Rasagiline mesylate, a new MAO-B inhibitor for the treatment of Parkinson's disease: a double-blind study as adjunctive therapy to levodopa. Pergolide versus levodopa monotherapy in early Parkinson's disease patients: The PELMOPET study. Five-year follow-up of early lisuride and levodopa combination therapy versus levodopa monotherapy in de novo Parkinson's disease. The French Lisuride Study Group. Levodopa or dopamine agonists, or deprenyl as initial treatment for Parkinson's disease. A randomized multicenter study. Ten-year follow-up of three different initial treatments in de-novo PD: a randomized trial. Early combination of bromocriptine and levodopa in Parkinson's disease: a prospective randomized study of two parallel groups over a total follow-up period of 44 months including an initial 8-month double-blind stage. Pramipexole vs levodopa as initial treatment for Parkinson disease: a 4-year randomized controlled trial. Does combined levodopa and bromocriptine therapy in Parkinson's disease prevent late motor complications? Amantadine as treatment for dyskinesias and motor fluctuations in Parkinson's disease.
Rasagiline mesylate (TVP-1012) is a potent, selective, non-reversible MAO-B inhibitor, without the tyramine-potentiating effect and with neuroprotective activities. The benefit of rasagiline as monotherapy in patients with early Parkinson's disease (PD) has already been reported. To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and clinical effect of rasagiline as adjunctive therapy to levodopa, a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study (0.5, 1, and 2 mg/d) was conducted for 12 weeks in 70 patients with PD (mean age, 57.4 y; mean disease duration, 5.7 y; 32 patients had motor fluctuations). A beneficial clinical effect was observed in fluctuating patients treated with rasagiline (all doses), expressed as a decrease in total Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) score (23.0% vs 8.5% in the placebo group). The treatment effect was still evident 6 weeks after drug discontinuation (in all doses). The safety and tolerability of rasagiline were good. Adverse events were no different than those of patients taking placebo. Almost complete platelet MAO-B inhibition was obtained at all rasagiline doses. This study has demonstrated that rasagiline (up to 2 mg/day) has a good safety profile and a beneficial clinical effect in fluctuating patients with PD when given as an add-on to chronic levodopa therapy. Dopamine agonists are used as initial treatment in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) to reduce incidence and severity of motor complications. This paradigm is based on long-term studies, allowing "rescue" therapy with levodopa. The present strict monotherapy study (PELMOPET, the acronym for the pergolide-versus-L-dopa-monotherapy-and-positron-emission-tomography trial) evaluated the efficacy and safety of pergolide versus levodopa without levodopa "rescue" medication. This multicenter, double-blind, randomized, 3-year trial compared pergolide monotherapy (n=148) with levodopa monotherapy (n=146) in dopamine-naive patients with early PD (Hoehn and Yahr stage 1-2.5). Primary efficacy measures were clinical efficacy, severity and time to onset of motor complications, and disease progression. During the 3 years, severity of motor complications was significantly lower and time to onset of dyskinesia was significantly delayed in the group receiving pergolide (3.23 mg/day) compared with those receiving levodopa (504 mg/day). However, time to onset of motor complications was not longer in patients receiving pergolide after 3 years. Symptomatic relief (assessed by Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale [UPDRS], UPDRS II, and III, Clinical Global Impressions [CGI] severity, and CGI and Patient Global Impressions [PGI] improvement) was significantly greater in patients receiving levodopa. Adverse events led to discontinuation of therapy in 17.6% of pergolide patients and 9.6% of levodopa patients. This is the first study comparing strict monotherapy with a dopamine agonist versus levodopa in previously untreated early PD. In principle, both levodopa and a dopamine agonist such as pergolide seem to be suitable options as initial PD therapy. The choice remains with the treating physician based on the different efficacy and adverse event profiles.
                (c) 2005 Movement Disorder Society. The value of an early initial coadministration of levodopa (L-dopa) and lisuride in Parkinson's disease was the main goal of the present study. Eighty-two patients with recently diagnosed idiopathic Parkinson's disease were randomized into two groups for treatment with L-dopa alone or L-dopa + lisuride. The trial was double-blinded for the first year and open for the following 4 years. Selegiline (10 mg/day b.i.d.) was added in both groups at the end of the first year. Outcome measures were evolution of L-dopa dosage and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale scores and subscores, and incidence of motor complications. The dropout rate was higher in the L-dopa group (63.4%) than in the combination group. Motor improvement was better (p < 0.01) in the L-dopa + lisuride group. Expected motor complications were rare, moderate and equivalent in the two groups despite a difference in L-dopa dosage (446.7 vs. 387.5 mg/day). Long-term follow-up demonstrated the L-dopa-sparing effect of lisuride (average 1 mg/day), the beneficial effect of early combination therapy on motor status and the paucity of motor complications in both groups.
