Cyclosporin versus cyclophosphamide for patients with steroid-dependent and frequently relapsing idiopathic nephrotic syndrome: a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Chlorambucil treatment of frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome. Eight and 12 week courses of cyclophosphamide in nephrotic syndrome. Cyclosporin A is superior to cyclophosphamide in children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome-a randomized controlled multicentre trial by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Pädiatrische Nephrologie. Long-term results of two unconventional agents in steroid-dependent nephrotic children. Effect of cytotoxic drugs in frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome with and without steroid dependence. A randomized study of two long-course prednisolone regimens for nephrotic syndrome in children. A randomized study comparing methylprednisolone plus chlorambucil versus methylprednisolone plus cyclophosphamide in idiopathic membranous nephropathy. Efficacy of intravenous pulse cyclophosphamide treatment versus combination of intravenous dexamethasone and oral cyclophosphamide treatment in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome.
To compare the efficacy (maintenance of remission), safety and tolerability of cyclosporin (CsA) with those of cyclophosphamide in patients with steroid-dependent or frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome (NS).
                Open, prospective, randomized, multicentre, controlled study for parallel groups, stratified for adults and children. The setting was in nephrological departments in Italy.
                Seventy-three patients with steroid-sensitive idiopathic NS admitted to the study were randomly assigned to cyclophosphamide (2.5 mg/kg/day) for 8 weeks or CsA (5 mg/kg/day in adults, 6 mg/kg/day in children) for 9 months, tapered off by 25% every month until complete discontinuation at month 12. Seven patients lost to follow up were not considered in the analysis. The remaining 66 patients were followed up for 3-24 months after randomization.
                Relapse-free survival; number of N.S. relapses/patient/year; cumulative dose of prednisone/patient; laboratory investigations (kidney and liver functions, haematological parameters); incidence of adverse events.
                At month 9, 26 of 35 CsA-treated patients were still in complete remission and a further five patients were in partial remission; 18 of 28 cyclophosphamide-treated patients were in complete remission, and one in partial remission (P = NS). No difference between adults and children was seen with either treatment. The risk of relapse was similar between frequent relapsers (19 of 22) and steroid-dependent patients (8 of 14) given CsA, and those given cyclophosphamide (5 of 15 and 6 of 15). The mean number of relapses per year and the mean dose of prednisone per year were significantly less (P < 0.001) in both groups for the experimental year than for the year before randomization. At 2 years, 25% of the patients given CsA (50% adults and 20% children) and 63% of those given cyclophosphamide (40% adults and 68% children) had not had any relapse of NS. Tolerance to the two drugs was generally good. The CsA-related side-effects were mild and disappeared after drug discontinuation.
                This study shows that both treatments are effective and well tolerated; more patients given cyclophosphamide had stable remissions. Chlorambucil, in combination with prednisone, was compared with prednisone alone in a randomized controlled trial in 21 children with either steroid-dependent or frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome to assess its effect on the duration of remission and the rate of relapse. All control patients treated with prednisone alone continued to relapse at the same rate, with all patients experiencing a return of proteinuria by seven months. Conversely, those who received the same prednisone therapy along with chlorambucil for six to 12 weeks remained in complete remission, without further medication, during 12 to 34 months of follow-up observation. Complications were minimal. Immediate side effects commonly reported with cyclophosphamide were not seen with chlorambucil. Comparison with published reports also suggests that remission induced by chlorambucil is more stable than that after cyclophosphamide. Chlorambucil appears to be of value in the frequently relapsing nephrotic patient, adding an effect that is unattainable with prednisone alone. Seventy-three children with steroid dependent minimal change nephrotic syndrome were randomly allocated to receive treatment with cyclophosphamide (2 mg/kg/day) for either eight or 12 weeks, in combination with prednisolone. All patients had previously relapsed while the dosage was being reduced or within 14 days of discontinuing prednisolone in the six months before receiving cyclophosphamide treatment (steroid dependent), and had severe steroid toxicity. Thirty two patients were treated with cyclophosphamide for eight weeks, and 41 for 12 weeks. There were no differences between the two groups in age at onset of nephrosis or entry into the study, sex ratio, duration of nephrosis, number of relapses before entry, and follow up period after entry. The relapse free rate of patients treated for eight weeks (25%) was similar to that of those treated for 12 weeks (24%) five years after stopping the treatment, and the mean