A randomised open multicentre comparative trial of lamotrigine and carbamazepine as monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent epilepsy. A comparison of monotherapy with lamotrigine or carbamazepine in patients with newly diagnosed partial epilepsy. Double-blind comparison of lamotrigine and carbamazepine in newly diagnosed epilepsy. UK Lamotrigine/Carbamazepine Monotherapy Trial Group. Multicentre, double-blind, randomised comparison between lamotrigine and carbamazepine in elderly patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. The UK Lamotrigine Elderly Study Group. The SANAD study of effectiveness of carbamazepine, gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, or topiramate for treatment of partial epilepsy: an unblinded randomised controlled trial. Adjunctive lamotrigine for partial seizures in patients aged 1 to 24 months. Controlled trial of lamotrigine (Lamictal) for refractory partial seizures. A multicentre comparative trial of sodium valproate and carbamazepine in adult onset epilepsy. Adult EPITEG Collaborative Group. Safety and efficacy of vigabatrin and carbamazepine in newly diagnosed epilepsy: a multicentre randomised double-blind study. Vigabatrin European Monotherapy Study Group.
The efficacy and safety of lamotrigine and carbamazepine as monotherapy in patients with untreated, newly diagnosed or recurrent partial and/or generalised tonic-clonic seizures, were compared in a randomised, open, multicentre study. Patients received 24 weeks' treatment with oral lamotrigine 100 mg (LTG 100, n = 115) or 200 mg (LTG 200, n = 111) or carbamazepine 600 mg (CBZ 600, n = 117). Efficacy measurements were comparable between the three treatment groups, although the higher lamotrigine dose was possibly most effective, with 60.4% completing seizure free compared with 51.3% (LTG 100) and 54.7% (CBZ 600). Both dosage regimens of lamotrigine were well tolerated. More patients on CBZ 600 reported adverse experiences, 66% versus 53% (LTG 100) and 58% (LTG 200), and of these a greater proportion were attributed to CBZ 600 treatment, 53% versus 23% (LTG 100) and 28% (LTG 200). Similarly, a greater proportion of the CBZ 600 group required a change in dose, 47% versus 20% (LTG 100) and 17% (LTG 200) or withdrew completely due to adverse experiences, 10.3% versus 4.3% (LTG 100) and 4.5% (LTG 200). The most common adverse experience leading to withdrawal was rash, with approximately double the proportion of reports occurring in patients on CBZ 600 (5.1%) compared with lamotrigine (1.7% on LTG 100 and 2.7% on LTG 200). Overall lamotrigine appeared equally effective but better tolerated compared with carbamazepine. Monotherapy with lamotrigine or carbamazepine was evaluated in a multicentre open trial of patients aged 2 years and above with newly diagnosed partial epilepsy. A total of 417 patients were randomised to treatment with lamotrigine, while 201 patients received carbamazepine. Following a dose escalation period of 6 weeks, maintenance therapy (Weeks 7-24) was adjusted according to response. Efficacy was similar with both treatments (65% with lamotrigine, 73% with carbamazepine, P=0.085). Efficacy was assessed by the proportion of patients seizure free during the last 16 weeks of treatment; all subjects who remained in the study for at least 18 weeks after the week 4 visit were included in the analysis. More patients receiving lamotrigine completed the study (81%), compared with those receiving carbamazepine (77%). This difference was primarily due to discontinuation as a result of adverse events, reported by 34 (8%) of those treated with lamotrigine but 26 (13%) of those treated with carbamazepine. The proportion of patients who experienced adverse events in the lamotrigine group was lower (218 patients, 52%) compared with the carbamazepine group (120 patients, 60%). The proportion of patients with adverse events considered to be drug related was lower in the lamotrigine group (132 patients, 32%) compared with the carbamazepine group (83 patients, 41%). Somnolence was the only adverse event reported at an incidence of greater than 5% and where there was a difference of 5% or more between treatment groups (4% lamotrigine, 11% carbamazepine patients). The small subsets of elderly patients (aged 65 years or over) and paediatric patients (aged 2-12 years) also showed better tolerability to lamotrigine than to carbamazepine. In conclusion, monotherapy with lamotrigine is as effective as carbamazepine in patients with newly diagnosed partial epilepsy. Patients were able to tolerate lamotrigine better than carbamazepine, so more patients receiving lamotrigine were able to remain on therapy. Lamotrigine has been licensed widely as adjunctive therapy for partial and secondary generalised seizures. Use of the drug as monotherapy was investigated in a double-blind, randomised, parallel-group comparison with carbamazepine in newly diagnosed epilepsy. After 4 weeks of planned, fixed dose escalation, doses were adjusted according to efficacy, adverse events, and plasma concentrations. 