Failure of hydrocortisone to affect outcome in dengue shock syndrome. Failure of high-dose methylprednisolone in established dengue shock syndrome: a placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Hydrocortisone in the management of dengue shock syndrome. Effect of treatment with low doses of hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone on mortality in patients with septic shock. Hydrocortisone therapy for patients with septic shock. The effects of high-dose corticosteroids in patients with septic shock. A prospective, controlled study. Comparison of three fluid solutions for resuscitation in dengue shock syndrome. Reversal of late septic shock with supraphysiologic doses of hydrocortisone. Acute management of dengue shock syndrome: a randomized double-blind comparison of 4 intravenous fluid regimens in the first hour.
Despite the absence of a clear-cut rationale for their use, corticosteroids are widely employed in the treatment of dengue shock syndrome. Previous comparative therapeutic trials have yielded contradictory results. Resolution of this therapeutic controversy has been attempted with a double-blind evaluation of the clinical effect of steroid administration in dengue shock syndrome. Placebo or a single dose of hydrocortisone hemisuccinate, 50 mg/kg of body weight, was administered randomly to 97 physiologically treated patients with dengue shock syndrome. The severity of disease on admission to the hospital and the effectiveness of treatment were quantified by a World Health Organization scoring system. The response to therapy as measured by mortality, duration of shock, and amount of replacement fluids required was virtually identical in 47 children who were and 50 children who were not treated with steroids. The comparison groups were composed of children similar in age, sex, and severity of illness. It is concluded that hydrocortisone is of no value in the treatment of dengue shock syndrome. Reliance should be placed on appropriate supportive and physiologic therapy. Steroids are widely used in Thailand and other dengue-endemic countries to treat severe dengue shock syndrome. This study was designed to determine whether a single high dose of methylprednisolone will reduce mortality in children with dengue shock syndrome who did not respond to simple fluid and plasma replacement therapy.
                A prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial was conducted in two hospitals in Khon Kaen Thailand during June to September in 1987 and 1988. Sixty-three children with severe dengue shock syndrome were randomized into two groups; the first group received a single dose of methylprednisolone (30 mg/kg) and the second group received placebo.
                There was no significant difference in mortality between the two groups (P = .63). The mortality rate was 12.5% (4/32) in the steroid group and 12.9% (4/31) in the group that received placebo. The sequelae at 2 weeks among treatment and control survivors were not significantly different. These two groups were comparable in age, sex, severity of illness, and duration of shock at the outset of the study. The two treatment groups were similar in subsequent hospital course as determined by maximum and minimum hematocrit level and bleeding severity. The numbers of patients in each group who had liver failure and evidence of disseminated intravascular clotting defect were also comparable. Complications such as occurrence of fever after shock, pneumonia, convulsion, cardiac arrest, pulmonary hemorrhage, and positive hemoculture were not significantly different in the treatment and control groups.
                A single high dose of methylprednisolone does not reduce mortality in severe dengue shock syndrome which does not respond to conventional critical care. A total of 98 patients with dengue shock syndrome admitted into Children's Hospital from February 1973 to February 1974 were randomly selected into 2 groups. A double blind controlled trial of the efficacy of pharmacologic doses of hydrocortisone hemisuccinate was carried out. The 2 groups were confirmed to be completely matched by age, sex and severity of the disease. Nine deaths occurred out of 48 cases in the steroid group (Case Fatality Rate 18.75%) and 22 deaths out of 50 cases in the non-steroid group (Case Fatality Rate 44%), the difference being statistically significant. No significant difference was detected in fluid requirements and other morbidity pattern. Septic shock may be associated with relative adrenal insufficiency. Thus, a replacement therapy of low doses of corticosteroids has been proposed to treat septic shock.
                To assess whether low doses of corticosteroids improve 28-day survival in patients with septic shock and relative adrenal insufficiency.
                Placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial performed in 19 intensive care units in France from October 9, 1995, to February 23, 1999.
                Three hundred adult patients who fulfilled usual criteria for septic shock were enrolled after undergoing a short corticotropin test.
                Patients were randomly assigned to receive either hydrocortisone (50-mg intravenous bolus every 6 hours) and fludrocortisone (50- micro g tablet once daily) (n = 151) or matching placebos (n = 149) for 7 days.
