Metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: reconsideration of traditional contraindications. Comparative outcomes study of metformin intervention versus conventional approach the COSMIC Approach Study. [Body mass index, blood lactate and therapeutic effectiveness of metformin in type II diabetes mellitus]. Metformin improves peripheral but not hepatic insulin action in obese patients with type II diabetes. Metabolic effects of metformin on glucose and lactate metabolism in noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The hyperlactatemic effect of biguanides: a comparison between phenformin and metformin during a 6-month treatment. A retrospective chart review of uncontrolled use of metformin as an add-on therapy in type 2 diabetes. Metformin as secondary therapy in a defined population with type 2 diabetes. Combined metformin and insulin therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
BACKGROUND: The strict limiting criteria for the use of metformin in diabetes mellitus stem largely from reports, in the 1970s, of mortality and lactic acidosis associated with phenformin. Data about metformin are less clear and are based mainly on case reports. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of continued use of metformin in patients with contraindications to this agent. PATIENTS: Some 393 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (serum creatinine 130-220 &mgr;mol/l) were studied. Among them were 266 patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), 94 with congestive heart failure (CHF), and 91 with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), all of whom had been treated with metformin. The patients were randomized to either continue or to stop metformin and were then followed for 4 years. RESULTS: Analysis was by intention-to-treat. The patients who stopped taking metformin showed a rise in body mass index and in hemoglobin A1c significantly greater than those who continued the drug. There were no cases of lactic acidosis. Lactic acid values did not differ in the two groups and correlated only with serum creatinine and body mass index. Microvascular diabetic complications, cardiovascular events, and cardiovascular and total mortality were identical in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetic patients who are treated with metformin and who tolerate the drug well may continue taking it, even when mild renal impairment develops, possibly up to serum creatinine levels of 220 &mgr;mol/l. There is also no apparent reason why patients with CHD, CHF, and COPD should discontinue metformin. Metformin was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 1995 subject to the conduct of a randomized trial to evaluate the risk of lactic acidosis or other serious adverse events (SAEs) with this agent, under usual care conditions.
                The Comparative Outcomes Study of Metformin Intervention versus Conventional (COSMIC) Approach Study was a randomized, open-label, active-comparator, parallel-group, 1-year trial in type 2 diabetic patients suboptimally controlled on diet or sulfonylurea. Patients received metformin (n = 7,227) or other usual care treatments (n = 1,505). The primary end point was the incidence of SAEs, death, and hospitalization.
                SAEs occurred in 10.3% (95% CI 9.6-11.1%) of the metformin group and in 11.0% (9.5-12.7%) of the usual care group (P = 0.431). Lactic acidosis did not occur. All-cause mortality (1.1% [0.9-1.4%] vs. 1.3% [0.8-2.0%], P = 0.596) and hospitalization (9.4% [8.8-10.1%] vs. 10.4% [8.9-12.1%], P = 0.229) were similar between groups.