relapse free interval and the sparing effect of cyclophosphamide (if any) on subsequent treatment with steroids did not differ between the groups. We conclude that cyclophosphamide should be used for no longer than eight weeks at a dose of 2 mg/kg/day in children with steroid dependent minimal change nephrotic syndrome. First line immunosuppressive treatment in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in children is still open to discussion. We conducted a controlled multicentre randomized open label trial to test the efficacy and safety of cyclosporin A (CSA) versus cyclophosphamide pulses (CPH) in the initial therapy of children with newly diagnosed primary steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome and histologically proven minimal change disease, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis or mesangial hypercellularity. Patients in the CSA group (n = 15) were initially treated with 150 mg/m(2) CSA orally to achieve trough levels of 120-180 ng/ml, while patients in the CPH group (n = 17) received CPH pulses (500 mg/m(2) per month intravenous). All patients were on alternate prednisone therapy. Patients with proteinuria >40 mg/m(2) per hour at 12 weeks of therapy were allocated to a non-responder protocol with high-dose CSA therapy or methylprednisolone pulses. At week 12, nine of the 15 (60%) CSA patients showed at least partial remission, evidences by a reduction of proteinuria <40 mg/h per m(2). In contrast, three of the 17 (17%) CPH patients responded (p < 0.05, intention-to-treat). Given these results, the study was stopped, in accordance with the protocol. After 24 weeks, complete remission was reached by two of the 15 (13%) CSA and one of the 17 (5%) CPH patients (p = n.s.). Partial remission was achieved by seven of the 15 (46%) CSA and two of the 15 (11%) CPH patients (p <0.05). Five patients in the CSA group and 14 patients in the CPH group were withdrawn from the study, most of them during the non-responder protocol. The number of adverse events was comparable between both groups. We conclude that CSA is more effective than CPH in inducing at least partial remission in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in children. Children with steroid-dependent minimal change nephrotic syndrome are prone to serious steroid side effects. Alternative therapies, such as oral cyclophosphamide, may also have serious side effects. We conducted this novel prospective study to compare the long-term efficacies of levamisole and I.V. pulse cyclophosphamide as therapies with potentially fewer side effects. This study included 40 children with idiopathic steroid-dependent minimal change nephrotic syndrome (age 3-15 years; 31 boys and 9 girls). The patients were randomized into two equal groups. One group received levamisole 2.5 mg/kg on alternate days (levamisole group) while the other group received I.V. cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2/month for six months (cyclophosphamide group). Prednisolone was gradually withdrawn. After stopping treatment, the number of patients that maintained remission was five (25%) in each group at six months, four (20%) versus two (10%) at one year and three (15%) versus one (5%) at two years in the levamisole and cyclophosphamide groups respectively, and one (5%) in each group at three and four years. The overall side effects were mild and both drugs were well tolerated. In view of the results, we recommend trial of levamisole before adopting other therapies with more serious side effects in such patients. In a prospective, controlled study, 50 children with frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome who had steroid toxicity were treated for eight weeks with either cyclophosphamide (2 mg per kilogram of body weight per day) or chlorambucil (0.15 mg per kilogram per day), in combination with prednisone in tapering doses. Of the 34 children shows relapses had tended to occur after the prednisone dosage had been reduced or immediately after the drug was discontinued (the steroid-dependent group), 22 also had early relapses after cytotoxic-drug treatment. In contrast, cytotoxic drug treatment produced long-lasting remissions in 12 of the 16 children whose relapses usually occurred after prednisone treatment had been interrupted for more than 14 days (the non-steroid-dependent group). The difference in response between the two groups was highly significant (P less than 0.001). We conclude that patients with frequent relapses without steroid dependence can be treated successfully with an eight-week course of cytotoxic drugs, whereas those with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome do not profit from cytotoxic drugs in the low doses used. Long-course prednisolone regimens have been shown to be more effective than short-course regimens in sustaining remission of nephrotic syndrome in children. However, the most beneficial approach among the long-course regimens remains unknown.
                Seventy-three children with new-onset nephrotic syndrome were allocated at random to the two long-course regimens and followed up for 2 years. Group A was administered prednisolone at a daily dose of 60 mg/m2 for 6 weeks, followed by an alternate-day dose of 40 mg/m2 for 6 weeks (the long daily regimen). Group B was administered the same daily dose for 4 weeks, followed by an alternate-day dose of 60 mg/m2 for 4 weeks, and doses were tapered by 10 mg/m2 every 4 weeks (the long alternate-day regimen).
