Allergen reduction measures in houses of allergic asthmatic patients: effects of air-cleaners and allergen-impermeable mattress covers. Domiciliary air filtration units, symptoms and lung function in atopic asthmatics. A placebo-controlled trial of a HEPA air cleaner in the treatment of cat allergy. Efficacy of an air-cleaning device equipped with a high efficiency particulate air filter in house dust mite respiratory allergy. Clinical effects of air cleaners in homes of asthmatic children sensitized to pet allergens. Laminar flow air cleaner bed attachment: a controlled trial. An evaluation of mattress encasings and high efficiency particulate filters on asthma control in the tropics. The effect of high-efficiency and standard vacuum-cleaners on mite, cat and dog allergen levels and clinical progress. Control of exposure to mite allergen and allergen-impermeable bed covers for adults with asthma.
Recommendations for allergen avoidance or allergen reduction measures play an important part in the treatment of allergic asthmatic patients. The purpose of this study was to test recently developed air-cleaners with respect to their capacity to capture airborne allergen particles and to improve clinical parameters of asthmatic patients sensitized to aeroallergens. Forty five allergic asthmatic patients were studied in a double-blind procedure for 6 months. The patients were divided into three groups of 15 patients. In Group 1, the intervention consisted of the application of active air-cleaners in living-rooms and bedrooms. In Group 2, placebo air-cleaners were used in combination with allergen-impermeable mattress covers. In Group 3, the same intervention was performed as in Group 2 but with active air-cleaners. Allergen levels in mattress and floor dust were measured before, and 3 and 6 months after the interventions. After 6 months, the air-cleaners were dismantled and the filters were analysed for the amount of dust collected and allergen content. Immunological and lung function parameters were measured before, and 3 and 6 months after the interventions. Considerable amounts of airborne dust and allergenic particles were captured in the filters of the air-cleaners. Up to the 18.9 g of dust, 4,513 ng of house dust mite allergen, Der p 1, and 50,000 mU of cat allergen, Fel d 1, (in houses with cats) were collected by air-cleaners in living-rooms. Only in Group 3 (in which both active air-cleaners and mattress covers were used) was a small (less than 1 doubling dose) but statistically significant improvement of provocative concentration of histamine causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (PC20) observed (from 5.96 to 9.02 mg x mL(-1)). The amount of dust and house dust mite allergen collected in the filters was significantly correlated with an improvement of peak flow variation. In combination with other allergen avoidance measures, the examined air-cleaners can contribute to diminished allergen exposure and improvement of airway hyperresponsiveness in asthmatic patients. Air infiltration units (AFUs) incorporating a high efficiency particulate air filter are theoretically able to remove almost all potential airborne allergens. This may have implications for subjects with allergic lower respiratory disease. AFUs were placed in the living room of 12 atopic asthmatics, and the internal filters were inserted and removed in a double-blind fashion. No difference in subjective symptom scoring, spirometry or bronchial reactivity was demonstrated. Peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) variability was significantly improved from baseline readings, and there was a trend towards higher mean PEFRs when the filters were present in the AFU. Trends towards lower levels of airborne micro-organisms were also demonstrated when the filters were present, however no effect upon total airborne dust and airborne Der pI could be demonstrated. To evaluate the effect of a room high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) cleaner on cat-induced asthma and rhinitis, 35 cat-allergic subjects who were living with one or more cats were studied in a double-blind, placebo controlled trial. After a 1 mo baseline period, subjects' bedrooms were equipped with an active or placebo air cleaner for the following 3 mo. Evaluations included monthly measurement of cat-allergen levels, daily morning, afternoon, and nighttime nasal- and chest-symptom scores, twice-daily measurement of peak-flow rates, daily medication scores, monthly spirometry, and methacholine (MCh) challenge testing before and after the study. Airborne allergen levels were reduced in the active-filter group as compared with the placebo group (p = 0.045). However, no differences were detected in settled-dust allergen levels (p = 0.485), morning, afternoon, or nighttime nasal-symptom scores (p = 0.769, 0.534, and 0.138), chest-symptom scores (p = 0.388, 0.179, and 0.215), sleep disturbance (p = 0.101), morning or afternoon peak-flow rates (p = 0. 