The effects of Frankel's function regulator (FR-4) therapy on the treatment of Angle Class I skeletal anterior open bite malocclusion. Anterior open bite treatment with magnets. Randomized effectiveness study of four therapeutic strategies for TMJ closed lock. Long-term follow-up of early treatment of unilateral forced posterior cross-bite. Orofacial status. Assisted feeding is more reliable for infants with clefts--a randomized trial. Evaluation of non-invasive treatment applied to occlusal surfaces. The nature of feeding in infants with unrepaired cleft lip and/or palate compared with healthy noncleft infants. Effect of elimination of occlusal interferences on signs and symptoms of craniomandibular disorder in young adults. A clinical investigation of the correction of unilateral first molar crossbite with a transpalatal arch.
The present study attempts to evaluate cephalometrically the effects of Fränkel's function regulator (FR-4) appliance on the treatment of Angle Class I skeletal anterior open bite malocclusion. Forty Turkish children (26 girls and 14 boys), with Angle Class I skeletal anterior open bite, were randomly divided into two groups of 20 (13 girls and 7 boys). Patients who had not undergone treatment served as the control group, whereas a second group was treated with lip-seal training and the FR-4 appliance. Chronologic mean decimal age at initial period of the investigation was 8.7 years in the treated group, and 8.9 years in the control group. Treatment and observation periods were 2 years. Investigation was carried out on lateral cephalograms taken before and after the study period. The results indicate that a spontaneous downward and backward growth direction of the mandible observed in the control group could be changed to a upward and forward direction by FR-4 therapy. The skeletal anterior open bite was successfully corrected through upward and forward mandibular rotation. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of repelling magnets on the treatment of anterior open bite and compare them with the effects of acrylic posterior bite-blocks. Twenty patients, aged 9-16 years with skeletal anterior open bite, were randomly divided into two groups. In one group the patients wore posterior repelling magnet splints and in the other they wore acrylic posterior bite-blocks of the same thickness as the magnet splints. The patients were instructed to use their appliance as much as possible (the minimum accepted being 18 hours daily) during a 6-month period. Dental casts, intra-oral photos, and lateral cephalograms were taken before and after treatment, and the patients were also examined regularly to identify the development of any craniomandibular disorders. In the first group, the dental and skeletal vertical relation responded quickly to the magnet treatment. The open bite was generally closed in just under 4 months, especially in patients in early mixed dentition. Spacing in the labial segments decreased in some cases, while slight crowding was induced in others. Transverse problems, i.e. unilateral cross-bite, sometimes followed by scissor-bite on the opposite side, was observed in those patients who were in the early mixed dentition and had used the magnets intensively. The patients who wore acrylic posterior bite-blocks also showed improvement in the dental and skeletal vertical relationships, especially during the first months. This was followed by a 'plateau' period. No transverse problems were found in these patients. For individuals with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc displacement without reduction with limited mouth opening (closed lock), interventions vary from minimal treatment to surgery. In a single-blind trial, 106 individuals with TMJ closed lock were randomized among medical management, rehabilitation, arthroscopic surgery with post-operative rehabilitation, or arthroplasty with post-operative rehabilitation. Evaluations at baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 60 months used the Craniomandibular Index (CMI) and Symptom Severity Index (SSI) for jaw function and TMJ pain respectively. Using an intention-to-treat analysis, we observed no between-group difference at any follow-up for CMI (p > or = 0.33) or SSI (p > or = 0.08). Both outcomes showed within-group improvement (p < 0.0001) for all groups. The findings of this study suggest that primary treatment for individuals with TMJ closed lock should consist of medical management or rehabilitation. The use of this approach will avoid unnecessary surgical procedures. Twenty-nine subjects, 20 years old on average and all treated at 4 years of age for unilateral forced posterior dento-alveolar cross-bite by grinding or by expansion of the upper dental arch, were clinically examined to evaluate the long-term effects of their treatment. The frequency of successful treatment-indicated as stable correction of the cross-bite-by means of only 1 treatment sequence was 59%; by grinding, 57%; and by expansion, 60%. The 18 subjects that had only been treated at the age of 4 years formed the 'early group' in our study. Eleven of our subjects had been retreated later in the mixed or permanent dentition because of a relapse of the unilateral forced posterior cross-bite and formed the 'late group'. A significantly higher frequency of mouth breathing, breathing obstacles, and snoring was found in this group. According to our clinical investigation, 2 of the subjects in our cohort still had a unilateral forced posterior cross-bite. Our findings regarding masticatory performance, bite force, and endurance showed no significant differences between the initial cross-bite and the healthy sides or between the early and the late group subjects, which showed that the masticatory function of the treated subjects was symmetrical. Grinding and expansion treatments seem to display similar success rates in the long-term regarding correction of unilateral posterior forced cross-bite. To compare the effectiveness of squeezable and rigid feeding bottles for infants with clefts.
                Patients were randomly assigned at birth to feeding with a squeezable bottle (assisted feeding) or to feeding with a rigid bottle and were followed for 1 year. The data were analyzed on the basis of intention to treat.
                The trial was conducted within the existing arrangements for hospital and home care for children with clefts within the National Health Service in the north of England.
                The patients were 101 consecutively born children with cleft lip and/or palate who were otherwise healthy. All patients completed the trial. Two were excluded from the analysis when unrelated developmental problems became apparent.
                Anthropometric measures-nude weight, crown-heel length (CHL), and occipito-frontal circumference (OFC)-were recorded.
