A widely available method for the assessment of aerosol delivery in cystic fibrosis. Drug delivery and adherence in young children. Impact of a criteria-based reimbursement policy on the use of respiratory drugs delivered by nebulizer and health care services utilization in Nova Scotia, Canada. Comparison of drug delivery from conventional versus "Venturi" nebulizers. Metered dose inhalers for bronchodilator delivery in intubated, mechanically ventilated patients. An evaluation of two aerosol delivery systems for rhDNase. Use of an 'evidence-based implementation' strategy to implement evidence-based care of asthma into rural district hospital emergency departments. Comparison of three jet nebulizer aerosol delivery systems used to administer recombinant human DNase I to patients with cystic fibrosis. The Pulmozyme rhDNase Study Group. Aerosol deposition in cystic fibrosis using an aerosol conservation device and a conventional jet nebulizer.
Whilst nebulisers are commonly used in the treatment of cystic fibrosis (CF), nebulised aerosol lung deposition in individual patients is not routinely assessed in clinical practice. The present study was designed to evaluate whether a comparative measurement of aerosol lung deposition from nebulisers using a widely available scintigraphic method could be employed to assist the selection of the best system for individual patients. Lung deposition of the radiolabelled aerosol from the Pari LC Plus (Pari Medical Ltd) nebuliser and the HaloLite Adaptive Aerosol Delivery (AAD) system (Profile Therapeutics Ltd) was measured using planar scintigraphy in 10 healthy volunteers and 6 CF patients. The HaloLite AAD delivered on average 2.1 times (P=0.003) as much aerosol to the lungs compared with Pari LC Plus. Only two subjects had higher lung deposition from Pari LC Plus than HaloLite AAD system. There was marked inter-individual variation in the deposition pattern in CF patients. The aerosol deposition from HaloLite AAD had higher central distribution than that obtained with the Pari LC Plus. The overall intersubject variability of the delivered dose was 56% with Pari LC Plus and 24% with HaloLite AAD (P<0.05). The measurement of aerosol deposition from nebulisers can be performed using a simple and widely available methodology, and may improve nebuliser selection in CF patients. The aim of this pilot study was to compare a the HaloLite Paediatric Nebulizer (HPN) with a pressurized metered dose inhaler and valved holding chamber (pMDI VHC, Aerochamber) in terms of drug delivery, adherence to treatment, compliance with device, true adherence, and acceptability. Fourteen children aged 11-36 months with asthma on regular treatment with inhaled corticosteroids were enrolled into an open, randomized, crossover trial. They received budesonide for 2 weeks with each delivery system. Both devices incorporated a datalogger which recorded information on how the device was used. The HPN was preprogrammed to deliver 25 microg of budesonide to the patient. A single actuation of budesonide 200 microg was used with the pMDI VHC. The median delivered dose of budesonide was 36 microg (range, 31-45 microg; CV, 15%) for the HPN and 53 microg (range, 17-85 microg; CV, 47%) for the pMDI VHC. The median adherence was 68% (range, 11-96%) with the HPN and 71% (range, 11-100%) with the pMDI VHC. The median device compliance was 30% and 51% and the median true adherence was 23% and 36%, respectively. The shape, size, and weight of the HaloLite Paediatric Nebulizer were generally less acceptable than the shape, size, and weight of the pMDI VHC with datalogger. These results indicate that reproducible quantities of drug can be delivered to very young children using AAD technology such as that incorporated into the HPN. Drug delivery with the pMDI VHC was more variable, but parents preferred this device.
                Copyright 2004 Wiely-Liss, Inc. In February 2000, the Nova Scotia Seniors' Pharmacare Program announced a change in the reimbursement of respiratory drugs that added specific reimbursement criteria for wet nebulization therapy. Policy implementation coincided with multifaceted interventions to assist patients and providers with the change.
                To assess the impact of the new policy and associated interventions on the use of wet nebulization and portable inhaler delivery systems of respiratory drugs and on the utilization of health services.
                The administrative claims database identified all beneficiaries (age > or = 65 yrs) who received at least one respiratory drug prescription in the 12 months before the study. These patients were then grouped into the wet nebulization cohort or the control cohort receiving a metered-dose or a dry-powder inhaler. The study period was from April 1998-February 2002. Use of respiratory drugs, physician visits, and hospitalizations were compared between study cohorts using an interrupted time-series design.
