Double-blind placebo-controlled comparison of the analgesic effects of single doses of lornoxicam and aspirin in patients with postoperative dental pain. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response study of the analgesic effect of lornoxicam after surgical removal of mandibular third molars. Analgesic efficacy and safety of lornoxicam quick-release formulation compared with diclofenac potassium: randomised, double-blind trial in acute low back pain. Is pain prophylaxis in minor gynaecological surgery of clinical value? a double-blind placebo controlled study of paracetamol 1 g versus lornoxicam 8 mg given orally. Analgesic efficacy of quick-release versus standard lornoxicam for pain after third molar surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose trial. Multicenter clinical trial of ibuprofen and acetaminophen in the treatment of postoperative dental pain. A double-blind, randomized study of naproxen sodium, ibuprofen, and placebo in postoperative dental pain. Analgesic efficacy of single oral doses of lumiracoxib and ibuprofen in patients with postoperative dental pain. Dose-response of flurbiprofen on postoperative pain and emesis after paediatric strabismus surgery.
The pain experienced after third molar surgery was used as a model to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of a new non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, lornoxicam, in a Phase II study. One hundred and fifty fit, young adults participated in this randomised, single dose, double-blind, parallel group clinical study. Three doses of lornoxicam (2 mg, 4 mg, and 8 mg) were compared with aspirin 650 mg and placebo. Patients suffering from moderate to severe pain following surgery were monitored for up to 8 hours. All indices of efficacy showed similar results, all active treatments being associated with highly significant (P less than 0.0001) reductions in pain during the study period. Lornoxicam 8 mg demonstrated significant analgesic efficacy as compared with placebo. The two lower doses of lornoxicam and aspirin all showed apparent degrees of efficacy intermediate between that of placebo and lornoxicam 8 mg, although the trial proved to have inadequate power to show significant differences between these three treatments. Lornoxicam was very well tolerated at all three doses studied, with no adverse events definitely attributable to its administration. The aim of the present study was to investigate the dose-effect relationship of single doses of 4 to 32 mg of lornoxicam (LNX), a new nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug belonging to the oxicam group, compared with placebo and 10 mg ketorolac (KET) in the treatment of pain after oral surgery. Also, it was the aim of the study to evaluate the relationship between adverse events and different doses of LNX. After the surgical removal of a mandibular third molar, test medication was taken when the patients experienced at least moderate pain. After medication, pain relief, pain intensity, and any discomfort from the medication were noted in a questionnaire. Paracetamol was used as rescue medication. A total of 278 patients completed the study according to the protocol. The primary efficacy parameter was total pain relief after 6 hours, and all active treatments showed significantly better effect than placebo, with LNX 16 and 32 mg being significantly superior to LNX 4 mg. All other efficacy parameters showed the same dose-effect relationship. A total of 37 adverse events were reported evenly distributed in the 6 treatment groups; only 3 of these were considered severe, and all disappeared without treatment. In conclusion, the study showed a dose-effect relationship of LNX without a rise in adverse events. The effect of 10 mg KET seemed to be at the level of 8 to 16 mg LNX. NSAIDs are widely used for patients presenting with low back pain. A quick-release formulation of lornoxicam, a potent NSAID from the chemical class of oxicams, offers a faster onset of pain relief compared with the standard tablet formulation.
                Time to onset of pain relief with lornoxicam was compared with the quick-release formulation of diclofenac potassium in acute low back pain in a randomised, double-blind, multicentre study. 220 patients received either lornoxicam 24 mg or diclofenac potassium 150 mg on day 1 followed by lornoxicam 8 mg twice daily or diclofenac potassium 50 mg twice daily for 5 days. Efficacy outcomes included time to onset of pain relief, as measured by the stopwatch method (primary outcome), pain intensity, pain relief, rescue medication, ability to perform daily activities and global evaluation of the study medication.
                The time to onset of pain relief ratios between diclofenac potassium/lornoxicam was 1.03 (95% CI 0.91, 1.26) and 1.05 (95% CI 0.93, 1.29) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses, respectively, demonstrating the non-inferiority of lornoxicam (defined by lower limits of the 95% CIs >0.80). Time to onset of pain relief was shorter with lornoxicam (30 minutes) compared with diclofenac potassium (36 minutes). The difference was not statistically significant (ITT analysis). A higher magnitude of analgesic effect associated with better global evaluation of the study medication for lornoxicam was also demonstrated. The drugs were equally well tolerated.
                Lornoxicam administered as a quick-release formulation was shown to be non-inferior to the equivalent formulation of diclofenac potassium in terms of onset of pain relief and more effective on most of the major standard efficacy outcomes. Methods: In a prospective randomised placebo controlled double-blind study 210 ASA I-II women scheduled for elective termination of pregnancy received 1 g paracetamol, 8 mg lornoxicam or placebo orally 60 min before anaesthesia which was standardised with propofol, fentanyl and oxygen in nitrous oxide 1:2. Postoperative pain was assessed by VAS-score at 30 and 60 min after end of surgery and at discharge as primary endpoints. Need for rescue medication and time to discharge were secondary endpoints. Results: All patients had an uncomplicated course. Overall pain intensity was low, however, the patients pretreated with lornoxicam had significantly less pain after surgery, no difference could however, be seen in need for rescue medication or time to discharge between the three groups. Conclusion: General pain prophylaxis may be argued in minor gynaecological surgical procedures where postoperative pain is of low intensity. If general prophylaxis is to be given in minor gynaecological surgery, a non steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID) such as lornoxicam, seems more efficacious as compared to a standard dose of 1 g paracetamol. The aim of this study was to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and time to onset of effect of the lornoxicam quick-release (LNX-QR) tablet compared with the standard-release tablet (LNX-ST).
