Treatment of chronic pilonidal sinus with local anaesthesia: a randomized trial of closed compared with open technique. Which technique for treatment of pilonidal sinus--open or closed? Surgical treatment of chronic sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus. Open method versus primary closure. Modified lay-open (incision, curettage, partial lateral wall excision and marsupialization) versus total excision with primary closure in the treatment of chronic sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: a prospective, randomized clinical trial with a complete two-year follow-up. Excision with or without primary closure for pilonidal sinus disease. V-Y advancement flap closures for complicated pilonidal sinus disease. Treatment of pilonidal sinus by primary closure with a transposed rhomboid flap compared with deep suturing: a prospective randomised clinical trial. Morbidity and short term results in a randomised trial of open compared with closed treatment of chronic pilonidal sinus. Comparison between three therapeutic modalities for non-complicated pilonidal sinus disease.
To compare open with closed treatment of chronic pilonidal sinus.
                From 1993 to 1996, 100 patients were submitted to excision of chronic pilonidal sinus, with local anaesthesia and were randomized in two groups: group A in which open treatment and group B in which direct suture were performed. The follow-up, ranging from 37 to 89 months, was performed by outpatient visits or by phone.
                Short-term results showed 6 (12.0%) post-operative complications in group A vs 10 (20.0%) in group B. Long-term results showed 9 (18.0%) complications in group A vs 7 (14.0%) in group B. Mean wound healing was 58 days (range: 29-93) in group A vs 12 (range: 9-61) in group B. The return to normal activity was 25.7 (range: 11-77) vs 10.4 (range: 5-32). Wound healing and the return to normal activity were the only statistically significant differences.
                Regarding morbidity neither technique has particular advantages over the other. The closed technique produced quicker wound healing and a quicker return to normal activity. After excision of the pilonidal sinus, some surgeons leave the wound open, and others close the wound primarily. The aim of this study is to compare length of hospital stay, length of time to return to work, wound infection rate, and recurrence rate in chronic pilonidal sinus patients, after modification of both closed and open techniques.
                One hundred ten patients who had chronic-stage pilonidal sinus were randomly assigned to receive one of two excisional surgical procedures. One-half were treated by surgical excision and primary closure (closed technique, Group A). The other one-half were treated with Obeid's surgical excision (open technique, Group B).
                Ninety-one (46 in Group A and 45 in Group B) of 110 patients were followed for a period four months to three years. Although patients with primary closure had significantly longer hospital stays (P < 0.05) than patients in the open group, they returned to work significantly earlier (P < 0.05). In Group A and Group B, infection rates were 3.6 percent and 1.8 percent (P > 0.01), and recurrence rates were 4.4 percent and 0 percent (P > 0.01), respectively.
                Because both techniques have very low complication rates, treatment of chronic pilonidal sinus should be based on patient preference and characteristics, especially employment status. To study the comparison between the primary closure and open technique after excision of chronic sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus.
                A randomized study was designed and 77 patients with chronic sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus were included in this study. This study took place in Rizgary Teaching Hospital, Erbil, Kurdistan, Iraq, from January 1997 to August 2003. The patients were separated into 2 groups; Group A (37 patients) were treated by open method (excision and healing by secondary intention) and Group B (40 patients) for whom primary midline suturing was performed after excision of the pilonidal sinus. The follow up ranged from 1.5-5.5 years (mean 4.16) was through outpatient visits.
                The Student t test was applied for statistical analysis for the operating time, hospital-stay, time off from work and wound healing time; and the results show extremely significant differences between the 2 groups (p < 0.0001). The statistical analysis of the total number of postoperative complications of both techniques showed a significant difference (p = 0.0401), while the differences were insignificant for each complication when analyzed separately.
