Low positioning of umbilical-artery catheters increases associated complications in newborn infants. Umbilical artery catheterization in newborns. I. Thrombosis in relation to catheter type and position. Prophylactic antibiotics in neonates with umbilical artery catheter placement: a prospective study of 137 patients. Randomized trial of umbilical arterial catheter position: clinical outcome. Prevention of umbilical artery catheter clots with heparinized infusates. Intravenous access in newborn infants: impact of extended umbilical venous catheter use on requirement for peripheral venous lines. Efficacy of thromboresistant umbilical artery catheters in reducing aortic thrombosis and related complications. Double lumen umbilical venous catheters in critically ill neonates: a randomized prospective study. Randomized controlled trial of vascular access in newborns in the neonatal intensive care unit.
We performed a randomized prospective study of the effect of placement position of umbilical-artery catheters on complication rates in high-risk newborn infants. A higher complication rate (31 of 40 vs. 13 of 33) (P less than 0.005) occurred in the group with the catheter tip at the third to fourth lumbar segment, as compared to those with the tip at the seventh to eighth thoracic segment, owing to more episodes of blanching and cyanosis of the extremities. There was no difference between groups in the rate of complications requiring catheter removal. Aortography revealed thrombosis in 21 of 23 patients studied, but there was no clinical evidence of impaired circulation. In retrospect, we found that, independently of catheter position, administration of antibiotics through the catheter was associated with an increased rate of complications (63 vs. 20 per cent). Umbilical-artery catheterization entails potential risks regardless of the position of the catheter; placement of the catheter with its tip at the seventh to eighth thoracic segment may be associated with fewer complications than at lower positions. Seventy-one sick newborn infants, who had an umbilical artery catheterized, were randomized in one of four catheter groups: long end-hole-, short end-hole-, long side-hole- or short side-hole catheter. A long catheter means a high position of the catheter tip (Th6--11) and a short catheter a low position of the tip (L3--5). An angiography through the indwelling catheter in order to diagnose thrombosis was performed before the catheter was withdrawn. Dissection of the aorta and its brances was performed on infants who died. The total frequency of thromboses was 26%. There were no thromboses among infants with long end-hole catheters while infants with short end-hole catheters had thrombosis in 26%, long side-hole catheters in 33% and short side-hole catheters in 64%. Long end-hole catheters functioned better than the others. Only 6 of 16 infants with thrombosis had physical signs from the legs, while 12 infants without thrombosis had similar signs. To analyze the risk of cannula sepsis from indwelling umbilical arterial catheters and the indication for prophylactic antibiotics, 137 catheterized neonates with respiratory distress were prospectively placed into either antibiotic-treated (penicillin 50,000U/kg/day and kanamycin 15 mg./kg./day) or non-treated groups. Although bacteria were frequently isolated from blood and catheter tip cultures obtained upon removal of the catheter, especially among non-antibiotic treated infants, these isolates were predominantly non-pathogens and probably skin flora. Corresponding peripheral blood cultures were usually sterile. No cases of cannula-associated sepsis occurred among treated and non-treated newborns. The risk of bacteriologically proven sepsis resulting from an indwelling umbilical artery catheter appears insufficient to justify prophylactic antibiotics. In order to determine if umbilical arterial catheter position affects the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis, clinical outcome was analysed in 308 infants whose umbilical arterial catheter had been randomly allocated to a high (n = 162) or a low (n = 146) position. Necrotizing enterocolitis was classified as suspected or confirmed; all renal, lower limb and local catheter complications were also recorded. High umbilical arterial catheters were in place for longer than low catheters, provided more samples and were removed as an emergency less often. Lower limb blanching and cyanosis were more common with low catheters. Eleven cases of confirmed necrotizing enterocolitis occurred in the "high" group and nine in the "low" group. One case of fatal aortic thrombosis was encountered in the high group. Positioning umbilical arterial catheters in a high position allowed longer functional use and did not increase the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis. 49 neonates requiring umbilical artery catheters (UACs) were randomly assigned to receive standard or heparin-containing infusates. 3 of 23 (13%) of the patients receiving heparin had catheters removed because they became functionally occluded compared to 15 of 26 (58%) in the control group (p less than 0.005). 4 of 13 (31%) single injection aortograms obtained in control infants demonstrated thrombi, compared to none of 7 in the heparin group. 