An observer-blinded comparison of supervised and unsupervised aerobic exercise regimens in fibromyalgia. Is group physical therapy superior to individualized therapy in ankylosing spondylitis? A randomized controlled trial. Circuit class therapy versus individual physiotherapy sessions during inpatient stroke rehabilitation: a controlled trial. Comparison of supervised exercise training and home-based exercise training in chronic heart failure. The effectiveness of intensive group exercise on patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Effects of home versus supervised exercise for patients with intermittent claudication. A pilot study of a supervised group exercise programme as a rehabilitation treatment for women with breast cancer receiving adjuvant treatment. Value of a supervised exercise program for the therapy of arterial claudication. Combined spa-exercise therapy is effective in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a randomized controlled trial.
To compare a supervised 12-week aerobic exercise class with unsupervised home aerobic exercises in the treatment of patients with fibromyalgia.
                This was a 48-week randomized single (observer) blind study in a teaching hospital rheumatology and physiotherapy department. The subjects were 74 patients who fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology criteria for fibromyalgia. Results and conclusions. A 12-week exercise class programme with home exercises demonstrated no benefit over a single physiotherapy session with home exercises in the treatment of pain in patients with fibromyalgia. Neither group (nor the groups combined) showed an improvement in pain compared with baseline. There was some significant benefit in psychological well-being in the exercise class group and perhaps a slowing of functional deterioration in this group. To study the effects of adding supervised group physical therapy to unsupervised individualized therapy in ankylosing spondylitis.
                One hundred forty-four patients were randomized to exercises at home, or the same plus weekly group physical therapy for 9 months. Endpoints were spinal mobility, fitness (maximum work capacity by ergometry), functioning (Sickness Impact Profile, Health Assessment Questionnaire for the Spondylarthropathies, and Functional Index), and patient's global assessment of change on a 10-cm visual analogue scale.
                Thoracolumbar flexion and extension increased by an average of 0.5 cm (9%) after home exercises, and by 0.9 cm (16%) after group therapy. Maximum load in ergometry decreased by 2 W (1%) after home exercises, but increased by 7 W (4%) after group therapy. Global assessment improved by 0.3 (6%) after home exercises, and by 1.7 (34%) after group therapy. These three differences were statistically significant. There were no significant differences in chest expansion, cervical rotation, or the self-assessments of functioning.
                Group physical therapy proved superior to individualized therapy in improving thoracolumbar mobility and fitness, and had an important effect on global health reported by the patients. To compare the effectiveness of circuit class therapy and individual physiotherapy (PT) sessions in improving walking ability and functional balance for people recovering from stroke.
                Nonrandomized, single-blind controlled trial.
                Medical rehabilitation ward of a rehabilitation hospital.
                Sixty-eight persons receiving inpatient rehabilitation after a stroke.
                Subjects received group circuit class therapy or individual treatment sessions as the sole method of PT service delivery for the duration of their inpatient stay.
                Five-meter walk test (5MWT), two-minute walk test (2MWT), and the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) measured 4 weeks after admission. Secondary outcome measures included the Iowa Level of Assistance Scale, Motor Assessment Scale upper-limb items, and patient satisfaction. Measures were taken on admission and 4 weeks later.
                Subjects in both groups showed significant improvements between admission and week 4 in all primary outcome measures. There were no significant between group differences in the primary outcome measures at week 4 (5MWT mean difference, .07m/s; 2MWT mean difference, 1.8m; BBS mean difference, 3.9 points). A significantly higher proportion of subjects in the circuit class therapy group were able to walk independently at discharge (P=.01) and were satisfied with the amount of therapy received (P=.007).
                Circuit class therapy appeared as effective as individual PT sessions for this sample of subjects receiving inpatient rehabilitation poststroke. Favorable results for circuit classes in terms of increased walking independence and patient satisfaction suggest this model of service delivery warrants further investigation. This study was planned to compare the outcomes between supervised and home-based exercise training in patients with chronic heart failure.
                The study was conducted at the Department of Physical Therapy in Ankara University, Faculty of Medicine, Turkey between 2000 and 2001. Twenty-two patients with stable chronic heart failure were randomly assigned to the supervised exercise training group (n=11) or the home-based exercise training group (n=11). Symptom-limited maximal exercise tests with gas exchange analysis were carried out before randomization. Work load equivalent to 60% of achieved peak heart rate at the tests was determined as exercise training work load for each subject. Both groups participated in a program of 3 exercise training sessions per week for 3 months. The exercise tests were repeated after 3 months.
