Importance of timing for thoracic irradiation in the combined modality treatment of limited-stage small-cell lung cancer. The National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Early compared with late radiotherapy in combined modality treatment for limited disease small-cell lung cancer: a London Lung Cancer Group multicenter randomized clinical trial and meta-analysis. Randomized study of chemotherapy and surgery versus radiotherapy for stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer: a National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Study. Thoracic radiation therapy alone compared with combined chemoradiotherapy for locally unresectable non-small cell lung cancer. A randomized, phase III trial. Initial versus delayed accelerated hyperfractionated radiation therapy and concurrent chemotherapy in limited small-cell lung cancer: a randomized study. Radiotherapy versus radiotherapy enhanced by cisplatin in stage III non-small cell lung cancer. Radiotherapy alone versus combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy in nonresectable non-small-cell lung cancer: first analysis of a randomized trial in 353 patients. Duration of chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer: a Cancer Research Campaign trial. High-dose radiation therapy for inoperable non-small cell lung cancer without mediastinal involvement (clinical stage N0, N1).
The importance of the timing of thoracic irradiation (TI) in the combined modality therapy of limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) was assessed in a randomized trial.
                All 308 eligible patients received cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine (CAV) alternating with etoposide and cisplatin (EP) every 3 weeks for three cycles of each chemotherapy regimen. Patients randomized to early TI received 40 Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks to the primary site concurrent with the first cycle of EP (week 3), and late TI patients received the same radiation concurrent with the last cycle of EP (week 15). After completion of all chemotherapy and TI, patients without progressive disease received prophylactic cranial irradiation (25 Gy in 10 fractions over 2 weeks).
                Although complete remission rates were not significantly different between the two arms, progression-free survival (P = .036) and overall survival (P = .008) were superior in the early TI arm. Patients in the late TI arm had a higher risk of brain metastases (P = .006).
                The early administration of TI in the combined modality therapy of limited-stage SCLC is superior to late or consolidative TI. To replicate an earlier National Cancer Institute of Canada (NCIC) trial that examined the effect on survival of the timing of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) in patients with limited disease small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).
                Patients received three cycles of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine alternating with three cycles of etoposide and cisplatin. Three hundred twenty five chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-naïve patients were randomly assigned to either early TRT administered concurrently in the second cycle or late TRT administered concurrently with the sixth cycle; the dose was 40 Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks.
                TRT was received by 92% and 82% of patients in the early and late arms, respectively (P = .01). Sixty-nine percent of patients in the early arm received all six courses of chemotherapy compared with 80% in the late arm (P = .003). There was no evidence of a survival difference; median overall survival time was 13.7 and 15.1 months in the early and late arms, respectively (P = .23). In a meta-analysis of all eight trials that compared early and late TRT, there were three in which the proportion of patients who completed their planned chemotherapy was similar between the TRT arms (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.86) and five in which proportionally fewer patients in the early TRT arm completed their chemotherapy (HR = 1.06; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.17).
                This study failed to show a survival advantage for early TRT with chemotherapy in limited-stage SCLC, unlike the NCIC trial. However, the results of a meta-analysis suggest that it is essential to ensure that the delivery of chemotherapy is optimal when administered with early TRT. Thirty-one patients with stage IIIA (N2) non-small-cell lung cancer were randomized to receive radiotherapy alone or chemotherapy with cisplatin and vinblastine followed by surgery. Response rates to induction chemotherapy and radiotherapy were 50% and 53.3% respectively. Complete surgical resection was possible for 62.5% of patients. Median survival times were 16.2 and 18.7 months for radiotherapy alone and chemotherapy-surgery respectively (P = Ns), with no long-term improvement in survival seen with combined-modality treatment. To compare the survival of patients with medically inoperable or unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer treated with thoracic radiotherapy alone or in combination with chemotherapy.
                Randomized, prospective phase III trial.
                Multi-institutional cooperative oncology group.
                A total of 121 patients were enrolled in the study, of whom 7 (5.8%) were ineligible. All patients were ambulatory and had measurable or evaluable disease. Before they were randomized, patients were stratified by ECOG performance score, histologic type, maximum tumor diameter, and NCCTG institution.
                Radiotherapy consisted of a total of 5000 cGy in 5 weeks with a 1000 cGy boost in 5 fractions to a small tumor field. Combined modality therapy was MACC which is intravenous methotrexate, intravenous doxorubicin, intravenous cyclophosphamide, and oral lomustine (CCNU), on day 1 and 28. Chemotherapy was followed by identical thoracic radiotherapy 4 weeks after the second cycle of chemotherapy. Four weeks after thoracic radiotherapy was completed, patients received another two cycles of identical chemotherapy. Patients who had progression of disease after chest irradiation only were treated with MACC chemotherapy.
                Major clinical responses were observed in 31 of 56 (55%; 95% Cl, 42% to 68%) patients treated with combination therapy and 37 of 58 (64%; Cl, 51% to 76%) treated with radiation only (P greater than 0.2). The median time to progression was 192 days with radiotherapy only compared with 199 days for combined modality therapy (P greater than 0.2). The median survival time was 313 days compared with 317 days, respectively (P greater than 0.2). The 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates after thoracic radiation only were 45% (Cl, 32% to 58%), 16% (Cl, 6% to 25%), and 7%. With chemoradiotherapy, the survival rates were 46% (Cl, 33% to 60%), 21% (Cl, 11% to 32%), and 5%, respectively. Myelosuppression was significantly greater for the combined modality therapy arm (P = 0.002).