1 patient in the heparin group had an aortic clot demonstrated at post-mortum examination. There were neither clinical coagulopathies nor abnormalities of partial thromboplastin time attributable to the administration of heparinized fluids. Heparinization of UAC infusates appears to be a safe method of reducing the risk of catheter occlusion. Heparin effect on large vessel clot risk remains unproven. Central venous lines are used to care for critically ill neonates in cases of limited peripheral venous access. This prospective, randomized study evaluated the risks and benefits of the use of single- and double-lumen umbilical venous catheters for up to 14 days. Patients were randomized to one of three treatment arms: (1) single-lumen umbilical catheter, (2) double-lumen umbilical catheter, or (3) no umbilical catheter; peripheral intravenous lines only. Infants in the groups treated with an umbilical venous catheter had significantly fewer venipunctures and peripheral intravenous lines placed during their first 2 weeks of life than those in the peripheral line only group. Less time and money were spent obtaining peripheral line placement in the umbilical venous catheter groups. The incidence rates of sepsis and complications were not higher in treated patients than in control patients. The double-lumen catheter further reduced peripheral venipunctures and lines. We conclude that an umbilical venous catheter used during the first 2 weeks of life is a relatively safe, less stressful, cost-effective means of providing intravenous therapy to neonates. Previous in vitro and in vivo reports suggest that catheters constructed of polyurethane with heparin bonded to the surface (HB-PU) are less thrombogenic than catheters made of polyvinyl chloride (PVC). A randomized trial sufficiently large (power 80%) to detect a reduction in the incidence of umbilical artery (UA) catheter complications, including aortic thrombus formation, from 45% to 20% was conducted in 125 infants. The infants were monitored for complications possibly related to the use of a UA catheter, such as systemic hypertension and abnormalities of lower extremity perfusion. The presence of aortic thrombi was assessed by ultrasound study 3.5 +/- 1.2 (SD) days and 11.1 +/- 2.3 days after insertion of the catheter. The use of HB-PU umbilical catheters did not lead to a significant reduction in the incidence of complications and aortic thrombi compared with the use of PVC catheters. The lack of reduction may have been related to the prolonged duration of catheter use in both groups. A much larger study would have been required to detect a smaller, but perhaps clinically significant, reduction in catheter-associated complications. To compare relative efficacies and complications associated with the use of double lumen vs. single lumen umbilical venous catheters in critically ill neonates.
                Prospective randomized control trial.
                Neonatal ICU.
                Forty-three critically ill neonates.
                Group 1 patients (n = 20) received single lumen umbilical venous catheters and group 2 patients (n = 23) received double lumen catheters. A record of the following information was kept: demographic data including diagnosis and indication for umbilical venous catheter insertion, catheter tip location, length of catheterization (days), number of additional iv catheters and complications (sepsis, hepatic necrosis, thrombosis, or mechanical complications).
                Double lumen umbilical venous catheters were well tolerated and were associated with no significant increased risk of mechanical complications when compared with single lumen umbilical venous catheters. The number of additional iv catheters required (0.8 +/- 0.1 [SD]) was significantly (p less than .05) less in the double lumen umbilical venous catheter group as compared with additional iv catheters required (2.3 +/- 0.8) in the single lumen umbilical venous catheter group.
                Double lumen umbilical venous catheters are well tolerated for short-term use, decrease the need for additional venous catheters in critically ill neonates, and may not significantly increase the risk of mechanical complications when compared with single lumen umbilical venous catheters. To compare the effectiveness of two methods of vascular access in newborns.
                Randomized controlled trial.
                Neonatal intensive care unit in Regional Hospital of Valdivia, Chile.
                Seventy-four high-risk newborns.
                Peripherally inserted central catheter and peripheral intravenous catheter.
                Length of neonatal intensive care unit stay and incidence of sepsis and phlebitis. RESULTS/DATA ANALYSIS: There were no statistically significant differences in the length of the neonatal intensive care unit stay and in the incidence of sepsis between groups. There was a significant higher incidence of phlebitis in the peripheral intravenous catheter group.
                Although there was not a significant effect of the kind of catheter on length of neonatal intensive care unit stay, the peripherally inserted central catheter is recommended because of the decreased risk of phlebitis and the decreased number of venipuncture attempts and catheters needed to complete intravenous therapy.
Side hole catheters should be avoided for umbilical arterial catheterisation in the newborn.