Clinical effects of heliox administration for acute bronchiolitis in young infants. Heliox reduces respiratory system resistance in respiratory syncytial virus induced respiratory failure. Noninvasive therapy with helium-oxygen for severe bronchiolitis. Randomized trial of the use of heliox as a driving gas for updraft nebulization of bronchodilators in the emergent treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Evaluation of heliox in children hospitalized with acute severe asthma. A randomized crossover trial. Use of heliox-driven nebulizer therapy in the treatment of acute asthma. Recombinant human deoxyribonuclease in infants with respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis. The Provo multicenter early high-frequency oscillatory ventilation trial: improved pulmonary and clinical outcome in respiratory distress syndrome. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure with heliox versus air oxygen in infants with acute bronchiolitis: a crossover study.
To assess the effect of heliox, a helium-oxygen mixture, on respiratory distress symptoms in young infants.
                Prospective, randomized, double-blind study.
                Pediatric ICU (PICU) of a university hospital.
                Twenty infants, all < 3 months old, admitted to the PICU with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis.
                All infants were randomly and blindly assigned to inhale either heliox or an air-oxygen mixture (airox) for 1 h under an oxyhood.
                After 1 h, the respiratory distress score was significantly lower in the heliox group compared with the airox group (3.05 vs 5.5, p < 0.01), with a significant reduction in accessory muscles use (p < 0.05) and expiratory wheezing (p < 0.01). In contrast, inspiratory breath sounds and cyanosis did not significantly differ between groups. The ex-premature infants of the heliox group had a higher respiratory distress score at baseline compared with the term infants of this group (5.8 vs 5.2, p < 0.05) and a comparable decrease in the score at 60 min.
                In young infants, even those born prematurely, heliox breathing induced a rapid reduction in accessory muscles use and expiratory wheezing. Further studies are needed to confirm the decreased respiratory muscle work of breathing during heliox inhalation in this population. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) lower respiratory tract disease is characterised by narrowing of the airways resulting in increased airway resistance, air-trapping and respiratory acidosis. These problems might be overcome using helium-oxygen gas mixture. However, the effect of mechanical ventilation with heliox in these patients is unclear. The objective of this prospective cross-over study was to determine the effects of mechanical ventilation with heliox 60/40 versus conventional gas on respiratory system resistance, air-trapping and CO2 removal.
                Mechanically ventilated, sedated and paralyzed infants with proven RSV were enrolled within 24 hours after paediatric intensive care unit (PICU)admission. At T = 0, respiratory system mechanics including respiratory system compliance and resistance, and peak expiratory flow rate were measured with the AVEA ventilator. The measurements were repeated at each interval (after 30 minutes of ventilation with heliox, after 30 minutes of ventilation with nitrox and again after 30 minutes of ventilation with heliox). Indices of gas exchange (ventilation and oxygenation index) were calculated at each interval. Air-trapping (defined by relative change in end-expiratory lung volume) was determined by electrical impedance tomography (EIT) at each interval.
                Thirteen infants were enrolled. In nine, EIT measurements were performed. Mechanical ventilation with heliox significantly decreased respiratory system resistance. This was not accompanied by an improved CO2 elimination, decreased peak expiratory flow rate or decreased end-expiratory lung volume. Importantly, oxygenation remained unaltered throughout the experimental protocol.
                Respiratory system resistance is significantly decreased by mechanical ventilation with heliox (ISCRTN98152468). To determine whether noninvasive therapy using a helium-oxygen mixture reduces the use of positive-pressure ventilation in the treatment of respiratory failure caused by severe bronchiolitis.
                This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that recruited infants in 4 pediatric intensive care units (PICUs). A total of 39 nonintubated infants with severe bronchiolitis caused by respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) were randomly assigned within 8 hours of PICU admission to receive a helium-oxygen mixture (helium group) or an air-oxygen mixture (control group) through an inflatable head hood. The primary study outcome was the requirement for positive pressure mechanical ventilation. Results were compared using Fisher's exact test.
