Comparison of magnesium sulfate, terbutaline and a placebo for inhibition of preterm labor. A randomized study. A comparison of ritodrine, terbutaline, and magnesium sulfate for the suppression of preterm labor. The use of a calcium antagonist (nifedipine) to suppress preterm labour. Antibiotic treatment of preterm labor with intact membranes: a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Efficacy and safety of nifedipine versus magnesium sulfate in the management of preterm labor: a randomized study. A randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled trial of ascorbic acid supplementation for the prevention of preterm labour. A randomized comparison of nifedipine and ritodrine for suppression of preterm labor. Prevention of preterm delivery: nifedipine or magnesium sulfate. [Treatment of preterm labor with ritodrine].
Magnesium sulfate has been recommended as a safe and effective agent for inhibiting preterm labor. Its reported adequacy as a tocolytic agent, however, has not been substantiated by randomized, controlled trials. To assess the efficacy of magnesium sulfate, we initiated a prospective, randomized study comparing the capabilities of magnesium sulfate, terbutaline and a placebo (5% dextrose in lactated Ringer's solution) for labor inhibition. The study population consisted of 54 patients between 26 and 34 weeks of gestation and in preterm labor. The diagnosis of labor was made if, following hydration, persistent uterine contractions occurred at a frequency of at least three in a ten-minute period and cervical examination suggested active labor. Success was defined as postponement of delivery for at least 48 hours after initiation of therapy. Despite a trend toward increased efficacy in the terbutaline group there were no significant differences between the three treatment groups with regard to capability of delaying delivery at least 48 hours. Also, there were no significant differences between the groups with regard to gestational age at delivery, birth weight and neonatal survival. The fact that delivery occurred in less than 48 hours of approximately one-half the patients under the best of circumstances emphasizes the need for more effective techniques for the inhibition of preterm labor and the need for a better understanding of the mechanisms involved in the initiation of preterm labor. Ritodrine, terbutaline, and magnesium sulfate have all been used in the United States as tocolytic drugs. Studies have shown each of these drugs to be effective in suppressing preterm labor. The current study was undertaken in order to compare their relative safety and efficacy and to evaluate the effectiveness of a second drug when the first-used drug failed to stop contractions. No differences in efficacy could be demonstrated between the drugs; however, there was a marked difference in the incidence of maternal side effects. Because of an unacceptable level of side effects, we have stopped the use of terbutaline at our institution. The efficacy of an orally administered calcium antagonist, nifedipine, in suppressing premature uterine activity, was compared with intravenous ritodrine and no treatment. Nifedipine was found to be significantly more effective than ritodrine or withholding therapy, and was almost devoid of side-effects. Although an association between subclinical intrauterine infection and preterm birth is well established, there is conflicting evidence regarding the benefits of antibiotic administration to women in preterm labor with intact membranes. We attempted to determine the effect of ampicillin-amoxicillin and erythromycin treatment on prolongation of pregnancy, the rate of preterm birth, and neonatal morbidity in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes.
                A multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial was designed and implemented by the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Two hundred seventy-seven women with singleton pregnancies and preterm labor with intact membranes (24 to 34 weeks) were randomly allocated to receive either antibiotics or placebos.
                Of the 2373 patients screened for participation in this study in six medical centers, 277 women were enrolled (n = 133 for antibiotics group vs n = 144 for placebo group). In each study group, 60% of patients completed all the study medications. The overall prevalence of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity was 5.8% (14/239). No significant difference between the antibiotic group and the placebo group was found in maternal outcomes, including duration of randomization-to-delivery interval, frequency of preterm delivery (< 37 weeks), frequency of preterm premature rupture of membranes, clinical chorioamnionitis, endometritis, and number of subsequent admissions for preterm labor. Similarly, no significant difference in neonatal outcomes could be detected between the two groups including respiratory distress syndrome, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, intraventricular hemorrhage, sepsis, and admission and duration of newborn intensive special care unit hospitalization.
                The results of this study do not support the routine use of antibiotic administration to women in preterm labor with intact membranes. Our purpose was to establish the efficacy and safety of nifedipine versus magnesium sulfate in arresting preterm labor and the efficacy of nifedipine versus terbutaline in preventing recurrent labor.
                Singleton pregnancies at < 34 weeks in preterm labor were randomized to either oral nifedipine or intravenous magnesium sulfate. In case of tocolysis failure ritodrine was added. After labor was arrested, the patients in the nifedipine group were maintained on oral nifedipine, and those in the magnesium sulfate group were treated with oral terbutaline until completing 34 weeks.
