Ovulation induction with urinary FSH or recombinant FSH in polycystic ovary syndrome patients: a prospective randomized analysis of cost-effectiveness. Induction of ovulation in women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques: recombinant human FSH (follitropin alpha) versus highly purified urinary FSH (urofollitropin HP). Recombinant FSH vs. urinary FSH for ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization. Efficacy of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone in improving oocyte quality in assisted reproductive techniques. LHRH analogues for ovulation induction, with particular reference to polycystic ovary syndrome. Controlled ovarian stimulation with exclusive FSH followed by stimulation with hCG alone, FSH alone or hMG. Efficacy of recombinant versus human derived follicle stimulating hormone on the oocyte and embryo quality in IVF-ICSI cycles: Randomised, controlled, multi-centre trial. A randomized comparison of two ovarian stimulation protocols with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist cotreatment for in vitro fertilization commencing recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone on cycle day 2 or 5 with the standard long GnRH agonist protocol. The luteal phase in polycystic ovary syndrome during ovulation induction with human menopausal gonadotropin with and without leuprolide acetate.
The aim of this prospective, randomized trial was to compare the clinical results and the cost-effectiveness of urinary FSH (uFSH) and recombinant FSH (rFSH) in ovarian stimulation for intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) patients. One-hundred and seventy PCOS infertile patients undergoing IUI were enrolled, and protocols of ovarian stimulation with uFSH or rFSH were randomly assigned. The total number of cycles performed was 379 (182 and 197, respectively). The main outcome measures were the number of mature follicles, the days of stimulation, the number of ampoules and IU used per cycle, the biochemical/clinical pregnancy rates, the number of multiple pregnancies and the cost-effectiveness. No statistically significant differences were found in the follicular development, length of stimulation, pregnancy rates, delivery rates and multiple pregnancies between the two groups. In the uFSH group, the cost per cycle remained significantly lower (218.51 +/- 88.69 versus 312.22 +/- 118.12; P < 0.0001), even though a significantly higher number of IU of gonadotrophins were used (809.3 +/- 271.9 versus 589.1 +/- 244.7; P < 0.0001). The cost-effectiveness (i. e. within a group, the total cost of all cycles divided by no. of clinical pregnancies) was 1729.08 in the uFSH group and 3075.37 in the rFSH group. In conclusion, uFSH and rFSH demonstrated the same effectiveness in ovarian stimulation in IUI cycles in PCOS patients. The urinary preparation is more cost-effective due to the difference of its cost per IU. This multicentre, open, randomized, study compared the efficacy and safety of recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH; follitropin alpha) with highly purified urinary human FSH (uFSH; urofollitropin HP) in women undergoing ovulation induction for assisted reproductive techniques. Following long down-regulation with buserelin, patients received two ampoules of 75 IU (150 IU) s.c. rFSH or highly purified uFSH for 6 days, after which the dose could be increased until they fulfilled the criteria for human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration. Of 168 patients recruited, 155 received at least one dose of FSH, and 137 received HCG [68: rFSH (85%); 69: uFSH (92%)]. Following oocyte retrieval and fertilization, up to three embryos were replaced/patient and luteal support was given. The mean number of oocytes retrieved/patient was 10.2 +/- 6.0 for rFSH patients compared with 10.8 +/- 6.1 in the uFSH group (not significant). There was a trend towards fewer ampoules used (22.3 +/- 6.5 versus 24.3 +/- 6.5), higher pregnancy (44.3 versus 41.4%) and live birth rates (33.8 versus 26.7%), as well as a lower miscarriage rate (0.0 versus 16.7%) in favour of rFSH. However, no significant differences in efficacy parameters were recorded. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome occurred in 8.6% and 7.9% of rFSH and uFSH patients respectively. In conclusion, this protocol was effective in inducing multiple follicular development and high numbers of oocytes were retrieved with both drugs. To compare ovarian stimulation with recombinant FSH (rFSH) vs. urinary FSH (uFSH) in terms of hormonal events within ovarian follicles and the outcome of in vitro fertilization.
                A prospective randomized comparative study of rFSH (n = 70) vs. uFSH (n = 61) ovarian stimulation. Hormone determinations were serum estradiol (E2) on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration, and E2, androstenedione (A) and testosterone (T) at the time of follicular aspiration in the follicular fluid and serum.
