Ranitidine controls nocturnal gastric acid breakthrough on omeprazole: a controlled study in normal subjects. Bedtime ranitidine does not eliminate the need for a second daily dose of omeprazole to suppress nocturnal gastric pH. A short-term controlled trial of an adjustable oral appliance for the treatment of mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnoea. A novel approach to the prevention of postoperative delirium in the elderly after gastrointestinal surgery. Mandibular advancement appliances and obstructive sleep apnoea: a randomized clinical trial. A randomized trial of nocturnal oxygen therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. Clinical trial: the effects of adding ranitidine at night to twice daily omeprazole therapy on nocturnal acid breakthrough and acid reflux in patients with systemic sclerosis--a randomized controlled, cross-over trial. A randomized trial of a combined physical activity and environmental intervention in nursing home residents: do sleep and agitation improve? Reduction of sleep-disordered breathing after physostigmine.
Proton pump inhibitors administered twice daily do not provide complete nocturnal acid suppression. Acid breakthrough, or decrease in intragastric pH to <4 for an hour or longer, occurs in three quarters of normal subjects and patients at night. We compared the effect of a third dose of omeprazole at bedtime with that of a dose of ranitidine at bedtime on residual nocturnal acid secretion in patients receiving omeprazole twice daily.
                Twelve volunteers underwent overnight intragastric pH monitoring after 7 days of treatment with omeprazole, 20 mg twice daily, followed by different treatment supplements at bedtime: placebo; additional omeprazole, 20 mg; ranitidine, 150 mg; and ranitidine, 300 mg.
                Additional omeprazole at bedtime reduced the percentage of time with intragastric pH of <4 from 48% to 31% (P < 0.005) compared with omeprazole twice daily with placebo at bedtime. Ranitidine at bedtime reduced this parameter more, 5% with 150 mg and 6% with 300 mg (P <0.01 vs. omeprazole twice daily plus bedtime). Results for percentage of time with intragastric pH <3 were similar. Eleven subjects had acid breakthrough with placebo at bedtime; 7 with omeprazole at bedtime (P = NS); 4 with ranitidine, 150 mg at bedtime; and 3 with ranitidine, 300 mg at bedtime (P < 0. 05, ranitidine vs. placebo).
                Bedtime ranitidine is more effective than bedtime omeprazole on residual nocturnal acid secretion in patients receiving omeprazole twice daily. This finding suggests that fasting breakthrough nocturnal acid secretion in patients receiving omeprazole twice daily is most likely histamine related. We have previously shown that 70% of patients experience nocturnal gastric acid breakthrough (defined as pH<4 for more than 60 min between 22.00 and 06.00 hours) on twice a day (b.d.) proton pump inhibitor. Adding 150 or 300 mg of ranitidine at bedtime is more effective than additional omeprazole at bedtime in control of night-time acid breakthrough.
                To assess whether omeprazole 20 mg AM plus ranitidine 150 mg HS would be as effective as omeprazole 20 mg before breakfast and dinner (b.d. AC) in intragastric pH control, particularly during the overnight period.
                Twenty healthy volunteers (11 males, 9 females, mean age 32.7 years) were treated with omeprazole (OME) 20 mg b.d. AC and placebo HS or omeprazole 20 mg AM and placebo before dinner plus ranitidine (RAN) 150 mg HS for 7 days, in a randomized, double-blind, crossover design, with a 1 week washout between study periods. On day 8 subjects were monitored for 24 h with a single channel pH probe placed in the stomach 10 cm below the proximal border of the LES. Percentage time pH<4 for total, upright and recumbent positions were compared between the two regimens using Wilcoxon matched pairs testing.
                Expressed in median values of percentage time pH<4: upright time intragastric pH<4 on OME 20 mg b.d. AC was 18.9 compared to 29.7 on OME AM + RAN HS (P = 0.003). Recumbent time pH<4 on OME 20 mg b.d. AC was 23.45 compared to 44.75 on OME AM + RAN HS (P = 0.02).
                Bedtime ranitidine does not eliminate the need for an evening dose of omeprazole to control intragastric pH in patients requiring more than a single daily dose of omeprazole. Although oral appliances are effective in some patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), they are not universally effective. A novel anterior mandibular positioner (AMP) has been developed with an adjustable hinge that allows progressive advancement of the mandible. The objective of this prospective crossover study was to compare efficacy, side effects, patient compliance, and preference between AMP and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) in patients with symptomatic mild to moderate OSA.
                Twenty four patients of mean (SD) age 44.0 (10.6) years were recruited with a mean (SD) body mass index of 32.0 (8.2) kg/m2, Epworth sleepiness score 10.7 (3.4), and apnoea/hypopnoea index 26.8 (11.9)/hour. There was a two week wash-in and a two week wash-out period and two treatment periods (AMP and nCPAP) each of four months. Efficacy, side effects, compliance, and preference were evaluated by a questionnaire and home sleep monitoring.
