Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
qid
int64
1
65.8k
site
large_stringclasses
2 values
url
large_stringlengths
43
51
question_title
large_stringlengths
15
150
question_body
large_stringlengths
32
27.1k
question_tags
large_stringlengths
5
113
question_score
int64
-13
211
question_view_count
int64
12
411k
question_answer_count
int64
0
17
question_creation_date
large_stringdate
2013-07-16 20:51:47
2024-03-31 22:53:51
answer_body
large_stringlengths
31
27.6k
βŒ€
answer_score
int64
-13
302
βŒ€
answer_creation_date
large_stringdate
2013-07-16 21:13:35
2024-03-31 22:02:17
βŒ€
answer_accepted
bool
2 classes
24,590
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/24590
How much gold is there in our sun?
XKCD 1944 claims that there is "more gold in the sun than water in the oceans". Is this really true?
|the-sun|
150
26,681
2
2018-01-19T08:19:35Z
The mass of the sun is 1.989 Γ— 1030 kg. Abundance in the Sun of the elements gives a percentage 1 Γ— 10-7 % for gold *, so that leaves you with a mass of 1.989 Γ— 1021 kg of gold. HowStuffWorks states that there is 1.26 Γ— 1021 kg water on Earth, of which 98% is in the oceans, i.e. 1.235 Γ— 1021 kg. This would mean the ...
130
2018-01-19T08:38:05Z
true
12,854
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/12854
How loud would the Sun be?
Sound can't travel through outer space. But if it could, how loud would the Sun be? Would the sound be dangerous to life on Earth, or would we barely hear it from this distance?
|the-sun|earth|asteroseismology|sound|
141
23,424
3
2015-12-15T00:51:33Z
The Sun is immensely loud. The surface generates thousands to tens of thousands of watts of sound power for every square meter. That's something like 10x to 100x the power flux through the speakers at a rock concert, or out the front of a police siren. Except the "speaker surface" in this case is the entire surface of ...
110
2015-12-15T01:41:42Z
true
16,311
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/16311
How can there be 1,000 stellar ancestors before our Sun?
I've heard from a few sources* recently that the Sun is a 1,000th generation star, meaning it had a thousand stars that came before it based on its heavy-element content. I understand that earlier stars' supernovae created the heavier elements and those were incorporated into the Sun when it formed and we can calculat...
|the-sun|stellar-evolution|
108
21,635
1
2016-06-21T16:38:10Z
The Sun is actually a THIRD generation star. What I mean by this is that there are chemical elements in the Sun that were made inside another star, but that star itself can only have made those elements because it had material in it that must also have been made inside previous, second generation stars. Eventually we g...
175
2016-06-21T17:23:39Z
true
23,161
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/23161
Why is the discovery of merging neutron stars important?
I'm fairly certain people here will have heard about it, already, but apparently, two supernova leftovers clashed some 130 million years ago and some billion billion kilometres away ... What I haven't heard yet, however, is why we should care. I mean sure, it's an interesting phenomenon and measuring it can't have be...
|gravitational-waves|neutron-star|
94
12,596
2
2017-10-16T17:31:12Z
Reasons why this is important: It is the first simultaneous detection of a gravitational wave and electromagnetic signal, and the strongest GW signal yet in terms of signal to noise (Abbott et al. 2017a). It spectacularly corroborates the reality of the GW detection technology and analysis. The progenitor has been una...
177
2017-10-16T18:44:49Z
true
138
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/138
Does the Sun rotate?
The planets rotate as an after effect of their creation, the dust clouds that compressed span as they did so and the inertia has kept it rotating ever since. It's fairly easy to prove that planetary bodies are rotating just by watching their features move across their respective horizons. This seems less easy to disc...
|the-sun|rotation|star-formation|plasma-physics|
93
8,741
6
2013-09-25T15:46:34Z
Yes. It does not rotate uniformly though, different portions have a different angular velocity (as a body made of plasma, it can get away with this). Measuring this in theory is pretty easy, we just need to track the motion of the sunspots. This isn't as simple as calculating the changes in relative positions of the ...
92
2013-09-25T16:04:10Z
true
20,466
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/20466
Why don't astronomers use meters to measure astronomical distances?
In astronomy distances are generally expressed in non-metric units like: light-years, astronomical units (AU), parsecs, etc. Why don't they use meters (or multiples thereof) to measure distances, as these are the SI unit for distance? Since the meter is already used in particle physics to measure the size of atoms, why...
|distances|units|
86
23,099
12
2017-03-20T15:38:30Z
In addition to the answer provided by @HDE226868, there are historical reasons. Before the advent of using radar ranging to find distances in the solar system, we had to use other clever methods for finding the distance from the Earth to the sun; for example, measuring the transit of Venus across the surface of the sun...
88
2017-03-20T17:09:52Z
true
24,810
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/24810
Could the dinosaurs have seen the asteroid that killed them?
Wikipedia says the Chicxulub impactor is thought to have been a 10-15 km diameter object. Would it have been visible to a (human*) naked eye before impact? And if so, would it have appeared like a star that grew brighter and brighter each night? * I know, there were no humans at the time.
|asteroids|history|comets|naked-eye|chicxulub|
85
18,856
2
2018-01-31T22:58:00Z
The answer is yes; for a few nights prior to the impact (assuming they had eyes with a similar sensitivity to our own and could look up!). It could be a bit longer than this if the body was larger than 10 km (it goes up roughly in proportion to the impactor's radius) and could be much longer if the object was a cometar...
