Can general practitioners use training in relaxation and management of stress to reduce mild hypertension? Effects of education and relaxation training with essential hypertension patients. Relaxation therapy and continuous ambulatory blood pressure in mild hypertension: a controlled study. The effect of a relaxation technique on coronary risk factors. Relaxation therapy for hypertension: setting-specific effects. Comparison of relaxation techniques, routine blood pressure measurements, and self-learning packages in hypertension control. Effects of group relaxation training and thermal biofeedback on blood pressure and related physiological and psychological variables in essential hypertension. Relaxation behavior therapy as sole treatment for mild hypertension. Behavioral and physiological effects of a beta blocker and relaxation therapy on mild hypertensives.
To see whether general practitioners could effectively carry out training in relaxation and management of stress to reduce mild hypertension a study was carried out with a subsample of phase 2 of the Medical Research Council's treatment of mild hypertension trial. In the main mild hypertension trial patients had been receiving either an active drug or placebo for six years. In phase 2 a subsample of these patients were randomly allocated either to continue or to stop receiving the active drug or placebo. In a further subsample patients were again randomised to receive or not to receive relaxation therapy. This factorial design presented an additional opportunity to assess whether patients controlled with active drugs might have their blood pressure maintained by this behavioural therapy once drug treatment was stopped and to assess whether blood pressure might be further reduced by this therapy in patients who had been under regular medical supervision for as long as six years and who had already received non-pharmacological advice. The therapy was conducted by general practitioners in group sessions once a week for eight weeks. The training in relaxation was accompanied by galvanic skin resistance biofeedback. At one year follow up blood pressure in the relaxation subgroups was either maintained (in the group who had stopped receiving drugs) or reduced further (in the group who had continued receiving drugs and in both placebo groups), while in the control group it had increased in all the subgroups, but particularly in those who had stopped receiving drugs. Differences in changes in blood pressure between the relaxation and control groups were significant. There were five new cardiovascular events, including evidence of myocardial ischaemia in blindly coded electrocardiograms in the control group, compared with one in the treatment group. General practitioners, if motivated, can successfully apply this technique of training those with mild hypertension in relaxation and management of stress. Thirty subjects with essential hypertension were assigned randomly to either a no treatment control, education, or education with relaxation training group. Independent blood pressure recordings were collected by medical staff at pretest, posttest, and 8-week follow-up. Results suggest a significant interaction between treatment and time for the dependent physiological measure, systolic blood pressure. During the pretest to follow-up period, the control group averaged a 5.9 mm. Hg. increase, the education with relaxation group an 8.8 mm. Hg. decrease, and the education group a 14.9 mm. Hg. decrease in systolic blood pressure. There was no significant difference in group means for diastolic blood pressure within groups over time. As measured at follow-up, education appeared more effective in reducing systolic blood pressure than education with relaxation training. More than one-third of subjects associated unpleasant side effects with their antihypertensive medication. Almost all treatment subjects rated the education and relaxation as helpful for understanding and managing their hypertension. To determine the long term effects of relaxation therapy on 24 hour ambulatory intra-arterial blood pressure in patients with mild untreated and uncomplicated hypertension.
                Four week screening period followed by randomisation to receive either relaxation therapy or non-specific counselling for one year. Ambulatory intra-arterial blood pressure was measured before and after treatment.
                Outpatient clinic in Amsterdam's university hospital.
                35 Subjects aged 20-60 who were being treated by general practitioners for hypertension but were referred to take part in the study. At three consecutive screening visits all subjects had a diastolic blood pressure without treatment of 95-110 mm Hg. Subjects were excluded if they had damaged target organs, secondary hypertension, diabetes mellitus, a cholesterol concentration greater than 8 mmol/l, or a history of malignant hypertension.
                The group allocated to relaxation therapy was trained for eight weeks (one hour a week) in muscle relaxation, yoga exercises, and stress management and continued exercising twice daily for one year with monthly visits to the clinic. The control group had the same attendance schedule but had no training and were requested just to sit and relax twice a day. All subjects were asked not to change their diet or physical activity.
                Changes in ambulatory intra-arterial blood pressure after one year of relaxation therapy or non-specific counselling.
                Mean urinary sodium excretion, serum concentration of cholesterol, and body weight did not change in either group. Diastolic pressures measured by sphygmomanometry were 2 and 3 mm Hg lower in subjects in the relaxation group and control group respectively at the one year follow up compared with initial readings. The mean diastolic ambulatory intra-arterial pressure during the daytime had not changed after one year in either group, but small treatment effects could not be excluded: the mean change for the relaxation group was -1 mm Hg (95% confidence interval -6 to 3.9 mm Hg) and for the control group -0.4 mm Hg (-5.3 to 4.6 mm Hg). Mean ambulatory pressure in the evening also had not changed over the year, and in both groups nighttime pressure was 5 mm Hg higher. The variability in blood pressure was the same at both measurements.