                One patient dropped out early in the study and three refused to cross over so treatment results are presented on the remaining 20 patients. The apnoea/hypopnoea index (AHI) was lower with nasal CPAP 4.2 (2.2)/hour than with the AMP 13.6 (14.5)/hour (p < 0.01). Eleven of the 20 patients (55%) who used the AMP were treatment successes (reduction of AHI to < 10/hour and relief of symptoms), one (5%) was a compliance failure (unable or unwilling to use the treatment), and eight (40%) were treatment failures (failure to reduce AHI to < 10/hour and/or failure to relieve symptoms). Fourteen of the 20 patients (70%) who used nCPAP were treatment successes, six (30%) were compliance failures, and there were no treatment failures. There was greater patient satisfaction with the AMP (p < 0.01) than with nCPAP but no difference in reported side effects or compliance.
                AMP is an effective treatment in some patients with mild to moderate OSA and is associated with greater patient satisfaction than nCPAP. Postoperative delirium (POD) is known to be one of the most critical complications of major operative procedures in elderly patients. Since disorders of the sleep-wake cycle have been reported to be one of the key factors in POD, we attempted to clarify the effectiveness of improving sleep-wake cycle disorders with medication after surgery to prevent POD, by conducting a prospective randomized study of 42 elderly patients who underwent resection of either gastric or colon cancer through an open laparotomy.
                The delirium-free protocol (DFP) group was given an intramuscular injection of diazepam at 20:00 h each night, as well as a continuous intravenous infusion of flunitrazepam and pethidine administered over 8 h, for the first three nights postoperatively. Two patients were excluded because of failure to complete the DFP.
                The incidence of POD was 7/20 (35.0%) in the non-DFP group and 1/20 (5.0%) in the DFP group, this difference being significant (P = 0.023). Morning lethargy produced by the DFP was observed in 40% of the DFP group; however, no other side effects were seen.
                These findings indicate that DFP treatment is effective for controlling POD in elderly patients after general surgery and does not appear to be associated with severe complications or side effects. To our knowledge, this is the first report proposing artificial control of the sleep-awake rhythm by medication as a means of preventing POD in elderly patients. This randomized placebo-controlled cross-over trial assessed the effectiveness of a mandibular advancement appliance (MAA) in managing obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). Twenty-one adults, with confirmed OSA, were provided with a maxillary placebo appliance and a MAA for 4-6 weeks each, in a randomized order. Questionnaires at baseline and after each appliance assessed bed-partners' reports of snoring severity (loudness and number of nights per week), and patients' daytime sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Score, ESS). The Apnoea Hypopnoea Index (AHI) and Oxygen Desaturation Index (ODI) were measured at baseline and with each appliance during single night sleep studies. Seventy-nine per cent of subjects wore their MAA for at least 4 hours at night. Sixty-eight per cent of subjects wore their MAA for 6-7 nights per week. Excessive salivation was the most commonly reported complication. One subject was unable to tolerate the MAA and withdrew from the study. Among the remaining 20 subjects, the MAA produced significantly lower AHI and ODI values than the placebo. However, although the reported frequency and loudness of snoring and the ESS values were lower with the MAA than the placebo, these differences were not statistically significant. When wearing the MAA, 35 per cent of the OSA subjects had a reduction in the pre-treatment ODI to 10 or less, while 33 per cent had an AHI of 10 or less. The MAA was less effective in the subjects with the most severe OSA (pre-treatment ODI > 50 and/or pre-treatment AHI > 50). The beneficial effects of nocturnal oxygen therapy (NOT) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with mild-to-moderate daytime hypoxaemia (arterial oxygen tension (Pa,O2) in the range 7.4-9.2 kPa (56-69 mmHg)) and exhibiting sleep-related oxygen desaturation remains controversial. The effectiveness of NOT in that category of COPD patients was studied. The end points included pulmonary haemodynamic effects after 2 yrs of follow-up, survival and requirement for long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT). Seventy-six patients could be randomized, 41 were allocated to NOT and 35 to no NOT (control). The goal of NOT was to achieve an arterial oxygen saturation of >90% throughout the night. All these patients underwent polysomnography to exclude an associated obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome. The two groups exhibited an identical meansD daytime Pa,O2 of 8.4+/-0.4 kPa (63+/-3 mmHg) at baseline. Twenty-two patients (12 in the NOT group and 10 in the control group, p=0.98) required LTOT during the whole follow-up (35+/-14 months). Sixteen patients died, nine in the NOT group and seven in the control group (p=0.84). Forty-six patients were able to undergo pulmonary haemodynamic re-evaluation after 2 yrs, 24 in the NOT and 22 in the control group. In the control group, mean resting pulmonary artery pressure increased from 19.8+/-5.6 to 20.5+6.5 mmHg, which was not different from the change in mean pulmonary artery pressure in the NOT group, from 18.3+/-4.7 to 19.5+/-5.3 mmHg (p= 0.79). Nocturnal oxygen therapy did not modify the evolution of pulmonary haemodynamics and did not allow delay in the prescription of long-term oxygen therapy. No effect of NOT on survival was observed, but the small number of deaths precluded any firm conclusion. These results suggest that the prescription of nocturnal oxygen therapy in isolation is probably not justified in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is an important problem in systemic sclerosis due to impaired salivation and oesophageal function.