                Twenty-eight-day survival distribution in patients with relative adrenal insufficiency (nonresponders to the corticotropin test).
                One patient from the corticosteroid group was excluded from analyses because of consent withdrawal. There were 229 nonresponders to the corticotropin test (placebo, 115; corticosteroids, 114) and 70 responders to the corticotropin test (placebo, 34; corticosteroids, 36). In nonresponders, there were 73 deaths (63%) in the placebo group and 60 deaths (53%) in the corticosteroid group (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.47-0.95; P =.02). Vasopressor therapy was withdrawn within 28 days in 46 patients (40%) in the placebo group and in 65 patients (57%) in the corticosteroid group (hazard ratio, 1.91; 95% confidence interval, 1.29-2.84; P =.001). There was no significant difference between groups in responders. Adverse events rates were similar in the 2 groups.
                In our trial, a 7-day treatment with low doses of hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone significantly reduced the risk of death in patients with septic shock and relative adrenal insufficiency without increasing adverse events. Hydrocortisone is widely used in patients with septic shock even though a survival benefit has been reported only in patients who remained hypotensive after fluid and vasopressor resuscitation and whose plasma cortisol levels did not rise appropriately after the administration of corticotropin.
                In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we assigned 251 patients to receive 50 mg of intravenous hydrocortisone and 248 patients to receive placebo every 6 hours for 5 days; the dose was then tapered during a 6-day period. At 28 days, the primary outcome was death among patients who did not have a response to a corticotropin test.
                Of the 499 patients in the study, 233 (46.7%) did not have a response to corticotropin (125 in the hydrocortisone group and 108 in the placebo group). At 28 days, there was no significant difference in mortality between patients in the two study groups who did not have a response to corticotropin (39.2% in the hydrocortisone group and 36.1% in the placebo group, P=0.69) or between those who had a response to corticotropin (28.8% in the hydrocortisone group and 28.7% in the placebo group, P=1.00). At 28 days, 86 of 251 patients in the hydrocortisone group (34.3%) and 78 of 248 patients in the placebo group (31.5%) had died (P=0.51). In the hydrocortisone group, shock was reversed more quickly than in the placebo group. However, there were more episodes of superinfection, including new sepsis and septic shock.
                Hydrocortisone did not improve survival or reversal of shock in patients with septic shock, either overall or in patients who did not have a response to corticotropin, although hydrocortisone hastened reversal of shock in patients in whom shock was reversed. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00147004.)
                2008 Massachusetts Medical Society To determine whether corticosteroids are efficacious in severe septic shock, we conducted a prospective study of 59 patients randomly assigned to a methylprednisolone, dexamethasone, or control group. Patients were treated 17.5 +/- 5.4 hours (mean +/- S.E.M.) after the onset of shock, and 55 patients required vasopressor agents. Early in the hospital course, reversal of shock was more likely in patients who received corticosteroids than in those who did not. Four (19 per cent) of 21 methylprednisolone-treated, 7 (32 per cent) of 22 dexamethasone-treated, and none of 16 control patients had reversal of shock 24 hours after drug administration (corticosteroid groups vs. control group, P less than 0.05). Patients treated with corticosteroids within four hours after the onset of shock had a higher incidence of shock reversal (P less than 0.05). At 133 hours after drug administration, 17 (40 per cent) of 43 corticosteroid-treated patients had died, and 11 (69 per cent) of 16 control patients had died (P less than 0.05). However, these differences in reversal of shock and survival disappeared later in the course. Overall, 16 (76 per cent) of 21 patients receiving methylprednisolone, 17 (77 per cent) of 22 patients receiving dexamethasone, and 11 (69 per cent) of 16 controls in the hospital died. We conclude that corticosteroids do not improve the overall survival of patients with severe, late septic shock but may be helpful early in the course and in certain subgroups of patients. Dengue shock syndrome is characterized by severe vascular leakage and disordered hemostasis and progresses to death in 1 to 5 percent of cases. Although volume replacement is recognized as the critical therapeutic intervention, World Health Organization management guidelines remain empirical rather than evidence-based.
