The cardiovascular effects of dopamine in the severely asphyxiated neonate. Reducing the risk of major elective surgery: randomised controlled trial of preoperative optimisation of oxygen delivery. [Preventive treatment of convulsions in perinatal asphyxia]. Randomized, blind trial of dopamine versus dobutamine for treatment of hypotension in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome. Response to dobutamine and dopamine in the hypotensive very preterm infant. High-dose phenobarbital therapy in term newborn infants with severe perinatal asphyxia: a randomized, prospective study with three-year follow-up. Randomised controlled trial of plasma protein fraction versus dopamine in hypotensive very low birthweight infants. Moderate hypothermia to treat perinatal asphyxial encephalopathy. Controlled trial of D-penicillamine to prevent retinopathy of prematurity.
The cardiovascular effects of dopamine were evaluated in 14 severely asphyxiated neonates. After a period of stabilization, either dopamine 2.5 micrograms/kg/minute or placebo was infused in a randomized double-blind protocol. In seven dopamine-treated infants, echocardiographically determined shortening fraction and mean velocity of circumferential fiber shortening increased when compared to preinfusion values (P less than 0.05). There was no significant change in these echo indices of cardiac function in the placebo-treated group. Systolic blood pressure rose in the dopamine group when compared to predopamine infusion values and to the postinfusion values of the placebo group (P less than 0.001 and 0.025, respectively). Diastolic blood pressure increased to a small degree in the dopamine group. There was no significant change in heart rate or echocardiographically measured systolic time intervals. Low doses of dopamine increase cardiac performance and raise systolic blood pressure in the severely asphyxiated neonate. To determine whether preoperative optimisation of oxygen delivery improves outcome after major elective surgery, and to determine whether the inotropes, adrenaline and dopexamine, used to enhance oxygen delivery influence outcome.
                Randomised controlled trial with double blinding between inotrope groups. Setting: York District Hospital, England.
                138 patients undergoing major elective surgery who were at risk of developing postoperative complications either because of the surgery or the presence of coexistent medical conditions. Interventions: Patients were randomised into three groups. Two groups received invasive haemodynamic monitoring, fluid, and either adrenaline or dopexamine to increase oxygen delivery. Inotropic support was continued during surgery and for at least 12 hours afterwards. The third group (control) received routine perioperative care.
                Hospital mortality and morbidity.
                Overall, 3/92 (3%) preoptimised patients died compared with 8/46 controls (17%) (P=0.007). There were no differences in mortality between the treatment groups, but 14/46 (30%) patients in the dopexamine group developed complications compared with 24/46 (52%) patients in the adrenaline group (difference 22%, 95% confidence interval 2% to 41%) and 28 patients (61%) in the control group (31%, 11% to 50%). The use of dopexamine was associated with a decreased length of stay in hospital.
                Routine preoperative optimisation of patients undergoing major elective surgery would be a significant and cost effective improvement in perioperative care. A double blind randomized study has been performed in 17 newborn infants bearing a diagnosis of perinatal asphyxia and treated with phenobarbital (FB) or phenytoin (DPH) to prevent the onset of seizures. The initial dose for both drugs was 12 m/kg IM the first day, followed by 6 mg/kg/day through the seventh day. Patients were clinically assessed daily and drug blood levels were also determined daily by enzyme immunoassay (EMIT). Mean FB levels along the seven days were 17.6, 23.7, 25.6, 31.6, 31.4, 36.7, and 44.6 micrograms/ml. One child treated with FB exhibited seizures on the second day and six children showed drowsiness and bradycardia on the last two days, that were attributable to high levels of FB. Mean (DPH) levels along the study were: 4.6, 7.0, 9.7, 6.5, 4.5, and 5.2 micrograms/ml. Seizures occurred in one of the DPH-treated patients and signs of therapeutic inefficacy such as hypertonus and abnormal movements appeared in four children. To