The sensitivity and specificity of the Slump and the Straight Leg Raising tests in patients with lumbar disc herniation. Use of lumbar extension, slump test, physical and neurological examination in the evaluation of patients with suspected herniated nucleus pulposus. A prospective clinical study. Diagnosis and prognosis in lumbar disc herniation. Lumbar disc herniation. A controlled, prospective study with ten years of observation. Predictive value of clinical and surgical findings in patients with lumbago-sciatica. A prospective study (Part I). Physical signs in lumbar disc hernia. Cramp finding: can it be used as a new diagnostic and prognostic factor in lumbar disc surgery? A critical assessment of clinical diagnosis of disc herniation in patients with monoradicular sciatica. Lumbar spine films in primary care: current use and effects of selective ordering criteria.
An accurate and specific diagnosis prevents the recurrences of low back pain and chronic spinal pain. The physical examination is the most useful tool to diagnosis. The examiner must aim to determine the exact tissue that pain arises from to make the specific diagnosis. Lumbar disc herniation is 1 disease that physical examination, symptoms, and findings on imaging technique do not always correlate with each other. The Straight Leg Raising (SLR) test has been used as the primary test to diagnosis lumbar disc herniations and found to have high correlation with findings on operation since its sensitivity is high in only disc herniations leading to root compression that may eventually need operation. More sensitive test, like the Slump, might be used in herniations in which the SLR is negative. The Slump test is really a variant of the SLR and the Lasègue's tests performed in the seated position and is a progressive series of maneuvers designed to place the sciatic nerve roots under increasing tension. At each step in the procedure, the patient informs the examiner what is being felt and whether radicular pain is produced. As a result, the Slump test applies traction to the nerve roots by incorporating spinal and hip joint flexion into the leg raising and would warn the examiner of the presence of nerve root compression when there is a negative SLR test.
                This study measured the sensitivity and specificity of the Slump test and compare it with the SLR test in patients with and without lumbar disc herniations.
                A prospective case control study of 75 patients with complaints suggestive of lumbar disc herniation was carried out in the outpatient clinics of the neurosurgery department of a state teaching hospital. Seventy-five referred or self-admitted patients with low back, leg, or low back and leg pain who had results of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lumbar spine were included in the study. Thirty-eight patients had signs of herniation demonstrated by MRI. Control patients (n = 37) had no disc bulges or herniations on MRI. Both the Slump and SLR tests were performed during the assessment of all the patients by the second author. The MRI results were assessed and recorded by the first author.
                The Slump test was found to be more sensitive (0.84) than the SLR (0.52) in the patients with lumbar disc herniations. However, the SLR was found to be a slightly more specific test (0.89) than the Slump test (0.83).
                The Slump test might be used more frequently as a sensitive physical examination tool in patients with symptoms of lumbar disc herniations. In contrast, owing to its higher specificity, the SLR test may especially help identify patients who have herniations with root compression requiring surgery. This prospective and consecutive study was designed to evaluate the validity of different clinical tests, e.g. lumbar extension in lying and slump test for patients with suspected herniated nucleus pulposus, in comparison with findings on computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan. There were 105 patients who were seen and examined by the senior author (for the sake of the study) at the Orthopaedic Physiotherapy Department, on an average of 5.5 days (range 0-21 days) before CT and/or MRI examination were carried out. There were 36 women and 69 men with an average age of 42.7 +/- 9.8 (range 19-64) years. According to the radiological findings on CT and/or MRI, the patients were divided into three groups: 52 patients with disc hernia, 41 patients with bulging discs and 12 patients without positive findings. The mean values with standard deviations of 25 variables of three diagnostic groups were studied. Multiple comparison adjustment according to Bonferroni showed significant differences for three variables that were of diagnostic value (lumbar range of motion for forward flexion, left side-bending in standing, and pain distribution during extension in standing). The agreement between clinical and radiological findings for type and level of diagnosis of disc herniation was accurate in 72 patients (69%). The diagnostic sensitivity for disc herniation was 82.6% and the specificity 54.7%. In a prospective 2-year followup study of 160 consecutive patients undergoing primary surgery for suspected lumbar disc herniation, the authors studied the diagnostic and prognostic factors by using stepwise logistic regression analysis. When the different factors were entered in the same order as presented clinically, history and pain analysis contained most of the predictive information available. When all factors were entered simultaneously in the computations, the following factors (in order of relative importance) predicted relief of sciatica after 2 years: rupture of the anulus (as opposed to bulging disc or negative exploration), no preoperative comorbidity, and male gender. The following factors predicted return to work at 2 years: no preoperative comorbidity, duration of sciatica less than 7 months, education or vocational training in addition to compulsory school, age younger than 41 years, male gender, and no previous nonspinal surgery. Return to work does not seem to be a valid result parameter in lumbar disc surgery. The most important physical signs were root tension tests and lumbar range of motion, whereas neurologic signs were of secondary importance. Many people have asymptomatic herniations, and today supersensitive diagnostic imaging is widely available. Thus, the importance of clinical evaluation has increased, and most of the relevant information can be obtained by listening to the patient. A simple anamnesis apparently is a good alternative to psychologic tests in surgical triage. Two hundred eighty patients with herniated lumbar discs, verified by radiculography, were divided into three groups. One group, which mainly will be dealt with in this paper, consisted of 126 patients with uncertain indication for surgical treatment, who had their therapy decided by randomization which permitted comparison between the results of surgical and conservative treatment. Another