A prospective randomized comparison of sublingual and oral misoprostol when combined with mifepristone for medical abortion at 12-20 weeks gestation. Sublingual compared with oral misoprostol in term labour induction: a randomised controlled trial. A randomised controlled trial of mifepristone in combination with misoprostol administered sublingually or vaginally for medical abortion up to 13 weeks of gestation. Two routes of administration for misoprostol in the treatment of incomplete abortion: a randomized clinical trial. Comparison of vaginal and sublingual misoprostol for second trimester abortion: randomized controlled equivalence trial. Sublingual compared with oral misoprostol for cervical dilatation prior to vacuum aspiration: a randomized comparison. Efficacy of two intervals and two routes of administration of misoprostol for termination of early pregnancy: a randomised controlled equivalence trial. A prospective randomized study to compare the use of repeated doses of vaginal with sublingual misoprostol in the management of first trimester silent miscarriages. A randomized trial of mifepristone in combination with misoprostol administered sublingually or vaginally for medical abortion at 13-20 weeks gestation.
Sublingual misoprostol has been shown to be effective in medical abortion. A prospective double-blinded placebo-controlled trial was done to compare the efficacy and side-effects of sublingual to oral misoprostol when used with mifepristone for medical abortion from 12 to 20 weeks gestation.
                A total of 120 women at 12-20 weeks of gestation were randomized to receive 200 mg oral mifepristone followed by either sublingual or oral misoprostol 400 mg every 3 h for a maximum of five doses 36-48 h later. The course of misoprostol was repeated if the woman did not abort within 24 h.
                There was no significant difference (P = 0.43) in the success rate at 24 h [relative risk = 1.075; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.94-1.19]. Abortion occurred in 91.4% in the sublingual group (95% CI: 81.0-96.7%) as compared to 85.0% (95% CI: 73.7-92.1%) in the oral group. The median induction-to-abortion interval was significantly shorter (P = 0.009) in the sublingual group (5.5 h) as compared to the oral group (7.5 h). The incidence of fever was higher in the sublingual group (P < 0.0001). The incidences of other side-effects were similar.
                Sublingual misoprostol, when combined with mifepristone, is effective for medical abortion in the second trimester. The induction-to-abortion interval is shorter when sublingual misoprostol is used when compared to oral misoprostol. To compare the efficacy and patient acceptability of 50 microg of sublingual misoprostol with 100 microg of oral misoprostol in the induction of labour at term.
                Non-blinded randomised comparative trial.
                Tertiary level UK Hospital.
                Two hundred and fifty women at term with indications for labour induction.
                Fifty micrograms of sublingual misoprostol or 100 microg of oral misoprostol was administered every four hours after random allocation, to a maximum of five doses.
                Number of patients delivering vaginally within 24 hours of the induction, mode of delivery, neonatal outcomes and patient acceptability.
                There was no significant difference in the number of women delivering vaginally within 24 hours of the induction in the sublingual group as compared with the oral group (62.8% vs 59%, RR 1.1, 95% CI 0.6-2.1), or in the mean induction to delivery time (21.8 vs 24.1 h, mean difference 2.3 h 95% CI -2.2 to +6.7). There was no difference in the uterine hyperstimulation rates (1.6% in both groups), operative delivery rates or neonatal outcomes. In the sublingual group, 92.6% found the induction acceptable with 15.8% finding the tablets with an unpleasant taste, while in the oral group it was 96.9% and 4%, respectively. More patients in the oral group thought that they would consider the same method of induction again as compared with the sublingual group (58.6% vs 40%, RR 1.4, 95% CI 1.04-1.9).
                Fifty micrograms of sublingual misoprostol every four hours has the same efficacy and safety profile as compared with 100 microg orally, but the oral route might be preferred by women. To assess women's acceptability, the efficacy and side effects of sublingual versus vaginal administration of misoprostol in combination with mifepristone for medical abortion up to 13 weeks of gestation.
                Randomised controlled trial.
                Aberdeen Royal Infirmary.
                Women undergoing medical abortion under the terms of the 1967 Abortion Act.
                Mifepristone (200 mg) was given orally followed 36-48 hours later by misoprostol administration (sublingual: 600 microg; vaginal: 800 microg). A second dose of misoprostol 400 microg was given 3 hours later (sublingually or vaginally). Women between 9 and 13 weeks of gestation received a further (third) dose of misoprostol 400 microg (sublingually or vaginally), 3 hours later if abortion had not occurred.
                Women's acceptability, efficacy of the regimen and side effects experienced.
