Sublingual misoprostol before first trimester abortion: a comparative study using two dose regimens. Vaginal misoprostol in managing premature rupture of membranes. Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour: a more effective agent than prostaglandin F2 alpha gel and prostaglandin E2 pessary. Prostaglandin E2 gel versus misoprostol for cervical ripening in patients with premature rupture of membranes after 34 weeks. Cervical priming with sublingual misoprostol vs. 15-methyl-prostaglandin F2alpha prior to surgical abortion. Intravaginal misoprostol as a cervical ripening agent. Second-trimester uterine evacuation: A comparison of intra-amniotic (15S)-15-methyl-prostaglandin F2alpha and intravaginal misoprostol. Second-trimester pregnancy termination: comparison of three different methods. The abortifacient effect of misoprostol in the second trimester. A randomized comparison with gemeprost in patients pre-treated with mifepristone (RU486).
Various methods have been described for preoperative cervical priming prior to vacuum aspiration (VA) in first trimester pregnancy termination, to facilitate cervical dilatation and shorten the abortion procedure. Recently misoprostol a prostaglandin E1 analogue has been shown to be effective in facilitating cervical dilatation prior to VA. Misoprostol offers several advantages over the other prostagland in analogues including stability at room temperature, ease of administration and minimal side effects.
                To determine the optimal dosage and dosing interval for the use of misoprostol administered sublingually for pre-abortion cervical dilatation.
                This was a prospective randomised study conducted at Comprehensive Rural Health Project, Ballabgarh the rural health centre under Centre for Community Medicine, AIIMS, New Delhi.
                One hundred and twenty pregnant women between 6-11 weeks of gestation opting for voluntary medical termination of pregnancy were (MTP) randomly allocated to either 200 microg or the 400 microg misoprostol group. Vacuum aspiration was performed either two or three hours after administration of sublingual misoprostol. Using Hegar's dilators, degree of cervical dilatation before vacuum aspiration was measured. Other parameters assessed included the amount of additional dilatation required, intra-operative blood loss and associated side effects.
                Statistical analysis was conducted using chisquare, the student's t and the Mann-Whitney U tests to examine the difference between the two groups.
                In the 200 microg misoprostol group 33% achieved a dilatation of > or = 8 mm compared with 71% of women in the 400 microg misoprostol group. The odds ratio was 95.8 (95% CI 10.2-842.9) for 400 microg misoprostol for successful preoperative cervical dilatation of > or = 8 mm. The mean baseline cervical dilatation for 400 microg and 200 microg misoprostol was 8.2 mm and 6.0 mm respectively (P < 0.001). The use of 400 mg misoprostol with an evacuation interval of two hours appears to be the optimal dosage and evacuation interval. Increasing the time interval beyond two hours did not confer any additional advantage on the rate of successful cervical dilatation but was instead associated with an increased incidence of side effects such as preoperative vaginal bleeding, abdominal pain and shivering.
                Our study has shown that Sublingual administration of 400 microg of misoprostol at least two hours before procedure is effective for preoperative cervical dilatation before vacuum aspiration in first trimester pregnancy termination. There is no additional advantages of increasing the dosing interval upto three hours. We compared the efficacy of misoprostol with that of prostaglandin E2 in cervical ripening and labour induction. Thus 238 women with rupture of membranes beyond 36 weeks gestation without labour were randomized to receive 50 microg misoprostol vaginal gel or 5 mg of prostaglandin E2 gel. Bishop score was evaluated before drug application and 6 hours later. Clinical data and perinatal outcome were recorded. Mean time from induction to delivery and the need for oxytocin were significantly less in the misoprostol group. There were no significant differences in spontaneous labour rate, type of delivery and perinatal outcome. It is concluded that intravaginal misoprostol is safe and more effective than prostaglandin E2 for preinduction cervical ripening in premature rupture of membranes beyond 36 weeks gestation. To compare labour outcome in women who had labour induced with PGF2 alpha gel, PGE2 vaginal pessary or misoprostol administered intravaginally or orally.
                Unmasked randomised controlled trial.
                Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Zimbabwe, Harare.
                Women with a singleton foetus in cephalic presentation after 37 weeks gestation admitted for induction of labour who were randomised to prostaglandin F2 alpha gel (n = 76), prostaglandin E2 pessary (n = 75) and misoprostol administered either intra-vaginally (n = 128) or orally (n = 127).
                Primary outcome was induction to delivery interval. Secondary outcomes included use of oxytocin during labour, mode of delivery, duration of labour, neonatal condition at delivery and maternal complications.
                Four hundred and six women admitted for induction of labour with a singleton foetus in cephalic presentation after 37 weeks gestation were enrolled. To estimate the risk with induction using other agents the odds ratio and 95% confidence interval was calculated using the group that received prostaglandin F2 alpha gel as referents.
