A randomized comparison of suturing techniques for episiotomy and laceration repair after spontaneous vaginal birth. Postpartum perineal repair performed by midwives: a randomised trial comparing two suture techniques leaving the skin unsutured. The Ipswich Childbirth Study: 1. A randomised evaluation of two stage postpartum perineal repair leaving the skin unsutured. A multicentre evaluation of the two-layered repair of postpartum perineal trauma. Does perineal suturing make a difference? The SUNS trial. Continuous versus interrupted sutures for repair of episiotomy or second-degree perineal tears: a randomised controlled trial. Randomized controlled clinical trial on two perineal trauma suture techniques in normal delivery. Continuous versus interrupted perineal repair with standard or rapidly absorbed sutures after spontaneous vaginal birth: a randomised controlled trial. Continuous versus interrupted episiotomy repair with monofilament or multifilament absorbed suture materials: a randomised controlled trial.
To compare the continuous knotless technique of perineal repair with the interrupted method after spontaneous vaginal birth
                A randomized controlled trial.
                Canadian Task Force Classification I.
                This study was undertaken in a university hospital with more than 2200 deliveries per year. The static population of this district includes a wide range of socioeconomic classes and is predominately white.
                From May 1 to November 19, 2003, 214 primiparous women with a second-degree perineal tear or episiotomy were randomly allocated to either the continuous knotless technique (CKT; n=107) or the interrupted technique (IT; n=107) suturing method.
                The interrupted technique (IT) involves placing 3 layers of sutures whereas the continuous knotless technique (CKT) involves reapproximating vaginal trauma, perineal muscles, and skin with a loose, continuous, nonlocking technique.
                The primary outcomes of the study were perineal pain (evaluated by visual analogue scale) at 48 hours and day 10 and dyspareunia 3 months after delivery. Secondary outcomes included suture removal, wound dehiscence, analgesia use up to 48 hours, and satisfaction with repair established at 3 and 12 months after childbirth. At day 10, 19 women had dropped out of the study. Significantly fewer women reported pain at 10 days with the CKT than with the IT (32.3% vs 60.4%; p<.001). Analgesia use up to 48 hours postpartum was less in the CKT group than in the IT group (33.6% vs 54.2%; p<.05). No difference was found in superficial dyspareunia at 3 months for the CKT versus the IT group.
                The use of a continuous knotless technique for perineal repair is associated with less short-term pain than techniques with interrupted sutures. To compare a continuous suture technique with interrupted stitches using inverted knots for postpartum perineal repair of second-degree lacerations and episiotomies.
                A double-blind randomised controlled trial.
                A Danish university hospital with more than 4800 deliveries annually.
                A total of 400 healthy primiparous women with a vaginal delivery at term. METHOD Randomisation was computer-controlled. Structured interviews and systematic assessment of perineal healing were performed by research midwives blinded to treatment allocation at 24-48 hours, 10 days and 6 months postpartum. Pain was evaluated using a visual analogue scale and the McGill Pain Questionnaire. Wound healing was evaluated using the REEDA scale and by assessment of gaping wounds >0.5 cm. Analysis complied with the intention-to-treat principle.
                The primary outcome was perineal pain 10 days after delivery. Secondary outcomes were wound healing, patient satisfaction, dyspareunia, need for resuturing, time elapsed during repair and amount of suture material used.
                A total of 400 women were randomised; 5 women withdrew their consent, leaving 395 for follow up. The follow-up rate was 98% for all assessments after delivery. No difference was seen in perineal pain 10 days after delivery. No difference was seen in wound healing, patient satisfaction, dyspareunia or need for resuturing. The continuous suture technique was significantly faster (15 versus 17 minutes, P = 0.03) and less suture material was used (one versus two packets, P < 0.01).
                Interrupted, inverted stitches for perineal repair leaving the skin unsutured appear to be equivalent to the continuous suture technique in relation to perineal pain, wound healing, patient satisfaction, dyspareunia and need for resuturing. The continuous technique, however, is faster and requires less suture material, thus leaving it the more cost-effective of the two techniques evaluated. To evaluate a policy of two stage postpartum perineal repair leaving the skin unsutured.
                A stratified randomised controlled trial using a 2 x 2 factorial design.
                The maternity unit at Ipswich Hospital NHS Trust, a district general hospital, between 1992 and 1994.
                1780 women requiring surgical repair of episiotomy or first or second degree tear following a spontaneous or simple instrumental delivery.
                A policy of two-stage perineal repair leaving skin unsutured was compared with a policy of three stage repair including skin closure with interrupted or subcuticular sutures. Both groups were assessed by a research midwife, blind to the allocation, completing questionnaires at 24 to 48 hours and 10 days postpartum, and by self-completed questionnaires at three months after birth.
