Lubeluzole in acute ischemic stroke. A double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II trial. Lubeluzole International Study Group. Lubeluzole in acute ischemic stroke treatment: A double-blind study with an 8-hour inclusion window comparing a 10-mg daily dose of lubeluzole with placebo. Cardiovascular safety of lubeluzole (Prosynap(R)) in patients with ischemic stroke. Combination Therapy Stroke Trial: recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator with/without lubeluzole. The Clomethiazole Acute Stroke Study in tissue-type plasminogen activator-treated stroke (CLASS-T): final results. SYNTHESIS expansion: design of a nonprofit, pragmatic, randomized, controlled trial on the best fast-track endovascular treatment vs. standard intravenous alteplase for acute ischemic stroke. Clomethiazole Acute Stroke Study in ischemic stroke (CLASS-I): final results. Lisinopril for the treatment of hypertension within the first 24 hours of acute ischemic stroke and follow-up. Glycine antagonist (gavestinel) in neuroprotection (GAIN International) in patients with acute stroke: a randomised controlled trial. GAIN International Investigators.
We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of lubeluzole in patients with a clinical diagnosis of acute (< 6 hours) ischemic stroke in the carotid artery territory.
                A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial was conducted in 232 patients. Because treatment was administered within 6 hours and a CT scan was not mandatory before the start of treatment, 39 patients with either an intracerebral hemorrhage or ischemic stroke in the vertebrobasilar circulation were excluded from the primary efficacy analysis as prespecified in the protocol. Of the 193 patients with acute ischemic stroke in the carotid artery territory (target population), 61 received placebo, 66 lubeluzole 7.5 mg over 1 hour followed by 10 mg/d for 5 days, and 66 lubeluzole 15 mg over 1 hour followed by 20 mg/d for 5 days.
                The trial, initially aimed at a patient inclusion of 270, was terminated prematurely according to the advice of the Safety Committee because of an imbalance in mortality between the treatment groups. Mortality rates at the final follow-up of 28 days for placebo, lubeluzole 10 mg/d, and lubeluzole 20 mg/d were, respectively, 18%, 6%, and 35% in the target population, results that were confirmed in the intent-to-treat population. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the lower mortality in the lubeluzole 10 mg/d group was significantly in favor of the 10 mg/d treatment (P = .019). The higher mortality rate in the 20 mg/d group could be explained, at least in part, by an imbalance at randomization that led to a higher number of patients in that group with severe ischemic stroke. A total of 26 of 66 patients (39%) who received lubeluzole 10 mg/d had a score on the Barthel Index of > 70 at day 28, indicating no or mild disability, compared with 21 of 61 (34%) in the placebo group and 19 of 66 (29%) in the lubeluzole 20 mg/d group (P = NS).
                In patients with acute ischemic stroke, the dosage regimen of 7.5 mg over 1 hour followed by 10 mg/d of intravenous lubeluzole is safe and statistically significantly reduced mortality. Further clinical trials in a larger number of patients are ongoing to confirm efficacy. This trial was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial with an 8-hour inclusion window to assess the efficacy and safety of an intravenous loading dose of 7.5 mg followed by a daily intravenous dose of 10 mg lubeluzole for 5 days in acute ischemic stroke patients.
                A total of 1786 patients were randomized: 901 to lubeluzole and 885 to placebo. Overall, 212 patients (23.5%) from the lubeluzole group and 213 (24.1%) from the placebo group discontinued the trial prematurely. In the lubeluzole group 201 patients (22.3%) discontinued because of adverse events compared with 193 patients (21.8%) in the placebo group.
