Should gonadotropin-releasing hormone down-regulation therapy be routine in in vitro fertilization? Comparison of mild stimulation and conventional stimulation in ART outcome. Adjuvant low-dose aspirin therapy in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Cessation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRH-a) upon down-regulation versus conventional long GnRH-a protocol in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization. The use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist to induce oocyte maturation after cotreatment with GnRH antagonist in high-risk patients undergoing in vitro fertilization prevents the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a prospective randomized controlled study. Evaluation of ovulation induction protocols for poor responders undergoing assisted reproduction techniques. Human menopausal gonadotropin versus recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in normogonadotropic women down-regulated with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist who were undergoing in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a prospective randomized study. A randomized comparison of two ovarian stimulation protocols with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist cotreatment for in vitro fertilization commencing recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone on cycle day 2 or 5 with the standard long GnRH agonist protocol. Comparison of ovarian stimulation regimens for in vitro fertilization (IVE) with and without a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist: results of a randomized study.
To compare the classic clomiphene citrate (CC) and hMG regime for ovarian stimulation before IVF in women who received hMG post-long protocol down-regulation with either 3 mg triptorelin [INN] IM or 150 mg buserelin acetate four times daily intranasally. Furthermore, if possible, to determine the preferred method of down-regulation.
                A prospective study of 150 women randomized blind to the clinician to one of three alternative ovarian stimulation regimes when passing for the first time through an IVF program during 1992.
                Triptorelin [INN] down-regulated significantly more quickly than buserelin acetate. The non-down-regulated group CC and hMG used significantly less hMG in a shorter time. In these women LH levels at hCG administration were significantly higher. No other intergroup differences were found. Pregnancy and take-home baby rates for the overall study were, respectively, 32%:25% (per cycle) and 42%:33%; (per ET) for the triptorelin [INN] group 28%:22% and 39%:31%; the CC group 32%:24% and 46%:34%; and the buserelin acetate group 34%:28% and 42%:34%.
                Triptorelin [INN] and buserelin acetate were comparable in all parameters except down-regulation. The former was significantly quicker and more sure. In none of the clinical end points measured, however, was the classic CC and hMG non-down-regulation regime significantly less effective or troublesome than where down-regulation was used. These results therefore show that although indications for down-regulation before IVF exist, it should not be used on all patients. To provide a treatment for particular condition that is the most effective treatment with the least risk and cost for the patient we compared the efficacy of using clomiphene 100 mg + delayed low dose gonadotropin + flexible GnRH antagonist administration for ovarian stimulation protocol and GnRH agonist + gonadotropin for stimulation protocol in IVF outcome.
                Clinical outcome of 243 women with regularly menstruation who were candidate for IVF. They had undergone stimulation with GnRH agonist and gonadotropin (group A) or clomiphene citrate, gonadotropin and GnRH antagonist (group B). Main outcome was ongoing pregnancy.
                There were no significant difference in mean age, cause of infertility, basal FSH, BMI, duration of infertility, endometrial thickness on the day HCG administration in two groups. The number of recovered oocytes, obtained embryos, transferred embryos, peak of estradiol on the day HCG administration and OHSS were significantly higher in group A. Significantly more patients in control group had embryos for cryopreservation. There were no significant difference in clinical pregnancy rate and ongoing pregnancy rate between two groups.
                Clomiphene + delayed low dose gonadotropin + flexible GnRH - antagonist stimulation is an acceptable alternative protocol for IVF in patients with regularly menstruation. To evaluate the effect of adjuvant low-dose aspirin on utero-ovarian blood flow and ovarian responsiveness in poor responders undergoing IVF.
                Prospective randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
                University-affiliated teaching hospital.
                Sixty patients classified as poor responders undergoing IVF.
                Supplementation with low-dose aspirin (80 mg daily) or placebo to a long down-regulation protocol.
                Doppler measurement of intraovarian and uterine pulsatility index was performed before (baseline) and after ovarian stimulation (day of hCG administration). Duration of use and dose of gonadotropins, cycle cancellation rate, number of mature follicles recruited, and oocytes retrieved were also measured.
                High cancellation rates were found in both groups (33.3% vs. 26.7%, placebo vs. treatment). There were no significant differences in total dose of hMG used (66 vs. 57 hMG, 75 IU ampules), median number of mature follicles recruited (3.5 vs. 3.0), or median number of oocytes retrieved (4 vs. 3). No significant differences were found in either intraovarian or uterine artery pulsatility index measured at baseline or on the day of hCG administration.
                Supplementation with low-dose aspirin failed to improve either ovarian and uterine blood flow or ovarian responsiveness in poor responders undergoing IVF. To determine whether a controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) regimen that involves GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) discontinuation before administration of gonadotropins would benefit poor responders.
