Randomized, controlled, blinded trial of doxapram for extubation of the very low birthweight infant. [A comparison of the efficacy of aminophylline and doxapram in preventing idiopathic apnea in preterm newborn infants]. A blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to compare theophylline and doxapram for the treatment of apnea of prematurity. Propofol compared with the morphine, atropine, and suxamethonium regimen as induction agents for neonatal endotracheal intubation: a randomized, controlled trial. Effectiveness of dexamethasone in preventing extubation failure in preterm infants at increased risk for airway edema. Randomized, controlled trial of nasopharyngeal continuous positive airway pressure in the extubation of very low birth weight infants. Low-dose doxapram for treatment of apnoea following early weaning in very low birthweight infants: a randomized, double-blind study. Elective use of nasal continuous positive airways pressure following extubation of preterm infants. Successful extubation of newborn infants without preextubation trial of continuous positive airway pressure.
The objective of the study was to determine whether administering doxapram by infusion to the very low birthweight infant, prior to extubation during the first 3 weeks of life, would increase the incidence of successful extubation. The study patients, 56 infants of less than 1251 g birthweight and less than 30 weeks' gestation, were entered in the first 3 weeks of life when lung disease had started to improve. A randomized blinded trial was performed, with infants receiving 3.5 mg kg(-1) doxapram bolus, followed by an infusion at 1 mg kg(-1) h(-1), or placebo. Weaning from positive pressure ventilation was standardized and extubation occurred after a 12 h trial of an intermittent mandatory ventilation (IMV) rate of 6 breaths min(-1), if PCO2 < 55 mmHg, pH > 7.26, and FiO2 < 0.45. Study drug was continued for 48 h postextubation, and the infants were placed on nasopharyngeal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for 72 h postextubation. Extubation failure within the first 72 h after extubation was objectively defined in terms of acidosis (pH < 7.26), hypercarbia (PCO2 > 55 mmHg), excessive oxygen requirement (FiO2 > 0.8) or frequent apnoea (more than three in 12 h, or more than two requiring face mask IMV in 24 h). No difference was noted in the frequency of successful extubation between the groups. Fifteen infants in each group were successfully extubated before the 10th day of the study. In conclusion, when given in accordance with this protocol doxapram does not increase the likelihood of successful extubation in the very low birthweight infant. Increasing successful extubations in this group of infants will require other strategies. Doxapram is an analeptic of the respiratory system that has been used in the last few years for the treatment of idiopathic apnea spells in infants who show resistance to methylxantine. In this study we have compared the efficacy of aminophylline and doxapram for the prevention of idiopathic apnea spells in two groups of preterm infants comparable for gestational age, birthweight and postnatal age. The two drugs resulted to be effective in preventing the spells of apnea in 66% and 60% of the cases respectively. In the cases in which there was a partial or negative response, the association of the two substances resulted in a noticeable reduction of the apnea spells. The positive effect of the association of aminophylline and doxapram is probably due to the different action mechanism on the stimulation of the respiratory system. A blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of theophylline and doxapram therapy in 31 infants with significant apnea of prematurity. Of 10 infants, two had a short-term response to placebo, 8 of 10 infants to theophylline, and 7 of 11 infants to doxapram (placebo vs treatment with theophylline or doxapram: p = 0.01). The two infants who initially responded to placebo remained responsive for the duration of the study. Of the eight infants in whom treatment with placebo failed, five were randomly assigned to receive theophylline, for a total of 15 infants treated with theophylline, and two of the eight were randomly assigned to receive doxapram, for a total of 13 infants treated with doxapram; the remaining infant required tracheal intubation. Of the 15 infants randomly assigned to receive theophylline, seven responded for the duration of the study; of the eight infants who did not respond to treatment with theophylline, five responded to doxapram, one responded to a combination of theophylline and doxapram, and two remained resistant to treatment. Of the 13 infants randomly assigned to receive doxapram four responded for the duration of the study; of the nine who did not respond to doxapram, seven responded to theophylline, one responded to a combination of theophylline and doxapram, and one remained resistant to treatment. This study demonstrates that although therapy with theophylline or doxapram is associated with a significant short-term reduction in the incidence of apnea compared with that in placebo-treated infants, the long-term response to treatment is frequently incomplete and is not sustained more than 1 week. The purpose of this work was to compare the efficacy of propofol, a hypnotic agent, to the regimen of morphine, atropine, and suxamethonium as an induction agent for nonemergency neonatal endotracheal intubation. We hypothesized that propofol aids intubation by allowing the continuation of spontaneous breathing.
