Continuous twice daily or once daily amoxicillin prophylaxis compared with placebo for children with recurrent acute otitis media. High-dose azithromycin versus high-dose amoxicillin-clavulanate for treatment of children with recurrent or persistent acute otitis media. Comparison of five-day cefdinir treatment with ten-day low dose amoxicillin/clavulanate treatment for acute otitis media. Efficacy and safety of amoxycillin/clavulanate (Augmentin) twice daily versus three times daily in the treatment of acute otitis media in children. The Augmentin 454 Study Group. Efficacy of twice-daily dosing of amoxycillin/clavulanate in acute otitis media in children. Bacteriologic and clinical efficacy of amoxicillin/clavulanate vs. azithromycin in acute otitis media. A multicenter, double blind comparison of azithromycin and amoxicillin/ clavulanate for the treatment of acute otitis media in children. A multicenter, open label trial of azithromycin vs. amoxicillin/ clavulanate for the management of acute otitis media in children. Once daily clarithromycin extended-release vs twice-daily amoxicillin/clavulanate in patients with acute bacterial sinusitis: a randomized, investigator-blinded study.
To determine the effectiveness of amoxicillin administered continuously twice daily vs. once daily vs. placebo to prevent new episodes of acute otitis media (AOM).
                Randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial at a hospital-based general pediatric clinic and a private pediatric practice, both in Denver, CO.
                One hundred ninety-four children (age 3 months through 6 years) were enrolled with 3 documented AOM episodes within the prior 6 months, without ventilating tubes or associated anatomic defects, immunodeficiency disorders or allergy to penicillin. Thirty-six were noncompliant and were excluded from the study, leaving 158 evaluable subjects.
                The amoxicillin dosage was 20 mg/kg/day either bid or qd. After randomization to placebo twice daily (bid), amoxicillin once daily (qd)/placebo qd or amoxicillin bid, patients were followed monthly and were also seen for upper respiratory infection symptoms during enrollment in the trial. Development of two new AOM episodes terminated the patients from the study.
                Incidence density (ID) measurements were calculated for all study subjects and were stratified by age and season. Overall study subjects in all 3 arms of the trial had 7243 days at risk during which time they developed 56 new AOM episodes for a annual ID of 2.82. There were no significant differences in the IDs between amoxicillin qd vs. bid or amoxicillin (bid or qd) vs. placebo. After stratifying by age and season of enrollment, there were no significant differences in ID rates among the 3 groups. The proportion of subjects remaining otitis-free was 63% for the placebo group, 64% for once daily amoxicillin and 61% for twice daily amoxicillin.
                While once-a-day dosing was equivalent to twice-a-day dosing for amoxicillin prophylaxis, there was no benefit of amoxicillin prophylaxis compared with a placebo control in preventing new AOM episodes. Because of the potential of excessive antibiotic use to promote the acquisition of resistant pneumococci and the lack of effectiveness in this trial, routine use of amoxicillin prophylaxis should be discouraged. Infants and young children, especially those in day care, are at risk for recurrent or persistent acute otitis media (AOM). There are no data on oral alternatives to high-dose amoxicillin-clavulanate for treating AOM in these high-risk patients. In this double-blind, double-dummy multicenter clinical trial, we compared a novel, high-dose azithromycin regimen with high-dose amoxicillin-clavulanate for treatment of children with recurrent or persistent AOM. Three hundred four children were randomized; 300 received either high-dose azithromycin (20 mg/kg of body weight once a day for 3 days) or high-dose amoxicillin-clavulanate (90 mg/kg divided twice a day for 10 days). Tympanocentesis was performed at baseline; clinical response was assessed at day 12 to 16 and day 28 to 32. Two-thirds of patients were aged < or =2 years. A history of recurrent, persistent, or recurrent plus persistent AOM was noted in 67, 18, and 14% of patients, respectively. Pathogens were isolated from 163 of 296 intent-to-treat patients (55%). At day 12 to 16, clinical success rates for azithromycin and amoxicillin-clavulanate were comparable for all patients (86 versus 84%, respectively) and for children aged < or =2 years (85 versus 79%, respectively). At day 28 to 32, clinical success rates for azithromycin were superior to those for amoxicillin-clavulanate for all patients (72 versus 61%, respectively; P = 0.047) and for those aged < or =2 years (68 versus 51%, respectively; P = 0.017). Per-pathogen clinical efficacy against Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae was comparable between the two regimens. The rates of treatment-related adverse events for azithromycin and amoxicillin-clavulanate were 32 and 42%, respectively (P = 0.095). Corresponding compliance rates were 99 and 93%, respectively (P = 0.018). These data demonstrate the efficacy and safety of high-dose azithromycin for treating recurrent or persistent AOM. Short course beta-lactam antibiotic therapy for acute otitis media (AOM) should improve patient adherence, but it has not been evaluated since the heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine became routinely used in the United States.