                A prospective, randomized controlled trial.
                Hospital-based IVF Unit.
                Sixty-three patients with previous poor response to COH and/or high basal FSH level (> or =9 mIU/mL) undergoing 78 IVF-ET cycles.
                In both groups, administration of GnRH-a was started in the midluteal phase. Whereas in the study group (40 cycles), it ended before administration of gonadotropins, in controls (38 cycles) GnRH-a treatment was continued throughout the follicular phase.
                Ovarian stimulation patterns and IVF outcome.
                A significantly higher cancellation rate was noted in the study group than in the controls (22.5% versus 5%, respectively). The new and control regimens resulted in similar stimulation characteristics and clinical pregnancy rates (11% versus 10.3%, respectively). In 13 patients with a basal FSH level that was not persistently high, the new regimen resulted in a significantly higher number of retrieved oocytes compared with the standard protocol (7.6+/-1.03 versus 4.0+/-0.68, respectively).
                Whereas for most low responders, the new COH regimen offers no further advantage, future prospective studies may demonstrate whether it can confer a benefit for a subset of patients with a basal FSH level that is not persistently high. To determine whether there are any differences in the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and implantation rates in high-risk patients undergoing IVF using a protocol consisting of GnRH agonist trigger after cotreatment with GnRH antagonist or hCG trigger after dual pituitary suppression protocol.
                Prospective randomized controlled trial.
                University-based tertiary fertility center.
                Sixty-six patients under 40 years of age with polycystic ovarian syndrome, polycystic ovarian morphology, or previous high response undergoing IVF.
                Patients were randomized to an ovarian stimulation protocol consisting of either GnRH agonist trigger after cotreatment with GnRH antagonist (study group) or hCG trigger after dual pituitary suppression with a GnRH agonist (control group). Both groups received luteal phase and early pregnancy supplementation with IM progesterone (P), and patients in the study group also received E(2) patches and their doses were adjusted according to the serum levels.
                Incidence of OHSS and implantation rate.
                None of the patients in the study group developed any form of OHSS compared with 31% (10/32) of the patients in the control group. There were no significant differences in the implantation (22/61 [36.0%] vs. 20/64 [31.0%]), clinical pregnancy (17/30 [56.7%] vs. 15/29 [51.7%]), and ongoing pregnancy rates (16/30 [53.3%] vs. 14/29 [48.3%]) between the study and control groups, respectively.
                The use of a protocol consisting of GnRH agonist trigger after GnRH antagonist cotreatment combined with adequate luteal phase and early pregnancy E(2) and P supplementation reduces the risk of OHSS in high-risk patients undergoing IVF without affecting implantation rate. To compare 3 stimulation protocols in poor ovulation responders undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF).
                The study was a randomized, prospective clinical trial from June 2003 to July 2004, in Royan Institute, Tehran, Iran. One hundred and fifty-four patients, who had poor responses to ovulation induction in at least one previous IVF attempt, were randomly divided into 3 groups. In the first group, human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) was administered from day 3 of the cycle at a dose rate of 150 IU/day. In the second group, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist was started at a dose rate of 800 microg/day by nasal spray or 500 microg/day subcutaneously in the mid-luteal phase, followed by a standard HMG dose after pituitary down regulation was confirmed. In the third group, clomiphene at a dose rate of 100 mg/day was given from day 3 and HMG from day 6. Our main outcomes were number of mature oocytes, cancellation rate, number of HMG ampoules used and incidence premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surge.
                There was a high incidence of premature LH surge in all groups except in the GnRH group (p=0.0001) and there were significant differences between groups in HMG requirements (p=0.004). There were no significant differences between groups in number of mature oocytes recovered and cancellation rate.
                Results showed no advantage in the use of GnRH agonist compared to the older regimens of clomiphene plus HMG and HMG alone. The cancellation rate was similar for 3 protocols and HMG requirement was higher with the use of GnRH agonist. The treatment of poor responders in assisted reproductive technologies remains a challenge. To evaluate clinical and endocrinological effects of intranasal (IN) vs. subcutaneous (SC) GnRH-a for pituitary down-regulation combined with hMG vs. rFSH.
                Prospective, randomized study.
                University hospital, IVF unit.
                Three hundred seventy-nine normogonadotropic women eligible for IVF or ICSI.
                Randomization to intranasal (IN) or SC GnRH-a and to hMG or rFSH.
                Oocytes retrieved, embryos developed, clinical pregnancy, and delivery rates. Serum hormone concentrations on stimulation days 1 (S1) and 8 (S8), and oocyte pick-up (OPU) day.
