[Orbit decompression surgery in patients with exophthalmos caused by Graves-Basedow disease]. Surgical or medical decompression as a first-line treatment of optic neuropathy in Graves' ophthalmopathy? A randomized controlled trial. Combined orbital irradiation and systemic steroids compared with systemic steroids alone in the management of moderate-to-severe Graves' ophthalmopathy: a preliminary study. Surgical decompression for space-occupying cerebral infarction (the Hemicraniectomy After Middle Cerebral Artery infarction with Life-threatening Edema Trial [HAMLET]): a multicentre, open, randomised trial. Prospective randomized controlled study comparing simple decompression versus anterior subcutaneous transposition for idiopathic neuropathy of the ulnar nerve at the elbow: Part 1. Orbital cobalt irradiation combined with systemic corticosteroids for Graves' ophthalmopathy: comparison with systemic corticosteroids alone. Elective colon and rectal surgery without nasogastric decompression. A prospective, randomized trial. 5-Fluorouracil in initial trabeculectomy. A prospective, randomized, multicenter study. A prospective, comparative study between endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation and the Ahmed drainage implant in refractory glaucoma.
To evaluate in a prospective trial two surgical technique routinely used for orbital decompression in Graves' disease ophthalmopathy.
                Patients with Graves' disease exophthalmus (greater than 22 mm) that was euthyroid for at least six months after treatment were admitted to the study and randomly assigned to two groups, twenty six orbits in 17 patients were surgically decompressed with the Walsh and Ogura technique (group I) and 18 orbits in 18 patients were decompressed with Kennedy's surgical approach (group II).
                Both surgical techniques were equally effective in reducing the exophthalmus (p < 0.05). Morbility was significantly greater in terms of diplopia and infraorbital nerve lesion with Walsh and Ogura surgical approach.
                Due to reduced morbility, orbital surgical decompression with Kennedy's technique is recommended in patients with Graves' disease exofthalmus. Only a small percentage of Graves' ophthalmopathy (GO) patients develop optic neuropathy with impending loss of visual acuity. Therapy with methylprednisolone pulses is the treatment of first choice in severe and active GO patients. When the effect is insufficient, patients are usually treated with surgical decompression. We investigated whether surgery could become the first-line treatment, thus preventing treatment with steroids.
                We performed a randomized trial in 15 patients with very active GO and optic neuropathy. Six patients were treated with surgical decompression, and nine with methylprednisolone i.v. pulses for 2 weeks, followed by oral prednisone for 4 months. The primary outcome was determined by changes in visual acuity. If the eye disease deteriorated despite treatment or did not improve sufficiently, patients were switched to the other treatment arm.
                The severity and activity of GO in both groups were similar at baseline. The Clinical Activity Score (CAS) was 6.3+/- 0.8 in the surgical group vs. 6.0+/- 0.5 in the steroids group and the Total Eye Score was 24+/- 6 vs. 25+/- 6. In the surgery group, 5/6 patients (82%) did not respond because of insufficient improvement in vision (n=3) or persistent chemosis (n=2), and all needed further immunosuppression. In the steroids group, 4/9 patients (45%) did not improve in visual acuity (P=0.132 vs. surgery group), and these needed decompressive surgery. All patients in whom therapy failed were switched to the other treatment arm and visual acuity improved in almost all patients. Visual acuity improved from 0.36 (0.02--0.40) to 0.90 (0.63--1.0) in the surgery group and from 0.50 (0.32--0.63) to 0.75 (0.32--1.0) in the steroids group at 52 weeks. At long-term follow-up in the surgery group 3/6 patients required squint surgery and 5/9 patients in the steroids group. Eyelid surgery was performed in 5/6 patients in the surgery group and in 4/9 patients in the steroids group.
                Immediate surgery does not result in a better outcome and therefore methylprednisolone pulse therapy appears to be the first-choice therapy. To assess the efficacy and safety of combined orbital irradiation and systemic steroids in the management of moderate-to-severe Graves' ophthalmopathy.
                Single-blind randomised prospective study.
                Regional hospital, Hong Kong.