                The total dose of gonadotropins required and the length of ovarian stimulation were the same in the 2 groups. In follicular fluid the E2 and the A levels were significantly higher in the rFSH group (3,065 +/- 1,646 vs. 2,368 +/- 1,240 nmol/L, P = .004, and 103.7 +/- 51.6 vs. 89.0 +/- 42.3 nmol/L, P = .042, respectively), whereas A:E2 and T:E2 ratios were significantly lower (39.6 +/- 22.5 vs. 52.3 +/- 59.6, P = .042, and 9.1 +/- 4.7 vs. 17.6 +/- 26.9, P = .006, respectively). Serum hormonal levels, number of oocytes retrieved and pregnancy rates did not differ significantly between the groups.
                rFSH provides results similar to those of uFSH. rFSH enhances steroidogenesis and provokes different androgen/estrogen ratios than does uFSH without influencing the outcome of in vitro fertilization. To estimate the efficacy of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) versus highly purified urinary human FSH (uFSH) in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) for in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET).
                This prospective, randomized, quality of retrieved double-blind study compared uFSH with rFSH in IVF-ET rFSh cycles. A total of 254 cycles from 241 patients who attended the infertility clinic at Samsung Cheil Hospital from January to August 2001 were included in the study. With pituitary desensitization using gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and a short protocol, rFSH was administered in 131 cycles; uFSH was administered in 123 cycles. We analyzed ovarian response, oocyte quality, fertilization rate, embryo quality, pregnancy rate and live birth rate in the uFSH and rFSH groups.
                Total FSH dosage (1322.3 +/- 526.2 vs. 2124.4 +/- 881.9 i.u.) and dosage per retrieved oocyte (90.6 +/- 36.0 vs. 138.0 +/- 57.2 i.u.) were significantly lower in the rFSH group than those in the uFSH group (P < .001). The proportion of good-quality oocytes (grade 1 and 2) was higher in the rFSH group (68.2% vs. 64.8%, P = .024). Moreover, the proportion of atretic oocytes (grade 5) was lower in the rFSH group (7.5% vs. 10.3%, P = .002). The fertilization rate, quality of transferred embryos, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate were not significantly differ between the 2 groups.
                In women undergoing COH, rFSH revealed more efficient ovarian response and better quality of oocytes than did uFSH. Infertile women with PCO have been treated with exogenous gonadotrophins (hMG/hCG) for ovulation induction either with or without LHRH-agonist treatment. Those treated without LHRH-agonist-induced LH suppression showed PL in greater than 30% of the cycles and this problem was eliminated by LHRH-agonist therapy. The pregnancy rate (approximately 80% of patients) during the combined therapy was approximately twice that of the group treated with hMG/hCG alone. The suppression of endogenous LH by the LHRH-agonist appeared to have no effect upon the profiles of follicular development in response to hMG, and a high rate of follicle recruitment characterized all PCO treatment cycles irrespective of circulating LH concentrations. These results suggest that LH suppression improves the efficacy of ovulation induction but has no influence on the primary metabolic disturbance in the PCO syndrome. To assess if low-dose hCG is similar to hMG and to rFSH in the late follicular phase.
                In a prospective randomized controlled trial, 51 patients undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation received ovarian priming with rFSH and then received hCG (200 IU/day) (hCG group, n=17), hMG (225 IU/day) (hMG group, n=17) or rFSH (200 IU/day) (FSH group, n=17) in the late stage of follicular development. Parameters of follicular response and serum estradiol, progesterone and testosterone levels were assessed.
                Pre-ovulatory ovarian follicle occurrence and length of treatment were similar among the three treatment groups. Serum progesterone level on the day of pre-ovulatory hCG was significantly higher in the hCG group than in the hMG or rFSH group. Clinical pregnancy rates were similar for all groups. The total cost of treatment was significantly lower for the hCG group than for the groups supplemented with hMG or rFSH.