                We conducted a randomized, open-label, controlled trial of infants who required nonemergency endotracheal intubation. Primary outcome was successful intubation confirmed by chest auscultation and clinical examination of the infant.
                Infants randomly assigned to propofol (n = 33) and the morphine, atropine, and suxamethonium regimen (n = 30) were comparable in median gestational age (27 vs 28 weeks), birth weight (1020 vs 1095 g), weight at intubation (1068 vs 1275 g), and age at intubation (4 vs 3 days). Sleep or muscle relaxation were achieved within 60 seconds in both groups, but time to achieve successful intubation was more than twice as fast with propofol (120 vs 260 seconds). Blood pressure and heart rates were not different, but intraprocedural oxygen saturations were significantly lower in infants on the morphine, atropine, and suxamethonium regimen (trough arterial oxygen saturation: 60% vs 80%). Nasal/oral trauma was less common, and recovery time was shorter (780 vs 1425 seconds) in the propofol group. No significant adverse effects were seen in either group.
                Propofol is more effective than the morphine, atropine, and suxamethonium regimen as an induction agent to facilitate neonatal nasal endotracheal intubation. Importantly, hypoxemia was less severe, probably because of the maintenance of spontaneous breathing. A controlled environment may have promoted the ease of intubation, resulting in less trauma. The shorter duration of action would be advantageous in a compromised infant. We studied 50 preterm infants who had multiple or traumatic endotracheal intubations, or whose duration of endotracheal intubation was > or = to 14 days, and who were considered at high risk for airway edema. These infants were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial to assess whether prophylactic dexamethasone therapy would be effective in the prevention of postextubation stridor and respiratory distress. At study entry, both groups had similar weights, postnatal ages, methylxanthine use, ventilator settings, blood gas values, and pulmonary function test results (dynamic compliance, total respiratory resistance, tidal volume, peak-to-peak transpulmonary pressure, minute ventilation, and peak inspiratory and expiratory flow rates). Patients underwent blood gas studies, physical examinations, and pulmonary function testing at baseline (4 hours before extubation) and again 2 to 4 hours and 18 to 24 hours after extubation. Twenty-seven infants received dexamethasone, 0.25 mg/kg per dose, at baseline, and then every 8 hours for a total of three doses; 23 infants received saline solution at corresponding times. Eighteen to twenty-four hours after extubation, total pulmonary resistance increased by 225% from baseline in the control group compared with 33% in the dexamethasone group (p < 0.006), and the dexamethasone group had a greater tidal volume, a greater dynamic compliance, and a lower arterial carbon dioxide pressure. Of 23 control infants, 10 had postextubation stridor compared with 2 of 27 dexamethasone-treated patients (p < 0.006). Of the 23 control patients, 4 required reintubation compared with none of the treated group (p < 0.05). We conclude that the prophylactic use of corticosteroids for the prevention of postextubation stridor and respiratory distress is efficacious in low birth weight, high-risk preterm infants. We conducted a prospective, randomized controlled trial to determine whether extubation of very low birth weight infants was facilitated by the use of nasopharyngeal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Eligible infants included patients weighing 600 to 1500 gm at birth who required tracheal intubation within 48 hours of birth and who met specific predetermined criteria for extubation by day 14 of life. We also sought to determine whether varying the duration of nasopharyngeal CPAP influenced the likelihood of successful extubation. Infants underwent random assignment to receive nasopharyngeal CPAP until resolution of lung disease (n = 40), 6 hours of nasopharyngeal CPAP (n = 42), or oxygen supplementation delivered by hood (n = 42). Extubation failure was predefined as a requirement for > or = 80% oxygen, pH < or = 7.20, severe apnea, or predefined clinical deterioration, and extubation success was predefined as the ability to remain free of a requirement for mechanical ventilation for 7 days and a 66% reduction in the need for supplemental oxygen. Each group was similar with regard to race, sex, and birth weight. Extubation was successful in 62%, 61%, and 60% of infants. After stratification by birth weight, there were no significant differences in the rates of successful extubation among the treatment groups. We conclude that nasopharyngeal CPAP does not improve the