A clinical trial of a slow-releasing fluoride device in children. In vivo inhibition of demineralization around orthodontic brackets. A comparative study of fluoride-releasing composite resin and glass ionomer materials used as fissure sealants. Fluoride release and cariostatic ability of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement used for orthodontic bonding. [The caries-protective efficacy of 2 fluoride varnishes in a 2-year controlled clinical trial]. Caries preventive effect of a fluoride-containing varnish (Duraphat) after 1 year's study. The caries-preventive effect of amine fluorides and inorganic fluorides in a mouthrinse or dentifrice after 30 months of use. Reversal of incipient and radiographic caries through the use of sodium and stannous fluoride dentifrices in a clinical trial. Comparative unsupervised clinical trial on caries inhibition effect of monofluorophosphate and amine fluoride dentifrices after 3 years in Strasbourg, France.
The objective was to test a fluoride-containing slow-release device in preventing dental caries in children. Accordingly a population of 174 children aged 8 years living in a high-caries, low socio-economic area of Leeds (UK) was assembled. Two slow-release/dissolving glass (SFG) pellets, one with fluoride (F) and one without, were randomly attached to the maxillary molars of the children. Baseline caries as dmft/s, DMFT/S, periodontal disease, plaque and calculus were recorded using standard indices. Unstimulated saliva samples were collected 2 h postprandial for F analysis. All parameters were measured at 6-month intervals for 2 years. There were 132 children completing the trial of whom 63 (test n = 31, control n = 32) still retained the glass devices at the end. Comparison of mean values for gingival health and calculus showed no differences between groups throughout the trial. Mean caries as dmfs at the end of the trial (2.26) was significantly lower for the test (SFG, 2.26) compared with that for the control children (8.41; p < or = 0.001). DMFS was significantly lower at 0.84 and 2.34, respectively (p < or = 0.05). Mean salivary fluoride concentrations were 0.11 and 0.03 mg/l for test and control groups. It was concluded that placement of a glass slow-releasing fluoride device significantly reduced caries incidence in a group of low socio-economic schoolchildren over 2 years.
                Copyright (c) 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel. Demineralization around orthodontic appliances is a problem. Suboptimal oral hygiene, long intervals between appointments, and potentially poor patient cooperation with using fluoride dentifrices and mouth rinses necessitate a compliance-free means of preventing tooth decay. The hypothesis of this study was that fluoride released by glass ionomer cement inhibits the formation of carious lesions around orthodontic brackets in vivo. Brackets were bonded on 2 first premolars in 21 randomized, consecutively selected patients 11 to 18 years old. Eleven test-group subjects were bonded with fluoride-releasing glass ionomer cement, and 10 control subjects were bonded with composite resin (no fluoride). The teeth were extracted after 4 weeks, sectioned, and evaluated quantitatively by cross-sectional microhardness testing. Fluoride levels in patient saliva were measured by the Taves diffusion method in samples taken at days 0 (baseline), 1, 2, 3, 7, 14, 21, and 28 to determine whether fluoride from the glass ionomer cement influenced the overall intraoral fluoride levels. The results demonstrated significantly more demineralization around the brackets of the control patients (P <.01, Wilcoxon signed rank test). For whole-mouth salivary fluoride levels, no significant overall difference between the groups (P >.05) and no noticeable trend within groups (P >.05) were found. These results indicate that using fluoride-releasing glass ionomer cement for bonding orthodontic brackets successfully inhibited caries in vivo. This cariostatic effect was localized to the area around the brackets and was statistically significant after 4 weeks. The objectives of the study were to investigate the clinical use of two fluoride-releasing fissure sealants and to study fluoride release under laboratory conditions.
                In the clinical part of the study the two materials, FluroShield and Baseline, were applied to matched contralateral caries-free first permanent molars in 86 children aged 7-8 years. In the laboratory study fluoride release from each material was measured using a model cavity system.
                After 3 years FluroShield was intact on 70% of teeth. Retention was significantly better on lower molars than upper molars. Baseline was lost from all except two teeth within 6 months. After 3 years, caries had affected four teeth sealed with FluroShield and 24 teeth sealed with Baseline; this difference was highly significant. The laboratory study showed that FluroShield released twice as much fluoride over 9 days than did Baseline. Long term studies using FluroShield showed a small steady fluoride release over 6 months.
                The conclusion of the study was that FluroShield was a much more effective fissure sealant than Baseline. The clinical performance of FluroShield was comparable to that of other inert composite resin sealants and superior to that of fluoride-releasing sealants used previously. The aims of this study were to compare the local and systemic uptake of fluoride released from a compomer material (Dyract Ortho) and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (Vitremer) with that of a conventional resin adhesive (Right-On) and to compare the cariostatic ability of each of the test materials with that of the resin control.
                Twenty six patients were randomly allocated to have a bracket bonded to a premolar on one side of the arch with one of the test materials and on the opposite side with the control material. Premolars destined for extraction as part of an orthodontic treatment plan were selected for bonding. A non-fluoride toothpaste was used by all participants for 4 weeks prior to bracket bonding and throughout the 4 week trial period. Fluoride release was measured in saliva, plaque and urine samples taken pre-bonding and 4 weeks post-bonding. Enamel demineralisation was assessed by scoring the buccal surface of each extracted tooth using a caries index.
