Effects of low-dose oral contraceptives on body weight: results of a randomized study of up to 13 cycles of use. A comparative study of one-year weight gain among users of medroxyprogesterone acetate, levonorgestrel implants, and oral contraceptives. Weight changes in clients on hormonal contraceptives in Zaria, Nigeria. Effects of two types of hormonal contraception--oral versus intravaginal--on the sexual life of women and their partners. Contraceptive efficacy and cycle control with the Ortho Evra/Evra transdermal system: the analysis of pooled data. Comparison profiles of cycle control, side effects and sexual satisfaction of three hormonal contraceptives. Association between efficacy and body weight or body mass index for two low-dose oral contraceptives. Effects of a new oral contraceptive containing an antimineralocorticoid progestogen, drospirenone, on the renin-aldosterone system, body weight, blood pressure, glucose tolerance, and lipid metabolism. A comparative study on the effects of a contraceptive vaginal ring NuvaRing and an oral contraceptive on carbohydrate metabolism and adrenal and thyroid function.
To compare the effect of 2 oral contraceptives (OCs) on body weight.
                A randomized, parallel-group, multicenter study of 1,723 women taking an OC with norgestimate (NGM) 180/215/250 microg/ethinyl estradiol (EE) 25 microg vs. 1,171 women taking on OC with norethindrone acetate 1 mg/EE 20 microg for 6-13 cycles was performed. Body weight changes between baseline and cycle 6 and baseline and cycle 13 were analyzed. Analysis included not only changes in mean body weight but also the distribution of changes that were within 5% of baseline weight, 5-10% of baseline weight and > 10% of baseline weight. Only the 10% change was felt to be clinically significant.
                The distribution of body weight changes did not statistically differ between the 2 OC groups for any parameter measured. The mean weight change after 6 months for the NGM/EE and norethindrone acetate/EE groups was +0.71 kg and +0.57 kg, respectively. At 13 cycles for the NGM/EE and norethindrone acetate/ EE groups, the mean body weight change was +0.93 kg and +0.62 kg, respectively. Only 0.3% of subjects in both OC groups experienced a 10% change in weight.
                Use of OCs does not substantially affect body weight for most women. With the recent introduction and growing popularity of Depo-Provera Contraceptive Injection, concern about the potential for weight gain during treatment has been raised. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether or not Depo-Provera Contraceptive Injection is associated with greater weight gain, and incidence thereof, than Norplant implants or oral contraceptives. A retrospective chart review of patients seen at a state- and federally-funded clinic was conducted. Fifty women in each treatment group who met the study criteria were identified and included in the study evaluation. Mean one-year weight gain for subjects in each group was as follows: -2.0 pounds in the oral contraceptive group, -1.8 pounds in the Norplant implants group, and +0.1 pounds in the Depo-Provera Contraceptive Injection group. While results among treatment groups differed slightly, no significant weight change occurred in any of the treatment groups. Misconceptions exist in Nigeria about the effects of hormonal contraceptives on weight, which may have negative effects on contraceptive use. Data from case notes of clients attending the reproductive health centre at the Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital, Zaria, between 1993 and 1995, were analysed to determine the effects of hormonal contraceptives on body weight, comparing them to clients using intrauterine contraceptive devices. Weight changes were not significantly different in clients using hormonal contraceptives and those using intrauterine contraceptive devices. This information will be beneficial in contraceptive counselling for clients in this environment and provide a baseline for further research. Data relating to the influence of hormonal contraception on sexual life are conflicting and mostly they refer to oral contraceptives. In this randomized, controlled, prospective study we compared the effect of an intravaginal hormonal contraceptive with the effect of a combined oral contraceptive on sexual function.
                Fifty-one healthy women with a permanent partner and an active sexual life were randomly divided in two groups according to a computer-generated randomization list: 26 women (group A) used an intravaginal contraceptive releasing 120 microg/day of etonogestrel and 15 microg/day of ethinylestradiol (EE) and 25 women (group B) used an oral contraceptive containing 20 microg di EE and 150 microg of desogestrel. Twenty-five women participated in the study as control group (group C). A specific questionnaire was completed by the patients and their partners at the start of the study and after cycles 3 and 6 of contraceptive use.
