Starting with a higher dose of inhaled corticosteroids in primary care asthma treatment. High or standard initial dose of budesonide to control mild-to-moderate asthma? Effect of inhaled budesonide on severe steroid-dependent asthma. Twelve-week, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study of the efficacy and tolerability of budesonide and formoterol in one metered-dose inhaler compared with budesonide alone and formoterol alone in adolescents and adults with asthma. Bioequivalent doses of budesonide and prednisone in moderate and severe asthma. Comparison of high and low dose of the inhaled steroid, budesonide, as an initial treatment in newly detected asthma. Randomised controlled trial of montelukast plus inhaled budesonide versus double dose inhaled budesonide in adult patients with asthma. Efficacy and safety of high-dose inhaled steroids in children with asthma: a comparison of fluticasone propionate with budesonide. Salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination therapy 50/250 microg twice daily is more effective than budesonide 800 microg twice daily in treating moderate to severe asthma.
New British guidelines on the treatment of asthma (9) advocate starting with a higher dose of inhaled corticosteroids in newly detected asthma patients. We investigated whether initiating inhaled steroid treatment with a higher dose is clinically more effective than a lower dose in steroid naive patients with asthma. The study had a 13-wk randomized, double-blind, parallel design: 1-mo treatment with 400 microg budesonide twice a day, or 100 microg budesonide twice a day by dry powder inhaler, and follow-up treatment period of 2 mo with 200 microg budesonide once daily for all patients. Forty patients started with 400 microg budesonide twice daily, 44 with 100 microg budesonide twice daily. Mean age was 32 yr, baseline FEV1 value 84% predicted, reversibility 9% from baseline, and mean bronchodilator use 1.6 inhalations/d in the run-in period. After 4 wk of treatment with 400 microg and 100 microg budesonide twice daily mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) increased 27 L/min (SD 50), and 38 L/ min (SD 53), respectively (p = 0.30); mean symptom score improved from 1.1 to 0.6 and from 1.1 to 0.5. These effects were maintained in the 2 mo follow-up. This study suggests that starting inhaled corticosteroids at a higher dose is not superior to a lower dose in the treatment of newly detected asthma. Guidelines on the use of inhaled steroids in asthma advocate that the daily dose should be chosen according to the severity of the disease. However, the question of the optimal starting dose remains to be properly addressed, as does the issue of the adjustment in dose required for a given patient. Whether a high initial dose of budesonide (800 microg b.i.d) was more efficacious than a standard dose (200 microg b.i.d) in controlling mild-to-moderate asthma was investigated, and whether the dose could be decreased, based on peak expiratory flow (PEF), symptom-score, beta2-agonist use in a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group 18-week study. One-hundred and sixty-nine patients (mean age 38 yrs, mean forced expiratory volume in one second 74% predicted) were enrolled. No difference was detected between the two groups in improvement in morning PEF (+61 L x min(-1) in the high-dose group, +60 L x min(-1) in the standard-dose group by 16 weeks). Morning and evening PEF values stabilized before the end of the first 4 weeks. No difference between groups was observed in symptom score, beta2-agonist use, number of exacerbation per interval and the best forced expiratory volume in one second achieved. The proportion of subjects being able to decrease the doses of budesonide was similar in both treatment strategies. It is concluded that both high and standard initial doses are equally effective in controlling symptoms and improving lung function in mild-to-moderate asthma. Twenty-four patients with severe steroid-dependent asthma participated in a double-blind cross-over study performed in two centers. After a run-in period of 2 weeks when beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) (400 micrograms/day) was used, the patients were treated for 4 weeks with either a high-dose (1600 micrograms/day) or a low-dose (400 micrograms/day) of budesonide (Pulmicort). Thereafter the doses of budesonide were switched and the treatment continued for a further 4-week period. Patients treated with high-dose budesonide displayed significant improvements in airway functions. In addition, subjective scores for cough, sputum production and dyspnoea were more improved in the high-dose group than in the low-dose group. The need for concomitant beta 2-agonist therapy was also significantly reduced during the high-dose treatment. No significant changes in plasma cortisol levels were detected and no adverse effects of importance were registered. The results indicate that high-dose budesonide treatment improves the clinical status of patients with severe steroid-dependent asthma more than a low-dose therapy but without causing systemic side-effects. The addition of the long-acting beta(2)-adrenergic agonist formoterol to low- to moderate-dose budesonide has shown clinical efficacy in patients with persistent asthma. Combination therapy with budesonide/formoterol in 1 pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) has been found to have greater efficacy than its monocomponents in patients with moderate to severe persistent asthma, but it has not been assessed in patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma.
                The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of budesonide and formoterol delivered via 1 pMDI (budesonide/formoterol pMDI), budesonide pMDI, formoterol dry powder inhaler (DPI), and placebo.
