Isradipine in patients with acute ischaemic cerebral infarction. An overview of the ASCLEPIOS Programme. A controlled trial of nimodipine in acute ischemic stroke. A double-blind, randomized trial of PY108-068 in acute ischemic cerebral infarction. Flunarizine in acute ischemic stroke: a pilot study. Randomised trial of effects of calcium antagonists compared with diuretics and beta-blockers on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertension: the Nordic Diltiazem (NORDIL) study. Nimodipine in acute ischemic stroke: a double-blind controlled study. Intravenous ancrod for acute ischaemic stroke in the European Stroke Treatment with Ancrod Trial: a randomised controlled trial. The effects of nimodipine on the clinical course of patients with acute ischemic stroke. A calcium antagonist vs a non-calcium antagonist hypertension treatment strategy for patients with coronary artery disease. The International Verapamil-Trandolapril Study (INVEST): a randomized controlled trial.
Calcium-related mechanisms are an integral part of metabolic reactions during acute cerebral infarction. In an animal model of stroke, the calcium antagonist isradipine was shown to protect neurons against ischaemia. In order to improve the neurological and functional outcome of human stroke patients, a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre study was started in up to 600 patients with acute ischaemic brain infarction. Since early treatment is considered to be of great importance, patients must be recruited no more than 12 hours after stroke onset. Medical, ECG, laboratory, neurological and functional evaluations are conducted for up to 90 days after stroke. Recent investigations suggest that increased cellular calcium concentrations may be implicated in neuronal death after ischemia. To determine whether treatment with a calcium-channel blocker would improve survival and neurologic outcome in acute ischemic stroke, we enrolled 186 patients in a prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of nimodipine (30 mg every six hours), begun within 24 hours of the onset of symptoms of an acute ischemic stroke. During the four-week treatment period, mortality from all causes was significantly reduced with nimodipine as compared with placebo (8 deaths [8.6 percent] vs. 19 [20.4 percent]). The improvement in survival was restricted to men. During the follow-up period of six months, an additional eight patients in each group died. A significantly better neurologic outcome, as assessed by the Mathew scale of neurologic deficit, was also observed in the nimodipine group. The improvement in neurologic status was greatest in patients with a moderate to severe deficit at base line. There were no important side effects except for one episode of reversible azotemia that may have been related to treatment with nimodipine. Our data suggest that patients with acute ischemic stroke may benefit from early treatment with nimodipine, but this therapeutic effect appears to be limited to men. A double-blind, randomized, pilot trial of the calcium channel antagonist PY108-068 was completed in patients with acute ischemic cerebral infarction. Nine treated patients received PY108-068 orally (150 mg/day in divided doses) and 10 control patients received placebo within 48 hours of stroke onset for 21 days. The mean age of the treated patients (four men, five women) was 63.7 years and of the control patients (seven men, three women) 64.4 years. Most infarctions were in the territory of the middle cerebral artery. One treated patient died of sudden cardiac death on Day 12; one control patient died of cerebral herniation. Two treated patients had episodes of clinically insignificant hypotension during Day 1 of treatment. Two control patients had myocardial infarctions during the trial. The mean Toronto Stroke Scale scores at stroke onset were 67 and 90 and at Week 12 were 22.5 and 34.7 in the treated and control groups, respectively. There was parallel improvement in the two groups, with no significant difference between groups (p = 0.12). The mean Barthel Index functional scores at stroke onset were 32.8 and 33 and at Week 12 were 90 and 78.8 in the treated and control groups, respectively. There was a trend in favor of the treated group, but differences between groups did not reach significance. In this pilot trial, PY108-068 was found to be safe but not effective in patients with acute ischemic cerebral infarction. Twenty-six patients with acute supratentorial brain infarction were randomly allocated to double-blind intravenous treatment with the calcium entry blocker flunarizine (12 patients) or placebo (14 patients) within 24 h. CT scan excluded other significant pathology. Impaired consciousness and gaze deviation were more common in the placebo group. Three patients in the treated group (25%) were either dead or severely disabled after 6 months, whereas this occurred in 8 of the 14 (57%) control patients, a difference of 32%. This difference is not statistically significant and there is an uneven distribution of important prognostic variables, however, the confidence limits of the difference (-4% and +68%) suggest that there may be a clinically important effect. Calcium antagonists are a first-line treatment for hypertension. The effectiveness of diltiazem, a non-dihydropyridine calcium antagonist, in reducing cardiovascular morbidity or mortality is unclear. We compared the effects of diltiazem with that of diuretics, beta-blockers, or both on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertensive patients.
                In a prospective, randomised, open, blinded endpoint study, we enrolled 10,881 patients, aged 50-74 years, at health centres in Norway and Sweden, who had diastolic blood pressure of 100 mm Hg or more. We randomly assigned patients diltiazem, or diuretics, beta-blockers, or both. The combined primary endpoint was fatal and non-fatal stroke, myocardial infarction, and other cardiovascular death. Analysis was done by intention to treat.
                Systolic and diastolic blood pressure were lowered effectively in the diltiazem and diuretic and beta-blocker groups (reduction 20.3/18.7 vs 23.3/18.7 mm Hg; difference in systolic reduction p<0.001). A primary endpoint occurred in 403 patients in the diltiazem group and in 400 in the diuretic and beta-blocker group (16.6 vs 16.2 events per 1000 patient-years; relative risk 1.00 [95% CI 0.87-1.15], p=0.97). Fatal and non-fatal stroke occurred in 159 patients in the diltiazem group and in 196 in the diuretic and beta-blocker group (6.4 vs 7.9 events per 1000 patient-years; 0.80 [0.65-0.99], p=0.04) and fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction in 183 and 157 patients (7.4 vs 6.3 events per 1000 patient-years; 1.16 [0.94-1.44], p=0.17).
