Dose-ranging efficacy of new once-daily extended-release minocycline for acne vulgaris. A double-blind comparison of topical clindamycin and oral minocycline in the treatment of acne vulgaris. Minocycline therapy in acne vulgaris. A comparison of the efficacy and safety of lymecycline and minocycline in patients with moderately severe acne vulgaris. Efficacy of minocycline compared with tetracycline in treatment of acne vulgaris. Multicenter randomized comparative double-blind controlled clinical trial of the safety and efficacy of zinc gluconate versus minocycline hydrochloride in the treatment of inflammatory acne vulgaris. Safety and efficacy of a new extended-release formulation of minocycline. Efficacy of oral antibiotics on acne vulgaris and their effects on quality of life: a multicenter randomized controlled trial using minocycline, roxithromycin and faropenem. Lymecycline in the treatment of acne: an efficacious, safe and cost-effective alternative to minocycline.
A multicenter, 12-week, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study was conducted in 233 subjects with moderate to severe facial acne vulgaris to determine the lowest effective once-daily oral dose of a new extended-release (ER) minocycline hydrochloride formulation with the safest adverse effect profile. Subjects randomly were assigned to treatment with daily dosages of ER-minocycline 1-, 2-, or 3-mg/kg tablets, or daily placebo tablets, for 84 days. At the end of the 12 weeks, the number of inflammatory lesions decreased approximately 50% from baseline levels in the dose groups. No dose-dependent effect was observed, with the percentage decrease in the number of inflammatory lesions in the 1-mg/kg treatment group being equal to or greater than higher doses. The pairwise difference between the ER-minocycline 1 mg/kg and placebo groups in the percentage decrease in inflammatory lesions was statistically significant (P = .015). Acute vestibular adverse events (AVAEs) appeared to be dose proportional, with the incidence being similar in the lowest (1 mg/kg) dosing group (24%) and in the placebo group (26%). Higher-dose regimens were associated with a higher incidence of central nervous system side effects and AVAEs. A 1-mg/kg daily dosage of the new ER-minocycline formulation is the lowest effective dose with the safest side effect profile, with higher-dose regimens offering no substantial therapeutic advantages. Sixty-six patients with moderate to severe facial acne vulgaris were entered in a 12-week double-blind study to compare the efficacy of topical clindamycin phosphate 1% twice daily and oral minocycline 50 mg twice daily. Both treatments gave significant overall improvements from baseline observations in acne grade and inflamed lesion counts, but not in noninflamed lesion counts. There were no significant differences between the two treatment groups in respect of acne grade, inflamed or non-inflamed lesion counts. Both treatment regimes were well tolerated. This study has shown that topical clindamycin twice daily is an effective alternative to oral minocycline 50 mg twice daily in the treatment of moderate to severe facial acne vulgaris. A double-blind, random distribution study showed that a lower than recommended dose of minocycline--50 mg twice daily--was as effective as a dose of 250 mg twice daily of tetracycline for treatment of acne vulgaris in comparable patient groups, and that minocycline produced no vestibular side effects at the lower dosage. Like tetracycline, minocycline did not produce the phototoxicity associated with demeclocycline or the life-threatening colitis associated with clindamycin. Patients in this study did not develop a resistance either to minocycline or to tetracycline. Studies of the use of minocycline in patients who have developed tetracycline resistance and long-range studies of patients on the new lower dose of minocycline are now underway. A multicentre, randomised, double-blind and double-dummy study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of lymecycline (n = 71) with that of minocycline (n = 73) in 144 patients with moderately severe acne vulgaris. Patients with an acne score of 1-5 on the Leeds scale received oral lymecycline, 300 mg/day for 2 weeks, then 150 mg/day for 10 weeks or oral minocycline, 100 mg/day for 2 weeks then 100 mg every other day for 10 weeks. Inflammatory, non-inflammatory and total lesion counts were determined at baseline (week 0) and after 4, 8 and 12 weeks' treatment, and global efficacy and safety assessments were made by the patient and investigator at the end of the study. Both treatments were equally effective at reducing differential lesion counts and improving acne condition and severity, with no significant differences between treatments. Inflammatory lesions were reduced by 50.6% and 52.2% with lymecycline and minocycline, respectively, and non-inflammatory lesions by 40.6% and 32.2%. Acne severity was reduced by 42.4% with lymecycline and by 47.9% with minocycline. A total of 4.3% of lymecycline recipients and 4.1% of minocycline recipients experienced treatment-related adverse events, the majority of which were mild in nature. Lymecycline was as effective as minocycline for the treatment of moderately severe acne vulgaris. Both treatments were well tolerated, although there were slightly fewer adverse gastrointestinal and dermatological effects with lymecycline. A double-blind evaluation of the efficacy and safety of minocycline hydrochloride and tetracycline hydrochloride was conducted and completed using 49 patients with Pillsbury grade 2 or grade 3 acne. For six months, half of the patients received minocycline and half received tetracycline. Although the differences between treatment groups were not statistically significant at any evaluation, more patients treated with minocycline reached and maintained a noninflammatory acne status in less time than did patients treated with tetracycline. After six weeks, twice as many patients in the group treated with minocycline had reached noninflammatory status. Side effects reported by 7 patients were equally distributed between treatment groups. No notable abnormalities were observed in the results of blood chemistry studies, hematologic tests, quantitative serum immunoglobulin determinations, or thyroid function tests in 20 of the patients examined. In addition to tetracyclines, zinc may constitute an alternative treatment in inflammatory lesions of acne.
