A randomized trial comparing 5-mg and 10-mg warfarin loading doses. Comparison of 10-mg and 5-mg warfarin initiation nomograms together with low-molecular-weight heparin for outpatient treatment of acute venous thromboembolism. A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Comparison of 5-mg and 10-mg loading doses in initiation of warfarin therapy. Comparison of a daily fixed 2.5-mg warfarin dose with a 5-mg, international normalized ratio adjusted, warfarin dose initially following heart valve replacement. A comparison of a low-dose warfarin induction regimen with the modified Fennerty regimen in elderly inpatients. Randomized trial of genotype-guided versus standard warfarin dosing in patients initiating oral anticoagulation. Comparison of an age adjusted warfarin loading protocol with empirical dosing and Fennerty's protocol. A randomized controlled trial of genotype-based Coumadin initiation. Initiation of warfarin therapy: comparison of physician dosing with computer-assisted dosing.
Warfarin sodium therapy is usually initiated with a loading dose to reduce the time required to elevate the international normalized ratio (INR). Warfarin loading doses are associated with early overanticoagulation and the development of a potential hypercoagulable state; they also may not hasten achieving an INR value between 2.0 and 3.0. This study was designed to prospectively confirm our observation that a 5-mg warfarin sodium loading dose is as effective as a 10-mg loading dose in achieving a therapeutic INR for 2 consecutive days on days 3 and 4 or 4 and 5 of therapy.
                Fifty-three patients initiating warfarin therapy with a target INR of 2.0 to 3.0 were randomly allocated to receive an initial dose of 5 or 10 mg of warfarin. Subsequent doses were based on dosing algorithms. The INR was measured daily for 5 days. The primary end point of the study was the proportion of patients whose INR values were between 2.0 and 3.0 on 2 consecutive daily determinations on days 3, 4, or 5 of the study and whose INR did not exceed 3.0 at any point during the study.
                Five (24%) of 21 patients in the 10-mg group and 21 (66%) of 32 patients in the 5-mg group achieved the primary end point (relative risk 2.22, 95% confidence interval 1.30-3.70 [P < .003]). A trend toward less overanticoagulation was seen in the 5-mg warfarin group.
                A 10-mg loading dose of warfarin is unlikely to be more effective than a 5-mg loading dose in achieving an INR of 2.0 to 3.0 by day 4 or 5 of therapy. The optimal means of achieving therapeutic oral anticoagulation in the outpatient setting has not been determined.
                To compare a 10-mg dosing nomogram with a 5-mg nomogram that has been suggested to be sufficient for warfarin initiation.
                Randomized, controlled clinical trial.
                Outpatient venous thromboembolism services of four tertiary care hospitals.
                201 of 210 consecutive patients with objectively confirmed diagnoses of acute venous thromboembolism.
                All patients were treated with subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin for a minimum of 5 days until a therapeutic international normalized ratio (INR) was achieved. Patients were randomly assigned to initially receive a 10-mg or 5-mg dose of warfarin.
                The primary end point was time in days to therapeutic INR. Secondary end points were the proportion of patients who had achieved a therapeutic INR by day 5, the total number of INR assessments, the number of INR measurements greater than 5.0, incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism and major bleeding, and survival.
                210 consecutive patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 9 were excluded and 201 were randomly assigned to study groups (104 to the 10-mg group and 97 to the 5-mg group). Demographic characteristics of both groups were similar. Patients in the 10-mg group achieved therapeutic INR 1.4 days earlier than patients in the 5-mg group (P < 0.001). Eighty-three percent of patients in the 10-mg group achieved a therapeutic INR by day 5 versus 46% in the 5-mg group (P < 0.001). Fewer INR assessments were performed in the 10-mg group than in the 5-mg group (8.1 vs. 9.1; P = 0.04). There were no significant differences between the two groups in recurrent events, major bleeding, survival, and number of INR measurements greater than 5.0.
                The 10-mg warfarin initiation nomogram is superior to the 5-mg nomogram because it allows more rapid achievement of a therapeutic INR. Loading doses of warfarin that are larger than those used for maintenance therapy are widely used in clinical practice, but they have never been prospectively evaluated.
                To compare the effect of 5- and 10-mg loading doses of warfarin on laboratory markers of warfarin's anticoagulant effect.
                Randomized clinical trial.
                Tertiary care teaching hospital.
                49 patients seen over a 5-month period with a target international normalized ratio (INR) of 2.0 to 3.0.
                Patients were randomly assigned to receive an initial dose of 5 or 10 mg of warfarin. Subsequent doses of warfarin were administered on the basis of dosing nomograms.
                INRs and levels of factors II, VII, IX, and X and protein C were measured daily for 5 days.
