A randomised controlled trial of metronidazole for the prevention of preterm birth in women positive for cervicovaginal fetal fibronectin: the PREMET Study. A randomized trial of management of pre-labor rupture of membranes at term in multiparous women using vaginal prostaglandin gel. Induction of labor compared with expectant management for prelabor rupture of the membranes at term. TERMPROM Study Group. Controlled comparison of induction versus expectant care for prelabor rupture of the membranes at term. A randomised trial of two expectant managements of prelabour rupture of the membranes at 34 to 42 weeks. Prevention of preterm delivery: nifedipine or magnesium sulfate. Induction versus expectant management in premature rupture of the membranes with mature amniotic fluid at 32 to 36 weeks: a randomized trial. Randomised trial of outpatient induction of labor with vaginal PGE2 at 40-41 weeks of gestation versus expectant management. Does knowledge of cervical length and fetal fibronectin affect management of women with threatened preterm labor? A randomized trial.
To determine whether metronidazole reduces early preterm labour in asymptomatic women with positive vaginal fetal fibronectin (fFN) in the second trimester of pregnancy.
                Randomised placebo-controlled trial.
                Fourteen UK hospitals (three teaching).
                Pregnancies with at least one previous risk factor, including mid-trimester loss or preterm delivery, uterine abnormality, cervical surgery or cerclage.
                Nine hundred pregnancies were screened for fFN at 24 and 27 weeks of gestation. Positive cases were randomised to a week's course of oral metronidazole or placebo.
                Primary outcome was delivery before 30 weeks of gestation. Secondary outcomes included delivery before 37 weeks.
                The Trial Steering Committee (TSC) recommended the study be stopped early; 21% of women receiving metronidazole (11/53) delivered before 30 weeks compared with 11% (5/46) taking placebo [risk ratio 1.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72-5.09, P = 0.18]. There were significantly more preterm deliveries (before 37 weeks) in women treated with metronidazole 33/53 (62%) versus placebo 18/46 (39%), risk ratio 1.6, 95% CI 1.05-2.4. fFN was a good predictor of early preterm birth in these asymptomatic women; positive and negative predictive values (24 weeks of gestation) for delivery by 30 weeks were 26% and 99%, respectively (positive and negative likelihood ratios 15, 0.35).
                Metronidazole does not reduce early preterm birth in high risk pregnant women selected by history and a positive vaginal fFN test. Preterm delivery may be increased by metronidazole therapy. To compare conservative management of pre-labor spontaneous rupture of membranes (SROM) with the use of prostaglandin (PG) E2 in healthy parous women at term (gestational age at least 37 weeks).
                An open randomized study was conducted with 100 parous women; 50 were treated conservatively for 24 hours, and 50 were managed actively using PGE2 gel (1 mg), administered at admission and repeated 6 hours later if labor was not established. Both groups received intravenous oxytocin if labor did not start within 24 hours after admission.
                The use of PGE2 gel led to a significant reduction in the mean interval (+/- standard error of the mean) from SROM to onset of labor: 17.26 +/- 1.51 hours in the conservative group versus 6.50 +/- 1.23 in the PGE2 group. A significantly smaller proportion of subjects required oxytocin in the PGE2 group (12 versus 38%, P < .02). The two groups were comparable with respect to analgesic requirements. Within 24 hours of SROM, 80% of the women in the PG group and 56% in the conservative group had delivered (P < .02). Most women delivered vaginally, 96% of those managed conservatively and 100% of those managed actively with PGE2.
                Active management using PGE2 gel in parous women with pre-labor SROM significantly improves the time to delivery without influencing the cesarean rate or fetal-maternal infective morbidity. As the interval between rupture of the fetal membranes at term and delivery increases, so may the risk of fetal and maternal infection. It is not known whether inducing labor will reduce this risk or whether one method of induction is better then another.
                We studied 5041 women with prelabor rupture of the membranes at term. The women were randomly assigned to induction of labor with intravenous oxytocin; induction of labor with vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel; or expectant management for up to four days, with labor induced with either intravenous oxytocin or vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel if complications developed. The primary outcome was neonatal infection. Secondary outcomes were the need for cesarean section and women's evaluations of their treatment.
                The rates of neonatal infection and cesarean section were not significantly different among the study groups. The rates of neonatal infection were 2.0 percent for the induction-with-oxytocin group, 3.0 percent for the induction-with-prostaglandin group, 2.8 percent for the expectant-management (oxytocin) group, and 2.7 percent for the expectant-management (prostaglandin) group. The rates of cesarean section ranged from 9.6 to 10.9 percent. Clinical chorioamnionitis was less likely to develop in the women in the induction-with-oxytocin group than in those in the expectant-management (oxytocin) group (4.0 percent vs. 8.6 percent, P<0.001), as was postpartum fever (1.9 percent vs. 3.6 percent, P=0.008). Women in the induction groups were less likely to say they liked "nothing" about their treatment than those in the expectant-management groups.
                In women with prelabor rupture of the membranes at term, induction of labor with oxytocin or prostaglandin E2 and expectant management result in similar rates of neonatal infection and cesarean section. Induction of labor with intravenous oxytocin results in a lower risk of maternal infection than does expectant management. Women view induction of labor more positively than expectant management. This randomized clinical trial compared oxytocin induction of labor with expectant care for 48 hours after prelabor rupture of the membranes at term. Women at term with prelabor rupture of the membranes for at least 8 hours were assigned at random to induction with oxytocin or to expectant management for 48 hours followed by induction if necessary. Of 168 eligible women, 123 (73%) agreed to participate. More women in the induction group (23%) than in the expectant group (10%) had operative delivery, either cesarean section or instrumental vaginal delivery. In the induction group 41% received analgesia versus 24% in the expectant group (p < 0.005). There was no difference in the rate of maternal and neonatal infection between groups and sepsis was not observed. The active policy of oxytocin induction exposed the mother to a higher risk of operative delivery and a less comfortable labor than the 48 hours expectant care option. To compare obstetric and perinatal outcome between two different expectant managements in women with prelabour rupture of the membranes (PROM).