                To determine the efficacy of adding ranitidine at bedtime to control nocturnal acid breakthrough (NAB) and GERD in patients with systemic sclerosis already prescribed high-dose omeprazole.
                Patients with systemic sclerosis and GERD symptoms (n = 14) were treated with omeprazole 20 mg b.d. and either placebo or ranitidine 300 mg at bedtime for 6 weeks in a randomized, cross-over, placebo controlled study. At the end of each period a 24 h pH-study with intragastric and oesophageal pH measurement was performed.
                Pathological acid reflux occurred in eight patients with omeprazole/placebo and in seven with omeprazole/ranitidine (P = ns) with technically adequate oesophageal pH-studies (n = 13). NAB was present in eight patients with omeprazole/placebo and six with omeprazole/ranitidine (P = ns) in whom technically adequate gastric pH-studies were obtained (n = 10). The addition of ranitidine had no consistent effect on patient symptoms or quality of life.
                Many patients with systemic sclerosis experienced NAB and pathological oesophageal acid exposure despite high-dose acid suppression with omeprazole b.d. Adding ranitidine at bedtime did not improve NAB, GERD or quality of life in this population. The purpose of this study was to test whether an intervention combining increased daytime physical activity with improvement in the nighttime environment improves sleep and decreases agitation in nursing home residents.
                A randomized trial.
                One community nursing home in the Los Angeles, California area.
                Twenty-nine incontinent residents (mean age 88.3 years, 90% female).
                Subjects were randomized to receive either (1) an intervention combining increased daytime physical activity (14 weeks in duration) plus a nighttime program (5 nights in duration) to decrease noise and sleep-disruptive nursing care practices (intervention group), or (2) the nighttime program alone (control group).
                Daytime physical activity monitors and structured physical function assessments; nighttime wrist activity monitors to estimate nighttime sleep; and timed daytime behavioral observations of sleep versus wakefulness, either in or out of bed, and agitation.
                Physical function measures did not change significantly (MANOVA for repeated measures, group by time effect). Wrist actigraphy estimation of nighttime percent sleep (time asleep over time monitored in bed at night) increased in intervention subjects from 51.7% at baseline to 62.5% at follow-up compared with 67.0% at baseline to 66.3% at follow-up in controls (MANOVA, group by time, F = 4.42, P = .045, df = 27). At follow-up, intervention subjects averaged a 32% decrease in the percent of daytime observations in bed compared with baseline, with essentially no change in controls (MANOVA, group by time, F = 5.31, P = .029, df = 27). Seven of 15 intervention subjects had a decrease in observed agitation at follow-up, compared with baseline, versus only 1 of 14 controls with a decrease in observed agitation.
                This study provides preliminary evidence that an intervention combining increased physical activity with improvement in the nighttime nursing home environment improves sleep and decreases agitation in nursing home residents. The cholinesterase inhibitor physostigmine (PHYS) was investigated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, crossover trial of 10 male patients with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea. PHYS (0.12 microg/minute/kg, 7-hour infusion) reduced mean apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) by 13.6 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2-25.1) corresponding to 21.4% (95% CI, -5.5 to 47.9) and increased minimum SaO2 by 8.7% (95% CI, -0.3 to 17.7) corresponding to 23.2% (95% CI, 4.8-41.3). During the last third of the night, coinciding with predicted plasma concentration steady state, non-REM sleep AHI decreased by 19.2 (95% CI, 0.1-38.3) or 14.9% (95% CI, -43.6 to 77.7) and REM AHI by 33.8 (95% CI, 13.7-54.0) or 67.5% (95% CI, 49.7-85.3). Mean total sleep time was reduced by 74 minutes (95% CI, 33.9-114.9), but patients with the least pronounced sleep shortening had the largest reduction of AHI (r = 0.73, p < 0.02). The nocturnal decline in heart rate was reduced by PHYS. Moreover, resting (early-night placebo heart rate) was positively correlated with proportional reduction of REM apnea index (r = 0.69, p < 0.02). Body mass index was negatively correlated with reduction of REM AHI (r = 0.77, p < 0.02). This, predominantly REM-related, reduction of obstructive sleep apnea after PHYS may provide a new treatment option if the effects are maintained in long-term studies.
We can conclude no implications for practice at this stage. Appropriately designed large-scale randomized controlled trials with long-term follow-up are needed to determine the effects of additional bedtime H2RAs in suppressing nocturnal gastric acid breakthrough.