Performance of the frameless GyneFix and the TCu380A IUDs in a 3-year multicenter, randomized, comparative trial in parous women. The TCu 380A IUD and the frameless IUD "the FlexiGard": interim three-year data from an international multicenter trial. UNDP, UNFPA, and WHO Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, World Bank: IUD Research Group. Comparison of the performances of TCu380A and TCu380S IUDs up to five years. Interval iud insertion in parous women: a randomized multicentre comparative trial of the Lippes Loop D, TCu220c and the Copper 7. A randomized comparative study of the TCu380A and Cu-Safe 300 IUDs. Performance of the TCu380A and Cu-Fix IUDs in an international randomized trail. An evaluation of the TCu 380Ag and the Multiload Cu375. A comparative clinical trial of the TCu 380A, Lippes Loop D and Multiload Cu 375 IUDs in Indonesia. Randomised controlled trial assessing the acceptability of GyneFix versus Gyne-T380S for emergency contraception.
This study was conducted to evaluate a new and improved inserter (GyneFix) for the anchoring of the Frameless IUD in the uterine cavity. Previous studies conducted with a prototype inserter (Flexigard) did not show fully the advantages of the new anchoring concept because of the shortcomings of the Flexigard inserter and the complexity of the insertion technique. The GyneFix IUD was compared with the TCu380A IUD in six centers in China in approximately 300 women in each group. Only parous women were included in the study. The data from this 3-year, ongoing study demonstrate that the shortcomings of the inserter have been corrected, resulting in better performance and a much reduced rate of failed insertion/expulsion of the frameless and anchored device. The cumulative expulsion rate with the GyneFix IUD was 3.0 at 3 years (annual rates 2.67, 0.33, and 0.0, respectively) compared with a cumulative expulsion rate of 7.38 at 3 years with TCu380A (annual rates 4.63, 1.76, and 1.04, respectively). This difference is statistically significant. The majority of the expulsions with the anchored IUD occurred early in the study, indicating improper anchoring technique. The study also shows that both devices are highly efficacious. No pregnancies occurred with the GyneFix IUD (cumulative pregnancy rate 0.0 at 3 years) versus one pregnancy with TCu380A (cumulative pregnancy rate 0.34 at 3 years). The total use-related discontinuation rate at 3 years was significantly lower with the GyneFix IUD (8.34) than with the TCu380A IUD (14.13) and results in a higher rate of continuation with the GyneFix IUD compared to the TCu380A IUD (90.73 vs 85.25). Neither perforations nor pelvic inflammatory disease cases were encountered with either device in this study, demonstrating the safety of the anchoring system. The TCu 380A and FlexiGard IUDs were compared in a randomized multicenter trial including 28 institutes in 13 countries. There were 53 insertion failures with the FlexiGard and one with the TCu 380A. There were 2184 successful insertions of the TCu380A and 2102 of the FlexiGard device. The three-year pregnancy rates for the TCu 380A and FlexiGard were similar (1.6 and 1.9 per 100 women, respectively) but the FlexiGard three-year expulsion rate (7.4 per 100 women) was significantly higher than that of the TCu 380A (4.4 per 100 women). The insertion technique for the FlexiGard needs to be improved in order to lower the expulsion rate. A modification of the TCu380A IUD to create the model TCu380S was introduced many years ago. The TCu380S utilizes copper sleeves that are flush in the plastic and are set at both ends of the horizontal arm. The objective of this study is to compare the clinical performance of the TCu380A and the TCu380S IUDs, especially regarding contraceptive performance and expulsion, in a cohort of women who had one of these two devices inserted at random. This paper presents the results up to 5 years of use. A total of 1568 women were enrolled: 806 women received a TCu380A and 762 women received a TCu380S IUD. The performance was evaluated by life-table analysis and significance between rates was tested by the method of log-rank. The cumulative pregnancy rate was low in users of both models of IUD but lower in users of the TCu380S model through the 5 years of use, without statistical significance. Expulsion was significantly higher in users of the TCu380S model during the five years of use. The other reasons for discontinuation were similar for both devices and did not show statistical significance. The continuation rate was significantly lower in users of the TCu380S model in the first and second years of use. Both devices presented a very low pregnancy rate and TCu380S presented a lower pregnancy rate than the TCu380A, although without statistical significance. A multicentre randomized clinical trial of the TCu220C, Lippes Loop D and Copper 7 was undertaken in nine WHO Collaborating centres for Clinical Research in Human Reproduction. A total of 984, 992 and 994 devices, respectively, were inserted between 1976 and 1978. The subjects were followed for two years. At this time 18,743, 17,013 and 17,927 woman-months experience had been accumulated with each device, respectively. The Lippes Loop consistently failed to perform as well as the TCu220C regardless of age or parity. The TCu220C had statistically significantly lower pregnancy rates at one and two years of use than either of the other two devices as well as lower expulsion rates. The TCu220C had lower removal rates at one and two years than the Lippes Loop and Copper 7. At one and two years the TCu220C had significantly higher continuation rates than the other two devices. It is concluded that the TCu220C is the device of choice amongst the three