Double-blind placebo-controlled study of velnacrine in Alzheimer's disease. Velnacrine for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The Mentane Study Group. Effectiveness and safety of velnacrine for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Mentane Study Group. Vitamin E and donepezil for the treatment of mild cognitive impairment. Atorvastatin for the treatment of mild to moderate Alzheimer disease: preliminary results. Efficacy, safety and tolerability of rivastigmine capsules in patients with probable vascular dementia: the VantagE study. Randomized controlled trial of atorvastatin in mild to moderate Alzheimer disease: LEADe. Evaluation of cycloserine in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. Effects of cognitive-communication stimulation for Alzheimer's disease patients treated with donepezil.
The present study assessed the safety and efficacy of the cholinesterase inhibitor, velnacrine, for treating the cognitive symptoms of Alzheimer's disease. Patients (N = 236) meeting NINCDS-ADRDA criteria for Alzheimer's disease entered a double-blind, placebo-controlled dose-ranging protocol (30, 75, 150, 225 mg/day each for one week) to identify velnacrine responders (> or = four point improvement on the cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale [ADAScog]). After a two week drug washout, velnacrine responders were randomly assigned to their best velnacrine dose or placebo in a six week dose-replication protocol employing the ADAScog and the Clinical Global Improvement scale as primary outcome measures. During dose-replication, intent-to-treat analysis revealed that velnacrine patients scored significantly better than placebo patients on the ADAScog after two (p < 0.004), four (p < 0.025) and six (p < 0.001) weeks of treatment. No significant treatment effect on Clinical Global Improvement scores was observed. The primary adverse event was an asymptomatic elevation of liver transaminases found among 28% of the 236 treated patients. Cholinergic side effects including diarrhea (14%), nausea (11%) and vomiting (5%) were observed and 8% of patients experienced skin rash. The present study identified a subgroup of Alzheimer's patients who demonstrated a significant, but modest, improvement during velnacrine treatment on structured cognitive testing. The present study examines the safety and efficacy of the centrally acting cholinesterase inhibitor, velnacrine, in treating the cognitive symptoms of Alzheimer's disease. Seven hundred thirty-five patients with mild-to-severe Alzheimer's disease were treated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Following the screen visit, patients were treated with velnacrine (10, 25, 50 and 75 mg t.i.d.) or placebo in a double-blind dose-ranging study to identify velnacrine-responsive patients and their best dose. Following placebo washout velnacrine responsive patients were randomly assigned to their best dose of velnacrine (N = 153) or placebo (N = 156) in a six week double-blind dose-replication study. Primary efficacy measures were the cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS) and the Physician's Clinical Global Impression of Change. Statistically significant improvement was observed in both primary efficacy measures in velnacrine-treated patients during the dose-replication study. Velnacrine patients scored better on the cognitive subscale of the ADAS than placebo patients (P < 0.001), with patients receiving the highest velnacrine dose averaging a 4.1-point improvement with respect to screen values. Clinical Global Impression of Change scores of velnacrine-treated patients were significantly improved at the end of the 6 weeks of treatment when compared to those of placebo patients (P < 0.05). The most common side effect was asymptomatic elevation in liver transaminase levels, which occurred among 29% of patients. These data suggest that velnacrine produces modest clinical improvement in a subset of patients with mild-to-severe Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimer's disease is characterized by cognitive and behavioral disturbances that are mediated in part by cholinergic brain deficits.
                To evaluate the long-term effectiveness and safety of an investigational cholinesterase inhibitor, that is, velnacrine maleate, in treating patients with clinically probable Alzheimer's disease (according to the criteria of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [Washington, DC]-Alzheimer Disease and Related Disorders Association [Chicago, Ill]).
                This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. After a single-blind washout period, patients were randomized to receive placebo (n = 152), velnacrine maleate, 150 mg/d (n = 149), or velnacrine maleate, 225 mg/d (n = 148) for 24 weeks. Primary end points were cognitive behavior and memory components of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale and the Clinical Global Impression of Change scale. Secondary end points were caregiver-rated scales.
                The scores for the cognitive behavior and memory components of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale deteriorated in the placebo-treated group (P < .05) but not in the velnacrine-treated groups. Between-group comparisons favored velnacrine maleate, 225 mg over 150 mg (P < .05). Findings were similar for the Clinical Global Impression of Change scale and three of the four caregiver-rated scales. Treatment-related adverse clinical events occurred in 36%, 28%, and 30% of patients in the groups that received placebo, velnacrine maleate (150 mg), and velnacrine maleate (225 mg), respectively. The most common adverse clinical event was diarrhea, which rarely interrupted therapy. Treatment was stopped because of reversible abnormal liver function test results (five or more times the upper limits of normal) in 3%, 30%, and 24% of the patients who received placebo, velnacrine maleate (150 mg), and velnacrine maleate (225 mg), respectively.
