Quality of randomised trials in COPD. Effects of psychotherapy in moderately severe COPD: a pilot study. Can small group education and peer review improve care for patients with asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? Non-pharmacological intervention for breathlessness in lung cancer. The Canadian Optimal Therapy of COPD Trial: design, organization and patient recruitment. Humanistic outcomes in the hypertension and COPD arms of a multicenter outcomes study. Effectiveness of pharmacist care for patients with reactive airways disease: a randomized controlled trial. Clinical and economic outcomes in the hypertension and COPD arms of a multicenter outcomes study. Efficacy of confronting smokers with airflow limitation for smoking cessation.
Randomised trials can provide high-level evidence to inform treatment decisions. Since their quality in respiratory medicine is largely unknown, we assessed the quality of a large set of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) trials. As a marker of trial quality, we assessed the procedure and concealment of random allocation, and the conduct of an intention-to-treat-analysis in 344 randomised trials published between 1957 and 2006. We used ordered logistic regression to assess the association between trial quality and type of intervention, type of journal, journal impact factor and year of publication. 257 (75%) trials assessed pharmacological and 87 (25%) assessed nonpharmacological interventions. The generation of appropriate randomisation was reported in 27.0% of the trials, concealment of random allocation in 11.6% and an intention-to-treat analysis in 21.8% of trials. Significantly higher quality was found in trials on nonpharmacological interventions (OR 2.49, 95% CI 1.56-3.99), and in trials published in general medical journals (versus specialised journals; OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.30-3.90) and after 2000 (versus 1957-2000; OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.45-3.58). The association of quality with a high impact factor was of borderline significance (p = 0.06). The quality of many COPD trials is low but tends to become better since the adoption of the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement. Anxiety is common in the "pink puffer" syndrome associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The degree of anxiety correlates well with perceived dyspnoea. This pilot study examines the effect of group psychotherapy on anxiety, exercise tolerance, dyspnoea and quality of life. Ten patients with moderately severe, stable COPD (mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1)-1.15 L) had six 90 min sessions of cognitive and behavioural psychotherapy at weekly intervals. Patients completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Medical Research Council Questionnaire (MRCQ) and St George's Respiratory Questionnaires (SGRQ), 1 week before and after therapy. FEV1, forced vital capacity (FVC), slow vital capacity (SVC), blood gas tensions and 6 min walking distance (6MWD) were measured. Eight control patients attended weekly for lung function and 6MWD for 6 weeks, but had no psychotherapy. Mean baseline HADS score was significantly higher in the psychotherapy group (12) than in controls (7), but otherwise there were no differences in lung function, blood gas tensions, 6MWD, or the other questionnaire scores between groups. After treatment, the physiological and psychological parameters where unchanged in both groups with the exception of the mean 6MWD, which had improved in the psychotherapy group only, from 351 to 423 m (p<0.001), an increase of 24%. Three months after treatment, the 6MWD was still 16% above the baseline value (p=0.02). In conclusion, six sessions of cognitive and behavioural psychotherapy produced a sustained improvement in exercise tolerance in a group of 10 anxious patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, without any change in anxiety scores on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Further studies of more prolonged, intensive psychotherapy would establish whether better symptom and quality of life scores accompany more dramatic increases in exercise tolerance in "pink puffers". To study the effectiveness of an intensive small group education and peer review programme aimed at implementing national guidelines on asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) on care provision by general practitioners (GPs) and on patient outcomes.
                A randomised experimental study with pre-measurement and post-measurement (after one year) in an experimental group and a control group in Dutch general practice.
                Two groups of GPs were formed and randomised. The education and peer review group (17 GPs with 210 patients) had an intervention consisting of an interactive group education and peer review programme (four sessions each lasting two hours). The control group consisted of 17 GPs with 223 patients (no intervention).
                Knowledge, skills, opinion about asthma and COPD care, presence of equipment in practice; actual performance about peakflow measurement, non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatment; asthma symptoms (Dutch Medical Research Council), smoking habits, exacerbation ratio, and disease specific quality of life (QOL-RIQ). Data were collected by a written questionnaire for GPs, by self recording of consultations by GPs, and by a written self administered questionnaire for adult patients with asthma/COPD.
                Data from 34 GP questionnaires, 433 patient questionnaires, and recordings from 934 consultations/visits and 350 repeat prescriptions were available. Compared with the control group there were only significant changes for self estimated skills (+16%, 95% confidence interval 4% to 26%) and presence of peakflow meters in practice (+18%, p < 0.05). No significant changes were found for provided care and patient outcomes compared with the control group. In the subgroup of more severe patients, the group of older patients, and in the group of patients not using anti-inflammatory medication at baseline, no significant changes compared with the control group were seen in patient outcomes.
                Except for two aspects, intensive small group education and peer review in asthma and COPD care do not seem to be effective in changing relevant aspects of the provided care by GPs in accordance with guidelines, nor in changing patients' health status. To evaluate the effect of non-pharmacological intervention for breathlessness in lung cancer on breathlessness ratings and patient functioning.