                This 12-week, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-dummy study was conducted at 56 centers across the United States. Patients aged > or =12 years with mild to moderate persistent asthma treated with inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) for > or =4 weeks before screening and who had a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) of > or =60% to < or =90% of predicted normal at screening were eligible. After 2 weeks (current asthma therapy discontinued), patients received twice-daily budesonide/formoterol pMDI 80/4.5 microg x 2 inhalations (160/9 microg), budesonide pMDI 80 microg x 2 inhalations (160 microg), formoterol DPI 4.5 microg x 2 inhalations (9 microg), or placebo. The coprimary efficacy variables were changes from baseline in morning predose FEV(1) and 12-hour mean FEV(1) (from serial spirometry) after administration of the morning dose of study medication. Tolerability was assessed based on adverse events (AEs); routine laboratory assessments; electrocardiography; 24-hour Holter monitor assessments; and physical examinations, including vital signs (eg, systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate). AEs were recorded manually by the patient in paper notebooks and reviewed at each clinic visit by the investigator and during a final follow-up phone call.
                A total of 480 patients were randomized (299 females, 181 males; mean age, 36 years; mean FEV(1), 2.4 L; budesonide/formoterol pMDI, 123 patients; budesonide pMDI, 121; formoterol DPI, 114; placebo, 122). At end of treatment, the mean increases from baseline in predose FEV(1) were greater with budesonide/formoterol pMDI versus budesonide pMDI, formoterol DPI, and placebo (0.37 vs 0.23, 0.17, and 0.03 L, respectively; all, P<0.005). 0.005). After administration of the first dose and at weeks 2 and 12, mean increases in 12-hour mean FEV(1) were significantly greater with budesonide/formoterol pMDI (0.41, 0.47, and 0.50 L, respectively) versus budesonide pMDI (0.17, 0.30, and 0.32 L) and placebo (0.15, 0.12, and 0.12 L) (all, P < 0.001). Fewer patients receiving budesonide/formoterol pMDI met criteria for (18.7%; P < 0.001) or withdrew because of (7.3%; P < or = 0.010) worsening asthma versus formoterol DPI (42.1% and 18.4%, respectively) and placebo (56.6% and 32.8%); results were similar between budesonide pMDI (21.5% and 6.6%, respectively) and budesonide/formoterol pMDI. Three patients experienced serious AEs; none was considered related to study medication. The proportions of withdrawals due to worsening asthma were not significantly different between the budesonide/formoterol pMDI and budesonide pMDI groups.
                In this population of adults and adolescents with mild to moderate persistent asthma previously treated with ICSs, twice-daily budesonide/formoterol pMDI was associated with significantly increased pulmonary function versus its monocomponents. All study drugs were generally well tolerated. We determined the relative antiasthmatic and systemic glucocorticoid potencies of inhaled budesonide (BUD) versus morning-dose oral prednisone (PRED) in 34 adult patients with asthma over a dose range extending from conventional to high and potentially toxic levels, 3.2 mg of BUD or 40 mg of PRED per day. Changes in symptom frequency and severity, FEV1, and peak expiratory flow rate were measured during a double-blind, double-dummy controlled, crossover protocol. The drugs proved equally effective, provided a sufficient dosage was administered. The dose required to eliminate recurrently disabling asthma relapses in these patients was about 2.0 mg of BUD per day or greater than 40 mg of PRED per day. On the average, BUD doses greater than or equal to 1.84 mg/day/70 kg adult (26.3 micrograms/kg/day) exhibited systemic effects on the 8 AM serum cortisol level and blood eosinophil count equivalent to greater than or equal to 15 mg of PRED per day. The latter doses are known to be associated with steroid-induced complications, such as osteoporosis. However, the level of systemic glucocorticoid activity produced by any particular dose of BUD in these patients was consistently much lower than that produced by the dose of PRED needed to achieve an equivalent level of antiasthmatic response. Thus, the use of high-dose inhaled BUD appears clinically reasonable and ethically acceptable in patients with severe asthma in whom the alternative is their continuing dependency on PRED. The importance of early initiation of inhaled steroids even in mild asthma has been documented in several studies. It is not, however, clear whether the treatment should be started with a high or a low dose of the inhaled steroid. We have compared the effects of high and low dose inhaled steroid, budesonide, in patients with newly detected asthma. We studied 101 adult patients with newly detected bronchial asthma who were without inhaled steroid or any regular pharmacological treatment for their asthma. The patients were randomly allocated to two treatment groups: one to receive 800 microg inhaled budesonide per day and the other to receive 200 microg inhaled budesonide per day. The drugs were given with a Turbuhaler dry powder inhaler. During the 3-month treatment period, no significant differences between the treatment groups were noted in morning or evening PEF values, in spirometric parameters, in asthmatic symptoms or in the use of rescue beta2-agonists. The decrease in bronchial hyperresponsiveness was, however, more marked in the high dose budesonide group, reaching a borderline significance (P=0.10 high vs. low dose budesonide). In addition, in serum markers of asthmatic inflammation significant differences were shown between the treatment groups. The decrease in the number of blood eosinophils during the treatment was more marked in the high dose budesonide group (P=0.02; high vs. low dose budesonide). In serum ECP no change was observed in the low dose budesonide group, but a marked decrease in the high-dose budesonide group (P=0.008; high vs. low dose budesonide). The change was even more marked with regard to serum EPX (P=0.005; high vs. low dose budesonide). Our results support the view that the treatment of newly detected asthma should be started with a high dose of inhaled steroid. The low dose may not be enough to suppress asthmatic inflammation despite good clinical primary response. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) affect many inflammatory pathways in asthma but have little impact on cysteinyl leukotrienes. This may partly explain persistent airway inflammation during chronic ICS treatment and failure to achieve adequate asthma control in some patients. This double blind, randomised, parallel group, non-inferiority, multicentre 16 week study compared the clinical benefits of adding montelukast to budesonide with doubling the budesonide dose in adults with asthma.
