A randomised control study comparing the Infant Flow Driver with nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants. Comparative efficacy of exosurf and survanta surfactants on early clinical course of respiratory distress syndrome and complications of prematurity. Comparison of two nasal prongs for application of continuous positive airway pressure in neonates. A prospective randomized, controlled trial comparing synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as modes of extubation. Advantages and disadvantages of different nasal CPAP systems in newborns. Efficacy of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in treating apnea of prematurity. Randomized controlled trial of very early continuous distending pressure in the management of preterm infants. Randomized, controlled trial of nasopharyngeal continuous positive airway pressure in the extubation of very low birth weight infants. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure from high flow cannula versus Infant Flow for Preterm infants.
To compare the effectiveness of the Infant Flow Driver (IFD) with single prong nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) in preterm neonates affected by respiratory distress syndrome.
                Randomised controlled study.
                Between September 1997 and March 1999, 36 preterm infants who were eligible for CPAP treatment were randomly selected for either nCPAP or IFD and studied prospectively for changes in oxygen requirement and/or respiratory rate. The requirement for mechanical ventilation, complications of treatment, and effects on mid-term outcome were also evaluated.
                Use of the IFD had a significantly beneficial effect on both oxygen requirement and respiratory rate (p < 0.0001) when compared with nCPAP. Moreover, O(2) requirement and respiratory rate were significantly decreased by four hours (p < 0.001 and p < 0.03 respectively). The probability of remaining supplementary oxygen free over the first 48 hours of treatment was significantly higher in patients treated with the IFD than with nCPAP (p < 0.02). IFD treated patients had a higher success (weaning) rate (94% v 72 %) and shorter duration of treatment (49.3 (31) v 56 (29.7) hours respectively; mean (SD)), although the difference was not significant.
                IFD appears to be a feasible device for managing respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants, and benefits may be had with regard to oxygen requirement and respiratory rate when compared with nCPAP. The trend towards reduced requirement for mechanical ventilation, shorter clinical recovery time, and shorter duration of treatment requires further evaluation in a multicentre randomised clinical trial. To determine the comparative efficacy of Exosurf Neonatal and Survanta surfactants on the early course of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), arterial blood gases, ventilatory support, outcome morbidity rate, and complications of prematurity and RDS.
                Medical records from 203 premature newborn infants undergoing mechanical ventilation for respiratory distress syndrome, and who received up to four rescue doses of either Exosurf or Survanta, were retrospectively reviewed.
                All groups were comparable for birth weight and gestational age. Although the two randomized groups were similar in severity of RDS based on fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) and ventilatory support, a significantly greater improvement in respiratory function as evidenced by FIO2, mean airway pressure, alveolar-arterial partial pressure of oxygen difference, and oxygen index, was observed in the Survanta group from 12 hours (p < 0.05) through 48 hours (p < 0.01). Comparison of outcome morbidity rate by gestational age showed a higher occurrence of retinopathy of prematurity (p < 0.02) among the older infants (28 to 32 weeks) who were treated with Exosurf.
                Survanta exerted a significantly faster response in the early clinical course of RDS compared with Exosurf. However, no difference in the impact on eventual respiratory outcome was observed. We therefore conclude that both surfactants are effective for the treatment of RDS. OBJECTIVE: Few studies have compared the performance of nasal prongs used for applying continuous positive airway pressure. The present study compared the tolerance and efficacy with the Argyle and Hudson nasal prongs. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized clinical study. SETTING: A tertiary neonatal intensive care unit in a university hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 99 preterm infants weighing </=2500 g were assigned to one of three weight categories. They were then randomly assigned to use one of two nasal prong types. The number of times the prongs were out of the nostrils, time on nasal continuous positive airway pressure, respiratory and heart rate, Silverman-Andersen retraction score, blood gases, abdominal distention, nasal hyperemia and bleeding, septum necrosis, pneumothorax, and therapeutic success were documented. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The two groups were matched for weight, gestational age, and disease for which the continuous positive airway pressure was used. For patients weighing 1500-2000 g, the Hudson users had a greater gestational age. Both types of nasal prongs reduced the Silverman-Andersen retraction score in all infants 2 hrs after continuous positive airway pressure application, except for patients weighing </=1000 g. The Argyle prong was related to a higher frequency of hyperemia in babies weighing <1500 g (p =.03). There were no cases of septum necrosis or pneumothorax. The frequency of therapeutic success for patients using Hudson prongs and weighing >/=1500 g was significantly higher than for those using the Argyle catheter (p =.03). CONCLUSION: Considering the difference in gestational age for the patients weighing 1500-2500 g, we conclude that the two prongs tested are equally effective for nasal continuous positive airway pressure, but the Argyle prong is more difficult to keep in the nostrils of active patients, and nasal hyperemia, the first sign of tissue aggression, occurs more frequently among infants using this prong. To determine whether synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (SNIPPV) would decrease extubation failure compared with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in preterm infants being ventilated for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS).
