Aztreonam versus gentamicin, each with clindamycin, in the treatment of endometritis. Comparative clinical evaluation of ceftizoxime with clindamycin and gentamicin and cefoxitin in the treatment of postcesarean endomyometritis. A comparison of clindamycin-gentamicin and penicillin-gentamicin in the treatment of post-cesarean section endomyometritis. Ciprofloxacin versus gentamicin/clindamycin for postpartum endometritis. [Treatment of puerperal endometritis. Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of clindamycin + gentamycin vs. penicillin + chloramphenicol + gentamycin]. Postcesarean endometritis: a brief review and comparison of three antibiotic regimens. Ampicillin/sulbactam vs. clindamycin/gentamicin in the treatment of postpartum endometritis. Prophylactic antibiotics in Caesarean section: effect of a short preoperative course of benzyl penicillin or clindamycin plus gentamicin on postoperative infectious morbidity. Gentamicin and clindamycin therapy in postpartum endometritis: the efficacy of daily dosing versus dosing every 8 hours.
A randomized comparison of aztreonam (2 g intravenously every eight hours) versus gentamicin (1.5 mg/kg intravenously every eight hours), each with clindamycin (600 mg intravenously every six hours), was performed in 119 patients with endometritis after cesarean section. Patients in both groups had similar risk factors. Genital cultures revealed an average of 3.0 isolates per specimen. Eighty-five aerobic gram-negative rods were isolated from 57 (48%) patients. All were susceptible to both aztreonam and gentamicin. Of 133 anaerobic isolates, 131 (98%) were susceptible to clindamycin. The failures in the aztreonam group were associated with a wound abscess and with an enterococcal bacteremia. Of the six failures in the gentamicin group, two were associated with persistent isolation of enteric bacilli. In the other four failures, no explanation was evident. Side effects occurred in four patients, (three diarrhea, one allergic reaction). All were self-limited and appeared to be due to clindamycin. No patient showed nephrotoxicity. When used in combination with clindamycin, aztreonam gave clinical results similar to gentamicin. New third generation cephalosporins have been recommended as single agent antibiotic therapy in the treatment of postoperative infections. This study compares the new third generation cephalosporin ceftizoxime with cefoxitin, clindamycin and gentamicin in the treatment of postcesarean section endomyometritis. The results indicate that the clindamycin and gentamicin regimen is more efficacious in the treatment of severe infection after cesarean section than either ceftizoxime or cefoxitin regimens. Therefore, the results of this study suggest caution in substituting single drug antibiotic therapy with cefoxitin or the third generation cephalosporins for the standard clindamycin and gentamicin regimen in the treatment of postcesarean section endomyometritis until more clinical data are available. A random comparison of clindamycin-gentamicin (C-G) and penicillin-gentamicin was made in 200 women who developed endomyometritis following cesarean section. All pretreatment profiles indicated similar populations. The clinical response was more favorable in the women receiving clindamycin-gentamicin. The implications of these results upon clinical practice is discussed. An open, randomized, comparative study of intravenous ciprofloxacin versus gentamicin and clindamycin was performed on women with postpartum endometritis. Ciprofloxacin alone successfully eradicated the infections in 35 of 49 patients (71%), while the combination of gentamicin/clindamycin cured 41 of 48 (85%) (P = .15). The microbiology and antibiotic sensitivity of the endometrial isolates confirmed the poor activity of ciprofloxacin against anaerobic bacteria and less-than-optimal activity against Streptococcus faecalis. Ciprofloxacin, when used alone, may not be suitable for the treatment of postpartum endometritis. This was a prospective, single-blind, comparative study in patients with diagnosis of puerperal endometritis, carried out at the Loayza Hospital in Lima, Peru. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of clindamycin and gentamicin in the management of endometritis vs. penicillin, chloramphenicol and gentamicin for 10 days. Sixty-five patients were enrolled and 62 were evaluable for efficacy. Both treatment groups were comparable in the pre-treatment period in terms of age, history of pregnancies, controls by gynecologist, days of disease and fever, clinical symptoms like fever, pelvic pain, pulse, uterine size and in laboratory, in hematocrit and leukocytes count. In the culture of endometrium tissue, 27/32 patients (84.4%) in Group A (penicillin + CAF + gentamicin) and 27/30 patients (90%) in Group B (clindamycin + gentamicin) had positive cultures at baseline; 18 and 22 patients showed anaerobes; 8 and 4 patients showed anaerobes plus aerobes and, one patient in each treatment group showed aerobes only. Peptostreptococcus and Bacteroides fragilis were the most frequently isolated pathogens. Improvement in lochia fetidity was more rapid in Group B, it turned transparent and not fetid since day 3. Complete cure was significantly better in Group B 24/30 (80%) in comparison with Group A 16/32 (50%) (p = 0.02). Partial response was found in 15 patients (43.3%) in Group A and 5 patients (16.6%) in Group B. Only one case was considered as bacteriological failure in Group A and only one patient in Group B was considered as failure and required an additional operation due to residual abscess.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) Three different antibiotic regimens (trospectomycin plus azteonam, clindamycin plus azteonam, and triple antibiotics-ampicillin plus clindamycin plus gentamicin) were all effective in treating patients with postcesarean endometritis. Patients are frequently cured clinically despite the fact that the offending organisms may be isolated in post-treatment cultures. Treatment of postcesarean endometritis without obtaining endometrial cultures is acceptable gynecologic practice. Obtaining post-treatment cultures is clearly not cost effective nor clinically beneficial. Drug treatment efficacy should be evaluated by clinical response. This communication is the first to report the new antibiotic, trospectomycin, in the treatment of postcesarean endometritis. Further clinical trials are currently underway. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ampicillin/sulbactam with those of clindamycin/gentamicin.
