Prophylaxis for recurrent acute otitis media: a Brazilian study. Wait-and-see prescription for the treatment of acute otitis media: a randomized controlled trial. Nonsevere acute otitis media: a clinical trial comparing outcomes of watchful waiting versus immediate antibiotic treatment. Continuous twice daily or once daily amoxicillin prophylaxis compared with placebo for children with recurrent acute otitis media. Penicillin treatment of acute otitis media in children. A study of the duration of treatment. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial of 5 versus 10 days of antibiotic therapy for acute otitis media in young children. Treatment of acute otitis media with probiotics in otitis-prone children-a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised study. Management for the children with otitis media with effusion in the tertiary hospital. Is treatment of acute otitis media with once-a-day amoxicillin feasible? Results of a pilot study.
We enrolled 60 children with recurrent acute otitis media (AOM) in a study of the effectiveness of antimicrobial prophylaxis. All children were entered into the study following an acute episode of infection treated with amoxicillin (AMX) for 10 days. Following therapy, the children were re-examined, and then randomly assigned to receive either trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), amoxicillin (AMX) or a placebo (PLA). Twenty children were included in each group. Each drug was administered once a day at bedtime, at 1/3 the therapeutic dose, for 3 months. Children were re-evaluated with pneumootoscopy during episodes of acute illness and with pneumootoscopy and impedance tympanometry (TYMP) at monthly intervals. We observed a significantly increased rate of recurrent AOM in children receiving placebo compared with those who received antibiotics (50% vs. 17% P < 0.005). Both prophylactic antibiotics were equally effective in preventing recurrent AOM (recurrence rate 20% TMP-SMX, 15% AMX). We also observed that recurrences in children receiving placebo occurred earlier in the study period than in those receiving antibiotics. These results suggest that antimicrobial prophylaxis in children with recurrent acute otitis media is effective in reducing subsequent disease. The similar efficacy of both antibiotics tested suggests that the less expensive agent should be used. Acute otitis media (AOM) is the most common diagnosis for which antibiotics are prescribed for children. Previous trials that have evaluated a "wait-and-see prescription" (WASP) for antibiotics, with which parents are asked not to fill the prescription unless the child either is not better or is worse in 48 hours, have excluded children with severe AOM. None of these trials were conducted in an emergency department.
                To determine whether treatment of AOM using a WASP significantly reduces use of antibiotics compared with a "standard prescription" (SP) and to evaluate the effects of this intervention on clinical symptoms and adverse outcomes related to antibiotic use.
                A randomized controlled trial conducted between July 12, 2004, and July 11, 2005. Children with AOM aged 6 months to 12 years seen in an emergency department were randomly assigned to receive either a WASP or an SP. All patients received ibuprofen and otic analgesic drops for use at home. A research assistant, blinded to group assignment, conducted structured phone interviews 4 to 6, 11 to 14, and 30 to 40 days after enrollment to determine outcomes.
                Filling of the antibiotic prescription and clinical course.
                Overall, 283 patients were randomized either to the WASP group (n = 138) or the SP group (n = 145). Substantially more parents in the WASP group did not fill the antibiotic prescription (62% vs 13%; P<.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in the frequency of subsequent fever, otalgia, or unscheduled visits for medical care. Within the WASP group, both fever (relative risk [RR], 2.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.75 - 4.99; P<.001) and otalgia (RR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.26 - 2.03; P<.001) were associated with filling the prescription.
                The WASP approach substantially reduced unnecessary use of antibiotics in children with AOM seen in an emergency department and may be an alternative to routine use of antimicrobials for treatment of such children.
                clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00250900. The widespread use of antibiotics for treatment of acute otitis media (AOM) has resulted in the emergence of multidrug-resistant pathogens that are difficult to treat. However, it has been shown that most children with nonsevere AOM recover without ABX. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety, efficacy, acceptability, and costs of a non-ABX intervention for children with nonsevere AOM.
                Children 6 months to 12 years old with AOM were screened by using a novel AOM-severity screening index. Parents of children with nonsevere AOM received an educational intervention, and their children were randomized to receive either immediate antibiotics (ABX; amoxicillin plus symptom medication) or watchful waiting (WW; symptom medication only). The investigators, but not the parents, were blinded to enrollment status. Primary outcomes included parent satisfaction with AOM care, resolution of symptoms, AOM failure/recurrence, and nasopharyngeal carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae strains resistant to ABX. Secondary outcomes included medication-related adverse events, serious adverse events, unanticipated AOM-related office and emergency department visits and telephone calls, the child's absence from day care or school resulting from AOM, the parent's absence from school or work because of their child's AOM, and costs of treatment. Subjects were defined as failing (days 0-12) or recurring (days 13-30) if they experienced a higher AOM-severity score on reexamination.
