Refractory idiopathic urge urinary incontinence and botulinum A injection. Intravesical resiniferatoxin versus botulinum-A toxin injections for neurogenic detrusor overactivity: a prospective randomized study. BOTOX and physical therapy in the treatment of piriformis syndrome. Improvement in quality of life after botulinum toxin-A injections for idiopathic detrusor overactivity: results from a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. A randomized, double-blind, prospective pilot study of botulinum toxin injection for refractory, unilateral, cervicothoracic, paraspinal, myofascial pain syndrome. Outcome of a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial of botulinum A toxin for refractory overactive bladder. Randomized double-blind study of botulinum toxin type B for sialorrhea in ALS patients. Botulinum toxin type B: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, safety and efficacy study in cervical dystonia. Botulinum toxin A in the hemiplegic upper limb: a double-blind trial.
We compared 200 U intradetrusor botulinum toxin A vs placebo in women with refractory idiopathic urge incontinence.
                This institutional review board approved, multicenter registered trial randomized women with refractory urge incontinence, detrusor overactivity incontinence and 6 or greater urge incontinence episodes in 3 days to botulinum toxin A or placebo at a 2:1 ratio. Refractory was defined as inadequate symptom control after 2 or more attempts at pharmacotherapy and 1 or more other first line therapies for detrusor overactivity incontinence. The primary outcome measure was time to failure, as evidenced by a Patient Global Impression of Improvement score of 4 or greater at least 2 months after injection, or changes in treatment (initiation or increase) at any time after injection. Safety data, including increased post-void residual volume, defined as more than 200 ml irrespective of symptoms, was obtained at specified time points.
                Approximately 60% of the women who received botulinum toxin A had a clinical response based on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement. The median duration of their responses was 373 days, significantly longer than the 62 days or less for placebo (p <0.0001). In the botulinum toxin A group increased post-void residual urine (12 of 28 women or 43%) and urinary tract infection in those with increased post-void residual urine (9 of 12 or 75%) exceeded expected ranges. Further injections were stopped after 43 patients were randomized, including 28 to botulinum toxin A and 15 to placebo.
                Local injection of 200 U botulinum toxin A was an effective and durable treatment for refractory overactive bladder. However, a transient post-void residual urine increase was experienced in 43% of patients. Botulinum toxin A for idiopathic overactive bladder is still under investigation. We investigated the effectiveness and safety of intravesical resiniferatoxin (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Missouri) and botulinum-A toxin injections into the detrusor muscle in a group of spinal cord injured patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity unresponsive to conventional anticholinergic therapy.
                A total of 25 patients were randomly assigned to receive intravesically 0.6 microM resiniferatoxin in 50 ml of 0.9% NaCl or injections into the detrusor muscle of 300 units botulinum A-toxin diluted in 30 ml 0.9% NaCl. Clinical evaluation and urodynamics were performed at baseline, and at 6, 12 and 18 months after treatment.
                In both arms there was a significant decrease in catheterization and incontinent episodes, and a significant increase in first detrusor contraction and maximum bladder capacity at 6, 12 and 18-month followup. There were no local side effects with either treatment. Botulinum-A toxin induced a significant decrease in the frequency of daily incontinence episodes (p <0.05), a significant increase in first uninhibited detrusor contraction (p <0.01) in maximum bladder capacity (p <0.01), and a significant decrease in maximum pressure of uninhibited detrusor contractions (p <0.01) compared to resiniferatoxin at 6, 12 and 18-month followup.
                In spinal cord injured patients with refractory neurogenic detrusor overactivity, intravesical resiniferatoxin and botulinum-A toxin injections into the detrusor muscle provided beneficial clinical and urodynamic results with decreases in detrusor overactivity and restoration of urinary continence in a large proportion of patients. Botulinum-A toxin injections provided superior clinical and urodynamic benefits compared to those of intravesical resiniferatoxin. This study evaluates the efficacy of botulinum toxin A injections used in conjunction with physical therapy for the treatment of piriformis syndrome.
