Physiologic effects of oral supplemental feeding in malnourished patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A randomized control study. Impact of nutritional support on functional status during an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Medical and surgical treatment of nonallergic asthma associated with gastroesophageal reflux. Therapy of pancreatogenic steatorrhoea: does acid protection of pancreatic enzymes offer any advantage? Physiologic evidence for the efficacy of positive expiratory pressure as an airway clearance technique in patients with cystic fibrosis. Dietary counseling improves patient outcomes: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial in colorectal cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication compared with proton-pump inhibitors for treatment of chronic gastro-oesophageal reflux. A randomized study of oral nutritional support versus ad lib nutritional intake during chemotherapy for advanced colorectal and non-small-cell lung cancer. Ascorbic acid supplementation attenuates exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in patients with asthma.
The association between severe nutritional depletion and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has long been recognized. A potential therapeutic benefit to nutritional support was previously suggested by us in a pilot investigation. Subsequent studies have reported conflicting results regarding the role of nutritional therapy in this clinical population. We report a randomized controlled study of nutritional therapy in underweight patients with COPD that combines an initial inpatient investigation (controlled nutritional support) with a prolonged outpatient follow-up interval. Provision of adequate calorie and protein support, adjusted to metabolic requirements, resulted in weight gain (intervention = +2.4 kg versus control -0.5 kg), improved handgrip strength (intervention = +5.5 kg-force versus control -6.0 kg-force), expiratory muscle strength (intervention = +14.9 cm H2O versus control -9.2 cm H2O), and walking distance (intervention = +429 feet versus control -1.0 foot). Inspiratory muscle strength was also improved (intervention = +11.4 cm H2O versus control +4.8 cm H2O) although this did not quite reach statistical significance. We conclude that provision of adequate nutrient supply under controlled conditions results in significant clinical improvements in the COPD patient population. However, the intervention is costly, time-intensive, and of limited therapeutic magnitude. More detailed work of alternative outpatient strategies combined with additional rehabilitative measures is indicated to delineate the full therapeutic potential of nutritional support for this clinical population. The impact of oral nutritional supplementation during an acute exacerbation of COPD on functional status was assessed through measuring change in lung function, strength testing, and general well-being. Subjects hospitalized for an acute exacerbation of COPD (n = 33) were randomized to extra nutritional support or the regular hospital care. They consumed an additional 10 kcal/kg/d. Outcome measures were measured at 2 wk as change scores. Forced vital capacity (% predicted) improved in the treatment group as compared with the control group (+8.7% versus -3.5%, p = 0.015), and change in FEV1 was in the same direction but not significantly different (p = 0.099). There were no changes in handgrip strength or respiratory muscle strength, but there was a trend towards more improvement in the general well-being score (+11.96 versus -10.25, p = 0.066). Almost all subjects were in negative nitrogen balance, indicating muscle wasting. The degree of muscle wasting was strongly correlated with the dose of corticosteroids (r = 0.73, p < 0.005). In conclusion, it is difficult to prevent important muscle wasting in patients with COPD treated with corticosteroids, but some small gains were observed with increased dietary intake. Patients presenting to a chest clinic because of adult-onset wheezing with no history of allergy had a 90 percent prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux, even though reflux symptoms were mild or absent. Ninety patients were randomly assigned to receive cimetidine or an identical placebo or to undergo antireflux surgery. During a six-month period, all groups improved clinically; the cimetidine and surgical groups improved more than the placebo group. The intake of pulmonary medication decreased significantly in both cimetidine and surgical groups. Pulmonary function test results improved in the cimetidine- and surgically treated patients; improvement was not statistically significant. At long-term follow-up, the surgical group maintained clinical improvement and decreased pulmonary medication intake, whereas the placebo group worsened. We conclude that gastroesophageal reflux can play a significant role in some patients with nonallergic pulmonary disease and that its treatment can improve pulmonary symptoms and objective measurements of pulmonary function. Pancreatic enzyme replacement may fail to achieve a beneficial effect because of enzyme inactivation by gastric acid. In this controlled randomized study, 8 hospitalized patients with severe exocrine pancreatic insufficiency and considerable steatorrhoea (greater than 15 g faecal fat/day) were treated with a conventional pancreatic enzyme preparation (Pankreon 700; 3 X 3 dragees daily), with (300 mg) and without cimetidine before meals, and with a new pH-sensitive enzyme preparation (Kreon; 3 X 6 capsules daily) comprising acid-protected granules. Both conventional enzyme replacement plus cimetidine, and acid-protected pancreatin were significantly (p less than 0.05) more effective than conventional enzyme therapy alone. Since both regimens are equally potent in overcoming gastric acid-induced enzyme inactivation, it is concluded that therapy with acid-protected pancreatin may simplify and improve treatment of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency in the presence of gastric hyper- or normo-acidity. Individuals with cystic fibrosis (CF) have large amounts of infected mucus in their lungs, which causes irreversible lung tissue damage. Although patient-administered positive expiratory pressure (PEP) breathing has been promoted as an effective therapeutic modality for removing mucus and improving ventilation distribution in these patients, the effects of PEP on ventilation distribution and gas mixing have not been documented. Therefore, this preliminary investigation described responses in distribution of ventilation and gas mixing to PEP breathing for patients with moderate to severe CF lung disease.