                Sixteen patients with active moderate-to-severe Graves' ophthalmopathy who were randomly assigned to steroid therapy (ST group) or combination therapy of orbital irradiation and systemic steroids (SRT group) between June 2000 and June 2003.
                NOSPECS scoring system, total eye score, subjective eye score, and extra-ocular muscle thickness as determined by either computed tomographic or magnetic resonance imaging scans.
                The study was completed by 15 of 16 patients. Both groups experienced improvement in total eye score, soft tissue swelling, ocular motility, visual acuity, and subjective eye score at 52-week follow-up. Total eye score improved earlier in the SRT group, achieving statistical significance (P<0.05) at as early as 4 weeks of follow-up. Improvement in ocular parameters was greater and led to a significantly greater reduction in total eye score than in the ST group at weeks 16, 24, and 52. Maximum extra-ocular muscle thickness was significantly reduced in the SRT group only. No change was observed in proptosis in either group. No serious adverse effect was observed with the addition of orbital irradiation to steroid therapy.
                A combination of orbital irradiation and systemic steroids is well tolerated and more effective than steroids alone in the treatment of active moderate-to-severe Graves' ophthalmopathy. It achieves greater and more rapid improvement in soft tissue swelling, ocular motility, and visual acuity. Patients with space-occupying hemispheric infarctions have a poor prognosis, with case fatality rates of up to 80%. In a pooled analysis of randomised trials, surgical decompression within 48 h of stroke onset reduced case fatality and improved functional outcome; however, the effect of surgery after longer intervals is unknown. The aim of HAMLET was to assess the effect of decompressive surgery within 4 days of the onset of symptoms in patients with space-occupying hemispheric infarction.
                Patients with space-occupying hemispheric infarction were randomly assigned within 4 days of stroke onset to surgical decompression or best medical treatment. The primary outcome measure was the modified Rankin scale (mRS) score at 1 year, which was dichotomised between good (0-3) and poor (4-6) outcome. Other outcome measures were the dichotomy of mRS score between 4 and 5, case fatality, quality of life, and symptoms of depression. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered, ISRCTN94237756.
                Between November, 2002, and October, 2007, 64 patients were included; 32 were randomly assigned to surgical decompression and 32 to best medical treatment. Surgical decompression had no effect on the primary outcome measure (absolute risk reduction [ARR] 0%, 95% CI -21 to 21) but did reduce case fatality (ARR 38%, 15 to 60). In a meta-analysis of patients in DECIMAL (DEcompressive Craniectomy In MALignant middle cerebral artery infarction), DESTINY (DEcompressive Surgery for the Treatment of malignant INfarction of the middle cerebral arterY), and HAMLET who were randomised within 48 h of stroke onset, surgical decompression reduced poor outcome (ARR 16%, -0.1 to 33) and case fatality (ARR 50%, 34 to 66).
                Surgical decompression reduces case fatality and poor outcome in patients with space-occupying infarctions who are treated within 48 h of stroke onset. There is no evidence that this operation improves functional outcome when it is delayed for up to 96 h after stroke onset. The decision to perform the operation should depend on the emphasis patients and relatives attribute to survival and dependency. The main objective of this study was to compare the clinical outcome of participants treated by simple decompression (SD) of the ulnar nerve versus anterior subcutaneous transposition (AST).
                A prospective randomized controlled study was performed. Three hundred forty participants were referred to our institution between March 1999 and July 2002. One hundred fifty-two patients met the inclusion criteria and were randomized into two surgical groups: 75 were assigned to SD, and 77 were assigned to AST. Participants were followed for 1 year after surgery. The main outcome measure was clinical outcome 1 year after surgery.
                An excellent or good result was obtained in 49 of 75 participants who underwent SD and in 54 of 77 participants undergoing AST. The difference was not statistically significant. However, the complication rate was statistically lower in the SD group (9.6%) compared with the AST group (31.1%) (risk ratio, 0.32; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.69). Duration of symptoms, (sub)luxation of the ulnar nerve, and severity of the complaints did not influence outcome.
