Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of SPf66 malaria vaccine in children in northwestern Thailand. Shoklo SPf66 Malaria Vaccine Trial Group. Randomised trial of efficacy of SPf66 vaccine against Plasmodium falciparum malaria in children in southern Tanzania. Evaluation of SPf66 malaria vaccine efficacy in Brazil. Vaccination with SPf66, a chemically synthesised vaccine, against Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Colombia. Evaluation of SPf66 malaria vaccine during a 22-month follow-up field trial in the Pacific coast of Colombia. Safety, immunogenicity and protective effect of the SPf66 malaria synthetic vaccine against Plasmodium falciparum infection in a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled field trial in an endemic area of Ecuador. Efficacy trial of malaria vaccine SPf66 in Gambian infants. Evaluation of the SPf66 vaccine for malaria control when delivered through the EPI scheme in Tanzania. Immunization with SPf66 and subsequent infection with homologous and heterologous Plasmodium falciparum parasites.
Previous efficacy trials of SPf66 malaria vaccine have produced conflicting results in different populations. We report a randomised double-blind trial of the SPf66 vaccine conducted in Karen children aged 2-15 living in a malarious region of northwestern Thailand. Recombinant hepatitis B vaccine was used as a comparator.
                The study had a power of 90% to detect an efficacy of 30%, defined as a reduction in the incidence of first cases of symptomatic falciparum malaria after three doses of vaccine. 1221 children received three immunisations and were eligible for the primary efficacy analysis. Intense active and passive case detection continued over 15 months of follow-up.
                The SPf66 vaccine was well tolerated, although 26 children had mild or moderately severe local or systemic allergic reactions, compared with none in the comparator group. The vaccine was immunogenic; after three doses, 73% of recipients had seroconverted. There were no deaths due to malaria during the study. During the 15-month period of evaluation there were 379 first cases of symptomatic falciparum malaria (195 in the SPf66 recipients, 184 in the comparator group); an SPf66 efficacy of -9% (95% CI -33 to 14, p = 0.41). No significant differences between the two study groups in parasite density or any other measure of malaria-related morbidity were detected.
                These findings are consistent with a recent study showing lack of efficacy of SPf66 among Gambian infants and differ from earlier positive reports from South America and evidence of borderline efficacy from Tanzania. We conclude that SPf66 does not protect against clinical falciparum malaria and that further efficacy trials are not warranted. Effective, safe antimalarial vaccines have proved elusive. The synthetic polypeptide SPf66 vaccine is based on preerythrocytic and asexual blood-stage proteins of Plasmodium falciparum. We report here a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of the efficacy of the SPf66 vaccine against clinical P falciparum malaria in idete, southern Tanzania, an area of intense perennial malaria transmission. 586 children aged 1-5 years received three doses of vaccine (n = 274) or placebo (n = 312). The incidence and density of parasitaemia were assessed through repeated cross-sectional surveys on subgroups of children. Morbidity was monitored over a 1 year period through passive case detection in all children plus active case detection in a subgroup of 191. An episode of clinical malaria was defined as measured fever (> or = 37.5 degrees C) and parasite density > 20,000/microL. No severe side-effects were seen and the frequency of mild side-effects after the third dose was less than 6%. The vaccine was highly immunogenic and after three doses all vaccine recipients had detectable anti-SPf66 antibodies: the geometric mean index of response was 8.3 in the vaccine group and 0.7 in the placebo group. The incidence of parasitaemia was similar in both groups. 123 children had at least one episode of clinical malaria during the follow-up period after the third dose and annual incidence rates were 0.25 in the vaccine group and 0.35 in the placebo group. Estimated vaccine efficacy was 31% (95% confidence interval 0-52%; p = 0.046). After the third dose there were 6 deaths among the study cohort (1 vaccine, 5 placebo). This study confirms that SPf66 is safe, immunogenic and reduces the risk of clinical malaria among children exposed to intense P falciparum transmission. This paper reports the efficacy results of the randomized, placebo-controlled, field trial of SPf66 malaria vaccine in Costa Marques, Rondonia, Brazil. This region is characterized by the seasonal distribution of Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax infections, and the recent occupation by migrants from nonendemic areas. A total of 800 individuals of both sexes, ranging in age from seven to 60 years, were