hCG administration offers no outcome benefit over spontaneous ovulation in anovulatory women treated with clomiphene citrate. Evaluation of clomiphene citrate and human chorionic gonadotropin treatment: a prospective, randomized, crossover study during intrauterine insemination cycles. Addition of human chorionic gonadotropin to clomiphene citrate ovulation induction therapy does not improve pregnancy outcomes and luteal function. Comparison of clomiphene citrate, metformin, or the combination of both for first-line ovulation induction, achievement of pregnancy, and live birth in Asian women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Comparison of mild stimulation and conventional stimulation in ART outcome. Minimal stimulation protocol for use with intrauterine insemination in the treatment of infertility. Unexplained infertility: evaluation of treatment with clomiphene citrate and human chorionic gonadotropin. A randomized prospective study comparing pregnancy rates after clomiphene citrate and human menopausal gonadotropin before intrauterine insemination. Prospective, randomized, crossover study to evaluate the benefit of human chorionic gonadotropin-timed versus urinary luteinizing hormone-timed intrauterine inseminations in clomiphene citrate-stimulated treatment cycles.
This randomized controlled trial compared spontaneous ovulation versus hCG-triggered ovulation in anovulatory women treated with clomiphene citrate. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of ovulation and pregnancy rates. To test the hypothesis that in couples undergoing IUI, actively managed cycles using clomiphene citrate (CC) stimulation, ultrasound monitoring, and hCG timing will result in increased pregnancy rate (PR) per cycle compared with unstimulated urinary LH-timed cycles.
                Fifty-six couples with unexplained infertility (n = 26) or male factor infertility (n = 30) participated in the study.
                Tertiary academic medical center.
                Prospective, randomized, crossover. Couples were randomized initially to one of the two study groups (treatment A: LH-timed IUI; treatment B: CC-stimulated, hCG-timed IUI). If no pregnancy occurred, each couple alternated between the two regimens during subsequent cycles, up to a total of four cycles.
                Twenty-nine couples completed the study and the analysis of 95 cycles revealed that among the male factor infertility group, one pregnancy occurred during the 26 cycles of each treatment group (PR per cycle of 3.9% for both treatment groups). In contrast, among the unexplained infertility group, there was a marked difference in the effect of treatments. During treatment A only one pregnancy occurred in 20 cycles (PR of 5% per cycle) whereas during treatment B, six pregnancies occurred in 23 cycles (PR of 26.1% per cycle).
                If IUI is chosen as the treatment modality in unexplained infertility, the addition of active ovulation management that includes CC stimulation, ultrasound monitoring of folliculogenesis, and hCG timing of ovulation increases the PR per cycle. In couples with male infertility, PR per cycle is low and is apparently not affected by the addition of active ovulation management. In a randomized prospective study, 125 women with World Health Organization class II anovulation received 50 mg of clomiphene citrate alone (group A, n = 65) or 50 mg of clomiphene citrate plus hCG (group B, n = 60) in a total of 125 cycles during natural intercourse-advised cycles. There were no statistically significant differences between groups regarding pregnancy outcomes and midluteal P levels, but luteal phase length was longer in group A. To determine the first-line medication to be used in anovulatory patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) for ovulation induction and pregnancy achievement.
                Randomized controlled trial.
                Infertility unit of a public hospital.
                One hundred fifteen newly diagnosed patients with PCOS based on ESHRE/ASRM criteria.
                These patients were assigned to three groups: group 1 (38 patients) received 500 mg of metformin three times a day; group 2 (39 patients) received clomiphene citrate (CC) at an incremental dose; group 3 (38 patients) received both medications.
                Rates of ovulation, pregnancy (PR), and live birth.
                The ovulation rate was 23.7% in the metformin group, 59% in the CC group, and 68.4% in the combination treatment group. This was translated into a similar PR and live birth rate, which were higher in the CC and combination groups compared to the metformin group (PR: 7.9%, 15.4%, and 21.1%; live birth rate: 7.9%, 15.4%, and 18.4% in metformin, CC, and combination treatment groups, respectively), although statistically the differences were not significant. There were no multiple pregnancies and the rate of spontaneous first trimester loss was similar to the general population.
                Clomiphene citrate should be the first-line treatment for ovulation induction in anovulatory patients with PCOS. To provide a treatment for particular condition that is the most effective treatment with the least risk and cost for the patient we compared the efficacy of using clomiphene 100 mg + delayed low dose gonadotropin + flexible GnRH antagonist administration for ovarian stimulation protocol and GnRH agonist + gonadotropin for stimulation protocol in IVF outcome.
                Clinical outcome of 243 women with regularly menstruation who were candidate for IVF. They had undergone stimulation with GnRH agonist and gonadotropin (group A) or clomiphene citrate, gonadotropin and GnRH antagonist (group B). Main outcome was ongoing pregnancy.
                There were no significant difference in mean age, cause of infertility, basal FSH, BMI, duration of infertility, endometrial thickness on the day HCG administration in two groups. The number of recovered oocytes, obtained embryos, transferred embryos, peak of estradiol on the day HCG administration and OHSS were significantly higher in group A. Significantly more patients in control group had embryos for cryopreservation. There were no significant difference in clinical pregnancy rate and ongoing pregnancy rate between two groups.
