Addition of salmeterol versus doubling the dose of fluticasone propionate in patients with mild to moderate asthma. Low- and high-dose fluticasone propionate in asthma; effects during and after treatment. Steroid-sparing effects of fluticasone propionate 100 microg and salmeterol 50 microg administered twice daily in a single product in patients previously controlled with fluticasone propionate 250 microg administered twice daily. Fluticasone propionate in asthma: a long term dose comparison study. Improved safety with equivalent asthma control in adults with chronic severe asthma on high-dose fluticasone propionate. Fluticasone propionate 1 mg daily and beclomethasone dipropionate 2 mg daily: a comparison over 1 yr. High-dose inhaled fluticasone does not replace oral prednisolone in children with mild to moderate acute asthma. A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, multicenter, dose-reduction trial of the minimal effective doses of budesonide and fluticasone dry-powder inhalers in adults with mild to moderate asthma. A comparison of clinical use of fluticasone propionate and beclomethasone dipropionate in pediatric asthma.
The objective of this multicentre, randomised, double blind, parallel group study was to compare the efficacy and safety of the addition of salmeterol with that of doubling the dose of fluticasone propionate in asthmatic patients not controlled by a low or intermediate dose of inhaled corticosteroids.
                After a four week run in period of treatment with fluticasone propionate (100 micrograms twice daily if pre-trial dose was 400-600 micrograms inhaled corticosteroids or 250 micrograms twice daily if pre-trial dose was 800-1200 micrograms inhaled corticosteroids), 274 patients were randomised to treatment for 12 weeks with either salmeterol 50 micrograms twice daily plus the run in dose of fluticasone propionate or twice the run in dose of fluticasone propionate (200 or 500 micrograms twice daily). Outcome measures were daily records of peak expiratory flow (PEF), symptom scores, and clinic lung function.
                The improvements in both the morning and evening PEF were better in the salmeterol than in the fluticasone propionate group, the mean increase in morning PEF being 19 l/min higher (95% CI 11.0 to 26.1) and in evening PEF being 16 l/min (95% CI 18.4 to 24.0) higher in the salmeterol group. The increase in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was 0.09 1 greater in the salmeterol group than in the fluticasone propionate group after four weeks of treatment (95% CI 0.01 to 0.18), but not after 12 weeks. Both regimens showed an increase in symptom free days and a reduction in the need for rescue salbutamol both during the day and the night, but these improvements were greater in the salmeterol group. There were no significant differences between the groups in adverse effects or in the number of rescue course of oral corticosteroids.
                In this group of patients still symptomatic despite 100 or 250 micrograms fluticasone propionate twice daily, the addition of salmetterol caused a greater improvement in lung function and symptom control than doubling the dose of fluticasone propionate. The dose dependency of the effects of inhaled corticosteroids on markers of asthmatic airway inflammation have not been well studied. There is a need to study the dose/response effects on this inflammation. In order to determine the dose/response effects of fluticasone propionate (FP), 24 asthmatic subjects were randomized to low- (100 microg x day(-1)) or high-dose (1,000 microg x day(-1)) FP for six weeks followed by placebo for 3 weeks. During treatment, the median increase in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1)was 12% in the high-dose group (p<0.05) and 10% in the low-dose group (p<0.05) (p>0.05 between groups); the median decrease in the percentage of sputum eosinophils was 93% in the high-dose group (p<0.05) and 46% in the low-dose group (p<0.05) (p>0.05 between groups). Symptoms, salbutamol use, morning peak flow, provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20), sputum eosinophil cationic protein concentration and tryptase activity improved significantly in both groups (p<0.05), but only the improvement in salbutamol use was greater in the high-dose group (p<0.05). During the run-out, the improvements in FEV1 and PC20 were rapidly reversed in both groups, but the improvements in peak flow and tryptase activity persisted; the improvement in sputum eosinophil concentration persisted only in the high-dose group (p<0.05). It was concluded that dose/response effects for FP are not easily demonstrable because low-dose FP is quite effective. For most outcomes, the effects of high- and low-dose FP are relatively short-lived after treatment is stopped. This finding raises questions about the extent to which inhaled corticosteroids are disease-modifying in asthma. Concurrent use of an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and an inhaled long-acting beta2-agonist provides better overall asthma control than the use of higher doses of ICS alone.
