Flexible GnRH antagonist protocol versus GnRH agonist long protocol in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome treated for IVF: a prospective randomised controlled trial (RCT). A prospective randomized study comparing coasting with GnRH antagonist administration in patients at risk for severe OHSS. GnRH antagonist versus long GnRH agonist protocol in poor responders undergoing IVF: a randomized controlled trial. Comparison of multiple dose GnRH antagonist and minidose long agonist protocols in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization: a randomized controlled trial. Comparing GnRH agonist long protocol and GnRH antagonist protocol in outcome the first cycle of ART. A randomised study of GnRH antagonist (cetrorelix) versus agonist (busereline) for controlled ovarian stimulation: effect on safety and efficacy. A modified gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol failed to increase clinical pregnancy rates in comparison with the long GnRH protocol. Use of a GnRH antagonist in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for assisted conception in women with polycystic ovary disease: a randomized, prospective, pilot study. A lower ongoing pregnancy rate can be expected when GnRH agonist is used for triggering final oocyte maturation instead of HCG in patients undergoing IVF with GnRH antagonists.
Women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) are at risk of developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) during ovarian stimulation. Use of GnRH antagonist in the general subfertile population is associated with lower incidence of OHSS than agonists and similar probability of live birth but it is unclear if this is true for patients with PCOS. Our aim was to compare the flexible GnRH antagonist and GnRH agonist long protocols in patients with PCOS undergoing IVF (primary end-point: ongoing pregnancy rate per patient randomized).
                In this randomised controlled trial (RCT), 220 patients with PCOS were randomly allocated in two groups: long GnRH agonist down-regulation protocol (n = 110) and flexible GnRH antagonist protocol (n = 110).
                No differences were observed in ongoing pregnancy rates [50.9 versus 47.3%, difference 3.6%, 95% confidence interval (CI): -9.6 to +16.8%] in the agonist and antagonist protocols, respectively. Incidence of OHSS Grade II was lower in the antagonist compared with agonist group (40.0 versus 60.0%, difference -20.0%, 95% CI: -7.1 to -32.9%, P < 0.01). Duration of stimulation (10 versus 12 days, difference 2 days, 95% CI: +1 to +2, P < 0.001) and total gonadotrophin required (1575 versus 1850 IU, difference -275 IU, 95% CI: -25 to -400, P < 0.05) were also lower in the antagonist compared with agonist protocol.
                The current RCT suggests that the flexible GnRH antagonist protocol is associated with a similar ongoing pregnancy rate, lower incidence of OHSS grade II, lower gonadotrophin requirement and shorter duration of stimulation, compared with GnRH agonist. The GnRH antagonist might be the treatment choice for patients with PCOS undergoing IVF. The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov. ID: NCT00417144. This work evaluated possible advantages of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist administration as an alternative to coasting in prevention of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in women undergoing IVF/ intracytoplasmic sperm injection. A prospective randomized study comparing coasting (group A) (n = 96) and GnRH antagonist administration (group B) (n = 94) in patients at risk of OHSS was performed. The primary outcome measure was high quality embryos. The secondary outcome measures were days of intervention, number of oocytes, pregnancy rate, number of cryopreserved embryos and incidence of severe OHSS. There were significantly more high quality embryos (2.87 +/- 1.2 versus 2.21 +/- 1.1; P < 0.0001), and more oocytes (16.5 +/- 7.6 versus 14.06 +/- 5.2; P = 0.02), in group B as compared with group A. There were more days of coasting as compared with days of antagonist administration (2.82 +/- 0.97 versus 1.74 +/- 0.91; P < 0.0001). In conclusion, GnRH antagonist was superior to coasting in producing significantly more high quality embryos and more oocytes as well as reducing the time until HCG administration. There was no significant difference in pregnancy rate between the two groups. No OHSS developed in either group. This is the first published report of a prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing a fixed, multi-dose GnRH antagonist protocol with a long GnRH agonist protocol in poor responders undergoing IVF.
                Sixty-six poor responders were randomized into two groups: the study group received 0.25 mg of cetrorelix daily starting on day 6 of stimulation; the control group received 600 microg of buserelin acetate daily starting in the mid-luteal phase of the preceding cycle. Both groups were given a fixed dose of recombinant FSH (300 IU daily) for stimulation.
                There were no significant differences in the cycle cancellation rates, duration of stimulation, consumption of gonadotrophins, and mean numbers of mature follicles, oocytes and embryos obtained. The implantation rates were similar, but the number of embryos transferred was significantly higher for the antagonist group (2.32 +/- 0.58 versus 1.50 +/- 0.83; P = 0.01). The pregnancy rates were also higher in the antagonist group, but the difference was not statistically significant.
                A fixed multi-dose GnRH antagonist protocol is feasible for patients who are poor responders on a long agonist protocol; however, our study failed to demonstrate an overall improvement in ovarian responsiveness. Clinical outcomes may be improved by developing more flexible antagonist regimens, an approach that requires further evaluation. To investigate the efficacy of gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH) in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization.
                Ninety-six patients with poor ovarian response in previous treatment cycles were prospectively randomized into two groups. Forty-four patients were stimulated with GnRH antagonist multidose protocol and 45 patients received a standard long agonist protocol. Ovarian response was evaluated by transvaginal ultrasound and hormonal parameters. Cycle characteristics and treatment outcomes were statistically compared between groups.