                11 of 25 patients in the 10-mg group (44% [95% CI, 34% to 54%]) and 2 of 24 patients in the 5-mg group (8% [CI, 3% to 14%]) had INRs greater than 2.0 at 36 hours (P = 0.005), at which time the factor VII levels were 27% (CI, 18% to 36%) in the 10-mg group and 54% (CI, 43% to 65%) in the 5-mg group (P < 0.001). In contrast, factor II levels were 74% (CI, 67% to 81%) in the 10-mg group and 82% (CI, 73% to 93%) in the 5-mg group (P > 0.2). At 60 hours, 9 of 25 patients in the 10-mg group (36% [CI, 17% to 54%]) and no patients in the 5-mg group had INRs greater than 3.0. At 84 hours, 15 of 24 patients in the 10-mg group (63% [CI, 43% to 81%]) and 19 of 24 patients in the 5-mg group (79% [CI, 62% to 95%]) had INRs between 2.0 and 3.0. Four patients in the 10-mg group and 1 patient in the 5-mg group received vitamin K for excessive prolongation of the INR.
                A 5-mg loading dose of warfarin produces less excess anticoagulation than does a 10-mg loading dose; the smaller dose also avoids the development of a potential hypercoagulable state caused by precipitous decreases in levels of protein C during the first 36 hours of warfarin therapy. Patients starting oral anticoagulant therapy after heart valve replacement initially require a lower target international normalized ratio (INR) (2.0, range 1.5 to 2.6) because of a higher risk of bleeding until pericardial wires are removed. In a previous retrospective analysis, we observed a higher sensitivity to warfarin in these patients compared with nonsurgical patients. In a randomized clinical trial, we compared a fixed, lower dose of warfarin (2.5 mg) with the standard treatment consisting of a 5-mg loading dose, then adjusted to the target INR during the first 5 days of anticoagulation. INRs were measured daily, but the fixed dose was only modified on day 3 if the INR was <1.5 or >3.0. One hundred ninety-seven patients were considered eligible for the study. The 2 groups were well matched according to age, gender, body mass index, concomitant treatments, and type of valves implanted. The proportion of INRs >2.6 during the study period was 42.5% in the 5-mg group and 26.2% in the 2.5-mg group (p <0.05), and the proportion of INRs >3.0 on day 3 was 23.9% and 9.5% (p <0.05), respectively. In the 2.5-mg group, 35.7% of patients had an INR <1.5 on day 3 and had the dose increased (vs 3.5%, p <0.001); however, in the 5-mg group, 95.6% had the initial dose reduced, 49.6% had the dose withheld for at least 1 day, and the mean dose during the 5 days of study was 3.08 mg. Average time to achieve therapeutic range was higher in the 2.5-mg group (2.72 vs 1.98 days, p <0.0001), but the approach to the targeted INR was more regular, and the gap between target and mean INR on day 5 was smaller. There were no bleeding or thromboembolic complications in either group. Thus, a lower loading dose of warfarin in patients after heart valve replacement reduces excessive anticoagulation and offers a more regular achievement of the therapeutic target by reducing the number of dose adjustments. Daily monitoring of the INR is still recommended. To compare a new low-dose warfarin induction regimen with the Fennerty regimen in elderly inpatients.
                Age-stratified, randomized prospective study.
                120 age-stratified elderly inpatients.
                Each patient was randomized to either the new induction regimen or to a modified Fennerty regimen.
                Days to therapeutic International Normalized Ratio (INR >2); days in the therapeutic range (INR 2-3) during induction; number of patients with INR >4.5; ability of day 4 INR to predict day 8 warfarin dose.
                The mean time to therapeutic INR was longer for the new induction regimen than modified Fennerty regimen in patients aged 65-75 years [4.6 (mean) +/- 1.6 (SD) days vs 3.8 +/- 0.8 days; P = 0.03] and in patients aged >75 years (4.5 +/- 1.4 days vs 3.5 +/- 0.7 days; P = 0.003). Patients spent more time in the therapeutic INR range with the new induction regimen [3.0 +/- 1.3 days vs 2.7 +/- 1.3 days (P = 0.03) for those aged 65-75 years and 2.9 +/- 1.1 days vs 2.4 +/- 1.3 days (P = 0.04 for those aged >75 years]. Fewer patients using the new regimen had INRs >4.5 in the first 8 days [1 (3%) vs 6 (20%) for 65-75 years (P < 0.05) and 1 (3%) vs 11 (37%) for >75 years (P < 0.01)]. The ability to predict the maintenance dose to within 1 mg was 55% for both regimens.
                The low-dose regimen has important clinical advantages over the Fennerty regimen for anticoagulating elderly inpatients. Pharmacogenetic-guided dosing of warfarin is a promising application of "personalized medicine" but has not been adequately tested in randomized trials.