devices studied. The Cu-Safe 300 is one of the latest additions to the array of available IUDs. It was specifically designed to decrease unwanted side-effects (e.g. bleeding, pain and expulsion) while providing simplicity of insertion, ease of removal and fair contraceptive protection. For comparison, the TCu380A was chosen. Both types were inserted at random in 600 recipients by a group of independent physicians with a long standing experience in intrauterine contraception. Life table analysis was used for comparison over a period of three years. The Cu-Safe 300 produced a slightly but not statistically significant higher pregnancy rate and more expulsions. Removals for bleeding and pain, however, were significantly less frequent. All inserting physicians agreed that insertion and removal of this new device was remarkably easy. To compare the clinical performance of the TCu380A, the most widely used copper IUD in the world today, and a new frameless device, the Cu-Fix, we report results from a randomized international two-year clinical trial involving 874 parous women followed for an average of fourteen months. Event rates at the end of two years (per 100 women) for pregnancy were 0.0 for the TCu380A and 1.5 for the Cu-Fix. Termination due to expulsion was significantly less for TCu380A as compared with Cu-Fix users (2.0 and 11.4 per hundred women, respectively); other medical reasons for termination (bleeding/pain, pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), and other) did not differ significantly. PID incidence rates at two years were 1.0 per hundred women for the TCu380A and 1.6 for the Cu-Fix (equivalent to 6.0 and 8.3 per 1,000 woman-years, respectively). The net cumulative continuation rates at two years per hundred women were 78.8 for TCu380A, and 71.9 for the Cu-Fix. Both IUDs provide highly effective protection against pregnancy, but the TCu380A has a lower expulsion rate. The low rate of PID indicates that it is an in-frequent occurrence in appropriately selected candidates. The TCu 380Ag (Outokumpu Oy, Pori, Finland) and the Multiload Cu375 (Multilan, Organon, Oss, The Netherlands) were evaluated in 1477 women in a multicenter clinical trial. The intrauterine devices showed similar, low-event rates. Cumulative life-table pregnancy rates were less than 1.0, and continuation rates were approximately 90 per 100 women at 1 year after insertion. The risk of subsequent hospitalization or pelvic infection was low. The Copper T 380A (TCu 380A), Lippes Loop D (LLD) and the Multiload Cu 375 (MLCu 375) IUDs were evaluated for safety and efficacy in a multicenter randomized clinical trial in Indonesia. A total of 2992 women were enrolled into the study and data for 2845 women were analyzed (147 cases did not meet protocol criteria). Although study IUDs were randomly assigned, LLD users in this study were older and of higher parity than TCu 380A and MLCu 375 users. The 24-month gross cumulative life-table pregnancy rates for TCu 380A, LLD and MLCu 375 users were 1.2, 2.2 and 2.7, respectively. The 24-month expulsion rates for TCu 380A, LLD and MLCu 375 users were 6.7, 7.5 and 5.3, respectively. Overall, 24-month continuation rates were 85.5%, 85.0% and 85.4% for the respective device groups. Differences in both gross and age- and parity-adjusted life-tables rates for the major outcome variables were not statistically significant at 24 months postinsertion. The study suggests that the TCu 380A, LLD and MLCu 375 IUDs seem to be safe and effective contraceptive options for Indonesian women. To assess insertion-linked pain and the short-term user-acceptability and safety of the GyneFix as compared with T-framed intrauterine devices (IUDs).
                A randomised controlled trial in an outpatient clinic setting.
                Women requesting an IUD for emergency contraception (EC) were allocated to either the short-term arm (GyneFix versus Nova-T200, or the long-term arm (GyneFix versus Gyne-T380S, and then randomised within each group. Visual analogue scores were used to assess the women's perception of the pain associated with insertion, which was patient-blinded. Follow-up was double-blinded, at 6 weeks, with bleeding and pain recorded over this time.
                A total of 175 women received an IUD in the long-term arm. The short-term arm was discontinued due to low recruitment (17 women at 20 months) and therefore the results relate to the long-term arm only. Outcome was known in 98% of subjects. The actual insertion procedure was scored as more painful for the GyneFix, both by the women (p = 0.013) and the doctors making their assessment of the women's pain (p = 0.04). The women with GyneFix described less pain in the subsequent 30 days after insertion (p = 0.005). Only 13% of women with GyneFix requested removal as compared with 20% with Gyne-T380S, with the difference being attributed to removal due to pain. The bleeding pattern was similar for those using GyneFix and Gyne-T380S.
                Our study suggests that although the actual fitting may be more painful, pain is less during the 6 weeks after insertion of GyneFix and fewer women discontinue its use because of pain, as compared with Gyne-T380S. The high overall continuation rate of all emergency IUDs at 6 weeks and low morbidity seen in this study favours more frequent IUD insertion where unprotected intercourse has occurred, given also its higher efficacy over oral hormonal EC.
There is insufficient data to show that problems of early expulsions have been overcome with the modified introducer used in GyneFix. Apart from that, the frameless device performs similarly to TCu380, and appears to have a lower pregnancy rate in later years, although the absolute difference is small.