The use of in-line intravenous filters in sick newborn infants. In-line filters in central venous catheters in a neonatal intensive care unit. A randomized trial of heparin and saline for maintaining intravenous locks in neonates. Randomized controlled trial of vascular access in newborns in the neonatal intensive care unit. Heparin vs saline for intermittent intravenous device maintenance in neonates. Intravenous access in newborn infants: impact of extended umbilical venous catheter use on requirement for peripheral venous lines. A randomized trial comparing peripherally inserted central venous catheters and peripheral intravenous catheters in infants with very low birth weight. Heparin lock intravenous line. Use in newborn infants. A controlled trial. A comparison of continuous infusion and intermittent flushing methods in peripheral intravenous catheters in neonates.
This study assesses the improvement in outcome for newborn infants by decreasing major complications associated with intravenous fluid therapy by using an in-line filter, and evaluates the economical impact this might have in relation to daily changing of i.v. lines.
                In a prospective controlled study, 88 infants were randomly assigned to receive either filtered (except for lipids, blood and blood products) or non-filtered infusions via a central catheter. Main outcome measures such as bacteraemia, phlebitis, extravasation, thrombosis, septicaemia and necrosis were all scored. The costs attributable to patients during a standard 8-day stay were also recorded.
                Significant reductions were found in major complications such as thrombi and clinical sepsis (control group (21), filter group (8); p < 0.05). Bacterial cultures of the filters showed a contamination rate on the upstream surface of 15/109 filters (14%). The mean costs of disposables were less in the filter group, showing a reduction from 31.17 euros to 23.79 euros.
                The use of this in-line filter leads to a significant decrease in major complications and substantial cost savings. Nosocomial sepsis remains an important cause of morbidity in neonatal intensive care units. Central venous catheters (CVCs) and parenteral nutrition (TPN) are major risk factors. In-line filters in the intravenous (IV) administration sets prevent the infusion of particles, which may reduce infectious complications. We randomized infants to in-line filter (for clear fluids and lipid emulsions) or no filter placement. Sepsis, nursing time and costs were assessed. IV sets without filters were changed every 24 h, IV-sets with filters every 96 h. Of 442 infants with a CVC, 228 were randomized to filter placement, 214 to no filter. No differences were found in clinical characteristics, CVC-use, and catheter days. Nosocomial sepsis occurred in 37 (16.2%) infants with filters, in 35 (16.3%) in the group without filter (NS). Nursing time to change the IV-administration sets was 4 min shorter in the filter-group (P<0.05). Costs of materials used were comparable. In conclusion, the incidence of sepsis when using filters was not reduced but the nursing time for changing the intravenous sets was reduced without a difference in costs. To determine the effects of saline, heparin 2 units (U) per ml saline, and heparin 10 U/ml saline flush solutions on the duration of intravenous (i.v.) locks and the incidence of i.v. infiltration in neonates.
                Randomized double-blind experiment.
                Tertiary-care nursery.
                Neonates (N = 90) hospitalized at birth in the intensive, intermediate care, or newborn units.
                Total hours from the time the i.v. was inserted to the time the i.v. was removed; hours from the time the i.v. was first flushed to the time the i.v. was removed; number of i.vs. removed because of infiltration.
                No statistical or clinical differences between the three groups for duration of i.v. nor for incidence of complications.
                The use of heparin in i.v. lock flush solution did not affect the duration of i.v. locks nor the incidence of infiltration in neonates. To compare the effectiveness of two methods of vascular access in newborns.
                Randomized controlled trial.
                Neonatal intensive care unit in Regional Hospital of Valdivia, Chile.
                Seventy-four high-risk newborns.
                Peripherally inserted central catheter and peripheral intravenous catheter.
                Length of neonatal intensive care unit stay and incidence of sepsis and phlebitis. RESULTS/DATA ANALYSIS: There were no statistically significant differences in the length of the neonatal intensive care unit stay and in the incidence of sepsis between groups. There was a significant higher incidence of phlebitis in the peripheral intravenous catheter group.
