Intra-alveolar chlorhexidine gel for the prevention of dry socket in mandibular third molar surgery. A pilot study. Evaluation of 0.12% chlorhexidine rinse on the prevention of alveolar osteitis. Comparison of two chlorhexidine rinse protocols on the incidence of alveolar osteitis following the surgical removal of impacted third molars. Effectiveness of chlorhexidine gel versus chlorhexidine rinse in reducing alveolar osteitis in mandibular third molar surgery. Perioperative use of 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate for the prevention of alveolar osteitis: efficacy and risk factor analysis. Randomized, double-blind study on effectiveness of intra-alveolar chlorhexidine gel in reducing the incidence of alveolar osteitis in mandibular third molar surgery. The effect of a chlorhexidine rinse on the incidence of alveolar osteitis following the surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars. The prevention of 'dry socket' with topical metronidazole in general dental practice. Control of oral mucositis and candidiasis in marrow transplantation: a prospective, double-blind trial of chlorhexidine digluconate oral rinse.
Chlorhexidine is a good prophylactic agent for post-extraction dry socket alveolitis. The bio-adhesive 0.2% chlorhexidine gel could improve this action since its intra-alveolar positioning would allow a more direct action on the alveolus and more prolonged action of the medication.
                We present a single blind, randomised study on 30 patients to evaluate the efficacy of the bio-adhesive 0.2% chlorhexidine gel, placed only once within the alveolus, on the reduction of the incidence of impacted third molar post-extraction dry socket alveolitis and its post-operative effects on patients.
                A reduction of 42.65% in the occurrence of alveolitis and a more favourable post-operative period in the experimental group was observed. In the control group, the appearance of alveolitis was 30.76% opposite to 17.64 % in the experimental group.
                The bio-adhesive 0.2% chlorhexidine gel, applied only once after the extraction of impacted third molars, seems to be an appropriate option for the reduction of alveolitis. It improves the buccal aperture and oedema in the post-operative period, although further double blind studies with larger samples are necessary. A double-blind study evaluated the ability of 0.12% chlorhexidine rinse to decrease the incidence of localized alveolar osteitis after the removal of mandibular third molar teeth. One hundred sixty extraction sites in 80 patients were evaluated. A statistically significant decrease in the incidence of dry socket was seen in patients using the chlorhexidine rinse with no significant adverse reactions. Thus a 0.12% chlorhexidine rinse is shown to be an effective means of decreasing alveolar osteitis that may follow removal of third molar teeth. Alveolar osteitis (dry socket) is the most common complication following the extraction of permanent teeth. This study was undertaken to compare the effect of two chlorhexidine rinse protocols on the incidence of alveolar osteitis in patients undergoing surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar teeth.
                A prospective randomized clinical trial was conducted among 99 subjects. Patients were randomly assigned into two groups. Subjects were instructed to rinse twice daily with 15 ml of chlorhexidine rinse 30 seconds for one week before and one week after surgery (group I) or one week after surgery (group II). Postoperatively, all patients were instructed to return in one week or sooner if bothersome pain increased or persisted. Data were collected regarding abnormal healing, presence of necrotic tissue, exposed bone, and absence of clot.
                The results indicated group I and group II were not statistically significant different in the reduction of alveolar osteitis.
                To reduce alveolar osteitis after impacted third molar surgery, it was observed use of postoperative chlorhexidine rinse was adequate. The postoperative use of chlorhexidine is more feasible than both preoperative and postoperative use. Chlorhexidine is an antimicrobial agent used in the prevention of postextraction alveolar osteitis, tooth decay, and periodontal diseases. There are various forms of chlorhexidine application. The most extensively studied is one that uses the rinse as the form of application. Recently, a bioadhesive gel form has become available. Its main advantage is that it prolongs the bioavailability of chlorhexidine in the application area. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of chlorhexidine gel versus a chlorhexidine rinse in reducing postoperative alveolar osteitis after the extraction of mandibular third molars.
                The experimental or gel group (n = 41) applied the bioadhesive 0.2% chlorhexidine gel to the wound during the first postoperative week and a control or rinse group (n = 32) used a 0.12% chlorhexidine rinse during the first week postextraction.
                We observed a 70% decrease in postoperative alveolar osteitis in the gel group (P = .040). The rinse group had 25% incidence postoperative alveolar osteitis, while the gel group had 7.5%.
                It was concluded that the topical application of bioadhesive chlorhexidine gel to the surgical wound during the postoperative week may decrease the incidence of alveolar osteitis after extraction of the mandibular third molars. The purposes of this study were to evaluate the use of 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate as a prophylactic therapy for the prevention of alveolar osteitis and to further examine subject-based risk factors associated with alveolar osteitis.
                The trial was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study conducted among 279 subjects, each of whom required oral surgery for the removal of a minimum of one impacted mandibular third molar. Subjects were instructed to rinse twice daily with 15 ml of chlorhexidine or placebo mouthrinse for 30 seconds for 1 week before and 1 week after the surgical extractions. This regimen included a supervised presurgical rinse. Alveolar osteitis diagnosis was based on the subjective finding of increasing postoperative pain at the surgical site that was not relieved with mild analgesics, supported by clinical evidence of one or more of the following: loss of blood clot, necrosis of blood clot, and exposed alveolar bone.