                Chemotherapy with MACC, in combination with thoracic radiotherapy, did not result in significant survival advantage compared with radiation alone (P greater than 0.2) in patients with medically inoperable or unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer. To perform a randomized study of the optimal timing of thoracic radiation (RT) as accelerated hyperfractionated radiation therapy (ACC HFX RT) in combination with concurrent chemotherapy (CHT) in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).
                Between 1988 and 1992, 107 patients were enrolled and 103 were assessable. All patients received ACC HFX RT with 1.5 Gy twice daily to 54 Gy plus concurrent daily carboplatin/etoposide (C/E) (30 mg each) and four sequential cycles of cisplatin/etoposide (PE) (30 mg/m2 and 120 mg/m2, respectively, on days 1 to 3). Group I patients (n = 52) received concurrent chemoradiation at weeks 1 to 4, and group II (n = 51) at weeks 6 to 9. Patients who showed a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) underwent prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) at weeks 16 to 17.
                The median survival time was 34 months in group I and 26 months in group II, and the Kaplan-Meier 5-year survival rates were 30% and 15%, respectively. The difference was almost significant on univariate analysis (P = .052) and was significant on multivariate analysis (P = .027). Group I patients had a significantly higher local control rate than group II patients, but there was no difference between the two groups in distant metastasis rate. There was no difference in the incidence of acute or late grade 3 to 4 toxicity.
                Initial administration of thoracic ACC HFX RT with concurrent C/E seems to produce better local control and survival rates than delayed administration. Between January 1987 and June 1991, 173 patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer, Stage III, were entered into a randomized trial comparing radiotherapy only (RT) (45 Gy/15 fractions/3 weeks) (arm A) versus RT and a daily low dose of cDDP (6 mg/m2) (arm B). An overall response rate of 58.9% was observed in arm A and 50.6% in arm B, respectively. No differences in the pattern of relapse were noted between the two treatment groups. Median time to progression was 10.6 months for arm A and 14.2 months for arm B. Median survivals were 10.3 months and 9.97 months, respectively. Toxicity was acceptable and no treatment-related death occurred in either treatment schedule. In this study no significant advantage of the combined treatment over radiation therapy only was found. The encouraging results achieved in some trials together with the intractability of the disease suggest that further efforts should be made to optimize clinical trial protocols, perhaps by reviewing the radiobiological and pharmacological basis of the combined treatment. We report the results observed in a large, randomized study that compared the effects of radiotherapy alone (the standard therapy) with those of a combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy in nonresectable squamous cell and large-cell lung carcinoma. The radiation dose was 65 Gy in each group, and chemotherapy included vindesine, cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, and lomustine. In this study, 177 patients received radiotherapy alone (group A), and 176 patients received the combined treatment (group B). The 2-year survival rate was 14% in group A and 21% in group B (P = .08). The distant metastasis rate was significantly lower in group B (P less than .001). Local control was poor in both groups (17% and 15%, respectively) and remained the major problem. A total of 610 patients with small cell lung cancer were entered into a randomised trial designed to assess the effect of duration of initial chemotherapy on survival. Patients were randomised to receive either four or eight courses of cytotoxic chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, vincristine and etoposide and also randomised to receive, on disease progression, either second line chemotherapy (methotrexate and doxorubicin) or symptomatic treatment only. In the whole study 196 (32.1%) had limited disease and 414 (67.9%) extensive disease. During initial chemotherapy the response rate (complete and partial responses) after four courses of treatment was 61% with no significant increase in patients receiving eight courses (63%). In those randomised to receive relapse chemotherapy the response rate was improved slightly for those who had originally received four courses of chemotherapy (25.6%) over those receiving eight (18.7%). The overall results show that of the four possible treatment randomizations, four courses of chemotherapy alone is inferior in terms of overall survival (30 weeks median survival) to the other three treatment options (39 weeks median survival, P less than 0.01). In patients responding to initial chemotherapy the disadvantage of four courses of chemotherapy alone was apparent (median survival of 40 weeks versus 49 weeks, P = 0.003) but not if drug treatment was given on relapse. The study shows that limiting treatment to four courses of chemotherapy alone is associated with inferior survival, but this is not the case if chemotherapy is given at relapse. To evaluate the usefulness of radiation therapy alternative to surgery for clinical N0-N1 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
                From 1976 through 1989, 116 patients with NSCLC without mediastinal involvement were treated with definitive radiation therapy alone at Gunma University Hospital. All patients were treated with once-daily standard fractionation using 10 MV X-rays. The total dose ranged from 60 Gy to 80 Gy.
                The actuarial 2- and 5-year survival rates of the entire group were 43% and 20%, respectively with a median survival time of 19 months. The survival of 76 patients with stage T2 tumors was significantly better than that of 28 patients with T3 tumors (mean survival time 21 versus 15.5 months; p < 0.05). Sixty-two patients with tumors less than 5 cm in diameter had a 2-year progression rate of 20%, in comparison with 39% of 54 patients with tumors greater than 5 cm. The difference of survivals for these 2 groups was statistically significant. Twelve patients given a total dose of 80 Gy or more had only 17% local progression at the time of last follow-up, however, 5 of them developed severe stenosis of proximal bronchus after 6 to 15 months.
                These results should provide support for definitive radiation therapy using 60 to 70 Gy to manage the patients with medically inoperable NSCLC without mediastinal involvement.
At present, it is uncertain whether the timing of chest radiotherapy as such is important for survival. The optimal integration of chemotherapy and chest radiotherapy in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer is unknown. Further research is needed to establish the best combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy in this disease.