                A total of 223 subjects were recruited: 73% were nonwhite, 57% were <2 years old, 47% attended day care, 82% had experienced prior AOM, and 83% had not been fully immunized with heptavalent pneumococcal vaccine. One hundred twelve were randomized to ABX, and 111 were randomized to WW. Ninety-four percent of the subjects were followed to the 30-day end point. Parent satisfaction with AOM care was not different between the 2 treatment groups at either day 12 or 30. Compared with WW, symptom scores on days 1 to 10 resolved faster in subjects treated with immediate ABX. At day 12, among the immediate-ABX group, 69% of tympanic membranes and 25% of tympanograms were normal, compared with 51% of normal tympanic membranes and 10% of normal tympanograms in the WW group. Parents of children in the ABX group gave their children fewer doses of pain medication than did parents of children in the WW group. Subjects in the ABX group experienced 16% fewer failures than subjects in the WW group. Of the children in the WW group, 66% completed the study without needing ABX. Immediate ABX resulted in eradication of S pneumoniae carriage in the majority of children, but S pneumoniae strains cultured from children in the ABX group at day 12 were more likely to be multidrug-resistant than strains from children in the WW group. More ABX-related adverse events were noted in the ABX group, compared with the WW group. No serious AOM-related adverse events were observed in either group. Office and emergency department visits, phone calls, and days of work/school missed were not different between groups. Prescriptions for ABX were reduced by 73% in the WW group compared with the ABX group. Costs of ABX averaged $47.41 per subject in the ABX group and $11.43 in the WW group.
                Sixty-six percent of subjects in the WW group completed the study without ABX. Parent satisfaction was the same between groups regardless of treatment. Compared with WW, immediate ABX treatment was associated with decreased numbers of treatment failures and improved symptom control but increased ABX-related adverse events and a higher percent carriage of multidrug-resistant S pneumoniae strains in the nasopharynx at the day-12 visit. Key factors in implementing a WW strategy were (a) a method to classify AOM severity; (b) parent education; (c) management of AOM symptoms; (d) access to follow-up care; and (e) use of an effective ABX regimen, when needed. When these caveats are observed, WW may be an acceptable alternative to immediate ABX for some children with nonsevere AOM. To determine the effectiveness of amoxicillin administered continuously twice daily vs. once daily vs. placebo to prevent new episodes of acute otitis media (AOM).
                Randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial at a hospital-based general pediatric clinic and a private pediatric practice, both in Denver, CO.
                One hundred ninety-four children (age 3 months through 6 years) were enrolled with 3 documented AOM episodes within the prior 6 months, without ventilating tubes or associated anatomic defects, immunodeficiency disorders or allergy to penicillin. Thirty-six were noncompliant and were excluded from the study, leaving 158 evaluable subjects.
                The amoxicillin dosage was 20 mg/kg/day either bid or qd. After randomization to placebo twice daily (bid), amoxicillin once daily (qd)/placebo qd or amoxicillin bid, patients were followed monthly and were also seen for upper respiratory infection symptoms during enrollment in the trial. Development of two new AOM episodes terminated the patients from the study.
                Incidence density (ID) measurements were calculated for all study subjects and were stratified by age and season. Overall study subjects in all 3 arms of the trial had 7243 days at risk during which time they developed 56 new AOM episodes for a annual ID of 2.82. There were no significant differences in the IDs between amoxicillin qd vs. bid or amoxicillin (bid or qd) vs. placebo. After stratifying by age and season of enrollment, there were no significant differences in ID rates among the 3 groups. The proportion of subjects remaining otitis-free was 63% for the placebo group, 64% for once daily amoxicillin and 61% for twice daily amoxicillin.
                While once-a-day dosing was equivalent to twice-a-day dosing for amoxicillin prophylaxis, there was no benefit of amoxicillin prophylaxis compared with a placebo control in preventing new AOM episodes. Because of the potential of excessive antibiotic use to promote the acquisition of resistant pneumococci and the lack of effectiveness in this trial, routine use of amoxicillin prophylaxis should be discouraged. Two hundred and ninety-seven children, aged 6 months to 7 years, with AOM were treated with penicillin V. One hundred and forty-eight children were given 25 or 50 mg/kg body weight twice a day for 5 days, and 149 children 25 mg/kg body weight twice a day for 10 days. No differences were found in the rate of healing between the 5- and 10-day groups. The larger penicillin dose, which was given to half the 5-day group, did not lead to improved healing. Treatment with penicillin for 5 days instead of 10 does not mean any increased risk of complications such as SOM, relapses, or therapeutic failure. Nor does the risk of a recurrence of otitis increase either. The investigation showed that the treatment of AOM with penicillin for 10 days, which is the rule in Sweden, can be reduced to 5 days with maintained satisfactory healing and without risk of increasing the number of complications. All but 2 of the 15 published trials have failed to show a difference in efficacy between short (3 to 5 days) and standard (7 to 10 days) antibiotic regimens for acute otitis media (AOM). These studies involved relatively few patients under 2 years of age, who are at a higher risk for treatment failure.
                In a prospective, comparative, double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial, we compared amoxicillin/clavulanate in 3 divided doses for 10 days with an identical 5-day regimen, followed by a 5-day placebo period.
