Is laparoscopic hysterectomy a waste of time? Prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) with abdominal hysterectomy (AH) for the treatment of the uterus weighing >200 g. Comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy and laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. A randomised comparison and economic evaluation of laparoscopic-assisted hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy. [Comparison of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy with abdominal hysterectomy. Technique and results]. Value of laparoscopic assistance for vaginal hysterectomy with prophylactic bilateral oophorectomy. Identifying the indications for laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a prospective, randomised comparison with abdominal hysterectomy in patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: a study of 100 cases on light-endorsed transvaginal section. [Clinical comparison of laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) and total laparoscopy hysterectomy (TLH) in women with benign disease of uterus--a prospective randomized study].
Laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) is a way to avoid laparotomy. However, there is evidence that most women treated by abdominal hysterectomy are suitable for vaginal surgery. To test this hypothesis, and to determine the relative merits of laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy (VH) and the best technique for LH, we prospectively studied 98 women who had relative contraindications for vaginal surgery by traditional criteria. 75 underwent LH and 23 VH. The LH group included 22 women who had been assigned to this route of surgery as part of a prospective randomised controlled comparison with VH (23 women). Surgery was completed with the intended technique in 93.9% of cases. 5 women in the LH group (6.7%) and 2 in the VH group required laparotomy or additional procedures. In the prospective randomised study LH took longer than VH (mean duration 131 vs 77 min). VH was the faster procedure, irrespective of uterine size and need for oophorectomy. With LH, the operative time increased as more of the hysterectomy was carried out with laparoscopic rather than vaginal dissection. Complication rates, blood loss, analgesia requirements, and recovery were similar for the two techniques. Our study confirms that most hysterectomies could be performed vaginally, and that LH is a much slower procedure. If LH is done, it should be converted to a vaginal procedure as early as possible to reduce the overall operating time. LH does seem to be a waste of time for most patients. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) can be used for the vaginal removal of large uteri (200 g), which are conventionally treated with an abdominal approach (AH).
                Forty-eight women with a sonographically estimated uterine weight of >200 g were prospectively randomized to undergo either LAVH (n = 28) or AH (n = 20).
                The median uterus weight was 334 g for LAVH vs 428 g for AH (not significant). The median operative time (133 vs 132 min) and duration of recuperation (42 vs 42 days) were similar. LAVH was associated with significantly less intraoperative blood loss (median, 200 vs 600 ml; p < 0.05), a lower pain index at postoperative day 4 (median [who scale], 0 VS 5; P < 0.05), a lower decrease in hemoglobin (median,-0.6 VS -1.55 MG/DL; P < 0.05), and a lower decrease in hematocrit (median, -0.03% VS -0.07%; P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the frequency of postoperative complications (14.3% for LAVH VS 30% for AH). Although all LAVH patients who answered the questionnaire said they would undergo the same procedure again, only 45% of the AH group were satisfied (P < 0.05).
                For the treatment of uteri >200 g, LAVH has several advantages over AH: lower postoperative morbidity, quicker short-term recuperation, and better patient acceptance. We compare the surgical results of 60 women undergoing laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) and 41 having total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) under the indications of uterine fibroids or adenomyosis. With similar specimen weight, TLH required longer surgery duration (140.4 vs. 115.1 min; p < 0.05) than LAVH. Among women with uteri weighing <or=200 g, TLH resulted in relatively smaller blood loss with comparable operating time (115.6 vs. 116.0 min for LAVH; p > 0.05) although the TLH group had a significantly higher rate of previous abdominal surgery (57.7 vs. 20%; p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to the mean cost, length of hospital stay and rate of various complications (p > 0.05). As for sexual symptoms, dyspareunia decreased significantly post-operatively in the LAVH group (p < 0.05), but not in the TLH group. A significant reduction in the frequency of orgasms after surgery was detected in both groups (p < 0.05). In conclusion, LAVH has advantages over TLH with reduced operating time. Although it is a technical challenge, TLH can be effectively performed within reasonable time limits in selected cases. The effects on sexual function, following either LAVH or TLH, are found to be similar.
                Copyright 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel To determine the safety, cost effectiveness and effect on quality of life of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) compared with total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) in the management of benign gynaecological disease.
                Randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation.
                Three hospitals in the West of Scotland.
                Two hundred women scheduled for an abdominal hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.
                Conversion rate of LAVH to TAH, complication rates, NHS resource use and costs, quality of life using EuroQol 5 D visual analogue scale, and achievement of milestones.
                The overall incidence of operative complications was 14% in the TAH group and 8% in the LAVH group, with an 8% conversion rate. Length of operation was significantly greater in the women having LAVH at 81 +/- 30 min vs 47 +/- 16 min (P < 0.001). There was no difference in analgesic requirements between the groups although there was a significantly shorter hospital stay for those having LAVH. The rate of post-surgery recovery, satisfaction with operation and quality of life at four weeks post-operative were similar in the two groups of women. LAVH was significantly more expensive than TAH and remained more expensive for all but the most extreme scenario.
