Introduction of the Misgav Ladach caesarean section at an African tertiary centre: a randomised controlled trial. Mandatory second opinion to reduce rates of unnecessary caesarean sections in Latin America: a cluster randomised controlled trial. A randomised, controlled study of uterine exteriorisation and repair at caesarean section. Scar appearance of different skin and subcutaneous tissue closure techniques in caesarean section: a randomized study. Combined spinal epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section: a randomised comparison of Oxford, lateral and sitting positions. Two decision aids for mode of delivery among women with previous caesarean section: randomised controlled trial. Uterine exteriorisation at caesarean section: influence on maternal morbidity. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Anaesthetic technique for elective caesarean section and neurobehavioural status of newborns.
To determine whether the Misgav Ladach caesarean section technique can offer benefits compared with conventional caesarean section technique in the prevailing conditions of a busy African tertiary centre.
                A randomised controlled trial.
                A tertiary African obstetric unit with 18,000 deliveries annually.
                Three hundred and thirty-nine women undergoing caesarean section.
                Eight residents and registrars were instructed in the Misgav Ladach technique for caesarean section during one week, after which the study commenced. The course participants instructed their colleagues; in total, 16 doctors participated. Women requiring caesarean section were randomised to Misgav Ladach or to the conventional lower midline incision procedure, excluding those with a previous scar.
                During 11 weeks 339 randomised procedures (328 of which were emergency procedures) were carried out. Mean operating time was 25 x 3 minutes for Misgav Ladach and 32 x 6 minutes for the lower midline incision procedure (95% CI -8 x 3; -6 x 3). Mean blood loss was 354 mL and 447 mL (-133; -53), and the number of sutures 3 x 1 and 6 x 1 (-3 x 1; -2 x 9), respectively. No significant difference was found in Apgar scores. Mobilisation was earlier with the Misgav Ladach procedure. No difference was found in overall post-operative infection rates i.e. wound infection or febrile illness, but the combination of wound infection and fever was more common in the Misgav Ladach group.
                The Misgav Ladach caesarean section confers benefits such as reduced blood loss, conservation of time and suture material, and rapid mobilisation, but more studies are needed to explore modifications aimed at reducing post-operative infections in settings with limited resources. Latin America has a high rate of caesarean sections. We tested the hypothesis that a hospital policy of mandatory second opinion, based on the best existing scientific evidence, reduces the hospital caesarean section rate by 25%, without increasing maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality.
                36 hospitals in Argentina (18), Brazil (eight), Cuba (four), Guatemala (two), and Mexico (four), were randomly assigned to intervention or control in a matched pair design. All physicians in the intervention hospitals deciding a non-emergency caesarean section had to follow a policy of mandatory second opinion. The primary outcome was the overall caesarean section rate in the hospitals after a 6-month implementation period. We also assessed women's satisfaction with labour and delivery care and physicians'acceptance of the second opinion policy.
                A total of 34 hospitals attending 149?276 deliveries were randomised and completed the protocol. The mandatory second opinion policy was associated with a small but significant reduction in rates of caesarean section (relative rate reduction 7.3%; 95% CI 0.2-14.5), mostly in intrapartum sections (12.6%; 0.6-24.7). Other maternal and neonatal outcomes and women's perceptions and satisfaction with the process of care were similarly distributed between the groups.
                In hospitals applying this policy of second opinion, 22 intrapartum caesarean sections could be prevented per 1000 deliveries, without affecting maternal or perinatal morbidity, and without affecting mothers' satisfaction with the care process. To determine the surgical and anaesthetic benefits and problems associated with the practice of routine exteriorisation of the uterus to facilitate repair at caesarean section.
                A randomised controlled study of women undergoing caesarean section. After establishment of anaesthesia, women were randomised to either exteriorisation and uterine repair or suture of the uterus in the abdomen.
                A maternity hospital in the United Kingdom.
                Peri-operative haemoglobin change, duration of operation, maternal morbidity and length of hospital stay. Intra-operative pain, nausea, vomiting, pulling or tugging sensations were secondary outcome measures.
