Aggressive surgical effort and improved survival in advanced-stage ovarian cancer. Radical pelvic surgery versus radical surgery plus radiotherapy for stage Ib carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Preliminary results of a prospective randomized clinical study. The effect of debulking surgery after induction chemotherapy on the prognosis in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecological Cancer Cooperative Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Secondary surgical cytoreduction for advanced ovarian carcinoma. Complete cytoreductive surgery is feasible and maximizes survival in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a prospective study. Understanding the problem of inadequately staging early ovarian cancer. Intervention debulking surgery in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Stages III and IV invasive epithelial ovarian carcinoma in younger versus older women: what prognostic factors are important? Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib-IIa cervical cancer.
Residual disease after initial surgery for ovarian cancer is the strongest prognostic factor for survival. However, the extent of surgical resection required to achieve optimal cytoreduction is controversial. Our goal was to estimate the effect of aggressive surgical resection on ovarian cancer patient survival.
                A retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIIC ovarian cancer undergoing primary surgery was conducted between January 1, 1994, and December 31, 1998. The main outcome measures were residual disease after cytoreduction, frequency of radical surgical resection, and 5-year disease-specific survival.
                The study comprised 194 patients, including 144 with carcinomatosis. The mean patient age and follow-up time were 64.4 and 3.5 years, respectively. After surgery, 131 (67.5%) of the 194 patients had less than 1 cm of residual disease (definition of optimal cytoreduction). Considering all patients, residual disease was the only independent predictor of survival; the need to perform radical procedures to achieve optimal cytoreduction was not associated with a decrease in survival. For the subgroup of patients with carcinomatosis, residual disease and the performance of radical surgical procedures were the only independent predictors. Disease-specific survival was markedly improved for patients with carcinomatosis operated on by surgeons who most frequently used radical procedures compared with those least likely to use radical procedures (44% versus 17%, P < .001).
                Overall, residual disease was the only independent predictor of survival. Minimizing residual disease through aggressive surgical resection was beneficial, especially in patients with carcinomatosis.
                II-2. In a preliminary report of a prospective controlled study treatment results and therapy morbidity of 60 patients with stage pT1bNoMo carcinoma of the uterine cervix treated by radical surgery only (Wertheim-Meigs) were compared with those of 60 patients treated by radical surgery followed by a postoperative external radiotherapy. The median duration of follow-up was 44 (24--72) months. Comparing the survival probability analyzed by life-table-method up to 18 months there was a significant better result for patients treated with surgery only. However, after that the study demonstrated comparable therapeutic results with the two therapeutic regimens. There was no difference of tumor size in patients who died after surgery alone and those who died after combined therapy. The therapy morbidity was slightly greater in patients treated by combined therapy. Especially lymphedemas of the leg developed more frequent in patients treated with combined surgery and radiotherapy. Preliminary analysis of the study does not demonstrate any beneficial effect of postoperative radiotherapy followed a radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphonodectomy in cervical cancer stage pT1bNoMo, but optimal staging, radical surgery and carefully histological examination of the removed tissue are essential needs for this approach. Although the value of primary cytoreductive surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer is beyond doubt, the value of debulking surgery after induction chemotherapy has not yet been defined. In this randomized study we investigated the effect on survival of debulking surgery.
                Eligible patients had residual lesions measuring more than 1 cm in diameter after primary surgery. After three cycles of cyclophosphamide and cisplatin, these patients were randomly assigned to undergo either debulking surgery or no surgery, followed by further cycles of cyclophosphamide and cisplatin. The study end points were progression-free and overall survival. At surgery 65 percent of the patients had lesions measuring more than 1 cm. In 45 percent of this group, the lesions were reduced surgically to less than 1 cm.
                Of the 319 patients who underwent randomization, 278 could be evaluated (140 patients who underwent surgery and 138 patients who did not). Progression-free and overall survival were both significantly longer in the group that underwent surgery (P = 0.01). The difference in median survival was six months. The survival rate at two years was 56 percent for the group that underwent surgery and 46 percent for the group that did not. In the multivariate analysis, debulking surgery was an independent prognostic factor (P = 0.012). Overall, after adjustment for all other prognostic factors, surgery reduced the risk of death by 33 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 10 to 50 percent; P = 0.008). Surgery was not associated with death or severe morbidity.
                Debulking surgery significantly lengthened progression-free and overall survival. The risk of death was reduced by one third, after adjustment for a variety of prognostic factors. We evaluated the effect of adding secondary cytoreductive surgery to postoperative chemotherapy on progression-free survival and overall survival among patients who had advanced ovarian cancer and residual tumor exceeding 1 cm in diameter after primary surgery.
                Women were enrolled within six weeks after primary surgery. If, after three cycles of postoperative paclitaxel plus cisplatin, a patient had no evidence of progressive disease, she was randomly assigned to undergo secondary cytoreductive surgery followed by three more cycles of chemotherapy or three more cycles of chemotherapy alone.