                A total of 340 women were recruited (171 sublingual and 169 vaginal). A total of 70% of women in the sublingual group expressed satisfaction with the route of misoprostol administration; 18% answered 'Don't know' while 12% were dissatisfied, compared with 68%, 28% and 4%, respectively, in the vaginal group (P= 0.02). There was no significant difference in the need for surgical evacuation for women in the sublingual (3/158, 1.9%) and vaginal groups (4/156, 2.6%) (P= 0.70). Women receiving misoprostol sublingually were more likely to experience diarrhoea (P < 0.01), shivering (P < 0.01) and unpleasant mouth taste (P < 0.01).
                Sublingual administration of misoprostol is an effective alternative to vaginal administration for medical abortion up to 13 weeks of gestation. The prevalence of prostaglandin-related side effects, however, was higher with this route of administration. This study was conducted to compare the safety, effectiveness and acceptability of 400 mcg sublingual misoprostol and 600 mcg oral misoprostol for treatment of incomplete abortion.
                We used an open-label randomized controlled trial conducted from July 2005 to August 2006 in a large tertiary level maternity hospital in Antananarivo, Madagascar, and a large tertiary level hospital in Chisinau, Moldova. Three hundred consenting women seeking treatment for clinically diagnosed incomplete abortion with uterine size <or=12 weeks since last menstrual period were randomized to misoprostol either 600 mcg orally or 400 mcg sublingually. The primary outcome measure was the complete resolution of clinical signs and symptoms of incomplete abortion without need for surgical intervention. Women were seen for follow-up on Day 7 and, if necessary, on Day 14 to assess abortion status. The study was powered to detect a 7% difference in efficacy with a total of 142 women required in each arm.
                Efficacy rates were 94.6% and 94.5%, for the oral and sublingual routes, respectively (RR: 1.00, 95% CI=0.95-1.06, p=.98). At 1 week follow-up, more than 80% of women had completed abortions (77.8% oral and 84.8% sublingual, p=.12). Mean pain scores were 2.95 and 3.04, respectively, for the oral and sublingual groups. Side effects included abdominal pain, bleeding, headaches and dizziness/weakness with no differences reported between the two groups. Acceptability and satisfaction were high for both routes and women indicated a preference for medical versus surgical treatment if ever needed in the future.
                Both treatment regimens were very effective. Four hundred micrograms of sublingual misoprostol and 600 mcg oral misoprostol appear to have similar safety and effectiveness profiles when used for the treatment of incomplete abortion. A lower 400-mcg misoprostol dose may provide an alternative treatment option as well as have potential benefits in terms of cost. To identify an effective misoprostol-only regimen for the termination of second trimester pregnancy, we compared sublingual and vaginal administration of multiple doses of misoprostol in a randomized, placebo-controlled equivalence trial.
                Six hundred and eighty-one healthy pregnant women requesting medical abortion at 13-20 weeks' gestation were randomly assigned within 11 gynaecological centres in seven countries into two treatment groups: 400 microg of misoprostol administered either sublingually or vaginally every 3 h up to five doses, followed by sublingual administration of 400 microg misoprostol every 3 h up to five doses if abortion had not occurred at 24 h after the start of treatment. We chose 10% as the margin of equivalence. The primary end-point was the efficacy of the treatments to terminate pregnancy in 24 h. Successful abortion within 48 h was also considered as an outcome along with the induction-to-abortion-interval, side effects and women's perceptions on these treatments.
                At 24 h, the success (complete or incomplete abortion) rate was 85.9% in the vaginal administration group and 79.8% in the sublingual group (difference: 6.1%, 95% CI: 0.5 to 11.8). Thus, equivalence could not be concluded overall; the difference, however, was driven by the nulliparous women, among whom vaginal administration was clearly superior to sublingual administration (87.3% versus 68.5%), whereas no significant difference was observed between vaginal and sublingual treatments among parous women (84.7% versus 88.5%). The rates of side effects were similar in both groups except for fever, which was more common in the vaginal group. About 70% of women in both groups preferred sublingual administration.
                Equivalence between vaginal and sublingual administration could not be demonstrated overall. Vaginal administration showed a higher effectiveness than sublingual administration in terminating second trimester pregnancies, but this result was mainly driven by nulliparous women. Fever was more prevalent with vaginal administration. Registered with International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial number ISRCTN72965671. The aim of the study was to compare the effect of oral and sublingual administration of misoprostol for cervical priming prior to vacuum aspiration. Thirty-two first-time-pregnant women with 8-12 weeks amenorrhea were randomly assigned to receive 400 microg misoprostol either orally or sublingually 3 h prior to surgery. The degree of baseline dilatation and the cumulative force needed for dilatation of the cervical canal did not differ between the two treatment groups. However, the number of patients in whom a strong force was needed was significantly higher following oral than following sublingual treatment. It was shown that sublingual administration is more effective than oral administration of misoprostol for cervical priming and is associated with less blood loss but a higher frequency of side effects. The most effective route and best interval between several doses of misoprostol to induce abortion have not been defined. Our aim was to assess the effects of the interval between multiple doses of misoprostol and the route of administration to terminate pregnancy.