                We performed a double-blind, randomized comparison of three fluids for initial resuscitation of Vietnamese children with dengue shock syndrome. We randomly assigned 383 children with moderately severe shock to receive Ringer's lactate, 6 percent dextran 70 (a colloid), or 6 percent hydroxyethyl starch (a colloid) and 129 children with severe shock to receive one of the colloids. The primary outcome measure was requirement for rescue colloid at any time after administration of the study fluid.
                Only one patient died (<0.2 percent mortality). The primary outcome measure--requirement for rescue colloid--was similar for the different fluids in the two severity groups. The relative risk of requirement for rescue colloid was 1.08 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.78 to 1.47; P=0.65) among children with moderate shock who received Ringer's lactate as compared with either of the colloid solutions, 1.13 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.74 to 1.74; P=0.59) among children who received dextran as compared with starch in the group with severe shock, and 0.88 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.66 to 1.17; P=0.38) among children who received dextran as compared with starch in the combined analysis. Although treatment with Ringer's lactate resulted in less rapid improvement in the hematocrit and a marginally longer time to initial recovery than did treatment with either of the colloid solutions, there were no differences in all other measures of treatment response. Only minor differences in efficacy were detected between the two colloids, but significantly more recipients of dextran than of starch had adverse reactions. Bleeding manifestations, coagulation derangements, and severity of fluid overload were similar for all fluid-treatment groups.
                Initial resuscitation with Ringer's lactate is indicated for children with moderately severe dengue shock syndrome. Dextran 70 and 6 percent hydroxyethyl starch perform similarly in children with severe shock, but given the adverse reactions associated with the use of dextran, starch may be preferable for this group.
                Copyright 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society. Preliminary studies have suggested that low doses of corticosteroids might rapidly improve hemodynamics in late septic shock treated with catecholamines. We examined the effect of hydrocortisone on shock reversal, hemodynamics, and survival in this particular setting.
                Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
                Two intensive care units of a University hospital.
                Forty-one patients with septic shock requiring catecholamine for >48 hrs.
                Patients were randomly assigned either hydrocortisone (100 mg i.v. three times daily for 5 days) or matching placebo.
                Reversal of shock was defined by a stable systolic arterial pressure (>90 mm Hg) for > or =24 hrs without catecholamine or fluid infusion. Of the 22 hydrocortisone-treated patients and 19 placebo-treated patients, 15 (68%) and 4 (21%) achieved 7-day shock reversal, respectively, a difference of 47% (95% confidence interval 17% to 77%; p = .007). Serial invasive hemodynamic measurements for 5 days did not show significant differences between both groups. At 28-day follow-up, reversal of shock was higher in the hydrocortisone group (p = .005). Crude 28-day mortality was 7 (32%) of 22 treated patients and 12 (63%) of 19 placebo patients, a difference of 31% (95% confidence interval 1% to 61%; p = .091). Shock reversal within 7 days after the onset of corticosteroid therapy was a very strong predictor of survival. There were no significant differences in outcome in responders and nonresponders to a short corticotropin test. The respective rates of gastrointestinal bleeding and secondary infections did not differ between both groups.
                Administration of modest doses of hydrocortisone in the setting of pressor-dependent septic shock for a mean of >96 hrs resulted in a significant improvement in hemodynamics and a beneficial effect on survival. These beneficial effects do not appear related to adrenocortical insufficiency. Dengue hemorrhagic fever is an important cause of morbidity among Asian children, and the more severe dengue shock syndrome (DSS) causes a significant number of childhood deaths. DSS is characterized by a massive increase in systemic capillary permeability with consequent hypovolemia. Fluid resuscitation is critical, but as yet there have been no large trials to determine the optimal fluid regimen. We undertook a randomized blinded comparison of 4 fluids (dextran, gelatin, lactated Ringer's, and "normal" saline) for initial resuscitation of 230 Vietnamese children with DSS. All the children survived, and there was no clear advantage to using any of the 4 fluids, but the longest recovery times occurred in the lactated Ringer's group. The most significant factor determining clinical response was the pulse pressure at presentation. A comparison of the colloid and crystalloid groups suggested benefits in children presenting with lower pulse pressures who received one of the colloids. Further large-scale studies, stratified for admission pulse pressure, are indicated.
There is insufficient evidence to justify the use of corticosteroids in managing dengue shock syndrome. As corticosteroids can potentially do harm, clinicians should not use them unless they are participating in a randomized controlled trial comparing corticosteroids with placebo.