[Total enteral nutrition versus mixed enteral and parenteral nutrition in patients at an intensive care unit]. Enteral nutrition is superior to parenteral nutrition in severe acute pancreatitis: results of a randomized prospective trial. Enteral versus parenteral nutrition: effects on gastrointestinal function and metabolism. [A randomized controlled study of total parenteral nutrition and enteral nutrition by elemental and polymeric diet as primary therapy in active phase of Crohn's disease]. Improvement of nutritional measures during preoperative parenteral nutrition in patients selected by the prognostic nutritional index: a randomized controlled trial. Effect of total enteral nutrition on the short-term outcome of severely malnourished cirrhotics. A randomized controlled trial. [Total enteral nutrition vs. total parenteral nutrition in patients with severe acute pancreatitis]. Influence of postoperative enteral nutrition on postsurgical infections. Seeking quality care for patients with pressure ulcers.
To compare metabolic, nutritional and epidemiological data in two groups of patients, one receiving total enteral nutrition, via nasoenteric tube, and one receiving both enteral and parenteral nutrition.
                A prospective, randomized study.
                A general ICU, with both medical and surgical patients, in a big regional University and National Health Service hospital.
                24 patients requiring Intensive Care after major surgery or because suffering from severe head injury or major neurological impairment.
                All patients initially received total parenteral nutrition: after 4 days 12 patients were "weaned" to total enteral nutrition and 12 stayed on mixed parenteral and enteral nutrition. LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS AND OBSERVATIONAL DATA: Blood levels of albumin, prealbumin, transferrin, ALT, AST, bilirubin, blood urea, blood glucose, total linfocite count, and nutritional and epidemiological data such as nitrogen balance, calorie intake, diarrhea incidence, blood and sputum cultures and radiologic evidence of pneumonia are analysed.
                At T1, NET patients were able to reduce their nitrogen losses (0.27.1 g/kg +/-0.12 vs 0.35 +/- 0.13 at TO; p < 0.05) and improve nitrogen balance (-9 +/- 7 vs -2 +/- 6 at T0; p < 0.05); they also had a better total linfocite count (2034 +/- 304 vs. 1413 +/- 360 of the MISTA group; p < 0.05), and a lower incidence of pneumonia as documented by sputum cultures and radiograms.
                Patients fed with both parenteral and enteral nutrition did no better than those on total enteral nutrition as far as nutritional and metabolic indices were concerned; they also seemed more prone to infections than those on total enteral nutrition, indicating that mixed nutrition may result in more stable feeding, but this does not seem to have any beneficial nutritional, immunological and metabolic effect. Parenteral nutrition is well established for providing nutritional support in acute pancreatitis while avoiding pancreatic stimulation. However, it is associated with complications and high cost. Benefits of enteral feeding in other disease states prompted a comparison of early enteral feeding with total parenteral nutrition in this clinical setting.
                Thirty-eight patients with acute severe pancreatitis were randomized into two groups. The first (n = 18) received enteral nutrition through a nasoenteric tube with a semi-elemental diet, while the second group (n = 20) received parenteral nutrition through a central venous catheter. Safety was assessed by clinical course of disease, laboratory findings and incidence of complications. Efficacy was determined by nitrogen balance. The cost of nutritional support was calculated.
                Enteral feeding was well tolerated without adverse effects on the course of the disease. Patients who received enteral feeding experienced fewer total complications (P < 0.05) and were at lower risk of developing septic complications (P < 0.01) than those receiving parenteral nutrition. The cost of nutritional support was three times higher in patients who received parenteral nutrition.
                This study suggests that early enteral nutrition should be used preferentially in patients with severe acute pancreatitis. The effects of total parenteral nutrition (TPN) versus enteral nutrition (TEN) were studied in 34 patients following major neurosurgery. Measurements were made of resting energy expenditure (REE), urea production rate (UPR), visceral proteins, parameters of liver and pancreas function, as well as gastrointestinal absorption. To predict nutritional status, nutritional index (NI) was calculated. UPR revealed no significant differences between the groups. After 12 days of TEN, however, synthesis of visceral proteins increased significantly. In addition, NI improved after TEN (p < 0.05), whereas it remained unchanged after TPN. Thrombocyte and lymphocyte counts rose predominately during enteral nutrition. Only in the TEN group was REE increased by 18% and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) enhanced from Day 6 on. Exogenous insulin demand was enhanced in the parenterally fed group, and bilirubin (p < 0.05), amylase (p < 0.05), and lipase (p < 0.01) rose significantly, as did gamma-glutamyl-transferase (p < 0.0005) and alkaline phosphatase (p < 0.0005). After 12 d of TPN, vitamin A absorption was significantly attenuated, indicating reduced fat absorption compared to TEN. Carbohydrate absorption did not show significant changes between the groups. Only during TPN did mean values of xylose absorption remain below the normal range. Therefore, enteral nutrition following neurosurgical procedures is associated with an accelerated normalization of nutritional status and an improved substrate tolerance. TEN opposes early postoperative absorption disturbances of the small intestine. We performed randomized controlled study to compare the short-term therapeutic effect of total parenteral nutrition (TPN), elemental diet (ED) and polymeric diet (PD) given as primary therapy in active phase of Crohn's disease. In hospital for Crohn's disease, twenty-eight patients were given nutritional therapy: 9 patients by TPN, 10 by ED, and 9 by PD. Nutritional state, inflammatory reactions, disease activity and clinical remission rate were assessed two weeks and four weeks after treatment, and morphological findings were assessed before and after each