The effects of a prefeeding stimulation program on preterm infants. Controlled study of transpyloric and intermittent gavage feeding in the small preterm infant. Feeding strategies for premature infants: randomized trial of gastrointestinal priming and tube-feeding method. Beneficial effects of early hypocaloric enteral feeding on neonatal gastrointestinal function: preliminary report of a randomized trial. Randomized controlled trial of slow vs rapid enteral feeding advancements on the clinical outcomes of preterm infants with birth weight 750-1250 g. Oral probiotics prevent necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight preterm infants: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Promotion of preterm infant nipple feeding with nonnutritive sucking. Gastrointestinal priming prior to full enteral nutrition in very low birth weight infants. Randomised controlled study of clinical outcome following trophic feeding.
This study examined the effects of stroking and a perioral and intraoral prefeeding stimulation program on healthy, growing, preterm infants in a Level II special care nursery. Only infants without cardiac, gastrointestinal, or central nervous system problems were included in the study.
                Two groups of nine randomly assigned, medically stable preterm infants, born between 30 weeks and 34 weeks gestation, were selected for the study. All infants were introduced to nipple feeding at approximately 34 weeks postconceptual age. The infants in the control group received a 5-min stroking protocol before feeding; the infants in the experimental group received a 5-min stroking protocol in addition to a perioral and intraoral stimulation program.
                Compared with the control group, the experimental group had a decreased number of gavage feedings, greater weight gain, and fewer days of hospitalization. The experimental group also had higher scores on the Revised-Neonatal Oral Motor Assessment nutritive suck scale than the control group.
                On a preliminary basis, the findings from this study establish the efficacy of occupational therapy in a Level II special care nursery for healthy, growing, preterm infants. Further, the specific treatment strategies conducted with the infants receiving the experimental procedures have also been preliminary established as effective in enhancing the infants' feeding skills, resulting in weight gain and decreased hospital stays as compared with their counterparts in the control group. However, our findings cannot be generalized to preterm infant populations who are at greater medical risk than the infants in our study because of the potentially hazardous effects that could result. Implications of the results for intervention programs and future research are discussed. There were 53 appropriate for gestational age infants with a birth weight of less than 1,700 gm admitted to the Children's Hospital in Denver who were randomly assigned to two groups for gavage or transpyloric (nasojejunal) feedings. The two groups were not significantly different in terms of gestational age, birth weight, and morbidity. No significant differences were observed for caloric intake after 4 days of age, growth parameters (weight, length, and head circumference), serum total protein levels, feeding-related complications, duration of intravenous fluid supplementation, and length of hospitalization. The results indicate that intermittent gastric gavage feedings are as efficacious as transpyloric feedings in supplying nutrition to the low birth-weight infant. Because of inherently greater risks, costs, radiation, and requisite personnel expertise, transpyloric feedings cannot be recommended as a routine method of feeding for the low birth-weight infant. Data on enteral feeding management of premature infants are limited and often not the subject of randomized clinical trials. Several small studies suggest benefits from the early initiation of feeding, but do not assess the combined effects of time of initiation of feeding, tube-feeding method, and type of milk used. Either singly or in combination, these treatments may affect growth, bone mineralization, biochemical measures of nutritional status, and feeding tolerance, and, ultimately, the duration of hospitalization.
                A total of 171 premature infants, stratified by gestational age (26 to 30 weeks) and diet (human milk or preterm formula) were assigned randomly among four treatment combinations in a balanced two-way design comparing the presence or absence of gastrointestinal (GI) priming for 10 days and continuous infusion versus intermittent bolus tube-feeding.
                The major outcome, time required for infants to attain full oral feeding, was similar among treatments. GI priming was not associated with any measured adverse effect and was associated with better calcium and phosphorus retention, higher serum calcium and alkaline phosphatase activity, and shorter intestinal transit times. The bolus tube-feeding method was associated with significantly less feeding intolerance and greater rate of weight gain than the continuous method. In addition, the greater the quantity of human milk fed, the lower the morbidity.
