Low dose dopamine in postpartum pre-eclamptic women with oliguria: a double-blind, placebo controlled, randomised trial. Oliguria during corrective spinal surgery for idiopathic scoliosis: the role of antidiuretic hormone. Improvement in hyperprolactinemia and reproductive comorbidities in patients with schizophrenia switched from conventional antipsychotics or risperidone to olanzapine. Striatal vs extrastriatal dopamine D2 receptors in antipsychotic response--a double-blind PET study in schizophrenia. Double-blind olanzapine vs. haloperidol D2 dopamine receptor blockade in schizophrenic patients: a baseline-endpoint. Effects of olanzapine and haloperidol on serum prolactin levels in male schizophrenic patients. Trial of prophylactic administration of TXA2 synthetase inhibitor, ozagrel hydrochloride, for preeclampsia. Lactation inhibition by the dopamine agonist CV 205-502. A 24-week randomized trial of controlled-release physostigmine in patients with Alzheimer's disease.
To assess the effect of low dose dopamine on the urine output in postpartum pre-eclamptic or eclamptic women with oliguria.
                A double blind, randomised controlled study.
                The high care area of the labour ward in a teaching hospital.
                Forty postpartum pre-eclamptic women with oliguria, defined as < 30 mL/hour, who have not responded to a 300 mL crystalloid fluid challenge.
                Dopamine was infused at a rate of 1 to 5 microg/kg per minute, or sterile water was given as placebo in the same dilution.
                Urine output, blood pressure and pulse was measured for six hours before and for six hours after the intervention.
                Women who received dopamine (344 mL over 6 hours) showed a clinically and statistically significant (P = 0.0014, Mann-Whitney U test) higher median urine output compared with those receiving placebo (135 mL over 6 hours) for the duration of therapy. The respective 95% confidence intervals were 212.3 to 712.7 mL compared with 73.8 to 244.7 mL. No differences in blood pressure or pulse were found between the two groups.
                The use of low dose dopamine in a labour setting improved urine output in postpartum pre-eclamptic women with oliguria who had not responded to a single fluid challenge without a detrimental effect on the blood pressure or pulse. Patients undergoing surgery for idiopathic scoliosis were studied to determine the incidence and aetiology of oliguria during the perioperative period and to evaluate the efficacy of low dose dopamine in preventing its occurrence. Thirty patients, aged 6-18 years undergoing elective surgery were studied. Anaesthesia was standardized. Patients were randomized to receive either dopamine infusion (3 micrograms.kg-1.min-1) (Group A) (n = 15) or dextrose infusion (control) (Group B) (n = 15). Serum and urinary electrolytes and osmolalities and serum antidiuretic hormone (ADH) concentrations were measured. Urine output and haemodynamic parameters were recorded. Intraoperative oliguria occurred in 7% of patients in Group A and 47% in Group B (P < 0.05). Postoperative oliguria occurred in 20% of patients in Group A and 47% in Group B (P > 0.05). Urine and serum biochemical analysis revealed a statistically significant decrease in serum sodium and osmolality (P < 0.005) and an increase in urinary sodium and osmolality in both groups. Serum ADH concentrations were increased in both groups (P < 0.05), returning to baseline 18 h postoperatively. We conclude that oliguria during corrective spinal surgery occurs in association with excess ADH secretion as opposed to perioperative hypovolaemia. Dopamine increases urine output in the perioperative period but does not prevent the release of ADH and its subsequent biochemical effects. This open-label, prospective, 4-month study in hyperprolactinemic patients with schizophrenia explored whether prolactin levels decrease after switching antipsychotic therapy to olanzapine. A secondary objective was to determine if reproductive morbidities and sexual dysfunction occurring with hyperprolactinemia improved with prolactin normalization. Clinically stable patients with schizophrenia, who had hyperprolactinemia defined as >18.8 ng/ml for males and >24.2 ng/ml for females, were randomized to: remain on current therapy (n=27) or switch to olanzapine, 5-20 mg/day, (n=27). Baseline prolactin levels in female patients randomized to receive olanzapine (n=14) were 66.3+/-38.7 ng/ml and were 82.0+/-37.6 (p=.32) in those remaining on their pre-study antipsychotic medication (n=14). In male patients, baseline prolactin levels were 33.7+/-12.1 and 33.5+/-13.8 ng/ml (p=.97), respectively, for those randomized to olanzapine (n=13) or remaining on pre-study treatment (n=13). At study end, patients switched to olanzapine experienced significant reductions in mean serum prolactin levels of 19.8+/-18.1 ng/ml in males (p=.02), and 32.3+/-47.5 ng/ml in females (p=.01), but prolactin continued to be elevated in patients who remained on pre-study antipsychotic treatment. After switching to olanzapine treatment, male patients experienced significantly (p=.03) increased free testosterone levels but there were no significant improvements in total testosterone levels; some female patients experienced improved menstrual cycling, as well as resolution of galactorrhea and gynecomastia, and sexual functioning was significantly improved in both genders. Patients switched to olanzapine, as well as those remaining on their pre-study medication, maintained clinical stability, their symptoms continued to improve, although there were no significant between-treatment differences in improvement. Treatment-emergent adverse events did occur in both treatment groups; however, they were not significantly different between groups. Olanzapine-treated