A randomized trial of early versus standard inhaled nitric oxide therapy in term and near-term newborn infants with hypoxic respiratory failure. Inhaled nitric oxide in the management of preterm infants with severe respiratory failure. Neonatal Ventilation With Inhaled Nitric Oxide Versus Ventilatory Support Without Inhaled Nitric Oxide for Preterm Infants With Severe Respiratory Failure: the INNOVO multicentre randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN 17821339). The safety and efficacy of nitric oxide therapy in premature infants. Inhaled nitric oxide and hypoxic respiratory failure in infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. The Neonatal Inhaled Nitric Oxide Study Group (NINOS). Inhaled nitric oxide in the treatment of moderate persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn: a randomized controlled, multicenter trial. Treatment of MAS with PPHN using combined therapy: SLL, bolus surfactant and iNO. Cumulative meta-analysis of therapeutic trials for myocardial infarction. Inhaled nitric oxide therapy in premature infants with mild to moderate respiratory distress syndrome.
Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) reduces the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)/incidence of death in term and near-term neonates with severe hypoxic respiratory failure. We conducted a randomized, double masked, multicenter trial to determine whether administration of iNO earlier in respiratory failure results in additional reduction in the incidence of these outcomes.
                Neonates who were born at > or =34 weeks' gestation were enrolled when they required assisted ventilation and had an oxygenation index (OI) > or =15 and <25 on any 2 measurements in a 12-hour interval. Infants were randomized to early iNO or to simulated initiation of iNO (control). Infants who had an increase in OI to 25 or more were given iNO as standard therapy.
                The trial enrollment was halted after 75% of target sample size was reached because of decreasing availability of eligible patients. The 150 infants who were given early iNO and 149 control infants had similar baseline characteristics. Arterial oxygen tension increased by >20 mm Hg in 73% of early iNO and 37% of control infants after study gas initiation. Control infants received standard iNO and deteriorated to OI >40 more often than infants who were given early iNO. The incidence of death (early iNO, 6.7% vs control, 9.4%), ECMO (10.7% vs 12.1%), and their combined incidence (16.7% vs 19.5%) were similar in both groups.
                iNO improves oxygenation but does not reduce the incidence of ECMO/mortality when initiated at an OI of 15 to 25 compared with initiation at >25 in term and near-term neonates with respiratory failure. Elevated pulmonary vascular resistance and poor ventilation-perfusion matching are commonly found in preterm infants with severe respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and respiratory failure. Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) can improve gas exchange and decrease pulmonary vascular resistance. This study was conducted to determine whether iNO therapy improves oxygenation in such infants.
                Between July 2000 and 2006, 65 preterm infants (birth weight, <1500 g; gestational age, <31 weeks) with severe RDS and respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation and an oxygenation index (OI)>or=25 were randomly divided into two groups. Group A infants (n=32) received iNO therapy. iNO was started at a dose of five parts per million (p.p.m.). The maximal dose of NO was 20 p.p.m. Group B infants (n=33) did not receive iNO therapy, receive inhaled oxygen placebo only, was served as control group. Mechanical ventilation and iNO therapy were managed by neonatologists who were not involved in safety monitoring, data analysis and interpretation, or manuscript preparation. This study was randomized but not blinded.
                The OI was significantly lower (P<0.01) in the iNO therapy group than in the control group at 30 min, 3, 12 and 24 h after initiating iNO therapy. Six infants in the iNO-treated group and 10 infants in the control group died. Post hoc analyses did not reveal any significant differences in the incidences of chronic lung disease (CLD), intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) or duration of intubation between the iNO-treated and the control groups.
                We conclude that iNO therapy leads to an improvement in oxygenation without short-term side effects (such as pulmonary hemorrhage, intracranial hemorrhage, pneumothorax or acute deterioration) in premature infants with severe RDS and respiratory failure. However, iNO therapy does not significantly reduce mortality rate or the incidences of CLD, ICH, PDA or ROP. Although inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) may be a promising treatment for newborn infants with severe respiratory failure, the results from 3 previous small trials were inconclusive.
                Infants of <34 weeks' gestation, <28 days old, and with severe respiratory failure requiring ventilatory support were randomized to receive or not receive iNO. The study was not blinded.
                Recruited were 108 infants (55 allocated to receive iNO and 53 not allocated to receive iNO) from 15 neonatal units in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland. Fifty-nine percent (64 of 108) died, and 84% of the survivors (37 of 44) had signs of some impairment or disability, 9 (20%) of them classified as severely disabled. There was no evidence of an effect of iNO on the primary outcomes: death or severe disability at 1 year corrected age (relative risk [RR]: 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76 to 1.29); death or supplemental oxygen on expected date of delivery (RR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.68 to 1.02); or death or supplemental oxygen at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age (RR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.87 to 1.12). There was a trend for infants allocated to the iNO group to spend more time on the ventilator (log rank: 3.6), on supplemental oxygen (log rank: 1.4), and in hospital (log rank: 3.5) than those allocated to receive no iNO. This pattern predominantly reflected the infants who died. Mean total costs at 1 year corrected age were significantly higher in the iNO group, partly because of the costs of the gas but mainly because of the difference in initial hospitalization costs.