                This a double-blind, placebo controlled clinical trial using electrophysiologic criteria for patient selection and a visual analog scale to assess treatment efficacy in relieving pain.
                As measured on the visual analog scale, patients injected with botulinum toxin A experienced more relief from pain than patients receiving lidocaine with steroid (P < 0.05) and more relief than patients receiving placebo (P = 0.001).
                Injection with botulinum toxin A is an effective adjunct to physical therapy in the treatment of piriformis syndrome. H-reflex prolongation by flexion, adduction, and internal rotation (FAIR test) beyond 1.86 msec (3 SD) of the mean is a clinical indication of piriformis syndrome. OBJECTIVE To determine whether botulinum toxin-A (BTX-A) treatment has an effect on the quality of life (QoL) of patients with overactive bladder (OAB) refractory to anticholinergics. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a single centre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Participants were men and women with idiopathic detrusor overactivity (IDO). Participants were randomised to receive either 200 U of BTX-A (Botox(R), Allergan Inc., Irvine, CA, USA; n = 16) or placebo (n = 18) via a trigone-sparing flexible cystoscopic technique. QoL was assessed using the King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) at baseline and at 4 and 12 weeks, after injection. At 12 weeks patients were 'unblinded' and a further open-label follow-up in the BTX-A group occurred at 24 weeks. The changes in the subdomains of the KHQ were assessed over the study period. RESULTS Overall QoL was significantly improved in the BTX-A treated patients compared with placebo in the blinded part of the study. When analysing the KHQ subdomains, 'Incontinence Impact', 'Emotions', 'Physical Limitations', 'Social Limitations' and 'Severity Measures' were significantly improved in those that received BTX-A compared with placebo. The 'Symptom Severity' domain was also significantly improved at 4 weeks but not at 12 weeks. At 12 weeks 'Role Limitations' also became statistically significant in favour of BTX-A. The open-label extension study suggested these benefits last for at least 24 weeks. CONCLUSIONS BTX-A bladder injections at 200 U appear to improve QoL in patients with OAB symptoms and IDO refractory to anticholinergics for at least 24 weeks. As well as the improvement seen in clinical parameters with this form of therapy, perhaps of more importance to the patient, is the improvement in QoL. In a randomized, double-blind study, two dosage strengths of botulinum toxin type A were compared with normal saline injected into symptomatic trigger points in the cervicothoracic paraspinal muscles.
                To compare the effect of botulinum toxin type A injections with that of normal saline to determine the former's usefulness in the management of neck pain and disability.
                The results of several studies have suggested that botulinum toxin type A may reduce pain associated with myofascial pain syndromes.
                Thirty-three participants were divided randomly to receive either 50 or 100 units of botulinum toxin type A, or normal saline. Patients were re-evaluated over a 4-month period by assessment of their pain and disability and pressure algometer readings, and then offered a second injection of 100 units of botulinum toxin type A.
                All three groups showed significant treatment effects as measured by a decline in the scores on the Neck Pain and Disability Visual Analogue Scale and an increase in the pressure algometer scores. Group differences were apparent only when the authors considered the number of patients who were asymptomatic as a result of the injections.
                Although no statistically significant benefit of botulinum toxin type A over placebo was demonstrated in this study, the high incidence of patients who were asymptomatic after a second injection suggests that further research is needed to determine whether higher dosages and sequential injections in a larger cohort might show a botulinum toxin type A effect. We determined the effectiveness of cystoscopic administration of botulinum-A toxin compared to placebo for the treatment of urinary incontinence in subjects with idiopathic overactive bladder.
                Subjects were recruited from the Division of Urogynecology at the University of Rochester. Inclusion criteria were overactive bladder refractory to anticholinergic medications, multiple daily incontinence episodes and a 24-hour pad weight of 100 gm or greater. Subjects with low leak point pressures, increased post-void residual volume or neurological etiologies were excluded from study. Subjects were randomized to placebo or to 1 of 2 doses of botulinum-A toxin. The detrusor was injected at 8 to 10 sites above the trigone. Evaluations were performed at baseline, and at 3 and 6 weeks after injection, and included bladder diaries, pad weights, quality of life questionnaires and urodynamic studies.
