Furosemide prevents the renal side effects of indomethacin therapy in premature infants with patent ductus arteriosus. A comparison of oral ibuprofen and intravenous indomethacin for closure of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants. Prophylactic treatment of asymptomatic patent ductus arteriosus in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome. Randomized trial of prolonged low-dose versus conventional-dose indomethacin for treating patent ductus arteriosus in very low birth weight infants. [Comparison of the efficacy of ibuprofen and indomethacin in the treatment of patent ductus arteriosus in prematurely born infants]. Prophylactic indomethacin therapy for patent ductus arteriosus in very-low-birth-weight infants. Prophylactic indomethacin for prevention of intraventricular hemorrhage in premature infants. Comparison of oral ibuprofen and indomethacin on closure of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants. Effects of prolonged versus acute indomethacin therapy in very low birth-weight infants with patent ductus arteriosus.
To determine if furosemide would prevent the renal side effects of indomethacin therapy in premature infants with patent ductus arteriosus, 19 premature infants were randomized into two groups: nine received indomethacin alone, and ten received indomethacin followed immediately by furosemide. There was no significant difference between the groups in birth weight, gestational age, postnatal age, and in cardiopulmonary or renal status at the time of study. Infants who received indomethacin and furosemide had significantly higher urine output (P less than 0.05), higher FENa and FECl (P less than 0.01), and higher glomerular filtration rate (P less than 0.05) than those of infants who received indomethacin alone. Seven infants in each group responded to indomethacin therapy with disappearance of PDA murmur and improvement of cardiovascular status. The results of this study suggest that furosemide may prevent the renal side effects of indomethacin therapy and yet not affect the efficacy of indomethacin in the closure of a PDA. Indomethacin is widely accepted as the treatment for patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in preterm infants but it has various side effects. Ibuprofen is the alternative treatment and believed to be less likely to induce side effects.
                To compare efficacy and side effects of ibuprofen versus indomethacin treatment for symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in preterm infants.
                The authors studied 30 infants (gestational age < or = 35 weeks, aged < or = 10 days) who were diagnosed as having symptomatic PDA confirmed by echocardiogram. The infants were randomly assigned to receive three intravenous doses of indomethacin given at 12-hour intervals or three doses of ibuprofen given at 24-hour intervals, starting within ten days of life. The demographic data, rate of clinical closure, need for additional treatment, side effects, complications and the infants' clinical course were recorded within 28 days.
                The rate of ductal closure was similar with the two treatment regimes. Ductal closure occurred in 7 of 15 infants given ibuprofen (46.67%) and 10 of 15 infants given indomethacin (66.67%). (Relative risk 0.669; 95% confidence interval, 0.328 to 1.364; p = 0.462) The number of infants who needed a second pharmacologic treatment was not significantly different between the two groups, (6 cases in the ibuprofen group, 5 cases in the indomethacin group) but surgical ligation was performed in two cases in the indomethacin group. There was a significant difference in using the diuretic drug (furosemide) in the indomethacin group (11 cases), compared to the ibuprofen group (3 cases), (p = 0.009). More cases of necrotizing enterocolitis were seen in the indomethacin group (66.67% compared to 40% in the ibuprofen group) but there was no statistically significant difference.
                Ibuprofen has the same efficiency as indomethacin for the treatment of symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants and less likely to induce necrotizing enterocolitis and renal toxicity than indomethacin. Early treatment of premature infants with indomethacin has been proposed as a means of reducing the morbidity associated with respiratory distress syndrome complicated by symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus. We identified 26 infants less than 48 hours old with severe respiratory distress syndrome who had an asymptomatic patent ductus arteriosus. These infants were treated with either indomethacin or placebo. There was a significant difference in the frequency of ductal closure after receiving indomethacin treatment. No significant difference was observed in the time required for mechanical ventilation, time receiving supplemental oxygen, or time in the hospital, and there were no significant differences in the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, intraventricular hemorrhage, retinopathy of prematurity, or death between the two groups. Indomethacin is used for closing the patent ductus arteriosus in premature infants. Prolonged low-dose indomethacin given over 6 days could potentially improve closure rates because ductal constriction is maintained long enough for more effective anatomic closure. We compared the efficacy of this regimen to conventional dosing in a cohort of very low birth weight infants.
