Short-term regular beta 2-adrenergic agonists treatment is safe in mild asthmatics taking low doses of inhaled steroids. Randomised trial of an inhaled beta2 agonist, inhaled corticosteroid and their combination in the treatment of asthma. [Combination of inhaled salmeterol/fluticasone and tiotropium in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised controlled trial]. A long-term evaluation of once-daily inhaled tiotropium in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cost effectiveness of leukotriene receptor antagonists versus long-acting beta-2 agonists as add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids for asthma: a pragmatic trial. [A fixed combination of fluticasone and salmeterol permits better control of asthma than a beclomethasone dipropionate and montelukast combination]. Poor adherence with inhaled corticosteroids for asthma: can using a single inhaler containing budesonide and formoterol help? Comparative clinical study of inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate and triamcinolone acetonide in persistent asthma. Randomised controlled trial of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Regular treatment with beta 2-adrenergic agonists is controversial in bronchial asthma. To investigate whether beta 2-adrenergic agonists can be used safely if associated with low doses of inhaled steroids, for a short period, without a deterioration of asthma control, we have examined 24 mild asthmatics. In a parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 1 week of run-in and run-out period framed 3 weeks of treatment. All patients received inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP 250 micrograms t.i.d.); after 1 week, 12 patients inhaled 400 micrograms of broxaterol and 12 patients received placebo t.i.d. FVC, FEV1, PD20-FEV1 methacholine, morning and evening PEF, and PEF amplitude % mean were measured before, during, and after treatment. No significant changes were noted in patients receiving inhaled broxaterol. There were no differences in symptoms and the use of rescue medication (salbutamol spray). We conclude that short-term regular treatment with beta 2-adrenergic agonists is not associated with a deterioration in asthma control in mild asthmatics inhaling low doses of steroids. Although many asthmatic patients are treated with a combination of beta2 agonist and corticosteroid inhalers, the clinical effects of combining the drugs are unknown. Studies on the early asthmatic response to allergen suggest that beta2 agonists may reduce the benefit of inhaled corticosteroids. A study of the effects of combining the drugs on asthma control was undertaken.
                Sixty one subjects with mild to moderate asthma were randomised to a double blind crossover comparison of inhaled budesonide (200-400 microg twice daily), terbutaline (500-1000 microg four times daily), combined treatment, and placebo. Each treatment was given for six weeks following a four week washout period. Ipratropium was used for symptom relief. Treatments were ranked from worst (1) to best (4) based on need for oral steroid, mean morning peak flow, nocturnal awakening, ipratropium use, and asthma symptoms. Lung function and bronchial hyperresponsiveness were measured before and after each treatment.
                Evaluable data for all four treatments were obtained from 47 subjects. The mean rank of each treatment was: placebo = 2.05; terbutaline = 2.13; budesonide = 2.48; combined treatment = 3.34. Combined treatment was ranked significantly better than any other treatment (p<0.01). Mean (95% CI) morning and evening peak flows were 14 (5 to 23) and 24 (15 to 34) l/min higher, respectively, during combined treatment than during budesonide, and 27 (17 to 37) and 15 (7 to 23) l/min higher than during terbutaline. Asthma symptoms tended to be least frequent during combined treatment but were not significantly different from budesonide alone. There was no significant difference between combined treatment and budesonide alone for lung function and bronchial hyperresponsiveness.
                In this group of mild to moderate asthmatic subjects the combination of beta2 agonist and corticosteroid gave better asthma control than either treatment alone. There was no evidence that regular beta2 agonist treatment impaired the beneficial effect of inhaled corticosteroid. To observe the efficacy of combination therapy with inhaled salmeterol/fluticasone and tiotropium in reducing the frequency of acute episodes of symptom exacerbation and improving lung function and health status in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
                One hundred and twenty-six patients (M/F: 92/34) with COPD were treated in a randomised, parallel-group, controlled study with salmeterol/fluticasone (50/250 microg) twice daily and tiotropium 18 microg once daily (n = 33, M/F: 23/10); salmeterol/fluticasone (50/250 microg) twice daily (n = 32, M/F: 24/8); or tiotropium 18 microg once daily (n = 32, M/F: 23/9) for 12 months. Patients in the blank control group (n = 29, M/F: 22/7) did not receive any inhaled anticholinergic drugs, long-acting beta(2) agonists or glucocorticoid therapy. Intention-to-treat analysis (n = 161) and per-protocol analysis (n = 126, age 45 - 71 years) were performed.
                Three active treatments significantly improved symptoms and health status. The use of rescue medication in the combination group [1 (0 - 7) time, 95% CI] was significantly decreased compared with those in the blank group [2 (0 - 29) times], salmeterol/fluticasone alone [2 (0 - 13) times], tiotropium alone [1 (0 - 11) time], F = 4.914, P < 0.01. The frequency of exacerbations in the combination group was (0.7 +/- 0.5) time, significantly lower than that in the blank group [(1.5 +/- 0.9) times], salmeterol/fluticasone alone [(1.2 +/- 0.6) times], and tiotropium alone [(1.1 +/- 0.5) times], F = 8.513, P < 0.01. The FEV(1) in the combination group after the trial was (1.19 +/- 0.03) L, significantly improved compared to that before treatment (1.09 +/- 0.04) L, a 9.5% increase, which was greater than the blank (0.9%), tiotropium alone (8.2%) and salmeterol/fluticasone alone (6.3%), t = -5.024 to -15.58, P < 0.01.
