Effects of maternal supplementary oxygen on the newborn for elective cesarean deliveries under spinal anesthesia. Comparison of neonatal effects of epidural and general anesthesia for cesarean section. Comparison of general and regional anesthesia for cesarean section: success rate, blood loss and satisfaction from a randomized trial. Prospective, randomized trial comparing general with spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery in preeclamptic patients with a nonreassuring fetal heart trace. Amnioinfusion for relief of recurrent severe and moderate variable decelerations in labor. Anaesthetic technique for elective caesarean section and neurobehavioural status of newborns. Short-term outcome of newborn infants: spinal versus general anesthesia for elective cesarean section. A prospective randomized study. Randomized trial of amniotomy in labour versus the intention to leave membranes intact until the second stage. Randomized trial of prophylactic antibiotic therapy after preterm amnion rupture.
The aim of this investigation was to determine whether supplementary oxygen provided by either nasal cannula or face mask versus room air might affect fetal oxygenation during elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia by assessing maternal and neonatal regional cerebral oxygenation (rSO(2)) with a cerebral oximeter.
                Ninety parturients were randomly allocated into three groups: two groups received 5 L/min oxygen by either nasal cannula (Group NC, n = 30) or face mask (Group FM, n = 30), respectively, and the third group was allowed to breathe room air (Group RA, n = 30). After maternal mean arterial pressure, heart rate and peripheral oxygen saturation had been monitored, rSO(2) was determined by cerebral oximeter. Umbilical artery (UA) and venous (UV) blood samples were collected for blood gas analysis. Neonatal rSO(2) and Apgar scores were recorded.
                The mean maternal rSO(2) which was recorded 3 and 5 min after administration of the spinal block in Group FM was lower than that of Group NC (p = 0.033 and 0.042, respectively). Neonatal rSO(2), UA pH, UV pH and UA base excess (BE) were lower in Group FM than in the other groups (p < 0.05). The Apgar score (1 min) in Group FM was lower than that of Group RA (p = 0.046).
                The effect of maternal supplementary oxygen on the newborn has been demonstrated by a cerebral oximeter monitor and supported by umbilical cord blood gas analysis and Apgar scores. We assessed the influence of anesthetic technique for cesarean section on neonatal outcome. Thirty parturient women (ASA I/II) were randomly allocated into two groups. In Group GA general anesthesia was induced with 4 mg.kg(-1) thiopental and 1.5 mg.kg(-1) succinylcholine. In group EA epidural anesthesia was performed with 20 ml 0.375% bupivacaine through L(3-4) inter-space. 1-min Apgar scores were significantly higher in group EA (p < 0.001). Neurologic and Adaptive Capacity scores at 2 and 24 h were higher in group EA (p < 0.001). In terms of blood gas values, umbilical arterial pH and pO(2) values were higher in group EA (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively). The first breast-feeding intervals were found to be shorter in group EA (p < 0.001). We conclude that in terms of better Apgar and NAC scores, acid-base status and earlier initiation of breast-feeding, the epidural anesthesia may be preferred to general anesthesia in cesarean section.
                Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel A prospective randomized trial was organized to compare the effectiveness of general and regional anesthesia for cesarean section (C/S).
                Three hundred and forty-one patients were randomized into the general anesthesia group (GA), epidural anesthesia group (EA) and spinal anesthesia group (SA). The effectiveness of interest was success rate, blood loss and patient satisfaction.
                We found that the success rates of EA and SA were lower than GA. Success in EA should be improved by using an epidural catheter to add more local anesthetic drug instead of a single shot; and the surgeon should allow more time for the block to work adequately. Success in SA should be improved by using bupivacaine instead of lidocaine. GA resulted in significantly more blood loss, lower postoperative hematocrit, and higher proportion of patients who had postoperative hematocrit < 30 per cent than EA and SA. The patients' satisfaction scores were not different among the 3 techniques. This meant that, given adequate explanation and perioperative care, Thai women were satisfied with regional anesthesia.
                Regional anesthesia is a better choice of anesthesia for C/S than general anesthesia. However, the availability of different techniques and ability to change the technique when needed were very useful and important. If GA is chosen, all safety procedures must be followed. Oxygen supplement and endotracheal intubation facilities must be available in all techniques. Guidelines of anesthesia for C/S at a national level should be agreed upon, including the type of personnel, monitoring equipment and postoperative care. There are no randomized studies on neonatal outcome after spinal versus general anesthesia for cesarean delivery in preeclamptic patients with a nonreassuring fetal heart trace. This study examined both markers of neonatal hypoxia and maternal hemodynamics.
