A double-blind placebo-controlled evaluation of sublingual immunotherapy with a standardized ragweed extract in patients with seasonal rhinitis. Evidence for a dose-response relationship. Sublingual-swallow immunotherapy (SLIT) with a standardized five-grass-pollen extract (drops and sublingual tablets) versus placebo in seasonal rhinitis. Comparison of the efficacy of subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy in mite-sensitive patients with rhinitis and asthma--a placebo controlled study. Sublingual immunotherapy in Parietaria pollen-induced rhinitis: a double-blind study. Randomized double-blind controlled study with sublingual carbamylated allergoid immunotherapy in mild rhinitis due to mites. Clinical efficacy of sublingual-swallow immunotherapy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of a standardized five-grass-pollen extract in rhinitis. Randomized controlled trial of high-dose sublingual immunotherapy to treat seasonal allergic rhinitis. Sublingual immunotherapy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with Parietaria judaica extract standardized in mass units in patients with rhinoconjunctivitis, asthma, or both. Double-blind placebo-controlled evaluation of sublingual-swallow immunotherapy with standardized Parietaria judaica extract in children with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.
There is a growing consensus on the benefits of sublingual-swallow immunotherapy in the treatment of allergic diseases.
                This randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study was undertaken to assess the efficacy and safety of sublingual immunotherapy with standardized ragweed pollen extract tablets, in patients with an allergic rhinitis. A total of 110 outpatients were randomized (immunotherapy [I]: 55; placebo [P]: 55), of whom 99 were analyzable for efficacy (I: 48; P: 51) and 106 analyzable for safety (I: 53; P: 53). After a 28-day progression phase, the patients received a maintenance treatment during 6.5 months. Efficacy variables included a global assessment of efficacy (patient/ investigator), symptoms and medication scores as well as the frequency of asthma attacks.
                In the active treatment group, 43 patients completed the study, versus 49 on placebo. During the whole period of pollination, the difference favoring immunotherapy was highly significant for the global assessment by the patient (p = 0.004) and by the investigator (p = 0.005). Adverse reactions were reported more often in the active treatment but mild or moderate, and they abated after dose adjustment. A subgroup analysis of those patients receiving the highest dose of immunotherapy (3 tablets 3 times a week) showed a highly significant response for rhinitis and conjunctivitis total scores by comparison to lower dosages.
                This study confirms the efficacy and safety of sublingual immunotherapy and strongly suggests a dose-response relationship.
                Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel Recent studies have demonstrated the efficacy of sublingual-swallow immunotherapy (SLIT) in seasonal and perennial rhinitis. Sublingual administration of solutions is not convenient for all patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy administered sublingually, initially as drops, and then as tablets during maintenance therapy.
                A total of 126 patients with grass-pollen seasonal rhinitis were included in this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. During the progression of doses phase, the five-grass extract was given as sublingual drops from 1 to 100 IR/ml. Once the 100 IR dose was reached, the drops were replaced by a single 100-IR sublingual tablet per day.
                Throughout the grass-pollen season, patients in the active treatment group had significantly lower (P < 0.05) total conjunctivitis and ocular redness scores. Rhinitis symptoms were not significantly different between the two groups. Patients given the active treatment were significantly (P < O.02) less likely to have asthma symptoms. The global medication score showed no significant difference between the two groups. A highly significant difference in favor of the active treatment group was seen in inhaled salbutamol use (P < 0.01).
                Clinical benefits achieved during the present study included significant improvements in conjunctivitis symptoms and prevention of asthma symptoms. The overall safety profile of the active treatment (drops or tablets) was good. The efficacy of therapy with sublingual allergen extracts is unproven.
                To evaluate the clinical and immunologic outcome of sublingual immunotherapy and to compare the results with subcutaneous immunotherapy and placebo in 36 patients with rhinitis and asthma due to mite allergy.
                Thirty-six patients with rhinitis and asthma due to mite allergy were randomly divided into three groups in order to receive subcutaneous injections with allergenic extracts, sublingual drops with solutions of purified standardized allergen preparations, or sublingual placebo for a period of 1 year. Assessment of clinical and immunologic efficacy included symptom and medication scores, methacholine provocation tests, skin prick tests, and specific IgE and IgG4 antibody concentrations.
