Long-term follow-up of early treatment of unilateral forced posterior cross-bite. Orofacial status. A clinical investigation of the correction of unilateral first molar crossbite with a transpalatal arch. Longitudinal study on the effect of early interceptive treatment in 4-year-old children with unilateral cross-bite. An evaluation of the effects of two distal extension removable partial denture designs on tooth stabilization and periodontal health. Two-point rapid palatal expansion: an alternate approach to traditional treatment. Anterior open bite treatment with magnets. Skeletal and dental changes after maxillary expansion in the mixed dentition. Effect of stannous fluoride treatments on the progression of initial lesions in approximal surfaces of permanent posterior teeth. Prospective evaluation of implants connected to teeth.
Twenty-nine subjects, 20 years old on average and all treated at 4 years of age for unilateral forced posterior dento-alveolar cross-bite by grinding or by expansion of the upper dental arch, were clinically examined to evaluate the long-term effects of their treatment. The frequency of successful treatment-indicated as stable correction of the cross-bite-by means of only 1 treatment sequence was 59%; by grinding, 57%; and by expansion, 60%. The 18 subjects that had only been treated at the age of 4 years formed the 'early group' in our study. Eleven of our subjects had been retreated later in the mixed or permanent dentition because of a relapse of the unilateral forced posterior cross-bite and formed the 'late group'. A significantly higher frequency of mouth breathing, breathing obstacles, and snoring was found in this group. According to our clinical investigation, 2 of the subjects in our cohort still had a unilateral forced posterior cross-bite. Our findings regarding masticatory performance, bite force, and endurance showed no significant differences between the initial cross-bite and the healthy sides or between the early and the late group subjects, which showed that the masticatory function of the treated subjects was symmetrical. Grinding and expansion treatments seem to display similar success rates in the long-term regarding correction of unilateral posterior forced cross-bite. The correction of a unilateral first molar crossbite with a Goshgarian type of transpalatal arch was evaluated in 35 children from 6 years, 8 months to 15 years, 11 months old. Fifteen of the children were treated with an arch activated for expansion only and 20 children with an arch activated in a similar way but with the inclusion of buccal root torque of the anchorage tooth. With both types of activation, the arches worked in a statically determinate system, i.e., the tooth in crossbite was allowed to tip buccally. The movements of the first molars as a result of the treatment were monitored by measurements on dental casts and frontal cephalometric roentgenograms. In addition, the width of the midpalatal suture was measured on occlusal roentgenograms of the maxilla. In the children treated with an arch activated only for expansion, the molars on both sides of the dental arch moved buccally during the treatment. In the children treated by torque activation, on the other hand, there was a considerable buccal movement of the molar on the side of the crossbite without any significant buccal movement of the anchorage tooth. In individual cases, the molar on the noncrossbite side moved and tipped palatally and in some cases buccally but to a minor degree. With both types of activation, there was only a slight change in inclination of the transverse occlusal plane through the first molars; the plane opened up slightly toward the side of the crossbite. For both types of activation, there was a slight widening of the palatal suture during the treatment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) To evaluate the results of early interceptive grinding and also the possibility of self-correction of unilateral cross-bite, 76 4-yr-old children with this malocclusion were divided into one treated and one untreated group. In the treatment group 50% of the children exhibited a normal transverse occlusion evaluated in the mixed dentition, at the age of 9. In the untreated group only 17% showed a spontaneous correction of the cross-bite. Among the studied dental variables the "max./mand. arch width difference" especially in the canine region was found to be a valuable predictor indicating whether cross-bite can be successfully treated in preschoolchildren by selective grinding. The results of this study support early treatment of unilateral cross-bite and gives the criteria whereby successful treatment by selective grinding may be expected. A 30-month follow-up study was conducted on 36 patients to evaluate the effects of the lingual plate as a major connector in distally extended removable partial dentures (RPDs) on tooth stabilization. At the same time, the study evaluated the effects of lingual plate-type RPDs and lingual bar-type RPDs on periodontal health. The most striking finding of the study was that, with the exception of gingival recession (GR), periodontal conditions improved with both types of RPDs. At the end of 30 months, there were significant differences in plaque index, GR and tooth mobility (TM) values between treatment groups (P < 0.05). Plaque accumulation was greater in the lingual plate treatment group; however, this did not result in periodontal breakdown. There were no statistically significant differences between treatment groups with respect to pocket depth, gingival index or attachment loss (P > 0.05). Moreover, patients treated with lingual plate-type RPDs demonstrated less TM when compared with patients treated with lingual bar-type RPDs at the end of 30 months follow-up. Overall study findings established that with adequate checks on oral and denture hygiene at regular intervals, patients with RPDs may even experience improved periodontal health. Moreover, the clinical interpretation of decreased TM observed in patients treated with lingual plate-type RPDs may be questionable as the plaque accumulation was greater in the lingual plate treatment group inspite of periodic recalls. Rapid palatal expansion (RPE) causes separation of the lateral halves of the palate and traditionally has used four maxillary teeth as anchorage. The purpose of this study was to introduce a rapid palatal expander that requires only two anchor teeth (two-point RPEe) and to compare the expansion obtained with that from a Hyrax appliance. This study involved two groups of 25 children aged 7 to 15 years who were treated in a private orthodontist's office with either a Hyrax appliance or a two-point RPEe. Dental casts and occlusal radiographs were made before treatment and at least three months after stabilization of the appliance. Paired t-tests were performed to identify significant intragroup changes, and independent t-tests were performed to determine intergroup differences. The findings showed the two-point RPEe was as efficient as the Hyrax in obtaining dental expansion of the maxillary posterior teeth with less effect on the maxillary anterior and mandibular teeth. Therefore, the two-point RPEe may be useful in certain clinical situations. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of repelling magnets on the treatment of anterior open bite and compare them with the effects of acrylic posterior bite-blocks. Twenty patients, aged 9-16 years with skeletal anterior open bite, were randomly divided into two groups. In one group the patients wore posterior repelling magnet splints and in the other they wore acrylic posterior bite-blocks of the same thickness as the magnet splints. The patients were instructed to use their appliance as much as possible (the minimum accepted being 18 hours daily) during a 6-month period. Dental casts, intra-oral photos, and lateral cephalograms were taken before and after treatment, and the patients were also examined regularly to identify the development of any craniomandibular disorders. In the first group, the dental and skeletal vertical relation responded quickly to the magnet treatment. The open bite was generally closed in just under 4 months, especially in patients in early mixed dentition. Spacing in the labial segments decreased in some cases, while slight crowding was induced in others. Transverse problems, i.e. unilateral cross-bite, sometimes followed by scissor-bite on the opposite side, was observed in those patients who were in the early mixed dentition and had used the magnets intensively. The patients who wore acrylic posterior bite-blocks also showed improvement in the dental and skeletal vertical relationships, especially during the first months. This was followed by a 'plateau' period. No transverse problems were found in these patients. The purpose of this study was to compare skeletal and dental aspects of three different expansion methods in the mixed dentition period in sagittal, vertical, and transversal planes, treatment periods, complications, and relapse tendencies in early periods. Patients with unilateral or bilateral posterior crossbites in the mixed dentition were studied. They were divided into three groups of 10 patients in each group. The first group received treatment with removable plates for semirapid maxillary expansion; the second group with quad-helix appliances for slow maxillary expansion; and the third group with conventional fixed hyrax appliances for rapid maxillary expansion (RME). Lateral and posteroanterior cephalometric films, occlusal films, and dental casts were taken before and after expansion, and after retention with the same appliances. Cephalometric and dental cast analyses were made. Both skeletal and dental changes were observed after all three expansion methods. Bite-wing radiographs were used to determine the effect of three forms of topical SnF2 therapy on the progression of initial lesions in the approximal surfaces of permanent posterior teeth. Radiographs were taken annually over a four-year period. The subjects were schoolchildren, aged 12-14 yr, living in a low fluoride area. The professional application of a 10% SnF2 solution for 30 s, semi-annually for two yr, had no discernible effect on the development of the initial lesions. However, the home use of a SnF2 dentifrice did inhibit caries progression appreciably at all but one of the four time intervals in the study. The professional application of a 10% SnF2 solution for 30 s, semi-annually for two yr, combined with the home use of a SnF2 dentifrice, was the most effective treatment in retarding lesion development. Even without topical fluoride therapy, the rate of progression of initial approximal lesions was generally quite slow. In view of these findings, it would seem sound clinical practice to treat all initial lesions in approximal surfaces with topical fluoride therapy and delay placement of restorations until there is radiographic evidence of lesions reaching dentin. This prospective clinical trial examined the effect on teeth and implants when rigidly or non-rigidly connected in a cross-arch model.
                Thirty patients received 2 implants, 1 on each side of the mandible, and were restored with 3-unit fixed partial dentures connected either rigidly or non-rigidly to an abutment tooth. Patients were followed for at least 5 years post-restoration.
                Repeated-measures analysis revealed no significant difference in crestal bone loss at implants (rigid versus non-rigid methods). An overall significant difference (P < .001) was found comparing methods for teeth. Paired t tests revealed no significant differences in crestal bone levels for implants or teeth at the 5-year recall. Kaplan-Meier methods and the Cox proportional hazards model showed no differences between attachment methods with regard to success based on survival and bone loss criteria. During the 5-year recall period, 1 implant (rigid side) was removed. Four implants developed bone loss greater than 2 mm during the course of this trial. One tooth on the rigid side and 2 teeth on the non-rigid side had greater than 2 mm of crestal bone loss and were removed secondary to fractures. In all, 5 abutment teeth were removed, all of which had been treated with root canal therapy and fractured at the interface of the post within the tooth. There was no clear relationship of tooth fracture to attachment. Repeated-measures analysis of mobility values revealed no significant changes over the time course of this study, and paired t tests revealed no statistically significant differences between implants for mobility. Repeated-measures analysis and paired t tests for probing depth revealed no significant changes over the time course of this study. There were no significant differences in soft tissue indices for either attachment method. The percentage of patients who had measurable intrusion was 66% for the non-rigid group, and 44% for the rigid group; 25% of the non-rigid teeth had greater than 0.5 mm intrusion, compared with 12.5% for the rigid group. For the 2 time periods evaluated, there was no significant increase in intrusion over time. The non-rigid-side implant required more nonscheduled visits to treat problems than the rigid implant and the teeth. Discussion: Most patients were treated successfully with rigid or non-rigid attachment of implants to teeth.
                The high incidence of intrusion and non-scheduled patient visits suggest that alternative treatments without connecting implants to teeth may be indicated.
The evidence from the trials reported by Thilander 1984 and Lindner 1989 suggests that removal of premature contacts of the baby teeth is effective in preventing a posterior crossbite from being perpetuated to the mixed dentition and adult teeth. When grinding alone is not effective, using an upper removable expansion plate to expand the top teeth will decrease the risk of a posterior crossbite from being perpetuated to the permanent dentition.The comparisons of treatments made in the trials reported by Mossaz-Joëlson 1989; Schneidman 1990; Ingervall 1995; Asanza 1997 and Sandikçioglu 1997 were inconclusive so recommendations for clinical practice can not be made based on the results of these trials. However, these trials were small and inadequately powered so further studies, with appropriate sample sizes, would be required to assess the relative effectiveness of these interventions.