Efficacy of autologous fresh whole blood or platelet-rich plasma in adult cardiac surgery. Plateletpheresis before redo CABG diminishes excessive blood transfusion. Preoperative plateletpheresis does not reduce blood loss during cardiac surgery. Hematological assessment of patients undergoing plasmapheresis during cardiac surgery. The influence of acute preoperative plasmapheresis on coagulation tests, fibrinolysis, blood loss and transfusion requirements in cardiac surgery. Autologous platelet-rich plasmapheresis: risk versus benefit in repeat cardiac operations. Preoperative plasmapheresis in patients undergoing cardiac surgery procedures. The haemostatic effectiveness of autologous platelet rich plasma sequestered after heparin administration and institution of cardiopulmonary bypass. [Effects of platelet-rich plasma on hemostasis and transfusion requirement in vascular surgery].
Transfusing fresh autologous blood during cardiac surgery may improve hemostasis and decrease the need for transfusion.
                A prospective randomized study was performed with fresh whole blood (WB) obtained by intraoperative hemodilution (IH) and with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) obtained by perioperative apheresis from adult cardiac surgery patients.
                Seventy patients were randomly assigned to three arms: 24 to the PRP arm, 18 to the IH arm, and 28 to serve as controls. A mean of 924 +/- 130 mL of WB was collected from the IH group, and a mean of 650 +/- 124 mL of PRP was collected from the PRP group (mean, 1.42 +/- 0.74 x 10(11) platelets); these components were transfused after bypass. Preoperative measures were similar among groups. Intraoperatively, the groups did not differ in bypass time, estimated blood loss, number of transfusions, or proportion receiving transfusion(s). Postoperatively, control patients had more mediastinal drainage (736 mL vs. 476 mL [IH] and 463 mL [PRP]; p = 0.014), but there was no difference in the proportion of patients requiring red cell transfusion (p = 0.87), the hemoglobin at discharge (p = 0.20), or the length of hospitalization (p = 0.57).
                Although a hemostatic benefit manifested as reduced postoperative bleeding was observed, this study does not support the use of fresh blood components obtained by IH or PRP collection during low-risk cardiac surgery. Additional studies are needed to assess whether more aggressive component collection or the use of these techniques in high-risk cases may have a greater impact on clinical outcome variables, including transfusion. Blood conservation remains an important element for patients undergoing cardiac operations with cardiopulmonary bypass. Preoperative platelet-rich plasma (PRP) harvest is an autologous blood conservation method. The efficacy of preoperative PRP harvest and post-cardiopulmonary bypass reinfusion on postoperative bleeding and need for postoperative blood transfusion was evaluated in patients undergoing redo coronary artery bypass grafting in a prospective, randomized manner.
                All adult patients admitted for redo coronary artery bypass grafting entered into the study. The PRP harvest aim was 20% or more of the total estimated circulating platelets. Immediately preoperatively three sequestration cycles were performed. The PRP was reinfused after weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass. One hundred seven parameters/patient were recorded. There were 20 patients in the RPR group and 20 controls (without PRP harvest).
                Patient characteristics, operative data, and preoperative hematologic parameters did not differ between the groups. In the PRP group, the mean platelet count in the PRP was 864 +/- 139 x 10(3)/microL, and the platelet yield was 27% +/- 5% (range, 20% to 37%). The average total chest tube blood loss was 423 mL (PRP) compared with 1,462 mL (controls; p < 0.001). Fourteen patients in the control group required blood transfusions postoperatively compared with only 1 patient in the PRP group (p < 0.001). Postoperative fluid requirements were also significantly greater in the control group (p < 0.001). Postextubation gas exchange was significantly better in the PRP group compared with controls (p < 0.01). Postoperative ventilation time and intensive care stay were significantly shorter in patients in the PRP group.
