Sertraline as a first-line treatment for cholestatic pruritus. Topical capsaicin for treatment of hemodialysis-related pruritus. Kappa-opioid system in uremic pruritus: multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical studies. A pramoxine-based anti-itch lotion is more effective than a control lotion for the treatment of uremic pruritus in adult hemodialysis patients. Oral naltrexone treatment for cholestatic pruritus: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. House-dust mite sublingual-swallow immunotherapy in perennial conjunctivitis: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Paroxetine in the treatment of severe non-dermatological pruritus: a randomized, controlled trial. A clinical trial of hydrocortisone/potassium hydroxyquinoline sulphate ('Quinocort') in the treatment of infected eczema and impetigo in general practice. A controlled trial of ondansetron in the pruritus of cholestasis.
Pruritus is frequently the most debilitating symptom of cholestatic liver diseases. Moreover, existing therapies are often ineffective. Recent small, retrospective case series reports suggest that serotonin reuptake inhibitors can improve pruritus. This study was undertaken to establish the dose of sertraline and to evaluate its efficacy for cholestatic pruritus. Twenty one subjects with chronic pruritus due to liver disease (including primary biliary cirrhosis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, chronic hepatitis C, and postnecrotic cirrhosis) initially underwent an open-label, dose escalation to determine the dose with optimal efficacy and tolerability. After a washout period, 12 of the subjects entered a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Participants quantified their pruritus using a 0-10 visual analog scale, and pruritus was assessed for distribution, timing, degree of disability, and physical evidence of scratching. The optimum sertraline dose (75-100 mg/day) was well tolerated. In the controlled portion of the study, itch scores improved in patients taking sertraline, but worsened in patients taking placebo (P=0.009). Changes in itch distribution, duration, direction, and physical evidence of scratching paralleled changes in the visual analog pruritus score.
                Sertraline seems to be an effective, well-tolerated treatment for pruritus due to chronic liver disease. These results suggest that serotonergic pathways are important in the perception of itch. Pruritus is a significant problem for many patients undergoing long-term hemodialysis. Topical capsaicin depletes and prevents the reaccumulation of substance P in peripheral sensory neurons. Substance P functions in the transmission of pain and probably itch sensations. An open-label, uncontrolled trial and a double-blind, vehicle-controlled trial were conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of capsaicin 0.025% cream in the treatment of localized areas of pruritus in patients undergoing long-term hemodialysis. Eight of nine evaluable patients in the open-label trial reported marked relief or complete resolution of itching during the study period, and two of five evaluable patients in the double-blind trial reported complete resolution of itching in the capsaicin-treated arm with no or minimal improvement in the vehicle-treated arm. Twelve patients in the open-label trial and two in the double-blind trial were unevaluable. No serious treatment-related adverse reactions occurred. Uremic pruritus is a very common and frustrating condition for both patients and clinicians because no treatment has been demonstrated to be effective in relieving the itch. In this report, nalfurafine, a new kappa-opioid receptor agonist, was used to treat uremic pruritus in patients who were undergoing routine hemodialysis. Two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies enrolled 144 patients with uremic pruritus to postdialysis intravenous treatment with either nalfurafine or placebo for 2 to 4 wk. A meta-analysis approach was used to assess the efficacy of nalfurafine. Statistically significant reductions in worst itching (P = 0.0212), itching intensity (P = 0.0410), and sleep disturbances (P = 0.0003) were noted in the nalfurafine group as compared with placebo. Improvements in itching (P = 0.0025) and excoriations (P = 0.0060) were noted for the nalfurafine-treated patients. Nalfurafine showed similar types and incidences of drug-related adverse events as did placebo. Nalfurafine was shown to be an effective and safe compound for use in this severely ill patient population. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a commercially available anti-itch lotion containing 1% pramoxine hydrochloride versus control lotion in the treatment of uremic pruritus in adult hemodialysis patients.
                This was a randomized, double-blind, controlled comparative trial set in a community hemodialysis center. The study population comprised 28 individuals (mean age 53.5) with moderate to severe uremic pruritus who had been receiving hemodialysis for at least 3 months. All participants were recruited from one community hemodialysis center. Topical anti-itch lotion containing 1% pramoxine was applied twice daily to all affected areas of pruritus for 4 weeks. The main outcome measure was a reduction in itch intensity. Secondary outcomes included increases in the investigator's global assessment and improvement in skin hydration.
