--- license: cc-by-sa-4.0 task_categories: - text-classification - question-answering - zero-shot-classification language: - bn tags: - communal - violence - dataset - classification - bengali - low-resource - annotator-disagreement - multi-label - bengali - bangla - social-media - anonymyzed - human-annotation pretty_name: DANGA size_categories: - 10K [!WARNING] > **Content Warning:** This dataset contains **violent, hateful, and severely offensive language** in Bengali, including communal slurs, dehumanizing rhetoric, threats, and incitement to violence targeting religious, ethnic, and cultural communities. It is intended **solely for research purposes** (hate speech detection, content moderation, NLP). Do not use this dataset to generate, promote, or amplify harmful content. # BanDANGA: A Bangla Dataset on Aggressive Narratives and Group-based Attacks **দাঙ্গা** (DANGA) is an expert-annotated Bengali dataset of **12,720** social media texts classified for communal and sectarian violence. It captures violence across four identity dimensions: religion, ethnicity, socioculture, and nondenominational. Each dimensions were annotated with up to four expression types: derogation, antipathy, prejudication, and repression. The dataset includes full annotator disagreement metadata with individual votes, resolution strategies, and anonymized annotator pairs. This makes it suitable for multi-label classification, preference learning (DPO), and LLM fine-tuning on low-resource hate speech detection. ## Dataset Summary ## Authors & Attribution DANGA was developed by **Istiak Shihab** and **Nazia Tasnim** as part of a broader effort to advance resources for the Bengali language. The work was carried out in collaboration with **Bengali.AI**, a non-profit focused on building and promoting open technologies for Bengali. --- ## Dataset Summary | | Count | |---|---| | Total samples | 12,720 | | Violent | 4,459 (35.1%) | | Non-violent | 8,261 (64.9%) | | Multi-category violent | 146 | | Annotator pairs | 4 (8 annotators) | | Disputed samples | 4,963 (39.0%) | | Expert-resolved disputes | 1,553 | ## Schema Each record is a JSON object with the following structure: ```json { "text": "হিন্দু মালুরা বাংলাদেশে বসবাস করে ...", "violent": true, "labels": { "religion": ["derogation", "antipathy", "prejudication"], "ethnicity": [], "socioculture": [], "nondenominational": ["prejudication"] }, "annotation": { "disputed": true, "resolution": "third-party", "annotators": ["C", "D"], "votes": { "annot_1": { "religion": ["derogation", "antipathy", "prejudication"], "ethnicity": [], "socioculture": [], "nondenominational": ["derogation", "antipathy", "prejudication"] }, "annot_2": { "religion": ["derogation", "antipathy", "prejudication"], "ethnicity": [], "socioculture": [], "nondenominational": [] } } } } ``` ### Fields | Field | Type | Description | |---|---|---| | `text` | string | Bengali social media text (YouTube comments) | | `violent` | bool | Whether the text contains any violence expression | | `labels` | object | Gold-standard labels across 4 identity dimensions | | `annotation` | object | Full annotator disagreement metadata | ### Identity Dimensions | Dimension | Column | Target Communities | Examples | |---|---|---|---| | **Religio-communal** | `religion` | Religious identity groups | Muslim, Hindu, Christian, Ahmadia, Shia, Atheist, Baul | | **Ethno-communal** | `ethnicity` | Ethnic identity groups | Bihari, Rohingya, Chakma, Adibashi | | **Sociocultural** | `socioculture` | Regional/geographic/cultural identity | Sylheti, Kashmiri, Brahmanbaria, Cultural Baul | | **Nondenominational** | `nondenominational` | Individual, gender, political targets | Misogyny, homophobia, political entities, government | ### Expression Types (Degree of Violence) Each identity dimension is annotated with zero or more expression types: | Expression | Description | Count | |---|---|---| | **Derogation** | Communal slurs, incivility, dehumanization, bullying | 2,212 | | **Prejudication** | False accusation, victim blaming, stereotyping, justifying mistreatment | 2,125 | | **Antipathy** | Alienation, deportation, stripping rights, internalized hatred | 827 | | **Repression** | Direct threats, incitement to harm, encouraging violence | 517 | ### Annotation Metadata Each sample includes full disagreement provenance: | Field | Values | Description | |---|---|---| | `disputed` | `true` / `false` | Whether annotators disagreed | | `resolution` | `sided_with_X` / `third-party` / `null` | How the dispute was resolved | | `annotators` | `["X", "Y"]` | Anonymized annotator pair (A–H) | | `votes.annot_1` | labels object | First annotator's original labels | | `votes.annot_2` | labels object | Second annotator's original labels | **Resolution distribution (4,963 disputed samples):** | Resolution | Count | |---|---| | Sided with first annotator | 2,205 | | Sided with second annotator | 1,205 | | Third-party expert label | 1,553 | ## Taxonomy The dataset employs a **4×4 orthogonal taxonomy**: - **4 Identity dimensions** (WHO is targeted): Religio-communal, Ethno-communal, Sociocultural, Nondenominational - **4 Expression types** (HOW violence is expressed): Derogation, Antipathy, Prejudication, Repression - Posts can have **multiple identity categories** and **multiple expression types** simultaneously (multi-label) This produces a theoretical space of 16 fine-grained violence classes. ## Source | Metric | Value | |---|---| | Language | Bengali (বাংলা) | | Source | YouTube, Facebook, Newspaper comments | ## Intended Uses - **Violence detection** in Bengali social media - **Multi-label classification** research - **Annotator disagreement modeling** and calibration - **LLM fine-tuning** for hate speech and communal violence tasks - **Preference learning (DPO/RLHF)** using annotator votes as chosen/rejected pairs - **Cross-lingual transfer** for low-resource language hate speech detection ## License This dataset is released under [CC BY-SA 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). It is intended for research purposes only. ## Anonymization Policy To protect the privacy of individuals whose content appears in this dataset, the following anonymization measures were applied: - **Annotator identities** are fully anonymized. All annotators are referred to only by a randomly assigned letter (A–H). No names, institutional affiliations, or demographic information about annotators are disclosed. - **Author/poster identities** from source platforms (YouTube, Facebook, newspaper comment sections) are not included in the dataset. Usernames and profile references have been removed or replaced. - **Personal mentions** within text (e.g., tagged usernames, phone numbers, identifiable personal details) were removed or masked where detected during preprocessing. - The raw source URLs or post IDs that could be used to re-identify individuals are not released as part of this dataset. Researchers who discover re-identification risks are encouraged to contact the authors. ## Ethical Considerations This content is preserved for research purposes, specifically to build systems that can detect and mitigate such violence. The following guidelines apply: - The dataset **must not** be used to generate, promote, or amplify hate speech or communal violence - The dataset is intended for **research use only** (NLP, content moderation, computational social science) - All annotators have been **fully anonymized** (see Anonymization Policy above) - The data was collected from **publicly available** social media comments; personal identifiers have been removed - Users of this dataset are expected to adhere to responsible AI and research ethics guidelines