                The primary population for the efficacy analysis comprised the core stroke patients (exclusion of older patients aged >75 years with severe stroke) in the 0- to 6-hour inclusion time window. The primary efficacy parameter was a 3-category functional status (Barthel Index 70 to 100/0 to 70/vegetative, dead) at week 12. In the lubeluzole group 207 patients (47.8%) were classified as mildly dependent/independent at week 12, 131 (30.3%) were moderately/severely dependent, and 95 (21.9%) were vegetative/dead. In the placebo group these numbers were 221 (54.4%), 112 (27.6%), and 73 (18.0%), respectively. Logistic regression analysis showed no statistically significant difference between the treatment groups (P:=0.162). Additionally, for none of the secondary efficacy parameters (mortality at week 12, modified Rankin score, total Barthel score) was a statistically significant difference between the lubeluzole and placebo groups obtained. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 treatments for all treated patients, patients included within the 6- to 8-hour window, and patients with severe strokes aged >75 years. Overall, of all treated patients, 401 (22.5%) died: 203 (22.5%) in the lubeluzole group and 198 (22.4%) with placebo. Of all subjects treated, 853 (95%) on lubeluzole and 826 (93%) on placebo reported an adverse event during their treatment period or within the next 2 days after discontinuation of treatment. The most frequently observed adverse events were fever (25.9% lubeluzole; 23.4% placebo), constipation (20.2%; 19.7%), and headache (17.6%; 21.2%). Imbalances were found for atrial fibrillation (1.8% lubeluzole; 1.1% placebo) and QT prolongation (0.9%; 0.2%).
                This study failed to show an efficacy of lubeluzole in the treatment of acute stroke. On the other hand, lubeluzole treatment by the current dosage schedule was not associated with a significant safety problem. The cardiovascular safety of lubeluzole was evaluated in patients with ischemic stroke in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Forty-six patients were randomized to receive a continuous daily infusion of lubeluzole 5 mg (loading dose 3.75 mg over 1 h), lubeluzole 10 mg (loading dose 7.5 mg over 1 h), or placebo for 5 days within 24 h of stroke onset. The primary measure of cardiovascular safety was the QTc interval, derived from the continuous electrocardiogram (ECG) and measured during treatment and a 2-day follow-up. Compared with placebo. Neither dosage of lubeluzole had any statistically or clinically relevant effects on the QTc. Neither were there any significant differences among the three treatment groups in the area under the curve for heart rate, QT interval, QT dispersion, or QTlc. Lubeluzole did not increase the frequency of ECG abnormalities. No ventricular fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia, or torsades de pointes were observed in any of the treatment groups. During this trial, 3 patients in the placebo group and 2 patients in the lubeluzole 5-mg group died. There were no deaths in the lubeluzole 10-mg group. Adverse experiences were similar in all three treatment groups except that superficial thrombophlebitis was more frequent in the lubeluzole 10-mg group. In doses to 10 mg/day, lubeluzole has a favorable cardiovascular safety profile, as demonstrated by the lack of clinically relevant effects on heart rate, QT, QTc, and QTlc, and it was well tolerated by patients with ischemic stroke. A neuroprotective drug may be safe and effective if given very early and in combination with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) to acute stroke patients. No clinical trial has yet tested this hypothesis.
                To assess the feasibility, safety and efficacy of simultaneously combining the neuroprotective drug lubeluzole with rt-PA.
                Patients who qualified for and received rt-PA within 3 h of symptom onset were randomly allocated 1:1 to lubeluzole (7.5 mg i.v. over 1 h, then continuous 5-day infusion of 10 mg/day) or placebo. Infusion of the study medication was started before the end of the 1-hour rt-PA infusion. Inclusion criteria were the same as those of the FDA-approved guidelines for rt-PA, plus National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) >5 and absence of serious ventricular arrhythmia, atrioventricular block or Q-T >450 ms. EKG was continuously monitored until 48 h after treatment. The primary outcomes were adverse events, especially hemorrhage and severe arrhythmia, and functionality as determined by the Barthel Index divided into >70,0-70 and dead.
                89 patients were randomized at 34 centers over 8 months. The study was terminated by the sponsor before the planned enrollment of 200 patients when a concurrent phase 3 trial of lubeluzole versus placebo given up to 8 h after stroke was negative. In our study, the mean NIHSS was 14.5, and the mean time from symptom onset to rt-PA was 2.5 h and to randomization to lubeluzole or placebo 3.2 h. Mortality was 26%, intracerebral hemorrhage occurred in 10% and serious adverse events in 51%. There were no differences between the two treatment groups in any of these variables, outcomes or in the Barthel Index or other measures of functionality.
                Combining neuroprotective drugs such as lubeluzole simultaneously with rt-PA is feasible and safe. The efficacy of this strategy, using a potentially more effective neuroprotective agent, should be evaluated in an adequately powered clinical trial.
                Copyright 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel To assess the safety of tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) plus clomethiazole in patients with acute ischemic stroke and determine the feasibility of combination stroke therapy.