                A total of 22 subjects participated in stage 1 of this 2-stage study. We report on the outcomes of stage 1 of this study. Because stage 2 is still ongoing and investigators remain blind to the doses of botulinum-A toxin, the 2 botulinum-A toxin groups were combined for this report. There were no differences in mean baseline measurements between the 2 groups. Statistically significant improvements in daily incontinence episodes, pads changed per day and quality of life questionnaires were seen in the botulinum-A toxin group with no changes in the placebo group. No change in nocturia, daily voiding frequency, peak flow or detrusor pressure was seen in either group. Of 15 subjects 4 (26%) receiving botulinum-A toxin had a post-void residual volume of 200 cc or greater and 1 subject required intermittent catheterization. Four subjects experienced a urinary tract infection, 2 (13%) in the botulinum-A toxin group and 2 (28%) in the placebo group (not significant).
                Botulinum-A toxin can significantly reduce urge urinary incontinence due to overactive bladder at 6 weeks. However, there is a risk of urinary retention requiring self-catheterization. Twenty ALS patients with sialorrhea refractory to medical therapy were enrolled in this double-blind, randomized study to receive either 2,500 U of botulinum toxin type B (BTxb) or placebo into the bilateral parotid and submandibular glands using electromyographic guidance. Patients who received BTxb reported a global impression of improvement of 82% at 2 weeks compared to 38% of those who received placebo (P < 0.05). This significant effect was sustained at 4 weeks. At 12 weeks, 50% of patients who received BTxb continued to report improvement compared to 14% of those who received placebo. There were no significant adverse events, including dysphagia, in the BTxb group, and there was no significant increase in the rate of decline of vital capacity. We enrolled and treated 122 patients with idiopathic cervical dystonia in a double-blind, placebo-controlled safety and efficacy study of botulinum toxin type B (BotB). Both A-responsive and A-resistant patients were enrolled. Patients received intramuscular injections of either BotB (2,500 U, 5,000 U, or 10,000 U) or placebo. The primary outcome measure of efficacy was the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS)-Total score at 4 weeks following study drug administration. Secondary measures of efficacy were TWSTRS-Severity, -Disability, and -Pain subscale scores, and Analog Pain Assessment, Investigator Global Assessment, Patient Global Assessment, and Sickness Impact Profile scores. Duration of effect was estimated with an intent-to-treat analysis of responders. Safety measures included clinical parameters, laboratory tests, and adverse events. The primary and most of the secondary analyses indicated a statistically significant treatment effect and a dose response. BotB is safe, well tolerated, and efficacious in the treatment of cervical dystonia at the doses tested. In a randomised, double-blind study, the effects of intramuscular injection of botulinum toxin type A (BtA) into the upper limb were compared with those of normal saline solution in 14 patients with cerebral palsy; their mean age was 9 years. Range of movement and function were assessed before injection and at 2 and 12 weeks after injection. BtA injection significantly increased maximum active elbow and thumb extension and significantly reduced tone at wrist and elbow. The hand grasp-and-release score improved, representing a modest functional change, but fine motor function, assessed by the ability to pick up coins, did not improve and in some cases deteriorated temporarily. The most notable subjective change was the cosmetic benefit of reduced involuntary elbow flexion. The tone-reducing effect of BtA was clinically detectable in comparison with the placebo and patients and parents perceived the change as beneficial. The median of changes in the treatment group was small but the range was large, suggesting that BtA can be useful in selected patients.
Intravesical botulinum toxin appears to be an effective therapy for refractory OAB symptoms, but as yet little controlled trial data exist on benefits and safety compared with other interventions, or with placebo. Further robust data are required on long term outcomes, safety, and optimal dose of botulinum toxin for OAB.