                The effects of PEP breathing on ventilation distribution, gas mixing, lung volumes, expiratory airflow, percentage of arterial blood oxyhemoglobin saturation (SpO(2)), and sputum volume were studied in 5 patients with CF (mean age=18 years, SD=4, range=13-22) after no-PEP, low-PEP (10-20 cm H(2)O), and high-PEP (>20 cm H(2)O) breathing conditions. Single-breath inert gas studies and lung function tests were performed before, immediately after, and 45 minutes after intervention. Single-breath tests assess ventilation distribution homogeneity and gas mixing by observing the extent to which an inspired test gas mixes with gas already residing in the lung.
                Improvements in gas mixing were observed in all PEP conditions. By 45 minutes after intervention, the no-PEP group improved by 5%, the low-PEP group improved by 15%, and the high-PEP group improved by 23%. Slow vital capacity increased by 1% for no PEP, by 9% for low PEP, and by 13% for high PEP 45 minutes after intervention. Residual volume decreased by 13% after no PEP, by 20% after low PEP, and by 30% after high PEP. Immediate improvements in forced expiratory flow during the middle half of the forced vital capacity maneuver (FEF(25%-75%)) were sustained following high PEP but not following low PEP.
                This study demonstrated the physiologic basis for the efficacy of PEP therapy. The results confirm that low PEP and high PEP improve gas mixing in individuals with CF, and these improvements were associated with increased lung function, sputum expectoration, and SpO(2). The authors propose that improvements in gas mixing may lead to increases in oxygenation and thus functional exercise capacity. To investigate the impact of dietary counseling or nutritional supplements on outcomes in cancer patients: nutritional, morbidity, and quality of life (QoL) during and 3 months after radiotherapy.
                A total of 111 colorectal cancer outpatients referred for radiotherapy, stratified by staging, were randomly assigned: group 1 (G1; n = 37), dietary counseling (regular foods); group 2 (G2; n = 37), protein supplements; and group 3 (G3; n = 37), ad libitum intake. Nutritional intake (diet history), status (Ottery's Subjective Global Assessment), and QoL (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire version 3.0) were evaluated at baseline, at the end, and 3 months after radiotherapy.
                At radiotherapy completion, energy intake increased in G1/G2 (P < or = .04), G1 more than G2 (P = .001), and decreased in G3 (P < .01). Protein intake increased in G1/G2 (P < or = .007), G1 less than G2 (not significant), and decreased in G3 (P < .01). At 3 months, G1 maintained nutritional intake and G2/G3 returned to baseline. After radiotherapy and at 3 months, rates of anorexia, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea were higher in G3 (P < .05). At radiotherapy completion, in G1 all QoL function scores improved proportionally to adequate intake or nutritional status (P < .05); whereas in G2 only three of six function scores improved proportionally to protein intake (P = .04), and in G3 all scores worsened (P < .05). At 3 months, G1 patients maintained/improved function, symptoms, and single-item scores (P < .02); in G2, only few function and symptom scales improved (P < .05); in G3, QoL remained as poor as after radiotherapy. In G1/G2, respectively, improvement/deterioration of QoL correlated with better or poorer intake or nutritional status (P < .003).
                During radiotherapy, both interventions positively influenced outcomes; dietary counseling was of similar or higher benefit, whereas even 3 months after RT, it was the only method to sustain a significant impact on patient outcomes. Both laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) and proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy are established in the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). The aim of this study was to compare these two treatments in a randomized clinical trial.
                Between July 1997 and August 2001, 340 patients with a history of GORD for at least 6 months were investigated by endoscopy, 24-h pH monitoring and manometry. Of these, 217 were randomized, 109 to LNF and 108 to PPI therapy. The two groups were well matched for age, sex, weight and severity of reflux. Twenty-four-hour pH monitoring and manometry were performed 3 months after treatment, and quality of life was assessed in both groups using the Psychological General Well-being Index and the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale at 3 and 12 months after treatment.