                The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether fluticasone propionate (FP) combined with salmeterol in the Diskus device can be used to reduce the dose of ICS in patients currently stable on medium-dose ICS while maintaining asthma control.
                This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, 12- to 24-week trial consisting of a 3-part run-in period. The run-in period was designed to first establish FP 250 microg administered twice a day (bid) via Diskus as the minimum effective dose. During run-in period 1, patients received FP 220 microg bid or the equivalent for 10 to 14 days. Controlled patients moved to run-in period 2 (5-28 days), which assessed asthma stability on FP 100 microg bid administered via Diskus. Only patients who became unstable on FP 100 microg bid were eligible to enter run-in period 3 (26-30 days), during which they were placed on FP 250 microg bid and those regaining asthma control were eligible for randomization. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients who remained in the study with no evidence of worsening asthma. Secondary efficacy measures included FEV1, morning peak expiratory flow, percent of symptom-free days, and daily albuterol use.
                Only 5% of patients treated with FP100/salmeterol withdrew because of worsening asthma in the first 12 weeks; this compared with 7% in the FP250 group. All patients from a subset of sites continued in the study for an additional 12 weeks; only an additional 1% of patients treated with either FP100/salmeterol or FP250 withdrew because of worsening asthma. Secondary efficacy measures confirmed primary efficacy results.
                In patients requiring FP250 bid for asthma stability, FP100/salmeterol bid was steroid-sparing, allowing a 60% reduction in the FP dose while maintaining overall asthma control. Few dose ranging studies have investigated optimal dosing with inhaled corticosteroids in children with asthma.
                To compare the efficacy and tolerability of fluticasone propionate 100 or 200 microg twice daily in children with moderate to severe asthma for one year.
                One year, randomised, double blind, parallel group, multicentre study. Children aged 4-11 years (n = 528) with moderate to severe asthma who had previously received high dose inhaled corticosteroids were given fluticasone propionate 100 or 200 microg twice daily for the 52 week treatment period. Efficacy (exacerbations, lung function, and symptoms) and tolerability (adverse events and cortisol levels) were measured.
                There was a non-significant decreased risk of experiencing an exacerbation at any time with fluticasone propionate 200 microg twice daily compared with fluticasone propionate 100 microg twice daily. This difference reached significance among patients with more severe asthma (defined by previous inhaled corticosteroid dose >800 microg/day). Daily record card morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) in the total population improved significantly more with the higher dose of fluticasone propionate (between group difference, weeks 1-52: 11.4 l/min). Clinic visit mean PEF improved from baseline with both doses, but the response was significantly greater with the higher dose (between group difference, week 52: 17.8 l/min). Both doses were equally well tolerated and overnight urinary cortisol concentrations were unchanged or slightly increased during treatment with either dose.
                This long term dose comparison study shows that treatment with fluticasone propionate 200 micro g twice daily may offer benefits over a lower dose, particularly in children with more severe asthma. High-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) have been associated with the same side-effects as oral corticosteroids. Beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) and budesonide (BUD) in doses greater than 2000 microg/day are used regularly in severe asthma, despite the fact that safety and efficacy data at such high doses are limited. Fluticasone propionate (FP) has been promoted as being twice as potent clinically as BDP or BUD at doses of 2000 microg/day or less with a similar safety profile. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of FP with BDP and BUD in 133 symptomatic adult asthmatics requiring at least 1750 microg/day of BDP or BUD.
                Patients fulfilling the entry criteria were randomized to receive either their regular ICS medication or FP at approximately half the microgram dose for 6 months in an open, parallel group study. The primary efficacy measure was based on morning peak expiratory flow measurements recorded by patients on daily record cards, while determination of safety was based on a number of endpoints including changes in bone turnover indices, the incidence of topical side-effects and assessments of quality of life.