                Between February 1995 and May 1996, 385 children (mean age, 13.3 months) were enrolled, 194 in the 5-day treatment group and 191 in the 10-day treatment group. In the per protocol analysis, clinical success was obtained on days 12 to 14 after the beginning of treatment (main analysis) in 125 (76.7%) of the 163 children receiving the 5-day regimen and 148 (88.1%) of the 168 receiving the 10-day regimen (P = .006). Clinical success persisted on days 28 to 42 among 57 (40.4%) of the 141 assessable patients in the 5-day group and 64 (46%) of the 139 assessable patients in the 10-day group. (P = .34). Multivariate analysis showed that the 10-day course was statistically superior only among children cared for outside their homes (86.8% vs 70.8%; P = .008).
                When assessed on days 12 to 14 after the outset of treatment, a 5-day regimen is not equivalent to a 10-day regimen among young children with AOM. To examine whether probiotics would reduce the occurrence or duration of acute otitis media (AOM), or the nasopharyngeal carriage of otitis pathogens in otitis-prone children.
                During this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, 24-week intervention, 309 otitis-prone children (10 months-6 years) consumed either one probiotic capsule (Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and LC705, Bifidobacterium breve 99 and Propionibacterium freudenreichii JS) (n=155) or placebo (n=154) daily. Clinical examinations were carried out and nasopharyngeal samples taken three times. Parents recorded the symptoms of upper respiratory infection (URI) in a diary.
                Probiotic treatment did not reduce the occurrence (probiotic vs. placebo: 72% vs. 65%, OR=1.48, 95% CI 0.87-2.52, p=n.s.) or the recurrence ( three) of AOM episodes (18% vs. 17%, OR=1.04, 95% CI 0.55-1.96, p=n.s.). The median duration of AOM episodes was 5.6 (IQR 3.5-9.4) vs. 6.0 (IQR 4.0-10.5) days, respectively (p= n.s.). There was a tendency showing a reduction in the occurrence of recurrent (4 to 6) respiratory infections in the probiotic group (OR for 4 URIs: 0.56, 95%CI 0.31-0.99, p=0.046; OR for 6 URIs: 0.59, 95% CI 0.34 to 1.03, p=n.s.). Probiotics did not affect the carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae or Haemophilus influenzae, but increased the prevalence of Moraxella catarrhalis (OR=1.79, 95% CI 1.06-3.00, p=0.028).
                Probiotics did not prevent the occurrence of AOM or the nasopharyngeal carriage of otitis pathogens in otitis-prone children. A tendency showing a reduction in recurrent respiratory infections must be confirmed in further studies. Recently, new evidence-based recommendations have been introduced for diagnosing and managing otitis media with effusion (OME) in children. However, there are some difficulties to follow the general guidelines in the tertiary hospitals. The purpose is to evaluate the efficiency of antibiotics or antihistamines for treatment of children with OME in the tertiary hospital with a randomized prospective clinical study.
                Eighty-four children with OME who had been diagnosed in the tertiary hospital were randomized to receive 5 different medications for 2 weeks. We prescribed antibiotics (amoxicillin-clavulanate syrup) in Group I (n=16), antibiotics/steroids (prednisolone) in Group II (n=18), antibiotics/antihistamines (ebastine) in Group III (n=15), antibiotics/steroids/antihistamines in Group IV (n=17), and mucolytics (ivy leaf extract) in Group V (n=17) for control. We followed-up children every 2 weeks and evaluated the state of OME at 3 months.
                Thirty six (42.9%) of 84 children were resolved within average 6.9 weeks after the treatments. Thirty-six (42.9%) were treated with ventilation tube insertion and 12 patients (14.3%) were observed. There was no difference in the resolution rates of OME among the five different protocols (P>0.05). There was no difference in the resolution rates among groups who used steroids, antihistamines, steroids and antihistamines, or other medications to manage 42 children with allergies (P>0.05).
                In the tertiary hospital, the cure rate of children with OME was not as high as well-known, and antibiotics or anti-allergic medications were not more effective than control. We may, therefore, need any other guidelines which are different from the previous evidence-based recommendations, including early operation in the tertiary hospitals. We report a study of the feasibility of once-a-day amoxicillin to treat acute otitis media (AOM). Seventy-seven children between ages 7 months and 12 years with AOM participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Subjects received amoxicillin 40 mg/kg/day for 10 days. They were similar in age, sex, history of ear infections, and presenting symptoms. Group I received one total dose of amoxicillin and two doses of placebo daily. Group II received three divided doses of amoxicillin daily. Parents kept a daily diary of symptoms related to the child's illness and possible medication side effects. Ten children were lost to follow-up. In the remaining 67, pneumatic otoscopy and tympanometry after 10 to 14 days revealed that AOM had resolved in 82% of group I and 68% of group II. Groups showed no significant differences in persistence of middle ear effusion; 39% in group I and 24% in group II still had fluid. Diaries showed no significant differences between groups in medication side effects. Thus, reduced-frequency dosing for AOM seems feasible and more realistic than current regimens.
For children at risk, antibiotics given once or twice daily will reduce the probability of AOM while the child is on treatment. In similar populations, antibiotics will reduce the number of episodes of AOM per year from around three to around 1.5. We believe that larger absolute benefits are likely in high-risk children. These conclusions were not affected by sensitivity analyses.