151 of 260 patients (131 lamotrigine, 129 carbamazepine) in eight UK centres completed the 48-week trial. No differences in efficacy between the drugs were found for partial seizures with or without secondary generalisation or for primary generalised tonic-clonic seizures. The proportion of patients maintained seizure-free during the last 24 weeks of treatment was almost the same in both groups (39% lamotrigine, 38% carbamazepine). More patients with primary generalised tonic-clonic seizures (47% both groups) than those presenting with a focal onset (35%, 37%) were fully controlled. Overall, fewer patients on lamotrigine than on carbamazepine withdrew because of adverse events (15 vs 27%). The commonest side-effect leading to withdrawal with either drug was rash (9%, 13%). Sleepiness was less common in lamotrigine than in carbamazepine recipients (12 vs 22%, p < 0.05). More lamotrigine than carbamazepine recipients (65 vs 51%, p = 0.018) completed the study (hazard ratio 1.57 [95% CI 1.07-2.31]). Lamotrigine and carbamazepine showed similar efficacy against partial onset seizures and primary generalised tonic-clonic seizures in newly diagnosed epilepsy. Lamotrigine, however, was better tolerated. In a multicentre, double-blind trial 150 elderly patients (mean age 77 years) with newly diagnosed epilepsy were randomised in a 2:1 ratio to treatment with lamotrigine (LTG) or carbamazepine (CBZ). Following a short titration period, the dosage was individualised for each patient while maintaining the blind over the next 24 weeks. The main difference between the groups was the rate of drop-out due to adverse events (LTG 18% versus CBZ 42%). This was in part a consequence of the lower rash rate with LTG (LTG 3%, CBZ 19%; 95% CI 7-25%). LTG-treated patients also complained less frequently of somnolence (LTG 12%, CBZ 29%; 95% CI 4-30%). Although there was no difference between the drugs in time to first seizure, a greater percentage of LTG-treated patients remained seizure-free during the last 16 weeks of treatment (LTG 39%, CBZ 21%; P = 0.027). Overall, more patients continued on treatment with LTG than CBZ (LTG 71%, CBZ 42%; P < 0.001) for the duration of the study. The hazard ratio for withdrawal was 2.4 (95% CI 1.4-4.0) indicating that a patient treated with CBZ was more than twice as likely to come off medication than one taking LTG. In conclusion, LTG can be regarded as an acceptable choice as initial treatment for elderly patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. Carbamazepine is widely accepted as a drug of first choice for patients with partial onset seizures. Several newer drugs possess efficacy against these seizure types but previous randomised controlled trials have failed to inform a choice between these drugs. We aimed to assess efficacy with regards to longer-term outcomes, quality of life, and health economic outcomes.
                SANAD was an unblinded randomised controlled trial in hospital-based outpatient clinics in the UK. Arm A recruited 1721 patients for whom carbamazepine was deemed to be standard treatment, and they were randomly assigned to receive carbamazepine, gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, or topiramate. Primary outcomes were time to treatment failure, and time to 12-months remission, and assessment was by both intention to treat and per protocol. This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN38354748.
                For time to treatment failure, lamotrigine was significantly better than carbamazepine (hazard ratio [HR] 0.78 [95% CI 0.63-0.97]), gabapentin (0.65 [0.52-0.80]), and topiramate (0.64 [0.52-0.79]), and had a non-significant advantage compared with oxcarbazepine (1.15 [0.86-1.54]). For time to 12-month remission carbamazepine was significantly better than gabapentin (0.75 [0.63-0.90]), and estimates suggest a non-significant advantage for carbamazepine against lamotrigine (0.91 [0.77-1.09]), topiramate (0.86 [0.72-1.03]), and oxcarbazepine (0.92 [0.73-1.18]). In a per-protocol analysis, at 2 and 4 years the difference (95% CI) in the proportion achieving a 12-month remission (lamotrigine-carbamazepine) is 0 (-8 to 7) and 5 (-3 to 12), suggesting non-inferiority of lamotrigine compared with carbamazepine.
                Lamotrigine is clinically better than carbamazepine, the standard drug treatment, for time to treatment failure outcomes and is therefore a cost-effective alternative for patients diagnosed with partial onset seizures. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted to assess the efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive lamotrigine for the treatment of partial seizures in infants aged 1 to 24 months.
                The study used a responder-enriched design in which all patients received adjunctive lamotrigine during an open-label phase (n = 177; maximum maintenance dose 5.1 mg/kg/day for those on non-enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs [AEDs] or valproate and 15.6 mg/kg/day for those on enzyme-inducing AEDs). Patients meeting response criteria were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment for up to 8 weeks with continued lamotrigine (n = 19) or to withdrawal from lamotrigine (placebo; n = 19) while background AEDs were maintained.
                The proportion of treatment failures (patients who met escape criteria or withdrew before completing the double-blind phase) was lower with lamotrigine (58%) than with placebo (84%). This finding was not significant in the primary analysis (two-sided chi(2) test [primary endpoint]). A post hoc sensitivity analysis of the primary endpoint was also performed (p = 0.045 by one-sided, mid-p corrected Fisher exact test). The median time to meet escape criteria was longer with lamotrigine (42 days) than with placebo (22 days) (p = 0.059). During the last 28 days of the open-label phase, 53% of the patients had a >or=50% reduction in frequency of partial seizures with lamotrigine. Additional reduction in partial seizure frequency was observed during the double-blind phase compared with the last 4 weeks of the open-label phase among those randomly assigned to lamotrigine (32% with a >or=25% reduction) but not those randomly assigned to placebo (5% with a >or=25% reduction). Lamotrigine was well tolerated, with an adverse event profile comparable to that observed in older pediatric patients.