                In a 2-arm clinical trial, 140 infants were randomized to either conventional dose (0.2 mg/kg/dose every 12 hours for 3 doses) or prolonged low-dose indomethacin (0.1 mg/kg/dose daily for 6 doses). The primary outcome measure was ductal closure rate, and the secondary outcomes were the need for a second course of treatment, surgical ligation rates, and side effects.
                Ductal closure after 1 course of indomethacin was similar between the 2 groups: 68% for the conventional dose group and 72% for the prolonged low dose (mean difference -4%; 95% confidence interval: -19% to 11%). The incidence of transient oliguria was higher in the conventional dose group, 31% versus 9%. There was a trend toward more necrotizing enterocolitis in the prolonged low-dose group, 7.0% versus 1.4%.
                There was no difference in efficacy between the 2 dosing regimens. In view of this and with its higher incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis, we do not recommend using prolonged low-dose indomethacin for closing the patent ductus arteriosus in very low birth weight infants. To assess the efficacy and safety of early treatment with ibuprofen (IBU) and indomethacin (INDO) of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants. Prospective study with blind trial.
                We studied 35 preterm infants (19 treated with INDO, 16 IBU) (gestation age <33 and birth weight < 1500 g), who had an echocardiographicaly confirmed patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). The infants were randomly assigned in two groups to receive INDO (0.2-0.2-0.2 mg/kg) or IBU (10-5-5 mg/kg) in first 72 hours of life (average 2 days of life). The rate of ductal closure, the need for surgical ligation, side effects, complications, and the infants clinical course were recorded.
                The rate of ductal closure was similar in two groups (15/19, 80% INDO; 11/16, 69% IBU). 27 infants (15 INDO, 12 IBU) were treated per protocol (3 doses). For remaining 8 infants we stopped treatment due to side effects. In the IBU group the main reason to stop treatment was pulmonary hemorrhage (3/16, 19%) and pulmonary hypertension (1/16, 6%), but in the INDO group it was increased serum creatinine and urea nitrogen concentrations (3/19, 16%) and intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH IV) grade (1/19 5%). In IBU group vs. INDO, urine output decreased (p=0.02), but never before below the level of oliguria (defined as urine output below 1 ml/kg/h). Risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) grade II was similar in two groups, but only patients treated with INDO showed intestinal perforations (p=ns). They received also postnatal hydrocortisone and we showed near significant tendency (p=0.06) for intestinal perforation in patients treated with INDO and hydrocortisone. There were no significant differences with respect to IVH or PVL between the groups.