included in the study. Of the initial cohort, 572 participants completed the vaccination schedule. Clinical and parasitologic evaluations were obtained by active and passive searches on a periodic basis. The overall protective efficacy against P. falciparum infections was -1.6% (-32.9% to 22.4%), and 14.1% (-17.0% to 36.9%) for the first episode. The overall protective efficacy for P. vivax infections was -19.7% (-44.8% to 1.03%), and -10.8% (-41.1% to 12.8%) for the first episode. No statistical evidence of an overall significant protective effect of SPf66 malaria vaccine against P. falciparum and P. vivax malaria was obtained in this trial. Preclinical and clinical studies have established the safety and immunogenicity of the chemically synthesised SPf66 malaria vaccine. The present study is a phase III randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, efficacy trial completed in La Tola, Colombia. 1548 volunteers over one year of age received three doses of either the vaccine (n = 738) or placebo (n = 810). Active and passive case detection methods were used to document clinical episodes of malaria among the study population. The follow-up period began one month after the third dose and lasted for one year. 168 and 297 episodes of Plasmodium falciparum malaria were documented in the SPf66 group and the placebo group, respectively; this corresponds to a crude protective efficacy of 38.8%. Incidence rates for first or only P falciparum malarial episodes were 22.3% per annum among the vaccinee group and 33.5% among the placebo group (RR = 1.5; 95% Cl 1.23, 1.84). Therefore, the protective efficacy of SPf66 against first or only episodes was 33.6% (95% Cl 18.8, 45.7), being highest in children aged 1-4 years (77%) and adults older than 45 years (67%). The estimated protective efficacy against second episodes was 50.5% (95% Cl 12.9-71.9). Our study shows that the chemically synthesised SPf66 malaria vaccine is safe, immunogenic, and protective against P falciparum malaria in semi-immune populations subject to natural challenge. A double-blind randomized placebo-controlled field trial with the SPf66 malaria vaccine was carried out in an endemic area consisting of 14 small villages with exclusive fluvial access, in a rain forest area along the Rosario River, Colombia. A total of 1257 subjects completed the full three dose vaccination schedule on days 0, 30 and 180 (643 vaccinated group/623 placebo group) and were followed-up by passive and active surveillance over a period of 22 months. One hundred and thirty-four Plasmodium falciparum malaria episodes were detected (53 in vaccinated group/81 in placebo group), yielding an attack rate of 5.47 cases/100 person years of follow-up (pyears) in the vaccine group and 8.44/100 pyears in the placebo group. The estimated vaccine protective efficacy was 35.2% (95% CI 8.4-54.2%, P = 0.01). This result supports earlier findings that the SPf66 malaria vaccine diminishes the risk of infection by P. falciparum in endemic areas of South America. A total of 537 subjects were randomized to receive either SPf66 malaria vaccine against Plasmodium falciparum or placebo in three doses (days 0, 30 and 180). Subjects completing the course of vaccination (230 in the vaccine and 238 in the placebo group) were followed up for a further 12 months. Case detection surveillance was implemented by parasitological cross-sectional surveys every 2 months and by monthly household visits to each participant. Symptomatic subjects were also diagnosed in a local health centre. Minor local side-effects were observed mainly after the second dose in about 19% of the vaccinated subjects and in 3.7% of the placebo group. Thirty days after the third dose the prevalence of anti-SPf66 antibodies was 57% in the vaccine and 8.8% in the placebo groups. The prevaccination prevalence of antibodies measured by indirect immunofluorescence assay increased with age and seemed to be inversely related to anti-SPf66 antibody production. Immune response to SPf66 was independent of age. Vaccine efficacy was calculated based on person-time of exposure. The protective effect considering any malaria episode was 66.8% (95% confidence interval = -2.7-89.3%) and considering only one episode per individual was 60.2% (95% confidence interval = -26-87.5%). SPf66 malaria vaccine is a synthetic protein with aminoacid sequences derived from pre-erythrocytic and asexual blood-stage proteins of Plasmodium falciparum. SPf66 was found to have a 31% protective efficacy in an area of intensive malaria transmission in Tanzanian children, 1-5 years old. We report a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of SPf66 against clinical P falciparum malaria in Gambian infants. 