Comparison of percutaneous acetic acid injection and percutaneous ethanol injection for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients: a prospective study. Randomised controlled trial comparing percutaneous radiofrequency thermal ablation, percutaneous ethanol injection, and percutaneous acetic acid injection to treat hepatocellular carcinoma of 3 cm or less. Evaluation of transcatheter arterial embolization prior to percutaneous tumor ablation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial. Adjuvant oral chemotherapy to prevent recurrence after curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Small hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: randomized comparison of radio-frequency thermal ablation versus percutaneous ethanol injection. Portal vein chemotherapy for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of 4000 patients in 10 studies. Liver Infusion Meta-analysis Group. Efficacy of postoperative transarterial chemoembolization and portal vein chemotherapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma complicated by portal vein tumor thrombosis--a randomized study. Colorectal liver metastases: recurrence and survival following hepatic resection, radiofrequency ablation, and combined resection-radiofrequency ablation. Randomised controlled trial of adjuvant chemotherapy by portal-vein perfusion after curative resection for colorectal adenocarcinoma.
Ultrasound-guided percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) and percutaneous acetic acid injection (PAI) are effective in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We conducted a prospective study to compare the therapeutic efficacy of both these methods.
                Sixty-three patients were treated by PAI using 50% acetic acid and 62 by PEI using pure ethanol. There were no significant baseline differences in age, sex, Child-Pugh class, tumour size and number, or other clinico-biochemical parameters between the two groups.
                During a follow-up period of 24 +/- 9 (range 6-38) months, 19 (30%) of the PAI group and 21 (34%) of the PEI group died (P = 0.704). The 1- and 3-year survival rates were 84% and 51% for the PAI group and 81% and 46% for the PEI group (P = 0.651). The corresponding tumour recurrence rates were 51% and 74% for the PAI group, and 54% and 64% for the PEI group (P = 0.787). The treatment sessions were 3.9 +/- 1.6 and 6.2 +/- 2.3 for the PAI and PEI groups, respectively, in each treatment cycle (P = 0.008). A multivariate analysis using the Cox regression model revealed that ascites (relative risk (RR) 3.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5-6.3, P = 0.002), large (>3 cm) or multinodular HCCs (RR 2.4, 95% CI 1.1-5.4, P = 0.04), and development of tumour recurrence (RR 7.0, 95% CI 3.1-16.0, P < 0.001) were independent, poor prognostic factors in both groups.
                PAI and PEI are equally effective in the treatment of HCC. PAI has the advantage of fewer treatment sessions in each treatment course. Careful pretreatment patient selection may improve survival. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of radiofrequency thermal ablation (RFTA), percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI), and percutaneous acetic acid injection (PAI) in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
                A total of 187 patients with HCCs of 3 cm or less were randomly assigned to RFTA (n = 62), PEI (n = 62), or PAI (n = 63). Tumour recurrence and survival rates were assessed.
                One, two, and three year local recurrence rates were 10%, 14%, and 14% in the RFTA group, 16%, 34%, and 34% in the PEI group, and 14%, 31%, and 31% in the PAI group (RFTA v PEI, p = 0.012; RFTA v PAI, p = 0.017). One, two, and three year survival rates were 93%, 81%, and 74% in the RFTA group, 88%, 66%, and 51% in the PEI group, and 90%, 67%, and 53% in the PAI group (RFTA v PEI, p = 0.031; RFTA v PAI, p = 0.038). One, two, and three year cancer free survival rates were 74%, 60%, and 43% in the RFTA group, 70%, 41%, and 21% in the PEI group, and 71%, 43%, and 23% in the PAI group (RFTA v PEI, p = 0.038; RFTA v PAI, p = 0.041). Tumour size, tumour differentiation, and treatment methods (RFTA v PEI and PAI) were significant factors for local recurrence, overall survival, and cancer free survival. Major complications occurred in 4.8% of patients (two with haemothorax, one gastric perforation) in the RFTA group and in none in two other groups (RFTA v PEI and PAI, p = 0.035).
                RFTA was superior to PEI and PAI with respect to local recurrence, overall survival, and cancer free survival rates, but RFTA also caused more major complications. Transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) may reduce the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence when performed before percutaneous tumor ablation (PTA), either percutaneous ethanol injection therapy (PEIT) or radiofrequency ablation (RFA). We conducted a randomized, controlled trial comparing the use of TAE combined with percutaneous ethanol injection therapy (TAE/PEIT) to the use of PEIT only to assess the effects on HCC recurrence and survival. We continued the study after the introduction of RFA and compared TAE combined with RFA (TAE/RFA) with RFA only.