                2066 healthy pregnant women requesting medical abortion with 63 days or less of gestation were randomly assigned within 11 gynaecological centres in six countries to the four treatment groups (three doses of 0.8 mg misoprostol given sublingually at 3-h intervals, vaginally 3 h, sublingually 12 h, and vaginally 12 h), stratifying by gestational age. This was an equivalence trial with a 5% margin of equivalence. The primary endpoints were efficacy of treatment to achieve complete abortion and to terminate pregnancy. The main efficacy analysis excluded women lost to follow-up. This trial is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN10531821.
                Efficacy outcomes were analysed for 2046 women (99%), excluding 20 lost to follow-up. Complete abortion rates at 2-week follow-up were recorded for 431 (84%) in the sublingual and for 434 (85%) women in the vaginal group when misoprostol was given at 3-h intervals (difference 0.4%, 95% CI -4.0 to 4.9, p=0.85 equivalence shown), and for 399 (78%) in the sublingual and for 425 (83%) in the vaginal 12-h groups (4.6%, -0.2 to 9.5, p=0.06, equivalence not shown). In the 3-h groups, pregnancy continued in 29 (6%) women after sublingual and in 20 (4%) women after vaginal administration (difference 1.8%, 95% CI -0.8 to 4.4, p=0.19, equivalence shown); in the 12-h groups it continued in 47 (9%) after sublingual and in 25 (5%) after vaginal administration (4.4%, 1.2-7.5, p=0.01, vaginal better than sublingual). Differences for complete abortion between intervals for sublingual and vaginal routes were 6% (95% CI 1.0-10.6, p=0.02, 3 h better than 12 h) and 2% (-2.9 to 6.1, p=0.49, equivalence not shown), respectively; for continuing pregnancies they were 4% (0.4-6.8, p=0.03, 3 h better than 12 h) and 1% (-1.5 to 3.5, p=0.44, equivalence shown), respectively.
                Administration interval can be chosen between 3 h and 12 h when misoprostol is given vaginally. If administration is sublingual, the intervals between misoprostol doses need to be short, but side-effects are then increased. With 12-h intervals, vaginal route should be used, whereas with 3-h intervals either route could be chosen. A randomized controlled trial comparing sublingual with vaginal administration of misoprostol for medical management of silent miscarriages.
                Eighty women who had silent miscarriages (<13 weeks) were randomized to receive 600 micro g of misoprostol every 3 h for a maximum of three doses either sublingually or vaginally.
                The success rates of medical management were the same in both groups (87.5%; 95% CI: 74-95%). There were no serious complications. The incidence of diarrhoea was higher in the sublingual (70%) than the vaginal route (27.5%) (P < 0.005). Other side effects were similar in each group, although fatigue was experienced by more women in the sublingual group than in the vaginal group (65 versus 40%: P = 0.043). The overall acceptability of medical management was good. Most women would choose the medical method if they were allowed to choose again and would recommend the method to others.
                The current regimen of misoprostol is useful for the management of silent miscarriage in terms of complete miscarriage rate and patient acceptability. Sublingual misoprostol may offer an alternative for women who do not like repeated vaginal administration of the drug. Several studies have now reported the successful use of the sublingual administration of misoprostol for medical abortion in the first trimester. The objective of this study was to assess the acceptability to women, the efficacy of the regimen, as well as the acceptability to staff of sublingual versus vaginal administration of misoprostol following mifepristone for medical abortion at 13-20 weeks gestation.
                Women were randomized by opening consecutive sealed envelopes generated using random number tables. Mifepristone (200 mg) was followed 36-48 h later by sublingual administration of misoprostol 600 microg or vaginal misoprostol 800 microg. This was followed by 3 hourly doses of misoprostol 400 microg administered sublingually or vaginally.
                A total of 76 women were randomized. Of women in the sublingual group, 24 (66.7%) expressed satisfaction with the route of misoprostol administration compared with 25 (62.5%) in the vaginal group. A higher proportion in the sublingual group used intramuscular opiates. There was no significant difference in the surgical evacuation rate between the sublingual (three out of 36 women, 8.3%) and vaginal groups (one out of 40, 2.5%), (P=0.26) and acceptability to staff was the same for both methods.
                Sublingual administration of misoprostol following mifepristone is an acceptable and effective alternative to vaginal administration for medical abortion at 13-20 weeks gestation. However, women should be advised about the greater likelihood of requiring stronger analgesia.
Based on only three small trials, sublingual misoprostol appears to be at least as effective as when the same dose is administered orally. There are inadequate data to comment on the relative complications and side-effects. Sublingual or buccal misoprostol should not enter clinical use until its safety and optimal dosage have been established by larger trials.
[Note: The 17 citations in the awaiting classification section of the review may alter the conclusions of the review once assessed.]