Folic acid treatment of fragile X males: a further study. Oral folic acid versus placebo in the treatment of males with the fragile X syndrome. Folic acid treatment in males and females with fragile-(X)-syndrome. High dose folic acid treatment of fragile (X) males. Double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study of folinic acid (Leucovorin for the treatment of fragile X syndrome. A randomised trial of low dose folic acid to prevent neural tube defects. The Irish Vitamin Study Group. Influence of routine administration of folic acid and iron during pregnancy. Folic acid supplementation in dementia: a preliminary report. Randomized trial of a physician-based intervention to increase the use of folic acid supplements among women.
Investigations of the effect of high dose folic acid treatment of fragile X syndrome in males has produced mixed results. However, no study had examined the possible drug effects of folic acid on non-fragile X control males. Therefore, we examined the effect of folic acid on fragile X males using non-fragile X control males. Subjects were assigned randomly to an ABA or BAB design. Duration of either folic acid or placebo condition was 4 months. Folic acid or placebo was given in a double-blind fashion. At the end of each condition, the subjects' behavior was assessed. At the end of the study, parents were asked to complete a questionnaire. Using parents' responses, we examined 22 items on the Autistic Descriptors Checklist and two subscales from the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale which corresponded to areas of behavior parents' noted to have shown improvement. We did not find significant differences between fragile X males and control males, within subjects, nor across folic acid and placebo conditions. Thus, our follow-up study confirms and extends our original findings, as well as those of other researchers: namely, that no dramatic changes in behavior result from high dose folic acid. Moreover, subtle improvements observed in earlier investigations were not confirmed. A double-blind, crossover study of a 10 mg folic acid per day (vs. placebo) treatment was carried out in 25 fra(X) males (ages 1-31 years). Each treatment period lasted 6 months. Before, during and after the study, the patients were assessed blindly with psychological, language and behavioral evaluations, and parent or caretaker reports were collected. Standardized testing did not show statistically significant changes in the group as a whole; psychological testing demonstrated a statistically significant improvement on folic acid in the prepubertal males. After uncoding, caretaker or parent reports also demonstrated behavioral improvements in the prepubertal males while being treated with folic acid. Ten males with the fragile X (fra(X] syndrome were treated with folic acid (10 mg/day) for 4 months in a double-blind design study. To eight heterozygotes with mental impairment and fra(X), folic acid was given for 4 months (10 mg/day) in an effort to study possible beneficial effects of folic acid. Psychological and cytogenetic testing were carried out during the trial. There was no improvement in concentration, fine motor co-ordination, or comprehension in the adult male and female patients of the study. One patient showed improvement under a control medications. In the females, improvement was seen only in the youngest patient, a 5-year-old girl. Folate treatment does not seem to be effective in fra(X) adults, but may have some effect in children of both sexes with the disorder. Cytogenetic studies using peripheral lymphocytes showed that the fra(X) frequency decreased significantly (t = 0.00856; 1% level) only in cells cultured in a folic acid-free medium but not in cells cultured in a medium with added antifolate (methotrexate). This shows a "contamination effect" of folate-free culture medium after oral folic acid treatment of these patients. The decrease of fra(X) involves primarily the early-replicating X when culturing with folic acid-free medium. A synergistic suppression effect of "external folate" and BrdU is the most likely explanation of this phenomenon. We conducted an experimental trial of high-dose folic acid given to five males, ages 8 to 26 years, with the fra(X) syndrome. In this double blind study, each subject received 250 mg per day of folic acid for 3 months, followed by placebo for 3 months, and folic acid again for an additional three months. Based on IQ tests, behavior ratings, the Autistic Descriptors Checklist, and parental ratings, there was little evidence to suggest any positive effects seen during the administration of high-dose folic acid. Therefore, this study has provided little support for a hypothesis of benefit of high-dose folic acid in the treatment of the fra(X) syndrome. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study of folinic acid therapy (dl-Leucovorin, 15 mg/day) or placebo for males with Fragile X (fra(x)) syndrome. Twenty-one patients were enrolled in the study. The treatment periods were 3 months in length. Patients were followed with chemistry panels and complete blood counts. No differences between placebo and treatment phases were noted in any laboratory parameter. Instruments to measure functioning were the Vineland Adaptive Behavioral Scales, Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised, Conners Parent and Teaching Rating Scales, the ADD-H: Comprehensive Teacher's Rating Scales (ACTeRS), and a questionnaire designed by the investigators. At the crossover point, 2 parents requested to withdraw from the study because they felt their children had made dramatic gains during the first half of the study and had lost those gains after the crossover point. Both parents