                A preoperative PRP harvest of 20% or more of the total platelets and reinfusion of the PRP after cardiopulmonary bypass resulted in significantly less postoperative blood loss and decreased fluid and blood transfusion requirements compared with controls. Postextubation gas exchange, ventilation time, and time required in the intensive care unit were also better, and the method was found cost-effective. Acute preoperative plateletpheresis has been reported to be effective in reducing blood loss and blood component transfusion while improving haematological profiles in patients undergoing open-heart surgery. However, in these studies, the concomitant use of cell saver techniques may have been responsible for the beneficial effects because they remove free haemoglobin and activated procoagulants and, therefore, could mask the deleterious effects of combined plateletpheresis and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). In the present study, 40 patients undergoing primary myocardial revascularization were randomly divided into two groups: a control group without plateletpheresis performed, and a second group in which preoperative platelet-rich plasma 10 ml.kg-1 (PRP group) was collected and later reinfused after reversal of heparin. Standardized surgery, anaesthesia and CPB without concomitant cell saver techniques were employed. In the PRP group, blood transfusion was reduced (1.5 +/- 1.3 vs 2.4 +/- 1.3 units, P < 0.05) but this was accompanied by lower postoperative haemoglobin concentrations. There were no differences in blood loss (992.6 +/- 327.4 vs 889.6 +/- 343.7 ml), fresh frozen plasma (2/19 vs 3/20 patients) or platelet requirements (1/19 vs 1/20 patients). Reinfusion of autologous PRP did not improve platelet count and function, nor tests of coagulation. Fibrinogen concentrations were lower in the PRP group on the operative day (P < 0.05), suggesting increased fibrinogen consumption; and more patients in the PRP group had low haptoglobin levels during CPB (8/19 vs 0/20 patients, P < 0.005), which indicated greater haemolysis in this group. We conclude that acute preoperative plateletpheresis offers no advantage in haemostasis during elective primary myocardial revascularization surgery. Methods of reducing patient exposure to homologous blood transfusions include the technique of intraoperative plasmapheresis for the production of platelet rich plasma (PRP). The present study was designed to determine the patient benefits of PRP by examining hemostatic changes in coagulation screens and viscoelastic whole blood monitoring (Thrombelastography, [TEG]). One hundred fifteen patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery were prospectively randomized into a blinded study. Sixty-three patients had 20 percent of the circulating plasma volume sequestered prior to heparinization and pheresed into PRP, which was reinfused 10 minutes following heparin reversal with protamine. The control (CTR) group of 52 patients were exposed to no sequestration procedure. Patients were followed to discharge and 112 parameters, including anthropometric, operative, and postoperative factors, were measured. There were no significant differences between patient groups in preoperative, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), or surgical parameters. Average PRP volume was 600+/-100 ml with a total platelet yield of 1.1 billion platelets per patient. TEG indices were determined at four distinct times during the surgical procedure. The CTR group had significantly higher pre-CPB TEG indices of 2.3+/-1.2 and 2.1+/-1.2 (mean+/-SD), vs. 1.8+/-1.5 and 1.4+/-1.7 in the PRP group (p less than .04). Following heparin reversal, pre-PRP reinfusion TEG values were similar between groups, although both groups had significantly decreased indices when compared to pre-CPB values. Thirty minutes post-PRP infusion the treatment group had significantly improved TEG recovery when compared to the CTR group, 1.0+/-1.2 vs. 0.3+/-1.7 (p less than .05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) Withdrawal of autologous plasma and reinfusion after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) offers the opportunity of improving patients' haemostasis and reducing homologous blood consumption in cardiac surgery. The influence of acute, preoperative plasmapheresis (APP) on coagulation tests, fibrinolysis, blood loss and transfusion requirements was investigated in elective aortocoronary bypass patients.
                Forty patients were randomized to a control or pheresis group. The pheresis group had platelet-rich plasmapheresis (PRP-group, n = 20) performed before incision and the platelet-rich plasma (PRP) was returned after CPB. The control group (n = 20) was managed without pheresis. All patients had serial coagulation studies, including prothrombin split products (F1/F2), fibrinopeptide A (FPA), protein C (PC), thrombomodulin (TM), tissue-plasminogen-activator (t-PA), plasminogen-activator-inhibitor (PAI 1), fibrinopeptide B beta 15-42 (FPB beta 15-42), haemoglobin and platelet counts determined intra- and postoperatively. Chest tube drainage and transfusion requirements were recorded.