                In a prospective, investigator-blinded, multicenter study, 425 patients, age 6 months-6 years, with a clinical diagnosis of nonrefractory AOM were randomized to receive either 5 days of cefdinir therapy (14 mg/kg divided twice daily) or 10 days of amoxicillin/clavulanate therapy (45/6.4 mg/kg divided twice daily). Clinical response was assessed at end of therapy (2-4 days postantibiotic, respectively) and week 4 (study days 25-28).
                With no difference in demographics between treatment groups, overall the mean age (+/-SD) was 2.8 +/- 1.8 years, 65% had received conjugated pneumococcal vaccination and 48% had bilateral AOM. The satisfactory clinical response rate at end of therapy was comparable for cefdinir versus amoxicillin/clavulanate (88%, 170 of 194 versus 85%, 164 of 192; 95% CI -4.9, 9.3). Although this must be interpreted with caution, cefdinir showed an apparent trend for higher efficacy than amoxicillin/clavulanate (92%, 72 of 78 versus 77%, 55 of 71; P = 0.019) in a subsample of patients 6-24 months old who had received conjugated pneumococcal vaccination. The incidence of drug-related adverse events was less for cefdinir than for amoxicillin/clavulanate (24%, 50 of 211 versus 38%, 82 of 214; P = 0.0018)
                For children with nonrefractory AOM, based only on clinical endpoints, 5 days of therapy with cefdinir 14 mg/kg divided twice daily was comparable overall with 10 days of therapy with low dose amoxicillin/clavulanate 45/6.4 mg/kg divided twice daily. This multicenter, randomized, single-blind study compared the efficacy and safety of a new, twice-daily formulation of amoxycillin/clavulanate (Augmenting) with the standard three-times-daily formulation. Children with a clinical diagnosis of acute otitis media, aged between 2 months and 12 years, received either amoxycillin/clavulanate 45/6.4 mg/kg/day twice-daily (b.d.) (range 38.3/5.5-76.2/10.9 mg/kg/day) or amoxycillin/clavulanate 40/10 mg/kg/day three-times-daily (t.d.s.) (range 25/6.25-56/14 mg/kg/day) for 7 or 10 days. Patients were evaluated during therapy (Days 3-5), at the end of therapy (Days 7-12) and at follow-up (Days 38-42). At the end of therapy, for the intent-to-treat and per-protocol populations, respectively, clinical success (cure) was achieved by approximately 94% of patients in both treatment groups. A successful bacteriological response at the end of therapy (Visit 3) was documented in 7/9 patients (77.8%) in the twice-daily group and in 11/13 patients (84.6%) in the three-times-daily group. At follow-up (Visit 4), 93.3% of patients in the twice-daily group and 87.9% in the three-times-daily group continued to have a clinically successful response. Both treatment regimens were well tolerated, with most adverse events being of a mild-moderate and transient nature. The most common treatment-related adverse event was diarrhea, occurring in 7.2% of patients in the twice-daily group and in 10.7% of the three-times-daily group. In total, 173 patients (82.8%) in the twice-daily group and 151 patients (73.3%) in the three-times-daily group were compliant with medication. In conclusion, this study confirms that b.d. amoxycillin/clavulanate is an effective treatment for pediatric acute otitis media and demonstrates that the b.d. and t.d.s. formulations of amoxycillin/clavulanate produce equivalent efficacy. Furthermore, there was a trend towards a higher level of compliance and a lower incidence of drug-related adverse events in the twice-daily compared with the three-times-daily treatment group. Children with acute otitis media (AOM), aged 2-12 years, were randomised to 10 days treatment with amoxycillin/clavulanate (A/C) 70/10 mg/kg/day given b.i.d. (231 patients) or to A/C 60/15 mg/kg/day given t.i.d. (232 patients). Clinical success rates at end of therapy (10-17 days) were 91.8% for the b.i.d. group and 90.5% for the t.i.d. group and at follow-up (28-42 days) were 80.1% for the b.i.d. group and 77.6% for the t.i.d. group, indicating that the b.i.d. regimen was as effective as the t.i.d. regimen. There was no statistically significant difference in incidence of adverse experiences between the two groups. The overall incidence of protocol defined diarrhoea assessed from diary booklets was low, with a lower incidence in the b.i.d. group (6.7%) than in the t.i.d. group (10.3%). Significantly more patients in the b.i.d. group (83.1%) than in the t.i.d. group (72.8%) had at least 80% compliance over a 7-10 day treatment period. A/C given twice or three-times daily was highly effective in the treatment of AOM in children. The two regimens showed equivalent clinical efficacy, both were well tolerated, and there was evidence of improved compliance with the b.i.d. regimen. To compare the bacteriologic and clinical efficacy of amoxicillin/clavulanate and azithromycin in patients with acute otitis media (AOM), particularly the ability to eradicate the predominant AOM pathogens from middle ear fluid as assessed by mandatory second tympanocentesis.