                Clomethiazole is a neuroprotectant that appeared to improve outcome in patients with clinical deficits of a major stroke (total anterior circulation syndrome [TACS]) in a previous study, the Clomethiazole Acute Stroke Study (CLASS). Combining a neuroprotectant such as clomethiazole with thrombolysis may augment the beneficial effects of the two agents. CLASS-t-PA (CLASS-T) was a pilot study to explore the safety of the combination and the feasibility of performing combination treatment in the setting of acute ischemic stroke.
                In a randomized, double-blind design (stratified for age, severity at admission, and time since onset of stroke), all patients received 0.9 mg/kg t-PA beginning within 3 hours of stroke onset and then either 68 mg/kg clomethiazole (n = 97) IV over 24 hours or placebo (n = 93) beginning within 12 hours of stroke onset. Patients were followed for 90 days. The main measures of safety were mortality and serious adverse events, and the main measure of functional outcome was the Barthel Index.
                The number of serious adverse event reports was 47 in the clomethiazole group and 48 in the placebo group. Death during the 90 days after treatment occurred in 15 clomethiazole and nine placebo patients (p = 0.26). Sedation was reported as an adverse event during therapy in 42% of clomethiazole patients vs 13% of placebo patients. The proportion of patients with TACS was 53% in the clomethiazole group and 41% in the placebo group. In the TACS subgroup, 52.9% of the clomethiazole patients scored a Barthel Index greater than 60 vs 44.7% of placebo patients (odds ratio 1.39; 95% CI 0.60 to 3.23).
                In this pilot study, there were no safety concerns related to the combination of t-PA and clomethiazole. The combination paradigm proved feasible, although many patients received clomethiazole several hours after thrombolysis; future studies must require prompt administration of the neuroprotectant either before or during administration of the thrombolytic. Patients with major strokes (TACS) may have the potential to benefit from the combination of t-PA and clomethiazole. Rationale Reperfusion in ischemic stroke can be pursued by either systemic intravenous thrombolysis or endovascular treatment. However, systemic intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase within 4·5 h of symptom onset in selected patients is the only medication of proven efficacy. No randomized-controlled trials have so far compared the two modalities. To explore this, after a pilot phase, we started the SYNTHESIS Expansion trial. Aims To determine whether endovascular treatment (i.e., intra-arterial thrombolysis with alteplase - if necessary, associated to or substituted by mechanical clot disruption and/or retrieval) compared with systemic intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase, administered according to European labelling, increases the proportion of independent survivors at three-months. Design SYNTHESIS Expansion is an open-label, multicenter randomized-controlled trial, with blinded follow-up. Eligibility applies to; patients with symptomatic ischemic stroke, seen within 4·5 h of onset; being able to initiate intravenous alteplase immediately, and endovascular treatment as soon as possible (not later than six-hours of stroke onset). The study is pragmatically based on the 'uncertainty principle' between endovascular treatment and systemic intravenous thrombolysis for patients eligible for intravenous alteplase. There are no prespecified clinical or instrumental criteria to further select a patient, although investigators are left free to use them. Enrollment will be completed with 350 randomized patients. Primary analysis is on an intent-to-treat basis. Study outcomes Primary: modified Rankin scale score of 0 or 1 at three-months. Secondary: neurological deficit seven-days after thrombolysis and the safety of the procedure on the basis of events reported within seven-days following thrombolysis - symptomatic cerebral hemorrhage, fatal and nonfatal stroke, death from any cause, neurological deterioration.
                © 2011 The Authors. International Journal of Stroke © 2011 World Stroke Organization. A previous trial (the Clomethiazole Acute Stroke Study) generated the hypothesis that clomethiazole is effective in patients with a major ischemic stroke (total anterior circulation syndrome), and this was tested in the present study.
                A total of 1198 patients with major ischemic stroke and a combination of limb weakness, higher cortical dysfunction, and visual field deficits were randomly assigned to clomethiazole (68 mg/kg IV over 24 hours) or placebo. The study drug was initiated within 12 hours of symptom onset. Functional outcome and neurological recovery were assessed at days 7, 30, and 90, with the proportion of patients with a Barthel Index > or =60 at last follow-up as the primary outcome measure.
