Safety and efficacy of ranibizumab in diabetic macular edema (RESOLVE Study): a 12-month, randomized, controlled, double-masked, multicenter phase II study. Sustained benefits from ranibizumab for macular edema following branch retinal vein occlusion: 12-month outcomes of a phase III study. The RESTORE study: ranibizumab monotherapy or combined with laser versus laser monotherapy for diabetic macular edema. Ranibizumab combined with verteporfin photodynamic therapy in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: year 1 results of the FOCUS Study. Randomized trial of intravitreal bevacizumab alone or combined with triamcinolone versus macular photocoagulation in diabetic macular edema. [Radiotherapy of exudative senile macular degeneration. A prospective controlled study]. Ranibizumab for macular edema following central retinal vein occlusion: six-month primary end point results of a phase III study. Two-year outcomes of the ranibizumab for edema of the mAcula in diabetes (READ-2) study. Randomized controlled trial of combined 5-Fluorouracil and low-molecular-weight heparin in the management of unselected rhegmatogenous retinal detachments undergoing primary vitrectomy.
The expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is elevated in diabetic macular edema (DME). Ranibizumab binds to and inhibits multiple VEGF variants. We investigated the safety and efficacy of ranibizumab in DME involving the foveal center.
                This was a 12-month, multicenter, sham-controlled, double-masked study with eyes (age>18 years, type 1 or 2 diabetes, central retinal thickness [CRT]≥300 μm, and best corrected visual acuity [BCVA] of 73-39 ETDRS letters [Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study]) randomly assigned to intravitreal ranibizumab (0.3 or 0.5 mg; n=51 each) or sham (n=49). The treatment schedule comprised three monthly injections, after which treatment could be stopped/reinitiated with an opportunity for rescue laser photocoagulation (protocol-defined criteria). After month 1, dose-doubling was permitted (protocol-defined criteria, injection volume increased from 0.05 to 0.1 ml and remained at 0.1 ml thereafter). Efficacy (BCVA and CRT) and safety were compared between pooled ranibizumab and sham arms using the full analysis set (n=151, patients receiving≥1 injection).
                At month 12, mean±SD BCVA improved from baseline by 10.3±9.1 letters with ranibizumab and declined by 1.4±14.2 letters with sham (P<0.0001). Mean CRT reduction was 194.2±135.1 μm with ranibizumab and 48.4±153.4 μm with sham (P<0.0001). Gain of ≥10 letters BCVA from baseline occurred in 60.8% of ranibizumab and 18.4% of sham eyes (P<0.0001). Safety data were consistent with previous studies of intravitreal ranibizumab.
                Ranibizumab is effective in improving BCVA and is well tolerated in DME. Future clinical trials are required to confirm its long-term efficacy and safety. Assess 12-month efficacy and safety of intraocular injections of 0.3 mg or 0.5 mg ranibizumab in patients with macular edema after branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).
                Prospective, randomized, sham injection-controlled, double-masked, multicenter trial.
                A total of 397 patients with macular edema after BRVO.
                Eligible patients were randomized 1:1:1 to 6 monthly injections of 0.3 mg or 0.5 mg ranibizumab or sham injections. After 6 months, all patients with study eye best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≤20/40 or central subfield thickness ≥250 μm were to receive ranibizumab. Patients could receive rescue laser treatment once during the treatment period and once during the observation period if criteria were met.
                The main efficacy outcome reported is mean change from baseline BCVA letter score at month 12. Additional visual and anatomic parameters were assessed.
                Mean (95% confidence interval) change from baseline BCVA letter score at month 12 was 16.4 (14.5-18.4) and 18.3 (15.8-20.9) in the 0.3 mg and 0.5 mg groups, respectively, and 12.1 (9.6-14.6) in the sham/0.5 mg group (P<0.01, each ranibizumab group vs. sham/0.5 mg). The percentage of patients who gained ≥15 letters from baseline BCVA at month 12 was 56.0% and 60.3% in the 0.3 mg and 0.5 mg groups, respectively, and 43.9% in the sham/0.5 mg group. On average, there was a marked reduction in central foveal thickness (CFT) after the first as-needed injection of 0.5 mg ranibizumab in the sham/0.5 mg group, which was sustained through month 12. No new ocular or nonocular safety events were identified.
                At month 12, treatment with ranibizumab as needed during months 6-11 maintained, on average, the benefits achieved by 6 monthly ranibizumab injections in patients with macular edema after BRVO, with low rates of ocular and nonocular safety events. In the sham/0.5 mg group, treatment with ranibizumab as needed for 6 months resulted in rapid reduction in CFT to a similar level as that in the 0.3 mg ranibizumab treatment group and an improvement in BCVA, but not to the extent of that in the 2 ranibizumab groups. Intraocular injections of ranibizumab provide an effective treatment for macular edema after BRVO.
                Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
                Copyright © 2011 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. To demonstrate superiority of ranibizumab 0.5 mg monotherapy or combined with laser over laser alone based on mean average change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) over 12 months in diabetic macular edema (DME).
                A 12-month, randomized, double-masked, multicenter, laser-controlled phase III study.
                We included 345 patients aged ≥18 years, with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus and visual impairment due to DME.
                Patients were randomized to ranibizumab + sham laser (n = 116), ranibizumab + laser (n = 118), or sham injections + laser (n = 111). Ranibizumab/sham was given for 3 months then pro re nata (PRN); laser/sham laser was given at baseline then PRN (patients had scheduled monthly visits).
                Mean average change in BCVA from baseline to month 1 through 12 and safety.
                Ranibizumab alone and combined with laser were superior to laser monotherapy in improving mean average change in BCVA letter score from baseline to month 1 through 12 (+6.1 and +5.9 vs +0.8; both P<0.0001). At month 12, a significantly greater proportion of patients had a BCVA letter score ≥15 and BCVA letter score level >73 (20/40 Snellen equivalent) with ranibizumab (22.6% and 53%, respectively) and ranibizumab + laser (22.9% and 44.9%) versus laser (8.2% and 23.6%). The mean central retinal thickness was significantly reduced from baseline with ranibizumab (-118.7 μm) and ranibizumab + laser (-128.3 μm) versus laser (-61.3 μm; both P<0.001). Health-related quality of life, assessed through National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25), improved significantly from baseline with ranibizumab alone and combined with laser (P<0.05 for composite score and vision-related subscales) versus laser. Patients received ∼7 (mean) ranibizumab/sham injections over 12 months. No endophthalmitis cases occurred. Increased intraocular pressure was reported for 1 patient each in the ranibizumab arms. Ranibizumab monotherapy or combined with laser was not associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events in this study.
                Ranibizumab monotherapy and combined with laser provided superior visual acuity gain over standard laser in patients with visual impairment due to DME. Visual acuity gains were associated with significant gains in VFQ-25 scores. At 1 year, no differences were detected between the ranibizumab and ranibizumab + laser arms. Ranibizumab monotherapy and combined with laser had a safety profile in DME similar to that in age-related macular degeneration.
                Copyright © 2011 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. To investigate the safety and efficacy of intravitreal ranibizumab treatment combined with verteporfin photodynamic therapy (PDT) in patients with predominantly classic choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration.
                In this 2-year, phase I/II, multicenter, randomized, single-masked, controlled study, patients received monthly ranibizumab (0.5 mg) (n = 106) or sham (n = 56) injections. The PDT was performed 7 days before initial ranibizumab or sham treatment and then quarterly as needed.
                Proportion of patients losing fewer than 15 letters from baseline visual acuity at 12 months (primary efficacy outcome) and the incidence and severity of adverse events.
                At 12 months, 90.5% of the ranibizumab-treated patients and 67.9% of the control patients had lost fewer than 15 letters (P<.001). The most frequent ranibizumab-associated serious ocular adverse events were intraocular inflammation (11.4%) and endophthalmitis (1.9%; 4.8% if including presumed cases). On average, patients with serious inflammation had better visual acuity outcomes at 12 months than did controls. Key serious nonocular adverse events included myocardial infarctions in the PDT-alone group (3.6%) and cerebrovascular accidents in the ranibizumab-treated group (3.8%). CONCLUSION/APPLICATION TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Ranibizumab + PDT was more efficacious than PDT alone for treating neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Although ranibizumab treatment increased the risk of serious intraocular inflammation, affected patients, on average, still experienced visual acuity benefit. To compare the results of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) injection alone or in combination with intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVT) versus macular laser photocoagulation (MPC) as a primary treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME).
                Randomized 3-arm clinical trial.
                A total of 150 eyes of 129 patients with clinically significant DME and no previous treatment.
                The eyes were randomly assigned to 1 of the 3 study arms: the IVB group, patients who received 1.25 mg IVB (50 eyes); the IVB/IVT group, patients who received 1.25 mg of IVB and 2 mg of IVT (50 eyes); and the MPC group, patients who underwent focal or modified grid laser (50 eyes). Retreatment was performed at 12-week intervals whenever indicated.
                Change in best-corrected visual acuity (VA) at week 24.
