Efficacy of isotonic nasal wash (seawater) in the treatment and prevention of rhinitis in children. Are antibiotics beneficial for patients with sinusitis complaints? A randomized double-blind clinical trial. Intranasal beclomethasone dipropionate in the treatment of common cold. Do delayed prescriptions reduce the use of antibiotics for the common cold? A single-blind controlled trial. The end of antibiotic treatment in adults with acute sinusitis-like complaints in general practice? A placebo-controlled double-blind randomized doxycycline trial. Flunisolide nasal spray for perennial rhinitis in children. Effectiveness of an antihistamine-decongestant combination for young children with the common cold: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Is an antihistamine-decongestant combination effective in temporarily relieving symptoms of the common cold in preschool children? Exploratory study of the decongestive effect of Rhinopront syrup in adults and in children with acute rhinitis.
To evaluate the potential of nasal isotonic saline application to prevent reappearance of cold and flu in children during the winter.
                Prospective, multicenter, parallel-group, open, and randomized comparison.
                Eight pediatric outpatient clinics.
                A total of 401 children (aged 6-10 years) with uncomplicated cold or flu.
                We randomly assigned patients to 2 treatment groups, one with just standard medication, the other with nasal wash with a modified seawater solution (Physiomer) plus standard medication, and observed them for 12 weeks.
                The primary efficacy end points were nasal symptoms resolution during acute illness (visits 1 and 2). We also looked for reappearance of cold or flu, consumption of medication, complications, days off school, and reported days of illness during the following weeks when preventive potential was evaluated (visits 3 and 4).
                At visit 2, patients in the saline group achieved primary end points (measured on a 4-point numeric scale on which 1 indicated no symptoms and 4, severe symptoms) in the parameters nasal secretion and obstruction (mean scores vs nonsaline group, 1.79 vs 2.10 and 1.25 vs 1.58, respectively) (P < .05 for both). During the prevention phase (at visit 3, 8 weeks after study entry) patients in the saline group showed significantly lower scores in sore throat, cough, nasal obstruction, and secretion (P < .05 for all). By visit 3, significantly fewer children in the saline group were using antipyretics (9% vs 33%), nasal decongestants (5% vs 47%), mucolytics (10% vs 37%), and systemic antiinfectives (6% vs 21%) (P < .05 for all). During the same period children in the saline group also reported significantly fewer illness days (31% vs 75%), school absences (17% vs 35%), and complications (8% vs 32%) (P < .05 for all). Similar results were found at the final visit.
                Children in the saline group showed faster resolution of some nasal symptoms during acute illness and less frequent reappearance of rhinitis subsequently. Sinusitis is the fifth most common reason for patients to visit primary care physicians, yet clinical outcomes relevant to patients are seldom studied.
                To determine whether patients with purulent rhinitis, "sinusitis-type symptoms," improved with antibiotics. Second, to examine a clinical prediction rule to provide preliminary validation data.
                Prospective clinical trial, with double-blinded placebo controlled randomization. The setting was a suburb of Washington, DC, from Oct 1, 2001, to March 31, 2003. All participants were 18 years or older, presenting to a family practice clinic with a complaint of sinusitis and with pus in the nasal cavity, facial pressure, or nasal discharge lasting longer than 7 days. The main outcome measures were resolution of symptoms within a 14-day follow-up period and the time to improvement (days).
                After exclusion criteria, 135 patients were randomized to either placebo (n=68) or amoxicillin (n=67) for 10 days. Intention-to-treat analyses showed that 32 (48%) of the amoxicillin group vs 25 (37%) of the placebo group (P=.26) showed complete improvement by the end of the 2-week follow-up period (relative risk=1.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87-1.94]). Although the rates of improvement were not statistically significantly different at the end of 2 weeks, the amoxicillin group improved significantly earlier, in the course of treatment, a median of 8 vs 12 days, than did the placebo group (P=.039).
