A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of cyclosporine in steroid-resistant idiopathic focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in children. Cyclosporin A is superior to cyclophosphamide in children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome-a randomized controlled multicentre trial by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Pädiatrische Nephrologie. Initial treatment of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in children: prednisone versus prednisone plus cyclosporine A: a prospective, randomized trial. A randomized trial of cyclosporine in steroid-resistant idiopathic nephrotic syndrome. Cyclosporin versus cyclophosphamide for patients with steroid-dependent and frequently relapsing idiopathic nephrotic syndrome: a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus versus cyclosporine in children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Cyclophosphamide does not benefit patients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. A report of the International Study of Kidney Disease in Children. A randomized trial of cyclosporine in patients with steroid-resistant focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. North America Nephrotic Syndrome Study Group. A randomized prospective trial comparing cyclosporine monotherapy with triple-drug therapy in renal transplantation.
There is no generally accepted treatment for primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). Steroids alone and steroids plus cyclophosphamide can be expected to induce a remission of the proteinuria in only 27% of patients. Probably the majority of FSGS patients will reach ESRD over the extended course of their disease. In addition to the work presented in this study, there have been many reports of the potential effectiveness of cyclosporine (CSA) on reducing the proteinuria of FSGS. This study was undertaken to test the efficacy and safety of a 6-month course of CSA in a double-blinded, prospectively randomized, placebo-controlled trial in children with corticosteroid-resistant FSGS. The potential inhibitory effect of hypercholesterolemia on the proteinuria-reducing actions of CSA was also assessed. Twenty-five patients with FSGS were randomized to receive either placebo or CSA for 6 months. Twelve of the 12 patients that received CSA experienced a diminution of their proteinuria as opposed to only two of the 12 placebo-treated patients. Proteinuria was significantly reduced from 151.7 +/- 162.4 mg/kg per 24 h at Week 0 to 36.9 +/- 42.3 at the end of the study in the group that received CSA (P < 0.05). There was no significant change in the proteinuria of the patients in the placebo group. A significant correlation between the percentage change of proteinuria over the 6 months of the study and the prestudy serum cholesterol levels (r = 0.79, P < 0.05) was seen in the CSA group. A partial correlation analysis controlling for the effects of serum cholesterol uncovered a significant relationship between average CSA level and proteinuria change (r = -0.76, P < 0.05). The fractional decline in GFR over the course of the study was not significantly different between the CSA and placebo-treated groups. In conclusion, CSA reduces proteinuria, increases serum albumin levels, and can be expected, therefore, to reduce the symptoms of nephrotic syndrome. Hypercholesterolemia antagonizes this effect of CSA. First line immunosuppressive treatment in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in children is still open to discussion. We conducted a controlled multicentre randomized open label trial to test the efficacy and safety of cyclosporin A (CSA) versus cyclophosphamide pulses (CPH) in the initial therapy of children with newly diagnosed primary steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome and histologically proven minimal change disease, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis or mesangial hypercellularity. Patients in the CSA group (n = 15) were initially treated with 150 mg/m(2) CSA orally to achieve trough levels of 120-180 ng/ml, while patients in the CPH group (n = 17) received CPH pulses (500 mg/m(2) per month intravenous). All patients were on alternate prednisone therapy. Patients with proteinuria >40 mg/m(2) per hour at 12 weeks of therapy were allocated to a non-responder protocol with high-dose CSA therapy or methylprednisolone pulses. At week 12, nine of the 15 (60%) CSA patients showed at least partial remission, evidences by a reduction of proteinuria <40 mg/h per m(2). In contrast, three of the 17 (17%) CPH patients responded (p < 0.05, intention-to-treat). Given these results, the study was stopped, in accordance with the protocol. After 24 weeks, complete remission was reached by two of the 15 (13%) CSA and one of the 17 (5%) CPH patients (p = n.s.). Partial remission was achieved by seven of the 15 (46%) CSA and two of the 15 (11%) CPH patients (p <0.05). Five patients in the CSA group and 14 patients in the CPH group were withdrawn from the study, most of them during the non-responder protocol. The number of adverse events was comparable between both groups. We conclude that CSA is more effective than CPH in inducing at least partial remission in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in children. Previous studies of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Pädiatrische Nephrologie in children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome have shown that the length of initial prednisone therapy has an impact on the subsequent relapse rate. The aim of this randomized, prospective, multicenter study was to reduce the number of relapses further by increasing the initial immunosuppression: Patients with an initial attack of nephrotic syndrome were randomly allocated to treatment with 6 wk of 60 mg/m(2) per d prednisone followed by 6 wk of 40 mg/m(2) per 48 h (Pred group) or to the same prednisone treatment plus 8 wk of cyclosporine (Pred+CsA group). The primary end point was first relapse; follow-up was truncated at 2 yr. In the Pred+CsA group (n = 49 patients), the first relapse occurred later compared with the Pred group (n = 55 patients) (median 22.8 versus 12.5 mo). After 6 mo, 10.4% of patients in the Pred+CsA group experienced a first relapse versus 31.5% in the Pred group (P = 0.01); after 1 yr, 36.5 versus 51% (P = 0.15); and after 2 yr, 51 versus 50%. The mean relapse rate per patient was 0.12 versus 0.57 after 6 mo (P = 0.01), 0.63 versus 1.03 after 1 yr (P = 0.02), and 1.03 versus 2.06 after 2 yr (not significant). The significant benefit for adding CsA was lost after 9 to 12 mo. GFR remained unchanged. The subsequent treatment rate with cyclophosphamide was lower in the CsA group (five versus 12 patients) after 2 yr. With the use of logistic regression statistics, children who were younger than 7 yr show a significantly better sustained remission rate with initial CsA treatment for the 2-yr observation time (P = 0.03). It remains questionable, however, whether the intensified initial treatment with CsA could be recommended generally. To compare the efficacy (induction of remission) and safety of cyclosporine (CsA) with those of supportive therapy in patients with steroid-resistant idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS), we organized an open, prospective, randomized, multicentric, controlled study for parallel groups, stratified for adults and children. Forty-five patients with steroid-resistant INS were randomly assigned to supportive therapy or CsA (5 mg/kg/day for adults, 6 mg/kg/day for children) for six months, then tapered off by 25% every two months until complete discontinuation. Four patients were lost to follow-up. During the first year 13/22 CsA-treated patients versus three of 19 controls attained remission of the nephrotic syndrome (P < 0.001). A symptom score was assessed at time 0 and at six months. The mean score significantly decreased in the CsA group (P < 0.001), but remained unchanged in the controls. At month 6 the mean urinary protein excretion, the mean serum proteins and plasma cholesterol had significantly improved in the CsA group but were not changed in the controls. There were no significant differences in serum creatinine and creatinine clearance between treatments (interaction time* treatments, P = 0.089 and P = 0.935, respectively) at month 6 versus basal. The CsA-related side-effects were mild; no significant difference in blood pressure between the two groups was seen at any time. This study shows that CsA can bring about remission in some 60% of patients with steroid-resistant INS. In patients with normal renal function and without severe hypertension, CsA at the therapeutic scheme adopted did not produce severe renal or extrarenal toxicity. To compare the efficacy (maintenance of remission), safety and tolerability of cyclosporin (CsA) with those of cyclophosphamide in patients with steroid-dependent or frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome (NS).
                Open, prospective, randomized, multicentre, controlled study for parallel groups, stratified for adults and children. The setting was in nephrological departments in Italy.
                Seventy-three patients with steroid-sensitive idiopathic NS admitted to the study were randomly assigned to cyclophosphamide (2.5 mg/kg/day) for 8 weeks or CsA (5 mg/kg/day in adults, 6 mg/kg/day in children) for 9 months, tapered off by 25% every month until complete discontinuation at month 12. Seven patients lost to follow up were not considered in the analysis. The remaining 66 patients were followed up for 3-24 months after randomization.