                In this randomized, double-blind, single-dose trial, 200 patients with moderate pain after surgical removal of an impacted third molar were randomized to treatment with an LNX-QR 8 mg tablet (80 patients), an LNX-ST 8 mg tablet (80 patients) or placebo (40 patients). Pain intensity (PI) and pain relief (PAR) were assessed (numerical and verbal rating scales) for 6 hours, and time to onset of PAR was recorded. The cumulated sum of PI differences (SPID) and PAR (TOTPAR) were calculated. Tolerability was evaluated by occurrence of adverse events.
                Kaplan-Meier analysis of time to onset of analgesic efficacy demonstrated a significantly faster onset with LNX-QR than placebo or LNX-ST (p < 0.0001). Median time of onset was 32 minutes (range 29-37) for LNX-QR and 46 minutes (range 37-59) for LNX-ST. The analgesic efficacy of LNX-QR and LNX-ST were superior to that of placebo, whereas paired comparisons of TOTPAR and SPID showed LNX-QR to be superior to LNX-ST (p < 0.05).
                LNX-QR provided a faster onset and superior analgesic effect against pain following third molar surgery than LNX-ST. Pharmacological management of pain for acute and chronic conditions has been guided by a scientific understanding of peripheral and central acting mechanisms for the control of inflammation as well as pain. Oral surgery pain is a reliable model to reference the effectiveness of commonly used analgesics such as ibuprofen and acetaminophen. A total of 706 patients who were experiencing moderate to severe pain received a single dose of ibuprofen, acetaminophen, or placebo. After 6 hours, the degree of pain relief and tolerance was assessed. Ibuprofen has important implications for postoperative pain in clinical practice. In a double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled study, 203 patients with post-operative dental pain following the extraction of one or two bony impacted third molars were randomized to receive a single dose of naproxen sodium 220 mg, ibuprofen 200 mg or placebo. Pain intensity and pain relief were assessed at intervals for 12 hours postdose. Both active drugs demonstrated superior analgesic efficacy over placebo. Naproxen sodium and ibuprofen were comparable both in onset of analgesic action and in pain relief. From 1 to 12 hours postdose, naproxen sodium showed a trend for superior analgesic efficacy compared with ibuprofen; this trend reached statistical significance at the 12-hour time point. Both drugs were well-tolerated and effective analgesics for postoperative dental pain. This randomised, double-blind study compared single dose lumiracoxib (a cyclooxygenase-2 selective inhibitor) 100 and 400 mg, ibuprofen 400 mg and placebo in patients with postoperative dental pain over 12 h. The primary efficacy variable was pain intensity difference. Lumiracoxib 400 mg and ibuprofen were superior to placebo from 1 to 12 h post dose while lumiracoxib 100 mg was superior from 1.5 to 9 h. Lumiracoxib 400 mg demonstrated the fastest median time to onset of analgesia (37.4 min) followed by ibuprofen (41.5), and lumiracoxib 100 mg (52.4; all p < or = 0.001 vs. placebo). Median time to rescue medication (h) was longer for lumiracoxib 400 mg (> or = 12), lumiracoxib 100 mg (approximately 7) and ibuprofen (approximately 8) than placebo (approximately 2; all p < or = 0.001 vs. placebo). Patients rated lumiracoxib 400 mg superior to the other active treatments (p < 0.05); lumiracoxib 100 mg was comparable with ibuprofen and superior to placebo (p < 0.001). Lumiracoxib provided rapid, effective and well-tolerated analgesia. Intravenous flurbiprofen, a non-steroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID), has been used recently for postoperative pain relief in adults. The drug is also likely to have antiemetic property. The present study was undertaken to investigate the effect of flurbiprofen on postoperative pain and emesis in children undergoing strabismus surgery, which is well known to produce postoperative nausea and vomiting.
                In a prospective, randomised, controlled clinical trial, 90 children aged 2-11 yr received saline (control), flurbiprofen 0.5 mg.kg-1, or flurbiprofen 1 mg.kg-1. Saline and flurbiprofen were administered i.v. immediately after induction of anaesthesia. Anaesthesia was induced and maintained with sevoflurane and nitrous oxide in oxygen. Postoperative pain was assessed by a blinded observer using an objective pain scale (OPS). No opioids or antiemetics were administered throughout the study. The incidence and frequency of vomiting were compared among groups.
                Flurbiprofen 1 mg.kg-1 provided lower OPS (highest) scores during the eight hours after surgery and a reduced requirement for postoperative supplementary analgesic (diclofenac suppository) compared with the other two regimens. The two doses of flurbiprofen failed to decrease the incidence and frequency of vomiting.
                These data suggest that preoperative flurbiprofen 1 mg.kg-1 iv is a simple and effective approach to postoperative pain relief but not to the prevention of emesis following paediatric strabismus surgery.
Oral lornoxicam is effective at treating moderate to severe acute postoperative pain, based on limited data. Adverse events did not differ significantly from placebo.