Nimodipine in the treatment of old age dementias. Efficacy and safety of nimodipine in subcortical vascular dementia: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. A phase I/II trial of nimodipine for HIV-related neurologic complications. Effect of nimodipine on memory after cerebral infarction. Effect of nimodipine on regional cerebral glucose metabolism in patients with acute ischemic stroke as measured by positron emission tomography. Nimodipine and perfusion changes after stroke. Double-blind study of nimodipine in non-severe stroke. Nimodipine in acute ischemic stroke: a double-blind controlled study. Placebo-controlled trial of nimodipine in the treatment of acute ischemic cerebral infarction.
1. In a multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical study in 178 elderly patients with cognitive decline, nimodipine, a calcium antagonist was found to be a therapeutically effective agent in the treatment of old age dementias. 2. Treatment with 90 mg of nimodipine administered orally in divided doses for 12 weeks was significantly superior to an inactive placebo on all outcome measures including the Wechsler Memory Scale, the Mini Mental State Examination, the Global Deterioration Scale, the Sandoz Clinical Assessment Geriatric Scale, the Plutchik Geriatric Rating Scale, the Severity of Illness and Global Improvement Scales of Clinical Global Impression, and the Hamilton Psychiatric Rating Scale for Depression. 3. Adverse effects with nimodipine were few and mild. The drug was equally well tolerated and equally effective in the two major dementias of old age, i.e., primary degenerative and multi-infarct. The number of abnormal laboratory test readings remained essentially unchanged from pre-treatment to post-treatment. Evidence of drug efficacy in vascular dementia (VaD) is scanty. Therapeutic trials should address VaD subtypes. We studied the efficacy and safety of the calcium antagonist nimodipine in subcortical VaD.
                242 patients defined as affected by subcortical VaD based on clinical (ICD-10) and computed tomography criteria were randomized to oral nimodipine 90 mg/d or placebo.
                230 patients (121 nimodipine, mean age 75.2+/-6.1; 109 placebo, 75.4+/-6.0) were valid for the intention-to-treat analysis. At 52 weeks, the Sandoz Clinical Assessment Geriatric scale 5-point variation (primary outcome measure) did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. However, patients on nimodipine performed better than placebo patients in lexical production (P<0.01) and less frequently showed deterioration (3 or more point-drop versus baseline) on a Mini-Mental State Examination (28.1% versus 50.5%; chi2 P<0.01) and Global Deterioration Scale (P<0.05). Dropouts and adverse events were all significantly more common among placebo than nimodipine patients, particularly cardiovascular (30 versus 13; RR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.11 to 4.60) and cerebrovascular events (28 versus 10; RR, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.23 to 4.98), and behavioral disturbances requiring intervention (22 versus 5; RR, 3.88; 95% CI, 1.49 to 10.12). A worst-rank analysis, performed to correct for the effect of the high dropout rate in the placebo group, showed additional significant differences in favor of nimodipine in Set Test and MMSE total scores.
                Nimodipine may be of some benefit in subcortical VaD. Confirming previous results, the safety analysis of this study shows that in this high-risk population, nimodipine might protect against cardiovascular comorbidities. Few effective treatments are available for AIDS dementia complex (ADC) and HIV-associated neuropathy. However, recent in vitro studies indicate that nimodipine, a voltage-dependent calcium channel antagonist, can prevent HIV-related neuronal injury and may provide a novel form of treatment for these disorders.
                To determine the safety and possible efficacy of this agent, 41 patients with mild to severe ADC, including 19 patients with neuropathy, were entered into the AIDS Clinical Trial Group multicenter, phase-I and phase-II study. Nimodipine at 60 mg p.o., five times daily; 30 mg p.o., three times daily; or placebo was administered for 16 weeks as adjuvant treatment to antiretroviral therapy.
                Neuropsychological performance at baseline, measured by the composite neuropsychological Z score (NPZ-8), correlated significantly with the ADC stage and with CSF levels of neopterin, a marker of immune activation. No significant differences in toxicity were observed among the three arms. Intent-to-treat analysis showed no significant change in the NPZ-8, although improvement was suggested in the high-dose arm. In addition, a trend toward stabilization in peripheral neuropathy was observed in both nimodipine arms compared with placebo.