424 and 0.679), or rescue medication use (nasal, p = 0.164, chest, p = 0.650), respectively. Although the combination of a HEPA room air cleaner, mattress and pillow covers, and cat exclusion from the bedroom did reduce airborne cat-allergen levels, no effect on disease activity was detected for any parameter studied. The efficacy of an air-cleaning device equipped with a high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filter (without further avoidance measures) was studied in patients allergic to house dust mite. The effects of the air-cleaner on indoor Dermatophagoides sp. levels, symptom score and bronchial hyperresponsiveness in nine mite-allergic patients were assessed using a cross-over controlled study. No significant effect was demonstrated on indoor Dermatophagoides sp. levels when comparing the period of air-cleaner activity (2 months) with the control period (2 months). The Dermatophagoides sp. levels in the houses studied were lower than the risk level for asthmatic attacks, making it difficult to assess any effect on asthma; however, neither bronchial hyperresponsiveness nor rhinitis symptom score were changed by air-cleaner activity. During the trial period, however the mean level of Dermatophagoides sp. allergen in the houses changed spontaneously from 4.4 micrograms/g (mean level in the first 2 trial months) to 1.75 micrograms/g of dust (second 2 months) (P less than 0.05). Owing to this change, the mean rhinitis symptom score also decreased (P less than 0.05), even if no significant correlation was demonstrated (r = 0.4 P = 0.089). HEPA filter air-cleaners appear insufficient as substitutes for standard avoidance measures in mite allergic patients. Exposure to cat and dog allergens is very common in the Western World and is a serious cause of asthma in sensitized subjects.
                We sought to study the clinical effects of air cleaners in living rooms and bedrooms of asthmatic children sensitized to cat or dog allergens.
                Twenty asthmatic children sensitized to pet allergens (cat/dog) and with an animal at home participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study in which the effects of air cleaners placed in the living room and bedroom for 3 months were compared with the effects of sham air cleaners. Before and after each study period, lung function, airway hyperresponsiveness (adenosine monophosphate), and peak flow variation were recorded. Cat and dog allergen levels were assessed in the filters of the air cleaners.
                After a 3-month intervention with active air cleaners, airway hyperresponsiveness decreased significantly, showing a 1.2 doubling dose increase of PC(20 )adenosine (P =.003). Peak flow amplitude also decreased (P =. 045). Substantial amounts of airborne cat and dog allergen were captured by the air cleaners in living rooms and bedrooms as well. Allergen levels in floor dust were not changed.
                In young asthmatic patients sensitized and exposed to pets in the home, application of air cleaners in living rooms and bedrooms was accompanied by a significant improvement in airway hyperresponsiveness and a decrease in peak flow amplitude. Thirteen house dust mite-allergic young asthmatics were entered into a double-blind, crossover clinical trial to compare "in use" with "non-use" of a laminar flow air cleaner bed attachment. The study design encouraged maintenance of symptom control by adjustment of the dose of medications used. There was a significant reduction in the amount of medications required by the patients during the trial period that the air cleaner was in use. Histamine airway responsiveness was significantly decreased for a group of eight of the subjects tested at the end of a 3-month open trial. The effect of two allergen avoidance modalities, Allergy Control Covers (ACC) and High Efficiency Particulate Filters (HEPA) on asthma control in children were evaluated. This was an open study involving 24 dust mite sensitive asthmatic children. Following a 4 week run-in period, the subjects were randomly allocated to use mattresses fitted with ACC (n = 6), HEPA filters in their bedrooms (n = 12) or act as controls (n = 6) for a study duration of 4 months. Measurements of the major Dermatophagoides spp. mite allergens, Der p 1 and Der f 1, levels in dust samples obtained from mattresses were made at baseline, 1, 2 and 4 months post implementation. Daily symptom scores including morning and evening peak flow readings, and monthly spirometry and exercise bronchoprovocation tests were carried out Our results showed that dust mite allergen levels in mattresses fell at 1 and 2 months post implementation in the ACC group (p<0.05). In contrast, no decrease in allergen levels was seen in the HEPA and control group. At the end of the 16 weeks, only the ACC group showed improvement in FEV1 and reduction in diurnal peak expiratory flow rate (p<0.05). Improvement in mean symptom scores was also observed for both the ACC and HEPA