                Clomiphene + delayed low dose gonadotropin + flexible GnRH - antagonist stimulation is an acceptable alternative protocol for IVF in patients with regularly menstruation. To determine whether minimal stimulation with clomiphene and one injection of 150 IU of human menopausal gonadotrophin (hMG) provides pregnancy rates comparable with those in a conventional full hMG stimulation protocol for infertile patients undergoing intrauterine insemination (IUI).
                A prospective study was carried out at the Infertility Clinic of a teaching institute and tertiary care referral center in Chandigarh, India. Two hundred couples with either unexplained infertility or ovulatory dysfunction cases who ovulated with clomiphene citrate (CC) but failed to conceive were offered ovarian stimulation with CC and hMG along with IUI for 420 cycles. Pregnancy rate, medication and monitoring cost were compared between minimal and conventional stimulation protocols.
                There was no difference in the couples of the two stimulation protocols regarding their age, duration and type of infertility as well as cause of infertility. Number of ampoules of hMG and monitoring costs were significantly higher in the full hMG stimulation cases whereas pregnancy rate was comparable in both protocols.
                Minimal stimulation appears to be an effective protocol in cases of unexplained infertility undergoing intrauterine insemination. Reduced cost and minimal monitoring is appealing to patients and the clinician. A double-blind, randomized, prospective therapeutic trial was conducted in 148 couples with unexplained infertility. Treatment consisted of 4 consecutive months of placebo or clomiphene citrate (CC) (100 mg) by mouth on cycle days 5 to 9, and placebo or human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) (5,000 IU) intramuscularly on cycle days 19, 22, 25, and 28. There were 14 pregnancies during the trial and 39 pregnancies during observation before and after the trial. Placebo treatment resulted in no pregnancies over 4 months. Clomiphene citrate was significantly better than placebo (P less than 0.04), with a pregnancy rate of 19% over the course of 4 months. The pregnancy rate with hCG either alone (11%) or in combination with CC (7.6%), was not significantly better than placebo. Treatment-independent pregnancies, defined as those before treatment (but after enrollment), or more than 1 month after therapy, occurred in 16% of the couples, with a mean time to conception of 8.8 months. As part of their follow-up, 39 of the study couples subsequently underwent in vitro fertilization (IVF), and 43% were found to have a previously unrecognized male factor or fertilization defect. A pregnancy rate of 16% was achieved after a mean of 1.1 cycles in these 39 couples. The authors conclude that CC is useful in treating unexplained infertility and is a reasonable initial therapy. For couples who fail to conceive, IVF may be diagnostic as well as therapeutic. To determine whether hMG offers an advantage over clomiphene citrate (CC) in achieving pregnancy after IUI with husband's sperm.
                Randomized prospective trial.
                Infertility patients in a university teaching hospital.
                Fifty-eight women under 39 years old undergoing ovulation induction before IUI.
                The women were assigned randomly to one of two treatment groups. Patients in group I (CCHH) received CC for the first two cycles and hMG for the last two cycles. Patients in group II (HHCC) received hMG for the first two cycles and CC for the last two cycles.
                Cycle fecundity rates for the two treatment modalities were compared statistically with use of life-table analysis.
                Of the 174 cycles studied, overall cycle fecundity rate was 11.11 (9 of 81 cycles) in the CCHH group and 10.75 (10 of 93 cycles) in the HHCC group. The difference was not statistically significant. The cycle fecundity rate was 14.44% (13 of 90 cycles) for cycles with CC and 7.14% (6 of 84) with hMG. The difference was not statistically significant.
                These data suggest that CC is an effective alternative to hMG in the population examined. To compare two methods of timing IUI, urinary LH monitoring and transvaginal ultrasonography/ hCG timing of ovulation, in patients receiving clomiphene citrate.
                Prospective, randomized, crossover study.
                Yale University Reproductive Medicine Center.
                Infertile couples undergoing IUI because of unexplained infertility, anovulation, or male factor infertility.
                Patients received clomiphene citrate on days 3-7 of the menstrual cycle and were randomized initially to one of two monitoring protocols. In protocol A, urinary LH monitoring was used to time IUI. Urinary LH levels were determined daily with the use of commercial kits, starting on day 10 of the cycle. When urinary LH was detected, IUIs were performed daily for the next 2 days. In protocol B, ultrasound monitoring of folliculogenesis was performed until a leading follicle of > or = 18 mm was noted, at which time hCG (10,000 IU) was given intramuscularly and IUIs were performed daily for the next 2 days. If no pregnancy occurred, the couple crossed over to the alternate protocol for the next cycle and continued this alternating therapy for a total of four cycles.
                Pregnancy rate per cycle.
                One hundred forty-one cycles were completed. In these cycles, six pregnancies occurred, for an overall pregnancy rate of 4.26% per cycle. The pregnancy rate with LH-timed IUI was 4.29% (3/70) and that with hCG-induced ovulation was 4.23% (3/71); the difference was not statistically significant.
                Timing IUI with the use of a relatively expensive and time-consuming method such as ultrasound monitoring of folliculogenesis and hCG induction of ovulation does not appear to produce an increased pregnancy rate over urinary LH monitoring of ovulation.
There is inadequate evidence to recommend or refute the use of urinary hCG, as an ovulation trigger, in anovulatory women being treated with clomiphene citrate. We did not find trials evaluating the use of ovulation triggers in anovulatory women, being treated with other ovulation inducing agents.