Efficacy and tolerability of tolcapone compared with bromocriptine in levodopa-treated parkinsonian patients. Tolcapone Study Group. Pergolide compared with bromocriptine in Parkinson's disease: a multicenter, crossover, controlled study. Randomized trial of tolcapone versus pergolide as add-on to levodopa therapy in Parkinson's disease patients with motor fluctuations. Double-blind comparison of cabergoline and bromocriptine in Parkinson's disease patients with motor fluctuations. Double-blind comparison of pramipexole and bromocriptine treatment with placebo in advanced Parkinson's disease. International Pramipexole-Bromocriptine Study Group. Pergolide versus levodopa monotherapy in early Parkinson's disease patients: The PELMOPET study. Pergolide in the treatment of Parkinson's disease. Long-term double masked trial of early treatment with L-dopa plus bromocriptine versus L-dopa alone in Parkinson's disease. Interim results. A double-blind study of bromocriptine and L-dopa in de novo Parkinson's disease. Short-term results.
The catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitor tolcapone was compared with the dopamine agonist bromocriptine in an open-label, randomized trial involving 146 levodopa-treated parkinsonian patients with end-of-dose deterioration of efficacy. Tolcapone was given at a dosage of 200 mg three times daily; bromocriptine was titrated from 1.25 mg once daily at baseline to, at most, 10 mg three times daily by day 24 (mean final dose 22.4 mg/day). After 8 weeks, the tolcapone group had a significant reduction in daily levodopa dose compared with the bromocriptine group (p<0.05). No significant differences in the "on/off" time and motor disability were seen between the tolcapone and bromocriptine treatment groups. Bromocriptine induced more hallucinations, orthostatic hypotension, and nausea, whereas tolcapone therapy was associated with more muscle cramps and dystonia. These results suggest that when added to levodopa therapy, the two drugs have a different side effect profile, with the advantages for tolcapone being absence of titration and quicker efficacy. We compared the efficacy and safety of pergolide and bromocriptine in 57 patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) with a declining response to levodopa therapy in a single-blind, crossover study. Patients were placed randomly on the sequence bromocriptine-pergolide (12 + 12 weeks) or vice versa. Regular evaluations using the New York University Parkinson's Disease Scale were performed by a clinician blinded to treatment assignment. Patients' and clinicians' impressions also were recorded. The average daily dose of pergolide was 2.3 +/0- 0.8 mg, and that of bromocriptine was 24.2 +/- 8.4 mg. Significantly greater efficacy was demonstrated by both drugs as adjunctive therapy to levodopa compared with previous treatment of levodopa alone (pergolide, p = 0.0001; bromocriptine, p = 0.0005; Wilcoxon t test). Pergolide was more effective than bromocriptine in daily living scores (p = 0.020) and motor scores (p = 0.038). No difference in dyskinesias, dystonias, and psychosis was observed. Adverse events were more frequent in bromocriptine-treated patients. Most patients and physicians preferred pergolide to bromocriptine. Pergolide as adjunctive therapy to levodopa was more effective than bromocriptine in this short-term trial. In this 12-week, randomized, open-label, blinded-rater, parallel-group trial, the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of tolcapone and pergolide were compared in parkinsonian patients with a fluctuating response to levodopa. Patients received tolcapone 100 mg three times daily (t.i.d.), with a possible increase to 200 mg t.i.d., or pergolide titrated to a maximum dose of 5 mg/day by week 9 (mean final dose 2.2 mg/day). The trial involved 203 patients. Efficacy variables that decreased from baseline to week 12 with tolcapone and pergolide included "off" time (reduced by 2-3 hours/day), daily levodopa intake, sickness impact profile scores, Parkinson's disease questionnaire (PDQ)-39 scores, and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) scores. Improvements in efficacy variables were similar with tolcapone and pergolide, with the exception of improvements in quality of life, which were significantly greater with tolcapone; the relative changes in PDQ-39 score at week 12 were -8.7 and -14.2 (P < 0.05) with pergolide and tolcapone, respectively. Improvements in the investigator's global assessment (IGA) of overall efficacy were recorded in 86% of tolcapone-treated patients and in 78% of pergolide-treated patients. The proportion of patients who withdrew because of adverse events was higher in the pergolide group (15%) than in the tolcapone group (5%). Confusion, hypotension, nausea, constipation, abdominal pain, and dyspepsia occurred more frequently with pergolide, whereas diarrhea and urine discoloration occurred more frequently with tolcapone. Tolcapone was better tolerated than pergolide (P < 0.01) according to the IGA of overall tolerability. We conclude that, in this 3-month study, both tolcapone and pergolide provided improvements in motor fluctuations and allowed reductions in levodopa intake when added to levodopa therapy; intent to treat analysis and a less than maximal dose of pergolide may have biased the results in favor of tolcapone. Tolcapone provided greater improvements in quality of fife, was better tolerated, and had a more favorable adverse-event profile than pergolide.