                Copyright 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel Objectives: levodopa improves the quality of life in parkinsonian patients, however long term response is compromised by the emergence of motor fluctuations and dyskinesias. The aim of this study was to compare the occurrence of motor fluctuations and dyskinesias in previously untreated patients assigned to receive levodopa, a dopamine agonist or deprenyl.Thirty-five neurological departments in Italian hospitals participated in this randomized open trial. Patients with Parkinson's disease, who required the initiation of an effective antiparkinsonian treatment, were randomly assigned to receive levodopa, dopamine agonists or deprenyl. The end-points were motor dyskinesias and motor fluctuations occurring in a median follow-up period of about 3years.After a median follow-up of 34months, motor fluctuations and dyskinesias were less frequent in patients assigned to a dopamine agonist or deprenyl than in patients assigned to levodopa (relative risk [RR] 0.5, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.3-0.8, and RR=0.6, 95% CI 0.3-0.9, respectively), but dopamine agonists were less effective and less well tolerated than levodopa. The lower frequency of motor fluctuations in patients assigned to deprenyl was no longer statistically significant when prognostic predictors were considered in a multivariable analysis. Long-term mortality did not differ in the three arms of the study. Dopamine agonists and deprenyl can be considered as an alternative to levodopa for starting treatment in Parkinson's disease patients. However, on clinical grounds, only small advantages are expected over the traditional therapy initiation with levodopa. The long-term effectiveness of three different initial drug regimes in patients with early, mild PD was evaluated by the PD Research Group of the United Kingdom (PDRGUK). In 1995, the selegiline arm of the trial was terminated following an interim analysis.
                This was an open, randomized trial. Between 1985 and 1990, 782 patients with de-novo PD were recruited and randomized to one of three treatment arms: levodopa plus dopa decarboxylase inhibitor; levodopa plus decarboxylase inhibitor and selegiline; or bromocriptine. The main endpoints were mortality, disability, and adverse events. Intention-to-treat analysis was used.
                There was no significant difference in mortality between the bromocriptine and the levodopa arms (hazard ratio 1.15 [95% CI 0.90, 1.47]). Patients initially randomized to bromocriptine had slightly worse disability scores throughout follow-up. This difference was significant during the first years. Patients in the bromocriptine arm returned to pretreatment disability levels one year earlier than those in the levodopa arm. Patients randomized to bromocriptine had a significantly lower incidence of dyskinesias than those randomized to levodopa (rate ratio 0.73 [95% CI 0.57, 0.93]). However, this difference was not significant when only moderate to severe dyskinesias were considered. Patients in the bromocriptine arm had slightly lower rates of dystonias and on-off fluctuations, but moderate and severe forms were equally frequent in both arms.
                Starting treatment with the dopamine agonist bromocriptine does not reduce mortality in PD. A slightly lower incidence of motor complications is achieved at the expense of significantly worse disability scores throughout the first years of therapy. To determine if the combination of levodopa (LD) plus bromocriptine (Br) in the early stages of Parkinson's disease (PD) permits reduction of LD dosage and consequently results in fewer motor fluctuations and dyskinesias, a double-blind, multicenter prospective study in 50 PD patients who had responded favorably to LD while under treatment with that drug for < or = 6 months was undertaken. Patients were randomized into two parallel groups (LD alone and LD plus Br). During the first placebo-controlled stage of the study lasting 8 months, association of a fixed dose of Br (15 mg/day) in the LD regimen did not allow a significant reduction in the daily LD dose. Still, in patients on combined LD plus Br, there was a tendency toward smaller daily requirements of LD as compared with those on LD alone, and the difference in LD dose between the two groups was significantly different (515.4 +/- 240 vs. 725.6 +/- 230 mg/day; p < 0.01) after 44 months of continuous treatment in the 40 patients still enrolled in the open-label stage. At that point in time, the mean dose of Br had been increased by 9.2 mg in the combined treatment group, and the mean dose of LD was 40.7% lower than in the group receiving LD alone. On subsequent evaluations, the number of patients with dyskinesias or describing wearing-off fluctuations severe enough to require changes in treatment was lower than in the group under combined therapy, the differences being significant after 20 and 44 months, respectively (36.8 vs. 9.5 and 47.3 vs. 14.2%). Our results support early combined LD-Br therapy in PD, but no conclusions can be drawn as to whether this dopamine agonist exerts a preventive effect on the late side effects of LD or has another mechanism of action. The best way to initiate dopaminergic therapy for early Parkinson disease remains unclear.
                To compare initial treatment with pramipexole vs levodopa in early Parkinson disease, followed by levodopa supplementation, with respect to the development of dopaminergic motor complications, other adverse events, and functional and quality-of-life outcomes.
                Multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind, randomized controlled trial.
                Academic movement disorders clinics at 22 sites in the United States and Canada.