101
2018-01-31T23:54:49Z
true
2,398
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/2398
Is the Moon only 60x60 pixels?
In doing research on vision, I have learned that "20/20" vision corresponds to a visual acuity of being able to resolve details 1 arcminute in size, that most people have around 20/15 vision, and that due to the limits of physiology basically nobody has vision better than 20/10 vision. This is an upper limit of resolvi...
|the-moon|naked-eye|angular-resolution|
81
11,461
6
2014-05-09T15:14:16Z
It doesn't seem so far-fetched to me. Sure, you might be off by a few pixels, due to differences between the human eye and a computer monitor, but the order of magnitude seems about right β€” the detail in your images, viewed closely, more or less matches what I see when I look at the full moon. Of course, you could fa...
60
2014-05-11T17:54:43Z
true
8,100
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/8100
How does the Earth move in the sky as seen from the Moon?
I just want to be sure I am visualizing this correctly, because it seems odd. The Moon is tidally locked to the Earth but there are wobbles to its motion due to libration. So from a point on the surface of the near side of the Moon, the Earth would always be near the same place in the sky? It would describe a small cir...
|the-moon|earth|observational-astronomy|orbital-elements|
77
10,137
4
2014-12-01T19:15:42Z
Still new at stellarium but here are some quick capture gif lasting one month. Sorry about the quality- limited to 256 colors for smaller gifs. Date on lower left corner. By the way the sun is of course the brightest and i use it as reference for recording (start record when sun is in frame then stop when it appears a...
55
2014-12-03T06:13:38Z
true
30,579
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/30579
Can gravitational waves pass through a black hole?
As the title says, what happens when a gravitational wave approaches a black hole? I would presume that something interesting happens because of the way spacetime works near black holes but I have no knowledge to back it up.
|black-hole|general-relativity|gravitational-waves|
77
10,678
2
2019-04-21T17:21:58Z
No, gravitational waves cannot pass through a black hole. A gravitational wave follows a path through spacetime called a null geodesic. This is the same path that would be followed by a light ray travelling in the same direction, and gravitational waves are affected by black holes in the same way that light rays are. ...
73
2019-04-21T18:26:06Z
true
30,339
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/30339
Why not take a picture of a closer black hole?
There are closer galaxies than Messier 87 for sure, even ours! It sparked my curiosity that they went with one 53 million light years away. Is there a reason for this?
|black-hole|supermassive-black-hole|event-horizon-telescope|
75
15,266
5
2019-04-10T23:44:51Z
I was surprised too when I first heard they were trying to image M87's black hole. The short answer is because it's really, really big. It is 1500 times bigger (diameter) than our Sagittarius A*, and 2100 times farther away. This makes its apparent size about 70% of that of Sgr A*, which they are also attempting to im...
88
2019-04-11T00:23:47Z
true
35,431
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/35431
Is it dark inside the Sun?
This might sound like a strange question, but something got me thinking about it recently. The opacity of plasma in stellar interiors can get quite high, making for shorter free-paths for photons. In these conditions I guess that the light you could theoretically gather, supposing you have a pair of indestructuble eye...
|the-sun|stellar-astrophysics|plasma-physics|opacity|
74
14,320
2
2020-03-05T20:18:38Z
No, it's not. The radiation field in the interior of the Sun is very close to a blackbody spectrum. If you look in any particular direction the brightness (power per unit area) you see is $\sigma T^4$, where $\sigma$ is Stefan's constant. Even at any particular wavelength it is always the case that a blackbody of high...
75
2020-03-05T20:27:23Z
true
16
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/16
Why is only one side of the Moon visible from Earth?
Why do we only ever see the same side of the moon? If this is to do with gravity are there any variables which mean we might one day see more than we have before?
|the-moon|orbit|
73
17,253
6
2013-09-24T19:31:17Z
The reason for this is what we call tidal locking: Tidal locking (or captured rotation) occurs when the gravitational gradient makes one side of an astronomical body always face another, an effect known as synchronous rotation. For example, the same side of the Earth's Moon always faces the Earth. A tidally locked bod...
79
2013-09-24T19:42:15Z
true
22,651
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/22651
Does the Milky Way move through space?
Does our galaxy moves through space? Or does it stay in a single location? If it does move, what causes it to move?
|galaxy|universe|milky-way|
70
21,472
5
2017-09-12T17:51:45Z
Does the Milky Way move through space? Yes it does. I'm very fascinated with space, although I don't have a degree or any formal education, I'm still very in love with everything about it and want to learn constantly. Good man Mike. One thing I ask myself is if our galaxy moves through space? It does. When we look...
85
2017-09-12T18:49:05Z
true
32,059
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/32059
If a massive object like Jupiter flew past the Earth how close would it need to come to pull people off of the surface?
I understand this is a silly hypothetical but I'm asking for a 7 year old so please bear with me. Imagine an interstellar stray gas giant comes flying through our solar system. If we were not concerned that it would also steal our atmosphere and create tidal forces that destroyed everything... How close would it need...
|gravity|
70
19,709
3
2019-05-27T00:27:18Z