patients experienced significantly lower eosinophil counts and higher elevations in low-density lipoproteins and standing blood pressure than non-switched patients. Olanzapine treatment may offer sustained reduction in serum prolactin and improvement in sexual and reproductive comorbid symptoms in patients with schizophrenia who have treatment-emergent hyperprolactinemia. Blockade of dopamine D2 receptors remains a common feature of all antipsychotics. It has been hypothesized that the extrastriatal (cortical, thalamic) dopamine D2 receptors may be more critical to antipsychotic response than the striatal dopamine D2 receptors. This is the first double-blind controlled study to examine the relationship between striatal and extrastriatal D2 occupancy and clinical effects. Fourteen patients with recent onset psychosis were assigned to low or high doses of risperidone (1 mg vs 4 mg/day) or olanzapine (2.5 mg vs 15 mg/day) in order to achieve a broad range of D2 occupancy levels across subjects. Clinical response, side effects, striatal ([11C]-raclopride-positron emission tomography (PET)), and extrastriatal ([11C]-FLB 457-PET) D2 receptors were evaluated after treatment. The measured D2 occupancies ranged from 50 to 92% in striatal and 4 to 95% in the different extrastriatal (frontal, temporal, thalamic) regions. Striatal and extrastriatal occupancies were correlated with dose, drug plasma levels, and with each other. Striatal D2 occupancy predicted response in positive psychotic symptoms (r=0.62, p=0.01), but not for negative symptoms (r=0.2, p=0.5). Extrastriatal D2 occupancy did not predict response in positive or negative symptoms. The two subjects who experienced motor side effects had the highest striatal occupancies in the cohort. Striatal D2 blockade predicted antipsychotic response better than frontal, temporal, and thalamic occupancy. These results, when combined with the preclinical data implicating the mesolimbic striatum in antipsychotic response, suggest that dopamine D2 blockade within specific regions of the striatum may be most critical for ameliorating psychosis in schizophrenia. The aim of this study was to compare in vivo striatal D2 dopamine receptor occupancy induced by olanzapine and haloperidol in schizophrenic patients using a baseline-endpoint [(123)I]IBZM single photon computed emission tomography (SPECT) design. The relationships of striatal D2 receptor occupancy with clinical efficacy and extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) were also assessed. Twenty-seven inpatients with schizophrenia or schizophreniform disorder were included in a 4-week prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel and comparative clinical trial. Thirteen patients were treated with haloperidol (10 mg/day) and 14 with olanzapine (10 mg/day). Ratings of clinical status and EPS were obtained weekly. The percentage of D2 receptor occupancy was estimated by using basal ganglia (striatum)/frontal cortex IBZM uptake ratios obtained from each patient before and after 4 weeks of maintained antipsychotic treatment. Olanzapine led to a mean striatal D2 receptor occupancy of 49% (range 28-69%), which was significantly lower than that induced by haloperidol (mean 64%, range 46-90%). The baseline-endpoint SPECT design used in this study revealed lower antipsychotic D2 occupancy percentage values than those reported in the literature, using other approaches. The degree of striatal D2 receptor occupancy correlated to the EPS, which predominantly appeared in patients on haloperidol. No relationship was found between the striatal D2 receptor occupancy and clinical improvement. Olanzapine induced a lower striatal D2 occupancy than haloperidol. This low striatal D2 occupancy, together with the lower incidence of EPS in olanzapine-treated patients, contributed to confirm the atypical behavior of this new antipsychotic drug. Nevertheless, conclusions based on SPECT-estimated percentages of antipsychotic D2 occupancy should be cautious, since the SPECT design could influence the results. In this regard, SPECT studies including baseline and endpoint examinations should be encouraged. It has been proposed that new atypical antipsychotics cause minimal prolactin (PRL) elevation compared to traditional antipsychotic agents because they spare dopamine blockade within the brain's tuberoinfundibular tract. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of olanzapine and haloperidol on PRL secretion in male schizophrenic patients. Twenty-nine male schizophrenic inpatients were included in the study. Fifteen of them were given olanzapine in a fixed dose of 10 mg/day PO and 14 of them were given haloperidol in a fixed dose of 10 mg/day PO for 6 weeks after a 2-week drug washout period. Fifteen age-matched healthy control subjects were used as control group. PRL levels were measured both before and after the 6-week treatment period in the patients. At the end of the 6th week, the PRL values observed with olanzapine treatment were significantly less than those observed with haloperidol, but not different from those of the controls. There was a significant positive correlation between the PRL values and the severity of extrapyramidal side effects in only the haloperidol group after the six week's treatment period. Our data indicate that short-term olanzapine treatment at doses of 10 mg/day PO causes minimal elevations in PRL secretion in male schizophrenic patients in contrast to haloperidol. This finding is consistent with the previous reports and may be attributed to olanzapine's differential effects on dopamine neurotransmission. In an attempt to investigate the prophylactic effect of a thromboxane A2 (TXA2) synthetase inhibitor on pregnant women with a high risk of preeclampsia, the following clinical study was undertaken.