                The incidence of SAEs was similar between groups. Lactic acidosis was not observed. Metformin may be safely prescribed for type 2 diabetes if contraindications and warnings are respected. This study demonstrates the utility of large, simple trials for risk evaluation of treatments for common diseases. Obese type II diabetic patients are often treated with metformin after full doses of sulfonylureas or insulin fail to achieve a satisfactory metabolic control. Clinical practice has often indicated that metformin has little effect on normal weight type II diabetics. The effectiveness of metformin vs placebo was evaluated in a double blind cross-over study on 53 type II diabetic patients with unsatisfactory glycaemic control. The patients were divided into two groups-the sulfonylurea-treated (S) and the insulin treated (I). Each group was then subdivided into three classes: 1) normal weight [BMI less than 25], 2) overweight [BMI 25-30] and 3) obese [BMI greater than 30]. Metformin did not modify body weight, plasma lipids or insulin profiles. Blood lactate increased slightly but only occasionally reached statistical significance. Metformin's antidiabetic activity was not influenced by the basal treatment (S or I) of the diabetics but was strongly linked to the degree of adiposity. Indeed both plasma glucose and HbA1 remained almost unchanged in normal weight patients. In the overweight and in the obese metformin significantly improved glycaemic profiles and reduced HbA1 levels. These results confirm clinical experience indicating that some degree of adiposity is a necessary prerequisite for metformin efficacy in diabetics. Nine obese patients with Type II diabetes mellitus were examined in a double-blind cross-over study. Metformin 0.5 g trice daily or placebo were given for 4 weeks. At the end of each period fasting and day-time postprandial values of plasma glucose, insulin, C-peptide and lactate were determined, and in vivo insulin action was assessed using the euglycemic clamp in combination with [3-3H]glucose tracer technique. Metformin treatment significantly reduced mean day-time plasma glucose levels (10.2 +/- 1.2 vs 11.4 +/- 1.2 mmol/l, P less than 0.01) without enhancing mean day-time plasma insulin (43 +/- 4 vs 50 +/- 7 mU/l, NS) or C-peptide levels (1.26 +/- 0.12 vs 1.38 +/- 0.18 nmol/l, NS). Fasting plasma lactate was unchanged (1.57 +/- 0.16 vs 1.44 +/- 0.11 mmol/l, NS), whereas mean day-time plasma lactate concentrations were slightly increased (1.78 +/- 0.11 vs 1.38 +/- 0.11 mmol/l, P less than 0.01). The clamp study revealed that metformin treatment was associated with an enhanced insulin-mediated glucose utilization (370 +/- 38 vs 313 +/- 33 mg.m-2.min-1, P less than 0.01), whereas insulin-mediated suppression of hepatic glucose production was unchanged. Also basal glucose clearance was improved (61.0 +/- 5.8 vs 50.6 +/- 2.8 ml.m-2.min-1, P less than 0.05), whereas basal hepatic glucose production was unchanged (81 +/- 6 vs 77 +/- 4 mg.m-2.min-1, NS). Conclusions: 1) Metformin treatment in obese Type II diabetic patients reduces hyperglycemia without changing the insulin secretion.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) Metformin is a biguanide that has been shown to effectively lower plasma glucose levels in subjects with noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). However, its mechanism of action remains unknown. Studies that have examined the effect of metformin on hepatic glucose production (HGP) and muscle glucose utilization in NIDDM have yielded conflicting results, and little information is available about the action of metformin on lactate turnover and gluconeogenesis from lactate in humans. We studied 20 NIDDM subjects and 8 nondiabetic controls in a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial to determine the effect of 15 weeks of treatment with metformin or placebo on glucose and lactate metabolism. Before and after treatment, all participants received a 7-h infusion of [6-3H]glucose and [3-14C]lactate in combination with indirect calorimetry and estimation of lactate central vein specific activity. A euglycemic insulin clamp (20 mU/m2.min) was performed during the last 3 h of the tracer infusions. The study design allowed us to evaluate the effects of metformin vs. placebo treatment on glycemic control, plasma lipid profile, HGP, insulin-mediated glucose uptake, oxidative and nonoxidative glucose metabolism, and lactate turnover. Metformin treatment significantly reduced fasting plasma glucose (196 +/- 18 vs. 152 +/- 12 mg/dL; P < 0.01), hemoglobin A1 (12.5 +/- 0.6 vs. 9.2 +/- 0.3%; P < 0.01), and plasma triglyceride and low density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations. When