A multicenter trial of the efficacy of nimodipine on outcome after severe head injury. The European Study Group on Nimodipine in Severe Head Injury. Traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage and its treatment with nimodipine. German tSAH Study Group. Cerebral arterial spasm--a controlled trial of nimodipine in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Prevention of vasospasm in subarachnoid haemorrhage. A controlled study with nimodipine. A controlled trial of nimodipine in acute ischemic stroke. Controlled study of nimodipine in aneurysm patients treated early after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Effect of oral nimodipine on cerebral infarction and outcome after subarachnoid haemorrhage: British aneurysm nimodipine trial. Nimodipine in acute ischemic stroke: a double-blind controlled study. The effects of nimodipine on the clinical course of patients with acute ischemic stroke.
Between January 1, 1989, and June 30, 1991, 852 severely head-injured patients were entered into a prospective placebo-controlled trial of the efficacy of nimodipine administration. The patients could not obey commands at the time of entry into the trial, which was within 12 hours after the start of the inability to obey commands and within 24 hours of injury. The main hypothesis that nimodipine would increase the percentage of patients with a favorable outcome (moderate disability or good recovery) from 50% to 60% was rejected. A trend toward a favorable effect was seen in patients who exhibited traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) on the computerized tomography (CT) scan obtained prior to entry into the study. The effect was statistically significant in those patients who complied with all protocol requirements. This finding is consistent with the effect of nimodipine on secondary ischemia following spontaneous SAH. The results of the study warrant a clinical trial of the efficacy of nimodipine in severely head-injured patients who show traumatic SAH on the initial CT scan. A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of nimodipine used to treat traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (tSAH) was conducted in 21 German neurosurgical centers between January 1994 and April 1995. One hundred twenty-three patients with tSAH appearing on initial computerized tomography (CT) scanning were entered into the study. Requirements for inclusion included age between 16 and 70 and admission into the study within 12 hours after head injury, regardless of the patient's level of consciousness. Eligible patients received either a sequential course of intravenous and oral nimodipine or placebo treatment for 3 weeks. Patients were closely monitored using clinical neurology, computerized tomography, laboratory, and transcranial Doppler ultrasound parameters. Patients treated with nimodipine had a significantly less unfavorable outcome (death, vegetative survival, or severe disability) at 6 months than placebo-treated patients (25% vs. 46%, p = 0.02). The relative reduction in unfavorable outcome in the nimodipine-treated group was even higher (55%, p = 0.002) when only patients who complied with the protocol were considered. We enrolled 125 neurologically normal patients with intracranial aneurysms in a multi-institution, prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial within 96 hours of their subarachnoid hemorrhage, to determine whether treatment with the calcium blocker nimodipine would prevent or reduce the severity of ischemic neurologic deficits from arterial spasm. A deficit from cerebral arterial spasm that persisted and was severe or caused death by the end of the 21-day treatment period occurred in 8 of 60 patients given placebo and in 1 of 56 given nimodipine (P = 0.03, Fisher's exact test). Analysis of the amount of basal subarachnoid blood on pre-entry CAT scans in patients with deficits from spasm showed that an increase in subarachnoid blood was not associated with a worse neurologic outcome among patients who received nimodipine, unlike the situation in patients given a placebo. There were no side effects from nimodipine. We conclude that nimodipine should be given to patients who are neurologically normal after subarachnoid hemorrhage in order to reduce the occurrence of severe neurologic deficits due to cerebral arterial spasm. A prospective randomized double blind study was conducted in 70 patients suffering from subarachnoid haemorrhage, due to aneurysm rupture, to determine if the use of nimodipine reduces the severity of ischaemic deficits secondary to vasospasm. At the end of the study, two patients had severe deficit or died in the treated group, while 10 had a bad outcome in the placebo group. Angiographic vasospasm was not significantly different in its frequency or its severity between the two groups. However, the association of extensive and diffuse vasospasm was less frequent in the nimodipine group. This study confirms the effectiveness of Nimodipine in reducing the occurrence of neurological deficit due to vasospasm, even if this action is not observed in all cases. Recent investigations suggest that increased cellular calcium concentrations may be implicated in neuronal death after ischemia. To determine whether treatment with a calcium-channel blocker would improve survival and neurologic outcome in acute ischemic stroke, we enrolled 186 patients in a prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of nimodipine (30 mg every six hours), begun within 24 hours of the onset of symptoms of an acute ischemic stroke. During the four-week treatment period, mortality from all causes was significantly reduced with nimodipine as compared with placebo (8 deaths [8.6 percent] vs. 19 [20.4 percent]). The improvement in survival was restricted to men. During the follow-up period of six months, an additional eight patients in each group died. A significantly better neurologic outcome, as assessed by the Mathew scale of neurologic deficit, was also observed in the nimodipine group. The improvement in neurologic status was greatest in patients with a moderate to severe deficit at base line. There were no important side effects except for one episode of reversible azotemia that may have been related to treatment with nimodipine. Our data suggest that patients with acute ischemic stroke may benefit from early treatment with nimodipine, but this therapeutic effect appears to be limited to men. We enrolled 75 consecutive patients admitted with subarachnoid hemorrhages in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to determine the effect of early intervention with nimodipine on outcome and cerebral blood flow. The cardioprotective effect of nimodipine was assessed by measuring the electrocardiographic changes over the first 3 days of drug treatment. There was a mild lowering of the mean cerebral blood flow in the nimodipine-treated group over the 21-day period. Analysis of the continuous electrocardiographic traces showed no difference between the nimodipine and placebo groups in the frequency or type of abnormality detected. At 3 months, 4 of the 38 patients receiving nimodipine had died, compared with 10 of the 37 placebo-receiving patients. Of the 50 eligible patients who had a proven cerebral aneurysm, 1 patient (4%) on nimodipine died compared with 6 (24%) receiving placebo (0.01 less than P less than 0.05, chi 2 test; approximate 95% confidence interval for mortality difference, 0.4% to 39.6%). We conclude that nimodipine does not increase the cerebral blood flow or protect the heart after a subarachnoid hemorrhage. There were no side effects from nimodipine. The trend toward improved outcome should be verified in a larger series of patients. To determine the efficacy of oral nimodipine in reducing cerebral infarction and poor outcomes (death and severe disability) after subarachnoid haemorrhage.
