The effect of spinal manipulation on pain and prostaglandin levels in women with primary dysmenorrhea. Spinal manipulative therapy versus a low force mimic maneuver for women with primary dysmenorrhea: a randomized, observer-blinded, clinical trial. [Chronic low back pain and vertebral manipulation]. Psychological treatments of dysmenorrhea: differential effectiveness for spasmodics and congestives. [Magnesium--a new therapeutic alternative in primary dysmenorrhea]. The amelioration of the suffering associated with spinal cord injury with subperception transcranial electrical stimulation. Randomized controlled trial assessing a traditional Chinese medicine remedy in the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea. Curative treatment of primary (spasmodic) dysmenorrhoea. A sham-controlled, phase II trial of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of central pain in traumatic spinal cord injury.
The primary objectives of this study were to compare the effect of spinal manipulation vs. sham manipulation on a) circulating plasma levels of the prostaglandin F2a metabolite, 15-keto-13,14-dihydroprostaglandin (KDPGF2a), b) perceived abdominal and back pain and c) perceived menstrual distress in women with primary dysmenorrhea.
                This randomized clinical pilot study investigated the outcome measures before and after either a spinal manipulation treatment (SMT) or a sham manipulation.
                All subjects were treated at the National College Chiropractic clinic, a private chiropractic clinic in the suburban Chicago area.
                Forty-five women with a history of primary dysmenorrhea were recruited from the local community. The volunteers ranged in age from 20-49 (mean age = 30.3 yr), and were entered into the study between April 1990 and January 1991. Twenty-four were randomly assigned to the spinal manipulation group and 21 were assigned to the sham group.
                Subjects treated with spinal manipulation were placed in a side-lying position with the bottom leg straight and the top leg flexed at the knee and hip. They received a high-velocity, short lever, low-amplitude thrust to all clinically relevant vertebral levels within T10 and L5-S1 and the sacroiliac joints. In the sham manipulation, subjects were placed in a side-lying position with both hips and knees flexed. Their manipulation consisted of a similar thrust administered to the midline base of the sacrum.
                Perceived abdominal and back pain were measured with a visual analog scale, and menstrual distress was measured with the Menstrual Distress Questionnaire. Both were administered 15 min before and 60 min after treatment. Blood samples were collected by venipuncture for the determination of plasma levels of KDPGF2a at the same times. The plasma was then assayed for KDPGF2a by radioimmunoassay.
                Analysis of covariance and paired Student's t tests were used for the statistical evaluation. Immediately after treatment, the perception of pain and the level of menstrual distress were significantly reduced by SMT. This reduction was associated with a significant reduction in plasma levels of KDGPF2a in the SMT group. A significant and similar reduction in plasma KDPGF2a also occurred in the sham group, indicating that a placebo effect was associated with a single sham intervention.