                For most patients with sinusitis-type complaints, no improvement was seen with anti-biotics over placebo. For those who did improve, data suggested there is a subgroup of patients who may benefit from antibiotics. Sinusitis is usually considered a complication of viral rhinitis. Virus infections in the upper respiratory tract lead to mucosal swelling, which may obstruct paranasal sinus outflow, resulting in infection in the paranasal sinuses. Topical nasal steroids have been found beneficial in a variety of acute and chronic nasal conditions including allergic and nonallergic rhinitis and chronic rhinosinusitis. The purpose of this study was to examine whether the intranasal inhalation powder beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) 400 micrograms/day treatment has a beneficial or harmful effect on symptoms and signs of common cold, and whether or not it can prevent common cold complications. A total of 54 patients were randomized, 26 into the placebo-group and 28 into the BDP group. During the 14-day follow-up, there were on an average 10.3 symptomatic days in the placebo group and 10.7 days in the BDP group (p = 0.72). The use of intranasal BDP in the treatment of common cold neither reduced symptoms caused by inflammation nor did it shorten the recovery time. On the other hand, because BDP does not increase the risk of complications or significantly prolong the recovery during the common cold, there is no need to discontinue its use in the patients with allergic rhinitis or nasal polyposis. To test the use of a delayed prescription compared with instructions to take antibiotics immediately in patients presenting to family physicians with upper respiratory tract infections (common colds).
                Randomized controlled single-blind study.
                Subjects were 129 patients presenting with the common cold who requested antibiotics or whose physicians thought they wanted them. All patients were in a family practice in Auckland, New Zealand, consisting of 15 physicians (9 male, 6 female) who had completed medical school between 1973 and 1992.
                Outcomes were antibiotic use (taking at least 1 dose of the antibiotic), symptom scores, and responses to the satisfaction questions asked at the end of the study.
                Patients in the delayed-prescription group were less likely to use antibiotics (48%, 95% CI, 35%-60%) than were those instructed to take antibiotics immediately (89%, 95% CI, 76%-94%). Daily body temperature was higher in the immediate-prescription group. The lack of difference in the symptom score between the 2 groups suggests that there is no danger in delaying antibiotic prescriptions for the common cold.
                Delayed prescriptions are a safe and effective means of reducing antibiotic consumption in patients with the common cold. Clarification of patient expectations for antibiotics may result in a lower prescription rate. When the patient demands a prescription, delaying its delivery has the potential to provide gentle education. Acute sinusitis-like complaints are very common and are usually treated with antibiotics in spite of the lack of evidence for the effectiveness of antibiotic therapy and the increasing number of resistant strains.
                To assess the effectiveness of doxycycline in adults with acute sinusitis-like complaints in general practice.
                The effects of doxycycline in a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trial were assessed in adults consulting their general practitioner (GP) with complaints after a common cold or influenza, pain in the head when bending forward, purulent nasal discharge, predominantly unilateral maxillary pain, toothache, or pain when chewing. Primary outcome events were the resolution of facial pain and the resumption of daily activities. Treatment differences were assessed by means of Kaplan-Meier curves and hazard ratios. The follow-up period was 42 days.
                No significant difference was found in time to recover between the doxycycline-treated group and the placebo-treated group. However, the adjusted hazard ratio for the group receiving doxycycline was 1.17 (95% CI = 0.87-1.57) for the resolution of pain and 1.31 (95% CI = 0.96-1.78) for the resumption of daily activities. After 10 days, 85% of all patients reported improvement and 60% were completely cured. Side effects were reported by 17% of the doxycycline-treated group, with two patients withdrawing because of side effects.
