Evaluation of two self-care treatments for prevention of vaginal candidiasis in women with HIV. Efficacy, tolerability and development of resistance in HIV-positive patients treated with fluconazole for secondary prevention of oropharyngeal candidiasis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. A dose comparison study of a new triazole antifungal (D0870) in HIV-positive patients with oral candidiasis. Therapy for oropharyngeal candidiasis in HIV-infected patients: a randomized, prospective multicenter study of oral fluconazole versus clotrimazole troches. The Multicenter Study Group. A clinical multicenter study comparing efficacy and tolerability of topical combination therapy with clotrimazole (Canesten, two formats) with oral single dose fluconazole (Diflucan) in vulvovaginal mycoses. Fluconazole prophylaxis of recurrent oral candidiasis in HIV-positive patients. Weekly fluconazole for the prevention of mucosal candidiasis in women with HIV infection. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Terry Beirn Community Programs for Clinical Research on AIDS. A randomized trial comparing fluconazole with clotrimazole troches for the prevention of fungal infections in patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection. NIAID AIDS Clinical Trials Group. A randomized trial of continuous or intermittent therapy with fluconazole for oropharyngeal candidiasis in HIV-infected patients: clinical outcomes and development of fluconazole resistance.
Vaginal candidiasis (VC) is a common concern for women living with HIV infection. The authors evaluated the effectiveness of two self-care approaches to prophylaxis of VC among HIV-infected women, weekly intravaginal application of Lactobacillus acidophilus or weekly intravaginal application of clotrimazole tablets, in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. VC was defined as a vaginal swab positive for Candida species in the presence of signs/symptoms of vaginitis and the absence of a diagnosis of Trichomonas vaginalis or bacterial vaginosis. Thirty-four episodes of VC occurred among 164 women followed for a median of 21 months. The relative risk of experiencing an episode of VC was 0.4 (95% CI = 0.2, 0.9) in the clotrimazole arm and 0.5 (95% CI = 0.2, 1.1) in the Lactobacillus acidophilus arm. The estimated median time to first episode VC was longer for clotrimazole (p = .03, log rank test) and Lactobacillus acidophilus (p = .09, log rank test) compared with placebo. Vaginal yeast infections can be prevented with local therapy. Education about self-care for prophylaxis of VC should be offered to HIV-infected women. Over 37 months, we conducted a prospective double-blind, randomized study in a cohort of 138 HIV-infected patients to compare the effect of two different strategies on the prevention and treatment of oropharyngeal candidiasis relapses and on the development of clinical and microbiological resistance to fluconazole. Each episode was treated with a 7 day course of fluconazole 200 mg/day, followed by secondary prophylaxis with fluconazole 150 mg once weekly matched to placebo. The duration of the double-blind phase of the study, from the day of randomization to the first primary end-point, was 347 +/- 186 days for the fluconazole group and 196 +/- 128 days for the placebo group (P < 0.001). A total of 33 patients remained relapse-free during the course of the study. Clinical failure was observed in a total of five patients (four in the fluconazole group, one in the placebo group; P = 0.15). Microbiological resistance was recorded in 12 patients (eight in the fluconazole group, four in the placebo group; P = 0.20). There were no significant treatment group differences in microbiological resistance whether comparisons were made for all cases or for cases up to 1 month post-study. In the few patients who developed clinical and/or microbiological resistance, the cumulative dose of fluconazole before entry into the study was a mean value of 8.6 g (compared with 2.9 g in patients without clinical and/or microbiological resistance). In summary, patients treated with secondary prophylaxis suffered fewer relapses of oropharyngeal candidiasis. Development of resistant candidiasis (clinical and/or microbiological) was rarely seen in either group and its incidence was not significantly different. This multicentre study evaluated the clinical efficacy and tolerability of D0870 in treating oropharyngeal candidiasis in HIV-positive patients who had no history of clinical resistance to fluconazole.
                Three regimens were evaluated in two phases. In phase I a 50 mg initial dose was followed by 10 mg for 4 days (Group 1). In phase II a 100 mg initial dose was followed by 25 mg for 4 days (Group 2), or 10 mg for 5 days (Group 3).
                Clinical cure was obtained in 27 patients of a total of 35 (77%) and six other patients improved (17%). Two patients at the lowest dose failed and both had very low plasma concentration of D0870. No association was found between clinical outcome; minimum inhibitory concentration of D0870 pre-therapy for Candida albicans, maximum recorded plasma D0870 concentration, cfu of culture or CD4 cell count at entry. Overall, 37% of the patients experienced relapse during the 2 weeks post therapy. Tolerance was excellent. Mild adverse events possibly related to the study drug were recorded in five patients.