                No differences were noted between the control and helium groups with respect to age (1.0 vs 1.1 months), prematurity, or family history of asthma or smoking. Positive pressure ventilation was judged necessary for 4 of the 21 (19.0%) infants in the control group and in 4 of the 18 (22.2%) in the helium group (relative risk = 1.17; 95% confidence interval = 0.34 to 4.01).
                This study did not detect any differences between the patients in the helium group and the control group with respect to the rate of positive-pressure ventilation. To determine whether the bronchodilator effects of albuterol and ipratropium bromide are greater if updraft nebulization is driven by 80% helium and 20% oxygen (HELIOX) than if driven by compressed room air (AIR) during the treatment of an acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
                The emergency department of a 750-bed inner-city community hospital.
                Over a 12-month period, a convenience sample of 50 normoxic patients presenting with signs and symptoms of an acute exacerbation of COPD were prospectively randomized to receive either HELIOX or AIR as the driving gas for updraft nebulization of a mixture of albuterol 2.5 mg and ipratropium bromide 0.5 mg. Additional aerosol treatments with albuterol 2.5 mg were given at 20, 40, and 120 mins after randomization using the assigned gas. Spirometry was obtained while breathing room air before the first treatment (baseline) and at 1 hr and 2 hrs after the initiation of treatment. The primary measure of efficacy was the change in percent of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) over the treatment period. A secondary measure of efficacy was the change in percentage of predicted forced expiratory flow after 25% to 75% of vital capacity had been expelled (FEF25-75).
                Twenty-five patients were randomized to each treatment group. Three patients (1 HELIOX, 2 AIR) were unable to complete the study. The baseline FEV1was 44% (95% confidence interval, 35% to 52%) of predicted in the HELIOX group and 39 (31% to 46%) of predicted in the AIR group. There were no adverse outcomes observed in either the HELIOX group or the AIR group. There were no significant differences in the change of FEV1 between the two groups by either the 1 hr or 2 hr time point (1 hr, HELIOX + 10% [7% to 13%], AIR + 9% [5% to 13%]; 2 hr HELIOX + 10% [6% to 15%], AIR + 10% [6% to 14%]). The improvement in FEF25-75 was significantly greater in the HELIOX group than in the AIR group at both the 1 hr time point (HELIOX + 14% [7% to 22%] vs. AIR + 7% [3% to 10%], p = .05) and at the 2 hr time point (HELIOX + 15% [8% to 21%] vs. AIR + 7% [4% to 11%], p = .05).
                Use of HELIOX as a driving gas for the updraft nebulization of bronchodilators during the first 2 hrs of treatment of an acute COPD exacerbation failed to improve FEV1 faster than the use of AIR. The faster improvement in FEF25-75 during the first 2 hrs of treatment was small and of uncertain clinical significance. To determine whether breathing a blend of 70% helium:30% oxygen (heliox) would improve pulmonary function, decrease clinical score, and improve the sensation of dyspnea in children hospitalized with acute severe asthma.
                Prospective, randomized, double-blind, crossover study.
                The inpatient pediatric service of a military, tertiary care, teaching hospital.
                Children 5 to 18 years who required hospital admission for treatment of acute asthma.
                All patients received 5 mg of nebulized albuterol every 1 to 4 h, with a dose given within 30 min of the start of the study, and IV administered methylprednisolone. Patients breathed heliox and a 30% oxygen-enriched air mixture for 15 min each in random order.
                Clinical score, dyspnea score, oxygen saturation, heart rate, and respiratory rate, followed by FVC, FEV1, peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), and, mean midexpiratory flow rate (FEF25-75) were obtained at study entry, 15 min after breathing the first gas mixture (heliox or air per randomization), 15 min after breathing the second mixture, and again 15 min after stopping the second gas mixture (study end values). Eleven children were enrolled, and all completed the study. There were no significant differences between study entry and study end spirometric values. Using the paired t test, we found no significant differences between mean values (SD) of FEV1 and FVC obtained while breathing heliox vs air; FEV1-heliox, 53% (18%) of the predicted value; FEV1-air, 52% (16%) of the predicted value (p = 0.36); FVC-heliox, 69% (22%) of the predicted value; and FVC-air, 70% (21%) of the predicted value (p = 0.50). The differences in values for PEFSR and FEF25-75 while breathing heliox vs air were small but did reach statistical significance in favor of heliox: PEFR-heliox, 56% (20%) of the predicted value; PEFR-air, 50% (16%) of the predicted value (p = 0.04); FEF25-75-heliox, 32% (13%) of the predicted value; and FEF25-75-heliox, 29% (11%) of the predicted value (p = 0.006). Heliox had no effect on either clinical or dyspnea scores.