                Evidence of prolongation of intensive care and increased costs of such care, without clear beneficial effects, implies that iNO cannot be recommended for preterm infants with severe hypoxic respiratory failure. To assess the safety-efficacy balance of low-dose inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) in hypoxemic premature infants because no sustained beneficial effect has been demonstrated clearly and there are concerns about side effects.
                Eight hundred and sixty infants <32 weeks were randomized at birth to receive 5 ppm iNO or placebo when they presented with hypoxemic respiratory failure (HRF) defined by a requirement for mechanical ventilation, fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO 2 ) >40%, and arterio-alveolar ratio in oxygen (aAO 2 ) <0.22. The primary end point was intact survival at 28 days of age.
                Sixty-one of 415 infants presented with HRF and were compared with 84 of 445 controls who presented with HRF. There was no difference in the primary end point (61.4% in infants [23% with HRF who were treated with iNO] vs 61.1% in controls [21.4% in controls with HRF]; P = .943). For the infants with HRF who were treated with iNO, there was no significant difference from controls for intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) (6% vs 7%), necrotizing enterocolitis (8% vs 6 %), or patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) (34% vs 37%). Compared with nonhypoxemic infants, the risk of bronchopulmonary displasia (BPD) increased significantly in HRF controls (OR = 3.264 [CI 1.461-7.292]) but not in infants with HRF who were treated with iNO (OR = 1.626 [CI 0.633-4.178]).
                iNO appears to be safe in premature infants but did not lead to a significant improvement in intact survival on day 28. We designed and conducted a randomized, double-masked, controlled multicenter study to determine whether inhaled nitric oxide (INO) in term and near-term infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) would reduce the occurrence of death and/or the initiation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).
                Infants of 34 weeks gestation or more, <14 days of age with CDH, without known structural heart disease, requiring assisted ventilation for hypoxemic respiratory failure with two oxygenation indices (OIs) of 25 or more at least 15 minutes apart, were eligible for this trial. Infants were centrally randomized and then received masked treatment with 20 ppm NO or 100% oxygen as control. Infants with less than a full response to 20 ppm NO (increase in PaO2 > 20 Torr) after 30 minutes were evaluated at 80 ppm NO/control study gas.
                The 28 control and 25 treated infants enrolled by the 13 participating centers were not significantly different at randomization for any of the measured variables including prerandomization therapies and initial OIs (45.8 +/- 16.3 for controls, 44.5 +/- 14.5 for INO). Death at <120 days of age or the need for ECMO occurred in 82% of control infants compared with 96% of INO infants (ns). Death occurred in 43% of controls and 48% of the INO group (ns), and ECMO treatment was used for 54% of control and 80% of INO-treated infants. There was no significant improvement in PaO2 (delta PaO2 7.8 +/- 19.8 vs 1.1 +/- 7.6 Torr, ns) nor significant reduction in OI (-2.7 +/- 23.4 vs 4.0 +/- 14.8, ns) associated with INO treatment. Mean peak nitrogen dioxide (NO2) concentration was 1.9 +/- 1.3 ppm and the mean peak methemoglobin was 1.6 +/- 0.8 mg/dL. No infant had study gas discontinued for toxicity. There were no differences between the control and INO groups for the occurrence of intracranial hemorrhage, specific grades of intracranial hemorrhage, periventricular leukomalacia, brain infarction, and pulmonary or gastrointestinal hemorrhages.
                Although the immediate short-term improvements in oxygenation seen in some treated infants may be of benefit in stabilizing responding infants for transport and initiation of ECMO, we conclude that for term and near-term infants with CDH and hypoxemic respiratory failure unresponsive to conventional therapy, inhaled NO therapy as used in this trial did not reduce the need for ECMO or death. Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) improves oxygenation and reduces the need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in infants with severe persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN). The effectiveness of iNO in the treatment of moderate PPHN has not been adequately defined. We therefore conducted a randomized, prospective multicenter study to assess whether iNO in patients with moderate PPHN would improve arterial p(a)O(2), prevent progression to severe PPHN, and improve outcomes.
                Infants > or = 34 weeks gestation with moderate pulmonary hypertension (alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient (AaDO(2)) 500-599 Torr) were randomly assigned to continue standard medical therapy (control group) or standard medical therapy plus iNO (iNO group). For each patient in the iNO group, iNO concentration was increased in steps of 10-20 ppm every 30 minutes until there was no further improvement in arterial p(a)O(2). This concentration of iNO was then maintained while all other ventilatory support, including inspired oxygen concentration, was weaned according to a predefined protocol.
                In all, 27 of 40 control patients (58%) compared to six of 40 infants (15%) in the iNO group failed assigned therapy and developed severe PPHN (p<0.0005). Arterial p(a)O(2) improved from 112+/-48 to 133+/-100 (p=0.132) in control infants compared to an increase from 101+/-29 to 208+/-118 (p<0.0005) in iNO-treated patients. For the first 36 hours after study, entry AaDO(2) levels and ventilatory support were significantly lower in iNO-treated infants compared to control patients.