                VA changes among the groups were statistically significant at 6 (P<0.001) and 24 (P = 0.012) weeks. The significant treatment effect was demonstrated in the IVB group at all follow-up visits and in the IVB/IVT group at 6 and 12 weeks. VA changes +/- standard deviation at 36 weeks were -0.28+/-0.25, -0.04+/-0.33, and +0.01+/-0.27 logarithm of minimum angle of resolution in the IVB, IVB/IVT, and MPC groups, respectively (P = 0.053). Significant central macular thickness (CMT) reduction was observed in all groups only up to 6 weeks; however, CMT changes were not significant among the groups in all visits. Overall, retreatment was required for 27 eyes up to 36 weeks (14 in the IVB group, 10 in the IVB/IVT group, and 3 in the MPC group). In the IVB group, in which a greater VA improvement was observed, only 1 injection was required in 72% of the cases. VA improvement >2 Snellen lines at 36 weeks was detected in 37%, 25%, and 14.8% of patients in the IVB, IVB/IVT, and MPC groups, respectively.
                Intravitreal bevacizumab injection in patients with DME yielded a better visual outcome at 24 weeks compared with macular photocoagulation. A change in CMT beyond the 6-week time point that corresponded to the vision change was not detected. No adjunctive effect of IVT was demonstrated.
                The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article. Despite the successful therapy of subretinal neovascular membranes by laserphotocoagulation there are many problems to be overcome. In the case of subfoveolar neovascularization, photocoagulation leads to a sudden decrease in visual acuity. Recently radiotherapy is considered as an alternative. Complications and effectivity were evaluated in this prospective and randomized trial. The initial results are presented.
                There are 76 patients (51 women, 25 men, average age 77.7 +/- 8.6 years) included in the prospective randomized study. All of them show subfoveolar neovascular membranes in FLA and a decrease in visual acuity between 0.05 and 0.5. They were randomly assigned to either the radiotherapy or the control group. Radiotherapy was done within 6 days by 6 x 2 Gy (6 MV photons). The follow-up was at 4 weeks, after 3 months, after 6 months and then every 6 months after the end of radiotherapy. On average the follow-up is at 15.1 months.
                Concerning age and visual acuity before therapy, the control group and the radiotherapy group were not significantly different. At 4 weeks after radiotherapy, visual acuity was 0.13 +/- 0.46 (LogMAR). After 12 months, visual acuity at a distance was 0.11 +/- 0.30 in the therapy group and 0.09 +/- 0.13 (P = 0.838) in the control group. Patients with a preoperative visual acuity better than 0.2 improved more after radiotherapy. Metamorphopsy improved in 75% of the therapy group. The following complications could be observed: In the control group 3 patients suffered subretinal bleeding, in the radiotherapy group 3 patients, respectively.
                At present, the follow-up is too short to recommend radiotherapy as a standard procedure in the case of subfoveolar neovascularization. The results in patients with a better preoperative visual acuity encourage us to continue this study. To assess the efficacy and safety of intraocular injections of 0.3 mg or 0.5 mg ranibizumab in patients with macular edema after central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).
                Prospective, randomized, sham injection-controlled, double-masked, multicenter clinical trial.
                A total of 392 patients with macular edema after CRVO.
                Eligible patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive monthly intraocular injections of 0.3 or 0.5 mg of ranibizumab or sham injections.
                The primary efficacy outcome measure was mean change from baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) letter score at month 6. Secondary outcomes included other parameters of visual function and central foveal thickness (CFT).
                Mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) change from baseline BCVA letter score at month 6 was 12.7 (9.9-15.4) and 14.9 (12.6-17.2) in the 0.3 mg and 0.5 mg ranibizumab groups, respectively, and 0.8 (-2.0 to 3.6) in the sham group (P<0.0001 for each ranibizumab group vs. sham). The percentage of patients who gained > or =15 letters in BCVA at month 6 was 46.2% (0.3 mg) and 47.7% (0.5 mg) in the ranibizumab groups and 16.9% in the sham group (P<0.0001 for each ranibizumab group vs. sham). At month 6, significantly more ranibizumab-treated patients (0.3 mg = 43.9%; 0.5 mg = 46.9%) had BCVA of > or = 20/40 compared with sham patients (20.8%; P<0.0001 for each ranibizumab group vs. sham), and CFT had decreased by a mean of 434 microm (0.3 mg) and 452 microm (0.5 mg) in the ranibizumab groups and 168 microm in the sham group (P<0.0001 for each ranibizumab group vs. sham). The median percent reduction in excess foveal thickness at month 6 was 94.0% and 97.3% in the 0.3 mg and 0.5 mg groups, respectively, and 23.9% in the sham group. The safety profile was consistent with previous phase III ranibizumab trials, and no new safety events were identified in patients with CRVO.