                Three hundred and sixteen women were randomised, of whom 288 were subsequently analysed (139 women in whom the uterus was exteriorised and 149 where the uterus was not exteriorised). Exteriorisation of the uterus, an elective caesarean section and a spinal or general anaesthesia each had a statistically significant association with reduced blood loss (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups with regard to intra-operative complications or pain, nor were there any statistically significant difference in post-operative wound sepsis, pyrexia, deep vein thrombosis, blood transfusion or length of hospital stay.
                With effective anaesthesia, exteriorisation of the uterus for repair following caesarean delivery is not associated with significant problems and is associated with less blood loss. To determine the role of skin and subcutaneous space closure in caesarean section on the cosmetic appearance of the scar and the patients' satisfaction.
                153 patients undergoing caesarean section without prior abdominal delivery were included and randomly assigned in a non-blinded study to four different combinations of skin and subcutaneous tissue closure. The scar was assessed after a period of at least 4 months by a self-developed protocol and the patient was asked to complete a survey regarding her satisfaction with the scar.
                One hundred patients were eligible for long-term evaluation of the scar. Skin closure by either staples or intracutaneous suture in combination with closure or non-closure of the subcutaneous space has a comparable outcome in view of cosmetic outcome and patient satisfaction.
                All four methods of skin closure seem to be a reasonable choice in caesarean section because they have comparable cosmetic outcome, do not differ with respect to the patients' satisfaction and bear comparable costs. Maternal position during induction of intrathecal anaesthesia for caesarean section influences block height and haemodynamic stability. In a randomised study of 90 women presenting for elective caesarean section using combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia, three positions were compared--the Oxford position (group O), the right lateral to supine wedged (group R) and the sitting to supine wedged (group S). Hyperbaric bupivacaine 12.5 mg with fentanyl 12.5 microg was injected intrathecally using a needle-through-needle CSE technique. Intravenous ephedrine 6 mg was given every minute that systolic blood pressure fell below 80% of baseline. Time required for block height to reach T5 as assessed by light touch, was similar in the three groups. There were no significant differences in blood pressure although ephedrine requirements were less in group R. There were no significant differences in the incidence of maternal nausea and vomiting or in neonatal outcome as assessed by Apgar scores and umbilical cord blood gas analysis. Although the study failed to show any significant differences in block height between the groups, no women in group O had a block above T2 compared with three in group R and three in group S. To determine the effects of two computer based decision aids on decisional conflict and mode of delivery among pregnant women with a previous caesarean section.
                Randomised trial, conducted from May 2004 to August 2006.
                Four maternity units in south west England, and Scotland.
                742 pregnant women with one previous lower segment caesarean section and delivery expected at >or=37 weeks. Non-English speakers were excluded.
                Usual care: standard care given by obstetric and midwifery staff. Information programme: women navigated through descriptions and probabilities of clinical outcomes for mother and baby associated with planned vaginal birth, elective caesarean section, and emergency caesarean section. Decision analysis: mode of delivery was recommended based on utility assessments performed by the woman combined with probabilities of clinical outcomes within a concealed decision tree. Both interventions were delivered via a laptop computer after brief instructions from a researcher.
                Total score on decisional conflict scale, and mode of delivery.
                Women in the information programme (adjusted difference -6.2, 95% confidence interval -8.7 to -3.7) and the decision analysis (-4.0, -6.5 to -1.5) groups had reduced decisional conflict compared with women in the usual care group. The rate of vaginal birth was higher for women in the decision analysis group compared with the usual care group (37% v 30%, adjusted odds ratio 1.42, 0.94 to 2.14), but the rates were similar in the information programme and usual care groups.
                Decision aids can help women who have had a previous caesarean section to decide on mode of delivery in a subsequent pregnancy. The decision analysis approach might substantially affect national rates of caesarean section. Trial Registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN84367722. To compare the influence on caesarean section morbidity of uterine exteriorisation or in situ repair.
                Randomised controlled trial.
                Princess Anne Maternity Unit of the Royal Bolton Hospital, UK.
                One hundred and ninety-four women undergoing delivery by caesarean section.
