[Preventing the recurrence of febrile seizures: intermittent prevention with rectal diazepam compared with continuous treatment with sodium valproate]. Double-blind, randomized trial of diazepam versus placebo for prevention of recurrence of febrile seizures. Diazepam versus clobazam for intermittent prophylaxis of febrile seizures. Effect of acetaminophen and of low intermittent doses of diazepam on prevention of recurrences of febrile seizures. Comparison of phenobarbitone, phenytoin with sodium valproate: randomized, double-blind study. A controlled trial of diazepam administered during febrile illnesses to prevent recurrence of febrile seizures. Placebo-controlled study of phenobarbitone and phenytoin in the prophylaxis of febrile convulsions. Intention to treat febrile convulsions with rectal diazepam, valproate or phenobarbitone. Prevention of recurrent febrile convulsions--a randomized therapeutic assay: sodium valproate, phenobarbital and placebo.
Sixty nine children suffering from a first febrile seizure without evidence of neurologic disorder or associated risk factors were randomly assigned to one of three groups: no treatment; intermittent rectal diazepam; or continuous oral sodium valproate. All patients were followed for two years. Periodical controls were performed every three months in order to record febrile episodes, recurrent seizures, and treatment side affects. Rate of recurrent febrile seizures was 16% in control group, and 5.5% in diazepam group. Sodium valproate group showed no recurrences in the follow-up period. The low relapsing rate in control group suggests that prophylaxis should not be established even if it is requested by certain parental attitudes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of intermittent oral administration of diazepam during hyperthermia for reducing the recurrence of febrile seizure: 185 children, between 8 months and 3 years of age, with a first febrile seizure and normal neurologic development, were randomly assigned in a double-blind fashion to receive orally administered diazepam (0.5 mg/kg, then 0.20 mg/kg, every 12 hours) or placebo, whenever the rectal temperature was more than 38 degrees C. The main criterion of efficacy was the seizure recurrence rate 1 year after the first seizure. The duration of the study was 3 years; eight different centers in France participated. There were 462 febrile episodes and 1000 days with prophylactic treatment. The recurrence rates did not differ between the diazepam group (16%) and the placebo (19.5%) group. The children with recurrent seizures were significantly younger at the time of the first seizure (17 +/- 6.9 months) than children without a recurrent seizure (21 +/- 8.5 months). In children with recurrent seizures, prophylactic treatment was correctly administered to only 1 of 15 children in the diazepam group and to 7 of 18 children in the placebo group. The following were the reasons for this poor cooperation: convulsion being the first manifestation of the fever (seven cases in each group), parents neglecting to give treatment (nine cases), and refusal to take treatment by two children. Side effects were similar in the two groups except for hyperactivity, which was more frequent in the diazepam (138 days) than in the placebo (34 days) group. Intermittent oral administration of diazepam at the onset of fever offered no advantage over placebo in preventing recurrence of seizure. This finding probably reflects a lack of efficacy of the intermittent method rather than of diazepam itself. To compare the effectiveness of intermittent clobazam versus diazepam therapy in preventing the recurrence of febrile seizures and assess adverse effects of each drug.
                This prospective randomized controlled trial was performed on neurologically normal children aged from 6 months to 5 years with a history of simple febrile seizures and normal electroencephalogram without any evidence of acute central nervous system infection. The patients were randomly prescribed with oral clobazam (37 cases) or diazepam (35 cases) when they developed a febrile disease. They were advised to use the medications during the first 48 h of the onset of fever. All the patients were monitored regarding developing seizure and adverse effects of the drugs. All patients were followed for 12 months.
                Overall, 243 episodes of fever occurred during the period, including 116 episodes in the clobazam group and 127 episodes in the diazepam group. Recurrence of seizures occurred in 2 (1.7%) subjects in the clobazam group, and in 4(3.1%) cases in the diazepam group. (P value=0.474). Twenty cases (54%) in the diazepam group and 5 (14.2%) cases in the clobazam group developed drowsiness and sedation during the follow-up period (P value=0.0001).