                After a 1 month single blind run in period, patients inadequately controlled on inhaled budesonide (800 microg/day) were randomised to receive montelukast 10 mg + inhaled budesonide 800 microg/day (n=448) or budesonide 1600 microg/day (n=441) for 12 weeks.
                Both groups showed progressive improvement in several measures of asthma control compared with baseline. Mean morning peak expiratory flow (AM PEF) improved similarly in the last 10 weeks of treatment compared with baseline in both the montelukast + budesonide group and in the double dose budesonide group (33.5 v 30.1 l/min). During days 1-3 after start of treatment, the change in AM PEF from baseline was significantly greater in the montelukast + budesonide group than in the double dose budesonide group (20.1 v 9.6 l/min, p<0.001), indicating faster onset of action in the montelukast group. Both groups showed similar improvements with respect to "as needed" beta agonist use, mean daytime symptom score, nocturnal awakenings, exacerbations, asthma free days, peripheral eosinophil counts, and asthma specific quality of life. Both montelukast + budesonide and double dose budesonide were generally well tolerated.
                The addition of montelukast to inhaled budesonide is an effective and well tolerated alternative to doubling the dose of inhaled budesonide in adult asthma patients experiencing symptoms and inadequate control on budesonide alone. To compare the efficacy and adverse effects of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP), 400 microgram/d, with those of budesonide (BUD), 800 microgram/d, in children with moderate to severe asthma.
                Three hundred thirty-three children, ages 4 to 12 years, receiving inhaled corticosteroids were enrolled in a double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, parallel-group study. After a 2-week run-in phase, 166 children received FP and 167 received BUD for 20 weeks. The primary outcome variable was mean morning peak expiratory flow; the 2 treatments were to be regarded as equivalent if the 90% CI for the treatment difference was within +/- 15 L/min. Pulmonary function, height, and diary cards were assessed at each visit; and morning serum cortisol levels were determined before and after treatment.
                Baseline peak expiratory flow was similar, FP 236 +/- 72 (SD) L/min and BUD 229 +/- 74, increasing after treatment to 277 +/- 41 and 257 +/- 28, a difference between treatments of 12 L/min (90% CI 6-19 L/min; P =.002). Symptom control and use of rescue medication were the same. Cortisol levels after treatment were 199 nmol/L (FP) and 183 nmol/L (BUD) (treatment ratio = 1.09; 90% CI 0.98-1.21; P =.172). Linear growth was less in those receiving BUD (mean difference, 6.2 mm; 95% CI 2.9-9.6; P =.0003).
                FP at half the dose was superior to BUD in improving peak expiratory flow and comparable in controlling symptoms. Growth was reduced with BUD compared with FP, but there was no difference in serum cortisol suppression or hepatic or renal function. Three hundred and fifty-three asthmatic patients who remained symptomatic despite treatment with budesonide 800-1200 microg day(-1) (or equivalent) were randomized to a new combination therapy comprising salmeterol 50 microg and fluticasone propionate 250 microg (Seretide, Advair, Viani 50/250 microg) twice daily or budesonide 800 microg twice daily for 24 weeks. Patients kept daily records of their morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF), daytime and night-time symptom scores and daytime and night-time use of rescue salbutamol. Mean morning PEF increased by 451 min(-1) (baseline 361 l min(-1)) in the salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination (SFC) group and by 19 l min(-1) (baseline 358 l min(-1)) in the budesonide group over the 24 weeks. The adjusted mean morning PEF over weeks 1 to 24 was significantly greater in the SFC group, despite the > three-fold lower corticosteroid dose (406 vs. 380 l min(-1); P < 0.001). A significantly greater improvement in evening PEF was also seen in the SFC group (adjusted mean 416 vs. 398 l min(-1); P<0.001). SFC also provided significantly better control of daytime symptoms and a significantly greater reduction in the requirement for rescue salbutamol compared with budesonide. These results demonstrate that SFC 50/250 microg twice daily is superior to budesonide 800 microg twice daily in the management of patients with moderate to severe asthma who are symptomatic on their existing dose of corticosteroid.
This review strongly supports use of budesonide in chronic asthma. Consensus guidelines for chronic asthma suggest titrating inhaled steroid dose to individual requirements. Evidence from this review of trials does not present a case for routine dose titration above 800 mcg/d.