Quality of life after anterior resection versus abdominoperineal extirpation for rectal cancer. Comparison of quality of life in patients undergoing abdominoperineal extirpation or anterior resection for rectal cancer. Quality of life in rectal cancer patients: a four-year prospective study. Quality of life after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Objective assessment of morbidity and quality of life after surgery for low rectal cancer. Impact of functional results on quality of life after rectal cancer surgery. Quality of life and functional outcome following anterior or abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer. Randomized clinical trial comparing quality of life after straight and pouch coloanal reconstruction. [Quality of life after rectal resection or extirpation. A comparison using different measurement parameters].
Abdominoperineal extirpation has been assumed to put patients at higher risk of disruption to quality of life than sphincter-preserving surgery in rectal cancer surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate quality of life in patients after anterior resection versus abdominoperineal extirpation for rectal cancer and to evaluate the psychometrics of the Danish version of a symptom-specific Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale.
                Fourteen patients undergoing abdominoperineal extirpation and 26 undergoing anterior resection. The generic quality of life instrument SF-36 together with a new symptom-specific Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale were used. Psychometric analysis of the symptom-specific scale was carried out.
                The only significant difference between the two groups was found in the total score of the symptom-specific scale in favour of anterior resection (P = 0.02). Psychometric evaluation of the symptom-specific fecal incontinence questionnaire proved it reliable and valid.
                The present study shows that a stoma influences quality of life only slightly, while a relatively high anterior resection does not. However, a few appropriate newer studies indicate that the cost of spinchter-preserving techniques in the form of incontinence disturbances may influence the quality of life seriously, which should be borne in mind when low anterior resection is intended. Further studies in this field are necessary and could benefit from use of the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale, including its total score. To evaluate the quality of life (QoL) in patients undergoing anterior resection (AR) or abdominoperineal extirpation (APE) for rectal cancer in a sample of patients recruited from a field trial.
                Abdominoperineal resection has been reported to put patients at higher risk of disruption to QoL than sphincter-preserving surgery.
                Fifty patients treated with AR and 23 patients treated with APE were prospectively followed up. All patients were treated in curative attempt and were disease-free throughout the study. QoL was assessed before surgery and 6 to 9 and 12 to 15 months after surgery.
                Multivariate analysis of variance and subsequent post hoc comparisons revealed a main effect for time (role function, emotional function, body image, future perspective, and micturition-related problems) and group in favor of APE (sleeping problems, constipation, diarrhea), and a time-by-group interaction (role function). No significant results were obtained for the remaining scores, but patients undergoing APE consistently had more favorable QoL scores than those undergoing AR. Multivariate analysis and post hoc comparisons revealed a particularly poor QoL for patients undergoing low AR. They had a significantly lower total QoL, role function, social function, body image, and future perspective, and more gastrointestinal and defecation-related symptoms than patients undergoing high AR.
                Patients undergoing APE do not have a poorer QoL than patients undergoing AR. Patients undergoing low AR have a lower QoL than those undergoing APE. Attention should be paid to QoL concerns expressed by patients undergoing low AR. To assess long-term quality of life in a population-based sample of rectal cancer patients.
                Quality of life in rectal cancer patients who suffer reduced bowel and sexual function is very important. Few studies, however, have long term follow-up data or sufficient sample sizes for reliable comparisons between operation groups.
                A 4-year prospective study of rectal cancer patients' quality of life was assessed by using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-30 and CR38 questionnaires.
                A total of 329 patients returned questionnaires. Overall, anterior resection patients had better quality of life scores than abdominoperineal extirpation patients. High-anterior resection patients had significantly better scores than both low-anterior resection and abdominoperineal extirpation patients. Low-anterior resection patients, however, overall had a better quality of life than abdominoperineal extirpation patients, especially after 4 years. Abdominoperineal extirpation patients' quality of life scores did not improve over time. Stoma patients had significantly worse quality of life scores than nonstoma patients. Quality of life improved greatly for patients whose stoma was reversed.
                Anterior resection and nonstoma patients, despite suffering micturition and defecation problems, had better quality of life scores than abdominoperineal extirpation and stoma patients. Comparisons between abdominoperineal extirpation and anterior resection patients should consider the effect of temporary stomas. Improvements in quality of life scores over time may be explained by reversal of temporary stomas or physiologic adaptation. After total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer, many surgeons try to avoid an abdominoperineal resection (APR) by performing a transanally double stapled low colo-rectal anastomosis (LRA), frequently without a pouch. This policy is mainly based on the assumption that the quality of life after such LRA is higher than after APR. It has been suggested that a better functional outcome and therefore a higher quality of life might be achieved by a colo-anal J-pouch anastomosis (CPA). The aim of this study was to assess quality of life among disease-free survivors after APR, LRA and CPA.
                The charts of 301 consecutive patients who had undergone surgery for cancer in the middle or lower third of the rectum were analysed. Two hundred four patients were eligible for inclusion. The quality of life among these patients was assessed using one generic (EQ-5D) and two disease-specific questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-CR38).
                The response rate was 82%. The median follow-up was 31 months. Overall, quality of life was good but CPA patients had better quality of life scores than APR and LRA patients. This difference was not only due to the better functional outcome but also to the lower incidence of disturbed micturition and sexual problems in the CPA group.