                It was shown that patients who were switched to FP, but not those continuing with BDP or BUD, had significant increases in levels of morning serum cortisol and the urine cortisol:creatinine ratio while maintaining asthma control. Serum osteocalcin and the pyridinoline:creatinine ratio, as well as the deoxypyridinoline:creatinine ratio, were also shown to increase only in the FP group. Subjective assessments such as quality of life score, the incidence and ease of bruising, and reports of hoarseness also favoured the FP group.
                It is concluded that, at the doses studied and with the delivery devices used clinically, FP is at least as effective as BDP/BUD in the management of severe asthma and may offer clinical advantages with respect to steroid-related adverse effects. This study was designed primarily to assess the safety and tolerability of fluticasone propionate (FP) 1 mg day-1 by comparison with beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) 2 mg day-1 over a 12-month study period. Lung function data were also recorded and used to determine whether the potency ratio between the two inhaled corticosteroids observed in previous studies was maintained in the long-term. Two hundred and thirteen patients with an established clinical history of severe chronic asthma and who were currently receiving between 1000 micrograms and 2000 micrograms day-1 of inhaled steroids were randomized to treatment in a ratio of 3:1 for FP:BDP (159 patients FP; 54 patients BDP), both via metered dose inhalers. Both treatments were well tolerated with a similar adverse event profile. No unexpected adverse events were recorded. Most adverse events were related to the patients' asthma, an intercurrent infection or underlying atopy. The incidence of pharmacologically predictable adverse events was equally low in both treatment groups as was the incidence of events suggestive of systemic steroid effect. Mean serum cortisol levels remained within the normal range at all visits for both treatments. At 12 months, however, the mean cortisol levels for the FP group had risen 4% above the baseline value but had dropped 15% below for the BDP group, giving a ratio of FP:BDP of 1.22; P = 0.01; 95% confidence limits (CL) 1.05-1.43. Fluticasone propionate 1 mg day-1 was at least as effective as BDP 2 mg day-1 in improving lung function (PEF, FEV1 and FVC) over this period. Moreover, the difference in FEV1 values at 6 months was significantly greater for the FP group than for the BDP group (P = 0.04; difference = 0.12 1; 95% CL = 0.01, 0.24 1). The difference between treatments in the amount of FEV1 reversibility was also significantly greater for FP at 12 months (difference in treatments = -3%; 95% CL = - 7-0%; P = 0.044). This study supports previous studies and suggests that FP is likely to be of benefit in the long-term treatment of chronic severe asthma. Inhaled corticosteroids are not as effective as oral corticosteroids in school-aged children with severe acute asthma. It is uncertain how inhaled corticosteroids compare with oral corticosteroids in mild to moderate exacerbations.
                The purpose of this work was to determine whether there is a significant difference in the percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second in children with mild to moderate acute asthma treated with either inhaled fluticasone or oral prednisolone.
                This was a randomized, double-blind controlled trial conducted between 2001 and 2004 in a tertiary care pediatric emergency department. We studied a convenience sample of 69 previously healthy children 5 to 17 years of age with acute asthma and forced expiratory volume in 1 second at 50% to 79% predicted value; 41 families refused participation. Albuterol was given in the emergency department and salmeterol was given after discharge to all patients, as well as either 2 mg of fluticasone via metered dose inhaler and valved holding chamber in the emergency department plus 500 microg twice daily via Diskus for 10 doses after discharge (fluticasone group, N = 35) or 2 mg/kg of oral prednisolone in the emergency department plus 5 daily doses of 1 mg/kg of prednisolone after discharge (prednisolone group, N = 34). We measured a priori defined absolute change in percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second from baseline to 4 and 48 hours in the 2 groups. RESULTS. At 240 minutes, the forced expiratory volume in 1 second increased by 19.1% +/- 12.7% in the fluticasone group and 29.8% +/- 15.5% in the prednisolone group. At 48 hours, this difference was no longer significant (estimated difference: 4.0 +/- 3.4; P = .14). The relapse rates by 48 hours were 12.5% and 0% in the fluticasone group and prednisolone group, respectively.