TL:DR Jupiter isn't dense enough for its gravity gradient over Earth's radius to produce a 1g tidal acceleration, even right at Jupiter's surface. thanks to PeterCordes Jupiter's gravity will pull on the Earth itself, as well as everything on it. It's not like a vacuum cleaner that selectively lifts small and light ...
102
2019-05-27T01:06:21Z
true
39,561
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/39561
Why is there a zig-zag in elemental abundances?
In this answer to Is lithium considered a metal in astronomy? this image from Wikimedia of the abundances of elements in the universe was shared: Credit: Wikimedia Commons user 28bytes, under C.C.-by-S.A.-3.0. I thought it was fascinating that there is a near-constant zig-zag of abundancies. Are these values accurat...
|elemental-abundances|
69
5,915
5
2020-10-28T00:30:47Z
Nuclei are more stable if they have an even number of protons Z, and are also more stable if they have an even number of neutrons N. This is because the particles form pairs. (Almost all nuclei with both N and Z odd are unstable with respect to beta decay.) If a nucleus is going to have significant cosmic abundance, i...
46
2020-10-28T03:41:07Z
false
32,410
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/32410
If two black hole event horizons overlap (touch) can they ever separate again?
Hypothetical question based on my understanding that two event horizons that overlap (touch) can't ever separate again: Imagine a 1 billion solar mass black hole (so the event horizon is massive and very gravitationally weak) is travelling at a velocity of 0.9c through empty flat intergalactic space; now imagine an id...
|black-hole|supermassive-black-hole|event-horizon|
67
14,235
2
2019-06-24T21:26:14Z
You have already got some good answers, but I'll just try to provide one more intuitive solution on why the event horizons will never separate again if overlapping each other: First, imagine a speck of dust that comes inside the EH of a black hole. I believe we'll agree this speck can never escape the black hole, beca...
69
2019-06-25T15:28:39Z
false
35,049
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/35049
Why is the asteroid belt shaped like a triangle?
So, in this question, the user JollyJoker posted this image depicting the orbits of the asteroids in the asteroid field in the comments: [ In this image, you can see that while the individual asteroids follow elliptical orbits, the asteroid belt as a whole is a giant triangle with the Jovian Trojans at two corners, a...
|orbital-mechanics|asteroid-belt|
63
9,447
1
2020-02-12T12:55:13Z
It's not. The image doesn't show the main asteroid belt. It shows the Jovian Trojans (in green) , and the Hilda Asteroids (in red). The Hildas are a dynamical group of a few thousand known asteroids in elliptical orbits that are locked in a 3:2 orbital resonance with Jupiter, and reach aphelion coinciding with the reg...
75
2020-02-12T13:09:41Z
true
13,330
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/13330
Why hasn't the "9th Planet" been detected already?
In the comments to this question, there was considerable doubt placed as to the subject of if the so called "9th planet" really exists. That wasn't really the intent of the previous question, so I ask this. Why hasn't this "9th planet" been detected before now, if it even exists?
|solar-system|planet|observational-astronomy|9th-planet|
62
7,885
6
2016-01-23T01:36:35Z
Brown and Batygin, the authors of the paper on the possible planet, have a webpage addressing this. A few reasons not already covered: It moves quite slowly - the authors estimate 0.2-0.6 arc seconds per hour - so standard surveys may not notice the movement and fail to recognize it as a solar system object. Eris, w...
59
2016-01-23T22:52:38Z
true
33,018
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/33018
What is the hottest thing in the universe?
Straight from my 7 year old to you, exactly what it says on the cover: What is the hottest thing in the universe? To make it Stack Exchange-friendly, I'll add the following caveats: it should be bounded, as in an actual compact object, or class of objects, or part of an object it should be observable it should be ...
|neutron-star|observable-universe|heat|
62
15,655
3
2019-08-13T16:55:24Z
Energetic neutrinos have been observed from the core of a supernova (SN 1987A). The inferred temperature at the "neutrinosphere" is about 4 MeV (equivalent to 50 billion K - ($5\times 10^{10}$ K, Valentim et al. 2017). These are thermal neutrinos with energies that are characteristic of the temperature of the material ...
50
2019-08-13T18:17:51Z
true
539
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/539
How many planets are there in this solar system?
So, in school (that's a long time ago) they have been teaching us there are 9 planets in our solar system. Mercury Venus Earth Mars Jupiter Saturn Uranus Neptune Pluto But every now and then I keep reading stories about another "dwarf planet" (Eris, discovered in 2005) that - depending on what source tells th...
|solar-system|planet|dwarf-planets|
61
40,074
7
2013-10-08T23:43:31Z
Since we're talking about terminology, we need to remember that none of this really matters, outside of clarity when communicating. Still, some people tend to have rather strong opinions on it, thus confusion about how many planets are really in the solar system arises. The people The most trusted source in Astronomy...
87
2013-10-09T00:34:45Z
true
17,875
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/17875
When will the Sun end all human life on Earth?
If nothing else wipes out human existence prior to this, at what point will the Sun make Earth uninhabitable for humans?
|the-sun|
60
12,657
5
2016-08-10T19:26:56Z
The Sun is gradually getting larger and brighter. In fact, as called2voyage pointed out, its brightness is increasing by 1% every 100 million years. You can see how the Sun will change in the future from this graph: (Source) According to this paper, within 1 billion (short scale) years from now, the ever-increasing lu...
68
2016-08-10T19:59:26Z
true
33,520
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/33520