                To evaluate the place of zinc gluconate in relation to antibiotics in the treatment of acne vulgaris.
                Zinc was compared to minocycline in a multicenter randomized double-blind trial. 332 patients received either 30 mg elemental zinc or 100 mg minocycline over 3 months. The primary endpoint was defined as the percentage of the clinical success rate on day 90 (i.e. more than 2/3 decrease in inflammatory lesions, i.e. papules and pustules).
                This clinical success rate was 31.2% for zinc and 63.4% for minocycline. Minocycline nevertheless showed a 9% superiority in action at 1 month and one of 17% at 3 months, with respect to the mean change in lesion count. Regarding safety, the majority of the adverse effects of zinc gluconate and of minocycline concerned the gastrointestinal system and were moderate (5 dropouts with zinc gluconate and 4 with minocycline).
                Minocycline and zinc gluconate are both effective in the treatment of inflammatory acne, but minocycline has a superior effect evaluated to be 17% in our study.
                Copyright 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel The complete safety and efficacy of a new extended-release (ER) minocycline hydrochloride formulation were assessed in an analysis of a phase 2 dose-finding study and 2 phase 3 safety and efficacy studies. The studies were similar in design, subject populations, and shared common dose groups of subjects given ER minocycline 1 mg/kg daily or placebo over 12 weeks. The similar designs were prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, and placebo-controlled. A total of 1038 subjects with moderate to severe acne were available for the pooled analysis. Independently, each study showed that treatment with ER-minocycline significantly reduced (P < .001) the number of inflammatory lesions and significantly improved (P < .001) their Evaluator's Global Severity Assessment (EGSA) scores (phase 3 studies). Analysis of the pooled population confirmed the results of the individual studies. The percentage of subjects reporting acute vestibular adverse events (AVAEs) was comparable between those receiving the ER-minocycline 1-mg/kg dose and placebo (approximately 10% of subjects in each group) for both the individual studies and the pooled population. It was concluded that a novel ER-minocycline formulation that delivers consistent levels of drug at a 1-mg/kg dose reduces dose-dependent AVAEs while reducing inflammatory lesions and improving the overall appearance of patients with acne vulgaris. There are few clinical studies which compare the efficacy and patient satisfaction for oral antibiotics to treat inflammatory acne. To clarify the difference between oral antibiotics, acne patients with moderate to severe inflammatory eruptions were randomized into three groups, and each patient was given minocycline (MINO), roxithromycin (RXM) or faropenem (FRPM) for 4 weeks, followed by 4 weeks of observation without any oral antibiotics. We estimated the reduction rate of inflammatory lesion counts, the scale of Skindex-16 which represents patient quality of life (QOL), and minimum inhibitory concentrations required to inhibit the growth of 90% of Propionibacterium acnes isolated from acne patients (MIC(90) ). In all three groups, inflammatory lesion counts, and emotional and total score of Skindex-16 were significantly improved (P<0.05) after 4 weeks treatment, and these effects were maintained for the following 4 weeks. Dizziness/nausea in two patients (4.1%) of the MINO group and diarrhea in three patients (5.9%) of the FRPM group were observed. There was no significant difference of percentage reduction in inflammatory lesion counts and incident rates of side-effects between these three oral antibiotics. MIC(90) of MINO was 0.25 μg/mL before and after treatment, but MIC(90) of RXM had increased from 0.25 μg/mL to more than 32 μg/mL after treatment. MIC(90) of FRPM was 0.06 μg/mL or less for all strains before and after treatment. Our randomized controlled clinical trial suggested that MINO, RXM and FRPM were efficient to improve inflammatory acne and patient QOL, and there was no significant difference between them.
                © 2010 Japanese Dermatological Association. A comparison of efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of lymecycline and minocycline in the treatment of acne vulgaris has been addressed. This was a multicenter, randomized, investigator-masked, parallel group trial involving patients with moderate to moderately severe acne vulgaris, receiving either lymecycline or minocycline for 12 weeks. Efficacy and safety evaluation was performed at baseline and at weeks 4, 8, and 12 and completed by a pharmacoeconomic analysis including week 12 data. One hundred and thirty-six patients were enrolled. At week 12, the mean percent reductions in inflammatory count were 63 % and 65 %, and for total lesions counts 58 % and 56 % for lymecycline and for minocycline respectively. Median percent reduction in non-inflammatory count were 54 % and 47 % for lymecycline and for minocycline respectively. Eighty-seven per cent of all patients tolerated the treatments well. Treatment with lymecycline was found to be 4 times more cost-effective than with minocycline. Results showed that lymecycline has a comparable efficacy and safety profile to minocycline while being 4 times more cost-effective.
Minocycline is an effective treatment for moderate to moderately-severe inflammatory acne vulgaris, but there is still no evidence that it is superior to other commonly-used therapies. This review found no reliable evidence to justify the reinstatement of its first-line use, even though the price-differential is less than it was 10 years ago. Concerns remain about its safety compared to other tetracyclines.