compare the efficacy of dopamine and dobutamine for the treatment of hypotension (mean arterial blood pressure, < or = 30 mm Hg) in preterm (< or = 34 weeks of gestation) infants with respiratory distress syndrome in the first 24 hours of life, we enrolled 63 hypotensive preterm infants in a randomized, blind trial. Inclusion criteria required an arterial catheter for measurement of mean arterial blood pressure, treatment with exogenous surfactant, and persistent hypotension after volume expansion with 20 ml/kg (packed erythrocytes if hematocrit < 0.40, 5% albumin if > or = 0.40). Intravenous study drug infusions were initiated at 5 micrograms/kg per minute and then increased in increments of 5 micrograms/kg per minute at 20-minute intervals until a mean arterial blood pressure > 30 mm Hg was attained and sustained for > or = 30 minutes (success) or a maximum rate of 20 micrograms/kg per minute was reached without resolution of hypotension (failure). The study groups at entry were comparable for birth weight, gestational age, postnatal age, gender, birth depression, hematocrit < 0.40, heart rate, oxygenation index, delivery route, maternal chorioamnionitis, and maternal magnesium or ritodrine therapy. No infants in the dopamine group had a treatment failure (0/31; 0%); (16%) of 32 infants failed to respond to dobutamine (p = 0.028). Success was attained at < or = 10 micrograms/kg per minute in 30 (97%) of 31 infants given dopamine and in 22 (69%) of 32 infants given dobutamine (p < 0.01). Among those treated successfully, the increase in mean arterial blood pressure was significantly higher in those given dopamine (mean, 11.3 vs 6.8 mm Hg; p = 0.003). We conclude that dopamine is more effective than dobutamine for the early treatment of hypotension in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome. A randomised double blind study was designed to evaluate haemodynamic response to dobutamine and dopamine in 20 hypotensive preterm infants of less than 32 weeks' gestation. Neonates initially received dopamine or dobutamine 5 micrograms/kg/min. If mean arterial pressure (MAP) remained below 31 mm Hg, the infusion rate was increased in increments of 5 micrograms/kg/min. If 20 micrograms/kg/min of the initial drug failed to achieve a MAP above 30 mm Hg, it was discontinued and the other drug was administered at the same infusion rate. Left ventricular output (LVO) was measured by pulsed Doppler echocardiography. Mean (SE) MAP increased significantly from 24.4 (1.0) to 32.0 (1.4) mm Hg at a median dobutamine dosage of 20 micrograms/kg/min and from 25.6 (1.2) to 37.7 (1.5) mm Hg at a median dopamine dosage of 12.5 micrograms/kg/min. The percentage LVO increase was +21 (7)% with dobutamine compared with -14 (8)% with dopamine. Dobutamine failed to increase MAP above 30 mm Hg in six infants out of 10, whereas dopamine succeeded in all 10 infants. Six switches from dobutamine to dopamine were thus performed, providing a rise in MAP (29.2 (0.5) to 41.2 (2.0) mm Hg) and drop in LVO (356 (40) to 263 (36) ml/kg/min). These data indicate that dopamine is more effective than dobutamine in raising and maintaining MAP above 30 mm Hg; however dopamine does not increase LVO. To determine whether 40 mg/kg phenobarbital given to term infants with severe asphyxia would result in a lower incidence of seizures in the newborn period and an improved neurologic outcome.
                We conducted a randomized, controlled, prospective study. Entry criteria included (1) an initial arterial pH less than or equal to 7.0 with a base deficit 15 mEq/L or more, (2) Apgar score less than or equal to 3 at 5 minutes of age, or (3) failure to initiate spontaneous respiration by 10 minutes of age. Sample size was calculated to detect a 50% reduction in the incidence of neonatal seizures.
                No differences were present between treatment and control groups with respect to severity of asphyxia assessed by initial arterial pH, base excess, cerebrospinal fluid lactate dehydrogenase concentration or detection of CSF creatine kinase of its BB isoenzyme. Seizures occurred in 9 of 15 infants in the treatment group and 14 of 16 infants in the control group (p = 0.11). No adverse effects were observed from phenobarbital on heart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure, or arterial blood gas values. Three-year follow-up revealed normal outcome in 11 of 15 infants in the treatment group and 3 of 16 in the control group (p = 0.003).