                In this single blind study 238 infants and children with AOM were randomized to receive amoxicillin/clavulanate (45/6.4 mg/kg/day in two divided doses for 10 days) or azithromycin (10 mg/kg on Day 1, then 5 mg/kg daily on Days 2 through 5). Tympanocentesis was performed before the first dose and repeated on Day 4, 5 or 6. Clinical response was assessed at end of therapy between Days 12 and 14 and at follow-up between Days 22 and 28.
                Amoxicillin/clavulanate was significantly more likely to eradicate all bacterial pathogens [83% (54 of 65) vs. 49% (35 of 71), P = 0.001] and Haemophilus influenzae [87% (26 of 30) vs. 39% (13 of 33), P = 0.0001] from middle ear fluid than was azithromycin. Amoxicillin/clavulanate was also more likely to eradicate Streptococcus pneumoniae, but the difference was not statistically significant [90% (18 of 20) vs. 68% (13 of 19) [corrected], P = 0.095]. On Days 12 to 14, signs and symptoms were more likely to resolve completely or improve in all culture-positive patients [86% (60 of 70) vs. 70% (51 of 73), P = 0.023] and in those with H. influenzae infections [91% (30 of 33) vs. 65% (22 of 34), P = 0.010] who received amoxicillin/clavulanate compared with those who received azithromycin. Otherwise there were no significant differences between groups in clinical outcomes on Days 12 to 14 or at follow-up.
                Our findings indicate that amoxicillin/clavulanate has superior bacteriologic and clinical efficacy compared with azithromycin in children with AOM. To compare the efficacy and safety of azithromycin and amoxicillin/clavulanate in pediatric acute otitis media.
                Investigators from 12 US centers recruited 677 children. In a randomized, double blind, double dummy fashion, participants received either azithromycin suspension (n = 341) once daily for 5 days or amoxicillin/clavulanate suspension (n = 336) in three divided doses daily for 10 days.
                Among evaluable patients satisfactory clinical response rates (cured and improved) measured 11 days after therapy began were 87.5% in the azithromycin group and 87.9% in the amoxicillin/clavulanate group; corresponding rates at 30 days were 73.5% in the azithromycin and 71.2% in the amoxicillin/clavulanate groups. Relapse rates were comparable for the treatment groups. Treatment-related side effects, primarily gastrointestinal, were reported significantly less frequently with azithromycin (8.8%) than with amoxicillin/clavulanate (30.8%) (P < 0.0001). Two (0.6%) azithromycin patients and 12 (3.6%) amoxicillin/ clavulanate patients discontinued therapy because of treatment-related side effects (P < 0.006 between groups).
                In these children with acute otitis media, azithromycin given once daily for 5 days and amoxicillin/clavulanate given three times daily for 10 days had similar efficacy; however, azithromycin was significantly better tolerated. This randomized, open label study compared the efficacy and safety of a 5-day course of once daily azithromycin to those of a 10-day course of three times daily amoxicillin/ clavulanate.