                Intermittent clobazam therapy seems advantageous to diazepam due to similar efficacy but significantly lower adverse effects such as drowsiness and sedation. Acetaminophen and low doses of diazepam were evaluated for the prevention of recurrences of febrile seizures in a placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Children after their first febrile seizure were assigned to receive either one dose of rectally administered diazepam, and then, after 6 hours, oral doses of 0.2 mg/kg three times a day for the first 2 days if the fever stayed greater than 38.5 degrees C, or a placebo similarly during forthcoming febrile episodes. In addition, each febrile episode was randomly assigned to be treated with acetaminophen or the placebo. Thus four groups were examined for 2 years: patients receiving two kinds of placebo, patients receiving diazepam and a placebo, patients receiving acetaminophen and a placebo, and patients receiving both diazepam and acetaminophen. Of a total of 180 patients (102 boys), 161 were followed for the 2-year period and 157 were seen at the last outpatient examination: 80 in the diazepam group and 77 in the placebo group. The final analysis of the efficacy of the drugs was made on the basis of the data from 153 patients who had had at least one febrile episode during follow-up. There were 641 fever events during this period, and 38 children (21.1%) had 55 recurrences of febrile seizures. Acetaminophen had no effect on the recurrence rate. Seizures recurred at least once in 21 patients (28.4%) receiving diazepam and 17 (21.5%) receiving a placebo (p = 0.4138, log-rank test). The combination of antipyretic agents with anticonvulsant medication did not reduce the recurrence of febrile seizures. Our results show that low doses of acetaminophen or diazepam or both are ineffective for preventing febrile seizures. To compare the efficacy and side effects of phenobarbitone (PB), phenytoin (PHT) and sodium valproate (SVP) in controlling generalized tonic-clonic convulsions (GTC).
                Randomized, double blind clinical trial.
                Out-Patients in a tertiary care hospital.
                151 children with GTC, aged 4-12 yrs, from Madras city were enrolled. At the end of 2 yrs, 127 children remained in the study.
                Each child was given one active drug and 2 placebo tablets. Clinical, hematological and biochemical evaluations were done every month. Serum drug levels were assessed periodically.
                Recurrence of convulsion and side effects.
                The proportion of children with recurrence did not differ among the 3 groups. More than one side effect was observed in 16 (32%) children on PB, 20 (40%) children on PHT and 9 (19%) children on SVP and this difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Hyperactivity was the major side effect of PB, observed in 22% of children.
                All 3 drugs were equally effective in controlling seizures. Side effects were minimal with SVP followed by PB. Though side effects were more frequent with PHT, most of them disappeared on adjusting drug dosage. Least expensive phenobarbitone may be preferred as the first drug of choice but, only for pre-school children. SVP is advised for school going children. Phenobarbital, once widely prescribed to prevent febrile seizures, is now in disfavor because of its side effects and lack of efficacy. Diazepam, administered only during episodes of fever, may be a safe, effective agent to prevent the recurrence of febrile seizures.
                We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial among 406 children (mean age, 24 months) who had at least one febrile seizure. Diazepam (0.33 mg per kilogram of body weight) or placebo was administered orally every eight hours during all febrile illnesses.
                During a mean follow-up of 1.9 years (a period during which 90 percent of febrile seizures recur), our intention-to-treat analysis showed a reduction of 44 percent in the risk of febrile seizures per person-year with diazepam (relative risk = 0.56; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.38 to 0.81; P = 0.002). A survival analysis of the length of time to the first recurrent febrile seizure did not show a significant difference between the treatment groups (P = 0.064 by the log-rank test), but after adjustment for covariates, diazepam was found to have a benefit (P = 0.027 by Cox regression analysis). An analysis restricted to children who had seizures while actually receiving the study medication (7 in the diazepam group and 29 in the placebo group) showed an 82 percent reduction in the risk of febrile seizures with diazepam (relative risk = 0.18; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.09 to 0.37; P < 0.001). Of the 153 children who took at least one dose of diazepam, 39 percent had ataxia, lethargy, or irritability or at least one other moderate side effect that was reversed after a reduction in the dose. There were no severe side effects.