                Data from this study indicate that doxycycline does not add to the effectiveness of decongestive nose drops and steam inhalation in treating acute sinusitis-like complaints in general practice adults. Twenty-seven children with perennial rhinitis entered a double-blind cross-over study comparing nasal sprays of flunisolide---a new topical corticosteroid---and placebo. Symptoms were assessed over two consecutive monthly periods with each treatment. Weekly diary cards, monthly clinical assessments, and end-of-trial preferences all favoured the active drug. At the end of the trial 20 patients preferred the treatment month with flunisolide, four preferred the placebo month, and two rated the periods equally. Side effects were mild, the commonest being transient nasal stinging. Seventeen children who derived benefit from flunisolide continued with the treatment for a six-month open-study period. Many reduced the dosage from three times to twice or once daily without losing benefit. The effect of flunisolide on the pituitary-adrenal axis was assessed in seven children by measuring the 0900 blood cortisol concentrations at two-month intervals over the six months. No effect was observed. The results show that flunisolide is effective and safe for the treatment and prophylaxis of perennial rhinitis in children. We tested the hypothesis that antihistamine-decongestant combinations cause no clinically significant relief of the symptoms of upper respiratory tract infections in young children by randomly assigning 96 children to one of three treatment groups: antihistamine-decongestant, placebo, and no treatment. There were no differences among the three study groups in the proportion of children considered "better" overall by the parent 48 hours after the initial assessment (drug, 67%; placebo, 71%; no treatment, 57%; p = 0.53). There were no differences among groups in individual or composite symptom score changes. Two thirds of parents whose children were eligible for the drug trial believed that their child needed medicine for cold symptoms. In the proportion of parents believing that their child needed medicine, there was no difference between those who consented to participate and those who refused. Parents who wanted medicine at the initial visit reported more improvement at follow-up, regardless of whether the child received drug, placebo, or no treatment. We conclude that there is no clinically significant improvement in symptoms of upper respiratory tract infection, including no significant placebo effect, in young children for whom an antihistamine-decongestant is prescribed. To determine whether an antihistamine-decongestant combination (ADC) is superior to placebo in temporarily relieving symptoms of upper respiratory tract infection (URI) in preschool children.
                Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
                Four pediatric offices in the Seattle, Wash, area.
                Children 6 months through 5 years of age with a URI of less than 7 days' duration.
                Children were randomly assigned to receive an ADC (brompheniramine maleate-phenylpropanolamine hydrochloride) or placebo as needed for URI symptoms. Two hours after each dose of study medication, changes in the child's runny nose, nasal congestion, cough, and sleep status were assessed by means of a standardized questionnaire.
                A total of 175 responses were recorded for 59 patients. There were no statistically significant differences in symptom improvement between the ADC and the placebo group (runny nose, p = 0.48; nasal congestion, p = 0.94; cough, p = 0.66). However, the proportion of children asleep 2 hours after receiving the ADC was significantly higher than the proportion receiving placebo (46.6% vs 26.5%; p = 0.01). Results were unchanged after control for the correlated nature of repeated responses, age, symptom duration, use of acetaminophen, time that the medication was given, and parental desire for medication.
                The ADC was equivalent to placebo in providing temporary relief of URI symptoms in preschool children. However, the ADC did have significantly greater sedative effects than did placebo. The decongestive effect of Rhinopront syrup was assessed in 18 adults and 18 children with acute rhinitis, by comparison to a matching placebo syrup and to a commercial standard decongestant (Triaminic tablets or drops). The evolution of symptoms following single dose administration of each treatment was estimated both by objective measurements of nasal resistance using bilateral rhinomanometry and by subjective evaluation of nasal congestion and aspect of the mucosa. In children, the treatment was continued over the next 4 days and the global clinical efficacy of the formulations was subjectively evaluated by the parents. In adult patients, a significant decrease in nasal resistance was obtained after a single dose of Rhinopront (15 g). The effect was already important after 0.5 h and reached a minimum of approximately 50% of baseline within 1 to 2 h; the drop in nasal resistance was significantly less intense for Triaminic (p < 0.05; 0.5-1-h period) and for the placebo (p < 0.05; 0.5-2-h period). In children, the scatter of rhinomanometric measurements precluded the observation of any significant within- or between-group differences; however, a significantly lower nasal congestion score was observed for Rhinopront than placebo, between 4 and 10 h after single dose administration (1 g per year of age). The present work suggests that Rhinopront is an effective nasal decongestant in adults and children with acute congestive rhinitis and supports the adequacy of the proposed twice-daily dosing rate.
There is no evidence of benefit from antibiotics for the common cold or for persisting acute purulent rhinitis in children or adults. There is evidence that antibiotics cause significant adverse effects in adults when given for the common cold and in all ages when given for acute purulent rhinitis. Routine use of antibiotics for these conditions is not recommended.