                Although there was not a significant effect of the kind of catheter on length of neonatal intensive care unit stay, the peripherally inserted central catheter is recommended because of the decreased risk of phlebitis and the decreased number of venipuncture attempts and catheters needed to complete intravenous therapy. The purpose of this study was to determine whether normal saline (NS) is as effective as 10 units heparin/ml saline (HS) in maintaining patency of intermittent intravenous devices (i.v. locks) in neonates. We conducted a prospective, double-blind, randomized study of 118 24-gauge catheters used exclusively as i.v. locks and removed consequent to catheter failure. Subjects were infants, including premature infants, less than one month of age, admitted to a Level II NICU. Catheters were observed for length of patency as well as incidence of phlebitis, occlusion, infiltration, and leaking. There was no statistically significant difference in average duration of patency between NS-flushed catheters and HS-flushed catheters. Phlebitis, occlusion, infiltration, and leaking occurred with equal frequency for both solutions. Central venous lines are used to care for critically ill neonates in cases of limited peripheral venous access. This prospective, randomized study evaluated the risks and benefits of the use of single- and double-lumen umbilical venous catheters for up to 14 days. Patients were randomized to one of three treatment arms: (1) single-lumen umbilical catheter, (2) double-lumen umbilical catheter, or (3) no umbilical catheter; peripheral intravenous lines only. Infants in the groups treated with an umbilical venous catheter had significantly fewer venipunctures and peripheral intravenous lines placed during their first 2 weeks of life than those in the peripheral line only group. Less time and money were spent obtaining peripheral line placement in the umbilical venous catheter groups. The incidence rates of sepsis and complications were not higher in treated patients than in control patients. The double-lumen catheter further reduced peripheral venipunctures and lines. We conclude that an umbilical venous catheter used during the first 2 weeks of life is a relatively safe, less stressful, cost-effective means of providing intravenous therapy to neonates. To determine whether percutaneously inserted central venous catheters (PICC) and peripheral intravenous catheters (PIV) in infants with very low birth weight (VLBW) differ with respect to (1) incidence of sepsis, (2) number of insertion attempts and catheters required for total intravenous therapy, (3) courses of antibiotics, and (4) total duration of intravenous (IV) use.
                A randomized comparative trial was conducted involving 63 VLBW infants (<1,251 g) who required IV therapy. Infants were assigned randomly at 1 week of age to either a PIV or a PICC catheter and followed up prospectively until an IV was no longer required or the infant was transferred out of the neonatal intensive care unit.
                Data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. There was no difference in the incidence of sepsis (P = .64), number of courses of antibiotics (P = .16), or total duration of IV use (P= .34) between the 2 groups. The number of insertion attempts required for total IV therapy was significantly lower in the PICC group than in the PIV group (P = .008). There also was a significantly lower number of total catheters utilized in the PICC group (P = .002). When data were controlled for birth weight strata the results were similar.
                PICC lines reduced the number of painful IV procedures in VLBW infants without additional morbidity. The heparin lock technique has been available for parenteral access in older children and adults but has not yet been described for use in newborns. We randomized 39 newborns who needed parenteral medication in the intermediate care nursery to receive a heparin lock catheter (17) or an intravenous line kept patent by continuous low infusion rate (22). There were no differences between study groups with regard to birthweight, gestational age, or distribution of diagnoses. Infants in the heparin lock group were enrolled in the study on average 1 day longer than the continuous intravenous group (p less than 0.05). Subcutaneous infiltration occurred twice as frequently with the continuous intravenous line (p = 0.0015), and the life span was significantly less than heparin lock (1.0 +/- 0.5 days versus 2.1 +/- 1.0 days, p = 0.0003). Infants with continuous intravenous lines received approximately 20 ml/kg/day greater quantity of fluid (p less than 0.0001). There was no difference between groups with regard to mean heparin activity level. None of the infants developed hemorrhagic complications, thrombophlebitis, or documented nosocomial infection. Nurses significantly favored heparin locks over continuous intravenous lines for ease of use. The heparin lock technique is a safe and reasonable alternative to a continuous low infusion intravenous line for administering parenteral medications to intermediate care newborns. The purpose of this study was to compare two methods of maintaining peripheral intravenous devices in neonates: continuous infusion (CI) and intermittent flushing (IF). There was no significant difference in the mean duration of patency between the two groups, but there was a significant difference with respect to reasons for removal or loss of patency. The main reason for removal in the CI group was infiltration or phlebitis, and in the IF group the reason was occlusion.
There is insufficient evidence to recommend the use of intravenous in-line filters to prevent morbidity and mortality in neonates.