                Phenobarbital, when administered in a dose of 40 mg/kg intravenously over 1 hour in term, severely asphyxiated newborn infants appeared to be safe and was associated with a 27% reduction in the incidence of seizures and a significant improvement in neurologic outcome at 3 years of age. Around 20% of very low birthweight infants admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit become hypotensive within 24 hours of their admission. Standard treatment is either expansion of the circulating volume by the infusion of plasma protein fraction or by using dopamine to improve cardiac function. The purpose of this study was to investigate by a randomised controlled trial which was the most appropriate treatment. Thirty nine infants were randomised to receive either plasma protein fraction or dopamine as first line treatment if they became hypotensive within 24 hours of admission to the neonatal intensive care unit. Seventeen of 19 (89%) infants responded to dopamine, whereas only 9/20 (45%) responded to plasma protein fraction. The median dose of dopamine needed to increase the blood pressure to at least the 10th centile was 7.5 micrograms/kg/min and was infused for a median duration of 18 hours. These observations suggest that dopamine should be used earlier in the treatment of these infants than has previously been recommended. Whether hypothermic therapy improves neurodevelopmental outcomes in newborn infants with asphyxial encephalopathy is uncertain.
                We performed a randomized trial of infants who were less than 6 hours of age and had a gestational age of at least 36 weeks and perinatal asphyxial encephalopathy. We compared intensive care plus cooling of the body to 33.5 degrees C for 72 hours and intensive care alone. The primary outcome was death or severe disability at 18 months of age. Prespecified secondary outcomes included 12 neurologic outcomes and 14 other adverse outcomes.
                Of 325 infants enrolled, 163 underwent intensive care with cooling, and 162 underwent intensive care alone. In the cooled group, 42 infants died and 32 survived but had severe neurodevelopmental disability, whereas in the noncooled group, 44 infants died and 42 had severe disability (relative risk for either outcome, 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68 to 1.07; P=0.17). Infants in the cooled group had an increased rate of survival without neurologic abnormality (relative risk, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.16 to 2.12; P=0.003). Among survivors, cooling resulted in reduced risks of cerebral palsy (relative risk, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.96; P=0.03) and improved scores on the Mental Developmental Index and Psychomotor Developmental Index of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development II (P=0.03 for each) and the Gross Motor Function Classification System (P=0.01). Improvements in other neurologic outcomes in the cooled group were not significant. Adverse events were mostly minor and not associated with cooling.
                Induction of moderate hypothermia for 72 hours in infants who had perinatal asphyxia did not significantly reduce the combined rate of death or severe disability but resulted in improved neurologic outcomes in survivors. (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN89547571.)
                2009 Massachusetts Medical Society 204 infants with birthweights between 751 and 2000 g and 26-35 weeks gestational age (100 treated and 104 control subjects) were enrolled in a prospective controlled trial of the effectiveness of D-penicillamine (DPA) in the prevention of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). The two groups did not differ significantly in gestational age, birth weight, Apgar scores, the time of exposure to oxygen and in the incidence of PDA or in the number of exchange transfusions and RBTs. Of the treated infants 29, and of the control infants 34 died before the tenth week of life. These cases were not included in further analysis. Patients were subsequently examined and assessed by two ophthalmologists independently, who did not know which babies were receiving DPA. Six of the 70 surviving control infants and none of the 71 surviving treated infants had ROP stage II or graver. The results suggested that ROP may effectively be prevented with DPA in very low-birth-weight-infants, and that the drug has no serious adverse effects during the neonatal period.
There is currently insufficient evidence from randomised controlled trials that the use of dopamine in term infants with suspected perinatal asphyxia improves mortality or long-term neurodevelopmental outcome. The question of whether dopamine improves outcome for term infants with suspected perinatal asphyxia has not been answered. Further research is required to determine whether or not the use of dopamine improves mortality and long-term morbidity for these infants and if so, issues such as which infants, at what dose and with what co-interventions should be addressed.