter, placebo-controlled double-blind trial, the effect on depression (ICD 10 F 32.1) of treatment with an innovative highly concentrated hypericum preparation was investigated. The study contained 97 outpatients who received 100 to 120 mg of the hypericum extract bid. The course of the illness was assessed with the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD), the von Zerssen Depressivity Scale (D-S) and the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGIS). Treatment resulted in an appreciable improvement in the symptoms of depression, and the 70% response rate (n = 43), corresponded to that of chemical antidepressants. The preparation also showed an anxiolytic effect. The substance was extremely well tolerated, and no side-effects were reported by any of the patients. To assess the efficacy and safety of hypericum extract (STEI 300, Steiner Arzneimittel, Berlin) compared with imipramine and placebo in patients in primary care with a current episode of moderate depression.
                Randomised, double blind, multicentre, parallel group trial for 8 weeks.
                Trained panel of 18 general practitioners from four German states: Bavaria, Berlin, Rhineland Palatinate, and Saxony.
                263 patients (66 men, 197 women) with moderate depression according to ICD-10 (international classification of diseases, 10th revision) codes F32. 1 and F33.1.
                1050 mg hypericum extract (350 mg three times daily), 100 mg imipramine (50 mg, 25 mg, and 25 mg daily), or placebo three times daily.
                Change from baseline score on the 17 item version of the Hamilton depression scale, the Hamilton anxiety scale, the clinical global impressions scale, Zung's self rating depression scale, and SF-36, and adverse events profile.
                Hypericum extract was more effective at reducing Hamilton depression scores than placebo and as effective as imipramine (mean -15.4 (SD 8.1), -12.1 (7.4), and -14.2 (7.3) respectively). Comparable results were found for Hamilton anxiety and clinical global impressions scales and were most pronounced for the Zung self rating depression scale. Quality of life was more improved in the standardised mental component scale of the SF-36 with both active treatments than with placebo but in the physical component scale was improved only by hypericum extract compared with placebo. The rate of adverse events with hypericum extract was in the range of the placebo group but lower than that of the imipramine group (0.5, 0.6, and 1.2 events per patient respectively).
                At an average dose of 350 mg three times daily hypericum extract was more effective than placebo and at least as effective as 100 mg imipramine daily in the treatment of moderate depression. Treatment with hypericum extract is safe and improves quality of life. In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, prospective study, the clinical efficacy and tolerability of oral Hypericum extract STW 3-VI (Laif) 900 mg once daily was compared with that of placebo. A total of 140 outpatients (94 women; 46 men) with moderate depressive disorders and a 17-item Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD-17) score of 20 to 24 were enrolled in this study. Following a single-blind placebo run-in period of 7 days, the patients were randomized to Hypericum extract 900 mg or placebo for the 6-week treatment period. Nineteen patients have been excluded from the per protocol collective because of violations of protocol regarding the scheduling of study visits and intake of study medication. The primary endpoint for treatment efficacy was the change in total HAMD-17 score at the end of the 6-week treatment period. The HAMD-17 total score decreased significantly from baseline by approximately 11.1 +/- 4.5 points (from 22.8 +/- 1.1 to 11.8 +/- 4.4) in the Hypericum group and by approximately 3.4 +/- 3.9 points (from 22.6 +/- 1.2 to 19.2 +/- 3.8) in the placebo group (P < .001). Comparable group differences in favor of Hypericum were revealed by an additional responder analysis, the von Zerssen's Adjective Mood Scale, the Clinical Global Impressions scale, and a global efficacy assessment. Tolerability was very good in both groups; neither serious adverse events nor clinically relevant changes in safety parameters were observed, and only 2 cases demonstrated a possible connection between an adverse event and the study medication. The final safety assessment showed no differences between the Hypericum extract and placebo groups. The study provided evidence that Hypericum extract STW 3-VI in a once-daily dosing regimen may be an effective and well-tolerated option for patients with moderate depressive disorders. Efficacy and tolerability of Hypericum LI 160 was compared to fluoxetine and placebo in mild to moderate Major Depression (DSM-IV) in a 4-week randomized, double-blind trial. One hundred and sixty-three outpatients from 15 general practitioner centers received either 900 mg Hypericum LI 160, 20 mg fluoxetine, or placebo daily. Amelioration was measured by the Hamilton and the Montgomery-Asberg Depression scales. Response and remission rates and global ratings by investigators and patients were measured. Adverse event reports, laboratory screening, vital signs, physical exams and ECG were collected. No significant differences could be observed regarding efficacy measures except for remission rate (Hypericum 24%; fluoxetine 28%; placebo 7 %). Hypericum was significantly better tolerated than fluoxetine. Hypericum LI 160 or fluoxetine were not more effective in short-term treatment in mild to moderate depression than placebo. