Intrauterine contraception for adolescents aged 14-18 years: a multicenter randomized pilot study of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system compared to the Copper T 380A. Clinical performance of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and oral contraceptives in young nulliparous women: a comparative study. A randomized, double-blind study of two combined and two progestogen-only oral contraceptives. Randomized clinical trial with intrauterine devices (levonorgestrel intrauterine device (LNG), CuT 380Ag, CuT 220C and CuT 200B). A 36-month study. Indian Council of Medical Research Task Force on IUD. Open randomised study of use of levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system as alternative to hysterectomy. A 12-month comparative clinical investigation of a levonorgestrel-releasing intracervical device situated in the uterine cavity or cervical canal. Randomised comparative trial of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system and norethisterone for treatment of idiopathic menorrhagia. Long-term intracervical contraception with a levonorgestrel device. Comparative study on intermittent versus continuous use of a contraceptive pill administered by vaginal route.
Intrauterine contraception can provide adolescents with effective, long-term contraception as well as with other health benefits. In adult populations, intrauterine contraception rates highly in patient satisfaction and safety. It is rarely prescribed to adolescents because of limited data.
                Multicenter, randomized, controlled, participant-blinded pilot study of 14-18-year-old females assigned to the Copper T 380A intrauterine device or the Levonorgestrel Intrauterine System. Participants were followed up for 6 months following insertion.
                We enrolled 23 participants; 12 received the Levonorgestrel Intrauterine System, and 11 received the Copper T 380A. At 6 months, the continuation rates were 75% for the Levonorgestrel Intrauterine System users and 45% for the Copper T 380A users (p=.15). Two Copper T 380A users experienced partial expulsion. Heavy bleeding and pelvic pain were the most commonly reported side effects. Participants rated both methods favorably.
                This study shows that at 6 months, though not statistically significant, adolescent continuation rates trended towards being greater with the Levonorgestrel Intrauterine System compared to the Copper T 380A. These pilot data will be helpful in the design of a larger trial of intrauterine contraception use among adolescents. This 1-year randomized study was carried out at family-planning clinics of two university hospitals to compare the safety and acceptability of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG IUS) and oral contraceptives (OCs) in young nulliparous women. The study population consisted of 200 women aged 18-25 years seeking contraception. Ninety-four women entered the LNG IUS group and 99 entered the OC group. Continuation rates, reasons leading to discontinuation, adverse events, menstrual questionnaires, subjective well-being and sexual behavior were evaluated. Nineteen women (20%) in the LNG IUS group discontinued the study during the 1-year observation period, and 27 discontinued (27%) in the OC group. The most common reason (31%) for discontinuation in the IUS group was pain. In the OC group, hormonal side effects were the predominant medical reason for study termination. The safety and acceptability of the LNG IUS for contraception was observed to be as good as with OCs, with a high continuation rate. A randomized double-blind study of two combined oral contraceptives and two progestogen-only oral contraceptives was conducted using the same protocol at WHO Collaborating Centres for Clinical Research in Human Reproduction in Bombay and Ljubljana of the 518 women admitted to the trial, 123 received mestranol 50 micrograms + norethisterone 1mg (MES 50 + NET 1); 137 received ethinyl estradiol 30 micrograms + levonorgestrel 150 micrograms (EE 30 + LNG 150); 130 received norethisterone 350 micrograms/NET 350); and 128 received levonorgestrel 30 micrograms (LNG 30). At one year, between 52.6 and 61.0 percent of those recruited had discontinued oral contraceptive use for all reasons, and by two years, between 70.5 and 76.5 percent had discontinued the treatment. These rates did not differ between the four treatment groups. However, discontinuation rates for all medical reasons at one and two years, and at two years pregnancy rates and discontinuation rates for bleeding disturbances, were significantly lower in the EE/LNG preparation. The groups receiving the MES/NET, LNG and NET had similar pregnancy rates, discontinuation rates for all medical reasons and all bleeding disturbances. There were two ectopic pregnancies among the 22 pregnancies in the progestogen-only groups. Discontinuation because of headache, dizziness and other central nervous system symptoms were significantly more common in those receiving MES/NET compared to EE/LNG. In contrast, discontinuation for gastro-intestinal disturbances were significantly higher in the EE/LNG combined preparation. Bleeding disturbances in the first few cycles tended to be higher in NET than in the LNG group. The data suggest that greater consideration be given to the benefits and risks of including progestogen-only oral contraceptives in the family planning programmes of some countries. A total of 1905 subjects were randomly allocated to four types of intrauterine devices (IUDs) and were observed for 45,683 woman-months of use. While no method failure was observed with levonorgestrel (LNG) IUD, 11 women became pregnant with other devices; 4 with Copper T 380Ag, 1 with Copper T 220C, and 6 while using Copper T 200B, indicating method failure rates of 1.0, 0.3 and 1.6, respectively, at 36 months of use. These rates were within acceptable range. Continuation rates were significantly lower with LNG IUD (74.5, 58.7, 38.8 at 1 year, 2 years and 3 years, respectively) as compared to other copper devices, which ranged between 82.4 to 84.4 at 1 year, 66.6 to 69.9 at 2 years and 45.4 to 50.4 at 3 years. The difference in continuation rates was mainly due to menstrual disturbances (e.g. amenorrhoea, irregular bleeding) which were higher with LNG IUD (27.9 per 100 users) as compared to the copper devices (13.4-15.4 per 100 users) at 36 months of use. The risk of expulsion ranged between 8.3 to 10.6 per 100 users and was comparable for all the devices. The observations from the present study based on 36 months of experience with different intrauterine devices do not indicate the need to replace CuT 200, the device currently in use in the National Programme. To assess whether the levonorgestrel intrauterine system could provide a conservative alternative to hysterectomy in the treatment of excessive uterine bleeding.