                Infants who were </=34 weeks' gestational age and who were ventilated for RDS were randomized to either SNIPPV or NCPAP after extubation. The criteria for extubation were peak inspiratory pressure of </=16 cm H(2)O, positive end expiratory pressure of </=5 cm H(2)O, intermittent mandatory ventilation rate of 15 to 25, and fraction of inspired oxygen </=0.35. Pulmonary function tests (PFT) were obtained before extubation. After extubation, blood gases were monitored for a minimum of 72 hours. Success was defined as remaining in the selected mode of treatment or demonstrating improvement (switching to oxyhood/nasal cannula/room air) by 72 hours.
                Thirty-two (94%) of 34 infants were extubated successfully with the use of SNIPPV versus 18 (60%) of 30 with the use of NCPAP (P <.01). There was no difference in apnea/bradycardia episodes in the 2 groups during the 72-hour study period. Among 55 infants who had PFT, 80% (8 of 10) with dynamic lung compliance of >/=0.5 mL/kg/cm H(2)O and expiratory airway resistance of </=70 cm H(2)O/L/s were extubated successfully. In infants with poor lung function (dynamic lung compliance: <0.5 mL/kg/cm H(2)O; expiratory airway resistance: >70 cm H(2)O/L/s), successful extubation was seen in 93% (27 of 29) in the SNIPPV group and 60% (15 of 25) in the NCPAP group. When weight was controlled for at the time of extubation, the odds of success in the SNIPPV group were 21.1 times higher (95% confidence interval: 3.4, 130.1) than that of the NCPAP group.
                SNIPPV is more effective than NCPAP in weaning infants with RDS from the ventilator. PFT may be useful in predicting successful extubation. To compare three different systems of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP): the naso-pharyngeal tube and two-prong systems in newborns, focusing on duration of CPAP, side effects and cost.
                Randomized clinical study.
                Between July 2000 and September 2001 newborns were randomized to three different CPAP systems. Forty infants in two weight groups (>2500 g and 1250-2500 g; 20 patients in each group) were included.
                In the group >2500 g the median duration of CPAP was 1.1 days (range 0.25-14.3 days). The median time on a naso-pharyngeal CPAP was 1 day (range 0.25-14.3 days), on Hudson prongs 1.6 days (range 0.5-3.3 days) and on the Infant Flow system 0.7 days (range 0.3-13.6 days; p>0.05 for comparison between groups, Fisher's exact test). With naso-pharyngeal CPAP, 2 patients developed moderate nasal injuries. On Hudson, 2 patients developed moderate and three mild nasal injuries. One patient on the Infant Flow showed mild and one moderate nasal injuries. In the weight group 1250-2500 g the median duration of CPAP was 1.1 days (range 0.1-7.0 days). The median time on the naso-pharyngeal tube was 0.9 days (range 0.1-7 days), on Hudson prongs 1.1 days (range 0.7-6.6 days) and on the Infant Flow system 1.3 days (range 0.25-5.9 days; p>0.05 for comparison between groups, Fisher's exact test). With a naso-pharyngeal tube, one infant developed mild and one moderate nasal injuries. On Hudson prongs, two had moderate nasal injuries. On Infant Flow, one newborn showed a severe nasal injury and two mild injuries. None of the patients developed a pneumothorax.
