[The effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor on IgA nephropathy and the influencing factors]. Aliskiren, an orally effective renin inhibitor, provides antihypertensive efficacy alone and in combination with valsartan. ACE-inhibition with perindopril in essential hypertensive patients with concomitant diseases. The Perindopril Therapeutic Safety Collaborative Research Group. Efficacy of immunosuppressive therapy in IgA nephropathy presenting with isolated hematuria. Coadministration of losartan and enalapril exerts additive antiproteinuric effect in IgA nephropathy. Aliskiren, a novel orally effective renin inhibitor, provides dose-dependent antihypertensive efficacy and placebo-like tolerability in hypertensive patients. Intramuscular interferon beta-1a in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. High-dose interferon alfa-2b significantly prolongs relapse-free and overall survival compared with the GM2-KLH/QS-21 vaccine in patients with resected stage IIB-III melanoma: results of intergroup trial E1694/S9512/C509801. Is reduced systemic heparinization justified with heparin-bonded bypass circuits in cardiac surgery?--Experience with and without aprotinin.
OBJECTIVE To investigate the effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) on IgA nephropathy(IgAN) and the factors influencing the therapeutic effects. METHODS 131 cases with IgAN diagnosed by renal biopsy were randomly divided into two groups: ACEI group (benazepril 10 mg/d) and non-ACEI group as control. The pathological changes in the kidney were analyzed using Lee SMK. RESULTS After 1 month treatment of ACEI, the levels of proteinuria and serum cholesterol decreased significantly, meanwhile those of serum albumin and total protein increased obviously in patients with IgAN(P < 0.05). The proteinuria level at the 3rd month after treatment was lower than that at the 1st month, but was same as that at the 18th month. While in the control group the proteinuria level increased and the clearance of creatinine decreased continuously during the observation (P < 0.05). The effects correlated positively with mesangial proliferation and negatively with course of the disease glomerular sclerosis in glomerulus and changes of small arterioles in the kidney. Normal blood pressare normal renal function I approximately II degree of Lee SMK I degee of interstitial changes minimal changes of small arterioles and mild glomerular sclerosis predicted better response to ACEI treatment than hypertension renal insufficiency V degree of Lee SMK IV degee of interstitial changes severe changes of small arterioles and massive glomerular sclerosis. CONCLUSIONS It is suggested that benezepril could definitely reduce the excretion of urinary protein and protect renal function of patients with IgAN and should be used as earlier as possible. Mesangial prolife ration glomerular sclerosis in glomerulus changes of small arterioles in kidney and course of the disease are the major influencing factors of ACEI treatment on IgAN. By blocking the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) at its rate-limiting step, renin inhibition may provide improved RAAS suppression. We investigated the blood pressure (BP)-lowering effects of the oral direct renin inhibitor aliskiren, alone or in combination with the angiotensin receptor blocker valsartan.
                In this multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, 8-week trial, 1123 patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension underwent a 3 to 4 week single-blind placebo run-in and were then randomized in a modified factorial study design to receive once-daily, double-blind oral treatment with placebo, aliskiren monotherapy (75, 150, or 300 mg), valsartan monotherapy (80, 160, or 320 mg), aliskiren and valsartan in combination, or valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide (160/12.5 mg). The primary efficacy variable was the change from baseline in mean sitting diastolic BP (DBP) at endpoint.
                Once-daily oral treatment with aliskiren 300 mg significantly (P < .0001) lowered mean sitting DBP and systolic BP (SBP) compared with placebo; aliskiren monotherapy demonstrated a safety and tolerability profile comparable to placebo. Changes in DBP and SBP were fitted to a first-order dose-response surface (lack-of-fit test, P = .65), which showed that aliskiren and valsartan alone and in combination produced dose-related reductions in DBP and SBP. Coadministration of aliskiren and valsartan produced a greater antihypertensive effect than either drug alone, comparable in magnitude to the effect of valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide, with similar tolerability to the component monotherapies and to placebo.
                Aliskiren monotherapy provides antihypertensive efficacy and placebo-like tolerability in patients with hypertension. Aliskiren and valsartan in combination may provide additive BP-lowering effects with maintained tolerability. Many hypertensive patients have other, usually long-term diseases. Antihypertensive therapy may interfere with these diseases and their therapies. In the present study, the possible interactions of the ACE-inhibitor perindopril with several of the most common long-term diseases was evaluated.