                After randomization, four groups were formed: IN/hMG (n = 100), IN/FSH (n = 98), SC/hMG (n = 89), and SC/FSH (n = 92). Mean number of oocytes retrieved and of transferable and transferred embryos were similar in the four groups. Clinical pregnancy rate per started cycle was significantly higher in the IN/HMG group than in the SC/FSH group (P<.05) and was intermediate in the two remaining groups. Se-LH on S8 in the two SC groups was significantly lower than in the two IN groups. Se-E2 on S8 in the SC/FSH group was significantly lower than in the other three groups.
                The clinical and endocrinological outcome in IVF and ICSI-treated normogonadotropic women is significantly influenced by mode of down-regulation as well as gonadotropin formulation. Extending the FSH window for multifollicular development by administering FSH from the midfollicular phase onward constitutes a novel mild protocol for ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF) based on the physiology of single dominant follicle selection in normo-ovulatory women. We compared outcomes from this protocol with two other stimulation protocols. One hundred and forty-two normo-ovulatory patients with an indication for IVF (or IVF/ICSI) were randomized to a GnRH agonist long protocol (group A; n = 45) or one of two GnRH antagonist protocols commencing recombinant FSH on cycle d 2 (group B; n = 48) or cycle d 5 (group C; n = 49). A fixed dose (150 IU/d) of rFSH was used for ovarian stimulation, and GnRH antagonist cotreatment was initiated on the day when the leading follicle reached 14 mm diameter. Group C showed a shorter duration of stimulation (median duration, 11, 9, and 8 d for groups A, B, and C, respectively; P < 0.001), reflected in a significantly lower total dose of rFSH used (median amount of rFSH, 1650, 1350, and 1200 IU for groups A, B, and C, respectively; P < 0.001). In group C more cycles were cancelled during the stimulation phase due to insufficient response, resulting in a lower percentage of oocyte retrievals (84%, 73%, and 63% for groups A, B, and C; P = 0.02). However, women in group C obtained better quality embryos (percentage of embryo score of 1 for best embryo, 29%, 37%, and 61% for groups A, B, and C, respectively; P = 0.008), resulting in more transfers per oocyte retrieval (68%, 71%, and 90% for groups A, B, and C, respectively; P = 0.04). After profound ovarian stimulation (groups A and B) only 7% of the patients who retrieved four oocytes or less conceived, whereas after mild stimulation (group C) 67% of these patients conceived (P < 0.01). Overall, no differences were found among the three groups comparing pregnancy rate per started IVF cycle. In conclusion, application of the described mild ovarian stimulation protocol resulted in pregnancy rates per started IVF cycle similar to those observed after profound stimulation with GnRH agonist cotreatment despite shorter stimulation and a 27% reduction in exogenous FSH. A higher cancellation rate before oocyte retrieval was compensated by improved embryo quality concomitant with a higher chance of undergoing embryo transfer. A relatively low number of oocytes retrieved after mild ovarian stimulation distinctly differs from the pathological reduction in the number of oocytes retrieved after profound ovarian stimulation (poor response) associated with poor IVF outcome. The relatively small number of oocytes obtained after mild ovarian stimulation may represent the best of the cohort in a given cycle. In order to diminish the cancellation rate due to a premature endogeneous LH surge and/or to a poor ovarian response and thus increasing the pregnancy rate, a GnRH agonist (Buserelin) was applied in patients starting their first ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins for IVF. All patients suffered from tubal infertility and were not older than 40 years. Each woman was allocated randomly to one of three groups: the conventional treatment with hMG alone (group I), patients from group II started the hMG treatment shortly after the LH rise caused by the GnRH agonist and patients in group III commenced the hMG treatment when an hypogonadotropic state was achieved after a long treatment of Buserelin. All male partners had a normal spermiogram. A reduction of poor responders to the superovulation is seen in the short-term group (6%), compared with the other two groups (14%). In some cases from group III ovarian cyst formation led to the cancellation of the treatment. The long-term group differs significantly from the other two in the duration of the gonadotropin stimulation and the number of ampoules hMG used. A severe ovarian overstimulation syndrome was not observed. There is no difference in the number of retrieved oocytes and the fertilization rate among the three groups. The pregnancy rate per cycle or per patient in the group with a short-term GnRH-agonist regimen is significantly higher compared to that of the group using the conventional hMG treatment.
There is insufficient evidence to support the routine use of any particular intervention either for pituitary down regulation, ovarian stimulation or adjuvant therapy in the management of poor responders to controlled ovarian stimulation in IVF. More robust data from good quality RCTs with relevant outcomes are needed.