                Oral diazepam, given only when fever is present, is safe and reduces the risk of recurrent febrile seizures. Of 138 children who had a first febrile convulsion before their second birthday, 48 were treated with phenobarbitone, 47 with phenytoin, and 43 with a placebo for 12 months. Drug levels were monitored and adverse effects of the drugs were noted. Compared with placebo, phenobarbitone significantly reduced recurrences among children under 14 months old at the time of their first convulsion, but nor among older children. Phenytoin was an ineffective prophylactic agent. Ideal drug levels were difficult to maintain, and many recurrences occurred when concentrations were suboptimal. Behavioural disturbance in children taking phenobarbitone was not a serious problem. The decision to give continuous prophylaxis for febrile convulsions is complex, and each case must be judged on its merits. For children who have a first seizure before 14 months of age prophylaxis may be advisable and phenobarbitone is effective. One hundred and eighty-six consecutive children aged between six and 72 months admitted to the Manchester Children's Hospitals with a febrile convulsion in the first year of life, a complicated febrile convulsion, or more than one febrile convulsion within two years, were allocated randomly to one of three groups who were offered rectal diazepam in the event of a subsequent prolonged febrile convulsion, or prophylactic treatment with sodium valproate or phenobarbitone. Over-all risk of recurrence was 30 per cent and adequate prophylactic treatment did not lessen this risk. Side-effects in 24 per cent of the valproate group and 61 per cent of the phenobarbitone group did not justify the use of prophylactic treatment. The purpose of this study was to compare three different modes of treatment in the prevention of relapses of febrile convulsions (Phenobarbital = PH, Sodium Valproate = SV, Placebo = PO) in a randomized therapeutic trial. The patients included in the study had shown their first generalized convulsive seizure during a bout of fever (greater than or equal to 38.5 degrees C) and were aged between 6 months and 4 years. They were subsequently followed up as outpatients, and Phenobarbital and sodium valproate levels were measured regularly to ascertain compliance with the treatment and to adjust the dosage accordingly. The patients' families were questioned with respect to the occurrence of feverish bouts and convulsive seizures during the interval between visits, as well as possible adverse reactions. An EEG was carried out yearly. Results were as follows: - 69 patients - 35 boys and 34 girls - with an average age of 24 months were divided into 3 groups according to treatment: 21 cases on PH, 22 cases on SV, and 26 cases on PO. - they were followed up for an average duration of 21 months. - the average number of feverish bouts per child and per year was evaluated at 2.5, no statistically significant difference being noticeable between the various modes of prophylaxis. - 15 relapses of febrile seizures were noted in 14 children, over an average duration of 23 months; on average, relapses occurred after 9 months; among the 14 children who had relapsed, one had been treated with SV, 4 with PH and 9 with PO, leading to estimated relapse rates of 4%, 19%, and 35% respectively. There is a statistically significant difference in the relapse rates between the treated groups (SV and PH) and the Placebo group, and a particularly significant difference between Sodium Valproate and Placebo.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
No clinically important benefits for children with febrile seizures were found for intermittent oral diazepam, phenytoin, phenobarbitone, intermittent rectal diazepam, valproate, pyridoxine, intermittent phenobarbitone or intermittent ibuprofen, nor for diclofenac versus placebo followed by ibuprofen, acetominophen or placebo. Adverse effects were reported in up to 30% of children. Apparent benefit for clobazam treatment in one recent trial needs to be replicated to be judged reliable. Given the benign nature of recurrent febrile seizures, and the high prevalence of adverse effects of these drugs, parents and families should be supported with adequate contact details of medical services and information on recurrence, first aid management and, most importantly, the benign nature of the phenomenon.