Low-dose nebulized morphine does not improve exercise in interstitial lung disease. Morphine increases synchronous ventilation in preterm infants. Domiciliary nebulized terbutaline in severe chronic airways obstruction. A long-term prospective assessment of home nebulizer treatment. Results of a multicenter study of nebulized inhalant bronchodilator solutions. Inhibition of epidural morphine-induced pruritus by intravenous droperidol. Addition of anticholinergic solution prolongs bronchodilator effect of beta 2 agonists in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Controlled trial of beclomethasone dipropionate by nebulization in oxygen- and ventilator-dependent infants. Does additional support by nurses enhance the effect of a brief smoking cessation intervention in people with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? A randomised controlled trial.
Recent reports have suggested that low-dose nebulized morphine may improve exercise tolerance in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) by acting on peripheral opioid-sensitive pulmonary receptors. We therefore examined whether the administration of low-dose nebulized morphine would influence dyspnea or the breathing pattern during exercise of subjects with ILD and improve their exercise performance. Each of six subjects with ILD underwent three maximal incremental cycle ergometer tests, each test separated from the last by at least 3 d. Each exercise test was similar except that 30 min before exercise, the subjects received nebulized saline (control), morphine 2.5 mg, or morphine 5.0 mg, respectively, in double-blinded fashion. No significant differences were noted in exercise duration, maximal workload, or sense of dyspnea at the end of exercise in the control test and the tests with either morphine 2.5 mg or morphine 5.0 mg. Nor were significant differences noted in resting, submaximal, or end-exercise measurements of oxygen uptake (VO2), carbon dioxide output (VCO2), end-tidal CO2 (PETCO2), oxygen saturation (SaO2), minute ventilation (VI), respiratory frequency (f), tidal volume (VT), or heart rate (HR) in the three tests. Low-dose nebulized morphine did not alter the subjects' breathing pattern or affect the relationship between dyspnea and ventilation during exercise. No significant side effects were noted. The administration of low-dose nebulized morphine to subjects with ILD neither relieves their dyspnea during exercise nor improves their maximal exercise performance. To examine the short-term cardiorespiratory effects of intravenous morphine infusion in ventilated preterm infants.
                A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial in a neonatal intensive care unit. Twenty-six preterm infants (29-36 weeks gestation) with hyaline membrane disease requiring ventilatory assistance on the first day after birth were included in the study. A loading dose of morphine 100 micrograms/kg over 30 min followed by a continuous intravenous infusion at 10 micrograms/kg per hour was given. Primary measures were heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate and interaction of spontaneous respiration with mechanical ventilation. Secondary measures were durations of oxygen therapy, ventilator therapy and hospitalization as well as incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, periventricular haemorrhage and pneumothorax.
                Morphine-treated infants spent a significantly greater percentage of total ventilated time breathing in synchrony with their ventilators (median [IQ] = 72[58-87] vs 31[17-51]%; P = 0.0008). Heart rate and respiratory rate, but not blood pressure, were reduced in morphine-treated infants. Duration of oxygen therapy was reduced (median [IQ] = 4.5[3-7] vs 8[4.75-12.5] days; P = 0.046).