                A randomised study.
                One thousand three hundred and eighty-five women with rupture of the membranes at 34 to 42 weeks without contractions.
                Women without contractions 2 h after admission were randomised to early induction the following morning after PROM (early induction group) or induction two days later (late induction group). Women with contractions starting within 2 h after admission were included in the calculations as a short latency group. Digital examinations of the cervix were avoided until onset of active labour. Labour was induced with oxytocin in both groups if no spontaneous contractions occurred or if chorioamnionitis or fetal distress was detected.
                The frequency of spontaneous deliveries, operative deliveries, maternal and neonatal infections.
                In nulliparous women, a higher rate of spontaneous deliveries was found in the late induction group (89%) compared with the early induction group (81%) (P < 0.05). The ventouse extraction rate was 7% and 14% respectively (P < 0.05). A low (2-4%) caesarean section rate was recorded and did not differ between the groups. Endometritis was detected in six women after delivery. Sixty-one children were treated with antibiotics, and no difference could be detected between the groups.
                A higher rate of spontaneous deliveries was found among nulliparous women with prolonged latency as compared with brief latency prior to induction. A protocol of no digital examination before labour was associated with infrequent maternal and fetal morbidity, regardless of latency. to establish the efficacy and safety of nifedipine and magnesium sulfate in arresting preterm labor.
                seventy-four patients with singleton pregnancies at 23-36 weeks in preterm labor, were selected randomly to receive either oral nifedipine or intravenous magnesium sulfate.
                both drugs had similar tocolytic efficacy and side effects while nifedipine was faster than magnesium sulfate in arresting uterine contractions (4.8 +/- 4.23 vs. 2.98 +/- 3.03 h) P = 0.04.
                this data suggests that oral nifedipine with the same efficacy, side effects and faster action could be a suitable and more convenient alternative to intravenous magnesium sulfate in arresting preterm labor. Our objective was to compare maternal and perinatal outcomes between two management schemes for women with preterm premature rupture of the membranes and documented fetal pulmonary maturity.
                Of 164 women with preterm premature rupture of the membranes at 32 weeks to 36 weeks 6 days' gestation, 93 eligible and consenting women were randomly selected for either induction of labor (n = 46) or expectant management (n = 47). Expectant management included hospitalization, assessment for fetal heart rate abnormalities, chorioamnionitis, and labor. Digital cervical examinations were prohibited until progressive labor occurred. Follow-up was also done for the 71 women who did not participate.
                The women in the induction of labor and expectant management groups had similar demographic characteristics and gestational ages (34.1 vs 34.3 weeks). Expectant management was associated with prolonged latencies to labor, delivery, and maternal hospitalization (p < 0.001), as well as increased hospitalization of infants at 2 to 5 days after delivery (p < 0.05). These patients had increased chorioamnionitis and fetal heart rate abnormalities before labor (p = 0.01, 0.03). Infants received more frequent (p < 0.001) and prolonged antimicrobial therapy after expectant management (p = 0.003) with no reduction in proven sepsis (6.8% vs 4.4%). These latter differences were influenced by the neonatologist's concern over potential neonatal infection.
                Among women with preterm premature rupture of the membranes at 32 to 36 weeks with mature surfactant profiles, immediate induction of labor reduces the duration of hospitalization and infection in both mothers and neonates. Two hundred consecutive women with uncomplicated pregnancies, at or within 4 days of their expected date of confinement, were prospectively randomized into 2 groups. One group had expectant management, with twice weekly surveillance tests, while the other group had 3 mg of vaginal prostaglandin E2 as outpatient treatment. There were 104 women in the expectant group and 70 in the induction group (26 women allocated to induction preferred no treatment). The average number of days to delivery was 1.6 in the induction group and 5.2 in the expectant group (p < 0.001). While meconium was much less frequent in the induction group (p < 0.002), all other outcome measures, including cesarean section rates, incidence of macrosomia, and Apgar scores, were similar in the two groups. The purpose of this study was to estimate the effect of sonographic cervical length (CL) and fetal fibronectin (FFN) on length of evaluation and outcomes in women with preterm labor (PTL).
                Women with threatened PTL were randomized to either a knowledge group (results of CL and FFN available and used according to study protocol), or a standard group (blinded to CL and FFN). Primary outcome was length of evaluation in triage.
                One hundred women were randomized. There was no significant difference between groups in length of evaluation, but in women with CL > or = 30 mm, the mean time for evaluation was significantly shorter in the knowledge group (1:58 h +/- 0:50 vs 2:53 h +/- 0:50, P = .004). Incidence of spontaneous preterm birth (SPTB) in the knowledge group was significantly reduced (13.0 vs 36.2%, P = .01).
                The knowledge of CL and FFN was associated with reduction in length of evaluation in women with CL > or = 30 mm and in incidence of SPTB in all women with PTL.
Although FFN is commonly used in labor and delivery units to help in the management of women with symptoms of preterm labor, currently there is not sufficient evidence to recommend its use. Since this review found an association between knowledge of FFN results and a lower incidence of preterm birth before 37 weeks, further research should be encouraged.