A randomized study of tiotropium Respimat Soft Mist inhaler vs. ipratropium pMDI in COPD. Improved delivery of ipratropium bromide using Respimat (a new soft mist inhaler) compared with a conventional metered dose inhaler: cumulative dose response study in patients with COPD. Clickhaler (a novel dry powder inhaler) provides similar bronchodilation to pressurized metered-dose inhaler, even at low flow rates. Results of a multicenter study of nebulized inhalant bronchodilator solutions. Efficacy and tolerability of budesonide/formoterol in one hydrofluoroalkane pressurized metered-dose inhaler in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: results from a 1-year randomized controlled clinical trial. In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, a combination of ipratropium and albuterol is more effective than either agent alone. An 85-day multicenter trial. COMBIVENT Inhalation Aerosol Study Group. Is oral theophylline effective in combination with both inhaled anticholinergic agent and inhaled beta 2-agonist in the treatment of stable COPD? Severe exacerbations of COPD and asthma. Incremental benefit of adding ipratropium to usual therapy. Efficacy and safety of tiotropium Respimat SMI in COPD in two 1-year randomized studies.
The aim of these studies was to compare the efficacy and the safety of tiotropium, delivered via Respimat Soft Mist Inhaler (SMI), a novel multi-dose, propellant-free inhaler, with ipratropium pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. Two identical, 12-week, multi-national, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, active- and placebo-controlled studies were performed. COPD patients were randomized to treatment with either inhaled tiotropium (5 or 10 microg) via Respimat SMI administered once daily, ipratropium (36 microg) pMDI QID or placebo. The primary endpoint was the mean trough forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV(1)) response after 12 weeks of treatment. Secondary endpoints included other spirometry measures and rescue medication use. A total of 719 patients were randomized; the majority were male (69%) with a mean pre-bronchodilator FEV(1) (% predicted) of 40.7%. The mean treatment differences between tiotropium 5 and 10 microg and placebo for the primary endpoint (mean trough FEV(1) response at week 12) were 0.118 and 0.149L, respectively (both P<0.0001). Treatment differences between tiotropium 5 and 10 microg and ipratropium were 0.064L (P=0.006) and 0.095L (P<0.0001). The increases in peak FEV(1), FEV(1) AUC((0-6h)) and FVC for both tiotropium doses were statistically superior to placebo (P<0.01) and higher than ipratropium. All active treatments significantly reduced the rescue medication use compared with placebo, but only tiotropium 10 microg was statistically superior to ipratropium (P=0.04). The incidence of adverse events was comparable across groups. In conclusion, tiotropium 5 and 10 microg daily, delivered via Respimat SMI, significantly improved lung function compared with ipratropium pMDI and placebo. Respimat (RMT) is a reusable, propellant-free, soft mist inhaler (SMI), a novel device for inhalation therapy. We conducted a three-period cross-over study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of cumulative doses of ipratropium bromide inhaled from RMT (Two dose levels) or from a pressurized metered dose inhaler (MDI), in 36 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The bronchodilator effect of ipratropium bromide was greater when administered via RMT (10 or 20 microg per puff, given double-blind within device, to total doses of 160 or 320 microg) than via MDI (20 microg per puff, total dose 320 microg). The bronchodilator effects of the 160 and 320 microg doses delivered via RMT were similar. Cumulative ipratropium bromide doses of 320 microg given via MDI or RMT and 160 microg given via RMT produced similar safety profiles. Between 45 min after the first drug inhalation and 45 min after the final dose, greater bronchodilatory effect was obtained from half the cumulative dose of ipratropium (RMT 10 microg per puff) when compared with the MDI (20 microg per puff). Therefore, ipratropium bromide delivered by RMT is as safe as, and can be more effective than, the MDI on acute administration in patients with COPD. Comparison of the bronchodilator response to an albuterol novel dry powder inhaler (DPI) (Clickhaler [CH]; ML Laboratories PLC; St. Albans, UK) activated at various inspiratory flow rates and to an albuterol pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) by patients with moderate to moderately severe stable asthma.
                Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of the bronchodilator response to albuterol DPI (200 microg) at inspiratory flow rates of approximately 15, 30, and 60 L/min in patients with stable asthma with demonstrated reversibility to albuterol. Active (albuterol via pMDI inhaled at 30 L/min) and placebo controls were included.
                Single center study at the chest/allergy unit of a teaching hospital in Canada.
                Sixteen patients with moderate to moderately severe stable asthma.
                Efficacy end points were FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC, maximum expiratory flow, and forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of vital capacity. Safety end points included heart rate, BP, and tremor. There was no significant difference between the bronchodilator response to albuterol via the CH at 15, 30, and 60 L/min inspiratory flow rate and, at all flow rates, no significant difference was found comparing albuterol CH with the pMDI. All of the techniques for delivering albuterol provided significantly better bronchodilatation than placebo. Adverse events were minimal and did not differ between CH and pMDI or between the various flow rates inhaled through the CH.