                There was a 61% decrease in itch intensity in the treatment group, whereas a 12% reduction in itch intensity was observed in the control group. The rate of decline in itching was also greater in the treatment arm versus the control arm. No significant differences were displayed in other studied disease-related variables.
                Our study shows that individuals using pramoxine 1% lotion experienced a reduction in pruritus to a greater degree than those using the control lotion. This safe, convenient and effective topical lotion may potentially benefit the large number of patients affected by pruritus associated with end-stage renal disease. The efficacy of currently available therapeutic agents for cholestatic pruritus is often disappointing. The aim of this study was to assess the antipruritic effect of naltrexone, an oral opiate receptor antagonist.
                Sixteen patients with pruritus of chronic cholestasis were randomized to receive naltrexone (4-week course of 50 mg naltrexone daily) or placebo. Pruritus, quality of sleep, fatigue (using visual analogue scales), side effects, and liver function were assessed every 2 weeks. Serum naltrexone and 6 beta-naltrexol concentrations in all patients and 5 healthy controls were measured during the first day of naltrexone treatment.
                Mean changes with respect to baseline were significantly different, in favor of the naltrexone group, for daytime itching (-54% vs. 8%; P < 0.001) and nighttime itching (-44% vs. 7%, P = 0.003). In 4 naltrexone-treated patients, side effects (transient in 3 cases) consistent with an opiate withdrawal syndrome were noted. No deterioration of the underlying disease was observed. Naltrexone and 6 beta-naltrexol levels did not differ between patients and controls, and there was no significant association with treatment response.
                For patients with cholestatic liver disease and itching, refractory to regular antipruritic therapy, oral naltrexone may be an effective and well-tolerated alternative. The safety and the efficacy of sublingual-swallow immunotherapy (SLIT) in perennial conjunctivitis caused by house dust mite were evaluated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study including 60 patients for 24 months.
                Patients received either placebo or SLIT with standardized Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (D.pt.) and D. farinae (D.f.) 50/50 extract. The evaluation of the efficacy of the SLIT was obtained by using standardized D. pteronyssinus (D.pt.) extracts on the antigen-specific conjunctival provocation test (CPT). Specific CPT, skin sensitivity and serum-specific IgE were performed before starting treatment and 6, 12, 18 and 24 months.
                Of the 60 patients included, only 45 completed the study (26 in the active group and 19 in the placebo group, P < 0.05). Two out of 30 (6.6%) patients dropped out because of insufficient efficacy in the active group compared to eight out of 30 (26.6%) in the placebo group (P < 0.05). There was a significant increase in the antigen threshold required to obtain a positive CPT from 8.2 IR [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.9-11.4] at baseline to 21.7 IR (95% CI 15.4-30.4) at 2 years (M24) in the active group, compared to 8.1 IR (95% CI 5.4-12.1) at baseline to 8.1 IR (95% CI 5.1-12.4) at M24 in the placebo group (P < 0.04 for overall treatment difference, P < 10-7 for the time-treatment interaction; repeated measures ANOVA). Differences between groups at individual time points were significant from 18 months on. Despite increased antigen concentrations, CPT scores were lower overall in the active than in the placebo group (P < 0.001). No serious adverse effects were reported.
