Comparison of two percutaneous intravenous "midline" catheters in cystic fibrosis. Home intravenous therapy in cystic fibrosis: a prospective randomized trial examining clinical, quality of life and cost aspects. Silastic catheters for antibiotics in cystic fibrosis. Comparison of high-frequency chest wall oscillation and oscillating positive expiratory pressure in the home management of cystic fibrosis: a pilot study. Heparin lock intravenous line. Use in newborn infants. A controlled trial. Heparin vs saline for intermittent intravenous device maintenance in neonates. Intravenous access in newborn infants: impact of extended umbilical venous catheter use on requirement for peripheral venous lines. Implementation of an evidence-based guideline to reduce duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy and length of stay for patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized controlled trial. Comparison of effects of an intrapulmonary percussive ventilator to standard aerosol and chest physiotherapy in treatment of cystic fibrosis.
Administration of intravenous antibiotics in cystic fibrosis has been facilitated by the use of midline catheters; percutaneous lines inserted through a peripheral vein and advanced into a large but noncentral vein. In a randomized study, a 23-gauge silastic catheter (Vygon EC, Cirencester, United Kingdom) was compared with the Hydrocath (Viggo-Spectromed, Swindon, United Kingdom), a 22-gauge hydrophillic coated polyurethane catheter inserted using the Seldinger technique. Fifty eight courses of intravenous antibiotics were given, 28 through the Hydrocath (median age 11 years, range 1.5-17.5 years) and 30 through the silastic catheter, (median age 11 years, range 0.5-17.5). Mean line survival was equal. The Hydrocath took longer to insert and was associated with more pain on insertion. However, administration of antibiotics was easier through the Hydrocath and overall satisfaction was higher in those who had the Hydrocath. Both catheters performed well, but administration of antibiotics was easier through the Hydrocath. In this study, we set out to determine if home intravenous (i.v.) antibiotic therapy in adult patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) is a feasible, effective and less costly alternative to hospitalization, and to assess the impact of home therapy on quality of life. The study was a prospective, randomized, two-factor mixed design involving adults presenting with respiratory exacerbations of CF. Patients were randomized such that they were discharged home after 2-4 days, or remained in hospital. Seventeen patients had 31 admissions (13 home and 18 hospital). Following 10 days of therapy, there were no significant differences between home or hospital arms with respect to body weight, 12 minute walking distance, sputum weight, pulse oximetry, or improvement in lung function (forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), or forced vital capacity (FVC)). Patients who remained in hospital were less fatigued and noted a greater degree of mastery. Patients discharged early noted less disruption to their family life, personal life and sleeping pattern. The total cost for the home therapy arm was approximately half that of the hospital therapy arm. Home intravenous antibiotic therapy in patients with cystic fibrosis was a feasible, cost-effective alternative to receiving therapy in hospital. Although there was no clinical compromise associated with home therapy, there were advantages and disadvantages in terms of quality of life. A randomised comparison of percutaneous Silastic catheters and conventional intravenous cannulae for giving intravenous antibiotics in patients with cystic fibrosis showed that Silastic catheters were favoured by the patient, lasted longer, and had fewer complications. Enhanced airway clearance is thought to result in better-maintained pulmonary function in cystic fibrosis (CF). Postural drainage, percussion, and vibration (PDPV) have been the primary airway clearance technique (ACT) employed in CF for over 40 years. Two new airway clearance modalities are high-frequency chest wall oscillation (HFCWO) and oscillating positive expiratory pressure (OPEP). This pilot study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of these techniques during home use, assess patient satisfaction with them as compared to PDPV, and assess the feasibility of performing a definitive comparative trial. The prospective, randomized, multicenter crossover trial was conducted at three urban academic CF Care Centers. Twenty-nine CF patients, 9-39 years of age, participated. Subjects performed 4 weeks each of HFCWO and OPEP following 2-week lead-in/washout periods. Spirometry, lung volumes, National Institutes of Health and Petty Scores, and a satisfaction survey were performed at baseline and after each treatment period. An ACT preference survey was completed at the conclusion of the study. Twenty-four subjects completed both therapies. There were no statistically significant differences between therapies for spirometry, lung volumes, or clinical scores. No significant safety issues arose during the study period. Compliance between therapies was similar. Significant differences among therapies existed in patient satisfaction. Given a choice of therapy, 50% of subjects chose HFCWO, 37% OPEP, and 13% PDPV. This study suggests that HFCWO and OPEP are safe and as effective as patients' routine therapies when used for airway clearance in a home setting. Patient satisfaction and preference differ among ACTs and should be considered when prescribing home therapy. A definitive, multi-center, comparative study evaluating long-term efficacy of these techniques is feasible.
                Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc. The heparin lock technique has been available for parenteral access in older children and adults but has not yet been described for use in newborns. We randomized 39 newborns who needed parenteral medication in the intermediate care nursery to receive a heparin lock catheter (17) or an intravenous line kept patent by continuous low infusion rate (22). There were no differences between study groups with regard to birthweight, gestational age, or distribution of diagnoses. Infants in the heparin lock group were enrolled in the study on average 1 day longer than the continuous intravenous group (p less than 0.05). Subcutaneous infiltration occurred twice as frequently with the continuous intravenous line (p = 0.0015), and the life span was significantly less than heparin lock (1.0 +/- 0.5 days versus 2.1 +/- 1.0 days, p = 0.0003). Infants with continuous intravenous lines received approximately 20 ml/kg/day greater quantity of fluid (p less than 0.0001). There was no difference between groups with regard to mean heparin activity level. None of the infants developed hemorrhagic complications, thrombophlebitis, or documented nosocomial infection. Nurses significantly favored heparin locks over continuous intravenous lines for ease of use. The heparin lock technique is a safe and reasonable alternative to a continuous low infusion intravenous line for administering parenteral medications to intermediate care newborns. The purpose of this study was to determine whether normal saline (NS) is as effective as 10 units heparin/ml saline (HS) in maintaining patency of intermittent intravenous devices (i.v. locks) in neonates. We conducted a prospective, double-blind, randomized study of 118 24-gauge catheters used exclusively as i.v. locks and removed consequent to catheter failure. Subjects were infants, including premature infants, less than one month of age, admitted to a Level II NICU. Catheters were observed for length of patency as well as incidence of phlebitis, occlusion, infiltration, and leaking. There was no statistically significant difference in average duration of patency between NS-flushed catheters and HS-flushed catheters. Phlebitis, occlusion, infiltration, and leaking occurred with equal frequency for both solutions. Central venous lines are used to care for critically ill neonates in cases of limited peripheral venous access. This prospective, randomized study evaluated the risks and benefits of the use of single- and double-lumen umbilical venous catheters for up to 14 days. Patients were randomized to one of three treatment arms: (1) single-lumen umbilical catheter, (2) double-lumen umbilical catheter, or (3) no umbilical catheter; peripheral intravenous lines only. Infants in the groups treated with an umbilical venous catheter had significantly fewer venipunctures and peripheral intravenous lines placed during their first 2 weeks of life than those in the peripheral line only group. Less time and money were spent obtaining peripheral line placement in the umbilical venous catheter groups. The incidence rates of sepsis and complications were not higher in treated patients than in control patients. The double-lumen catheter further reduced peripheral venipunctures and lines. We conclude that an umbilical venous catheter used during the first 2 weeks of life is a relatively safe, less stressful, cost-effective means of providing intravenous therapy to neonates. Patients with pneumonia often remain hospitalized after they are stable clinically, and the duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy is a rate-limiting step for discharge. The purpose of this study was to determine whether implementation of an evidence-based guideline would reduce the duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy and length of stay for patients hospitalized with pneumonia.
                In a seven-site, cluster randomized clinical trial, we enrolled 325 control and 283 intervention patients who were admitted by one of 116 physician groups. Within site, physician groups were assigned randomly to receive a practice guideline alone (control arm) or a practice guideline that was implemented using a multifaceted strategy (intervention arm). The effectiveness of guideline implementation was measured by the duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy and length of stay; differences in the rates of discontinuation and hospital discharge were assessed with proportional hazards models. Medical outcomes were assessed at 30 days.
                Intravenous antibiotic therapy was discontinued somewhat more quickly in the intervention group (hazard ratio [HR] =1.23; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00 to 1.52; P = 0.06) than in the control group. Intervention patients were discharged more quickly, but the difference was not statistically significant (HR = 1.16; 95% CI: 0.97 to 1.38; P = 0.11). Fewer intervention (55% [157/283]) than control (63% [206/325]) patients had medical complications during the index hospitalization (P = 0.04), with no differences in other medical outcomes, including mortality, rehospitalization, and return to usual activities, between treatment arms.
                The multifaceted guideline implementation strategy resulted in a slight reduction in the duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy and a nonsignificant reduction in length of stay, without affecting patient outcomes. Impaired mucociliary clearance due to defective ion and water transport and the effects of chronic airway infections lead to stasis of secretions and progressive pulmonary damage in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). Methods to improve removal of tenacious lung secretions in CF patients contribute to slowing the decline in respiratory function. We have evaluated an intrapulmonary percussive ventilator (IPV), which is a device designed to enhance airway clearance and preserve lung function. A previous pilot study by us had determined that the device was acceptable to patients and is safe. We undertook a 6 month parallel comparative trial of the IPV versus standard, manual chest physiotherapy in 16 CF children and adults. No significant differences in spirometric measures, numbers of hospitalizations, use of oral or IV antibiotics, or anthropometric measurements were detected between the standard aerosol/chest physiotherapy group and the IPV group over the duration of the trial. Patient acceptance, as determined by participant survey, was good. The device appeared to be safe and durable. It was concluded that the IPV is as effective as standard aerosol and chest physiotherapy in preserving lung function and anthropometric measures, and there was no difference in the use of antibiotics and hospitalizations.
There is some evidence to support the use of long intravenous lines rather than short intravenous lines, in terms of lifespan of the line and patient satisfaction. There is no evidence to suggest that any one type of long intravenous line is superior, and currently choice of line should be determined by operator and patient preference. There are numerous devices available which are used in cystic fibrosis. Further research is required to identify clinically important differences between these devices.