Would we have more than 8 minutes of light, if the Sun "went out"?
The common theory is, that if the Sun "shut down", we would see the light for eight more minutes (the time that it takes the photons to reach the Earth). However recently I have read that photons need around 100,000 years to reach the Earth, since the reactions are happening at the Sun's core and gamma rays can't leav...
|the-sun|stellar-astrophysics|photons|
59
14,716
2
2019-09-28T09:40:10Z
If nuclear fusion were to suddenly stop in the centre of the Sun, then the only clear signature we would have of this is the lack of detectable neutrinos received at Earth, starting about 8 minutes after the reactions ceased. The Sun however would continue to shine for tens of millions of years at roughly its current l...
114
2019-09-28T11:06:38Z
true
36,294
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/36294
Why does Io cast a hard shadow on Jupiter, but the Moon casts a soft shadow on Earth?
Io (source): The Moon (source):
|the-moon|solar-eclipse|io|
59
6,526
6
2020-05-22T12:03:41Z
It's due to the larger relative apparent size of the Sun. When the source of light is a point source the shadow is harder, and when it is extended it is softer. Jupiter is approximately 5 times more distant from the Sun than the Earth, so the Sun is approximately 5 times smaller in the sky. *Source: University of Nor...
88
2020-05-22T12:58:58Z
true
20,142
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/20142
Where did TRAPPIST-1a go?
According to the NASA announcement and the Wikipedia article on TRAPPIST-1, the planets around the TRAPPIST-1 star are named TRAPPIST-1 b through h. What happened to "TRAPPIST-1 a"?
|exoplanet|naming|trappist-1|
58
7,949
3
2017-02-23T09:19:14Z
The convention for planetary naming is that the closest planet to the star (if multiple planets are found at the same time) is named "star"b, then "star"c and so on. As correctly pointed out by Zephyr, if the discoveries are more haphazard, the order of discovery takes precedence over distance from the star). So, ther...
42
2017-02-23T10:38:30Z
true
639
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/639
Why has Venus's atmosphere not been stripped away by solar wind?
This answer on Space Exploration to a question about Mars says that one reason Mars has such a thin atmosphere is because it lacks a magnetic field to protect it from the effect of double solar winds. Here MBR explains that Venus does not have a magnetic field. Image credit: ESA If this is the case, then why has Ven...
|planetary-atmosphere|magnetic-field|venus|solar-wind|
57
5,159
2
2013-10-14T14:30:22Z
Venus has a strong ionosphere that protects it against violent solar winds. So, even though Venus has no intrisic magnetic field, it has an effective, induced magnetic field due to the interaction between the solar winds and the atmosphere, that protects it against solar winds. Venus atmosphere is thick enough to have...
38
2013-10-14T14:56:26Z
true
36,326
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/36326
How did Astronomers deduce that the Sun was not a ball of fire?
Its common knowledge that people used to think that the sun is a ball of fire or molten metal, but when did science start to prove otherwise?
|the-sun|history|
57
16,697
4
2020-05-24T14:00:27Z
I think it's maybe not the case that there was a moment when the astronomy community conclusively rejected the ball-of-fire hypothesis; astronomers simply accumulated more and more evidence against it. If you want to put a rough date on it, you could put your finger somewhere in the middle of the 19th century, as by th...
86
2020-05-24T16:42:19Z
true
29,122
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/29122
If light has no mass, why is it affected by gravity?
Light doesn’t accelerate in a gravitational field, which things with mass would do, becauseΒ light has a universally constant velocity. Why is that exception?
|light|general-relativity|
56
25,903
6
2019-01-11T10:21:25Z
Another way to answer this question is to apply the Equivalence Principle, which Einstein called his "happiest thought" (so you know it has to be good). The equivalence principle says that if you are in an enclosed box in the presence of what Newton would call a gravitational field, then everything that happens in tha...
54
2019-01-11T14:24:40Z
true
35,254
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/35254
Sun constantly converts mass into energy, will this cause its gravity to decrease?
If the sun is constantly converting the mass into energy, then will its gravitational field continue decreasing?
|the-sun|
56
10,994
2
2020-02-25T03:26:50Z
If the sun is constantly converting the mass into energy, then will its gravitational field go on decreasing? It's a very interesting question and the answer is yes! The solar constant indicates the mean solar radiation of electromagnetic waves (mostly in visible and near infrared light and I'll answer based on that....
71
2020-02-25T04:18:27Z
false
2,357
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/2357
What would happen if an ice cube is left in space?
Recently I boarded a flight and noticed outside air temperature as -53Β°C at an altitude of 36860ft (11.23km). I don't know what causes such a freezing temperature in that altitude but was wondering higher altitudes (space) may have even freezing temperatures. Here I got a doubt i.e what happens if an ice cube is left i...
|space|temperature|water|
55
17,667
4
2014-05-04T15:01:12Z
It depends on where in outer space you are. If you simply stick it in orbit around the Earth, it'll sublimate: the mean surface temperature of something at Earth's distance from the Sun is about 220K, which is solidly in the vapor phase for water in a vacuum, and the solid-vapor transition at that temperature doesn't ...
90
2014-05-04T22:54:03Z
true
2,441
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/2441
Does matter accumulate just outside the event horizon of a black hole?