                SLIT effectively increased the antigenic threshold required to obtain a positive CPT to house-dust mite antigen. Tolerance to and innocuity of SLIT were comparable to previous studies. This could justify recommending SLIT for the preventive treatment of perennial conjunctivitis caused by house dust mites. Severe pruritus may be an idiopathic phenomenon or associated with advanced systemic disease. It is one of the most distressing and difficult to treat symptoms. Uncontrolled studies have suggested that, in patients experiencing severe pruritus, paroxetine appeared to have a rapid anti-pruritic effect. This study was a prospective double-blind, randomized within patient comparison of paroxetine and placebo. The intensity of pruritus was measured subjectively with a numerical analogue scale. The primary endpoint of the trial was the mean pruritus score, measured for seven days after randomization and after cross-over. The secondary endpoint was individual global response to the treatment. Response was defined as at least 50% reduction of intensity of pruritus in the last three days of the treatment period vs. baseline. Adverse effects and patient satisfaction and preferences were also recorded. Twenty-six patients were included in the study; 17 of them had solid tumors, 4 had hematological malignancies and 5 had various nonmalignant or idiopathic conditions. Eight patients had drug-induced pruritus (none opioid-induced), 7 patients had paraneoplastic pruritus and 3 had cholestatic pruritus. After a run-in period, patients were randomly assigned to treatment with 20 mg paroxetine or placebo. The crossover took place after 7 days. Two patients discontinued treatment because of adverse effects of paroxetine. Twenty-four patients treated with paroxetine had lower pruritus intensity scores over the 7 treatment periods (mean+/-SE=5.2+/-0.32) as compared to placebo (mean+/-SE=6.0+/-0.32). Mean difference between placebo and paroxetine was 0.78 (95% CI=0.37-1.19). Nine of twenty-four patients (37.5%) fulfilled criteria of response. The onset of anti-pruritic action was observed usually after 2-3 days, irrespective of the order of treatment. The outcome of this study indicates that paroxetine is effective in the treatment of severe pruritus of non-dermatological origin. A double-blind, multi-centre study was carried out in general practice in 76 patients with infected eczema and 43 with impetigo to assess the effectiveness and acceptability of treatment with 1% hydrocortisone plus 0.5% potassium hydroxyquinoline sulphate cream compared with that of 1% hydrocortisone plus 2% miconazole nitrate cream. Patients were allocated at random to receive treatment with one or other preparation, applied twice daily, over a period of 2 weeks. Assessments were made of total symptom severity scores on entry and at the end of each week, as also were bacteriological investigations. The results showed that both combinations produced marked clinical and bacteriological improvement or cure in approximately 90% of patients with infected eczema and the success rate was similar with each preparation. In the case of patients with impetigo, hydrocortisone/potassium hydroxyquinoline sulphate proved significantly more effective than the other combination, the success rates being 92% and 74%, respectively. Patient assessment of the two topical preparations in terms of greasiness, odour and staining showed that, whilst both were considered acceptable by most, there was a trend in favour of the hydrocortisone/potassium hydroxyquinoline sulphate cream. No systemic or local side-effects were reported. In patients with pruritus of cholestasis, response to conventional drug treatment may be unsatisfactory. Activation of 5-hydroxytryptamine receptors on dermal sensory nerve-endings plays a role in the perception of pruritus. The 5-hydroxytryptamine(3) receptor antagonist, ondansetron, has been used in the treatment of pruritus of cholestasis, but there are few controlled data.
                To determine whether ondansetron is effective in treating the pruritus of cholestasis.
                A total of 19 patients with resistant pruritus were randomized, double blind, to receive either ondansetron 8 mg or placebo as a single intravenous bolus, followed by oral ondansetron 8 mg or placebo twice daily for 5 days. Patients' perception of pruritus was recorded hourly using a visual analogue scale, and scratching activity measured by means of a piezo-electric crystal attached to the fingernail.
                Mean pruritus score using visual analogue scale and scratching activity were reduced on the first treatment day compared with baseline in both the ondansetron and placebo groups (P < 0.05), but there were no significant differences in mean pruritus perception or scratching activity between the two groups.
                Ondansetron was of no benefit in this group of pruritic patients during short-term treatment.
The findings of this review indicate that the number of systemic and topical drugs used for the different subforms of pruritus is increasing. Different interventions have been shown to be effective in the treatment of pruritus of different origins. Nevertheless, an optimal therapy for pruritus is constrained due to the limited understanding of crucial itch mediators and receptors in the various subforms of itch. Ideal antipruritic therapies are still lacking, especially for palliative care patients.
This systematic review also indicates that there is insufficient evidence to give any concrete recommendations regarding treatment of pruritus in palliative care patients. Due to the very small sample sizes and poor methodological quality of the majority of studies that were included, the results of this review need to be interpreted with caution. Furthermore, the generalizability is questionable. Additional studies, and particularly carefully designed treatment trials, are needed to provide valid evidence for adequate treatment of pruritus in palliative care patients.