Diazepam to improve acute stroke outcome: results of the early GABA-Ergic activation study in stroke trial. a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Prophylactic effect of neuroleptics in symptom-free schizophrenics. Ketazolam treatment for spasticity: double-blind study of a new drug. Therapy of alcohol withdrawal syndrome in intensive care unit patients following trauma: results of a prospective, randomized trial. The efficacy and safety of clozapine versus chlorpromazine in geriatric schizophrenia. Treatment of spasticity with tizanidine in multiple sclerosis. A comparison of chlormethiazole and thioridazine in agitated confusional states of the elderly. The Clomethiazole Acute Stroke Study in tissue-type plasminogen activator-treated stroke (CLASS-T): final results. Remacemide hydrochloride: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, safety and tolerability study in patients with acute ischemic stroke.
We tested whether diazepam, a GABA-ergic drug that also inhibits brain nitric monoxide formation, improves acute stroke prognosis.
                880 patients, randomized within 12 h of acute stroke, received diazepam 10 mg or placebo by rectiole, as soon as possible, followed by 10-mg tablets twice daily for 3 days. Primary outcome was independence (Rankin score <3) at 3 months; secondary outcome was complete recovery (Barthel index >or=95 or Rankin score <or=1).
                Intention-to-treat analyses on all 849 patients with full follow-up (50.4% on diazepam): odds ratio (OR) 1.14, 95% CI 0.87-1.49 for primary endpoint, and an OR of 1.26 (0.90-1.76) for complete recovery, both favoring diazepam. Adjusted analyses for all stroke patients (843): OR 1.20 (0.87-1.65), and 1.25 (0.89-1.74), respectively, and for all infarct patients (748): OR 1.31 (0.93-1.85), and 1.46 (1.02-2.09; p=0.037), respectively. Analyses restricted to cardioembolic infarct patients (200) showed treatment benefit for the primary outcome: OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.07-4.76, p=0.032, and complete recovery: OR 2.65, 95% CI 1.06-6.59, p=0.037. About one third of ischemic stroke patients had 'any adverse event', without any difference between treatment groups. In 95 intracerebral hemorrhage patients, frequency of pneumonia and death were higher in the diazepam group than in the placebo group: 35 and 10%, 22 and 12%, respectively.
                Although point estimates favored diazepam treatment in various analyses, our data did not confirm our primary hypothesis. Diazepam treatment seems beneficial in cardioembolic infarct patients, is safe in acute ischemic stroke, but may better be avoided in intracerebral hemorrhage.
                Copyright (c) 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel. Prophylactic effects of psychotropic drugs on 55 schizophrenics in remission were evaluated for 3 years in a double-blind controlled study employing a cross-over design. Patients were randomly assigned to the following drugs orally administered twice a day: placebo; diazepam 15 mg; imipramine 50 mg; chlorpromazine 75 mg; and haloperidol 3 mg. The number of days of remission for each patient was recorded. Since only two patients received all five drug treatments, the data were analyzed using the number of days allocated to the "first assigned drugs" only and the cross-over aspect of the experimental design was disregarded. All patients treated with either the placebo, diazepam or imipramine relapsed within a year. On the other hand, four patients treated with chlorpromazine, or with haloperidol, were in remission for more than 1 year. Fifty percent of the patients relapsed within 16 days with placebo; 88 days with diazepam; 30 days with imipramine; 165 days with chlorpromazine; and 74 days with haloperidol. Within a year, only chlorpromazine significantly prolonged the remission state as compared to placebo and imipramine. At the end of the 3-year trial, both chlorpromazine and haloperidol significantly prolonged the remission state as compared to the other three drugs. These data suggest that neuroleptic treatment for a longer period is vitally important to prevent relapse even in schizophrenics in remission and that such a trial seems an efficient method for investigating the prophylactic effects of neuroleptics. A minor tranquilizer, ketazolam, was tested in a double-blind, randomized, crossover study of 50 patients for its effects in neurologic spasticity. The drug was compared with diazepam (widely accepted as an effective antispasticity agent) and a placebo. The patients with spasticity were almost all cases of multiple sclerosis (24) or stroke (24). Thirty-nine patients completed the study. There was not statistically significant superiority of either diazepam or ketazolam, but both relieved symptoms significantly better than the placebo, as measured clinically and by electromyographic recording of deep tendon reflexes. Ketazolam is a relatively safe and clinically effective antispasticity agent (especially for patients with multiple sclerosis). The well-known "big 3"--dantrolene sodium, baclofen, and diazepam--produce large and small problems in many individual cases; hence, ketazolam now offers a safe and clinically useful alternative. To assess the effect of three different alcohol withdrawal therapy regimens in traumatized chronic alcoholic patients with respect to the duration of mechanical ventilation and the frequency of pneumonia and cardiac disorders during their intensive care unit (ICU) stay.