                Diltiazem was as effective as treatment based on diuretics, beta-blockers, or both in preventing the combined primary endpoint of all stroke, myocardial infarction, and other cardiovascular death. Nimodipine (BAY e 9736), a new dihydropyridine derivative, has been shown to reduce neurological deficits and mortality induced by acute cerebral ischemia in experimental studies. We investigated the effects of this calcium antagonist in patients with acute ischemic stroke through a randomized, double-blind, parallel-designed trial in which nimodipine was compared with placebo. Forty-one of 54 screened cases were found to fulfil the inclusion criteria (sudden occurrence of a focal neurological deficit secondary to an acute ischemic event in the carotid area diagnosed after a complete neurological work-up) and entered the study. Nineteen of them were treated with nimodipine (40 mg t.i.d. administered for 28 days) and the remaining 22 with placebo, given in identical tablets. In all patients the treatment started within 12 h after the onset of the symptoms. Course and intensity of the neurological deficit were evaluated by the Mathew Scale (slightly modified). Forty patients concluded the trial. Nimodipine was withdrawn in one case following the occurrence of a skin rash whose causative relation with the test drug could not be clarified. Altogether, however, nimodipine was well tolerated and no severe cardiovascular adverse reactions were observed. In terms of efficacy, the scores obtained by the Mathew Scale showed a higher rate of improvement on nimodipine than on placebo, thus indicating that patients receiving the latter drug did not fare as well as those receiving the test medication. Our data suggest that nimodipine may be beneficial in the treatment of acute stroke. Intravenous tissue plasminogen activator is the only approved specific treatment for acute ischaemic stroke. Ancrod, a natural defibrinogenating agent from snake venom, has proved to have a favourable effect when given within 3 h after an acute ischaemic stroke. The European Stroke Treatment with Ancrod Trial was undertaken to assess the effects of ancrod when given within 6 h.
                1222 patients with an acute ischaemic stroke were included in this randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Brain CT scans were done to exclude intracranial haemorrhages and large evolving ischaemic infarctions. Patients were randomly assigned ancrod (n=604) or placebo (n=618). The primary outcome was functional success at 3 months (survival, Barthel Index of 95 or 100, or return to prestroke level). The analysis was by intention-to-treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, trial number NCT00343174.
                Functional success at 3 months did not differ between patients given ancrod (42%) and those given placebo (42%) (p=0.94, OR=0.99, 95% CI, 0.76-1.29).
                On the basis of our findings, ancrod should not be recommended for use in acute ischaemic stroke beyond 3 h. 60 patients with acute ischemic stroke were enrolled in a prospective single-blind, randomized trial to determine whether treatment with the calcium antagonist nimodipine would reduce their neurological deficit. All patients received a standard treatment. In addition, 29 received a daily dose of 120 mg nimodipine orally as 3 divided doses (treatment group). Evaluation of therapy was assessed with a neurological scoring system ( Mathew scale). Comparison of the Mathew sum scores in the standard group with those of the nimodipine group (analysis of variance) revealed a highly significant difference (P less than 0.0001) in favour of nimodipine during the 4 week period of treatment. Based on the individual items of the Mathew scale, the level of consciousness and disability were significantly improved under the nimodipine-therapy. Side effects were of minor importance and of no clinical relevance. Despite evidence of efficacy of antihypertensive agents in treating hypertensive patients, safety and efficacy of antihypertensive agents for coronary artery disease (CAD) have been discerned only from subgroup analyses in large trials.
                To compare mortality and morbidity outcomes in patients with hypertension and CAD treated with a calcium antagonist strategy (CAS) or a non-calcium antagonist strategy (NCAS).
                Randomized, open label, blinded end point study of 22 576 hypertensive CAD patients aged 50 years or older, which was conducted September 1997 to February 2003 at 862 sites in 14 countries.
                Patients were randomly assigned to either CAS (verapamil sustained release) or NCAS (atenolol). Strategies specified dose and additional drug regimens. Trandolapril and/or hydrochlorothiazide was administered to achieve blood pressure goals according to guidelines from the sixth report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC VI) of less than 140 mm Hg (systolic) and less than 90 mm Hg (diastolic); and less than 130 mm Hg (systolic) and less than 85 mm Hg (diastolic) if diabetes or renal impairment was present. Trandolapril was also recommended for patients with heart failure, diabetes, or renal impairment.
                Primary: first occurrence of death (all cause), nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke; other: cardiovascular death, angina, adverse experiences, hospitalizations, and blood pressure control at 24 months.
                At 24 months, in the CAS group, 6391 patients (81.5%) were taking verapamil sustained release; 4934 (62.9%) were taking trandolapril; and 3430 (43.7%) were taking hydrochlorothiazide. In the NCAS group, 6083 patients (77.5%) were taking atenolol; 4733 (60.3%) were taking hydrochlorothiazide; and 4113 (52.4%) were taking trandolapril. After a follow-up of 61 835 patient-years (mean, 2.7 years per patient), 2269 patients had a primary outcome event with no statistically significant difference between treatment strategies (9.93% in CAS and 10.17% in NCAS; relative risk [RR], 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90-1.06). Two-year blood pressure control was similar between groups. The JNC VI blood pressure goals were achieved by 65.0% (systolic) and 88.5% (diastolic) of CAS and 64.0% (systolic) and 88.1% (diastolic) of NCAS patients. A total of 71.7% of CAS and 70.7% of NCAS patients achieved a systolic blood pressure of less than 140 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure of less than 90 mm Hg.
                The verapamil-trandolapril-based strategy was as clinically effective as the atenolol-hydrochlorothiazide-based strategy in hypertensive CAD patients.
No evidence is available using calcium antagonists in patients with acute ischemic stroke is effective.