                In a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, the effect of perindopril was evaluated in 490 patients with mild essential hypertension and any one of the following concomitant diseases: hyperlipidemia, type II diabetes mellitus, ischemic heart disease, cardiac arrhythmia, peripheral arterial occlusive disease, nephropathy with proteinuria, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or degenerative joint disease treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). After a 3-week single-blind placebo run-in, the patients received either perindopril (4 mg/d) or matching placebo for 6 weeks.
                Blood pressure was effectively reduced by perindopril irrespective of the associated disease. The rate of spontaneously reported side effects was low. Treatment with perindopril was free from adverse interactions with the concomitant diseases and therapies. Moreover, favorable actions could be observed in patients with ischemic heart disease (reduction of maximal ST-segment depression during peak exercise and decrease in the number of angina attacks), in patients with proteinuria (decrease in albuminuria in patients with normal serum creatinine levels), and in patients with NSAID-treatment (increase in prostaglandin E2 concentration in gastric mucosa suggesting gastric cytoprotection).
                This trial shows that ACE-inhibition with perindopril represents a simple, safe, and effective short-term therapeutic option for the large proportion of patients with mild essential hypertension and concomitant diseases and therapies. The role of immunosuppressive therapy in the management of IgA nephropathy (IgAN) remains controversial. No consensus has yet emerged on the specific treatment of IgAN and this is mostly related to the lack of complete understanding of the multifactorial pathogenesis of the disease. Choice of appropriate therapeutic agents is further limited by the difficulty in identifying patients who would most likely benefit from therapy. Immunosuppressive therapy has not been recommended in patients with isolated hematuria and well preserved renal function because of their generally favourable prognosis and there are no clinical trials in this area. Considering that mild IgAN may be an early stage of the disease and can be reversed by immunosuppressive agents we have used prednisolone and azathioprine in patients with isolated hematuria in a prospective, randomized, controlled study since 1988. In this prospective study we have evaluated the effect of prednisolone with azathioprine on the clinical course of IgAN and its impact on histologic parameters and prevention of progression in patients with isolated hematuria. We studied 43 biopsy-proven IgAN patients (29 males and 14 females, aged between 13-63 years, mean age 28+/-6) with isolated hematuria and well-preserved renal function (Ccr 89.2+/-10.2 ml/min). The patients were assigned to two groups: 21 patients received prednisolone (40 mg/day) and azathioprine (100 mg/day) orally for four months (group A) and 22 patients received no specific treatment for IgAN and served as a control group (group B). In Group A prednisolone was reduced to 20 mg/day at the end of the second month, then slowly tapered over a two-month period and stopped. The median duration of follow-up was 60 months (range 12-120 months). At the end of the therapy hematuria disappeared in 17 patients. In three patients who did not respond to therapy, microscopic hematuria persisted. Of the 22 patients of group B, three had episodes of gross hematuria and proteinuria >500 mg/day. No significant changes in biochemical profile were observed in either group. Thirteen patients (eight from the treated, five from the untreated group) underwent a repeat biopsy after 12+/-6 months (range 10-25). An improvement of histopathological features was noted in Group A, while deterioration was noted in Group B. We conclude that early treatment with prednisolone and azathioprine appears to be beneficial in preventing the progression of immunologic renal injury and in improving histopathological features in IgAN patients with isolated hematuria. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and AT1-receptor antagonists (ARAs) are widely administered to reduce urinary protein loss and slow the progression of proteinuric nephropathy to end-stage renal failure. Our group recently observed that the combination of ACE inhibitors and ARAs may have an additive antiproteinuric effect, which may occur because ACE inhibitors do not completely reduce angiotensin II (Ang II) production. Ang II is also produced by chymase. Thus, combination therapy better antagonizes the effects of Ang II. The purpose of this study is to ascertain whether the additive antiproteinuric effect of ACE inhibitors plus ARAs is dose dependent and related to the drug-induced reduction in systemic blood pressure. Therefore, enalapril (E; 10 mg/d) and losartan (LOS; 50 mg/d) were randomly administered alone and then in association; initial dosages were doubled when drugs were administered alone and in association. To determine the influence of the drug-dependent effect on reducing blood pressure and the reduction in urinary proteinuria, both ambulatory and office blood pressures were recorded. E and LOS administered alone reduced proteinuria by the same extent; no further reduction was observed when E and LOS alone were administered at a doubled dose. When E and LOS were coadministered, proteinuria decreased by a greater extent compared with E and LOS alone; an additional reduction in proteinuria was observed when combined therapy doses were doubled. The reduction in proteinuria was not correlated with clinical through blood pressure; however, reductions in diastolic and mean ambulatory blood pressures significantly correlated with the decrease in proteinuria, as well as with creatinine clearance. In conclusion, this study shows that combination therapy with E and LOS has an additive dose-dependent antiproteinuric effect that is likely induced by the drug-related reduction in systemic blood pressure. In normotensive proteinuric patients, it is likely that even a small reduction in systemic blood pressure may affect intraglomerular hemodynamics by a great extent because efferent arteriole regulation is hampered more completely by the coadministration of ACE inhibitors and ARAs. Stopping the detrimental effects of the renin-angiotensin system at the most upstream point of the cascade offers theoretical advantages for cardiovascular protection. This study compares the antihypertensive efficacy and safety of the novel oral renin inhibitor aliskiren with placebo and an active comparator.