                Subcutaneous immunotherapy for both rhinitis and asthma was clinically effective. Patients treated with sublingual immunotherapy had decreased rhinitis symptoms (P < .01) but no change in asthma scores. Medication scores significantly decreased in both actively treated groups (P < .01) at the first year compared with baseline. When skin prick tests were evaluated, the subcutaneously treated group had a significant decrease in the wheal diameter of D. pteronyssinus (P < .01), D. farinae (P < .05), and histamine (P < .05) while other two groups showed no difference. There was no significant change in methacholine PC20 values in all groups at the end of the first year when compared with baseline. No change in D. pteronyssinus and D. farinae specific IgE levels were observed; however, specific IgG4 concentrations were significantly higher than baseline both in sublingual and subcutaneous immunotherapy groups (P < .05) after 1 year immunotherapy. No significant difference was obtained in any of these parameters in the placebo group.
                Sublingual immunotherapy may be effective in patients with allergic rhinitis. Further, we believe it is a potential therapy for allergic asthmatic patients. The clinical usefulness of this form of immunotherapy (when administered to larger study groups for a longer time) and the mechanisms underlying its immunologic effect deserve additional studies. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of immunotherapy was conducted in 31 patients with allergic rhinitis due to Parietaria pollen to evaluate the efficacy and safety of high doses of allergen via the sublingual route. The patients were assessed before and after a 10-month period of treatment by clinical (symptom-medication scores and specific nasal reactivity) and immunological (total IgE, specific IgE, IgG and IgG4 antibodies) parameters. High doses of Parietaria extract corresponding to a cumulative dose of 105 BU for each patient were administered with negligible side effects. The actively treated patients had significantly lower medication scores than those on placebo (p < 0.05) when the maximum pollen count was recorded, and at the end of the trial they showed a significant decrease in nasal reactivity (p < 0.02) and a significant increase in serum specific IgG4 (p = 0.02). No differences were detected in any of these parameters in the placebo group. Possible explanations for the mechanisms of sublingual immunotherapy are proposed. The clinical efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in mite allergy and in mild disease is still a matter of debate, thus we performed a long-term clinical trial.
                The study was randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled. After a 1-year assessment, 68 patients with mild rhinitis with/without asthma due to mites were randomized to drugs + placebo or drugs + SLIT for 2 years. Sublingual immunotherapy was given as soluble tablets of monomeric carbamylated allergoid. Clinical scores for asthma and rhinitis (0, absent to 3, severe) and drug consumption were assessed by diary card in the period November-February. Quality of life was assessed before and after each observation period and pharmaco-economy data were evaluated as well.
                Fifty-six patients completed the study. The rate of dropouts was similar in the two groups. No relevant side effect was reported. There was a significant reduction of total clinical scores (P < 0.05) in the active group vs placebo at the first year, but not at the second whereas nasal obstruction significantly improved in both years (P < 0.05). The reduction of drug intake score was significant only at the first year. No change was observed concerning most of the Short Form-36 items, because at baseline all patients displayed a normal profile. A significant change in SLIT group was seen for the item 'change in health status'. The need for extra visits was significantly lower in the active group (25%vs 43%).
                Sublingual immunotherapy was clinically effective and safe in mite-induced mild disease. Sublingual-swallow immunotherapy (SLIT) using high doses of standardized allergen extracts has been found to be effective in reducing allergic symptoms and medication needs. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study was carried out in a large number of patients to determine whether medication needs can be reduced by SLIT. Some 136 patients with grass-pollen rhinitis with or without mild asthma were studied. Patients received either placebo or SLIT with a standardized grass-pollen extract administered daily with increasing doses up to 300 IR (index of reactivity) from January to the end of July 1994. During the grass-pollen season, patients were instructed to use medications as required and to visit their doctors in case of asthma. Symptom-medications scores were assessed during the pollen season, and serum-specific IgG4 was measured before and at the end of SLIT. In the SLIT group, drug consumption dropped significantly throughout the pollen season (P < 0.02). Moreover, at the peak of the pollen season, betamethasone consumption was significantly reduced in the SLIT group (P < 0.02). Only one patient in the SLIT group had an asthma attack compared to eight patients in the placebo group (P < 0.02). IgG4 levels increased significantly in the SLIT group (P < 0.001) but without correlation with symptoms. Side-effects were comparable in both groups. This study indicates that SLIT in grass-pollen rhinitis is well tolerated, improves overall clinical symptoms, and reduces drug consumption and the need for oral corticosteroids. Seasonal allergic rhinitis is common and troublesome. Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) has been proposed as an alternative to injection immunotherapy and might offer some advantages if it were effective and practical in a community setting.