                A prospective, randomized, blinded, controlled clinical trial.
                A university hospital ICU.
                Multiple-injured alcohol-dependent patients (n=180) transferred to the ICU after admission to the emergency room and operative management. A total of 180 patients were included in the study; however, 21 patients were excluded from the study after assignment.
                Patients who developed actual alcohol withdrawal syndrome were randomized to one of the following treatment regimens: flunitrazepam/clonidine (n=54); chlormethiazole/haloperidol (n=50); or flunitrazepam/haloperidol (n=55). The need for administration of medication was determined, using a validated measure of the severity of alcohol withdrawal (Revised Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol Scale).
                The duration of mechanical ventilation and major intercurrent complications, such as pneumonia, sepsis, cardiac disorders, bleeding disorders, and death, were documented. Patients did not differ significantly between groups regarding age, Revised Trauma and Injury Severity Score and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score on admission. In all except four patients in the flunitrazepam/clonidine group, who continued to hallucinate, the Revised Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol Scale decreased to <20 after initiation of therapy. ICU stay did not significantly differ between groups (p=.1669). However, mechanical ventilation was significantly prolonged in the chlormethiazole/haloperidol group (p=.0315) due to an increased frequency of pneumonia (p=.0414). Cardiac complications were significantly (p=.0047) increased in the flunitrazepam/clonidine group.
                There was some advantage in the flunitrazepam/clonidine regimen with respect to pneumonia and the necessity for mechanical ventilation. However, four (7%) patients had to be excluded from the study due to ongoing hallucinations during therapy. Also, cardiac complications were increased in this group. Thus, flunitrazepam/haloperidol should be preferred in patients with cardiac or pulmonary risk. Further studies are required to determine which therapy should be considered. There has been an absence of controlled studies focusing specifically on neuroleptic treatment in the elderly schizophrenic population. Therefore, we conducted a 12-week double-blind comparison study to assess the efficacy and tolerability of clozapine and chlorpromazine in a group of elderly inpatients with chronic schizophrenia.
                Forty-two elderly DSM-IV schizophrenic veterans were randomly assigned to clozapine or chlorpromazine and assessed for efficacy at baseline and at termination with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and the Clinical Global Impressions scale (CGI). Side effects were also monitored. Medications were titrated, on the basis of clinical response and side effects, to a maximum dose of 300 mg/day of clozapine or 600 mg/day of chlorpromazine.
                The results suggest that both the chlorpromazine and clozapine groups improved their PANSS scores at termination compared with baseline, but the difference between the 2 groups was not statistically significant. The mean CGI scores reflecting severity of illness also demonstrated improvement in both groups over time. Both groups had similar incidences of side effects. One patient in each group had a life-threatening side effect. More patients taking clozapine had tachycardia and weight gain, while more chlorpromazine patients noted sedation.
                We concluded that both clozapine and chlorpromazine are effective treatments for psychosis and behavioral disturbances in geriatric schizophrenia. Both agents had similar incidences of side effects. With careful monitoring and titration of dosage, both clozapine and chlorpromazine were fairly well tolerated in this population. Spasticity is a frequent and often disabling symptom in MS patients. Current drugs used as antispastic agents include Dantrolene Sodium, Baclofen and Diazepam. Tizanidine (5-chloro-4-(2imidazolin-2 yl amino)-2,1,3-benzothialdiazole) is a new antispasticity agent that has purported central action. A double blind placebo controlled trial was performed to study the efficacy of this drug in MS patients. Sixty-six patients entered an eight week therapeutic trial and fifty-nine completed the trial. Patients were assessed at 0, 2, 3 and 8 weeks of therapy for clinical effects. Electrophysiologic tests were performed at 0 and 8 weeks. A statistically significant benefit was noted in spastic muscle groups in the legs with concomitant significant reduction in hyperactive stretch reflexes and ankle clonus. Side effects most frequently cited included dry mouth and drowsiness. Two patients developed elevated liver function test that decreased with cessation of therapy. Other clinical details, side effects and electrophysiologic data will be presented. Tizanidine appears to reduce clinical spasticity and hyperreflexia in MS patients although no change in functional status was detected. Tizanidine may well serve as an alternate antispastic agent, alone or in combination with other agents. Chlormethiazole and thioridazine were found to be equally effective in the management of the agitational component of agitated confusional states in the elderly. Confusion and nocturnal awakening were found to be controlled more effectively with chlormethiazole than with thioridazine. Chlormethiazole treatment also resulted in significant reductions in physical disability as assessed by the Clifton Behaviour Rating Scale. A greater incidence of adverse effects was associated with thioridazine treatment. To assess the safety of tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) plus clomethiazole in patients with acute ischemic stroke and determine the feasibility of combination stroke therapy.