                Of 100 patients 80 were considered eligible, of whom 39 were randomized to the nifedipine group. Both groups were comparable in terms of a number of entry variables, including cervical examination, contraction frequency, and gestational age. Both drugs were equally effective in arresting labor and delaying delivery > 48 hours, 92% versus 93%. Both study groups had a similar incidence of side effects, although four (10%) of magnesium sulfate-treated patients required drug discontinuation because of severe symptoms. Nifedipine was as effective as terbutaline in preventing recurrent labor, 26% versus 24%, and in achieving a gestation > 34 weeks, 62% versus 68%.
                Oral nifedipine is as effective as magnesium sulfate and terbutaline in arresting and preventing idiopathic preterm labor. In a previous study from this institution, patients at high risk for preterm labour were screened for the presence of bacterial vaginosis (BV). When BV was present, they were randomised to receive either treatment (metronidazole) or placebo (vitamin C). There were significantly more patients with preterm labour in the metronidazole group. The aim of this double-blind randomised placebo-controlled trial study was to determine whether vitamin C could indeed reduce the recurrence risk of preterm labour. Patients with a history of preterm labour in a preceding pregnancy were randomised to receive 250 mg vitamin C or a matching placebo twice daily until 34 weeks' gestation. They attended a dedicated premature labour clinic. Significantly more women delivered before term in the group that received vitamin C, but there was no difference in the outcome of the babies between the two groups. Supplementation with vitamin C did not prevent premature labour. To compare the efficacy and safety of nifedipine and ritodrine in preventing preterm labor, and to evaluate maternal side effects and neonatal outcome.
                Non-blind, randomized controlled trial
                A randomized trial of 102 pregnant women with gestational ages under 34 weeks, including 24 with twin pregnancies and 45 on betasympathicomimetic drugs, who had regular uterine contractions with either observed cervical changes or preterm rupture of membranes. After stratification women were randomly assigned to receive either ritodrine intravenously or nifedipine orally. Fifty-five women were randomized to the nifedipine group and 47 to the ritodrine group. As expected, both groups were comparable in terms of several entry variables, including mean gestational age, ruptured membranes, treatment with tocolytic drugs, cervical examination, contraction frequency, age, and twin gestation. Delivery of women in the nifedipine group was delayed for 48 h, 7 days, and until 34 weeks gestation in 33 (60%), 26 (47%) and 21(38%) cases, respectively, compared with 31 (66%), 21(45%) and 11(23%) women in the ritodrine group (no significant difference). Maternal side effects were significantly less common in the nifedipine group than in the ritodrine group, however after 7 days of therapy there was no difference between the two groups. Neonatal outcome was similar in the two groups, with four neonatal deaths in the nifedipine and five in the ritodrine group.
                Nifedipine seems to be as effective as ritodrine in the treatment of preterm labor and is associated with less frequent side effects. to establish the efficacy and safety of nifedipine and magnesium sulfate in arresting preterm labor.
                seventy-four patients with singleton pregnancies at 23-36 weeks in preterm labor, were selected randomly to receive either oral nifedipine or intravenous magnesium sulfate.
                both drugs had similar tocolytic efficacy and side effects while nifedipine was faster than magnesium sulfate in arresting uterine contractions (4.8 +/- 4.23 vs. 2.98 +/- 3.03 h) P = 0.04.
                this data suggests that oral nifedipine with the same efficacy, side effects and faster action could be a suitable and more convenient alternative to intravenous magnesium sulfate in arresting preterm labor. To investigate the treatment of preterm labor with the beta-adrenergic agonist ritodrine.
                126 women with preterm labor were randomly assigned to intravenous infusion of ritodrine or magnesium sulfate treatment. Using minimal effective dosage for inhibition of uterine activity, terminating therapy on time, and repeating the i.v. infusion if contraction restarted were the strategy for treatment.
                Ritodrine was significantly more effective both in the treating period for suppression of contraction (2.33 +/- 0.63 hr for initiation of inhibiting uterine activity, 9.38 +/- 3.88 days of accumulative treating period) and prolongation of gestation (4.81 +/- 2.83 wks) than that of the magnesium sulfate (P < 0.001, 0.005 and 0.01 respectively), and had a term labor of 73.44%. There was no serious cardiac and pulmonary complications in the ritodrine group.
                The present study has shown that ritodrine as a tocolytic agent is highly effective for the management of preterm labor and relative safe for mother and fetus.
There was very little evidence about using COX inhibitors for preventing preterm labour. There are inadequate data to make any recommendation about using COX inhibitor in practice to prevent preterm labour. Future research should include follow-up of the babies to examine the short-term and long-term effects of COX inhibitors.