                Group B had a lower incidence of corticosteroid toxicities than group A during the initial treatment. Kaplan-Meier analysis of the sustained remission rate of the two treatment groups showed a marginally significant difference (P = 0.069) and showed a significant difference when patients were stratified for age of disease onset (P = 0.048). In a subgroup of younger children (<4 years at onset), group B had a greater rate of sustained remission (P < 0.01) and fewer children with frequent relapses (P < 0.05) than group A, whereas in older children (> or =4 years at onset), both groups had similar good sustained remission rates.
                These findings collectively indicate that the long alternate-day regimen may be more beneficial, with less corticosteroid toxicities, than the long daily regimen, and children with younger age at disease onset may be susceptible to relapse and especially benefit from the long alternate-day regimen for sustaining remission of the disease. To assess whether chlorambucil or cyclophosphamide may have a better therapeutic index in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy, we compared two regimens based on a 6-mo treatment, alternating every other month methylprednisolone with chlorambucil or methylprednisolone with cyclophosphamide. Patients with biopsy-proven membranous nephropathy and with a nephrotic syndrome were randomized to be given methylprednisolone (1 g intravenously for 3 consecutive days followed by oral methylprednisolone, 0.4 mg/kg per d for 27 d) alternated every other month either with chlorambucil (0.2 mg/kg per d for 30 d) or cyclophosphamide (2.5 mg/kg per d for 30 d). The whole treatment lasted 6 mo; 3 mo with corticosteroids and 3 mo with one cytotoxic drug. Among 87 patients followed for at least 1 yr, 36 of 44 (82%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 67.3 to 91.8%) assigned to methylprednisolone and chlorambucil entered complete or partial remission of the nephrotic syndrome, versus 40 of 43 (93%; 95% CI, 80.9 to 98.5%) assigned to methylprednisolone and cyclophosphamide (P = 0.116). Of patients who attained remission of the nephrotic syndrome, 11 of 36 in the chlorambucil group (30.5%) and 10 of 40 in the cyclophosphamide group (25%) had a relapse of the nephrotic syndrome between 6 and 30 mo. The reciprocal of plasma creatinine improved in the cohort groups followed for 1 yr for both treatment groups (P < 0.01) and remained unchanged when compared with basal values in the cohort groups followed for 2 and 3 yr. Six patients in the chlorambucil group and two in the cyclophosphamide group did not complete the treatment because of side effects. Four patients in the chlorambucil group but none in the cyclophosphamide group suffered from herpes zoster. One patient per group developed cancer. It is concluded that in nephrotic patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy both treatments may be effective in favoring remission and in preserving renal function for at least 3 yr. We compared, in a randomized controlled trial, the efficacy of a regimen based on intravenous (i.v.) cyclophosphamide therapy with a combination of i.v. dexamethasone and oral cyclophosphamide therapy in inducing remission in patients with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS). During April 2001 to December 2003, 52 consecutive patients with idiopathic SRNS, normal renal function and renal histology findings showing minimal change disease, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis or mesangioproliferative glomerulonephritis were enrolled into the study. Patients in group I received i.v. injection of cyclophosphamide once a month for 6 months and prednisolone on alternate days. Those in group II received i.v. treatment with dexamethasone (initially on alternate days, later fortnightly and monthly; total 14 doses), oral cyclophosphamide therapy (for 3 months) and prednisolone on alternate days. Data from 49 patients (26 in group I, 23 in group II) were analyzed; their clinical and biochemical features were similar at inclusion. Following treatment, complete remission was seen in 53.8% and 47.8% patients in groups I and II, respectively (P = 0.6). Long-term follow up showed favorable outcome in 14 (53.8%) patients in group I, and 9 (39.1%) in group II. Chief adverse effects, including cushingoid features and serious infections, were similar in both groups. Patients receiving i.v. dexamethasone therapy commonly showed hypertension and hypokalemia, while vomiting and reversible alopecia occurred in those receiving i.v. treatment with cyclophosphamide. In patients with SRNS, the efficacy of treatment intravenously with cyclophosphamide and orally with prednisolone was similar to the combination of dexamethasone intravenously, orally administered cyclophosphamide and prednisolone.
Eight week courses of cyclophosphamide or chlorambucil and prolonged courses of cyclosporin and levamisole reduce the risk of relapse in children with relapsing SSNS compared with corticosteroids alone. Clinically important differences in efficacy are possible and further comparative studies are still needed.