                At 3 months there was an improvement in lower oesophageal sphincter pressure from 6.3 to 17.2 mmHg in the LNF group but no change in the PPI group (8.1 and 7.9 mmHg before and after treatment respectively) (P < 0.001). The mean DeMeester acid exposure score improved from 42.7 to 8.6 (P < 0.001) in the LNF group and from 36.9 to 17.7 in the PPI group (P < 0.001). The mean gastrointestinal symptom and general well-being scores improved from 31.7 and 95.4 respectively before treatment to 37.0 and 106.2 at 12 months after LNF, compared with changes from 34.3 and 98.5 to 35.0 and 100.4 respectively in the PPI group. The differences in both of these scores were significant between the two groups at 12 months (P = 0.003).
                LNF leads to significantly less acid exposure of the lower oesophagus at 3 months and significantly greater improvements in both gastrointestinal and general well-being after 12 months compared with PPI treatment.
                Copyright (c) 2005 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. One hundred ninety-two patients with previously untreated metastatic cancer (102 non-small-cell lung cancer [NSCLC]; 90 colorectal cancer) were randomized to receive either ad lib nutritional intake (control group) or specific nutritional intervention during a 12-week study period when chemotherapy was administered. Those patients randomized to nutritional interventions were counselled to take oral nutrients with caloric intake equal to 1.7 to 1.95 times their basal energy expenditure, depending on their pretreatment nutritional status ("standard" group). An augmented group was counselled to have a caloric intake equivalent to that of the standard group but with 25% of calories provided as protein and additional supplements of zinc and magnesium. Counselling increased caloric intake in both tumor types but reduced weight loss in the short term only for lung cancer patients. Ninety-three NSCLC patients were evaluable for tumor response to vindesine and cisplatin. Overall, only 20.4% of the patients responded, and there were no significant differences in response rates, median time to progression, or overall duration of survival between the nutrition intervention groups and the control group. The tumor response rate to time-sequenced 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and methotrexate in the 81 evaluable patients with colorectal cancer was only 14.8%, and no significant differences in tumor response rates were noted between the three groups. Furthermore, the median time to progression and overall duration of survival were not different for the control, standard, and augmented groups. Nutritional interventions using dietary counselling had no impact on the percent of planned chemotherapy dose administered, the degree of toxicity experienced by patients, or the frequency of treatment delays. A multivariate prognostic factor analysis demonstrated that for lung cancer, the percent of weight loss, serum albumin concentration, and presence of liver metastases were significant (P less than .05) and independent prognostic variables for survival duration. For colorectal cancer, serum albumin, alkaline phosphatase, lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, and percent targeted caloric intake (TCI) were significant independent predictors of survival duration. Previous research has shown that diet can modify the bronchoconstrictor response to exercise in asthmatic subjects.
                Determine the effect of ascorbic acid supplementation on pulmonary function and several urinary markers of airway inflammation in asthmatic subjects with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB).
                Eight asthmatic subjects with documented EIB participated in a randomized, placebo controlled double-blind crossover trial. Subjects entered the study on their usual diet and were placed on either 2 weeks of ascorbic acid supplementation (1500 mg/day) or placebo, followed by a 1-week washout period, before crossing over to the alternative diet. Pre- and post-exercise pulmonary function, asthma symptom scores, fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FENO), and urinary leukotriene (LT) C4-E4 and 9alpha, 11beta-prostagladin (PG) F2] were assessed at the beginning of the trial (usual diet) and at the end of each treatment period. Results: The ascorbic acid diet significantly reduced (p < 0.05) the maximum fall in post-exercise FEV1 (-6.4 +/- 2.4%) compared to usual (-14.3 +/- 1.6%) and placebo diet (-12.9 +/- 2.4%). Asthma symptoms scores significantly improved (p<0.05) on the ascorbic acid diet compared to the placebo and usual diet. Post-exercise FENO, LTC4-E4 and 9alpha, 11beta-PGF2 concentration was significantly lower (p<0.05) on the ascorbic acid diet compared to the placebo and usual diet.
                Ascorbic acid supplementation provides a protective effect against exercise-induced airway narrowing in asthmatic subjects.
Trials have shown limited evidence that agents that reduce gastric acidity are associated with improvement in gastro-intestinal symptoms and fat absorption. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to indicate whether there is an improvement in nutritional status, lung function, quality of life, or survival. We therefore recommend that large, multicentre, randomised controlled clinical trials are undertaken to evaluate these interventions.