Effects of hormone replacement therapy on endometrial histology in postmenopausal women. The Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions (PEPI) Trial. The Writing Group for the PEPI Trial. Incidence of endometrial hyperplasia in postmenopausal women taking conjugated estrogens (Premarin) with medroxyprogesterone acetate or conjugated estrogens alone. The Menopause Study Group. Constant estrogen, intermittent progestogen vs. continuous combined hormone replacement therapy: tolerability and effect on vasomotor symptoms. Continuous oestrogen-progestogen treatment and serum lipoproteins in postmenopausal women. Effects of two different regimens of continuous hormone replacement therapy on endometrial histopathology and postmenopausal uterine bleeding. A prospective 1-year study of estrogen and progestin in postmenopausal women: effects on the endometrium. Comparison of the difference in histopathology and cell cycle kinetics among the postmenopausal endometrium treated with different progestins in sequential-combined hormone replacement therapy. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue (goserelin) plus hormone replacement therapy for the treatment of endometriosis: a randomized controlled trial. Evaluation of low-dose estrogen and progestin therapy in postmenopausal women. A double-blind, prospective study of sequential versus continuous therapy.
To report the histological findings of the endometrium of postmenopausal women who were randomized to receive placebo, estrogen only, or one of three estrogen plus progestin (E+P) regimens in the Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions (PEPI) Trial.
                A 3-year multicenter, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial.
                A total of 596 postmenopausal women aged 45 through 64 years without contraindication to hormone therapy.
                Participants were randomized and stratified in equal numbers to one of the following treatments in 28-day cycles: placebo, 0.625 mg/d of conjugated equine estrogens (CEE), 0.625 mg/d of CEE plus 10 mg/d of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) for the first 12 days, 0.625 mg/d of CEE plus 2.5 mg/d of MPA, or 0.625 mg/d of CEE plus 200 mg/d of micronized progesterone (MP) for the first 12 days.
                Histology of endometrium collected at baseline, annual, or unscheduled visits by biopsy, curettage, or hysterectomy.
                Intention to treat.
                During follow-up women assigned to estrogen alone were more likely to develop simple (cystic), complex (adenomatous), or atypical hyperplasia than those given placebo (27.7% vs 0.8%, 22.7% vs 0.8%, and 11.8% vs 0%, respectively) for the same types of hyperplasia (P < .001). Participants administered one of the three E+P regimens had similar rates of hyperplasia as those given placebo (P = .16). The occurrence of hyperplasia was distributed evenly across the 3 years of the trial. Women taking estrogens alone also had more unscheduled biopsies (66.4% vs 8.4%; P < .001) and curettages (17.6% vs 0.8%; P < .001) than women receiving placebo. The number of surgical procedures was similar for women receiving placebo and women receiving the E+P regimens (P = .38). Of the 45 women with complex (adenomatous) or atypical hyperplasia, study medications were discontinued in all, and the biopsy results of 34 (94%) of 36 women with hyperplasia reverted to normal with progestin therapy. The remainder had dilatation and curettage (n = 2) or hysterectomy with (n = 2) or without (n = 6) prior medical therapy, or refused further biopsies (n = 1). One woman developed adenocarcinoma of the endometrium while receiving placebo.
                At a dosage of 0.625 mg, the daily administration of CEE enhanced the development of endometrial hyperplasia. Combining CEE with cyclic or continuous MPA or cyclic MP protected the endometrium from hyperplastic changes associated with estrogen-only therapy. We evaluated four oral combinations of conjugated estrogens (Premarin) and medroxyprogesterone acetate in preventing endometrial hyperplasia, which can occur with conjugated estrogens alone.
                This was a 1-year prospective, double-blind, randomized, multicenter study in 1724 postmenopausal women. All five groups took conjugated estrogens (0.625 mg) daily. The respective medroxyprogesterone acetate dosages were 2.5 and 5.0 mg daily (groups A and B) and 5.0 and 10.0 mg for 14 days per 28-day cycle (groups C and D).
                Among the 1385 patients with valid biopsy data, endometrial hyperplasia developed in 20% in the conjugated estrogens-treated group and < or = 1% in each of the four conjugated estrogens/medroxyprogesterone acetate-treated groups. The incidence of endometrial hyperplasia did not differ significantly between any of the conjugated estrogens/medroxyprogesterone acetate regimens. However, none of the patients receiving the two higher medroxyprogesterone acetate dosages (groups B and D) had endometrial hyperplasia.