                Copyright 2001 Movement Disorder Society. In the present study we compared the efficacy and safety of the new dopamine agonist cabergoline (CBG) with bromocriptine (BCR) in Parkinson's disease (PD). CBG has a very long half-life and can be administered as a single daily dose. Forty-four PD patients with uncontrolled motor fluctuations participated in the study. Patients were randomly and blindly assigned to equivalent doses of either CBG or BCR in addition to preexisting levodopa. Dosage was titrated to optimal, using up to 6 mg of CBG or 40 mg of BCR daily. CBG was given as a single morning dose whereas BCR was administered tid. Sixteen patients were followed for 1 year and 16 additional patients for 6 months. The mean follow-up duration was 9 +/- 5 months. The main effect of both drugs was observed on motor UPDRS scores, rigidity, bradykinesia items, and the percentage of awake hours spent during "on" and "off". In general, the effect of CBG was similar to that of BCR. The percentage of awake hours spent during "on" was higher with CBG as compared with BCR. Adverse events included dyskinesias, orthostatism, confusion, edema, and paresthesias in limbs. These effects were seen at similar frequencies with both drugs. The study shows that CBG given as a single morning dose is at least as efficacious as BCR given tid. CBG is a promising dopamine agonist for the treatment of motor fluctuations in PD. Pramipexole is a new, selective, nonergoline dopamine agonist that acts on D2 and preferentially on D3 dopamine receptors. Phase II and III clinical trials have shown this drug to be useful in treating both early and advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. A double-blind, randomized, multicenter study was performed to compare the safety, tolerance, and efficacy of pramipexole versus placebo in patients with advanced PD with motor fluctuations. A bromocriptine treatment group was included to enable comparisons between bromocriptine and placebo groups, but the study was not powered to show statistical differences between the active treatment groups. The study included 247 patients with "wearing off." Patients were Hoehn and Yahr stages II to IV during "on" times. The trial included three phases: dose escalation, 6 months' maintenance, and dose reduction. The primary end points were the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) parts II and III. Up to 4.5 mg per day of pramipexole and 30 mg per day of bromocriptine were used. The results of the study showed that the UPDRS part II improved by 26.7% for pramipexole (p = 0.0002) and 14% for bromocriptine (p = 0.02) versus 4.8% for placebo. The UPDRS part III showed improvements of 34% for pramipexole (p = 0.0006) and 23.8% for bromocriptine (p = 0.01) versus 5.7% for placebo. There were no major differences in safety data. In the active treatment groups there were more reports of dyskinesia and nausea compared with placebo. In regard to comparison of the Global Clinical Assessment of Efficacy between active treatment groups, there was a trend to significance (p = 0.056) in favor of pramipexole. We conclude that pramipexole-treated patients with advanced PD improved significantly more than placebo for both primary end points. Dopamine agonists are used as initial treatment in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) to reduce incidence and severity of motor complications. This paradigm is based on long-term studies, allowing "rescue" therapy with levodopa. The present strict monotherapy study (PELMOPET, the acronym for the pergolide-versus-L-dopa-monotherapy-and-positron-emission-tomography trial) evaluated the efficacy and safety of pergolide versus levodopa without levodopa "rescue" medication. This multicenter, double-blind, randomized, 3-year trial compared pergolide monotherapy (n=148) with levodopa monotherapy (n=146) in dopamine-naive patients with early PD (Hoehn and Yahr stage 1-2.5). Primary efficacy measures were clinical efficacy, severity and time to onset of motor complications, and disease progression. During the 3 years, severity of motor complications was significantly lower and time to onset of dyskinesia was significantly delayed in the group receiving pergolide (3.23 mg/day) compared with those receiving levodopa (504 mg/day). However, time to onset of motor complications was not longer in patients receiving pergolide after 3 years. Symptomatic relief (assessed by Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale [UPDRS], UPDRS II, and III, Clinical Global Impressions [CGI] severity, and CGI and Patient Global Impressions [PGI] improvement) was significantly greater in patients receiving levodopa. Adverse events led to discontinuation of therapy in 17.6% of pergolide patients and 9.6% of levodopa patients. This is the first study comparing strict monotherapy with a dopamine agonist versus levodopa in previously untreated early PD. In principle, both levodopa and a dopamine agonist such as pergolide seem to be suitable options as initial PD therapy. The choice remains with the treating physician based on the different efficacy and adverse event profiles.