                Combination therapy with salmeterol/fluticasone and tiotropium leads to better control of symptoms and improved lung function, with no greater risk of side-effects, as compared to salmeterol/fluticasone or tiotropium alone in the treatment of COPD. Currently available inhaled bronchodilators used as therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) necessitate multiple daily dosing. The present study evaluates the long-term safety and efficacy of tiotropium, a new once-daily anticholinergic in COPD. Patients with stable COPD (age 65.2+/-8.7 yrs (mean+/-SD), n=921) were enrolled in two identical randomized double-blind placebo-controlled 1-yr studies. Patients inhaled tiotropium 18 microg or placebo (mean screening forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 1.01 versus 0.99 L, 39.1 and 38.1% of the predicted value) once daily as a dry powder. The primary spirometric outcome was trough FEV1 (i.e. FEV1 prior to dosing). Changes in dyspnoea were measured using the Transition Dyspnea Index, and health status with the disease-specific St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire and the generic Short Form 36. Medication use and adverse events were recorded. Tiotropium provided significantly superior bronchodilation relative to placebo for trough FEV1 response (approximately 12% over baseline) (p<0.01) and mean response during the 3 h following dosing (approximately 22% over baseline) (p<0.001) over the 12-month period. Tiotropium recipients showed less dyspnoea (p<0.001), superior health status scores, and fewer COPD exacerbations and hospitalizations (p<0.05). Adverse events were comparable with placebo, except for dry mouth incidence (tiotropium 16.0% versus placebo 2.7%, p<0.05). Tiotropium is an effective, once-daily bronchodilator that reduces dyspnoea and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation frequency and improves health status. This suggests that tiotropium will make an important contribution to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease therapy. Information is lacking on the relative effectiveness and cost effectiveness--in a real-life primary-care setting--of leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) and long-acting beta2 adrenergic receptor agonists (beta2 agonists) as add-on therapy for patients whose asthma symptoms are not controlled on low-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS).
                To estimate the cost effectiveness of LTRAs compared with long-acting beta2 agonists as add-on therapy for patients whose asthma symptoms are not controlled on low-dose ICS.
                An economic evaluation was conducted alongside a 2-year, pragmatic, randomized controlled trial set in 53 primary-care practices in the UK. Patients aged 12-80 years with asthma insufficiently controlled with ICS (n = 361) were randomly assigned to add-on LTRAs (n = 176) or long-acting beta2 agonists (n = 185). The main outcome measures were the incremental cost per point improvement in the Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (MiniAQLQ), per point improvement in the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) and per QALY gained from perspectives of the UK NHS and society.
                Over 2 years, the societal cost per patient receiving LTRAs was pounds sterling 1157 versus pounds sterling 952 for long-acting beta2 agonists, a (significant, adjusted) increase of pounds sterling 214 (95% CI 2, 411) [year 2005 values]. Patients receiving LTRAs experienced a non-significant incremental gain of 0.009 QALYs (95% CI -0.077, 0.103). The incremental cost per QALY gained from the societal (NHS) perspective was pounds sterling 22,589 (pounds sterling 11,919). Uncertainty around this point estimate suggested that, given a maximum willingness to pay of pounds sterling 30,000 per QALY gained, the probability that LTRAs are a cost-effective alternative to long-acting beta2 agonists as add-on therapy was approximately 52% from both societal and NHS perspectives.
                On balance, these results marginally favour the repositioning of LTRAs as a cost-effective alternative to long-acting beta2 agonists as add-on therapy to ICS for asthma. However, there is much uncertainty surrounding the incremental cost effectiveness because of similarity of clinical benefit and broad confidence intervals for differences in healthcare costs.
                UK National Research Register N0547145240; Controlled Clinical Trials ISRCTN99132811. It is now recommended to add an inhaled long-acting beta 2-agonist, or as an alternative, to add a leukotriene-antagonist, in patients whose asthma is insufficiently controlled with an inhaled corticosteroid alone. A randomised, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group study was carried out in 246 patients of at least 15 years, whose asthma was not adequately controlled with a medium dose of an inhaled corticosteroid. They received either fluticasone/salmeterol combination 250/50 micrograms one inhalation twice daily or CFC beclomethasone dipropionate 250 micrograms two puffs twice daily plus montelukast 10 mg in the evening for 12 weeks. The mean morning PEFR (main criterion) was significantly (p = 0.017) more improved with fluticasone/salmeterol (+44.2 L/min) than with beclomethasone dipropionate plus montelukast (+31.0 L/min). Other outcomes showed significantly better improvements (p 0.022 Pound) with fluticasone/salmeterol than with beclomethasone plus montelukast. The two treatments were well tolerated. Fluticasone/salmeterol provided a better asthma control than beclomethasone dipropionate plus montelukast in patients insufficiently controlled with an inhaled corticosteroid alone. Poor adherence with inhaled corticosteroids is an important problem in asthma management. Previous approaches to improving adherence have had limited success.