                There were statistically significant differences between the two groups in weight at 12 months (p = .038, with an adjusted mean difference of 0.43 kg) and in head circumference (p = .004 with an adjusted mean difference of 0.77 cm), indicating increased growth in the squeezable bottle group. The difference in CHL was not significant at conventional levels (p = .082). Whereas 25 of 52 (48%) rigid bottles required modification by the health visitor, this was needed for only 4 of 49 (8%) squeezable bottles. There was a highly significant difference when numbers of modifications for each method were compared (p < .0001). Despite modifications, six infants feeding with a rigid bottle (11%) were transferred to a squeezable bottle due to problems with feeding, but none were transferred from squeezable to rigid bottles. Thus, the squeezable bottle generally appeared to be a more satisfactory method, requiring less support or intervention after initial instruction.
                Both feeding methods achieved similar anthropometric outcomes, with a beneficial effect on head circumference and weight in the assisted feeding group. We recommend that this last observation be treated with caution. The squeezable bottles were easier to use, and we recommend that they be routinely prescribed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of non-invasive methods of treatment for active incipent occlusal caries. Anamnesis, professional prophylaxis, and visual inspection were used to classify 250 Brazilian pre-school-children. First permanent decayed molars (n=98) from thirty-one subjects (6 years+ 6 months) were selected and divided into three groups. Group 1: fissure sealants with resin-modified glass ionomer - Vitremer (n=29); Group 2: fluoride varnish -Duraphat (n=36) and control group: tooth brushing and 0.2 percent NaF weekly mouthwashes (n=33). Four clinical evaluations were carried out over three, six, nine, and twelve months. Caries activity and progression were observed through clinical and radiographic evaluation. The results were analyzed by Fisher=s Exact test. After twelve months, the results showed 100 percent of arrestment of caries activity for Group 1, 83.3 percent for group 2, and 72.7 percent for control group. At the same time, the results showed 0 percent of caries progression for group 1, 5.5 percent for Group 2, and 6.1 percent for control group. Group 1 showed a better inactivation property than the other groups (p<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in caries progression among these groups (p>0.05). It was concluded that this non-invasive methods were able to arrest the progression of occlusal caries, but fissure sealant showed better results in controlling caries activity. Feeding difficulties are reported widely in infants with cleft lip and/ or palate. There is, however, a paucity of objective information about the feeding patterns of these infants. This study compared patterns of feeding in infants with unrepaired cleft lip and palate with healthy noncleft infants of a similar age.
                North Thames Regional Cleft Centre. The noncleft cohort was recruited from West Middlesex University Hospital, a general hospital with similar demographics.
                Fifty newborn infants with nonsyndromic complete unilateral cleft lip and palate or a cleft of the soft and at least two thirds of the hard palate who were referred to the North Thames Regional Cleft Centre participated. Parents of 20 randomly selected, noncleft infants agreed to participate.
                Feeding patterns were rated using the Neonatal Oral Motor Assessment Scale. Additional objective information was collected using the Great Ormond Street Measurement of Infant Feeding (Masarei et al., 2001; Masarei, 2003).
                Infants with nonsyndromic complete unilateral cleft lip and palate or a cleft of the soft and at least two thirds of the hard palate had less efficient sucking patterns than their noncleft peers had. They used shorter sucks (mean difference, 0.30 second; p < .0005), a faster rate of sucking (mean difference, 34.20 sucks/second; p < .0005), higher suck-swallow ratios (mean difference, 1.87 sucks/swallow; p < .0005), and a greater proportion of intraoral positive pressure generation (mean difference, 45.97% positive pressure; p < .0005).
                This study demonstrated that the sucking patterns of infants with nonsyndromic complete unilateral cleft lip and palate or a cleft of the soft and at least two thirds of the hard palate differ from those of their noncleft peers. Sixty-two dental students judged not to be in need of treatment for craniomandibular disorder (CMD) were randomly divided into two groups, one receiving occlusal adjustment and the other mock adjustment. A double-blind study design was applied. After 2 years of education in dentistry, including courses in stomatognathic physiology, the increase in the subjective symptoms of CMD was significantly greater in the placebo control group than in the treatment group. The difference between the groups in the increase of sites tender to palpation was less clear, showing only a trend. However, the increase was statistically significant within the placebo group but not within the treatment group. Prophylactic occlusal adjustment thus appears to be effective in reducing the occurrence of symptoms of CMD, and possibly also the occurrence of clinical signs. The correction of a unilateral first molar crossbite with a Goshgarian type of transpalatal arch was evaluated in 35 children from 6 years, 8 months to 15 years, 11 months old. Fifteen of the children were treated with an arch activated for expansion only and 20 children with an arch activated in a similar way but with the inclusion of buccal root torque of the anchorage tooth. With both types of activation, the arches worked in a statically determinate system, i.e., the tooth in crossbite was allowed to tip buccally. The movements of the first molars as a result of the treatment were monitored by measurements on dental casts and frontal cephalometric roentgenograms. In addition, the width of the midpalatal suture was measured on occlusal roentgenograms of the maxilla. In the children treated with an arch activated only for expansion, the molars on both sides of the dental arch moved buccally during the treatment. In the children treated by torque activation, on the other hand, there was a considerable buccal movement of the molar on the side of the crossbite without any significant buccal movement of the anchorage tooth. In individual cases, the molar on the noncrossbite side moved and tipped palatally and in some cases buccally but to a minor degree. With both types of activation, there was only a slight change in inclination of the transverse occlusal plane through the first molars; the plane opened up slightly toward the side of the crossbite. For both types of activation, there was a slight widening of the palatal suture during the treatment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
There is weak evidence that the interventions FR-4 with lip-seal training and palatal crib associated with high-pull chincup are able to correct anterior open bite. Given that the trials included have potential bias, these results must be viewed with caution. Recommendations for clinical practice cannot be made based only on the results of these trials. More randomised controlled trials are needed to elucidate the interventions for treating anterior open bite.