Randomized trial and local biological effect of autologous platelets used as adjuvant therapy for chronic venous leg ulcers. Randomized trial comparing cryopreserved cultured epidermal allografts with hydrocolloid dressings in healing chronic venous ulcers. Stimulation of repair in chronic, nonhealing, cutaneous ulcers using platelet-derived wound healing formula. A prospective randomized trial of autologous platelet-derived wound healing factors for treatment of chronic nonhealing wounds: a preliminary report. [Venous leg ulcers: no improvement of wound healing with 685-nm low level laser therapy. Randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind study]. Bacterial load in relation to vacuum-assisted closure wound therapy: a prospective randomized trial. Comparison of ultrasound/ultraviolet-C and laser for treatment of pressure ulcers in patients with spinal cord injury. Ketanserin promotes wound healing: clinical and preclinical results. Vacuum-assisted wound closure for cheaper and more comfortable healing of pressure sores: a prospective study.
Platelet products have been proposed as adjuvant therapy for wound healing. We undertook this study to determine the healing effect of topically applied frozen autologous platelets (FAP) on chronic venous ulcers, compared with effect of placebo, and whether use of topical FAP modifies local expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), keratinocyte growth factor (KGF), interleukin 8 (IL-8), and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1) in wound fluid.
                This randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial was carried out in institutional practice, with ambulatory patients with proved chronic venous leg ulcers. In all patients, whole venous blood was drawn for preparation of FAP. FAP or normal saline solution was applied three times per week for up to 12 weeks, together with hydrocolloids and standardized compression bandages. Leg ulcer surface was assessed with numerical pictures. IL-8, VEGF, KGF, and TIMP-1 levels were determined (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) in wound fluid after each 4 weeks of treatment.
                Fifteen patients were randomized into two groups with comparable leg ulcer characteristics. Mean percent reduction in ulcer area was 26.2% in the FAP group versus 15.2% in the placebo group (P =.94). One ulcer in each group was completely healed at study end. Levels of TIMP-1 increased significantly during FAP treatment. IL-8 concentration was significantly lower in wound fluid of healing ulcers than in the fluid of nonhealing ulcers, in both FAP and placebo groups. Growth factor levels were not modified with FAP treatment.
                Topical autologous platelets have no significant adjuvant effect on healing of chronic venous leg ulcers and increased wound fluid TIMP-1 concentration. Ulcer healing is associated with a decrease in wound fluid IL-8. Cultured epidermal allografts have been successfully used to treat a variety of wounds. Their postulated mechanism of action is through release of cytokines that stimulate epithelialization. On the basis of previous experience we expected ulcers treated with cryopreserved cultured allografts (CCAs) to be healed by 6 weeks. Hydrocolloid dressings (HCDs) have also been reported to be effective in the treatment of venous ulcers.
                Our purpose was to compare the effectiveness of CCAs with HCDs in healing chronic venous ulcers.
                Forty-three patients with 47 ulcers were enrolled in a randomized controlled trial. Ulcers not healed by 6 weeks were changed to the other treatment.
                No difference in the number of healed ulcers between the two groups was observed at 6 weeks. Healing rate, percent reduction of initial ulcer size, and radial progression toward wound closure were significantly greater for CCAs than for HCDs. Pain relief was not significantly different.
                CCAs achieve more rapid healing and greater reduction in ulcer size than HCDs. Chronic, nonhealing, cutaneous ulcers are a serious clinical problem. The results of previous studies using platelet-derived wound healing formula (PDWHF), derived from autologous platelets, provided evidence that PDWHF actively stimulates repair of the wound. To test whether or not PDWHF accelerates repair, a prospectively randomized, blinded trial was conducted using a placebo control. A total of 32 patients with chronic, nonhealing, cutaneous wounds of the lower extremity were randomized and treated for eight weeks with PDWHF or placebo. Epithelialization of the wound was the end point of study. In the group who received treatment, 81 per cent of patients had epithelialization in eight weeks compared with 15 per cent in the control group (p less than 0.0001). After crossover to treatment with PDWHF, all of the patients in the control group had epithelialization in an average of 7.1 weeks. Regression analysis of the rates of epithelialization also showed significant differences during the initial eight week trial and showed no difference after crossover of the control group to therapy with PDWHF. Results from this study demonstrate a highly statistically significant effect of topically applied platelet-derived growth factors on the repair of chronic, nonhealing, cutaneous ulcers. Previous studies have suggested that topically applied platelet-derived wound healing factors (PDWHF) accelerate wound healing by stimulating angiogenesis, fibroblast proliferation, and collagen synthesis. To assess the ability of platelet factors to facilitate healing of chronic cutaneous ulcers we performed a randomized, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of topical PDWHF in 18 patients with 26 lower extremity wounds refractory to conventional therapy. Wounds were present for at least 8 weeks (mean, 5.5 +/- 4.3 months). They were extensively debrided initially and were measured and photographed at weekly intervals for 12 weeks. Eight patients with nine wounds were treated with placebo solution (controls), and 10 patients with 17 wounds were treated with PDWHF (treatment group). Seventy-eight percent of patients had diabetes mellitus, 72% had occlusive peripheral vascular disease, and 28% had venous disease; distribution of these disorders was equivalent in both groups. Ankle-brachial indexes, which were often spuriously elevated, averaged 0.93 +/- 0.54 in controls and 1.04 +/- 0.56 in patients treated with PDWHF (p greater than 0.5). Mean transcutaneous oxygen tension was 37.8 +/- 11.9 mmHg in controls and 37.1 +/- 9.1 mmHg in patients treated with PDWHF. Initial wound area was larger in controls than in the patients treated with PDWHF (28.9 +/- 45.2 cm2 vs 13.0 +/- 4.4 cm2), but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.19). Three (33%) wounds (in two patients) healed in controls, and four (24%) wounds (in three patients) healed in the PDWHF group (p greater than 0.5). The rate of healing in controls was 1.9 +/- 2.7 cm2/week.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) Venous leg ulcers (ulcera crurum venosa) are frequently seen in elderly patients. It has been suggested that low level laser irradiation has a biostimulative and wound healing effect; however, this has not yet been clinically verified by controlled studies.
