A randomized trial of cyclosporine in steroid-resistant idiopathic nephrotic syndrome. Intravenous pulse cyclophosphamide--a new regime for steroid-resistant minimal change nephrotic syndrome. Cyclosporin A is superior to cyclophosphamide in children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome-a randomized controlled multicentre trial by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Pädiatrische Nephrologie. Controlled trial of azathioprine in treatment of steroid-responsive nephrotic syndrome of childhood. Cyclosporine therapy for steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. A controlled study. Pulse cyclophosphamide therapy in steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome. Use of levamisole in maintaining remission in steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome in children. Cyclosporin versus cyclophosphamide for patients with steroid-dependent and frequently relapsing idiopathic nephrotic syndrome: a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Effect of cytotoxic drugs in frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome with and without steroid dependence.
To compare the efficacy (induction of remission) and safety of cyclosporine (CsA) with those of supportive therapy in patients with steroid-resistant idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS), we organized an open, prospective, randomized, multicentric, controlled study for parallel groups, stratified for adults and children. Forty-five patients with steroid-resistant INS were randomly assigned to supportive therapy or CsA (5 mg/kg/day for adults, 6 mg/kg/day for children) for six months, then tapered off by 25% every two months until complete discontinuation. Four patients were lost to follow-up. During the first year 13/22 CsA-treated patients versus three of 19 controls attained remission of the nephrotic syndrome (P < 0.001). A symptom score was assessed at time 0 and at six months. The mean score significantly decreased in the CsA group (P < 0.001), but remained unchanged in the controls. At month 6 the mean urinary protein excretion, the mean serum proteins and plasma cholesterol had significantly improved in the CsA group but were not changed in the controls. There were no significant differences in serum creatinine and creatinine clearance between treatments (interaction time* treatments, P = 0.089 and P = 0.935, respectively) at month 6 versus basal. The CsA-related side-effects were mild; no significant difference in blood pressure between the two groups was seen at any time. This study shows that CsA can bring about remission in some 60% of patients with steroid-resistant INS. In patients with normal renal function and without severe hypertension, CsA at the therapeutic scheme adopted did not produce severe renal or extrarenal toxicity. The treatment of steroid-resistant minimal change nephrotic syndrome (MCNS) continues to pose a therapeutic challenge. We conducted a randomised prospective controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of i.v. cyclophosphamide compared with oral cyclophosphamide in 13 children with biopsy-proven steroid-resistant MCNS. All 7 patients receiving i.v. cyclophosphamide achieved remission; this was sustained in 4 patients, while 3 relapsed. However, even these 3 patients subsequently became steroid sensitive. Of the 6 patients who received oral cyclophosphamide, 2 dropped out, 1 responded and 3 children continued to remain steroid resistant. The children who received IV cyclophosphamide had more sustained remissions, longer periods without proteinuria and fewer significant side effects; this was achieved at a lower cumulative dose. First line immunosuppressive treatment in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in children is still open to discussion. We conducted a controlled multicentre randomized open label trial to test the efficacy and safety of cyclosporin A (CSA) versus cyclophosphamide pulses (CPH) in the initial therapy of children with newly diagnosed primary steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome and histologically proven minimal change disease, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis or mesangial hypercellularity. Patients in the CSA group (n = 15) were initially treated with 150 mg/m(2) CSA orally to achieve trough levels of 120-180 ng/ml, while patients in the CPH group (n = 17) received CPH pulses (500 mg/m(2) per month intravenous). All patients were on alternate prednisone therapy. Patients with proteinuria >40 mg/m(2) per hour at 12 weeks of therapy were allocated to a non-responder protocol with high-dose CSA therapy or methylprednisolone pulses. At week 12, nine of the 15 (60%) CSA patients showed at least partial remission, evidences by a reduction of proteinuria <40 mg/h per m(2). In contrast, three of the 17 (17%) CPH patients responded (p < 0.05, intention-to-treat). Given these results, the study was stopped, in accordance with the protocol. After 24 weeks, complete remission was reached by two of the 15 (13%) CSA and one of the 17 (5%) CPH patients (p = n.s.). Partial remission was achieved by seven of the 15 (46%) CSA and two of the 15 (11%) CPH patients (p <0.05). Five patients in the CSA group and 14 patients in the CPH group were withdrawn from the study, most of them during the non-responder protocol. The number of adverse events was comparable between both groups. We conclude that CSA is more effective than CPH in inducing at least partial remission in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in children. A controlled trial of azathioprine treatment of steroid-responsive frequent-relapsing nephrotic syndrome of childhood failed to show a therapeutic effect on the stability of remission after withdrawal of corticosteroid treatment. We have conducted a controlled trial on the efficacy of cyclosporine in eight patients with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (four with idiopathic minimal lesion nephrotic syndrome and four with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis). Patients were randomly allocated to a cyclosporine (5 mg/kg/d) or a control group. After eight weeks of therapy and one month without cyclosporine therapy, patients in the control group were given cyclosporine for eight weeks and those in the cyclosporine group became controls. Before the initiation of treatment, there was no difference between the groups with regard to proteinuria and serum albumin levels. Proteinuria remained unchanged in the cyclosporine group, while there was a significant increase in proteinuria in the control group. There were no significant changes in serum albumin levels in either group during the trial. This study does not support the use of cyclosporine at the dose of 5 mg/kg/d in patients with steroid-resistant minimal lesion nephrotic syndrome or focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVCP) has been shown to be effective