                Within 3 months of contraceptive use, women from both groups A and B reported a global improvement in sexual function. A statistically significant increase in sexual fantasy was reported only by patients of group A. Whereas partners of the women in both groups A and B reported an improvement in sexual function after 3 months of contraceptive intake, only patients' partners of group A reported a significant increase in sexual interest, complicity and sexual fantasy.
                Both hormonal contraceptives tested were seen to have a positive effect on some aspects of sexual function. The intravaginal contraceptive ring seems to exert a further positive effect on the psychological aspect of both women and their partners, which is evident from an improved complicity and sexual satisfaction. To present efficacy and cycle control data pooled from three pivotal studies of the contraceptive patch (Ortho Evra/Evra).
                Three multicenter, open-label, contraceptive studies that included up to 13 treatment cycles.Setting: 183 centers.
                3,319 women.Intervention(s): Three consecutive 7-day patches (21 days) with 1 patch-free week per cycle.
                Contraceptive efficacy and cycle control.
                Overall and method failure life-table estimates of contraceptive failure through 13 cycles were 0.8% (95% CI, 0.3%-1.3%) and 0.6% (95% CI, 0.2%-0.9%), respectively. Corresponding Pearl indices were 0.88 (95% CI, 0.44-1.33) and 0.7 (95% CI, 0.31-1.10). Contraceptive failure among women with a body weight < 90 kg (<198 lb) was low and uniformly distributed across the weight range. A subgroup of women with body weight > or = 90 kg (> or = 198 lb) may have increased risk of pregnancy. The incidence of breakthrough bleeding was low and decreased over time.
                In contraceptive patch users, the overall annual probability of pregnancy was 0.8% and the method failure probability was 0.6%. The efficacy of the patch was high and similar across age and racial groups. Among women < 90 kg (<198 lb), contraceptive failure was low and uniformly distributed across the range of body weights. In women > or = 90 kg (> or = 198 lb), contraceptive failures may be increased. Efficacy and cycle control have been shown to be comparable to an established oral contraceptive. The objective of this study was to compare cycle control, tolerability and sexual well-being with the use of three hormonal contraceptives.
                In this prospective randomized study, the effects of two combined oral contraceptives [20 microg of ethinylestradiol (EE)/100 microg of levonorgestrel and 15 microg of EE/60 microg of gestodene] were compared with those of the vaginal ring (15 microg of EE/120 microg of etonogestrel). One-year data from 280 women were obtained. We investigated the pattern of menstrual cycle and the incidence of weight gain, nausea, headache, breast tenderness, irritability, depression and vaginal dryness. Moreover, desire and sexual satisfaction were evaluated. Finally, the cumulative rate of discontinuation in the three groups was estimated.
                The analysis of adverse events revealed two crucial points for acceptability, compliance and continuation: poor cycle control and disturbance of sexual intercourse due to vaginal dryness and loss of desire. This analysis investigated the association of oral contraceptive efficacy with body weight and body mass index (BMI) for hypothesis-generating purposes.
                Data were from a randomized, parallel-group trial of 180/215/250 mcg of norgestimate (NGM)/25 mcg of ethinyl estradiol (EE) (given to 1671 women) and 1 mg of norethindrone acetate (NETA)/20 mcg of EE (given to 1139 women). Pregnancies were evaluated across BMI deciles and by BMI and body weight dichotomies. A Pearl index was calculated for each treatment group. The relative risk (RR) of pregnancy was calculated with a Cox proportional hazards model.
                The Pearl index for women who received NGM/EE was 2.36 [95% confidence interval (CI)=1.33-3.40]; for those who received NETA/EE, the Pearl index was 3.29 (95% CI=1.81-4.77). Consistent, weak positive associations between weight and pregnancy risk were found. Overall, for women with a BMI >or=25 kg/m(2) (compared with women with a BMI <25 kg/m(2)), the RR of pregnancy was 1.84 (95% CI=0.98-3.45); that for women who received NGM/EE was 1.39 (95% CI=0.57-3.40), whereas that for women who received NETA/EE was 2.49 (95% CI=1.01-6.13). For women with a body weight >or=70 kg (compared with women with a body weight <70 kg), the RR was 1.25 (95% CI=0.63-2.46); that for women who received NGM/EE was 1.41 (95% CI=0.56-3.54), whereas that for women who received NETA/EE was 1.12 (95% CI=0.40-3.12).