                The naso-pharyngeal tube is an easy, safe and economical CPAP system usable with every common ventilator. For very low birth weight newborns, a prong system may have advantages. The efficacy of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) in treating apnea of prematurity was evaluated. Apneic preterm infants were randomly assigned to receive either NIPPV or continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for 4 hr when they failed to respond to conservative therapy. The amount of reduction in apneic spells and bradycardia in the two groups after treatment was compared. Thirty-four infants (18 with NIPPV, 16 with NCPAP) were enrolled. Their birth weights ranged from 590-1,880 g (mean, 1,021 g) and gestational ages from 25-32 weeks (mean, 27.6 weeks). The baseline characteristics were comparable in the two groups. Frequency of apnea and bradycardia was reduced during both forms of treatments. However, the infants receiving NIPPV had a greater reduction of apneic spells (P = 0.02) and a tendency to greater decrease in bradycardia (P = 0.09) than those receiving NCPAP. We conclude that NIPPV is more effective than NCPAP in reducing apnea in preterm infants. NIPPV may reduce bradycardia; however, this needs to be validated by a larger number of observations. Application of continuous distending pressure at birth (very early CDP) should stabilize the immature airways and reduce the severity of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in preterm infants. Eighty-two preterm infants of less than 32 weeks gestation were randomly assigned at birth to early treatment group (TG), in which CDP of 6 cm water pressure was applied at birth by the nasopharyngeal route (NP-CDP), or to control group (CG), in which CDP was applied when indicated for established criteria (pO2 less than 50 mmHg in FiO2 greater than 0.5). Characteristics of the infants in the two groups were comparable. No statistically significant difference between the two groups was found in the incidence of RDS. The course of RDS, and oxygen and ventilatory requirements also did not appear to be changed. In blood gas parameters of most of the time frames, no significant difference was found between the two groups when the results were analyzed according to the assigned group. When the results were analyzed separately for the infants who developed RDS, infants in TG appear to have fared worse from the therapy in terms of oxygenation, as indicated by significantly higher FiO2 (P less than 0.01) and lower a/A (P less than 0.01) values on the third day of the course of RDS, as compared to infants in CG. The incidence of complications was comparable in the two groups. Four infants from TG (9.3%) and one from CG (2.6%) died (P = NS). We conclude that VECDP by nasopharyngeal route does not reduce the incidence of RDS and does not appear to improve the outcome and may worsen the severity of RDS when compared to application of CDP for established criteria. We conducted a prospective, randomized controlled trial to determine whether extubation of very low birth weight infants was facilitated by the use of nasopharyngeal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Eligible infants included patients weighing 600 to 1500 gm at birth who required tracheal intubation within 48 hours of birth and who met specific predetermined criteria for extubation by day 14 of life. We also sought to determine whether varying the duration of nasopharyngeal CPAP influenced the likelihood of successful extubation. Infants underwent random assignment to receive nasopharyngeal CPAP until resolution of lung disease (n = 40), 6 hours of nasopharyngeal CPAP (n = 42), or oxygen supplementation delivered by hood (n = 42). Extubation failure was predefined as a requirement for > or = 80% oxygen, pH < or = 7.20, severe apnea, or predefined clinical deterioration, and extubation success was predefined as the ability to remain free of a requirement for mechanical ventilation for 7 days and a 66% reduction in the need for supplemental oxygen. Each group was similar with regard to race, sex, and birth weight. Extubation was successful in 62%, 61%, and 60% of infants. After stratification by birth weight, there were no significant differences in the rates of successful extubation among the treatment groups. We conclude that nasopharyngeal CPAP does not improve the likelihood of successful extubation of very low birth weight infants who are ready for extubation within the first 2 weeks of life. To compare the feasibility of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) support generated by high flow nasal cannula with conventional CPAP for prevention of reintubation among preterm infants with a birth weight of <or=1,250 g.
                Preterm infants were randomized to CPAP generated via high flow cannula or the Infant Flow Nasal CPAP System (VIASYS, Conshohocken, PA, USA) at extubation. Primary outcome was incidence of reintubation within 7 days. Secondary outcomes included change in oxygen use and frequency of apnea and bradycardias postextubation.
                Forty neonates were randomized. Twelve of 20 infants randomized to high flow cannula CPAP were reintubated compared to three of 20 using Infant Flow (P=0.003). The high flow cannula group had increased oxygen use and more apneas and bradycardias postextubation.
                CPAP delivered by high flow nasal cannula failed to maintain extubation status among preterm infants <or=1,250 g as effectively as Infant Flow CPAP.
Short binasal prong devices are more effective than single prongs in reducing the rate of re-intubation. Although the Infant Flow Driver appears more effective than Medicorp prongs the most effective short binasal prong device remains to be determined. The improvement in respiratory parameters with short binasal prongs suggests they are more effective than nasopharyngeal CPAP in the treatment of early RDS. Further studies incorporating longer-term outcomes are required. Studies are also needed to determine the optimal pressure source for the delivery of NCPAP.