Efficacy and tolerability of memantine in patients with dementia syndrome. A double-blind, placebo controlled trial. Memantine in the treatment of mild to moderate dementia syndrome. A double-blind placebo-controlled study. Memantine for cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Memantine and HIV-associated cognitive impairment: a neuropsychological and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. Specific functional effects of memantine treatment in patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease. A combination of galantamine and memantine modifies cognitive function in subjects with amnestic MCI. Randomized controlled trial of atorvastatin in mild to moderate Alzheimer disease: LEADe. Short-term administration of selegiline for mild-to-moderate dementia of the Alzheimer's type. Clinical trials in dementia with propentofylline.
The efficacy and tolerability of memantine (1-amino-3,5-dimethyl-adamantane hydrochloride, Akatinol Memantine; CAS 41100-52-1) was investigated in a double-blind, randomized clinical study versus placebo in 66 patients aged between 65 and 80 years predominantly suffering from mild to moderate vascular dementia. The target variables assessed were the baseline differences of the Sandoz Clinical Assessment Geriatric scale (SCAG) and Syndrom-Kurz-Test (SKT) total scores and the total time required in the subtests of Activity of Daily Living tests (ADL). Additional parameters assessed were the physician's global impression, the Mini Mental State Evaluation (MMSE), the Tapping and Trace tests for fine motor rating and the quality in performing the ADL tests. Adverse drug effects were recorded by DOTES/TWIS. 59 of the 66 patients included in the study terminated the trial (29 in the placebo and 30 in the memantine group). For the baseline differences of the SCAG total score a statistically significant improvement was observed already after 14 days of memantine treatment as compared to placebo. After 42 days this difference was still more pronounced and highly significant. Significant improvements after 14 and 42 days of memantine treatment could also be demonstrated for the SCAG subscales cognitive disturbances, lack of drive, emotional disturbances, social behaviour and somatic disturbances. Additionally, the efficacy of the drug could be confirmed by the SKT and ADL tests. Particularly striking in the ADL tests was the considerable improvement achieved in the quality of performing the tasks under memantine treatment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) The efficacy and the tolerability of memantine (1-amino-3,5-dimethyladamantane hydrochloride, Akatinol Memantine, CAS 41100-52-1) were investigated in patients with mild to moderate dementia syndrome in a randomized two-centre placebo-controlled clinical study. The test substance was administered at a dose of 10 mg/d from day 1 to day 3 and then at a dose of 2 x 10 mg/d from day 4 to the end of treatment after 42 days. Altogether, 88 patients were recruited to the study; their average age was 71.5 years. The efficacy of memantine was judged on the basis of the baseline/6 week differences in the total sum scores of the Clinical Assessment Geriatric Scale (SCAG), the Gottfries-Bräne-Steen Scale (GBS), the SCAG and GBS subscales and the global assessment of the change in the patient's condition. The effects of memantine on performance were studied with the aid of psychomotor tests and a behaviour investigation relating to activities of daily living (ADL). The tolerability of memantine was assessed on the basis of the doctor's global assessment and of entries on structured documentation forms (DOTES/TWIS). Further safety parameters--in the form of clinicochemical tests and measurements of blood pressure and heart rate--were also monitored during the study. On both the psychopathological measurement level (SCAG, global assessment of the change in the patient's condition) and the behavioural level (GBS), confirmatory statistical analysis brought to light significant differences between memantine and placebo (p less than or equal to 0.05), these differences showing a superiority of memantine. The tolerability of memantine was good in the main. The observed adverse reactions were not serious and, except in 3 patients, were rated as causing little or no impairment. The present clinical study demonstrates the efficacy of memantine in patients suffering from mostly moderate dementia syndrome. Clinical and statistically relevant improvements in the dementia-induced disturbances were found on the both the psychopathological level (SCAG, CGI) and the behavioural level (GBS). On the performance level also, the ADL behaviour investigation detected a highly significant improvement in the quality of performance of instrumented activities of daily living under memantine. Also the time taken to carry out these tasks was significantly reduced in comparison with placebo. Memantine, an NMDA antagonist, is effective for moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease.
                Determine whether memantine improves cognitive performance (CP) among subjects with multiple sclerosis (MS) and cognitive impairment (CI).