                The women were comparable for baseline characteristics. Compared to prostaglandin F2 alpha gel, the need for augmentation with oxytocin in labour was significantly reduced in women induced with prostaglandin E2 pessary (OR 0.46; 95%CI 0.23 to 0.93), vaginal misoprostol (OR 0.34; 95%CI 0.18 to 0.63) and oral misoprostol (OR 0.42; 95%CI 0.22 to 0.78). There was no difference in mode of delivery. There was a significantly reduced risk (OR 0.20; 95%CI 0.04 to 0.86) of Caesarean section (CS) for failure to progress in the vaginal misoprostol group. Labour induced with misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 pessary was significantly shorter than in prostaglandin F2 alpha gel. Vaginal misoprostol significantly shortened the induction to delivery interval. There were more admissions to the neonatal unit in the misoprostol groups.
                Compared to prostaglandin F2 alpha gel, misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 pessary had reduced need for oxytocin and a shorter duration of labour. Effects of misoprostol on the foetus need further investigation before it is used as a routine agent for induction of labour. To compare intravaginal misoprostol to prostaglandin (PG) E2 for cervical ripening in women with premature rupture of the membranes (PROM) after 34 weeks of gestation.
                Women with PROM after 34 weeks of gestation and an unripe cervix were randomized to receive PGE2 (2.5 mg) or misoprostol (50 microg). Both agents were placed intravaginally immediately after randomization, and the dose was repeated 6 hours later if necessary. After another 6 hours from the second insertion, oxytocin treatment was started if labor had not begun. Forty patients in each group were required to show a 30% improvement in delivery within 12 hours in the misoprostol group.
                One hundred nine patients were randomized; 54 were assigned to misoprostol and 55 to PGE2. Important demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between the groups. The mean time from first insertion to delivery was 16.4 hours in the misoprostol group and 22.0 hours in the PGE2 group. A second dose was required less frequently in the misoprostol group (22% vs 62% in the PGE2 group), and the percentage of patients delivered within 12 hours was higher in the misoprostol group (41% vs 16%). Tachysystole occurred in 20% and 6% of women in the misoprostol and PGE2 groups, respectively. Hyperstimulation occurred in 9% and 0%, and cesarean delivery in 19% and 26% of women in the misoprostol and PGE2 groups, respectively. Neonatal outcome was similar between groups.
                Intravaginal misoprostol is more effective than local PGE2 application to treat PROM after 34 weeks of gestation, but tachysystole occurs more commonly with misoprostol. To compare the efficacy and tolerability of sublingual misoprostol with those of intramuscular 15-methyl-prostaglandin F2alpha (15-M-PG F2alpha) for cervical dilation prior to vacuum aspiration (VA) in first-trimester pregnancy termination.
                Sixty pregnant women requesting pregnancy termination between the 9th and 12th week were randomized to receive 400 microg of sublingual misoprostol or an intramuscular injection of 125 microg of 15-M-PG F2alpha 2 h prior to vacuum aspiration. Baseline cervical dilation prior to vacuum aspiration was measured using Hegar's dilators. Other variables assessed included procedure duration, intraoperative blood loss, and associated adverse effects. Patient acceptability was assessed by questionnaires completed at the time of discharge from the hospital.
                Mean cervical dilation at vacuum aspiration was significantly greater in the misoprostol group than in the 15-M-PG F2alpha group (8.8 vs. 7.6 mm; P<0.01), and preoperative adverse effects were significantly less frequent in the sublingual misoprostol group (P<0.05). However, procedure duration and intraoperative blood loss were similar in both groups. The acceptability rates were 93.3% in the sublingual misoprostol group and 76.6% in the 15-M-PG F2alpha group, respectively; however, 6.6% patients in the sublingual misoprostol group thought that the tablets had an unpleasant taste.
                Sublingual misoprostol appears to be an effective alternative to intramuscular 15-M-PG F2alpha for cervical dilation prior to vacuum aspiration in first trimester pregnancy. In addition, misoprostol is inexpensive and convenient to use and has higher patient acceptability rates. To determine if misoprostol (exogenous prostaglandin E1 PGE1) used vaginally was of value in improving the Bishop score, leading to an early safe vaginal delivery in women in whom the cervix is unripe and delivery is indicated.
                A double-blind clinical trial.
                Antenatal and labour wards of the University Hospital of the West Indies, Jamaica.
                Forty-five women in the third trimester with various obstetric indications for induction of labour and with no contra-indications to prostaglandins.
                The women were randomly assigned to receive treatment or a placebo. The treated group had 100 micrograms misoprostol inserted vaginally while the placebo was similarly inserted.
                Efficacy of the misoprostol was measured by the increase in the Bishop score 12 h after giving the treatment, the time between insertion and delivery, the need for oxytocin, and the outcome of the pregnancy.