                Randomised controlled pilot study.
                A nurse led clinic in a specialist cancer centre.
                20 patients with advanced small cell and non-small cell lung cancer.
                Weekly sessions with a nurse research practitioner over 3-6 weeks using counselling, breathing re-training, relaxation and teaching coping and adaptation strategies.
                Visual analogue scale ratings of breathlessness, distress caused by breathlessness, functional capacity, ability to perform activities of daily living and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.
                Improvements in median scores on all measures were observed in the intervention group with the exception of depression, compared with the control group where median scores were static or worsened. Distress from breathlessness was improved by a median of 53%, breathlessness at worst by 35% and functional capacity by 21%. In contrast, distress in the control group worsened by a median of 10%. Significant improvements compared with the control group were observed in breathlessness at best (p < 0.02), breathlessness at worst (p < 0.05), distress caused by breathlessness (p < 0.01), functional capacity (p < 0.02) and ability to perform activities of daily living (p < 0.03) but were not observed for anxiety or depression.
                Lung cancer patients suffering from breathlessness benefited from this rehabilitative approach to breathlessness management and strategies employed in this pilot study warrant further multicentre research. Macmillan nurses and palliative care teams are recommended to explore the potential of adopting similar approaches. There are no published studies that have assessed whether adding long-acting beta 2-agonist bronchodilators and/or inhaled steroids to chronic therapy with tiotropium would provide additional clinical benefit to patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
                The Canadian Optimal Therapy of COPD Trial is a randomized, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research that has been designed to determine which combination of inhaled medications will most effectively prevent exacerbations and optimize disease-specific quality of life in patients with COPD. The trial is the first to evolve from the Canadian Thoracic Society Clinical Trials Group. The study will randomize 432 patients with moderate to severe COPD to one of three parallel treatment arms for 52 weeks: tiotropium and fluticasone/salmeterol; tiotropium and salmeterol; or tiotropium and placebo inhaler. The participants will be allowed to use salbutamol as required throughout the trial period.
                The primary outcome measure is the proportion of patients in the three treatment groups who experienced a respiratory exacerbation within 52 weeks of randomization. Other outcomes that will be assessed over the 52-week trial period will include: changes in disease-specific quality of life and changes in dyspnea, health care use and changes in lung function. A pharmacoeconomic analysis will also be performed to evaluate the cost of these therapies.
                The study commenced recruitment in October 2003. It is currently operating at 22 centres across Canada and has randomized 137 patients during the first four months of recruitment. Recruitment is scheduled to continue until April 2005 or until 432 patients have been randomized.
                The present randomized, placebo-controlled trial offers a unique opportunity to answer the question, what is the best combination of inhaled medications to use for COPD patients? It is hoped that optimal use of inhaled medications will improve patient health and quality of life, reduce patient respiratory exacerbations, and ultimately, reduce health care resource use. To evaluate the effects of pharmaceutical care on selected humanistic outcomes in patients with hypertension or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
                Clinic patients with hypertension or COPD were randomly assigned to a treatment group (pharmaceutical care) or a control group (traditional pharmacy care) over a six-month period. Clinical pharmacists and pharmacy residents conducted the protocols. There were 133 evaluable patients (63 treatment, 70 control) in the hypertension study arm and 98 evaluable patients (43 treatment, 55 control) in the COPD study arm. The Pharmaceutical Care Questionnaire evaluated patient satisfaction with care. Tests specific to the disease states assessed disease and disease management knowledge. Quality of life (QOL) was evaluated using the Health Status Questionnaire 2.0 (HSQ 2.0) in the COPD arm; in the hypertension arm, the Hypertension/Lipid TyPE Specification Form 5.1 was used.
                Ambulatory care centers of 10 Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) medical centers and 1 university medical center.
                Patient-centered pharmaceutical care model (employing standardized care) implemented by clinical pharmacy residents.
                Satisfaction with pharmaceutical care, disease and disease management knowledge, and QOL.
                Statistically significant differences in most satisfaction items were found, with treatment patients expressing greater satisfaction. Treatment groups in both arms strongly agreed that pharmacists helped them with confidence in use of their medication and understanding of their illness, gave complete explanations about their medications, made them feel that their care was a priority, and followed up on their questions and concerns. In the hypertension arm, treatment patients demonstrated significant increases in knowledge scores. Trends in QOL were positive for both hypertension groups, with a significant decrease found in number of treatment patients reporting problems with sexual function. In the COPD arm, improvement trends were significantly stronger for treatment patients.
                Although patients were not dissatisfied with traditional pharmacy care, they were more satisfied overall with the pharmaceutical care model. It is not known whether patient outcomes are enhanced by effective pharmacist-patient interactions.