                In patients with moderate PPHN, treatment with iNO improves arterial p(a)O(2), reduces the amount of ventilatory support needed, and prevents progression to severe PPHN. The objective of the study was to compare the effectiveness of surfactant treatment either by bolus or surfactant lung lavage followed by inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) therapy in infants with meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS) complicated by persistent pulmonary hypertension (PPHN). In this study, thirteen infants with diagnosis of MAS and PPHN were first treated with conventional respiratory support. Then between 2 and 22h of life they were randomized either to bolus surfactant treatment (n=6) or surfactant lung lavage (SLL, n=7) treatment. Then all infants were treated with iNO therapy. The groups were compared with regard to their clinical course: changes in PaO(2), FiO(2), MAP, OI, A-a oxygen gradient, duration of iNO therapy, length of ventilation and hospitalization. Complications and mortality were also compared. The results showed that infants treated with SLL had significant improvements in oxygenation, decreases in MAP and A-a gradients. But there were no significant differences in duration of ventilation, iNO treatment, length of hospitalization or complications. In conclusion these data show no advantage of SLL therapy over bolus surfactant treatment in infants with MAS complicated by PPHN. The large volume of published randomized, controlled trials has led to a need for meta-analyses to track therapeutic advances. Performing a new meta-analysis whenever the results of a new trial of a particular therapy are published permits the study of trends in efficacy and makes it possible to determine when a new treatment appears to be significantly effective or deleterious. We describe the use of such a procedure, cumulative meta-analysis, to assess therapeutic trials among patients with myocardial infarction.
                We performed cumulative meta-analyses of clinical trials that evaluated 15 treatments and preventive measures for acute myocardial infarction.
                An example of this method is its application to the use of intravenous streptokinase as thrombolytic therapy for acute infarction. Thirty-three trials evaluating this therapy were performed between 1959 and 1988. We found that a consistent, statistically significant reduction in total mortality (odds ratios, 0.74; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.59 to 0.92) was achieved in 1973, after only eight trials involving 2432 patients had been completed. The results of the 25 subsequent trials, which enrolled an additional 34,542 patients through 1988, had little or no effect on the odds ratio establishing efficacy, but simply narrowed the 95 percent confidence interval. In particular, two very large trials, the Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Streptochinasi nell'Infarto Miocardico trial in 1986 (11,712 patients) and the Second International Study of Infarct Survival trial in 1988 (17,187 patients) did not modify the already established evidence of efficacy. We used a similar approach to study the accumulating evidence of efficacy (or lack of efficacy) of 14 other therapies and preventive measures for myocardial infarction.
                Cumulative meta-analysis of therapeutic trials facilitates the determination of clinical efficacy and harm and may be helpful in tracking trials, planning future trials, and making clinical recommendations for therapy. Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) therapy has been demonstrated to acutely improve oxygenation in preterm infants with severe pulmonary disease. Administration of iNO to the premature infants with less severe pulmonary illness has not yet been studied extensively. Therefore, the authors performed a pilot study enrolling thirty-four premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) within 72 hours of age, birth weight between 500-2,000 g, whose oxygenation indexes exceeded our birthweight-specific criteria. Infants were randomly assigned to either treatment with (iNO group; n = 16) or without (control group; n = 18) iNO. Inhaled NO was started at 20 ppm and weaned to 5 ppm over 24-48 hours. Routine cranial ultrasonography was performed and the occurrence of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) was interpreted by an attending pediatric radiologist unaware of the treatment group assignment. The study showed that the two groups were of similar birth weight (mean+/-SEM): control 901+/-73 g vs iNO 874+/-70 g; and gestational age: control 27.2+/-0.5 wk vs iNO 26.8+/-0.5 wk. Other baseline parameters between the two groups were also similar. The mean ages of the infants at the time of entry were 11.7+/-2.2 and 8.3+/-0.9 hours in the controls and iNO group. The entry oxygenation index (OI) did not differ between the two groups: control 11.9+/-2.2 vs iNO 10.8+/-1.50. After 30 minutes of iNO therapy, there was a 50 per cent increase in partial pressure of oxygen tension (PaO2) and 15 per cent reduction in OI, (p = 0.02 and p = 0.04 vs baseline, respectively). No statistical difference in the incidence of significant IVH (Grade III and IV) was detected: control 27.8 per cent; iNO 25.0 per cent. The incidence of other acute complications as well as early neonatal death, were comparable between the groups. The mean methemoglobin concentration was 1.2+/-0.5 per cent. In conclusion, these preliminary data suggest that iNO, as used in this protocol, acutely improves oxygenation without increasing significant IVH in premature infants with mild to moderate RDS. These important findings serve to justify further study of the efficacy of iNO on long term pulmonary outcome and mortality in this group of infants.
We observed no differences with the use of iNO in the outcomes reviewed. No data were available for several clinical outcomes including long-term mortality and neurodevelopmental outcome. We found it difficult to draw valid conclusions given concerns regarding methodologic quality, sample size, and heterogeneity.