                Open randomised multicentre study with two parallel groups: a levonorgestrel intrauterine system group and a control group.
                Gynaecology departments of three hospitals in Finland.
                Fifty six women aged 33-49 years scheduled to undergo hysterectomy for treatment of excessive uterine bleeding.
                Women were randomised either to continue with their current medical treatment or to have a levonorgestrel intrauterine system inserted.
                Proportion of women cancelling their decision to undergo hysterectomy.
                At 6 months, 64.3% (95% confidence interval 44.1 to 81.4%) of the women in the levonorgestrel intrauterine system group and 14.3% (4.0 to 32.7%) in the control group had cancelled their decision to undergo hysterectomy (P < 0.001).
                The use of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system is a good conservative alternative to hysterectomy in the treatment of menorrhagia and should be considered before hysterectomy or other invasive treatments. A randomized study was performed in two clinics in order to compare the efficacy, safety and acceptability of a new model of a levonorgestrel-releasing intracervical device situated either in the cervical canal (group I) or in the uterine cavity (group II). Group I included 151 women (age 18-43) and group II, 147 women (age 19-43). The number of nulliparous women was 145. The total expulsion rate was 9.1%. The expulsion rate was lower among nulliparous women (4.8%) than among parous women (13.1%). There was also a significant difference in the expulsion rates between the two clinics. Two pregnancies occurred in both groups and two of these were ectopic, one in each group. The other two occurred after unnoticed expulsion. These figures give 12-month cumulative pregnancy rates of 1.3% and 1.4% in groups I and II, respectively. Total infection rate was 0.3%. The continuation rates were 82.1% in group I and 85.0% in group II after the first year. At three-month follow-up there were significantly fewer menstrual problems in group I than in group II (p = 0.0266). It is concluded that expulsion is still a problem with a small device but it may be diminished by intrauterine insertion and by selecting the users carefully. To compare the efficacy and acceptability of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system and norethisterone for the treatment of idiopathic menorrhagia.
                A randomised comparative parallel group study.
                Gynaecology outpatient clinic in a teaching hospital.
                Forty-four women with heavy regular periods and a measured menstrual blood loss exceeding 80 ml.
                Twenty-two women had a levonorgestrel intrauterine system inserted within the first seven days of menses, and 22 women received norethisterone (5 mg three times daily) from day 5 to day 26 of the cycle for three cycles.
                The main outcome measure was the change in objectively assessed menstrual blood loss after three months of treatment.
                When menstrual blood loss at three months was expressed as a percentage of the control, the levonorgestrel intrauterine system reduced menstrual blood loss by 94% (median reduction 103 ml; range 70 to 733 ml), and oral norethisterone by 87% (median reduction 95 ml; range 56 to 212 ml). After three cycles of treatment 76% of the women in the levonorgestrel intrauterine system group wished to continue with the treatment, compared with only 22% of the norethisterone group.
                Both the levonorgestrel intrauterine system and oral norethisterone in this regimen provided an effective treatment for menorrhagia in terms of reducing menstrual blood loss to within normal limits. The levonorgestrel intrauterine system was associated with higher rates of satisfaction and continuation with treatment, and thus offers an effective alternative to currently available medical and surgical treatments for menorrhagia. An intracervical levonorgestrel-releasing mini-T device was tried as contraceptive in 100 fertile multiparous women for 3 years. This device release about 10 micrograms/day. The results were compared with those of an intrauterine levonorgestrel device and copper-T-200 (Cu-T-200). The continuation rates of the three device did not reveal any significant differences at 1, 2 and 3 years. Incidence of unintended pregnancies and removals due to bleeding and pain was comparable to those of Cu-T-200 but higher than those of intrauterine levonorgestrel device. The number of days of bleeding and spotting for both levonorgestrel devices was significantly lower than those for Cu-T-200. A multicenter, international, randomized, comparative trial was conducted to assess the acceptability, efficacy and safety of two different schedules of a contraceptive pill, containing 250 micrograms levonorgestrel and 50 micrograms ethinyl estradiol, administered by the vaginal route. One schedule of daily administration for 21 days with a seven-day interruption to allow withdrawal bleeding was compared to daily administration without interruption for bleeding. A total of 900 women were recruited in three countries, Brazil, Egypt and China; 7,090 women-months of vaginal pill use were recorded (3,364 using the pills intermittently and 3,726 continuously). Four undesired pregnancies occurred, one in Egypt and three in China, all four in women using the pills intermittently. There was a statistically significant difference (p = 0.486) in pregnancy rate between the two groups. There were no other significant differences in discontinuation rates despite marked differences in bleeding patterns, amenorrhea predominating in the continuous use group. Hemoglobin levels increased significantly in the two groups but hematocrit was significantly higher in the continuous use group.
Current evidence is insufficient to compare contraceptive efficacy and continuation rates for hormonal and intrauterine methods in women aged 25 years and younger. Limited data suggests that the levonorgestrel intrauterine system may be an acceptable alternative to the combined oral contraceptive in this population.