                The study was a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, active-comparator 8-week trial in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension (mean sitting diastolic blood pressure [DBP] > or =95 and <110 mm Hg). After a 2-week, single-blind placebo run-in, 652 patients were randomized to receive double-blind treatment with once-daily oral doses of aliskiren (150, 300, or 600 mg), irbesartan 150 mg, or placebo. Aliskiren 150, 300, and 600 mg effectively lowered both trough mean sitting DBP and systolic blood pressure (SBP) (P<0.001 versus placebo for both variables). The least-squares mean reductions in trough DBP were 9.3+/-0.8, 11.8+/-0.8, and 11.5+/-0.8 mm Hg, respectively, versus 6.3+/-0.8 mm Hg for placebo, and the least-squares mean reductions in trough SBP were 11.4+/-1.3, 15.8+/-1.2, and 15.7+/-1.2 mm Hg, respectively, versus 5.3+/-1.2 mm Hg for placebo. The antihypertensive effect of aliskiren 150 mg was comparable to that of irbesartan 150 mg (8.9+/-0.7 and 12.5+/-1.2 mm Hg, least-squares reduction in mean sitting DBP and SBP, respectively, for irbesartan). Aliskiren 300 and 600 mg lowered mean sitting DBP significantly more than irbesartan 150 mg (P<0.05). Aliskiren showed safety and tolerability comparable to those of placebo and irbesartan; the incidence of adverse events and number of patients discontinuing therapy were similar in all groups.
                Once-daily oral treatment with aliskiren lowers blood pressure effectively, with a safety and tolerability profile comparable to that of irbesartan and placebo, in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. Aliskiren 150 mg is as effective as irbesartan 150 mg in lowering blood pressure. Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) shares immunologic features with multiple sclerosis (MS). Because IM interferon beta-1a (IM IFNbeta-1a) is an effective and safe treatment for MS, we conducted a dose-ranging efficacy study of IFNbeta-1a in patients with CIDP.
                Adults with IV immunoglobulin (IVIg)-dependent CIDP (n = 67) were enrolled in this 32-week double-blind trial and randomized to IM IFNbeta-1a. Patients received 30 microg once weekly plus placebo (n = 12), IM IFNbeta-1a 60 microg once weekly plus placebo (n = 11), IM IFNbeta-1a 30 microg twice weekly (n = 11), IM IFNbeta-1a 60 microg twice weekly (n = 11), or placebo twice weekly (n = 22). Participants were maintained on IVIg through week 16, when IVIg was discontinued. Patients who worsened were restarted on IVIg. The primary outcome was total IVIg dose (g/kg) administered from week 16 to 32.
                There was no difference in total IVIg dose administered after week 16 for patients treated with IFNbeta-1a (1.20 g/kg) compared with placebo (1.34 g/kg; p = 0.75). However, exploratory analyses suggested IFNbeta-1a significantly reduced total dose of IVIg compared with placebo for participants who required either high-dose IVIg (>0.95 g/kg per month) or had greater weakness at baseline (Medical Research Council sum score <51). Adverse events included flu-like symptoms, headache, and fatigue in the IFNbeta-1a groups.
