Enzyme-potentiated desensitization in children with asthma and mite allergy: a double-blind study. Desmopressin and imipramine in the management of nocturnal enuresis: a multicentre study. A controlled trial of desmopressin and behavioral therapy for nocturnal enuresis. Oral immunotherapy for cow's milk allergy with a weekly up-dosing regimen: a randomized single-blind controlled study. The efficacy and safety of oral desmopressin in children with primary nocturnal enuresis. Oral ondansetron decreases vomiting after tonsillectomy in children. A comparison of contingency management and cognitive-behavioral approaches during methadone maintenance treatment for cocaine dependence. Efficacy and tolerability of mirtazapine and sertraline in Korean veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder: a randomized open label trial. Effects of anticholinergics on postoperative vomiting, recovery, and hospital stay in children undergoing tonsillectomy with or without adenoidectomy.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of enzyme-potentiated desensitization (EPD) in children with asthma. Twenty asthmatic children (14 males and 6 females; median age: 8.5 years) were included in the study. They had positive skin tests to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Dpt), no history of other allergy and had suffered from asthma for at least two years. The children were examined before starting the trial, at the first EPD dose, after 8 weeks, at the second EPD dose and 3 months after the second EPD dose. Blood samples for PRIST and RAST were drawn before the first and at the second EPD dose, and at the last follow-up. Conjunctival provocation tests (CPT) and skin test endpoint determinations were performed with dilutions of a freeze-dried Dpt extract (10-100,000 SQ-U/ml) at the start of the trial and at the last follow-up. Parents kept a diary record of the days with asthma and daily drug usage. The children were randomized to receive either two intradermal placebo injections or the active material with an 8-week interval (November 1991 and January 1992). Ten children received EPD and 10 children placebo. The intradermal injection of EPD (0.05 ml) contained 0.01 ml of beta-glucuronidase (40 Fishman units) and 0.04 ml of a mixture of inhalant allergens (1 Noon unit). The placebo injection consisted of buffer solution only. The EPD-treated children had significantly fewer days with asthma (p = 0.00000). In addition, the EPD-treated children used significantly less medication for the management of asthma attacks (p = 0.00000). At the start of the trial, three out of 10 children in the EPD group and two out of 10 in the placebo group reacted only to the highest dose of allergen used in the CPT (100,000 SQ/ml) (NS). At the last follow-up, the threshold dose in the CPT was 100,000 SQ/ml or more in nine out of 10 children in the EPD group and in four out of 10 children of the placebo group (p = 0.0349). At the last follow-up, one child in the EPD group had a negative CPT with all doses tested. Global clinical evaluation by the investigators showed that eight out of 10 EPD-treated children improved, in comparison with three out of 10 children in the placebo group (p = 0.0349). Assessment by the parents was six out of 10 and four out of 10 improved, respectively (NS). Specific IgE to Dpt, total IgE and skin prick test endpoints before and after EPD showed no significant changes. One child in the placebo group experienced mild urticaria several hours following the second injection. No other local or systemic side effects were reported. The results of the present study provide further data on the effectiveness and safety of EPD in patients with asthma. The efficacy and safety of desmopressin (Minirin/DDAVP) treatment compared with imipramine were investigated in a multicentre, open, cross-over design in 57 patients, aged 6-15 years, affected by nocturnal enuresis to establish the best therapeutic approach to this condition. After a two-weeks observation and control period, patients were randomised to one of two groups: intranasal administration of desmopressin, 30 micrograms/day for three weeks, followed by imipramine, 0.9 mg/kg for a further three weeks, or imipramine 0.9 mg/kg for three weeks, followed by desmopressin, 30 micrograms/day for a further three weeks. Following treatment, all patients were observed for a further two weeks. Administration of either treatment protocol resulted in a statistically significant decline in the number of enuretic episodes per week compared to the control. The greater antidiuretic effect observed in the group receiving imipramine followed by desmopressin suggests the two compounds have different