                Neither Vitremer nor Dyract Ortho altered salivary or urinary fluoride concentration significantly 4 weeks post-bonding but plaque fluoride concentration increased significantly around premolars bonded with Vitremer. The test materials as a combined group were associated with significantly less demineralisation than the control material but there was no significant difference in cariostatic ability detected between either Dyract Ortho or Vitremer when each group was compared separately with the control.
                Fluoride released from Dyract Ortho or Vitremer is likely to exert a local and not a systemic effect. In a 4-week clinical study, the cariostatic ability of the fluoride-releasing cements, as a combined group, was superior to that of the non-fluoride releasing control but there was no significant difference in cariostatic ability between the two test materials when each test group was compared separately with the control. The aim of this randomized, double-blind study was to measure the cariostatic effect of Bifluorid 12 (VOCO GmbH), containing 6% sodium fluoride and 6% calcium fluoride and Laweflour-Schüttellack (LAW), containing 5% sodium fluoride in comparing of placebo varnish. The caries study included 400 schoolchildren, aged 12-14 years. The tests according to the DMFS were carried out by two independent examiners. The 400 children were divided into 3 test and 1 placebo group, each group consisting of 100 subjects. After two years there was a significant inhibition of caries increment in all test groups compared to placebo group. Percentage caries reduction ranged from 25 to 30%. The highest effect was stated at proximal surfaces. The caries prophylactic effect of semi-annual applications of a fluoride-containing varnish (Duraphat) was tested in 121 15-year-old children. The children were divided into a test (60 subjects). The teeth of the children in the test group were coated with fluoride varnish at the beginning of the experimental period and again 6 months later. A clinical and radiographic examination of all children was performed immediately prior to the first application of varnish and 1 year later. The mean caries increment was 0.9 new DMFS in the test group and 4.0 in the control group. The difference was statistically significant at the 0.1% level. The caries prophylactic effect on different tooth surfaces was statistically significant both on proximal and on occlusal surfaces at the 0.1% level. Analyzing the material with respect to the caries prophylactic effect against the background of caries prevalence at the start of the investigation showed a better effect in the group of children with low and medium initial DMFS values. The study groups using a dentifrice and mouthrinse both containing fluorides, a dentifrice containing stannous fluoride and a mouthrinse containing sodium fluoride, or a mouthrinse containing sodium fluoride with a placebo dentifrice had a 20.7% to 29.0% lower DMF increment than the control group after 30 months. These differences were significant. The study groups using a dentifrice containing amine fluorides and a placebo mouthrinse, a mouthrinse containing amine fluorides and a placebo dentifrice, or a dentifrice containing stannous fluoride and a placebo mouthrinse had a 13.6% to 22.4% lower DMF increment than the control group. These differences were not statistically significant. There was no significant difference in effectiveness against caries between the use of the organic or inorganic fluoride products. Experimental evidence has clearly demonstrated that the early stages of lesion formation (enamel demineralization) are reversible following exposure to saliva and/or fluoride. Clinical evidence for remineralization has also been reported extensively in the literature. However, the literature is lacking with respect to data from well-controlled clinical studies regarding the quantitative contribution of remineralization to arrestment and reversal of caries. Retrospective analysis of an existing clinical trial database provided an opportunity to examine the incidence of clinical lesion reversals in a placebo-controlled, double-blinded caries clinical study. The clinical study examined three treatment groups: 1) 0.243% sodium fluoride/silica dentifrice, 2) 0.4% stannous fluoride/calcium pyrophosphate (positive control) dentifrice and 3) non-fluoridated placebo/calcium pyrophosphate (negative control) dentifrice. Clinical measures in this study included both radiographic and visual-tactile assessments of caries. Examination of all subjects revealed a statistically greater frequency for caries reversals in the sodium fluoride group as compared to the placebo group at Year 3, for both total and radiographic caries. In contrast, while caries reversals in the stannous fluoride group occurred with greater frequency than in the placebo group at Year 3, for both total and radiographic caries, the differences were not statistically significant. When only subjects who were "at risk" for potential reversals (i.e., those with a minimum of one carious lesion at baseline) were examined, a statistically greater frequency in caries reversals was observed in both the sodium fluoride (total, incipient, and radiographic caries) and stannous fluoride (total and radiographic caries) groups as compared to the placebo group at Year 3. Collectively, these data confirm the ability of both 0.243% sodium fluoride/silica and 0.4% stannous fluoride/calcium pyrophosphate dentifrices to clinically reverse caries. The results suggest that sodium fluoride may deliver a greater frequency of caries reversals than stannous fluoride, although these treatments were not found to be significantly different. A randomized, double blind clinical trial of the caries inhibition effects of dentifrices containing respectively monofluorophosphate and amine fluoride was performed. A third control group used a toothpaste without fluoride. A total number of 2008 schoolchildren ranging in age from 6 to 8 years and living in Strasbourg (France) participated in this study. After a baseline examination three groups were constructed with the block randomization technic. The caries inhibition effects of the three dental pastes were compared after 3 years of unsupervised use. The monofluorophosphate dentifrice showed a reduction of 7.02% for DMFT, 5.17% for DMFS and 25.26% for the df rate. The reduction of amine fluoride dentifrice caries was respectively 21.62% for DMFT, 20.94% for DMFS and 48.66% for the df rate.
There is some evidence of a caries-inhibiting effect of slow-release fluoride glass beads. This evidence is regarded as weak and unreliable because the results were from participants selected on the basis of bead retention rather than an intention-to-treat analysis.