                Excision and primary closure for chronic sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus is superior to excision and healing by secondary intention. We believe that primary midline suturing is a useful method for management of chronic sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus. The best surgical technique for treating pilonidal sinus disease is controversial. The aim of this study is to compare the modified lay-open technique with primary closure following excision with respect to operating time, healing time, time before return to work, morbidity rate, and recurrence rate.
                After a pre-study power analysis, 142 patients with chronic sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus were prospectively and randomly allocated, either to the modified lay-open group (Group A, n=73) or the primary closure group (Group B, n=69). In the former, incision, curettage, partial lateral wall excision, and marsupialization were performed. Single doses of cefazoline (1 g) and metronidazole (500 mg) were given intravenously 15 min before surgery to all patients.
                There were no differences with respect to gender, age, body mass index, and mean operating time between the groups. In Group A, healing failure and early bridging occurred in one patient each. In Group B, wound infection occurred in four patients, wound breakdown in three, one healing failure and hematoma in one patient each. Morbidity and recurrence rates were significantly lower in Group A (2.7 vs. 13%, P=0.028 and 1.4 vs. 17.4%, P<0.001 respectively). The median time before return to work in Group A was significantly shorter than in Group B (3 [range 2--8] vs. 21 [range 14--63] days, P<0.001). The median healing time in Group A was significantly longer than in Group B (7 [range 3--16] weeks vs. 2 [range 2--9] weeks; P<0.001).
                The results of the present study suggest that modified lay-open is superior to excision with primary closure for the surgical treatment of chronic sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus with regard to morbidity and recurrence rates, and time before return to work, although healing time is longer. To evaluate the outcome of excision with or without primary closure in the management of chronic pilonidal sinus (PNS) disease.
                Between July 2002 and November 2006, a randomized trial was conducted in the Department of General Surgery, Riyadh Medical Complex, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. All the patients who presented with chronic natal cleft PNS disease were included in the study. They underwent either excision with midline closure (EMC group), or excision without closure (EWC group). Patients, who came with an acute pilonidal abscess (complicated) were excluded from the study. The principle outcome measures recorded were wound infection, healing time, time off work and the recurrence rate.
                A total of 380 patients of chronic PNS were divided into EMC group, (188 patients) and EWC group (192 patients). Majority of the patients were male in both the groups (93%). The hospital stay ranged from 2 to 5 days (mean = 3.6 +/- 1.4 days) for EMC group, while it was 3-5 days (mean = 4 +/- 1.1 days) for EWC group (p < 0.002). wound infection was 4.2% in EMC group, compared to 3.12% of EWC group (MS). The mean healing time and time off work in EMC group was significantly shorter than the patients in EWC group. Median follow up of EMC group was 36.3 months (range 10-52 months) while it was 35.2 months (range 13-51 months) for EWC group. Statistically there was no significant difference in the recurrence rate of both the groups (3.7% vs. 3%).
                Excision and primary closure is recommended, as a preferred procedure in the management of chronic PNS disease. It has the advantages of early wound healing, rapid return to work and comparable recurrence rate with excision and open wound. Hair entry into the midline is the generally accepted theory in pilonidal sinus formation. This theory is also involved in the pathogenesis of the recurrence after different types of operations for pilonidal sinus disease. The relationship of the suture lines and the midline was evaluated in this study.
                Thirty-four patients with stage 4 or recurrent pilonidal sinus disease who underwent V--Y advancement flap closure were randomized into two groups: vertical suture line unrelated to midline (VLUM, n=18) and vertical suture line related to midline (VLRM, n=16).
                None of the patients with or without a suction drain developed flap necrosis, local haematomas or seromas. The median length of the postoperative hospital stay was 3 days for theVLRM group and the VLUM group (p>0.05). The median follow-up period was 32 months. During the follow-up period, two recurrences were determined 22 and 15 months after operation in the VLRM group. Recurrences were situated in the scar tissue over the midline.
                Routine application of suction drains is not recommended after V--Y advancement flap closure. Avoidance of the relationship of the postoperative suture line and the midline, if possible, offers a safe method of definitive reconstruction. To assess two techniques of primary closure after excision of pilonidal sinus.