                This randomized pilot study suggests that SMT may be an effective and safe nonpharmacological alternative for relieving the pain and distress of primary dysmenorrhea. However, the large change in KDPGF2a observed in both treatment groups clearly indicates that further studies with more subjects, studied over a longer time frame, are needed to resolve the question of a placebo effect. Non-drug therapies for women with primary dysmenorrhea are primarily based on anecdotal evidence and small-scale clinical studies. This randomized, observer-blinded, clinical trial evaluated the efficacy of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) in the treatment of women with primary dysmenorrhea. Women were recruited from the Chicago metropolitan area and evaluated for inclusion through four screening levels. One hundred thirty eight women, ages 18-45, with primary dysmenorrhea diagnosed by participating gynecologists, were randomly assigned to either SMT or a low-force mimic (LFM) maneuver. No treatment occurred at menstrual cycle 1. Treatment for both groups took place on day 1 of cycles 2, 3 and 4, and prophylactic treatment of three visits took place during the 7 days before cycles 3 and 4. Main outcome measures were the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and plasma concentration of the prostaglandin F2alpha metabolite, 15-keto-13,14-dihydro-prostaglandin F2alpha (KDPGF2alpha), measured 15 min before treatment and 60 min after treatment on day 1 of four consecutive menstrual cycles. The Moos' Menstrual Distress Questionnaire (MDQ) was also administered after treatment on day 1 of each cycle. At cycle 2, the post-treatment VAS scores decreased for both groups, with no statistically significant difference in pre- to post-treatment scores between the two groups (P = 0.44). The changes in pre- to post-treatment KDPGF2alpha levels were not statistically different between the SMT and LFM groups (P = 0.15). No treatment effects were detected over the three cycles for VAS, KDPGF2alpha or MDQ (P = 0.65, P = 0.61 and P = 0.78, respectively). However, there were statistically significant linear time effects for VAS (P = 0.008), MDQ (P < 0.001), and borderline significance for KDPGF2alpha (P = 0.054); these decreases were not considered clinically meaningful. The LFM maneuver used in this study was designed to act as a 'placebo-like' control treatment in comparison with SMT. Although it is possible that the trial did not continue long enough for any placebo effect of the LFM to wash out, it seems more likely that this maneuver was indistinguishable from SMT. Therefore, the postulated superior benefit of high-velocity, short-lever, low-amplitude, high-force spinal manipulation to a low-force maneuver is not supported by the results of this study. 1999 International Association for the Study of Pain. This study examined the short-term effectiveness of vertebral manipulation for treating chronic low back pain and disability.
                Sixty-four patients were randomly assigned into two groups. One group received 4 true vertebral manipulations (VMG), and the other group received sham manipulations (sham-VMG) under the same conditions as for the first technique. Patients formulated assessments after the manipulations and 1 month later.
                Sixty-four patients participated in the study. Patients receiving the true manipulations showed significant improvement in pain (visual analogic scale score decrease from 71.8+/-18.11 to 49.37+/-16.78; P<0.001) and function (Oswestry scale score decrease from 15.59+/-6.03 to 12.25+/-5.69; P<0.001). Pain improvement persisted at the second month (P=0.01). The improvement was more evident in the VMG than the sham-VMG. No change in perceived disability was observed in the sham-VMG.
                Our study confirms the efficiency of short-term vertebral manipulation for treating chronic low back pain. The assessment of vertebral manipulation effectiveness is difficult. This manual therapy must be preceeded by a specific clinical exam performed by a trained physician. Two studies are reported, examining the effectiveness of psychological treatments for dysmenorrhea. In Experiment 1, 33 women with spasmodic dysmenorrhea were treated with relaxation alone, or relaxation plus imagery, or assigned to a waiting-list control condition; and 29 women with congestive dysmenorrhea were treated with relaxation alone, or assigned to a waiting-list control condition. In Experiment 2, 18 additional congestives were treated with a coping skills package, or this package plus relaxation; these two groups were compared with the two congestive groups from Experiment 1. The dependent measures were reports of symptom severity, general discomfort, resting time, and medication use. Consistent with the literature, the main findings of the present studies are: (a) relaxation training (alone or with imagery) effectively reduces resting time for spasmodics; and (b) none of the treatments was shown to be effective for congestive sufferers. 50 patients suffering from primary dysmenorrhoea were treated with Magnesium (Mg 5-longoral, Artesan GmbH) in a double-blind study. After a six-month period 21 out of 25 women showed a decline of symptoms, only 4 ones reported no therapeutical effect. For monitoring treatment results prostaglandin F2 alpha (PGF2 alpha) was measured every second month. On Mg-therapy conditions we achieved a reduction of PGF2 alpha in menstrual blood to 45% of value before treatment started. As against that 90% of basic concentration were estimated from women who received a placebo. Probably, the specific therapeutical effect of Mg based on inhibition of biosynthesis of PGF2 alpha but also on its direct muscle relaxant and vasodilatory effect. Beside the PG-synthesis and ovulation inhibitors the use of Magnesium is a potential, natural opportunity to treat primary dysmenorrhoea, which is widely free of side effects. Double blind, partial crossover.
