Q:

"quality" = upvotes/views

An interesting measure of a question is not only the total number of views and the total number of upvotes, but their quotient. I (as a user) can calculated this quotient in mind - given the two numbers - but would find it better to be given it directly: prominently, and at first sight.
Other opinions?

A:

I looked up the top questions according to this ratio (among 100+ views questions with a score of 5+). As user7530 predicted, the leaders are generally good, but not necessarily fantastic, questions with specific titles. Putting (rather long) in the title is a winning move in this game.  Top 5: 

Paracompactness of CW complexes (rather long)
How low can the approval rating of a majority candidate be?
Do we really know the reliability of PrimeQ[n] (for $n>10^{16}$)? 
Evaluate $\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{k^2-1}{k^4+k^2+1}$
Smallest order for finite group that needs many elements to generate it

A:

I can sort of see what the idea would be, but wouldn't the denominator need to be the number of times the question was shown to a user who has enough reputation to vote? (Otherwise a good question would drop in your ranking simply by being linked from Reddit). And this number is not public knowledge and probably not even remembered by the system.