                Intraocular injections of 0.3 mg or 0.5 mg ranibizumab provided rapid improvement in 6-month visual acuity and macular edema following CRVO, with low rates of ocular and nonocular safety events.
                Copyright 2010 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. To determine the long-term effects of ranibizumab (RBZ) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME).
                Prospective, randomized, interventional, multicenter clinical trial.
                One hundred twenty-six patients with DME.
                Subjects were randomized 1:1:1 to receive 0.5 mg RBZ at baseline and months 1, 3, and 5 (group 1), focal or grid laser photocoagulation at baseline and month 3 if needed (group 2), or a combination of 0.5 mg RBZ and focal or grid laser at baseline and month 3 (group 3). Starting at month 6, if retreatment criteria were met, all subjects could be treated with RBZ.
                The mean change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at month 24.
                After the primary end point at month 6, most patients in all groups were treated only with RBZ, and the mean number of injections was 5.3, 4.4, and 2.9 during the 18-month follow-up period in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. For the 33 patients in group 1, 34 patients in group 2, and 34 patients in group 3 who remained in the study through 24 months, the mean improvement in BCVA was 7.4, 0.5, and 3.8 letters at the 6-month primary end point, compared with 7.7, 5.1, and 6.8 letters at month 24, and the percentage of patients who gained 3 lines or more of BCVA was 21, 0, and 6 at month 6, compared with 24, 18, and 26 at month 24. The percentage of patients with 20/40 or better Snellen equivalent at month 24 was 45% in group 1, 44% in group 2, and 35% in group 3. Mean foveal thickness (FTH), defined as center subfield thickness, at month 24 was 340 μm, 286 μm, and 258 μm for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and the percentage of patients with center subfield thickness of 250 μm or less was 36%, 47%, and 68%, respectively.
                Intraocular injections of RBZ provided benefit for patients with DME for at least 2 years, and when combined with focal or grid laser treatments, the amount of residual edema was reduced, as were the frequency of injections needed to control edema.
                Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
                Copyright © 2010 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. To determine the efficacy of a combination of 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in the treatment of unselected rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) undergoing primary vitrectomy.
                Double-masked, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
                Six hundred forty-one patients presenting with primary RRD were recruited from 2 specialized vitreoretinal units-Moorfields Eye Hospital, London (n = 553) and St. Pauls Eye Unit, Liverpool (n = 88).
                All patients underwent primary vitrectomy and gas endotamponade. Adjuvant therapy in the treatment group consisted of 5 IU/ml LMWH and 200 mug/ml 5FU added to the perioperative infusion fluid.
                The primary outcome measure was retinal reattachment after primary vitrectomy without any reoperations at 6 months. Secondary outcome measures recorded at 6 months were the occurrence and grade of proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR), best-corrected visual acuity in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, intraocular pressure (mmHg), corneal clarity, and complications.
                The overall primary success rate was 84.4%; in the treatment group, the primary success rate was 82.3% compared with 86.8% in the placebo group (P = 0.12). At 6 months, the final complete anatomical reattachment rate was 97.9% in both treatment and placebo groups. The number of patients who failed due to the development of PVR was not statistically significant, 23 in the treatment group (7.0%) and 14 in the placebo group (4.9%) (P = 0.309). There was no significant difference in the mean visual acuity at 6 months in the placebo group (0.48) versus the treatment group (0.53; P = 0.072). The visual acuity at 6 months of patients presenting with a macula-sparing retinal detachment was significantly worse in the treatment group (P = 0.0091). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in patients who presented with a macula involving retinal detachment (P = 0.896).
                Primary vitrectomy has a high anatomic and visual success rate for RRD. Adjuvant therapy with 5FU and LMWH does not improve the anatomic or visual success rate of unselected primary retinal detachments undergoing vitrectomy. After adjuvant therapy, a worse visual outcome was observed in patients presenting with macula-sparing retinal detachments. A combination of 5FU and LMWH should not be used routinely for primary RRD surgery.
The available RCT evidence suggests that repeated treatment of non-ischaemic MO secondary to BRVO with the anti-VEGF agent ranibizumab may improve clinical and visual outcomes at six and 12 months. However, the frequency of re-treatment has not yet been determined and the impact of prior or combined treatment with laser photocoagulation on the primary outcome is unclear. Results from ongoing studies should assess not only treatment efficacy but also, the number of injections needed for maintenance and long-term safety and the effect of any prior treatment.