group comprising 67 patients had symptoms and signs that beyond doubt, required surgical therapy. The third group of 87 patients was treated conservatively because there was no indication for operative intervention. Follow-up examinations in the first group were performed after one, four, and ten years. The controlled trial showed a statistically significant better result in the surgically treated group at the one-year follow-up examination. After four years the operated patients still showed better results, but the difference was no longer statistically significant. Only minor changes took place during the last six years of observation. In a prospective, consecutive study of patients with lumbar back pain and sciatica, various clinical features and surgical findings were evaluated in order to analyse the predictive value regarding (1) level of diseased interspace (2) presence and type of lesion responsible for root compression (3) outcome after surgery. One hundred patients underwent surgery solely on clinical grounds. Fifty-eight had disc herniation. The level of disc herniation was correctly predicted in three quarters of patients with a prolapsed disc. The outcome after surgery was good in 77 patients. Only few clinical features, namely male sex and scoliosis were predictors of a good outcome. Lasegue's sign was indicative of root compression in 90%, but only two-thirds had disc herniation. Conversely one-third had disc herniation in spite of a "negative" test. Lasegue's sign was not superior to other clinical tests in predicting outcome. The most important indicator of a good outcome was the presence of disc herniation at surgery. Patients with disc pathology other than true disc herniation fared equally with patients, who had normal discs disclosed at surgery. Myelography was undertaken in all patients prior to surgery, the results of which are analysed in the following paper. (Espersen et al.: Predictive value of radiculography in patients with lumbago-sciatica. A prospective study (Part II, Acta Neurochirurgica 73 (1984), 213-221. In a prospective study of 163 consecutive patients operated on because they were thought to have lumbar disc hernia, the authors investigated whether physical signs could predict the degree of hernia (complete hernia, incomplete hernia, protruded disc, and normal disc) found at surgery. Stepwise discriminant analysis showed that there were only 2 physical signs of diagnostic value: lumbar range of motion and crossed Lasegue sign. By these signs, 74% of the uncontained hernias and 68% of the contained hernias could be correctly classified. Discrimination also was made between intact annuli (negative exploration and protruded disc) versus ruptured annuli (incomplete hernias and complete hernias). Again, lumbar range of motion and crossed Lasègue sign were the only significant parameters, predicting 71% of the ruptured annuli and 80% of the intact annuli. These 2 physical signs are important because the degree of the hernia is the most important prognostic factor for the outcome of lumbar disc surgery. The degree of the hernia also has an impact on the choice of invasive therapy: open surgery, percutaneous surgery, or enzymatic nucleolysis. Neurologic signs often were absent, showed low correlation to the degree of the hernia, and had a limited value for predicting the level of the hernia. However, they are important for the differential diagnosis in distinguishing between radicular and referred pain. In this prospective study, the validity and the importance of a new finding (cramp finding) in the diagnosis and outcome after lumbar disc surgery were tested. The test is performed with the person in prone position. Against a forceful knee flexion, the examiner holds the leg with one hand and applies a force to overcome the knee flexion. The finding is positive if the examined person feels a disturbing cramp in the leg or thigh. The study was performed between October 1997 and December 1999. Besides the cramp finding, the classical disc herniation examination, including mechanical and neurological findings, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging tests, and laboratory findings were checked pre- and postoperatively. The positive cramp finding in the operated group was 72% (n=133) preoperatively and straight leg raising (SLR) test was positive in all of them. Cramp finding was positive in 70%, 52%, 34%, and 8% of patients postoperatively in the first, 3rd, 12th and 24th months, respectively. The presented finding appears to be as valuable as the SLR, and especially contralateral SLR, tests in lumbar disc surgery. Cramp finding is also important in outcome evaluation. The diagnostic power or clinical parameters in the diagnosis of lumbar disc herniation in patients with monoradicular pain was evaluated in a prospective study with a 100% verification of the diagnosis. Eighty patients with monoradicular pain corresponding to the fifth lumbar or the first sacral nerve root were included. Pre-operatively a number of clinical parameters were recorded and compared to the intra-operative finding of a disc herniation. The parameters were analysed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results from the available literature were analysed by ROC curves for comparison. In 76% of the cases a disc herniation was discovered. The level of the disc herniation was correctly predicted in 93% of these cases by the location of the pain alone or supplemented by neurological signs. Apart from radicularly distributed pain, all parameters in the present study and in the literature had no or low diagnostic accuracy. Thus, in patients with monoradicular sciatica further clinical parameters do not add to the diagnosis of lumbar disc herniation. Low back pain (LBP) often prompts radiography, although the diagnostic yield of lumbar spine films is low, and many radiographic abnormalities are unrelated to symptoms. Criteria have been proposed for selective x-ray use, but their value and safety are uncertain. To evaluate these criteria, the authors prospectively studied 621 walk-in patients with LBP. The yield of explanatory x-ray findings was over three times greater among patients with indications for radiography than among those without. Furthermore, an indication for x-rays existed for all patients found to have a malignancy, and for 13 of 14 patients with an identified fracture. Actual physician ordering, however, did not correspond well with the recommended indications. Application of selective criteria appears safe and may improve the yield of useful findings. It may not, however, reduce x-ray utilization from current levels without further refinement in the criteria.
When used in isolation, current evidence indicates poor diagnostic performance of most physical tests used to identify lumbar disc herniation. However, most findings arise from surgical populations and may not apply to primary care or non-selected populations. Better performance may be obtained when tests are combined.