                The patients were randomly assigned equally, and the two treatment groups were well matched for baseline characteristics, including stroke severity (mean National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score 16.9+/-5.2). Ninety-six percent were classified as total anterior circulation syndrome. The proportion of patients reaching a Barthel Index score of > or =60 was 42% in the clomethiazole-treated group and 46% in the placebo-treated group (odds ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.05; P=0.11). There was no evidence of efficacy on any secondary outcome variables (modified Rankin Score, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, Scandinavian Stroke Scale, and 30-day CT infarct volumes) compared with placebo. Subgroup analysis showed a similar lack of treatment effect in patients treated early (<6 hours) and in those treated later (6 to 12 hours). Somnolence was an expected pharmacological effect of clomethiazole, and this occurred during treatment as an adverse event in half of the patients randomly assigned to study drug.
                The target population was selected, and sufficient drug was given to produce the expected pharmacological effect in the brain. Clomethiazole does not improve outcome in patients with major ischemic stroke. Hypertension immediately after acute ischemic stroke is associated with impaired morbidity and mortality, although there are few data on antihypertensive use immediately after ictus. This randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study explored the hemodynamic effect and safety of oral lisinopril initiated within 24 h after an ictus.
                Forty hypertensive (systolic blood pressure [BP] >/=140 or diastolic BP >/=90 mm Hg) acute ischemic stroke patients (14 lacunar, 13 partial anterior, 7 total anterior, 6 posterior circulation infarct) were randomized to 5 mg of oral lisinopril (n = 18) or matching placebo (n = 22). Dose was increased to 10 mg (or 2 x placebo) on day 7 if casual systolic BP was >/=140 mm Hg and continued to day 14. After the initial dose, automated BP levels were monitored for 16 h. The BP levels and stroke outcome measures were assessed at day 14, and all patients were followed to day 90.
                At h 4 after the first dose, systolic/diastolic BP change was -20 +/- 21/-6 +/- 10 mm Hg (mean +/- SE) in the lisinopril group and 1 +/- 11/0 +/- 8 mmHg in the placebo group (group differences: systolic BP, P < .05; diastolic BP, P = .07). With a daily dosing regime, systolic BP, mean arterial pressure (MAP), diastolic BP, and pulse pressure (PP) were significantly lower in the lisinopril group compared to the placebo group at day 14 (P < .01). Neurologic and functional measures were similar between groups at follow-up.
                Lisinopril, even at small dosages, is well tolerated and an effective hypotensive agent after acute ischemic stroke, gradually reducing BP by 4 h after oral first-dose administration. Oral lisinopril is now being studied in a larger outcome-based trial in acute hypertensive stroke patients. Early treatment may improve acute ischaemic stroke outcome. Gavestinel is a selective antagonist at the glycine site of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor, and is neuroprotective in animal models of ischaemic stroke.
                We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to test whether gavestinel could improve functional outcome after acute stroke in human beings. Conscious patients with stroke involving limb weakness received either gavestinel at an intravenous loading dose of 800 mg followed by 200 mg every 12 h for five doses, or matching placebo, within 6 h of stroke onset. Stratification variables were age and stroke severity. A computed tomography brain scan within 18 h of stroke onset identified the primary efficacy population with ischaemic stroke. Outcome was assessed by an independent observer with the Barthel index at 3 months. Three outcome categories were applied: good (Barthel index 95-100), moderate (60-90), and poor (0-55 or dead). Analysis was by intention to treat.
                Of 1804 patients randomised, 16 received no treatment, and 333 had primary intracranial haemorrhage. 891 patients received gavestinel and 897 received placebo. Outcome in 721 patients who received gavestinel and were analysed for the primary endpoint at 3 months was good in 246 (34.1%), moderate in 136 (18.8%), and poor in 339 (47.0%), compared with 256 (34.9%), 133 (18.1%), and 345 (47.0%), respectively, of 734 patients who received placebo (p=0.8). Mortality at 3 months was 147 (20.4%) in the gavestinel group and 138 (18.8%) in the placebo group. Outcomes within preplanned subgroup and secondary analyses were also neutral. There were no significant differences in serious side-effects between the groups.
                Treatment with gavestinel within 6 h of acute ischaemic stroke did not improve outcome.
Lubeluzole, given in the acute phase of ischaemic stroke, is not associated with a significant reduction of death or dependency at the end of scheduled follow-up period but seems to be associated with a significant increase of heart-conduction disorders (Q-T prolonged > 450 msec).