Failure to prevent preterm labour and delivery in twin pregnancy using prophylactic oral salbutamol. Global report on preterm birth and stillbirth (3 of 7): evidence for effectiveness of interventions. Antibiotic treatment of preterm labor with intact membranes: a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Prophylactic administration of clindamycin 2% vaginal cream to reduce the incidence of spontaneous preterm birth in women with an increased recurrence risk: a randomised placebo-controlled double-blind trial. A double-blind randomized controlled trial on the use of prophylactic antibiotics in patients undergoing elective caesarean section. A randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled trial of ascorbic acid supplementation for the prevention of preterm labour. Progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth in twin pregnancy (STOPPIT): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study and meta-analysis. Prevention of prematurity in twin pregnancy by orally administered terbutaline. Randomized trial of antibiotics in addition to tocolytic therapy to treat preterm labor.
A double blind, controlled study was performed to see whether the use of prophylactic oral salbutamol would reduce the incidence of preterm labour in twin pregnancy. Of the 144 women studied, 74 took salbutamol and 70 placebo. No difference was found in the length of gestation, birthweight or fetal outcome, although fewer babies suffered from respiratory distress syndrome in the salbutamol group. Women did not experience troublesome side-effects from salbutamol. Interventions directed toward mothers before and during pregnancy and childbirth may help reduce preterm births and stillbirths. Survival of preterm newborns may also be improved with interventions given during these times or soon after birth. This comprehensive review assesses existing interventions for low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).
                Approximately 2,000 intervention studies were systematically evaluated through December 31, 2008. They addressed preterm birth or low birth weight; stillbirth or perinatal mortality; and management of preterm newborns. Out of 82 identified interventions, 49 were relevant to LMICs and had reasonable amounts of evidence, and therefore selected for in-depth reviews. Each was classified and assessed by the quality of available evidence and its potential to treat or prevent preterm birth and stillbirth. Impacts on other maternal, fetal, newborn or child health outcomes were also considered. Assessments were based on an adaptation of the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria.
                Most interventions require additional research to improve the quality of evidence. Others had little evidence of benefit and should be discontinued. The following are supported by moderate- to high-quality evidence and strongly recommended for LMICs: Two interventions prevent preterm births--smoking cessation and progesterone. Eight interventions prevent stillbirths--balanced protein energy supplementation, screening and treatment of syphilis, intermittant presumptive treatment for malaria during pregnancy, insecticide-treated mosquito nets, birth preparedness, emergency obstetric care, cesarean section for breech presentation, and elective induction for post-term delivery. Eleven interventions improve survival of preterm newborns--prophylactic steroids in preterm labor, antibiotics for PROM, vitamin K supplementation at delivery, case management of neonatal sepsis and pneumonia, delayed cord clamping, room air (vs. 100% oxygen) for resuscitation, hospital-based kangaroo mother care, early breastfeeding, thermal care, and surfactant therapy and application of continued distending pressure to the lungs for respiratory distress syndrome
                The research paradigm for discovery science and intervention development must be balanced to address prevention as well as improve morbidity and mortality in all settings. This review also reveals significant gaps in current knowledge of interventions spanning the continuum of maternal and fetal outcomes, and the critical need to generate further high-quality evidence for promising interventions. Although an association between subclinical intrauterine infection and preterm birth is well established, there is conflicting evidence regarding the benefits of antibiotic administration to women in preterm labor with intact membranes. We attempted to determine the effect of ampicillin-amoxicillin and erythromycin treatment on prolongation of pregnancy, the rate of preterm birth, and neonatal morbidity in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes.
                A multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial was designed and implemented by the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Two hundred seventy-seven women with singleton pregnancies and preterm labor with intact membranes (24 to 34 weeks) were randomly allocated to receive either antibiotics or placebos.
                Of the 2373 patients screened for participation in this study in six medical centers, 277 women were enrolled (n = 133 for antibiotics group vs n = 144 for placebo group). In each study group, 60% of patients completed all the study medications. The overall prevalence of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity was 5.8% (14/239). No significant difference between the antibiotic group and the placebo group was found in maternal outcomes, including duration of randomization-to-delivery interval, frequency of preterm delivery (< 37 weeks), frequency of preterm premature rupture of membranes, clinical chorioamnionitis, endometritis, and number of subsequent admissions for preterm labor. Similarly, no significant difference in neonatal outcomes could be detected between the two groups including respiratory distress syndrome, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, intraventricular hemorrhage, sepsis, and admission and duration of newborn intensive special care unit hospitalization.
                The results of this study do not support the routine use of antibiotic administration to women in preterm labor with intact membranes. To test the hypothesis that prophylactic administration of clindamycin 2% vaginal cream can reduce the incidence of preterm birth in a high risk population.
                A multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
                Twelve city hospitals in The Netherlands.
                One hundred and sixty-eight women with a singleton pregnancy and a history of a spontaneous preterm delivery in the preceding pregnancy.
                Clindamycin 2% vaginal cream, or placebo cream, administered daily for seven days at 26 and 32 weeks of gestation.
                Spontaneous preterm birth at < 37 weeks, admission for threatened preterm labour, neonatal infectious morbidity.
                In the intention-to-treat analysis no difference was found in overall preterm birth between clindamycin and placebo (23% vs 18%, respectively). In the subgroup who completed the trial and administered all medication, more women delivered before 34 weeks in the clindamycin group (1.4% in the placebo vs 9.0% in the clindamycin group; P < 0.05). The length of admissions for threatened preterm labour did not differ. More infectious neonatal morbidity was seen in the clindamycin group (5/83 vs 0/85; P < 0.05).
