A double-blind, randomized study of naproxen sodium, ibuprofen, and placebo in postoperative dental pain. A single-dose, double-blind comparison of naproxen sodium, acetaminophen, and placebo in postoperative dental pain. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of nonprescription doses of naproxen and naproxen sodium with ibuprofen, acetaminophen, and placebo in the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea: a pooled analysis of five studies. Efficacy and tolerability of the specific cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor DFP compared with naproxen sodium in patients with postoperative dental pain. A randomised clinical trial of the effect of informed consent on the analgesic activity of placebo and naproxen in cancer pain. A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study comparing the analgesic effect of etoricoxib to placebo, naproxen sodium, and acetaminophen with codeine using the dental impaction pain model. Tramadol allows reduction of naproxen dose among patients with naproxen-responsive osteoarthritis pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Assay of aspirin and naproxen analgesia. Analgesic efficacy and safety of nonprescription doses of naproxen sodium compared with acetaminophen in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee.
In a double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled study, 203 patients with post-operative dental pain following the extraction of one or two bony impacted third molars were randomized to receive a single dose of naproxen sodium 220 mg, ibuprofen 200 mg or placebo. Pain intensity and pain relief were assessed at intervals for 12 hours postdose. Both active drugs demonstrated superior analgesic efficacy over placebo. Naproxen sodium and ibuprofen were comparable both in onset of analgesic action and in pain relief. From 1 to 12 hours postdose, naproxen sodium showed a trend for superior analgesic efficacy compared with ibuprofen; this trend reached statistical significance at the 12-hour time point. Both drugs were well-tolerated and effective analgesics for postoperative dental pain. The analgesic efficacy and duration of action of naproxen sodium 440 mg (n = 92), acetaminophen 1000 mg (n = 89), and placebo (n = 45) were compared in a single-dose, randomized, double-blind, 12-hour study of patients with at least moderate pain secondary to extraction of three or four third molars. Time to remedication, a measure of duration of analgesic effect, was significantly longer (P < 0.001) with naproxen sodium (median, 9.9 hours) than with either acetaminophen (median, 3.1 hours) or placebo (median, 2.0 hours). Naproxen sodium was also superior to acetaminophen for peak pain intensity difference (visual analog scale), summed pain intensity differences, total pain relief, peak pain relief, time to reduction of pain by 50%, and overall rating. The overall percentages of patients reporting adverse events, and the types of events reported, were comparable with the three treatments. Thus naproxen sodium demonstrated superior efficacy and similar tolerability to acetaminophen in this postoperative dental pain model. Dysmenorrhea is the most common menstrual complaint in young women, with a prevalence as high as 90%. It is responsible for substantial repeated short-term absenteeism from school and work in young women. Effective treatments are available, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). In many countries, a variety of NSAIDs have become available as over-the-counter (OTC) drugs.
                The goal of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of OTC doses of naproxen (400 mg) and naproxen/naproxen sodium (200/220 mg) with acetaminophen (1000 mg), ibuprofen (200 mg), and placebo in the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea.
                A pooled analysis of 5 trials was performed. Efficacy was assessed by pain relief, relief of other dysmenorrheic symptoms, time to backup medication or remedication, and treatment preference. Tolerability was assessed by recording adverse events (AEs).
                A total of 443 women were enrolled in the combined studies. Naproxen 400 mg provided greater pain relief than acetaminophen and placebo within 30 minutes of administration (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively). Furthermore, naproxen 400 mg and 200 mg provided greater pain relief than both acetaminophen (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively) and ibuprofen (P < 0.001 and P < 0.01, respectively) at 6 hours after administration. Both doses of naproxen had higher scores than placebo for symptom relief and drug preference (all P < 0.001). The AEs and their frequency were similar among the treatment groups. No serious AEs were reported.