                To evaluate the analgesic activity of a novel cranial electrostimulus in people with spinal cord injury (SCI).
                Hereward College, a residential centre that provides educational facilities for students with disabilities.
                Subjects with SCI experiencing chronic pain were randomly assigned into two groups, one of which received sham and the other transcranial electrostimulation treatment (TCET) on two occasions daily for four successive days. After a 'wash-out' period of 8 weeks all subjects returned and received the identical stimulus that the treated cohort received on the first arm of the study.
                Pain measurements applied before and after each session indicated that the pain decreased in the treated group to 51% of that reported at the commencement of treatment; reported pain intensity did not decrease significantly in the sham treated subjects. The same (sham) subject group reported experiencing 59% of the pain at the end of the second arm of the study (TCET) as on the first arm (sham). No significant differences were determined between the mood of all subjects estimated before and after each sham or TCET treatment session. The reported analgesic, and combined antidepressant and anxiolytic drug use in subjects receiving TCET on the second arm of the study, was 46% and 53% respectively of the average pre-study drug use. No similar decrease in the use of the drugs was noted in the same subjects after sham treatment on the first arm of the study. Salivary cortisol determinations made prior to and after each sham and treatment session implicated this corticoid in the pain-relieving mode of action of the treatment, but could not be associated with any changes in mood. Subjects receiving TCET had significantly higher urinary 3-methoxy-4-hydroxy-phenylglycol (MHPG) output after the TCET treatment period than sham stimulation, implicating increased central noradrenaline (NA) metabolism in the observed effects.
                The subjects reported less pain during, and immediately after receiving this transcranial treatment, although they were using less medication than when receiving sham treatment. A proof-of-concept study to assess the safety and efficacy of a traditional Chinese medicine formula as treatment for primary dysmenorrhea showed no statistically significant benefit over placebo. However, some efficacy parameters suggested possible superiority of the active treatment and so a larger study needs to be performed to determine whether this remedy has a role in the treatment of dysmenorrhea. To prove the efficacy of oral vitamin B1 administration for the treatment of primary dysmenorrhoea, a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was carried out on 556 girls aged 12-21 yr, having moderate to very severe spasmodic dysmenorrhoea. Thiamine hydrochloride (vitamin B1) was given in a dose of 100 mg orally, daily for 90 days. The combined final results of both the 'active treatment first' group and the 'placebo first' group, after 90 days of vitamin B1 administration, were 87 per cent completely cured, 8 per cent relieved (pain almost nil to reduced) and 5 per cent showed no effect whatsoever. The results remained the same two months later as well when no drug was administered. Unlike all the current treatments which are suppression-oriented, this curative treatment directly treats the cause, is free from side effects, is inexpensive and easy to administer. Past evidence has shown that motor cortical stimulation with invasive and non-invasive brain stimulation is effective to relieve central pain. Here we aimed to study the effects of another, very safe technique of non-invasive brain stimulation--transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)--on pain control in patients with central pain due to traumatic spinal cord injury. Patients were randomized to receive sham or active motor tDCS (2mA, 20 min for 5 consecutive days). A blinded evaluator rated the pain using the visual analogue scale for pain, Clinician Global Impression and Patient Global Assessment. Safety was assessed with a neuropsychological battery and confounders with the evaluation of depression and anxiety changes. There was a significant pain improvement after active anodal stimulation of the motor cortex, but not after sham stimulation. These results were not confounded by depression or anxiety changes. Furthermore, cognitive performance was not significantly changed throughout the trial in both treatment groups. The results of our study suggest that this new approach of cortical stimulation can be effective to control pain in patients with spinal cord lesion. We discuss potential mechanisms for pain amelioration after tDCS, such as a secondary modulation of thalamic nuclei activity.
There is no evidence to suggest that spinal manipulation is effective in the treatment of dysmenorrhoea. In the one trial reporting on adverse effects there was no greater risk of such events with spinal compared with sham manipulation.