                A sharp decrease was noted in use of wet nebulization after the policy announcement, along with an increase in use of short-acting beta2-agonists and anticholinergic agents delivered by metered-dose or drypowder inhaler. From December 1999 to December 2001, in the heavy wet nebulization cohort (a subset of the wet nebulization cohort), wet nebulization use dropped from 100% to 35%; in the wet nebulization cohort, wet nebulization use decreased from 67% to 20%. Rates of spacer device use were 42%, 31%, and 17% in the heavy wet nebulization, wet nebulization, and control cohorts, respectively, in December 2001. Rates of general practitioner visits and hospitalizations for respiratory conditions did not increase in the intervention cohorts after the policy announcement. In fact, relative to the control cohort, health services use in response to the policy and interventions in the wet nebulization cohort decreased.
                The reimbursement policy resulted in decreased use of respiratory drugs delivered by wet nebulization without a negative impact on general practitioner visits and hospitalizations for respiratory conditions. Attempts to improve drug delivery from conventional jet nebulizers have included the use of storage systems to reduce drug wastage during exhalation. Venturi nebulizers enhance drug delivery during inhalation, reducing treatment times and drug wastage. This study investigated the effect of age on inhaled dose from a conventional jet nebulizer (Acorn) used both with and without a storage chamber (Mizer), compared to two Venturi nebulizers (Ventstream and Pari LC). Filters were attached to the four nebulizer systems, containing salbutamol, and 18 children with cystic fibrosis (3-16 yrs) inhaled through these devices. The quantity of drug collected on the filter was assessed using ultraviolet spectrophotometry. The particle size distribution of the aerosol from each nebulizer system was measured using laser diffraction. Inspiratory filter deposition using the Acorn was lower than the Acorn with Mizer, and both Venturi nebulizers. Filter deposition using the Acorn with Mizer was lower than the Pari LC. No trend with age, height or weight was noted using any nebulizer. Aerosol particle size using the Ventstream was lower than the other nebulizer systems. Drug output from both Venturi nebulizers was more efficient than from the jet nebulizer, used with and without the storage chamber, during inhalation by children with cystic fibrosis. The inhaled dose did not change with the patient's age or size using both types of nebulizer. We determined the relative efficacy of two bronchodilator aerosol delivery methods in 18 intubated mechanically ventilated patients with airways obstruction. Two treatment arms, consisting of albuterol 270 micrograms (three puffs) from a metered dose inhaler and albuterol 2.5 mg from a saline solution nebulized with an updraft inhaler, were compared in a single blind, randomized crossover design. Pulmonary function was evaluated using an interrupter technique. Changes in passive expiratory flow at respiratory system recoil pressures between 6 and 10 cm H2O provided the therapeutic endpoints. Paired measurements were made before and 30 minutes after drug delivery. The MDI and NEB resulted in similar improvements in iso-recoil flow (mean increase for both groups = 0.1 L/s). Treatment sequence, severity of obstruction, and bronchodilator responsiveness had no effect on relative efficacy. Albuterol caused a small but significant increase in heart rate that was similar following both delivery methods. We conclude that bronchodilator aerosol delivery with metered dose inhalers provides a viable alternative to nebulizer therapy in intubated mechanically ventilated patients and may result in a cost savings to hospitals and patients. Increasingly, proteins are delivered to the respiratory tract as an aerosol, and clinical efficacy is dependent on optimal delivery of the protein in an intact form. The object of this study was to compare the in vivo and in vitro results of two aerosol delivery systems for the aerosolization of recombinant human deoxyribonuclease I (rhDNase) in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). Patients with CF who were to be initiated on rhDNase were randomized either to the Hudson nebulizer and Pulmo-Aide compressor or to the Sidestream nebulizer driven by the CR50 air compressor. An in vitro study was performed in six sets of the two aerosol delivery systems. One hundred and seventy three patients were randomized in this open study, where rhDNase was administered for 7 days. Improvements in pulmonary function were observed in both groups following 1 week of therapy with rhDNase. Changes in the Sidestream/CR50 and Hudson/Pulmo-Aide groups, respectively, were: 16 and 11% for forced expiratory volume in one second (p=0.14); 12 and 10% for forced vital capacity (p=0.70); and 14 and 7% for forced expiratory flow at 25-75% of expiration (FEF(25-75)) (p=0.18). A greater proportion of patients in the Sidestream/CR50 group (58%) had a >10% response in FEF(25-75) compared to the Hudson/Pulmo-Aide group (42%; p=0.03). The Sidestream nebulizer had a faster nebulization rate (p<0.05), lower mass median diameter for the aerosol mass produced (p<0.001), higher percentage of particles in the respirable range (p<0.001) and greater respirable output (p<0.005), compared to the Hudson nebulizer. The Sidestream/CR50 combination is a quicker, more efficient system in vitro than the Hudson/Pulmo-Aide combination, whereas the in vivo study only suggested a difference. Clinically, the two systems have similar efficacy. To determine if an evidence-based implementation (EBI) could lead to the successful implementation of evidence based care for adult asthma in small rural district hospitals.