                Early GI priming with human milk, using the bolus tube-feeding method, may provide the best advantage for the premature infant. In a prospective randomized trial, we studied the effects of early hypocaloric enteral feedings (PO) begun at 48 hours of age in 19 infants compared with 20 infants who received no enteral feedings (NPO) for at least the first 9 days of life. Both groups initially received the majority of their calories by parenteral alimentation. The groups were similar with respect to birth weight, gestational age, sex, Apgar score, and major neonatal diagnoses. The early enteral feeds proved to be significantly beneficial without an increased incidence of complications. The PO group reached full enteral feedings faster than the NPO group (31.2 vs 47.3 days). The PO group had a greater decline in serum bilirubin concentration over the first 2 weeks of life and spent less time under phototherapy (6.8 vs 9.5 days). Less cholestasis was observed among the PO infants (6.7% vs 33%), and peak direct bilirubin levels were also lower (0.7 vs 2.5 mg/dL). Osteopenia of prematurity, manifested by significantly lower alkaline phosphatase activity, was also decreased in the PO group, perhaps because of greater calcium intake during the first month among PO infants (1.3 vs 0.8 g). Compared with complete bowel rest, early onset of hypocaloric enteral feedings has beneficial effects on indirect hyperbilirubinemia, cholestatic jaundice, and metabolic bone disease of very low birth weight infants. To evaluate the effect of slow vs rapid rates of advancement of enteral feed volumes on the clinical outcomes in preterm infants with 750-1250 g birth weight.
                A total of 92 stable neonates 750-1250 g and gestational age <32 weeks were randomly allocated to enteral feeding advancement of 20 mL/kg/d (n = 46) or 30 mL/kg/d (n = 46). The primary outcome was days to reach full enteral feeding, defined as 180 mL/kg/d. Secondary outcomes included rates of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and culture-proven sepsis, days of parenteral nutrition (PN), length of hospital stay, and growth end points.
                Neonates in the rapid-feeding advancement group achieved full enteral volume of feedings earlier than the slower advancement group. They received significantly fewer days of PN, exhibited a shorter time to regain birth weight, and had a shorter duration of hospital stay. The incidence of NEC and the number of episodes of feeding intolerance were not significantly different between the groups, whereas the incidence of culture-proven late-onset sepsis was significantly less in infants receiving a rapid feeding advancement. Excluding infants who were small for gestational age at birth, the incidence of extrauterine growth restriction was significantly reduced in the rapid-advancement group at 28 days and at hospital discharge.
                Rapid enteral feeding advancements in 750-1250 g birth weight infants reduce the time to reach full enteral feeding and the use of PN administration. Rapid-advancement enteral feed also decreases extrauterine growth restriction with improved short-term outcomes for these high-risk infants. The goal was to investigate the efficacy of orally administered probiotics in preventing necrotizing enterocolitis for very low birth weight preterm infants.
                A prospective, blinded, randomized, multicenter controlled trial was conducted at 7 NICUs in Taiwan, to evaluate the beneficial effects of probiotics in necrotizing enterocolitis among very low birth weight infants (birth weight: <1500 g). Very low birth weight infants who survived to start enteral feeding were eligible and were assigned randomly to 2 groups after parental informed consent was obtained. Infants in the study group were given Bifidobacterium bifidum and Lactobacillus acidophilus, added to breast milk or mixed feeding (breast milk and formula), twice daily for 6 weeks. Infants in the control group were fed with breast milk or mixed feeding. The clinicians caring for the infants were blinded to the group assignment. The primary outcome measurement was death or necrotizing enterocolitis (Bell's stage >or=2).
                Four hundred thirty-four infants were enrolled, 217 in the study group and 217 in the control group. The incidence of death or necrotizing enterocolitis (stage >or=2) was significantly lower in the study group (4 of 217 infants vs 20 of 217 infants). The incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis (stage >or=2) was lower in the study group, compared with the control group (4 of 217 infants vs 14 of 217 infants). No adverse effect, such as sepsis, flatulence, or diarrhea, was noted.