                Intravenous morphine infusion increases synchronicity of spontaneous and ventilator-delivered breaths in preterm infants. Morphine reduces heart rate and respiratory rate without reducing blood pressure, and may help to reduce duration of oxygen therapy in preterm infants with hyaline membrane disease. Forty-eight patients with severe chronic airways obstruction were given 5 mg terbutaline or placebo from a nebulizer twice daily for 2 + 2 weeks. Twenty three patients preferred terbutaline, 9 placebo and 16 had no preference. The baseline lung function and the 6 minute walking distance were not increased after the terbutaline period. The patients who preferred terbutaline indicated less dyspnoea after the terbutaline period as compared to the placebo period, but did not differ with regard to lung function or walking distance after the terbutaline treatment. The physiology behind the subjective relief from the terbutaline inhalations remains unexplained. Forty-nine patients (15 asthma, mean FEV1/FVC 1.3/2.1; 34 COPD, mean FEV1/FVC 0.7/1.8) were referred for consideration of home nebulizer treatment. All were monitored for 2 weeks while using their usual inhaled treatment followed by 2 weeks using a 'Nebuhaler' spacer to deliver 1 mg of terbutaline and 80 micrograms of ipratoropium bromide (IB) four times daily. They then borrowed a System 22 nebulizer to self-administer salbutamol nebulizer solution (5 mg), IB unit dose vials (0.5 mg) or a mixture of these drugs four times daily for 1 month each. Both asthmatic and bronchitic patients had a significant rise in their mean daily peak flow rate (PFR) during home nebulizer treatment (P < 0.03) and the COPD patients also had a significant PFR rise during Nebuhaler treatment (P = 0.0004). The mean daily peak flow rates (PFR 1 min-1 were: baseline 179, Nebuhaler 195, salbutamol nebulizer 200, IB nebulizer 198, mixed nebulizer 216). Four patients failed to respond subjectively or objectively to either Nebuhaler or nebulizer treatment. Five patients responded well to Nebuhaler treatment and did not proceed to a home nebulizer trial. Eight further patients preferred Nebuhaler to nebulizer treatment or could not tolerate nebulizer treatment (two cases). Thirty-two patients requested home nebulizer treatment for long-term use (nine salbutamol, five IB, 18 mixture). Twenty-seven of these patients had an increased mean daily PFR (compared to their usual therapy) while using their chosen nebulized treatment. The mean increase in PFR for all 32 patients was 191 min-1 (11%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) The efficacy, persistence of bronchodilator action, and safety of the quaternary ammonium anticholinergic agent, ipratropium bromide (500 microgram), and placebo were compared when each was added in solution form to the beta-adrenergic agonist solution, metaproterenol sulfate (15 mg), and administered three times daily for 12 weeks to a total of 213 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Subjects had a mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of approximately 1 liter (37% of predicted) and were permitted to use nonanticholinergic therapy for COPD throughout the trial. The study was a randomized, double-blind, 85-day, parallel-group, eight-center study. On a 3 test days, 1, 43, and 85, mean peak responses for FEV1 and forced vital capacity and mean area under the curve were significantly higher for the iprathropium bromide-metaproterenol combination than for metaproterenol only. Duration of action was also significantly longer for the combination therapy than for the beta-agonist alone on test days 1 and 43. Neither treatment regimen produced an demonstrable effect on daily morning peak expiratory flow rates, reported respiratory symptoms, or quality of life. Both treatment regimens were similarly well tolerated with a comparable frequency of adverse events. These results suggest that the combination of iprathropium bromide and metaproterenol inhalation solutions offers a potential therapeutic advantage to patients with symptomatic COPD over nebulized metaproterenol alone without the risk of increased side effects. Our objective was to study in more detail our previous finding that intravenous droperidol inhibits pruritus induced by epidural morphine.
                In a double blind study, 107 ASA I or II patients undergoing cesarean section received epidural anesthesia with 150 mg (30 ml) of 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine and 2 mg of morphine hydrochloride in a single injection. They were randomly allocated to either receive (treated group, n = 54) or not receive (control group, n = 53) an intravenous injection of 2.5 mg of droperidol just after delivery. During the postoperative period, the patients were assessed for the occurrence and severity of pruritus or other possible untoward symptoms. Pruritus was classified as absent, mild, moderate, or severe.
                The incidence of pruritus in control group was absent, 26.4%; mild, 39.6%; moderate, 28.3%; severe, 5.7%; for the treated group, the incidences were, respectively: 59.2; 27.8; 13.0; and 0.0% (p = 0.0003; Mann-Whitney test). As for other side effects of morphine, nausea and vomiting had a similar incidence in the two groups; urinary retention could not be analyzed because of bladder catheterization, and constipation, herpes labialis and clinical evidence of respiratory depression were never observed. Droperidol produced a greater incidence of somnolence (2% in control and 17% in treated group--p < 0.02; Fisher's exact test), but it was never incapacitating. The incidence of hypotension was similar in the two groups.