                To assess the efficacy and side-effect profile of SLIT in patients with summer hay fever uncontrolled on current standard medication. To assess the feasibility of delivering SLIT in a United Kingdom general practice setting.
                Double-blind, placebo-controlled study in 186 patients with severe summer hay fever identified from 16 United Kingdom general practices. After a baseline year to ensure balanced groups, subjects were randomized, and SLIT was given for 1 or 2 years and compared with placebo. The principal outcome measure was symptoms as recorded on diary cards. Secondary criteria were skin and conjunctival reactivity, allergen-specific IgE and IgG 4 , and the frequency and severity of adverse effects.
                One hundred thirty-six subjects completed the study. After 1 year, no significant differences were found between actively treated subjects and the placebo group. After the second year of therapy, subjects who had received 2 years treatment were 6.8 times more likely to show a reduction in nose running (P <.001) and 2.4 times more likely to have reduced sneezing (P <.05) compared with subjects in the placebo group. Benefits for nasal blockage were found at the peak pollen season and were similar in both actively treated groups.
                Sublingual immunotherapy can be given successfully and safely in the community. High-dose SLIT has beneficial effects on nasal symptoms during the peak pollen season in patients with severe seasonal allergic rhinitis. At least 2 years of treatment with SLIT is required to show a benefit. New routes of administering immunotherapy in respiratory allergy are being studied as an alternative to conventional injective immunotherapy. We carried out a study to evaluate the clinical efficacy and effects of sublingual immunotherapy in patients with Parietaria judaica-induced respiratory allergy.
                A double-blind, placebo-controlled design was followed. Thirty patients with P. judaica rhinoconjunctivitis, mild asthma, or both were randomly chosen for sublingual immunotherapy (14 patients) or placebo treatment (16 patients). The patients underwent preseasonal rush induction treatment followed by coseasonal maintenance treatment during the Parietaria pollen season. Symptom and drug scores, as well as specific IgE and specific IgG4, were recorded.
                Significantly lower symptom and drug scores were found (P=0.04), especially during the Parietaria pollination period, in the immunotherapy group. No significant difference in specific IgE and specific IgG4 was detected between the active and placebo groups; a statistically significant increase of specific IgE was detected in both groups (P=0.05). No patient undergoing active sublingual immunotherapy reported local or systemic side-effects.
                Our data suggest that sublingual immunotherapy is both clinically effective and safe in treating patients with Parietaria-induced rhinoconjunctivitis and mild asthma. Sublingual-swallow immunotherapy was recently recognized in the World Health Organization Position Paper (Allergen immunotherapy: therapeutic vaccines for allergic diseases) "as a viable alternative to parenteral injection therapy to treat allergic diseases" in adults. More controlled studies were required to assess the efficacy and safety of this treatment in children.
                This study was carried out to assess the clinical efficacy and safety profile of sublingual-swallow immunotherapy with high-dose allergen in children with allergies.
                We used a double-blind placebo-controlled design. Forty-one children with Parietaria -induced rhinoconjunctivitis were randomized to receive sublingual standardized Parietaria judaica extract (n = 20) or placebo (n = 21) for 2 years. The cumulative dose of allergen was 375 times higher than that used in parenteral immunotherapy and the cumulative dose of Par j 1 major allergen was 52.5 mg over 2 years. The main efficacy assessment criteria were symptoms and rescue medication scores recorded on the patients' diary cards. Secondary criteria were changes in skin and conjunctival specific reactivity as well as blood parameters, analyzed after 1 and 2 years of immunotherapy. The safety of the treatment was assessed by evaluating the frequency and severity of adverse effects.
                A significant reduction in rhinitis symptoms was observed in the active treatment group during the second season (P =.02), with no difference in medication scores. A significant decrease in skin reactivity (P =.002 after 2 years of treatment) and an increase in the threshold dose for conjunctival allergen provocation test (P =.02) were observed in the active treatment group compared with the group receiving placebo. A significant increase in specific IgG(4 ) levels (P =.02) was also observed in the active group. Immunotherapy was well tolerated.
                Sublingual-swallow immunotherapy in Parietaria -allergic children provided a clinical benefit and a decreased specific reactivity to the allergen. The safety profile of this treatment, which constitutes an important issue, indicated good tolerance and compliance.
This updated review reinforces the conclusion of the original 2003 Cochrane Review that sublingual immunotherapy is effective for allergic rhinitis and has been proven to be a safe route of administration.