                In comparison with use of the placebo mouthrinse, prophylactic use of the chlorhexidine mouthrinse resulted in statistically significant (p < 0.05) reductions in the incidence of alveolar osteitis. With chlorhexidine therapy, the subject- and extraction-based incidences of alveolar osteitis in the evaluable subset (271 subjects) were reduced, relative to placebo, by 38% and 44%, respectively. The corresponding odds ratios that describe the increased odds of experiencing alveolar osteitis in the placebo group were 1.87 and 2.05 for subject- and extraction-based analyses, respectively. In comparison with nonuse of oral contraceptives, the use of oral contraceptives in female subjects was related to a statistically significant increase in the incidence of alveolar osteitis (odds ratio = 1.92, p = 0.035). Relative to male subjects, the observed incidence of alveolar osteitis for female subjects not using oral contraceptives was not statistically significant (odds ratio = 1.18, p = 0.64). Smoking did not increase the incidence of alveolar osteitis relative to not smoking (odds ratio = 1.20, p = 0.33).
                These data confirm that the prophylactic use of 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthrinse results in a significant reduction in the incidence of alveolar osteitis after the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. In addition, oral contraceptive use in females was confirmed to be a risk factor for the development of alveolar osteitis. Chlorhexidine (CHX) mouthwash is a good prophylactic agent for postextraction alveolar osteitis (AO), a very common complication. Recently, a bio-adhesive gel to deliver the active substance, CHX, has been introduced. The intra-alveolar positioning of the bio-adhesive gel allows more direct and prolonged action of CHX, which could be useful in the prevention of AO following extraction of impacted third molars. Presented here is a double-blind, randomised and parallel-group study evaluating the efficacy of the bio-adhesive 0.2% CHX gel (n=53) applied once within the alveolus during third molar surgery, compared to placebo gel only (n=50), in reducing the incidence of impacted third-molar postextraction AO. A 63.33% reduction in the occurrence of AO (P=0.019) was observed in the experimental group. In the control group, the occurrence of AO was 30% compared to 11% in the experimental group. Bio-adhesive 0.2% CHX gel, applied only once within the alveolus site at the time of surgery, may reduce the incidence of AO following removal of impacted third molars. A prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study was conducted with 139 patients (278 bilaterally impacted mandibular third molars) to determine the effect of a perioperative 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate rinse on the incidence of alveolar osteitis following surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars. A statistically significant 60% reduction in the incidence of alveolar osteitis was obtained in the chlorhexidine group compared with the placebo group. In most subgroups analyzed, chlorhexidine was associated with at least a 50% reduction in alveolar osteitis compared with control groups. The purpose of the study was to determine if the intra-alveolar application of topical metronidazole gel could reduce the incidence of alveolar osteitis (dry socket) following routine tooth extraction in molar and premolar extraction sites.
                This was a multicentre, double blind, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial. A total of 302 patients took part, of which 23 returned with alveolar osteitis. Of these, eight had received the metronidazole gel and 15 the placebo.
                The study was carried out in three general dental practices by general dental practitioners working in England over the period 2000-2003.
                Following extraction of either a molar or premolar tooth, either a 25% metronidazole gel or KY Jelly was syringed gently into the socket. A painful post operative complication was recorded if either a dry socket was present or the patient returned with pain.
                The difference in the incidence of alveolar osteitis between the placebo and the active gel groups was not significant and it was concluded that 25% topical metronidazole gel was not effective in reducing the incidence of alveolar osteitis. It was found that the incidence of alveolar osteitis reduced with increasing age and was more likely to occur in a patient with a previous history of the condition. Conditioning chemoradiotherapy damages the mucosal barrier of the mouth and throat and often produces severe oral inflammation and infection. In a prospective, double-blind, randomized study, we examined the use of a chlorhexidine digluconate mouthrinse for prophylaxis against oral mucosal complications in 51 bone marrow transplant patients. Use of chlorhexidine mouthrinse produced significant reductions in the incidence and severity of oral mucositis. Mucositis also resolved more quickly in patients receiving chlorhexidine. Concomitant reductions in total oral streptococci (p less than 0.02-p less than 0.001) and oral candida (p less than 0.004) were seen in patients using chlorhexidine. Persistent clinical oral candidiasis (thrush) was observed in 15 to 27 control group patients (56%), but only transiently in two (8%) of 24 patients who used chlorhexidine rinse (p less than 0.001). Five of 27 control group patients (19%) had candidemia, while no candidemia was observed in the chlorhexidine group (p less than 0.03). Three deaths from disseminated candidiasis occurred in the placebo group; none occurred in patients who received chlorhexidine. Prophylactic use of chlorhexidine mouthrinse produces reductions in oral soft tissue disease and oral microbial burden in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation. The reductions in mucositis and in oral candida infections observed with prophylactic chlorhexidine mouthrinse represent a significant advantage for patients undergoing marrow transplantation.
Most tooth extractions are undertaken by dentists for a variety of reasons, however, all but three studies included in the present review included participants undergoing extraction of third molars, most of which were undertaken by oral surgeons. There is some evidence that rinsing with chlorhexidine (0.12% and 0.2%) or placing chlorhexidine gel (0.2%) in the sockets of extracted teeth, provides a benefit in preventing dry socket. There was insufficient evidence to determine the effects of the other 10 preventative interventions each evaluated in single studies. There was insufficient evidence to determine the effects of any of the interventions to treat dry socket. The present review found some evidence for the association of minor adverse reactions with use of 0.12%, 0.2% and 2% chlorhexidine mouthrinses, though most studies were not designed to detect the presence of hypersensitivity reactions to mouthwash as part of the study protocol. No adverse events were reported in relation to the use of 0.2% chlorhexidine gel placed directly into a socket (though previous allergy to chlorhexidine was an exclusion criterion in these trials). In view of recent reports in the UK of two cases of serious adverse events associated with irrigation of dry socket with chlorhexidine mouthrinse, it is recommended that all members of the dental team prescribing chlorhexidine products are aware of the potential for both minor and serious adverse side effects.