                The efficacy of ibuprofen and indomethacin in PDA treatment is similar. Treatment of ibuprofen and indomethacin may cause transient renal dysfunction: diminished urine output and increase of serum creatinine and urea nitrogen concentrations. Indomethacin, especially with concomitant treatment with hydrocortisone, may increase the risk of intestinal perforation. We performed a double-blind, controlled study of prophylactic indomethacin therapy in 47 premature infants (less than 1700 g) who had subclinical patent ductus arteriosus. They received either indomethacin or placebo at a mean age of 2.9 days. Among the 25 infants weighing more than 1000 g, a hemodynamically important ductus shunt developed in only four of the 14 given placebo. The incidence of important shunts, the number of surgical ligations, and the duration of oxygen therapy were not appreciably different between the study groups. In contrast, among the 22 infants who weighed 1000 g or less, a major ductus shunt developed in 10 of the 12 given placebo. In the smaller infants indomethacin therapy was associated with a significantly lower incidence of major shunts, fewer surgical ligations, a decreased duration of oxygen therapy, and fewer days necessary to regain birth weight. We conclude that prophylactic indomethacin therapy in infants weighing under 1000 g prevents the later development of large ductus shunts and decreases morbidity. The impact of early prophylactic use of intravenous indomethacin on the incidence and severity of periventricular-intraventricular hemorrhage and patent ductus arteriosus in 199 oxygen-requiring premature infants (less than or equal to 1300 g birth weight) was prospectively investigated. The trial was controlled, the infants were randomized, and the investigators were unaware of the group assignments. Patients with minimal (grade I) or no periventricular-intraventricular hemorrhage determined by prestudy echoencephalography were randomized within two birth weight subgroups (500 to 899 and 900 to 1300 g) to receive either prophylactic indomethacin (n = 99) or an equal volume of saline-vehicle placebo (n = 100). The first dose (0.2 mg/kg) was given within 12 hours of delivery and two subsequent doses (0.1 mg/kg) were administered at 12 hourly intervals. Prophylactic indomethacin significantly reduced the incidence of grades II to IV periventricular-intraventricular hemorrhage. Intraventricular hemorrhage was half as common in infants given prophylactic indomethacin as in control infants (23% v 46%, P less than .002). The reduction was manifested in both birth weight subgroups. Results of this study also confirmed a lower incidence of clinically significant patent ductus arteriosus in infants who received prophylactic indomethacin in contrast to those who received placebo (11% v 42%, P less than .001). No significant differences were found between treatment and control groups in the duration of oxygen therapy, mechanical ventilation, or hospitalization or in the incidence of pneumothorax, chronic lung disease, sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis, retinopathy of prematurity, or death. Early prophylactic indomethacin initiated within 12 hours of delivery is effective in reducing the incidence of intraventricular hemorrhage as well as clinically significant patent ductus arteriosus in very low birth weight premature infants. Although intravenous indomethacin and ibuprofen are widely used for closure of patent ductus arteriosus in premature infants, these formulations are unavailable in the Islamic Republic of Iran. In this study of the therapeutic effects of oral treatments, 20 preterm infants were randomized to oral ibuprofen (1 x 10 mg/kg, then 2 x 5 mg/kg at 24-hour intervals) or oral indomethacin (3 x 0.2 mg/kg at 24-hour intervals). Complete ductal closure was seen in 7/10 of the indomethacin and 8/10 of the ibuprofen group. The difference was not significant. There was no reopening after the ductal closure during the hospital stay or in the follow-up visits in either group and no excessive increases in the blood urea nitrogen or serum creatinine levels were observed. Indomethacin has proven effective in closing the patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in most low birth weight (LBW) neonates with this disorder. Early reopening of the ductus is a problem and often leads to the need for surgery. Prolonged use of indomethacin for several days has been suggested as a means to alleviate this problem. The present study was designed to determine if prolonged therapy over 5 days is more effective than a two-dose regimen in preventing reopening of the PDA. Seventy neonates were randomized for either prolonged therapy over 1 week or to receive two doses of indomethacin. All infants were given two doses of indomethacin 0.15 mg per kg, 12h apart. The maintenance group received an additional 0.1 mg per kg daily for 5 days. Ten days after the infants' initial dose of indomethacin, 6 of 22 in the nonmaintenance group as compared to 0 of 22 in the maintenance group had reopening of their ductus arteriosus. Ten infants in the maintenance group eventually had the ductus reopen at a median of 29, range 11-66 days compared to a median of 3, range 2-44 days in the nonmaintenance group. Significantly fewer babies in the maintenance group had a grade II-IV intraventricular hemorrhage compared to the nonmaintenance group. There was no other significant difference in the two groups in the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis, retrolental fibroplasia or death. Indomethacin given over 5 days is effective for closure of the ductus arteriosus and will prevent reopening until after the acute clinical course in babies under 1500 g; however, the overall incidence of reopening was not different.
There is not enough evidence to support the administration of furosemide to premature infants treated with indomethacin for symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus. Furosemide appears to be contraindicated in the presence of dehydration in those infants.