[Prophylaxis with fluoroquinolones in patients with neutropenia]. Rifampin does not improve the efficacy of quinolone antibacterial prophylaxis in neutropenic cancer patients: results of a randomized clinical trial. Levofloxacin to prevent bacterial infection in patients with cancer and neutropenia. Infection prophylaxis in neutropenic patients with acute leukaemia--a randomized, comparative study with ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin and co-trimoxazole/colistin. Quinolone-based antibacterial chemoprophylaxis in neutropenic patients: effect of augmented gram-positive activity on infectious morbidity. National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) with or without a quinolone in the prevention of infection in cancer patients. Prophylactic antibiotics for the prevention of neutropenic fever in patients undergoing autologous stem-cell transplantation: results of a single institution, randomized phase 2 trial. Levofloxacin prophylaxis to prevent bacterial infection in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in acute leukemia. A randomized trial of roxithromycin in patients with acute leukemia and bone marrow transplant recipients receiving fluoroquinolone prophylaxis.
In order to evaluate whether the prophylactic use of fluoroquinolones diminishes the incidence of infections and/or mortality during neutropenia, we undertook a prospective, aleatory and controlled study in non-hospitalized adult patients with acute leukemia and chemotherapy-induced neutropenia including twenty five episodes of neutropenia including twenty five episodes of neutropenia which had occurred in 14 patients who were randomly selected either to receive or not quinolones (norfloxacin 800 mg daily or ciprofloxacin 1000 mg daily). Both groups were similar in terms of sex, age, underlying disease, chemotherapy for hematologic malignancy, duration and severity of neutropenia. The use of quinolones was associated with a delay in the fever onset during neutropenia (p = 0.0448), a decrease in the proportion of neutropenic febrile days (p = 0.0456), a decrease of infections caused by gram-negative bacilli (p = 0.037) and an increase of Streptococcus infections (p = 0.0857). There was no significant decrease in mortality, incidence of severe infections, proportion of neutropenic episodes without fever, empiric use of amphotericin B or fungal infections between both groups. The results of this study demonstrate that the prophylactic use of fluoroquinolones does not diminish the infectious morbidity and/or mortality in these patients. To determine whether the addition of rifampin to a quinolone-based antibacterial prophylactic regimen in patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with peripheral-blood stem-cell transplantation (PBSCT) decreases the incidence of neutropenia and fever, Gram-positive bacteremia, and infection-related morbidity.
                Patients with solid tumors undergoing HDC with PBSCT were randomized to receive prophylactic antibiotics with either ciprofloxacin 500 mg orally every 8 hours or the same ciprofloxacin regimen with rifampin 300 mg orally every 12 hours. Prophylaxis was started 48 hours before stem-cell reinfusion. Patients were monitored to document the occurrence of neutropenia and fever, incidence and cause of bacterial infection, time to onset and duration of fever, requirement for intravenous antimicrobials, and length of hospital admission.
                Sixty-five patients were randomized to receive ciprofloxacin and 65 to receive ciprofloxacin plus rifampin, and from these groups, 62 and 61 were assessable, respectively. The proportion of patients who developed neutropenia and fever was 87% in the group treated with ciprofloxacin and 78% in the group treated with ciprofloxacin and rifampin (P =.25). Although there was a trend toward a reduction in the overall incidence of bacteremia (12 v 4 patients), and Gram-positive bacteremia (8 v 2 patients) with the addition of rifampin, none of these comparisons was statistically significant (P =.05 and P =.09, respectively).
                The results of this study, which demonstrate that rifampin does not improve ciprofloxacin antibacterial prophylaxis in cancer patients undergoing HDC with PBSCT support but that it does increase the occurrence of undesirable side effects, do not support the routine use of rifampin in this setting. The prophylactic use of fluoroquinolones in patients with cancer and neutropenia is controversial and is not a recommended intervention.
                We randomly assigned 760 consecutive adult patients with cancer in whom chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (<1000 neutrophils per cubic millimeter) was expected to occur for more than seven days to receive either oral levofloxacin (500 mg daily) or placebo from the start of chemotherapy until the resolution of neutropenia. Patients were stratified according to their underlying disease (acute leukemia vs. solid tumor or lymphoma).
                An intention-to-treat analysis showed that fever was present for the duration of neutropenia in 65 percent of patients who received levofloxacin prophylaxis, as compared with 85 percent of those receiving placebo (243 of 375 vs. 308 of 363; relative risk, 0.76; absolute difference in risk, -20 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, -26 to -14 percent; P=0.001). The levofloxacin group had a lower rate of microbiologically documented infections (absolute difference in risk, -17 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, -24 to -10 percent; P<0.001), bacteremias (difference in risk, -16 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, -22 to -9 percent; P<0.001), and single-agent gram-negative bacteremias (difference in risk, -7 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, -10 to -2 percent; P<0.01) than did the placebo group. Mortality and tolerability were similar in the two groups. The effects of prophylaxis were also similar between patients with acute leukemia and those with solid tumors or lymphoma.