nutritional therapy by radiographic and colonoscopic findings. Inflammatory reactions were more effectively controlled by TPN and ED than by PD, and early improvement achieved by TPN and ED was especially note-worthy. Clinical remission rate after treatment by TPN was highest in three types of nutritional approach, but no significant difference was seen at any point. In nutritional state, disease activity and morphological findings, comparable changes were effected without preference. These results suggest that nutritional therapy by total parenteral nutrition and elemental diet is superior to polymeric diet for treating active phase of Crohn's disease with marked inflammatory reactions. Patients undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery who had a prognostic nutritional index (PNI) score of greater than 30% were randomized to receive a preoperative course of 10 days of intravenous nutrition or to undergo surgery at the next convenient operation list. Two groups of 17 patients were well matched for age, sex, and nutritional status. Although they underwent diverse operations, the extent of these was similar: 12 +/- 3 days of parenteral nutrition resulted in weight gain, 3.2 +/- 2.3 kg p less than 0.01; increased triceps skinfold, 0.6 +/- 1.2 mm p less than 0.05; improved immunological state, p less than 0.02; and improved PNI, 5.5 +/- 10.1% p less than 0.05. The changes in serum albumin and transferrin were not significant. There were only three major complications with one death in the treatment group but this was not significantly different from the control group which had six major complications and three deaths. This study suggests that patients with demonstrable nutritional depletion who require major gastrointestinal surgery will benefit from a preoperative course of parenteral nutrition, but to conclusively prove this a large and probably multicentre study will be required. Thirty-five severely malnourished cirrhotic patients were randomized to receive either enteral-tube feeding as the sole nutritional support (n = 16) or an isocaloric, isonitrogenous, low-sodium standard oral diet (n = 19). Both groups were homogeneous regarding age, sex distribution, etiology of liver cirrhosis, history of previous complications, clinical status, liver and renal function, modified Child's score, and nutritional status at admission. The enteral formula diet was energy dense, containing 40 mmol Na/day, whole protein plus branched-chain amino acids, medium- and long-chain triglycerides, and maltodextrin. It supplied 2115 kcal/day. The amount of vitamins and trace elements was at the upper limit of the recommended dietary allowances. The orally fed patients were encouraged to eat all meals served. Total enteral nutrition was well tolerated without major complications. Serum albumin and Child's score improved in the enterally fed patients but not in controls. Mortality rate while in the hospital was lower in patients on enteral feeding than in controls (12% vs 47%). These results show that total enteral nutrition is safe and effective in improving the short-term clinical outcome in severely malnourished cirrhotics. To compare the efficacy of early total enteral nutrition (TEN) vs. total parenteral nutrition (TPN) in patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP).
                A total of 22 consecutive patients with SAP were randomized to receive TPN (group I) or TEN (group II). SAP was defined applying APACHE II score, C-reactive protein (CRP) measurements and/or Balthazar CT scan score. Acute inflammatory response (CRP, TNF-a, IL-6), visceral proteins (pre-albumin, albumin), complications (systemic inflammatory response syndrome, multiorgan failure, infections), surgical interventions, length of hospital stay and mortality were evaluated.
                No significant differences were found between the two groups in the APACHE II score, in CRP, TNF-a and IL-6 concentrations or in pre-albumin and albumin levels over the first 10 days. Seven patients in group I and 4 in group II suffered severe complications. Three patients in group I required surgical intervention. Length of hospital stay was alike in the two groups. Two patients from group I died in the course of the hospitalization.
                SAP patients with TEN feeding showed a tendency towards a better outcome than patients receiving TPN. This study was undertaken to test the hypothesis that early enteral nutrition might reduce the incidence of serious complications after major abdominal surgery.
                In a randomised double blind prospective trial 30 patients received Nutri-drink and 30 patients received placebo through a nasoduodenal feeding tube. On the day of operation the patients were given median 600 ml of either nutrition or placebo, 60 ml per hour. On the first postoperative day the patients received either 1000 ml (median) of nutrition or placebo, on day 2 1200 ml (median) nutrition, 1400 ml placebo, on day 3 1000 ml (median) nutrition, 1150 ml placebo, and on day 4 1000 ml (median) nutrition, 800 ml placebo. All patients were followed up for 30 days by the same investigator.
                The two groups were similar with regard to nutritional status and type of operation. The rate of postoperative infectious complications was significantly lower in the nutrition group, two of 30 compared with 14 of 30 in the placebo group (p = 0.0009).
                Early enteral nutrition given to patients after major abdominal surgery results in an important reduction in infectious complications. Improving quality care for patients with pressure ulcers resulted in a two-year intensive effort to educate staff, keep morale high, standardize care plans by stage of ulcer, and participate in a comparison study of two support surfaces (Thera-Pulse, Kinetic Concepts and Geo-Matt, SpanAmerica). When all pressure ulcers were considered, the analysis of covariance revealed no statistically significant difference in the healing of pressure ulcers with respect to type of support surface used (F[1, 78] = 0.35, p > .05). For patients with stage III and IV pressure ulcers, the proportion of patients improving more than 10cm2 was higher in the air-suspension group. There was relatively little difference in the Stage II ulcer patients.
It was not possible to draw any firm conclusions on the effect of enteral and parenteral nutrition on the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers. Further trials of high methodological quality are necessary.