                To assess the effectiveness of a pharmaceutical care program for patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
                Randomized controlled trial conducted at 36 community drugstores in Indianapolis, Ind. We enrolled 1113 participants with active COPD or asthma from July 1998 to December 1999. Outcomes were assessed in 947 (85.1%) participants at 6 months and 898 (80.7%) at 12 months.
                The pharmaceutical care program (n = 447) provided pharmacists with recent patient-specific clinical data (peak expiratory flow rates [PEFRs], emergency department [ED] visits, hospitalizations, and medication compliance), training, customized patient educational materials, and resources to facilitate program implementation. The PEFR monitoring control group (n = 363) received a peak flow meter, instructions about its use, and monthly calls to elicit PEFRs. However, PEFR data were not provided to the pharmacist. Patients in the usual care group (n = 303) received neither peak flow meters nor instructions in their use; during monthly telephone interviews, PEFR rates were not elicited. Pharmacists in both control groups had a training session but received no components of the pharmaceutical care intervention.
                Peak expiratory flow rates, breathing-related ED or hospital visits, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), medication compliance, and patient satisfaction.
                At 12 months, patients receiving pharmaceutical care had significantly higher peak flow rates than the usual care group (P =.02) but not than PEFR monitoring controls (P =.28). There were no significant between-group differences in medication compliance or HRQOL. Asthma patients receiving pharmaceutical care had significantly more breathing-related ED or hospital visits than the usual care group (odds ratio, 2.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.76-2.63; P<.001). Patients receiving pharmaceutical care were more satisfied with their pharmacist than the usual care group (P =.03) and the PEFR monitoring group (P =.001) and were more satisfied with their health care than the usual care group at 6 months only (P =.01). Despite ample opportunities to implement the program, pharmacists accessed patient-specific data only about half of the time and documented actions about half of the time that records were accessed.
                This pharmaceutical care program increased patients' PEFRs compared with usual care but provided little benefit compared with peak flow monitoring alone. Pharmaceutical care increased patient satisfaction but also increased the amount of breathing-related medical care sought. To evaluate the impact of pharmaceutical care on selected clinical and economic outcomes in patients with hypertension or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in ambulatory care settings.
                Clinic patients with hypertension or COPD were randomly assigned to a treatment group (pharmaceutical care) or a control group (traditional pharmacy care) over a six-month period. Clinical pharmacists and pharmacy residents conducted the protocols. There were 133 evaluable patients (63 treatment and 70 control) in the hypertension study arm and 98 evaluable patients (43 treatment and 55 control) in the COPD study arm.
                10 Departments of Veterans Affairs medical centers and 1 academic medical center.
                Patient-centered pharmaceutical care model (employing standardized care) implemented by clinical pharmacy residents.
                Patient knowledge, medication compliance, and health resource use.
                The hypertension treatment group had a significantly greater reduction in systolic blood pressure from visit 1 to visit 5 than did the control group. In the COPD study arm, trends were positive in the treatment group for patients ratings of symptom interference with activities and dyspnea measures. There was a significant difference between the hypertension treatment and control group for compliance. There were no significant changes in compliance scores in the COPD study arm. Mean number of hospitalizations and other health care provider visits was higher for the hypertension control group. For patients with COPD, hospitalizations increased in the control group, and the number of other health care provider visits was higher in the control group.
                Pharmacists' participation in a pharmaceutical care program resulted in disease state improvement in ambulatory patients with hypertension and COPD. The objective of the present study was to test whether confronting smokers with previously undetected chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) increases the rate of smoking cessation. In total, 296 smokers with no prior diagnosis of COPD were detected with mild-to-moderate airflow limitation by means of spirometry and randomly allocated to: confrontational counselling by a nurse with nortriptyline for smoking cessation (experimental group); regular counselling by a nurse with nortriptyline (control group 1); or "care as usual" for smoking cessation by the general practitioner (control group 2). Only the experimental group was confronted with their abnormal spirometry (mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)) post-bronchodilator 80.5% predicted, mean FEV(1)/forced vital capacity post-bronchodilator 62.5%). There was no difference in cotinine-validated prolonged abstinence rate between the experimental group (11.2%) and control group 1 (11.6%) from week 5-52 (odds ratio (OR) 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.43-2.18). The abstinence rate was approximately twice as high in the experimental group compared with control group 2 (5.9%), but this difference was not statistically significant (OR 2.02, 95% CI 0.63-6.46). The present study did not provide evidence that the confrontational approach increases the rate of long-term abstinence from smoking compared with an equally intensive treatment in which smokers were not confronted with spirometry. The high failure rates (> or =88%) highlight the need for treating tobacco addiction as a chronic relapsing disorder.
Due to the sub-optimal quality of the trials and statistically non-significant results, it is not possible to draw any conclusions for treatment. This review highlights the paucity of data in this area. As such, there is a need for scientifically rigorous research trials to evaluate the role of pharmacological interventions for anxiety disorders in patients with COPD, using a sample size large enough to demonstrate meaningful clinical significance.