                A controlled trial involving eight small rural hospitals (four each in the study and control groups) was conducted. Retrospective pre-intervention audits were conducted at all eight hospitals for 7 months (1 January 2004 to 31 July 2004) and evidence-practice gaps identified. An EBI was then used to implement established guidelines for the management of asthma in the study hospitals. Post-intervention audits were then performed over a period of 7 months (1 October 2004 to 31 April 2005).
                There were 52 presentations of asthma in the study hospitals in the pre-implementation phase and 47 post-implementation. The corresponding numbers for the control hospitals were 46 and 42 respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the severity between the groups. Following the EBI there were significant improvements at the study hospitals for the documentation of severity (8% to 62%, p <0.001), use of spirometry (12% to 62%, p <0.001) and the use of written short-term asthma plans (9% to 26%, p = 0.05). There was a decrease in use of ipratropium in mild asthma (44% to 30%, p = 0.228), an increase in the use of systemic steroids (61% to 72%, p = 0.255) and no change in prescribing antibiotics for afebrile patients with asthma (21% to 21% p = 0.956). There was no significant change in practice at the control hospitals except for a decrease in the use of systemic steroids (48% to 21%, p = 0.011). For the six clinical indicators aggregate there was a significant increase in compliance with guidelines at the study hospitals (36% to 62%, p < 0.001) but no change at the control hospitals (31% to 31%, p = 0.970).
                The pre-intervention audits demonstrated low levels of compliance with asthma guidelines across six clinical indicators. An EBI significantly improved compliance across these six indicators, and no improvement was noted in the control hospitals. This study demonstrates that an EBI can alter clinical practice in small rural district hospitals. To compare the degree of improvement in pulmonary function achieved with recombinant human DNase I (rhDNase) administered by three different aerosol delivery systems: DeVilbiss Pulmo-Aide compressor with the Marquest Acorn II nebulizer, the Hudson T Up-draft nebulizer, and the Pari LC Jet Plus nebulizer with the Pari Inhalier Boy compressor. These produce similar aerosols in vitro in terms of size distribution and activity of delivered rhDNase.
                Multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group comparison of changes from baseline in pulmonary function variables in each test group. Patients were treated with rhDNase (2.5 mg bid) for 15 days, administered with three different aerosol delivery systems.
                Outpatient clinics at 26 sites in the United States.
                397 patients > 5 years of age with cystic fibrosis and baseline forced vital capacity (FVC) values between 40 and 70% of predicted values.
                All three nebulizers gave comparable improvements in pulmonary function. FEV1 increased by an average of 13.2 to 14.1%, FVC by 10.9 to 11.8% and forced midexpiratory flow (FEF25-75) by 16.5 to 17.1%. No unusual or unexpected adverse events were reported other than those that would be expected in patients with cystic fibrosis.
                Recombinant human DNase I produced a similar magnitude of improvement in the pulmonary function of patients with cystic fibrosis when the drug was administered using three different types of nebulizer systems with similar in vitro delivery and safety characteristics. The deposition of technetium radiolabelled aerosol within the lungs of 12 stable cystic fibrosis patients (mean age 12.7 years) was compared using the Acorn nebulizer and mouthpiece alone, and the Acorn nebulizer attached to the Mizer Aerosol Conservation Device (MACD). The total activity delivered to the patient using the MACD was 11.1% (+/- 7.8% s.d.) of the initial dose, compared to 5.8% (+/- 4.2% s.d.) with the nebulizer and mouthpiece alone (P < 0.05). With the MACD, 84% of the intrapulmonary dose was delivered to the peripheral regions, compared to 76.5% with the nebulizer and mouthpiece (P < 0.05). No significant correlation was found between aerosol deposition and pulmonary function. The Mizer Aerosol Conservation Device significantly increases both total intrapulmonary aerosol deposition and peripheral aerosol distribution.
Clinicians should be aware of the variability in the performance of different nebuliser systems. Technologies such as adaptive aerosol delivery and vibrating mesh technology have advantages over conventional systems in terms of treatment time, deposition as a percentage of priming dose, patient preference and adherence. There is a need for long-term randomised controlled trials of these technologies to determine patient-focused outcomes (such as quality of life and burden of care), safe and effective dosing levels of medications and clinical outcomes (such as hospitalisations and need for antibiotics) and an economic evaluation of their use.