Biochemical and physiological parameters of recovery in acute severe head injury: responses to multisensory stimulation. The efficacy of multidisciplinary rehabilitation in stable multiple sclerosis patients. Coma arousal procedure: a therapeutic intervention in the treatment of head injury. Multicentre, cluster-randomized clinical trial of algorithms for critical-care enteral and parenteral therapy (ACCEPT). A prospective randomized controlled trial of multimodal perioperative management protocol in patients undergoing elective colorectal resection for cancer. The effect of systematic care planning after acute stroke in general hospital medical wards. Design issues of a randomised controlled clinical trial on spinal cord stimulation in critical limb ischaemia. ESES Study Group. Traumatic brain injury: efficacy of multidisciplinary rehabilitation. The treatment of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. A prospective randomized trial of surgical and conservative treatment.
We investigated the efficacy of applying a programme of multisensory stimulation to patients with severe diffuse traumatic brain injury, during their admission to a tertiary neurosurgical intensive care unit. We attempted to determine the nature and extent of any physiological or biochemical changes occurring as a result of the multisensory stimulation in the initial period of their comatose state. The findings were inconclusive with no significant treatment effect demonstrated. To evaluate the short-term efficacy of multidisciplinary, inpatient rehabilitation of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients.
                A double-blind, randomized, parallel group design was used. The intervention group were offered comprehensive, multidisciplinary inpatient rehabilitation at the Haslev MS Hospital for an average of 35.5 days, while the control group received no treatment related to the study. All patients were examined in their homes twice with a 10-week interval. The rehabilitation of the intervention group started 2-3 weeks after the first examination and ended 2-3 weeks before the second examination. Impairment was assessed by the Multiple Sclerosis Impairment Scale and the Expanded Disability Status Scale. Disability was assessed by means of Guy's Neurological Disability Scale. Two specific scales were used to assess upper limb function and ambulation: The Nine-Hole Peg Test and timed 10-metre walking. Patients' own perception of bodily pain, bladder symptoms, spasticity, fatigue, impaired walking and transfers were recorded using visual analogue scales. Finally, quality of life was assessed using the Life Appreciation and Satisfaction Questionnaire and the Functional Assessment in Multiple Sclerosis.
                Two hundred and thirty-three patients were screened and of those 38 were included for treatment and 52 as controls.
                We found no statistically significant differences between the two groups in any of the outcome measures.
                Although the study was underpowered, the negative outcome exposes the difficulties in quantitative analyses of the efficacy of multidisciplinary rehabilitation, which is liable to confounding factors such as variation in the indication for treatment, in the placebo effect, and in the reliability and responsiveness of the outcome measures. This study reports on the efficacy of a 'coma arousal procedure'. This procedure involved a programme of vigorous sensory stimulation administered to comatose patients by relatives using Comakits. An experimental group of 12 severely head-injured patients received the coma arousal procedure while a matched control group did not. Total duration of coma and weekly Glasgow Coma Scale Scores were recorded for the two groups. Results indicate that the total duration of coma was significantly shorter and that coma lightened more rapidly for the experimental group. The provision of nutritional support for patients in intensive care units (ICUs) varies widely both within and between institutions. We tested the hypothesis that evidence-based algorithms to improve nutritional support in the ICU would improve patient outcomes.
                A cluster-randomized controlled trial was performed in the ICUs of 11 community and 3 teaching hospitals between October 1997 and September 1998. Hospital ICUs were stratified by hospital type and randomized to the intervention or control arm. Patients at least 16 years of age with an expected ICU stay of at least 48 hours were enrolled in the study (n = 499). Evidence-based recommendations were introduced in the 7 intervention hospitals by means of in-service education sessions, reminders (local dietitian, posters) and academic detailing that stressed early institution of nutritional support, preferably enteral.
                Two hospitals crossed over and were excluded from the primary analysis. Compared with the patients in the control hospitals (n = 214), the patients in the intervention hospitals (n = 248) received significantly more days of enteral nutrition (6.7 v. 5.4 per 10 patient-days; p = 0.042), had a significantly shorter mean stay in hospital (25 v. 35 days; p = 0.003) and showed a trend toward reduced mortality (27% v. 37%; p = 0.058). The mean stay in the ICU did not differ between the control and intervention groups (10.9 v. 11.8 days; p = 0.7).
                Implementation of evidence-based recommendations improved the provision of nutritional support and was associated with improved clinical outcomes. A prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) of multimodal perioperative management protocol in patients undergoing elective colorectal resection for cancer.
                This study evaluates the use of a multimodal package in colorectal cancer surgery in the context of an RCT.
                Patients for elective resection for colorectal cancer were offered trial entry. Participants were stratified by sex and requirement for a total mesorectal excision and centrally randomized. Multimodal patients received intravenous fluid restriction, unrestricted oral intake with prokinetic agents, early ambulation, and fixed regimen epidural analgesia. Control patients received intravenous fluids to prevent oliguria, restricted oral intake until return of bowel motility, and weaning regimen epidural analgesia. Adherence to both regimens was reinforced using a daily checklist and protocol guidance sheets. Discharge decision was made using pre-agreed criteria. The primary endpoint was postoperative stay, and achievement of independence milestones. Secondary endpoints were postoperative complications, readmission rates, and mortality. Analysis was by intention to treat.