                Velnacrine produces modest but significant benefits in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Velnacrine maleate (225 mg) is more effective than 150 mg of velnacrine. Both dosages have acceptable safety profiles. Mild cognitive impairment is a transitional state between the cognitive changes of normal aging and early Alzheimer's disease.
                In a double-blind study, we evaluated subjects with the amnestic subtype of mild cognitive impairment. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive 2000 IU of vitamin E daily, 10 mg of donepezil daily, or placebo for three years. The primary outcome was clinically possible or probable Alzheimer's disease; secondary outcomes were cognition and function.
                A total of 769 subjects were enrolled, and possible or probable Alzheimer's disease developed in 212. The overall rate of progression from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease was 16 percent per year. As compared with the placebo group, there were no significant differences in the probability of progression to Alzheimer's disease in the vitamin E group (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.74 to 1.41; P=0.91) or the donepezil group (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.57 to 1.13; P=0.42) during the three years of treatment. Prespecified analyses of the treatment effects at 6-month intervals showed that as compared with the placebo group, the donepezil group had a reduced likelihood of progression to Alzheimer's disease during the first 12 months of the study (P=0.04), a finding supported by the secondary outcome measures. Among carriers of one or more apolipoprotein E epsilon4 alleles, the benefit of donepezil was evident throughout the three-year follow-up. There were no significant differences in the rate of progression to Alzheimer's disease between the vitamin E and placebo groups at any point, either among all patients or among apolipoprotein E epsilon4 carriers.
                Vitamin E had no benefit in patients with mild cognitive impairment. Although donepezil therapy was associated with a lower rate of progression to Alzheimer's disease during the first 12 months of treatment, the rate of progression to Alzheimer's disease after three years was not lower among patients treated with donepezil than among those given placebo.
                Copyright 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society. Laboratory evidence of cholesterol-induced production of amyloid beta as a putative neurotoxin precipitating Alzheimer disease, along with epidemiological evidence, suggests that cholesterol-lowering statin drugs may favorably influence the progression of the disorder.
                To determine if treatment with atorvastatin calcium affects the cognitive and/or behavioral decline in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer disease.
                Pilot intention-to-treat, proof-of-concept, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized (1:1) trial with a 1-year exposure to once-daily atorvastatin calcium (80 mg; two 40-mg tablets) or placebo using last observation carried forward analysis of covariance as the primary method of statistical assessment.
                Individuals with mild to moderate Alzheimer disease (Mini-Mental State Examination score of 12-28) were recruited. Of the 98 participants providing informed consent, 71 were eligible for randomization, 67 were randomized, and 63 subjects completed the 3-month visit and were considered evaluable.
                The primary outcome measures were change in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale and the Clinical Global Impression of Change Scale scores. The secondary outcome measures included scores on the Mini-Mental State Examination, Geriatric Depression Scale, the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Scale, and the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living Inventory. The tertiary outcome measures included total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels.
                Atorvastatin reduced circulating cholesterol levels and produced a positive signal on each of the clinical outcome measures compared with placebo. This beneficial effect reached significance for the Geriatric Depression Scale and the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale at 6 months and was significant at the level of a trend for the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale, Clinical Global Impression of Change Scale, and Neuropsychiatric Inventory Scale at 12 months assessed by analysis of covariance with last observation carried forward.
                Atorvastatin treatment may be of some clinical benefit and could be established as an effective therapy for Alzheimer disease if the current findings are substantiated by a much larger multicenter trial. The aim was to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of rivastigmine capsules in patients diagnosed with probable vascular dementia (VaD).
                VantagE (Vascular Dementia trial studying Exelon) was a 24-week, multicentre, double-blind study. VaD patients aged 50-85 years were randomized to rivastigmine capsules (3-12 mg/day) or placebo. Efficacy assessments included global and cognitive performances, activities of daily living and neuropsychiatric symptoms. Adverse events were recorded. Additional exploratory analyses determined whether heterogeneity in pathologies and symptoms extended to differential treatment effects.
                NCT00099216.
                710 patients were randomized. Rivastigmine demonstrated superiority over placebo on three measures of cognitive performance (Vascular Dementia Assessment Scale, Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale cognitive subscale, Mini-Mental State Examination; all p< or = 0.05, intent-to-treat population [ITT]), but not other outcomes. Predominant adverse events were nausea and vomiting. Exploratory analyses indicated that older patients (> or =75 years old), assumed more likely to also have Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology, demonstrated significant cognitive responses to rivastigmine and a safety profile similar to that seen in AD patients. Younger patients, assumed less likely to have concomitant AD pathology, showed no efficacy response and were associated with slight elevations of blood pressure, cerebrovascular accidents and mortality. Rivastigmine-placebo differences in patients with, versus those without, medial temporal atrophy (also suggestive of concomitant AD) showed a numerical difference similar to that seen between the older versus younger patients, but did not attain statistical significance.