                APP had no negative effects on the quality of PRP. The platelet count of the withdrawn autologous plasma was 239 +/- 33 x 10(9)/l. From the end of the operation (after retransfusion of autologous plasma) until the first postoperative day platelet counts were significant higher in the PRP-group (P > 0.05). Plasma concentrations of modified antithrombin III (ATM), F1/F2 and FPA increased (166-290% from baseline) and PC- and TM-antigen decreased (11-49% from baseline) to a different extent for both groups throughout CPB. t-PA-activity increased intraoperatively peaking at the end of CPB (PRP-group: 4.8 +/- 0.8 IU/ml, control-group: 8.1 +/- 2.3 IU/ml)(P > 0.05). With onset of CPB PAI-1 levels decreased and were further reduced after CPB in control patients in comparison to PRP-patients (P < 0.05). FPB beta 15-42 occurred in peak concentrations after neutralisation of heparin by protamine. Only PRP-patients showed baseline values of coagulation and fibrinolytic parameters on the next morning (P < 0.05). Total postoperative blood loss during the first 24 h was 503 +/- 251 ml (PRP-group) and 937 +/- 349 ml in the control-group (P < 0.05). None of the PRP-patients received allogeneic blood, whereas five control-patients received 11 units of packed red cells (P < 0.05).
                The findings suggest that in elective cardiac surgery heparin cannot prevent generation of both thrombin and fibrin, born throughout CPB and postoperatively. The use of PRP withdrawn immediately preoperatively is an attractive technique to reduce allogeneic blood usage and preoperative blood loss, especially in patients in whom withdrawal of autologous whole blood cannot be performed. Preoperative platelet-rich plasmapheresis has been suggested as a means of reducing homologous blood transfusions in cardiac surgical patients. The current study evaluated this technique in patients undergoing repeat cardiac operations. Fifty-two patients undergoing repeat myocardial revascularization and/or valve replacement were evaluated in a prospective randomized controlled study design. Autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) was harvested after the induction of anesthesia in the experimental group. After reversal of heparin, each patient received his or her autologous plasma. Patients in the control group did not have plasmapheresis and received standard transfusion therapy if coagulation variables were abnormal and a coagulopathy was clinically evident. Routine coagulation tests, thromboelastography (TEG), perioperative bleeding, and transfusion requirements were compared in the two groups. Forty-four patients completed the study. A significantly larger volume of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) was transfused in the PRP group than in the control group (P = 0.03). Platelet and fresh frozen plasma (FFP) transfusions did not differ between the two groups. Mediastinal tube drainage did not differ between the two groups. During PRP infusion, 60% of the patients required treatment for moderate hypotension (mean arterial pressure [MAP] < 60 mm Hg). Only 16% of control patients required treatment for hypotension during the comparable time period (P < 0.05). No patient who completed the study returned to the operating room for postoperative bleeding. These data suggest that PRP did not reduce postbypass bleeding or transfusion requirements in repeat cardiac surgical patients. Moreover, the incidence of hypotension during PRP reinfusion introduces a potential risk to the procedure in the absence of any obvious benefit. Donor plasmapheresis that is carried out weeks before the operation has proven to be of benefit in elective orthopedic patients with regard to reducing homologous blood consumption and preserving coagulation. In this study acute preoperatively performed plasmapheresis (APP) was investigated in cardiac surgery patients. Forty-five patients scheduled for elective aortocoronary bypass surgery were randomly divided into three groups of 15 patients each: 1) removal of platelet-poor plasma (PPP), 2) removal of platelet-rich plasma (PRP), and 3) no plasmapheresis (control group). Plasma volume removed was 10 ml/kg in all APP patients, and plasma was replaced by the same amount of low-molecular weight hydroxyethylstarch solution (6% HES 200/0.5). Various laboratory data were investigated before, during, and after extracorporeal circulation (ECC). Blood loss in control patients was more pronounced than in the two APP groups; two of the control patients needed packed red cells. APP itself did not affect coagulation variables, free hemoglobin, or polymorphonuclear (PMN) elastase. At the end of the operation, 5 h after ECC, and at the first postoperative day the number of platelets was significantly lower in the control group; PRP patients showed the highest values. Fibrinogen and AT-III levels were less compromised in APP patients than in the