                1. 24 to 48 hours postpartum: perineal pain; healing; 2. 10 days postpartum: perineal pain, healing and removal of sutures; 3. three months postpartum: perineal pain, removal of sutures, resuturing, dyspareunia, and failure to resume pain-free intercourse.
                Completed questionnaires were returned for 99% of women at both 24 to 48 hours and ten days and by 93% of women three months postpartum. No differences were detected in perineal pain at 24 to 48 hours (62% vs 64%; RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.90-1.03; 2P = 0.3) and 10 days (25% vs 28%; RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.77-1.06; 2P = 0.2). Significantly fewer women allocated to two-stage repair reported tight stitches at ten days (14% vs 18%; RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.62-0.96, 2P = 0.02); similar numbers of repairs were judged to be breaking down (five compared with seven women). At three months postpartum fewer women allocated to the two-stage repair reported perineal pain and more had resumed pain-free intercourse. Amongst women who had resumed intercourse there was a significant difference in dyspareunia (15% vs 19%; RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.65-0.99; 2P = 0.04). Significantly fewer women in the two-stage repair group (7% vs 12%; RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.45-0.83; 2P = < 0.01) reported removal of suture material. Four women in the two-stage repair group had required resuturing, compared with nine allocated to the three-stage repair.
                Two-stage repair of perineal trauma leaving the skin unsutured appears to reduce pain and dyspareunia three months postpartum. There are no apparent disadvantages, in particular no evidence of an increased risk of breakdown of the repair and resuturing. We set out to compare a policy of two-layered postpartum perineal repair leaving the skin unsutured with a policy of three-layered repair, which involved skin closure. Parturients who sustained a second-degree tear or an episiotomy in four Nigerian centers were randomised to have either a two-layered repair (417 women) or a three-layered repair (406 women). Fewer women in the two-layered group reported perineal pain at 48 hours (57% vs. 65%, relative risk [RR] 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78-0.97) and 14 days postpartum (22% vs. 28%, RR 0.77, CI 0.61-0.98). The two-layered repair was also associated with reduced risk of suture removal (6% vs. 10%, RR 0.62, CI 0.39-0.99), and less superficial dyspareunia at 3 months (6% vs. 12%, RR 0.52, CI 0.33-0.81). The rates of wound healing were similar between the two groups. Leaving the skin unsutured during postpartum perineal repair reduces perineal pain and dyspareunia. To examine differences in outcome between primiparous women who do and who do not have suturing to first or second degree perineal lacerations sustained during spontaneous vaginal births after 37 weeks of gestation.
                Parallel group randomised controlled trial.
                Bellshill Maternity Hospital, Lanarkshire, and St John's Hospital, Livingston.
                Primigravidae with perineal lacerations following spontaneous birth.
                One thousand and three hundred fourteen women were recruited to the trial antenatally from whom 74 were randomised either to be sutured or not sutured immediately after giving birth. Randomisation was stratified by degree of tear.
                Using standardised measures, perineal pain and healing were measured at 1 and 10 days and 6 weeks postpartum. In addition, postnatal depression was assessed at 10 days and 6 weeks postpartum.
                Findings indicated that there were no significant differences between the groups with regard to pain or depression but there were differences with regard to healing. At six weeks, there remained a significant difference in wound closure between the groups, with women who had not been sutured having poorer wound approximation.
                While acknowledging the small sample size, the results are nonetheless important, showing persistent evidence of poorer wound approximation in those women who had not been sutured. Practitioners need to review the present practices of not suturing perineal lacerations until research examining the longer term implications is undertaken. To evaluate the repair techniques of continuous and interrupted methods for episiotomy or perineal tears.
                A randomised controlled trial.
                The Hospital Universitario Principe de Asturias, a state hospital belonging to the community of Madrid.
                Four hundred forty-five women who had undergone vaginal deliveries with episiotomies or second-grade tearing of the perineum between September 2005 and July 2007.
                One group was repaired with continuous, nonlocking sutures involving the vagina, perineum, and subcutaneous tissues. The other group had continuous, locking sutures of the vagina, interrupted sutures in the perineal muscles, and interrupted transcutaneous sutures. The threads used for stitching were identical in both groups.
                The participants were questioned regarding the sensation of pain and the use of painkillers on the second and the tenth days, and 3 months postpartum.
                When comparing the group with continuous suture to the group with interrupted sutures, the differences included less repair time (1 minute; P= 0.017) and less suture material used (relative risk [RR], 3.2, 95% CI: 2.6-4.0). The comparison of pain on the second and tenth days, and 3 months postpartum were not statistically different between the two techniques (RR, 1.08, 95% CI: 0.74-1.57; RR, 0.96, 95% CI: 0.59-1.55; and RR, 0.68, 95% CI: 0.19-2.46, respectively).