                Consistent with trials evaluating other cholinesterase inhibitors, rivastigmine did not provide consistent efficacy in probable VaD. The efficacy apparent on cognitive outcomes was derived from effects in older patients likely to have concomitant Alzheimer pathology. This is supportive of an existing argument that the putative cholinergic deficit in VaD reflects the presence of concomitant Alzheimer pathology. There is some evidence that statins may have a protective and symptomatic benefit in Alzheimer disease (AD). The LEADe study is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluating the efficacy and safety of atorvastatin in patients with mild to moderate AD.
                This was an international, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study. Subjects had mild to moderate probable AD (Mini-Mental State Examination score 13-25), were aged 50-90 years, and were taking donepezil 10 mg daily for > or 3 months prior to screening. Entry low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (LDL-C) were > 95 and < 195 mg/dL. Patients were randomized to atorvastatin 80 mg/day or placebo for 72 weeks followed by a double-blind, 8-week atorvastatin withdrawal phase. Coprimary endpoints were changes in cognition (Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale [ADAS-Cog]) and global function (Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Clinical Global Impression of Change [ADCS-CGIC]) at 72 weeks.
                A total of 640 patients were randomized in the study. There were no significant differences in the coprimary endpoints of ADAS-cog or ADCS-CGIC or the secondary endpoints. Atorvastatin was generally well-tolerated.
                In this large-scale randomized controlled trial evaluating statin therapy as a treatment for mild to moderate Alzheimer disease, atorvastatin was not associated with significant clinical benefit over 72 weeks. This treatment was generally well-tolerated without unexpected adverse events. Classification of evidence: This study provides Class II evidence that intensive lipid lowering with atorvastatin 80 mg/day in patients with mild to moderate probable Alzheimer disease (aged 50-90), taking donepezil, with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels between 95 and 195 mg/dL over 72 weeks does not benefit cognition (as measured by Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale) (p = 0.26) or global function (as measured by Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Clinical Global Impression of Change) (p = 0.73) compared with placebo. This multicenter study evaluated the efficacy and safety of cycloserine and measured its effects on explicit and implicit memory tests in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Four hundred ten patients with AD, aged 50 years or older, were enrolled in this parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial of 5, 15, or 50 mg cycloserine or placebo twice daily, and 403 entered the double-blind treatment phase. Two hundred sixty-five patients completed the entire 26-week treatment phase. There were no baseline differences among the four treatment groups. Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) efficacy assessments showed no differences between active treatments and placebo from baseline to study weeks 2, 6, 14, or 26. Patients receiving 15 mg of cycloserine improved significantly on one section of an implicit memory test. No differences among treatments were observed for any other assessment scales evaluated. The incidence and severity of adverse events were similar across treatment groups. Cycloserine was well tolerated but did not demonstrate consistent evidence of efficacy during the course of therapy. Higher doses may be necessary to achieve efficacy in the AD population and do not appear to be precluded by the adverse event profile seen in this study. This randomized study evaluated the combined effect of a cognitive-communication program plus an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (donepezil; donepezil-plus-stimulation group; n = 26), as compared with donepezil alone (donepezil-only group; n = 28) in 54 patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD; Mini-Mental Status Examination score of 12- 28) ranging in age from 54 to 91 years. It was hypothesized that cognitive-communication stimulation in combination with donepezil would positively affect the following: (a) relevance of discourse, (b) performance of functional abilities, (c) emotional symptoms, (d) quality of life, and (e) overall global function, as measured by caregiver and participant report and standardized measures. Cognitive-communication, neuropsychiatric, functional performance, and quality of life evaluations were conducted at baseline and Month 4, the month after the 2-month active stimulation period. Follow-up evaluations were performed at Months 8 and 12. The stimulation program consisted of 12 hr of intervention over an 8-week period and involved participant-led discussions requiring homework, interactive sessions about AD, and discussions using salient life stories. Additive effects of active stimulation with donepezil were examined in 2 ways: (1) comparing mean group performance over time and (2) evaluating change scores from baseline. A Group x Time interaction was found for the donepezil-plus-stimulation group in the emotional symptoms of apathy and irritability as compared with the donepezil-only group. Evaluation of change scores from baseline to 12 months revealed a positive effect for the donepezil-plus-stimulation group on discourse and functional abilities with a trend on apathy, irritability, and patient-reported quality of life. In sum, the research revealed benefits to the donepezil-plus-stimulation group in the areas of discourse abilities, functional abilities, emotional symptoms, and overall global performance. This study adds to growing evidence that active cognitive stimulation may slow the rate of verbal and functional decline and decrease negative emotional symptoms in AD when combined with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, indicating a need to advance research in the area of cognitive treatments. The fact that AD is a progressive brain disease should not preclude ameliorative treatment.
There has been no research into the use of velnacrine as a cognitive enhancer in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease since 1994. The FDA peripheral and CNS drug advisory board voted unanimously against recommending approval. This review shows the toxic nature of velnacrine, and provides no evidence of efficacy. There are no grounds for further research into velnacrine.