My understanding is that time slows and approaches stopping when approaching the event horizon of a black hole. I have seen this explained several places, including a brief explanation in the last paragraph under: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole#General_relativity, quoted below: Oppenheimer and his co-authors...
|black-hole|space-time|redshift|matter|horizon|
55
11,285
9
2014-05-14T17:27:41Z
Yes, you are absolutely right, from OUR VIEWPOINT it does. From Kip Thorne's book "Black Holes and Time Warps: Einstein's Outrageous Legacy." Like a rock dropped from a rooftop, the star’s surface falls downward (shrinks inward) slowly at first, then more and more rapidly. Had Newton’s laws of gravity been correct, t...
32
2016-03-19T15:31:54Z
true
26,780
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/26780
Why is moon light not the same color as sunlight?
The light from the moon is light being reflected from the sun. The sun, in space, is white. But on Earth, when the light is filtered through an atmosphere, the light appears yellow. So then, why is moonlight white through the atmosphere?
|the-sun|the-moon|atmospheric-effects|
54
19,907
5
2018-06-27T15:10:42Z
The light from the moon is light being reflected from the sun. This is at least one reason you should not expect the Moon to have the same color. Sunlight hitting an e.g. blue object would appear predominantly blue and similar. So the color we might expect to see from the Moon is going to be adjusted by the color pr...
64
2018-06-27T17:13:39Z
false
33,292
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/33292
Is there a star over my head?
Say I'm standing up straight, and I draw a straight line from my core through the top of my head (perpendicular to the ground). What is the probability that that line intersects with a star? EDIT: I'm not trying to exclude any stars. This should include stars which we've observed and stars which we haven't yet observe...
|star|universe|density|hypothetical|
54
11,066
5
2019-09-08T14:38:52Z
Summary There's a 1 in 500 billion chance you're standing under a star outside the Milky Way, a 1 in 3.3 billion chance you're standing under a Milky Way star, and a 1 in 184 thousand chance you're standing under the Sun right now. Big, fat, stinking, Warning! I did my best to keep my math straight, but this is all s...
91
2019-09-09T09:03:22Z
true
32,510
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/32510
Does the Milky Way orbit around anything?
We know most of the objects in the Universe have a spherical or elliptical shape. The object which has less mass and gravitational pull orbits around the nearest object with more mass and gravitational pull. For example: Moon orbits around Earth Earth orbits around Sun Sun orbits around Sagittarius A* which is the c...
|orbit|galaxy|milky-way|
53
41,313
3
2019-07-02T11:53:19Z
The object which has less mass and gravitational pull orbits around the nearest object with more mass and gravitational pull. Actually, both the heavier and the lighter object orbit around their common center of mass. It's just that the heavier object doesn't move much (has a tiny orbit), while the lighter object move...
66
2019-07-02T18:47:33Z
true
40,263
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/40263
Is there any role today that would justify building a large single dish radio telescope to replace Arecibo?
It seems that most of the modern radio astronomy instruments and observations that make the news are interferometers or phased array systems of one kind of another. Is there any application left for which a single huge dish is better (or cheaper) than the same collecting surface in the form of some kind of array of sm...
|observational-astronomy|radio-astronomy|radio-telescope|radar|
53
6,476
4
2020-12-07T15:55:08Z
Single-dish telescopes have advantages over interferometers in a few areas; existing answers have touched on some of them. Collecting area is extremely important, as Rob Jeffries mentioned, and you need extremely large arrays to compensate for this. Granted, such arrays are certainly possible (ignoring the fairly sizab...
18
2020-12-08T15:59:49Z
true
666
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/666
How powerful a telescope would allow me to view the astronauts aboard ISS do a space-walk?
This arose from a comment posted against a question elsewhere on the stackexchange How powerful a telescope/binoculars would allow me to view the astronauts aboard the ISS do a space-walk? Aperture? Magnification?
|amateur-observing|telescope|
52
28,390
3
2013-10-16T13:37:49Z
This has been done before, so I don't have to go through all the heavy calculations using Rayleigh criterion accounting for atmospheric diffraction and visible light wavelength. Ralf Vandebergh, a Dutch astronomer, professional photographer and veteran satellite spotter has been busy trying to do exactly this since the...
45
2013-10-16T15:16:45Z
true
782
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/782
Two species of dark matter?
At this point in time, evidence for the existence of dark matter has accumulated in many ways: it affects galactic rotation curves plays a major role in cosmology, and the evolution of structure in the universe is predicted in copious amounts by gravitational lensing on a wide range of scales influences the dynamic...
|cosmology|dark-matter|galactic-dynamics|gravitational-lensing|axion|
52
2,378
2
2013-10-25T15:45:17Z
Hot dark matter would be made from very light, fast moving particles. Such particles could not possibly be gravitationally bound to any structure, but rather would be dispersed all across the universe. But dark matter is always "found" (or "inferred") either gravitationally bound to some visible structure (e.g. weak l...
23
2013-10-27T03:50:43Z
true
669
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/669
What is in the center of the universe?
If the universe has formed & originated by a Big Bang Explosion, then there must be empty space left in the center of the explosion site, as all the matter is travelling at tremendous speeds away from the center, and there must be more matter, stars, galaxies and dust, etc near the present periphery or circumference or...