                Interferon beta-1a (IFNbeta-1a) therapy did not provide significant benefit over IV immunoglobulin (IVIg) therapy alone for patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. However, IFNbeta-1a might be beneficial for patients with more severe disability or those needing high doses of IVIg. Level of evidence: This study was designed to provide Class I evidence for the safety and efficacy of IM IFNbeta-1a in the treatment of CIDP but has been subsequently classified as Class II due to a >20% patient dropout rate. Thus, this randomized, controlled clinical trial provides Class II evidence of no effect on primary and secondary endpoints of 4 dosage regimens of IM IFNbeta-1a added to IVIg in persons with CIDP. Vaccine alternatives to high-dose interferon alfa-2b therapy (HDI), the current standard adjuvant therapy for high-risk melanoma, are of interest because of toxicity associated with HDI. The GM2 ganglioside is a well-defined melanoma antigen, and anti-GM2 antibodies have been associated with improved prognosis. We conducted a prospective, randomized, intergroup trial to evaluate the efficacy of HDI for 1 year versus vaccination with GM2 conjugated to keyhole limpet hemocyanin and administered with QS-21 (GMK) for 96 weeks (weekly x 4 then every 12 weeks x 8).
                Eligible patients had resected stage IIB/III melanoma. Patients were stratified by sex and number of positive nodes. Primary end points were relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS).
                Eight hundred eighty patients were randomized (440 per treatment group); 774 patients were eligible for efficacy analysis. The trial was closed after interim analysis indicated inferiority of GMK compared with HDI. For eligible patients, HDI provided a statistically significant RFS benefit (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.47, P = .0015) and OS benefit (HR = 1.52, P = .009) for GMK versus HDI. Similar benefit was observed in the intent-to-treat analysis (RFS HR = 1.49; OS HR = 1.38). HDI was associated with a treatment benefit in all subsets of patients with zero to > or = four positive nodes, but the greatest benefit was observed in the node-negative subset (RFS HR = 2.07; OS HR = 2.71 [eligible population]). Antibody responses to GM2 (ie, titers > or = 1:80) at days 29, 85, 365, and 720 were associated with a trend toward improved RFS and OS (P2 = .068 at day 29).
                This trial demonstrated a significant treatment benefit of HDI versus GMK in terms of RFS and OS in melanoma patients at high risk of recurrence. The effects of aprotinin combined with heparin-bonded bypass circuits and reduced systemic heparinization on haemostasis and inflammatory reactions were measured in patients with elective CABG operation. Patients were randomized to be operated on either without aprotinin (NOAPRO, n=15) or with aprotinin (APRO, n=15) at a low dose of 2 Mio KIU in the priming volume. Activated clotting time was adjusted to 400 +/- 50 s during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Haemostasis (fibrinopeptide A (FPA), thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT), D-Dimer, plasmin-antiplasmin (PAP), plasminogen-activator inhibitor (PAI)), inflammatory reaction (lactoferrin, IL-6, sTNF-IIR, SC5b-9) and clinical data were evaluated perioperatively. Perioperative clinical and laboratory data including mediastinal drainage volume, postoperative morbidity and mortality were comparable for patients in both groups. FPA was elevated in the APRO group during CPB (P=0.001), D-Dimer in the NOAPRO group after CPB (P=0.002). No differences were seen for TAT, PAP or PAI between the groups. Lactoferrin was elevated in NOAPRO at the end of CPB (P=0.01) and after heparin reversal with protamine sulphate (P=0.02). No intergroup differences were seen for IL-6, sTNF-IIR or SC5b-9 between the groups. In association with reduced heparinization, pump prime aprotinin retains its antifibrinolytic effect in modified bypass equipment with a heparin surface besides an anti-inflammatory effect in terms of inhibition of leukocyte activation. However, thrombin activation may be increased with aprotinin. We therefore recommend sufficient systemic heparinization despite heparin surface modification of bypass equipment.
IgAN remains a disease in search of adequately powered RCTs to reliably inform clinical practice. More and better evidence is needed to understand the magnitude of benefit and the possible risks of anti-hypertensive or more specifically of ACEi/ARB therapy alone or in combination and which specific types of patients with the IgAN might have the greatest potential for benefit. For other non-immunosuppressive therapies, where neither benefit nor significant harm has yet to be demonstrated, there remains some justification for further exploration of the potential benefits.