                Clindamycin 2% vaginal cream given prophylactically to women with a spontaneous preterm birth in the preceding pregnancy did not prevent preterm delivery or reduce the number of admissions for threatened preterm labour. The neonatal infectious morbidity in the group treated with clindamycin was significantly higher and a major concern. In a double-blind randomized controlled study 232 patients undergoing elective lower segment caesarean section were randomly allocated to receive a pre-operative prophylactic dose of a combination of crystalline penicillin and chloramphenicol or a placebo. The two groups were comparable in terms of patient characteristics and operation variables. The group receiving antibiotics had significantly fewer febrile and infectious morbid events and thus spent fewer days in hospital than the group receiving the placebo. In a previous study from this institution, patients at high risk for preterm labour were screened for the presence of bacterial vaginosis (BV). When BV was present, they were randomised to receive either treatment (metronidazole) or placebo (vitamin C). There were significantly more patients with preterm labour in the metronidazole group. The aim of this double-blind randomised placebo-controlled trial study was to determine whether vitamin C could indeed reduce the recurrence risk of preterm labour. Patients with a history of preterm labour in a preceding pregnancy were randomised to receive 250 mg vitamin C or a matching placebo twice daily until 34 weeks' gestation. They attended a dedicated premature labour clinic. Significantly more women delivered before term in the group that received vitamin C, but there was no difference in the outcome of the babies between the two groups. Supplementation with vitamin C did not prevent premature labour. Women with twin pregnancy are at high risk for spontaneous preterm delivery. Progesterone seems to be effective in reducing preterm birth in selected high-risk singleton pregnancies, albeit with no significant reduction in perinatal mortality and little evidence of neonatal benefit. We investigated the use of progesterone for prevention of preterm birth in twin pregnancy.
                In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 500 women with twin pregnancy were recruited from nine UK National Health Service clinics specialising in the management of twin pregnancy. Women were randomised, by permuted blocks of randomly mixed sizes, either to daily vaginal progesterone gel 90 mg (n=250) or to placebo gel (n=250) for 10 weeks from 24 weeks' gestation. All study personnel and participants were masked to treatment assignment for the duration of the study. The primary outcome was delivery or intrauterine death before 34 weeks' gestation. Analysis was by intention to treat. Additionally we undertook a meta-analysis of published and unpublished data to establish the efficacy of progesterone in prevention of early (<34 weeks' gestation) preterm birth or intrauterine death in women with twin pregnancy. This study is registered, number ISRCTN35782581.
                Three participants in each group were lost to follow-up, leaving 247 analysed per group. The combined proportion of intrauterine death or delivery before 34 weeks of pregnancy was 24.7% (61/247) in the progesterone group and 19.4% (48/247) in the placebo group (odds ratio [OR] 1.36, 95% CI 0.89-2.09; p=0.16). The rate of adverse events did not differ between the two groups. The meta-analysis confirmed that progesterone does not prevent early preterm birth in women with twin pregnancy (pooled OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.89-1.51).
                Progesterone, administered vaginally, does not prevent preterm birth in women with twin pregnancy.
                Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health Directorate. The intention of this study was to evaluate whether perorally administrated terbutaline given prophylactically could reduce prematurity in twin pregnancy. In a double-blind study, 50 women with twin pregnancies were given either placebo (25) or terbutaline (25). Six in the terbutaline group and 15 in the placebo group went into preterm labor which required intravenous infusion of terbutaline. The difference is statistically significant (p = 0.010). The total number of days in hospital due to preterm labor was 115 in the terbutaline group and 256 in the placebo group. There is a slight difference in prematurity (delivery week less than 37th week) - the placebo group gave birth somewhat earlier - but this difference is not statistically significant. When evaluating this, it has to be considered that 15 of the 25 in the placebo group received parenteral treatment with terbutaline because of preterm labor. Birth weights of the twins in relation to gestational age seemed to be the same in the two groups. The objective of this study was to assess whether antibiotic therapy plus tocolysis given to women in preterm labor would prolong pregnancy compared with tocolysis alone.
                A randomized, double-blind trial of intravenous mezlocillin and oral erythromycin therapy vs. placebo was used in addition to tocolysis among women in preterm labor < or =34 weeks gestation with intact membranes. Amniocentesis was performed, and chorioamnionic membranes were examined histologically and cultured for microorganisms after delivery.
                Clinical characteristics including gestational age at enrollment, frequency of contractions, cervical Bishop's score, and white blood cell count on admission were similar in the 2 groups. Antibiotic therapy was well tolerated. No significant differences in the interval to delivery, birth weight, and neonatal outcomes were observed between the 2 groups. Women in the antibiotic group had a significantly lower incidence of postpartum infections compared with women in the placebo group. Patients with evidence of upper genital tract infection in either group had a significantly shorter interval to delivery, lower gestational age at delivery, lower mean birth weight, and increased neonatal hospitalization time.
                Lack of an antibiotic effect on the gestational age at delivery may be due to the low prevalence of upper genital tract infection among unselected women in preterm labor, to advanced preterm labor unresponsive to antibiotic therapy, or to an inability of antibiotics given alone to inhibit the cytokine response. Further work is needed to identify markers of upper genital tract infection among women in preterm labor and to evaluate other potential therapeutic interventions.
There is insufficient evidence to support or refute the use of prophylactic oral betamimetics for preventing preterm birth in women with a twin pregnancy.