                Relaxation therapy was an ineffective method of lowering 24 hour blood pressure, being no more beneficial than non-specific advice, support, and reassurance--themselves ineffective as a treatment for hypertension. This study examined the effect of a relaxation technique on plasma lipids, weight, blood pressure, and blood glucose. Sixteen outpatient males were randomly assigned to control or experimental groups. The experimental group was taught a relaxation technique that they used throughout the study. The control group was started in a reading program. Subjects were followed by a nurse practitioner and dietitian for eight weeks. Results revealed a significant reduction in systolic blood pressure and a marginally significant reduction in low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol in the experimental group. Both control and experimental groups self-reported high compliance with diet and adherence to prescribed intervention. State anxiety was found to be inversely related to changes in total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol. We determined the effect of relaxation therapy for hypertension in patients whose blood pressure remained elevated despite the use of antihypertensive medication. The effect was assessed in multiple settings, including the relaxation therapist's office, the Hypertension Clinic, and the patient's natural environment, the latter using 24-hour automated ambulatory blood pressure measures. Nineteen patients were randomized either to temperature biofeedback-assisted relaxation or to an attention control, "stress education." Antihypertensive medication was kept constant. In the behavioral therapist's office, blood pressure decreased in equivalent amounts with both treatments. Hypertension Clinic nurse blood pressure remained stable or increased with both treatments, but again there was no difference between treatments. Ambulatory blood pressure increased with relaxation therapy and decreased with stress education, the effect being significant for diastolic pressure. The effects on ambulatory blood pressure were limited to the waking hours. The only variable that showed superior effects for relaxation therapy was physician-determined blood pressure. These results call into question the generalizability of the effects of relaxation therapy from one setting to another. Even though the effectiveness of mediation and relaxation skills is controversial in blood pressure control, extensive field studies are limited. A national study targeting 50 communities randomly selected from northern Taiwan was conducted to test and compare the effectiveness of hypertension control incorporating three strategies.
                Five hundred ninety hypertensives identified from 3,128 adults at a screening survey among the 50 communities were invited to participate in the study and were randomly assigned to three treatment modalities, (a) relaxation techniques training at home, (b) routine blood pressure measurement by a health professional, and (c) reading self-learning packages, or to a control group.
                After a 2-month intervention period, the three treatment groups showed a significant reduction in systolic blood pressure levels compared with the control group (11.0 mm Hg for group 1, 9.2 mm Hg for group 2, and 5.1 mm Hg for group 3). The relaxation group had the most significant reduction in systolic blood pressure levels, followed by the routine blood pressure monitoring group and the self-learning group. However, the effect of relaxation training at home was not significantly greater than routine blood pressure measurement by a health professional. One hundred and one patients, 70 experimental and 31 controls, with a diagnosis of essential hypertension, were examined for the effects of group relaxation training and thermal biofeedback on blood pressure and on other psychophysiologic measures: heart rate, forehead muscle tension, finger temperature, depression, anxiety, plasma aldosterone, plasma renin activity, and plasma and urinary cortisol. Eighty percent of the participants were medicated. Treatment yielded a short-term success rate, defined as a decrease in mean arterial pressure of 5 mm Hg, of 49% in the experimental group. Other significant short-term changes included a reduction of forehead muscle tension, state anxiety, plasma aldosterone, and increased finger temperature. Follow-up measurements were made approximately 10 months after treatment in 36 patients, 51% of the treatment completers. Twenty of the 36 were short-term treatment failures, while 16 were treatment succeeders. Thirty-seven percent of the short-term succeeders continued to meet blood pressure criterion at follow-up. In short-term succeeders, continued practice of relaxation may influence long-term maintenance of decreased blood pressure. It is suggested that group relaxation training can be beneficial for short-term and long-term adjunctive treatment of essential hypertension in selected individuals. This study tested the efficacy of relaxation therapy as sole treatment for mild hypertension in 110 men and women recruited from a five-stage worksite blood pressure screening program. Participants were randomized to 12-weeks of relaxation therapy or support therapy. Outcome blood pressure assessments made by assessors who were unaware of group allocation revealed similar decreases in both treatment groups at post-treatment and 6-month follow-up. While body weight did not change, alcohol consumption decreased similarly in both groups, and alcohol consumption was positively correlated with both absolute diastolic blood pressure and change in diastolic blood pressure at outcome. In conclusion, a superior blood pressure effect was not associated with relaxation therapy; however, alcohol consumption decreased in both treatment groups, suggesting that both interventions facilitated changes in health risk behaviors and indirectly on blood pressure level. In this industrial-based study we compared the blood pressure (BP)-lowering effectiveness of relaxation, a beta blocker, and the combined use of these two treatments in 47 untreated, mildly hypertensive blue collar steel workers. Using a randomized two by two factorial design, patients received either nadolol or placebo drug daily, and either a relaxation training or an education program, each lasting 8 weeks. A pre-intervention and post-intervention stress test measured response of heart rate and BP to mental and physical tasks. BP assessments were done at baseline, post-intervention, 1 month, and 3 month follow-up. Change in several self-report measures was determined. Results showed that beta blocker was more effective in lowering BP than placebo, but relaxation was not more effective in lowering BP than health education. The combined effect of beta blocker and relaxation was not superior to beta blocker alone. Compliance with relaxation practice was not superior to compliance with medication. We conclude that pharmacologic treatment is superior to the relaxation therapy tested.
In view of the poor quality of included trials and unexplained variation between trials, the evidence in favour of causal association between relaxation and blood pressure reduction is weak. Some of the apparent benefit of relaxation was probably due to aspects of treatment unrelated to relaxation.