                (c) 2005 Movement Disorder Society. Three trials evaluated the efficacy and safety of pergolide. Eighty-six de novo patients and 314 patients already receiving levodopa were enrolled in an open-label study. Of the de novo patients, 47.5% showed a marked or moderate improvement and 32% showed a mild improvement. In the levodopa add-on group, 53.8% showed marked or moderate improvement and 36.3% showed mild improvement. In a short-term, double-blind study, the efficacy of pergolide was compared with that of bromocriptine. One hundred seventy-two patients were randomized to receive pergolide, and 173 were randomized to receive bromocriptine. In de novo patients, bromocriptine (n = 49) and pergolide (n = 49) demonstrated similar efficacy. However, significantly more levodopa-treated patients in the pergolide group, compared with the bromocriptine group, demonstrated marked or moderate improvements in several items of the rating scale score. In a long-term study, 151 of 314 patients receiving pergolide in combination with levodopa remained in the study for 3 years, and 127 for 4 years, and in these patients the initial improvement was maintained. In 18 of 62 de novo patients, the initial improvement was maintained for up to 3 years. These trials indicate that pergolide has efficacy in patients with Parkinson's disease, either as monotherapy or in combination with levodopa. The quality and duration of control in two groups of parkinsonian patients under treatment with an L-dopa-based drug alone or L-dopa-based drug which has been partially substituted with bromocriptine are being compared over a 5-year period using a double-blind placebo-controlled study design. The aim is to establish whether early addition of bromocriptine will minimise late L-dopa complications. Results are presented after 1 year. Of 31 patients randomised, 13 were treated with combined L-dopa/bromocriptine and 14 with L-dopa/placebo. 4 patients were withdrawn for various reasons. In both groups any dose adjustments were aimed at maintaining the pre-entry clinical condition. In the group receiving bromocriptine combination therapy, progressive reduction of L-dopa was possible without deterioration of the patients' condition. In patients receiving L-dopa alone, the dose of L-dopa at 12 months was almost similar to that recorded on entry to the study. The total number of patients reporting adverse events in the L-dopa/bromocriptine combination and L-dopa alone groups were 8 and 7, respectively. At the present interim stage of the study it is not possible to compare the incidence of L-dopa long-term complications in either group. The first phase of a longitudinal multicenter study comparing bromocriptine and L-dopa (as Sinemet) as de novo therapy for Parkinson's disease using a double-blind randomized design has recently been completed. Over a period of 5.5 months, bromocriptine and L-dopa were equipotent in reducing functional and neurological disability. These observations complement and extend earlier studies and suggest a role for bromocriptine as de novo therapy of Parkinson's disease.
The two trials comparing tolcapone with the dopamine agonists bromocriptine and pergolide were underpowered to detect clinically relevant differences between them. This is based on medium-term evidence. No evidence was found comparing entacapone with active comparators. Further larger and longer-term trials are required to compare tolcapone with entacapone and COMT inhibitor therapy with alternative adjuvant classes of drug in later Parkinson's disease such as dopamine agonists and monoamine oxidase inhibitors.