                Nimodipine and other similar nonantiretroviral agents may provide a safe and promising avenue of treatment for neurologic disorders associated with HIV infection. The results of this study indicate that further clinical trials are warranted. Epidemiological studies indicate widespread memory impairment in patients with stroke in the early post-ictal stage. Nimodipine may have psychopharmacological properties and may improve memory. We conducted a single-blind randomized controlled trial to determine whether nimodipine given 7-14 days after cerebral infarction improved memory.
                One hundred patients with acute cerebral infarction were consecutively enrolled between D7 to D14. After stratification, patients were randomized to receive oral nimodipine 90 mg daily for 12 weeks, or no drug. Independent assessors administered Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Fuld Object-Memory Evaluation (FOME) at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks.
                Patients receiving nimodipine showed greater improvement in FOME mean scores at 12 weeks (P=0.0334), and also in FOME score change across time (P=0.0283). Patients with severe disability who received nimodipine also showed greater MMSE score change across time (P=0.0495).
                Nimodipine given 7-14 days after cerebral infarction for 3 months results in memory improvement. In a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study of 27 patients with acute ischemic stroke, the effect on regional CMRglc (rCMRglc) of the calcium channel blocking agent nimodipine administered in addition to routine treatment was investigated. Following computed tomography-supported diagnosis of focal ischemia in the middle cerebral artery territory, positron emission tomography (PET) of 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) was performed, and the patients were entered into the study within 48 h after onset of symptoms, randomly receiving either nimodipine (2 mg/h constant i.v. infusion for 5 days, 120 mg/day orally for another 16 days) or carrier/placebo. FDG PET was repeated after completion of therapy. The clinical course was followed during the treatment period and for 6 months after the stroke, using the Mathew Score for early and the Barthel Index for late assessment. During that observation period, five patients died in the nimodipine group and four in the control group. Subsequently, the code was broken, and the clinical and PET data were analyzed in relation to treatment assignment, with the nimodipine group comprising 11 and the control group 12 eligible cases. The two groups were similar with respect to age and sex distribution, initial clinical deficit, and infarct size and location. While the infarct rCMRglc showed comparable slight increases over time in both groups, the metabolic changes in the other evaluated regions (contralateral infarct mirror region, ipsi- and contralateral cerebral gray matter, contra- and ipsilateral cerebellar hemispheres) differed significantly between treatment groups (side x region x treatment interaction p less than 0.025).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) Meta-analysis of previous trials of oral nimodipine in acute stroke has suggested a benefit when commenced within 12 hours of onset. We sought to study the effect of oral nimodipine on reperfusion after acute stroke and the relation between reperfusion and outcome.
                Fifty patients with acute middle cerebral artery territory cortical infarction were blindly randomized within 12 hours of onset to either oral nimodipine (30 mg every 6 hours) or placebo. Treatment was continued for 2 weeks. Cerebral blood flow was assessed with the use of 99mTc-hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime single-photon emission CT before therapy, 24 hours later, and at 3 months. Hypoperfusion was measured by a validated volumetric technique. Neurological impairment and functional outcome were assessed with the Canadian Neurological Scale and Barthel Index, respectively. Tissue loss was measured with CT at 3 months. Four patients were excluded from analysis for technical reasons.
                Twenty-three patients received nimodipine, and 23 received placebo. In the nimodipine group, there was early reperfusion that was not maintained at outcome (P=0.01). In the placebo group, mean infarct hypoperfusion volumes showed no overall change. Nonnutritional reperfusion in nimodipine-treated patients was associated with adverse neurological (P=0.05) and functional outcome (P=0.06). There was, however, no difference in clinical outcome between the 2 groups.