profiles. Also, when the treatment period was compared with the follow-up, the antidiuretic effect had a longer duration in the group initially given imipramine. No further improvement was seen when desmopressin was administered first, with a mild worsening of the effect sometimes occurring, suggesting a different carry-over effect between the two treatments. This suggests that desmopressin offers a better approach to the management of nocturnal enuresis. The combination of desmopressin (DDAVP) and behavioral therapy for treatment of nocturnal enuresis was compared with use of each of these modes alone. We randomly assigned 226 enuretic children being treated in primary care clinics of a major medical center in the largest health maintenance organization in Israel into 3 groups: Group A) DDAVP plus behavioral therapy (double-blind); Group B) behavioral therapy plus placebo (double-blind); and Group C) DDAVP alone (open group). DDAVP (20 micrograms/naris) and placebo were administered by intranasal spray. Both pharmacologic and behavioral therapy were initiated after a 2-week observation period and continued for 8 weeks. All patients were followed for 2 months after completion of treatment. A significant reduction in the number of wet nights/week was registered for all 3 groups: 49% in Group A, 45% in Group B, and 19% in Group C. After controlling for confounding factors, no significant difference in effect was noted among the 3 types of treatment during the trial period. However, on follow-up the results for the DDAVP patients were significantly less stable compared with the other 2 groups (p = 0.015). Minor side effects were registered, but none of the participants withdrew from the trial. To our knowledge, this is the largest randomized trial of nocturnal enuresis conducted to date. Our findings suggest that simply discussing the problem with the patient and family leads to improvement, and that behavioral therapy is also beneficial. DDAVP can help, but the relapse rate on discontinuation is high. Cow's milk allergy (CMA) in children is a important problem in medical practice. Oral desensitization has been proposed as a therapeutic approach, but current protocols are time-consuming and impractical.
                To establish a patient-friendly desensitization regimen with weekly up-dosing and to evaluate it in a randomized controlled trial.
                Thirty children with IgE-mediated CMA confirmed by double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge were equally randomized to desensitization with CM or soy milk as control. The weekly up-dosing lasted 18 weeks. The occurrence and severity of reactions after each dose was evaluated, and the desensitization was stopped if severe reactions occurred. Specific IgE and IgG4 levels to CM were measured at baseline, after 8 weeks, and at the end of the study. The double-blind food challenge was repeated once the desensitization was completed or after premature discontinuation.
                Two active and 1 control patient dropped out. Full tolerance to CM (200 mL) was achieved in 10 active patients and partial tolerance in 1. Two active patients discontinued the desensitization after experiencing severe reactions, whereas no reactions occurred in controls, whose sensitivity to CM remained unchanged. A significant increase in specific IgG4 levels was found only in the active group.
                This weekly up-dosing desensitization protocol for CMA performed under medical supervision was effective and reasonably safe and induced consistent immunologic changes.
                Copyright © 2010 American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. We confirmed findings that oral desmopressin safely decreases the number of wet nights in children with enuresis and identified doses at which acceptable responses can be obtained.
                We evaluated the safety and efficacy of oral desmopressin in a double-blind, placebo controlled, parallel group, randomized, multicenter trial of 193 children 6 to 16 years old with documented primary nocturnal enuresis. The study was conducted in 2 phases: 1) a 2-week dose ranging phase in which children received desmopressin (0.2, 0.4 or 0.6 mg.) or placebo at bedtime and 2) an 8-week dose titration phase that followed a 2-week placebo washout. Patients received 0.2 mg. desmopressin or placebo for the first 2 weeks and then the dose was increased in 0.2 mg. increments at 2-week intervals until the patient was completely dry or was receiving 0.6 mg. Patients were instructed to limit fluid intake. Mean decrease from baseline in the number of wet nights, percentage of responding patients and safety were assessed at 2-week intervals.