                Women in the higher body weight or BMI category showed a small increase in the risk of pregnancy with these oral contraceptives, but this increase was not statistically significant overall or for either formulation studied. Combined hormonal oral contraceptives (OCs) may lead to a mild rise in blood pressure and body weight. In rare instances, large increments in blood pressure are measured. We investigated the effect of a combination of ethinyl estradiol (EE) plus a progestogen with antimineralocorticoid, i.e. natriuretic, properties [Drospirenone (DRSP)] on body weight, blood pressure, the renin-aldosterone system, atrial natriuretic factor, plasma lipids, and glucose tolerance. It is anticipated that this will lead to the development of an OC that does not raise body weight or blood pressure. Four groups of 20 women each received 30 micrograms EE plus 3 mg DRSP (group A), 20 micrograms EE plus 3 mg DRSP (group B), 15 micrograms EE plus 3 mg DRSP (group C), and, as a control OC, 30 micrograms EE plus 150 micrograms levonorgestrel (Microgynon, Schering; group D) for 6 months. During the OC-free control cycles before and after treatment and throughout treatment, the target parameters were measured. Between the pretreatment cycle and the sixth treatment cycle, mean body weight fell by 0.8 to 1.7 kg in groups A, B, and C (P < 0.05 vs. D), whereas it rose by 0.7 kg in group D. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures fell by 1-4 mm Hg in groups A, B, and C (significant for A and C vs. D) and increased by 1-2 mm Hg in group D. Renin substrate rose equally in all groups (P < 0.05), whereas PRA and plasma aldosterone rose significantly only in the DRSP groups, presumably due to sodium loss. In the DRSP groups, high density lipoprotein cholesterol rose (P < 0.05), in contrast to group D. Low density lipoprotein cholesterol fell slightly (P > 0.05), whereas triglyceride levels showed a stronger increase in the DRSP groups (P < 0.05) than in group D. All groups attained good cycle control; group A had the best. Side-effects were minimal. To our knowledge, this is the first report on a combined OC that leads to a small decrease in body weight and blood pressure. It may be especially beneficial for women susceptible for a gain in weight and a rise in blood pressure. To compare carbohydrate metabolism, adrenal and thyroid function during use of a combined contraceptive vaginal ring (NuvaRing, NV Organon, Oss, The Netherlands) with those of a combined oral contraceptive.
                Healthy women aged 18-40 years used either the vaginal ring, delivering 15 microg ethinylestradiol and 120 microg of etonogestrel per day, or a combined oral contraceptive containing 30 microg ethinylestradiol and 150 microg levonorgestrel, for six cycles. Each cycle comprised 3 weeks of use of the ring or the pill followed by 1 ring- or pill-free week. The following parameters were measured at baseline and at the end of cycles 3 and 6: carbohydrate metabolism (glucose, insulin, glycosylated hemoglobin); adrenal function (total cortisol, cortisol binding globulin, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate); thyroid function (thyroid stimulating hormone, free thyroxine).
                Small and similar increases in insulin were seen in both groups. Concentrations of cortisol binding globulin and total cortisol rose significantly less during ring use than during combined oral contraceptive use (cycle 3, p= 0.0002; cycle 6, p < 0.0001). Levels of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate did not change in either group. Thyroid stimulating hormone levels increased significantly more in the ring group at cycle 3 (p = 0.0016) but free thyroxine levels were unchanged in both groups.
                Both the vaginal ring and the oral contraceptive have no clinically relevant effects on carbohydrate metabolism, adrenal or thyroid function.
Available evidence was insufficient to determine the effect of combination contraceptives on weight, but no large effect was evident. Trials to evaluate the link between combination contraceptives and weight change require a placebo or non-hormonal group to control for other factors, including changes in weight over time.