                Seventy patients were recruited. Approximately one fourth underwent TME. Median ages were similar (69.3 vs. 73.0 years). The median stay was significantly reduced in the multimodal group (5 vs. 7 days; P < 0.001, Mann-Whitney U test). Patients in the control arm were 2.5 times as likely to require a postoperative stay of more than 5 days. Patients in the multimodal group had less cardiorespiratory and anastomotic complications but more readmissions. There were 2 deaths, both controls.
                This RCT provides level 1b evidence that a multimodal management protocol can significantly reduce postoperative stay following colorectal cancer surgery. Morbidity and mortality are not increased. In a multidisciplinary study comprising 280 patients with acute cerebrovascular disease, the functional capacity was followed from the acute stage onwards with a test battery mainly measuring activities of daily living and motor capacity. Systematized care procedures with written care plans in accordance with the nursing process model, together with a booklet of guidelines in stroke care, were introduced during an experimental period in the care of 173 of the stroke victims. The remaining 107 patients received conventional care. The functional improvements were equal from a statistical standpoint in these two groups. However, in the group, which received special activities, there was a significant decrease in bed days, and a slightly larger number were able to return to their own homes. Compared with another stroke population from the same hospital, measured with the same functional instrument 7 years ago, the patients in this study seemed better off from a functional standpoint. For the individual severely-disabled patient, the care planning procedures seemed to be valuable and an effective way of promoting communication between different units. The difficulties in introducing new routines for documentation are discussed. Review of the design of a clinical study to evaluate of the efficacy of epidural spinal cord electrical stimulation (ESES) as compared to best medical treatment in patients with nonreconstructible critical limb ischaemia.
                Randomised controlled clinical trial of pragmatic type, which will be analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle. The treatment strategies are ESES, in addition to best medical treatment, and best medical treatment alone. Patients are followed-up for at least 18 months.
                The ESES-trial is an ongoing multicentre trial in 17 hospitals in The Netherlands.
                Patients with critical limb ischaemia, nonsuitable for either primary intervention or reintervention after failing reconstructions.
                Limb survival, patient survival, quality of life and cost-effectiveness.
                From November 1991 until May 1994 120 patients had been enrolled. Using life-table analysis, at one year 76% of these randomised patients were alive: 41% without amputation and 35% with amputation. Quality of life of the trial patients was low, even compared to other severely ill patient groups, such as liver and heart transplant candidates.
                Considering the high incidence of death and amputation, 18 months of follow-up seems adequate to detect a clinically relevant outcome improvement from ESES-treatment, if present. We hope to present the results of this study at the end of 1995. To establish efficacy of a coordinated multidisciplinary rehabilitation service for severe head injury, provided at Hunters Moor Regional Rehabilitation Centre.
                A quasi-experimental design to compare treatment effects between two groups. The first group received a coordinated, multidisciplinary regional rehabilitation service; the other, a single discipline approach provided by local, district hospitals. Follow-up was for 2 years postinjury.
                Fifty-six consecutive severe head injury admissions, with an identified main caregiver, referred for rehabilitation within 4 weeks of their injury.
                The Barthel index, the Functional Independence Measure (FIM), and the Newcastle Independence Assessment Form (NIAF), a newly developed, real-life, comprehensive measure. In addition, caregivers completed the General Health Questionnaire.
                The group that received coordinated multidisciplinary rehabilitation not only demonstrated significant gains throughout the study period but also maintained treatment effect after input ended. Furthermore, caregivers of this group had significantly reduced levels of distress. The comparison group, despite initial lower injury severity and shorter hospital stay, did not demonstrate equivalent gains or any posttreatment effect.
                The results show the efficacy of a comprehensive, specialist multidisciplinary regional service. There are significant implications for service provision for people with severe traumatic head injury. In a prospective study, 52 patients with a spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hematoma (ICH) were randomly assigned to receive emergency surgery or conservative treatment within 48 hours after the bleed. Patients with a decreased level of consciousness and/or a severe neurological deficit were admitted to the study. The overall mortality rate at 6 months was 42%: 10 (38%) of the 26 patients in the conservative group and 12 (46%) of the 26 in the surgical group. Six (20%) of the 30 survivors at 6 months were able to conduct their activities of daily living independently: five (31%) of the 16 patients in the conservative group and one (7%) of the 14 in the operative group. These differences are not statistically significant. The mortality rate of semicomatose or stuporous patients (Glasgow Coma Scale score 7 to 10) was statistically significantly lower in the surgical group (none of the four patients) than in the conservative group (four of five patients) (p less than 0.05); however, all surviving patients in this subgroup were severely disabled. The study suggests that surgical treatment of this category of patients with ICH does not offer any definite advantage over conservative treatment. In semicomatose or stuporous patients, surgery may improve the length of survival, but the quality of life remains poor.
This systematic review indicates that there is no reliable evidence to support, or rule out, the effectiveness of multisensory programmes in patients in coma or vegetative state.