                The endometrial hyperplasia incidence was significantly lower in women treated with conjugated estrogens and medroxyprogesterone acetate than in women treated with conjugated estrogens alone. To compare the efficacy and tolerability of a novel oral constant estrogen plus intermittent progestogen hormone replacement therapy (HRT) regimen to a continuous combined HRT regimen in postmenopausal women.
                Subjects were randomly assigned to receive treatment with either constant 17beta-estradiol (E2), 1 mg, plus intermittent norgestimate (NGM) 90 microg (3 days off, 3 days on) (n=221) or E2 2 mg/norethisterone acetate (NETA) 1 mg (n=217) for 1 year. Treatments were evaluated based on the incidence of hot flushes and uterine bleeding.
                Both regimens had similar bleeding profiles and provided comparable vasomotor symptom relief. However, breast discomfort and edema were experienced by twice as many subjects who received E2/NETA.
                The constant E2/intermittent NGM regimen was well tolerated and possesses similar efficacy compared with a continuous combined E2/NETA regimen and may be considered whenever HRT without withdrawal bleeding is deemed appropriate. Serum lipids and lipoproteins were examined in 44 healthy postmenopausal women every 3 months during 1 year of treatment with either continuous oestrogen-norethisterone acetate or placebo. Total serum cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol levels were reduced by approximately 15% and 20% (P less than 0.001), respectively in the hormone group but were unchanged in the placebo group. Serum triglycerides levels remained constant in both groups. HDL-cholesterol levels were significantly reduced by approximately 10% in the hormone group but significant reductions of 5-10% also occurred in the placebo group so that differences between the two groups were only significant after 3 months of treatment. Vaginal bleedings were experienced during the first 3 months by eight of the 21 women receiving hormones, but in only one woman after 9 months of therapy. The addition of norethisterone acetate to postmenopausal oestrogen therapy in clinically relevant doses had no adverse effects on lipoproteins as previously reported, even though administered continuously. Moreover, the low frequency of bleeding with continuous oestrogen-progestogen therapy would make this an appropriate alternative in postmenopausal replacement therapy. To compare the effects of frequently used two different regimens of combined continuous hormone replacement therapy; 0.625 mg conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) + 2.5 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) and 1 mg 17beta estradiol (E2) + 0.5 mg norethindrone acetate (NETA), on endometrial histopathology and postmenopausal uterine bleeding.
                Two hundred and forty-six outpatient subjects aged 41-57 years were enrolled in the study conducted at the menopause clinic between November 2003 and November 2004. One hundred and thirty-nine patients were assigned to receive 0.625 mg conjugated equine estrogen + 2.5 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate (CEE/MPA), whereas 107 patients were to receive 17beta estradiol + 0.5 mg norethindrone acetate (E2/NETA). Inclusion criteria of the study were: normal values of endometrial thickness at basal evaluation, women with intact uterus, at least 12 months of amenorrhea, normal vaginal smear, bilateral mammography and biochemical blood parameters. All women were questioned every 3 months for vaginal bleeding/spotting. Endometrial sampling was performed by Pipelle catheter in the 12th month of therapy.
                For the first 3 months, vaginal bleeding/spotting rate for the CEE/MPA group was 38.7%, whereas it was higher (45%) in the E2/NETA group. For the second 3-month period, vaginal bleeding/spotting frequencies were 41.1 and 37.8%, respectively. In the third 3-month period 30.6 and 29.6%, and in the fourth 3-month period, 18.5 and 12.5% of the patients reported vaginal bleeding or spotting. None of the results of endometrial sampling have shown findings of cancer histopathology.
                Compared to CEE/MPA regimen, E2/NETA therapy has not shown more favorable effects on postmenopausal bleeding abnormalities. Irregular endometrial proliferation was seen more with the E2/NETA regimen. The endometrial response to oral, cyclic conjugated equine estrogens with and without the randomized addition of medroxyprogesterone acetate was evaluated in 95 postmenopausal women with respect to morphology and bleeding patterns. At 1 year, therapy with 0.625 mg conjugated equine estrogens or 1.25 mg conjugated equine estrogens for 25 days of a 30-day cycle and 5 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate added to the last 11 days of the conjugated equine estrogens cycle was associated with hyperplasia in 0 and 10% of the patients, respectively (P = not significant). Hyperplasia developed in 30 and 57% of the patients who received the above conjugated equine estrogens and placebo regimens, respectively. Irregular, breakthrough bleeding occurred in 14% of the conjugated equine estrogens/medroxyprogesterone acetate users and in 54% of the conjugated equine estrogens/placebo users. The results of this study indicate that 1 year of therapy with 0.625 mg conjugated equine estrogens and 5 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate provided the most satisfactory endometrial protection against hyperplasia and was associated with relatively low rates of breakthrough bleeding. To investigate the difference in histopathology and cell cycle kinetics in the menopausal endometrium treated with sequential-combined hormone replacement therapy (HRT) using different types and doses of progestins.