                A novel passive albuterol DPI (CH) provides a similar bronchodilator response at 15, 30, and 60 L/min inspiratory flow rates compared with a pMDI used optimally. The efficacy, persistence of bronchodilator action, and safety of the quaternary ammonium anticholinergic agent, ipratropium bromide (500 microgram), and placebo were compared when each was added in solution form to the beta-adrenergic agonist solution, metaproterenol sulfate (15 mg), and administered three times daily for 12 weeks to a total of 213 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Subjects had a mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of approximately 1 liter (37% of predicted) and were permitted to use nonanticholinergic therapy for COPD throughout the trial. The study was a randomized, double-blind, 85-day, parallel-group, eight-center study. On a 3 test days, 1, 43, and 85, mean peak responses for FEV1 and forced vital capacity and mean area under the curve were significantly higher for the iprathropium bromide-metaproterenol combination than for metaproterenol only. Duration of action was also significantly longer for the combination therapy than for the beta-agonist alone on test days 1 and 43. Neither treatment regimen produced an demonstrable effect on daily morning peak expiratory flow rates, reported respiratory symptoms, or quality of life. Both treatment regimens were similarly well tolerated with a comparable frequency of adverse events. These results suggest that the combination of iprathropium bromide and metaproterenol inhalation solutions offers a potential therapeutic advantage to patients with symptomatic COPD over nebulized metaproterenol alone without the risk of increased side effects. Combination therapy with a long-acting bronchodilator and an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) is recommended in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who have frequent exacerbations. The efficacy and tolerability of the combination of budesonide/formoterol have been demonstrated in patients with COPD when administered via the dry powder inhaler (DPI) in a 1-year study and when administered via the hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) in a 6-month study.
                This study assessed the long-term efficacy and tolerability of budesonide/formoterol HFA pMDI in patients with moderate to very severe COPD.
                This was a 12-month, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, active- and placebo-controlled, multicentre study (NCT00206167) of 1, 964 patients aged >or =40 years with moderate to very severe COPD conducted from 2005 to 2007 at 237 sites in the US, Europe and Mexico. After 2 weeks of treatment based on previous therapy (ICSs, short-acting bronchodilators allowed), patients received one of the following treatments twice daily: budesonide/formoterol pMDI 160/4.5 microg x two inhalations (320/9 microg); budesonide/formoterol pMDI 80/4.5 microg x two inhalations (160/9 microg); formoterol DPI 4.5 microg x two inhalations (9 microg); or placebo.
                The co-primary efficacy variables were pre-dose forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and 1-hour post-dose FEV1. .
                Budesonide/formoterol 320/9 microg demonstrated greater improvements in pre-dose FEV1 versus formoterol (p = 0.008), and both budesonide/formoterol doses demonstrated greater improvements in 1-hour post-dose FEV1 versus placebo (p < 0.001). The rate of COPD exacerbations was lower in both budesonide/formoterol groups compared with formoterol and placebo (p <or= 0.004). Both budesonide/formoterol doses were more effective than placebo (p <or= 0.006) for controlling dyspnoea and improving health status (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire). All treatments were generally well tolerated. The incidence of pneumonia was not different for active (3.4-4.0%) and placebo (5.0%) groups.
                Budesonide/formoterol pMDI (320/9 microg and 160/9 microg) improved pulmonary function and reduced symptoms and exacerbations over 1 year in patients with moderate to very severe COPD. Only budesonide/formoterol pMDI 320/9 microg demonstrated greater efficacy for both co-primary variables compared with formoterol DPI 9 microg. Both budesonide/formoterol pMDI dosages were well tolerated relative to formoterol and placebo. Combination bronchodilator therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is available widely throughout the world except in North America. Previous studies have yielded conflicting results regarding the advantages of combining anticholinergic therapy with sympathomimetic therapy in COPD. We report the results of a 12-week prospective, double-blind, parallel-group evaluation of the use of the following: albuterol, a beta-adrenergic agent; ipratropium, an anticholinergic agent; or a combination of the two, administered by metered-dose inhaler to patients with moderately severe stable COPD. Following baseline studies, 534 patients were given one of the three test bronchodilator preparations to be used at home four times daily in addition to oral theophylline and corticosteroids as required. The doses of the latter two drugs were kept stable. Subjects were tested on days 1, 29, 57, and 85. Analysis of 1-s forced expiratory volume (FEV1) curves on those test days indicated that the combination was superior to either single agent alone in peak effect, in the effect during the first 4 h after dosing, and in the total area under the curve of the FEV1 response. The mean peak percent increases in FEV1 over baseline on the four test days were 31 to 33 percent for the combination, 24 to 25 percent for