630 children, aged 6-11 months at time of the first dose, received three doses of SPf66 or injected polio vaccine (IPV). Morbidity was monitored during the following rainy season by means of active and passive case detection. Cross-sectional surveys were carried out at the beginning and at the end of the rainy season. An episode of clinical malaria was defined as fever (> or = 37.5 degrees C) and a parasite density of 6000/microL or more. Analysis of efficacy was done on 547 children (316 SPf66/231 IPV). No differences in mortality or in health centre admissions were found between the two groups of children. 347 clinical episodes of malaria were detected during the three and a half months of surveillance. SPf66 vaccine was associated with a protective efficacy against the first or only clinical episode of 8% (95% CI -18 to 29, p = 0.50) and against the overall incidence of clinical episodes of malaria of 3% (95% CI -24 to 24, p = 0.81). No significant differences in parasite rates or in any other index of malaria were found between the two groups of children. The findings of this study differ from previous reports on SPf66 efficacy from South America and from Tanzania. In The Gambia, protection against clinical attacks of malaria during the rainy season after immunisation in children 6-11 months old at time of the first dose was not achieved. Malaria control programmes need to protect young children, who bear the brunt of malaria disease and death in Africa. The development of a vaccine is a priority if improved and sustained malaria control is to be achieved. The best use of a vaccine in Africa will be achieved if it can be delivered through the expanded programme of immunization (EPI). We conducted a trial designed to evaluate the efficacy of SPf66 vaccine for malaria control when delivered through the EPI scheme in Tanzania.
                The study was a two-arm, double blind, individually randomized placebo controlled trial involving 1207 infants. The primary objective of the trial was to estimate the efficacy of three doses of SPf66 given at 1, 2 and 7 months of age in preventing clinical episodes of malaria. These were documented through a health facility-based passive case detection system.
                Among 1207 randomized children, overall compliance for third dose was 91%. SPf66 was safe, immunogenic and did not interfere with the humoral immune responses to EPI vaccines. There were 294 children among SPf66 recipients and 288 among placebo recipients with at least one malaria episode, yielding a vaccine efficacy estimate of 2% (95% CI: -16, 16; P = 0.84).
                This has been the first trial of a malaria vaccine among very young infants. It provides information on the safety of peptide vaccines administered at this early age as well as their capacity to induce immune responses without negatively interacting with EPI vaccines. Given the modest protection previously documented in older age groups and the lack of efficacy in younger infants, this vaccine in its current alum-based formulation does not appear to have a role in malaria control in sub-Saharan Africa. The lack of efficacy found in this trial also raises concerns about potential difficulties of inducing protective immune responses against malaria through immunization in infants. In an area of intense transmission, a malaria vaccine could reduce infection due to the parasite types represented in the vaccine, but have no detectable effect on the overall frequency of infection if it did not protect against infection with heterologous parasites. These studies were performed to determine whether immunization with SPf66 decreased infection with homologous parasites containing the 11 amino acid peptide from merozoite surface protein-1 (MSP-1) in SPf66, or increased infection due to heterologous parasites containing heterologous (alternative) MSP-1 sequences. Based on this 11 amino acid peptide (YSLFQKEKMVL), three forward primers (S,Q,V) were designed to amplify the MSP-1 sequence present in SPf66, and 3 additional forward primers (G,H,I) to amplify the alternative MSP-1 sequence (YGLFHKEKMIL). This strategy was validated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification and dideoxy sequencing with 14 cloned laboratory isolates, which demonstrated that each primer amplified one MSP-1 sequence or the other, but not both. The technique was then used to examine filter paper blots from an SPf66 vaccine study of 69 subjects in Saradidi, Kenya. In that study, the prevalence of infection with YSLFQKEKMVL or YGLFHKEKMIL type parasites was unaffected by immunization with SPf66 (based on PCR amplification with the S, Q, V, G, H and I primers, respectively). These results suggest that immunization with SPf66 does not produce a selective effect in vivo. They demonstrate a molecular method to test for selection in vivo as an indirect measure of vaccine efficacy.
There is no evidence for protection by SPf66 vaccines against P. falciparum in Africa. There is a modest reduction in attacks of P. falciparum malaria following vaccination with SPf66 in South America. There is no justification for further trials of SPf66 in its current formulation. Further research with SPf66 vaccines in South America or with new formulations of SPf66 may be justified.