                Forty pregnant women were randomly allocated to control or treatment groups. Ozagrel Hydrochloride (400 mg/day, orally) and placebo were started at 20 weeks of gestation and continued until delivery.
                Seventeen of 20 (85%) women in the control group developed preeclampsia, whereas 9 of 20 (45%) in the treatment group developed preeclampsia. Ozagrel Hydrochloride significantly (p < 0.01) reduced the occurrence of preeclampsia, and the incidence of both hypertension (p < 0.05) and proteinuria (p < 0.01) was significantly less in the treatment group compared with the control group. One month after administration, the mean plasma concentration of TXB2, a metabolite of TXA2, was significantly decreased (p < 0.01) to 62.4 +/- 13.6%, whereas that of 6-keto prostaglandin F1 alpha, a metabolite of PGI2, was significantly increased (p < 0.01) to 206.7 +/- 52.8%. There were no maternal or fetal side effects observed.
                It seems likely that Ozagrel Hydrochloride could be used for the prevention of preeclampsia in high-risk pregnant women. In an open pilot study with a parallel group design 30 bottle feeding women were randomly assigned in a two to one ratio to receive either the new dopamine agonist CV 205-502 or bromocriptine for lactation inhibition. Ten women who intended to breast feed served as normal controls. All treated women reached prepregnant prolactin levels within 72 h with once-daily 0.075 mg of CV 205-502 or twice-daily 2.5 mg of bromocriptine, at starting doses of 0.05 mg and 2.5 mg respectively. Fifteen of the 20 women treated with CV 205-502 reported breast symptoms, 50% occurring on days 3 and 4 of treatment. Three of the 10 women treated with bromocriptine had breast symptoms between days 2 and 28. Overall efficacy and tolerance in the two groups was very good. Side effects did not differ between the groups, with the exception of pulse rate in the standing position, which was significantly higher in the bromocriptine treated group than in either the CV 205-502 group (P = 0.02) or the breast feeding group (P less than 0.01). The coagulation tests (fibrinogen, AT III, PTT and APTT) showed no significant differences between the three groups. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of controlled-release physostigmine, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, in patients with probable AD of mild to moderate severity.
                A prospective, 24-week, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, parallel group study of patients was conducted. The study enrolled 475 patients at 24 sites. Patients met criteria for probable AD and were randomized to one of three arms: placebo, controlled-release (CR) physostigmine 30 mg daily, or CR physostigmine 36 mg daily. Dosage was escalated by a forced upward titration during the first 6 to 9 weeks of the trial, then maintained at a constant dose to 24 weeks. Primary outcome measures were the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) and the Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change-Plus with caregiver input (CIBIC+). Secondary outcome measures included the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC), the Geriatric Evaluation by Relatives Rating Instrument, and an Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale.
                In an intent-to-treat population, the last observation carried forward analysis revealed a 2.9-point ADAS-Cog (p = 0.002) difference between physostigmine and placebo-treated patients for both dosages, and a 0.26 to 0.31-point difference on the CIBIC+ (p = 0.048). There were no significant differences on the secondary outcome measures except for a difference on the CGIC when analyzed by use of the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel statistic (p = 0.014). There were significant increases in gastrointestinal side effects including nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, anorexia, dyspepsia, and abdominal pain for patients on either dose of physostigmine, resulting in a high dropout rate. Agitation was decreased significantly. There was no evidence of cardiac rhythm disturbance or liver function abnormalities.
                CR physostigmine enhanced cognitive and global function. It is relatively safe for the treatment of cognitive dysfunction secondary to AD. However, in light of the gastrointestinal side effects, a lower starting dose and a flexible titration schedule might lead to a more favorable adverse event profile in the clinical arena.
It is unclear whether low-dose dopamine therapy for pre-eclamptic women with oliguria is worthwhile. It should not be used other than in prospective trials.