                Oral nimodipine administered within 12 hours enhanced acute reperfusion, but this was largely nonnutritional. Larger studies using a shorter treatment delay are required to evaluate the clinical efficacy of nimodipine in acute ischemic stroke. We evaluated the effect of nimodipine (30 mg q.i.d. orally for 14 days) on acute ischemic stroke of mild or moderate severity in a unicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled pilot study. Treatment had to be started after CT, within 48 h of infarct in patients with a Mathew scale sum score between 50 and 75. The duration of follow-up was 4 months. Eight of the 60 randomized patients were excluded because of incorrect diagnosis. For the remaining 52 patients, 24 were allocated to nimodipine and 28 to placebo. Analysis of variance and covariance and repeated measurements of the Mathew scale scores showed no difference between the two groups, who had continuous and parallel improvement. There was no recurrent stroke, but 1 control died 4 weeks after stroke. Treatment with nimodipine was well tolerated (hypotension: 1 treated patient, 3 controls; bradycardia: 1 treated patient, 2 controls; sGPT increase: 1 treated patient, 1 control). The lack of efficacy of nimodipine in this study may be due to: (1) the neurologic deficit not being severe enough, or (2) the delay before treatment was too long. Nimodipine (BAY e 9736), a new dihydropyridine derivative, has been shown to reduce neurological deficits and mortality induced by acute cerebral ischemia in experimental studies. We investigated the effects of this calcium antagonist in patients with acute ischemic stroke through a randomized, double-blind, parallel-designed trial in which nimodipine was compared with placebo. Forty-one of 54 screened cases were found to fulfil the inclusion criteria (sudden occurrence of a focal neurological deficit secondary to an acute ischemic event in the carotid area diagnosed after a complete neurological work-up) and entered the study. Nineteen of them were treated with nimodipine (40 mg t.i.d. administered for 28 days) and the remaining 22 with placebo, given in identical tablets. In all patients the treatment started within 12 h after the onset of the symptoms. Course and intensity of the neurological deficit were evaluated by the Mathew Scale (slightly modified). Forty patients concluded the trial. Nimodipine was withdrawn in one case following the occurrence of a skin rash whose causative relation with the test drug could not be clarified. Altogether, however, nimodipine was well tolerated and no severe cardiovascular adverse reactions were observed. In terms of efficacy, the scores obtained by the Mathew Scale showed a higher rate of improvement on nimodipine than on placebo, thus indicating that patients receiving the latter drug did not fare as well as those receiving the test medication. Our data suggest that nimodipine may be beneficial in the treatment of acute stroke. Nimodipine is a 1,4-dihydropyridine derivative that shows a preferential cerebrovascular activity in experimental animals. Clinical data suggest that nimodipine has a beneficial effect on the neurologic outcome of patients suffering an acute ischemic stroke. Our double-blind placebo-controlled multicenter trial was designed to assess the effects of oral nimodipine on the mortality rate and neurologic outcome of patients with an acute ischemic stroke. One hundred sixty-four patients were randomly allocated to receive either nimodipine tablets (30 mg q.i.d.) or identical placebo tablets for 28 days. Treatment was always started less than or equal to 48 hours after the acute event. The Mathew Scale, slightly modified by Gelmers et al, was used for neurologic assessment. Mortality rate and neurologic outcome after 28 days were used as evaluation criteria. We considered 123 patients to be valid for the analysis of efficacy. Mortality rates did not differ significantly between groups. Neurologic outcome after 28 days of therapy did not differ between groups. However, when only those patients most likely to benefit from any intervention (Mathew Scale sum score of less than or equal to 65 at baseline) were analyzed separately in post hoc-defined subgroups, the nimodipine-treated subgroups showed a significantly better neurologic outcome. This result suggests that some patients with acute ischemic stroke will benefit from treatment with nimodipine tablets.
Nimodipine can be of some benefit in the treatment of patients with features of dementia due to unclassified disease or to Alzheimer's disease, cerebrovascular disease, or mixed Alzheimer's and cerebrovascular disease. It appears to be well tolerated with few side effects. Data were not available from several trials, a total of more than 500 patients. A meta-analysis of individual patient data from all trials is desirable. Dementia is a chronic disorder and the short-term benefits of nimodipine demonstrated in the trials reviewed do not justify its use as a long-term anti-dementia drug. New research must focus on longer term outcomes.