groups, but not the control groups (p<0.05). Although the numbers in this study were small, the results Indicate that the effectiveness on mite exposure barrier covers was short-lived, and the improvement in asthma control though documented was not obvious. The major triggers for allergic asthma are exposure to allergens of the house dust mite, Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, and of pets. Unfortunately studies of techniques designed to reduce house dust mite and pet allergens have had mixed results. However, new so-called 'improved' products continue to appear on the market and require subjective evaluation. The homes of 60 house dust mite-allergic patients were studied to compare the effects of high-efficiency and standard vacuum-cleaners on allergen concentration. Der p 1 (house dust mite), Fel d 1 (cat) and Can f 1 (dog) allergens were measured in four separate locations in each home. Clinical analysis was by lung function, bronchodilator usage and histamine challenge techniques. There was a significant reduction in Fel d 1 (ng/m2) in dust samples from the living-room carpet (p = 0.046), bedroom carpet (p = 0.003) and mattress (p = 0.013) and living-room sofa (p = 0.005) after 12 months of using the high-efficiency cleaners, but only in the mattress sample using the standard cleaners (p = 0.014). Can f 1 (ng/g dust) was reduced in the mattress sample after using the high-efficiency vacuum-cleaners (p = 0.028), but not at other sites. Der p 1 levels were not significantly changed over this period. Clinically, patients in the high-efficiency group showed improvements in peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) (p = 0.004), FEV1 (p = 0.026) and bronchodilator usage (p = 0.005) after 12 months. When the cat-sensitive patients were analyzed separately, improvements in histamine PC20 (p = 0.039) were also seen. Reducing Fel d 1 concentrations, in the absence of any change in Der p 1 concentrations, can produce significant improvements in the lung function of atopic, asthmatic patients. This effect was primarily achieved in those patients with cat sensitivity, but who did not possess a cat themselves. The effectiveness of avoidance of house-dust-mite allergen (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus 1 [Der p1]) in the management of asthma is uncertain.
                We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of allergen-impermeable bed covers involving 1122 adults with asthma. The primary outcomes were the mean morning peak expiratory flow rate over a four-week period during the run-in phase and at six months and the proportion of patients who discontinued inhaled corticosteroid therapy as part of a phased-reduction program during months 7 through 12. Der p1 was measured in mattress dust in a 10 percent random subsample of homes at entry and at 6 and 12 months.
                The prevalence of sensitivity to dust-mite allergen was 65.4 percent in the group supplied with allergen-impermeable bed covers (active-intervention group) and 65.1 percent in the control group supplied with non-impermeable bed covers. The concentration of Der p1 in mattress dust was significantly lower in the active-intervention group at 6 months (geometric mean, 0.58 microg per gram vs. 1.71 microg per gram in the control group; P=0.01) but not at 12 months (1.05 microg per gram vs. 1.64 microg per gram; P=0.74). The mean morning peak expiratory flow rate improved significantly in both groups (from 410.7 to 419.1 liters per minute in the active-intervention group, P<0.001 for the change; and from 417.8 to 427.4 liters per minute in the control group, P<0.001 for the change). After adjustment for base-line differences (by analysis of covariance), there was no significant difference between the groups in the peak expiratory flow rate at six months (difference in means, active-intervention group vs. control group, -1.6 liters per minute [95 percent confidence interval, -5.9 to 2.7] among all patients [P=0.46] and -1.5 liters per minute [95 percent confidence interval, -6.9 to 3.9] among mite-sensitive patients [P=0.59]). There was no significant difference between the groups in the proportion in whom complete cessation of inhaled corticosteroid therapy was achieved (17.4 percent in the active-intervention group and 17.1 percent in the control group) or in the mean reduction in steroid dose, either among all patients or among mite-sensitive patients.
                Allergen-impermeable covers, as a single intervention for the avoidance of exposure to dust-mite allergen, seem clinically ineffective in adults with asthma.
                Copyright 2003 Massachusetts Medical Society
The available trials are too small to provide evidence for or against the use of air filtration units to reduce allergen levels in the management of pet-allergic asthma. Adequately powered trials are needed. There are no trials of other allergen reduction measures, such as pet washing or possibly pet removal.