                We enrolled 550 women. After completing three cycles of postoperative chemotherapy, 216 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive secondary surgical cytoreduction followed by chemotherapy and 208 to receive chemotherapy alone. Surgery was declined by or medically contraindicated in 15 patients who were assigned to secondary surgery (7 percent). As of March 2003, 296 patients had died and 82 had progressive disease. The likelihood of progression-free survival in the group assigned to secondary surgery plus chemotherapy, as compared with the chemotherapy-alone group, was 1.07 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.87 to 1.31; P=0.54), and the relative risk of death was 0.99 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.79 to 1.24; P=0.92).
                For patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma in whom primary cytoreductive surgery was considered to be maximal, the addition of secondary cytoreductive surgery to postoperative chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus cisplatin does not improve progression-free survival or overall survival.
                Copyright 2004 Massachusetts Medical Society. Despite correlation between the completeness of surgical cytoreduction and survival for patients with advanced ovarian cancer, relatively few undergo complete cytoreduction. This study was initiated to prospectively determine the ability to surgically eliminate all visible disease in patients with stage IIIC and IV epithelial ovarian cancer and the associated impact on survival.
                Between 1990 and 1996, 163 consecutive patients underwent primary cytoreduction. The goal was the excision or ablation of all visible disease prior to initiation of systemic platinum-based combination chemotherapy. A multivariate analysis determined which clinical and pathologic variables influenced the probability of achieving complete cytoreduction (logistic regression) and survival (Cox proportional hazards model).
                One hundred thirty-nine patients (85.3%) underwent removal of all visible tumor, 22 (13.5%) had cytoreduction to </=1 cm residual disease, and 2 (1.2%) had unresected bulky disease. The median and estimated 5-year survival for the entire cohort was 54 months and 48%, respectively. The probability of achieving complete cytoreduction was influenced independently by the preoperative Gynecologic Oncology Group performance status (0-1 vs 2-3, P = 0.04), the number of mesenteric and intestinal serosal implants (</=75 vs >75 implants, P = 0.005), and stage (IIIC vs IV, P = 0.006). The probability of survival was independently influenced by age (</=61 vs >61 years, P = 0.003), volume of ascites (</=1 vs >1 liter, P = 0.01), stage (IIIC vs IV, P = 0.04), histology (clear cell and mucinous vs all other, P = 0.03), and the completeness of cytoreductive operation (complete vs incomplete cytoreduction, P = 0.02).
                Complete cytoreduction is possible for the majority of patients and improves survival, even compared to operations with minimal (</=1 cm) residual disease. Unless their medical condition prohibits anesthesia and surgery, patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer should undergo primary cytoreductive surgery with the intention of complete tumor removal.
                Copyright 1998 Academic Press. Early ovarian cancer patients are often incompletely staged during initial surgery.(1-3) This omission can have serious adverse consequences for the prognosis of patients as the completeness of surgical staging has been identified as an independent prognostic parameter for survival.(4,5) The reasons for the problem of inadequate staging of early ovarian cancer are largely unknown. We have analysed the data of a large randomised trial in early ovarian cancer in which detailed information of the surgical staging procedure was monitored.(5)
                Data of the EORTC Adjuvant ChemoTherapy In Ovarian Neoplasm (ACTION) Trial were used in which 448 early ovarian cancer patients were randomised between postoperative chemotherapy in one arm and observation following surgery in the other. In this trial strict criteria for surgical staging were advised but optimal, complete staging was performed in only 1/3 of patients. Staging characteristics of the incompletely staged patients were analysed and factors that could explain the failure to perform a complete staging were studied.
                Sampling of para-aortic nodes was omitted in 78% of the incompletely staged patients, while 52% of these patients had no pelvic lymph node dissection. Taking blind biopsies from different peritoneal sites was not performed in more than 1/3 of the incompletely staged group. Omission of the staging steps ranged from 3% (infracolic omentectomy) to 55% (biopsy of the right hemi-diaphragm). A significant difference (p=0.04) between the fraction of completely staged patients was found when comparing institutes who entered less than 5 patients (21%) versus those who included more than 20 patients (37%) in the trial.
                Even in a randomised trial in which comprehensive surgical staging was strongly advised in the study protocol the majority of patients (66%) were incompletely staged. Factors relating to a lack of surgical skills attributed most to the number of incompletely staged patients, but insufficient knowledge of the tumour behaviour and routes of spread of ovarian cancer also contributed substantially to this problem. Multicentre trials recruiting patients from many institutes with small volume contribution to the study, run the risk of inadequate adherence to the study protocol.
                Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. To study whether intervention debulking surgery improves survival in patients with advanced ovarian cancer who have bulky (> 2 cm) residual disease after primary surgery.