                There was a statistically significant linear response to oral desmopressin at doses from 0.2 to 0.6 mg. during the dose ranging phase (p < or =0.05). The decrease in wet nights after 2 weeks of treatment with desmopressin was 27%, 30% and 40% at 0.2, 0.4 and 0.6 mg. doses, respectively, compared to 10% with placebo. All doses were statistically significantly different from placebo (p < or =0.05). During the dose titration phase all placebo treated and 87% of desmopressin treated patients were receiving the maximum dose of 3 tablets nightly because they had not been completely dry in the previous 2 weeks. Nevertheless, 44% of desmopressin treated patients had achieved at least a 50% reduction from baseline in the number of wet nights per 2 weeks at the lower doses of 0.2 and 0.4 mg. Most adverse events (rhinitis, pharyngitis, headache and increased cough) were mild to moderate in severity, unrelated to treatment and resolved before the study was completed.
                Oral desmopressin administered at bedtime to children with primary nocturnal enuresis was significantly better than placebo for decreasing episodes of bed-wetting (p <0.05). A linear dose-response relationship was observed (p <0.05). An acceptable response to treatment (50% or greater reduction from baseline in wet nights per 2 weeks) was seen at all doses of desmopressin. Oral desmopressin, up to 0.6 mg. for 8 weeks, was well tolerated. Vomiting is a common, unpleasant aftermath of tonsillectomy in children. Intraoperative intravenous ondansetron (OND) reduces vomiting after this operation. Our double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized investigation studied the effect of the oral form of OND on vomiting after outpatient tonsillectomy in children. We studied 233 healthy children age 2-14 yr undergoing elective tonsillectomy. Subjects were given placebo (PLAC) or OND 0.1 mg.kg-1 rounded off to the nearest 2 mg one hr before surgery. Anaesthesia was induced with either propofol or halothane/N2O. Vecuronium 0.1 mg.kg-1 was administered at the discretion of the anaesthetist. Anaesthesia was maintained with halothane/N2O, 50 micrograms.kg-1 midazolam iv and 1-1.5 mg.kg-1 codeine im. At the end of surgery, residual neuromuscular blockade was reversed with neostigmine and atropine. All episodes of in-hospital emesis were recorded by nursing staff. Rescue antiemetics in the hospital were 1 mg.kg-1 dimenhydrinate iv for vomiting x 2 and 50 micrograms.kg-1 droperidol iv for vomiting x 4. Parents kept a diary of emesis after discharge. Postoperative pain was treated with morphine, codeine and/or acetaminophen. The two groups were similar with respect to demographic data, induction technique and anaesthesia time. Oral OND (n = 109) reduced postoperative emesis from 54% to 39%, P < 0.05. This effect was most dramatic in-hospital, where 10% of the OND-patients and 30% of the PLAC-group vomited, P < 0.05. The OND-subjects required fewer rescue antiemetics, 7% vs 17%, P < 0.05. In conclusion, oral ondansetron decreased the incidence of vomiting after outpatient tonsillectomy in children. This study compared 2 psychosocial approaches for the treatment of cocaine dependence: contingency management (CM) and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT).
                Patients with cocaine dependence who were receiving methadone maintenance treatment (n = 120) were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 conditions: CM, CBT, combined CM and CBT (CBT + CM), or treatment as usual (ie, methadone maintenance treatment program only [MMTP only]) (n = 30 per cell). The CM procedures and CBT materials were comparable to those used in previously published research. The active study period was 16 weeks, requiring 3 clinic visits per week. Participants were evaluated during treatment and at 17, 26, and 52 weeks after admission.
                Urinalysis results during the 16-week treatment period show that participants assigned to the 2 groups featuring CM had significantly superior in-treatment urinalysis results, whereas urinalysis results from participants in the CBT group were not significantly different than those from the MMTP-only group. At week 17, self-reported days of cocaine use were significantly reduced from baseline levels for all 3 treatment groups but not for the MMTP-only group. At the 26-week and 52-week follow-up points, CBT participants showed substantial improvement, resulting in equivalent performance with the CM groups as indicated by both urinalysis and self-reported cocaine use data.