had accurately predicted that their sons were receiving folinic acid during the first half of the study. However, no statistically significant differences could be demonstrated between the treatment and placebo phases of the study with any instrument when the results were averaged over the entire cohort. After the conclusion of the study, approximately one-half of the parents believed that their children had benefitted from the folinic acid therapy and elected to continue treatment. Thus far, no significant side effects have been noted from long-term folinic acid therapy so we are offering all Fragile X patients a 3-month trial of medication. A randomised trial was initiated in Ireland in 1981 to determine if periconceptional supplementation with either folic acid alone or a multivitamin preparation alone could reduce the recurrence risk of neural tube defects (NTDs) in women with a previously affected pregnancy from 5.0% to 1.0% or less. The trial was concluded before the initial target number of study subjects was reached and without a clear treatment effect being observed. A total of 354 women were randomised to receive one of three treatments: folic acid, multivitamins without folic acid, and folic acid plus multivitamins. At the end of the trial 257 women had had a first trial pregnancy outcome (261 infants/fetuses) where the presence or absence of NTDs was ascertainable. There was one NTD recurrence in the 89 infants/fetuses of women in the multivitamin group and no recurrence in the 172 infants/fetuses of women in the folic acid groups, a non-significant difference. Otherwise eligible women who were pregnant when first contacted constituted a non-randomised control group; there were three recurrences among the 103 infants in this group. The difference in the recurrence rate between the folic acid groups and the non-randomised controls was statistically significant but we have reservations about the validity of this comparison. Although our findings do not provide clear evidence of a protective effect of folic acid supplementation they are consistent with those of the Medical Research Council (MRC) trial which demonstrated the efficacy of folic acid in preventing recurrence of NTDs and they raise the possibility that folic acid may be protective at a much lower dosage than that used in the MRC trial. Haematological and folic acid status were assessed in 200 women in the 6th month of pregnancy. Folic acid deficiencies with no or little haematological impairment were found in one third of the cases, and their occurrence increased when the socioeconomic level was low. During the last trimester of pregnancy, the women were given either iron alone or iron and folic acid supplementation. In the mothers, the rise of folate values in serum and red blood cells, in the folic acid-supplemented group, had no obvious haematological consequences, showing that iron therapy alone can, in developed countries, prevent the anaemia in pregnancy. In the infants, there was no difference in the haematological indices, whatever the mothers' treatment had been. However, a significant difference appeared for the gestational age and, therefore, the height and weight. Folic acid supplementation during pregnancy increased its duration by virtually 1 week. Recent work on high plasma homocysteine levels in patients at risk for developing Alzheimer's disease has led to the hypothesis that folic acid supplementation might reduce risk in such patients. The authors report on the effects of folic acid 10 mg/day versus placebo on 11 patients (only 7 completers) with dementia and low-normal folic acid levels. This is the first study evaluating folic acid or placebo in patients with dementia. Subjects had low-normal baseline folic acid levels. The magnitude of change between baseline and second testing was not statistically significant between the 2 groups. However, there was a trend for the folate group to perform worse on two specific cognitive measures, suggesting a possible trend toward worsening of some cognitive abilities after the folic acid. The folic acid in very high doses was well tolerated. Larger studies are necessary before empirically administering folic acid to patients already suffering from dementia. Fewer than one third of American women take folic acid daily, although many women report that they would take folic acid if their physicians advised them to do so. This study determined the impact of a physician intervention during routine gynecologic visits on folic acid supplementation.
                Patients were assigned randomly to receive brief folic acid counseling, a reminder phone call, and 30 folic acid tablets (n = 162 women; intervention group) or to receive counseling about other preventive health behaviors and a folic acid informational pamphlet (n = 160 women; control group). Self-reported folic acid use was compared at baseline and at 2 months.
                Of the 279 patients who completed the study, weekly folic acid intake increased in the intervention group by 68%, compared with 20% in the control group ( P =.008). No significant differences were found in daily intake. The women who were most influenced by the intervention were black and lower income and not planning pregnancies.
                With little effort expended to encourage folic acid use, gynecologists could potentially reduce the risk of folate-preventable birth defects among their patients by as much as 11%.
The quality of available evidence is low and not suitable for drawing conclusions about the effect of folic acid on fragile X syndrome patients. It consists of few studies with small samples of patients, all of them male, with little statistical power to detect anything other than huge effects.