                Relapse-free survival; number of N.S. relapses/patient/year; cumulative dose of prednisone/patient; laboratory investigations (kidney and liver functions, haematological parameters); incidence of adverse events.
                At month 9, 26 of 35 CsA-treated patients were still in complete remission and a further five patients were in partial remission; 18 of 28 cyclophosphamide-treated patients were in complete remission, and one in partial remission (P = NS). No difference between adults and children was seen with either treatment. The risk of relapse was similar between frequent relapsers (19 of 22) and steroid-dependent patients (8 of 14) given CsA, and those given cyclophosphamide (5 of 15 and 6 of 15). The mean number of relapses per year and the mean dose of prednisone per year were significantly less (P < 0.001) in both groups for the experimental year than for the year before randomization. At 2 years, 25% of the patients given CsA (50% adults and 20% children) and 63% of those given cyclophosphamide (40% adults and 68% children) had not had any relapse of NS. Tolerance to the two drugs was generally good. The CsA-related side-effects were mild and disappeared after drug discontinuation.
                This study shows that both treatments are effective and well tolerated; more patients given cyclophosphamide had stable remissions. To examine whether tacrolimus is more effective and safe than cyclosporine (CsA) in inducing remission in patients with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS).
                Randomized controlled trial, nonblind, parallel group.
                Tertiary-care hospital; 41 consecutive patients with idiopathic SRNS, estimated glomerular filtration rate greater than 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2), and histological characteristics showing minimal change disease, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, or mesangioproliferative glomerulonephritis were randomly assigned to treatment with tacrolimus (n = 21) or CsA (n = 20).
                Tacrolimus (0.1 to 0.2 mg/kg/d) or CsA (5 to 6 mg/kg/d) for 1 year; cotreatment with alternate-day prednisolone and enalapril.
                Patients achieving complete remission (urinary protein-creatinine ratio < 0.2 g/g and serum albumin > or = 2.5 g/dL) or partial remission (urinary protein-creatinine ratio, 0.2 to 2 g/g, and serum albumin > or =2.5 g/dL) at 6 and 12 months; time to remission; proportion with relapses; side effects.
                No patient was lost to follow-up. After 6 months of therapy, remission occurred in 18 (85.7%) and 16 patients (80%) treated with tacrolimus and CsA, respectively (relative risk [RR], 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81 to 1.41). Rates of remission at 12 months were also similar (RR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.55). The proportion of patients who experienced relapse was significantly greater in those receiving CsA compared with tacrolimus (RR, 4.5; 95% CI, 1.1 to 18.2; P = 0.01). The decrease in blood cholesterol levels was greater with tacrolimus compared with CsA (difference in mean values, 45.1 mg/dL; 95% CI, 19.1 to 71.2). Persistent nephrotoxicity necessitating stoppage of medicine was seen in 4.7% and 10% patients, respectively. Cosmetic side effects (hypertrichosis and gum hypertrophy) were significantly more frequent in CsA-treated patients (P < 0.001).
                Single-center study, small sample size, and short duration of follow-up.
                Tacrolimus or CsA in combination with low-dose steroids show similar efficacy in inducing remission in patients with SRNS. Therapy with tacrolimus is a promising alternative to CsA in view of the lower risk of relapses and lack of cosmetic side effects. Sixty children, with biopsy diagnosed focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) and with unremitting nephrotic syndrome despite intensive therapy with adrenocortical steroids, were randomly allocated into a clinical trial comparing prednisone, 40 mg/m2 on alternate days for a period of 12 months (control group), with the same prednisone regimen plus a 90-day course of daily cyclophosphamide, 2.5 mg/kg in a single morning dose (experimental group). One-quarter of the children in each group had complete resolution of proteinuria. The proportions of children with increased, unchanged, and decreased proteinuria by the end of the study were the same in the two groups. Treatment failure was defined as an increase in serum creatinine of 30% or more or greater than 0.4 mg/dl, or onset of renal failure. Treatment failure occurred in 36% of the control group and 57% of the experimental group (P > 0.1). Five patients died during the trial, 3 in the experimental group and 2 in the control group. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed no significant differences between the two groups. Cyclophosphamide therapy for children with steroid-resistant FSGS is not recommended. A randomized trial of cyclosporine in patients with steroid-resistant focal segmental glomerulosclerosis.