                Airway obstruction in children with mild to moderate acute asthma in the emergency department improves faster on oral than inhaled corticosteroids. Inhaled corticosteroids are established first-line anti-inflammatory treatment for asthma. Clinical trials comparing inhaled corticosteroids must take into consideration that because of their excellent effect at low doses, they typically induce a near-maximal response in asthma patients.
                The aim of the present dose-response study was to estimate the minimal effective doses (MEDs) of budesonide and of fluticasone propionate via dry-powder inhaler in adults with mild to moderate asthma.
                This was a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, multicenter, dose-reduction trial performed in adults to compare these 2 inhaled corticosteroids. After a 4- to 6-week run-in period with beclomethasone dipropionate 2000 pg/d, patients fulfilling defined criteria for asthma control were randomly allocated to treatment with budesonide or fluticasone, both administered BID at a total of 800 pg/d. At 5-week intervals, the dose was reduced to 400 and then 200 pg/d (200 and 100 pg BID) if asthma control was maintained according to further defined criteria. The MED was defined as the last dose level before deterioration of asthma control.
                Subjects were 197 asthmatic patients with a mean age of 40.6 years in the budesonide group and 41.5 years in the fluticasone group. In both groups, baseline mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) was 79.4% of the predicted normal volume and baseline mean FEV(1) reversibility was 22.3%. The median MED for both groups was 400 microg/d, with no detectable difference in dis-tributions. The budesonide-to-fluticasone ratio for the geometric mean MED was 123% (95% CI, 99-153 [not significant]). No statistically significant differences regarding lung function, symptom scores, or rescue medication usage were found between the treatment groups during the first treatment period. Adverse-event profiles were similar in both groups, and no unexpected adverse events were considered to be caused by the study drugs.
                This effect-controlled study did not detect a statistically significant difference between the MEDs for budesonide and fluticasone via dry-powder inhaler in adults with mild to moderate asthma. Inhaled steroids play a very important role in the prevention and treatment of asthma. Previous studies indicated that fluticasone propionate (FP) had low bioavailability and high local potency. However, the laboratory data in these studies were not obtained among Taiwan population. It is very important that native data should be established. Thus a 12-week research program was designed, involving 77 patients, 51 for FP group and 26 for beclomethasone dipropionate (BD) group. The objects were victims of moderate to severe asthma and their age ranged from 4 to 14 years old. An open, comparative and randomized method was adopted. Except for the 4-week-later daytime symptom score(P = 0.033, BD group was better), no other significant differences were found between the two groups in the symptom score improvement(P > 0.05). All the P-values for the daytime & night-time scores were lower than 0.001, which means obvious improvement after treatment in both groups. P-value for PEF improvement was 0.003 after 4 weeks (BD group was better) and 0.943 after 8 weeks; for FEV1 improvement, it was 0.005 after 4 weeks(BD group was better) and 0.252 after 8 weeks; and for FEV1/FVC improvements, it was 0.067 after 4 weeks and 0.097 after 8 weeks. There was no statistic significance in total eosinophil count (TEC), IgE, eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) serum level changes after 4 or 8 weeks. Adverse effects were all anticipated and no statistic significance showed up, either, between the two groups or in the cortisol levels (P > 0.05). In conclusion, native data indicated that the potency of 100 micrograms of FP was equal to that of 200 micrograms of BD and that few side effects were noted in FP group. It is recommended that this drug be introduced for clinical use.
We have not found evidence of a pronounced dose response in FEV1 with increasing doses of fluticasone. The number of studies contributing to our primary outcomes was low. At dose ratios of 1:2, there are statistically significant differences in favour of the higher dose in morning peak flow across the low dose range. The clinical impact of these differences is open to interpretation. Patients with moderate disease achieve similar levels of asthma control on medium doses of fluticasone (400 to 500 µg/day) as they do on high doses (800 to 1000 µg/day). More work in severe asthma would help to confirm that doses of FP above 500 µg/day confer greater benefit in this subgroup than doses of around 200 µg/day. In oral corticosteroid-dependent asthmatics, reductions in prednisolone requirement may be gained with FP 2000 µg/day.