                Patients with early Parkinson disease (N = 301) who required dopaminergic therapy to treat emerging disability, enrolled between October 1996 and August 1997 and observed until August 2001.
                Subjects were randomly assigned to receive 0.5 mg of pramipexole 3 times per day with levodopa placebo (n = 151) or 25/100 mg of carbidopa/levodopa 3 times per day with pramipexole placebo (n = 150). Dosage was escalated during the first 10 weeks for patients with ongoing disability. Thereafter, investigators were permitted to add open-label levodopa or other antiparkinsonian medications to treat ongoing or emerging disability.
                Time to the first occurrence of dopaminergic complications: wearing off, dyskinesias, on-off fluctuations, and freezing; changes in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale and quality-of-life scales; and adverse events.
                Initial pramipexole treatment resulted in a significant reduction in the risk of developing dyskinesias (24.5% vs 54%; hazard ratio, 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25-0.56; P<.001) and wearing off (47% vs 62.7%; hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.49-0.63; P =.02). Initial levodopa treatment resulted in a significant reduction in the risk of freezing (25.3% vs 37.1%; hazard ratio, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.11-2.59; P =.01). By 48 months, the occurrence of disabling dyskinesias was uncommon and did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. The mean improvement in the total Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale score from baseline to 48 months was greater in the levodopa group than in the pramipexole group (2 +/- 15.4 points vs -3.2 +/- 17.3 points, P =.003). Somnolence (36% vs 21%, P =.005) and edema (42% vs 15%, P<.001) were more common in pramipexole-treated subjects than in levodopa-treated subjects. Mean changes in quality-of-life scores did not differ between the groups.
                Initial treatment with pramipexole resulted in lower incidences of dyskinesias and wearing off compared with initial treatment with levodopa. Initial treatment with levodopa resulted in lower incidences of freezing, somnolence, and edema and provided for better symptomatic control, as measured by the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, compared with initial treatment with pramipexole. Both options resulted in similar quality of life. Levodopa and pramipexole both appear to be reasonable options as initial dopaminergic therapy for Parkinson disease, but they are associated with different efficacy and adverse-effect profiles. Levodopa-carbidopa (LD) in low dosages adequately controls symptoms in most patients with Parkinson's disease and delays the appearance of fluctuations and dyskinesias. It has been suggested that early combination therapy with bromocriptine and levodopa delays or prevents the onset of late treatment complication associated with LD monotherapy in Parkinson's disease. We have conducted this study to assess the possible benefit of combined therapy compared with levodopa monotherapy. Seventy-eight previously untreated patients with Parkinson's disease were recruited over a period of 54 months and randomly allocated to either a levodopa-carbidopa (LD) Group or a levodopa-carbidopa in combination with low-dose bromocriptine (LD-Br) Group. The appearance of motor complications determined the end point of the study. We gradually increased the doses of bromocriptine (2.5-15 mg/d) or levodopa (125-500 mg/d) until the maximum "on" time was reached. In six patients, the doses of levodopa had to be increased up to the optimal dose (625-1000 mg/day). In the last evaluation the on-time and parkinsonian disability were similar in both treatment groups. We did not find statistically significant differences in the frequency of motor complications when comparing the two groups of treatment. Our study suggests that early combination of levodopa and bromocriptine does not confer any clinical benefit over levodopa alone in treating early Parkinson's disease, nor will it influence the evolution of the disease.Copyright Lippincott-Raven Publishers To determine the effects of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist amantadine on levodopa-associated dyskinesias and motor fluctuations in Parkinson's disease (PD).
                NMDA receptor blockade can ameliorate levodopa-induced dyskinesias in primates and PD patients. Amantadine, a well-tolerated and modestly effective antiparkinsonian agent, was recently found to possess NMDA antagonistic properties.
                Eighteen patients with advanced PD participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study. At the end of each 3-week treatment arm, parkinsonian and dyskinesia scores were obtained during a steady-state intravenous levodopa infusion. Motor fluctuations and dyskinesias were also documented with patient-kept diaries and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) interviews.
                In the 14 patients completing this trial, amantadine reduced dyskinesia severity by 60% (p = 0.001) compared to placebo, without altering the antiparkinsonian effect of levodopa. Motor fluctuations occurring with patients' regular oral levodopa regimen also improved according to UPDRS and patient-kept diaries.
                These findings suggest that amantadine given as adjuvant to levodopa can markedly improve motor response complications and support the view that hyperfunction of NMDA receptors contributes to the pathogenesis of levodopa-associated motor complications.
MAO-B inhibitors are one option for the early treatment of PD although they have weaker symptomatic effects than levodopa and dopamine agonists. They may reduce the rate of motor fluctuations compared with initial levodopa therapy and may have fewer significant adverse effects than the older agonists but data are too few to provide reliable conclusions.