diabetics were compared to nondiabetic controls, basal HGP was higher (12.9 +/- 1.0 vs. 9.8 +/- 1.2 mumol/kg.min; P < 0.01) despite the presence of fasting hyperinsulinemia and insulin-mediated total body glucose disposal (10.9 +/- 0.9 vs. 20.2 +/- 3.3 mumol/kg.min; P < 0.01) was decreased. Metformin significantly reduced fasting HGP (from 12.9 +/- 0.7 to 11.0 +/- 0.5 mumol/kg.min; P < 0.01), but did not enhance total body glucose disposal during insulin stimulation (10.9 +/- 0.9 vs. 11.0 +/- 0.5 mumol/kg.min; P = NS). Neither oxidative nor nonoxidative glucose disposal was improved by metformin treatment. The fasting plasma lactate concentration (1.1 +/- 0.1 vs. 0.6 +/- 0.1 mmol/L) and lactate turnover (14.0 +/- 0.8 vs. 10.3 +/- 0.6 mumol/kg.min) were significantly increased in diabetics and strongly correlated (r = 0.68; P < 0.001). The percent gluconeogenesis derived from lactate was similar in diabetic and control subjects (17 +/- 2% vs. 15 +/- 2%; P = NS), but the estimated rate of gluconeogenesis from lactate was increased in the diabetic group (P < 0.01). Despite the significant reduction in HGP after metformin treatment, the percentage of gluconeogenesis from lactate and the rate of lactate-derived gluconeogenesis were unchanged from baseline. Basal lactate turnover (15.4 +/- 1.4 vs. 14.8 +/- 1.4 mumol/kg.min) and lactate oxidation (7.9 +/- 0.7 vs. 8.1 +/- 0.9 mumol/ kg.min) as well as total lactate turnover and lactate oxidation during the insulin clamp were similar before and after metformin treatment. There were no changes in any of the above metabolic parameters in the placebo-treated group. In poorly controlled NIDDM subjects, the primary mechanism by which metformin improves glycemic control is related to the suppression of accelerated basal HGP, and this most likely is secondary to an inhibition of hepatic glycogenolysis. Metformin has no effect on the rate of lactate turnover or gluconeogenesis from lactate in either the basal or insulin-stimulated states. To compare the chronic hyperlactatemic effect of phenformin and metformin, we performed a double-blind study in 10 non insulin-dependent diabetics without any other known hyperlactatemic condition. After a pre-study period, each patient was allocated to a 6-month treatment with phenformin (50 mg bid) or metformin (850 mg bid) in random sequence. Body weight values were not significantly different between phenformin and metformin. Diabetic control was significantly (p less than 0.001) improved by both biguanides versus pre-study, but was the same during metformin and phenformin: HbAI = 13.8 +/- 0.3 SEM% during pre-study 9.7 +/- 0.2% during phenformin, 10.2 +/- 0.2% during metformin. Mean values of plasma lactate during metformin were significantly lower versus phenformin (1.30 +/- 0.05 vs 1.64 +/- 0.05 mmol/l, p less than 0.001). Mean values of plasma lactate/pyruvate ratio during metformin were significantly lower versus phenformin (16.92 +/- 0.59 vs 22.65 +/- 0.87, p less than 0.001), but not versus pre-study (16.19 +/- 0.51). These results indicate that: 1) during a 6-month treatment with a diabetic control of similar degree phenformin produces a significantly higher hyperlactatemic effect vs metformin; 2) metformin treatment is associated with less impairment of intracellular redox state versus phenformin, and therefore should be considered advantageous in the long-term treatment of non insulin-dependent diabetics. The hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance, and obesity syndrome associated with type 2 diabetes can have debilitating consequences. The biguanide metformin has a mechanism of action that is complementary to those of insulin and the sulfonylureas, suggesting that combination therapy that includes metformin may result in improved glycemic control. The purpose of this retrospective chart review was to determine the effects of adding metformin in an uncontrolled fashion to existing therapy in obese patients with type 2 diabetes who had suboptimal glycemic control and insulin resistance. For the review, the records of 124 patients were divided into two groups: group 1 included 71 patients who were taking insulin with or without a sulfonylurea, and group 2 consisted of 53 patients who were taking a sulfonylurea alone. Metformin was added to patients' existing therapy in conjunction with downward titration of the sulfonylurea and insulin doses. A retrospective chart review was conducted at the end of 6 months for group 1 and at the end of 12 months for group 2 to determine the change from baseline in measures of diabetes control (ie, insulin and sulfonylurea dose, glycated hemoglobin [Hb A1c] value, body mass index [BMI], and lipid profiles). In group 1, the mean