                Probiotics, in the form of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus, fed enterally to very low birth weight preterm infants for 6 weeks reduced the incidence of death or necrotizing enterocolitis. Transition of preterm infants from enteral to nipple feeding is a necessary milestone for hospital discharge. This study tested the efficacy of one potential intervention to facilitate the transition process. Ten minutes of nonnutritive sucking (NNS) and a control condition were administered randomly before first nipple feedings. The sample consisted of 20 preterm infants (gestational ages 27-33 weeks, M = 31.6, SD = 1.7; birth weights 931-2, 140 g, M = 1,649, SD = 373) who served as their own controls. NNS resulted in fewer behavioral state changes during feedings and produced quiet, awake states more frequently during feedings. Heart rates did not differ between feedings following NNS compared with those in the control condition. Priming of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract with low-volume feedings before giving full enteral feedings to very premature, high-risk infants is a controversial practice. We designed a study of infants weighing less than 1,250 g and receiving total parenteral nutrition to determine whether GI priming would hasten weight gain, improve tolerance of subsequent feedings, enhance nutritional status, and increase serum concentration of gastrin, a hormone trophic for intestinal growth. Infants were randomly assigned to receive total parenteral nutrition (TPN) alone (N = 21) or GI priming plus TPN (N = 19) for 12 days beginning on day 3 of life. Full-strength premature infant formula was used for priming. Both groups received the same total nutrition. Beginning on day 15, feedings in both groups were increased daily to a maximum of 120 kcal/kg/day on day 20, where they were maintained until day 30. After day 30, the feedings were modified according to the infants' condition. The groups did not differ in birth weight, gestational age, or 5-min Apgar scores. GI-primed infants had improved feeding tolerance after day 20 and a faster rise in serum gastrin during the initial phase of the study. There was no significant difference in weight gain. GI priming improves tolerance of feedings, accelerates rate of rise of serum gastrin during the first weeks of life, and does not increase the risk of feeding complications when compared to TPN alone. This may lead to more rapid maturation of the GI tract in primed infants. To determine the effect of trophic feeding on clinical outcome in ill preterm infants.
                A randomised, controlled, prospective study of 100 preterm infants, weighing less than 1750 g at birth and requiring ventilatory support and parenteral nutrition, was performed. Group TF (48 infants) received trophic feeding from day 3 (0.5-1 ml/h) along with parenteral nutrition until ventilatory support finished. Group C (52 infants) received parenteral nutrition alone. "Nutritive" milk feeding was then introduced to both groups. Clinical outcomes measured included total energy intake and growth over the first six postnatal weeks, sepsis incidence, liver function, milk tolerance, duration of respiratory support, duration of hospital stay and complication incidence.
                Groups were well matched for birthweight, gestation and CRIB scores. Infants in group TF had significantly greater energy intake, mean difference 41.4 (95% confidence interval 9, 73.7) kcal/kg p=0.02; weight gain, 130 (CI 1, 250) g p = 0.02; head circumference gain, mean difference 0.7 (CI 0.1, 1.3) cm, p = 0.04; fewer episodes of culture confirmed sepsis, mean difference -0.7 (-1.3, -0.2) episodes, p = 0.04; less parenteral nutrition, mean difference -11.5 (CI -20, -3) days, p = 0. 03; tolerated full milk feeds (165 ml/kg/day) earlier, mean difference -11.2 (CI -19, -3) days, p = 0.03; reduced requirement for supplemental oxygen, mean difference -22.4 (CI-41.5, -3.3) days, p = 0.02; and were discharged home earlier, mean difference -22.1 (CI -42.1, -2.2) days, p = 0.04. There was no significant difference in the relative risk of any complication.
                Trophic feeding improves clinical outcome in ill preterm infants requiring parenteral nutrition.
The available data do not provide evidence of any beneficial effect of transpyloric feeding for preterm infants. Some evidence of harm exists, including a higher risk of gastrointestinal disturbance and mortality, but these findings should be interpreted and applied cautiously because of methodological weaknesses in the included trials.