                Study findings provide solid evidence of efficacy for CM and CBT. Although the effect of CM is significantly greater during treatment, CBT appears to produce comparable long-term outcomes. There was no evidence of an additive effect for the 2 treatments in the CM + CBT group. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential use of mirtazapine in Korean veterans diagnosed with PTSD, by comparing it with sertraline, a drug approved for use in PTSD in the USA.
                Efficacy was evaluated by the clinician administered PTSD scale (CAPS-2), the Hamilton rating scale for depression (HAMD-17) and the clinical global impression scale (CGI), at baseline and at weeks 1, 2 and 6. A response was defined as a > or = 30 % decrease in CAPS-2 total severity, a > or = 50 % decrease in total HAMD-17 score, and a CGI-I score < 3.
                51 patients on mirtazapine (mean age/duration of illness: 59.1/33.5 years) and 49 on sertraline (mean age/duration of illness: 60.6/35.6 years) completed the study. The mean daily dosage was 34.1 mg for mirtazapine and 101.5 mg for sertraline. On the CAPS-2 total score more patients responded in the mirtazapine group at week 1 (13 vs 2 %) and week 2 (51 vs 31 %). At week 6 this difference was statistically significant (88 % vs 69 %, p = 0.039) on the CAPS-2 total score. The HAMD-17 total score and CGI-I score decreased in both groups, with no significant differences between th groups on all time points. The main side effects for the mirtazapine group were: dry mouth (19.6 %), constipation (19.6 %), somnolence (15.7 %) and weight gain (1.96 %); and for the sertraline group: indigestion (14.3 %), palpitation (6.1 %), agitation (2.0 %), epigastric soreness (2.0 %), insomnia (2.0 %) and sexual dysfunction (2.0 %).
                Mirtazapine appeared to be an effective and well-tolerated treatment for PTSD in Korean veterans.
                2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Nausea and vomiting are the most frequent problems after minor ambulatory surgical procedures. The agents used to induce and maintain anesthesia may modify the incidence of emesis. When neuromuscular blockade is antagonized with anticholinesterases, atropine or glycopyrrolate is used commonly to prevent bradycardia and excessive oral secretions. This study was designed to evaluate the effect of atropine and glycopyrrolate on postoperative vomiting in children.
                Ninety-three patients undergoing tonsillectomy with or without adenoidectomy were studied. After inhalation induction of anesthesia with nitrous oxide, oxygen, and halothane, anesthesia was maintained with a nitrous oxide-oxygen mixture, halothane, morphine, and atracurium. Patients were randomized to receive, in a double-blinded manner, either 15 microg/kg atropine or 10 microg/kg glycopyrrolate with 60 microg/kg neostigmine to reverse neuromuscular blockade. Patient recovery, the incidence of postoperative emesis, antiemetic therapy, and the duration of postoperative hospital stay were assessed.
                There were no significant differences in age, gender, weight, or discharge time from the postanesthesia care unit or the hospital between the groups. Twenty-four hours after operation, the incidence of vomiting in the atropine group (56%) was significantly less than in the glycopyrrolate group (81%; P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the atropine and glycopyrrolate groups in the number of patients who required antiemetics or additional analgesics.
                In children undergoing tonsillectomy with or without adenoidectomy, reversal of neuromuscular blockade with atropine and neostigmine is associated with a lesser incidence of postoperative emesis compared with glycopyrrolate and neostigmine.
Studies to date have involved small numbers of patients and the quality of evidence is generally low. The current evidence shows that MOIT can lead to desensitization in the majority of individuals with IMCMA although the development of long-term tolerance has not been established. A major drawback of MOIT is the frequency of adverse effects, although most are mild and self-limited. The use of parenteral epinephrine is not infrequent. Because there are no standardized protocols, guidelines would be required prior to incorporating desensitization into clinical practice.