                Seventy patients were randomized to general (n = 35) or spinal anesthesia (n = 35). The general anesthesia group received thiopentone, magnesium sulfate, and suxamethonium intravenously before intubation, followed by 50% nitrous oxide in oxygen, 0.75-1.5% isoflurane, and morphine after delivery. The target end-tidal partial pressure of carbon dioxide (Pco2) was 30-34 mmHg. The spinal anesthesia group received 1.8 ml hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 10 microg fentanyl at the L3-L4 interspace. Heart rate and blood pressure were measured at specific time points. Hypotension was treated with ephedrine. Maternal arterial and neonatal umbilical arterial blood gas samples were taken at delivery. Resuscitation requirements were recorded.
                In both groups, hemodynamic measures remained within acceptable limits. Spinal anesthesia patients required more ephedrine (13.7 vs. 2.7 mg). Maternal Paco2 was lower in the spinal group (28.9 vs. 32.4 mmHg). One-minute Apgar scores were lower after general anesthesia. Base deficit was greater (7.13 vs. 4.68 mEq/l) and neonatal umbilical arterial pH was lower (7.20 vs. 7.23) after spinal anesthesia. Post hoc analysis showed that if maternal diastolic blood pressure on admission was greater than 110 mmHg, neonatal umbilical arterial base deficit was greater after spinal anesthesia. There was no difference in the number of patients with Apgar scores less than 7 at 1 or 5 min or umbilical arterial pH less than 7.2 or in the requirements for resuscitation.
                In preeclamptic patients with a nonreassuring fetal heart trace, spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery was associated with a greater mean neonatal umbilical arterial base deficit and a lower median umbilical arterial pH. The clinical significance remains to be established. Maternal hemodynamics were similar and acceptable with either anesthetic technique. To determine whether intrapartum amnioinfusion (AI) relieves recurrent moderate and severe variable decelerations in laboring women with clear or grade I meconium-stained amniotic fluid and reduces cesarean section rate for fetal distress.
                A randomized controlled trial was conducted in labor unit of Christian Medical College Hospital, Vellore, India, between October 2003 and September 2004. Women were randomized to receive AI (group I) and not to receive it (group II).
                A total of 150 women (75 in each group) were included in the study. There was significant relief of variable decelerations in group I and no difference in overall cesarean section rate but significant reduction in cesarean section rate for fetal distress in group I, and significant reduction in cesarean section rate for fetal distress in nulliparous women of group I. Neonatal acidemia was also significantly reduced in the nulliparous women receiving AI. The duration of maternal postpartum hospital stay was significantly reduced in group I. There were no adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes.
                AI was a beneficial therapeutic intervention in women patients showing fetal distress in first stage of labor, and it reduced cesarean section for fetal distress and neonatal acidemia. Ninety healthy parturients undergoing elective caesarean section were randomly allocated to receive either general (n = 30), epidural (n = 30) or spinal (n = 30) anaesthesia. Acid-base status, Apgar score and neurobehavioural status, using the neurologic and adaptive capacity scoring (NACS) system, were studied in the newborn. Apgar scores and acid-base parameters were similar in all the three groups. NACS testing revealed significantly more vigorous babies in the spinal anaesthesia group than in the other two groups at 15 min and 2 h interval after delivery, despite a higher incidence of maternal hypotension. We conclude that newborns tend to have a better neurobehavioural status in the early post-delivery period if their mothers receive spinal anaesthesia rather than general or epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section. To compare general and spinal anesthesia with respect to the short-term outcome of newborns born by elective cesarean deliveries.