|universe|big-bang-theory|formation|
51
11,622
7
2013-10-16T15:44:06Z
I think your question is on topic, but @RhysW has linked a very helpful post in understanding why your question is a common misconception about the Big Bang. No Center There is no 'center' to the universe. At any point, a local observer will claim that they are at the center of the universe by the way galaxies move a...
42
2013-10-23T18:31:14Z
false
28,969
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/28969
Why does it take so long to transmit an image from New Horizons to Earth?
I just got the news that the New Horizons space probe has passed by some remote planet on the edge of the solar system. I was surprised that the guy from NASA says that it might take 24 months from us to get the photo of that planet. The solar system is not that big, right? It is slow because the signal transmission ...
|solar-system|data-analysis|nasa|
51
11,405
4
2019-01-02T02:31:06Z
New Horizons has just passed the Kuiper Belt Object (KBO) 2014 MU69 also known as Ultima Thule. KBOs form a belt of asteroids (the Kuiper Belt) from Neptune's orbit outwards and of which Pluto is the largest member of the Belt. During the encounter with Ultima Thule, all of the 7 instruments on New Horizons were gather...
69
2019-01-02T03:50:41Z
false
20,499
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/20499
Is it possible to achieve a stable "selenostationary" orbit around the Moon?
Is there a stable geostationary orbit around the Moon? My feeling is, that the orbit would collide with Earth, because of the Moon's slow rotation.
|orbit|the-moon|
50
22,277
3
2017-03-22T12:21:39Z
First off, such an orbit wouldn't be a geostationary orbit since geo- refers to the Earth. A more appropriate name would be lunarstationary or selenostationary. I'm not sure if there is an officially accepted term since you rarely hear people talk about such an orbit. You can calculate the orbital distance of a seleno...
77
2017-03-22T15:14:32Z
true
48,993
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/48993
Is there a better explanation of this picture showing the very distant star "Earendel"?
"Close-up of the tiny region where Earendel happened to fall right on top of the narrow line where the magnification increases by (tens of) thousands of times. A cluster of many stars is seen slightly offset from the line, resulting in a much smaller magnification but instead being mirrored by gravity. Credit: NASA/ESA...
|star|hubble-telescope|gravitational-lensing|galaxy-cluster|earendel-whl0137-ls|
50
5,465
1
2022-04-03T20:08:42Z
I did the annotation of that figure for the press release, so let me start by apologizing for the poor explanation, and then try to dig deeper into what's going on :) (although you already seem to pretty much get it right). Lens models The big orange galaxies all belong to a foreground cluster called WHL0137-08. For ...
83
2022-04-03T21:58:06Z
true
51,544
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/51544
Is the Solar core hard?
This may seem like a weird question, but something got me thinking about it just recently. The Sun's core is composed of mainly hydrogen and helium, and is present in the form of a extremely hot supercrushed plasma. The Sun's core is mind-bogglingly dense, about 150,000 kg/m3 (about 15x denser than lead, 7x denser tha...
|the-sun|core|plasma-physics|
50
7,782
6
2023-01-08T12:29:41Z
The solar core can be considered soft in a relative sense (compared to other materials at the same density), but hard and incompressible in an absolute sense. The material behaves almost exactly like a perfect gas but would be as viscous as ketchup. The equation of state is that of a perfect monatomic gas and thus the...
50
2023-01-08T17:18:35Z
true
24,064
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/24064
Why do Black Holes in the middle of galaxies not suck up the whole galaxy?
As stated in several sources, it's supposed that in every galaxy there is a black hole in the middle. My question is, why do these black holes in the middle of galaxies not suck up all the surrounding matter in the galaxy?
|black-hole|galaxy|
49
20,661
11
2017-12-19T15:41:02Z
You shouldn't think of black holes as "sucking things in". Black holes interact with matter through gravity, just the same as any other object. Think of our Solar System. All the planets orbit around the sun because it has a lot of mass. Since the planets have some lateral motion (they're not moving directly towards or...
88
2017-12-19T19:01:18Z
true
6,519
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/6519
Where does the Solar System end?
The Sun is roughly 4 light-years away from the closest star system, the Alpha Centauri system. The planets in our Solar System, however, aren't even close to that far away from the Sun. Where does our Solar System end? Is the edge considered to be the orbit of Neptune, the Kuiper Belt, the Oort Cloud, or something else...
|the-sun|solar-system|oort-cloud|kuiper-belt|
48
8,546
5
2014-10-04T15:32:43Z
According to the Case Western Reserve University webpage The Edge of the Solar System (2006) an important consideration is that The whole concept of an "edge" is somewhat inaccurate as far as the solar system is concerned, for there is no physical boundary to it - there is no wall past which there's a sign that says, ...
34
2014-10-04T16:10:01Z
true
31,678
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/31678
If Earth is tilted, why is Polaris always above the same spot?
Why is Polaris, the North Star, always above (or near) the North Pole? If Earth is tilted, Polaris' path should be in winter 23 degrees away from its path in summer, or not?
|observational-astronomy|earth|amateur-observing|
48
15,391
3
2019-04-28T16:46:19Z
You are correct that the axis of the Earth's rotation is tilted with respect to the plane of its orbit by 23 degrees. But it is incorrect that the direction that the axis points changes by a large amount (it should be 2*23 degrees) over a 6 month time span. Your assumption: If axis it pointed at Polaris at (1), then i...