                The difference in size reduction of leg ulcers with and without low level laser or placebo laser treatment was measured in 44 patients randomised into two treatment groups (685-nm low level laser and placebo laser) or a control group which served to quantify the effect of laser application. All patients received standardized wound care.
                The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of low level laser irradiation with that of a placebo "light source". The size of the ulcers was planimetrically measured at baseline (day 1), at the end of therapy (day 28) and 2 months later (day 90). The difference in wound size was evaluated.
                There were no statistically significant differences in reduction of wound size between the three groups, thus suggesting that low level laser light does not have any stimulatory effect on wound healing in ulcera crurum venosa. Vacuum-assisted closure has become a new technique in the challenging management of contaminated, acute, and chronic wounds. Although promising clinical results have been described, scientific proof to substantiate the mechanism of action of this therapy is scarce. In the present study, we examined whether the positive effect on wound healing found in vacuum-assisted closure-treated wounds could be explained by an effect on the bacterial load. Fifty-four patients who needed open wound management before surgical closure were included in this study. Wounds were randomized to either vacuum-assisted closure therapy (n= 29) or treatment by conventional moist gauze therapy (n= 25). Healing was characterized by development of a clean granulating wound bed ("ready for surgical therapy") and reduction of wound surface area. To quantify bacterial load, biopsies were collected. No significant difference was found in time needed to reach "ready for surgical therapy" comparing both therapies. Wound surface area reduction was significantly larger in vacuum-assisted closure-treated wounds: 3.8 +/- 0.5 percent/day (mean +/- SEM) compared to conventional-treated wounds (1.7 +/- 0.6 percent/day; p < 0.05). The total quantitative bacterial load was generally stable in both therapies. However, nonfermentative gram negative bacilli showed a significant decrease in vacuum-assisted closure-treated wounds (p < 0.05), whereas Staphylococcus aureus showed a significant increase in vacuum-assisted closure-treated wounds (p < 0.05). In conclusion, this study shows a positive effect of vacuum-assisted closure therapy on wound healing, expressed as a significant reduction of wound surface area. However, this could not be explained by a significant quantitative reduction of the bacterial load. The purpose of this study was to compare in patients with spinal cord injury the effect on wound healing of nursing care alone with the effect on wound healing of nursing care combined with either laser treatment or a regimen of ultrasound and ultraviolet-C (US/UVC).
                Twenty patients (22 wounds) were randomly assigned to the treatment groups.
                All patients received standard wound care consisting of wound cleaning twice daily, application of moist dressings, and continuous relief of pressure until the wounds were healed. The laser protocol consisted of three treatments weekly using a cluster probe with an 820-nm laser diode and 30 superluminous diodes (10 each at 660, 880, and 950 nm), and energy density of 4J/cm2, and a pulse repetition rate of 5,000 pulses per second. The US/UVC regimen consisted of five treatments weekly, alternating the treatment modality daily. The pulsed US was applied at a frequency of 3 MHz and a spatial average-temporal average intensity of 0.2 W/cm2 (1:4 pulse ratio) for 5 minutes per 5 cm2 of wound area. The UVC dosage (95% emission at 250 nm) was calculated each session according to wound appearance. The dosage level was E1 for clean/granulating areas, E3 for purulent/slow-granulating areas, E4 for heavily infected areas, and 2E4 for wound debridement. Wounds were traced every 14 days, and surface areas were calculated using the Sigma-Scan Measurement System. Weekly percentage changes in wound area were compared.
                Results showed that US/UVC treatment had a greater effect on wound healing than did nursing care, either alone or combined with laser.
                Ultrasound/ultraviolet-C may decrease healing time and may allow faster return to rehabilitation programs, work, and leisure activities for patients with spinal cord injury who have pressure ulcers. nan Pressure sores are a common complication of patients with spinal injuries. The vacuum-assisted closure technique is widely used to induce and promote wound healing. We tested our clinical impression that pressure sores healed faster with vacuum-assisted closure, and compared it with the traditional wet-to-dry/wet-to-wet technique with gauze soaked in Ringer's solution changed three times a day. Consecutive patients with pressure sores were entered into the study. Two randomised groups of 11 patients each with pressure sores of the pelvic region were included. We found no difference in time to reach 50% of the initial wound volume between the two methods. The vacuum-assisted group took a mean (SD) of 27 (10) days and the traditional group 28 (7) days. The two methods were equally effective in forming granulation tissue, so one can profit from the other advantages of the vacuum-assisted treatment (reduced costs and improved comfort) knowing that the effect on the formation of granulation tissue is as good as with the traditional treatment.
Trials comparing TNP with alternative treatments for chronic wounds have methodological flaws and data do demonstrate a beneficial effect of TNP on wound healing however more, better quality research is needed.