                To determine whether treatment with a single inhaler containing a long-acting beta(2)-agonist and a corticosteroid for maintenance treatment and symptom relief can overcome the problem of poor adherence with inhaled corticosteroids.
                Randomised, parallel group, open-label trial.
                Forty-four general practices in Nottinghamshire.
                Participants who used less than 70% of their prescribed dose of inhaled corticosteroid and had poorly controlled asthma were randomised to budesonide 200 microg one puff twice daily plus their own short-acting beta(2)-agonist as required (control group), or budesonide/formoterol 200/6 microg one puff once daily and as required (active group) for 6 months. The primary outcome was inhaled corticosteroid dose.
                Seventy-one participants (35 control, 36 active group) were randomised. Adherence with budesonide in the control group was approximately 60% of the prescribed dose. Participants in the active group used approximately 80% more budesonide than participants in the control group (448 versus 252 microg/day, mean difference 196 mug, 95% confidence interval 113 to 279; P<0.001) and were less likely to withdraw from the study (3 versus 13; P<0.01). No safety issues were identified.
                Using a single inhaler for both maintenance treatment and symptom relief approximately doubled the dose of inhaled corticosteroid taken, suggesting this could be a useful strategy to overcome the problems related to poor adherence with inhaled corticosteroids. At this time, no placebo-controlled studies in the clinical literature compare the efficacy and safety of the most widely prescribed oral inhaled corticosteroids when dosed at their recommended daily doses. This study compared the efficacy and safety of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) 336 microg/day administered by metered dose inhaler (MDI) alone, and triamcinolone acetonide (TA) 800 microg/day by MDI with a built-in tube extender in adults with persistent asthma.
                This 56-day, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial was conducted in 328 adults with mild to moderately severe asthma (FEV1 50% to 90% of predicted while maintained on inhaled corticosteroids). Patients were seen at a baseline visit and on study days 28 and 56. Efficacy variables included pulmonary function tests, physician and patient assessments of asthma condition, and use of rescue medication.
                Statistically significant improvements from baseline in most efficacy measures were demonstrated for both active treatments versus placebo, and with the following exception were the same between active treatments: mean increase in FEV1 in the beclomethasone dipropionate group was statistically significantly greater than in the triamcinolone acetonide group on day 28. Throughout the study, BDP was statistically superior to TA with respect to mean change from baseline in total asthma symptom scores and for 3 of 8 weeks in reducing the mean average weekly use of rescue albuterol (the two active treatments were comparable for this variable at all other time points). Beclomethasone dipropionate and TA were comparable in safety.
                In adult patients with mild to moderately severe persistent asthma, treatment with BDP consistently conferred greater improvement from baseline in mean FEV1 than TA. This difference achieved statistical significance after 28 days of therapy but was not maintained to endpoint. Decreases in overall asthma symptom scores and in the use of rescue albuterol were statistically significantly greater for the BDP group compared with the TA group. Based on these findings, we conclude that BDP is at least as effective as TA in the treatment of persistent asthma in adults, and judged by some measures, may be superior. Inhaled corticosteroids are known to be beneficial for patients with asthma, but their role in treating patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains controversial. A study was undertaken to determine whether inhaled corticosteroids are of functional benefit in patients who did not show improvement with a trial of oral corticosteroids.
                In phase I patients with stable COPD were given a two week course of oral placebo followed by two weeks of prednisone 40 mg per day in a single blind manner to distinguish between responders and non-responders to oral corticosteroids. In phase II a double blind, randomised, parallel group trial of inhaled budesonide 1600 micrograms per day versus placebo was carried out in 79 nonresponders to oral corticosteroids. The primary outcome measure was forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), and secondary outcome measures were exercise capacity, dyspnoea with exertion, quality of life, peak expiration flow rate, and respiratory symptoms.
                Randomisation allocated 39 subjects to inhaled corticosteroids and 40 to placebo. There was no difference in the change in FEV1 from baseline between the treatment and placebo groups; mean difference -12 ml (95% CI -88 to 63) at three months and -4 ml (95% CI -95 to 87) at six months. The proportion of patients with a 15% or greater improvement was no higher among those receiving inhaled corticosteroids than in the placebo group at any of the follow up visits. Changes in secondary outcomes were also no different.
                Inhaled corticosteroids, even at high doses, were of no physiological or functional benefit in these patients with advanced COPD.
The relative efficacy and safety of adding inhaled corticosteroid to tiotropium and a long-acting beta2-agonist for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients remains uncertain and additional trials are required to answer this question.