                This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00300716) compared memantine 10 mg twice a day (4 week titration followed by 12 weeks on the highest tolerated dose) with placebo. The primary outcome was the change from baseline to exit on the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) and the California Verbal Learning Test-II (CVLT-II) Long Delay Free Recall (LDFR). Secondary outcomes included additional neuropsychological tests; self-report measures of quality of life, fatigue, and depression; and family/caregiver reports of subjects' CI and neuropsychiatric symptoms.
                The differences between the groups on the change on the PASAT (placebo-memantine = 0.0 correct responses, 95% CI 3.4, 3.4; p = 0.9) and on CVLT-II LDFR (placebo-memantine =-0.6 words, 95% CI -2.1, 0.8; p = 0.4) as well as on the other cognitive tests were not significant. Subjects on memantine had no serious adverse events (AEs) but had more fatigue and neurological AEs as well as, per family members' reports, less cognitive improvement and greater neuropsychiatric symptoms than subjects on placebo.
                Memantine 10 mg twice a day does not improve CP in subjects with MS, ages 18-65, without major depression, who have subjective cognitive complaints and perform worse than one SD below the mean on the PASAT or on the California Verbal Learning Test-II (total recall or delayed free recall). To assess the safety and efficacy of memantine, an uncompetitive antagonist of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor as treatment of HIV-associated cognitive impairment.
                This was a Phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial within the Adult AIDS Clinical Trials Group. One-hundred and forty HIV-infected adults with mild to severe AIDS dementia complex receiving stable antiretroviral therapy were enrolled. Memantine was initiated at 10 mg daily escalated to 40 mg daily, or up to the maximum tolerated dose and continued for 16 weeks (primary evaluation visit) followed by a 4-week washout period and re-evaluation at week 20. Changes in cognitive performance were measured as percent change from baseline to week 16 in the average of eight neuropsychological test scores (NPZ-8). Brain metabolism was measured by magnetic resonance spectroscopy in a subgroup of subjects.
                Sixty-one percent of subjects in the memantine group and 85% in the placebo group reached the 40 mg dose while the reported adverse experiences between the two groups were similar. There were no significant improvements in neuropsychological performance over 16 weeks; however, memantine was associated with a significant increase at week 16 in the N-acetyl aspartate to creatine ratio, in the frontal white matter (P = 0.040) and parietal cortex (P = 0.023).
                Memantine was safe and tolerated by HIV-infected subjects with cognitive impairment. Although we observed no significant differences in cognitive performance, the magnetic resonance spectroscopy data suggest that memantine may ameliorate neuronal metabolism, an important step to stabilizing or preventing neuronal injury. These results underscore the need for longer studies to assess the full potential of neuroprotective agents. Treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD) that combats progressive functional deterioration can improve the patient's quality of life and reduce caregiver burden. Memantine, a moderate affinity N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, reduces global deterioration in AD patients and provides cognitive and functional benefits relative to placebo. Two previous studies reported statistically significant benefits of memantine for overall functional ability on the Alzheimer Disease Cooperative Study Activities of Daily Living Inventory modified for severe dementia (ADCS-ADL(19)), Functional Assessment Staging, and G2 scale. The present study reports a single-item analysis of the ADL scales from the two trials and shows that patients treated with memantine demonstrated a numerical advantage over placebo on all items assessed. These results help to translate the positive effects of memantine into specific aspects of functional ability, information that is relevant to AD patients and their families as well as to researchers interested in the assessment of functional ability in AD clinical trials.
                Copyright 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is etiologically heterogeneous, and a substantial proportion of MCI subjects will develop different dementia disorders. One subtype of this syndrome, amnestic MCI, occurs preferentially but not exclusively in prodromal AD and is characterized by defined deficits of episodic memory.
                For a 2-year, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study MCI patients, presenting with an amnestic syndrome but not necessarily based on presumed prodromal AD were randomized.
                Patients received (a) a combination of 16 mg galantamine plus 20 mg memantine, or (b) 16 mg galantamine alone or (c) placebo.
                The primary objective was to explore the differential impact of these interventions on the progression to dementia and on cognitive changes as measured by the ADAScog.