likelihood of successful extubation of very low birth weight infants who are ready for extubation within the first 2 weeks of life. The effects of low-dose doxapram (0.5 mg kg(-1)h(-1)) in combination with caffeine were evaluated on apnoea frequency following weaning from mechanical ventilation, and on blood pressure, in very low birthweight (BW) premature infants. Twenty-nine infants with BW < or=1250 g, gestational age at birth (GA) <34 weeks and postnatal age <5 d, who required minimal respiratory support, were included. Following randomization, they received a loading dose of caffeine citrate and a continuous infusion of doxapram (doxapram, n=14) or placebo (n=15) was started. They were extubated 8 h after starting the infusion, which was continued for 5 d. During this period, weaning was well tolerated in both groups, apnoeas occurred less frequently and there was a greater increase in systolic blood pressure in infants treated with doxapram than in controls. Plasma doxapram levels were also higher than expected. It is therefore suggested that doxapram, even at low doses, should not be used during the first few days of life. Careful monitoring of blood pressure is required if doxapram is used later. The aim of this study was to determine whether elective use of nasal continuous positive airways pressure (CPAP) following extubation of preterm infants was well tolerated and improved short- and long-term outcomes. A randomized comparison of nasal CPAP to headbox oxygen was undertaken and a meta-analysis performed including similar randomized trials involving premature infants less than 28 days of age. A total of 150 infants (median gestational age 30 weeks, range 24-34 weeks) were randomized in two centres. Fifteen nasal CPAP infants and 25 headbox infants required increased respiratory support post-extubation and 15 nasal CPAP infants and nine headbox infants required reintubation (non significant). Eight infants became intolerant of CPAP and were changed to headbox oxygen within 48 h of extubation; 19 headbox infants developed apnoeas and respiratory acidosis requiring rescue nasal CPAP, 3 ultimately were re-intubated. Seven other trials were identified, giving a total number of 569 infants. Overall, nasal CPAP significantly reduced the need for increased respiratory support (relative risk, 0.57, 95% CI 0.43-0.73), but not for re-intubation (relative risk 0.89, 95% CI 0.68-1.17). Nasal CPAP neither influenced significantly the intraventricular haemorrhage rate reported in four studies (relative risk 1.0, 95% CI 0.55, 1.82) nor that of oxygen dependency at 28 days reported in six studies (relative risk 1.0, 95% CI 0.8, 1.25). In two studies nasal CPAP had to be discontinued in 10% of infants either because of intolerance or hyperoxia.
                Elective use of nasal continuous positive airways pressure post-extubation is not universally tolerated, but does reduce the need for additional support. Sixty newborn infants who had been mechanically ventilated through 3.0- or 3.5-mm endotracheal tubes were studied to examine the necessity of a preextubation trial of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Thirty randomly assigned study infants were directly extubated from intermittent mandatory ventilation rates of six per minute; 30 randomly assigned control infants were extubated after a six-hour trial of continuous positive airway pressure of 3 cm H2O. Changes in respiratory rate, in PCO2, and in PO2/FIO2 were similar. All 30 study infants tolerated direct extubation without significant apnea or respiratory acidosis. Two study and eight control infants developed apnea during six hours after intermittent mandatory ventilation was discontinued (chi 2 = 4.3, P less than .05). Five control and no study infants had apneic episodes greater than or equal to 0.5 per hour (chi 2 = 5.5, P less than .02). The results of this study suggest that newborn infants may tolerate direct extubation from low intermittent mandatory ventilation rates without a preextubation trial of CPAP. A preextubation trial of CPAP appears to be unnecessary and may cause more frequent apnea in newborn infants if used for more than several hours.
The evidence does not support the routine use of doxapram to assist endotracheal extubation in preterm infants who are eligible for methylxanthine and/or CPAP. The results should be interpreted with caution because the small number of infants studied does not allow reliable assessment of the benefits and harms of doxapram. Further trials are required to evaluate the benefits and harms of doxapram compared with no treatment or with other treatments, such as methylxanthines or CPAP, to evaluate whether it is more effective in infants not responding to these other treatments, and to assess whether the drug is effective when given orally.