                When administered at OTC doses, naproxen was effective in the relief of pain and other symptoms of primary dysmenorrhea and had a good safety profile in the population studied. DFP [3-(2-propyloxy)-(4-methyl-sulfonylphenyl)-(5,5-dimethyl)-fu ranone] is a highly specific cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor (>2500-fold selective in transfected Chinese hamster ovary cell assays) that has demonstrated efficacy in preclinical models of pain and inflammation. The present single-dose, randomized, double-masked, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study was undertaken to compare DFP 5, 25, and 50 mg with naproxen sodium 550 mg and with placebo in 196 patients (mean age, 25.8 years; 187 [95.4%] males) who experienced moderate-to-severe pain after surgical removal of > or =2 third molars. Overall analgesic effect, duration of effect, time to onset of analgesic effect, peak analgesic effect, and tolerability were assessed over a 24-hour postdose period. Both DFP 25 and 50 mg, as well as the active comparator, naproxen sodium 550 mg, were significantly more effective than placebo. The onset of analgesic effect in the DFP 25-mg, DFP 50-mg, and naproxen sodium 550-mg groups did not differ significantly. DFP was generally well tolerated in single doses up to 50 mg. DFP 50 mg was efficacious in the treatment of postoperative dental pain and was indistinguishable from the active comparator, naproxen sodium 550 mg. To determine whether informed consent in a therapeutic trial modifies the analgesic effect of naproxen and placebo, we conducted a prospective, randomised, single dose, placebo-controlled trial. Patients were randomly selected to receive or not information concerning the study. All patients included were then given a single dose of naproxen and placebo according to a crossover, double-blind design. Forty-nine patients with mild or moderate cancer pain which did not need narcotic analgesics entered the study. Twenty-five received both treatments without any information and constituted the uninformed group. Twenty-four had a complete information about the trial; six refused to participate. The 18 others constituted the informed-consent group. Visual analogue scales of pain before and 30, 60, 120 and 180 min after the intake of naproxen and placebo were recorded. As an analgesic, naproxen was more effective than placebo in both groups of patients (p = 0.001). For naproxen as well as for placebo, the analgesic effect was better in the informed-consent group compared to the uninformed group (p = 0.012). The difference in therapeutic activity between naproxen and placebo was moderately higher in the uninformed patients (p = 0.08). We concluded that, in contrast with parallel studies, giving information in a crossover, placebo-controlled trial may increase the apparent efficacy of both the tested agent and the placebo, and decrease the perceived difference the two. To compare the overall analgesic effect, including time to onset, peak and duration of effect for etoricoxib 120 mg, a new COX-2 selective inhibitor, in patients with acute pain to that of placebo. Naproxen sodium 550 mg and acetaminophen/codeine 600/60 mg were the active comparators.
                A total of 201 patients with moderate to severe pain following surgical extraction of > or = 2 third molars, of which at least the mandibular tooth was impacted, were randomly allocated to receive single oral doses of placebo (n = 50), etoricoxib 120 mg (n = 50), naproxen sodium 550 mg (n = 51), or acetaminophen/codeine 600/60 mg (n = 50). The endpoints included total pain relief over 8 hours (TOPAR8, primary end point), sum of pain intensity difference over 8 hours, patient's global evaluation, onset, peak, and duration of analgesia.
                Etoricoxib 120 mg had a significantly greater least squares (LS) mean TOPAR8 score than placebo (20.9 vs 5.4; P < 0.001) and acetaminophen/codeine 600/60 mg (20.9 vs 11.5; P < 0.001), and a similar LS mean TOPAR8 score to naproxen sodium 550 mg (20.9 vs 21.3). All three active treatments had rapid onset of analgesia, median time approximately 30 minutes. The duration of analgesic effect, defined as median time to rescue medication use, was >24 hours for etoricoxib, 20.8 hours for naproxen sodium, 3.6 hours for acetaminophen/codeine, and 1.6 hours for placebo.
                Etoricoxib is a new COX-2 selective inhibitor under development for treatment of osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and acute pain. In this study, etoricoxib 120 mg provided rapid and long-lasting pain relief to patients with moderate-to-severe postdental surgery pain. Etoricoxib was generally well tolerated. To demonstrate that in patients receiving naproxen for the pain of osteoarthritis (OA), the addition of tramadol will allow a reduction in the naproxen dosage without compromising pain relief.