                The short-term inhalation of heliox did not benefit this group of children hospitalized with acute, severe asthma. To compare the effectiveness of a helium-oxygen mixture with that of oxygen alone as an aerosolizing gas for beta-agonist therapy in patients with mild to moderate exacerbation of asthma.
                A prospective, single-blinded study was performed in an urban teaching hospital over a period of 5 months. A convenience sample of 205 patients with mild to moderate exacerbation of asthma were enrolled. The participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups. The first group received 3 doses of albuterol, 5.0 mg aerosolized in 10 L/min of oxygen, 15 minutes apart. The second group received 3 doses of albuterol, 5.0 mg aerosolized in 10 L/min of a 70:30 helium-oxygen mixture (heliox), 15 minutes apart. Peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), forced vital capacity (FVC), and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1 ) were measured before and after each treatment. Only PEFR and FEV1 were used in data analysis.
                Although both the heliox and the oxygen group showed significant improvement in PEFR from baseline after 45 minutes (72% and 70%, respectively), the difference between the 2 groups was clinically and statistically insignificant (P =.56). Similar findings were observed for FEV1. There was no difference in rate of admission or rate of complications between the 2 groups.
                Despite its ability to decrease the turbulent flow in airways and to reach distal pulmonary tissues, heliox had no clinically significant advantage over standard therapy in the treatment of mild to moderate asthma. Further large-scale studies are necessary to determine the clinical efficacy of heliox in this setting. Treatment of hospitalized infants with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) bronchiolitis is mainly supportive. Bronchodilators and systemic steroids are often used but do not reduce the length of hospital stay. Because hypoxia and airways obstruction develop secondary to viscous mucus in infants with RSV bronchiolitis, and because free DNA is present in RSV mucus, we tested the efficacy of the mucolytic drug recombinant human deoxyribonuclease (rhDNase).
                In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial, 225 oxygen-dependent infants admitted to the hospital for RSV bronchiolitis were randomly assigned to receive 2.5 mg bid of nebulized rhDNase or placebo until discharge. The primary end point was length of hospital stay. Secondary end points were duration of supplemental oxygen, improvement in symptom score, and number of intensive care admissions.
                There were no significant differences between the groups with regard to the length of hospital stay (p = 0.19) or the duration of supplemental oxygen (p = 0.07). The ratio (rhDNase/placebo) of geometric means of length of stay was 1.12 (95% confidence interval, 0.96 to 1.33); for the duration of supplemental oxygen, the ratio was 1.28 (95% confidence interval, 0.97 to 1.68). There were no significant differences in the rate of improvement of the symptom score or in the number of intensive care admissions.
                Administration of rhDNase did not reduce the length of hospital stay or the duration of supplemental oxygen in oxygen-dependent infants with RSV bronchiolitis. To compare the hospital course and clinical outcome of preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome treated with surfactant and managed with high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) or conventional mechanical ventilation (CV) as their primary mode of ventilator support.
                A prospective randomized clinical trial.
                Three community-based level III neonatal intensive care units.
                A total of 125 neonates who were 35 weeks or less estimated gestation requiring intubation and assisted ventilation for respiratory distress syndrome with arterial to alveolar oxygen ratio less than .50.
                Patients were randomized to continue CV (61 patients) or be changed to HFOV (64 patients) after exogenous surfactant administration (100 mg/kg). HFOV was used in a strategy to promote lung recruitment and maintain lung volume. Protocol respiratory care guidelines were followed; otherwise routine care was provided by each neonatal intensive care unit.
