You are here

Jews

TWO CATHOLIC CONGRESS-CRITTERS HAVE INTRODUCED AN UNNECESSARY "ELIE WIESEL" SPENDING BILL just as the Trump administration is seeking to sharply trim the federal budget!

The two bleeding heart Catholics (Jewish water-carriers, both) – Reps. Joe Crowley, D-N.Y., and Ann Wagner R-Mo – introduced “The Elie Wiesel Genocide and Atrocities Prevention Act of 2017” into the House of Representatives on June 22. It was previously introduced into the Senate by Ben Cardin, D-Maryland on May 17, 2017. Cardin is a Jew and a committed Liberal.

A PROPOSED LAW THAT IS BEING FULLY SUPPORTED BY PRIME MINISTER BINYAMIN NETANYAHU (who said a month ago he would get it passed within 60 days) seeks to add to the Basic Law of Israel the words “the nation state of the Jewish people.” Israel has no constitution by direct vote of its people, but, like Germany, uses a Basic Law as an equivalent.

The proposal specifies that theright to self-determination in Israel would be unique to the Jewish people. It also states that

Israel will establish [separate?] ethnic communities where every [non-jewish] resident can preserve their culture and heritage;

the Law of Return for all Jews is established as part of the Basic Law;

the Hebrew language will be the official language, while Arabic (currently also designated an official language) will be demoted to a special status;

DID YOU NOTICE THE 'MASSIVE SURGE' IN ANTISEMITISM in America in 2017? An eighty-six percent rise in the first three months is the figure that has been disseminated by the influential Anti-Defamation League (ADL). Many other Jewish organizations and writers joined in the chorus, calling for “something to be done” to stem this alarming, rising tide. They called for special protections to be afforded to Jews in their schools, neighborhoods and community centers, and new laws to be passed against hate speech, and even against antisemitism itself. Possibly American's constitutional First Amendment right of free speech should be amended to prohibit certain kinds of speech.

All this has been thrown about, and it continues to be featured by the media every time another Jewish organization or Jewish writer decides to bring it up again. Now 6 months into 2017, there has been no diminishment in the furor or the statistical claims, even though all of the increase has been discovered to have been hoaxes carried out by two unrelated individuals, one a Jew and one an African-American, who had no anti-Jewish feelings at all.

The following article was taken from Inconvenient History, Vol. 9, No. 1. It was first published in Dubitando, No. 7, March 2006; republished in: Jean-Marie Boisdefeu, Dubitando: Textesrévisionnistes (2004-2008). Based on questions raised numerous times on this web site about the validity of the 6 million number, I find it worthwhile to republish here.-CY

As shown before, the Yad Vashem database of Holocaust victims contains many double entries as well as entries of survivors. This paper shows that entire sets of victims were entered multiple times, in the present case the 52,000 Jews deported from Berlin. The data contained in the database also reveals that many Jews deported through the infamous Treblinka camp, which is said to have been a wholesale extermination camp with almost no survivors, are reported to have died "downstream" (further east). Hence, for them Treblinka merely served as a transit camp.

Germany's holohoaxers have been cheated out of the grisley satisfaction of jailing the extreme elderly.

By Carolyn Yeager

NINETY-FIVE YEAR OLD REINHOLD HANNING DIED ON TUESDAY , as reported on Thursday by his lawyer Andreas Scharmer. No cause of death was given apart from old age.

Lawyer for the Jewish plaintiffs testifying against Hanning, Jew Thomas Walther (right), expressed disappointment that the elderly Hannning escaped prison. Walther complained, “"If the judiciary had not been silent for decades, then there would not have been this disappointment.”

Berlin Holocaust Memorial built by Jews. This is the kind of regulation they seem bent on achieving in the goyim population where their Holocaust narrative is concerned. Total, unwavering acceptance of their story by all is what Jews are after.