                After training, peak exercise duration increased significantly in the supervised exercise training group and the home-based exercise training group (p<0.05). There was substantial improvement in peak VO2 with exercise training in the supervised exercise training group (p<0.05) but, peak VO2 did not change significantly in the home-based exercise training group (p>0.05).
                Supervised and home-based exercise training enhanced exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure. The training program must be tailored to each patient's specific limitations, individual needs and possibilities. Home-based exercise training may be a training alternative to stable chronic heart failure patients who prefer not to participate in an outpatient supervised training program. To compare, in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS), the effectiveness on pain, functional and psychological status of an intensive group exercise programme under the supervision of a physiotherapist and a home physiotherapy programme.
                Fifty-one patients with AS were randomly allocated into study and control groups. The study was designed as a prospective, double-blind study.
                Outpatient department, Istanbul Medical Faculty.
                Patients who consulted with complaints of pain, morning stiffness and restricted range of movement with a confirmed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis.
                Before exercise, both groups were given an education programme about AS. For group I patients an intensive exercise programme was organized under the supervision of a physiotherapist for six weeks. Group II patients had to practise exercises individually at home.
                Both groups were evaluated and compared for pain, functional and psychological status before treatment, at the end of treatment and three months after treatment using a visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, Beck Depression Scale and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI).
                Six patients withdrew, four from group I. Results from the remaining 45 showed more positive changes in the patients undertaking group exercise at six weeks and three months after treatment. Values showed a statistical significant difference in favour of group I.
                Group exercise in hospital may be more effective than home-based exercises at reducing impairment associated with ankylosing spondylitis. This study was performed to test the efficacy of a supervised, hospital-based exercise program compared with a home-based exercise program involving minimal supervision, for both walking ability and quality of life measures in patients with exercise-limiting intermittent leg claudication.
                Twenty-one patients were assigned randomly to 12 weeks of supervised exercise or to a home-based exercise group. After 12 weeks the participants in the supervised group transitioned to a home-based program. Both groups were then reevaluated at the end of 24 weeks. The initial claudication distance (ICD) and absolute claudication distance (ACD) on progressive treadmill exercise was measured at baseline, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks. Additionally, self-reported quality of life status was evaluated using the MOS SF-36 questionnaire.
                Each group improved (P < 0.01) ACD from baseline to 12 weeks, which was sustained at the 24-week follow-up. Both groups experienced similar long-term improvements (P < 0.05) in ACD (521.5 +/- 253.4 meters to 741.9 +/- 365.6 meters for the supervised group, 532.2 +/- 263.5 meters to 715.0 +/- 394.4 meters in the home group, P not significant, between groups). The supervised group experienced a greater improvement (P < 0.01) in the ICD after 12 weeks than the home group but not at 24 weeks. The on-site group also experienced significant improvements in ICD after 24 weeks (P < 0.05). Neither group manifested an improvement in self-reported physical function or mental health as assessed by the MOS SF-36.
                A structured exercise program was more effective in improving the ICD over a 24-week period than a less formal, home-based program. However, if patients are screened properly and receive adequate instruction, a home-based program can be a safe, low-cost alternative providing similar long-term (24 weeks) exercise benefits in ACD. This pilot study examined whether exercise as an adjunctive rehabilitation therapy could benefit women who have early stage breast cancer and are currently receiving chemotherapy/radiotherapy. The study was designed as a randomised controlled trial (RCT). Physical functioning, fatigue and Quality of Life (QoL) outcomes were evaluated pre and post a 12-week intervention. The results showed that after 12 weeks the women who participated in the exercise programme (n = 12) displayed significantly higher levels of physical functioning and reported higher QoL scores than the controls (n = 10). Changes in fatigue and satisfaction with life favoured the intervention group but did not reach significance. These results are encouraging and suggest that a structured group exercise programme during adjuvant treatment is a safe, well tolerated and effective way of providing physical and psychological health benefits to women during treatment for early stage breast cancer. Since this was a pilot study the numbers did not allow appropriately powered analyses of some variables of interest and favoured relatively young and socio-economically advantaged women. Future studies need to address these issues and determine if these short-term benefits can be sustained. This study was performed to test the effectiveness of a formal supervised exercise program against a home-based exercise program for both walking ability and quality of life endpoints.
