Effectiveness of indomethacin (indocid) suppositories as post-episiotomy analgesia. Rectal indomethacin reduces postoperative pain and morphine use after cardiac surgery. Indomethacin as adjunct analgesia following open cholecystectomy. Postoperative headache in young patients after spinal anaesthesia. Multimodal analgesia before thoracic surgery does not reduce postoperative pain. Indomethacin and ethamsylate alone and in combination for the relief of post episiotomy pain. Indomethacin suppositories versus intravenously titrated morphine for the treatment of ureteral colic. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in treatment of postoperative pain after cardiac surgery. The effects of three different analgesia techniques on long-term postthoracotomy pain.
A double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled study was carried out to assess the efficacy of indometacin suppositories as a post-episiotomy analgesic. Thirty patients received 2 X 100 mg indometacin suppositories, and 30 patients received placebo suppositories within 15 min of an episiotomy repair operation. Local infiltration of the episiotomy incision was performed using 20 ml of 0.5% lignocaine in every case. Subjective symptoms of pain were evaluated 15, 30, 60 and 90 min post-episiotomy repair. Average numbers of hours as lying in patients after delivery is 4 h. None of the patients who received indometacin complained of post-episiotomy pain; whereas the patients on placebo manifested varying degrees of pain. To evaluate the combination of rectal indomethacin with patient controlled intravenous morphine analgesia (PCA) on postoperative pain relief and opioid use after cardiac surgery.
                With institutional ethics approval, 57 consenting adults undergoing elective aortocoronary bypass surgery were randomly assigned preoperatively in a double-blind fashion to receive either placebo (n = 26) or indomethacin 100 mg suppositories (n = 31), 2-3 hr postoperatively, and 12 hr later. Both groups utilized PCA morphine. Pain scores in the two treatment groups were assessed on a 10-cm visual analogue scale (VAS) (at rest and with cough) at 4, 6, 12, 18 and 24 hr after initial dosing, and were analyzed through a 2 x 5 repeated measures of variance. The 24 hr analgesic consumption, 12 and 24 hr chest tube blood loss, and time to tracheal extubation were also recorded, and compared for the two treatment arms through Student's t test on independent samples.
                Postoperative morphine consumption in the first 24 hr was 38% less in the indomethacin group (22.40 +/- 12.55 mg) than the placebo group (35.99 +/- 25.84 mg), P = 0.019. Pain scores, measured with a VAS, were 26% to 66% lower in the indomethacin vs placebo group at rest (P = 0.006), but not with cough, for all times assessed. There was no difference in blood loss (at 12 hr) or time to tracheal extubation for both groups.
                The combination of indomethacin with morphine after cardiac surgery results in reduced postoperative pain scores and opioid use without an increase in side effects. Fifty patients scheduled for elective cholecystectomy were randomised to receive either indomethacin suppositories 200 mg p.r. at the end of anaesthesia, followed by 100 mg bd for three days, or placebo suppositories according to the same regimen. All patients were given intravenous pethidine via patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) postoperatively. The mean dose of pethidine required by the patients in the indomethacin group was significantly less than that used by the placebo group, the cumulative dose after three days being 530.7 mg (SD 664.0) and 1151.0 mg (682.0) for the indomethacin and placebo groups respectively. At the same time the patients in the indomethacin group had lower pain scores both at rest and with movement, though this was only statistically significant on the first day on movement. There was no statistical difference between the groups with respect to the incidence of nausea, indigestion, proctitis, volume of drainage from the wound drain, or width of bruising around the wounds. Serum creatinine levels were compared pre- and postoperatively where possible and showed no change in either group. Spinal anaesthesia was performed on 247 young adult patients with a 25-G needle. Rectal administration of indomethacin had no significant effect on the incidence of postdural puncture headache, which occurred in 16.8% of patients who received the drug compared to 24.5% who received a placebo. A history of headache pre-operatively did not influence the incidence of postlumbar puncture headache. Several reports have suggested that preoperative nociceptive block may reduce postoperative pain, analgesic requirements, or both, beyond the anticipated duration of action of the analgesic agents. We have investigated, in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study, pre-emptive analgesia and the respiratory effects of preoperative administration of a multimodal antinociceptive regimen. Thirty patients undergoing thoracotomy were allocated randomly to two groups. Before surgery, the treatment group (n = 15) received morphine 0.15 mg kg-1 i.m. with perphenazine 0.03 mg kg-1 i.m. and a rectal suppository of indomethacin 100 mg, while the placebo group (n = 15) received midazolam 0.05 mg kg-1 i.m. and a placebo rectal suppository. After induction of anaesthesia, the treatment group received intercostal nerve block with 0.5% bupivacaine and adrenaline 1:200,000 (3 ml) in the interspace of the incision and in the two spaces above and two spaces below. The placebo group received identical injections but with normal saline only. The treatment group consumed significantly less morphine by patient-controlled analgesia in the first 6 h after operation, but the total dose of morphine consumed on days 2 and 3 after surgery was significantly greater in the treatment group. There were no differences between the groups in postoperative VAS scores (at rest or after movement), PaCO2 values or postoperative spirometry. However, pain thresholds to pressure applied at the side of the chest contralateral to the site of incision decreased significantly from preoperative values on days 1 and 2 after surgery in both groups. The results of this study do not support the preoperative use of this combined regimen for post-thoracotomy pain. In a bid to minimise dosage and possible side-effects when relieving post episiotomy pain, the NSAID Indomethacin was studied in combination with a systemic haemostat Ethamsylate which has been shown to selectively inhibit some prostaglandins. Comparative groups also took Indomethacin alone and placebo in a double blind non-crossover comparison. Efficacy was judged in terms of side-effects and assessments of pain intensity, pain relief and global assessment of pain. There was some evidence of a beneficial interaction between Indomethacin and Ethamsylate when adjustments were made for the patient's age and initial pain score. Side-effects were most common in the combination therapy group. To develop a protocol for the blinded IV titration of morphine and to compare the analgesic efficacy and side effect profile of indomethacin suppositories versus IV morphine in the treatment of acute ureteral colic.
                Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, two-period crossover study.
                Emergency department of a central-city, teaching hospital.
                Patients 18 to 75 years of age with pain suggestive of ureteral colic. Exclusions included pregnancy, adverse reactions to the study drugs, chronic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) therapy, or any pain medicine taken within four hours of ED admission.
                Patients were randomized to one of two groups: indomethacin 100-mg rectal suppository or morphine by IV titration (5-mg loading dose and up to two additional 2.5-mg doses if needed). At the end of 30 minutes, if adequate pain relief had not been obtained, treatment was crossed over.
                Verbal analog scale (initial pain) and visual analog pain relief scale.
                Seventy-five patients were entered into the study. Only data from those patients with stone presence confirmed by IV pyelogram or stone passage were analyzed. Twenty-four could not be evaluated (23 who did not meet criteria for stone presence and one whose pain resolved spontaneously before study medications could be administered). Of the remaining 51 patients, 31 received indomethacin first and 20 received morphine first. Morphine recipients reported more pain relief at ten minutes (P = .02), but at 20 and 30 minutes, no significant difference (P = .17 and .74, respectively) existed between the two groups.
                IV morphine produced more rapid analgesia than rectally administered indomethacin. There were no significant differences in vital sign changes or number of side effects between the two treatment groups. This study is the first to compare an NSAID with morphine administered by IV titration, considered by many to be the "gold standard" for relief of acute, severe pain. Future studies could evaluate the simultaneous administration of an opioid combined with an NSAID or compare an IV titrated opioid with an IV NSAID. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are used as analgesic in postoperative pain to reduce opioid side effects, such as drowsiness and nausea. However, NSAIDs have not been used extensively in cardiac surgical patients due to the fear of untoward effects on gastric, renal, and coagulation parameters. This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of three NSAIDs for pain control in CABG patients.
                One hundred and twenty patients scheduled for elective CABG surgery were enrolled in randomized, double blind, controlled study. Standardized fast track cardiac anesthesia was used. One dose of drug (75 mg diclofenac, 100 mg ketoprofen, 100 mg indomethacin, or placebo) was given pr one hour before tracheal extubation and a second dose 12 hr later. Pain was treated with morphine iv and acetaminophen po. Visual analogue pain scores were recorded at baseline, 3, 6, 12 and 24 hr after the first dose of drug.
                There were no differences among the groups in pain scores. Only patients who received diclofenac required less morphine than patients in the control group (P < 0.05). When the total amounts of pain medications were computed to morphine equivalents, only patients in the diclofenac group received less pain medications than the placebo group (P < 0.05). Proportion of patients with postoperative increase of creatinine level (20% and over) did not differ between placebo and drug groups.
                Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs may be used for analgesia management post CABG surgery in selected patients. Diclofenac appears to have the best analgesic effects by reducing the morphine and other analgesic requirement postoperatively. In this clinical, randomized, prospective study, we compared the effects of three different analgesia techniques (thoracic epidural analgesia [TEA] with and without preoperative initiation and IV patient-controlled analgesia [IV-PCA]) on postthoracotomy pain in 69 patients. In two groups, a thoracic epidural catheter was inserted preoperatively. Group Pre-TEA had bupivacaine and morphine solution preoperatively and intraoperatively. Postoperative analgesia was maintained with epidural PCA with a similar solution. Group Post-TEA, with no intraoperative medication, had the same postoperative analgesia as Group Pre-TEA plus the bolus dose. Group IV-PCA received only IV-PCA with morphine for postoperative analgesia. Pain was evaluated every 4 h during the first 48 h at rest, cough, and movement. Pre-TEA was associated with decreased pain compared with the other groups. Six months later, the patients were asked about their pain. The incidence and the intensity of pain were most frequent in Group IV-PCA (78%) and were the least in Group Pre-TEA (45%) (Group Pre-TEA versus Group IV-PCA, P = 0.0233; Group Pre-TEA versus Group IV-PCA, P = 0.014). Patients having pain on the second postoperative day had 83% chronic pain. TEA with preoperative initiation is a preferable method in preventing acute and long-term thoracotomy pain.
                Preoperatively initiated thoracic epidural analgesia has the most satisfying results in controlling postthoracotomy pain in the acute and long-term period, and it is associated with a decreased incidence (and intensity) of chronic pain compared with postoperative (epidural or IV) analgesia. Chronic pain has an incidence of 62%.
Conclusions about the clinical efficacy of indometacin for postoperative pain cannot be made unless more studies are conducted for a variety of surgical procedures, and different doses of indometacin are assessed. Since the last version of this review no new relevant studies have been identified.