                A randomized, double-blind, 1-year study was conducted. In a menopause clinic of a university hospital, 241 postmenopausal women using HRT were included for the study of histopathology and cell cycle analysis. Conjugated equine estrogens, 0.625mg/day, were administered for 25 days (days 1-25) of each month, and the following were also administered for 14 days (days 12-25): in group A ( n= 102), medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), 5 mg/day; in group B ( n= 66), MPA, 10mg/day; and in group C ( n= 73), dydrogesterone, 20mg/day. Endometrial sampling was performed after at least 10 months of treatment. Fifty-two premenopausal women were also enrolled for the comparative studies (group Y). The S-G2-M fractions in the cell cycle were used as the marker of proliferation.
                Most menopausal endometria were normal regardless of the regimens of HRT. Endometrial hyperplasia was only found in two cases (both in group A). The S-G2-M fractions of the endometrial cells in all three menopausal groups showed no statistically significant difference. It appeared that S-G2-M fractions increased from normal postmenopausal to normal premenopausal endometria to postmenopausal hyperplasia to premenopausal hyperplasia. The S-G2-M fractions of the normal menopausal endometrial cells were lower than those of the premenopausal controls either in normal or in hyperplastic categories.
                Our study showed that there is no difference between the effect of MPA and dydrogesterone used in sequential-combined HRT based on the cycle kinetics of the menopausal endometrium. To determine whether treatment of endometriosis with a GnRH analogue (GnRH-a; goserelin) combined with continuous estrogen and progestogen hormone replacement therapy (HRT) would prevent the hypoestrogenic effects, including loss of bone density, while maintaining efficacy for treatment of endometriosis.
                Randomized controlled trial.
                Fifty premenopausal women with laparoscopically diagnosed endometriosis (revised American Fertility Score for endometriosis implants equal to four or greater) and significant symptoms of dysmenorrhoea, dyspareunia, and other pelvic pain.
                Patients were randomized to receive either goserelin alone, 3.6 mg SC depot every 4 weeks for 24 weeks, or goserelin, 3.6 mg SC depot every 4 weeks for 24 weeks, plus HRT (25 micrograms transdermal 17 beta E2 daily and 5 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate orally daily) for 20 weeks commencing with the second goserelin injection.
                There was a significant reduction in the extent of pelvic endometriosis in both groups, with no difference between the groups. Both groups experienced an improvement in symptoms and signs, again with no difference between groups. Hypoestrogenic side effects of hot flushes and loss of libido were significantly less in the group that received HRT. The amount of bone mineral density loss was significantly less in the HRT group at the lumbar spine, although it was not prevented completely.
                The addition of HRT to GnRH-a for the treatment of endometriosis did not reduce the efficacy of treatment, and adverse hypoestrogenic effects were decreased, although not abolished. In this prospective, double-blind study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of low-dose estrogen and progestin replacement therapy in 36 postmenopausal women who were administered oral medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) cyclically or continuously in combination with conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) 0.625 mg daily. In the sequential group, MPA (5.0 mg) was administered daily for 12 days of each 25-day treatment cycle. In the two continuous groups, MPA was administered without interruption at a daily dose of either 2.5 mg or 5.0 mg for 12 treatment cycles. Of the 36 women in the study, 29 women completed the one-year protocol. The clinical and metabolic responses were assessed before and every three cycles during the 12 cycles of treatment. Endometrial biopsies and lumbar bone density scans were performed before and during the last week of the 12th treatment cycle. Vasomotor and urogenital symptoms improved in all women. Cyclic menstrual bleeding occurred in all patients on sequential therapy, and proliferative endometrium was noted in two of these women. All patients in both continuous treatment groups experienced amenorrhea after the fifth cycle of therapy, and all endometrial biopsies were atrophic or inactive. From the 3rd through the 12th month of cycle, favorable lipid and lipoprotein changes occurred in all treatment groups. Lumbar bone mineral density improved significantly (P < .05) by an average of 6.41% in all patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Hormone therapy for postmenopausal women with an intact uterus should comprise both estrogen and progestogen to reduce the risk of endometrial hyperplasia.