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study, the clinical efficacy and safety of two different extracts of St. John's wort were investigated in 147 male and female out-patients suffering from mild or moderate depression according to DSM-IV criteria. Fifty-six (38.1%) of them had an initial total score ≥ 22 points on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD, 17-item version). Following a placebo run-in period of three to seven days, the patients were randomized to one of three treatment groups: During the 42-day treatment period, they received 3×1 tablet of either placebo, Hypericum extract WS 5573 (300mg, with a content of 0.5% hyperforin), or Hypericum extract WS 5572 (300 mg, with a content of 5% hyperforin). The manufacturing process for both Hypericum preparations was identical, they only differed with regard to their content of hyperforin. Efficacy regarding depressive symptoms was assessed on days 0, 7,14,28, and 42. The last observation of patients withdrawn from the trial prematurely was carried forward. At the end of the treatment period (day 42), the patients receiving WS 5572 (5% hyperforin) exhibited the largest HAMD reduction versus day 0 (10.3 ± 4.6 points; mean ± SD), followed by the WS 5573 group (0.5% hyperforin; HAMD reduction 8.5 ± 6.1 points) and the placebo group (7.9 ± 5.2 points). The monotonie trend was significant (Jonckheere-Terpstra test; p = 0.017). In patients with an initial HAMD total score ≥ 22, the HAMD reduction was even by 16.5% larger than in the total study group receiving WS 5572. More severely depressed patients treated with WS 5573, however, showed a 22.4% lower reduction of the HAMD total score than the entire WS 5573 treatment group. In patients with HAMD ≥ 22, WS 5572 showed a 53.8% larger HAMD reduction than placebo, whereas WS 5573 was not relevantly different from the placebo level. The mean HAMD reductions, treatment end versus baseline, for the more severely depressed patients were 12.0 (3.7) points, 6.6 (7.7) points and 7.8 (5.4) points [mean (SD)] for WS 5S72, WS 5573 and placebo, respectively. The results of a responder analysis support these findings. The data point to a dose-response relationship between the antidepressant efficacy of Hypericum extract and its hyperforin content. The extract with a higher content of hyperforin was particularly effective in patients who were more severely depressed.
                Copyright © 1998 Gustav Fischer Verlag. Published by Elsevier GmbH.. All rights reserved. Treatment with St John's wort extract tablets (hypericum Ze 117) and the commonly used slow serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) fluoxetine was compared in patients with mild-moderate depression with entry Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D) (21-item) in the range 16-24, in a randomized, double-blind, parallel group comparison in 240 subjects; fluoxetine: 114 (48%), hypericum: 126 (52%). After 6 weeks' treatment, mean HAM-D at endpoint decreased to 11.54 on hypericum and to 12.20 on fluoxetine (P < 0.09), while mean Clinical Global Impression (CGI) item I (severity) was significantly (P < 0.03) superior on hypericum, as was the responder rate (P = 0.005). Hypericum safety was substantially superior to fluoxetine, with the incidence of adverse events being 23% on fluoxetine and 8% on hypericum. The commonest events on fluoxetine were agitation (8%), GI disturbances (6%), retching (4%), dizziness (4%), tiredness, anxiety/nervousness and erectile dysfunction (3% each), while on hypericum only GI disturbances (5%) had an incidence greater than 2%. We concluded that hypericum and fluoxetine are equipotent with respect to all main parameters used to investigate antidepressants in this population. Although hypericum may be superior in improving the responder rate, the main difference between the two treatments is safety. Hypericum was superior to fluoxetine in overall incidence of side-effects, number of patients with side-effects and the type of side-effect reported. Hypericum (St. John's wort) has been shown to be as efficacious and well tolerated as standard antidepressants in the treatment of depression but has not been compared with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs).
                This study compared hypericum and the SSRI sertraline in the treatment of depression.
                In a double-blind, randomized study conducted in a community hospital, 30 male and female outpatients (19 women, 11 men; mean age, 45.5 years) with mild to moderate depression received 600 mg/d of a standardized extract of hypericum (LI 160) or 50 mg/d sertraline for I week, followed by hypericum 900 mg/d or sertraline 75 mg/d for 6 weeks.
                The severity of symptoms, as assessed by scores on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) and the Clinical Global Impression scale, was significantly reduced in both treatment groups (P < 0.01). Clinical response (defined as a > or =50% reduction in HAM-D scores) was noted in 47% of patients receiving hypericum and 40% of those receiving sertraline. The difference was not statistically significant. Both agents were well tolerated. A post hoc power analysis indicated that failure to reach statistical significance between treatments resulted primarily from an absence of clinical differences rather than the small sample size.
                The hypericum extract was at least as effective as sertraline in the treatment of mild to moderate depression in a small group of outpatients.
The available evidence suggests that the hypericum extracts tested in the included trials a) are superior to placebo in patients with major depression; b) are similarly effective as standard antidepressants; c) and have fewer side effects than standard antidepressants. The association of country of origin and precision with effects sizes complicates the interpretation.