                Consenting patients (n=206) being initiated on warfarin were randomized to pharmacogenetic-guided or standard dosing. Buccal swab DNA was genotyped for CYP2C9 *2 and CYP2C9 *3 and VKORC1C1173T with a rapid assay. Standard dosing followed an empirical protocol, whereas pharmacogenetic-guided dosing followed a regression equation including the 3 genetic variants and age, sex, and weight. Prothrombin time international normalized ratio (INR) was measured routinely on days 0, 3, 5, 8, 21, 60, and 90. A research pharmacist unblinded to treatment strategy managed dose adjustments. Patients were followed up for up to 3 months. Pharmacogenetic-guided predicted doses more accurately approximated stable doses (P<0.001), resulting in smaller (P=0.002) and fewer (P=0.03) dosing changes and INRs (P=0.06). However, percent out-of-range INRs (pharmacogenetic = 30.7%, standard = 33.1%), the primary end point, did not differ significantly between arms. Despite this, when restricted to wild-type patients (who required larger doses; P=0.001) and multiple variant carriers (who required smaller doses; P<0.001) in exploratory analyses, results (pharmacogenetic = 29%, standard = 39%) achieved nominal significance (P=0.03). Multiple variant allele carriers were at increased risk of an INR of > or = 4 (P=0.03).
                An algorithm guided by pharmacogenetic and clinical factors improved the accuracy and efficiency of warfarin dose initiation. Despite this, the primary end point of a reduction in out-of-range INRs was not achieved. In subset analyses, pharmacogenetic guidance showed promise for wild-type and multiple variant genotypes. A warfarin loading protocol adjusting doses for age was compared to both Fennerty's protocol (Fenn) and empirical dosing (Emp).
                Patients beginning warfarin were randomised to receive doses according to either the age adjusted (Age) protocol or Fenn. Data were retrospectively collected for patients who had begun warfarin in the previous six months to represent empirical dosing. The study was performed on inpatients being commenced on warfarin for the first time at two teaching hospitals.
                Endpoints were time to reach a stable, therapeutic International Normalised Ratio (INR) between 2-3, the number of patients experiencing an INR > or =4 in the first week and the number of patients who had a dose held in the first week.
                Thirty-five patients were assessed in the Age group, 28 in the Fenn group, and 123 patients for the Emp group. Patients using the Age protocol achieved a stable, therapeutic INR more rapidly than either the Fenn (p=0.003, log rank test) or Emp (p<0.001) group. The Age group had a lower proportion of patients experiencing an INR > or =4 in the first week (p<0.05) as well as a lower proportion having doses held in the first week (p<0.01). There were no differences between Emp and Fenn for any of the endpoints.
                Adjustment of warfarin loading doses for age exhibits clear superiority over the use of Fenn or Emp. This becomes increasingly important as the average age of patients being warfarinised increases, with the recognition that atrial fibrillation requires anticoagulation. Fenn consistently overdosed elderly patients, especially those aged 80 years and older. A randomized controlled trial was conducted in patients initiating warfarin to determine whether algorithms that incorporate genotypes affecting warfarin metabolism and function, and Vitamin K metabolism improve prediction of therapeutic warfarin dose and anticoagulation management.
                A total of 230 patients were randomized to either a clinical arm where dosing algorithms considered only clinical information or an interventional arm where dosing algorithms used clinical and genotypic variables (CYP2C9, CYP4F2, and VKORC1). Subjects in the interventional arm were genotyped within 5 hours, and the initial dose was informed by genotype. Primary endpoints were absolute prediction error relative to therapeutic dose, and time in therapeutic target range during the first 14 days. Secondary endpoints included time to stable dose in therapeutic range, time to first international normalization ratio >4, and warfarin-related adverse events.
                The model including genetics more accurately identified therapeutic dose twice as often as the clinical model (65.3% vs. 34.7%) (P < 0.0001). Patients in the interventional arm did not achieve greater time in therapeutic range. Study arms were similar regarding time to international normalization ratio >4 and adverse events.
                Genotype-informed dosing clearly improved prediction of therapeutic dose beyond that available with clinical parameters. Genetic information did not affect time in therapeutic target range during the first 14 days of therapy. Current management practices with the vagaries in dose adjustment after warfarin initiation exert a strong influence on traditional clinical outcomes. In a prospective, randomized study at two university hospitals, the authors examined how effectively housestaff physicians (n = 36) managed the initiation of warfarin therapy compared with a computer-assisted dosing regimen (n = 39) using the software program Warfcalc, which was managed by one of the authors. Target prothrombin time ratios were selected by the physicians. Study endpoints included: the time to reach a therapeutic prothrombin ratio, the time to reach a stable therapeutic dose, the number of patients transiently overanticoagulated, the number of bleeding complications, and the accuracy of the predicted maintenance dose, which was assessed at steady-state 10-14 days later. Computer-assisted dosing consistently out-performed the physicians: a stable therapeutic dose was achieved 3.7 days earlier (p = 0.002), fewer patients were overanticoagulated (10% versus 41%), and the predicted maintenance dose was in the therapeutic range in 85% of the computer-dosed patients versus 42% of the physician group (p less than 0.002). For physicians who did not routinely manage warfarin therapy, computer-assisted dosing improved the accuracy of dosing and shortened the time required to achieve a stable therapeutic dose.
The studies in this review compared loading doses in several different situations. There is still considerable uncertainty between the use of a 5 mg and a 10 mg loading dose for the initiation of warfarin. In the elderly, there is some evidence that lower initiation doses or age adjusted doses are more appropriate, leading to fewer high INRs. However, there is insufficient evidence to warrant genotype guided initiation.