                One hundred sixty-nine children with confirmed acute bacterial otitis media were randomized to treatment with 10 mg/kg of azithromycin oral suspension on Day 1, followed by 5 mg/kg once daily for the next 4 days or 40 mg/kg/ day of amoxicillin/clavulanate suspension in three divided doses for 10 days. Clinical efficacy and safety were evaluated on Days 11 and 30.
                Analysis of evaluable patients 11 days after the start of treatment demonstrated that 87.8% of patients treated with azithromycin and 100.0% of the patients treated with amoxicillin/ clavulanate were cured or improved. Presumed bacteriologic eradication of the baseline pathogens Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis and Streptococcus pyogenes was comparable in the two groups: 87.8% in patients treated with azithromycin; and 100.0% in patients receiving amoxicillin/clavulanate. At Day 30, 82.2% of patients treated with azithromycin and 80.0% of patients treated with amoxicillin/clavulanate were cured or improved. Presumed bacteriologic eradication of the base-line pathogens was similar in the two groups: 82.2% in patients treated with azithromycin; and 81.1% in patients receiving amoxicillin/clavulanate. Relapses occurred in 5.1% of patients receiving azithromycin and 21.1% of patients taking amoxicillin/clavulanate (P = 0.047). Treatment-related side effects occurred in 3.5% of the azithromycin patients compared with 31.0% of amoxicillin/clavulanate patients (P < 0.001).
                Azithromycin was comparable to amoxicillin/clavulanate in achieving clinical cure or improvement and presumed eradication of baseline pathogens in pediatric patients with acute otitis media. Azithromycin was significantly better tolerated and was associated with fewer relapses than seen after amoxicillin/clavulanate therapy. To compare the efficacy and tolerability of clarithromycin extended-release (ER) to amoxicillin/ clavulanate in patients diagnosed with acute bacterial sinusitis.
                In a controlled, multicenter, investigator-blinded study, 437 ambulatory patients at least 12 years old with signs/symptoms and radiographic findings of acute sinusitis were randomized to receive clarithromycin ER 1000 mg once daily or amoxicillin/ clavulanate 875 mg/l25 mg twice daily for 14 days.
                Clinical and bacteriological response rates were determined at a test-of-cure visit, which was conducted up to 10 days following the completion of treatment. Radiological response was assessed at a follow-up visit.
                The clinical cure rate in clinically evaluable patients was 98% (184/188) in the clarithromycin ER group and 97% (179/185) in the amoxicillin/clavulanate group (95% CI for the difference in rates [-2.4%, 4.7%]). Clinical cure was sustained at the follow-up visit (96% for each treatment group). The pathogen eradication rates were 94% (61/65) in the clarithromycin ER group and 98% (61/62) in the amoxicillin/clavulanate group (95% CI for difference in rates [-12.0%, 2.9%]). The radiological success rate was 94% (172/183) in both the clarithromycin ER and amoxicillin/clavulanate groups (95% CI for difference in rates [-4.9%, 4.9%]). Symptomatic improvement or relief was observed as early as 2 days-5 days after the initiation of study drug, with a statistically significantly higher resolution rate of sinus pressure (p = 0.027) and improvement/resolution rate of nasal congestion (p = 0.035) during treatment with clarithromycin ER. The resolution/improvement rate at the test-of-cure visit for each treatment group was > or = 94% for the primary acute sinusitis signs/symptoms, with a statistically significantly higher resolution/improvement rate of purulent nasal discharge with clarithromycin ER (p = 0.010). Both study drugs had a positive and rapid impact on quality of life. Patients reported a high level of satisfaction and probability of using either study antibiotic again, and health care resource use was low, with slightly fewer sinusitis-related physician and outpatient visits required by patients in the clarithromycin ER group (p = 0.055). The treatment groups were comparable with respect to incidence of drug-related adverse events.
                In this multinational population of patients with acute bacterial sinusitis, clarithromycin ER was comparable, and for selected measures superior, to amoxicillin/clavulanate based on clinical, bacteriological, and radiological responses as well as quality of life measures, satisfaction with antibiotic therapy, and health care resource utilization.
This review showed insufficient evidence to judge whether once or twice daily doses of amoxicillin, with or without clavulanate, were comparable with three or four daily doses for the treatment of AOM. The evidence appears to be biased and therefore no firm conclusions can be drawn.