                A clinical trial of cyclosporine in patients with steroid-resistant focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) was conducted. Despite the fact that it is the most common primary glomerulonephritis to progress to renal failure, treatment trials have been very limited.
                We conducted a randomized controlled trial in 49 cases of steroid-resistant FSGS comparing 26 weeks of cyclosporine treatment plus low-dose prednisone to placebo plus prednisone. All patients were followed for an average of 200 weeks, and the short- and long-term effects on renal function were assessed.
                Seventy percent of the treatment group versus 4% of the placebo group (P < 0. 001) had a partial or complete remission of their proteinuria by 26 weeks. Relapse occurred in 40% of the remitters by 52 weeks and 60% by week 78, but the remainder stayed in remission to the end of the observation period. Renal function was better preserved in the cyclosporine group. There was a decrease of 50% in baseline creatinine clearance in 25% of the treated group compared with 52% of controls (P < 0.05). This was a reduction in risk of 70% (95% CI, 9 to 93) independent of other baseline demographic and laboratory variables.
                These results suggest that cyclosporine is an effective therapeutic agent in the treatment of steroid-resistant cases of FSGS. Although a high relapse rate does occur, a long-term decrease in proteinuria and preservation of filtration function were observed in a significant proportion of treated patients. In a prospective trial 151 recipients of renal transplants were randomly assigned to treatment with CsA alone (74 patients) and to low dose of AZA, prednisolone, and CsA (77 patients). At two years, graft survival was 84% for the monotherapy and 90% for the triple therapy. This difference was not statistically significant. The number of rejection episodes was similar in the two groups, but the severity of rejection was significantly worse among the patients on monotherapy. More kidneys were lost because of rejection (6 versus 3), and a higher number of methylprednisolone pulses was used for treating rejection (5.2 +/- 2.3 versus 4.3 +/- 2.9; P = 0.0077). CsA nephrotoxicity episodes were more frequent among patients on monotherapy (23 versus 7; P less than 0.02). Infectious episodes were equally distributed between the two groups. Creatinine clearance was poorer in the monotherapy-treated patients at the third month (42 +/- 16 ml/min versus 48 +/- 15 ml/min; P = 0.02), but no differences were observed between the two groups since the sixth month after transplantation. Many patients on monotherapy required changes in maintenance therapy. In fact, one patient was switched to conventional immunosuppression because of Cremophor-induced anaphylaxis. Another patient who developed Kaposi's sarcoma 4 months after surgery was switched to steroids alone. Excluding 5 patients who lost their grafts a few days after transplantation, only 30 of 74 patients (40%) could be kept without steroids. We conclude that both the therapeutic protocols can give good results in renal allotransplantation; however, monotherapy could create some problems in keeping the balance between drug toxicity and significant immunosuppression. On the contrary, triple therapy is easier to handle, especially in the early posttransplant period when the differential diagnosis between acute rejection and CsA-related nephrotoxicity can be difficult even for a skilled clinician.
Adult patients treated with CSA at an initial dose of 3.5-5 mg/kg/d in two divided doses perhaps in combination with oral prednisolone 0.15 mg/kg/d are more likely to achieve a partial remission of the nephrotic syndrome compared with symptomatic treatment or prednisolone alone. However, there is a probability of deterioration of kidney function due to the nephrotoxic effect of CSA in the long term. For CSA, a larger controlled trial with longer follow-up should be performed to prove the benefit of this regimen not only on proteinuria but also on the preservation of kidney function. Present available data do not support the general use of alkylating substances for the treatment of FSGS in adults.