                Prospective randomised study.
                University department of surgery, United Arab Emirates.
                46 patients with chronic pilonidal sinus disease, 24 treated by rhomboid flap transposition, and 22 by deep suturing technique.
                Early mobility and recurrence.
                All patients in the rhomboid flap transposition group healed their wounds primarily compared with 17 in the primary deep suturing group (77%). (P = 0.02). Five patients wounds broke down as a result of haematoma and infection (23%). The mean hospital stay for the rhomboid flap technique was 6 days compared with 9 days after deep suturing, and the mean follow up for both groups was 18 months, the rhomboid flap group returned to work a mean of nine days earlier than the deep suturing group (23 days). No recurrence has been identified yet in the rhomboid flap group, while 2 recurrences have developed in the deep suturing group (9%).
                Primary closure after excision of pilonidal sinus with a transposed rhomboid flap is successful in the management of pilonidal sinus and is superior to primary closure by deep suturing. To evaluate the morbidity and short term results after open compared with closed treatment of chronic pilonidal sinus.
                Randomised control trial.
                120 of 164 patients with chronic pilonidal sinus treated between April 1987 and April 1989.
                60 patients were treated by excision and primary suture, and 60 by excision and open packing.
                Incidence of early complications (bleeding that needed treatment, wound breakdown, infection, haematoma, or wound pain), number of postoperative visits required, and length of sick leave taken.
                Those patients who underwent excision and suture had slightly but not significantly fewer early complications (16/60, 27%, compared with 23/60, 38%). Most of the early complications were the result of infection (8, 13% compared with 18, 30%, respectively). They also required fewer followup visits and less sick leave, and their wounds healed more quickly. At one year the numbers of late complications were 19 (32%) and 14 (23%), respectively.
                Excision and primary closure of chronic pilonidal sinus causes less morbidity and is more cost effective than excision and open packing. We plan a three year follow-up to see if these results are maintained. To evaluate the outcome of each of the three methods used to treat pilonidal sinus disease.
                A prospective blind randomised study.
                Between April 2000 and February 2003, 83 patients (68 male and 15 female), aged between 19 and 31 years (mean 26.6), scheduled for elective operations for pilonidal sinus disease. Patients were randomly assigned to receive one of three excisional surgical procedures. Group A consisted of 28 patients (22 males and six females) and underwent wide resection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue of the natal cleft, followed by primary closure of the wound in two layers after insertion of suction drain. Group B consisted of 26 patients (22 males and four females) and underwent wide resection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue and their wounds left opened for secondary intention healing. Group C consisted of 29 patients (24 males and five females) and underwent limited excision of the fistulous tract and their wounds were left opened for secondary intention healing. Patients were followed-up for 15 to 48 months post-operatively. Demographic data, operative time, hospital stay, operative blood loss, post-operative pain, wound healing time and patient's satisfaction were recorded.
                The limited excision group of patients had a highly significant shorter operative time than the closed wound group of patients (p<0.001). They also had the shortest hospital stay, operative blood loss and post-operative pain (p<0.001). The closed wound group of patients showed significantly shortest wound healing time, followed by the limited excision group of patients; the wide excision group of patients showed the longest healing time. Apart from the minimal non-significant elevation of the rate of recurrence in the closed wound group of patients, there was no difference between the three groups. All recurrent cases were obese patients and presented within the first six months after operations.
                Limited excision of a pilonidal sinus represents one of the best therapeutic options. The result of this method is comparable with the more aggressive frequently used excisional method, and it has the advantage of having a shorter convalescence and better patient satisfaction.
No clear benefit was shown for open healing over surgical closure. A clear benefit was shown in favour of off-midline rather than midline wound closure. When closure of pilonidal sinuses is the desired surgical option, off-midline closure should be the standard management.