                No differences were noted in demographic features between the two study groups. The study population birth weight was 1.51 +/- .47 kg (mean +/- SD), gestational age was 30.9 +/- 2.5 weeks, and study entry age was 2 to 3 hours. Patients randomized to HFOV demonstrated the following significant findings compared with CV-treated patients: vasopressor support was less intensive; surfactant redosing was not as frequent; oxygenation improved more rapidly and remained higher during the first 7 days; fewer infants required prolonged supplemental oxygen or ventilator support; treatment failure was reduced; more patients survived without chronic lung disease at 30 days; need for continuous supplemental oxygen at discharge was less; frequency of necrotizing enterocolitis illness was lower; there were fewer abnormal hearing tests; and hospital costs were decreased. No differences were seen between the two study groups in the frequency or severity of patent ductus arteriosus, air leak, retinopathy of prematurity, or intraventricular hemorrhage. Length of hospital stay and survival to discharge were similar for HFOV- and CV-treated infants.
                When used early with a lung recruitment strategy, HFOV after surfactant replacement resulted in clinical outcomes consistent with a reduction in both acute and chronic lung injury. Benefit was evident for preterm infants both less than or equal to 1 kg and more than 1 kg. In addition, early HFOV treatment may have had a more global effect on patient health throughout the hospitalization, resulting in reduced morbidity and decreased health care cost. The purpose of this work was to evaluate the effects of administering either heliox or air oxygen in combination with nasal continuous positive airway pressure in infants with refractory bronchiolitis.
                We conducted a prospective, interventional, single-center, crossover study in a teaching hospital including infants 1 month to 2 years of age, consecutively admitted to the PICU from February 2004 to February 2005 for treatment of severe acute bronchiolitis unresponsive to therapy. Patients with a clinical score (Modified Wood's Clinical Asthma Score) of >5, arterial oxygen saturation of <92%, or transcutaneous CO(2) pressure of >50 mmHg despite supportive therapy, nebulized L-epinephrine, and heliox therapy through a nonrebreathing reservoir face mask were eligible. During the study period, 40 infants with bronchiolitis were admitted to the PICU; 12 fulfilled inclusion criteria. A predetermined balanced sequential allocation to either 30 minutes of treatment with nasal continuous positive airway pressure with heliox or to air-oxygen nasal continuous positive airway pressure was performed. Measurements were taken at baseline and after 30 minutes of each treatment.
                Baseline mean values were as follows: nasal continuous positive airway pressure of 7.2 cmH(2)O; clinical score of 7.7 points; transcutaneous CO(2) pressure of 61.6 mmHg; and arterial oxygen saturation of 88.6%, with the fraction of inspired oxygen at 35.4%. Clinical score, transcutaneous CO(2) pressure, and arterial oxygen saturation improved during the study time with both heliox-nasal continuous positive airway pressure and air-oxygen-nasal continuous positive airway pressure: after 1 hour, the clinical score fell 1.7 points, transcutaneous CO(2) pressure decreased 8.2 mmHg, and arterial oxygen saturation increased by 7.7%. Improvement in clinical score was double with heliox-nasal continuous positive airway pressure compared with the air-oxygen-nasal continuous positive airway pressure (2.12 vs 1.08 points), and the fall in the transcutaneous CO(2) pressure was greater with heliox-nasal continuous positive airway pressure compared with air-oxygen-nasal continuous positive airway pressure (9.7 vs 5.4 mm Hg). There was no difference in arterial oxygen saturation between groups. No patients required endotracheal intubation. No adverse effects attributable to either of the study interventions were detected.
                Nasal continuous positive airway pressure improves the clinical score and the CO(2) elimination of infants with refractory bronchiolitis. These positive effects are significantly enhanced when nasal continuous positive airway pressure is combined with heliox instead of air oxygen. Both techniques are noninvasive, seem safe, and may reduce the need for endotracheal intubation.
Current evidence suggests that the addition of heliox therapy may significantly reduce a clinical score evaluating respiratory distress in the first hour after starting treatment in infants with acute RSV bronchiolitis. Nevertheless, there was no reduction in the rate of intubation, in the need for mechanical ventilation, or in the length of PICU stay. Further studies with homogeneous logistics in their heliox application are needed. Such studies would provide necessary information as to the appropriate place for heliox in the therapeutic schedule for severe bronchiolitis.