107
2019-04-28T17:46:14Z
true
19,446
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/19446
How can 'HD 140283' be older than the universe?
Scientists have known about the star HD 140283, informally nicknamed the Methuselah star, for more than 100 years, since it cruises across the sky at a relatively rapid clip. The star moves at about 800,000 mph (1.3 million km/h) and travels the width of the full moon in the sky every 1,500 years or so, researchers sai...
|star|universe|
47
12,963
3
2016-12-19T09:33:06Z
It's not - the current age is an estimate. The discrepancy comes from astronomer's attempts to fully and correctly measure aspects of the star, particularly its distance. From the NASA page: The new Hubble age estimates reduce the range of measurement uncertainty, so that the star's age overlaps with the universe's a...
39
2016-12-19T11:34:52Z
false
33,628
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/33628
Why is Mars cold?
The surface temperatures of Mars are about -87C to 5C, which is much colder than that of Earth's. If Mars has 95% carbon dioxide, which is a Greenhouse gas, why is the surface of Mars so cold? Shouldn't it trap heat and render it hot?
|mars|temperature|surface|
47
12,517
3
2019-10-09T11:03:27Z
Firstly, Mars has a mean distance from the Sun of 1.524 AU, so by the inverse square law the energy it gets from the Sun is about 40% of what the Earth gets. But the main reason that Mars is so cold is that its atmosphere is very thin compared to Earth's (as well as very dry, see below). From Wikipedia Atmosphere of M...
95
2019-10-09T12:10:50Z
true
30,087
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/30087
Why does the Sun have different day lengths, but not the gas giants?
The Sun's rotation period varies from about 25 days at the equator to about 38 days at the poles. As I understand it, this is because the Sun is not solid, and because of the way centripetal force works, the equator must move faster than the poles. Question: if this works, why do Jupiter/Saturn/Uranus/Neptune have wel...
|the-sun|rotation|gas-giants|
46
5,685
1
2019-03-22T02:38:32Z
It's a matter of how "day" is defined. Wikipedia's article on Jupiter cites this IAU/IAG paper for the length of a Jupiter day. In it, footnote (e) of table I has the following: The equations for W for Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune refer to the rotation of their magnetic fields (System III) The radio emission...
56
2019-03-22T03:14:13Z
true
33,899
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/33899
Does the sun cross other spiral arms in its movement around the galaxy's center?
Today, Ansa.it released an article that states: [...]. In questo suo peregrinare galattico, il Sole ha attraversato anche i due bracci della Via Lattea Perseo e Centauro. "Sono zone di alta densitΓ  stellare, in corrispondenza delle quali il Sole e le stelle intorno rallentano e possono anche fermarsi, [...] (my...
|the-sun|milky-way|speed|movement|spiral-arms|
46
5,575
2
2019-11-12T12:57:55Z
What is a spiral arm? The reason that the Sun, in principle (but see below), may cross spiral arms is that galactic spiral arms are not rigid entities consisting of some particular stars; rather they are "waves" with a temporary increase in density. An often-used analogy is the pile-up of cars behind a slow-moving tru...
47
2019-11-12T17:23:36Z
true
34,076
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/34076
Why is Gaia operating around Earth orbit? Why not send it to Neptune's orbit?
Gaia is an astrometry spacecraft that's currently operating around the Sun-Earth L2 Lagrangian point. Question: why here? Why not the Sun-Neptune L2 Lagrangian point? By orbiting the Sun at a larger distance, it should be able to get more accurate parallax measurements. Only reason I can think of is cost. I'm not fami...
|gaia|space-probe|
46
9,217
5
2019-11-25T01:12:56Z
Well, you thought about the spatial aspect of a parallax measurement, but not about the temporal one. Gaia's intention is to measure 3D positions as well as 3D velocities. For the distance, you need accurate parallactic measurement, which come in with your orbital period. For a typical Gaia-star with several measurem...
71
2019-11-25T02:16:33Z
true
748
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/748
How does a neutron star collapse into a black hole?
We know the spectacular explosions of supernovae, that when massive enough, form black holes. The explosive emission of both electromagnetic radiation and massive amounts of matter is clearly observable and studied quite thoroughly. If the star was massive enough, the remnant will be a black hole. If it wasn't massive ...
|black-hole|neutron-star|astrophysics|
45
48,314
2
2013-10-23T09:19:16Z
A neutron star must have a minimum mass of at least 1.4x solar masses (that is, 1.4x mass of our Sun) in order to become a neutron star in the first place. See Chandrasekhar limit on wikipedia for details. A neutron star is formed during a supernova, an explosion of a star that is at least 8 solar masses. The maximum...
25
2013-10-24T09:22:33Z
true
54,499
astronomy
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/54499
Shouldn't very very distant objects appear magnified?
My understanding of the expansion of space itself is very shaky, but if space itself is expanding, then shouldn't very very distant objects appear magnified? For example these James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) galaxies from like the year 400M. Perhaps the distance at which that effect would become noticeable is past ...
|cosmology|expansion|
45
49,631
1
2023-08-19T01:30:53Z
Yes. And they are! This is called the "Angular diameter distance turnaround" (or turnover). In the usual model for expansion $\Lambda CDM$, it is at a redshift of about 1.5 or about 15 billion light-years (corresponding to a light travel time of about 10 billion years, or about 4 billion years after the big bang, the...
65
2023-08-19T06:39:16Z
true
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio

Stack Exchange Space Q&A

The gamma-ray sky β€” representative of the community-written answers covering all of space science

Credit: NASA/DOE/Fermi LAT Collaboration

Part of a dataset collection on Hugging Face.

Dataset description

This dataset is a clean, tabular Q&A corpus of space and astronomy knowledge, derived from two Stack Exchange community Q&A sites: Astronomy Stack Exchange (astronomy.stackexchange.com) and Space Exploration Stack Exchange (space.stackexchange.com). Each row is one question paired with its best answer β€” either the question's accepted answer, or if none is accepted, the highest-scored answer. Unanswered questions are included with null answer fields so that downstream consumers can choose to filter them out.

Stack Exchange is vote-ranked, which makes it a particularly strong source of instruction-tuning data: community scores already encode a quality signal, and accepted-answer flags add an explicit gold-standard marker. The two sites together cover the full breadth of space science β€” from cosmology and stellar astrophysics to orbital mechanics, rocket propulsion, satellite operations, and crewed spaceflight. Topics tend toward the graduate-level-to-working-professional end of the spectrum; questions cite papers, use technical vocabulary, and receive carefully-written answers from practitioners.

The dataset is suitable for instruction fine-tuning (question β†’ answer pairs), preference learning (score-ranked accepted vs. unaccepted pairs can be derived by joining this table with itself on qid), retrieval-augmented generation (as a grounded Q&A corpus for a space-science RAG system), benchmarking (filter by tag to build evaluation sets on a specific topic), and linguistic analysis of how practitioners explain space concepts to each other. HTML has been converted to plain text; inline formatting (code blocks, lists, equations) is preserved where possible.

Content is licensed CC-BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange's standard license). Each row retains the question URL so that attribution can be traced to individual authors on the source site. The dataset is refreshed annually β€” Stack Exchange publishes quarterly data dumps to archive.org, but the quality-ranked subset changes slowly enough that yearly is sufficient.

Schema

Column Type Description Sample Null %
qid Int64 Stack Exchange question ID (unique within its site) 24590 0.0%
site string Which Stack Exchange site the question is from: 'astronomy' (astronomy.stackexchange.com) or 'space' (space.stackexchange.com β€” Space Exploration) astronomy 0.0%
url string Permalink to the question on Stack Exchange https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/q... 0.0%
question_title string Question title as posted How much gold is there in our sun? 0.0%
question_body string Question body in plain text (stripped of HTML, with code blocks and inline formatting preserved) XKCD 1944 claims that there is "more ... 0.0%
question_tags string Semicolon-joined list of tags attached to the question (e.g., 'black-holes;general-relativity') |the-sun| 0.0%
question_score Int64 Net vote score of the question (upvotes minus downvotes) at dump time 150 0.0%
question_view_count Int64 Number of times the question has been viewed 26681 0.0%
question_answer_count Int64 Total number of answers posted to the question 2 0.0%
question_creation_date string ISO-8601 UTC date when the question was posted 2018-01-19T08:19:35Z 0.0%
answer_body string Top-scored answer body in plain text, or null if the question is unanswered. Prefers the accepted answer when one exists; otherwise the highest-scored answer. The mass of the sun is 1.989 Γ— 1030 k... 14.6%
answer_score Int64 Net vote score of the selected answer; null if unanswered 130 14.6%
answer_creation_date string ISO-8601 UTC date when the selected answer was posted; null if unanswered 2018-01-19T08:38:05Z 14.6%
answer_accepted boolean True if the selected answer is the question's accepted answer; False if it is just the top-scored answer; null if unanswered True 14.6%

Quick stats

  • 33,519 questions across space (18,866), astronomy (14,653)
  • 28,628 have a top answer (17,052 of those are the question's accepted answer)
  • Median question score: 4
  • 52,011,395 total question views across the corpus

Usage

from datasets import load_dataset

ds = load_dataset("juliensimon/stackexchange-space-qa", split="train")
df = ds.to_pandas()
from datasets import load_dataset

ds = load_dataset("juliensimon/stackexchange-space-qa", split="train")
df = ds.to_pandas()

# High-quality accepted answers only β€” solid instruction-tuning pairs
high_quality = df[(df["answer_accepted"] == True) & (df["question_score"] >= 5)]
print(f"Accepted answers on highly-voted questions: {len(high_quality):,}")

# Filter by tag (e.g. exoplanets on Astronomy SE)
exo = df[df["question_tags"].str.contains("exoplanet", na=False)]
print(f"Exoplanet questions: {len(exo):,}")

# SFT-ready Q→A pairs
sft = (
    df[df["answer_body"].notna()]
    [["qid", "site", "question_title", "question_body", "answer_body"]]
    .rename(columns={"question_body": "prompt_body", "answer_body": "response"})
)

# Plot top 20 tags (astronomy)
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
astro = df[df["site"] == "astronomy"]
tag_counts = astro["question_tags"].str.split(";").explode().value_counts().head(20)
tag_counts.plot.barh(figsize=(10, 6))
plt.xlabel("Questions"); plt.title("Most-used tags on Astronomy Stack Exchange")
plt.gca().invert_yaxis()
plt.tight_layout(); plt.show()

Data source

https://archive.org/details/stackexchange

Update schedule

Annually β€” SE publishes quarterly data dumps, but the accepted-answer quality-filtered subset changes slowly.

Related datasets

If you find this dataset useful, please consider giving it a like on Hugging Face. It helps others discover it.

About the author

Created by Julien Simon β€” AI Operating Partner at Fortino Capital. Part of the Space Datasets collection.

Citation

@dataset{stackexchange_space_qa,
  title = {Stack Exchange Space Q&A},
  author = {juliensimon},
  year = {2026},
  url = {https://huggingface.co/datasets/juliensimon/stackexchange-space-qa},
  publisher = {Hugging Face}
}

License

CC-BY-SA-4.0

Downloads last month
43

Collection including juliensimon/stackexchange-space-qa