                This study demonstrates that despite the decreased length of hospital stay, LAVH is more expensive than TAH. In addition, recovery following operation and patient satisfaction were not affected by the route chosen. It is unlikely that LAVH represents an efficient use of NHS resources. Technique and Results: The aim of this prospective randomised study was to compare laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH, group A) with abdominal hysterectomy (abd. HE, group B). Therefore, 35 hysterectomies due to non-malignant diseases such as uterine fibroma were performed in each group. A rather simple technique of LAVH was developed. In respect of the indication for hysterectomy, mean duration of operation and the size of the excised uteri there were no statistical differences between the two groups. One severe complication of haemorrhage was observed after LAVH in a patient suffering from a coagulopathy. The requirements for analgesics were significantly lower after LAVH compared to abd. HE during the postoperative period. A significantly lower serum concentration of the c-reactive protein on the first and third days after operation was found in group A. The patients of group A were discharged on the average 5 days after operation and 11 days in group B, respectively. Hence LAVH should replace abd. HE in most cases with the advantages of shorter hospitalisation, minimised requirements for analgesics and cost reduction. This study was undertaken to compare morbidity for women undergoing laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with bilateral oophorectomy (LAVHO) and vaginal hysterectomy with bilateral oophorectomy without laparoscopic assistance (VHO).
                Between April 1, 2002, and February 1, 2004, a prospective randomized study at Marseille University Hospital (La Conception) included 48 patients who underwent a hysterectomy with prophylactic bilateral oophorectomy for benign uterine conditions. These patients were allocated to 2 groups (LAVHO vs VHO). The study variables were duration of surgery and of hospitalization and surgical and postoperative complications.
                There was no significant difference in the duration of surgery between the LAVHO and VHO groups (100.2 +/- 27.9 vs 83.9 +/- 34.6, P = .08). The rate of complications was significantly higher in the LAVHO group (13/24 [54.1%] vs 6/24 [25%], P = .039).
                The overall complication rate was higher with LAVHO than VHO. It thus appears that laparoscopic assistance is not useful in performing vaginal hysterectomies with prophylactic bilateral oophorectomies in patients without other related disorders (endometriosis, adhesions, adnexal anomalies). To compare laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) and total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) in patients with uterine fibroids.
                A prospective randomised study.
                The San Paolo Hospital, Milan.
                Sixty-two patients, who were not suitable for a vaginal hysterectomy, requiring treatment for uterine fibroids.
                Randomisation between LAVH and TAH. Comparison of outcomes on the whole series, patients with uteri < or = 500 g (Group 1) and patients with uteri > 500 g (Group 2).
                To establish operating time, blood loss, complications, febrile morbidity, analgesics administration and hospital stay for both treatment approaches.
                Median uterine weight was 400 g in both LAVH and TAH group. Median operating time was longer for LAVH (135 min compared with 120 min for TAH; P = 0.001), but patients undergoing LAVH had less analgesics administration (23% compared with 77%, P < 0.001) and a shorter median hospital stay (3.8 compared with 5.8 days; P < 0.001). LAVH, when compared with TAH in the two weight subgroups, required a significantly longer operating time only in Group 2, significantly reduced analgesics administration only in Group 1, and significantly reduced hospital stay in both groups. Conversions of LAVH to laparotomy were significantly more frequent in Group 2 (3/11) than in Group 1 (0/20) (P = 0.04).
                Compared with TAH, LAVH has advantages in removing uteri weighing < or = 500 g, with comparable operating time, less post-operative pain and shorter recovery. Among uteri weighing > 500 g LAVH showed a shorter recovery, but longer operating time than TAH and a 27% rate of conversion to laparotomy. The objective of this study was to compare the results of a modified laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) procedure, using light-endorsed transvaginal section by two puncture trocars, with those of total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) in a prospective, randomized, short-term study. A new, modified LAVH technique using Endo GIA stapler and two puncture trocars was established. For the laparoscopic phase, each adnexum was dissected, and the vesicouterine junction was identified clearly with the laparoscopic light from the vaginal side. Vaginal-phase surgery was performed as usual. Two hundred patients scheduled for abdominal hysterectomy were randomized to either LAVH (n = 100) or TAH (n = 100). Duration of hospitalization, time of surgery, dose of analgesics, and rates of complications were significantly lower in the LAVH group (p < 0.001). The average operating time was 77 +/- 30 min for LAVH and 102 +/- 18 min for TAH. The duration of hospitalization was 3.2 +/- 0.7 days for LAVH and 5.5 +/- 1.3 days for TAH. There were three complications in the LAVH group and 15 in the TAH group. Postoperative meperidine requirements (1.2 vs. 3.7 ampoules, 1 ampoule = 50 mg) were significantly fewer in the LAVH group. Regarding the training time, the mean operating time in the first 20 cases was 98 min, and in the last 20 cases it was 70.9 min. As compared with TAH and other modified LAVH procedures reported previously, the present technique is easy to learn and timesaving with fewer complications.
                Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel To compare two techniques of hysterectomy.
                Prospective, randomised study.
                Institute for the Mother and Child Care, Prague.
                85 patients randomized into two groups--laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) and total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). The criteria studied were length of the procedure, blood loss, complication rate, uterus weight, rate of conversions, consumption of analgesics, inflammatory response.
                Mean length of the procedure for LAVH, TLH was 85 and 111 min, respectivelly, the mean blood loss 306 and 184 ml. There was no difference in inflammatory response and use of antibiotics. Consumption of analgesics was higher in the TLH group. Conversions to laparotomy occurred only in the LAVH group. Only in the TLH group we noticed serious postoperative complications.
                LAVH seems to be the preferable technique of hysterectomy for benign diseases of the uterus.
Because of equal or significantly better outcomes on all parameters, VH should be performed in preference to AH where possible. Where VH is not possible, LH may avoid the need for AH however the length of the surgery increases as the extent of the surgery performed laparoscopically increases. The surgical approach to hysterectomy should be decided by the woman in discussion with her surgeon in light of the relative benefits and hazards.