                The quality of life after colo-anal J-pouch anastomosis is better than after abdominoperineal resection (APR) and low colo-rectal anastomosis (LRA). The quality of life after APR is similar to that after LRA. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether an anterior resection for low rectal cancer is associated with less morbidity and a better quality of life than an abdominoperineal resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-three patients who had anterior resection for low rectal cancer were individually matched with 53 other patients, who had an abdominoperineal resection during the same period of time, for gender, age and socioeconomic status. There was no evidence of tumour recurrence in these patients. All patients answered three quality of life questionnaires at least one year after surgery: Short Form 36 version 2, EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-CR38. Details on short-term and long-term complications were collected prospectively. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in both the short-term and the long-term complication rates between the two groups of patients. There was also no difference in the global quality of life score on the QLQ-C30. However, patients who had an anterior resection had a better perception of body image than those who had an abdominoperineal resection, as measured on the QLQ-CR38 questionnaire (P=0.009), but were more prone to suffer from constipation (P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The overall similarities in quality of life between the two groups is probably a reflection of better stoma care, although problems with body image still persist in stoma patients. Quality of life is an important outcome measure that has to be considered when deciding treatment strategy for rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to find out the impact of surgery-related adverse effects on quality of life.
                The RAND-36 questionnaire and questionnaires assessing urinary, sexual, and bowel dysfunction were administered to 94 patients with no sign of recurrence a minimum of one year after curative surgery. Results were compared with age-matched and gender-matched general population.
                Eighty-two (87 percent) patients answered the questionnaires. Major bowel dysfunction was as common after high anterior resection as after low anterior resection. Urinary complaints occurred as often after anterior resection as after abdominoperineal resection, but sexual dysfunction was more common after abdominoperineal resection. Overall, the patients reported better general health perception but poorer social functioning than population controls. In particular, elderly patients reported a significantly better quality of life in many dimensions than their population controls. There was no significant difference in quality of life between treatment groups. Major bowel dysfunction after anterior resection impaired social functioning compared with that of patients without such symptoms. Urinary dysfunction impaired social functioning and impotence impaired physical and social functioning.
                Quality of life after rectal cancer surgery is not worse than that of the general population. The major adverse impact of bowel and urogenital dysfunction is on social functioning. These adverse effects need to be discussed with the patient and preoperative function needs to be taken into account when choosing between treatment options. Permanent colostomy is not always the factor that disrupts a person's quality of life most. The aims of the study were (1) to evaluate quality of life (QoL) and functional outcome in patients following anterior resection (AR) or abdominoperineal resection (APR) for rectal cancer, and (2) whether these outcomes were dependent on the level of anastomosis.
                Patients who were without recurrent or metastatic disease were identified from the Norwegian Rectal Cancer Registry. QoL was assessed by the EORTC questionnaires QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38, and rectal function by a short questionnaire. Of 319 patients studied, 229 had undergone AR and 90 APR. The median age was 73 years, and the median time since surgery was 64 months.
                Mean QoL scores for body image and male sexual problems were better following AR than APR (P<0.01), also in patients with a low (< or = 3 cm) anastomosis. Patients who had undergone AR had higher mean scores for constipation (P<0.001) and more often used anti-diarrhoeal medication (P=0.005), than patients who had undergone APR. Patients with a low anastomosis (< or = 3 cm) had more incontinence for gas and solid stools (P<0.05), and had more incontinence (P=0.006) compared with patients with higher anastomosis, but there was no difference in QoL. Subgroup analysis showed that irradiated patients (n=34) had worse rectal function in terms of frequency, urgency, and incontinence (P<0.01).
                Although rectal function was impaired in patients with low anastomosis, patients who had undergone AR had better QoL than patients who had undergone APR. Functional results after rectal resection with straight coloanal anastomosis are poor. While most functional aspects are improved with coloanal J pouch anastomosis, it is still unclear whether this translates into better quality of life. The aim of this trial was to investigate health-related quality of life as a primary endpoint in patients undergoing sphincter-saving rectal resection.
                Sixty-four patients were randomized to either straight (n = 32) or coloanal J pouch (n = 32) anastomosis. Patients were studied before operation, at the time of stoma reversal and at 3-month intervals for 1 year thereafter. Quality of life was measured using two generic (Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30) and one disease-specific (EORTC QLQ-CR38) instruments. Functional results using a standardized score as well as manometric variables were recorded.
                Thirty-nine patients (19 with a pouch and 20 with a straight anastomosis) completed the trial. There was a marked difference between the two groups with regard to quality of life profile. Patients with a pouch reconstruction had a significantly better quality of life, particularly in the early postoperative period.
                Patients undergoing low anterior rectal resection and coloanal J pouch reconstruction may expect not only better functional results but also an improved quality of life in the early months after surgery compared with patients who receive a straight coloanal anastomosis. Two groups of 41 patients each who had undergone rectal resection or excision were questioned about the quality of their life an average of 4.3 or 3.8 years, respectively, after the operation. Three different measurements were obtained (Karnofsky, Grogono and Spitzer indexes). In addition, the patients provided a subjective estimate of the quality of their life. The quality of life was significantly better after resection than after excision, most clearly so according to the Grogono index, and this was also reflected in the patients' personal assessment. In males rectal excision frequently resulted in inferiority feelings, depression and disorders of sexual activity. Females found it easier to cope: they showed only minor differences in quality of life between resection and excision. Irrigation proved to be the best means of stoma care as far as quality of life was concerned.
The studies included in this review do not allow firm conclusions as to the question of whether the quality of life of people after anterior resection is superior to that of people after abdominoperineal excision/Hartmann's operation. The included studies challenges the assumption that anterior resection patients fare better.Larger, better designed and executed prospective studies are needed to answer this question.