                A prospective multicentre randomised study.
                Hospitals in the West Midlands.
                Ovarian cancer patients with bulky residual disease after primary surgery who are considered well enough to receive cis-platinum based chemotherapy and further surgery.
                Eligible patients were randomised to receive combination chemotherapy alone or combined with intervention debulking surgery.
                Survival was assessed using product limit method and log-rank test.
                Seventy-nine patients were entered into the study. Thirty-seven patients were randomised to intervention debulking surgery, 25 (67%) of whom underwent intervention debulking surgery, which was performed a median of 13 weeks after primary surgery. The median survival for the intervention debulking surgery group was 15 months (95% CI 10-20 mo) and that of those randomised to chemotherapy alone, which was 12 months (95% CI 8-16 mo), were not significantly different (hazard ratio = 0.71; 95% CI 0.44-1.13).
                Intervention debulking surgery may not improve survival in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. OBJECTIVE; To compare the survival rates in younger (45 years or younger) and older women (over 45) diagnosed with advanced-stage invasive epithelial ovarian cancer. Clinical and pathologic factors responsible for survival differences between the two groups were also determined.
                All younger women with advanced-stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma diagnosed between 1984 and 2001 were identified from tumor registry databases at two hospitals. Patients with borderline tumors were excluded. An older group of comparable controls was selected for comparison. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to determine the predictors for survival.
                Of 104 women with advanced-stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma, 52 were 45 or younger and the rest were over 45. The 5-year survival rate and median survival in younger patients were 48% and 54 months, compared with 22% and 34 months in the older women (P =.003). Younger women had significantly better performance status than older patients, and survival remained significantly better in younger women based on Kaplan-Meier analysis stratified by performance status (0 versus 1 to 2, P =.02). Furthermore, overall survival was significantly better in younger women after stratification by stage (III versus IV, P =.002) and by cytoreductive surgery (optimal versus suboptimal, P =.003). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that all these factors remained as significant independent prognostic factors for survival.
                Younger women with advanced-stage invasive epithelial ovarian cancer have significantly improved survival rates relative to older patients. Age, performance status, stage of disease, and extent of cytoreductive surgery are important independent prognostic factors for survival. Stage Ib and IIa cervical carcinoma can be cured by radical surgery or radiotherapy. These two procedures are equally effective, but differ in associated morbidity and type of complications. In this prospective randomised trial of radiotherapy versus surgery, our aim was to assess the 5-year survival and the rate and pattern of complications and recurrences associated with each treatment.
                Between September, 1986, and December, 1991, 469 women with newly diagnosed stage Ib and IIa cervical carcinoma were referred to our institute. 343 eligible patients were randomised: 172 to surgery and 171 to radical radiotherapy. Adjuvant radiotherapy was delivered after surgery for women with surgical stage pT2b or greater, less than 3 mm of safe cervical stroma, cut-through, or positive nodes. The primary outcome measures were 5-year survival and the rate of complications. The analysis of survival and recurrence was by intention to treat and analysis of complications was by treatment delivered.
                170 patients in the surgery group and 167 in the radiotherapy group were included in the intention-to-treat analysis; scheduled treatment was delivered to 169 and 158 women, respectively, 62 of 114 women with cervical diameters of 4 cm or smaller and 46 of 55 with diameters larger than 4 cm received adjuvant therapy. After a median follow-up of 87 (range 57-120) months, 5-year overall and disease-free survival were identical in the surgery and radiotherapy groups (83% and 74%, respectively, for both groups), 86 women developed recurrent disease: 42 (25%) in the surgery group and 44 (26%) in the radiotherapy group. Significant factors for survival in univariate and multivariate analyses were: cervical diameter, positive lymphangiography, and adeno-carcinomatous histotype. 48 (28%) surgery-group patients had severe morbidity compared with 19 (12%) radiotherapy-group patients (p = 0.0004).
                There is no treatment of choice for early-stage cervical carcinoma in terms of overall or disease-free survival. The combination of surgery and radiotherapy has the worst morbidity, especially urological complications. The optimum therapy for each patient should take account of clinical factors such as menopausal status, age, medical illness, histological type, and cervical diameter to yield the best cure with minimum complications.
We found only low quality evidence comparing ultra-radical and standard surgery in women with advanced ovarian cancer and carcinomatosis. The evidence suggested that ultra-radical surgery may result in better survival.  It was unclear whether there were any differences in progression-free survival, QoL and morbidity between the two groups. The cost-effectiveness of this intervention has not been investigated. We are, therefore, unable to reach definite conclusions about the relative benefits and adverse effects of the two types of surgery.
In order to determine the role of ultra-radical surgery in the management of advanced stage ovarian cancer, a sufficiently powered randomised controlled trial comparing ultra-radical and standard surgery or well-designed non-randomised studies would be required.