                Double blind, placebo controlled, randomised trial with three months of follow up and intention to treat analysis. To have an 80% chance with a significance level of 0.05 of detecting a 50% reduction in an incidence of cerebral infarction of 15% a minimum of 540 patients was required.
                Four regional neurosurgical units in the United Kingdom.
                In all 554 patients were recruited between June 1985 and September 1987 out of a population of 1115 patients admitted with subarachnoid haemorrhage proved by the results of lumbar puncture or computed tomography, or both. The main exclusion criterion was admission to the neurosurgical units more than 96 hours after subarachnoid haemorrhage. There were four breaks of code and no exclusions after entry. One patient was withdrawn and in 130 treatment was discontinued early. All patients were followed up for three months and were included in the analysis, except the patient who had been withdrawn.
                Placebo or nimodipine 60 mg was given orally every four hours for 21 days to 276 and 278 patients, respectively. Treatment was started within 96 hours after subarachnoid haemorrhage.
                Incidence of cerebral infarction and ischaemic neurological deficits and outcome three months after entry.
                Demographic and clinical data, including age, sex, history of hypertension and subarachnoid haemorrhage, severity of haemorrhage according to an adaptation of the Glasgow coma scale, number and site of aneurysms on angiography, and initial findings on computed tomography were measured at entry. Deterioration, defined as development of a focal sign or fall of more than one point on the Glasgow coma scale for more than six hours, was investigated by using clinical criteria and by computed tomography, by lumbar puncture, or at necropsy when appropriate. All episodes of deterioration and all patients with a three month outcome other than a good recovery were assessed by a review committee.
                Demographic and clinical data at entry were similar in the two groups. In patients given nimodipine the incidence of cerebral infarction was 22% (61/278) compared with 33% (92/276) in those given placebo, a significant reduction of 34% (95% confidence interval 13 to 50%). Poor outcomes were also significantly reduced by 40% (95% confidence interval 20 to 55%) with nimodipine (20% (55/278) in patients given nimodipine v 33% (91/278) in those given placebo).
                Oral nimodipine 60 mg four hourly is well tolerated and reduces cerebral infarction snd improves outcome after subarachnoid haemorrhage. Nimodipine (BAY e 9736), a new dihydropyridine derivative, has been shown to reduce neurological deficits and mortality induced by acute cerebral ischemia in experimental studies. We investigated the effects of this calcium antagonist in patients with acute ischemic stroke through a randomized, double-blind, parallel-designed trial in which nimodipine was compared with placebo. Forty-one of 54 screened cases were found to fulfil the inclusion criteria (sudden occurrence of a focal neurological deficit secondary to an acute ischemic event in the carotid area diagnosed after a complete neurological work-up) and entered the study. Nineteen of them were treated with nimodipine (40 mg t.i.d. administered for 28 days) and the remaining 22 with placebo, given in identical tablets. In all patients the treatment started within 12 h after the onset of the symptoms. Course and intensity of the neurological deficit were evaluated by the Mathew Scale (slightly modified). Forty patients concluded the trial. Nimodipine was withdrawn in one case following the occurrence of a skin rash whose causative relation with the test drug could not be clarified. Altogether, however, nimodipine was well tolerated and no severe cardiovascular adverse reactions were observed. In terms of efficacy, the scores obtained by the Mathew Scale showed a higher rate of improvement on nimodipine than on placebo, thus indicating that patients receiving the latter drug did not fare as well as those receiving the test medication. Our data suggest that nimodipine may be beneficial in the treatment of acute stroke. 60 patients with acute ischemic stroke were enrolled in a prospective single-blind, randomized trial to determine whether treatment with the calcium antagonist nimodipine would reduce their neurological deficit. All patients received a standard treatment. In addition, 29 received a daily dose of 120 mg nimodipine orally as 3 divided doses (treatment group). Evaluation of therapy was assessed with a neurological scoring system ( Mathew scale). Comparison of the Mathew sum scores in the standard group with those of the nimodipine group (analysis of variance) revealed a highly significant difference (P less than 0.0001) in favour of nimodipine during the 4 week period of treatment. Based on the individual items of the Mathew scale, the level of consciousness and disability were significantly improved under the nimodipine-therapy. Side effects were of minor importance and of no clinical relevance.
This systematic review of randomised controlled trials of calcium channel blockers in acute traumatic head injury patients shows that considerable uncertainty remains over their effects. The effect of nimodipine in a subgroup of brain injury patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage shows a beneficial effect, though the increase in adverse reactions suffered by the intervention group may mean that the drug is harmful for some patients.