control group. Global coagulation parameters did not differ between the groups within the whole investigation period. PMN elastase increased significantly during ECC in all groups with the greatest increase in the control group (722%) and the smallest increase in PRP patients (280%), possibly due to the removal of cellular elements in this group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) Preoperative harvesting and postoperative reinfusion of autologous platelet rich plasma (PRP) has been reported to decrease blood loss as well as the requirement for homologous blood transfusion following cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). We have developed a technique of intraoperative PRP sequestration which occurs during the initial period of CPB after the patient's circulation is supported and heparin has been given (PRP+). This process does not require any additional hardware, personnel or expense and it is performed without difficulty or complication. To evaluate the effect of PRP+ sequestration and reinfusion on blood loss and homologous blood requirement after CPB, we randomly assigned 126 consecutive patients undergoing elective open heart surgery into the experimental group 1 (PRP+) (n = 64) or the control (no platelet pheresis) group 2 (n = 52). A third group (n = 10) were not included in the randomization. Patients in group 3 had PRP prepared by conventional techniques (PRPc) prior to heparin administration and given to the patient after protamine infusion. Aggregation and activation studies were performed on the PRP+, PRPc, and blood bank platelets (BBP). Per cent aggregation of PRP in response to ADP was superior to that of BBP. There were no significant differences in ADP induced aggregation between PRP+ and PEPc. There was no significant difference in platelet activation (CD62) or number between the three groups. Patients infused with PRP+ showed significantly increased aggregation to ADP when compared with untreated patients 120 minutes after return to the ICW. Furthermore, more homologous haemostatic components (platelets/fresh frozen plasma) were required in the control group. We have demonstrated that collection of autologous PRP+ after administration of heparin does not interfere with its haemostatic effectiveness compared with PRPc prepared before the initiation of bypass. Moreover, this can be performed universally in haemodynamically unstable patients without any additional costs. To assess the effect of intraoperative autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) transfusion on haemostasis, blood loss and blood requirements during vascular surgery.
                Randomized clinical trial.
                Twenty patients undergoing elective abdominal infrarenal aortic aneurysmectomy, using autologous transfusion techniques (predonation programme and/or preoperative normovolaemic haemodilution and/or intraoperative use of a cell-saver), were randomly allocated either into the PRP group (n = 10) or the Control group (n = 10).
                In patients of PRP group, 10 mL.kg-1 of PRP were obtained over 40 to 50 min, prior to induction of anaesthesia, and compensated simultaneously with an equivalent amount of hydroxyethyl starch. Each PRP unit was transfused to its donor after aortic declamping. Blood samples were obtained before induction, before incision, at wound closing and at the end of PRP unit transfusion for determination of biological variables.
                The PRP units transfused in the patients of PRP group contained 755 +/- 117 mL of plasma with a platelet count of 62 +/- 31 G.L-1. The intra and postoperative blood losses were similar in both groups (1622 +/- 758 and 233 +/- 322 mL respectively in PRP group vs 1890 +/- 1331 and 291 +/- 303 mL respectively in Control group). In both groups, three patients required an additional transfusion of homologous blood. The results of biological tests (haematocrit, platelet and white cell counts, prothrombin time, aPTT, thrombin time, fibrinogen, D-dimers, proteins, calcium) were also similar between groups at the various times of sampling. The reinfusion of the PRP unit did not increase the platelet count.
                This study demonstrates that intraoperative infusion of autologous PRP does not decrease blood loss and homologous transfusion requirements in patients undergoing elective abdominal infrarenal aortic aneurysmectomy. This result can be related to the relatively moderate enrichment in platelets obtained with the centrifugation speed used in this study.
Although the results suggest that PRP is effective in reducing allogeneic RBC transfusion in adult patients undergoing elective surgery, there was considerable heterogeneity of treatment effects and the trials were of poor methodological quality. The available studies provided inadequate data for firm conclusions to be drawn regarding the impact of PRP on clinically important endpoints.