                D0870 demonstrates excellent efficacy at low doses in the treatment of HIV-related OPC and exhibits a favourable safety profile. A total of 334 HIV-infected patients with oral candidiasis were randomly assigned to receive 14 days of treatment with either 100 mg of oral fluconazole once daily or 10 mg clotrimazole five times daily. Both treatments were clinically effective: 98% of evaluable fluconazole-treated patients and 94% of evaluable clotrimazole-treated patients were cured or showed improvement (p = NS). Fluconazole was more effective than clotrimazole in eradicating Candida from the oral flora by the end of therapy (65% versus 48%) (p = 0.005). In addition, patients in the fluconazole-treated group were more likely to remain asymptomatic through the second week of follow-up (82.3% versus 50.0%) (p < 0.001). This difference was no longer evident by the post-therapy visit during week 4. Seven patients treated with clotrimazole and two patients treated with fluconazole discontinued therapy because of side effects. Two patients in the fluconazole group were withdrawn from therapy because of elevated serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase levels, one considered possibly related to drug therapy. Fluconazole was as effective as clotrimazole in the treatment of oral candidiasis and temporarily provided a more prolonged disease-free state. Future studies are needed to define the optimal regimen for both the treatment and prevention of recurrent oral candidiasis in HIV-infected patients, addressing special attention to the issue of compliance, cost, and emergence of resistance. Two topical formats containing clotrimazole [500 mg single dose vaginal tablet (VT) or 10% single dose vaginal cream (VC) for intravaginal use] combined with additional clotrimazole cream for topical application to the vulval area (Canesten 1 Combi, Bayer AG, Leverkusen, Germany) were compared with oral fluconazole 150 mg single dose treatment of vulvovaginal mycosis (VVM) in a single-blind clinical study. The objective of the study was to demonstrate the equivalent efficacy of the clotrimazole combination therapies (VT + 1% cream and VC + 2% cream), and fluconazole 150 mg oral capsule (Diflucan 1, Pfizer Gmbh, Karlsruhe, Germany) in terms of overall response defined as clinical cure and mycological resolution. Overall, combination therapies containing either clotrimazole 500 mg VTs or clotrimazole 10% VC were as effective as a single dose fluconazole 150 mg oral tablet in treating VVM with rates for overall response being 66%, 61% and 60%, respectively, after 14 days. There were no significant differences in the time to onset of symptom relief in the clotrimazole 500 mg tablet group and clotrimazole 10% VC compared with fluconazole 150 mg oral capsules. Only 50% of 88 patients across treatment groups with mycological recurrence also experienced return of symptoms over the entire 8 week follow-up period. All treatments administered were safe and well-tolerated and the number of patients experiencing adverse events was low. In a randomized, open study, the efficacy of fluconazole as a prophylaxis of recurrent oral candidiasis in patients with advanced stages of HIV-infection (CD4 cell count less than 100/mm3) was studied. For this purpose, the frequency of episodes of oral candidiasis during two different prophylaxis regimens (50 mg/day vs. 100 mg/day) were compared to an untreated control group. Sixty-five HIV-positive patients were included in the study from May, 1989 to January, 1990. Of these, 58 were evaluated over an observation time of 137-215 days. Prophylaxis with fluconazole clearly reduced the occurrence of oral candidiasis. In 20 out of 21 patients in the untreated control group, a total of 60 relapses occurred. In the prophylaxis group receiving 50 mg/day (group 2), two out of 18 patients had four relapses. In the group receiving 100 mg/day (group 3), four out of 19 patients had nine relapses in total. Of 3575 observation days in the control group, treatment due to oral candidiasis was necessary on 393 days (28%). In group 2, on 57 of 3316 days (2%), fluconazole in a higher dosage was administered for treatment. In group 3, relapse treatment with fluconazole 200 mg/day, or treatment with ketoconazole, became necessary in 116 out of 3314 observation days (3%). In all relapses, Candida albicans cfu greater than 10(3)/ml were isolated in the oral wash-outs. As compared to the untreated control group, fluconazole prophylaxis in a daily dosage of 50 as well as 100 mg led to significantly less frequent relapses of oral candidiasis (p less than 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) Candidiasis is a frequent complication of infection with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); however, few data exist about the natural history, prevention, and treatment of mucosal candidiasis in women.
                To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of weekly fluconazole prophylaxis for mucosal candidiasis in women infected with HIV.
                Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
                14 sites participating in the Community Programs for Clinical Research on AIDS (CPCRA).
                323 women with HIV infection and CD4+ cell counts of 300 cells/mm3 or less.
                200 mg of fluconazole per week or placebo. Open-label fluconazole for candidiasis prophylaxis was permitted after two oropharyngeal or vaginal episodes or one esophageal episode.
                Development of mucosal candidiasis, clinical and in vitro resistance of Candida species to fluconazole, survival, and adverse events.