                Intravenous droperidol reduces the incidence and severity of pruritus caused by epidural injection of morphine without inducing important side effects. A randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial was designed to assess the safety, efficacy, and duration of the bronchodilation resulting from the addition of 500 micrograms of ipratropium bromide (Atrovent; Boehringer Ingelheim, CT) inhalation solution to standard small volume nebulizer treatments with 2.5 mg albuterol inhalation solution. A total of 195 patients (63% men, average age 64 years) with > 10 pack-year smoking histories and stable, moderate-to- severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] 1.02 liter, 38.8% predicted) from eight university-affiliated chest clinics in seven U.S. cities were enrolled into the study. Asthma, rhinitis, and eosinophilia were exclusions, as was daily use of > 10 mg of prednisone (or 20 mg on alternate days). There was a 2-week stabilization period during which the patients were instructed in the use of the small volume nebulizers, which they used three times daily with albuterol alone. They were asked to keep daily logs of peak flow rates, pulmonary symptoms, and additional medication usage. On their test day 1 the subjects came to the pulmonary function laboratory having been off theophylline for 24 hours and beta 2-agonists for 12 hours and performed a baseline spirometry. They then received their morning small volume nebulizer treatment of albuterol to which was added either 500 micrograms if ipratropium bromide or a saline placebo. Spirometry was repeated at 15, 30, and 60 minutes, and then hourly for 8 hours. Subjects then took home a 2-week supply of albuterol and test drug for thrice daily use in their small volume nebulizer. They were evaluated for pulmonary symptoms and adverse effects every 14 days. The 8-hour spirometry was repeated on test day 43 and finally on test day 85. Primary data evaluated were the peak increase in FEV1 and the area between the FEV1 baseline value and the 8-hour FEV1 curve. Similar calculations were made for forced vital capacity (FVC) and 25-75% forced expiratory flow (FEF25-75%). On test day 1 the peak increase in FEV1 for the ipratropium bromide + albuterol subjects was 26% greater than those on placebo + albuterol (p < 0.003). The area under the 8-hour FEV1 curve was 64% greater in those given ipratropium bromide on test day 1 (p < 0.0002). Similar increases were seen in FVC and FEF25-75%. The peak improvements in FEV1 and FVC with the addition of ipratropium bromide to albuterol were maintained on test days 43 and 85. Considering the safety and efficacy profiles of this combination, the data would suggest that ipratropium bromide inhalation solution should be considered first-line therapy for those patients with COPD requiring small volume nebulizer treatments. Parenteral glucocorticoids have been shown to be effective in the treatment of oxygen- and ventilator-dependent bronchopulmonary dysplasia. We conducted a randomized, prospective study using a nebulized, water-soluble form of beclomethasone dipropionate for the treatment of infants with oxygen- and ventilator-dependent lung disease. Newborn infants with chest x-ray changes consistent with bronchopulmonary dysplasia at 14 days of age were randomly assigned, in a paired sequential fashion by birth weight, to treatment (beclomethasone) or placebo (saline solution) groups. Treatment included three nebulized doses of beclomethasone (50 micrograms) or saline solution per day for 28 days. Measured variables included tidal volume, total dynamic compliance, and airway resistance. Weight gain, gender, and incidence of infection during therapy were also recorded. Pulmonary functions were measured before initiation of therapy and weekly thereafter. Thirteen infants, seven in the saline solution group and six in the beclomethasone group, met study criteria and completed treatment. Infants treated with beclomethasone had reductions in airway resistance that were significant in weeks 2, 3, and 4 (p < 0.05, p < 0.02, and p < 0.001, respectively). Dynamic lung compliance increased at weeks 3 and 4 (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively). As expected, tidal volume increased with weight and time, but there were no significant differences between groups. There were no differences between the groups in weight gain, gender, or infection. This study demonstrates that beclomethasone by nebulization (1) reduced airway resistance in oxygen-dependent neonates with bronchopulmonary dysplasia, (2) improved dynamic lung compliance, as reported with parenterally administered glucocorticoids, and (3) produced no apparent increase in the incidence of infection. Smoking cessation is the primary disease modifying intervention for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
                A Regional Respiratory Centre (RRC) out-patient department in Northern Ireland.
                A randomised controlled trial (RCT) evaluated the effectiveness of brief advice alone or accompanied by individual nurse support or group support facilitated by nurses. Smoking status was biochemically validated and stage of change, nicotine addiction and dyspnoea were recorded at 2, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.
                Ninety-one cigarette smokers with COPD were enrolled in the study (mean age 61 years, 47 female).
                After 12 months cessation rates were not significantly different between groups (p=0.7), but all groups had a significant reduction in their nicotine addiction (p=0.03-0.006). No changes in subjects' motivation or dyspnoea were detected over the 12 months.
                Patients with COPD were unable to stop smoking regardless of the type of support they received. Harm reduction may be a more appropriate goal than complete cessation for intractable smokers and nurses must evaluate their role in this arena.
The hypothesis that nebulized morphine may reduce dyspnoea in patients with interstitial lung disease has not been confirmed in the single small RCT identified.