                Between March 1997 and April 2001, 42 HCC patients were enrolled who satisfied the following inclusion criteria: (1) uninodular HCC as determined by angiography under computed tomography, (2) arterial hypervascularity, and (3) no prior history of HCC treatment. Twenty-two patients were treated with TAE/PTA (PEIT, 12; RFA, 10) and 20 patients with PTA only (PEIT, 14; RFA, 6).
                There were four cases of local recurrence in the PTA-only group and none in the TAE/PTA group (P=0.043). The four patients with local recurrence were treated with PEIT. None of the patients treated with RFA showed local recurrence. The effect of TAE on overall recurrence was not significant (P=0.4179). In the multivariate analysis, prior TAE was not significant for survival (P=0.514).
                TAE has a limited use in suppressing local recurrence when performed before PEIT but not before RFA. Adjuvant oral chemotherapy was studied in 67 patients with stage II hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent curative resection between May 1988 and December 1990. Patients were stratified into two groups according to preoperative liver dysfunction: 55 had stage I disease (mild dysfunction) and 12 had stage II (moderate dysfunction). A randomized controlled study of postoperative oral administration of 1-hexylcarbamoyl-5-fluorouracil (HCFU) was conducted in each group. From October 1994 HCFU administration was suspended because of side-effects in nine patients with stage I liver dysfunction and in three with stage II dysfunction who had received the drug for more than 4 weeks. Cumulative survival and recurrence-free survival rates of patients with stage I disease in the treatment group were higher (P = 0.08 and P = 0.04 respectively) than those in the control group. However, in patients with stage II disease no significant difference was observed (P = 0.77 and P = 1.0 respectively). This study suggests that the potential benefits of HCFU on tumour recurrence should be weighed against the risk of adverse reactions in patients with mild liver dysfunction. To compare the effectiveness of radio-frequency (RF) thermal ablation with that of percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with cirrhosis.
                A series of 102 patients with hepatic cirrhosis and either single HCC 5 cm in diameter or smaller or as many as three HCCs each 3 cm or smaller (overall number of lesions, 142) randomly received either RF ablation (n = 52) or PEI (n = 50) as the sole first-line anticancer treatment. Mean follow-up was 22.9 months +/- 9.4 (SD) in the RF group and 22.4 months +/- 8.6 in the PEI group. Prognostic value of treatment techniques was assessed with univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models.
                One- and 2-year survival rates were 100% and 98% in the RF group and 96% and 88% in the PEI group, respectively (univariate relative risk [RR] = 0.20; 95% CI: 0.02, 1.69; P =.138). One- and 2-year local recurrence-free survival rates were 98% and 96% in the RF group and 83% and 62% in the PEI group, respectively (univariate RR = 0.17; 95% CI: 0.06, 0.51; P =.002). One- and 2-year event-free survival rates were 86% and 64% for the RF group and 77% and 43% for the PEI group, respectively (univariate RR = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.27, 0.85; P =.012). RF treatment was confirmed as an independent prognostic factor for local recurrence-free survival rates with multivariate analysis (adjusted RR = 0.20; 95% CI: 0.05, 0.73; P =.015).
                RF ablation is superior to PEI with respect to local recurrence-free survival rates. Systemic delivery of cytotoxic drugs yields relatively low doses in the liver, a major site of recurrence for colorectal cancer. Giving chemotherapy by means of continuous portal vein infusion (PVI) into the liver during the immediate postoperative period may improve therapeutic efficacy.
                We undertook a meta-analysis to assess the effects on recurrence and survival of administering fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy by PVI after colorectal cancer surgery.
                Data on mortality and recurrence were sought for all patients enrolled in randomized trials initiated before 1987 in which a few days (range, 5-7 days) of continuous postoperative PVI of cytotoxic drugs was compared with no further treatment. Data from 10 trials (a promising initial study and nine hypothesis-testing trials) involving about 4000 patients were available for analysis. The main cytotoxic drug in each trial was 5-FU (given with heparin); however, mitomycin C was co-administered in two of the trials. Four trials included an additional control group of patients treated with continuous noncytotoxic PVI of either heparin or urokinase alone; one trial included a second control group of patients treated with continuous systemic infusion of 5-FU. Reported P values are two-sided.
                Among the 3499 patients randomly assigned to receive either cytotoxic PVI or no further treatment, 1557 deaths are known to have occurred. Survival with and without PVI appeared to be the same for the first 2 years; thereafter, it diverged significantly, with the absolute survival difference (i.e., improvement) associated with PVI at 5 years being 4.7 % (standard deviation [SD] = 1.2 %) (P = .006). When just the nine hypothesis-testing trials were considered, the absolute survival difference was 3.6% (SD = 1.2%) (P = .04). If, ignoring any potential for bias in stage assignment, attention was restricted to patients with Dukes' stage A, B, or C disease (88.3% of the total), the absolute effect on 5-year survival for all 10 trials increased to 6.0% (SD = 1.8%) (P = .001); this estimate remained statistically significant when the initial study was excluded (absolute survival difference = 4.8%; SD = 1.8%; P = .01). In contrast to the highly significant reduction in liver metastases seen in the initial study (79% reduction; SD = 15%; P = .00000007), the reduction found in the nine hypothesis-testing trials was not significant (14% reduction; SD = 10%; P = .2). In the trials with additional control groups, survival appeared to be better with cytotoxic PVI than with noncytotoxic PVI or with systemic cytotoxic drug infusion.