                Prophylactic treatment with levofloxacin is an effective and well-tolerated way of preventing febrile episodes and other relevant infection-related outcomes in patients with cancer and profound and protracted neutropenia. The long-term effect of this intervention on microbial resistance in the community is not known.
                Copyright 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society. Preliminary results are presented of an ongoing, prospective, randomized, study comparing ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin and co-trimoxazole/colistin for the prevention of infection in patients with acute leukaemia. The results for 59 patients (median age 47 years, range 21-72) included 88 episodes of neutropenia, each associated with a course of cytotoxic therapy. The main factor measured was the time elapsed from the beginning of neutropenia (neutrophils less than 500/microliter) until the first infectious febrile episode. The median time for the period was 12 days (range 1-56) for the cotrimoxazole/colistin group, 15 days (range 1-38) for the ofloxacin group and 20 days (range 1-36) for the ciprofloxacin group (differences not significant). Microbiologically proven major infections occurred in 10/27 treatment courses with co-trimoxazole/colistin 7/31 courses with ofloxacin and 7/30 courses with ciprofloxacin (P not significant). These were mostly due to Gram-positive cocci. There were no Gram-negative infections in the quinolone groups compared with one major Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in the co-trimoxazole/colistin group. No Pneumocystis carinii infections were encountered. Adverse reactions associated with co-trimoxazole/colistin required discontinuation of medication in 11/27 treatment courses because of compliance problems, skin reactions or gastrointestinal intolerance. There were significantly fewer discontinuations in the ofloxacin (n = 2) and in the ciprofloxacin groups (n = 3). Major side effects of the quinolones included persistent icterus in one patient receiving ofloxacin and psychiatric symptoms in one patient receiving ciprofloxacin. It is concluded from these data that there were no statistically significant differences between the three treatment groups in respect of the prevention of infection.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) To determine whether augmented quinolone-based antibacterial prophylaxis in neutropenic patients with cancer reduces infections caused by gram-positive cocci and preserves the protective effect against aerobic gram-negative bacilli.
                Open, randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical trial.
                Centers participating in the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.
                111 eligible and evaluable patients hospitalized for severe neutropenia (neutrophil count < 0.5 x 10(9)/L lasting at least 14 days) who were receiving cytotoxic therapy for acute leukemia or bone marrow autografting.
                One of three oral antibacterial prophylactic regimens (norfloxacin, 400 mg every 12 hours; ofloxacin, 400 mg every 12 hours; or ofloxacin, 400 mg, plus rifampin, 300 mg every 12 hours) beginning with cytotoxic therapy.
                Incidence and cause of suspected or proven infection.
                Microbiologically documented overall infection rates for norfloxacin, ofloxacin, and ofloxacin plus rifampin were 47%, 24%, and 9%, respectively (P < 0.001). Corresponding rates were 24%, 13%, and 3%, respectively for staphylococcal bacteremia (P = 0.03) and, 21%, 3%, and 3%, respectively for streptococcal bacteremia (P < 0.01). The pattern of bacteremia suggested that rifampin played a role in suppressing staphylococcal infection. Both ofloxacin alone and ofloxacin plus rifampin had a clinically significant antistreptococcal effect. Aerobic gram-negative rods were cleared from rectal surveillance cultures in all patients after a median of 5.5 days and caused infection in only one patient (0.9%). The reductions in the number of microbiologically documented infections among ofloxacin recipients and ofloxacin plus rifampin recipients were offset by concomitant increases in the number of unexplained fevers (24% of norfloxacin recipients, 53% of ofloxacin recipients, and 49% of ofloxacin plus rifampin recipients; P = 0.02). No statistically significant difference was found among the treatment arms with respect to the overall incidence of febrile neutropenic episodes as defined for this trial (79% for the norfloxacin group, 82% for the ofloxacin group, and 77% for the ofloxacin plus rifampin group).