insulin dose decreased from 46.4 U/d at baseline to 6.1 U/d at the end of follow-up. Eighty-three percent of the patients were able to discontinue insulin therapy completely. Similarly, group 2 had statistically significant reductions in mean sulfonylurea dose. Both groups also achieved statistically significant reductions in Hb A1c, BMI, and total cholesterol level. The addition of metformin to treatment with insulin or sulfonylureas, either alone or in combination, significantly improved glycemic control and cholesterol levels and promoted weight loss in obese type 2 diabetic patients with insulin resistance. Less than 5% of patients reported mild, transient gastrointestinal side effects, none of which required cessation of metformin therapy. Five patients discontinued metformin due to lack of efficacy. This study was undertaken to assess the effect of metformin as a second-line oral antihyperglycemic agent in a defined population with type 2 diabetes mellitus. We measured the extent and circumstances of metformin use in the 15,000-person diabetes registry of a large, group-model health maintenance organization (HMO). Among subsets of patients in whom adequate glycemic control could not be maintained with sulfonylurea (SU) therapy, we compared glycemic control before and after metformin use to glycemic control during a similar interval before metformin was introduced. Metformin users were significantly more likely than nonusers to have had poor glycemic control at baseline. Nearly two thirds (63.8%) of patients with a glycosylated hemoglobin (Hb A1c) level >10% switched to metformin, as did 46.3% of those with an Hb A1c level of 8% to 10%. In all patients (metformin users and nonusers) in whom SU therapy failed to maintain glycemic control, Hb A1c levels decreased 0.9% after metformin was introduced, compared with a decrease of 0.4% during the control period. In a group-model HMO that promoted the use of metformin as second-line therapy in patients unable to maintain glycemic control with SU therapy, metformin reduced hyperglycemic levels. This study was undertaken to assess the effects of combined treatment with insulin and metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in whom dietary measures, weight control, and oral antihyperglycemic therapy had failed.
                Insulin resistance in peripheral tissues, increased hepatic gluconeogenesis, and impaired insulin secretion are the underlying factors in the development of type 2 diabetes. Metformin is a biguanide antihyperglycemic agent that increases peripheral insulin sensitivity, reduces hepatic gluconeogenesis, and decreases intestinal glucose absorption.
                Thirty-one patients (24 women, 7 men; mean age, 61.8 years; mean body mass index [BMI], 28.0 kg/m2) were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind, 2-way, crossover, placebo-controlled study. Patients with type 2 diabetes who were treated previously with insulin or oral hypoglycemic agents and who had a glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level >9% or a fasting blood glucose level >8 mmol/L were included. Patients who were being treated with oral agents were switched to insulin therapy and required to maintain stable blood glucose control for 2 months prior to randomization. Patients received insulin plus either metformin 1,700 mg/d or placebo for 5 months, followed by a 2-month washout period, and were then crossed over to the other treatment arm for 5 months of additional treatment (total treatment period: 12 months).
                Thirty patients completed the study; 1 patient withdrew early because of hypoglycemia. Compared with placebo, metformin produced significant reductions from overall baseline in mean daily insulin dose requirement (-8.69 units (17.2%], P < 0.001), HbA1c level (-0.74 [9.9%], P = 0.005), serum fructosamine level (-44.40 micromol/L, P = 0.026), 24-hour blood glucose profile (P = 0.008), and total cholesterol level (-0.42 mmol/L, P = 0.005). No treatment effects were observed on body weight, blood pressure, serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, or serum triglyceride levels. There was no correlation between BMI and reduction in HbA1C. No major side effects were reported.
                Combination therapy with metformin and insulin improves glycemic control and reduces insulin requirements. with no major side effects, in patients with type 2 diabetes and may improve the risk profile in this patient population.
There is no evidence from prospective comparative trials or from observational cohort studies that metformin is associated with an increased risk of lactic acidosis, or with increased levels of lactate, compared to other anti-hyperglycemic treatments.