                Lamotrigine was well tolerated, and the data indicate that it may be efficacious in the treatment of partial seizures in infants aged 1 to 24 months. The antiepileptic effect of lamotrigine (LTG) was assessed in a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial in 24 adult patients with refractory partial seizures. LTG or placebo was added to existing antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). The dose of LTG varied from 75 to 400 mg daily. Three patients did not complete the trial. One was withdrawn from the trial with ataxia, tiredness, dyspnea, and diplopia while receiving LTG and died 18 days later of invasive carcinoma involving the liver. A second patient was withdrawn during baseline for contravening admission criteria, and a third received LTG in error during both treatment periods. Twenty-one patients (12 men and 9 women) completed the trial. An analysis of seizure counts in the 12-week treatment period with LTG showed a statistically significant reduction in seizures as compared with placebo for total seizures (p less than 0.002), partial seizures (p less than 0.002), and secondarily generalized seizures (p less than 0.05). The analysis of total seizure days showed a significant reduction during LTG treatment (p less than 0.002). There were no statistically significant changes in plasma concentrations of phenytoin (PHT), carbamazepine (CBZ), primidone (PRM), or phenobarbital (PB) between the two treatment periods. The most common adverse events reported during the trial were diplopia, drowsiness, tiredness, ataxia, and headache, but although these were more frequent during LTG treatment, the differences from placebo were not statistically significant. No hematological or biochemical changes were noted. The long-term efficacy and safety of sodium valproate and carbamazepine in adult outpatients with newly diagnosed primary generalised or partial and secondarily generalised seizures were compared in a randomised, open, multicentre study at 22 neurology outpatient clinics. Patients were randomised to oral sodium valproate (Epilim EC enteric coated 200 mg tablets twice daily, n = 149) or oral carbamazepine (100 mg twice daily increasing to 200 mg twice daily in week 2, n = 151) and followed up for three years. If clinically necessary, dosages were regularly increased until seizures were controlled or toxicity developed. Sodium valproate and carbamazepine controlled both primary generalised and partial seizures equally effectively overall. Significantly more patients on sodium valproate than carbamazepine (126/140 (90%) v 105/141 (75%), p = 0.001) remained on randomised treatment for at least six months. Skin rashes occurred significantly more often in carbamazepine recipients than in sodium valproate recipients (11.2% v 1.7%, p < 0.05) and carbamazepine was associated with a higher withdrawal rate because of adverse events (15% v 5% on sodium valproate) in the first six months of treatment. There was no difference between the drugs in the rate of withdrawal because of poor seizure control at any stage, regardless of seizure type. At the end of the three year trial period, over 70% of the available patients were still on randomised treatment or had recently stopped treatment after achieving full seizure control. Sodium valproate and carbamazepine were both associated with a high degree of overall seizure control regardless of seizure type and both have good long-term tolerability in adult patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. Recommendations are made for a higher initial dosage regime for sodium valproate in partial seizures. Vigabatrin is a newly licensed drug for use in patients with epilepsy. We investigated whether this drug was comparable to standard first-line monotherapy in efficacy and incidence of adverse events.
                We enrolled 459 patients with newly diagnosed, previously untreated partial epileptic seizures from 44 European centres and randomly assigned them carbamazepine 600 mg daily (n=230) or vigabatrin 2 g daily (n=229). After initial maintenance doses were reached, doses were adjusted downwards (in the case of adverse events) or upwards (in the case of seizures) by the clinician. The primary outcome was time to withdrawal because of lack of efficacy or adverse events. Secondary outcomes included efficacy (time to 6-month remission of seizures, time to first seizure after initial dose stabilisation), and adverse events (incidence and severity). Analysis was by intention to treat.
                Time to withdrawal for lack of efficacy or adverse events did not differ between groups (p=0.318). Vigabatrin was better tolerated than carbamazepine with fewer withdrawals, but was more frequently associated with psychiatric symptoms (58 [25%] vs 34 [15%]) and weight gain (25 [11%] vs 12 [5%]). Carbamazepine was associated with rash (22 [10%] vs seven [3%]). All efficacy outcomes favoured carbamazepine and failed to show equivalence between the two drugs. No significant difference was found for time to achieve 6 months of remission from seizures (p=0.058), but the most powerful outcome, time to first seizure after the first 6 weeks from randomisation, showed carbamazepine to be significantly more effective than vigabatrin (p=0.0001).
                Vigabatrin seems less effective but better tolerated than carbamazepine, which is the first-choice drug for the treatment of partial epilepsies. Vigabatrin cannot therefore be recommended as a first-line drug for monotherapy in this group of patients.
Lamotrigine was significantly less likely to be withdrawn than carbamazepine but results for time to first seizure suggested that carbamazepine may be superior in terms of seizure control. Trials were of too short a duration to measure important seizure outcomes such as time to 12 month remission. Further trials are needed in which longer-term outcome is assessed as well as measures such as psychosocial outcome and quality of life.