                LH in the form of low-dose hCG during the late follicular phase induced the same follicular pattern as hMG and rFSH after ovulation induction. The procedure using hCG produced pregnancy rates similar to those obtained using hMG and rFSH, even though the patients showed higher serum progesterone levels on the hCG day. The aim of this trial, comparing human follicle stimulating hormone (hFSH) and recombinant FSH (rFSH) was to evaluate the efficacy on oocyte and embryo quality in in vitro fertilisation/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Four-hundred and one women were randomised in two groups to receive or hFSH or rFSH in stimulation protocols. The primary end point of this study was the oocyte/embryo quality. No significant difference in oocyte/embryo quality was observed between the two groups. The number of oocytes retrieved was significantly higher in the hFSH group (6 +/- 2.8 in hFSH group vs. 5 +/- 2.6 in rFSH group; P = 0.003). A less amounts of gonadotropins consumed (2106 +/- 719 IU in hFSH group vs. 3536 +/- 1099 IU in rFSH group; P < 0.0001) and shorter duration of stimulation (human chorionic gonadotropin day of administration: Day 12.3 +/- 1.0 in hFSH and Day 13.3 +/- 1.2 in rFSH group, respectively; P < 0.0001) was registered in hFSH group. Fertilisation, cleavage and implantation rates, pregnancy and abortion rates were similar in both groups. However, lower clinical abortion rate (not significant) in hFSH group might be noteworthy. In our study, we demonstrated that hFSH and rFSH products are equivalent in terms of clinical efficacy. Extending the FSH window for multifollicular development by administering FSH from the midfollicular phase onward constitutes a novel mild protocol for ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF) based on the physiology of single dominant follicle selection in normo-ovulatory women. We compared outcomes from this protocol with two other stimulation protocols. One hundred and forty-two normo-ovulatory patients with an indication for IVF (or IVF/ICSI) were randomized to a GnRH agonist long protocol (group A; n = 45) or one of two GnRH antagonist protocols commencing recombinant FSH on cycle d 2 (group B; n = 48) or cycle d 5 (group C; n = 49). A fixed dose (150 IU/d) of rFSH was used for ovarian stimulation, and GnRH antagonist cotreatment was initiated on the day when the leading follicle reached 14 mm diameter. Group C showed a shorter duration of stimulation (median duration, 11, 9, and 8 d for groups A, B, and C, respectively; P < 0.001), reflected in a significantly lower total dose of rFSH used (median amount of rFSH, 1650, 1350, and 1200 IU for groups A, B, and C, respectively; P < 0.001). In group C more cycles were cancelled during the stimulation phase due to insufficient response, resulting in a lower percentage of oocyte retrievals (84%, 73%, and 63% for groups A, B, and C; P = 0.02). However, women in group C obtained better quality embryos (percentage of embryo score of 1 for best embryo, 29%, 37%, and 61% for groups A, B, and C, respectively; P = 0.008), resulting in more transfers per oocyte retrieval (68%, 71%, and 90% for groups A, B, and C, respectively; P = 0.04). After profound ovarian stimulation (groups A and B) only 7% of the patients who retrieved four oocytes or less conceived, whereas after mild stimulation (group C) 67% of these patients conceived (P < 0.01). Overall, no differences were found among the three groups comparing pregnancy rate per started IVF cycle. In conclusion, application of the described mild ovarian stimulation protocol resulted in pregnancy rates per started IVF cycle similar to those observed after profound stimulation with GnRH agonist cotreatment despite shorter stimulation and a 27% reduction in exogenous FSH. A higher cancellation rate before oocyte retrieval was compensated by improved embryo quality concomitant with a higher chance of undergoing embryo transfer. A relatively low number of oocytes retrieved after mild ovarian stimulation distinctly differs from the pathological reduction in the number of oocytes retrieved after profound ovarian stimulation (poor response) associated with poor IVF outcome. The relatively small number of oocytes obtained after mild ovarian stimulation may represent the best of the cohort in a given cycle. Little data exist on the effects of adjunctive therapy with leuprolide acetate (LA) in the luteal phase of women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) undergoing ovulation induction with human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG). Additionally, it is not known whether gonadal steroid concentrations in the luteal phase of induced cycles in PCOS are predictive of pregnancy. In this prospective, randomized study comparing cycles using hMG alone (n = 26) with cycles using hMG with LA (n = 33), no differences were noted between treatment groups in progesterone (P), estradiol (E2), and P:E2 ratios on luteal days 3, 6, and 9. When all treatment cycles were pooled, there were no differences in P, E2, or P:E2 ratios, comparing conception and nonconception cycles. We conclude that adjunctive therapy with LA in PCOS patients undergoing ovulation induction with hMG does not alter the luteal phase concentrations of P, E2, and P:E2. Furthermore, no correlation was found between the serum concentrations of these luteal phase steroids and cycle fecundity.
At this moment there are not sufficient data to determine which of rFSH or uFSH is preferable for ovulation induction in women with PCOS.