                Pregnant women admitted to our hospital from January 1999 to July 2000, for whom elective repeat cesareans were planned after 37 weeks gestation, were allocated randomly after their informed consent to spinal anesthesia or general anesthesia. Maternal age, gestational age, birth weight, Apgar's score, hospital stay duration, and duration of cesarean section time were all noted. The rate of the neonatal respiratory depression, perinatal asphyxia, and admittance to the neonatal intensive care unit of the infants were documented. We also studied arterial samples withdrawn from the cord for the pH, bicarbonate, PaO(2) (oxygen pressure, arterial), and PaCO(2) (carbon dioxide pressure, arterial). The serum levels of creatine kinase with myocardial-specific isoform, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and total cortisol levels of the newborns were measured and served in ruling out perinatal stress and in confirming the diagnosis of perinatal asphyxia (and of myocardial damage). Statistical analyses was performed with the use of an unpaired Student's t-test, Chi-square test, and a power calculation was done.
                From the randomly selected patients, we had 38 (45.2%) infants for general anesthesia and 46 (54.8%) for spinal anesthesia. None of our primary endpoints favored any of the study groups, and the clinical short-term outcome of the infants was similar in the neonates born both by spinal and general anesthesia (P>0.05). The biochemical assays did not rule out or confirm any differences in the occurrence of perinatal stress (P>0.05).
                Anesthesia type does not seem to influence the short-term outcome of the newborn infants for the elective cesarean deliveries. We believe that both spinal and general anesthesia could be performed in elective term cesarean deliveries without any risk to the newborn infants. To compare by randomized prospective clinical trial the outcome of labours which are managed with the intention to leave the membranes intact, compared with the practice of elective artificial rupture of the membranes (ARM) in early established labour.
                Prospective randomized controlled trial of low risk women admitted in spontaneous labour, with intact membranes.
                The labour ward of St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
                362 women in spontaneous labour with intact membranes and no evidence of fetal distress, between 37 and 42 weeks gestation. During the course of the trial it was found that some randomization cards could not be accounted for and a system of daily checks was instituted. The results were analysed for all recorded women (n = 362) and after institution of the more rigorous system (n = 120).
                The duration of each phase of labour, epidural rate, prevalence of an abnormal cardiotocograph (CTG) (assessed blind), method of delivery and neonatal outcome.
                178 of the 183 women (97%) in the ARM group had their membranes ruptured in early labour, and 83 (46%) of the 179 women allocated to non-intervention had ARM performed at some stage. A significant decrease in the duration of labour (mean 8.3, SD 4.1 h vs mean 9.7, SD 4.8 h, n = 156; P = 0.05) was found amongst primigravidae allocated to ARM when compared with non intervention. The duration of the second stage of labour was unaffected. In the ARM group the epidural rate was higher and labour was more often complicated by CTG abnormalities. There were no differences in the method of delivery, fetal condition at birth (cord blood lactate, Apgar score) or postpartum pyrexia between the ARM and non-intervention groups. The same trends were observed when analysis was confined to women entered into the trial after the system of rigour was instituted.
                Routine ARM results in labour that is slightly shorter than if the membranes are allowed to rupture spontaneously but more epidurals are used suggesting that labour is more painful. There are fewer fetal heart rate abnormalities if the membranes are left intact but amniotomy has no effect on fetal condition at birth. Our purpose was to determine whether maternal administration of prophylactic ampicillin or erythromycin after preterm amnion rupture is associated with maternal or neonatal benefits.
                Women with singleton pregnancies between 24 and 33 weeks 6 days of gestation were eligible if they had no immediate indication for delivery. After giving informed consent, patients were randomized either to receive ampicillin (erythromycin if penicillin allergic) until delivery or to enter a control group. Women whose cervical cultures were positive for either group B streptococci or Neisseria gonorrhoeae received treatment. Tocolytics and corticosteroids were not used.
                From January 1990 to February 1992 117 patients (antibiotics 59, control 58) were recruited and analyzed. Prophylactic antibiotics were associated with a longer latent phase (mean 12 vs 7.0 days, p = 0.004) and fewer maternal infectious complications (29% vs 60%, p = 0.001). A higher incidence of neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis was observed in the treatment group (14% vs 3.5%, p = 0.05). Other neonatal complications, including death, were lower in the treatment group, but none attained statistical significance (p = 0.09 to 0.33).
                The use of prophylactic antibiotics in selected patients after preterm amnion rupture appears to have a demonstrable maternal benefit. Large, multicenter trials may demonstrate a significant neonatal benefit or confirm any adverse outcomes.
There is no evidence from this review to show that RA is superior to GA in terms of major maternal or neonatal outcomes. Further research to evaluate neonatal morbidity and maternal outcomes, such as satisfaction with technique, will be useful.