By Carolyn Yeager

IN 1998, AN ARTICLE APPEARED IN THE jOURNAL OF HISTORICAL REVIEW (IHR) penned by Mark Weber, titled “Jewish Group Demands More Anti-Revisionist Laws.” At that time, only five or six European countries had holocaust denial or hatred incitement laws. Now that number is 19 (virtually all), plus the European Union. Joining them are Israel, Australia and the United Arab Emirates.

This is all due to the lobbying of Jewish groups, because, they say, “Jews' rights are best protected in open and tolerant democracies that actively prosecute all forms of racial and religious hatred." But why should conducting research into the historical Holocaust and finding reason to have an alternative view be considered “hatred”? Only because Jews fear such views will spread if the public has the opportunity to learn what these researchers have found. Thus it is actually the Jewish groups spreading the hatred against those they have labeled Deniers. Back in 1998, Weber quoted some Jews who told deliberate lies about what the “revisionists/deniers” said. Itzhak Nener, Israeli deputy president of the International Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists (IAJLJ) charged at a meeting in June '98:

The President and First Lady place a wreath at Israel's Yad Vashem museum at a small crypt that supposedly contains the ashes of "holocaust victims." But the museum can't even say where the ashes came from. Trump has to wear a scullcap because he's in a holy place. This is pure Jew worship.

By Carolyn Yeager

Let's be clear. History is being assaulted, as well as Germany and Germans, when we pander to the Jewish myth of a six-million-strong "Holocaust." But that is what our President did yesterday - not only to satisfy protocol, but to please his friends, Bibi and Sara Netanyahu, and his daughter Ivanka too. In his remarks, Trump mentioned two of the "three main pillars" of the alleged Holocaust. (I say alleged because none of the claims have ever been proven.) I have put the two in boldface: the six million and the systematic plan. He did not mention the third: gas chambers. There could be a lot of reasons for that, but I think one of them is that he does not want to say something so specific. You can notice that his entire talk is very generalized ... in a way, very airy-fairy ... or like a fairy tale. (You know, "Once upon a time there was an old woman who lived in a forest ...")

Should The Hill be running articles featuring hate-speech from questionable characters like Chabad Lubavitch rebbe Shmuley Boteach (above)? When is enough enough?

By Carolyn Yeager

THE HILL IS A LONGTIME WASHINGTON FIXTURE WHICH FIRST APPEARED AS A NEWSPAPER in 1994, published by Jerry Finkelstein, now owned by his son Jimmy Finkelstein. Now online as well as in print, it has specialized in reporting about the doings of Congress.

Having updated its style a few times, The Hill's current control by Zionist forces has become clear as day. This is nothing out of the ordinary for the American news media, of course, but for some reason I had naively thought of The Hill as more independent. Not so, The definite anti-Trump slant has just been too obvious since Trump was actually elected as president.

The day before he was fired, FBI Director James Comey gave the closing remarks at the ADL Leadership Summit in Washington DC, extolling the close relationship between the two organizations.

By Carolyn Yeager

HEREWITH ARE EXCERPTS FROM COMEY'S SPEECH AT THE ADL NATIONAL LEADERSHIP SUMMIT on May 8, 2017. Other headliners at the 3-day event were Republican Sen. Marco Rubio (keynote address) and liberal Republican 'strategist' and immigrant Ana Navarro. A video of Comey's full speech can be found here.

Comey's words reveal the very special place organized Jewry holds in the USA (no surprise there) and the "special treatment" they enjoy. I like to use the term Special Treatment, and am slowly developing that theme in a future, more comprehensive article, because Special Treatment has been used by the Holocaust Industry “death camp” spinners as code for “selected for extermination.” What was actually being referred to by the SS detention camp bureaucrats was the confiscation and storage of personal and household goods belonging to detainees and deportees, many Jewish. (See Mattogno … Special Treatment in Auschwitz, Origin and Meaning of a Term, Theses & Dissertations Press, Chicago IL, October 2004.) Therefore, the post-1945 Jewish demand for Special Treatment because of the holocaust has quite an irony to it.