Cyclosporin A treatment in primary biliary cirrhosis: results of a long-term placebo controlled trial. Pilot study of cyclosporin A in patients with symptomatic primary biliary cirrhosis. A controlled trial of cyclosporine in the treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis. Randomized trial of chlorambucil for primary biliary cirrhosis. Tacrolimus versus microemulsified ciclosporin in liver transplantation: the TMC randomised controlled trial. A prospective trial of colchicine for primary biliary cirrhosis. Enisoprost in liver transplantation. Ursodeoxycholic acid in the treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis. Long-term effects of ursodeoxycholic acid in primary biliary cirrhosis: results of a double-blind controlled multicentric trial. UDCA-Cooperative Group from the Spanish Association for the Study of the Liver.
Effective treatment for primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) resulting in slower progression and improved survival remains elusive. Cyclosporin A (CyA), which has been so effective in preventing human allograft rejection, has shown promise in small numbers of patients in early studies.
                Three hundred forty-nine patients with PBC were randomized to receive CyA, 3 mg.kg-1.day-1, or placebo in a multicenter study with follow-up for 6 years. The end point was death or liver transplantation.
                Cox multivariate analysis showed time from entry to death or transplantation was significantly prolonged (by up to 50%) in the CyA-treated group. Liver-related mortality was also significantly lower. However, a univariate analysis of survival showed no statistical differences between the two groups. Biochemical liver indices deteriorated more slowly in the CyA-treated group, but serum creatinine concentration was elevated > 150 mumol/L in 9%, necessitating permanent discontinuation in half of these. A reduction in the dose of CyA was required in 11% because of hypertension.
                CyA has some therapeutic potential in primary biliary cirrhosis, providing blood pressure and renal function are closely monitored. The purpose of this pilot study was to determine whether daily administration of cyclosporin A to symptomatic patients with primary biliary cirrhosis for 1 yr would lead to a significant and sustained improvement in liver enzyme abnormalities. Twelve adult patients (11 female, 1 male; aged 52.6 +/- 8.9 yr, mean +/- SD) with serologic and histologically defined primary biliary cirrhosis were randomized to receive either oral cyclosporin A or vehicle placebo. Cyclosporin A was administered at sufficient dosages to maintain serum radioimmunoassay trough levels between 100 and 200 ng/ml (starting dosage, 2.5 mg/kg.day). After 1 yr of therapy, significant changes from pretreatment values were seen only in recipients of cyclosporin A. These included a 37% decrease in mean serum alkaline phosphatase and a 43% decrease in gamma-glutamyltransferase (controls +3% and -14%, respectively). Mean serum bilirubin and albumin levels and prothrombin times remained unaltered in the two groups, as did the extent of inflammation and fibrosis and the histologic staging of liver biopsy specimens. Although mean serum creatinine levels increased by 51% in recipients of cyclosporin A (+2% in controls), there were no associated changes in diastolic blood pressure or creatinine clearance values. Other side effects including thrombocytopenia, hirsutism, headaches, tremor, and parasthesiae were common in the treated group but not of sufficient severity to warrant adjustment in the dosage or discontinuation of therapy. The observed changes in hepatic, renal, and hematologic tests tended to return to baseline after discontinuation of therapy. Two patients, both placebo recipients, died of liver failure during the study period. The results of this study indicate that in symptomatic primary biliary cirrhosis, cyclosporin A administration is associated with a significant improvement in cholestatic liver enzyme abnormalities that persists for the duration of therapy. A progressive rise in serum creatinine levels and a high incidence of side effects raise concerns regarding the long-term safety of this agent in primary biliary cirrhosis. Primary biliary cirrhosis is a progressive disease of the liver characterized by the immunologic destruction of bile ducts; effective therapy is lacking. We therefore evaluated the safety and efficacy of low-dose cyclosporine in 29 patients with primary biliary cirrhosis without evidence of damage to the lobular architecture (precirrhotic disease) or portal hypertension. The patients were randomly assigned to receive either cyclosporine (4 mg per kilogram of body weight per day) or placebo. After one year 17 of the 19 patients assigned to cyclosporine had improvement or stability in their degree of fatigue, and 18 in their degree of pruritus. In contrast, among the 10 patients assigned to placebo, fatigue increased in 4 (P less than 0.06) and pruritus worsened in 6 (P less than 0.001). Those assigned to cyclosporine also had significant decreases in serum levels of bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, gamma globulin, and the titer of antimitochondrial antibodies. For the 20 patients who have completed two years in the study, liver biopsies (coded specimens) showed evidence of histologic progression in only 1 of 13 patients in the cyclosporine group, as compared with 5 of 7 in the placebo group (P less than 0.003). No patient has permanently discontinued cyclosporine because of side effects; however, signs of nephrotoxicity developed in 12 of 19, and 9 of 19 had increased blood pressure. We conclude that in patients with precirrhotic primary biliary cirrhosis, immunosuppressive therapy with cyclosporine is promising and deserves further evaluation. Twenty-four patients with primary biliary cirrhosis were entered into a prospective, randomized trial of chlorambucil therapy. Thirteen patients received chlorambucil (0.5-4 mg/day) and 11 patients received no therapy; all have been followed for 2-6 yr (mean, 4.1 yr). Two control but no treated patients died. Average serum bilirubin, serum aspartate aminotransferase activities, and albumin levels improved or remained unchanged in treated patients but worsened in controls. Serum alkaline phosphatase levels did not change in either group. Immunoglobulin M levels decreased and became normal in all treated patients but in only 3 control patients. Liver biopsy histology revealed an improvement in inflammatory cell infiltrate in treated patients in comparison with controls, but no significant change in degree of fibrosis or the histologic stage of disease. Side effects of therapy included bone marrow suppression necessitating discontinuation of the drug in 4 patients. These findings indicate that chlorambucil therapy may retard the progression of primary biliary cirrhosis. Whether such therapy will ultimately decrease morbidity and improve survival in this disease can only be demonstrated by large-scale, placebo-controlled trials. Calcineurin inhibitors are the most commonly used immunosuppressive drugs in liver transplantation, but the optimum initial immunosuppression regimen is not known. The aim of our study was to compare tacrolimus with microemulsified ciclosporin, in a regimen with standardised concomitant immunosuppressive therapy.
                In all liver transplant centres in the UK and Republic of Ireland, 606 patients undergoing a first orthotopic liver transplantation were randomly assigned open-label tacrolimus or microemulsified ciclosporin. Primary outcome was the combined frequency (whichever occurred first) of death, retransplantation, or treatment failure for immunological reasons, analysed by intention to treat.
                96% of patients received the treatment allocated to them. The primary outcome was reached in 62 (21%) of 301 patients in the tacrolimus group versus 99 (32%) of 305 allocated microemulsified ciclosporin (relative risk 0.63 [95% CI 0.48-0.84], p=0.001; time-to-event analysis log-rank test p=0.002): deaths (50 [17%] vs 72 [24%]); retransplantations (11 [4%] vs 31 [10%]) treatment failure for immunological reasons (6 [2%] vs 12 [4%]). The relative risk for the composite outcome was in favour of tacrolimus. The main causes of death in both trial groups were sepsis and multiple organ failure (31 [10%] vs 30 [10%]), and the main cause for retransplantation was hepatic artery thrombosis (6 [2%] vs 17 [6%]). Renal dysfunction and the need for antihypertensive therapy were much the same in both groups. Tacrolimus was more diabetogenic.
                Clinical outcome at 1 year was better with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression than with microemulsified ciclosporin during the first year after liver transplantation. Tacrolimus should be the first choice of calcineurin inhibitor for patients receiving their first liver graft. We entered 60 patients with primary biliary cirrhosis in a double-blind randomized controlled trial to determine whether colchicine is therapeutically effective. Thirty patients had early disease (Stages 1 and 2), and 30 had advanced disease (Stages 3 and 4). Fifteen patients with early disease and 15 with advanced disease received colchicine (0.6 mg twice daily), and the remainder received placebo. Patients were studied about every two months; those remaining in the blind phase at two years underwent repeat liver biopsy and were then placed on open-label colchicine (0.6 mg twice daily). With a few exceptions, the results in patients with early disease were similar to those in patients with advanced disease; hence, data on patients in all stages were combined in the main analysis. During the two-year study period the colchicine-treated patients, as compared with the placebo-treated patients, had improvement in levels of serum albumin, serum bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, cholesterol, and aminotransferases. However, there was no such improvement in the severity of symptoms or physical findings; moreover, there was no significant difference in the histologic changes noted at liver biopsy in the two treatment groups. At four years after entry, the cumulative mortality from liver disease was 21 percent in patients given colchicine and 47 percent in those given placebo (P = 0.05). The only side effect of colchicine was diarrhea, noted in three patients. The consistent and significant improvement in a number of markers of liver disease and the apparent decreased mortality from liver disease suggest that colchicine may provide some long-term clinical