                The prostaglandin was superior to the placebo in ripening the cervix and inducing labour. The change in Bishop score was 5.3 in the misoprostol group compared with 1.5 in the placebo group (P < 0.001). The mean time from insertion to delivery was 15.6 h in the former while it was 43.2 h in the placebo group (P < or = 0.001). The need for oxytocin was also significantly less in the women receiving the prostaglandin compared with those who received the placebo (29% vs 62%, P < 0.02). There was no difference in the two groups in the delivery outcome in terms of complications, Apgar scores and mode of delivery.
                Intravaginal misoprostol is an effective and cheap method of inducing labour in the third trimester. Our purpose was to compare the efficacy, safety, and adverse effects of intra-amniotically administered (15S)-15-methyl-prostaglandin F(2alpha) and intravaginally administered misoprostol for second-trimester uterine evacuation.
                Fifty-one patients were randomly assigned to receive either a single 2.5-mg intra-amniotic injection of (15S)-15-methyl-prostaglandin F(2)(alpha) (n = 26) or two 200-microg intravaginal doses of misoprostol (n = 25) at 12-hour intervals. The primary outcome measured was evacuation of the uterus within 24 hours.
                The mean time from initiation of termination to uterine evacuation was less in the prostaglandin group than in the misoprostol group (17.5 +/- 8.6 hours vs 22.3 +/- 12.5 hours), but this was not statistically significant (P >.05). The rate of successful fetal evacuation at 24 hours was significantly higher in the prostaglandin group than in the misoprostol group (88% vs 60%, P =.02). The complete-abortion rate and the incidence of adverse effects were similar in both groups.
                The use of an intra-amniotic injection of (15S)-15-methyl-prostaglandin F(2alpha) for midtrimester pregnancy termination is safe and is associated with a greater number of successful uterine evacuations within 24 hours, without an increase in adverse effects, than intravaginal administration of misoprostol. The object of this study was to compare intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone (prostaglandin E2) for second-trimester pregnancy termination, and to examine the role of the nitric oxide donor, glyceryl trinitrate, as a possible alternative to prostaglandins to induce cervical ripening in second-trimester pregnancy termination. This was a randomised clinical trial. The trial involved pregnant women between 13 and 28 weeks' gestation admitted with clear medical or obstetric indications for pregnancy termination, and was carried out in the department of obstetrics and gynecology, Assiut University Hospital, Egypt. Patients were classified into Group A, where pregnancy termination was induced by vaginal misoprostol 100 micrograms every 4 hours with a maximum dose of 500 micrograms; Group B, where induction was by vaginal dinoprostone 6 mg every 6 hours with a maximum dose of 24 mg; and Group C, where induction involved vaginal glyceryl trinitrate 500 micrograms every 6 hours with a maximum dose of 2.5 mg. Twenty-four hours after the start of induction, the rate of complete abortion in the three groups was 100%, 66.67% and 0%, respectively. The rate of complete abortion was 100% in the nitric oxide (glyceryl trinitrate)-induced group after introducing a complementary procedure. The induction-abortion interval was significantly shorter, the number of doses needed was less and the maximum Bishop score reached was greater with misoprostol than with dinoprostone. A higher rate of side effects occurred with the misoprostol-induced group (74%) compared with the other two groups (46.6% and 0%). Misoprostol is a cheap, effective drug for second-trimester pregnancy termination with short induction abortion intervals but a higher rate of side effects. Prostin E2 is also effective in termination of second-trimester pregnancy but is expensive and may require high doses to be administered. Glyceryl trinitrate is an effective drug for cervical ripening (softening) but it has no role in the stimulation of uterine contractions. The objective of this work was to study the abortifacient effects of misoprostol, an orally active prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) analogue, in the second trimester. A randomized study of two prostaglandin regimens in women pre-treated with the antiprogesterone mifepristone was carried out in the gynaecological wards of Aberdeen Royal Hospitals, NHS Trust, and included 60 women at 13-20 weeks' gestation, in whom termination of pregnancy had been agreed. Following pre-treatment with mifepristone 600 mg women were randomly allocated to one of two prostaglandin regimens which started 36-48 h later. The first misoprostol 400 micrograms orally (up to three doses) followed by gemeprost vaginal pessary 1 mg up to two doses. The second was gemeprost vaginal pessary 1 mg up to five doses. The main outcome measures were success rate induction-to-abortion interval and side-effects. There were no significant differences between the two groups in any of the main outcome measures. We conclude that misoprostol is a stable, cheap PGE1 analogue with demonstrable efficacy and acceptable side-effects in the management of second trimester abortion. Further work is needed to establish the optimum dose and regimen.
The use of vaginal misoprostol in the termination of second and third trimester of pregnancy is as effective as other prostaglandin preparations (including cervagem, prostaglandin E2 and prostaglandin F2alpha), and more effective than oral administration of misoprostol. However, important information regarding maternal safety, and in particular the occurrence of rare outcomes such as uterine rupture, remains limited. Future research efforts should be directed towards determining the optimal dose and frequency of administration, with particular attention to standardised reporting of all relevant outcomes and assessment of rare adverse events. Further information is required about the use of sublingual misoprostol in this setting.