                After a median follow-up of 29 months, 72 of 162 patients receiving fluconazole and 93 of 161 patients receiving placebo had at least one episode of candidiasis (relative risk [RR], 0.56 [95% Cl, 0.41 to 0.77); P < 0.001). Weekly fluconazole was effective in preventing oropharyngeal candidiasis (RR, 0.50 [Cl, 0.33 to 0.74]; P < 0.001) and vaginal candidiasis (RR, 0.64 [Cl, 0.40 to 1.00]; P = 0.05) but not esophageal candidiasis (RR, 0.91 [Cl, 0.48 to 1.72]; P > 0.2). Relative risks were similar for women who had a history of mucosal candidiasis (RR, 0.5 [Cl, 0.35 to 0.75]) and those who did not (RR, 0.69 [Cl, 0.35 to 1.34]). Absolute risk reduction for patients with a history of infection was 25.6 per 100 person-years, which is more than twice the reduction of 11.2 per 100 person-years seen in patients with no history of infection. This difference reflects the higher risk of patients who previously had an infection. Candida albicans was not usually resistant to fluconazole in vaginal specimens in clinical or in vitro settings; such resistance occurred in less than 5% of patients in each group.
                Weekly fluconazole (200 mg) seems to be safe and effective in preventing oropharyngeal and vaginal candidiasis. This regimen has a useful role in the management of HIV-infected women who are at risk for recurrent mucosal candidiasis. Cryptococcal meningitis and other serious fungal infections are common complications in patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Fluconazole is effective for long-term suppression of many fungal infections, but its effectiveness as primary prophylaxis had not been adequately evaluated.
                We conducted a prospective, randomized trial that compared fluconazole (200 mg per day) with clotrimazole troches (10 mg taken five times daily) in patients who were also participating in a randomized trial of primary prophylaxis for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia.
                After a median follow-up of 35 months, invasive fungal infections had developed in 4.1 percent of the patients in the fluconazole group (9 of 217) and in 10.9 percent of those in the clotrimazole group (23 of 211; relative hazard, as adjusted for the CD4+ count, 3.3; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.5 to 7.6). Of the 32 invasive fungal infections, 17 were cryptococcosis (2 in the fluconazole group and 15 in the clotrimazole group; adjusted relative hazard, 8.5; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.9 to 37.6). The benefit of fluconazole was greater for the patients with 50 or fewer CD4+ cells per cubic millimeter than for the patients with higher counts. Fluconazole was also effective in preventing esophageal candidiasis (adjusted relative hazard, 5.8; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.7 to 20.0; P = 0.004) and confirmed and presumed oropharyngeal candidiasis (5.7 and 38.1 cases per 100 years of follow-up in the fluconazole and clotrimazole groups, respectively; P < 0.001). Survival was similar in the two groups.
                Fluconazole taken prophylactically reduces the frequency of cryptococcosis, esophageal candidiasis, and superficial fungal infections in HIV-infected patients, especially those with 50 or fewer CD4+ lymphocytes per cubic millimeter, but the drug does not reduce overall mortality. The effects of continuous or intermittent therapy with fluconazole on the recurrence of and the development of fluconazole resistance are not known.
                We studied human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients with CD4 cell count <350 x 10(6)/L and oropharyngeal candidiasis in a prospective, randomized study. After initial treatment, 20 patients (16 of whom completed 3 months of follow-up) received continuous fluconazole at 200 mg/day, and 48 patients (28 of whom completed follow-up) received intermittent therapy at the time of symptomatic relapses. Oral samples were obtained weekly during episodes of infection and quarterly as surveillance cultures. Development of resistance was defined as a fourfold rise in minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) to at least 16 microg/mL from the initial culture in the same species, the emergence of new, resistant (MIC > or =16 microg/mL) species, or a significant increase in the proportion of resistant isolates.
                During a mean follow-up of 11 months, median annual relapse rates were lower in patients on continuous therapy (0 episodes/year) than in patients on intermittent therapy (4.1 episodes/year; P <0.001). Sterile cultures were seen in 6 of 16 (38%) patients on continuous therapy compared with 3 of 28 (11%) on intermittent therapy (P = 0.04). Microbiological resistance developed in 9 of 16 (56%) patients on continuous treatment, compared with 13 of 28 (46%) on intermittent treatment (P = 0.75). However, despite isolates with increased MICs, 42 of 44 patients responded to fluconazole in doses up to 800 mg/day.
                In patients with frequent recurrences, continuous suppressive therapy significantly reduced relapses and colonization. Resistance occurred with both continuous and intermittent therapy; however, therapeutic responses were excellent.
Implications for practice
No trials were found addressing treatment of VVC in HIV positive women.In comparison to placebo,Fluconazole was found to be an effective preventative intervention. However, the potential for resistant Candida organisms to develop might impact the feasibility of implementation.
Direction of findings suggests that Clotrimazole and Lactobacillus improved the prophylactic outcomes when compared to placebo.
Implications for researchThere is a need to evaluate drugs and drug regimens for VVC treatment and prophylaxis in HIV positive women through randomised clinical trials. Development of resistance to azoles remains under-studied and more work must be done in this area, so as to determine whether routine prophylaxis for VVC is at all needed or whether adequate ART would be sufficient to prevent recurrent VVC. The viral load in vaginal secretions with or without treatment or prophylaxis has not been studied, this is very relevant to the spread of HIV.