                Although we did not demonstrate that one technique was better than the other in the incidence of pain in the short or long term, we showed that episiotomy and perineal tear repairs with continuous suturing were quicker and used less suture material without an increase in complication than interrupted suturing. The aim was to compare healing and perineal pain with the use of continuous and interrupted suture techniques in women after normal delivery. A randomized controlled trial was carried out at a hospital birth center in Itapecirica da Serra, Sao Paulo, Brazil. A total of 61 women participated with episiotomy or second degree perineal tear, allocated in two groups according to the continuous (n=31) or interrupted (n=30) suture techniques. The main outcomes evaluated were edema, ecchymosis, hyperemia, secretion, dehiscence, fibrosis, frequency and degree of pain (evaluated by numerical scale from 1 to 10). Data were collected during hospitalization and after discharge (four and 41 days after birth). Healing occurred by first intention in 100% of cases in both suture techniques. There were no statistically significant differences for the occurrence of morbidities, except for perineal pain due to palpation at four days after delivery, which was more frequent among women with interrupted suture. Trauma to the perineum is a serious and frequent problem after childbirth, with about 350000 women each year in the UK needing sutures for perineal injury after spontaneous vaginal delivery, and many millions more worldwide. We compared the continuous technique of perineal repair with the interrupted method, and the more rapidly absorbed polyglactin 910 suture material with the standard polyglactin 910 material.
                1542 women who had a spontaneous vaginal delivery with a second-degree perineal tear or episiotomy were randomly allocated to either the continuous (n=771) or interrupted (771) suturing method, and to either the more rapidly absorbed polyglactin 910 suture material (772) or standard polyglactin 910 material (770). Primary outcomes were pain 10 days after delivery and superficial dyspareunia 3 months postpartum. Analysis was by intention to treat.
                At day 10, three women had dropped out of the study. Significantly fewer women reported pain at 10 days with the continuous technique than with the interrupted method (204/770 [26.5%] vs 338/769 [44.0%], odds ratio 0.47, 95% CI 0.38-0.58, p<0.0001). Occurrence of pain did not differ significantly between groups assigned the more rapidly absorbed material or standard material (256/769 [33.3%] vs 286/770 [37.1%], 0.84, 0.68-1.04, p=0.10). Women reported no difference in superficial dyspareunia at 3 months for the continuous vs the interrupted method (98/581 [16.9%] vs 102/593 [17.2%], 0.98, 0.72-1.33, p=0.88) or the more rapidly absorbed versus standard material (105/586 [17.9%] vs 95/588 [16.2%], 1.13, 0.84-1.54, p=0.42). Suture removal was done less with the more rapidly absorbed material than with standard suture material (22/769 [3%] vs 98/770 [13%], p<0.0001), and with the continuous versus interrupted method (24/770 [3%] vs 96/769 [12%], p<0.0001).
                A simple and widely practicable continuous repair technique can prevent one woman in six from having pain at 10 days. Also, the more rapidly absorbed polyglactin 910 material obviates need for suture removal up to 3 months postpartum for one in ten women sutured. To compare different repair techniques and different suture materials for episiotomy.
                160 women having vertex delivery with right-mediolateral episiotomy were randomly allocated to four groups. In the groups where continuos technique was performed, vaginal mucosa, perineal muscles and the skin were sutured continuously. In the groups of interrupted technique, vaginal mucosa was sutured with continuous sutures, then muscle layers and skin were closed by interrupted sutures. Two different types of synthetic absorbed suture material were used: monofilament type is in form of polyglycolide-co-caprolactone and multifilament one is polyglactin 910-Rapide. Perineal pain during different activities on the first and tenth day postpartum and also during sexual intercourse 6 weeks after the delivery was questioned by visual analogous scale (VAS). Furthermore, repair time, amount of suture and episiotomy complications were investigated in each groups.
                On the first day after delivery, the perineal pain scores, the repair time, the amount of suture were statistically less in the continuous technique groups. The differences between the pain at tenth day and during sexual intercourse 6 weeks after the delivery were statistically same.
                The continuous suturing techniques for episiotomy closure, compared to interrupted methods, are associated with less short-term pain, are quicker and also need less suture material.
There is limited evidence available from RCTs to guide the choice between surgical or non-surgical repair of first- or second-degree perineal tears sustained during childbirth. Two studies find no difference between the two types of management with regard to clinical outcomes up to eight weeks postpartum. Therefore, at present there is insufficient evidence to suggest that one method is superior to the other with regard to healing and recovery in the early or late postnatal periods. Until further evidence becomes available, clinicians' decisions whether to suture or not can be based on their clinical judgement and the women's preference after informing them about the lack of long-term outcomes and the possible chance of a slower wound healing process, but possible better overall feeling of well being if left un-sutured.