                PVI of 5-FU (with or without other cytotoxic drugs) for about 1 week after surgery in patients with colorectal cancer may produce an absolute improvement in 5-year survival of a few percent. Although encouraging, this finding is not statistically secure, and additional evidence from randomized trials involving several thousand more patients is needed. The aim of this single, randomized study was to explore the efficacy of postoperative transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and portal vein chemotherapy (PVC) for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) complicated by portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) and to evaluate prognostic factors.
                The study cohort consisted of 112 patients with HCC and PVTT randomly divided into three groups: Group A (37 patients), operation only; Group B (35 patients), operation plus TACE; Group C (40 patients), operation plus TACE and PVC. Disease-free survival rates and prognostic factors were analyzed.
                Most of the side effects and complications were related to the operation, catheters, and local chemotherapy and included liver decompensation (15.0%), catheter obstruction (11.6%), and nausea and loss of appetite (22.1%). The disease-free survival curve was significantly different among the three groups, as estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method (both P < 0.05). Group C showed a significantly higher disease-free survival rate than Group A (P < 0.05), but no statistical differences were found between group A and group B, and group B and group C (both P > 0.05). Tumor size, tumor number, PVTT location, and treatment modalities were independent prognostic factors (P < 0.05).
                Postoperative TACE combined with PVC may benefit the survival of patients with HCC complicated by PVTT in the short-term (less than 60 months), but long-term efficacy is not yet certain and needs to be confirmed by further studies. Although radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is increasingly an accepted option for patients with colorectal liver metastases, patients treated with resection vs RFA may have different tumor biology profiles, which might confound the relationship between choice of liver-directed therapy and outcome.
                Retrospective review of a prospectively collected database.
                Major hepatobiliary center.
                Between January 1, 1999, and August 30, 2006, 258 patients with colorectal liver metastases underwent hepatic resection with or without RFA.
                Evaluation of outcome following resection alone, combined resection-RFA, and RFA alone using 3 statistical methods (paired-match control, Cox proportional hazards multivariate model, and propensity index) to identify and adjust for potential confounding variables.
                The median number of hepatic lesions was 2, and the median size of the largest lesion was 3.0 cm. One hundred ninety-two patients (74.4%) underwent resection alone, 55 patients (21.3%) underwent resection-RFA, and 11 patients (4.3%) underwent RFA alone. Patients who underwent resection-RFA had significantly increased risk of extrahepatic failure at 1 year vs patients who underwent resection alone or RFA alone (P < .05). On matched control and multivariate analyses, patients who underwent RFA with or without resection had significantly worse disease-free and overall survival than patients who underwent resection alone. Propensity score methods revealed that the aggregate distribution of clinical risk factors for resection-RFA was markedly different from that for resection alone. This suggested a lack of comparability to allow for statistical comparisons in the assessment of causal inferences regarding the efficacy of RFA therapy.
                Although results of matched control and multivariate analyses suggested that RFA with or without resection was associated with worse outcome, propensity score methods revealed that the resection-RFA and resection-alone groups were different with regard to baseline tumor and treatment-related factors, making causal inferences about the efficacy of RFA unreliable. About half the patients treated with curative resection for colorectal cancer do not survive long-term. Adjuvant chemotherapy given during and after surgery may prevent hepatic metastases and improve patient survival. In patients with colorectal cancer, we have done a multicentre, randomised controlled trial comparing five-year survival after intraportal infusion of fluorouracil (1 g per day) plus heparin (10,000 U per day) (130 patients) or heparin alone (123) during curative resection and for 7 days thereafter, or after resection alone (145). There was no reduction in liver metastasis or increased overall survival advantage in either active-treatment arm of the study. However, patients who had stage III, Dukes' C (lymph-node-positive) tumours resected and were treated with fluorouracil plus heparin had a significant (p less than 0.03) survival advantage of about 16% compared with surgery-only controls. Further study of intraportal infusion of chemotherapeutic agent as adjuvant treatment to surgery in patients with colorectal cancer appears worthwhile.
PEI and PAI do not differ significantly regarding benefits and harms in patients with early HCC, but only a limited number of patients have been examined and the risk of bias was high in all trials. There is also insufficient evidence to determine whether PEI or segmental liver resection is more effective. While some data from the single trial suggested that PEI was safer, the high risk of bias and the lack of any confirmatory evidence make an assessment impossible.