in lupus nephritis. This is a randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of IVCP with oral cyclophosphamide (OCP) in patients with steroid-dependent (SD) idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS). Forty-seven consecutive children who were SD were randomized to receive either OCP (2 mg/kg per dayx12 weeks) or IVCP (500 mg/m(2) per month IVx6 months) after achieving a steroid-induced remission. The response was evaluated in terms of remission, change in steroid response status, duration of remission (i.e., proteinuria-free days), side effects, and compliance. Of the 47, IVCP was given to 26 children and OCP to 21 children. The demographic data, histopathology, biochemical profile, and duration of follow-up in the two groups were similar. On Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the median proteinura-free time was 360+/-88 days compared with 96+/-88 days in the OCP group (values median+/-SE, log rank P=0.05). The actuarial cumulative sustained remission in our study was 73% in IVCP compared with 38.1% in OCP at 6 months after therapy, but was almost identical (18.6% in IVCP vs. 19%in OCP) after 2 years. Thus in our study the overall improvement in steroid response category from SD to sustained remission, infrequent relapser, and frequent relapser (88% in IVCP vs. 57% in OCP) was significantly better in the IVCP group, although the number of children with persistent remission tended to be similar at 2 years. Furthermore, the response was observed with a 40% lower cumulative dose than OCP. Hence, we conclude that IVCP is a safe and effective therapeutic modality in children with INS who are SD. A randomized, controlled trial was conducted in a pediatric unit in a teaching hospital in India to assess the efficacy of levamisole in maintaining remission in children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome. Sixty-one children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome, who had achieved remission with corticosteroids, were allocated to a treatment group (33 patients) receiving levamisole (2-3 mg/kg/day) twice a week for 12 months or to a control group (28 patients) receiving no treatment. The main outcome measure was duration of remission. Thirty months later, in the levamisole group, 21 of 33 patients were in remission as against 12 of 28 patients in the control group (chi 2 = 2.54, p = 0.11, NS). The median duration of remission maintenance was 12 months in the levamisole group as compared with 10.5 months in the control group. On survival analysis, the difference in duration of remission maintenance between the two groups was not significant (p = 0.10), though there was a trend in favor of the treatment group. On stratified survival analysis, multiple relapsers in the levamisole group had longer remission maintenance than the control group though this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.08). The clinically significant trend towards increased duration of remission maintenance in steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome observed with levamisole therapy, especially in patients with multiple relapses, may require a larger study with a longer follow-up for definitive confirmation. To compare the efficacy (maintenance of remission), safety and tolerability of cyclosporin (CsA) with those of cyclophosphamide in patients with steroid-dependent or frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome (NS).
                Open, prospective, randomized, multicentre, controlled study for parallel groups, stratified for adults and children. The setting was in nephrological departments in Italy.
                Seventy-three patients with steroid-sensitive idiopathic NS admitted to the study were randomly assigned to cyclophosphamide (2.5 mg/kg/day) for 8 weeks or CsA (5 mg/kg/day in adults, 6 mg/kg/day in children) for 9 months, tapered off by 25% every month until complete discontinuation at month 12. Seven patients lost to follow up were not considered in the analysis. The remaining 66 patients were followed up for 3-24 months after randomization.
                Relapse-free survival; number of N.S. relapses/patient/year; cumulative dose of prednisone/patient; laboratory investigations (kidney and liver functions, haematological parameters); incidence of adverse events.
                At month 9, 26 of 35 CsA-treated patients were still in complete remission and a further five patients were in partial remission; 18 of 28 cyclophosphamide-treated patients were in complete remission, and one in partial remission (P = NS). No difference between adults and children was seen with either treatment. The risk of relapse was similar between frequent relapsers (19 of 22) and steroid-dependent patients (8 of 14) given CsA, and those given cyclophosphamide (5 of 15 and 6 of 15). The mean number of relapses per year and the mean dose of prednisone per year were significantly less (P < 0.001) in both groups for the experimental year than for the year before randomization. At 2 years, 25% of the patients given CsA (50% adults and 20% children) and 63% of those given cyclophosphamide (40% adults and 68% children) had not had any relapse of NS. Tolerance to the two drugs was generally good. The CsA-related side-effects were mild and disappeared after drug discontinuation.
                This study shows that both treatments are effective and well tolerated; more patients given cyclophosphamide had stable remissions. In a prospective, controlled study, 50 children with frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome who had steroid toxicity were treated for eight weeks with either cyclophosphamide (2 mg per kilogram of body weight per day) or chlorambucil (0.15 mg per kilogram per day), in combination with prednisone in tapering doses. Of the 34 children shows relapses had tended to occur after the prednisone dosage had been reduced or immediately after the drug was discontinued (the steroid-dependent group), 22 also had early relapses after cytotoxic-drug treatment. In contrast, cytotoxic drug treatment produced long-lasting remissions in 12 of the 16 children whose relapses usually occurred after prednisone treatment had been interrupted for more than 14 days (the non-steroid-dependent group). The difference in response between the two groups was highly significant (P less than 0.001). We conclude that patients with frequent relapses without steroid dependence can be treated successfully with an eight-week course of cytotoxic drugs, whereas those with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome do not profit from cytotoxic drugs in the low doses used.
Further comparative studies are required to examine the efficacy of immunosuppressive agents for achievement of sustained remission of nephrotic syndrome caused by minimal change disease. Studies are also needed to evaluate treatments for adults with steroid-dependent or relapsing disease.