Q:

Good naming convention for scala "pimpers"

I don't like the fact that in scala its not obvious what some of my imports are doing - imports for implicits so i'm trying to come up with good naming conventions for them so when i see in my import statements something like:
import com.mycomp.example.RectangleImplicits

or 
import com.mycomp.example.RectanglePimper

I know i cant remove that import because its being used for pimping.
My problem with the above names is that sometimes I actually do an adapter, in that case
import com.mycomp.example.RectangleAdapter

does not say anyting about the fact that its actually a pimper however i don't want to name it RectangleAdapterPimp because the name becomes to combersome...
is there a golden bullet naming convention for that?
thanks

A:

In std Scala library such classes are prefixed with Rich, like RichString, RichInt, etc... So why not to use RichRectangleAdapter