                A prospective, randomized clinical trial of patients with the diagnosis of postpartum endometritis. Intravenous ampicillin, 2.0 g, combined with 1.0 g sulbactam was administered every six hours or intravenous clindamycin, 900 mg, plus gentamicin, 1.5 mg/kg (not to exceed 150 mg unless gentamicin levels were obtained) every eight hours. Endometrial and blood specimens were obtained for culture and antibiotic susceptibility testing.
                One hundred twenty-nine hospitalized women with the diagnosis of endometritis were enrolled. Both treatment regimens were equally effective. At the end of treatment, 42 of 51 (82%) ampicillin/sulbactam-treated patients achieved clinical cure in comparison to 47 of 56 (84%) patients in the clindamycin/gentamicin group. Respective bacterial eradication rates of 86% and 84% for each treatment group were seen. Both antibiotic regimens were well tolerated, with no statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse experiences.
                The two antibiotic regimens were equally effective for a clinical cure, bacterial eradication and incidence of adverse experiences. The efficacy of a narrow-spectrum (benzyl penicillin) versus broad-spectrum (clindamycin + gentamicin) preoperative antimicrobial prophylaxis was studied in a series of 147 consecutive patients undergoing Caesarean section at the State Maternity Hospital, Helsinki, Finland. Both regimens proved effective in reducing postoperative endometritis: from 33% (19/57 cases) to 6.5% (3/46 cases) in the penicillin treated group, and to 9.5% (4/42 cases) in the clindamycin + gentamicin treated group. The reduction in the incidence of endometritis was not reflected in the duration of hospital stay, which was 7.7 days in the untreated group, 7.8 days in the penicillin treated group, and 7.6 days in the clindamycin + gentamicin treated group. No significant differences between the groups were detected in the incidence of wound infections. The objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of gentamicin and clindamycin given once daily versus the more common 8-hour dosing regimen for the treatment of postpartum endometritis.
                In a prospective, placebo-controlled, double-blinded study, patients who had postpartum endometritis diagnosed were randomly selected to receive 1.5 mg/kg gentamicin and 900 mg clindamycin phosphate administered every 8 hours versus gentamicin 5 mg/kg and clindamycin phosphate 2700 mg administered as a single-daily dose. The single-dose group received an infusion of gentamicin and clindamycin, followed by an administration of intravenous placebo 8 and 16 hours later to maintain blinding. Treatment success was defined as absence of fever 72 hours after initiation of antibiotic therapy.
                One hundred ten patients were enrolled. The daily-dose group (n = 55) and the thrice-daily dose group (n = 55) were similar with respect to age, gravidity, parity, gestational age, and maternal weight. Clinical characteristics (including maximum temperature, presence of predelivery chorioamnionitis, white blood cell count, and mode of delivery) were also similar. There was no difference in the mean time from initiation of therapy until becoming afebrile in the daily-dose group (27.4 +/- 24.9 hours) compared with the thrice-daily dose group (32.9 +/- 26.3 hours). Forty-five of 56 (82%) patients in the daily-dose group and 38 of 55 (69%) patients in the thrice-daily dose group had treatment success (P =.12).
                Once-daily dosing with gentamicin and clindamycin in women with postpartum endometritis has a similar success rate as the standard every 8-hour dosing schedule.
The combination of gentamicin and clindamycin is appropriate for the treatment of endometritis. Regimens with activity against penicillin-resistant anaerobic bacteria are better than those without. There is no evidence that any one regimen is associated with fewer side-effects. Once uncomplicated endometritis has clinically improved with intravenous therapy, oral therapy is not needed.
[Note: the two citations in the awaiting classification section of the review may alter the conclusions of the review once assessed.]