                Quinolone-based antibacterial chemoprophylaxis protected patients from aerobic gram-negative bacillary infections. Augmentation of the gram-positive activity reduced the incidence of gram-positive infections but did not influence the overall incidence of febrile neutropenic episodes. 59 patients who had earlier developed an infection following antineoplastic chemotherapy were randomised to receive either granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone or G-CSF+quinolone as prophylaxis during subsequent identical chemotherapy courses. 30 patients received 48 courses of G+CSF, while 29 patients received 44 courses of G-CSF+ofloxacin or ciprofloxacin. The overall infection rate was 23%. Patients with WHO grade IV leukopenia at the onset of prophylactic treatment developed infection in 61% of cases when on G-CSF, but only in 22% when on G-CSF+quinolone (P = 0.002). Patients with initial leukopenia of grade WHO III-I had only a 11% infection rate showing no significant difference between the treatment groups. The median duration of leukopenia < 1 x 10(9)/l was 4 days for patients receiving G-CSF alone and 3.5 days for those receiving additional quinolone. Patients developing infection had grade IV leukopenia for a median of 5 days. Both prophylactic treatments were well tolerated. We conclude that when prophylactic G-CSF is initiated at WHO grade IV leukopenia, addition of an oral quinolone reduces the risk of infection. One hundred and fifty-seven patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy (HDT) and autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) for hematopoietic malignancies and solid tumors were randomly assigned to receive (Group A) or not (Group B) prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin, orally, and vancomycin, intravenously. Prophylactic antibiotics were given from day 0 until resolution of neutropenia or the appearance of a febrile event. Furthermore, patients in both groups received once a day fluconazole, orally. The primary end-point of our study was the incidence of neutropenic febrile episodes attributed to infection. One hundred and twelve (71.3%) patients developed neutropenic fever, 50 (56.2%) in Group A and 62 (91.2%) in Group B (P < 0.001) with the majority (82%) of patients developing fever of unknown origin. Patients on prophylactic antibiotics had a significantly lower rate of bacteremias (5.6%) than did those randomized to no prophylaxis (29.4%) (P = 0.005) and, when developing neutropenic fever, they had a lower probability of response to first-line empirical antibiotics (P = 0.025). Prophylactic administration of ciprofloxacin and vancomycin reduced the incidence of neutropenic fever in patients receiving HDT with ASCT, however, without affecting the total interval of hospitalization, time to engraftment, or all-cause mortality. Therefore, our results do not support the use of antibiotic prophylaxis for patients undergoing HDT and ASCT.
                © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Infection in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (neutrophils < 500/mm3) is the main cause of death during the treatment of acute leukemia. Antibiotic prophylaxis is a controversial issue to prevent or delay this infection. This study assessed the efficacy of prophylaxis with oral levofloxacin in chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenic patients. Eighty patients of acute leukemia was randomly assigned to had levofoxacin (500 mg/daily) or placebo from the starting of chemotherapy. Out of 80 patients 53 developed neutropenia and fever. The number of patients with fever (78% vs. 68%), isolation of the pathogenic bacteria (30.43% vs. 16%) was higher and mean starting day of the fever (11.1 vs. 13.2) was shorter in the placebo group than the levofloxacin group. Levofloxacin reduced the bacterial infections and delays the onset of fever in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia especially in short duration (< 7 days). Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis in patients with profound neutropenia may be useful for preventing gram-negative bacterial infection, but it is ineffective against gram-positive bacterial infections in the bloodstream, particularly those caused by streptococci and coagulase-negative staphylococci, which appear to have emerged as significant causes of morbidity, decreased treatment efficacy, and the increased costs of empiric antimicrobial therapy. In a prospective, randomized, open trial, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of oral roxithromycin (150 mg twice daily) as additional antibacterial prophylaxis in 131 adult patients with acute leukemia and bone marrow transplant recipients receiving oral ofloxacin. In comparison with patients given ofloxacin alone, fewer patients receiving ofloxacin plus roxithromycin developed bacteremia caused by viridans group streptococci (incidence, 9 versus 0%; P = 0.03), while the incidence of bacteremia caused by other organisms, the incidence of febrile episodes from any cause, the risk of infection-associated complications (including prolonged or secondary fever, pneumonia, septic shock, need for mechanical ventilation, and/or infection-related death), and antimicrobial usage for therapy were comparable between both groups. Adverse events possibly related to the study drugs were slightly more common among the patients receiving the combination treatment (P = 0.05). Although effective for the prevention of streptococcal bacteremia, the addition of roxithromycin to a fluoroquinolone should not be used routinely as a prophylactic regimen in patients with profound neutropenia, but it might be considered and may be useful for cancer patients with a particularly high risk of streptococcal infection and related complications.
Antibiotic prophylaxis in afebrile neutropenic patients significantly reduced all-cause mortality. In our review, the most significant reduction in mortality was observed in trials assessing prophylaxis with quinolones. The benefits of antibiotic prophylaxis outweighed the harm such as adverse effects and the development of resistance since all-cause mortality was reduced. As most trials in our review were of patients with haematologic cancer, we strongly recommend antibiotic prophylaxis for these patients, preferably with a quinolone. Prophylaxis may also be considered for patients with solid tumours or lymphoma.