                Patients with arterial claudication were randomized to either a 12-week supervised exercise program (SUPEX) with weekly lectures relating to peripheral vascular disease or to a home exercise group (HOMEX) who attended an identical lecture program and received weekly exercise instruction. The study population included 29 men and 26 women, with a mean age of 69.1 +/- 8.1 years. Forty-seven patients completed the 12-week program, 46 were available for testing at completion, and 38 for 6-month testing. Claudication pain time (CPT) and maximum walking time (MWT) on a progressive treadmill exercise test were assessed at baseline, program completion, and 6 months. The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) was administered at these intervals to assess effects on quality of life.
                Each group improved (p < 0.001) in both CPT and MWT at the completion of the 12-week program, which was sustained at the 6-month follow-up. Increase in HOMEX CPT from baseline (3.6 +/- 2.73 minutes) to 6-month follow-up (6.6 +/- 3.17 minutes) was less than for the SUPEX group (3.8 +/- 2.74 to 11.2 +/- 4.02 minutes, respectively); similar results were obtained for MWT. At both completion and 6 months, there was a significant intergroup difference for CPT and MWT (p < 0.004) favoring SUPEX. For both groups, measures of health perception based on the SF-36 demonstrated improvement (p < 0.002) in Physical Function Subscale, Bodily Pain Subscale, and Physical Composite Score. There were no between-group differences on the subsets of the SF-36 at the three assessment intervals.
                Supervised exercise programs provide superior increased walking ability in the noninterventional therapy of arterial claudication, and both supervised and home based exercise therapy result in improved SF-36 functional measures. The lack of intergroup differences in these measures may be a result of the high degree of interaction with healthcare providers in the HOMEX group. Although a supervised program results in optimal walking benefits, a highly structured home-based program provides similar functional improvement and may be a satisfactory alternative for patients with lesser walking requirements. To determine the efficacy of combined spa-exercise therapy in addition to standard treatment with drugs and weekly group physical therapy in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).
                A total of 120 Dutch outpatients with AS were randomly allocated into 3 groups of 40 patients each. Group 1 (mean age 48 +/- 10 years; male:female ratio 25:15) was treated in a spa resort in Bad Hofgastein, Austria; group 2 (mean age 49 +/- 9 years; male:female ratio 28:12) in a spa resort in Arcen, The Netherlands. The control group (mean age 48 +/- 10 years; male:female ratio 34:6) stayed at home and continued their usual drug treatment and weekly group physical therapy during the intervention weeks. Standardized spa-exercise therapy of 3 weeks duration consisted of group physical exercises, walking, correction therapy (lying supine on a bed), hydrotherapy, sports, and visits to either the Gasteiner Heilstollen (Austria) or sauna (Netherlands). After spa-exercise therapy all patients followed weekly group physical therapy for another 37 weeks. Primary outcomes were functional ability, patient's global well-being, pain, and duration of morning stiffness, aggregated in a pooled index of change (PIC).
                Analysis of variance showed a statistically significant time-effect (P < 0.001) and time-by-treatment interaction (P = 0.004), indicating that the 3 groups differed over time with respect to the course of the PIC. Four weeks after start of spa-exercise therapy, the mean difference in PIC between group 1 and controls was 0.49 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.16-0.82, P = 0.004) and between group 2 and controls was 0.46 (95% CI 0.15-0.78, P = 0.005). At 16 weeks, the difference between group 1 and controls was 0.63 (95% CI 0.23-1.02, P = 0.002) and between group 2 and controls was 0.34 (95% CI--0.05-0.73; P = 0.086). At 28 and 40 weeks, more improvement was found for group 1 compared with controls (P = 0.012 and P = 0.062, respectively) but not for group 2 compared with controls.
                In patients with AS, a 3-week course of combined spa-exercise therapy, in addition to drug treatment and weekly group physical therapy alone, provides beneficial effects. These beneficial effects may last for at least 40 weeks.
The results of this review suggest that an individual home-based or supervised exercise program is better than no intervention; that supervised group physiotherapy is better than home exercises; and that combined inpatient spa-exercise therapy followed by group physiotherapy is better than group physiotherapy alone.