                Two intra-operative readings of arterial pulse rate, mean arterial blood pressure, and arterial haemoglobin oxygen saturation were obtained. Pre-operative and day-3 haemoglobin concentrations were determined. Intra- and post-operative complications, puerperal pain scores, and febrile and infectious morbidity were assessed. A postal questionnaire was used to assess morbidity six weeks after delivery.
                Intra-operative changes in pulse rate, mean arterial blood pressure and oxygen saturation; peri-operative changes in haemoglobin concentration; incidence of intraoperative vomiting, pain, intra- and post-operative complications, and febrile and infectious morbidity; immediate and late puerperal pain scores; satisfaction with the operation.
                No clinically significant differences between uterine exteriorisation and in situ repair were found in pulse rate, mean arterial pressure, oxygen saturation and haemoglobin changes. Likewise, the incidence of vomiting and pain was similar. Vomiting occurred in 10% of all the women, and 57% of all pain complaints occurred at the initial skin incision. There was a trend towards higher immediate and late pain scores in the exteriorisation group, reaching statistical significance on day 3. Overall, pain scores averaged 6/10 on day 1 despite patient-controlled analgesia, and three-quarters of all women reported persisting pain on day 42. Intra- and post-operative complications, febrile and infectious morbidity, and duration of hospital stay were similar in both groups.
                We have demonstrated that uterine exteriorisation and in situ repair have similar effects on peri-operative caesarean section morbidity. Intra-operative pain reflected adequacy of anaesthesia, while vomiting reflected adequacy of pre-operative preparation of patients. Exteriorising the uterus at caesarean section is a valid option. For 3-4% of pregnancies, the fetus will be in the breech presentation at term. For most of these women, the approach to delivery is controversial. We did a randomised trial to compare a policy of planned caesarean section with a policy of planned vaginal birth for selected breech-presentation pregnancies.
                At 121 centres in 26 countries, 2088 women with a singleton fetus in a frank or complete breech presentation were randomly assigned planned caesarean section or planned vaginal birth. Women having a vaginal breech delivery had an experienced clinician at the birth. Mothers and infants were followed-up to 6 weeks post partum. The primary outcomes were perinatal mortality, neonatal mortality, or serious neonatal morbidity; and maternal mortality or serious maternal morbidity. Analysis was by intention to treat.
                Data were received for 2083 women. Of the 1041 women assigned planned caesarean section, 941 (90.4%) were delivered by caesarean section. Of the 1042 women assigned planned vaginal birth, 591 (56.7%) delivered vaginally. Perinatal mortality, neonatal mortality, or serious neonatal morbidity was significantly lower for the planned caesarean section group than for the planned vaginal birth group (17 of 1039 [1.6%] vs 52 of 1039 [5.0%]; relative risk 0.33 [95% CI 0.19-0.56]; p<0.0001). There were no differences between groups in terms of maternal mortality or serious maternal morbidity (41 of 1041 [3.9%] vs 33 of 1042 [3.2%]; 1.24 [0.79-1.95]; p=0.35).
                Planned caesarean section is better than planned vaginal birth for the term fetus in the breech presentation; serious maternal complications are similar between the groups. Ninety healthy parturients undergoing elective caesarean section were randomly allocated to receive either general (n = 30), epidural (n = 30) or spinal (n = 30) anaesthesia. Acid-base status, Apgar score and neurobehavioural status, using the neurologic and adaptive capacity scoring (NACS) system, were studied in the newborn. Apgar scores and acid-base parameters were similar in all the three groups. NACS testing revealed significantly more vigorous babies in the spinal anaesthesia group than in the other two groups at 15 min and 2 h interval after delivery, despite a higher incidence of maternal hypotension. We conclude that newborns tend to have a better neurobehavioural status in the early post-delivery period if their mothers receive spinal anaesthesia rather than general or epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section.
While caesarean section is a common procedure performed on women worldwide, there is little information available to inform the most appropriate surgical technique to adopt.
[Note: The 34 citations in the awaiting classification section of the review may alter the conclusions of the review once assessed.]