Combination drug therapy for the prevention of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in children. Attenuation of exercise induced asthma by nedocromil sodium and sodium cromoglycate. Beta2-agonist tolerance and exercise-induced bronchospasm. Effect of nedocromil sodium on exercise-induced bronchoconstriction exacerbated by inhalation of cold air. A comparison of inhaled albuterol and cromolyn in the prophylaxis of exercise-induced bronchospasm. Reduced protection against exercise induced bronchoconstriction after chronic dosing with salmeterol. Inhibition of exercise-induced asthma by different pharmacological pathways. Nedocromil sodium in exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in children. A comparison of the effects of oral montelukast and inhaled salmeterol on response to rescue bronchodilation after challenge.
Sequential administration of a beta-agonist and cromolyn or nedocromil before exercise is recommended for patients whose symptoms are not controlled by beta-agonists alone; however, this practice reduces compliance.
                To evaluate the effectiveness of a new pre-combined aerosol formulation (salbutamol and nedocromil) in preventing exercise-induced bronchoconstriction and to compare it to salbutamol alone.
                Twelve children with asthma were studied in a double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, crossover, placebo-controlled design to compare the protective effect of salbutamol and a new pre-combined salbutamol/nedocromil formulation against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. The drugs were delivered by a metered-dose inhaler (salbutamol, 200 microg; salbutamol/nedocromil, 200 microg/4 mg; placebo, 2 puffs) 20 minutes before exercise.
                Both active drugs were significantly more protective than placebo but there was no difference between them. Complete protection was obtained in 12/12, 10/12, and 1/12 subjects for the salbutamol/nedocromil combination, salbutamol alone and placebo, respectively.
                Although inhaled beta-agonists alone are highly efficacious in preventing exercise-induced bronchoconstriction, a minority of patients exists for whom a combined treatment with salbutamol and nedocromil is advantageous. This group may represent a subpopulation of subjects who release more, or different, mediators in response to exercise. A randomized double blind cross over trial to compare nedocromil sodium and sodium cromoglycate with placebo in the prevention of exercise induced asthma was conducted. Twenty asthmatics received nedocromil sodium, sodium cromoglycate or placebo via metered dose inhalers on successive days 30 minutes before exercise in a randomized order. Nedocromil sodium and sodium cromoglycate gave sufficient protection (P less than 0.05) compared to placebo as assessed by the reduction in the maximum percentage fall in the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). The protective effect of nedocromil sodium and sodium cromoglycate varied in individuals. The effect of regular inhaled beta-agonist on the treatment of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction was studied. Eight subjects with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction took 1 week each of salbutamol 200 microg qid or placebo in a random-order, double-blind, crossover study. They then withheld this treatment for 8 hours before performing a dry-air, sub-maximal exercise challenge at a work-rate previously shown to induce a 15% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). Five minutes after exercise, they inhaled salbutamol 100, 100, and 200 microg at 5-minute intervals. The mean pre-exercise FEV1 was similar on both study days. However, pretreatment for 1 week with salbutamol led to a significantly greater fall in FEV1 after exercise. The FEV1 remained lower than during the placebo arm despite the administration of salbutamol after exercise. This difference persisted 25 minutes after exercise. It is concluded that regular beta-agonist treatment leads to increased exercise-induced bronchoconstriction and a suboptimal bronchodilator response to beta-agonist. The data suggest that previous regular beta-agonist treatment may lead to a failure to respond to emergency bronchodilator treatment during an acute asthma attack and support current opinion that regular short-acting beta-agonist therapy should not be used to treat asthma. This double-blind placebo-crossover study examined the effect of nedocromil sodium, 4 mg aerosol 30 min before challenge, on exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) in cold air conditions. Twenty-one asthmatic patients (15-28 years), with methacholine PC20 < or = 8 mg/ml in the absence of significant allergen exposure, were randomized to active and placebo therapy on separate study days. Pulmonary function, measured up to 20 min after exercise, showed significantly less deterioration with nedocromil sodium, which effectively halved the maximum percentage decline in forced expiratory volume in the first second. EIB was increased by cold air, whereas an ancillary study in 15 healthy volunteers (18-19 years) showed no such effects. We conclude that prior inhalation of nedocromil sodium diminished cold air-exacerbated EIB in young adult asthmatic patients. Inhaled albuterol and cromolyn by spinhaler have both been shown to be effective in the treatment of exercise-induced bronchospasm. Eighty subjects with exercise-induced bronchospasm participated in a randomized parallel group study comparing albuterol (180 microgram) and cromolyn (20 mg) administered 15 minutes prior to a standardized treadmill challenge. The cromolyn group was restudied after 2 and 4 weeks of 4 times/day cromolyn therapy. The albuterol group was also studied at 2 and 4 weeks, but they only used their inhaler as needed between study visits. The mean maximum FEV1 drop post-exercise in the albuterol group improved from 33% (screening visit) to 6% (treatment day 1). The cromolyn group showed significantly less (P less than .01) improvement than the albuterol group (31% drop at the screening visit to 14% drop at treatment day 1). When 2 or 4 weeks of continuous cromolyn therapy was given in addition to a dosage 15 minutes prior to exercise, there was no significant difference compared with acute cromolyn administration alone. In summary, acute administration of albuterol was better prophylaxis for exercise-induced bronchospasm than acute or chronic cromolyn treatment. The purpose of the present study was to assess the degree of protection of inhaled salmeterol against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) after chronic compared with single dosing in patients with asthma. Twelve patients with exercise-induced asthma took part in a randomized double-blind crossover study to compare the duration of action of inhaled salmeterol 50 micrograms twice daily for 4 weeks with that of placebo. A standardized exercise test was performed at 6 h and 12 h after dosing on the first and last day of each treatment period. Salmeterol produced significant protection against EIB at 6 and 12 h after the first dose in comparison with placebo, whereas there was no significant attenuation of EIB after 4 weeks of chronic treatment with salmeterol. The percentage fall in FEV1 after exercise challenge at 6 h was (first dose): placebo 34.8 +/- 4.9% vs. salmeterol 11.9 +/- 2.8% (P < 0.05); (4 weeks): placebo 32.9 +/- 5.3% vs. salmeterol 24.0 +/- 4.4% (NS). These results suggest that tachyphylaxis may develop to the functional antagonism of salmeterol against EIB. Exercise-induced asthma (EIA) was provoked by standardized treadmill running for 6 minutes in 15 asthmatic children. The tests were carried out after the administration of a placebo, salbutamol, sodium cromoglycate, choline theophyllinate, and atrophine methonitrate aerosol in randomized fashion on different days. The mean post-exercise percent fall in peak expiratory flow rate was 45-2, 4-1, 19-6, 18-3, and 24-9 respectively. The proportion of children having significant amelioration of their EIA compared with those taking the placebo was 100% for salbutamol, 80% for cromoglycate and theophyllinate, and 60% for atropine. Salbutamol, choline theophyllinate, and atropine were bronchodilators at rest whereas cromoglycate was not, and the ability to suppress EIA was unrelated to bronchodilator effect. Even after bronchodilatation at rest, further broncho-dilatation occurred during the exercise period. Twenty asthmatic children were studied in a double-blind within-patient comparative trial designed to assess the efficacy of nedocromil sodium (4 mg) and placebo in exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. The response to exercise challenge given 30 minutes after treatment showed statistically significant differences in favor of nedocromil sodium. No unusual symptoms were reported. To compare the effects of addition of montelukast or salmeterol to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) on the response to rescue beta2-agonist use after exercise-induced bronchoconstriction.
                A double-blind, placebo-controlled study was performed at 16 centers in the United States. Patients with asthma (n = 122, ages 15-58) whose symptoms were uncontrolled on Low-dose inhaled fluticasone and who had a history of exercise-induced worsening of asthma were randomized to receive either montelukast (10 mg once daily), salmeterol (50microg twice daily), or placebo for 4 weeks. Standardized spirometry after exercise challenge and beta2-agonist rescue was performed at baseline, week 1 and 4.
                Maximum achievable forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) percent predicted after rescue beta2-agonist improved in the montelukast (+1.5%) and placebo (+1.2%) groups at 4 weeks, but diminished in the salmeterol (-3.9%) group (P < 0.001). Although pre-exercise FEV1 was greatest with salmeterol (P = 0.10), patients taking montelukast had significantly greater protection from an exercise-induced decrease in FEV1 than those taking salmeterol (P < 0.001). Both the magnitude and rate of rescue bronchodilation were greater with montelukast compared with salmeterol (P < 0.001). Five minutes after rescue beta2-agonist, 92% of patients taking montelukast and 68% of those taking placebo had recovered to pre-exercise levels, whereas only 50% of those taking salmeterol had recovered to pre-exercise levels.
                In patients whose asthma symptoms remain uncontrolled using ICS, addition of montelukast permits a greater and more rapid rescue bronchodilation with a short-acting beta2-agonist than addition of salmeterol and provides consistent and clinically meaningful protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction.
Inhaled corticosteroids used for 4 weeks or more before exercise testing significantly attenuated exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. The relative benefits of inhaled corticosteroids compared to other forms of exercise induced bronchoconstriction treatment (sodium cromoglycate, nedocromil sodium, salbutamol, and other anti-inflammatory agents) remains unclear.