Q:

Java Generics missunderstanding

Why is it that a generic T cannot be used as a return type of class if T extends Class. 
Example:
public class Foo<T extends Bar> {
    Bar[] array = new Bar[200];

    Optional<T> forIndex(int index) {
        return Optional.ofNullable(array[index]);
    }
}

T is required to extend Bar Which  means that T should never have a casting problem, or am I mistaking this? Could somebody elaborate.

A:

You got it the wrong way around. Each T is a Bar, but not each Baris a T. T is more specialized than Bar (each dachshound is a dog, but not each dog is a dachshound). This means, that return Optional.ofNullable(array[index]); tries to match a Bar on a T, which is not possible.
What you can do is making only the method generic:
public class Main {
    Bar[] array = new Bar[200];

    Optional<? super Bar> forIndex(int index) {
        return Optional.ofNullable(array[index]);
    }
}

You might want to look at Oracle's tutorial on Wildcards as well as the PECS (Producer extends - Consumer super) mnemonic