                This trial consisted of a 5-week open-label run-in and an 8-week double-blind phase. Patients with at least moderate pain (> or =40 mm on a 100-mm visual analog scale) of OA of the knee after a 1-week medication washout were treated with naproxen 500 mg/day for 1 week. Patients whose pain scores were reduced to <20 mm were discontinued. The remaining patients received naproxen 1,000 mg/day for 3 weeks. Tramadol 200 mg/day was added during the third week. Patients were then randomized in a double-blind manner to continue tramadol 200 mg/day or to begin placebo in addition to naproxen. Randomization was stratified based on response to naproxen 1,000 mg/day. During the double-blind phase, the naproxen dose was reduced by 250 mg every 2 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the minimum effective naproxen dose (MEND). The MEND was defined as 250 mg above the naproxen daily dosage at which pain relief was no longer adequate. Patients discontinuing the double-blind phase of the study for reasons other than lack of efficacy were assigned a MEND equal to the last naproxen dose received. If the effect of treatment between the responder and nonresponder groups was statistically different, the difference in the MEND was assessed separately within the groups.
                Of 236 patients randomized (mean age 61 years; 147 females), 90 were stratified as naproxen responders and 146 as naproxen nonresponders. There was a significant difference (P = 0.040) in the treatment effect between the naproxen responders and nonresponders, thus demonstrating a difference in the way responders and nonresponders react to a decrease in naproxen dosage after the addition of tramadol. Among naproxen responders, the MEND was significantly lower in patients receiving tramadol (n = 36) than in patients receiving placebo (n = 54), 221 mg versus 407 mg, respectively (P = 0.021). For the naproxen nonresponders, the mean MEND was 419 mg in the tramadol group and 396 mg in the placebo group (P = 0.706).
                In patients with painful OA of the knee responding to naproxen 1,000 mg/day, the addition of tramadol 200 mg/day allows a significant reduction in the dosage of naproxen without compromising pain relief. To establish the relative potency of naproxen and aspirin for oral analgesia, a 4-point, noncrossover bioassay with placebo control was undertaken with 197 patients. Subjective-response methods were used to determine two measures of postoperative analgesia over a period of 6 hr. With reasonable confidence for an oral analgesic assay, we found 220 mg of naproxen to be equivalent to 600 mg of aspirin for pain relief and 330 mg of naproxen to be equivalent to 600 mg of aspirin for decreased pain intensity. Nonprescription doses of naproxen sodium, acetaminophen, and placebo were compared to determine their efficacy and safety in osteoarthritis of the knee. In two identical multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multidose, parallel-design studies, patients with osteoarthritis aged (mean +/- SD) 60.6 +/- 12.8 years were randomized to daily doses of 660 mg naproxen sodium (440 mg naproxen sodium in patients >or=65 years), 4000 mg acetaminophen, or placebo for 7 days. Naproxen sodium (440/660 mg) provided significantly greater improvements in pain at rest, on passive motion, on weight-bearing, stiffness after rest (morning), day and night pain compared with placebo, and significantly greater relief from resting pain than acetaminophen (P < 0.05). Acetaminophen provided significantly greater improvements in day pain compared with placebo. Daily evaluations showed naproxen sodium (440/660 mg) provided superior pain relief to acetaminophen and was significantly better than acetaminophen at reducing difficulties experienced in walking several blocks and difficulties in bending, lifting, and stooping. Naproxen sodium (440/660 mg) and acetaminophen (4000 mg) were significantly more effective than placebo in improving mobility level, household tasks, and walking and bending. Patient and investigator evaluation scores were significantly higher in naproxen sodium and acetaminophen groups compared with placebo; no differences were observed between active treatments. Naproxen sodium and acetaminophen had similar safety profiles to placebo. Nonprescription doses of naproxen sodium (440/660 mg) effectively relieve pain and other symptoms of osteoarthritis. Naproxen sodium is an alternative in the initial treatment of osteoarthritis and may be preferred to acetaminophen as first-line therapy in patients with moderate or severe pain.
Doses equivalent to 500 mg and 400 mg naproxen administered orally provided effective analgesia to adults with moderate to severe acute postoperative pain. About half of participants treated with these doses experienced clinically useful levels of pain relief, compared to 15% with placebo, and half required additional medication within nine hours, compared to two hours with placebo. Associated adverse events did not differ from placebo.