ipratropium, and 24 to 27 percent for albuterol. The differences between the combination and its components were statistically significant on all test days. The AUC0-4 means for the combination were 21 to 44 percent greater than the ipratropium means and 30 to 46 percent greater than the albuterol means. Similar changes were noted in the forced vital capacity curves. Symptom scores did not change over time and did not differ among the treatment groups. We conclude that the combination of ipratropium and albuterol, when given by metered-dose inhaler to patients with COPD, is more effective than either of the two agents alone. The advantage of the combination is apparent primarily during the first 4 h after administration. The availability of combination therapy by metered-dose inhaler should help to improve patient compliance. To investigate the additive effect of oral theophylline on combined inhaled anticholinergic agent and beta 2-agonist therapy, 12 patients with stable COPD (64.6 +/- 5.9 years) completed a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled crossover trial of oral theophylline for a 4-week period (400 mg for 2 weeks, followed by 600 mg for 2 weeks). All of the patients continued to inhale both salbutamol, 200 micrograms, and ipratropium bromide, 40 micrograms, using a metered-dose inhaler four times a day. Spirometry was assessed before, and 15 and 60 min after the inhalation of bronchodilators at 2-week intervals. Even after the inhalation of salbutamol and ipratropium, theophylline significantly improved FEV1 and daily peak expiratory flow rate compared with the placebo. No significant improvement in the daily symptom scores for cough, sputum, wheezing, or shortness of breath was observed throughout the different phases of treatment. This study shows that the additive bronchodilating effect of theophylline, when used in combination with salbutamol, 200 micrograms, and ipratropium, 40 micrograms, is significant but small in stable COPD. The addition of theophylline did not significantly improve the patient's symptoms. Oral theophylline, when used in combination with an inhaled anticholinergic agent and an inhaled beta 2-agonist, may be of limited value in the treatment of stable COPD. Single dose studies have assessed the utility of ipratropium bromide alone or with beta agonists in the short- and long-term management of chronic obstructive lung disease and asthma. We performed a randomized, double-blind trial to assess the incremental benefit over 24 hours of adding ipratropium vs placebo to a standardized regimen of medications commonly used in the acute and subsequent hospital management of COPD and asthma. Sixty-eight subjects received nebulized salbutamol, intravenous methylprednisolone, intravenous aminophylline, and antibiotics and were randomized to receive either 80 micrograms of ipratropium or placebo via metered dose inhaler and spacing device with each salbutamol treatment (6 to 8 times per day). Among the 50 patients who completed the study, there were no significant differences between ipratropium and placebo groups with respect to baseline FEV1, FVC, and PaCO2. The improvement of FEV1 from baseline to 24 hours was 294 (SD = 568) ml in the ipratropium group vs 393 (SD = 622) ml in placebo group. Adjusting FEV1 by age, gender, and smoking did not significantly alter the findings. Those with an admission diagnosis of asthma showed larger 24 hour FEV1 responses (487 ml in ipratropium vs 801 ml in placebo) than those with COPD (149 ml ipratropium vs 102 ml in placebo). However, within these two strata, there were no significant differences in FEV1 improvement between ipratropium and placebo groups. This study suggests that if ipratropium is used in the initial emergency treatment of COPD or asthma, it could safely be discontinued by 24 hours in order to reduce the cost and complexity of therapy. Two 1-year studies evaluated the long-term efficacy and safety of tiotropium 5 or 10 microg versus placebo, inhaled via the Respimat Soft Mist Inhaler (SMI). The two studies were combined and had 4 co-primary endpoints (trough FEV(1) response, Mahler Transition Dyspnea Index [TDI] and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire scores all at week 48, and COPD exacerbations per patient-year). A total of 1990 patients with COPD participated (mean FEV(1): 1.09 L). The mean trough FEV(1) response of tiotropium 5 or 10 microg relative to placebo was 127 or 150 mL, respectively (both P < 0.0001). The COPD exacerbation rate was significantly lower with tiotropium 5 microg (RR = 0.78; P = 0.002) and tiotropium 10 microg (RR = 0.73; P = 0.0008); the health-related quality of life and Mahler TDI co-primary endpoints were significantly improved with both doses (both P < 0.0001). Adverse events were generally balanced except anticholinergic class effects, which were more frequent with active treatment. Fatal events occurred in 2.4% (5 microg), 2.7% (10 microg), and 1.6% (placebo) of patients; these differences were not significant. Tiotropium Respimat SMI 5 microg demonstrated sustained improvements in patients with COPD relative to placebo and similar to the 10 microg dose but with a lower frequency of anticholinergic adverse events.
In patients with stable COPD, pMDI produced similar outcomes to a dry powder device for delivering beta2-agonists, but the very small number of studies and included patients does not permit firm conclusions to be drawn. The soft mist device for ipratropium was more effective than a pMDI, but the data come from one small study. There need to be further well designed randomised controlled trials to define the role of inhaler devices using bronchodilators in stable COPD.