                After recruitment of 232 subjects, the trial was halted before reaching the planned sample size, because safety concerns arose in other studies with galantamine in MCI. This resulted in a variable treatment duration of 2-52 weeks. The statistical analysis plan was amended for studying cognitive effects of discontinuing the study medication, which was done separately for galantamine and memantine, and under double-blind conditions. There was one death, no unexpected severe adverse events, and no differences of severe adverse events between the treatment arms. The cognitive changes on the ADAScog were not different among the groups. Only for the subgroup of amnestic MCI with presumed AD etiology, a significant improvement of ADAScog score over placebo before the discontinuation of medication was observed, while amnestic MCI presumably due to other etiologies showed no cognitive changes with broad variation. Cognitive improvement was numerically larger in the combination treatment group than under galantamine alone. Patients who received placebo declined as expected. Discontinuation of galantamine, either as part of the combination regimen or as mono treatment, resulted in a transient decline of the ADAScog score in amnestic MCI of presumed AD etiology, while discontinuation of Memantine did not change the cognitive status.
                In an interrupted trial with amnestic MCI subjects the combination of galantamine plus memantine were generally well tolerated. In the subgroup of MCI subjects with presumed AD etiology, a cognitive benefit of a short-term combination treatment of galantamine plus memantine was observed, and cognitive decline occurred after discontinuation of galantamine. There is some evidence that statins may have a protective and symptomatic benefit in Alzheimer disease (AD). The LEADe study is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluating the efficacy and safety of atorvastatin in patients with mild to moderate AD.
                This was an international, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study. Subjects had mild to moderate probable AD (Mini-Mental State Examination score 13-25), were aged 50-90 years, and were taking donepezil 10 mg daily for > or 3 months prior to screening. Entry low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (LDL-C) were > 95 and < 195 mg/dL. Patients were randomized to atorvastatin 80 mg/day or placebo for 72 weeks followed by a double-blind, 8-week atorvastatin withdrawal phase. Coprimary endpoints were changes in cognition (Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale [ADAS-Cog]) and global function (Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Clinical Global Impression of Change [ADCS-CGIC]) at 72 weeks.
                A total of 640 patients were randomized in the study. There were no significant differences in the coprimary endpoints of ADAS-cog or ADCS-CGIC or the secondary endpoints. Atorvastatin was generally well-tolerated.
                In this large-scale randomized controlled trial evaluating statin therapy as a treatment for mild to moderate Alzheimer disease, atorvastatin was not associated with significant clinical benefit over 72 weeks. This treatment was generally well-tolerated without unexpected adverse events. Classification of evidence: This study provides Class II evidence that intensive lipid lowering with atorvastatin 80 mg/day in patients with mild to moderate probable Alzheimer disease (aged 50-90), taking donepezil, with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels between 95 and 195 mg/dL over 72 weeks does not benefit cognition (as measured by Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale) (p = 0.26) or global function (as measured by Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Clinical Global Impression of Change) (p = 0.73) compared with placebo. As a follow-up to an earlier study showing short-term benefit in inpatients with more severe dementia, the authors studied the short-term cognitive, functional, and behavioral effects of selegiline in outpatients with mild-to-moderate dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT) by means of a double-blind, randomized, crossover study of placebo vs. selegiline. Fifty outpatients with mild-to-moderate DAT and no behavioral disturbances were given selegiline in two 8-week treatment periods separated by a 4-week washout. Outcome was assessed with standardized measures of dementia severity, daily functioning, behavior, and cognition. There was no drug-placebo difference in any outcome measure. Selegiline did not show short-term benefit in this study, contrary to the earlier study, perhaps because the patients were studied less intensively and/or lacked behavioral problems that could show response, although the medication was well tolerated. The mode of action of propentofylline (a xanthine derivative) suggested that it would have beneficial effects in patients with Alzheimer's disease or vascular dementia. In four double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized studies, 901 patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease and 359 patients with mild to moderate vascular dementia were treated for up to 12 months (daily dose of propentofylline: 3 x 300 mg taken 1 hr before food). Patients were assessed at regular intervals for efficacy and safety of the drug. Efficacy variables covered cognitive and global functions as well as activities of daily living. Propentofylline showed statistically significant, clinically relevant improvements over placebo in efficacy assessments, both in patients with Alzheimer's disease and in patients with vascular dementia. The drug was also well tolerated. It had no significant effects on laboratory findings and the adverse events that were considered to be related to the study medication were mostly minor, transient, and affected the digestive and nervous systems.
Memantine has a small beneficial effect at six months in moderate to severe AD. In patients with mild to moderate dementia, the small beneficial effect on cognition was not clinically detectable in those with vascular dementia and was detectable in those with AD. Memantine is well tolerated.