benefit in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. However, the failure of colchicine to reduce hepatic inflammation and fibrosis leaves uncertain the effect of the drug on the longterm outcome of this disease. Previous human studies in renal transplant recipients have shown a lower incidence of acute rejection and cyclosporine-associated acute nephrotoxicity when prostaglandins are administered in conjunction with standard immunosuppressants. This study evaluates the effects of enisoprost (EP), a synthetic PGE methyl ester analog, in a single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group trial in 81 consecutive adult patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). The subjects received EP 100 mg p.o. t.i.d. (n = 40) or placebo (n = 41) for the first 12 weeks after OLT. Immunosuppression was based on cyclosporine, azathioprine, and corticosteroids. Effective renal plasma flow and glomerular filtration rate were determined at 4 and 12 weeks after OLT. Eighty-one patients entered the study; sixty-six patients completed the 16-week study period. There were no statistically significant differences between EP- and placebo-treated groups at 12 weeks for creatinine clearance, glomerular filtration rate, and effective renal plasma flow. At least 1 episode of cyclosporine nephrotoxicity occurred in 7/40 patients (17.5%) in the EP group compared with 9/41 patients (20.0%) in the placebo group (P = 0.781). There was no significant difference in the incidence of graft rejection episodes in the 2 groups. Enisoprost, as used in this study, does not have any beneficial effect on renal function or incidence of rejection in OLT recipients. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) was conducted in 180 patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) to define the efficacy and safety of UDCA. Efficacy was assessed by time to treatment failure defined as death; liver transplantation; histological progression; development of varices, ascites, or encephalopathy; doubling of total serum bilirubin levels; progression of fatigue or pruritus; drug toxicity; or voluntary withdrawal.
                Patients with well-defined PBC underwent complete history, physical examination, liver chemistries, ultrasonography, upper endoscopy, and liver biopsy at entry as well as at 2 years. Liver chemistries were determined every 3 months.
                In patients receiving UDCA, treatment failure was delayed compared with the placebo-treated group (P = 0.0003, log rank test). Seven patients receiving UDCA died or required transplantation compared with 12 in the placebo group (P = 0.18). No patients discontinued UDCA because of side effects of toxicity.
                UDCA was extraordinarily safe and well tolerated, and its use was associated with delayed progression of the disease as defined in this study. However, the lack of effects on symptoms, histology, and the need for liver transplantation or survival indicate that further evaluation is necessary to determine the ultimate role of UDCA in the treatment of PBC. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) for primary biliary cirrhosis in a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial.
                Consecutive patients (n=192) were randomized to receive 14-16 mg UDCA/kg/day or placebo. Patients underwent a complete history, physical examination, liver chemistries, immunological determinations and liver biopsy at entry and at the end of the trial, which lasted for at least 2 years. Patients were seen every 3 months and the median follow-up was 3.4 years (range 0.3 to 6.1 years).
                Patients receiving UDCA (99) or placebo (93) were comparable with regard to age, sex, biochemical parameters and liver histology. UDCA treatment was associated with decreases in alkaline phosphatase, gammaglutamyl transferase, alanine aminotransferase, and cholesterol levels, effects which were conspicuous after 3 months of treatment and remained similar during the follow-up. During the study 31 patients (10 receiving UDCA and 21 placebo) discontinued the trial because of noncompliance (n=11), voluntary withdrawal (n=19) or adverse effects (n=1). Treatment failure (death or liver transplantation) was observed in 17 patients receiving UDCA and in 11 patients receiving placebo. Times to death or liver transplantation and to clinical complications were not significantly different in patients receiving UDCA or placebo. Histological analysis indicates that UDCA improved portal inflammation and prevented histological stage progression. By contrast, histological stage as well as ductular proliferation and ductopenia progressed in patients receiving placebo.
                Although UDCA treatment did not significantly affect time to death or liver transplantation and to clinical complications, the effects on both cholestasis and liver histology suggest that UDCA is safe and may be useful for preventing the progression of primary biliary cirrhosis.
We found no evidence supporting or refuting that cyclosporin A may delay death, death or liver transplantation, or progression of primary biliary cirrhosis. Cyclosporin A caused more adverse events than placebo, like renal dysfunction and hypertension. We do not recommend the use of cyclosporin A outside randomised clinical trials.