                Clomethiazole is a neuroprotectant that appeared to improve outcome in patients with clinical deficits of a major stroke (total anterior circulation syndrome [TACS]) in a previous study, the Clomethiazole Acute Stroke Study (CLASS). Combining a neuroprotectant such as clomethiazole with thrombolysis may augment the beneficial effects of the two agents. CLASS-t-PA (CLASS-T) was a pilot study to explore the safety of the combination and the feasibility of performing combination treatment in the setting of acute ischemic stroke.
                In a randomized, double-blind design (stratified for age, severity at admission, and time since onset of stroke), all patients received 0.9 mg/kg t-PA beginning within 3 hours of stroke onset and then either 68 mg/kg clomethiazole (n = 97) IV over 24 hours or placebo (n = 93) beginning within 12 hours of stroke onset. Patients were followed for 90 days. The main measures of safety were mortality and serious adverse events, and the main measure of functional outcome was the Barthel Index.
                The number of serious adverse event reports was 47 in the clomethiazole group and 48 in the placebo group. Death during the 90 days after treatment occurred in 15 clomethiazole and nine placebo patients (p = 0.26). Sedation was reported as an adverse event during therapy in 42% of clomethiazole patients vs 13% of placebo patients. The proportion of patients with TACS was 53% in the clomethiazole group and 41% in the placebo group. In the TACS subgroup, 52.9% of the clomethiazole patients scored a Barthel Index greater than 60 vs 44.7% of placebo patients (odds ratio 1.39; 95% CI 0.60 to 3.23).
                In this pilot study, there were no safety concerns related to the combination of t-PA and clomethiazole. The combination paradigm proved feasible, although many patients received clomethiazole several hours after thrombolysis; future studies must require prompt administration of the neuroprotectant either before or during administration of the thrombolytic. Patients with major strokes (TACS) may have the potential to benefit from the combination of t-PA and clomethiazole. Remacemide hydrochloride and its principal active desglycinyl metabolite are low-affinity noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-receptor channel blockers. Remacemide hydrochloride has demonstrated neuroprotection in animal models of hypoxia and ischemic stroke. This study assessed the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of ascending doses of remacemide hydrochloride in patients with recent onset (within 12 hours) ischemic stroke.
                This was a placebo-controlled, dose escalating, parallel group study. Groups of 8 patients (6 active, 2 placebo) were planned to receive twice-daily treatment, with l00 mg, 200 mg, 300 mg, 400 mg, 500 mg, or 600 mg remacemide hydrochloride given as 2 intravenous infusions followed by 6 days' oral treatment. Patients who were unable to swallow discontinued study medication but continued to be monitored for safety; these patients were replaced. A CT or MRI scan was performed within 48 hours of admission to establish the cause of focal neurological deficit. Patients with ischemic stroke continued in the study. Patients with other causes of focal neurological deficit were withdrawn and replaced. Because the frequency of dysphagia after stroke in the first dose group (100 mg BID) was higher than had been anticipated, the protocol was amended so that subsequent dose groups received 6 intravenous infusions (2 doses per day for 3 days). Neurological and functional outcome data were collected, but the study was not powered to demonstrate drug efficacy. Patient safety was assessed by clinical observation, laboratory tests, and ECGs, while tolerability was assessed by recording adverse events. Blood sampling was included to determine plasma concentrations of remacemide and the desglycinyl metabolite at fixed points during the dosing period.
                The most common adverse events considered by the investigator to be possibly treatment related were related to the central nervous system (CNS), and these events appeared to increase with dose. Four patients were withdrawn from the study because of CNS-related events: 1 in the placebo group, 1 in the 500 mg BID group, and 2 in the 600 mg BID group. Infusion site reactions and gastrointestinal upset were also reported and considered to be treatment related. One patient in the placebo group and 4 patients in the 600 mg BID dose group experienced vomiting, whereas this event was not reported by patients in the other dose groups.
                On the evidence of this study, the maximum well-tolerated dose for remacemide hydrochloride in acute stroke is 400 mg BID. Doses of 200 mg BID or higher attained the putative neuroprotective plasma concentrations of remacemide predicted from animal models (250 to 600 ng/mL). The expected gradual accumulation of active metabolite might suggest that optimal neuroprotective concentrations are unlikely to be achieved within the early hours of treatment at this dose. However, plasma concentrations do not directly reflect brain concentrations, because studies in rats show that remacemide and the desglycinyl metabolite rapidly reach comparable brain concentrations within 1 hour, despite a lower plasma concentration of the metabolite.
This review does not provide the evidence to support the use of GABA receptor agonists (chlormethiazole or diazepam) for the treatment of patients with acute ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. Chlormethiazole appeared to be beneficial in improving functional independence in patients with TACS according to the subgroup analysis, but this result must be interpreted with great caution. More well-designed RCTs with large samples of TACS would be required for further confirmation. However, somnolence and rhinitis are frequent adverse events related to chlormethiazole.