                Surgery for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow is effective. The outcomes of SD and AST are equivalent, except for the complication rate. Because the intervention is simpler and associated with fewer complications, SD is advised, even in the presence of (sub)luxation. The effects of different methods of treatment of Graves' ophthalmopathy were evaluated in a series of 48 patients. Thirty-six patients were given combined treatment with orbital cobalt irradiation and systemic 6 alpha-methylprednisolone (methylprednisolone). Included in this group were 12 of 24 consecutive patients who were randomly assigned to either combined therapy or systemic methylprednisolone alone. The degree of ocular involvement and responses to treatment were evaluated by numerical scoring (ophthalmopathy index) and clinical assessment. Of the 36 patients treated by combined therapy, 12 (33%) showed excellent responses, 14 (39%) showed good responses, 9 (25%) showed slight responses, and 1 (3%) had no response. Treatment was more effective for soft tissue involvement, newly developed ophthalmoplegia, and optic neuropathy, while proptosis and longstanding ophthalmoplegia were less responsive. There was an inverse relationship between the duration of ophthalmopathy and the efficacy of treatment, more favorable results being observed when symptoms had been present for less than 2 yr. Treatment with systemic methylprednisolone alone was also effective, but, in general, responses were less satisfactory; 4 of the 12 patients of this group (33%) had good responses, 6 (50%) had slight responses, and 2 (17%) had no response. The results obtained in the 24 patients randomly assigned to combined therapy or steroid treatment alone were compared by evaluating changes in the ophthalmopathy index. Mean initial ophthalmopathy indices (6.4 vs. 6.2, respectively) showed no significant differences between the 2 groups, whereas the mean decrease in the group receiving combined therapy (4.8) was significantly greater (P less than 0.05) than that in the other group (3.2). In conclusion, the present study indicates that both orbital cobalt irradiation combined with systemic methylprednisolone treatment and systemic methylprednisolone therapy alone are valuable methods of treatment for Graves' ophthalmopathy, but the combined therapy proved to be more effective. Nasogastric (NG) decompression after colorectal surgery is practiced commonly. Our aim was to determine whether routine NG decompression benefitted patients undergoing this type of surgery. Five hundred thirty-five patients were randomized prospectively to either NG decompression or no decompression. Stratification was by type of operation and patient age. Excluded were patients who had emergency surgery with peritonitis, extensive fibrous adhesions, enterotomies, previous pelvic irradiation, intra-abdominal infection, pancreatitis, chronic obstruction. prolonged operating times, or difficult endotracheal intubation. Two hundred seventy-four patients received NG decompression (Salem sump, Argyle Co., Division of Sherwood Medical, St. Louis, MO) and two hundred sixty-one did not. There were 33 protocol violations included in the 535 patients. Patients who were not decompressed experienced significantly more abdominal distention, nausea, and vomiting than did those patients who were. Moreover, 13% required subsequent NG decompression as opposed to a reinsertion rate of 5% for patients routinely decompressed. The mean length of hospitalization for both groups was 11 days. There were no significant differences in nasopharyngeal or gastric bleeding, inability to cough effectively, respiratory infections, wound disruptions, reoperation, and wound infection rates (5%) between the two groups. We conclude that even though there is an increase in the rate of minor symptoms of nausea, vomiting, and abdominal distention, routine nasgastric decompression is not warranted after elective colon and rectal surgery. Postoperative subconjunctival 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) injections increase the success of filtration surgery in eyes with prior filtration failure or cataract removal and in eyes with secondary glaucoma. The authors evaluate the safety and benefit of adjunctive 5-FU in eyes undergoing initial trabeculectomy.
                Patients with phakic, uncontrolled, open-angle glaucoma who were undergoing initial trabeculectomy were prospectively assigned to the 5-FU group on the first postoperative day. Patients in this group received five 5-mg injections during 2 weeks after surgery. Patients in the control group received no injections.
                Preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) and number of antiglaucoma medications were similar in the 5-FU (n = 32) and control (n = 30) groups. Transient superficial punctate keratopathy was the only postoperative complication that occurred more frequently (P < 0.05) in the 5-FU (14 eyes) than in the control eyes (3 eyes). Patients were followed for a minimum of 1 year or until a study endpoint was reached: IOP of 21 mmHg or greater with maximum medical therapy (2 5-FU eyes and 8 control eyes; P < 0.03) or cataract removal after filtration (5 treated and 3 control eyes). At last follow-up (mean, > 20 months), IOP and the number of antiglaucoma medications were significantly lower (P < 0.02) in the 5-FU eyes (IOP, 12.0 +/- 1.3 mmHg; medications, 0.2 +/- 0.1) than in the control eyes (IOP, 16.8 +/- 1.3 mmHg; medications, 0.8 +/- 0.2). Intraocular pressure was 20 mmHg or lower in 94% of 5-FU eyes and in 73% of control eyes (P < 0.03) and 16 mmHg or lower in 84% of 5-FU eyes and in 57% of control eyes (P < 0.02).
                Adjunctive 5-fluorouracil increases the rate of success, decreases the level of postoperative IOP, and reduces the need for postoperative antiglaucoma medication in eyes with open-angle glaucoma undergoing initial trabeculectomy. To compare endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation (ECP) and the Ahmed drainage implant in the treatment of refractory glaucoma.
                Sixty-eight eyes of 68 patients with refractory glaucoma were prospectively assigned to either ECP or Ahmed tube shunt implantation. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon. Eyes that were included were pseudophakic with a history of at least one trabeculectomy with antimetabolite, an intraocular pressure (IOP) equal to or above 35 mm Hg on maximum tolerated medical therapy, and a visual acuity better than light perception. Exclusion criteria included eyes that had had previous glaucoma drainage device implantation or a cyclodestructive procedure. Success was defined as an IOP more than 6 mm Hg and less than 21 mm Hg, with or without topical anti-hypertensive therapy.
                The mean follow-up was 19.82 +/- 8.35 months and 21.29 +/- 6.42 months, for the Ahmed and ECP groups, respectively (P = 0.4). The preoperative IOP, 41.32 +/- 3.03 mm Hg (Ahmed) and 41.61 +/- 3.42 mm Hg (ECP) (P = 0.5), and the mean postoperative IOP, at 24 months follow-up, 14.73 +/- 6.44 mm Hg (Ahmed) and 14.07 +/- 7.21 mm Hg (ECP) (P = 0.7), were significantly different from baseline in both groups (P < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis showed a probability of success at 24 months of 70.59% and 73.53% for the Ahmed and ECP groups, respectively (P = 0.7). Complications included choroidal detachment (Ahmed 17.64%, ECP 2.94%), shallow anterior chamber (Ahmed 17.64%, ECP 0.0%), and hyphema (Ahmed 14.7%, ECP 17.64%).
                There was no difference in the success rate between the Ahmed Glaucoma Valve and ECP in refractory glaucoma. The eyes that underwent Ahmed tube shunt implantation had more complications than those treated with ECP.
A single study showed that the transantral approach for orbital decompression was related to more complications than the endoscopic transnasal technique which is preferred by Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT) surgeons, usually as an adjunctive procedure. Intravenous steroids were reported in a single trial to be the most efficient intervention for dysthyroid optic neuropathy. The majority of published literature on orbital decompression for thyroid eye disease consists of retrospective, cohort, or case series studies. Although these provide useful descriptive information, clarification is required to show the relative effectiveness of each intervention for various indications.
The two RCTs reviewed are not robust enough to provide credible evidence to our understanding of current decompressive surgery and to support recommendations for clinical practice. There is evidence from currently available uncontrolled studies that removal of the medial and lateral wall (balanced decompression) with or without fat removal may be the most effective surgical method related to only a few complications.
There is a clear need for randomised studies evaluating the balanced two-wall, three-wall and orbital fat decompression techniques. Comparison with other surgical techniques for orbital decompression or with immunosuppression in cases of compressive optic neuropathy would also be important. These studies should primarily address the reduction of exophthalmos, disease severity, complication rates, quality of life and cost of the intervention.