                There was significantly reduced duration of stimulation and consumption of gonadotrophins in the antagonist group when compared to the agonist group. The estradiol concentrations on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) injection, the number of oocytes retrieved, and the number of embryos transferred were similar for both groups. In the antagonist group, eight (18.1%) ongoing pregnancies were achieved and in the agonist group, ten (22.2%) clinical pregnancies were achieved but the difference was not statistically significant.
                The present study was not powered to detect clinically relevant differences between two protocols in outcomes such as pregnancy rate, with confidence. This prospective study evaluated the efficacy of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol in comparison with the GnRH agonist protocol in the first cycle of assisted reproductive technique (ART).
                We randomized 235 patients undergoing ART for the first time. The first group was stimulated with a standard long protocol and the second group stimulated with GnRH antagonis.
                There was no statistically significant difference in the age, infertility cause, basal FSH, BMI, the number of oocytes retrieved, number of M2 oocytes, embryo obtained and endometrial thickness between the two groups. But Serum estradiol, consumption of gonadotropins and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome were significantly lower in the antagonist protocol. Cancellation rate of embryo transfer due to poor-quality embryo in the antagonist protocol was higher, but it was not significant. There was no significant difference in the clinical pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy between the two groups.
                GnRH-antagonist is an effective, safe, and well-tolerated alternative to agonist in the first cycle of ART. To assess safety and efficacy of cetrorelix utilisation in controlled ovarian stimulation (COS).
                Phase III, randomized, single center study of 131 patients undergoing COS and IVF with or without ICSI, in a University affiliated Hospital. Sixty-six patients were allocated to the protocol with antagonist and 65 to the agonist protocol arm. The Student's t-test, the Mann-Whitney test and the chi-square test were applied as required, using SPSS for Windows with a two-sided 5% significance level.
                The mean (+/-S.D.) duration of stimulation was 9.5+/-1.7 days in the antagonist group and 10.6+/-2.1 days in the agonist group (P=0.02). The mean (+/-S.D.) duration of suppression was 4.6+/-1.3 days in the antagonist group and 27.3+/-5.2 days in the agonist group (P<0.0001). No significant differences were noted in other outcome measures: amount of rFSH required, estradiol level on hCG day, number of follicles>or=15 mm and endometrial thickness on oocyte retrieval day, number of oocytes retrieved, fertilization rate and number of OHS cases. Clinical pregnancy rates per-attempt and per-transfer were 15.1% and 17.0% in the antagonist group and 16.9% and 20.0% in the agonist group (P=0.79 and 0.71, respectively).
                GnRH antagonists are an effective, safe and well tolerated alternative to agonists for COS. The purpose of this prospective randomized study was to compare stimulation characteristics and IVF outcomes of the standard long GnRH agonist protocol for ovarian stimulation with a modified GnRH antagonist protocol. Starting GnRH antagonist in a flexible protocol according to the size of the leading follicle, with simultaneous augmentation of 75 IU recombinant FSH, failed to increase clinical pregnancy rates. To compare the outcome of using gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists versus agonists in women with polycystic ovary disease (PCOD) who underwent controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) for assisted reproductive techniques (ART).
                A total of 129 patients with PCOD were randomly allocated to undergo COH with a GnRH antagonist (59 patients) and GnRH agonist (leuprolide acetate) (70 patients) to prevent a premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surge. Assisted fertilization following oocyte retrieval and embryo transfer was performed.
                None of the cycles were cancelled due to a premature LH surge. There was no significant difference between the antagonist and agonist arms in the number of gonadotropin ampules consumed per cycle. However, in the antagonist arm a shorter duration of ovarian stimulation was recorded as compared to the agonist arm. Although similar numbers of oocytes was retrieved from both groups of patients, the quality of the oocytes, as measured by metaphase 2/total oocyte ratio, was lower in the antagonist arm as compared to the agonist arm. Pregnancy rates were 57.6% and 58.5% in the antagonist and agonist arms, respectively (p > 0.05). Implantation rates were not different (34.0% and 34.6%, respectively). The frequency of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome also did not differ between the treatment groups (5% and 7.1%, respectively).
                The size of our study, on a specific subgroup of patients, does not allow a reliable conclusion regarding ART outcomefollowing the use of a GnRH antagonist versus agonist. Nevertheless, the protocol with the antagonist gave results that were as good as those of the protocol with the agonist in this PCOD patient population. Eliciting an endogenous LH surge by GnRH-agonist for the induction of final oocyte maturation may be more physiological compared with the administration of HCG. However, the efficacy of this intervention in patients treated for IVF with GnRH antagonists remains to be assessed.
                106 patients were randomized to receive either 10 000 IU urinary HCG or 0.2 mg Triptorelin for triggering final oocyte maturation. Ovarian stimulation for IVF was performed with a fixed dose of 200 IU recombinant FSH and GnRH antagonist was started on stimulation day 6. Luteal phase was supported with micronized vaginal progesterone and oral estradiol. The study was monitored continuously for safety and stopping rules were established.
                No significant differences were present in the number of cumulus-oocyte complexes retrieved, in the proportion of metaphase II oocytes, in fertilization rates or in the number and quality of the embryos transferred between the two groups. However, a significantly lower probability of ongoing pregnancy in the GnRH agonist arm prompted discontinuation of the trial, according to the stopping rules established (odds ratio 0.11; 95% confidence interval 0.02-0.52).
                Lower probability of ongoing pregnancy can be expected when GnRH agonist is used for triggering final oocyte maturation instead of HCG in patients undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF with GnRH antagonists.
The use of antagonist compared with long GnRH agonist protocols was associated with a large reduction in OHSS and there was no evidence of a difference in live-birth rates.